asian development bank bangladesh water...

SOUTHWEST AREA INTEGRATED

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROJECT TA NO. 4079-BAN

Asian Development Bank

Bangladesh Water Development Board

Water Resources Planning Organization

December 2004

Halcrow Group Ltd, UK

in association with

DHI Water & Environment, Denmark

Engineering & Planning Consultants Ltd, Bangladesh

Kranti Associates Ltd, Bangladesh

Halcrow Bangladesh Ltd, Bangladesh

FINAL REPORT

Annex J: Socio-Economic Survey

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resource Management Project Final Report

TA 4079-BAN Annex J – Socio-Economic Survey

Socio-Economic Survey

Annex J

Socio-Economic Survey



Socio-Economic Survey i

Table of Contents

1 Background/ Introduction 1

2 Socio-Economic Survey 2

2.1 Summary of the Socio-Economic Findings 2

2.2 Rational of the SES in SAIWRMP 5

2.3 Objectives of the survey 5

2.4 Methodology followed 5

2.4.1 Data Collection Procedure 5

2.4.2 Sample Size for Household Interview and Sample Selection Procedure 6

2.4.3 Activity Details: 7

2.5 Problems faced and limitations 8

3 Major socio-economic basic figures in Chenchuri Beel Sub-project 9

3.1 Demographic profile 9

3.1.1 Family size 9

3.1.2 Occupational pattern 11

3.1.3 Age structure 12

3.1.4 Literacy education by land category and sex category 14

3.1.5 Land tenure by farm size 15

3.1.6 Housing condition and homestead 16

3.1.7 Livestock, Poultry and Tree resources 18

3.1.8 Agricultural Equipments 18

3.1.9 Other Assets 19

3.2 Livelihoods 19

3.2.1 Production and income from major livelihoods 19

3.2.2 Crop Damage 22

3.2.3 Paddy Marketing Problems 22

3.2.4 Access to information 23

3.2.5 Household Annual Expenditure 23

3.2.6 Food Security 26

3.2.7 Household Vulnerability 27

3.2.8 Savings and Credit 27

3.3 Health and Hygiene 28

3.4 Gender Dimensions and Participation 30

3.5 Problems and Suggestions 31

3.6 Environmental Aspects 34

4 Major Socio-Economic basic figures in Narail Sub-project 38

4.1 Demographic Profile 38

4.1.1 Family size 38

4.1.2 Occupation pattern 40

4.1.3 Age structure 41

4.1.4 Literacy education by land category and sex category 42

4.1.5 Land tenure by farm size 44

4.1.6 Housing condition and homestead 45

4.1.7 Livestock, Poultry and Tree Resources by HH 47

4.1.8 Agricultural Equipments 47

4.1.9 Other Assets 48

4.2 Livelihoods 48

4.2.1 Production and Income from major livelihoods 48



Socio-Economic Survey ii

4.2.2 Crop Damage 50

4.2.3 Paddy Marketing Problems 51

4.2.4 Access to Information 51

4.2.5 Household Annual Expenditure 52

4.2.6 Food Security 54

4.2.7 Household Vulnerability 55

4.2.8 Savings and Credit 55

4.3 Health and Hygiene 56

4.4 Gender Dimensions and Participation 58

4.5 Problems and Suggestions 59

4.6 Environmental Aspects 62

List of Tables

Table 3.1: Average Households Size according to Land Category .......................................... 9

Table 3.2: Average Households Size according to Land Category in Chenchuri .................... 9

Table 3.3: Average Size of Household Earning Member According to Sex and Land

Category in Chenchuri ............................................................................................................ 10

Table 3.4: Distribution of households heads according to their main occupation by sex

in Chenchuri ............................................................................................................................ 11

Table 3.5: Occupation of households percentage by major sectors and by sex ...................... 12

Table 3.6: Distribution of household heads according to their age group and land

category in Chenchuri ............................................................................................................. 12



Table 3.8: Distribution of household members according to their age group and land


Table 3.9: Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and

land category in Chenchuri ..................................................................................................... 14

Table 3.10: Distribution of household members according to their educational status

and sex in Chenchuri ............................................................................................................... 15

Table 3.11: Average amounts of land possessions per household according to tenural

pattern by sex and land category in Chenchuri ....................................................................... 15

Table 3.12: Distribution of households according to their house wall type by land


Table 3.13: Distribution of households according to their house roof type by land


Table 3.14: Distribution of households according to their responses on if they have

electricity by land category in Chenchuri ............................................................................... 17

Table 3.15: Average number and value (Taka) of livestock resources according to sex

and land category in Chenchuri .............................................................................................. 18

Table 3.16: Average number and value (Taka) of tree resources according to sex and

land category in Chenchuri ..................................................................................................... 18

Table 3.17: Average number and value (Taka) of Agricultural Equipments/

Implements according to sex and land category in Chenchuri ............................................... 18

Table 3.18: Average number and value (Taka) of household durable assets according

to sex and land category in Chenchuri .................................................................................... 19

Table 3.19: Average annual income per household according to source in Chenchuri .......... 19



Socio-Economic Survey iii

Table 3.20: Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range

by land category ...................................................................................................................... 21

Table 3.21: Distribution of households who had crop damage in different crop season

according to reasons for crop damage by household category in Chenchuri ......................... 22

Table 3.22: Distribution of households who sold-out their crop according to reasons

for not getting fair price by household category in Chenchuri ............................................... 22

Table 3.23: Percentage of households received training / information by Land


Table 3.24: Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to

source in Chenchuri ................................................................................................................ 23

Table 3.25: Consolidated incomes and expenditure by land category .................................... 25

Table 3.26: Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure

range by land category in Chenchuri ...................................................................................... 25

Table 3.27: Distribution of households who had food shortage according to reasons

for food shortage by land category in Chenchuri.................................................................... 26

Table 3.28: Per capita per day major food item consumed according to Land Category

in Chenchuri ............................................................................................................................ 26

Table 3.29: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on type

of vulnerability context affected their well-being in Chenchuri ............................................. 27

Table 3.30: Average amount of debt (Taka) per land category and average interest ............. 27

Table 3.31: Distribution of households according to type of latrine used by land


Table 3.32: Distribution of households suffering from diarrhoea <5 children ....................... 28

Table 3.33: Percentage Distribution of Household using different Water Sources

according to Use Pattern ......................................................................................................... 29

Table 3.34: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on

their sufferings during the last one year by major diseases and land category in

Chenchuri ................................................................................................................................ 29

Table 3.35: Distribution of Households in % about major Dimensions of Participation ....... 30

Table 3.36: Percentage of Household According to their Access and Participation in

the Different Service Centres by Sex in Chenchuri ................................................................ 31

Table 3.37: Percentage Distribution of Households According to major Problems by

Land Category in Chenchuri sub project ................................................................................ 31

Table 3.38: Percentage Distribution of Households According to Major suggestions

by Land Category in Chenchuri sub project ........................................................................... 33

Table 3.39: Different Fish Species Available in Beel and River in Chenchuri ...................... 34

Table 3.40: Name of Different Wild Animals Available in the Area in Chenchuri ............... 35

Table 3.41: Trees Available in Chenchuri .............................................................................. 36

Table 3.42: Vegetable Available in Chenchuri ....................................................................... 37

Table 4.1: Distribution of households according to their member size and land

category ................................................................................................................................... 38

Table 4.2: Average Households Size according to Land Category ........................................ 38

Table 4.3: Average Size of Household Earning Member According to Sex and Land

Category .................................................................................................................................. 39

Table 4.4: Distribution of households heads according to their Primary occupation by

sex -Sub project area ............................................................................................................... 40

Table 4.5: Occupation of households heads by major sectors and by sex .............................. 41


category ................................................................................................................................... 41



Socio-Economic Survey iv

Table 4.7: Distribution of household members according to their age group and land

category ................................................................................................................................... 42

Table 4.8: Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and

land .......................................................................................................................................... 42

Table 4.9: Distribution of household members according to their educational status

and Sex .................................................................................................................................... 43

Table 4.10: Average amounts of land possessions per household according to tenural

pattern by sex and land category ............................................................................................. 44

Table 4.11: Distribution of households according to their house wall type by land

category ................................................................................................................................... 45

Table 4.12: Distribution of households according to their house roof type by land

category ................................................................................................................................... 46

Table 4.13: Distribution of households according to their responses on if they have

electricity by land category ..................................................................................................... 46

Table 4.14: Total livestock value by land categories .............................................................. 47

Table 4.15: Total trees resources value by land categories .................................................... 47

Table 4.16: Total agricultural equipments value by land categories ...................................... 47

Table 4.17: Total household durable value by land categories ............................................... 48

Table 4.18: Average annual income per household according to source ............................... 48

Table 4.19: Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range

by land category ...................................................................................................................... 50

Table 4.20: Distribution of households who had crop damage in different crop season

according to reasons for crop damage by household category ............................................... 50

Table 4.21: Distribution of households who sold-out their crop according to reasons

for not getting fair price by household category ..................................................................... 51

Table 4.22: Percentage of households who received training / information by category ....... 51

Table 4.23: Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to

source ...................................................................................................................................... 52

Table 4.24: Consolidated incomes and expenditure by land category .................................... 53

Table 4.25: Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure

range by land category ............................................................................................................ 53

Table 4.26: Distribution of households who had food shortage according to reasons

for food shortage by land category ......................................................................................... 54

Table 4.27: Per capita per day major food item consumed according to Land Category ....... 55

Table 4.28: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on type

of vulnerability context affected their well-being ................................................................... 55

Table 4.29: Average amount of debt (Taka) per households interest from different

sources..................................................................................................................................... 55

Table 4.30: Distribution of households according to type of latrine used by land

category ................................................................................................................................... 56

Table 4.31: Distribution of households according to their responses on if any of the <5

children of the family suffering from diarrhea during the last 14 days by land category ....... 56

Table 4.32: Percentage Distribution of Households using different Water Sources

according to Use Pattern ......................................................................................................... 57

Table 4.33: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on

their sufferings during the last one year by major diseases and land category ....................... 57

Table 4.34: Percentage Distribution of Households According to Participation of

Women and male Counterpart According to major Dimensions of Participation .................. 58

Table 4.35: Percentage of Household According to their Access and Participation in

the Different Service Centers by Sex ...................................................................................... 59



Socio-Economic Survey v

Table 4.36: Percentage Distribution of Households According to major Problems by

Land Category ......................................................................................................................... 59

Table 4.37: Percentage Distribution of Households According to Major Suggestions

by Land Category .................................................................................................................... 61

Table 4.38: Different Fish Species Available in Beel and River ............................................ 62

Table 4.39: Name of Different Wild Animals Available in the Area ..................................... 63

Table 4.40: Trees Available ................................................................................................... 64

Table 4.41: Vegetable Available............................................................................................ 64

Appendix 1: ToR for Socio-economic Household Survey

Appendix 2: Questionnaire for Socio-economic Survey

Appendix 3: Project Map

Appendix 4: Socio-Economic Tables for Chenchuri Beel Sub-project

Appendix 5: Socio-Economic Tables for Narail Sub-project

Appendix 6: Pre-Assessment Survey Results (Narail and Chenchuri)



Socio-Economic Survey vi

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

BADC Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation

BWDB Bangladesh Water Development Board

DAE Department of Agricultural Extension

DC Deputy Commissioner

DOF Department of Fisheries

DPHE Department of Public Health Engineering

DTW Deep Tubewell

FGD Focus Group Discussion

GOB Government of Bangladesh

GPWM Guidelines for Participatory Water Management

HTW Hand Tubewell

LGED Local Government Engineering Department

LGI Local Government Institution

NGO Non-Government Organisations

PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance

PRRA Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal

REB Rural Electrification Board

STW Shallow Tubewell

SWAIWRMP South West Area Integrated Water Resource Management Project

ToR Terms of Reference

TW Tubewell

UNO Upazila Nirbahi Officer

UP Union Parisad

WSSL Water Sealed Sanitary Latrine



Socio-Economic Survey 1

1 Background/ Introduction

1. In the loan aide memoire it is mentioned that the PPTA will collect and compile data and information on physical, socio-economic and institutional setting of the selected district, including hydrology, surface and groundwater availability and quality, topography, land use, population, poverty incidence and other human development indexes, incomes and finance, gender and occupational pattern.

2. It is agreed initially with ADB that a socio-economic survey will be conducted along with the stakeholders‟ consultation in Phase I to collect necessary information required for obtaining a general scenario about the socio-economic situation of the project area vis-à-vis to identify the potential areas which might be addressed during the project implementation in order to improve the poverty situation.

3. Finally it is decided that the socio-economic survey will be conducted during the Phase-II of the PPTA through engaging professional institutions who have track record in this particular field.

4. One organization was selected for the purpose to conduct a socio-economic survey taking a representative sample size covering the both Narail sub-project and Chenchuri-beel sub-project area.

5. Major findings of the socio-economic survey are presented in this report including an analysis to indicate the existing scenario based on the information provided by the respondents.




2 Socio-Economic Survey

2.1 Summary of the Socio-Economic Findings

6. An attempt has been made to put some major highlights on each of the sub-section outlined for the report. Results/Tables for different socio-economic indicators furnished in Annex-C for Narail and Annex-D for Chenchuri. Major observations depicting „Big Picture‟ of the project area is detailed below:

a. Demographic Profile:

About 56.4% of the households in Narail Sub-Project area was found to be functionally landless (having total cultivable land upto 50 decimal was considered to be the landless), while the same in the Chenchuri Sub-Project area was 62.2%. The national estimates for Rural areas of Bangladesh for population belonging to the hardcore category is about 53.10 %. In the project area this was found to be higher than that of the national estimate, which may be due to other influencing factors like land and other concentration ratio to the wealthy category was found to be high, consecutive crop loss due to water logging and other environmental hazards, prevailing local socio-political environment, etc.

Average family size for the Narail was estimated to be 4.95, while the same for the Chenchuri is 5.25.

Average earning member per family was observed to be 1.49 for Narail and the same for Chenchuri is 1.41.

b. Resources and Assets:

In both the area percentage of people engaged in Sharecropping was found to be very high. Percentage of households involved in sharecropping was found to be 37.1% in Narail and the same for the Chenchuri is 38.2%.

About 5.1% of the female headed households have ownership of the living house in Narail, while the same in Chenchuri is 8.0%.

More than 90% of houses in the areas was observed to be Kacha with Tin roof and only about 1% households have Pacca house.

Only 32.7% of the households in Narail have access to electricity, while the same of Chenchuri is 21.8%.

It is observed in the area that livestock resources is not enough and according to the people it is reduced significantly as there is limited grazing field, fodder is costly, limited access to vetnary services for treatment and modern cultivation equipments (tractor). According to the farmers, this has reduced costs of cultivation but significantly affected the soil fertility and cowdung is not used now a days as compost manure due to limited availability and use as fuel.

c. Major Livelihoods:

In both areas percentage of people engaged in major livelihoods are of agriculture, agriculture and non-agriculture day labouring, rickshaw/van




pulling, small business. Quite a significant percentage of households especially females are engaged in livestock (goat and poultry, etc.) rearing as it gives them regular cash flow and they have control over the same.

In the area farmers are used to cultivate Aus, Amon, Boro, Oil seeds, Pulses, vegetables, Jute, etc. using both local and HYV varieties. Cropping intensity in the area is observed to be very low and according to the farmers they can not use the land year round due to water logging and salainity and flash flood due to excessive rainfall and river erosion. According to the farmers, about 20 to 30% of crop is damaged due to natural calamities they are exposed to it almost regularly.

It is also observed that farmers do not get fair price of their crop due to huge production/availability in the harvesting season, middleman influence, advance sale of crop due to financial crisis, etc.

Average annual income per household for Narail was estimated to be Tk.25960.93, while the same for Chenchuri was Tk.33471.34. On the contrary, average annual expenditure per household for Narail was observed to be Tk.29380.34 and for Chenchuri Tk.30962.09.

About 49 % of the households in Chenchuri and 40% of households in Narail experience food shortage due to limited job opportunity in the area, crop loss/ damage, cultivable land remains fallow, frequent sickness, high debt burden, etc. About 38.5% households in Narail and 39.3% of households in Chenchuri was found to be indebted, while the same for landless was 45.8% in Narail and 46.8% in Chenchuri.

During the food shortage/ crisis period, major copping strategies followed are: adjustment of meals, go for food substitutions, borrow from others, sell labor, take loan from money lender, use savings and sell productive assets and livestock resources.

d. Access to Information:

It is observed in both the areas that households access to different GOB services and information is very limited. Only Sadar Upazila people have some access to the same. NGO services was found to be very limited in the deep areas because of remoteness, passbility, limited transportation facilities, etc.

e. Health and Hygiene:

About 15.3% of the households in Narail defecate openly and 20% use hanging latrine, while the same in Cenchuri was observed to be 6.5% and 24.4% respectively. Open defecation among landless and marginal households was found to be high in both the areas.

Hand washing practicing with Soap was found to be very low in both the areas before eating and after defecation.

It is observed that about 8.4% of households having <5 yrs aged children experienced diarrhea during the last 14 days in Narail, while the same in Chenchuri was 9.9%.




Major diseases observed to be ARI, Dysentery-Diarrhea, Gastric, Typhoid and female diseases. Most of the households use to use village doctor and local govt. hospitals.

Most of the areas are highly arsenic contaminated and households are suffering from access to safe drinking water. Households are practicing different methods like rain water harvesting, use of well, etc. but in a very limited scale and have very limited knowledge on alternatives.

f. Gender Dimensions and Participation:

It is observed that most of the women have no/limited control over the resources in both Narail and Chenchuri. Mobility in the community was found to be higher than that of the outside. Participation in household decision-making process was found to be very low and mostly male counter parts decide.

More than 90% of the female respondents viewed that they do not participate in village Shalish/ mosque/ mandir committee activities, community activities, etc. Only about 13.8% of the women participates/visits in Union Parishad.

More than 80% of the women do not know and not aware about the legal rights related to marriage, inheritance and legal process.

g. Major Problems & Suggestions:

It is observed that water logging, seasonal drought, salainity, limited job opportunity, crop damage, siltation of river bed, over fishing, early marriage and dowry, poor infrastructure, social insecurity and limited scope of work for women was highlighted.

It is suggested by the community to construct/ repair embankments/ gates, re-excavate cannels, establish irrigation facilities, training on modern cultivation techniques, Income Generating Skill with financial support/access, social mobilization/ awareness against early marriage and dowry, involvement of community in the development process, etc.

Concluding Remarks:

1. It is observed that the area is very poor. Cultivable and other natural resources are highly concentrated to the local rich people and absentee landlords. There is very limited job opportunity for the poor and un-employed youth especially females. Farmers used to loss crops and cannot cultivate year round due to water logging, salainity, drought, limited irrigation facilities, operational problems of water outlets, etc. Significant percentage of the people used to migrate outside for alternative job during the off-season. In the area, social insecurity, early marriage, practice of dowry is very high.

2. It is recommended to construct/repair embankments and gates, IGA skill to the poor especially women inclusive of marketing opportunities, social mobilization against early marriage and dowry and other forces. It is highly recommended to engage and ensure active community participation in the process and ensure community led development so that community ownership is created and sustained.




2.2 Rational of the SES in SAIWRMP

7. In 2002, in consultation with Government of Bangladesh, Asian Development Bank included PPTA in the Country Strategy document and undertook a project entitled, “Southwest Area Integrated Water Resource Management Project” capturing Faridpur, Jessore, Magura, Narail, and Rajbari district. The program approaches mainly followed participatory process and engagement of key stakeholders in identifying development priorities to improve livelihoods of poor and vulnerable households in the areas. The program also emphasized upon to build on the program strategy on the views of beneficiaries on water resource management, constraints, opportunities and explore options to way forward in a more coordinated and integrated manner to reduce poverty of the poor and vulnerable households. This requires an in-depth analysis of the socio-economic status of households in the area capturing assets and natural resources and access pattern, livelihoods pattern, options availability of diversified and skills, socio-cultural settings especially women status and their participation in development process, natural and physical environment, etc. With this end, it is planned to conduct a socio-economic baseline study in the sub-project area capturing Chenchuri Beel and Narail sub-project, which can be used to document both anticipated and unanticipated impact.

2.3 Objectives of the survey

8. The main purpose of the baseline study is to collect data on variables indicative of the social, economic, cultural and natural context/ condition. This is done primarily to build up a database for comparing the same type of data to be collected after having implemented the project with those of the baseline study for measuring the impact of the study and project planning.

Specific Objectives:

9. The specific objectives of the assessment and resource survey initiatives are as follows:

in-depth assessment of available water resources, local technology, diversifies skills and livelihood options, socio-economic conditions, agriculture, livestock, fishing, participation and access to available services, women participation and mobility, access to common resources, market and processing system, infrastructures, resource centers, women participation and control over income and resources and development process, etc;

identifying the local problems, constraints, conflicts and needs and rights

recommending different community development options for different group of vulnerable households inclusive of women destitute, undergoing a rigorous process of critical analysis of the needs-resources- and social-political-economic context.

2.4 Methodology followed

10. Details of the data collection methods, procedures, sampling strategies and size, data quality control, data management and processing, reporting etc. for the purpose of Socio-Economic Baseline Survey are outlined below:

2.4.1 Data Collection Procedure

11. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were applied in generating data, which may also be termed as formal and non-formal methods. Quantitative data will provide the magnitude/degree of inter and intra- household variations and qualitative data will




focus on types/pattern prevailing in households as well as in the community which influences livelihoods.

12. Quantitative assessment was conducted deploying random sampling method from different strata of the village households is very much important as its main objective is to measure mean values of given indicators such as production, consumption, yields, returns, participation rates, proportion of practitioners and non-practitioners, skills, resources, etc. Household level data will be collected using structured questionnaires.

13. The socio-economic baseline survey team will also capture seasonal variations in livelihoods and other key social and economic dimensions and vulnerability through deploying a Seasonal Mapping exercise, Cropping Pattern (Major Crops), Vulnerability Matrix and Trend Analysis.

2.4.2 Sample Size for Household Interview and Sample Selection Procedure

14. In the project area, there are about 32,500 Households in the Century Beel and 46,500 Households in the Narail Beel. To represent the entire population in the baseline study the following standard sample size will be used.

15. Sample Size1

16. To select a statistical significant sample size, which represents the entire target population (within the confines as specified) can be determined with the following equation;

1

2

2

)1(.......eqne

pqZn

Where

n = The desired sample size when target population is greater than or equal to 32,500 & 46,500.

Z = The standard normal deviate (1.96) p = The portion in the target population estimated to have a particular characteristic q = 1.0-p (0.5) e = Degree of error desired (7%)

17. Hence, using the figures above for the parameters defined in equation 1for determining sample size, we see the following:

2

2

)06.0(

)5.0)(5.0()96.1(n n = 266

18. Considering the finite correction factor, ultimate sample is determined as n1 = 260, and finally this is rounded up to 275 for each of the Project area i.e. 275 sample for the Century Beel and 275 Sample for the Narail Beel and total Sample size for the study area is 550.

19. Distribution of samples according for both the sub-project areas according to village and Upazilas is furnished in the main report.

1 Kothari, Research Methodology, See also Cochran, Sampling Techniques

Considering the finite correct factor, the formula used to determine the size is:

qpZNe

NpqZn

2)1(2)(

2)(1




20. Therefore, a total of 275 samples from each of the Beel area were selected adopting the following strategies:

21. Step-1: Six Sample Villages representing the area were selected purposively considering remoteness, occupational diversity, and level of vulnerability due to water/ environmental changes, etc. for the purpose of the Household Survey purpose from each of the Beel area. Primary information were collected for both of the Beel areas capturing some basic information on social- economic and demographic aspects, which helped to categorize/ cluster areas. Maps highlighting selected samples villages for both the areas are attached in Appendix-3.

22. Step-2: After selecting sample villages, a Census survey was conducted listing all households living in the villages capturing some key areas like family member, land holdings, major occupations, vulnerability types, etc. The village household list will be treated a Sampling Frame.

23. Step-3: Households of the village were categorized using the standard landholding categories used by BBS and others and marked in the sampling frame.

24. Step-4: Total samples were distributed proportionally among all major landholding categories (large, medium, small, marginal and landless) from each of the selected village to reflect diversity.

25. Step-5: Samples from each strata were selected following systematic random sampling technique to avoid any kind of biasness and also getting representation from each of the sub-sets/ cluster of the village.

2.4.3 Activity Details:

A. Staff Recruitment and Training:

26. A small team was engaged for pre-survey and collect primary level data from both Narail and Century sub-project areas through field visit, and also collected available primary data from Upazila and District offices. This took about two weeks. The survey team analyzed primary data and selected sample villages for both the areas in consultation with the senior team members of the project according to the criteria stated earlier. A six-member team with Two Team Leaders conducted the Pre-Survey.

27. The Household Level Socio-Economic Baseline Survey was conducted immediate after the pre-survey and a survey team was engaged for the purpose. The team members were selected considering the past experiences and commitment level. The team members were given training on the survey before engaging field collection, which helped in ensuring quality data.

28. The Socio-Economist-Team Leader cum Statistician was responsible for the entire survey and organize team and undertake necessary measures to conduct the survey (survey design, questionnaire design, team mobilization and training, data entry and processing, ensuring quality of data) according to the time frame and also arrange for data entry and processing according to the report requirements within the agreed time frame by the Project Team Leader.

B. Field Test of Survey Instruments:

29. Immediate after accomplishment of staff training, survey instruments like, household interview questionnaire, seasonal map etc. were tested to finalize the survey instruments and data collection procedures. At the initial stage of survey, this initiative enabled the team to bring necessary modification in tools and process.




C. Field Activities and Period

30. The major survey activities started in June 18, 2004 with pre-assessment and the Household Socio-Economic Survey was completed in July 20, 2004.

2.5 Problems faced and limitations

31. As per the design of the programme it is anticipated that very limited time is allotted for the SE survey which posses a challenging situation for gathering qualitative information from the respondents who are busy to maintain their livelihood. It is also mentionable here that collection of reliable information largely depends on the relationship between respondent and investigation which needs sometime to develop. Moreover for a team of non-local members it is difficult to develop required relationship within the short possible time.

32. The field work of the survey is conducted during the monsoon which creates a problem in restricting the movement of the study team.

33. Finally providing the information required as per the design of the questionnaire needs quite sometime which was difficult in many occasions for the respondents who remains to be busy for searching income opportunities in order to maintain their livelihood.




1 8 8 15 70 102

1.0% 7.8% 7.8% 14.7% 68.6% 100.0%

16.7% 28.6% 22.9% 42.9% 40.9% 37.1%

3 13 19 13 69 117

2.6% 11.1% 16.2% 11.1% 59.0% 100.0%

50.0% 46.4% 54.3% 37.1% 40.4% 42.5%

4 6 6 30 46

8.7% 13.0% 13.0% 65.2% 100.0%

14.3% 17.1% 17.1% 17.5% 16.7%

2 3 2 1 2 10

20.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 20.0% 100.0%

33.3% 10.7% 5.7% 2.9% 1.2% 3.6%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

1-4

5-6

7-9

10 +

HH Member

Size

Total

Large Medium Small Marginal Landless

Household Category

Total

3 Major socio-economic basic figures in Chenchuri Beel Sub-project

34. All the data collected during the socio-economic survey in June 2004 have been processed and tabulated. All the tables produced for Chenchuri beel sub-project are available in the Appendix-4. Here below are presented the salient information of the area.

3.1 Demographic profile

35. The household size within the different land categories is presented through the following Tables.

Table 3.1: Average Households Size according to Land Category

36. It appears from the table that the highest number of households is from the landless category within the highest number of households by the same category of farmers within the family size of (5-6). It is worth while to mention here that no household was found within the family size of (7-9) in the large category of farmers. It can be printed out from the information that 42.5% of the sample households are within the family size of (5-6) followed by the family size of (1-4) which is 37% of the sample household.

3.1.1 Family size

Table 3.2: Average Households Size according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Household Size Land Category Total


Mean 8.17 5.79 5.69 5.31 4.96 5.25

SD 5.95 2.53 2.07 2.00 1.75 2.12

SD= Standard Deviation




37. This table demonstrates the fact that the family size of the large category of farmers is the biggest (8.17) followed by medium category of farmers (5.79). This table also present another characteristic that is the landless category has the smallest size of family (4.96) in the Chenchuri Beel Sub-project area which is indeed the opposite scenario of the traditional belief i.e. poor people are reluctant to practice the population control devices. Of course this is the initial explanation but there might be other explanation as well which was not available within the present study. The average family size for Narail district is 4.9 against the national average 5.6 according to the 2001 census. So it appears that the family size of large, medium and small farmers in the study area are bigger than the Narail district and as well as the national average. The average family size of landless farmers is as the same as Narail district and also below the national average.

Table 3.3: Average Size of Household Earning Member According to Sex and Land Category in Chenchuri

Household Category Male Female Total

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

Large 1.83 0.98 0.00 0.00 1.83 0.98

Medium 1.29 0.85 0.11 0.31 1.39 0.79

Small 1.51 0.78 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.78

Marginal 1.40 0.65 0.02 0.17 1.43 0.65

Landless 1.29 0.66 0.08 0.33 1.37 0.67

Total 1.34 0.70 0.06 0.29 1.41 0.70

38. It indicates from the table that no female members of the large farmers family are involved in any earning sources contrary to that it also indicates from the same table that highest number of male members from large category of farmers are involved in earning activities. Lowest number of household members from landless category and medium farmers category are involved in earning activities. On the other hand highest numbers of female household members from medium category of farmers are involved in earning sources.




40 2 42

95.2% 4.8% 100.0%

15.2% 18.2% 15.3%

21 21

100.0% 100.0%

8.0% 7.6%

38 38

100.0% 100.0%

14.4% 13.8%

40 40

100.0% 100.0%

15.2% 14.5%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

13 13

100.0% 100.0%

4.9% 4.7%

34 1 35

97.1% 2.9% 100.0%

12.9% 9.1% 12.7%

7 7

100.0% 100.0%

2.7% 2.5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

1.9% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

29 1 30

96.7% 3.3% 100.0%

11.0% 9.1% 10.9%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

24 7 31

77.4% 22.6% 100.0%

9.1% 63.6% 11.3%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

264 11 275

96.0% 4.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Pottery

Fisherman

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Service

Vill Doc

HH Work

Others

Primary

Occupation

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total

3.1.2 Occupational pattern

Table 3.4: Distribution of households heads according to their main occupation by sex in Chenchuri




1 1 4 6

16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

2.9% 2.9% 2.3% 2.2%

1 5 4 37 47

2.1% 10.6% 8.5% 78.7% 100.0%

3.6% 14.3% 11.4% 21.6% 17.1%

1 6 6 9 59 81

1.2% 7.4% 7.4% 11.1% 72.8% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 17.1% 25.7% 34.5% 29.5%

1 9 13 12 37 72

1.4% 12.5% 18.1% 16.7% 51.4% 100.0%

16.7% 32.1% 37.1% 34.3% 21.6% 26.2%

4 12 10 9 34 69

5.8% 17.4% 14.5% 13.0% 49.3% 100.0%

66.7% 42.9% 28.6% 25.7% 19.9% 25.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 20

21-30

31-40

41-50

51 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

39. From the table it shows that 15% of the sample household heads have own operated agriculture as primary occupation in the study area which is equal to the number of household heads involved in agriculture labour as their primary source of income. It appears from the figures presented in the table that agriculture is the dominant sector where about 53% of the heads of the sample households are engaged as their primary occupation. About 64% of the female headed households have household work as their primary occupation. Only two female headed households (18.2%) have own-operated agriculture as their primary occupation. Only two household heads are involved in fishing as their primary occupation. One of the female headed household is involved in small business as primary occupation as well as one of the female headed household is involved in service. For further information details are provided in the Appendix-4.

Table 3.5: Occupation of households percentage by major sectors and by sex

Primary Occupation Male Female Total

Agriculture 52.8 18.2 15.3

House work 9.1 63.6 11.3

P. Business 12.9 9.1 12.7

Transport, Rik 4.9 0 4.7

Service 11.4 9.1 11.3

Non agri labor 1.1 1.14.0

Artisans 6.2 5.8

Fishermen .8 07

Others 1.1 1.1

Artisans (potter, blacksmith, carpenters, tailor) Service (service, doctor)

3.1.3 Age structure

Table 3.6: Distribution of household heads according to their age group and land category in Chenchuri

40. This particular table demonstrate that highest number of households (59) from landless category belong to the age group of (31-40) which 35% of the total households belong to this particular category of farmers. 22% of the household heads from landless




4 23 18 22 116 183

2.2% 12.6% 9.8% 12.0% 63.4% 100.0%

9.8% 14.2% 9.0% 11.7% 13.8% 12.8%

5 13 27 26 129 200

2.5% 6.5% 13.5% 13.0% 64.5% 100.0%

12.2% 8.0% 13.6% 13.8% 15.4% 14.0%

6 23 30 33 106 198

3.0% 11.6% 15.2% 16.7% 53.5% 100.0%

14.6% 14.2% 15.1% 17.6% 12.6% 13.9%

9 41 53 49 217 369

2.4% 11.1% 14.4% 13.3% 58.8% 100.0%

22.0% 25.3% 26.6% 26.1% 25.9% 25.8%

9 32 40 30 141 252

3.6% 12.7% 15.9% 11.9% 56.0% 100.0%

22.0% 19.8% 20.1% 16.0% 16.8% 17.6%

3 17 22 23 92 157

1.9% 10.8% 14.0% 14.6% 58.6% 100.0%

7.3% 10.5% 11.1% 12.2% 11.0% 11.0%

5 13 9 5 38 70

7.1% 18.6% 12.9% 7.1% 54.3% 100.0%

12.2% 8.0% 4.5% 2.7% 4.5% 4.9%

41 162 199 188 839 1429

2.9% 11.3% 13.9% 13.2% 58.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 5

6-10

11-17

18-30

31-45

46-60

61 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

1 1 4 6

16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

2.9% 2.9% 2.3% 2.2%

1 5 4 37 47

2.1% 10.6% 8.5% 78.7% 100.0%

3.6% 14.3% 11.4% 21.6% 17.1%

1 6 6 9 59 81

1.2% 7.4% 7.4% 11.1% 72.8% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 17.1% 25.7% 34.5% 29.5%

1 9 13 12 37 72

1.4% 12.5% 18.1% 16.7% 51.4% 100.0%

16.7% 32.1% 37.1% 34.3% 21.6% 26.2%

4 12 10 9 34 69

5.8% 17.4% 14.5% 13.0% 49.3% 100.0%

66.7% 42.9% 28.6% 25.7% 19.9% 25.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 20

21-30

31-40

41-50

51 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

category belong to the age group of (21-30) and same number of household heads from this particular category of farmers belongs to the age group of (41-50). 67% of the household heads from large farmer category belong to the age group of (51+). Contrary to that 25% of the total households irrespective of farmers category belong to the age group of 51+ and 30% of the total households irrespective of farmers category are from the age group of (31-40).

Table 3.7: Distribution of household heads according to their age group and land category in Chenchuri

Table 3.8: Distribution of household members according to their age group and land category in Chenchuri




1 6 9 12 103 131

.8% 4.6% 6.9% 9.2% 78.6% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 25.7% 34.3% 60.2% 47.6%

1 6 5 6 8 26

3.8% 23.1% 19.2% 23.1% 30.8% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 14.3% 17.1% 4.7% 9.5%

1 3 3 2 1 10

10.0% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 100.0%

16.7% 10.7% 8.6% 5.7% .6% 3.6%

1 1 1 2 5

20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 100.0%

16.7% 3.6% 2.9% 1.2% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

1 4 5 6 36 52

1.9% 7.7% 9.6% 11.5% 69.2% 100.0%

16.7% 14.3% 14.3% 17.1% 21.1% 18.9%

1 8 13 7 21 50

2.0% 16.0% 26.0% 14.0% 42.0% 100.0%

16.7% 28.6% 37.1% 20.0% 12.3% 18.2%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Can Write Letter

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total


Household Category

Total

3.1.4 Literacy education by land category and sex category

Table 3.9: Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and land category in Chenchuri

41. It appears from the table that 48% of the sample household irrespective of farmers category are illiterate in the Chenchuri Beel Sub-project are which is much below the figure shown in the population census‟91 for Narail district (72%). The table indicates that 79% of the total households belong to landless category are illiterate. The study reveals the fact that only one household within the large farmer category is illiterate. From the data presented in the table shows that about 2% of the sample household heads irrespective of farmer category have the educational level upto Bachelor degree which seems quite significant. About 10% of the sample households irrespective of farmers category have the educational level upto Secondary Certificate while 4% of the sample household heads have the educational level upto Higher Secondary Certificate. About 19% of the sample household heads have education upto class V and 18% have the education between (VI-X).




