assessing benefits for environmental decision making
DESCRIPTION
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making. Chapter 7. Benefit-cost analysis is a risk management strategy; it guides environmental decisions. 1. Environmental Benefits: Conceptual Issues. Environmental benefits measure damage reductions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making
Chapter 7
1. Environmental Benefits: Conceptual Issues
• Environmental benefits measure damage reductions
• Policy brings about changes in these damage reductions, and these changes are referred to as __________________–the reduction in health, ecological, and property damages associated with an environmental policy initiative
2
Types of Incremental Benefits
– Primary environmental benefits • Damage-reducing effects, a direct
consequence of implementing environmental policy
– Secondary environmental benefits • Indirect gains to society, may arise from a
stimulative effect of primary benefits
3
Assign Value to Incremental Benefits
• Environmental quality is a public, ____________ good: its D cannot be identified
• But if we could infer society’s D (or MSB) for environmental quality, we could measure incremental benefits as follows:– Area under MSB is TSB– Changes in TSB: incremental benefits
4
5
Modeling Incremental Benefits (MSB)
6
MS
B (
$m
illio
ns)
A (abatement %)
D = MSB
250
25
17.5
20
19.0
Incremental Benefits = $91.25 million
MSB = 25 - 0.3A
• Find baseline TSB before policy• Find new TSB after policy is implemented• Subtract baseline TSB from new TSB
7
A (abatement %)
TS
B (
$m
illio
ns)
TSB
25
531.25
20
440.0
Incremental Benefits = $91.25 million
0
TSB = 25A - 0.15A2
Modeling Incremental Benefits (TSB)
Valuing Environmental QualityTwo Sources of Value
• ____________________________________– (1) User value is the benefit derived from physical use
or access to an environmental good• Direct user value— the benefit derived from directly
consuming services provided by an environmental good• Indirect user value—the benefit derived from indirect
consumption of an environmental good
– (2) Existence value is the benefit received from the continuance of an environmental good
8
9
• Physical linkage approach – Estimates benefits based upon a
________ relationship between environmental resource and user of resource
• Behavioral linkage approach – Estimates benefits using observations of
___________ in actual markets or survey responses about hypothetical markets
10
2. Approaches to Measuring Benefits
Overview (see Table 7.2 on page 154)
• Physical Linkage• Damage Function Method
• Behavioral Linkage– Direct Methods
• Political Referendum Method• Contingent Valuation Method
– Indirect Methods• Averting Expenditure Method• Travel Cost Method• Hedonic Price Method
11
3. Damage Function Method
• Specifies a relationship between a contaminant (C) and some observed total damage (TD)
• Estimates benefits as TD declines from the policy-induced change in C– Note: ______________ function is one type of
damage function
12
Damage Function Model T
ot a
l d
ama g
es (
TD
)
Contaminant (C)
Damage function
C0
TD0
C1
TD1
Damage reduction in nonmonetary termsDamage reduction in nonmonetary terms
0
Suppose policy causes adecline in the contaminantfrom C0 to C1
13
Assessing the Damage Function Method
• Estimates only one type of incremental benefit at a time
• Represents only a first step, since it is not capable of simultaneously monetizing the damage reduction that it identifies
14
Example
• Suppose a U.S. policy reduces pollution damage to crops, resulting in a higher crop yield as an incremental benefit– Model as an increase in supply (S)
• Measure the incremental benefit as:
(consumer surplus + producer surplus)
15
Incremental Benefits
$
D
aS0
S1
e
b
Q0Q of corn
P0
cP1
Q10
Incremental benefit = ebc
16
• Estimates benefits from survey responses about WTP for environmental quality ____________ upon hypothetical market
• Steps:– Construct model of hypothetical market– Design survey– Assess honesty of respondents
17
4. Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)
Assessing the CVM
• Broad applicability: it can be applied to a variety of environmental goods
• Can capture existence as well as user value• Inherent biases due to survey approach --How to improve survey? Use photographs/maps to more accurately depict
the environmental good; and avoid technical jargon
18
• Estimates benefits as the ________________ __________ on goods that are substitutes for a cleaner environment– As pollution damages the environment, people incur
“averting” expenditures to improve their personal environment
– This spending is reduced as policy improves the overall environment
• This spending reduction is an estimate of the WTP for associated incremental benefits
5. Averting Expenditure Method (AEM)
Application: AEM is used to estimate environmental benefits in the areas of urban smog and drinking water. 19
Modeling AEM• Define overall environmental quality (E) • The relevant market for study is personal
environmental quality (X)– D is MB; S is MC or averting expenditures
– MC0 of X0 is linked to a given level of E0
– As the overall environment improves, or as E increases from say, E0 to E1, the individual incurs lower costs, so MC shifts right from MC0 to MC1 and X0 improves to X1
• Change in spending for the same level of X is an estimate of incremental benefits
20
Modeling AEM
$
D = MBa
MC0 (based on E0)
MC1 (based on E1)b
X00
d
c
X1
abc is WTP for improvement in E based on achieving X1
Personal environmental quality (X)
E rises to E1
21
Modeling AEM
$
D = MBa
MC0 (based on E0)
MC1 (based on E1)
b
X00
d
c
X1 Personal environmental quality (X)
abd is WTP for improvement in E based on achieving X0 (acts as a lower bound)
22
Assessing the AEM
• Problem of ______________________– Some AE yield benefits other than those
from improving environmental quality• e.g., air conditioning provides comfort as
well as filters the air– Hence, the benefit estimate can be biased
23
• Estimates benefits as an increase in __________ ___________ in the market for the recreational use of the environment, as policy improves the environmental quality
• As policy improves the environment, the D for recreational use of the environment increases, causing an increase in CS
• This CS increase is the benefit estimate
24
6. Travel Cost Method
25
Modeling TCMMarket is recreational services of lake
Pri
ce (
P)
of
adm
issi
on
Number of Visits (V)
D0
P0Price line
V00
a
b
Original CS = abP0
D1
d
c
V1
New CS = cdP0
CS = abcd
26
Policy improves lake’s quality so D increases
Assessing the TCM
• Estimates only user value• Addresses only recreational use (not useful for
estimating commercial benefits)
27
Application: TCM is used to value improvements to water bodies used mainly for recreation.
• Uses estimated _______, or implicit, price of an environmental attribute to value a policy-driven improvement– e.g., PHOUSE = f(X1, X2, ….Xn, E), where:
• each Xi is an attribute of the house, and E is the environmental quality in the area
• Hedonics uses regression analysis, which provides estimates of the prices of the individual attributes, including E
28
7. Hedonic Price Method (HPM)
• This price could be used to estimate the D for environmental quality, which in turn could be used to measure the incremental benefit of improving that quality
• Recall that incremental benefit can be measured as an area under the D curve
29
The most common example of the HPM is in the housing market: the price of a property is determined by the characteristics of the house (size, features, condition) as well as the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood (accessibility to schools, level of water and air pollution and noise…) The hedonic pricing model is used to estimate the extent to which each factor affects the price.
Assessing the HPM
• Logical, intuitive
• Difficult to employ– Requires complex empirical modeling– Requires extensive data
30