asking questions in the classroom: an exploration of tools
TRANSCRIPT
Communications in Information Literacy Communications in Information Literacy
Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 9
7-12-2017
Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration
of Tools and Techniques Used in the Library of Tools and Techniques Used in the Library
Instruction Classroom Instruction Classroom
Sara Maurice Whitver The University of Alabama Libraries, [email protected]
Leo S. Lo Old Dominion University, [email protected]
Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit
Part of the Information Literacy Commons
Let us know how access to this document benefits you.
Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Whitver, S. M., & Lo, L. S. (2017). Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Techniques Used in the Library Instruction Classroom. Communications in Information Literacy, 11 (1), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
This open access Research Article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). All documents in PDXScholar should meet accessibility standards. If we can make this document more accessible to you, contact our team.
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
185 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools
and Techniques Used in the Library Instruction Classroom Sara Maurice Whitver, University of Alabama Libraries
Leo S. Lo, Old Dominion University
Abstract
This study explores the tools and techniques used within the library instruction classroom
to facilitate a conversation about teaching practices. Researchers focused on the questioning
methods employed by librarians, specifically the number of questions asked by librarians and
students. This study was comprised of classroom observations of a team of librarians
working towards standardized learning outcomes; members of the team had the freedom to
independently develop lesson plans and choose teaching approaches for each class.
Observations measured the frequency of questions asked of and answered by librarians and
students in library instruction sessions via oral discussion, worksheets, and polling.
Researchers also noted the use of visual aids and storytelling as tools to engage students in
conversation. The variety of tools and techniques observed in this study indicate that
librarians exercise a great amount of autonomy in the classroom while working towards
standardized learning outcomes.
Keywords: pedagogy; engagement; library instruction
Whitver, S.M. & Lo, L.S. (2017). Asking questions in the classroom: An exploration of tools
and techniques used in the library instruction classroom. Communications in Information
Literacy, 11(1), 185-203.
Copyright for articles published in Communications in Information Literacy is retained by the author(s). Author(s) also extend to Communications in
Information Literacy the right to redistribute this article via other scholarly resources and bibliographic databases. This extension allows the authors'
copyrighted content to be included in some databases that are distributed and maintained by for-profit companies. All other rights of redistribution
are licensed by Communications in Information Literacy under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-
NC-SA 4.0).
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
186 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools
and Techniques Used in the Library Instruction Classroom
Introduction
Librarians have a responsibility to study classroom practices in order to more effectively
support and develop teaching within the field of library instruction. When classroom
research is conducted, it is important that methods and techniques are analyzed as tools
employed by teachers; the successful application of a technique or methodology has less to
do with the fidelity of the tool itself than with the skill of the teacher. This study seeks to
identify basic techniques employed by librarians to facilitate active student participation
within the one-shot instruction classroom. The researchers were interested in observing
how librarians ask questions in the classroom and how students respond. Of specific interest
was the number of questions and answers exchanged between librarian and student, the
categories of “scripted” and “improvised” questions asked by the librarian, and the technique
used by the librarian to initiate each question. This study took place among a team of
librarians who participate in a shared community of practice, which makes the observed
difference in techniques and tools used striking, as it highlights the autonomy each librarian
exercised to achieve common learning outcomes.
Background
This study took place at the University of Alabama, where undergraduate enrollment hit
31,958 during the 2015-2016 academic year, with 7,211 full-time first-time first-year
students. In addition, 1,567 transfer students were enrolled. Nineteen percent of these
students were over age 25 (as compared to the national average of 12%). The University’s
Amelia Gayle Gorgas Library has a long-standing commitment to effective teaching and
outreach to the First-year Writing Program. Gorgas Information Services, a department of
six instruction librarians, is committed to pursuing excellence in teaching; these individuals
work together to hone and improve their skills through professional development and peer-
feedback. All department members share the teaching load for first-year writing instruction
and have a range of teaching experiences.
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
187 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
The University’s curriculum includes four first-year writing courses−EN 101, 102, 103 and
104−with over 150 sections offered per semester. Unless students have taken a comparable
writing course elsewhere or have tested out of the course, they are required to take the two-
course sequence of EN 101 and EN 102, a combined honors section, EN 103, or EN 104
(which is a first-year writing course for a selective service learning program). The writing
instructors for these courses range from tenured, tenure-track, and non-tenure track faculty
to graduate students in the Department of English. About half of the EN writing classes are
taught by first-time graduate student teachers, many of whom will teach the course again
during their graduate school career.