285 304 589

48.4% 51.6% 100.0%

37.5% 45.4% 41.2%

68 25 93

73.1% 26.9% 100.0%

8.9% 3.7% 6.5%

21 7 28

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

2.8% 1.0% 2.0%

12 1 13

92.3% 7.7% 100.0%

1.6% .1% .9%

3 3 6

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

.4% .4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.1% .1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.1% .1%

3 1 4

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

.4% .1% .3%

221 201 422

52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

29.1% 30.0% 29.5%

145 127 272

53.3% 46.7% 100.0%

19.1% 19.0% 19.0%

760 669 1429

53.2% 46.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

Dip Eng

Can Write Letter

Others

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total

Table 3.10: Distribution of household members according to their educational status and sex in Chenchuri

RESOURCES AND ASSETS

3.1.5 Land tenure by farm size

Table 3.11: Average amounts of land possessions per household according to tenural pattern by sex and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Own Cultivable Land Total Operational Land

Male Female Total Male Female Total

Large 761.50 40.33 801.83 648.00 40.33 830.00

Medium 294.07 2.17 296.25 176.28 1.25 278.64

Small 131.60 0.22 131.82 163.45 0.85 209.62

Marginal 70.00 1.71 78.51 109.91 7.00 116.91

Landless 10.52 0.93 11.45 62.23 1.30 49.78

Total-average 79.62 1.93 81.55 105.73 2.81 119.24

42. This particular table demonstrates the fact that except the medium farmer category all other categories of farmers are operating more land than they have in their




1 4 5 14 24

4.2% 16.7% 20.8% 58.3% 100.0%

3.6% 11.4% 14.3% 8.2% 8.7%

5 4 6 31 46

10.9% 8.7% 13.0% 67.4% 100.0%

17.9% 11.4% 17.1% 18.1% 16.7%

3 7 7 12 47 76

3.9% 9.2% 9.2% 15.8% 61.8% 100.0%

50.0% 25.0% 20.0% 34.3% 27.5% 27.6%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.9% 1.2% 1.1%

1 5 4 11 21

4.8% 23.8% 19.0% 52.4% 100.0%

3.6% 14.3% 11.4% 6.4% 7.6%

2 4 4 45 55

3.6% 7.3% 7.3% 81.8% 100.0%

7.1% 11.4% 11.4% 26.3% 20.0%

2 3 5

40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

5.7% 1.8% 1.8%

2 9 6 17

11.8% 52.9% 35.3% 100.0%

33.3% 32.1% 17.1% 6.2%

1 1 4 6

16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

16.7% 2.9% 2.3% 2.2%

1 7 8

12.5% 87.5% 100.0%

3.6% 4.1% 2.9%

2 2 1 2 7

28.6% 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 100.0%

7.1% 5.7% 2.9% 1.2% 2.5%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

2.3% 1.5%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

5.7% .6% 1.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Soil/Mud

Bamboo

Tin

Chatai

Timber/Wood

Jute Stick

Straw

Pucca

Semi-Pucca

Bamboo + Tin

Wood + Tin

Bamboo +Wood

Tin + Goal /Hogla

Wall

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total

ownership. Contrary to that about 40% of the lands owned by the medium category of farmers are transferred for operational proposes either in the form of share cropping or any other temporary arrangement. On the other hand it shows from the information that small, marginal and landless farmers are operating about 24%, 57% and 49% of more land against their ownership holdings in order to boost their household economy either in the form of share cropping in, or any other temporary arrangement which was not available within the present study.

3.1.6 Housing condition and homestead

Table 3.12: Distribution of households according to their house wall type by land category in Chenchuri

43. The information provided in the table demonstrate the scenario that no household belongs to the large category of farmers have houses with walls made of soil/mud, bamboo, chatai, timber/wood, jute stick, straw, bamboo/tin, wood+tin,




4 27 34 34 160 259

1.5% 10.4% 13.1% 13.1% 61.8% 100.0%

66.7% 96.4% 97.1% 97.1% 93.6% 94.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

1 1 8 10

10.0% 10.0% 80.0% 100.0%

2.9% 2.9% 4.7% 3.6%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

33.3% 3.6% 1.1%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

1.2% .7%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Tin

Jute Stick

Straw

Pucca

Chan

Roof

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total

4 16 14 10 16 60

6.7% 26.7% 23.3% 16.7% 26.7% 100.0%

66.7% 57.1% 40.0% 28.6% 9.4% 21.8%

2 12 21 25 155 215

.9% 5.6% 9.8% 11.6% 72.1% 100.0%

33.3% 42.9% 60.0% 71.4% 90.6% 78.2%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If has Electricity

Total


Household Category

Total

bamboo+wood and tin+goal/hogla. On the other hand 28% of the landless category farmers have houses with walls made of by tin followed by 26% having wall made of by jute stick and 18% having walls made of by bamboo. In the economic term the house condition of any individual household can demonstrate the poverty situation in that particular context. The materials used for making roof of the individual households within the different farmers category have shown in the subsequent tables.

Table 3.13: Distribution of households according to their house roof type by land category in Chenchuri

Table 3.14: Distribution of households according to their responses on if they have electricity by land category in Chenchuri

44. Having access to electricity supply is one of the important indicators for assessing the economic status of a household in the local context. From that point of view it has been found from the table that only 9% of the landless household have the access to power supply in their houses whereas 67% of the large farmers household/ have the power supply in their houses. 57% of the medium farmers, 40% of the small farmers, 29% of the marginal farmers have the access to power supply in their houses within the Chenchuri beel sub-project area. From the PRRA investigation it was reported that about 36% of the households have access to electricity.




3.1.7 Livestock, Poultry and Tree resources

Table 3.15: Average number and value (Taka) of livestock resources according to sex and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Total Livestock Resources Value in Taka

Total

MEAN SD

Large 15275.00 9441.06

Medium 10725.89 8315.72

Small 9275.42 6458.06

Marginal 6183.57 6558.21

Landless 4523.88 5942.17

Total 6205.90 6907.85

45. This table shows the resources the household posses in the area of livestock which is one of the significant assets for the rural households. This particular table also demonstrate the traditional practice that the households have the bigger share in land ownership also have the larger share in livestock ownership as well as also the tree resources for both fruits and timber shown in the next table. In many economy the poor families (in terms of less land holdings) posses more livestock for generating additional income for the households but this is not the case in the study area.

Table 3.16: Average number and value (Taka) of tree resources according to sex and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Total Tree Resources Value in Taka

Total Male Female

MEAN SD MEAN SD MEAN SD

Large 41350.00 24498.22 41350.00 24498.22 0.00 0.00

Medium 19803.64 18827.87 19155.43 17845.86 648.21 2874.90

Small 18703.86 19020.90 16057.14 16450.12 2645.71 12836.23

Marginal 10056.29 14300.34 9852.00 14246.70 204.28 810.44

Landless 3635.96 5663.89 3420.61 5462.78 215.35 982.05

Total 8839.84 14177.54 8277.20 13357.75 562.63 4753.29

3.1.8 Agricultural Equipments

Table 3.17: Average number and value (Taka) of Agricultural Equipments/ Implements according to sex and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Total Agricultural Equipments Value in Taka

Total Male Female


Large 24629.17 56791.36 24562.50 56824.91 66.66 163.29

Medium 3433.57 3871.16 3393.75 3872.45 39.82 107.32

Small 5450.31 7637.89 54.50.31 7637.89 5394.14 7643.87

Marginal 1678.85 1978.22 1621.85 1983.15 57.00 108.95

Landless 1672.14 5365.23 1630.19 5365.81 41.94 88.01

Total 2834.08 991.72 2788.08 9914.74 45.99 100.67

46. This table shows the value of agricultural equipments possessed by different category of households within the study area. The information provided in the table also demonstrates the scenario that the households possessed more land in their ownership have also more agricultural equipments in their possession. This is also the case for




durable assets possessed by sample households and shown in the next Table. For more details about the type of equipments and assets consult the Appendix-4.

3.1.9 Other Assets

Table 3.18: Average number and value (Taka) of household durable assets according to sex and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Total Household Durables Value in Taka

Total Male Female


Large 13186.67 4521.45 12886.67 4590.20 300.00 368.78

Medium 8673.57 6497.79 8205.00 5730.42 468.57 1423.50

Small 7489.00 4647.34 6571.00 4149.17 918.00 2832.52

Marginal 4352.85 4101.27 3807.71 3414.88 545.14 1343.21

Landless 2256.96 2500.16 2073.65 2467.18 183.33 415.63

Total (Average) 4061.41 4551.85 3726.94 4196.01 354.47 1262.41

3.2 Livelihoods

3.2.1 Production and income from major livelihoods

Table 3.19: Average annual income per household according to source in Chenchuri

Land Category Average Annual Income by Source

Agriculture Livestock Non-Agri. Labour


Large 40319.17 28028.93 5666.66 5379.83 0.0 0.0

Medium 22788.93 20711.25 1876.46 3386.13 71.42 377.96

Small 13139.03 10105.48 2244.34 2890.78 674.28 3656.76

Marginal 6999.62 6066.07 1840.85 3261.21 2946.00 6714.46

Landless 3214.27 4966.59 1377.61 3053.30 2990.29 6927.85

Total (Average) 7795.13 12369.94 1691.25 3204.36 2327.45 6193.27


Agriculture Labor Business Fish Dry/ Fish


Large 0.0 0.0 12500.00 30618.62 2518.33 1509.25

Medium 103.57 459.85 17500.00 36775.25 1960.25 2152.15

Small 742.85 2515.74 3965.71 9883.13 3300.42 3163.83

Marginal 2819.42 5604.43 6997.14 13334.42 2099.74 2772.36

Landless 4221.63 6182.36 5015.55 11750..20 1515.06 1869.49

Total (Average) 3089.01 5572.31 6568.58 16899..62 1883.92 2284.48


Urban/Abroad/Remittance Doctor (MBBS) Village Quack/ kabiraj


Large 50000.00 61318.84 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 24107.14 39512.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 18542.86 27592.99 0.0 0.0 1042.85 6169.62

Marginal 7314.28 9538.68 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 12453.22 16488.52 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total (Average) 14580.00 233949.98 0.0 0.0 132.72 2201.03





Begging Livestock Rickshaw/Van


Large 0.0 0.0 5666.66 5379.83 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 1628.57 3414.38 0.0 0.0

Small 0.0 0.0 2058.05 2920.29 168.00 993.90

Marginal 0.0 0.0 1553.00 3262.49 214.28 1267.73

Landless 25.14 306.61 1149.12 2998.35 1455.55 4321.38

Total (Average) 15.63 241.82 1463.58 3182.96 953.74 3510.98


Motor Driving Boatmanship Artisan Product


Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 0.0 0.0 205.71 1217.02 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 0.0 0.0 238.59 1346.54 43.50 400.36

Total (Average) 0.0 0.0 174.54 1148.31 27.05 316.06


Classified Profession Services Nursery


Large 0.0 0.0 27594.33 29992.56 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 9400.28 18993.98 0.0 0.0

Small 314.26 1859.33 8897.14 17686.98 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 10274.29 19326.24 0.0 0.0

Landless 492.10 2663.76 3168.42 11492.96 0.0 0.0

Total (Average) 346.00 2207.94 5969.36 15455.92 00.0 0.0


Others Total Income

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 1000.00 1725.10 145265.20 104077.00

Medium 814.28 1776.32 80250.93 509.57.50

Small 942.85 1638.19 56238.43 34125.20

Marginal 490.00 1244.26 43548.66 24006.36

Landless 474.21 1120.83 37796.73 24432.84

Total (Average) 581.96 1305.41 47543.29 37806.78

47. These tables above present the average annual household income derived from different sources by different category of farmers within the study area. The reported sources as was received from the respondents are agriculture, livestock, non-agriculture labor, agriculture labor, business, fish/dry fish, urban/abroad remittance, medical practice, village quack/ kabuki, begging, rickshaw/van, motor driving, boatmanship, artisan product, clarified profession, services, nursery, and others. As per the




0 1 1 3 30 35

.0% 2.9% 2.9% 8.6% 85.7% 100.0%

.0% 3.6% 2.9% 8.6% 17.5% 12.7%

0 1 8 5 35 49

.0% 2.0% 16.3% 10.2% 71.4% 100.0%

.0% 3.6% 22.9% 14.3% 20.5% 17.8%

1 5 3 9 36 54

1.9% 9.3% 5.6% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

16.7% 17.9% 8.6% 25.7% 21.1% 19.6%

1 6 9 9 44 69

1.4% 8.7% 13.0% 13.0% 63.8% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 25.7% 25.7% 25.7% 25.1%

4 15 14 9 26 68

5.9% 22.1% 20.6% 13.2% 38.2% 100.0%

66.7% 53.6% 40.0% 25.7% 15.2% 24.7%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Income in Tk

Total


Household Category

Total

information provided by the respondents the average annual income of the large farmer households is taka 145265, and that of medium farmers is taka 80250, small farmers is taka 56238, marginal farmers is taka 43548 and landless farmers is taka 37796. It is worthwhile to mention here that major source of deriving annual household income is the agriculture for all categories of farmers except large farmers who are deriving most of their household income from abroad/remittance. Table below shows the distribution of sample households according to the annual income ranging from taka 15000 to 60000+ which indicates that 17% of the landless families, 9% of the marginal families, 3% of the small households, 4% of the medium households have the annual average income upto taka 15000. Contrary to that 20% of the landless households, 14% of the marginal households, 23% of the small households and 4% of the medium households have the average annual income level within the range of taka 15001 to 25000. It is mentionable here that 67% of the large farmers households have the average annual income above 60000 taka.

Table 3.20: Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by land category




1 9 5 4 18 37

2.7% 24.3% 13.5% 10.8% 48.6% 100.0%

25.0% 39.1% 17.2% 18.2% 22.0% 23.1%

2 3 1 7 13

15.4% 23.1% 7.7% 53.8% 100.0%

50.0% 10.3% 4.5% 8.5% 8.1%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

9.1% 1.2% 1.9%

1 3 2 4 10

10.0% 30.0% 20.0% 40.0% 100.0%

4.3% 10.3% 9.1% 4.9% 6.3%

3 5 6 16 30

10.0% 16.7% 20.0% 53.3% 100.0%

13.0% 17.2% 27.3% 19.5% 18.8%

1 5 8 3 19 36

2.8% 13.9% 22.2% 8.3% 52.8% 100.0%

25.0% 21.7% 27.6% 13.6% 23.2% 22.5%

6 6

100.0% 100.0%

7.3% 3.8%

5 5 4 11 25

20.0% 20.0% 16.0% 44.0% 100.0%

21.7% 17.2% 18.2% 13.4% 15.6%

4 23 29 22 82 160

2.5% 14.4% 18.1% 13.8% 51.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Pest Attack

Excessive Rainfall

High Wind

Saline Water Intution

Inadequate Irrigation

Facilities

Draught

Problem of Seed Quality

Others

REASONS

FOR

CROP

DAMAGE

Total


Household Category

Total

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

100.0% 25.0% 28.6%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

50.0% 14.3%

1 3 4

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

50.0% 75.0% 57.1%

2 1 4 7

28.6% 14.3% 57.1% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Huge Production & Supply

during the season

Farmgate Price is Lower

Less Buyer

Reasons for

not Getting

Fair Price

Total

Small Marginal Landless

Household Category

Total

3.2.2 Crop Damage

Table 3.21: Distribution of households who had crop damage in different crop season according to reasons for crop damage by household category in Chenchuri

48. This table indicates that about 23% of the sample household irrespective of farmer category mentioned pest attack as one of the major reason for crop damage during the reporting period whereas 23% mentioned that draught is one of the major reason for crop damage followed by 19% mentioned that inadequate irrigation facilities as one of the reason for their crop damage. Any future intervention likely to be made in the Chenchuri beel area should address these issues as was reported by the sample households.

3.2.3 Paddy Marketing Problems

Table 3.22: Distribution of households who sold-out their crop according to reasons for not getting fair price by household category in Chenchuri




49. This table highlighted the reasons the respondent feel as reasons for not getting fair prices when they are selling their crop. The table shows that 57% of the respondent households mentioned “limited buyer” as reason for not getting fair prices whereas 29% of the respondent households mentioned “huge production and supply during the season” as another reason followed by 14% of the respondent mentioned “Farmgate price is lower” as reason for not getting fair prices.

3.2.4 Access to information

Table 3.23: Percentage of households received training / information by Land category in Chenchuri

Areas Sources of Training (Give Tick )

DAE DOF & Livestock

Youth Ministry

NGO TV/

Radio

Farmer Others (FWA/FWV)

M F M F M F M F M F M F M F

Agriculture

Large 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 3.6 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 21.1 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.1 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 6.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.54 0.4 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


Fishery 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

Livestock 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Health

Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 8.4 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.6

50. In this table effort has made to provide an overview how the technology/information related to Socio-economic development of the area is being transferred and adopted by the different category of farmers in the study area. It appears from the table that other than agricultural extension no substantial initiative is visible in order to disseminate the knowledge and technology in the areas of fishery, livestock, health etc.

3.2.5 Household Annual Expenditure

Table 3.24: Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to source in Chenchuri

Land Category Average Annual Expenditure (Tk.) by Source

Food Education Dowry


Large 32037.50 18848.63 3000.00 5019.96 0.00 0.00

Medium 17274.11 17208.03 1460.71 2962.89 357.14 1311.32

Small 13906.43 12380.36 680.00 1154.73 0.00 0.00

Marginal 14656.71 7652.55 935.42 2002.59 228.57 1352.24

Landless 14426.11 9166.65 397.07 2230.12 239.76 2205.83

Total (Average) 15063.54 11015.38 666.69 2304.77 214.54 1850.56





Shelter Health Clothes


Large 1041.67 19647.94 15450.00 9786.47 6978.33 3614.25

Medium 2321.42 7636.67 5685.00 9772.85 3709.82 3493.31

Small 1925.00 6082.91 2904.42 4208.97 3551.42 2466.13

Marginal 3035.71 10543.74 5915.94 17356.17 3564.28 3877.58

Landless 707.48 2162.51 2190.30 4028.52 1980.84 1950.78

Total (Average) 1533.50 6049.97 3408.13 8140.35 2667.34 2727.11


Recreation Fuel/Electricity Loan Repayment


Large 833.33 2041.24 2237.50 1655.72 5766.66 10174.81

Medium 510.35 939.64 1045.60 874.96 488.39 1334.71

Small 159.42 526.77 2141.17 3611.10 487.14 1426.39

Marginal 61.42 168.07 1290.25 2226.95 245.02 791.27

Landless 21.75 82.08 764.92 708.64 921.55 2523.49

Total (Average) 111.78 488.32 1067.65 1706.25 841.77 2637.28


Loan Int. Repayment Agriculture Inputs Others


Large 500.00 1224.74 16778.33 25714.46 0.00 0.00

Medium 73.39 220.95 9412.03 10878.74 3607.14 16223.76

Small 163.62 847.93 8974.88 6329.61 436.57 1777.07

Marginal 25.25 85.74 6078.51 8614.48 218.57 607.31

Landless 270.60 1031.49 2962.15 3923.12 407.71 1799.09

Total (Average) 210.46 890.00 5097.72 7583.56 704.17 5417.45


Mean SD

Large 100540.00 47164.79

Medium 47164.79 30176.99

Small 36928.83 15254.18

Marginal 37303.09 24379.26

Landless 25934.84 14985.27

Total (Average) 32759.40 23059.94

51. This Table illustrate the average annual expenditure made by different categories of farmers. The main item as was mentioned by the respondents are food, education, dowry, shelter, health, clothes, recreation, fuel/electricity, loan repayment, loan interest repayment, agriculture inputs, and others. From the data it can be analysed that for the large farmers major area of expenditure is food followed by purchase of agricultural inputs and health. For the medium farmers the major area of expenditure is food followed by purchase of agricultural inputs and health. For the small farmers the major area expenditure is food followed by purchase of agricultural inputs and clothes. For the marginal farmers the major area of expenditure is food followed by purchase of agricultural inputs and health. For the landless farmers the major area of expenditure is




5 1 2 37 45

11.1% 2.2% 4.4% 82.2% 100.0%

17.9% 2.9% 5.7% 21.6% 16.4%

3 7 8 59 77

3.9% 9.1% 10.4% 76.6% 100.0%

10.7% 20.0% 22.9% 34.5% 28.0%

5 17 14 56 92

5.4% 18.5% 15.2% 60.9% 100.0%

17.9% 48.6% 40.0% 32.7% 33.5%

1 6 6 8 13 34

2.9% 17.6% 17.6% 23.5% 38.2% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 17.1% 22.9% 7.6% 12.4%

5 9 4 3 6 27

18.5% 33.3% 14.8% 11.1% 22.2% 100.0%

83.3% 32.1% 11.4% 8.6% 3.5% 9.8%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Expenditure Tk

Total


Household Category

Total

food followed by purchase of agricultural inputs and health. From the household income and expenditure data it can be analysed that for all categories of farmers the average annual income is higher than the amount shown as annual average expenditure made by all categories of farmers.

Table 3.25: Consolidated incomes and expenditure by land category


Total income Total Expenditures

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 145665.20 104752.50 100540.00 47164.79

Medium 64625.93 45424.63 47164.79 30176.99

Small 42952.71 28417.92 36624.41 15254.18

Marginal 37350.09 21961.20 37303.09 24379.26

Landless 27596.69 21330.62 26169.74 14985.27

Total (Average) 37209.91 35317.17 32759.40 23059.94

Table 3.26: Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure range by land category in Chenchuri

52. This table illustrate the fact that 34% of the sample household irrespective of farmer category have the gross expenditure within the range of taka 25001-40000. 28% of the sample household irrespective of farmer category have the gross expenditure within the range of taka 15001-25000. 16% of the sample household irrespective of farmer category have the gross expenditure upto the range of taka 15000. Only 10% of the sample household have the gross expenditure range above taka 60000 per annum.




3 1 7 34 45

6.7% 2.2% 15.6% 75.6% 100.0%

50.0% 10.0% 43.8% 27.0% 28.5%

1 1 1 56 59

1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 94.9% 100.0%

16.7% 10.0% 6.3% 44.4% 37.3%

1 1 4 6

16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

10.0% 6.3% 3.2% 3.8%

2 4 5 14 25

8.0% 16.0% 20.0% 56.0% 100.0%

33.3% 40.0% 31.3% 11.1% 15.8%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

3.2% 2.5%

3 2 14 19

15.8% 10.5% 73.7% 100.0%

30.0% 12.5% 11.1% 12.0%

6 10 16 126 158

3.8% 6.3% 10.1% 79.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Limited Job Opportunity

Less Production due to

Water Logging

Frequent Illness

Single Earning Member


Poor Soil Ferti lity

Others

Reasons

for Food

Shortage

Total

Medium Small Marginal Landless

Household Category

Total

3.2.6 Food Security

Table 3.27: Distribution of households who had food shortage according to reasons for food shortage by land category in Chenchuri

53. In this table attempt has been made to highlight the reason for food shortage in their household level which can give some indication about the poverty situation prevailing in the household level. It is found from the table that 37% of the respondent household irrespective of farmer category mentioned “less production due to water logging” as the reason for having food shortage in their household level. About 29% of the respondent household mentioned “limited job opportunity” as one of the reason for having food shortage in their household level. About 16% of the respondent household mentioned “Single Earning Member” as one of the reason for having food shortage in their household level. Any poverty reduction initiative likely to be taken should address these issues in designing future intervention in Chenchuri beel sub-project area.

Table 3.28: Per capita per day major food item consumed according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Major Food Items Large Medium Small Marginal Landless Total (average)

Rice (kg) 0.410 0.470 0.560 0.550 0.510 0.510

Wheat (kg) 0.061 0.016 0.014 0.014 0.003 0.008

Meat (kg) 0.170 0.100 0.140 0.077 0.033 0.063

Egg (No) 0.480 0.540 0.530 0.640 0.450 0.490

Fish (kg) 0.078 0.069 0.074 0.099 0.096 0.091

Milk (kg) 0.120 0.100 0.100 0.076 0.050 0.068

Vegetables (kg) 0.087 0.078 0.092 0.113 0.112 0.106

Pulses (kg) 0.049 0.035 0.042 0.044 0.041 0.041

Oil (kg) 0.015 0.022 0.026 0.021 0.022 0.022

Fruits (kg) 0.061 0.767 0.051 0.039 0.028 0.108

54. This table indicates usual food intake by the sample household belong to different categories which might be helpful in measuring calorie intake by the respondent in the study area as well as to assess the poverty situation in Chenchuri beel area.




3.2.7 Household Vulnerability

Table 3.29: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on type of vulnerability context affected their well-being in Chenchuri

Vulnerability Context Percentage Vulnerability Context Percentage

Flood 12.0 Siltation 8.4

Water Logging 19.6 Storm 4.7

Cyclone 2.2 Salinity 9.5

Draught 61.8 River Erosion 7.3

Loss of Bio-diversity 0.7 Others (death, disease

etc.)

2.9

Excessive Rainfall 35.6

55. It was tried to figure out how far the resident of the study area are vulnerable to different context related to water and non-water issues which might help in designing the future intervention. Irrespective of farmer category mentioned that they are vulnerable to seasonal draught. About 36% of the respondent household mentioned that they are vulnerable to excessive rainfall whereas about 20% of the respondent household irrespective of farmer category mentioned that they are vulnerable to water logging. About 13% reported that they are vulnerable to flood.

3.2.8 Savings and Credit

Table 3.30: Average amount of debt (Taka) per land category and average interest

Sources of Loan Large Medium Small Marginal Landless Total loan (average) Interest (average)

Bank 39633.33 0.00 10000.0 3633.33 7688.21 11497.40 11.28

Money Lender 0.00 0.00 1200.00 0.00 3667.77 3421.00 79.00

Relatives 40000.00 17000.00 12500.00 1000.00 200.00 11177.78 0.00

NGOs 0.00 0.00 3507.75 6432.40 3098.23 3379.90 18.72

Others 0.00 0.00 0.00 3000.00 1615.00 2076.66 13.33

Total 52966.67 11658.33 8710.07 5229.11 3895.45 6164.85

56. This indicates the potential sources available in the study area for providing credit facility. The study reveals that commercial bank, money lenders, relatives, NGOs and others are the sources active in farmers and medium farmers did not borrow any amount from the traditional money lenders and NGOs whereas they borrowed substantial amount of money from their relatives. On the other hand marginal and landless farmers borrowed substantial amount of credit from commercial bank and NGOs. About the interest rate charged it reveals the fact that the money lenders are charging maximum rate of interest followed by NGOs and others. The table indicates that commercial bank plays a dominant role in providing credit amount followed by relatives and money lenders.




3 15 22 23 101 164

1.8% 9.1% 13.4% 14.0% 61.6% 100.0%

50.0% 53.6% 62.9% 65.7% 59.1% 59.6%

1 1 2 14 18

5.6% 5.6% 11.1% 77.8% 100.0%

3.6% 2.9% 5.7% 8.2% 6.5%

3 5 6 53 67

4.5% 7.5% 9.0% 79.1% 100.0%

10.7% 14.3% 17.1% 31.0% 24.4%

3 9 7 4 3 26

11.5% 34.6% 26.9% 15.4% 11.5% 100.0%

50.0% 32.1% 20.0% 11.4% 1.8% 9.5%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total


Household Category

Total

5 23 33 31 155 247

2.0% 9.3% 13.4% 12.6% 62.8% 100.0%

83.3% 85.2% 94.3% 88.6% 90.6% 90.1%

1 4 2 4 16 27

3.7% 14.8% 7.4% 14.8% 59.3% 100.0%

16.7% 14.8% 5.7% 11.4% 9.4% 9.9%

6 27 35 35 171 274

2.2% 9.9% 12.8% 12.8% 62.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

If <5 children

has diarrhea

Total


Household Category

Total

3.3 Health and Hygiene

Table 3.31: Distribution of households according to type of latrine used by land category in Chenchuri

57. From the table it indicates that only 10% of the sample household irrespective of farmer category are using sanitary latrine. About 60% of the sample household irrespective of farmer category are using “ring slab” 24% are using hanging toilet and about 7% have open defecation. Among the large farmer category 50% are using ring slab and 50% are using sanitary latrine. Among the landless category 59% of the household using ring slab, 8% using open defecation, 31% have hanging toilet and only about 2% using sanitary latrine. Of the medium farmers about 54% using ring slab, 4% using open defecation, 11% using hanging latrine, and 32% using sanitary latrine. Among the small farmer category 63% using ring slab, 3% using open defecation, 14% using hanging toilet and 20% using sanitary latrine. Among the marginal farmers 66% using ring slab, 6% using open defecation, 17% using hanging toilet and 11% using sanitary latrine.

Table 3.32: Distribution of households suffering from diarrhoea <5 children

58. The table demonstrate that about 10% of the sample household irrespective of land category have experience that their children under 5 yrs attacked by diarrhea during the last two weeks of the study conducted. Among the affected children 59% are from the landless category, 15% are from marginal category, 7% are from small category, 15% are from medium category and 4% are from the large category.




Table 3.33: Percentage Distribution of Household using different Water Sources according to Use Pattern

Water Sources Water Sources Used in Percentage

Cooking Drinking Washing Bathing Irrigation

Tube–well 48.0 95.0 32.0 16.0 1.0

Pond 43.0 1.0 69.0 72.0 2.0

DTW 4.0 10.0 0.4 0.7 5.0

STW 0.7 0.4 0.7 1.0 54.0

Well/Kua 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4

Rain Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.0

Surface Water 0.4 0.4 1.0 4.0 3.0

Others (specific) 13.0 0.0 13.0 18.0 3.0

59. In this table attempt has been made to present the scenario that from which sources the resident of the study area are managing their water requirements. From the data it indicates that 48% of the sample household use tube-well water for cooking, 95% of the sample household use tube-well water for drinking purposes, 32% of the sample household use tube-well water for washing, 16% of the sample household use tube-well water for bathing and only 1% of the sample household use tube-well water for irrigation. On the other hand 43% of the sample household use pond-water for cooking, 1% of the household use pond water for drinking, 69% of the household use pond water for washing, 72% of the household use pond water for bathing and only 2% of the household use pond-water for irrigation. 4% of the household use DTW water for cooking, 10% household use DTW water for drinking, 0.4% use DTW water for washing, 0.7% household use DTW water for bathing and 5% of the household use DTW water for irrigation. Contrary to that 0.7% of the household use STW water for cooking, 0.4% of the household use STW water for drinking, 0.7% use STW water for washing, 1% use STW water for bathing and 54% of the household use STW water for irrigation.

Table 3.34: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on their sufferings during the last one year by major diseases and land category in Chenchuri

Major Diseases Large Medium Small Marginal Landless Total

ARI-Fever-Cough 33.3 42.9 22.9 31.4 40.9 37.5

Dysentery-Diarrhea 0.0 14.3 17.1 2.9 11.1 10.9

Gastric 33.3 14.3 20.0 20.0 19.9 19.6

Arthritis 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.2

X-thma 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.2

Exima 0.0 0.0 2.9 5.7 0.6 1.5

Typhoid 0.0 7.1 5.7 2.9 4.1 4.4

Zondish (Hepa-B) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.07

Female Diseases 0.00 3.6 2.9 0.0 2.3 2.2

60. From the table it indicates that the large farmer category of the respondents are suffering from Ari-fever-Cough (33%) and gastric (33%) only. But the medium farmer category are suffering from ARI-fever-Cough (43%), Dysentry-Diarrhea (14%) and Gastric (14%). The small farmer category usually suffering from ARI-fever-Cough (23%), Dysentry-Diarrhea (17%), Gastric (20%) and Typhoid (6%). The marginal farmer category suffers from ARI-fever-Cough (31%), Gastric (20%), X-thma (3%), and Exima (6%). The landless farmers mostly suffer from ARI-fever-Cough (37%),




Dysentry-Diarrhea (11%), Gastric (20%) and Typhoid (4.5%). The most common diseases found from the study are ARI-fever-Cough, Gastric and Dysentry-Diarrhea.

3.4 Gender Dimensions and Participation

Table 3.35: Distribution of Households in % about major Dimensions of Participation

Components/ Factors Women Men

No L M H No L M H

1. Control over household resources (land, crop, cow, etc.) 22.2 58.9 13.5 4.4 0.7 6.5 30.5 58.2

2. Mobility inside the community (relative, shop, group meeting, etc.)

35.3 45.5 18.5 0.7 4.0 6.5 40.7 45.8

3. Mobility outside the community (market, labor, crop field, hospital, bank, fair, movie, etc.)

35.6 50.5 12.7 0.4 4.7 6.9 28.7 54.9

4. Participation at the Household Decisions:

a. Decision to have new children 27.6 37.1 28.4 3.6 2.5 6.5 40.0 45.5

b. Decision to undertake new economic activity 34.5 43.3 18.2 2.9 1.1 9.1 41.1 44.7

c. Decision to purchase/sell of property 34.2 40.4 20.4 3.3 2.2 8.7 30.9 54.5

d. Decision to children schooling 16.4 38.9 27.3 15.3 4.4 16.0 51.3 25.1

e. Decision to children marriage 21.8 40.4 29.8 3.6 2.9 11.6 35.3 44.4

f. Decision to buy inputs and daily essentials 20.7 42.9 29.5 4.4 0.7 12.0 40.7 41.8

5. Participation at the Community Decisions:

a. Participation in Mosque/Mondir Committee 90.9 6.2 1.5 0.0 18.2 19.6 25.5 33.1

b. Participation in Village Shalish 91.5 5.5 1.5 0.4 19.6 23.6 28.5 26.9

c. Participation in Village Development Activities 87.6 6.5 4.0 0.4 22.5 26.5 24.0 23.6

d. Participation in School Management Committee 86.5 8.0 3.3 1.1 28.7 25.5 18.2 24.4

e. Participation in Union Parishad 86.2 6.5 5.1 0.4 18.5 28.0 23.6 25.8

6. Knowledge and Awareness: 53.5 34.9 7.6 0.4 13.1 46.2 29.5 6.2

a. Law related to Marriage and divorce 58.2 32.7 7.3 1.1 12.7 44.4 32.0 5.8

b. Law related to inheritance rights 56.4 33.8 8.0 0.4 17.8 44.4 26.2 6.5

c. Legal process to torture and inhuman treatment 41.5 32.4 16.7 2.5 4.7 33.1 34.5 21.5

L =low, M = Medium, H = High

61. This table tries to present an overall scenario about the participation of male and female members of the household regarding different issues influencing the livelihood and position of different household members from the perspective of the household as well as from the community at large. The table indicates that in 81% of the sample household female members do not have any role on control over household resources, 80% of the household women do not go to shop, meeting or community like market, bank, hospital etc. About the female participation in household decision 64% of the household women do not have any role on decision to have new children, 77% of the household women do not have any role on decision to undertake new economic activity, 74% of the household women do not have any role on decision to purchase/ sell of property, 55% of women do not have any role on decision to children schooling, 62% of the household women do not have any role on decision to children marriage, and 63% of the household women do not have nay role on decision to buy inputs and daily essentials.

62. Regarding the community level participation 97% of the household women do not participate in mosque/ mandir committee, 97% of the household women do not participate in village shalish, 94% household women do not participate in village development activities, 94% household women do not participate in school management committee.

63. About knowledge and awareness of women on certain laws their position are about 90% of women do not aware about marriage and divorce laws, 90% of women do




not have the knowledge about laws related to inheritance rights and 73% of women do not aware about legal process for torturing and inhuman treatment.

Table 3.36: Percentage of Household According to their Access and Participation in the Different Service Centres by Sex in Chenchuri

Services Percentage Services Percentage

Male Female Male Female

1. Department of Agricultural Extension 16.7 0.7 14.Grameen Bank 1.8 6.2

2. Department of Fisheries 5.8 0.0 15. Other Government Offices (BRDB) 4.0 0.4

3. Forest Department 1.1 0.0 16. LGED 3.3 0.0

4. Agri Private Companies (seed, fertilizer, pesticide) 22.5 0.7 17. Union Parishad 42.5 5.1

5. Govt. Family Planning 5.5 38.5 18. Land Registration Office 12.4 0.0

6. Union Health Center 9.5 25.1 19. School/College 41.8 20.4

7. Upazila Health Center 14.5 10.2 20. Security Department (Police, VDP) 4.7 0.4

8.Govt. Immunization Services 10.5 35.6 21. Post Office 44.7 10.5

9. Private Health Services 25.1 18.9 22. Upazila/District Court 9.1 1.1

10. Veterinary Hospital 6.5 0.4 23. Telephone 38.5 12.7

11. Public Health Department 6.2 5.5 24. REB/ PDB 15.6 1.5

12. Commercial/ Krishi Bank 17.5 1.8 25.Social Welfare/ Women Affairs 17.1 10.9

13. NGOs/CBOs (specify name) 6.2 21.1 26. Others (specify) 0.4 0.0

3.5 Problems and Suggestions

Table 3.37: Percentage Distribution of Households According to major Problems by Land Category in Chenchuri sub project

Major Problems related to Agriculture Land Category Total

Landless Marginal Small Medium Large

Poor quality of seed/fertilizer/pesticide 28.65 22.86 51.43 50.00 33.33 33.09

Drought 20.47 22.86 25.71 32.14 50.00 23.27

Fertilizer/Insecticide/Seed Crisis 14.62 22.86 28.57 32.14 33.33 19.64

Insect attacked/virus 19.30 17.14 14.29 25.00 33.33 19.27

Water logging 10.53 28.57 17.14 21.43 50.00 15.64

Fertilizer/Insecticide/Seed cost high 14.04 17.14 17.14 14.29 0.00 14.55

Less used of composed/ cow dung 6.43 20.00 11.43 21.43 83.33 10.91

Heavy Rain 6.43 11.43 14.29 17.86 16.67 9.45

Lack of Agriculture Inputs/cost high 20.47 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.91

Salinity 4.68 5.71 14.29 7.14 0.00 6.18

Irrigation irregular/cost is high 2.92 5.71 5.71 3.57 16.67 4.00

Financial/Economical Problems 4.09 2.86 2.86 3.57 0.00 3.64

Lack of Cultivable land/share cropping land 6.43 2.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.27

Irrigation cost high/water crisis 4.68 0.00 5.71 3.57 0.00 3.27

Lack of Modern technology/HYV 2.92 5.71 0.00 3.57 0.00 2.91

Share cropper get less crop/ less amount of

crop/share cropping land crisis

4.09 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.55

Natural soil/land fertility lost gradually 10.53 0.00 0.00 3.57 16.67 2.18

Agri labor crisis in pick period 14.04 0.00 0.00 10.71 33.33 1.82

Agri labor wage rate poor 14.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82

Flood/Flash Flood 1.75 0.00 2.86 0.00 0.00 1.45

Water crisis/ During Pick Boro Season- Water layer

goes down

1.75 0.00 2.86 3.57 0.00

1.45




Major Problems related to Agriculture Land Category Total


Lack of Agriculture Training 28.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73

Canal/beel/river silted 20.47 0.00 0.00 3.57 0.00 0.36

Poor agriculture labor wage/monsoon agriculture

labor do not get job/migrated out

10.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00

Lack of Agriculture equipment 14.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Sudden Flash flood damaged Amon paddy 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Lost soil fertility 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Problems related to Fish Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total

Pond /canal silted /dry up/ No fish ghears/pond/less

fish /Current jal

23.39 45.71 37.14 28.57 1.75 29.09

Fish diseases 14.04 20.00 25.71 21.43 2.92 18.55

Flood inundated pond/ fish moves to other place 10.53 20.00 11.43 17.86 1.17 13.09

Fish growth is very poor 5.26 14.29 20.00 14.29 1.75 10.18

Fish stolen/breading fish is lost 5.26 20.00 14.29 10.71 1.75 9.82

Fish fry cost high/Poor farmer can not purchase fish

fry/Disease Fry/carrying high /Poor quality of fish fry

6.43 11.43 17.14 7.14 1.17

9.09

Lack of Training on Fish culture/aquiculture 5.26 20.00 11.43 7.14 0.58 8.36

No fishing pond/canal 6.43 8.57 5.71 7.14 0.00 6.55

Fish feed cost high 2.92 2.86 5.71 7.14 0.00 3.64

Gher water rotten 1.17 2.86 0.00 0.00 0.58 1.45

Others Major Problems Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total

Arsenic contaminated water/lack of safe

water/crisis of safe water

29.24 51.43 40.00 32.14 66.67

34.55

Poor quality of earthen/pacca road/rough road 30.41 31.43 25.71 25.00 50.00 29.82

Electricity scarcity 8.77 20.00 11.43 7.14 16.67 10.55

Fish /money Stolen/ Robbing 1.17 2.86 5.71 17.86 66.67 5.09

Early Marriage/Marriage in under age/Dowry 2.92 8.57 11.43 3.57 16.67 5.09

Lack of health services 2.92 8.57 5.71 3.57 16.67 4.36

Limited number of institutions 4.68 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 4.36

Lack of sanitary toilet 2.92 5.71 5.71 3.57 0.00 3.64

Less number of income earning member 2.34 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.91

Unstable day labor work/Lack of work(labor)/Low

wage rate for day labor/expense is higher than

income

2.34 2.86 2.86 0.00 0.00

2.18

Insufficient of VGD card 1.17 2.86 2.86 0.00 0.00 1.45

Financial problems 1.17 0.00 2.86 0.00 0.00 1.09

After election o\rulling party threaten 1.17 2.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09

Unplanned constructed houses created unhygienic

environment

0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.36

Less scope of Women work 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36

64. From the table it shows that 29% of the landless household, 23% of the marginal household, 51% of the small farmers household, 50% of the medium farmers household and 33% of the large farmer household mentioned poor quality of seed/fertilizer/pesticide as problem. 23% of sample household mentioned draught as problem, 19% of the sample household mentioned insect attacked/virus as problem and




16% of the sample household mentioned water logging as problem. 15% of the sample household found high price of fertilizer/insecticide/seed as problem, 11% of the household found minimum use of cowdung/composed as problem. Regarding fishery problem about 29% of household mentioned pond/canal silted up as problem, 18% of the respondents found fish diseases as one of the problem, 13% of the respondents found pond/canal inundated by flood as problem and about 8% of the respondent found lack of training on fish culture/aquaculture as constricts for fish culture. Among other major problems identified by respondents 34% mentioned crisis of safe drinking water as problem, 30% found poor quality of road as problems.

