asl qc procedures status and plans
DESCRIPTION
ASL QC Procedures Status and plans. Traditional Waveform Review. The “morning run” Daily email summarizes problems with availability, timing, and various data integrity values. Quick review of all LH waveform data for the previous 24 hours, PSD’s reviewed as needed Weekly review - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ASL QC ProceduresStatus and plans
GSNANSS Traditional Waveform Review
The “morning run”• Daily email summarizes problems with availability, timing, and
various data integrity values. Quick review of all LH waveform data for the previous 24 hours, PSD’s reviewed as needed
Weekly review• Similar to the morning run, but based on a 7-day dataset
Earth-tide comparison• Quick way to identify polarity issues and egregious gain errors
These traditional tools allow us to verify the short-term state-of-health of the network and identify most problems ….
GSNANSS
QAPs were swapped
QDP was swapped
Traditional Waveform Review
….however they do not catch everything
GSNANSS Data Quality Analyzer
The ASL has implemented several new tools to expand their capabilities
GSNANSS
Data Quality Analyzer – current parameters• Record parameters
Data availability Number of Gaps Timing quality
• Noise parameters Channel noise levels are measured with respect to a baseline Sampled at 4-8, 18-22, 90-110 and 200-400 s
• Coherence and Power difference Calculated at sites with 2 broadband sensors Sampled at 4-8, 18-22, 90-110 and 200-400 s
• Calibration parameters Days since last calibration Mean amplitude error between the calibration & current
metadata as measured in the flat part of the response Mean amplitude error between the calibration & current
metadata as measured at the long period corner
Data Quality Analyzer
GSNANSS
Data Quality Analyzer – future parameters• Noise parameters, coherence, and power difference at 1-5
Hz
• Noise values with respect to an absolute scale, as such as USGS low noise model or the GSN noise model
• Mass position values or some derived parameter thereof
• Comparison of the latest calibration to the nominal response in terms of the corner and flat part of the spectrum
• Orientation differences for sites with two broadband sensors
• Event windows, capturing station information for each major quake
Data Quality Analyzer
GSNANSS Event-based Review
With one plot we can identify response, timing, gains and polarity issues
Left: KIP for an event in 2007 Right: HIA for a 2011 event
GSNANSS Event-based Review Generating synthetics for all events
with CMTs M> 6.5• Multiple methods being explored
Long period: Princeton 3-D, Normal mode 1-D, W-phase Shorter period: Herrmann’s
wavenumber integration
Waveform comparison between both broad-band sensors and low-gain accelerometer data
Azimuth evaluation• Differential & absolute
GSNANSS ASL QC On-going Projects
Calibration analysis• Processing for the long-period corner
moving forward• Processing for the high-frequency corner
awaiting implementation SensOrLoc processing
• Determination of orientation and absolute calibration
• Performed during site visits• Values propagated backwards where
applicable Pre-deployment checks
• Thorough review of station performance prior to deployment
• Integration testing and review of equipment
Station Certification• Using all tools at our disposal, review each
station epoch verifying gain, lp-corner and orientation, updating metadata where needed
GSNANSS ASL QC Procedures summary
Daily waveform review• Earth-tide comparison
Data Quality Analyzer• Customizable format
Event-based review• Synthetics• Intra-sensor comparisons
Problem tracking• Using Report Tracker “RT” ticket system• Working with the field engineers to solve problems
Problem reporting• “Station issues” tab on the Network operations Web pages• Data Problem Reports (DPRs)
GSNANSS References
Hutt, C. R. and A. T. Ringler (2011). Some possible causes of and corrections for STS-1 gain changes in the Global Seismographic Network, Seismological Research Letters, 82, 484-495.
McNamara, D. E., C. R. Hutt, L. S. Gee, H. M. Benz, and R. P. Buland (2009). A Method to Establish Seismic Noise Baselines for Automated Station Assessment, Seismological Research Letters, 80, 628 - 637, 2009.
Ringler, A. T., L. S. Gee, C. R. Hutt, and D. E. McNamara (2010). Temporal variations in global seismic station ambient noise power levels, Seismological Research Letters, 81,605–613.
Ringler, A. T., C. R. Hutt, R. Aster, H. Bolton, L. S. Gee, and T. Storm (2012). Estimating pole/zero errors in GSN-IRIS/USGS network calibration metadata, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, in press.
Ringler, A. T., L. S. Gee, B. Marshall, and C. R. Hutt (2011). Data quality of seismic records from the Tohoku, Japan, earthquake as recorded across the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory Networks, Seismological Research Letters, in review.
Ringler., A. T., J. D. Edwards, C. R. Hutt, and F. Shelly (2011). Relative azimuth inversion by way of damped maximum correlation estimates, Computers and Geosciences, in review.
GSNANSS
Calibrated Channel, time, duration: KIP 00 BHZ 2011 306 03 40 16 9999-14400Cal Analysis Date: 2011,308Software Version: 2.01Instrument: STS1VBBE3##Best Fit Amplitude Error (dB): 0.014383Best Fit Phase Error (degree): 0.18542Nominal Amplitude Error (dB): 0.041388Nominal Phase Error (degree): 0.24889##Existing RESP infoB050F03 Station: KIP B050F16 Network: IU B052F03 Location: 00 B052F04 Channel: BHZ B052F22 Start date: 2010,281,19:16:59 B052F23 End date: No Ending Time #Old Response Values Here (removed for clarity)#New Response Values Here (removed for clarity)#old BHZ A0: 3.948470E+03new BHZ A0: 3.947835E+03##old VHZ A0: 3.975050E+03new VHZ A0: 3.989613E+03
Calibration Analysis