Students are required to visit Gorgas Library twice as a part of their EN 102 course. Library
instruction sessions take place during regularly scheduled class time and appear on the
course calendar as planned class activities. EN 102 instructors work with librarians prior to
scheduled sessions in order to make them cohesive and relevant to the current class topics
and goals, and they usually attend these sessions along with their students. Library
instruction usually relates to a research-based paper assignment that requires outside
sources. Each of the two sessions follows a standardized set of information literacy learning
outcomes that have been developed to meet the needs of first-year writing students.
EN 102 is the second semester of first-year composition, in which students are introduced
to academic writing. For the purpose of this study, five instruction librarians were observed
for a total of 32 classes. Observations took place in the Session 2: Source Evaluation, which
includes the learning outcomes: “Students will recognize the difference between popular and
scholarly sources in order to appraise a source’s value within their own research,” and
“Students will assess a source’s original intent, editorial and publication process, and the
expertise of its author in order to determine its credibility.” In this session students learn
how to evaluate a source by researching the author’s credibility, identifying the source’s
process of publication (form of review and editorial oversight), and the general purpose of
the source’s publication. These learning outcomes, the learning goals of the course unit, and
input from the instructor are used to develop lesson plans. Although librarians are teaching
to a set of standard learning outcomes, each librarian has considerable autonomy in creating
a unique lesson plan that meets the needs of their students. This programmatic use of
shared, standardized learning outcomes reflects the way faculty in other areas across campus
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
188 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
address multi-section courses taught by diverse faculty, and it allows librarians to function
as faculty-educators.
Literature Review
The literature indicates that librarians have sought to define what it means to be a teacher
many times over the years. The importance of this conversation around teacher identity for
instruction librarians is its assumed effect on classroom practice, the application of
intentional pedagogy, and the promotion of growth opportunities through professional
development and continuing education. Referring to the librarian as teacher, Walter asked
an important question: “Does saying that one is a teacher refer to one’s mastery of an
identifiable set of pedagogical skills, or, rather, to the way in which one approaches one’s
work (in the classroom or outside of one)?” As librarians seek evidence to support their
teacher identity, this distinction is important. Do we attempt to measure learning in the
classroom or assess the behavior of the person conducting class? Moreover, if we are
assessing the behavior as evidence of “teacher,” how are librarians learning this behavior?
Palmer’s (1998) ideas of identity and integrity seek to establish a definition of successful
teaching that transcends the how and what of a teacher’s practice, stating, “Good teaching
cannot be reduced to technique.” He continues, “If teaching cannot be reduced to technique,
I no longer need suffer the pain of having my peculiar gift as a teacher crammed into the
Procrustean bed of someone else’s method and the standards prescribed by it” (p. 11). Still,
when librarians engage in the discourse of classroom practice, it is necessary to talk about
these tools and techniques; while technique is not the sum of a good teacher, it is an
important aspect classroom teaching.
In their recent article, Wheeler and McKinney (2015) ask a question librarians have debated
for years: are librarians teachers? Respondents in their study noted theoretical frameworks,
intentional pedagogy, and other variables that add to the deduction that, if not definitively
teachers, librarians engage in teaching. Other studies have measured teacher-identity
through analyzing core job requirements, teaching skills (Brecher & Klipfel, 2014),
education and preparedness (Walter 2008), and development and articulation of teacher
identity (Lupton, 2002). Lupton extends the distinction between teacher-librarians and
teaching librarians, stating, “…the teacher-librarian’s approach and understanding is
grounded in the assumption that their role is primarily that of an educator. In contrast, the
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
189 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
teaching librarian is restricted by operational boundaries that work against the
implementation of information literacy” (p. 76). Lupton suggests that “If academic libraries
are prepared to support information literacy, there must also be a commitment to support
and encourage staff in moving from the role of trainer to that of educator” (p. 82), including
professional development access to the wider interdisciplinary conversation about teaching
theory and praxis. Wheeler and McKinney (2015) suggest that librarians most directly
benefit from and improve through practice and support from their colleagues and their
organization.