Table 3.38: Percentage Distribution of Households According to Major suggestions by Land Category in Chenchuri sub project

Major Suggestions Land Category Total


Constructed environmentally sound and qualitative bridge/road

29.82 31.43 25.71 28.57 50.00 29.82

Ensure Arsenic Free safe Water/install DTW 22.81 22.86 45.71 17.86 0.00 24.73

Salinity tolerant variety paddy seed 8.19 31.43 25.71 35.71 116.67 18.55

Canal re-excavation/Irrigation from canal/Irrigation system introduce by Govt.

12.28 11.43 22.86 25.00 66.67 16.00

Free /low cost Irrigation 12.28 14.29 8.57 21.43 0.00 12.73

Making electricity available for all houses 11.11 11.43 17.14 7.14 0.00 11.27

Reduce the price of fertilizer/seed/ insecticide/fuel/within purchase capacity/available/subsidy

6.43 2.86 20.00 14.29 16.67 8.73

Embankment & Sluice gate should be construct with proper environmental assessment.

4.68 11.43 14.29 3.57 16.67 6.91

Create Job to stop Migration out in monsoon/less work in monsoon

6.43 11.43 8.57 0.00 0.00 6.55

Ensure health services in the community level specially for poor/Ensure Medicine /Ensure qualified doctor

5.26 2.86 2.86 10.71 33.33 5.82

Khash land should distribute among landless farmer. 4.09 8.57 5.71 0.00 0.00 4.36

Stop early marriage/ control multi marriage /control dowry and reduce illiteracy

2.92 5.71 5.71 3.57 0.00 3.64

Alternate Job/Business create 2.92 8.57 5.71 0.00 0.00 3.64

Ensure Agriculture Loan for poor/landless farmer with low interest rate from Govt./NGO. Easy loan from NGO/Bank with low interest rate

2.92 5.71 2.86 0.00 16.67 3.27

Control breading catching 1.75 5.71 2.86 7.14 16.67 3.27

Canal/pond/river re-excavation 1.75 8.57 2.86 3.57 16.67 3.27

Agriculture labor wage should increased 2.34 8.57 2.86 0.00 0.00 2.91

Govt. should control poor/inferior quality of fertilizer/Seed/ Insecticide/inputs

1.75 2.86 0.00 10.71 0.00 2.55

Training/suggestion needed on modern agriculture from Agri.Dept.

2.92 2.86 0.00 3.57 0.00 2.55

Agriculture Officer of Upazila/Union provide training to poor farmer at community level

1.75 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.55

Create job opportunity for unemployed youth. 4.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.55

Political harassment / 1.75 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.55

Local Crop variety scarcity 1.75 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.55

Created a fish culture zone/place with govt. subsidy 2.92 0.00 0.00 3.57 0.00 2.18

Training/encourage on cattle/poultry/aquaculture/agriculture

2.34 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.18

VGD card for poor 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82

Build Public Toilet 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82

Control Current Jal/Net 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.71 33.33 1.82






Create job opportunity for women & increased their wage rate.

2.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45

Govt. should control the Mussel men. 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36

Govt. should initiate to supply free fish fry in Beel for poor community.

0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36

Agriculture labor wage rate should be increased 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

65. About measures for improving the situation 30% of the household mentioned construction of environmental friendly bridge/road, 25% mentioned to ensure arsenic free safe drinking water, 18% pond salinity tolerant veracity paddy seed 16% mentioned re-excavation of canal in order to ensure uninterrupted irrigation water during dry session, 13% recommended for low cost irrigation system and 11% mentioned that electricity should be made available for all houses. About 9% of the respondent mentioned to reduce the price of fertilizer/seed/insecticide, 4% of the respondent mentioned that their land should be distributed among the landless farmers.

3.6 Environmental Aspects

Table 3.39: Different Fish Species Available in Beel and River in Chenchuri

Fish Species Beel River Cultured

Puti

Taki

Shing

Kai

Chuchri

Pabda

Royna/Bheda

Shoul

Tengra

Kaoira

Magur

Roi

Kathol

Silver Carp

Mrigel

American Roi

American Mrigel

Telapia

Grass carp

Sharputi

Miror Carp/Minor carp

Japani puti

Bele

Chela

Baing

Paisha/Faisha

Chingri

Chaina Puti





Elisha

Pangash

Boyal

Bhetki Bele

Bacha

Mola

Ayeir

Chitol

Common carp

Gajar

Guzi

Golsha

Khalisha

Chapila

Chanda

Kakle

Vetki

Laita

Fali

Bashpata

African Magur

Naylotika

American Puti

Rita

Kholla

Kali Baosh

Cheng

Briged

Tepa

Nola

Moya

Dankina

Gochai/Gochi

Gotum

Table 3.40: Name of Different Wild Animals Available in the Area in Chenchuri

Sl.# Name of the Wild Animals Sl.# Name of the Wild Animals

1 Pecha 27 Payra/Kabutar

2 Khadash 28 Baipakhi

3 Golbagh 29 Chil

4 Kadthukra 30 Kak

5 Bano Hash 31 Shap (Snake)

6 Kat Birali 32 Kukur (Dog)

7 Shiyal 33 Kura Dhunkor

8 Idur 34 Pat Shiyal

9 Babai 35 Bagdasha




10 Machh Ranga 36 Guishap

11 Bano Biral 37 Haldia

12 Moyna 38 Kokil

13 Pankuri 39 Tara

14 Dongkor 40 Badur

15 Charai 41 Ghoghu

16 Doyel 42 Biya

17 Shalik 43 Oud

18 Bezi 44 Bele Hash

19 Bak 45 Dahuk

20 Tiya 46 Baz pakhi

21 Chiri Sona Bai 47 Tota

22 Kakrash 48 Finge

23 Kali Pecha 49 Hutum Pecha (Butum Pecha)

24 Tuntoni (Tona) 50 Ghargosh

25 Shamuk dohor 51 Chiea

26 Bulbuli 52 Ghariyal

Table 3.41: Trees Available in Chenchuri

Name of Fruits Tree Name of Timber Trees Medicinal Plant

Kathal Mehaguni Niem

Coconut Karai/Rendi Tulshi

Tal Rendi/Raintree Baira

Salon Debdaru Hartuki

Aym (Mango) Shiris Kela kuch-Leaf

Jam (Black Barry) Akash moni Dhutra

Lichu Chambal Shiuli

Peyara Epilapil Akand

Sobeda Shishu Bashak

Kamranga Uriash/uriyum Ulatkambal

Amra Shegun Chalta

Barai Babla Pathor kuchi

Jamrul Bakul Orjun

Ata Tetul Telakoch

Bel Kadam Gheeta kanchan

Kodbel Papor Nishinda

Khejur (date) Bat

Shal Mandar

Jambura Shirij

Bel Chatka

Gabh




Table 3.42: Vegetable Available in Chenchuri

Summer Vegetable Winter Vegetable

Mistri Kumar Mula

Chal Kumar Mula Shak

Kachu Shim (Country Beans)

Potol Bada kafi

Derosh Botbati (labey beans)

Chichinga / Kushi Lao (Bottle Guard)

Lati Palongshak

Kakrol Ful kafi

Karolla Lalshak

Begun Gul Alu

Jhinga Misti Alu

Data Pani kumra

Lalshak Gazar

Alu Khira

Baro shim Motor shuti

Osta Motor shak

Lao(Bottle Guard) Oul/ oul kafi

Pape (papaya) Tomato

Dundol Begun

Mukhi Puishak

Gadi Lao (Bottle Guard)

Kancha kala Misty Kumra

Botbati (labey beans) Pape

Puishak Misti Alu

Shasha Gol Alu

Patshak Shalgom

Motor shuti




2 10 21 21 90 144

1.4% 6.9% 14.6% 14.6% 62.5% 100.0%

25.0% 33.3% 43.8% 61.8% 58.1% 52.4%

2 8 13 6 52 81

2.5% 9.9% 16.0% 7.4% 64.2% 100.0%

25.0% 26.7% 27.1% 17.6% 33.5% 29.5%

2 8 9 6 10 35

5.7% 22.9% 25.7% 17.1% 28.6% 100.0%

25.0% 26.7% 18.8% 17.6% 6.5% 12.7%

2 4 5 1 3 15

13.3% 26.7% 33.3% 6.7% 20.0% 100.0%

25.0% 13.3% 10.4% 2.9% 1.9% 5.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

1-4

5-6

7-9

10 +

HH Member

Size

Total


Household Category

Total

4 Major Socio-Economic basic figures in Narail Sub-project

66. All the data collected during the socio-economic survey in June 2004 have been processed and tabulated. All the tables produced for Narail Sub-project are available in the Appendix-5. Here below are presented the salient information of the area.

4.1 Demographic Profile

67. The household size within the different land categories is presented through the following tables.

Table 4.1: Distribution of households according to their member size and land category

68. Table 4.1 from the above table it indicates that highest number of households are from the landless category within the age group of 1-4 followed by the same category of farmers within the age group of 5-6. On the other hand it shows that minimum number of household (1) are from the marginal category of farmers within the age group of 10+. In the large category of farmers all age groups have same number of households (2) for more details additional information is provided in the annexure.

4.1.1 Family size

Table 4.2: Average Households Size according to Land Category



Mean 6.50 6.27 5.83 4.76 4.38 4.95

SD 3.21 2.73 3.66 2.09 7.71 2.47


69. The table demonstrate the fact that the family size of large category of farmers is the biggest (6.50) followed by medium category of farmers (6.27). This table also present another characteristic that is the landless category has the smallest size of family in the




Narail Sub-project area which is indeed the opposite scenario of the traditional belief i.e. poor people are reluctant to practice the population control devices. Of course this is the initial explanation but there might be any other explanation as well. The average family size in Narail district is 4.9 against the national average 5.6. So it appears that the category of large, medium and small farmers have the family size above the district and national average.

Table 4.3: Average Size of Household Earning Member According to Sex and Land Category

Household Category Male Female Total


Large 1.88 0.83 0.00 0.00 1.88 0.83

Medium 1.73 0.83 0.03 0.18 1.77 0.86

Small 1.42 0.79 0.06 0.24 1.48 0.85

Marginal 1.32 0.64 0.15 0.36 1.47 0.66

Landless 1.25 0.66 0.18 0.42 1.43 0.69

Total 1.36 0.72 0.13 0.36 1.49 0.75

70. It appears from the data that no female numbers of the large farmers family is involved in any earning sources contrary to that it also indicates from the same table that highest number of male members from large farmers category is involved in earning sources. Lowest number of male member from landless category are involved in earning activities. On the other hand highest number of female members from landless category are involved in earning sources.




81 1 82

98.8% 1.2% 100.0%

30.9% 7.7% 29.8%

28 28

100.0% 100.0%

10.7% 10.2%

42 42

100.0% 100.0%

16.0% 15.3%

20 2 22

90.9% 9.1% 100.0%

7.6% 15.4% 8.0%

8 3 11

72.7% 27.3% 100.0%

3.1% 23.1% 4.0%

15 15

100.0% 100.0%

5.7% 5.5%

16 1 17

94.1% 5.9% 100.0%

6.1% 7.7% 6.2%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5%

11 11

100.0% 100.0%

4.2% 4.0%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

19 6 25

76.0% 24.0% 100.0%

7.3% 46.2% 9.1%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

262 13 275

95.3% 4.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Tailor-Handi

Service

Teacher

Homeo Doc

HH Work

Boatmanship

Primary

Occupation

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total

4.1.2 Occupation pattern

Table 4.4: Distribution of households heads according to their Primary occupation by sex -Sub project area




1 4 2 7

14.3% 57.1% 28.6% 100.0%

2.1% 11.8% 1.3% 2.5%

3 4 46 53

5.7% 7.5% 86.8% 100.0%

6.3% 11.8% 29.7% 19.3%

1 8 16 10 41 76

1.3% 10.5% 21.1% 13.2% 53.9% 100.0%

12.5% 26.7% 33.3% 29.4% 26.5% 27.6%

5 9 5 33 52

9.6% 17.3% 9.6% 63.5% 100.0%

16.7% 18.8% 14.7% 21.3% 18.9%

7 17 19 11 33 87

8.0% 19.5% 21.8% 12.6% 37.9% 100.0%

87.5% 56.7% 39.6% 32.4% 21.3% 31.6%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 20

21-30

31-40

41-50

51 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

71. It shows that about 31% of the sample household heads have own operated agriculture as primary occupation in the study area. Agriculture is the dominant sector where about 66% of the head of the sample households are engaged as their primary occupation. About half of the female headed households (46%) have household work as their primary occupation. Only one female headed household (8%) has own-operated agriculture as her primary occupation. Only 1% of the sample household head is involved in fishing as primary occupation. On the contrary 23% of the female headed households headed are involved in non-agriculture labour as their primary occupation. For further information detail is provided in the Annex-E.

Table 4.5: Occupation of households heads by major sectors and by sex

Primary Occupation Male Female Total

Agriculture 65.3 23.1 63.2

House work 7.3 46.2 9.1

Business 7.2 7.7 7.3

Transport, Rik 5.7 0 5.5

Service 5.7 0 5.5

Non agri labor 3.1 23.1 4.0

Artisans 3.8 0 3.7

Fishermen/ boat 1.9 0 1.8

4.1.3 Age structure

Table 4.6: Distribution of household heads according to their age group and land category

72. This particular table demonstrate that highest number of households (46) from landless category belong to the age group of 21-30 which is 30% of the total households belong to this particular category of farmers. In the large farmer category of responded 87% are from the age group of 51+. 32% of the sample household are from this particular age group (51+) irrespective of farmer category followed by 28% of sample household belong to the age group of (31-40) irrespective of farmer category.




11 21 13 86 131

8.4% 16.0% 9.9% 65.6% 100.0%

36.7% 43.8% 38.2% 55.5% 47.6%

2 3 4 8 17

11.8% 17.6% 23.5% 47.1% 100.0%

6.7% 6.3% 11.8% 5.2% 6.2%

1 5 1 1 8

12.5% 62.5% 12.5% 12.5% 100.0%

3.3% 10.4% 2.9% .6% 2.9%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

12.5% 2.9% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

3 7 9 5 33 57

5.3% 12.3% 15.8% 8.8% 57.9% 100.0%

37.5% 23.3% 18.8% 14.7% 21.3% 20.7%

4 9 9 9 27 58

6.9% 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 46.6% 100.0%

50.0% 30.0% 18.8% 26.5% 17.4% 21.1%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

MBBS

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total


Household Category

Total

6 22 32 21 90 171

3.5% 12.9% 18.7% 12.3% 52.6% 100.0%

11.5% 11.7% 12.5% 13.0% 13.5% 12.9%

5 13 27 17 91 153

3.3% 8.5% 17.6% 11.1% 59.5% 100.0%

9.6% 6.9% 10.5% 10.6% 13.6% 11.5%

4 24 32 21 70 151

2.6% 15.9% 21.2% 13.9% 46.4% 100.0%

7.7% 12.8% 12.5% 13.0% 10.5% 11.4%

14 48 60 43 193 358

3.9% 13.4% 16.8% 12.0% 53.9% 100.0%

26.9% 25.5% 23.3% 26.7% 28.9% 27.0%

9 35 54 30 127 255

3.5% 13.7% 21.2% 11.8% 49.8% 100.0%

17.3% 18.6% 21.0% 18.6% 19.0% 19.2%

7 24 29 20 62 142

4.9% 16.9% 20.4% 14.1% 43.7% 100.0%

13.5% 12.8% 11.3% 12.4% 9.3% 10.7%

7 22 23 9 34 95

7.4% 23.2% 24.2% 9.5% 35.8% 100.0%

13.5% 11.7% 8.9% 5.6% 5.1% 7.2%

52 188 257 161 667 1325

3.9% 14.2% 19.4% 12.2% 50.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 5

6-10

11-17

18-30

31-45

46-60

61 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 4.7: Distribution of household members according to their age group and land category

4.1.4 Literacy education by land category and sex category

Table 4.8: Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and land




269 300 569

47.3% 52.7% 100.0%

38.8% 47.5% 42.9%

40 17 57

70.2% 29.8% 100.0%

5.8% 2.7% 4.3%

17 6 23

73.9% 26.1% 100.0%

2.4% 1.0% 1.7%

8 1 9

88.9% 11.1% 100.0%

1.2% .2% .7%

6 1 7

85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

.9% .2% .5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.3% .2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.2% .1%

216 164 380

56.8% 43.2% 100.0%

31.1% 26.0% 28.7%

136 141 277

49.1% 50.9% 100.0%

19.6% 22.3% 20.9%

694 631 1325

52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

MBBS

Others

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total

73. It appears that 48% of the sample households head are illiterate in the Narail Sub-project area irrespective of farmer category which is much below the figure shown in the population census ‟91 for Narail district (72%). The table indicates that 56% of the total households belong to landless category are illiterate. The study reveals the fact that no household head is illiterate within the large farmer category. One MBBS holder was found in the small farmer category and one masters and one Bachelor degree holders were found in the marginal farmer category. After the illiterate a significant number of households irrespective of farmer category have the education status (VI-X) and this category constitute 21% of the sample household. Educational level for household members (for both sex) have shown in the Table 2.9 and for more detail further information is provided in the Annex-E.

Table 4.9: Distribution of household members according to their educational status and Sex




Resources and Assets

4.1.5 Land tenure by farm size

Table 4.10: Average amounts of land possessions per household according to tenural pattern by sex and land category

Land Category Own Cultivable Land (In Decimal) Operational Land (In Decimal)


Large 983.50 2.25 985.75 648.00 40.33 688.33

Medium 360.37 0.00 360.67 176.28 1.25 177.53

Small 140.35 2.16 142.52 163.45 0.85 164.31

Marginal 76.20 4.05 80.26 109.91 7.00 116.91

Landless 13.94 0.34 14.29 62.23 1.30 63.54

Total-average 109.70 1.14 110.84 105.73 2.81 108.56

74. This table demonstrates the fact that except the large and medium farmer category all other categories of farmers are operating more land than they have in their ownership. For the large category of farmers the study represent the scenario that about 30% of the land owned by large category of farmers are shifting for operational purposes either in the form of share cropping or any other arrangement. Contrary to that more than 50% of the lands owned by medium category of farmers are shifting for operational purposes either in the form of share cropping/lease out or any other temporary arrangement. On the other hand it shows from the information that small, marginal and landless category of farmers are operating about 15%, 46% and 346% more land against their ownership holding in order to boost their household economy. For more information please check in the Annex E.




3 12 12 61 88

3.4% 13.6% 13.6% 69.3% 100.0%

10.0% 25.0% 35.3% 39.4% 32.0%

4 4 4 28 40

10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 70.0% 100.0%

13.3% 8.3% 11.8% 18.1% 14.5%

1 3 7 6 16 33

3.0% 9.1% 21.2% 18.2% 48.5% 100.0%

12.5% 10.0% 14.6% 17.6% 10.3% 12.0%

4 5 3 17 29

13.8% 17.2% 10.3% 58.6% 100.0%

13.3% 10.4% 8.8% 11.0% 10.5%

1 6 5 2 8 22

4.5% 27.3% 22.7% 9.1% 36.4% 100.0%

12.5% 20.0% 10.4% 5.9% 5.2% 8.0%

4 5 22 31

12.9% 16.1% 71.0% 100.0%

8.3% 14.7% 14.2% 11.3%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

1 6 7

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

12.5% 20.0% 2.5%

4 4 5 1 2 16

25.0% 25.0% 31.3% 6.3% 12.5% 100.0%

50.0% 13.3% 10.4% 2.9% 1.3% 5.8%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.1% 2.9% .7%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

8.3% 1.5%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

12.5% .4%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Soil/Mud

Bamboo

Tin

Chatai

Timber/Wood

Jute Stick

Straw

Pucca

Semi-Pucca

Brick+Wood

Bamboo + Tin

Wood + Tin

Bamboo +Wood

Wall

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total

4.1.6 Housing condition and homestead

Table 4.11: Distribution of households according to their house wall type by land category

75. The information provided in the table demonstrate the scenario that no household belong to the large farmer category have houses with walls made of by soil/mud, bamboo, chatai, jute stick, strans, brick+wood, bamboo+tin, wood+tin. On the other hand 39% of the landless families have houses with walls made of by soil/mud followed by 18% by bamboo, 10% by tin, 11% by chatai, 5% by timber/wood, 14% by jute stick, 0.6% by straw and only 1% semi pucca. In the economic term the house condition of any individual household can demonstrate the poverty situation in that particular context. The materials used for making roof off the individual households within the different farmers category have shown in the subsequent table.




6 28 46 31 136 247

2.4% 11.3% 18.6% 12.6% 55.1% 100.0%

75.0% 93.3% 95.8% 91.2% 87.7% 89.8%

1 1 5 7

14.3% 14.3% 71.4% 100.0%

2.1% 2.9% 3.2% 2.5%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

12.5% .4%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.1% 1.3% 1.1%

7 7

100.0% 100.0%

4.5% 2.5%

1 2 2 5 10

10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 50.0% 100.0%

12.5% 6.7% 5.9% 3.2% 3.6%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Tin

Straw

Pucca

Advester

Chan

Tali

Roof

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total

6 15 15 12 42 90

6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 13.3% 46.7% 100.0%

75.0% 50.0% 31.3% 35.3% 27.1% 32.7%

2 15 33 22 113 185

1.1% 8.1% 17.8% 11.9% 61.1% 100.0%

25.0% 50.0% 68.8% 64.7% 72.9% 67.3%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If has Electricity

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 4.12: Distribution of households according to their house roof type by land category

Table 4.13: Distribution of households according to their responses on if they have electricity by land category

76. Having access to electricity supply is one of the important indicators for assessing the economic status of a household in the local context. From that point of view it has been found from the table that only 27% of the landless families have the electricity supply in their houses where as 75% of the large farmers have the facility of power supply in their houses.




4.1.7 Livestock, Poultry and Tree Resources by HH

Table 4.14: Total livestock value by land categories


Total Male Female


Large 12533.75 13136.88 14881.25 13305.74 352.50 497.61

Medium 14850.50 9195.70 13506.33 9633.82 1344.16 3435.92

Small 8608.12 10168.18 7463.95 10209.98 1144.16 3306.04

Marginal 5844.12 8085.55 5046.47 7772.73 797.64 1453.68

Landless 4215.84 7198.80 2312.36 4454.22 1903.48 6187.42

Total 6664.47 9039.49 5136.38 8158.37 1528.09 5011.82

77. This table shows the resources the households posses in the area of livestock which is one of the significant assets for the rural households. This particular table also demonstrate the traditional practice that the households have the bigger share in land ownership also have the larger share in livestock ownership as well as also the tree resources for both fruits and timber shown in the next table. In many economy the poor families (in terms of less land holding) posses more livestock for generating additional income for the households but this is not the case in the study area.

Table 4.15: Total trees resources value by land categories


Total Male Female


Large 24350.00 26360.00 24250.00 26425.10 100.00 282.84

Medium 14931.67 21062.11 13345.00 20905.36 1586.66 6186.51

Small 7747.91 8076.14 6934.37 7412.28 813.54 3251.59

Marginal 7797.05 17735.74 7251.47 17826.10 545.58 2126.25

Landless 3633.90 9929.19 3318.54 9942.73 315.35 1212.55

Total 6701.83 13833.38 6138.63 13688.68 563.20 2721.02

4.1.8 Agricultural Equipments

Table 4.16: Total agricultural equipments value by land categories


Total Male Female


Large 6111.87 5872.92 6111.87 5872.92 0.00 0.00

Medium 7347.76 14887.20 7342.76 14889.46 5.00 27.38

Small 3671.97 7423.03 3670.72 7423.53 1.25 8.66

Marginal 1734.11 2944.75 1731.76 2946.14 2.35 13.71

Landless 1240.82 3322.47 1214.56 3325.96 26.25 167.32

Total 2534.07 6723.22 2518.22 6727.36 15.85 126.46

78. This table shows the value of agricultural equipments possessed by different categories of households within the study area. This information also demonstrate the scenario that the households possessed more land in their ownership have also more agricultural equipments in their possession. This is also the case for durable assets possessed by sample households and shown in the Table 4.17. More details will be available in the Annex-E.




4.1.9 Other Assets

Table 4.17: Total household durable value by land categories


Total Male Female


Large 8825.00 5809.04 8475.00 6047.60 350.00 381.72

Medium 6808.00 5861.43 5805.66 5409.26 1002.33 2123.42

Small 3857.60 2973.07 3135.31 2853.55 722.29 1230.46

Marginal 2252.05 1863.57 1791.17 1733.97 460.88 801.57

Landless 1805.48 2167.09 1464.74 2084.31 340.74 413.07

Total (Average) 2968.81 3557.41 2474.18 3348.02 494.63 982.54

4.2 Livelihoods

4.2.1 Production and Income from major livelihoods

Table 4.18: Average annual income per household according to source


Agriculture Livestock Non-Agri.Labor


Large 32954.00 29292.81 3998.75 4337.38 0.00 0.00

Medium 23217.97 13439.18 1787.66 4823.04 240.00 1314.53

Small 13159.98 9651.40 1934.12 3546.45 543.75 2011.76

Marginal 7060.91 5891.66 645.00 1623.94 1157.35 4196.57

Landless 3496.90 7614.67 667.21 1801.26 3225.48 6811.14

Total (Average) 8632.51 12376.01 1104.74 2791.39 2082.18 5552.53




Large 0.00 0.00 12450.00 26699.75 3487.50 4673.46

Medium 770.00 2309.07 2474.66 7645.63 2960.00 2617.67

Small 2035.41 3830.75 3381.25 10373.36 1821.87 1935.22

Marginal 1905.88 3791.61 2235.29 8467.61 1955.14 3486.06

Landless 2897.41 4875.50 2189.03 6078.33 1528.21 1816.34

Total (Average) 2308.00 4337.87 2732.50 8677.20 1845.44 2348.77


Urban/Abroad/Remittance Doctor (MBBS) Village Quack/ Kbiraj


Large 83875.00 40072.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 37333.33 36939.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 20979.17 25814.80 0.00 0.00 686.45 2718.27

Marginal 23323.53 19728.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 18470.97 17343.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 23469.09 25660.79 0.00 0.00 119.81 1155.68




Large 0.00 0.00 3767.50 4113.30 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 1733.50 4839.98 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 1657.60 3364.18 131.25 909.32

Marginal 0.00 0.00 506.76 1465.47 529.41 2608.09

Landless 20.25 215.56 532.70 1736.11 1887.74 4802.35

Total (Average) 11.41 161.91 950.94 2704.66 1152.36 3826.77







Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 263.52 1346.42

Landless 19.35 240.96 30.96 385.54 613.29 2390.53

Total (Average) 10.90 180.90 17.45 289.45 378.25 1872.97




Large 0.00 0.00 4650.00 9304.83 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 8180.00 18454.22 0.00 0.00

Small 54.16 375.27 4341.66 11553.09 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 4282.35 12220.02 105.88 617.39

Landless 54.83 682.73 1723.22 7293.18 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 40.36 535.46 3286.18 10649.34 13.09 217.08


Others Total Income

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 4250.00 9696.98 149432.80 55303.09

Medium 936.66 1325.03 79633.80 52941.76

Small 293.75 820.84 51020.46 31267.22

Marginal 767.64 1376.14 44738.71 26317.99

Landless 479.27 1073.93 37836.90 22149.43

Total (Average) 642.13 2001.93 48797.43 37044.69

79. This table shows the average annual household income derived from different sources by different category of farmers within the study area. The possible sources as was reported by the respondent are agriculture, livestock, non-agricultural labour, agricultural labour, business, fish/dry fish, urban/abroad/remittance, medical practice, village quack/kabiraj, bagging, rickshaw/van, motor driving, boatmanship, artisan product, clarified profession, services, nursery and others. As per the information provided by the responded the average annual income of the large farmers households is, 149432 and that of medium 79633, small farmer 51020, marginal farmer 44738 and landless farmer 37836 taka. It is worthwhile to mention here that major source of deriving annual household income is the agriculture for all categories of farmers. Second major sector for household income is the business for the large farmer and non-agriculture labour for the landless farmers. Table 4.18 shows the distribution of sample households according to the annual income ranging from 15000 taka to 60000+ which indicates that 14% of the landless households, 15% of the marginal households, 17% of the small farmer households and 0% of the medium farmer households have the annual average income level upto 15000 taka. Contrary to that 19% of the landless households 9% of the marginal households, 4% of the small farmer household, and 20% of the medium farmer household have the average annual income level within the range of 15001-25000 taka.




3 6 9

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

12.5% 13.3% 7.9%

2 4 3 2 11

18.2% 36.4% 27.3% 18.2% 100.0%

11.1% 17.4% 12.5% 4.4% 9.6%

1 3 3 6 13

7.7% 23.1% 23.1% 46.2% 100.0%

5.6% 13.0% 12.5% 13.3% 11.4%

5 2 4 5 16

31.3% 12.5% 25.0% 31.3% 100.0%

27.8% 8.7% 16.7% 11.1% 14.0%

2 3 6 7 8 26

7.7% 11.5% 23.1% 26.9% 30.8% 100.0%

50.0% 16.7% 26.1% 29.2% 17.8% 22.8%

1 3 1 10 15

6.7% 20.0% 6.7% 66.7% 100.0%

5.6% 13.0% 4.2% 22.2% 13.2%

1 2 1 2 6

16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 100.0%

25.0% 11.1% 4.3% 4.4% 5.3%

1 4 4 3 6 18

5.6% 22.2% 22.2% 16.7% 33.3% 100.0%

25.0% 22.2% 17.4% 12.5% 13.3% 15.8%

4 18 23 24 45 114

3.5% 15.8% 20.2% 21.1% 39.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Pest Attack

Excessive Rainfall

High Wind



Facilities

Draught


Others

DAMAGE

REASONS

Total


Household Category

Total

0 0 8 5 22 35

.0% .0% 22.9% 14.3% 62.9% 100.0%

.0% .0% 16.7% 14.7% 14.2% 12.7%

0 6 2 3 30 41

.0% 14.6% 4.9% 7.3% 73.2% 100.0%

.0% 20.0% 4.2% 8.8% 19.4% 14.9%

0 5 11 7 43 66

.0% 7.6% 16.7% 10.6% 65.2% 100.0%

.0% 16.7% 22.9% 20.6% 27.7% 24.0%

0 3 10 12 39 64

.0% 4.7% 15.6% 18.8% 60.9% 100.0%

.0% 10.0% 20.8% 35.3% 25.2% 23.3%

8 16 17 7 21 69

11.6% 23.2% 24.6% 10.1% 30.4% 100.0%

100.0% 53.3% 35.4% 20.6% 13.5% 25.1%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Income in Tk

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 4.19: Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by land category

4.2.2 Crop Damage

Table 4.20: Distribution of households who had crop damage in different crop season according to reasons for crop damage by household category

80. From the table it indicates that about 23% of the affected households irrespective of farmer category mentioned inadequate irrigation facility as the major reason for crop damage where as 15% of the affected households mentioned others as major cause for their crop damage followed by saline water intuition be made in the




4 6 4 9 23

17.4% 26.1% 17.4% 39.1% 100.0%

66.7% 60.0% 80.0% 40.9% 50.0%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

4.5% 2.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

4.5% 2.2%

1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

16.7% 10.0% 4.5% 6.5%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

10.0% 4.5% 4.3%

3 1 2 1 9 16

18.8% 6.3% 12.5% 6.3% 56.3% 100.0%

100.0% 16.7% 20.0% 20.0% 40.9% 34.8%

3 6 10 5 22 46

6.5% 13.0% 21.7% 10.9% 47.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


during the season

Middleman

Advance Sale

Financial Crisis


To Avoid Transportation

Cost

Reasons

for not

Getting

Fair Price

Total


Household Category

Total

Narail sub-project area should address those issues as was mentioned by the sample households.

4.2.3 Paddy Marketing Problems

Table 4.21: Distribution of households who sold-out their crop according to reasons for not getting fair price by household category

81. This table highlight the reasons the respondent feel as cause for not getting fair prices when they are selling their product. It shows that 50% of the respondent mentioned “huge production and supply during the season” as major reason for not getting fair price followed by “farmgate price is lower” as mentioned by 35% of the respondent as they compel to sell in the farmgate to avoid transportation cost. Other causes as was mentioned by the respondent are financial crisis (6.5%), and advance sale (2.2%) and middle men (2.2%) etc.

4.2.4 Access to Information

Table 4.22: Percentage of households who received training / information by category

Areas/ Sectors Sources of Training / information

DAE DOF &

Livestock

Youth

Ministry

NGO TV/

Radio

Farmer Others

(FWA/FWV)


Agriculture

Large 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 29.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.9 0.0 5.2 0.6 0.0 0.0

- Total 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 2.2 0.0 4.4 0.4 0.0 0.0

Fishery

- Total 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Livestock

- Total 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Health

- Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 3.6 1.5 3.3 0.4 0.0 0.7 15.6




82. In this table effort has made to provide an overview how the technology related to socio-economic development of the area is being transferred and adopted by the farmers in the study area. It appears from the data that other than agriculture extension no substantial initiative is visible in the areas of fishery, livestock and health in order to disseminate the knowledge and technology in the study area.

4.2.5 Household Annual Expenditure

Table 4.23: Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to source




Large 17292.50 5784.34 19250.00 52849.52 17500.00 49497.47

Medium 14970.33 9482.10 366.66 1303.92 0.0 0.0

Small 11195.73 8443.96 718.75 2441.01 250.00 1732.05

Marginal 13434.85 12304.10 152.94 476.88 147.05 857.49

Landless 11065.64 6977.23 150.32 607.56 32.25 401.60

Total (Average) 11988.38 8416.77 829.09 9112.79 589.09 8478.94




Large 1062.50 2077.73 2375.00 3946.33 4837.50 5551.56

Medium 11266.67 54649.78 2465.00 2659.76 2840.00 2021.24

Small 2129.16 10283.68 2198.95 4134.93 1786.45 1650.39

Marginal 307.35 975.31 1230.88 1349.63 1685.29 1518.74

Landless 716.64 4161.31 1333.41 2809.13 1278.25 949.81

Total (Average) 2073.56 18839.06 1625.56 2992.11 1691.20 1733.03



Large 462.50 1040.51 1727.50 1431.20 1250.00 3535.53

Medium 266.66 996.66 1101.73 1003.51 500.00 1592.00

Small 188.54 481.49 867.54 569.72 2691.45 7510.74

Marginal 14.70 50.04 826.64 827.53 1330.58 2396.36

Landless 44.99 142.06 653.91 469.53 1254.81 2142.81

Total (Average) 102.63 441.66 792.64 684.81 1432.45 3732.35




Large 375.00 1060.66 17769.13 11991.50 0.0 0.0

Medium 278.33 765.54 13860.07 8269.84 0.0 0.0

Small 605.72 2101.66 10569.40 7463.44 62.50 433.01

Marginal 1335.76 7104.54 5826.90 3689.03 518.82 2547.59

Landless 285.66 739.36 3421.65 4517.72 344.38 2830.70

Total (Average) 473.16 2711.91 6498.42 7170.11 269.16 2312.11




2 9 8 48 67

3.0% 13.4% 11.9% 71.6% 100.0%

6.7% 18.8% 23.5% 31.0% 24.4%

2 4 13 14 71 104

1.9% 3.8% 12.5% 13.5% 68.3% 100.0%

25.0% 13.3% 27.1% 41.2% 45.8% 37.8%

12 14 7 27 60

20.0% 23.3% 11.7% 45.0% 100.0%

40.0% 29.2% 20.6% 17.4% 21.8%

2 7 8 2 5 24

8.3% 29.2% 33.3% 8.3% 20.8% 100.0%

25.0% 23.3% 16.7% 5.9% 3.2% 8.7%

4 5 4 3 4 20

20.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 20.0% 100.0%

50.0% 16.7% 8.3% 8.8% 2.6% 7.3%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Expenditure Tk

Total


Household Category

Total


Total Expenditure

Mean SD

Large 88276.63 116339.70

Medium 48983.47 59923.18

Small 34714.23 25786.26

Marginal 28369.94 19672.11

Landless 20977.91 12502.66

Total (Average) 29302.38 35063.29

83. This table illustrate the average annual expenditure made by different categories of farmers. The major items as was mentioned by the respondents are food, education, dowry, shelter, health, clothes, recreation, fuel/electricity, loan repayment, loan installment repayment, purchase of agriculture inputs, and other. From the data it can be analysed that for the large farmers major area of expenditure is education followed by agriculture input and dowry. On the other hand for the landless farmers the major area is food followed by agricultural input and health. For the medium farmers the major area of expenditure is food followed by agricultural input and shelter. For the marginal farmers the major area of expenditure is food followed by agricultural inputs and clothes. From the household income and expenditure data it can be agreed that for all categories of farmers the average expenditure is higher than the amount shown as their average income.

