assessing disease frequency

43
Assessing Disease Frequenc Thomas Songer, PhD Basic Epidemiology South Asian Cardiovascular Research Methodology Worksh

Upload: manish-chandra-prabhakar

Post on 07-May-2015

253 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing disease frequency

Assessing Disease Frequency

Thomas Songer, PhD

Basic Epidemiology

South Asian CardiovascularResearch Methodology Workshop

Page 2: Assessing disease frequency

Why should we be concerned with

monitoring disease(s)?

Why should we be concerned with

monitoring disease(s)?

Page 3: Assessing disease frequency

Disease Control and Prevention

Page 4: Assessing disease frequency

Good monitoring does not necessarily ensure the making of right decisions, but it reduces the risk of wrong ones.

Languimer, 1963

Page 5: Assessing disease frequency

There are several decisions regarding disease monitoring

• What level of resources should be allocated to disease monitoring?

• What outcomes do we want to achieve?

• What benefits are obtained from these items and to whom do the benefits accrue?

• Can the counting methods be readily accepted into the community?

Page 6: Assessing disease frequency

Approaches Towards Monitoring Disease and Injury

Death Certificates

Population Surveys

Surveillance

Registries

Screening

Page 7: Assessing disease frequency

Surveillance:

Systematic, regular ascertainment of incidence using methods distinguished by their practicality, uniformity, and frequently their rapidity, rather than by complete accuracy.

Last, 1990

Page 8: Assessing disease frequency

Types of Surveillance

•Active

•Passive

Page 9: Assessing disease frequency

Active Surveillance• the collection of data on a disease

by regular outreach. Designated medical personnel are called at regular intervals to collect information on the new cases of disease.

monitoring domestic violence in emergency departments

Page 10: Assessing disease frequency

Active Surveillance

Health Dept.

Page 11: Assessing disease frequency

Passive Surveillance

• data generated without contact by the agency carrying out the surveillance. Reportable diseases fall under this type of surveillance.

Page 12: Assessing disease frequency

Passive Surveillance

Health Dept.

Page 13: Assessing disease frequency

Comparison of Disease Counting Approaches

RegistriesPopulationScreening

CommunicableDisease

Surveillance

Source AcademiaAcademiaHealth Depts

Speed Slow Slow Fast

Cost/Case High High Low

Ascertain-ment

>90 % 65-75% Low andVariable

Page 14: Assessing disease frequency

So you have identified the frequency of disease in a given area….

What do you do with it?

Page 15: Assessing disease frequency

Epidemiology is a Science of Rates

• death rates

• disability rates

• hospitalization rates

• incidence rates

• prevalence rates

Page 16: Assessing disease frequency

Rates

• Rates are the basic tool of epidemiologic practice

• Why are rates important?

• because they provide more complete information to describe or assess the impact of disease in a community or population

Page 17: Assessing disease frequency

• Rate: a measure of the occurrence of a health event in a population group at a specified time period

Number of eventsin time period

Number at riskfor the event

numerator

denominator:

Page 18: Assessing disease frequency

Why are rates useful?

• Can help to identify groups with an elevated risk of disease

– can target interventions to these groups– these groups can be studied to identify

risk factors

Page, Cole 1995

Page 19: Assessing disease frequency

Rates

• Relate health events to a population base

• This provides a basis for making valid comparisons of health events by considering the number at risk in each population

Page, Cole 1995

Page 20: Assessing disease frequency

Injury Deaths, Australia, 1992

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

10-14yrs

20-24 30-34 40-44 50-54 60-64 70-74 80-84

num

ber

of d

eath

s

Male Female

Age Group

Harrison, 1995

Page 21: Assessing disease frequency

Injury Death Rates, Australia, 1992

0

50

100

150

200

10-14yrs

20-24 30-34 40-44 50-54 60-64 70-74 80-84

deat

hs p

er 1

00,0

00 p

op.