Oral questioning and the development of classroom dialog is discussed in various ways
throughout the literature. Jiang (2014) approaches teacher questioning as a method of
formative assessment, allowing the teacher to periodically check-in with students to
determine comprehension. Farrell and Mom (2016) explore the usefulness of teacher
questions as reflective practice and teacher self-assessment, allowing teachers to “collect data
about their teaching and use this information to make informed decisions” (p. 851). Bain
(2004) suggests that discussion within the classroom focuses and facilitates critical thought
and stimulates learning; when students participate in classroom discourse, they are
participating in knowledge creation. Nurkka et al. (2014) assert that the teacher plays the
role of mediator in order to “ensure that classroom discussion is conducted at an appropriate
level and in a way suited to the learning aims,” and “includes dialogic discussion where the
teacher opens up space for students to explore their views and experiences” (p. 56). Smart
and Marshall (2012) suggest that teacher questioning is a “potentially integral
subcomponent to achieving effective classroom discourse” but makes a distinction between
inquiry-based (meant to elicit critical thought) and non-inquiry based (meant to evaluate
student knowledge) questioning. They suggest that teacher questioning “can serve as
scaffolding to support students’ construction of conceptual understandings (p. 251).
Discussions of oral questioning and classroom discourse are abundant in the education
literature; however, they are less prevalent in library literature. Nevertheless, Reale (2016)
describes conversation within the library instruction classroom as “pedagogy,” a way to
crowd-source ideas and knowledge construction, and a way to facilitate conceptualization
and thinking. She asserts that generating conversation in the library instruction classroom
facilitates inquiry and that, when students join in conversation, they engage in critical
thought.
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
190 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
Library literature includes numerous case studies that discuss the pedagogical approaches of
information literacy instruction. Hsieh, Dawson, Hoffman, Titus, and Carlin (2014) report
on an analysis conducted on four pedagogical approaches used at Rider University; they use
a set of pre- and post-tests to measure student learning of two objectives derived from the
Association of College and Research Libraries’ Information Literacy Competency Standards for
Higher Education (2000). Their study was an examination of the effectiveness of “active
learning” (worksheets) and “preview”−an approach similar to a flipped classroom, where
students view asynchronous material and take a quiz before their library visit−as
pedagogical approaches. In addition to reporting on their pedagogy study, Hsieh et al.
(2014) also provide a thorough review of the literature encompassing the study of pedagogy
and information literacy, reporting that “few studies provide evidence of student-learning in
relation to teaching methods” (p. 235).
Recent attention has been paid to participatory technologies and pedagogy. Bobish (2001)
emphasizes the need to connect new technology to a pedagogical framework to assure sound
reasoning. Farkas (2012) notes the benefit participatory technologies have on learner
autonomy and the facilitation of reflection. Hoppenfeld (2012) specifically studies web-based
polling with the goal of eliciting real-time results from students to “get a feel for who their
audience is, what their feelings/experiences are within certain topics” (p. 236). In a study
measuring student engagement using traditional clickers, Walker and Pearce (2014) find
that students “had stronger, more audible reactions to polling results, especially when a low
percentage of the class chose the correct answer.” However, their control “non-clicker”
group scored higher in areas of increased library usage, information literacy skill acquisition,
and classroom engagement, leading the authors to conclude that “traditional library
instruction produces better results” than their experimental clicker approach. However,
these studies use student assessment to gauge success and do not focus on the teacher.
Methods and Definitions
The researchers selected tools and techniques based on general knowledge of librarian
teaching practice, and they verified the validity of their inclusion through initial survey data.
Originally, storytelling and analogy were separate variables; however, when analyzing the
coded data, the distinction between the two were not clear enough to the researchers. To
minimize the effect of this error, the researchers combined the two variables. For the
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
191 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
purpose of this study, the researchers found it helpful to use the following definitions for
specific tools and techniques:
Discussion: Scripted and unscripted oral questioning intended to solicit student
response and generate conversation. Coders identified questions as scripted if they
appeared on a worksheet, on a visual aid, or posed as a polling question, and all
other questions were treated as “unscripted.”
Worksheet: A digital or print handout that address the class’s learning outcomes and
the librarian’s lesson plan through the provision of instructions, tasks, and space for
written responses to activities, tasks, or instructions.