Table 4.24: Consolidated incomes and expenditure by land category

Land Category Total Income Total Expenditure

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 66907.75 51290.70 88276.63 116339.70

Medium 45272.90 29328.20 50179.45 59923.18

Small 29748..55 22142.48 34858.26 25786.26

Marginal 21603.61 16154.62 28365.06 19672.11

Landless 20262.55 13157.16 21297.26 12502.66

Total (Average) 26114.24 21951.27 29547.35 35063.29

Table 4.25: Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure range by land category




4 24 28

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

19.0% 21.2% 18.3%

3 5 35 43

7.0% 11.6% 81.4% 100.0%

17.6% 23.8% 31.0% 28.1%

1 3 4

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

4.8% 2.7% 2.6%

6 6 19 31

19.4% 19.4% 61.3% 100.0%

35.3% 28.6% 16.8% 20.3%

8 8

100.0% 100.0%

7.1% 5.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

4.8% .7%

3 1 4 8

37.5% 12.5% 50.0% 100.0%

17.6% 4.8% 3.5% 5.2%

2 5 3 20 30

6.7% 16.7% 10.0% 66.7% 100.0%

100.0% 29.4% 14.3% 17.7% 19.6%

2 17 21 113 153

1.3% 11.1% 13.7% 73.9% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%



Water Logging

Frequent Illness




Storm in April-May


Seasonal Drought

Others

Reasons

for Food

Shortage

Total


Household Category

Total

84. This table illustrates the fact that 24% of he sample household irrespective of farmer category have the gross expenditure range upto Tk.15000 annually whereas the maximum number of sample households (38%) irrespective of farmer category have their gross expenditure range Tk.15001-25000 annually. Only 7% of the sample households have the gross expenditure range above Tk.60,000 per annum.

4.2.6 Food Security

Table 4.26: Distribution of households who had food shortage according to reasons for food shortage by land category

85. In this table attempt has been made to highlight the reason for food shortage in their household level which can give some indication about the poverty situation prevailing in the household level. It is found that 28% of the respondent households mentioned” less production due to water logging” as the major reason for having food shortage in their household. 18% of the respondent mentioned “limited job opportunity” as the reason for having food shortage. About 20% of the respondent mentioned “others” as reason for food shortage which was not specified. 20% of the respondent also mentioned “single earning member” as reason for food shortage. Any poverty reduction initiative should address these issues in designing future intervention in Narail sub-project area.




Table 4.27: Per capita per day major food item consumed according to Land Category


Rice (kg) 0.550 0.570 0.600 0.540 0.520 0.540

Wheat (kg) 0.050 0.007 0.009 0.000 0.002 0.005

Meat (kg) 0.105 0.081 0.049 0.045 0.032 0.044

Egg (no) 0.780 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.480 0.520

Fish (kg) 0.140 0.120 0.110 0.110 0.100 0.110

Milk (kg) 0.150 0.085 0.060 0.042 0.022 0.042

Vegetables(kg) 0.091 0.095 0.099 0.145 0.134 0.124

Pulses (kg) 0.055 0.039 0.026 0.035 0.041 0.034

Oil (kg) 0.024 0.019 0.021 0.028 0.030 0.027

Fruits (kg) 0.212 0.050 0.051 0.035 0.051 0.054

86. This table indicates usually food intake by the sample household which might be helpful in measuring the caloric intake by the respondent in the study area as well as to assess the poverty situation in Narail sub-project area.

4.2.7 Household Vulnerability

Table 4.28: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on type of vulnerability context affected their well-being




Cyclone 4.7 Salinty 23.3

Draught (Seasonal) 39.3 River Srosion .04


etc.)

12.7


87. It was tried to figure out how far the resident of the study area are vulnerable from different context related to water and non-water issues which might help in designing the future intervention. It indicates from the table that 39% of the respondent mentioned that they are vulnerable to seasonal draught. 23% of the respondent mentioned that they are vulnerable to salinity whereas 21% mentioned as water logging for their vulnerability. 23% also mentioned they are vulnerable to excessive rainfall.

4.2.8 Savings and Credit

Table 4.29: Average amount of debt (Taka) per households interest from different sources

Sources of Loan Average loan size Average interest of the loan

Bank 12228.30 12.90

Money Lender 2929.44 52.88

Relatives 5616.38 0.00

NGOs 4615.67 21.03

Others 4054.44 12.00

88. Table indicates the potential sources available in the study area for providing credit facility. The study reveals that Commercial Bank, money lender, relatives, NGOs and others are the sources active in the area for providing credit facility. It is worthwhile to mention that non-institutional sources like money lender and relatives are also active in the area who normally collect exorbitant rate of interest from the borrowers. It also indicates in the table that money lenders are charging maximum interest rate. It reveals




2 19 24 23 72 140

1.4% 13.6% 17.1% 16.4% 51.4% 100.0%

25.0% 63.3% 50.0% 67.6% 46.5% 50.9%

4 3 35 42

9.5% 7.1% 83.3% 100.0%

8.3% 8.8% 22.6% 15.3%

1 11 7 36 55

1.8% 20.0% 12.7% 65.5% 100.0%

3.3% 22.9% 20.6% 23.2% 20.0%

6 10 9 1 12 38

15.8% 26.3% 23.7% 2.6% 31.6% 100.0%

75.0% 33.3% 18.8% 2.9% 7.7% 13.8%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total


Household Category

Total

8 28 46 31 139 252

3.2% 11.1% 18.3% 12.3% 55.2% 100.0%

100.0% 93.3% 95.8% 91.2% 89.7% 91.6%

2 2 3 16 23

8.7% 8.7% 13.0% 69.6% 100.0%

6.7% 4.2% 8.8% 10.3% 8.4%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

If <5

children

has

diarrhea

Total


Household Category

Total

from the table that Commercial Bank is the dominant sector for providing credit followed by relatives and NGOs.

4.3 Health and Hygiene

Table 4.30: Distribution of households according to type of latrine used by land category

89. The table indicates that only 14% of the respondent using sanitary latrine in the study area and average then large farmer category sample 75% using sanitary latrine. On the other hand survey the landless category respondent only 8% using sanitary latrine and 47% of the landless category using ring slab. 23% of the landless category using open deification and 23% of them use such latrine which is called “hanging”. 8% of the small farmer category and 9% of the marginal farmer category use open deification as their practice.

Table 4.31: Distribution of households according to their responses on if any of the <5 children of the family suffering from diarrhea during the last 14 days by land category

90. It indicates from the table that 8.4% of the sample household irrespective of land category have experience that their children under 5 attacked by diarrhoea during the last two weeks of the study conducted. Among the affected children maximum are from the landless category which is 69% of the affected. IT is important to note here that nobody from the large farmer category attacked diarrhoea during the reporting period.




Table 4.32: Percentage Distribution of Households using different Water Sources according to Use Pattern



Tube–well 81.0 99.0 52.0 19.0 0.0

Pond 13.0 0.0 37.0 53.0 3.0

DTW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0

STW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.0

Well/Kua 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4

Rain Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Surface Water 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.4 11.0

Others (specific) 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 5.0

91. In this table attempt was made to present the scenario that from which sources the resident of the study area are managing their water requirements. From the data it indicates that 81% of the respondent use table well water for cooking 99% of the respondent use tube-well water for drinking, 52% of the respondent use tube-well water for washing, 19% of the respondent use tube-well water for bathing. On the other hand 13% of respondent use pond water for cooking, 37% use pond water for washing, 53% use pond water for bathing and 3% use pond water for irrigation. Contrary to that 37% of the respondent use STW for irrigation and 11% use surface-water for irrigation.

Table 4.33: Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on their sufferings during the last one year by major diseases and land category


ARI-Fever-Cough 37.5 23.3 27.1 44.1 38.7 35.6


Gastric 0.0 23.3 14.6 20.6 8.4 12.4

Arthritis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.1

X-thma 10.0 4.2 2.9 1.9 3.3

Exima 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.7

Typhoid 0.0 10.0 2.1 2.9 5.2 4.7

Zondish (Hepa-B) 0.0 3.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 1.1

Female Diseases 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.4

92. Data indicates that 37.5% of the respondent from large farmer category suffer from ARI-Fever-Cough, 23% of the medium, 27% of the small, 44% of the marginal and 38.7% of the landless household suffers from ARI-fever-Cough during last one year from the study conducted. It reveals from the table that fever-cough, dysentery - diarrhoea and gastric are the diseases suffered by most the sample households during the reporting period.




4.4 Gender Dimensions and Participation

Table 4.34: Percentage Distribution of Households According to Participation of Women and male Counterpart According to major Dimensions of Participation


No L M H No L M H


2. Mobility inside the community (relative, shop, group meeting, etc.) 15.3 36.0 38.5 9.8 2.2 17.5 32.7 44.7

3. Mobility outside the community (market, labor, crop field, hospital,

bank, fair, movie, etc.)

29.5 40.7 24.7 3.3 1.5 6.2 32.4 57.1



















93. This table tries to present an overall scenario about the participation of male and female members of the household regarding different issues influencing the livelihood and position of different household members from the perspective of the household as well as the community at large.

94. The table indicates that 66% of sample household female do not have any role on control over household resources and 51% of household women do not move inside community where as 70% of household women do not move outside of the community like market, back, hospital, movie etc. About the participation in household decision about 55% of household women do not have any role on decision to have new children, 60% of household women do not have any role on decision to undertake any new economic activity, 64% of household women do not participate in taking the decision on purchase/sale of household property, 26% of household women do not have any role on decision to children schooling, 42% of household women do not have any role on decision related to children marriage and 36% of household women do not have any role on decision related to buy inputs and duly essentials for household consumption.

95. Regarding the community level participation 92% of household women do not participate in mosque/mandir committee, 94% of household women do not participate in village shalish, 93% of household women do not participate in village development activities, 93% of household women do not have any role on school management committee and 91% of household women do not participate in Union Praised activities.




96. About knowledge and awareness of women on certain laws their position are about 85% of household women are not aware about laws related to divorce and marriage about 92% do not have knowledge about laws related to inheritance right and 73% of household women do not have nay knowledge about legal process for torturing and inhuman treatment.

Table 4.35: Percentage of Household According to their Access and Participation in the Different Service Centers by Sex












10.Veterinary Hospital 2.9 0.7 23. Telephone 2.2 0.7


12. Commercial/ Krishi Bank 8.4 0.0 25. Social Welfare/ Women Affairs 0.7 0.7


4.5 Problems and Suggestions

Table 4.36: Percentage Distribution of Households According to major Problems by Land Category

Problems related to Agriculture Land Category Total


Fertilizer/Insecticide/Seed cost highz 23.23 52.94 45.83 50.00 37.50 34.18

Drought 18.06 41.18 29.17 16.67 25.00 22.91

Water logging 16.77 26.47 14.58 40.00 37.50 20.73

Salinity 12.26 17.65 31.25 40.00 25.00 19.64

Water crisis/ Pick Boro Season Water layer go down 10.32 32.35 14.58 26.67 62.50 17.09

Canal/River/Beel silted 9.03 35.29 14.58 16.67 37.50 14.91


Heavy Rain 10.97 20.59 10.42 10.00 12.50 12.00



Existing Sluice Gate Problems/It does not work properly 5.81 17.65 10.42 13.33 37.50 9.82

Irrigation irregular/ Irrigation cost high 7.10 11.76 12.50 10.00 12.50 9.09



Poor agriculture labor wage/monsoon agriculture labor do

not get job/migrated out

7.74 23.53 2.08 0.00 0.00 7.64

Crop Production Cost Higher than Production

Values/Prices

5.16 14.71 8.33 6.67 25.00 7.64





Problems related to Agriculture Land Category Total


Loss of soil fertility/ Natural soil/land losted fertility gradually 4.52 14.71 6.25 6.67 25.00 6.91



No Cultivatable land 5.81 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00


Agri labor wage rate is poor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Problems related to Fish Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total

Pond /canal silted /dried Up / No fish/less fish 14.19 20.59 25.00 13.33 25.00 17.09

Fish diseases 7.74 20.59 25.00 16.67 37.50 14.18

Fish stolen/breading fish catching 3.87 11.76 6.25 6.67 25.00 6.18

Limited fishing pond/canal/Beel 3.87 11.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.64

Excess/Over fishing 3.23 11.76 4.17 3.33 12.50 4.73

Fish fry cost high/Poor farmer can not purchased fish

fry/Disease or infected Fry/Poor quality of fish fry

3.87 11.76 6.25 10.00 12.50 6.18

Pond bank inundated / fish moves to other place 1.29 2.94 6.25 6.67 25.00 3.64


Local Fish Spices reduced gradually 4.52 14.71 8.33 10.00 37.50 8.00

Others Major Problems Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total

Poor quality of earthen/pacca broken road/rough road 17.42 41.18 20.83 20.00 50.00 22.18

Early Marriage/Dowry 10.32 23.53 22.92 30.00 50.00 17.45

Fish /Money Stolen/ Robbing /Mastan 9.68 20.59 18.75 26.67 37.50 15.27

Unstable daily income/less labor work-income/Lack of

work(labor)/Low wage rate for day labor/expense higher

than income

10.97 32.35 8.33 0.00 0.00 11.64



Arsenic contaminated water/lack of safe water/crisis of safe

water

4.52 8.82 4.17 10.00 12.50 5.82

Social Insecurity 3.23 8.82 8.33 3.33 12.50 5.09

Less work scope for Women /Poor wage rate for women 2.58 11.76 4.17 3.33 0.00 4.00


After election o\rulling party threaten/ Put Political Pressure 0.00 0.00 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.36

97. It is found from the table that 23% of the household from landless category mentioned high in pesticide, fertiliser/seed cost as problems whereas 53% of marginal farmers category seems this as problem 46% of the small category seems this as problems, 50% of the medium farmers and 37.5% of the large farmers seen this as problem 62.5% of the large farmer category households find water crisis during the pick boro season as problem, 50% of the large farmer category find poor quality of seed/fertiliser/pesticide as problem. Regarding the fish related problem 25% of the small farmer household find pond/canal silted up as one of the major problem, 37.5% of the large farmer household find fish diseases as one of the problems. 17% of the landless farmers, 41% of the marginal farmers, 21% of the small farmers, 20% of the medium farmers and 50% of the large farmer household find poor quality of earthen road/ broken pacca/ rough road as one of the major problems.




Table 4.37: Percentage Distribution of Households According to Major Suggestions by Land Category



Embankment & Sluice gate should

construct/repair with proper environmental

assessment.

22.58 47.06 58.33 36.67 75.00 34.91

Construct environmentally sound and qualitative

bridge/road

13.55 35.29 18.75 20.00 62.50 19.27

Canal/Beel/River needs to re-excavate /Irrigate

agri. field from canal/Irrigation(Modern) system

introduce by Govt.

14.19 20.59 20.83 20.00 50.00 17.82

Reduce the price of fertilizer/seed/

insecticide/fuel/within purchase

capacity/available

18.06 26.47 8.33 10.00 25.00 16.73


Ensure health services in the community level

specially for poor/Ensure Medicine & ensure

qualified doctor for poor community

7.10 20.59 12.50 13.33 25.00 10.91

Stop early marriage/ control multi marriage

/control dowry and reduce illiteracy

7.10 17.65 8.33 10.00 12.50 9.09

Ensure Agriculture Loan for poor/landless farmer

with low interest rate from Govt./NGO. Easy

access to get loan from NGO/Bank with low

interest rate

8.39 20.59 4.17 3.33 12.50 8.73

Ensure Electricity for all houses 3.87 26.47 8.33 6.67 12.50 8.00

Govt. should control poor/inferior quality of

fertilizer/Seed/ Insecticide

5.81 17.65 4.17 6.67 25.00 7.64

More VGD card for poor/Financial help for poor 5.81 11.76 4.17 6.67 12.50 6.55


Khash land should be distributed among

landless farmer.

8.39 8.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.82

Create job opportunity for youth/women & also

increased their wage rate.

7.10 8.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.09

Govt. should control the Mastan/corruption/illegal

activities

3.23 8.82 4.17 3.33 12.50 4.36

Created a fish culture zone/place with govt.

subsidy

3.23 8.82 2.08 3.33 12.50 4.00

Community involved in development process/UP

should improve their services

3.87 5.88 4.17 3.33 0.00 4.00

Govt. should initiate to supply Fish Fry for Beel

area with out cost to improve fish cultivation.

3.23 8.82 4.17 0.00 0.00 3.64



Training/encourage the community on

cattle/poultry/aquaculture /agriculture HYV

1.94 5.88 2.08 3.33 12.50 2.91

Govt. should provide agri. subsidy 1.94 5.88 2.08 3.33 12.50 2.91

Training/suggestion needs on modern

agriculture from Agri.Dept. at community level

1.94 5.88 2.08 0.00 12.50 2.55

Stop Political harassment 1.94 5.88 2.08 0.00 0.00 2.18

Alternate Job/Business can be created by Govt. 1.29 2.94 2.08 0.00 0.00 1.45

Introduce Salinity tolerant variety paddy seed

with subsidy price.

1.29 2.94 2.08 0.00 0.00 1.45

Build Public Toilet for poor community 0.65 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73




98. About measures for improving the situation 23% of the landless, 47% of the marginal, 58% of the small, 37% of the medium and 75% of large farmer household suggested that embankment and sluices gate should construct/repair with proper environmental assessment. 21% of small farmer, 50% of the large farmer household suggested that canal/beel/river need to reexcavate, irrigation water should be provided during the pick period. 26% of the marginal household suggested that power supply should be ensured for all household level.

4.6 Environmental Aspects

Table 4.38: Different Fish Species Available in Beel and River

Fish Species Beel River/Canal Cultured

Puti

Taki

Shing

Kai

Chuchri

Pabda

Royna/Bheda

Shoul

Tengra

Kholisha

Magur

Roi

Kathol

Silver Carp

Mrigel

Japani Puti

Japani Roi

Telapia

Grass carp

Sharputi

American Roi

Mirer Carp/Minar carp

Bele

Chela

Baing

Paisha/Faisha

Chingri

Chaina Puti

Elisha

Pangash

Boyal

Bacha

Mola

Ayeir

Chitol

Common carp

Gajar

Guzi

Golsha

Chapila

Chanda

Kakle

Vetki





Gule

Fali

Bashpata

African Magur

Naylotika

Rita

Kholla

Cheng

Briged

Tepa

Nola

Dankina

Baoush

Gochai/Gochi

Gotum

Kachki

Fema

Koicha

Dogra/Doga

Kakra

Table 4.39: Name of Different Wild Animals Available in the Area


1 Bak 25 Badur

2 Tiya 26 Ghoghu

3 Shalik 27 Biya

4 Bezi 28 Kura Dhunkor

5 Bano Biral 29 Pat Shiyal

6 Moyna 30 Bagdasha

7 Babai 31 Guishap

8 Machh Ranga 32 Tota

9 Pecha 33 Finge

10 Kat Birali 34 Dahuk

11 Shiyal 35 Baz pakhi

12 Charai 36 Oud

13 Doyel 37 Bele Hash

14 Chil 38 Hutum Pecha (Butum Pecha)

15 Kak 39 Shamu Bhanga

16 Shap (Snake) 40 Ghargosh

17 Kukur (Dog) 41 Kakatua



20 Payra/Kabutar 44 Khadash

21 Baipakhi 45 Golbagh

22 Haldia 46 Kadthukra

23 Kokil 47 Bano Hash

24 Tara




Table 4.40: Trees Available


Aym (mango) Bakul Kalomagh

Jam (Black Berry) Shissu Niem

Kathal (jackfruit) Segun Siaten

Jamrul Jibonmora Harikot (Hartoki)

Jambura Tetul Shish fal

Bel Shirish Baira

Gabh Mehogoni Amloki

Lichu Shishuful Nishinda

Sobeda Kadam Tulshi

Tal Papor Kelakuj

Coconut Bat Dhutkomar (leaf only)

Lebu Epilapil Orjun

Barai Chambol Mehedi

Payara Mandar Pathor kuchi

Ata Karai (Rendi) Thankuni pata

Khejur Chatka Helanchi

Shirij Harol gachh

Sada Akond

Shish Ande

Table 4.41: Vegetable Available


Data Tomato

Misty Kumra Fulkafi

Chal Kumra Batha Kafi

Potol Lao (Bottle Guard)

Derosh Misty Kumra

Kakrol Pape

Lalshak Oul / oul kafi

Puishak Misti Alu

Baro shim Gol Alu

Kancha kola Palonshak

Osta Lalshak

Jhinga Shim (country beans)

Chichinga/Kushi Mula

Begun Begun

Lati Gazor

Lao Shalgom

Pape Batboti (labey Beans)

Batboti (labey Beans) Khira

Kachu Motor shiti

Dundol Motor shak

Mughi

Gadi

Getkoli

Karolla

Getkolshak

Shasha

Patshak

Halencha shak



Appendix 1

Appendix 1

ToR for Socio-economic Household Survey



Appendix 1: ToR for Socio-economic Household Survey 1

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Management Project, ADB-BAN-4079

Terms of Reference for Socio-economic household Survey

Phase-II Program

Background

In consultation with the Government of Bangladesh, the 2002 Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Country Strategy program Update for Bangladesh includes Project Preparatory Technical Assistance (PPTA) to prepare an investment project suitable for ADB financing entitled Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Management Project. The last aide memoire of the TA review Mission (May 2004) stressed that the output, along with the sub-regional IWRM plans should analyze and sharpen the focus on poverty and thematic agendas such as gender, the strong linkage between water and poverty in Bangladesh, clear indicators in poverty reduction that are linked in achieving the millennium development goals (income, water supply and sanitation, hunger, health, environmental security, etc.). Household socio-economic survey with focus on poverty reduction

A detailed household income survey will collect primary income data just for an individual project. With focus on income poverty data to establish how the poor affected by a project can be identified.

Possible alternative to measurements to analyse the poverty level are the following:

- Derive approximate average income data from aggregate groups of beneficiaries by, for example, inferring income from data on household assets.

- ((ii) Use other alternatives such as indicators of landownership, if available from agriculture ministries and related offices, and data on agricultural output, which can indicate short-term fluctuations in poverty.

It will be important to understand: - Why certain factors correlate with poverty; - What factors influence poverty outcomes that are not easily quantifiable; Household survey The census and the house hold survey will be carried out to obtain basic information on the population, its demographic structure, and its location, information on household income, consumption, disease patterns, and poverty perceptions. Household surveys is important resource for poverty assessments and diagnostics and are essential for analysis of welfare distribution and poverty characteristics, indispensable tool for measuring the extent and distribution of income poverty. The careful selection of sample of households chosen will enable to accurately describe living conditions in the country, and different parts of the country. Living standard measurement surveys (LSMSs), and other multi-topic surveys are generally geared toward measuring and analyzing poverty and are important instruments for poverty analysis. LSMS collect information on such factors as (i) household expenditures and income, (ii) health, (iii) education, (iv) employment, (v) agriculture, (vi) ownership of assets such as housing or land, and (vii) access to vaccination, health center use of mothers and children, satisfaction with health services and cost of treatment; (ii) educational attainment; (iii) occupation, male/female; (iv) migration; (v) access to basic service; sources of water, electricity access, sanitation, ownership of durable goods.



Appendix 1: ToR for Socio-economic Household Survey 2

This will include questions about (i) household income, (ii) demographics, and (iii) housing features. They can be good sources for (i) employment statistics, (ii) income-based poverty indicators, and (iii) input indicators such as access to basic services. Disaggregation of the collected data will increase their analytical usefulness. Unemployment and wage rates, for example, are likely to be particularly revealing for workers who are on the margin of the labor market (e.g., women) and for those with relatively low skills and schooling. Because the more vulnerable families gain income from subsistence agriculture, data on agriculture production for the domestic market, informal sector activities, and indicators of trends in relative prices will be most useful. Objective of the household survey To construct a set of socio-economic data for each of the sub-project (baseline) To build up a data base enabling to compare with other project data. To collect sufficient data to measure the poverty situation and likely impact of the project. Area to be surveyed IWRM plan implementation and operation will be in two selected hydrological zones defined as follows: - System rehabilitation and improvement in Narail ( gross area 31,600ha) approx. 46,500

Households - Chenchuri Beel area (gross area: 25,500ha) approx 32,500 Households Both the areas are adjacent and located in Narail district. Methodology The data collection methods, procedures, sampling strategies and size, data quality control, data management and processing, reporting etc. will have to fulfill the purpose of Socio-Economic Baseline Survey that include focus on poverty aspects and water related issues. Time Frame and conditionalities The study/socio-economic survey will have to complete far ahead of the end of the project to enable use of the results in the economic calculations. The deadline being for final submission of the results is end of July 2002. The final preparation of the questionnaires will need to be done with agreement of the expatriate economist of the project and other technical expert if asked for.



Appendix 2

Appendix 2

Questionnaire for Socio-economic Survey



Appendix 2: Questionnaire for Socio-economic Survey 1

Household ID No:----------

HOUSEHOLD INTERVIEW SCHEDULE

BASELINE SURVEY - 2004

Southwest Area Integrated Resources Management Project BWDB

Part A: general Characteristics 1. IDENTIFICATION

SL Particulars CODE

1 District Name

2 Upazila Name

3 Union Name

4 Village Name

5 Name of the Head of the Household:

6 Name of the Sub-Project: (Narail=1 Chencury=2)

7 Household Category (Large-1, Medium-2, Small-3, Marginal-4, Landless-5)

2. DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 2.1 Name of the Respondent: -----------------------------------------------------------

2.4 Religion: Buddhist/Christian/Muslim/Hindu/Others-Specify

2.5 Please Provide Household Members Information:

A. Number of family members: Male--- Female ------- Total _______ B. Total earning members of the family Male________ Female______ Total_______

Sl. # Name

(start with family head)

Rel

atio

n w

ith

Hea

d

Sex

Age

Mar

ital S

tatu

s

Edu

catio

n

Can

rea

d an

d

writ

e

Occ

upat

ion

Year Month Primary Secondary

2.6 Type of Family: Extended/Nuclear 2.7 Land Category: High Land (no flood) ______ acres, Medium Land (flood upto 3 feet)

____acre, Low Land (flood more than 3 feet) _____acres.




3. RESOURCES AND ASSETS:

A. Dwelling Unit:

1. House ownership: Yes/No

2. Type of house(made of): Floor ____________Wall_____________, Roof __________

3. Main living house space (sq.ft) ______________

4. Plinth Height (ft)_____________ Plinth Made of:__________________

A1. OTHER FACILITIES: 1. Does the household have electricity connection? Yes/No 2. If yes, Expenditure per Month in Taka:___________

Observation Note on Quality and Type of House: (e.g. more than one house for the family,

maintenance conditions, etc.

B. Land Tenure Pattern:

Land Type Decimal Land Type Decimal

1. Own cultivable Land 1. Land Sharecrop Out

2. Land Sharecrop In 2. Land Mortgage Out

3. Land Mortgage In 3. Land Lease Out

4.Land Lease In B. Sub-Total =

5. Homestead Area C. Operational Land (A-B)

6. Other Fallow Land

7. Beel/Baor/Ditch Land

8. Pond Area

A. Sub- Total =

Write down the following:

a. Type of agreement in case of ‘Share Cropping’ and ‘Lease’

b. Any seasonal problems with land cultivation/ Why these are problems?

Note: please keep a note on local unit of land.




C. LIVESTOCK AND TREE RESOURCES

1. Please provide details of household Livestock, Tree Resources

Type of Animal Number Estimated

Current Value in

Tk.

Type of Animal Number Estimated current

Value in Tk.

Cows Buffalos

Bullocks Goat

Sheep Pigs

Poultry: Duck Others (specify)

Chicken

Trees 2Yrs +

Fruit Bamboo Stands

Timber Others (fuel, Mulberry)

D. AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENTS

1. Please provide details of agricultural implements Types of equipment Number Value Tk. Types of equipment Number Value Tk.

1.Plough 6. Dao/Spade

2.Bullock-Cart 7.Fish Gears

3.Pumpset(irriga) 8.Boat

4.Tractor/ Power tiller 9.Ladder/Widder

5.Thrashing Machine 9.Others(specify)

E. DURABLES OWNED:

1. Please provide details of the following household durables:

Type of Durables Number Estimated Current

Value in Tk.

Type of Durables Number Estimated

Current Value in

Tk.

Bi-cycle Radio

Watch Television

Furniture (Cot, Chair,

Table, Almirah, Shelf)

Others (specify)

Cookeries




PART B: LIVELIHOOD OPTIONS, VULNERABILITY, INCOME AND EXPENDITURES:

1. PRODUCTION AND INCOME FROM MAJOR LIVELIHOODS:

Crops: Crop Name

Are

a (A

cre)

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Land

Pre

para

tion

Hired Labor (transplation, weeding, harvesting, threshing & storing, etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)

Chemical Fertilizer Organic Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Ow

n La

bor

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Val

ue

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others

Mds Tk No Tk Kg Tk Kg Tk Kg Tk Tk Tk Tk No Tk Tk

Kharif-I

Kharif-II

Rabi

Others

1.Sugarcane

2.Betel Leaf

3.Bamboo

4.Betel Nut

5.

6.

7.

1. Tenureship: (Own/ Sharecrop in/ Mortgage in/ Lease in, etc.). Terms: __________________ 2. Irrigation Methods followed _____________ & Terms (if rented):______________________ 3. If sold out crops-Price in Tk. A. Paddy: Farmgate______ Market______ Middleman______ Others______ B. Vegetable: Farmgate______ Market______ Middleman______ Others_____ C. Other: Farmgate______ Market______ Middleman______ Others_____ 4. Proportion of vegetables consumed and sold out? Consumption___% Sell_______% Distribution______% 5. Does he get fair price? Yes/ No If No, Why?__________________________________________________




Fish Sources

Are

a

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other Disease Control Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Ow

n La

bor

Gross Income

Acre kg Taka Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk No Tk No Taka

Pond

Beel

Ditch/ Drain

Cannel/ River

Flood plains

1. Proportion of vegetables consumed and sold out? Consumption___% Sell_______% Distribution________% 2. Fish Selling Price/Kg in Tk.: : Farmgate______ Market______ Middleman______ Others_____________ 3. Does he get fair price? Yes/ No If No, Why?__________________________________________________

Livestock Gross Sell Feed costs Treatment Costs Hired labor Own Labor Other Costs

Gross Income

Number/Kg Taka Taka Taka No Taka Taka Taka Taka

Cow

Goat

Poultry

Others

1. Proportion of vegetables consumed and sold out? Consumption___% Sell_______% Distribution________% 2. Egg Selling Price/Doz in Tk.: : Farmgate______ Market______ Middleman______ Others_______ 3 Milk Selling Price/Kg in Tk.: : Farmgate______ Market______ Middleman______ Others_______ 4. Does he get fair price? Yes/ No If No, Why?__________________________________________________

ACCESS TO INFORMATION:

1. Have you received any training on the following:

Areas Sources of Training Training Topic

DAE DOF Youth Ministry

NGO (specify)

TV/ Radio

Farmer Others

Agriculture

Fishery

Livestock




2. MAJOR SOURCES OF INCOME:

a. Please provide information on annual gross income on major income sources of the family

Income Sources Taka Income Sources Taka

Agriculture Livestock

Poultry Rickshaw/Van

Non-Agri. Labor Motor Driving

Agriculture Labor Boatmanship

Business Artisanal Product/ Handicraft

Fish Drying Classified Profession (cobbler, barber,

pottery)

Urban/Abroad Remittance Govt.Service

Doctor Private Service

Village Quack/Kabiraj Nursery/Seed Vendor

Begging Others (specify)

2. How vulnerability context affected your income/livelihood options? (break down answers

according to identified income sources)

3. HOUSEHOLD ANNUAL EXPENDITURE ON MAJOR ITEMS:

4.1. How much money have spent you during the last 12 months on the following purposes?

Expenditure Purpose Amount in Taka Expenditure Purpose Amount in Taka

Food Fuel/Electricity

Education Loan Repayment

Dowry Loan Interest Payment

Shelter Religious/ Social Events

Health Agri./Fishing Inputs

Clothes Others (specify)

Recreation

4.2. a. How the excess amount/ savings (income-expenditure) is used? ____________________

b. How did you manage if there was shortage in income (expenditure-income)

______________




4. FOOD SECURITY

1. How many months in a year can you feed your family out of your income? _______ Months

2. Which months do you have food shortage? ________________

3. What are the major causes of this food shortage? (state major two) ____________________

4. Please mention food consumed with dietary diversity during the last three days

Major Food Items Number of times/ meals- the

given food is consumed in a

day

Number of days the

given food is consumed

in the last week

Quantity

Consumed per

day (Kg/No)

Own prod./

Purchased

Own-1,

Purchased-2

Own + Pur=3

Rice (Kg)

Wheat (Kg)

Meat (Kg)

Egg (No)

Fish (Kg)

Milk (Kg)

Vegetables (Kg)

Pulses (Kg)

Oil (Kg)

Fruits (Kg)

5. VULNERABILITY AND HOUSEHOLD LIVELIHOOD SECURITY:

1. Please provide information on vulnerability conditions and livelihood insecurity level of the

household. Rank vulnerability conditions/context in order of importance and also distribute

100 as weight to specify degree/level of insecurity level in the matrix given below:

(Rank: High-1, Moderate-2, Low-3, Not Applicable- 0)

Vulnerability Context Rank Well-being Indicator

Income Food Health Housing P.Water

Flood

Water Logging

Cyclone

Drought

Loss of bio-diversity

Excessive Rain

Siltation

Heavy Rainfall

Storm

Tidal flood

Others

2. Please describe how in which months you are highly affected and insecure:




3. Coping Strategies followed to address food insecurity and vulnerability:

Coping Strategies Y/N

ran

k

Ran

k

k

Coping Strategies Y/N

ran

k

Adjustment to meal Labor selling

Food substitution Loan from money lender

Sale of assets Loan from NGO

Borrowing from relatives/friends Use current net

Credit from Bank Mortgage out land

Consumption of wild/unusual foods Use saved money

Alternative employment Use stocked food

VGD/WFP Sell animals (cow, goat, poultry)

Illegal activities Others (specify)

4. Adaptation Strategies followed to address vulnerability and insecurity:

Adaptation Strategies Y/N

ran

k

Adaptation Strategies Y/N

ran

k

M F M F

Alternative IGA Duck Rearing

Water Tolerant Crop Variety Hydroponics

Homestead gardening Food Processing

Honey Collection CAGE Culture

Integrated Gher Farming Others (Specify)

4.1 Do you have any strategy to make the unused land productive? Yes/ No

4.2 If yes, please mention the strategy:

5. SAVINGS AND CREDIT:

1. Please provide information regarding savings and credit services you received during the

year?

Name of

Sources

Used for

Savings?

Y/N

Used for

Credit?

Y/N

Loan at

the begin-

inng of the

year (Tk)

Loan

Taken

during the

Year (Tk)

Total Loan repaid during

the Year

(Taka)

Annual

Interest

Rate in %

Satisfaction Level:

High-1, Moderate-

2, No-3

Principal Interest

1.Bank

2.Money Lenders

3.Relative

4.NGOs

5.Others




PART C: HEALTH & HYGEINE

1. Do you use latrine : Yes/No Types of Latrine: ____________

2. If it goes under water during rainy season? Yes/ No

3. If yes, what do you do? ______________________________________

4. Do children <5 yrs use latrine? Yes/ No. If no, where do they defecate? ___________

5. Hand washing practices (use tick)

Water Ash Soap Mud

Before Eating

After Defecation

6. Do you use sandal, while going to toilet? Yes/ No

7. Did any children (< 5yrs) suffer from diarrhea during the last 14 days? Yes/ No

8. Please describe the water use pattern of your family?

Water Sources Water Sources used for (use Tick)

Is th

e w

ater

cont

amin

ated

with

ars

enic

Y/N

Wat

er tr

eatm

ent

prac

tices


Tube-well

Pond

DTW

STW

Well/Kua

Rain Water

Surface Water

Others (Specify)

9. Did any of the family member suffered for diseases during the last one year period? If

yes, mention type of diseases and who was consulted? (Satisfaction Level = High-1, Moderate-2, Low-3, Not-4, N/A=0)

Disease Types

Gov

t.

Hos

pita

l

M.B

.B.S

Tra

ditio

nal

Hea

ler/

Kab

iraj

TB

A

FW

A

NG

O

Priv

ate

Clin

ic

Vill

.

Doc

tor

Hom

eo

Satisfaction Level with the

service providers




F. DIFFERENT SERVICES:

1. Please provide information regarding services you used during the last year?

Services Y/N

Services Y/N

1. Department of Agricultural Extension 14.Grameen Bank

2. Department of Fisheries 15. Other Government Offices (BRDB)

3. Forest Department 16. LGED

4. Agri Private Companies (seed, fertilizer,

pesticide)

17. Union Parishad

5. Govt. Family Planning 18. Land Registration Office

6. Union Health Center 19. School/College

7. Upazila Health Center 20. Security Department (Police, VDP)

8.Govt. Immunization Services 21. Post Office

9. Private Health Services 22. Upazila/District Court

10.Veterinary Hospital 23. Telephone

11. Public Health Department 24. REB/ PDB

12. Commercial/ Krishi Bank 25.Social Welfare/ Women Affairs

13. NGOs/CBOs (specify name) 26. Others (specify)

PART G: GENDER DIMENSIONS IN PARTICIPATION, ACCESS TO RESOURCES AND INFORMATION:

1. Please provide information on the following dimensions related to status of female at the

household and community level.