Male Female

Age Group

Harrison, 1995

Page 22: Assessing disease frequency

• Mortality: is one of the major measures of disease in the population

• information available from death certificates (required by law)

• Death rate:

Number of deathsin time period

Number at riskof dying

=

Page 23: Assessing disease frequency

Three common types of rates

• Crude rates

• Specific rates

• Adjusted rates

Page, Cole 1995

Page 24: Assessing disease frequency

Three common types of rates

• Crude rates– consider the entire population

• Specific rates– consider differences among subgroups of the population

• Adjusted rates– adjust for differences in population composition

Page, Cole 1995

Page 25: Assessing disease frequency

• Crude rates

• Specific rates

Crude death rate =

number of deaths in time period

total population

Age-specific death rate

number of deaths in age group in time period

population in age group=

Page 26: Assessing disease frequency

Adjusted Rates• Use statistical procedures to adjust for

differences in characteristics between populations

• Age is the most frequent factor adjusted for because age is related to both death and disease

• Adjusted rates do not describe actual occurrence, but are hypothetical given certain assumptions

Page 27: Assessing disease frequency

Crude and Age-Adjusted Death RatesUnited States, 1940-1992

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992

per

100,

000

popu

lati

on crude death rate

age-adjusted death rate

Page 28: Assessing disease frequency

Morbidity

• any departure from health

• i.e. the extent of illness, injury or disability in a defined population

• morbidity rates are used as indicators of health

• in epidemiology, the main measures of morbidity are incidence and prevalence

Page 29: Assessing disease frequency

Measures of disease frequency

• Incidence rates– crude incidence– cumulative incidence

• Prevalence rates– crude prevalence– period prevalence– point prevalence

Paneth

Page 30: Assessing disease frequency

• Incidence: is one of the major measures of disease in the population

• information available from surveys, registries, or investigations

• Incidence rate:

Number of new casesof disease in population

in time period

Number at risk ofdeveloping disease in

same time period

=

x 1000

Page 31: Assessing disease frequency

Incidence Rate

• The numerator has to come from the population at risk for developing disease

• The denominator may change over time as people develop disease

• The denominator does not include persons with the disease

numerator

denominator

Page 32: Assessing disease frequency

Incidence Rate

• in large studies, the denominator is often the mid-year population

• in small studies, the denominator does not include persons with the disease

numerator

denominator

However, in practice

Page 33: Assessing disease frequency

What is the incidence rate fromOctober 1, 1990 to Sep 30, 1991?

Page 34: Assessing disease frequency

What is the incidence rate fromOctober 1, 1990 to Sep 30, 1991?

4

4 / 14

Page 35: Assessing disease frequency

Cumulative incidence

• Number of new cases of disease occurring over a specified period of time in a population at risk (at the beginning of the interval)

Number of new cases of disease identified over a given time

interval

Estimated populationat beginning of interval

=Cumulative

incidencerate

Page 36: Assessing disease frequency

Prevalence

Page 37: Assessing disease frequency

• Prevalence: is another major measure of disease in the population

• information available from surveys, registries, or investigations

Number of existing casesof disease in population

in time period

Population at risk in same time period

=

x 1000

PrevalenceRate

Page 38: Assessing disease frequency

Difference between incidence rates and prevalence rates

• Numerator: New cases occurring during a given time period

• Denominator: Number at risk of developing disease

• Numerator: All cases present (new and existing) during a given time period

• Denominator: Number in population

Incidence Prevalence

Page 39: Assessing disease frequency

Several factors may affect prevalence

• Incidence

• Duration of disease

• Disease treatments

Page 40: Assessing disease frequency

Prevalence rate

Incidence Prevalence

Longer duration Prevalence

Better treatment Prevalence

=Incidence rate x average

duration of disease

Page 41: Assessing disease frequency

Point Prevalence

• Number of individuals in a specified population at risk who have the disease of interest at a given point in time

Number of cases of disease at a given point in time

Estimated populationat the same point in time

=Point

prevalencerate

Page 42: Assessing disease frequency

What is the point prevalence on April 1?

Page 43: Assessing disease frequency

What is the point prevalence on April 1?

7

7 / 18