Web-Based Polling: Asking questions through a web-based polling application such
as Poll Everywhere, Socrative, or Mentimeter to elicit quantifiable answers.
Visual Aids: Static and animated graphics and slides that synthesize aspects of the
learning objectives or offer a visual representation of the concept being taught. This
includes pictures, infographics, and slides/presentation software.
Storytelling: The use of storytelling conventions such as narrative, analogy, and
metaphor to help students connect learning objectives, skills, and concepts to tacit
knowledge.
The researchers selected these tools and techniques based on general knowledge of librarian
teaching practice, and they verified the validity of their inclusion through initial survey data.
Originally, storytelling and analogy were separate variables; however, when analyzing the
coded data, the distinction between the two were not clear enough to the researchers. To
minimize the effect of this error, the researchers combined the two variables.
Five librarians from Gorgas Information Services were surveyed and observed for this
study; all hold the faculty rank of assistant professor and share responsibility for providing
library instruction for first-year writing classes, in addition to their individual subject liaison
roles. All participants had at least one year of professional experience at the time of the
study. Participants were chosen because they share a community of practice and often
participate in professional development opportunities together; they use departmentally
implemented learning outcomes when teaching in this study’s designated course (EN 102).
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
192 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
This relationship allows the researchers to observe individuality and autonomy as well as
determine commonalities when analyzing tools and techniques used in the classroom.
The researchers used Qualtrics [Appendix 1] to distribute a preliminary survey to each
instruction librarian, inviting them to self-report on teaching style, pedagogy, and
instructional tools (such as visual aids, graphics, and use of worksheets). Data from this
survey guided the development of a coding instrument that was used during classroom
observations; the researchers focused on the frequency of use for each tool and technique
that the librarians identified through their responses. Three graduate student library
employees were recruited to observe the instruction librarians teaching for the EN 102
classes (n=32). These observers used the coding sheet outlining specific variables, such as
the number of questions asked, whether students responded or asked questions of their
own, the methods used for asking questions, and the other tools or techniques librarians
used to foster classroom participation. Data were immediately entered into a spreadsheet for
later analysis by the co-investigators. Google Forms, spreadsheets, and Qualtrics were used
for data entry and storage. Google Docs was used for the coding sheet documentation.
A total of 32 EN 102 classes were observed. Three of the classes were co-taught by two
librarians. The duration of class sessions were 50 minutes (n=12), 60 minutes (n=2), and 75
minutes (n=18).
Findings
As noted, asking questions is a technique teachers use to evaluate student comprehension
and foster critical thinking. The researchers were interested in learning to what extent
librarians prefer using certain methods of generating questions. The study measured the
number of scripted questions and unscripted/improvised questions asked by the librarians
and answered by the students, and the number of questions asked by students during the in-
class application of discussions, worksheets, and polling.
In the preliminary survey, all librarians indicated that using discussion to ask student
questions was one of their preferred methods. However, as seen in Figure 1, in over half of
the 32 observed classes, librarians did not use discussion to ask scripted questions. The
frequency of unscripted/improvised questions was much higher. Librarians asked at least
one unscripted question in 22 of the 32 classes. As seen in Figure 2, 10 or more unscripted
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
193 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
librarian questions were asked and answered through discussion in nine of the classes.
These data suggest that the nature of discussion is improvisational, which encourages
unscripted questions. Students also asked more questions through discussions compared
with polling, with at least one student question in eight of the 32 classes (25%), indicating
that students are more likely to respond verbally to oral questioning than to web polling.
Figure 1: Scripted librarian questions answered through discussions
Figure 2: Unscripted/improvised librarian questions answered through discussions
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
194 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
The use of worksheets generated by far the most questions asked and answered. Thirty-one
out of 32 classes (97%) featured six or more scripted librarian questions answered via
worksheets, with eight classes (25%) featuring 46 or more questions answered (See Figure
3). The frequency of unscripted/improvised worksheet questions was lower. Thirteen of the
32 classes (41%) had 0-5 unscripted questions asked and answered (See Figure 4). These
results seem logical, as worksheets are generally static instruments and are difficult to revise
mid-class. The researchers did not collect individual worksheet artifacts from librarians;
therefore, the researchers cannot definitively report how many questions were asked
through worksheets. Based on informal experience, the researchers feel comfortable
asserting the possibility that the worksheets generated such a high number of questions
because the librarians used them as discussion starters.