No L M H No L M H

1. Control over household resources (land, crop, cow, etc.)

Mobility inside the community (relative, shop, group meeting, etc.)

2. Mobility outside the community (market, labor, crop field, hospital, bank, fail, movie, etc.)


a. Decision to have new children

b. Decision to undertake new economic activity

c. Decision to purchase/sell of property

d. Decision to children schooling

e. Decision to children marriage

f. Decision to buy inputs and daily essentials


a. Participation in Mosque Committee

b. Participation in Village Shalish

c. Participation in Village Development Activities

d. Participation in School Management Committee

e. Participation in Union Parishad

6. Knowledge and Awareness:

a. Law related to Marriage and divorce

b. Law related to inheritance rights

c. Legal process to torture and inhuman treatment

7. Plan for crisis management/ future L =low M = Medium H = High




PART E: PROBLEMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. What are the three major problems you face in meeting household needs?

Problem-1 Agriculture: _________________________________________________

Problem-2 Fisheries: _________________________________________________

Problem-2 Other: _________________________________________________

[based on priority]

2. How are you dealing with these problems?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

3. Overall Comments of the enumerator

Signature of the Interviewer

Date:



Appendix 3

Appendix 3

Location Map

(Chenchuri & Narail



Appendix 3: Location Map (Chenchuri & Narail) 1



Appendix 3: Location Map (Chenchuri & Narail) 2



Appendix 4

Appendix 4

Socio-economic Tables for Chenchuri



Appendix 4: Socio-Economic Tables for Chenchuri 1

HH SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY CHENCHURI BEEL SUB-PROJECT

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILES Table: 1 Distribution of households according to their land category and sex in

Chenchuri

6 28 35 35 159 263

2.3% 10.6% 13.3% 13.3% 60.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.0% 95.6%

12 12

100.0% 100.0%

7.0% 4.4%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Male

Female

Household

Head Sex

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 2 Distribution of households according to their religiosity and land

category in Chenchuri

6 25 31 29 148 239

2.5% 10.5% 13.0% 12.1% 61.9% 100.0%

100.0% 89.3% 88.6% 82.9% 86.5% 86.9%

3 4 6 23 36

8.3% 11.1% 16.7% 63.9% 100.0%

10.7% 11.4% 17.1% 13.5% 13.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Muslim

Hindu

Religion

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 3 Distribution of households according to their member size and land


1 8 8 15 70 102

1.0% 7.8% 7.8% 14.7% 68.6% 100.0%

16.7% 28.6% 22.9% 42.9% 40.9% 37.1%

3 13 19 13 69 117

2.6% 11.1% 16.2% 11.1% 59.0% 100.0%

50.0% 46.4% 54.3% 37.1% 40.4% 42.5%

4 6 6 30 46

8.7% 13.0% 13.0% 65.2% 100.0%

14.3% 17.1% 17.1% 17.5% 16.7%

2 3 2 1 2 10

20.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 20.0% 100.0%

33.3% 10.7% 5.7% 2.9% 1.2% 3.6%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

1-4

5-6

7-9

10 +

HH Member

Size

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 4 Distribution of households according to their member size and sex of

HH Heads in Chenchuri

Table-5 Average Households Size according to Land Category in Chenchuri



Mean 8.17 5.79 5.69 5.31 4.96 5.25

SD 5.95 2.53 2.07 2.00 1.75 2.12


Table-6 Average Size of Household Earning Member According to Sex and Land Category in Chenchuri

Household Category

Male Female Total


Large 1.83 0.98 0.00 0.00 1.83 0.98

Medium 1.29 0.85 0.11 0.31 1.39 0.79

Small 1.51 0.78 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.78

Marginal 1.40 0.65 0.02 0.17 1.43 0.65

Landless 1.29 0.66 0.08 0.33 1.37 0.67

Total 1.34 0.70 0.06 0.29 1.41 0.70

94 115 44 10 263

35.7% 43.7% 16.7% 3.8% 100.0%

92.2% 98.3% 95.7% 100.0% 95.6%

8 2 2 12

66.7% 16.7% 16.7% 100.0%

7.8% 1.7% 4.3% 4.4%

102 117 46 10 275

37.1% 42.5% 16.7% 3.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Male

Female

Household

Head Sex

Total

1-4 5-6 7-9 10 +

HH Member Size

Total




Table 7 Distribution of households according to their number of earning member

in the family by land category in Chenchuri

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

3 21 22 23 121 190

1.6% 11.1% 11.6% 12.1% 63.7% 100.0%

50.0% 75.0% 62.9% 65.7% 70.8% 69.1%

1 4 9 9 36 59

1.7% 6.8% 15.3% 15.3% 61.0% 100.0%

16.7% 14.3% 25.7% 25.7% 21.1% 21.5%

2 3 4 3 13 25

8.0% 12.0% 16.0% 12.0% 52.0% 100.0%

33.3% 10.7% 11.4% 8.6% 7.6% 9.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

One

Two

Three +

Total Earning

Member

Total


Household Category

Total


in the family according to sex of household heads in Chenchuri

182 56 25 263

69.2% 21.3% 9.5% 100.0%

95.8% 94.9% 100.0% 95.6%

1 8 3 12

8.3% 66.7% 25.0% 100.0%

100.0% 4.2% 5.1% 4.4%

1 190 59 25 275

.4% 69.1% 21.5% 9.1% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Male

Female

Household

Head Sex

Total

No One Two Three +

Total Earning Member

Total




Table: 9 Distribution of households heads according to their primary occupation by sex in Chenchuri

40 2 42

95.2% 4.8% 100.0%

15.2% 16.7% 15.3%

21 21

100.0% 100.0%

8.0% 7.6%

38 38

100.0% 100.0%

14.4% 13.8%

38 2 40

95.0% 5.0% 100.0%

14.4% 16.7% 14.5%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

13 13

100.0% 100.0%

4.9% 4.7%

34 1 35

97.1% 2.9% 100.0%

12.9% 8.3% 12.7%

7 7

100.0% 100.0%

2.7% 2.5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

1.9% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

29 1 30

96.7% 3.3% 100.0%

11.0% 8.3% 10.9%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

25 6 31

80.6% 19.4% 100.0%

9.5% 50.0% 11.3%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Pottery

Fisherman

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Service

Vill Doc

HH Work

Others

Primary

Occupation

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 10 Distribution of households heads according to their primary occupation by land category in Chenchuri

1 12 15 4 10 42

2.4% 28.6% 35.7% 9.5% 23.8% 100.0%

16.7% 42.9% 42.9% 11.4% 5.8% 15.3%

1 20 21

4.8% 95.2% 100.0%

2.9% 11.7% 7.6%

4 5 11 18 38

10.5% 13.2% 28.9% 47.4% 100.0%

14.3% 14.3% 31.4% 10.5% 13.8%

2 38 40

5.0% 95.0% 100.0%

5.7% 22.2% 14.5%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.8% 1.1%

1 12 13

7.7% 92.3% 100.0%

2.9% 7.0% 4.7%

3 1 5 26 35

8.6% 2.9% 14.3% 74.3% 100.0%

10.7% 2.9% 14.3% 15.2% 12.7%

1 6 7

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

2.9% 3.5% 2.5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

1.2% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.9% .6% .7%

3 1 4 7 15 30

10.0% 3.3% 13.3% 23.3% 50.0% 100.0%

50.0% 3.6% 11.4% 20.0% 8.8% 10.9%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

2 7 7 2 13 31

6.5% 22.6% 22.6% 6.5% 41.9% 100.0%

33.3% 25.0% 20.0% 5.7% 7.6% 11.3%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

3.6% 1.2% 1.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Pottery

Fisherman

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Service

Vill Doc

HH Work

Others

Primary

Occupation

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 11 Distribution of households heads according to their secondary occupation by Sex in Chenchuri

93 3 96

96.9% 3.1% 100.0%

35.4% 25.0% 34.9%

43 2 45

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

16.3% 16.7% 16.4%

29 2 31

93.5% 6.5% 100.0%

11.0% 16.7% 11.3%

7 1 8

87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

2.7% 8.3% 2.9%

30 30

100.0% 100.0%

11.4% 10.9%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

1.9% 1.8%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

9 9

100.0% 100.0%

3.4% 3.3%

29 1 30

96.7% 3.3% 100.0%

11.0% 8.3% 10.9%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

.4% 16.7% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

.4% 8.3% .7%

8 8

100.0% 100.0%

3.0% 2.9%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Driver

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Teacher

Vill Doc

HH Work

Boatmanship

Secondary

Occupation

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 12 Distribution of households heads according to their secondary occupation by land category in Chenchuri

2 9 16 10 59 96

2.1% 9.4% 16.7% 10.4% 61.5% 100.0%

33.3% 32.1% 45.7% 28.6% 34.5% 34.9%

4 10 10 6 15 45

8.9% 22.2% 22.2% 13.3% 33.3% 100.0%

66.7% 35.7% 28.6% 17.1% 8.8% 16.4%

31 31

100.0% 100.0%

18.1% 11.3%

1 2 5 8

12.5% 25.0% 62.5% 100.0%

2.9% 5.7% 2.9% 2.9%

2 6 22 30

6.7% 20.0% 73.3% 100.0%

5.7% 17.1% 12.9% 10.9%

1 4 5

20.0% 80.0% 100.0%

2.9% 2.3% 1.8%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

1.2% .7%

1 8 9

11.1% 88.9% 100.0%

2.9% 4.7% 3.3%

6 5 9 10 30

20.0% 16.7% 30.0% 33.3% 100.0%

21.4% 14.3% 25.7% 5.8% 10.9%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

3.6% .6% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

3.6% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.8% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

3.6% .6% .7%

1 7 8

12.5% 87.5% 100.0%

2.9% 4.1% 2.9%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Driver

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Teacher

Vill Doc

HH Work

Boatmanship

Secondary

Occupation

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 13 Distribution of household heads according to their age group and land category in Chenchuri

1 1 4 6

16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

2.9% 2.9% 2.3% 2.2%

1 5 4 37 47

2.1% 10.6% 8.5% 78.7% 100.0%

3.6% 14.3% 11.4% 21.6% 17.1%

1 6 6 9 59 81

1.2% 7.4% 7.4% 11.1% 72.8% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 17.1% 25.7% 34.5% 29.5%

1 9 13 12 37 72

1.4% 12.5% 18.1% 16.7% 51.4% 100.0%

16.7% 32.1% 37.1% 34.3% 21.6% 26.2%

4 12 10 9 34 69

5.8% 17.4% 14.5% 13.0% 49.3% 100.0%

66.7% 42.9% 28.6% 25.7% 19.9% 25.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 20

21-30

31-40

41-50

51 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 14 Distribution of household members according to their age group and sex in Chenchuri

105 78 183

57.4% 42.6% 100.0%

13.8% 11.7% 12.8%

103 97 200

51.5% 48.5% 100.0%

13.6% 14.5% 14.0%

110 88 198

55.6% 44.4% 100.0%

14.5% 13.2% 13.9%

191 178 369

51.8% 48.2% 100.0%

25.1% 26.6% 25.8%

128 124 252

50.8% 49.2% 100.0%

16.8% 18.5% 17.6%

87 70 157

55.4% 44.6% 100.0%

11.4% 10.5% 11.0%

36 34 70

51.4% 48.6% 100.0%

4.7% 5.1% 4.9%

760 669 1429

53.2% 46.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 5

6-10

11-17

18-30

31-45

46-60

61 +

Age

Group

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total




Table 15 Distribution of household members according to their age group and land category in Chenchuri

4 23 18 22 116 183

2.2% 12.6% 9.8% 12.0% 63.4% 100.0%

9.8% 14.2% 9.0% 11.7% 13.8% 12.8%

5 13 27 26 129 200

2.5% 6.5% 13.5% 13.0% 64.5% 100.0%

12.2% 8.0% 13.6% 13.8% 15.4% 14.0%

6 23 30 33 106 198

3.0% 11.6% 15.2% 16.7% 53.5% 100.0%

14.6% 14.2% 15.1% 17.6% 12.6% 13.9%

9 41 53 49 217 369

2.4% 11.1% 14.4% 13.3% 58.8% 100.0%

22.0% 25.3% 26.6% 26.1% 25.9% 25.8%

9 32 40 30 141 252

3.6% 12.7% 15.9% 11.9% 56.0% 100.0%

22.0% 19.8% 20.1% 16.0% 16.8% 17.6%

3 17 22 23 92 157

1.9% 10.8% 14.0% 14.6% 58.6% 100.0%

7.3% 10.5% 11.1% 12.2% 11.0% 11.0%

5 13 9 5 38 70

7.1% 18.6% 12.9% 7.1% 54.3% 100.0%

12.2% 8.0% 4.5% 2.7% 4.5% 4.9%

41 162 199 188 839 1429

2.9% 11.3% 13.9% 13.2% 58.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 5

6-10

11-17

18-30

31-45

46-60

61 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 16 Distribution of household heads according to their marital status and sex in Chenchuri

251 6 257

97.7% 2.3% 100.0%

95.4% 50.0% 93.5%

11 11

100.0% 100.0%

4.2% 4.0%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

41.7% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

8.3% .4%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widower

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 17 Distribution of household heads according to their marital status and sex in Chenchuri

6 27 34 33 157 257

2.3% 10.5% 13.2% 12.8% 61.1% 100.0%

100.0% 96.4% 97.1% 94.3% 91.8% 93.5%

1 2 8 11

9.1% 18.2% 72.7% 100.0%

2.9% 5.7% 4.7% 4.0%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

3.6% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widower

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 18 Distribution of household members according to their marital status and sex in Chenchuri

318 328 646

49.2% 50.8% 100.0%

41.8% 49.0% 45.2%

439 291 730

60.1% 39.9% 100.0%

57.8% 43.5% 51.1%

1 45 46

2.2% 97.8% 100.0%

.1% 6.7% 3.2%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

.3% .1% .2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.1% .1%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .2%

760 669 1429

53.2% 46.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widowed

Divorced

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total




Table: 19 Distribution of household members according to their marital status and land category in Chenchuri

20 76 83 87 380 646

3.1% 11.8% 12.8% 13.5% 58.8% 100.0%

48.8% 46.9% 41.7% 46.3% 45.3% 45.2%

20 79 111 98 422 730

2.7% 10.8% 15.2% 13.4% 57.8% 100.0%

48.8% 48.8% 55.8% 52.1% 50.3% 51.1%

1 5 5 3 32 46

2.2% 10.9% 10.9% 6.5% 69.6% 100.0%

2.4% 3.1% 2.5% 1.6% 3.8% 3.2%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

.6% .2% .2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.1% .1%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

.6% .2% .2%

41 162 199 188 839 1429

2.9% 11.3% 13.9% 13.2% 58.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widowed

Divorced

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 20 Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and sex in Chenchuri

120 11 131

91.6% 8.4% 100.0%

45.6% 91.7% 47.6%

26 26

100.0% 100.0%

9.9% 9.5%

10 10

100.0% 100.0%

3.8% 3.6%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

1.9% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

52 52

100.0% 100.0%

19.8% 18.9%

49 1 50

98.0% 2.0% 100.0%

18.6% 8.3% 18.2%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Can Write Letter

Upto V

IV-X

Educational

Status

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 21 Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and

land category in Chenchuri

1 6 9 12 103 131

.8% 4.6% 6.9% 9.2% 78.6% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 25.7% 34.3% 60.2% 47.6%

1 6 5 6 8 26

3.8% 23.1% 19.2% 23.1% 30.8% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 14.3% 17.1% 4.7% 9.5%

1 3 3 2 1 10

10.0% 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 100.0%

16.7% 10.7% 8.6% 5.7% .6% 3.6%

1 1 1 2 5

20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 100.0%

16.7% 3.6% 2.9% 1.2% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

1 4 5 6 36 52

1.9% 7.7% 9.6% 11.5% 69.2% 100.0%

16.7% 14.3% 14.3% 17.1% 21.1% 18.9%

1 8 13 7 21 50

2.0% 16.0% 26.0% 14.0% 42.0% 100.0%

16.7% 28.6% 37.1% 20.0% 12.3% 18.2%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Can Write Letter

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 22 Distribution of household members according to their educational status

and sex in Chenchuri

285 304 589

48.4% 51.6% 100.0%

37.5% 45.4% 41.2%

68 25 93

73.1% 26.9% 100.0%

8.9% 3.7% 6.5%

21 7 28

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

2.8% 1.0% 2.0%

12 1 13

92.3% 7.7% 100.0%

1.6% .1% .9%

3 3 6

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

.4% .4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.1% .1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.1% .1%

3 1 4

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

.4% .1% .3%

221 201 422

52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

29.1% 30.0% 29.5%

145 127 272

53.3% 46.7% 100.0%

19.1% 19.0% 19.0%

760 669 1429

53.2% 46.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

Dip Eng

Can Write Letter

Others

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total




Table: 23 Distribution of household members according to their educational status and land category in Chenchuri

8 44 60 65 412 589

1.4% 7.5% 10.2% 11.0% 69.9% 100.0%

19.5% 27.2% 30.2% 34.6% 49.1% 41.2%

5 19 22 18 29 93

5.4% 20.4% 23.7% 19.4% 31.2% 100.0%

12.2% 11.7% 11.1% 9.6% 3.5% 6.5%

4 7 13 3 1 28

14.3% 25.0% 46.4% 10.7% 3.6% 100.0%

9.8% 4.3% 6.5% 1.6% .1% 2.0%

2 6 1 1 3 13

15.4% 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 23.1% 100.0%

4.9% 3.7% .5% .5% .4% .9%

2 3 1 6

33.3% 50.0% 16.7% 100.0%

1.2% 1.5% .5% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.5% .1%

2 2 4

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1.1% .2% .3%

12 43 45 49 273 422

2.8% 10.2% 10.7% 11.6% 64.7% 100.0%

29.3% 26.5% 22.6% 26.1% 32.5% 29.5%

10 40 55 48 119 272

3.7% 14.7% 20.2% 17.6% 43.8% 100.0%

24.4% 24.7% 27.6% 25.5% 14.2% 19.0%

41 162 199 188 839 1429

2.9% 11.3% 13.9% 13.2% 58.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

Dip Eng

Can Write Letter

Others

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total


Household Category

Total




RESOURCE AND ASSETS Table: 24 Average amounts of land possessions per household according to tenural

pattern by sex and land category in Chenchuri. [In Decimal] Land Category Own Cultivable Land Land Share Crop In


Large 761.50 40.33 801.83 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 294.07 2.17 296.25 14.96 0.00 14.96

Small 176.91 0.22 177.14 34.31 0.00 34.31

Marginal 76.80 1.71 78.51 41.94 0.00 41.94

Landless 10.52 0.93 11.45 21.87 0.77 22.64

Total-average 85.39 1.93 87.32 24.82 0.48 25.31

[In Decimal]

Land Category Land Mortgage In Land Lease In


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.42 0.00 0.42 0.39 0.00 0.39

Small 6.45 0.00 6.45 2.97 0.68 3.65

Marginal 9.14 0.00 9.14 5.14 0.00 5.14

Landless 5.57 1.75 7.32 0.91 0.26 1.17

Total-average 5.49 1.09 6.58 1.64 0.25 1.89

[In Decimal]

Land Category Homestead Area Other Fallow Land


Large 73.83 0.00 73.83 15.00 0.00 15.00

Medium 46.00 0.00 46.00 0.71 0.00 0.71

Small 24.40 0.00 24.40 0.00 0.00 0.00

Marginal 19.85 7.00 26.85 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 11.54 0.45 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total-average 19.10 1.17 20.28 0.40 0.00 0.40

[In Decimal]

Land Category Beel/Ditch Land Pond Area


Large 12.50 0.00 12.50 143.33 0.00 143.33

Medium 13.07 0.00 13.07 7.46 0.00 7.46

Small 6.91 0.00 6.91 7.02 0.00 7.02

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.91 0.00 5.91

Landless 0.05 0.00 0.05 1.73 0.16 1.90

Total-average 2.52 0.00 2.52 6.61 0.10 6.72

[In Decimal]

Land Category Share Crop Out Land Mortgage Out Land


Large 188.00 0.00 188.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 64.75 0.92 65.67 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 27.31 0.05 27.38 11.62 0.00 11.62

Marginal 37.08 1.71 38.80 10.08 0.00 10.08

Landless 2.01 1.75 3.77 1.33 0.80 2.14

Total-average 20.20 1.41 21.62 3.59 0.50 4.09

[In Decimal]

Land Category Land Lease Out Total Operational Land


Large 16.00 0.00 16.00 789.66 40.33 830.00

Medium 21.89 0.00 21.89 277.39 1.25 278.64

Small 4.37 0.00 4.37 208.77 0.85 209.62

Marginal 1.71 0.00 1.71 109.91 7.00 116.91

Landless 0.29 0.49 0.78 48.47 1.30 49.78

Total-average 3.53 0.30 3.84 116.41 2.81 119.24




Table: 25 Distribution of households according to their involvement in land share-cropping in by land category in Chenchuri

5 12 15 73 105

4.8% 11.4% 14.3% 69.5% 100.0%

17.9% 34.3% 42.9% 42.7% 38.2%

6 23 23 20 98 170

3.5% 13.5% 13.5% 11.8% 57.6% 100.0%

100.0% 82.1% 65.7% 57.1% 57.3% 61.8%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

YES

NO

Sharecrop

In

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 26 Distribution of households who are engaged in sharecropping with terms of sharecropping and land category in Chenchuri

4 5 27 36

11.1% 13.9% 75.0% 100.0%

33.3% 33.3% 37.0% 34.3%

4 7 10 41 62

6.5% 11.3% 16.1% 66.1% 100.0%

80.0% 58.3% 66.7% 56.2% 59.0%

1 1 5 7

14.3% 14.3% 71.4% 100.0%

20.0% 8.3% 6.8% 6.7%

5 12 15 73 105

4.8% 11.4% 14.3% 69.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

HALF-HALF (50% Owner and 50%

Sharecropper)

ONE-TWO (One third Owner and Two

third Sharecropper (IRRI Boro)

Land is mortgaged out with a condition

that Owner will cultivate on

asharecropping basis (50 : 50)

Share

crop

Terms

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 27 Distribution of households according to their involvement in land mortgage out by land category in Chenchuri

6 6 6 18

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

17.1% 17.1% 3.5% 6.5%

6 28 29 29 165 257

2.3% 10.9% 11.3% 11.3% 64.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 82.9% 82.9% 96.5% 93.5%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

YES

NO

Mortgage

Out

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 28 Distribution of households according to their responses on if the male own the living house by land category in Chenchuri

6 28 33 31 155 253

2.4% 11.1% 13.0% 12.3% 61.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 94.3% 88.6% 90.6% 92.0%

2 4 16 22

9.1% 18.2% 72.7% 100.0%

5.7% 11.4% 9.4% 8.0%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If Male Own

the House

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 29 Distribution of households according to their responses on if the female own the living house by land category in Chenchuri

2 4 16 22

9.1% 18.2% 72.7% 100.0%

5.7% 11.4% 9.4% 8.0%

6 28 33 31 155 253

2.4% 11.1% 13.0% 12.3% 61.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 94.3% 88.6% 90.6% 92.0%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If Female Own

the House

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 30 Distribution of households according to their house floor type by land category in Chenchuri

2 20 26 35 171 254

.8% 7.9% 10.2% 13.8% 67.3% 100.0%

33.3% 71.4% 74.3% 100.0% 100.0% 92.4%

4 7 6 17

23.5% 41.2% 35.3% 100.0%

66.7% 25.0% 17.1% 6.2%

1 3 4

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

3.6% 8.6% 1.5%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Soil/Mud

Pucca

Semi-Pucca

Floor

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 31 Distribution of households according to their house wall type by land category in Chenchuri

1 4 5 14 24

4.2% 16.7% 20.8% 58.3% 100.0%

3.6% 11.4% 14.3% 8.2% 8.7%

5 4 6 31 46

10.9% 8.7% 13.0% 67.4% 100.0%

17.9% 11.4% 17.1% 18.1% 16.7%

3 7 7 12 47 76

3.9% 9.2% 9.2% 15.8% 61.8% 100.0%

50.0% 25.0% 20.0% 34.3% 27.5% 27.6%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.9% 1.2% 1.1%

1 5 4 11 21

4.8% 23.8% 19.0% 52.4% 100.0%

3.6% 14.3% 11.4% 6.4% 7.6%

2 4 4 45 55

3.6% 7.3% 7.3% 81.8% 100.0%

7.1% 11.4% 11.4% 26.3% 20.0%

2 3 5

40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

5.7% 1.8% 1.8%

2 9 6 17

11.8% 52.9% 35.3% 100.0%

33.3% 32.1% 17.1% 6.2%

1 1 4 6

16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

16.7% 2.9% 2.3% 2.2%

1 7 8

12.5% 87.5% 100.0%

3.6% 4.1% 2.9%

2 2 1 2 7

28.6% 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 100.0%

7.1% 5.7% 2.9% 1.2% 2.5%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

2.3% 1.5%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

5.7% .6% 1.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Soil/Mud

Bamboo

Tin

Chatai

Timber/Wood

Jute Stick

Straw

Pucca

Semi-Pucca

Bamboo + Tin

Wood + Tin

Bamboo +Wood

Tin + Goal /Hogla

Wall

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 32 Distribution of households according to their house roof type by land category in Chenchuri

4 27 34 34 160 259

1.5% 10.4% 13.1% 13.1% 61.8% 100.0%

66.7% 96.4% 97.1% 97.1% 93.6% 94.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

1 1 8 10

10.0% 10.0% 80.0% 100.0%

2.9% 2.9% 4.7% 3.6%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

33.3% 3.6% 1.1%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

1.2% .7%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Tin

Jute Stick

Straw

Pucca

Chhan

Roof

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 33 Distribution of households according to their responses on if they have electricity by land category in Chenchuri

4 16 14 10 16 60

6.7% 26.7% 23.3% 16.7% 26.7% 100.0%

66.7% 57.1% 40.0% 28.6% 9.4% 21.8%

2 12 21 25 155 215

.9% 5.6% 9.8% 11.6% 72.1% 100.0%

33.3% 42.9% 60.0% 71.4% 90.6% 78.2%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If has Electricity

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 34 Average amount of expenditure made by households who have electricity per month in electricity in Taka by land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Sample HH Mean Standard Deviation

Large 4 257.50 137.44

Medium 16 142.87 55.09

Small 14 123.07 28.34

Marginal 10 111.00 42.01

Landless 16 109.00 19.64

Total 60 131.55 60.11




LIVESTOCK, POULTRY AND TREE RESOURCES Table: 35 Average number and value (Taka) of livestock resources according to sex

and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Cows (No) Cows (Taka)

Total Male Female Total Male Female

Large 2.33 2.33 0.00 11633.33 11633.33 0.00

Medium 1.25 1.21 0.03 7000.00 6785.71 214.29

Small 1.57 1.43 0.14 6234.28 5377.14 857.14

Marginal 1.02 0.86 0.17 4485.71 3800.00 685.71

Landless 0.56 0.46 0.11 3007.60 2352.63 654.97

Total 0.86 0.75 0.11 4201.09 3575.64 625.45

Land Category Bullocks (No) Bullocks (Taka)


Large 0.33 0.33 0.00 2666.66 2666.66 0.00

Medium 0.35 0.32 0.03 1964.28 1642.85 321.42

Small 0.45 0.46 0.00 2202.85 2202.85 0.00

Marginal 0.17 0.17 0.00 900.00 900.00 0.00

Landless 0.16 0.14 0.01 829.23 801.16 28.07

Total 0.22 0.21 0.01 1168.72 1118.54 50.18

Land Category Sheep (No) Sheep (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Land Category Duck (No) Duck (Taka)


Large 5.00 5.00 0.00 200.00 200.00 0.00

Medium 2.42 1.18 1.25 182.50 103.92 78.57

Small 2.60 0.97 1.63 201.14 74.85 126.28

Marginal 2.51 0.60 1.91 186.57 42.85 143.71

Landless 2.39 0.74 1.65 196.99 97.16 99.82

Total 2.49 0.89 1.61 194.78 90.34 104.43

Land Category Chicken (No) Chicken (Taka)


Large 11.66 8.67 2.50 508.33 316.66 191.66

Medium 7.60 5.21 2.39 454.46 605.53 148.92

Small 5.40 2.31 3.09 350.00 143.42 206.57

Marginal 5.11 0.91 4.20 391.28 80.00 311.28

Landless 4.08 0.61 3.48 234.55 61.87 172.68

Total 4.89 1.51 3.39 297.56 104.92 192.63

Land Category Buffalos (No) Buffalos (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.11 0.11 0.00 928.57 928.57 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.01 0.01 0.00 94.54 94.54 0.00




Land Category Goat (No) Goat (Taka)


Large 0.17 0.17 0.00 266.66 266.66 0.00

Medium 0.11 0.11 0.00 160.71 160.71 0.00

Small 0.23 0.23 0.00 241.42 241.42 0.00

Marginal 0.25 0.14 0.11 197.14 77.14 120.00

Landless 0.38 0.18 0.21 232.45 118.42 114.03

Total 0.32 0.17 0.15 222.54 136.36 86.18

Land Category Kabutar (No) Kabutar (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.11 0.11 0.00 5.35 5.35 0.00

Small 0.40 0.34 0.05 15.42 14.28 1.14

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.24 0.12 0.12 10.05 5.84 4.21

Total 0.21 0.13 0.08 8.76 6.00 2.76

Land Category Others (No) Others (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.39 0.39 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00

Small 1.00 1.00 0.00 30.28 30.28 0.00

Marginal 0.57 0.11 0.46 22.85 3.42 19.42

Landless 0.09 0.05 0.04 12.85 10.87 2.10

Total 0.29 0.21 0.08 17.89 14.10 3.78


Total Male Female


Large 15275.00 9441.06 15083.33 9375.80 191.66 300.69

Medium 10725.89 8315.72 9962.67 8141.41 763.21 2210.42

Small 9275.42 6458.06 8084.28 6718.96 1191.14 3053.38

Marginal 6183.57 6558.21 4903.42 6554.88 1280.14 2704.34

Landless 4523.88 5942.17 3447.98 5054.24 1075.90 2953.62

Total 6205.90 6907.85 5140.47 6508.56 1065.43 2827.39

Table: 36 Average number and value (Taka) of tree resources according to sex and


Land Category Fruit Trees (No) Fruit Trees (Taka)


Large 18.83 18.83 0.00 25333.33 25333.33 0.00

Medium 7.23 5.23 2.00 8496.67 7960.96 535.71

Small 7.62 6.85 0.77 8328.57 7385.71 942.85

Marginal 5.85 5.71 0.14 4727.14 4598.57 128.57

Landless 8.47 2.97 5.50 1572.57 1482.22 90.35

Total 81.06 4.80 76.26 4057.33 3810.24 247.09

Land Category Timber Trees (No) Timber Trees (Taka)


Large 48.83 48.83 0.00 12083.33 12083.33 0.00

Medium 20.42 20.42 0.00 8080.35 8080.35 0.00

Small 13.97 10.89 3.09 7234.28 6177.14 1057.14

Marginal 6.48 6.37 0.11 4055.71 3992.58 62.85

Landless 3.47 3.33 0.15 1360.23 1301.46 58.77

Total 7.90 7.41 0.50 3369.09 3190.00 179.09




Land Category Bamboo (No) Bamboo (Taka)


Large 94.16 94.17 0.00 3600.00 3600.00 0.00

Medium 68.89 66.39 2.50 2794.46 2681.96 112.50

Small 62.51 59.51 3.00 2838.14 2192.42 645.71

Marginal 27.08 26.66 0.43 1043.42 1030.57 12.85

Landless 15.73 13.75 1.99 578.12 511.90 66.22

Total 30.25 28.33 1.93 1216.58 1080.12 136.45

Land Category Other Tree (No) Other Tree (Taka)


Large 3.33 3.33 0.00 333.33 333.33 0.00

Medium 4.21 4.21 0.00 432.14 432.14 0.00

Small 0.97 0.97 0.00 302.85 302.85 0.00

Marginal 0.86 0.86 0.00 230.00 230.00 0.00

Landless 0.93 0.93 0.00 125.02 125.02 0.00

Total 1.31 1.31 0.00 196.83 196.83 0.00


Total Male Female


Large 41350.00 24498.22 41350.00 24498.22 0.00 0.00

Medium 19803.64 18827.87 19155.43 17845.86 648.21 2874.90

Small 18703.86 19020.90 16057.14 16450.12 2645.71 12836.23

Marginal 10056.29 14300.34 9852.00 14246.70 204.28 810.44

Landless 3635.96 5663.89 3420.61 5462.78 215.35 982.05

Total 8839.84 14177.54 8277.20 13357.75 562.63 4753.29

AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENTS Table: 37 Average number and value (Taka) of Agricultural Equipments/

Implements according to sex and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Plough (No) Plough (Taka)


Large 0.16 0.16 0.00 66.66 66.66 0.00

Medium 0.39 0.39 0.00 152.50 152.50 0.00

Small 0.17 0.17 0.00 55.71 55.71 0.00

Marginal 0.17 0.17 0.00 41.42 41.42 0.00

Landless 0.07 0.07 0.00 21.92 21.92 0.00

Total 0.13 0.13 0.00 42.98 42.98 0.00

Land Category Bullock-Cart (No) Bullock-Cart (Taka)


Large 0.16 0.16 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00

Medium 0.25 0.25 0.00 296.42 296.42 0.00

Small 0.08 0.08 0.00 128.57 128.57 0.00

Marginal 0.14 0.14 0.00 114.28 114.28 0.00

Landless 0.05 0.05 0.00 92.39 92.39 0.00

Total 0.09 0.09 0.00 119.63 119.63 0.00

Land Category Irrigation Pump (No) Irrigation Pump (Taka)


Large 0.50 0.50 0.00 4100.00 4100.00 0.00

Medium 0.21 0.21 0.00 1339.28 1339.28 0.00

Small 6.05 6.05 0.00 3285.71 3285.71 0.00

Marginal 0.08 0.08 0.00 362.85 362.85 0.00

Landless 0.02 0.02 0.00 336.25 336.25 0.00

Total 0.83 0.83 0.00 899.27 899.27 0.00




Land Category Tractor/Power Tiller (No) Tractor/Power Tiller (Taka)


Large 0.33 0.33 0.00 18666.67 18666.67 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.02 0.02 0.00 257.14 257.14 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.05 0.05 0.00 304.09 304.09 0.00

Total 0.01 0.01 0.00 629.09 629.06 0.00

Land Category Threshing Machine (No) Threshing Machine (Taka)


Large 0.33 0.33 0.00 766.66 766.66 0.00

Medium 0.35 0.35 0.00 700.00 700.00 0.00

Small 0.34 0.34 0.00 781.42 781.42 0.00

Marginal 0.17 0.17 0.00 320.00 320.00 0.00

Landless 0.04 0.04 0.00 126.31 126.31 0.00

Total 0.13 0.13 0.00 306.72 306.72 0.00

Land Category Dao/Spade (No) Dao/Spade (Taka)


Large 3.50 2.83 0.66 213.33 146.66 66.66

Medium 4.21 3.71 0.50 301.25 261.42 39.82

Small 4.34 3.71 0.62 320.45 264.28 56.17

Marginal 3.40 2.60 0.80 335.71 278.71 57.00

Landless 2.85 2.30 0.54 194.85 159.69 35.16

Total 3.26 2.68 0.58 240.00 198.22 41.77

Land Category Fish Gears (No) Fish Gears (Taka)


Large 1.00 1.00 0.00 450.00 450.00 0.00

Medium 1.17 1.17 0.00 298.57 298.57 0.00

Small 0.94 0.94 0.00 341.71 341.71 0.00

Marginal 0.82 0.82 0.00 214.85 214.85 0.00

Landless 1.11 1.11 0.00 226.72 226.72 0.00

Total 1.06 1.06 0.00 252.03 252.03 0.00

Land Category Boat (No) Boat (Taka)


Large 0.16 0.16 0.00 200.00 200.00 0.00

Medium 0.14 0.14 0.00 253.57 253.57 0.00

Small 0.05 0.05 0.00 74.28 74.28 0.00

Marginal 0.11 0.11 0.00 134.28 134.28 0.00

Landless 0.07 0.06 0.01 271.92 269.00 2.92

Total 0.08 0.05 0.03 225.81 224.00 1.18

Land Category Ladder/Weeder (No) Ladder/Weeder (Taka)


Large 0.83 0.83 0.00 115.83 115.83 0.00

Medium 0.92 0.92 0.00 57.67 57.67 0.00

Small 1.20 1.20 0.00 108.71 108.71 0.00

Marginal 1.17 1.17 0.00 49.71 49.71 0.00

Landless 2.63 0.77 1.86 38.36 36.55 1.81

Total 2.05 0.89 1.16 52.16 51.04 1.12



Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.21 0.21 0.00 34.28 34.28 0.00

Small 0.25 0.25 0.00 98.57 98.57 0.00

Marginal 0.05 0.05 0.00 105.71 105.71 0.00

Landless 0.27 0.26 0.01 59.26 27.22 2.04

Total 0.23 0.22 0.01 66.34 65.07 12.27





Total Male Female


Large 24629.17 56791.36 24562.50 56824.91 66.66 163.29

Medium 3433.57 3871.16 3393.75 3872.45 39.82 107.32

Small 5450.31 7637.89 54.50.31 7637.89 5394.14 7643.87

Marginal 1678.85 1978.22 1621.85 1983.15 57.00 108.95

Landless 1672.14 5365.23 1630.19 5365.81 41.94 88.01

Total 2834.08 991.72 2788.08 9914.74 45.99 100.67

OTHER ASSETS: Table: 38 Average number and value (Taka) of household durable assets according

to sex and land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Bi-Cycle (No) Bi-Cycle (Taka)


