asic_audit_report_analysis.docx
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
1/10
Please put your name here
4/29/2013
AUDIT INSPECTIONREPORT OFASIC
Analysis
This paper is essentially aimed at disseminating the key issues that have been identified
and highlighted in the report provided by the ASIC pertaining to audit/auditors for the
financial year 2011-2012. Apart from just identifying and listing down the key issuesof the report, various other elements like discussions regarding the key points
highlighted, identifying and presenting the implications of the deterioration etc. have
also been presented.
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
2/10
4/29/2013
1
THE ISSUE
The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) is the sole
authority in Australia that regulates the compliance requirements pertaining to financial
reporting and auditing of all the business organization of Australia in accordance to the
Corporations Act (2001) and offers all the entities relief from a few select requirements in
certain situations (Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC), 2012). ASIC
seeks to make sure that all the audit reports and opinions issued by the auditors are
extremely relevant and consistent, and ultimately aides the users in making better and
informed decisions.
In the recent report that was issued by the ASIC as part of its 18 month long audit
inspection program for the financial year 2011-2012, the ASIC inspected 20 different
Australian audit organizations by focusing predominantly on the auditing of financial
reports, specifically the public interest organizations that were prepared in accordance
with the Corporations Act. Unfortunately, the ASIC declared that the results of the audit
inspection were not very great and were actually disappointing due to the fact that the
quality of audits have not at all improved since the last similar inspection that was
conducted two years ago in the year 2010.
SUMMARY
The findings of the ASICs report predominantly highlighted three areas that
needs a lot improvement. They are as under:
the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence,
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
3/10
4/29/2013
2
level of professional skepticism, and extent of reliance on other auditors and experts along with lack of
sufficient evidence (Institute of Chartered Accountants, 2013).
Sufficiency and Appropriateness of AuditThis aspect focuses on the adequacy and
pertinence of audit evidence available in the engagement files. The evidence thus
available on engagement files need to be such that it supports the audit opinion by
demonstrating clearly various procedures and conclusions of the auditor pertaining to the
key audit judgment or areas of risk. The areas that were identified to be improved
include, instances when relying upon audits done by other auditors or experts in the field,
validation of key balances, sorting the balances pertaining to material loan, contemplation
of fraud risk, and the disclosure of the financial statement.
Level of professional skepticism This aspect relates to the engagement files in
particular. It has been identified that the level of professional skepticism needs to
improve in specific areas of audit judgment. Such key audit judgment includes
calculations related to impairment, fair value measurement of the companys assets
among others (ASIC focuses for audit firms, 2011).
Insufficient evidence Evidence pertaining to the files of engagement with specific
relevance to the nature of entity, the duration of engagement and reviews of quality
control etc., can be improved a lot, according to the ASIC.
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
4/10
4/29/2013
3
IDENTIFY
ASIC with the help of a risk-based review identified that most auditors are non-
compliant to the actual processes or rules while obtaining reasonable assurance that states
that the financial report which has been audited is not misstated. The finding of the
report reiterate the significance of auditing as a profession and that this profession has
considerable amount of work to be done in order to articulate the true value of the audit
report and also the prominence of the service that auditors offer to the capital markets and
also the entire Australian Corporate.
The points highlighted in the earlier section relate specifically to the audit
engagement files. In addition, the ASIC also highlighted areas for improvement
pertaining to Quality Control as well. According to the ASIC report, quite a few
organizations have a definite need for improving the quality control systems at their end
in order ensure that they adhere to the plethora of independence requirements according
to the Corporations Act and also various other professional standards of the land.
Specifically, ASIC feels that organizations are required to manage the auditor rotation
more resourcefully (Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC), December
2012).
Even though many organizations have mostly fulfilled the Clarity auditing
standards quite well, adherence relating to a few elements of these standards need quite a
bit of improvement. Particularly, a few of the Other National and Network organizations
and the smaller organizations have a large scope of improvement in terms of their human
resources policies and structures, and the efficacy of their internal monitoring policies
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
5/10
4/29/2013
4
(Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC), December 2012). Moreover, it
was also identified that superior auditors suitably balance commercial burdens with risks
and thus do not compromise on the quality of the audit. Such auditors make sure that they
comprehend the business model of the organization that is being audited, various risks of
the business, both internal and external, and the impact of such risks on the nature and
scope of the procedures of the audit. Furthermore, in case of better audits, the partners
who are engagement bring together their expertise and experience and use the same in
efficiently assessing the business model of the organization that is being audited, the risks
of the business, both internal and external and also their impact on the nature and scope
of the auditing process (Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC),
December 2012).