Figure 3: Scripted librarian questions answered through worksheets
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
195 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
Figure 4: Unscripted/improvised librarian questions answered through worksheets
The librarians employed different polling software based on their own preferences, but all
of the software used were web-based polling applications. Over half of the 32 classes (53%),
had six or more scripted librarian-initiated questions. Chi-Square statistics shows that there
is a correlation between individual librarians and the number of scripted questions asked
through polling (X2 (24, N= 32) = 0.00, p = .05).
There is also a statistically significant relationship between the duration of the class and the
number of scripted questions asked through polling (X2 (8, N= 32) = 0.00, p = .05). Out of
the 17 classes that had six or more scripted questions asked by librarians, 16 (94%) occurred
in the 75 minute classes, as compared to only one (6%) in the 50-minute classes, and none in
the 60-minute classes.
Librarians did not use any unscripted or improvised questions through polling in the
majority of classes (n=27). Chi-Square statistics shows a correlation between the duration of
classes and the number of unscripted/improvised questions asked through polling (X2 (8,
N= 32) = 0.00, p = .05). All of the unscripted/improvised questions asked by librarians via
polling occurred in 60-minute (n=2) and 75-minute classes (n=3). The number of student-
initiated questions through polling was low. Thirty-one out of the 32 classes (97%) did not
have any student-initiated questions through polling, which suggests that polling is
predominantly librarian-directed and scripted.
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
196 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
As shown in Figure 5, only 0-4 different visual aids used in the observed classes; librarians
in the majority of classes employed visual aids frequently. In five classes, more than 20
different visual aids were used. The number of visual aids used was correlated with the
librarians’ style of teaching and preferences for teaching tools. For example, one librarian
experimenting with the animated presentation software PowToon used a much higher
number of visual aids in her classes than others. Gorgas Library has since licensed
PowToon, and it is now widely used by many instruction librarians; therefore, the
researchers expect that the number of visual aids used will increase. It is also important to
note that although visual aids were prevalent classroom tools, not all of the aids included in
this analysis were used to ask questions.
Figure 5: How many different on-screen visual aids were used?
Although this study initially separated analogy and storytelling as categories, the researchers
are combining them for analysis, as the data collected did not yield enough distinction
between the two to be of any significance. The researchers believe that the coders could
have been more thoroughly trained to distinguish between these categories. Furthermore,
the coding sheet did not allow the coders to indicate the nature of the relationship between
storytelling and asking questions. Librarians incorporated two or more stories into their
teaching in 21 classes (See Figure 6). The researchers were interested in learning if the
librarians’ experience or teaching style might make a difference in the number of stories
used, or if a longer class duration might encourage librarians to employ more stories.
However, Chi-Square statistics show that there is neither correlation between the number
of stories used in class and the librarian instructor (X2 (24, N= 32) = 0.12, p = .05) nor
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
197 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
between the number of stories used and the duration of the class (X2 (8, N= 32) = 0.45, p =
.05).
Figure 6: How many stories were used?
Discussion and Future Directions
As library instruction programs grow, it is important to explore what librarians are doing
and how they are functioning within the classroom. The intent of this study was to explore
the variation of classroom tools and techniques used librarians who were teaching to a set of
standardized learning outcomes; however, data analysis revealed new areas for further
research.
Before observations were conducted, librarian/study participants were asked to self-report
their questioning techniques and classroom priorities through a preliminary survey. As
predicted through self-reporting, discussion (oral questioning) was by far the most-used
approach by librarians, followed by the use of worksheets. This is consistent with other data
collected in the survey showing that librarians perceive discussion as the most effective tool
or technique in facilitating active student participation. Regardless of the nature of the
questions (inquiry or non-inquiry), this study found that librarians work to facilitate
discussion in the classroom, which suggests that the development of discussion-based
classroom skills are necessary for librarians. While most questions asked though discussion
were librarian-initiated, it is important to note that most student-initiated questions were in
response to worksheets. The researchers suspect this indicates that students are taking more
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
198 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
responsibility for understanding expectations related to specific tasks than engaging in
abstract concepts. The authors would like to explore this idea in more depth. The result
showing that students respond to questions on worksheets and seek clarity suggests there is
an opportunity for librarians to design worksheets intended to engage students in critical
thought and problem solving; furthermore, this may allow librarian instructors to ask open
questions that have more than one answer.