Large 0.83 0.83 0.00 525.00 525.00 0.00

Medium 0.89 0.89 0.00 1251.78 1251.78 0.00

Small 0.60 0.60 0.00 795.71 795.71 0.00

Marginal 0.45 0.45 0.00 578.57 578.57 0.00

Landless 0.23 0.23 0.00 266.66 266.66 0.00

Total (Average) 0.38 0.38 0.00 479.63 479.63 0.00

Land Category Watch (No) Watch (Taka)


Large 2.83 2.50 0.33 1233.33 1083.33 15.00

Medium 1.75 1.50 0.25 845.00 721.07 123.92

Small 1.80 1.54 0.25 588.42 493.00 95.42

Marginal 1.11 1.02 0.08 329.42 310.85 18.57

Landless 0.63 0.56 0.06 210.32 192.66 17.66

Total (Average) 1.00 0.88 0.12 360.54 319.16 41.38

Land Category Furniture (No) Furniture (Taka)


Large 12.16 12.16 0.00 5900.00 5900.00 0.00

Medium 9.50 9.25 0.25 3655.35 3600.00 55.35

Small 7.14 6.66 0.45 3714.28 3417.14 297.14

Marginal 5.54 5.40 0.14 2081.42 1952.85 128.57

Landless 3.18 2.97 0.21 1119.59 1070.76 48.83

Total (Average) 4.82 4.59 0.23 1934.72 1844.54 90.18

Land Category Cookeries (No) Cookeries (Taka)


Large 17.16 13.33 3.83 2053.33 1970.00 63.33

Medium 15.42 12.00 3.42 1296.78 1025.35 271.42

Small 16.05 8.82 7.22 1282.26 764.28 518.00

Marginal 9.11 6.00 3.11 832.00 534.00 298.00

Landless 6.40 4.36 2.04 387.39 276.98 110.40

Total (Average) 9.13 6.11 3.01 686.81 484.85 201.96




Land Category Radio/Cassette Player (No) Radio/Cassette Player (Taka)


Large 0.16 0.00 0.16 66.66 0.00 66.66

Medium 0.42 0.42 0.00 253.92 253.92 0.00

Small 0.25 0.22 0.03 132.85 125.42 7.42

Marginal 0.20 0.20 0.00 92.85 92.85 0.00

Landless 0.16 0.15 0.01 64.23 59.55 4.68

Total (Average) 0.20 0.19 0.01 95.98 90.67 5.30

Land Category Television (No) Television (Taka)


Large 0.83 0.83 0.00 3216.66 3216.66 0.00

Medium 0.28 0.28 0.00 1339.28 1339.28 0.00

Small 0.17 0.17 0.00 914.28 914.28 0.00

Marginal 0.05 0.05 0.00 285.71 285.71 0.00

Landless 0.04 0.04 0.00 146.78 146.78 0.00

Total (Average) 0.10 0.10 0.00 450.54 450.54 0.00



Large 0.33 0.33 0.00 191.66 191.66 0.00

Medium 0.07 0.07 0.00 31.42 31.42 0.00

Small 0.20 0.20 0.00 61.14 61.14 0.00

Marginal 0.14 0.11 0.03 152.85 52.85 100.00

Landless 0.13 0.12 0.01 61.98 60.23 1.75

Total (Average) 0.14 0.13 0.01 73.16 57.52 15.63


Total Male Female


Large 13186.67 4521.45 12886.67 4590.20 300.00 368.78

Medium 8673.57 6497.79 8205.00 5730.42 468.57 1423.50

Small 7489.00 4647.34 6571.00 4149.17 918.00 2832.52

Marginal 4352.85 4101.27 3807.71 3414.88 545.14 1343.21

Landless 2256.96 2500.16 2073.65 2467.18 183.33 415.63

Total (Average) 4061.41 4551.85 3726.94 4196.01 354.47 1262.41




MAJOR LIVELIHOODS

Table: 39 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Aus Local according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,

weeding, harvesting,

threshing & storing,

etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)

Chemical Fertilizer Organic

Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others

Mds Tk No Tk Kg Tk Kg Tk Kg Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk

Large 21.33 6266.66 11.33 566.66 166.66 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 733.33 5533.33

Medium 17.98 5034.72 12.69 716.46 218.33 15.41 104.58 11.83 172.50 0.0 0.0 100.00 8.33 6.25 25.00 1351.46 3683.25

Small 17.07 4589.08 8.71 549.52 218.92 14.92 96.73 13.21 173.16 0.0 0.0 227.04 91.54 0.0 214.76 1571.71 3017.35

Marginal 16.53 4509.52 9.08 534.52 271.42 22.85 126.42 11.07 91.42 0.0 0.0 203.57 70.53 56.25 272.50 1626.66 2882.85

Landless 17.41 4598.61 4.77 303.73 299.62 24.20 151.71 19.64 211.24 0.0 0.0 106.20 48.57 26.89 191.91 1339.90 3258.70

Total 17.56 4768.24 8.20 487.77 254.26 18.86 118.54 14.46 168.49 0.0 0.0 137.25 49.30 18.93 160.83 1395.40 3372.83

Table: 40 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Aus HYV according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 27.66 8050.00 23.88 1696.29 66.66 57.77 360.00 25.59 204.07 0.0 0.0 500.00 100.74 0.0 315.55 3243.33 4806.66

Medium 26.18 7994.26 18.54 1279.67 166.35 25.24 152.15 20.96 260.86 0.0 0.0 203.60 113.70 25.75 187.38 2369.49 5604.77

Small 26.22 7572.68 18.15 1008.65 389.42 61.37 358.58 117.08 497.38 0.0 0.0 607.09 121.74 21.93 541.51 3546.33 4026.35

Marginal 24.80 7064.84 9.49 578.16 385.85 54.02 310.94 28.12 412.34 0.0 0.0 816.96 151.45 60.53 383.29 3099.56 3965.28

Landless 24.46 6520.12 13.84 1005.92 319.98 75.57 532.52 42.33 646.95 0.0 0.0 1054.21 155.76 36.19 509.17 4260.74 2259.38

Total 25.21 7080.63 14.89 994.65 312.76 61.18 399.55 49.67 504.69 0.0 0.0 786.67 140.64 35.12 438.65 3612.76 3467.97




Table: 41 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Boro Local according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category T

otal

Pro

duct

ion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,

weeding, harvesting


etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 42.33 12686.66 13.33 933.33 406.66 43.33 273.33 25.66 361.66 0.0 0.0 950.00 306.66 466.66 273.33 3971.66 8715.00

Medium 33.64 10027.77 19.72 1045.00 343.58 54.83 324.00 37.05 462.19 0.0 0.0 599.66 164.91 62.50 317.25 3319.10 6708.66

Small 37.44 10657.22 21.25 1126.78 548.86 54.03 356.72 47.29 562.27 0.0 0.0 890.91 271.62 41.66 325.99 4124.84 6532.37

Marginal 28.45 8478.08 11.36 614.54 643.61 46.56 351.31 32.84 476.45 0.0 0.0 964.51 183.10 52.95 570.31 3856.82 4621.26

Landless 32.76 9272.90 12.66 1024.09 516.79 49.90 322.29 34.38 510.14 0.0 0.0 989.94 204.64 68.18 584.40 4220.50 5052.39

Total 33.56 9715.29 15.44 966.57 511.92 50.63 332.68 36.77 498.59 0.0 0.0 895.27 212.84 79.43 466.11 3963.45 5751.84

Table: 42 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Boro HYV according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,

weeding, harvesting


etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 50.88 14966.66 25.01 1675.55 83.33 78.63 496.25 38.70 578.14 0.0 0.0 1132.22 279.07 16.66 420.74 4681.99 10284.67

Medium 44.91 13063.25 21.31 1282.40 458.08 70.19 416.42 52.58 421.79 0.0 0.0 936.68 155.31 130.75 355.48 4156.93 8906.31

Small 40.46 11578.22 21.12 1138.62 555.03 60.42 386.64 73.68 686.81 0.0 0.0 1005.27 219.40 81.88 390.18 4463.87 7114.35

Marginal 43.38 12094.71 16.42 1105.23 576.63 63.27 402.48 42.92 428.87 0.0 0.0 916.00 280.24 57.95 293.31 4060.74 8033.97

Landless 45.62 12939.77 16.88 1113.27 669.62 61.46 396.82 66.74 864.41 2.05 55.76 1205.61 266.42 95.60 814.06 5481.61 7458.15

Total 44.18 12599.80 18.90 1171.38 566.56 63.73 403.09 61.00 668.43 0.81 22.19 1065.51 240.01 88.54 539.28 4765.03 7834.76




Table: 43 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for B. Amon according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category T

otal

Pro

duct

ion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 33.88 9472.44 26.11 1788.88 0.0 33.33 200.00 11.11 166.66 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 333.33 2488.88 6983.33

Medium 30.07 8334.33 23.85 1412.32 83.08 30.83 195.37 24.92 367.19 0.0 0.0 303.03 29.29 435.60 536.46 3362.37 4971.96

Small 24.87 7328.39 15.72 1027.77 57.77 41.31 581.78 22.53 332.28 0.0 0.0 177.77 94.44 246.29 704.93 3223.06 4105.31

Marginal 23.55 6849.55 10.27 661.86 110.25 27.18 188.72 17.79 260.66 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.57 13.33 340.17 1616.58 5232.97

Landless 27.44 8396.64 12.90 914.76 196.91 24.73 202.97 23.24 335.67 0.0 0.0 57.23 138.25 43.18 612.62 2501.62 5895.02

Total 27.13 7980.18 15.70 1027.26 127.51 29.55 263.19 22.09 322.52 0.0 0.0 116.84 86.56 152.42 555.68 2652.00 5326.17

Table: 44 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for T. Amon according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 35.30 10314.28 24.63 1559.52 0.0 37.79 233.92 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 175.00 350.00 2318.45 7995.83

Medium 36.90 10653.80 20.63 1317.12 161.53 27.17 173.46 24.23 375.00 0.0 0.0 258.97 11.53 591.02 536.46 3427.12 7226.68

Small 29.84 8719.48 15.38 865.38 177.61 15.15 102.84 7.69 110.76 0.0 0.0 200.00 0.0 141.02 544.61 2142.25 6577.23

Marginal 28.95 8160.08 11.14 636.90 320.83 28.21 207.14 7.14 126.28 0.0 0.0 62.50 0.0 0.0 782.14 2135.80 6024.27

Landless 30.52 8769.85 16.40 1155.79 329.34 31.72 207.13 2.27 32.75 0.0 0.0 52.17 0.0 61.59 855.07 2693.86 6075.98

Total 31.58 9090.41 16.41 1046.42 245.90 27.25 181.96 8.46 131.88 0.0 0.0 120.02 2.23 173.63 688.01 2590.09 6500.32




Table: 45 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for T. Amon HYV according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 36.50 9041.66 21.13 1551.66 224.00 46.66 280.00 17.83 280.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 952.50 3288.16 5753.50

Medium 29.01 7528.19 18.55 1079.59 25.71 32.52 207.29 16.19 265.57 43.53 0.0 0.0 10.71 163.43 114.68 1867.01 5661.18

Small 25.31 7225.18 17.39 1251.34 75.58 35.03 228.29 28.19 354.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.00 202.01 871.88 3083.22 4141.96

Marginal 26.66 7520.00 14.33 966.66 140.00 50.00 325.00 25.00 383.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 143.33 758.00 2716.33 4803.66

Landless 27.33 7596.38 25.59 1853.61 375.83 42.61 270.45 36.83 529.41 0.0 0.0 0.0 207.50 210.00 1363.09 4809.91 2786.47

Total 28.18 7636.71 20.79 1431.32 193.56 39.65 252.20 27.02 391.92 11.28 0.0 0.0 98.14 170.83 854.42 3392.43 4244.28

Table: 46 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Oil Seed according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,

weeding,

harvesting,

threshing &

storing, etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 6.33 3600.00 7.00 400.00 11.66 7.50 45.00 7.50 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 233.33 860.00 2740.00

Medium 4.61 2169.55 7.56 429.80 37.14 19.76 132.14 13.09 163.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.89 78.57 926.65 1240.90

Small 4.41 2950.00 5.00 250.00 120.00 24.58 173.33 18.75 206.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 141.66 130.00 1021.25 1928.75

Marginal 3.27 1650.00 2.50 250.00 65.27 6.25 37.50 4.16 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 75.00 511.11 1138.88

Landless 5.05 2807.07 5.03 203.03 206.94 48.48 76.66 47.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.28 125.00 664.92 2142.14

Total 4.67 2544.51 5.66 308.03 100.03 25.51 103.67 21.71 107.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.34 114.16 810.38 1734.12




Table: 47 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Pulses according to Land Category in Chenchuri

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,

weeding,

harvesting,


etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 9.01 5940.17 16.15 735.04 0.00 8.33 50.00 8.33 133.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1085.04 4855.12

Medium 7.59 3524.46 15.04 1001.17 87.91 7.91 47.50 3.50 56.00 0.00 0.00 41.66 0.00 53.33 262.50 1550.09 1974.37

Small 8.88 300.00 13.33 666.66 88.88 16.66 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1655.56 1344.44

Marginal 4.54 2125.00 3.33 166.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 48.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 214.66 1910.33

Landless 6.16 2441.66 0.00 0.00 112.50 41.66 291.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 404.16 2037.50

Total 6.86 3294.03 9.95 587.36 109.42 10.94 71.22 3.31 52.97 0.00 0.00 16.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 986.21 2307.81

Table 48 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household according to Fishing Sources of Chenchuri

Fish

Sources Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs Lime/

Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals F

ish

Fee

d

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs

Kg Taka Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk No Tk Tk

Pond 69.80 3463.06 23.86 514.93 43.06 109.57 0.00 15.33 26.93 5.53 0.10 10.80 728.65 2772.22 75

Beel 51.30 1508.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1508.63 123

Ditch/Drain 22.00 1120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1120.00 5

Canal 19.16 939.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.23 920.35 78

Flood Plain 23.37 608.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 608.95 97

River 25.00 1225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1225.00 2




Table 49 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Pond According to Land Category for Chenchuri Sub-project

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs

kg Taka Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk Tk No Tk Tk

Landless 58.45 2938.75 39.58 390.0 82.70 122.0 0.0 18.75 39.16 11.45 0.125 22.91 638.91 2372.75 24

Marginal 81.42 3689.28 27.85 498.07 32.14 117.85 0.0 50.0 48.57 10.0 7.14 4.28 822.5 2877.92 14

Small 79.75 4270.0 0.0 631.5 24.75 155.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 824.25 3490.75 20

Medium 59.72 2913.63 40.90 370.45 13.63 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.63 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.63 2477.72 11

Large 73.33 3350 0.0 935 25 88.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.66 33.33 1081.66 2268.33 6

Total 69.8 3463.06 23.86 514.93 43.06 109.57 0.0 15.33 26.93 5.53 0.1067 10.80 728.65 2772.22 75

Table 50 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Beel According to Land Category for Chenchuri

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/

Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals F

ish

Fee

d

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 57.42 1418.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1418.52 88

Marginal 38.66 1841.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1741.66 12

Small 40.83 1991.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1991.66 12

Medium 27.63 1339.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1339.27 11

Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 51.30 1508.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1508.63 123




Table 51 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Ditch According to Land Category for Chenchuri

Land

Category T

ota

l Cat

ch

To

tal V

alu

e

Pre

par

atio

n c

ost

Fry

/ Fin

ger

ling

s

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irri

gat

ion

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n Hired labor

To

tal C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

nu

mb

er o

f H

Hs


Landless 23.33 1200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1200.00 3

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Small 10.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 1

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Large 30.00 1500.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1500.00 1

Total 22.00 1120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1120.00 5

Table 52 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Canal According to Land Category for Chenchuri

Land

Category

To

tal C

atch

To

tal V

alu

e

Pre

par

atio

n c

ost

Fry

/ Fin

ger

ling

s

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irri

gat

ion

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n Hired labor

To

tal C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

nu

mb

er o

f H

Hs


Landless 15.21 759.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 759.80 51

Marginal 27.00 882.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 882.00 9

Small 28.18 1681.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136.36 1545.45 11

Medium 23.14 1157.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1157.14 7

Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Total 19.16 939.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.23 920.35 78




Table 53 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Flood Plain According to Land Category for Chenchuri

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/

Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 32.61 591.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 591.83 49

Marginal 13.50 675.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 675.00 4

Small 14.33 716.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 716.66 6

Medium 12.00 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 8

Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Total 23.37 608.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 608.95 67

Table 54 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from River According to Land Category for Chenchuri Sub-project

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/

Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 25.00 1225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1225.00 2

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Total 25.00 1225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1225.00 2




Table: 55 Average sale, cost and gross income from Cow/bullock/ Ox by land category in

Chenchuri

Household

Category

Gross Sale Feed costs Treatment

Costs

Hired labor Other

Cost

Total

Costs

Gross

Income

N= No of HH

Number Taka Taka Taka No Taka Taka Taka

Large 1.50 7675.00 1500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1500.00 6175.0 2

Medium 1.00 7700.00 540.00 220.00 0.20 10.00 100.0 870.0 6830.0 5

Small 1.11 5033.33 400.00 140.00 0.0 0.0 62.50 307.50 7192.50 9

Marginal 1.20 7220.00 469.00 290.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 759.00 6461.00 5

Landless 1.47 8800.00 785.00 124.70 0.59 8.82 150.00 1068.52 7731.47 17

Total 1.29 7496.05 657.63 156.05 0.29 5.26 80.26 899.21 6596.84 38

Table: 56 Average sale, cost and gross income from Goat by land category in Chenchuri

Household

Category


Costs

Hired labor Other Cost Total Costs Gross

Income

N= No

of HH


Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 2.00 1850.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1850.00 1

Marginal 1.00 500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.00 1

Landless 1.67 2066.66 22.22 27.77 0.0 0.0 27.77 77.77 1988.88 9

Total 1.64 1904.54 18.18 22.72 0.0 0.0 22.72 63.63 1840.90 11

Table: 57 Average sale, cost and gross income from Poultry by land category in Chenchuri

Household

Category


Costs

Hired labor Other Cost Total

Costs

Gross Income N= No

of HH


Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 5.50 640.00 50.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.00 590.0 2

Small 7.00 502.40 90.00 21.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 111.00 391.40 5

Marginal 7.00 566.50 52.50 16.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.50 498.00 10

Landless 7.29 575.89 57.05 11.64 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.71 507.17 28

Total 7.11 568.48 59.40 13.13 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.53 495.95 45

Table: 58 Average sale, cost and gross income from Milk by land category in Chenchuri

Household

Category


Costs

Hired labor Other

Cost

Total

Costs

Gross Income N= No

of HH


Large 420.00 4320.00 325.00 180.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 505.00 3815.00 2

Medium 388.00 3880.00 530.00 70.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 600.00 3280.00 5

Small 288.90 3293.00 1256.20 117.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1373.20 1919.80 10

Marginal 172.00 1740.00 70.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.00 1670.00 5

Landless 331.43 2629.28 207.14 26.78 0.0 0.0 21.42 255.35 2373.92 14

Total 310.25 2957.77 530.88 62.63 0.0 0.0 8.33 601.86 2355.91 36




Table: 59 Average sale, cost and gross income from Egg by land category in Chenchuri

Household

Category

Gross Sale Feed

costs

Treatment

Costs

Hired labor Other

Cost

Total

Costs

Gross

Income

N= No

of HH


Large 360.00 900.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 900.00 1

Medium 316.00 839.42 12.14 47.14 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.28 780.14 7

Small 228.75 656.87 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.00 581.87 8

Marginal 229.50 1043.50 0.0 4.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.00 1039.50 10

Landless 288.12 643.13 18.60 4.65 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.25 619.88 43

Total 276.61 726.39 21.52 8.26 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.78 696.60 69

CROP DAMAGE:

Table: 60 Average crop damage in percentage-(who had damage) according to

household category and crop season in Chenchuri

Household Category Kharif-I Kharif-II Rabi

Mean No of HH Had

Damage

Mean No of HH Had

Damage

Mean No of HH Had

Damage

Large 8.33 3 23.75 4 20.00 1

Medium 18.88 18 29.50 10 27.50 2

Small 21.65 23 26.57 19 30.00 3

Marginal 25.00 18 23.30 10 35.00 2

Landless 26.71 66 25.96 33 26.25 4

Total 24.03 128 26.11 76 28.33 12

Table: 61 Distribution of households who had crop damage in different crop season

according to reasons for crop damage by household category in Chenchuri

1 9 5 4 18 37

2.7% 24.3% 13.5% 10.8% 48.6% 100.0%

25.0% 39.1% 17.2% 18.2% 22.0% 23.1%

2 3 1 7 13

15.4% 23.1% 7.7% 53.8% 100.0%

50.0% 10.3% 4.5% 8.5% 8.1%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

9.1% 1.2% 1.9%

1 3 2 4 10

10.0% 30.0% 20.0% 40.0% 100.0%

4.3% 10.3% 9.1% 4.9% 6.3%

3 5 6 16 30

10.0% 16.7% 20.0% 53.3% 100.0%

13.0% 17.2% 27.3% 19.5% 18.8%

1 5 8 3 19 36

2.8% 13.9% 22.2% 8.3% 52.8% 100.0%

25.0% 21.7% 27.6% 13.6% 23.2% 22.5%

6 6

100.0% 100.0%

7.3% 3.8%

5 5 4 11 25

20.0% 20.0% 16.0% 44.0% 100.0%

21.7% 17.2% 18.2% 13.4% 15.6%

4 23 29 22 82 160

2.5% 14.4% 18.1% 13.8% 51.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Pest Attack

Excessive Rainfall

High Wind



Facilities

Draught


Others

REASONS

FOR

CROP

DAMAGE

Total


Household Category

Total




PADDY MARKETING PROBLEMS: Table: 62 Distribution of households who sold-out their crop according to reasons

for not getting fair price by household category in Chenchuri

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

100.0% 25.0% 28.6%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

50.0% 14.3%

1 3 4

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

50.0% 75.0% 57.1%

2 1 4 7

28.6% 14.3% 57.1% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


during the season


Less Buyer

Reasons for

not Getting

Fair Price

Total

Small Marginal Landless

Household Category

Total

ACCESS TO INFORMATION: Table: 63 Percentage of households received training on Agriculture by Land



DAE DOF & Livestock

Youth Ministry

NGO TV/ Radio



Large 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 3.6 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 21.1 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.1 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 6.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.54 0.4 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Table: 64 Percentage of households received training on Fishery by Land category in Chenchuri


DAE DOF & Livestock

Youth Ministry

NGO TV/ Radio



Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0




Table: 65 Percentage of households received training on Livestock by Land category in Chenchuri


DAE DOF &

Livestock

Youth

Ministry

NGO TV/

Radio

Farmer Others

(FWA/FWV)


Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 2.9 0.0 0.0 2.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Table: 66 Percentage of households received training on Health by Land category

in Chenchuri


DAE DOF &

Livestock

Youth

Ministry

NGO TV/

Radio

Farmer Others

(FWA/FWV)


Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7

Small 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 5.7 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0

Landless 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 9.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.9

Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 8.4 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.6

MAJOR SOURCES OF INCOME

Table: 67 Average annual income (in Taka) per household according to source in

Chenchuri


Agriculture Livestock Non-Agri. Labour


Large 40319.17 28028.93 5666.66 5379.83 0.0 0.0

Medium 22788.93 20711.25 1876.46 3386.13 71.42 377.96

Small 13139.03 10105.48 2244.34 2890.78 674.28 3656.76

Marginal 6999.62 6066.07 1840.85 3261.21 2946.00 6714.46

Landless 3214.27 4966.59 1377.61 3053.30 2990.29 6927.85

Total (Average) 7795.13 12369.94 1691.25 3204.36 2327.45 6193.27




Large 0.0 0.0 12500.00 30618.62 2518.33 1509.25

Medium 103.57 459.85 17500.00 36775.25 1960.25 2152.15

Small 742.85 2515.74 3965.71 9883.13 3300.42 3163.83

Marginal 2819.42 5604.43 6997.14 13334.42 2099.74 2772.36

Landless 4221.63 6182.36 5015.55 11750..20 1515.06 1869.49

Total (Average) 3089.01 5572.31 6568.58 16899..62 1883.92 2284.48





Urban/Abroad/Remittance Doctor (MBBS) Village Quack/ kabiraj


Large 50000.00 61318.84 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 24107.14 39512.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 18542.86 27592.99 0.0 0.0 1042.85 6169.62

Marginal 7314.28 9538.68 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 12453.22 16488.52 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total (Average) 14580.00 233949.98 0.0 0.0 132.72 2201.03




Large 0.0 0.0 5666.66 5379.83 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 1628.57 3414.38 0.0 0.0

Small 0.0 0.0 2058.05 2920.29 168.00 993.90

Marginal 0.0 0.0 1553.00 3262.49 214.28 1267.73

Landless 25.14 306.61 1149.12 2998.35 1455.55 4321.38

Total (Average) 15.63 241.82 1463.58 3182.96 953.74 3510.98




Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 0.0 0.0 205.71 1217.02 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 0.0 0.0 238.59 1346.54 43.50 400.36

Total (Average) 0.0 0.0 174.54 1148.31 27.05 316.06




Large 0.0 0.0 27594.33 29992.56 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 9400.28 18993.98 0.0 0.0

Small 314.26 1859.33 8897.14 17686.98 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 10274.29 19326.24 0.0 0.0

Landless 492.10 2663.76 3168.42 11492.96 0.0 0.0

Total (Average) 346.00 2207.94 5969.36 15455.92 00.0 0.0


Others Total Income

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 1000.00 1725.10 145265.20 104077.00

Medium 814.28 1776.32 80250.93 509.57.50

Small 942.85 1638.19 56238.43 34125.20

Marginal 490.00 1244.26 43548.66 24006.36

Landless 474.21 1120.83 37796.73 24432.84

Total (Average) 581.96 1305.41 47543.29 37806.78




Table: 68 Average annual income (in Taka) per household according to source in Chenchuri (EXCLUDING ABROAD MONEY CASES MORE THAN TK.55000)




Large 33078.75 28943.87 3125.00 3608.67 0.00 0.00

Medium 23161.69 21199.95 2020.80 3475.60 76.92 392.23

Small 12916.67 9753.76 2289.45 2949.84 715.15 3765.31

Marginal 6999.62 6066.07 1840.85 3281.21 2946.00 3714.46

Landless 2985.78 4281.88 1374.98 3066.36 3025.68 6961.23

Total (Average) 7213.31 11473.47 1638.18 3129.41 2397.19 6272.35




Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2717.50 1291.43

Medium 111.53 746.92 17846.15 38017.74 1803.34 2079.38

Small 787.87 2586.11 4206.06 10136.01 3251.96 3252.30

Marginal 2819.42 5604.43 6997.14 1334.42 2099.74 2772.36

Landless 4271.59 6201.77 5074.91 11807.11 1510.50 1877.55

Total (Average) 3181.57 5629.29 6387.11 16557.66 1849.58 2289.83




Large 12500.00 15000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 673.07 2962.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 727.27 2950.34 0.00 0.00 1106.06 6353.83

Marginal 1125.71 4346.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 1257.98 5242.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 1286.51 5114.03 0.00 0.00 136.70 2233.76




Large 0.00 0.00 3125.00 3606.67 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 1753.84 3515.98 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 2091.87 2983.26 178.18 1023.57

Marginal 0.00 0.00 1553.00 3262.49 214.28 1267.73

Landless 25.44 308.41 1143.78 3010.68 1472.78 4344.09

Total (Average) 16.10 245.41 1403.69 3102.54 982.32 3559.43




Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 218.18 1253.35 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.00 0.00 241.42 1353.98 44.02 402.71

Total (Average) 0.00 0.00 179.77 1165.04 27.88 320.75







Large 0.00 0.00 29391.50 33201.46 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 10123.38 19545.33 0.00 0.00

Small 333.33 1914.85 8454.54 17676.06 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 10274.29 19326.24 0.00 0.00

Landless 497.92 2679.03 3205.91 11555.96 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 356.36 2240.06 5847.09 15361.76 0.00 0.00


Others Total Income

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 450.00 900.00 84387.75 53279.44

Medium 876.92 1830.47 59047.69 42103.18

Small 872.72 1577.03 38149.36 20897.11

Marginal 490.00 1244.26 37360.09 21961.20

Landless 479.82 1126.28 26612.58 19025.92

Total (Average) 567.94 1284.16 33471.34 26056.48

Table: 69 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by land category in Chenchuri

0 1 1 3 30 35

.0% 2.9% 2.9% 8.6% 85.7% 100.0%

.0% 3.6% 2.9% 8.6% 17.5% 12.7%

0 1 8 5 35 49

.0% 2.0% 16.3% 10.2% 71.4% 100.0%

.0% 3.6% 22.9% 14.3% 20.5% 17.8%

1 5 3 9 36 54

1.9% 9.3% 5.6% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

16.7% 17.9% 8.6% 25.7% 21.1% 19.6%

1 6 9 9 44 69

1.4% 8.7% 13.0% 13.0% 63.8% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 25.7% 25.7% 25.7% 25.1%

4 15 14 9 26 68

5.9% 22.1% 20.6% 13.2% 38.2% 100.0%

66.7% 53.6% 40.0% 25.7% 15.2% 24.7%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Income in Tk

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 70 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by household member size in Chenchuri

33 24 2 59

55.9% 40.7% 3.4% 100.0%

32.4% 20.5% 4.3% 21.5%

31 32 9 1 73

42.5% 43.8% 12.3% 1.4% 100.0%

30.4% 27.4% 19.6% 10.0% 26.5%

20 22 14 1 57

35.1% 38.6% 24.6% 1.8% 100.0%

19.6% 18.8% 30.4% 10.0% 20.7%

14 21 8 1 44

31.8% 47.7% 18.2% 2.3% 100.0%

13.7% 17.9% 17.4% 10.0% 16.0%

4 18 13 7 42

9.5% 42.9% 31.0% 16.7% 100.0%

3.9% 15.4% 28.3% 70.0% 15.3%

102 117 46 10 275

37.1% 42.5% 16.7% 3.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

1-4 5-6 7-9 10 +

HH Member Size

Total

Table: 71 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range

by number of earning member in Chenchuri

1 52 6 59

1.7% 88.1% 10.2% 100.0%

100.0% 27.4% 10.2% 21.5%

55 16 2 73

75.3% 21.9% 2.7% 100.0%

28.9% 27.1% 8.0% 26.5%

36 14 7 57

63.2% 24.6% 12.3% 100.0%

18.9% 23.7% 28.0% 20.7%

27 10 7 44

61.4% 22.7% 15.9% 100.0%

14.2% 16.9% 28.0% 16.0%

20 13 9 42

47.6% 31.0% 21.4% 100.0%

10.5% 22.0% 36.0% 15.3%

1 190 59 25 275

.4% 69.1% 21.5% 9.1% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

No One Two Three +


Total




Table: 72 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by

primary occupation of household head in Chenchuri

5 12 9 9 7 42

11.9% 28.6% 21.4% 21.4% 16.7% 100.0%

8.5% 16.4% 15.8% 20.5% 16.7% 15.3%

5 9 4 2 1 21

23.8% 42.9% 19.0% 9.5% 4.8% 100.0%

8.5% 12.3% 7.0% 4.5% 2.4% 7.6%

8 11 8 6 5 38

21.1% 28.9% 21.1% 15.8% 13.2% 100.0%

13.6% 15.1% 14.0% 13.6% 11.9% 13.8%

18 11 11 40

45.0% 27.5% 27.5% 100.0%

30.5% 15.1% 19.3% 14.5%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

3.4% 1.4% 1.1%

4 6 3 13

30.8% 46.2% 23.1% 100.0%

6.8% 8.2% 5.3% 4.7%

6 6 7 10 6 35

17.1% 17.1% 20.0% 28.6% 17.1% 100.0%

10.2% 8.2% 12.3% 22.7% 14.3% 12.7%

1 5 1 7

14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 100.0%

1.7% 6.8% 1.8% 2.5%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1.7% 1.4% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

1.8% .4%

1 2 2 5

20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100.0%

1.7% 2.7% 3.5% 1.8%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.3% .4%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

3.5% .7%

3 3 4 9 11 30

10.0% 10.0% 13.3% 30.0% 36.7% 100.0%

5.1% 4.1% 7.0% 20.5% 26.2% 10.9%

1 1

100% 100.0%

2.4% .4%

3 6 5 7 10 31

9.7% 19.4% 16.1% 22.6% 32.3% 100.0%

5.1% 8.2% 8.8% 15.9% 23.8% 11.3%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

3.4% 2.4% 1.1%

59 73 57 44 42 275

21.5% 26.5% 20.7% 16.0% 15.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Pottery

Fisherman

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Service

Vill Doc

HH Work

Others

Primary

Occupation

Total

Up to

15000

15001-2

5000

25001-

40000

40001-6

0000

60001

+

Total Annual Gross Income (Tk)

Total





by type of latrine used in Chenchuri

33 39 37 27 28 164

20.1% 23.8% 22.6% 16.5% 17.1% 100.0%

55.9% 53.4% 64.9% 61.4% 66.7% 59.6%

5 8 1 3 1 18

27.8% 44.4% 5.6% 16.7% 5.6% 100.0%

8.5% 11.0% 1.8% 6.8% 2.4% 6.5%

19 23 14 8 3 67

28.4% 34.3% 20.9% 11.9% 4.5% 100.0%

32.2% 31.5% 24.6% 18.2% 7.1% 24.4%

2 3 5 6 10 26

7.7% 11.5% 19.2% 23.1% 38.5% 100.0%

3.4% 4.1% 8.8% 13.6% 23.8% 9.5%

59 73 57 44 42 275

21.5% 26.5% 20.7% 16.0% 15.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total

Up to

15000

15001-25

000

25001-4

0000

40001-

60000

60001

+


Total

Table: 74 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income

range by number of months food available in Chenchuri

7 14 21 17 59

11.9% 23.7% 35.6% 28.8% 100.0%

58.3% 37.8% 32.3% 10.6% 21.5%

4 12 28 29 73

5.5% 16.4% 38.4% 39.7% 100.0%

33.3% 32.4% 43.1% 18.0% 26.5%

1 7 13 36 57

1.8% 12.3% 22.8% 63.2% 100.0%

8.3% 18.9% 20.0% 22.4% 20.7%

2 2 40 44

4.5% 4.5% 90.9% 100.0%

5.4% 3.1% 24.8% 16.0%

2 1 39 42

4.8% 2.4% 92.9% 100.0%

5.4% 1.5% 24.2% 15.3%

12 37 65 161 275

4.4% 13.5% 23.6% 58.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

Upto 3 4-6 7-9 10 -12

Number of Months Food Available

Total




CHENCHURI: INCOME EXCLUDING ABROAD MONEY CASES MORE THAN TK.55000 Table: 75 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range

by land category in Chenchuri

2 3 4 50 59

3.4% 5.1% 6.8% 84.7% 100.0%

7.7% 9.1% 11.4% 29.6% 22.1%

1 10 7 55 73

1.4% 13.7% 9.6% 75.3% 100.0%

3.8% 30.3% 20.0% 32.5% 27.3%

1 8 5 8 35 57

1.8% 14.0% 8.8% 14.0% 61.4% 100.0%

25.0% 30.8% 15.2% 22.9% 20.7% 21.3%

1 6 9 12 16 44

2.3% 13.6% 20.5% 27.3% 36.4% 100.0%

25.0% 23.1% 27.3% 34.3% 9.5% 16.5%

2 9 6 4 13 34

5.9% 26.5% 17.6% 11.8% 38.2% 100.0%

50.0% 34.6% 18.2% 11.4% 7.7% 12.7%

4 26 33 35 169 267

1.5% 9.7% 12.4% 13.1% 63.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total


Household Category

Total


by household member size in Chenchuri

33 24 2 59

55.9% 40.7% 3.4% 100.0%

32.7% 21.1% 4.4% 22.1%

31 32 9 1 73

42.5% 43.8% 12.3% 1.4% 100.0%

30.7% 28.1% 20.0% 14.3% 27.3%

20 22 14 1 57

35.1% 38.6% 24.6% 1.8% 100.0%

19.8% 19.3% 31.1% 14.3% 21.3%

14 21 8 1 44

31.8% 47.7% 18.2% 2.3% 100.0%

13.9% 18.4% 17.8% 14.3% 16.5%

3 15 12 4 34

8.8% 44.1% 35.3% 11.8% 100.0%

3.0% 13.2% 26.7% 57.1% 12.7%

101 114 45 7 267

37.8% 42.7% 16.9% 2.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

1-4 5-6 7-9 10 +

HH Member Size

Total





by total earning member in Chenchuri

1 52 6 59

1.7% 88.1% 10.2% 100.0%

100.0% 27.8% 10.3% 22.1%

55 16 2 73

75.3% 21.9% 2.7% 100.0%

29.4% 27.6% 9.5% 27.3%

36 14 7 57

63.2% 24.6% 12.3% 100.0%

19.3% 24.1% 33.3% 21.3%

27 10 7 44

61.4% 22.7% 15.9% 100.0%

14.4% 17.2% 33.3% 16.5%

17 12 5 34

50.0% 35.3% 14.7% 100.0%

9.1% 20.7% 23.8% 12.7%

1 187 58 21 267

.4% 70.0% 21.7% 7.9% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

No One Two Three +


Total




Table: 78 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by primary occupation of household heads in Chenchuri

5 12 9 9 6 41

12.2% 29.3% 22.0% 22.0% 14.6% 100.0%

8.5% 16.4% 15.8% 20.5% 17.6% 15.4%

5 9 4 2 1 21

23.8% 42.9% 19.0% 9.5% 4.8% 100.0%

8.5% 12.3% 7.0% 4.5% 2.9% 7.9%

8 11 8 6 4 37

21.6% 29.7% 21.6% 16.2% 10.8% 100.0%

13.6% 15.1% 14.0% 13.6% 11.8% 13.9%

18 11 11 40

45.0% 27.5% 27.5% 100.0%

30.5% 15.1% 19.3% 15.0%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

3.4% 1.4% 1.1%

4 6 3 13

30.8% 46.2% 23.1% 100.0%

6.8% 8.2% 5.3% 4.9%

6 6 7 10 6 35

17.1% 17.1% 20.0% 28.6% 17.1% 100.0%

10.2% 8.2% 12.3% 22.7% 17.6% 13.1%

1 5 1 7

14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 100.0%

1.7% 6.8% 1.8% 2.6%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1.7% 1.4% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