DISCUSS
In the recent years, the rapid development of the global economy and the growing
prosperity of the global financial markets have resulted in a new trend of global economic
development in the form of economic integration. Moreover, the financial industry is
gaining more significance in view of the modern economic development. In other words,
the global economic integration simply translates to a unified global financial market.
The uncertainty and volatility of the financial system started getting exposed with the
rapid development of the financial industry (Hossein Jalilian, 2006).
Financial regulation plays a key role in keeping economies financially stable and
also helps evading economic recessions and financial crises (The Theory of Economic
Regulation, 1971). Many of the global financial crises have time and again proved that
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
6/10
4/29/2013
5
markets have failed due to less and insufficient regulation in the market. The most
important cause in addition to regulation issues is the discrepancies in the corporate
reporting. The crisis in the European Union, remarkably in the Greek economy, had
economies around the world fidgeting and bracing them for a global crash which got
averted in the very last minute. Today, the relationships between economies, talent
pools, and industrial resources are so great that a simple Brazilian frost can boost coffee
prices in Coorg (India). Similarly, a downward spiral in crude prices sees a positive
impact on economies around the world.
Financial regulatory problems have actually become one of the most important
issues in the contemporary era and they are constantly affecting the world economy as
well as the financial stability of numerous economies all over the globe (The adoption of
international accounting standards in Bangladesh, 2006, Vol: 18). Having said so, the
point that is to be highlighted is that financial regulation plays a key role in keeping
economies financially stable and also helps evading economic recessions and financial
crises. In the overall analysis, it is safe to conclude that whatever the underlying cause be
for the collapse of these institutions which eventually led to the 2008financial crisis it
leads to the total collapse of the entire economic eco-systems. The underlying causes
which start off in the holy pursuit of delivering higher value for shareholders ultimately
in the name of professionalism is nothing short of excessive human greed, total alienation
of organizational mission as well as the shareholders. Shareholders are reduced to mere
spectators in the annual meets conducted by these voracious and greedy organizations.
What starts off as an individual act leads to total collective failure.
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
7/10
4/29/2013
6
The ASIC feels that organizations can look at ways to dramatically improve and
maintain the quality of the audit with specific focus being given to audit evidence, the
degree of professional skepticism, and also the extent of evidence while also highlighting
the using other industry experts or auditors for auditing.
The report also indicated various instances where organizations have strong need
to review their approaches while considering seeking the services or opinions of other
auditors. This is to make sure that they attain adequate and proper independent
substantiation which will support their opinions about the audits done. This is also
applicable in the context of group audits (particularly in connection with business
components in emerging markets), interests in joint ventures, and the use of service
organizations. This work can include assessing the other auditors and reviewing their
audit work. There may be a cost associated with this work (Australian Securities &
Investment Corporation (ASIC), December 2012).
Auditors are required to obtain independent declaration with respect to the work
that company experts undertake and also related to the work that is taking up by the
experts that companies engage. There were quite a few instances reported in the ASIC
report where it would have been better to engage independent experts of their own
because external auditors lack the sufficient and required skills and expertise and also the
necessary experience. However, irrespective of the person hired for auditor, whether
external expert or an internal person, it is highly essential that the audit must be carried
out on all and every source information that the experts use in their audit.
RECOMMENDATION
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
8/10
4/29/2013
7
The following were few of the many suggestions that the ASIC offered in its
report. According to the ASIC, it is regarded that organizations, by adhering to better
practices would foster professional skepticism by adapting to the following measures:
Fostering a strong organizational culture that promotes and supportsprofessional skepticism.
directing flawless, consistent and unpretentious messages from the toplevel management of the organization, and various other stakeholders that
professional skepticism and the quality of the audit should not be
compromised for the purpose of meeting organizational deadlines and
budgets, or for supporting a specific consequence of the management,
and/or lastly for saving on the auditor fees.