The data illustrate the use of discussion questions and the situation in which scripted and
unscripted questions were employed in observed classes. The researchers noted that
discussion questions were the most highly used technique in all of our classrooms.
Understandably, scripted questions were most used during polling and on worksheets, while
unscripted questions were heavily used in oral discussions. Unscripted questioning might
allow genuine engagement between teacher and student, but a productive discussion is
generally guided and key questions are generally charted by the teacher ahead of time in
order to ensure that the group stays on point. During this study, it was clear that some
questions were perhaps miscoded as “unscripted” because the question well-integrated into
the discussion; the researchers would like to investigate question-delivery in more depth to
determine whether some librarian questions that appear “unscripted” are actually
intentionally and strategically phrased in order to evoke response and ensure clarity. .In the
future, it would be informative to investigate the level of preparation and intentionality in
phrasing of initial discussion questions, determine if experience increases or decreases the
likelihood of employing scripted discussion questions, and measure their effectiveness of
engaging students in strategic thought processes. The authors believe their coding sheet was
unable to capture the broader conversation that might have resulted using polling questions.
The researchers are curious if librarians are intending one-way communication of
information with polling rather than the promotion of dialog, and they want to explore the
quality and nature of the questions asked via polling: Were the questions open-ended or
closed ended? Finally, do librarians attempt to use polling to facilitate open-ended response
(i.e., open response polling), or are polls intentionally designed with multiple-choice or
yes/no response only?
Compared to polling and discussions, students initiated more questions on worksheets. Of
the 32 classes, students asked at least one question on worksheets in 22 classes, with four or
more questions asked in nine of the classes. The researchers found this interesting, because
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
199 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
the perception identified through self-reporting was that questioning through discussion
was a more effective method of generating participation. This finding further reinforces the
need to explore the motivation behind student-asked questions generated by the use of
worksheets.
Librarians also reported through the initial survey that visual aids were the second-most
preferred technique for communicating concepts to students, followed by analogy,
storytelling, and the use of presentation software (discussion once again ranked first in this
list). This study found that visual aid was a broad category, which makes it difficult to
determine commonalities between librarians in their use of visual content. Still, the
observation of visual aids in instruction suggests librarians are employing accessible design,
which the researchers consider important. The researchers believe it would be interesting to
further investigate the quality and depth of visual aid material used in the classroom,
particularly to assess the nature of using visual aids and how they are being deployed. The
authors believe the following questions merit further investigation: Are visual aids simply
conveying ideas and information or do they serve a deeper pedagogical purpose such as
modeling? Are visual aids being used to foster inquiry?
Conclusion
The researchers believe it would be valuable in a future study to analyze different subsets of
storytelling because they suspect librarians are using a higher rate of storytelling within
their classrooms than this study was able to capture. It would be particularly informative to
use classroom observations to determine how committed librarian teachers are to
storytelling, and whether they develop a narrative as they teach in addition to employing
analogy when explaining difficult concepts. Future researchers may want to begin with
some of the following questions: When librarians engage in storytelling as pedagogy, how
do they engage students? Do stories lay the groundwork for conceptual work within the
classroom? Do librarians nest stories within discussions? Do they use stories as an
introduction to a discussion?
Ultimately, the researchers set out to determine how librarians were engaging students and
what techniques they were using to do so, rather than which technique or tools were most
effective. What is clear from this study is that the participating librarians rely on oral
discussion as a cornerstone for student engagement, and that the use of worksheets tends to
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
200 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
prompt more student questions in the classroom environment. Furthermore, library
instructors are using a blend of instructional technology and pedagogical approaches in
addition to oral discussion and worksheets. The researchers believe this exploratory study
was useful in advancing the conversation about librarians developing skills and techniques
within the classroom, and practicing individual teaching approaches while using common
learning outcomes. This study also reveals that librarians are using a variety of approaches
to reach a common goal, suggesting that they are committed to developing individual
teaching practices and skill sets, and that they share ideas but make independent choices
within the classroom. In the end, the data shows that librarians are approaching the
classroom as teachers who choose their own approach; this may indicate that autonomy is a
characteristic of teacher librarians, even as work within a standardized system.