1.8% .4%

1 2 2 5

20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100.0%

1.7% 2.7% 3.5% 1.9%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.3% .4%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

3.5% .7%

3 3 4 9 8 27

11.1% 11.1% 14.8% 33.3% 29.6% 100.0%

5.1% 4.1% 7.0% 20.5% 23.5% 10.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

3 6 5 7 8 29

10.3% 20.7% 17.2% 24.1% 27.6% 100.0%

5.1% 8.2% 8.8% 15.9% 23.5% 10.9%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

3.4% .7%

59 73 57 44 34 267

22.1% 27.3% 21.3% 16.5% 12.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Pottery

Fisherman

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Service

Vill Doc

HH Work

Others

Primary

Occupation

Total

Up to

15000

15001-2

5000

25001-4

0000

40001-6

0000

60001

+


Total





by type of latrine used in Chenchuri

33 39 37 27 24 160

20.6% 24.4% 23.1% 16.9% 15.0% 100.0%

55.9% 53.4% 64.9% 61.4% 70.6% 59.9%

5 8 1 3 17

29.4% 47.1% 5.9% 17.6% 100.0%

8.5% 11.0% 1.8% 6.8% 6.4%

19 23 14 8 3 67

28.4% 34.3% 20.9% 11.9% 4.5% 100.0%

32.2% 31.5% 24.6% 18.2% 8.8% 25.1%

2 3 5 6 7 23

8.7% 13.0% 21.7% 26.1% 30.4% 100.0%

3.4% 4.1% 8.8% 13.6% 20.6% 8.6%

59 73 57 44 34 267

22.1% 27.3% 21.3% 16.5% 12.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total

Up to

15000

15001-25

000

25001-40

000

40001-60

000

60001

+


Total


by number of months food available in Chenchuri

7 14 21 17 59

11.9% 23.7% 35.6% 28.8% 100.0%

58.3% 37.8% 32.3% 11.1% 22.1%

4 12 28 29 73

5.5% 16.4% 38.4% 39.7% 100.0%

33.3% 32.4% 43.1% 19.0% 27.3%

1 7 13 36 57

1.8% 12.3% 22.8% 63.2% 100.0%

8.3% 18.9% 20.0% 23.5% 21.3%

2 2 40 44

4.5% 4.5% 90.9% 100.0%

5.4% 3.1% 26.1% 16.5%

2 1 31 34

5.9% 2.9% 91.2% 100.0%

5.4% 1.5% 20.3% 12.7%

12 37 65 153 267

4.5% 13.9% 24.3% 57.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

Upto 3 4-6 7-9 10 -12


Total




HOUSEHOLD ANNUAL EXPENDITURE Table: 81 Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to

source in Chenchuri




Large 32037.50 18848.63 3000.00 5019.96 0.00 0.00

Medium 17274.11 17208.03 1460.71 2962.89 357.14 1311.32

Small 13906.43 12380.36 680.00 1154.73 0.00 0.00

Marginal 14656.71 7652.55 935.42 2002.59 228.57 1352.24

Landless 14426.11 9166.65 397.07 2230.12 239.76 2205.83

Total (Average) 15063.54 11015.38 666.69 2304.77 214.54 1850.56




Large 10416.67 19647.94 15450.00 9786.47 6978.33 3614.25

Medium 2321.42 7636.67 5685.00 9772.85 3709.82 3493.31

Small 1972.85 5999.47 2964.42 4208.97 3551.42 2466.13

Marginal 3035.71 10543.74 5915.94 17356.17 3564.28 3877.58

Landless 707.48 2162.51 2190.30 4028.52 1980.84 1950.78

Total (Average) 1541.01 6040.20 3408.13 8140.35 2667.34 2727.11




Large 833.33 2041.24 2237.50 1655.72 5766.66 10174.81

Medium 510.35 939.64 1045.60 874.96 488.39 1334.71

Small 159.42 526.77 2141.17 3611.10 487.14 1426.39

Marginal 61.42 168.07 1290.25 2226.95 245.02 791.27

Landless 21.75 82.08 764.92 708.64 921.55 2523.49

Total (Average) 111.78 488.32 1067.65 1706.25 841.77 2637.28




Large 500.00 1224.74 16778.33 25714.46 0.00 0.00

Medium 73.39 220.95 9412.03 10878.74 3607.14 16223.76

Small 163.62 847.93 8974.88 6329.61 436.57 1777.07

Marginal 25.25 85.74 6078.51 8614.48 218.57 607.31

Landless 270.07 1031.49 2927.50 3913.03 407.71 1799.09

Total (Average) 210.46 890.00 5060.65 7568.28 704.17 5417.45


Total Expenditure

Large Medium Small Marginal Landless Total

Mean 100540.00 47164.79 36928.83 37303.09 25934.84 32570.28

Standard Dev 47822.40 30176.99 15135.70 24379.26 14904.15 22960.08




Table: 82 Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to

source in Chenchuri (EXCLUDING ABROAD MONEY CASES MORE THAN TK.55000)




Large 28531.25 23207.93 3000.00 6000.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 15033.65 15229.76 1434.61 3035.12 384.61 1358.73

Small 13637.12 12545.62 612.12 1063.53 0.00 0.00

Marginal 14656.71 7652.55 935.42 2002.59 228.57 1352.24

Landless 14473.16 9210.59 387.57 2237.80 82.84 797.46

Total (Average) 14659.08 10532.46 628.23 2297.97 119.85 905.63




Large 3125.00 3750.00 14425.00 10859.21 6217.50 4237.43

Medium 2211.53 7853.88 5487.69 10126.08 3456.73 3453.53

Small 1183.33 3596.01 2945.75 4328.61 3537.87 2510.69

Marginal 3035.71 10543.74 5915.94 17356.17 3564.28 3877.58

Landless 686.56 2160.27 2187.82 4043.89 1989.49 1955.97

Total (Average) 1240.93 5043.19 3274.87 8129.16 2593.52 2675.20




Large 1250.00 2500.00 2981.25 1407.62 6250.00 12500.00

Medium 395.76 763.14 956.80 812.89 525.96 1379.64

Small 163.03 542.19 1877.00 3321.62 516.66 1464.93

Marginal 61.42 168.07 1290.25 2226.95 245.02 791.27

Landless 22.01 82.53 761.25 711.90 932.46 2536.46

Total (Average) 99.40 448.88 1020.80 1602.25 831.03 2618.64




Large 750.00 1500.00 5080.00 5672.03 0.00

Medium 79.03 228.61 8997.88 10382.85 3692.30 16842.25

Small 173.54 873.01 8459.78 5920.49 463.03 1828.31

Marginal 25.25 85.74 6078.51 8614.48 218.57 607.31

Landless 273.26 1034.15 2887.68 3910.08 412.53 1809.21

Total (Average) 216.65 900.88 4622.49 6304.37 706.55 5490.81


Total Expenditure


Mean 77672.50 73873.92 35114.73 37303.09 25745.99 30962.09

Standard Dev 22080.91 28679.22 13484.31 24379.26 14746.35 19794.09




Table: 83 Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure range by land category in Chenchuri

5 2 35 42

11.9% 4.8% 83.3% 100.0%

17.9% 5.7% 20.5% 15.3%

3 7 8 61 79

3.8% 8.9% 10.1% 77.2% 100.0%

10.7% 20.0% 22.9% 35.7% 28.7%

5 17 14 56 92

5.4% 18.5% 15.2% 60.9% 100.0%

17.9% 48.6% 40.0% 32.7% 33.5%

1 6 7 8 13 35

2.9% 17.1% 20.0% 22.9% 37.1% 100.0%

16.7% 21.4% 20.0% 22.9% 7.6% 12.7%

5 9 4 3 6 27

18.5% 33.3% 14.8% 11.1% 22.2% 100.0%

83.3% 32.1% 11.4% 8.6% 3.5% 9.8%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Expenditure Tk

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 84 Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure range by land category in Chenchuri (EXCLUDING ABROAD INCOME CASES)

5 2 35 42

11.9% 4.8% 83.3% 100.0%

19.2% 5.7% 20.7% 15.7%

3 7 8 60 78

3.8% 9.0% 10.3% 76.9% 100.0%

11.5% 21.2% 22.9% 35.5% 29.2%

5 17 14 56 92

5.4% 18.5% 15.2% 60.9% 100.0%

19.2% 51.5% 40.0% 33.1% 34.5%

1 6 7 8 13 35

2.9% 17.1% 20.0% 22.9% 37.1% 100.0%

25.0% 23.1% 21.2% 22.9% 7.7% 13.1%

3 7 2 3 5 20

15.0% 35.0% 10.0% 15.0% 25.0% 100.0%

75.0% 26.9% 6.1% 8.6% 3.0% 7.5%

4 26 33 35 169 267

1.5% 9.7% 12.4% 13.1% 63.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Expenditure Tk

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 85 Average annual gross income, expenditure, debt and use of other sources by land category in Chenchuri

Land Category Income Expenditure Total Debt Others

Large 145265.20 100540.00 52966.67 97691.87

Medium 64625.93 47164.79 11658.33 29119.47

Small 42952.71 36928.83 8710.07 14733.95

Marginal 37360.09 37303.09 5229.11 5286.11

Landless 27522.46 25934.84 3895.45 5483.07

Total 37085.11 32570.28 6164.85 10679.68

Note: Others (Savings/Asset Sale/Mortage/Lease Out/Stock)

Table: 86 Average annual gross income, expenditure, debt and use of other sources

by land category in Chenchuri (excluding abroad cases more than Tk.55,000)


Large 84387.75 77672.50 52966.67 59681.92

Medium 59047.69 73873.92 11658.33 -3167.90

Small 38149.36 35114.73 8710.07 11744.70

Marginal 37360.09 37303.09 5229.11 5286.11

Landless 26612.58 25745.99 3895.45 4762.04

Total 33471.34 30962.09 6164.85 8674.10

Note: Others (Savings/Asset Sale/Mortage/Lease Out/Stock)

FOOD SECURITY Table 87 Distribution of households according to the number of months food

available for the households by land category in Chenchuri

1 11 12

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

2.9% 6.4% 4.4%

1 6 30 37

2.7% 16.2% 81.1% 100.0%

2.9% 17.1% 17.5% 13.5%

4 3 6 52 65

6.2% 4.6% 9.2% 80.0% 100.0%

14.3% 8.6% 17.1% 30.4% 23.6%

6 24 31 22 78 161

3.7% 14.9% 19.3% 13.7% 48.4% 100.0%

100.0% 85.7% 88.6% 62.9% 45.6% 58.5%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 3

4-6

7-9

10 -12

Number of

Months Food

Available

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 88 Distribution of households who had food shortage according to reasons for food shortage by land category in Chenchuri

3 1 7 34 45

6.7% 2.2% 15.6% 75.6% 100.0%

50.0% 10.0% 43.8% 27.0% 28.5%

1 1 1 56 59

1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 94.9% 100.0%

16.7% 10.0% 6.3% 44.4% 37.3%

1 1 4 6

16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0%

10.0% 6.3% 3.2% 3.8%

2 4 5 14 25

8.0% 16.0% 20.0% 56.0% 100.0%

33.3% 40.0% 31.3% 11.1% 15.8%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

3.2% 2.5%

3 2 14 19

15.8% 10.5% 73.7% 100.0%

30.0% 12.5% 11.1% 12.0%

6 10 16 126 158

3.8% 6.3% 10.1% 79.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%



Water Logging

Frequent Illness




Others

Reasons

for Food

Shortage

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 89 Per capita per day major food item consumed according to Land Category in Chenchuri


Rice (kg) 0.410 0.470 0.560 0.550 0.510 0.510

Wheat (kg) 0.061 0.016 0.014 0.014 0.003 0.008

Meat (kg) 0.170 0.100 0.140 0.077 0.033 0.063

Egg (No) 0.480 0.540 0.530 0.640 0.450 0.490

Fish (kg) 0.078 0.069 0.074 0.099 0.096 0.091

Milk (kg) 0.120 0.100 0.100 0.076 0.050 0.068

Vegetables (kg) 0.087 0.078 0.092 0.113 0.112 0.106

Pulses (kg) 0.049 0.035 0.042 0.044 0.041 0.041

Oil (kg) 0.015 0.022 0.026 0.021 0.022 0.022

Fruits (kg) 0.061 0.767 0.051 0.039 0.028 0.108

HOUSEHOLD VULNERABILITY Table: 90 Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on type of

vulnerability context affected their well-being in Chenchuri




Cyclone 2.2 Salinity 9.5

Draught 61.8 River Erosion 7.3


etc.)

2.9





Table 91 Percentage Distribution of households according to their responses on Coping Strategies followed to address food insecurity and vulnerability: in Chenchuri

Coping Strategies In Percentage Coping Strategies In Percentage


Adjustment to meal 40.7 13.3 Labor selling 28.4 4.0

Food substitution 12.4 13.5 Loan from money lender 14.2 1.5

Sale of assets 2.2 1.1 Loan from NGO 1.1 21.5

Borrowing from relatives/friends 39.3 16.7 Use current net 0.0 0.0

Credit from Bank 3.6 0.4 Mortgage out land 4.4 0.7

Consumption of wild/unusual foods 1.8 3.3 Use saved money 20.0 6.5

Alternative employment 12.0 0.7 Use stocked food 16.7 17.1

Out-Migration (seasonal) 2.5 0.4 Re-distribution of Children 3.3 0.4

VGD/WFP 0.4 1.5 Sell animals (cow, goat, poultry) 11.3 4.4

Illegal activities 0.0 0.0 Others (specify) 4.0 1.5

SAVINGS AND CREDIT

Table 92 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted

by land category in Chenchuri

3 25 22 26 91 167

1.8% 15.0% 13.2% 15.6% 54.5% 100.0%

50.0% 89.3% 62.9% 74.3% 53.2% 60.7%

3 3 13 9 80 108

2.8% 2.8% 12.0% 8.3% 74.1% 100.0%

50.0% 10.7% 37.1% 25.7% 46.8% 39.3%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

TOUT

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 93 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted with Bank by land category in Chenchuri

3 28 30 32 157 250

1.2% 11.2% 12.0% 12.8% 62.8% 100.0%

50.0% 100.0% 85.7% 91.4% 91.8% 90.9%

3 5 3 14 25

12.0% 20.0% 12.0% 56.0% 100.0%

50.0% 14.3% 8.6% 8.2% 9.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

BANK

Total


Household Category

Total





with Money Lender by land category in Chenchuri

6 28 34 35 162 265

2.3% 10.6% 12.8% 13.2% 61.1% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 97.1% 100.0% 94.7% 96.4%

1 9 10

10.0% 90.0% 100.0%

2.9% 5.3% 3.6%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

MONEY

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 95 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted with Relatives/Friends by land category in Chenchuri

5 26 33 34 168 266

1.9% 9.8% 12.4% 12.8% 63.2% 100.0%

83.3% 92.9% 94.3% 97.1% 98.2% 96.7%

1 2 2 1 3 9

11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 33.3% 100.0%

16.7% 7.1% 5.7% 2.9% 1.8% 3.3%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

RELAT

Total


Household Category

Total


with NGOs by land category in Chenchuri

6 28 31 30 115 210

2.9% 13.3% 14.8% 14.3% 54.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 88.6% 85.7% 67.3% 76.4%

4 5 56 65

6.2% 7.7% 86.2% 100.0%

11.4% 14.3% 32.7% 23.6%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

NGO

Total


Household Category

Total





with others (shops, dealers, etc.) by land category in Chenchuri

6 28 35 34 169 272

2.2% 10.3% 12.9% 12.5% 62.1% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% 98.8% 98.9%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.9% 1.2% 1.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

OTHER

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 98 Average amount of debt (Taka) per households who have taken loan from

different sources according to their sources and land category in Chenchuri

Sources of Loan Large Medium Small Marginal Landless Total (average)

Bank 39633.33 0.00 10000.0 3633.33 7688.21 11497.40

Money Lender 0.00 0.00 1200.00 0.00 3667.77 3421.00

Relatives 40000.00 17000.00 12500.00 1000.00 200.00 11177.78

NGOs 0.00 0.00 3507.75 6432.40 3098.23 3379.90

Others 0.00 0.00 0.00 3000.00 1615.00 2076.66

Total 52966.67 11658.33 8710.07 5229.11 3895.45 6164.85

Table 99 Average interest rate (Taka) imposed per households who have taken

loan from different sources according to their sources and land category in Chenchuri


Bank 10.66 0.00 10.40 14.66 11.00 11.28

Money Lender 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 82.22 79.00

Relatives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NGOs 0.00 0.00 18.75 16.60 18.91 18.72

Others 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 15.00 13.33




HEALTH AND HYGEINE Table: 100 Distribution of households according to type of latrine used by land


3 15 22 23 101 164

1.8% 9.1% 13.4% 14.0% 61.6% 100.0%

50.0% 53.6% 62.9% 65.7% 59.1% 59.6%

1 1 2 14 18

5.6% 5.6% 11.1% 77.8% 100.0%

3.6% 2.9% 5.7% 8.2% 6.5%

3 5 6 53 67

4.5% 7.5% 9.0% 79.1% 100.0%

10.7% 14.3% 17.1% 31.0% 24.4%

3 9 7 4 3 26

11.5% 34.6% 26.9% 15.4% 11.5% 100.0%

50.0% 32.1% 20.0% 11.4% 1.8% 9.5%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 101 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Water to wash hands before eating by land category in Chenchuri

1 4 1 5 11

9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 45.5% 100.0%

3.6% 11.4% 2.9% 2.9% 4.0%

6 27 31 34 166 264

2.3% 10.2% 11.7% 12.9% 62.9% 100.0%

100.0% 96.4% 88.6% 97.1% 97.1% 96.0%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

WATER

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 102 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Ash to wash

hands before eating by land category in Chenchuri

6 28 33 35 162 264

2.3% 10.6% 12.5% 13.3% 61.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 94.3% 100.0% 94.7% 96.0%

2 9 11

18.2% 81.8% 100.0%

5.7% 5.3% 4.0%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

ASH

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 103 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Soap to wash hands before eating by land category in Chenchuri

3 20 21 26 153 223

1.3% 9.0% 9.4% 11.7% 68.6% 100.0%

50.0% 71.4% 60.0% 74.3% 89.5% 81.1%

3 8 14 9 18 52

5.8% 15.4% 26.9% 17.3% 34.6% 100.0%

50.0% 28.6% 40.0% 25.7% 10.5% 18.9%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

SOAP

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 104 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Mud to wash hands before eating by land category in Chenchuri

6 27 35 34 170 272

2.2% 9.9% 12.9% 12.5% 62.5% 100.0%

100.0% 96.4% 100.0% 97.1% 99.4% 98.9%

1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

3.6% 2.9% .6% 1.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

MUD

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 105 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Water to wash hands after defecation by land category in Chenchuri

2 14 20 20 86 142

1.4% 9.9% 14.1% 14.1% 60.6% 100.0%

33.3% 50.0% 57.1% 57.1% 50.3% 51.6%

4 14 15 15 85 133

3.0% 10.5% 11.3% 11.3% 63.9% 100.0%

66.7% 50.0% 42.9% 42.9% 49.7% 48.4%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

WATER

Total


Household Category

Total





hands after defecation by land category in Chenchuri

6 23 29 25 129 212

2.8% 10.8% 13.7% 11.8% 60.8% 100.0%

100.0% 82.1% 82.9% 71.4% 75.4% 77.1%

5 6 10 42 63

7.9% 9.5% 15.9% 66.7% 100.0%

17.9% 17.1% 28.6% 24.6% 22.9%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

ASH

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 107 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Soap to wash hands after defecation by land category in Chenchuri

2 10 17 25 141 195

1.0% 5.1% 8.7% 12.8% 72.3% 100.0%

33.3% 35.7% 48.6% 71.4% 82.5% 70.9%

4 18 18 10 30 80

5.0% 22.5% 22.5% 12.5% 37.5% 100.0%

66.7% 64.3% 51.4% 28.6% 17.5% 29.1%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

SOAP

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 108 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Mud to wash hands after defecation by land category in Chenchuri

4 18 20 13 54 109

3.7% 16.5% 18.3% 11.9% 49.5% 100.0%

66.7% 64.3% 57.1% 37.1% 31.6% 39.6%

2 10 15 22 117 166

1.2% 6.0% 9.0% 13.3% 70.5% 100.0%

33.3% 35.7% 42.9% 62.9% 68.4% 60.4%

6 28 35 35 171 275

2.2% 10.2% 12.7% 12.7% 62.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

MUD

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 109 Distribution of households according to their responses on if family

members use Sandal while going to Toilet by land category in Chenchuri

6 7 6 61 80

7.5% 8.8% 7.5% 76.3% 100.0%

22.2% 20.0% 17.1% 35.7% 29.2%

6 21 28 29 110 194

3.1% 10.8% 14.4% 14.9% 56.7% 100.0%

100.0% 77.8% 80.0% 82.9% 64.3% 70.8%

6 27 35 35 171 274

2.2% 9.9% 12.8% 12.8% 62.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

If use

Sandal

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 110 Distribution of households according to their responses on if any of the <5 children of the family suffering from diarrhea during the last 14 days by land category in Chenchuri

5 23 33 31 155 247

2.0% 9.3% 13.4% 12.6% 62.8% 100.0%

83.3% 85.2% 94.3% 88.6% 90.6% 90.1%

1 4 2 4 16 27

3.7% 14.8% 7.4% 14.8% 59.3% 100.0%

16.7% 14.8% 5.7% 11.4% 9.4% 9.9%

6 27 35 35 171 274

2.2% 9.9% 12.8% 12.8% 62.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

If <5 children

has diarrhea

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 111 Percentage Distribution of Household Using different Water Sources according to Use Pattern



Tube–well 48.0 95.0 32.0 16.0 1.0

Pond 43.0 1.0 69.0 72.0 2.0

DTW 4.0 10.0 0.4 0.7 5.0

STW 0.7 0.4 0.7 1.0 54.0

Well/Kua 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4

Rain Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.0

Surface Water 0.4 0.4 1.0 4.0 3.0

Others (specific) 13.0 0.0 13.0 18.0 3.0




Table: 112 Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on their sufferings during the last one year by major diseases and land category in Chenchuri


ARI-Fever-Cough 33.3 42.9 22.9 31.4 40.9 37.5


Gastric 33.3 14.3 20.0 20.0 19.9 19.6

Arthritis 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.2

X-thma 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.2

Exima 0.0 0.0 2.9 5.7 0.6 1.5

Typhoid 0.0 7.1 5.7 2.9 4.1 4.4

Zondish (Hepa-B) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.07

Female Diseases 0.00 3.6 2.9 0.0 2.3 2.2

Table: 113 Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on where do they visit for treatment with level of satisfaction in Chenchuri

Service Centers Percentage of HH

visited the given

center

Satisfaction Level on services (in percentage)

High Moderate Low Not

Govt. Hospital 17.5 9.8 9.1 7.3 0.4

M.B.B.S Doctor 28.0 15.6 17.5 1.5 0.4

Traditional Healer/Kabiraj 8.4 5.5 11.2 1.5 0.4

TBA 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0

FWA 2.5 0.0 3.6 2.5 1.8

NGO Health Clinic 0.4 0.7 0.0 1.5 0.4

Private Clinic 7.6 2.9 4.7 0.7 0.4

Village Doctor 57.8 21.1 41.1 12.4 0.4

Homeo Doctor 7.6 1.5 5.1 3.3 0.0

GENDER DIMENSIONS AND PARTICIPATION Table 114 Percentage Distribution of respondents according to Participation of

Women and male Counterpart by major Dimensions of Participation in Chenchuri


No L M H No L M H


2. Mobility inside the community (relative, shop, group meeting, etc.) 35.3 45.5 18.5 0.7 4.0 6.5 40.7 45.8

3. Mobility outside the community (market, labor, crop field, hospital, bank, fair, movie, etc.)

35.6 50.5 12.7 0.4 4.7 6.9 28.7 54.9

















c. Legal process to torture and inhuman treatment 41.5 32.4 16.7 2.5 4.7 33.1 34.5 21.5 L =low, M = Medium, H = High




Table: 115 Percentage of Household According to their Access and Participation in the Different Service Centers by Sex in Chenchuri






4. Agri Private Companies (seed, fertilizer,

pesticide)

22.5 0.7 17. Union Parishad 42.5 5.1










PROBLEMS AND SUGGESTIONS Table 116 Percentage distribution of households according to major problems by


Major Problems

Agriculture

Land Category Total


Drought 20.47 22.86 25.71 32.14 50.00 23.27

Heavy Rain 6.43 11.43 14.29 17.86 16.67 9.45


Water logging 10.53 28.57 17.14 21.43 50.00 15.64

Salinity 4.68 5.71 14.29 7.14 0.00 6.18






Irrigation irregular/cost is high 2.92 5.71 5.71 3.57 16.67 4.00


Lack of Agriculture Inputs/cost high 20.47 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.91





10.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00

Irrigation cost high/water crisis 4.68 0.00 5.71 3.57 0.00 3.27


Lack of Agriculture Training 28.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73

Water crisis/ During Pick Boro Season- Water layer

goes down

1.75 0.00 2.86 3.57 0.00

1.45

Sudden Flash flood damaged Amon paddy 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Lost soil fertility 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Share cropper get less crop/ less amount of

crop/share cropping land crisis

4.09 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.55

Canal/beel/river silted 20.47 0.00 0.00 3.57 0.00 0.36

Less used of composed/ cow dung 6.43 20.00 11.43 21.43 83.33 10.91

Agri labor wage rate poor 14.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82

Natural soil/land fertility lost gradually 10.53 0.00 0.00 3.57 16.67 2.18




Fish: Major Problems Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total

Pond /canal silted /dry up/ No fish ghears/pond/less

fish /Current jal

23.39 45.71 37.14 28.57 1.75 29.09

Fish diseases 14.04 20.00 25.71 21.43 2.92 18.55

Fish stolen/breading fish is lost 5.26 20.00 14.29 10.71 1.75 9.82

No fishing pond/canal 6.43 8.57 5.71 7.14 0.00 6.55

Lack of Training on Fish culture/aquiculture 5.26 20.00 11.43 7.14 0.58 8.36

Fish feed cost high 2.92 2.86 5.71 7.14 0.00 3.64

Fish fry cost high/Poor farmer can not purchase fish

fry/Disease Fry/carrying high /Poor quality of fish fry

6.43 11.43 17.14 7.14 1.17

9.09

Flood inundated pond/ fish moves to other place 10.53 20.00 11.43 17.86 1.17 13.09


Gher water rotten 1.17 2.86 0.00 0.00 0.58 1.45

Others: Major Problems Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total

Unstable day labor work/Lack of work(labor)/Low

wage rate for day labor/expense is higher than

income

2.34 2.86 2.86 0.00 0.00

2.18



29.24 51.43 40.00 32.14 66.67

34.55

Poor quality of earthen/pacca road/rough road 30.41 31.43 25.71 25.00 50.00 29.82

Fish /money Stolen/ Robbing 1.17 2.86 5.71 17.86 66.67 5.09

Insufficient of VGD card 1.17 2.86 2.86 0.00 0.00 1.45

Lack of health services 2.92 8.57 5.71 3.57 16.67 4.36

Unplanned constructed houses created unhygienic

environment

0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.36


Early Marriage/Marriage in under age/Dowry 2.92 8.57 11.43 3.57 16.67 5.09


Limited number of institutions 4.68 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 4.36

Financial problems 1.17 0.00 2.86 0.00 0.00 1.09

After election o\rulling party threaten 1.17 2.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09

Less scope of Women work 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36

Less number of income earning member 2.34 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.91

Table 117 Percentage distribution of households according to major suggestions by land


Major Suggestion

Agriculture

Land Category Total


Govt. should control poor/inferior quality of

fertilizer/Seed/ Insecticide/inputs

1.75 2.86 0.00 10.71 0.00 2.55



Ensure Agriculture Loan for poor/landless farmer with

low interest rate from Govt./NGO. Easy loan from

NGO/Bank with low interest rate

2.92 5.71 2.86 0.00 16.67 3.27

Canal re-excavation/Irrigation from canal/Irrigation

system introduce by Govt.

12.28 11.43 22.86 25.00 66.67 16.00

Reduce the price of fertilizer/seed/

insecticide/fuel/within purchase

capacity/available/subsidy

6.43 2.86 20.00 14.29 16.67 8.73

Agriculture labor wage rate should be increased 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Training/suggestion needed on modern agriculture

from Agri.Dept.

2.92 2.86 0.00 3.57 0.00 2.55

Agriculture Officer of Upazila/Union provide training to

poor farmer at community level

1.75 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.55




Major Suggestion

Agriculture

Land Category Total


Making electricity available for all houses 11.11 11.43 17.14 7.14 0.00 11.27

Ensure health services in the community level

specially for poor/Ensure Medicine /Ensure qualified

doctor

5.26 2.86 2.86 10.71 33.33 5.82

Stop early marriage/ control multi marriage /control

dowry and reduce illiteracy

2.92 5.71 5.71 3.57 0.00 3.64


Training/encourage on

cattle/poultry/aquaculture/agriculture

2.34 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.18

Constructed environmentally sound and qualitative

bridge/road

29.82 31.43 25.71 28.57 50.00 29.82

VGD card for poor 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82

Embankment & Sluice gate should be construct with

proper environmental assessment.

4.68 11.43 14.29 3.57 16.67 6.91

Create job opportunity for women & increased their

wage rate.

2.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45

Khash land should distribute among landless farmer. 4.09 8.57 5.71 0.00 0.00 4.36

Govt. should control the Mussel men. 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36


Build Public Toilet 2.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82

Alternate Job/Business create 2.92 8.57 5.71 0.00 0.00 3.64

Agriculture labor wage should increased 2.34 8.57 2.86 0.00 0.00 2.91


Political harassment / 1.75 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.55

Salinity tolerant variety paddy seed 8.19 31.43 25.71 35.71 116.67 18.55

Govt. should initiate to supply free fish fry in Beel for

poor community.

0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36

Control breading catching 1.75 5.71 2.86 7.14 16.67 3.27

Canal/pond/river re-excavation 1.75 8.57 2.86 3.57 16.67 3.27

Create Job to stop Migration out in monsoon/less work

in monsoon

6.43 11.43 8.57 0.00 0.00 6.55

Local Crop variety scarcity 1.75 5.71 2.86 3.57 0.00 2.55

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS Table 118 Percentage distribution of households according to major food taken during

normal time by land category in Chenchuri

Major Food Item Land Category Total

Landless Marginal Small Medium large

Rice 96.49 94.29 97.14 100.00 100.00 96.73

Vegetable 84.80 91.43 94.29 96.43 100.00 88.36

Fish 93.57 82.86 88.57 92.86 100.00 91.64

Pulses 71.93 77.14 82.86 67.86 100.00 74.18

Milk 38.60 57.14 42.86 67.86 83.30 45.45

Egg 67.59 77.14 74.29 60.71 66.70 62.55

Fruits 8.77 11.43 5.71 7.14 50.00 9.45

Roti/Ata/Wheat 33.92 34.29 25.71 25.00 33.33 32.00

Flat Rice/(Mori/Chira) 43.86 5.71 14.29 3.57 33.33 30.91




Table 119 Percentage distribution of households according to major food taken during food shortage by land category in Chenchuri


Landless Marginal Small Medium large

Rice 72.51 82.86 85.71 96.43 100.00 78.55

Extra/Small piece of Rice (Khud) 40.94 37.14 31.43 25.00 33.33 37.45

Liquid Rice(Jao) 36.26 31.43 22.86 0.0 0.0 29.45

Roti/Ata/Wheat 19.30 14.29 14.29 3.57 16.67 16.36

Vegetable 59.65 51.43 45.71 60.71 33.33 56.36

Small Amount of Food 14.04 8.57 11.43 10.71 0.0 12.36

Pulses 9.94 5.71 17.14 10.71 0.0 10.18

Potato/Boiled Potato 32.75 25.71 14.14 7.14 33.33 27.27

Table: 120 Different fish species available in Beel and River in Chenchuri


Puti

Taki

Shing

Kai

Chuchri

Pabda

Royna/Bheda

Shoul

Tengra

Kaoira

Magur

Roi

Kathol

Silver Carp

Mrigel

American Roi

American Mrigel

Telapia

Grass carp

Sharputi

Miror Carp/Minor carp

Japani puti

Bele

Chela

Baing

Paisha/Faisha

Chingri

Chaina Puti

Elisha

Pangash

Boyal

Bhetki Bele

Bacha

Mola

Ayeir

Chitol

Common carp

Gajar

Guzi

Golsha

Khalisha

Chapila

Chanda

Kakle





Vetki

Laita

Fali

Bashpata

African Magur

Naylotika

American Puti

Rita

Kholla

Kali Baosh

Cheng

Briged

Tepa

Nola

Moya

Dankina

Gochai/Gochi

Gotum

Table 121 Name of Different Wild Animals available in Chenchuri


1 Pecha 27 Payra/Kabutar

2 Khadash 28 Baipakhi

3 Golbagh 29 Chil

4 Kadthukra 30 Kak

5 Bano Hash 31 Shap (Snake)

6 Kat Birali 32 Kukur (Dog)

7 Shiyal 33 Kura Dhunkor

8 Idur 34 Pat Shiyal

9 Babai 35 Bagdasha

10 Machh Ranga 36 Guishap

11 Bano Biral 37 Haldia

12 Moyna 38 Kokil

13 Pankuri 39 Tara

14 Dongkor 40 Badur

15 Charai 41 Ghoghu

16 Doyel 42 Biya

17 Shalik 43 Oud

18 Bezi 44 Bele Hash

19 Bak 45 Dahuk

20 Tiya 46 Baz pakhi

21 Chiri Sona Bai 47 Tota

22 Kakrash 48 Finge

23 Kali Pecha 49 Hutum Pecha (Butum Pecha)

24 Tuntoni (Tona) 50 Ghargosh



Table: 122 Trees available in Chenchuri


Kathal Mehaguni Niem

Coconut Karai/Rendi Tulshi

Tal Rendi/Raintree Baira

Salon Debdaru Hartuki

Aym (Mango) Shiris Kela kuch-Leaf

Jam (Black Barry) Akash moni Dhutra





Lichu Chambal Shiuli

Peyara Epilapil Akand

Sobeda Shishu Bashak

Kamranga Uriash/uriyum Ulatkambal

Amra Shegun Chalta

Barai Babla Pathor kuchi

Jamrul Bakul Orjun

Ata Tetul Telakoch

Bel Kadam Gheeta kanchan

Kodbel Papor Nishinda

Khejur (date) Bat

Shal Mandar

Jambura Shirij

Bel Chatka

Gabh

Table: 123 Vegetable available in Chenchuri


Mistri Kumar Mula

Chal Kumar Mula Shak

Kachu Shim (Country Beans)

Potol Bada kafi

Derosh Botbati (labey beans)

Chichinga / Kushi Lao (Bottle Guard)

Lati Palongshak

Kakrol Ful kafi

Karolla Lalshak

Begun Gul Alu

Jhinga Misti Alu

Data Pani kumra

Lalshak Gazar

Alu Khira

Baro shim Motor shuti

Osta Motor shak

Lao(Bottle Guard) Oul/ oul kafi

Pape (papaya) Tomato

Dundol Begun

Mukhi Puishak

Gadi Lao (Bottle Guard)

Kancha kala Misty Kumra

Botbati (labey beans) Pape

Puishak Misti Alu

Shasha Gol Alu

Patshak Shalgom

Motor shuti



Appendix 5

Appendix 5

Socio-Economic Tables for Narail Sub-project



Appendix 5: Socio-Economic Tables for Narail 1

HH SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY TABLE NARAIL SUB -PROJECT

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Table: 1 Distribution of households according to their land category and sex in

Narail

8 30 48 33 144 263

3.0% 11.4% 18.3% 12.5% 54.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.1% 92.9% 95.6%

1 11 12

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

2.9% 7.1% 4.4%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Male

Female

Household

Head Sex

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 2 Distribution of households according to their religiosity and land category in Narail

6 15 19 16 106 162

3.7% 9.3% 11.7% 9.9% 65.4% 100.0%

75.0% 50.0% 39.6% 47.1% 68.4% 58.9%

2 15 29 18 49 113

1.8% 13.3% 25.7% 15.9% 43.4% 100.0%

25.0% 50.0% 60.4% 52.9% 31.6% 41.1%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Muslim

Hindu

Religion

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 3 Distribution of households according to their member size and land category in Narail

2 10 21 21 90 144

1.4% 6.9% 14.6% 14.6% 62.5% 100.0%

25.0% 33.3% 43.8% 61.8% 58.1% 52.4%

2 8 13 6 52 81

2.5% 9.9% 16.0% 7.4% 64.2% 100.0%

25.0% 26.7% 27.1% 17.6% 33.5% 29.5%

2 8 9 6 10 35

5.7% 22.9% 25.7% 17.1% 28.6% 100.0%

25.0% 26.7% 18.8% 17.6% 6.5% 12.7%

2 4 5 1 3 15

13.3% 26.7% 33.3% 6.7% 20.0% 100.0%

25.0% 13.3% 10.4% 2.9% 1.9% 5.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

1-4

5-6

7-9

10 +

HH Member

Size

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 4 Distribution of households according to their member size and sex of household heads in Narail