By making sure that all the stakeholders of the organization and the staffassigned for the purpose of the audit are cognizant about the business of
the organization that is being audited, possess sufficient and relevant
industry knowledge, experience and a thorough understanding of the
requirements of financial reporting.
Offering relevant and adequate training to the personnel, strong directionand processes, consultation procedures, flawless technical support, and
review which include review of the quality control of the engagement and
the quality control of the organization as well. (Australian Securities &
Investment Corporation (ASIC), December 2012)
CONCLUSION
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
9/10
4/29/2013
8
Globalization has brought in great many advantages to individual economies as
well as global markets. Access to resources and manpower has virtually become
seamless. A successful framework is what is required in order to decrease the flaws that
have been identified to be present in the current audit procedures. While the issues
highlighted in the ASIC report were genuine and comprehensive, there are critiques who
claim that ASIC has indeed cast a clear and strong doubt over the entire audit profession
and industry of Australia as a whole. It is believed that the risk-based approach or study
of the ASIC has considered a very small sample for the study and also all the 20
organizations chosen for inspection were not of Australia. The minimal size of the risk-
based sample chosen by the ASIC offers focus areas and understandings for use by the
audit profession and practice for gaining continuous improvement along with high-
quality audits. It is believed by many senior auditors of Australia that, the audit
inspection program of ASIC is not a illustrative sample of audits in the Australia
continent, and hence Certified Practicing Accountant (CPA) Australia have their
reservations and doubt pertaining to the obstinate statements indicated in the ASIC
Report about the quality of audit in Australia.
-
7/30/2019 ASIC_Audit_Report_Analysis.docx
10/10
4/29/2013
9
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ASIC focuses for audit firms. PublicAccountant - The Official Journal of the Institute of Public
Accountants. 2011. Melbourne : PublicAccountant - The Official Journal of the Institute of Public
Accountants IAvailable online at: http://pubacct.org.au/asic-focuses-for-audit-firms/), 2011. ABN 81 004
130 643.
Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC). December 2012.Audit Inspection Program
Report for 2011-2012. Canberra ACT : Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC), December
2012. 317.
. 2012. Financial Reporting and Audit - Overview.Australian Securities & Investment Corporation
(ASIC). [Online] Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC), August 10, 2012. [Cited: April
29, 2013.] Australian Securities & Investment Corporation (ASIC).
Dixon, Lloyd , Susan M. Gates, Kanika Kapur, Seth A. Seabury and Eric Talley. 2006.The Impact of
Regulation and Litigation on Small Business and Entrepreneurship: An Overview. Santa Monica, CA :
RAND Corporation, 2006. Research Report.
Hossein Jalilian, Colin Kirkpatrick, & David Parker. 2006.The Impact of Regulation on Economic
Growth in Developing Countires: A Cross-Country Analysis. UK : Cranfield Universtiy, 2006. Report.
Institute of Chartered Accountants. 2013. ASIC highlights areas for improvement in auditing.Institute of
Chartered Accountants. [Online] Institute of Chartered Accountants, February 18, 2013. [Cited: April 29,
2013.] http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/Industry-Topics/Audit-and-assurance/Current-
issues/Recent-audit-headlines/News-and-updates/ASIC-highlights-areas-for-improvement-in-auditing.
Measuring convergence of National Accounting Standards with International Financial Reporting
Standards. Fontes, A., Rodrigues, L. L., and Craig, R.,. 2005, vol: 29. 2005, vol: 29, Accounting Forum,
pp. 415-436.
Regulation of accountancy and accountants: a comparative analysis of accounting for research and
development in four advanced capitalist countries. C.H. Willmot, K. Robson, D.J. Cooper, & E.A.
Lowe. 1992. 1992, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountabilty Journal (Vol: 5, no. 2), pp. 32-56.
The adoption of international accounting standards in Bangladesh. Mir, M. Z. and A. S. Rahaman,.
2006, Vol: 18. 2006, Vol: 18, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, pp. 816 - 841.
The Organizational Structure of Financial Market Regulation: Highlights from the Literature (Available
online at: http://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fsr_0604.pdf). Parent, Christine Fay
and Nicolas. 2010. 2010, Financial System Review, pp. 53-59.
The Theory of Economic Regulation. Stigler, G. 1971. 1971, Bell Journal of Economics and Management
(Vol. 2), pp. 2-31.