References
American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher
education. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
Bain, K. (2004). How do they conduct class. What the best college teachers do Cambridge,MA:
Harvard University Press.
Bobish, G. (2011). Participation and pedagogy: Connecting the social web to ACRL learning
outcomes. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(1), 54-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.007
Brecher, D., & Klipfel, K. M. (2014). Education training for instruction librarians: A shared
perspective. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 43-49.
Farkas, M. (2012). Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy.
Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 82-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213229
Farrell, T. S. C., & Mom, V. (2015). Exploring teacher questions through reflective practice.
Reflective Practice, 16(6), 849-865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1095734
Hoppenfeld, J. (2012). Keeping students engaged with web‐based polling in the library
instruction session. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 235-252.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211239933
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
201 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
Hsieh, M. L., Dawson, P. H., Hofmann, M. A., Titus, M. L., & Carlin, M. T. (2014). Four
pedagogical approaches in helping students learn information literacy skills. Journal of
Academic Librarianship, 40(3), 234-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.03.012
Jiang, Y. (2014). Exploring teacher questioning as a formative assessment strategy. RELC
Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 45(3), 287-304.
Lupton, M. (2002). The getting of wisdom: Reflections of a teaching librarian. Australian
Academic & Research Libraries, 33(2), 75.
Nurkka, N., Viiri, J., Littleton, K., & Lehesvuori, S. (2014). A methodological approach to
exploring the rhythm of classroom discourse in a cumulative frame in science teaching.
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(1), 54-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.01.002
Palmer, P. J. (1998). The heart of a teacher. The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape
of a teacher's life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Reale, M. (2016) “Hands-off” teaching: Facilitating conversation as pedagogy in library
instruction" Hybrid Pedagogy. Retrieved from:
http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/hands-off-teaching/
Smart, J. & Marshall, J. (2013). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher
questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of
Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 249-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9297-9
Walker, K. W., & Pearce, M. (2014). Student engagement in one-shot library instruction.
Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3), 281-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.004
Walter, S. (2008). Librarians as teachers: A qualitative inquiry into professional identity.
College & Research Libraries, 69(1), 51-71.
Wheeler, E. & McKinney, P. (2015). Are librarians teachers? Investigating academic
librarians' perceptions of their own teaching roles. Journal of Information Literacy, 9(2),
111-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/9.2.1985
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017
Whitver & Lo Asking Questions in the Classroom...
[ ARTICLE ]
202 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
Appendix: Data Collection Worksheet
EN102 Information Literacy Classroom
Spring 2015
The information on this worksheet is confidential and exists for the purpose of data collection in the
above-named study. This worksheet will be used during class observation and will be completed by a
designated data collector. Please return this worksheet to Sara Whitver when it is completed.
Observer’s Name:
Section 1- Demographics:
Librarian
Course number and section
Date
Time
Classroom Location
Duration of Class Period
Male/Female Ratio in Class
Assignment Due Date
Section 2- Types of techniques and teaching aids the librarian utilized in the classroom:
# of times used (hashmarks):
Graphics
Storytelling
Analogies
Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 11, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 9
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol11/iss1/9DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41
[ ARTICLE ] Whitver & Lo
Asking Questions in the Classroom...
203 COMMUNICATIONS IN INFORMATION LITERACY | VOL. 11, NO. 1, 2017
Section 3- Response Rate to questions asked through techniques and teaching aids (please
count by using hash marks)
Questions asked by
polling
Questions asked
through discussion
Questions asked
by/about worksheet
Scripted librarian initiated questions
answered
Unscripted/improvised librarian-
initiated questions answered
Student-initiated questions asked
Student follow up questions asked
Librarian called on specific student
(cold calling)
Section 4-Pedagogy:
Periodically
throughout class
At the end
of class
Individual work
Group work
*Listen/discuss throughout class and perform task afterwards on
their own time
Does group work include compulsory oral response (i.e. are the
members of the group required to report the results of the group’s
assignment?)
Whitver and Lo: Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Te
Published by PDXScholar, 2017