134 79 35 15 263

51.0% 30.0% 13.3% 5.7% 100.0%

93.1% 97.5% 100.0% 100.0% 95.6%

10 2 12

83.3% 16.7% 100.0%

6.9% 2.5% 4.4%

144 81 35 15 275

52.4% 29.5% 12.7% 5.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Male

Female

Household

Head Sex

Total

1-4 5-6 7-9 10 +

HH Member Size

Total

Table-5 Average households size according to land category in Narail

Household Size

Land Category Total


Mean 6.50 6.27 5.83 4.76 4.38 4.95

SD 3.21 2.73 3.66 2.09 7.71 2.47


Table-6 Average size of household earning member according to sex and land

category in Narail

Household Category

Male Female Total


Large 1.88 0.83 0.00 0.00 1.88 0.83

Medium 1.73 0.83 0.03 0.18 1.77 0.86

Small 1.42 0.79 0.06 0.24 1.48 0.85

Marginal 1.32 0.64 0.15 0.36 1.47 0.66

Landless 1.25 0.66 0.18 0.42 1.43 0.69

Total 1.36 0.72 0.13 0.36 1.49 0.75


in the family by land category in Narail

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.1% .6% .7%

3 14 31 21 101 170

1.8% 8.2% 18.2% 12.4% 59.4% 100.0%

37.5% 46.7% 64.6% 61.8% 65.2% 61.8%

3 10 10 10 42 75

4.0% 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 56.0% 100.0%

37.5% 33.3% 20.8% 29.4% 27.1% 27.3%

2 6 6 3 11 28

7.1% 21.4% 21.4% 10.7% 39.3% 100.0%

25.0% 20.0% 12.5% 8.8% 7.1% 10.2%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

One

Two

Three +

Total Earning

Member

Total


Household Category

Total





in the family according to sex of household heads in Narail

1 164 72 26 263

.4% 62.4% 27.4% 9.9% 100.0%

50.0% 96.5% 96.0% 92.9% 95.6%

1 6 3 2 12

8.3% 50.0% 25.0% 16.7% 100.0%

50.0% 3.5% 4.0% 7.1% 4.4%

2 170 75 28 275

.7% 61.8% 27.3% 10.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Male

Female

Household

Head Sex

Total

No One Two Three +


Total




Table: 9 Distribution of households heads according to their Primary occupation

by sex in Narail

81 1 82

98.8% 1.2% 100.0%

30.8% 8.3% 29.8%

28 28

100.0% 100.0%

10.6% 10.2%

42 42

100.0% 100.0%

16.0% 15.3%

21 1 22

95.5% 4.5% 100.0%

8.0% 8.3% 8.0%

8 3 11

72.7% 27.3% 100.0%

3.0% 25.0% 4.0%

15 15

100.0% 100.0%

5.7% 5.5%

15 2 17

88.2% 11.8% 100.0%

5.7% 16.7% 6.2%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5%

10 1 11

90.9% 9.1% 100.0%

3.8% 8.3% 4.0%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

21 4 25

84.0% 16.0% 100.0%

8.0% 33.3% 9.1%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Tailor-Handi

Service

Teacher

Homeo Doc

HH Work

Boatmanship

Primary

Occupation

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 10 Distribution of households heads according to their primary occupation by land category in Narail

4 18 28 13 19 82

4.9% 22.0% 34.1% 15.9% 23.2% 100.0%

50.0% 60.0% 58.3% 38.2% 12.3% 29.8%

2 2 24 28

7.1% 7.1% 85.7% 100.0%

4.2% 5.9% 15.5% 10.2%

4 10 11 17 42

9.5% 23.8% 26.2% 40.5% 100.0%

13.3% 20.8% 32.4% 11.0% 15.3%

22 22

100.0% 100.0%

14.2% 8.0%

1 10 11

9.1% 90.9% 100.0%

2.9% 6.5% 4.0%

1 14 15

6.7% 93.3% 100.0%

2.9% 9.0% 5.5%

1 1 15 17

5.9% 5.9% 88.2% 100.0%

2.1% 2.9% 9.7% 6.2%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.1% 1.3% 1.1%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

3.3% 1.3% 1.1%

1 3 4

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

2.9% 1.9% 1.5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

1.3% .7%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

2.6% 1.5%

1 1 1 8 11

9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 72.7% 100.0%

3.3% 2.1% 2.9% 5.2% 4.0%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.1% 5.9% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

4 6 3 1 11 25

16.0% 24.0% 12.0% 4.0% 44.0% 100.0%

50.0% 20.0% 6.3% 2.9% 7.1% 9.1%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

1.3% .7%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Tailor-Handi

Service

Teacher

Homeo Doc

HH Work

Boatmanship

Primary

Occupation

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 11 Distribution of households heads according to their secondary occupation by Sex in Narail

134 9 143

93.7% 6.3% 100.0%

51.0% 75.0% 52.0%

17 1 18

94.4% 5.6% 100.0%

6.5% 8.3% 6.5%

9 9

100.0% 100.0%

3.4% 3.3%

6 6

100.0% 100.0%

2.3% 2.2%

44 1 45

97.8% 2.2% 100.0%

16.7% 8.3% 16.4%

16 1 17

94.1% 5.9% 100.0%

6.1% 8.3% 6.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

9 9

100.0% 100.0%

3.4% 3.3%

13 13

100.0% 100.0%

4.9% 4.7%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

3 3

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Driver

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Service

Teacher

HH Work

Others

Secondary

Occupation

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 12 Distribution of households heads according to their secondary occupation by land category in Narail

7 21 25 17 73 143

4.9% 14.7% 17.5% 11.9% 51.0% 100.0%

87.5% 70.0% 52.1% 50.0% 47.1% 52.0%

4 2 4 8 18

22.2% 11.1% 22.2% 44.4% 100.0%

13.3% 4.2% 11.8% 5.2% 6.5%

1 8 9

11.1% 88.9% 100.0%

2.1% 5.2% 3.3%

2 4 6

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

4.2% 2.6% 2.2%

3 6 4 32 45

6.7% 13.3% 8.9% 71.1% 100.0%

10.0% 12.5% 11.8% 20.6% 16.4%

2 4 11 17

11.8% 23.5% 64.7% 100.0%

4.2% 11.8% 7.1% 6.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

2 7 9

22.2% 77.8% 100.0%

4.2% 4.5% 3.3%

2 4 1 6 13

15.4% 30.8% 7.7% 46.2% 100.0%

6.7% 8.3% 2.9% 3.9% 4.7%

1 1 2 4

25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0%

12.5% 2.9% 1.3% 1.5%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.9% 1.3% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.1% .6% .7%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Driver

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Blacksmith

Tailor-Handi

Service

Teacher

HH Work

Others

Secondary

Occupation

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 13 Distribution of household heads according to their age group and land category in Narail

1 4 2 7

14.3% 57.1% 28.6% 100.0%

2.1% 11.8% 1.3% 2.5%

3 4 46 53

5.7% 7.5% 86.8% 100.0%

6.3% 11.8% 29.7% 19.3%

1 8 16 10 41 76

1.3% 10.5% 21.1% 13.2% 53.9% 100.0%

12.5% 26.7% 33.3% 29.4% 26.5% 27.6%

5 9 5 33 52

9.6% 17.3% 9.6% 63.5% 100.0%

16.7% 18.8% 14.7% 21.3% 18.9%

7 17 19 11 33 87

8.0% 19.5% 21.8% 12.6% 37.9% 100.0%

87.5% 56.7% 39.6% 32.4% 21.3% 31.6%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 20

21-30

31-40

41-50

51 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 14 Distribution of household members according to their age group and sex in Narail

91 80 171

53.2% 46.8% 100.0%

13.1% 12.7% 12.9%

83 70 153

54.2% 45.8% 100.0%

12.0% 11.1% 11.5%

85 66 151

56.3% 43.7% 100.0%

12.2% 10.5% 11.4%

165 193 358

46.1% 53.9% 100.0%

23.8% 30.6% 27.0%

143 112 255

56.1% 43.9% 100.0%

20.6% 17.7% 19.2%

71 71 142

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

10.2% 11.3% 10.7%

56 39 95

58.9% 41.1% 100.0%

8.1% 6.2% 7.2%

694 631 1325

52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 5

6-10

11-17

18-30

31-45

46-60

61 +

Age

Group

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total




Table 15 Distribution of household members according to their age group and land category in Narail

6 22 32 21 90 171

3.5% 12.9% 18.7% 12.3% 52.6% 100.0%

11.5% 11.7% 12.5% 13.0% 13.5% 12.9%

5 13 27 17 91 153

3.3% 8.5% 17.6% 11.1% 59.5% 100.0%

9.6% 6.9% 10.5% 10.6% 13.6% 11.5%

4 24 32 21 70 151

2.6% 15.9% 21.2% 13.9% 46.4% 100.0%

7.7% 12.8% 12.5% 13.0% 10.5% 11.4%

14 48 60 43 193 358

3.9% 13.4% 16.8% 12.0% 53.9% 100.0%

26.9% 25.5% 23.3% 26.7% 28.9% 27.0%

9 35 54 30 127 255

3.5% 13.7% 21.2% 11.8% 49.8% 100.0%

17.3% 18.6% 21.0% 18.6% 19.0% 19.2%

7 24 29 20 62 142

4.9% 16.9% 20.4% 14.1% 43.7% 100.0%

13.5% 12.8% 11.3% 12.4% 9.3% 10.7%

7 22 23 9 34 95

7.4% 23.2% 24.2% 9.5% 35.8% 100.0%

13.5% 11.7% 8.9% 5.6% 5.1% 7.2%

52 188 257 161 667 1325

3.9% 14.2% 19.4% 12.2% 50.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 5

6-10

11-17

18-30

31-45

46-60

61 +

Age

Group

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 16 Distribution of household heads according to their marital status and sex in Narail

242 5 247

98.0% 2.0% 100.0%

92.0% 41.7% 89.8%

11 11

100.0% 100.0%

4.2% 4.0%

1 6 7

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

.4% 50.0% 2.5%

8 8

100.0% 100.0%

3.0% 2.9%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

8.3% .4%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widower

Divorced

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 17 Distribution of household heads according to their marital status and land category in Narail

6 30 43 29 139 247

2.4% 12.1% 17.4% 11.7% 56.3% 100.0%

75.0% 100.0% 89.6% 85.3% 89.7% 89.8%

3 4 4 11

27.3% 36.4% 36.4% 100.0%

6.3% 11.8% 2.6% 4.0%

7 7

100.0% 100.0%

4.5% 2.5%

2 2 1 3 8

25.0% 25.0% 12.5% 37.5% 100.0%

25.0% 4.2% 2.9% 1.9% 2.9%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widower

Divorced

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 18 Distribution of household members according to their marital status and sex in Narail

337 331 668

50.4% 49.6% 100.0%

48.6% 52.5% 50.4%

346 226 572

60.5% 39.5% 100.0%

49.9% 35.8% 43.2%

1 62 63

1.6% 98.4% 100.0%

.1% 9.8% 4.8%

10 10

100.0% 100.0%

1.4% .8%

5 5

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .4%

7 7

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% .5%

694 631 1325

52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widowed

Divorced

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total




Table: 19 Distribution of household members according to their marital status and land category in Narail

28 100 121 79 340 668

4.2% 15.0% 18.1% 11.8% 50.9% 100.0%

53.8% 53.2% 47.1% 49.1% 51.0% 50.4%

21 81 119 69 282 572

3.7% 14.2% 20.8% 12.1% 49.3% 100.0%

40.4% 43.1% 46.3% 42.9% 42.3% 43.2%

1 6 13 11 32 63

1.6% 9.5% 20.6% 17.5% 50.8% 100.0%

1.9% 3.2% 5.1% 6.8% 4.8% 4.8%

2 2 1 5 10

20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 50.0% 100.0%

3.8% .8% .6% .7% .8%

1 4 5

20.0% 80.0% 100.0%

.5% .6% .4%

2 1 4 7

28.6% 14.3% 57.1% 100.0%

.8% .6% .6% .5%

52 188 257 161 667 1325

3.9% 14.2% 19.4% 12.2% 50.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Married

Unmarried

Widow

Widowed

Divorced

Seperated

Marital

Status

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 20 Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and sex in Narail

125 6 131

95.4% 4.6% 100.0%

47.5% 50.0% 47.6%

17 17

100.0% 100.0%

6.5% 6.2%

8 8

100.0% 100.0%

3.0% 2.9%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.4% .4%

54 3 57

94.7% 5.3% 100.0%

20.5% 25.0% 20.7%

55 3 58

94.8% 5.2% 100.0%

20.9% 25.0% 21.1%

263 12 275

95.6% 4.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

MBBS

Upto V

IV-X

Educational

Status

Total

Male Female

Household Head Sex

Total




Table: 21 Distribution of household heads according to their educational status and land category in Narail

11 21 13 86 131

8.4% 16.0% 9.9% 65.6% 100.0%

36.7% 43.8% 38.2% 55.5% 47.6%

2 3 4 8 17

11.8% 17.6% 23.5% 47.1% 100.0%

6.7% 6.3% 11.8% 5.2% 6.2%

1 5 1 1 8

12.5% 62.5% 12.5% 12.5% 100.0%

3.3% 10.4% 2.9% .6% 2.9%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

12.5% 2.9% .7%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.9% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

3 7 9 5 33 57

5.3% 12.3% 15.8% 8.8% 57.9% 100.0%

37.5% 23.3% 18.8% 14.7% 21.3% 20.7%

4 9 9 9 27 58

6.9% 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 46.6% 100.0%

50.0% 30.0% 18.8% 26.5% 17.4% 21.1%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

MBBS

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 22 Distribution of household members according to their educational status and sex in Narail

269 300 569

47.3% 52.7% 100.0%

38.8% 47.5% 42.9%

40 17 57

70.2% 29.8% 100.0%

5.8% 2.7% 4.3%

17 6 23

73.9% 26.1% 100.0%

2.4% 1.0% 1.7%

8 1 9

88.9% 11.1% 100.0%

1.2% .2% .7%

6 1 7

85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

.9% .2% .5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.3% .2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.2% .1%

216 164 380

56.8% 43.2% 100.0%

31.1% 26.0% 28.7%

136 141 277

49.1% 50.9% 100.0%

19.6% 22.3% 20.9%

694 631 1325

52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

MBBS

Others

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total

Male Female

Sex

Total




Table: 23 Distribution of household members according to their educational status and land category in Narail

15 65 100 69 320 569

2.6% 11.4% 17.6% 12.1% 56.2% 100.0%

28.8% 34.6% 38.9% 42.9% 48.0% 42.9%

4 15 14 10 14 57

7.0% 26.3% 24.6% 17.5% 24.6% 100.0%

7.7% 8.0% 5.4% 6.2% 2.1% 4.3%

5 8 3 7 23

21.7% 34.8% 13.0% 30.4% 100.0%

2.7% 3.1% 1.9% 1.0% 1.7%

2 2 2 1 2 9

22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 22.2% 100.0%

3.8% 1.1% .8% .6% .3% .7%

1 2 2 2 7

14.3% 28.6% 28.6% 28.6% 100.0%

1.9% 1.1% .8% 1.2% .5%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

.8% .2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.1% .1%

12 48 69 41 210 380

3.2% 12.6% 18.2% 10.8% 55.3% 100.0%

23.1% 25.5% 26.8% 25.5% 31.5% 28.7%

18 51 60 35 113 277

6.5% 18.4% 21.7% 12.6% 40.8% 100.0%

34.6% 27.1% 23.3% 21.7% 16.9% 20.9%

52 188 257 161 667 1325

3.9% 14.2% 19.4% 12.2% 50.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Illiterate

SSC

HSC

Bachelor

Master

MBBS

Others

Upto V

IV-X

EDUC1

Total


Household Category

Total




RESOURCES AND ASSETS Table: 24 Average amounts of land possessions per household according to tenural

pattern by sex and land category in Narail. [In Decimal]

Land Category Own Cultivable Land Land Share Crop In


Large 983.50 2.25 985.75 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 360.37 0.00 360.37 16.30 0.00 16.30

Small 153.85 2.16 156.02 30.77 0.00 30.77

Marginal 76.20 4.05 80.26 19.52 0.00 19.52

Landless 13.94 0.34 14.29 20.31 0.30 20.62

Total-average 112.06 1.14 113.20 21.01 0.17 21.18

[In Decimal]

Land Category Land Mortgage In Land Lease In


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 6.13 0.00 6.13 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 6.35 0.00 6.35 2.70 0.00 2.70

Marginal 1.91 0.00 1.91 9.41 0.00 9.41

Landless 5.47 0.30 5.78 1.54 0.00 1.54

Total-average 5.09 0.17 5.27 2.50 0.00 2.50

[In Decimal]

Land Category Homestead Area Other Fallow Land


Large 51.37 0.00 51.37 48.00 0.00 48.00

Medium 30.80 0.66 31.46 2.13 0.00 2.13

Small 16.70 1.70 18.41 0.75 0.62 1.37

Marginal 18.32 0.29 18.61 0.88 0.00 0.88

Landless 8.64 0.61 9.25 0.34 0.00 0.34

Total-average 14.90 0.76 15.66 2.06 0.10 2.17

[In Decimal]

Land Category Beel/Ditch Land Pond Area


Large 38.25 0.00 38.25 9.87 0.00 9.87

Medium 8.20 0.00 8.20 8.26 0.00 8.26

Small 2.29 0.00 2.29 3.50 0.00 3.50

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.47 0.00 2.47

Landless 2.02 0.00 2.02 1.19 0.00 1.19

Total-average 3.54 0.00 3.54 2.77 0.00 2.77

[In Decimal]

Land Category Share Crop Out Land Mortgage Out Land


Large 139.50 0.00 139.50 6.25 0.00 6.25

Medium 76.86 0.00 76.86 18.80 0.00 18.80

Small 11.85 0.00 11.85 14.33 0.00 14.33

Marginal 3.52 0.52 4.05 19.11 0.70 19.82

Landless 1.31 0.42 1.74 1.97 0.00 1.97

Total-average 15.69 0.30 15.99 8.21 0.08 8.29

[In Decimal]

Land Category Land Lease Out Total Operational Land


Large 171.00 0.00 171.00 776.00 2.25 778.25

Medium 5.40 0.00 5.40 322.93 0.66 323.60

Small 1.39 0.14 1.54 187.06 4.35 191.41

Marginal 1.41 0.00 1.41 104.67 3.11 107.79

Landless 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.18 1.15 49.33

Total-average 5.98 0.02 6.01 130.55 1.93 132.48




Table: 25 Distribution of households according to their involvement in land share-cropping in by land category in Narail

5 21 12 64 102

4.9% 20.6% 11.8% 62.7% 100.0%

16.7% 43.8% 35.3% 41.3% 37.1%

8 25 27 22 91 173

4.6% 14.5% 15.6% 12.7% 52.6% 100.0%

100.0% 83.3% 56.3% 64.7% 58.7% 62.9%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

YES

NO

Sharecrop

In

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 26 Distribution of households who are engaged in sharecropping with terms of sharecropping and land category in Narail

5 14 6 45 70

7.1% 20.0% 8.6% 64.3% 100.0%

100.0% 66.7% 50.0% 70.3% 68.6%

5 6 12 23

21.7% 26.1% 52.2% 100.0%

23.8% 50.0% 18.8% 22.5%

2 7 9

22.2% 77.8% 100.0%

9.5% 10.9% 8.8%

5 21 12 64 102

4.9% 20.6% 11.8% 62.7% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

HALF-HALF (50% Owner and 50%

Sharecroper

ONE-TWO -One Third Owner and Two

Third Sharecropper (IRRI Boro)

Land is mortgaged out with a condition

that owner will cultivate on a

Sharecropping basis (50: 50)

Share

Crop

Terms

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 27 Distribution of households according to their involvement in land

mortgage out by land category in Narail

2 8 11 14 11 46

4.3% 17.4% 23.9% 30.4% 23.9% 100.0%

25.0% 26.7% 22.9% 41.2% 7.1% 16.7%

6 22 37 20 144 229

2.6% 9.6% 16.2% 8.7% 62.9% 100.0%

75.0% 73.3% 77.1% 58.8% 92.9% 83.3%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

YES

NO

Mortgage

Out

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 28 Distribution of households according to their responses on if the male own the living house by land category in Narail

8 30 47 32 143 260

3.1% 11.5% 18.1% 12.3% 55.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 94.1% 92.3% 94.5%

1 2 12 15

6.7% 13.3% 80.0% 100.0%

2.1% 5.9% 7.7% 5.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If Male Own

the House

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 29 Distribution of households according to their responses on house if the

female own the living house by land category in Narail

1 2 11 14

7.1% 14.3% 78.6% 100.0%

2.1% 5.9% 7.1% 5.1%

8 30 47 32 144 261

3.1% 11.5% 18.0% 12.3% 55.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 94.1% 92.9% 94.9%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If Female Own

the House

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 30 Distribution of households according to their house floor type by land

category in Narail

7 27 47 33 155 269

2.6% 10.0% 17.5% 12.3% 57.6% 100.0%

87.5% 90.0% 97.9% 97.1% 100.0% 97.8%

1 3 4

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

12.5% 10.0% 1.5%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.1% 2.9% .7%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Soil/Mud

Pucca

Semi-Pucca

Floor

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 31 Distribution of households according to their house wall type by land

category in Narail

3 12 12 61 88

3.4% 13.6% 13.6% 69.3% 100.0%

10.0% 25.0% 35.3% 39.4% 32.0%

4 4 4 28 40

10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 70.0% 100.0%

13.3% 8.3% 11.8% 18.1% 14.5%

1 3 7 6 16 33

3.0% 9.1% 21.2% 18.2% 48.5% 100.0%

12.5% 10.0% 14.6% 17.6% 10.3% 12.0%

4 5 3 17 29

13.8% 17.2% 10.3% 58.6% 100.0%

13.3% 10.4% 8.8% 11.0% 10.5%

1 6 5 2 8 22

4.5% 27.3% 22.7% 9.1% 36.4% 100.0%

12.5% 20.0% 10.4% 5.9% 5.2% 8.0%

4 5 22 31

12.9% 16.1% 71.0% 100.0%

8.3% 14.7% 14.2% 11.3%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

.6% .4%

1 6 7

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

12.5% 20.0% 2.5%

4 4 5 1 2 16

25.0% 25.0% 31.3% 6.3% 12.5% 100.0%

50.0% 13.3% 10.4% 2.9% 1.3% 5.8%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.1% 2.9% .7%

4 4

100.0% 100.0%

8.3% 1.5%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

12.5% .4%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Soil/Mud

Bamboo

Tin

Chatai

Timber/Wood

Jute Stick

Straw

Pucca

Semi-Pucca

Brick+Wood

Bamboo + Tin

Wood + Tin

Bamboo +Wood

Wall

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 32 Distribution of households according to their house roof type by land category in Narail

6 28 46 31 136 247

2.4% 11.3% 18.6% 12.6% 55.1% 100.0%

75.0% 93.3% 95.8% 91.2% 87.7% 89.8%

1 1 5 7

14.3% 14.3% 71.4% 100.0%

2.1% 2.9% 3.2% 2.5%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

12.5% .4%

1 2 3

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

2.1% 1.3% 1.1%

7 7

100.0% 100.0%

4.5% 2.5%

1 2 2 5 10

10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 50.0% 100.0%

12.5% 6.7% 5.9% 3.2% 3.6%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Tin

Straw

Pucca

Aesbastors

Chhan

Tali

Roof

Made

of

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 33 Distribution of households according to their responses on if they have

electricity by land category in Narail

6 15 15 12 42 90

6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 13.3% 46.7% 100.0%

75.0% 50.0% 31.3% 35.3% 27.1% 32.7%

2 15 33 22 113 185

1.1% 8.1% 17.8% 11.9% 61.1% 100.0%

25.0% 50.0% 68.8% 64.7% 72.9% 67.3%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Yes

No

If has Electricity

Total


Household Category

Total




LIVESTOCK, POULTRY AND TREE RESOURCES Table: 34 Average amount of expenditure made by households who have electricity

per month in electricity in Taka by land category in Narail

Land Category Sample HH Mean Standard Deviation

Large 6 141.00 78.26

Medium 15 140.53 95.23

Small 15 121.20 46.16

Marginal 12 105.41 15.67

Landless 42 105.85 52.96

Total 90 116.47 60.34

Table: 35 Average number and value (Taka) of livestock resources according to sex and land category in Narail

Land Category Cows (No) Cows (Taka)


Large 2.50 2.50 0.00 10975.00 10975.00 0.00

Medium 1.733 1.60 0.13 9506.66 8706.67 800.00

Small 1.33 1.21 0.13 6225.00 5662.50 562.50

Marginal 1.02 0.94 0.08 3035.29 2829.41 250.88

Landless 0.70 0.48 0.22 3347.74 1889.68 1458.06

Total 1.01 0.85 0.17 4705.09 3672.36 1032.73

Land Category Bullocks (No) Bullocks (Taka)


Large 0.38 0.38 0.00 3125.00 3125.00 0.00

Medium 0.50 0.50 0.00 4226.66 4226.66 0.00

Small 0.15 0.15 0.00 770.83 770.83 0.00

Marginal 0.32 0.32 0.00 2088.23 2088.23 0.00

Landless 0.03 0.03 0.00 152.90 152.90 0.00

Total 0.15 0.15 0.00 1030.90 1030.90 0.00

Land Category Sheep (No) Sheep (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Land Category Duck (No) Duck (Taka)


Large 7.37 3.88 3.50 475.00 193.75 281.25

Medium 5.73 2.43 3.30 495.00 197.33 297.66

Small 6.06 1.90 4.17 473.75 147.29 326.45

Marginal 4.61 1.68 2.94 299.11 75.00 224.11

Landless 3.66 1.08 2.58 257.65 74.10 183.54

Total 4.53 1.53 3.01 332.71 103.91 228.80

Land Category Chicken (No) Chicken (Taka)


Large 5.12 4.50 0.63 306.25 275.00 31.25

Medium 5.00 1.97 3.03 382.16 135.66 246.50

Small 4.29 1.63 2.67 268.75 115.62 153.12

Marginal 2.85 0.47 2.38 203.82 53.82 150.00

Landless 2.32 0.85 1.48 161.16 58.64 102.51

Total 3.10 1.16 1.95 213.54 82.69 130.85




Land Category Buffalos (No) Buffalos (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.06 0.06 0.00 437.50 437.50 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.01 0.01 0.00 76.36 76.36 0.00

Land Category Goat (No) Goat (Taka)


Large 0.38 0.38 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.00

Medium 0.20 0.20 0.00 240.00 240.00 0.00

Small 0.48 0.33 0.15 417.70 330.20 87.50

Marginal 0.41 0.05 0.35 217.64 0.00 217.64

Landless 0.36 0.12 0.26 288.38 130.32 158.06

Total 0.37 0.16 0.21 295.81 164.54 131.27

Land Category Kabutar (No) Kabutar (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.13 0.00 0.13 6.25 0.00 6.25

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.11 0.06 0.05 4.12 2.83 1.29

Total 0.08 0.03 0.05 3.41 1.60 1.18



Large 1.75 0.75 1.00 102.50 62.50 40.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.21 0.00 0.21 8.33 0.00 8.33

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.01 0.01 0.00 3.87 3.87 0.00

Total 0.09 0.02 0.07 6.61 4.00 2.61


Total Male Female


Large 12533.75 13136.88 14881.25 13305.74 352.50 497.61

Medium 14850.50 9195.70 13506.33 9633.82 1344.16 3435.92

Small 8608.12 10168.18 7463.95 10209.98 1144.16 3306.04

Marginal 5844.12 8085.55 5046.47 7772.73 797.64 1453.68

Landless 4215.84 7198.80 2312.36 4454.22 1903.48 6187.42

Total 6664.47 9039.49 5136.38 8158.37 1528.09 5011.82




Table: 36 Average number and value (Taka) of tree resources according to sex and land category in Narail

Land Category Fruit Trees (No) Fruit Trees (Taka)


Large 62.00 10.12 51.87 5475.00 5375.00 100.00

Medium 8.63 7.96 0.67 6430.00 4986.66 1443.33

Small 5.04 4.39 0.64 2210.41 1647.91 562.50

Marginal 2.26 2.70 0.55 1185.29 813.23 372.05

Landless 2.64 2.30 0.33 1048.25 941.93 106.32

Total 5.52 3.56 1.95 1983.92 1619.45 364.47

Land Category Timber Trees (No) Timber Trees (Taka)


Large 28.12 28.12 0.00 9937.50 9937.50 0.00

Medium 10.90 10.80 0.10 4933.33 4873.33 60.00

Small 7.81 7.56 0.25 3777.08 3742.70 34.37

Marginal 6.38 6.15 0.24 5223.52 5064.70 158.82

Landless 7.44 3.23 4.21 1907.09 1726.12 180.96

Total 8.35 5.90 2.46 3207.27 3073.09 134.18

Land Category Bamboo (No) Bamboo (Taka)


Large 143.75 143.75 0.00 6437.50 6437.50 0.00

Medium 59.00 56.03 1.73 3233.33 3150.00 83.33

Small 31.08 26.92 4.17 1745.83 1529.16 216.66

Marginal 28.67 28.38 0.29 1241.17 1226.47 14.70

Landless 15.20 14.65 0.56 604.35 582.74 21.61

Total 28.04 26.76 1.27 1338.81 1277.90 60.90

Land Category Other Tree (No) Other Tree (Taka)


Large 6.25 6.25 0.00 2500.00 2500.00 0.00

Medium 4.66 4.67 0.00 335.00 335.00 0.00

Small 0.17 0.17 0.00 14.58 14.58 0.00

Marginal 0.38 0.38 0.00 147.04 147.04 0.00

Landless 0.60 0.54 0.06 74.19 67.74 6.45

Total 1.10 1.07 0.03 171.81 168.18 3.63


Total Male Female


Large 24350.00 26360.00 24250.00 26425.10 100.00 282.84

Medium 14931.67 21062.11 13345.00 20905.36 1586.66 6186.51

Small 7747.91 8076.14 6934.37 7412.28 813.54 3251.59

Marginal 7797.05 17735.74 7251.47 17826.10 545.58 2126.25

Landless 3633.90 9929.19 3318.54 9942.73 315.35 1212.55

Total 6701.83 13833.38 6138.63 13688.68 563.20 2721.02




AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENTS Table: 37 Average number and value (Taka) of agricultural equipments/

implements according to sex and land category in Narail.

Land Category Plough (No) Plough (Taka)


Large 0.25 0.25 0.00 71.87 71.87 0.00

Medium 0.33 0.33 0.00 80.00 80.00 0.00

Small 0.14 0.14 0.00 28.95 28.95 0.00

Marginal 0.17 0.17 0.00 48.52 48.52 0.00

Landless 0.01 0.01 0.00 4.51 4.54 0.00

Total 0.09 0.09 0.00 24.41 24.41 0.00

Land Category Bullock-Cart (No) Bullock-Cart (Taka)


Large 0.25 0.25 0.00 350.00 350.00 0.00

Medium 0.13 0.13 0.00 153.33 153.33 0.00

Small 0.04 0.04 0.00 52.08 52.08 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.02 0.02 0.00 36.00 36.00 0.00

Land Category Irrigation Pump (No) Irrigation Pump (Taka)


Large 0.37 0.37 0.00 3375.00 3375.00 0.00

Medium 0.30 0.30 0.00 4200.00 4200.00 0.00

Small 0.27 0.27 0.00 1933.33 1933.33 0.00

Marginal 0.20 0.20 0.00 923.52 923.52 0.00

Landless 0.05 0.05 0.00 384.51 384.51 0.00

Total 0.14 0.14 0.00 1224.72 1224.72 0.00

Land Category Tractor/Power Tiller (No) Tractor/Power Tiller (Taka)


Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.03 0.03 0.00 1000.00 1000.00 0.00

Small 0.02 0.02 0.00 625.00 625.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.06 0.06 0.00 193.54 193.54 0.00

Total 0.01 0.01 0.00 327.27 327.27 0.00

Land Category Threshing Machine (No) Threshing Machine (Taka)


Large 0.50 0.50 0.00 950.00 950.00 0.00

Medium 0.40 0.40 0.00 813.33 813.33 0.00

Small 0.22 0.22 0.00 414.58 414.58 0.00

Marginal 0.11 0.11 0.00 211.76 211.76 0.00

Landless 0.07 0.04 0.03 85.16 83.22 1.93

Total 0.15 0.13 0.02 262.90 261.81 1.09

Land Category Dao/Spade (No) Dao/Spade (Taka)


Large 5.12 5.12 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.00

Medium 6.16 6.16 0.00 233.66 233.66 0.00

Small 4.44 4.43 0.02 232.70 231.45 1.25

Marginal 2.38 2.35 0.03 136.76 135.29 1.47

Landless 2.34 2.27 0.07 115.50 108.79 6.70

Total 3.21 3.16 0.05 155.39 151.21 4.18




Land Category Fish Gears (No) Fish Gears (Taka)


Large 1.25 1.25 0.00 355.00 355.00 0.00

Medium 1.60 1.60 0.00 349.33 349.33 0.00

Small 1.52 1.52 0.00 281.66 281.66 0.00

Marginal 1.35 1.35 0.00 289.70 289.70 0.00

Landless 1.30 1.29 0.01 289.90 283.35 6.45

Total 1.37 1.37 0.07 296.76 293.12 3.63

Land Category Boat (No) Boat (Taka)


Large 0.12 0.12 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00

Medium 0.06 0.06 0.00 193.33 193.33 0.00

Small 0.02 0.02 0.00 20.83 20.83 0.00

Marginal 0.05 0.05 0.00 88.23 88.23 0.00

Landless 0.03 0.03 0.03 100.00 100.00 0.00

Total 0.04 0.04 0.00 106.54 106.54 0.00

Land Category Ladder/Weeder (No) Ladder/Weeder (Taka)


Large 2.00 2.00 0.00 260.00 260.00 0.00

Medium 1.50 1.50 0.00 84.76 84.76 0.00

Small 1.75 1.75 0.00 78.22 78.22 0.00

Marginal 1.26 1.23 0.03 35.58 34.70 0.88

Landless 0.85 0.80 0.05 26.64 25.16 1.48

Total 1.16 1.13 0.03 49.88 48.93 0.94



Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.03 0.03 0.00 240.00 240.00 0.00

Small 0.04 0.04 0.00 4.58 4.58 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 0.03 0.03 0.00 41.12 41.12 0.00

Total 0.02 0.02 0.00 50.16 50.16 0.00


Total Male Female


Large 6111.87 5872.92 6111.87 5872.92 0.00 0.00

Medium 7347.76 14887.20 7342.76 14889.46 5.00 27.38

Small 3671.97 7423.03 3670.72 7423.53 1.25 8.66

Marginal 1734.11 2944.75 1731.76 2946.14 2.35 13.71

Landless 1240.82 3322.47 1214.56 3325.96 26.25 167.32

Total 2534.07 6723.22 2518.22 6727.36 15.85 126.46




OTHER ASSETS: Table: 38 Average number and value (Taka) of household durable assets according

to sex and land category in Narail

Land Category Bi-Cycle (No) Bi-Cycle (Taka)


Large 0.87 0.87 0.00 1012.50 1012.50 0.00

Medium 0.66 0.66 0.00 740.00 740.00 0.00

Small 0.60 0.60 0.00 656.25 656.25 0.00

Marginal 0.41 0.41 0.00 432.35 432.35 0.00

Landless 0.27 0.27 0.00 367.41 367.41 0.00

Total (Average) 0.41 0.41 0.00 485.27 485.27 0.00

Land Category Watch (No) Watch (Taka)


Large 1.87 1.87 0.05 837.50 835.50 100.00

Medium 1.33 1.23 0.10 388.33 373.33 15.00

Small 0.85 0.79 0.06 201.97 181.14 20.83

Marginal 0.67 0.61 0.06 150.00 138.23 11.76

Landless 0.40 0.38 0.02 103.83 99.19 4.64

Total (Average) 0.65 0.61 0.04 181.96 172.61 9.34

Land Category Furniture (No) Furniture (Taka)


Large 8.25 7.50 0.75 3112.50 3012.50 100.00

Medium 7.56 6.90 0.66 2976.66 2580.00 396.66

Small 5.04 4.39 0.64 1677.08 1402.08 275.00

Marginal 3.00 2.70 0.30 820.58 757.35 63.23

Landless 2.55 2.21 0.34 705.33 617.74 87.29

Total (Average) 3.75 3.32 0.43 1206.83 1055.63 151.20

Land Category Cookeries (No) Cookeries (Taka)


Large 10.75 5.75 5.00 987.50 737.50 250.00

Medium 13.06 4.96 8.10 713.00 260.66 452.33

Small 10.70 3.43 7.27 542.50 118.12 424.37

Marginal 7.44 1.82 5.61 420.88 120.29 300.58

Landless 6.49 1.80 4.69 310.74 71.09 239.64

Total (Average) 8.18 2.55 5.63 428.38 125.45 302.92

Land Category Radio/Cassette Player (No) Radio/Cassette Player (Taka)


Large 0.62 0.62 0.00 987.50 987.50 0.00

Medium 0.50 0.50 0.00 550.00 550.00 0.00

Small 0.31 0.31 0.00 144.37 144.37 0.00

Marginal 0.17 0.14 0.03 108.82 102.94 5.88

Landless 0.15 0.14 0.01 85.41 82.83 2.58

Total (Average) 0.23 0.22 0.01 175.52 172.80 2.72

Land Category Television (No) Television (Taka)


Large 0.37 0.37 0.00 1687.50 1687.50 0.00

Medium 0.30 0.26 0.04 1433.33 1300.00 133.33

Small 0.14 0.14 0.00 575.00 575.00 0.00

Marginal 0.11 0.08 0.03 261.76 232.35 29.41

Landless 0.06 0.06 0.00 214.83 214.83 214.83

Total (Average) 0.12 0.11 0.01 459.27 441.09 18.18






Large 0.37 0.37 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00

Medium 0.06 0.06 0.00 6.66 6.66 0.00

Small 0.06 0.04 0.02 60.41 58.33 2.08

Marginal 0.11 0.05 0.06 57.64 7.64 50.00

Landless 0.03 0.02 0.01 18.19 11.61 6.58

Total (Average) 0.06 0.04 0.02 31.58 21.30 10.25


Total Male Female


Large 8825.00 5809.04 8475.00 6047.60 350.00 381.72

Medium 6808.00 5861.43 5805.66 5409.26 1002.33 2123.42

Small 3857.60 2973.07 3135.31 2853.55 722.29 1230.46

Marginal 2252.05 1863.57 1791.17 1733.97 460.88 801.57

Landless 1805.48 2167.09 1464.74 2084.31 340.74 413.07

Total (Average) 2968.81 3557.41 2474.18 3348.02 494.63 982.54




MAJOR LIVELIHOODS

Table: 39 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Aus Local according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 22.35 6257.97 12.34 849.20 224.20 26.62 162.61 33.01 452.69 0.0 0.0 134.92 47.61 171.42 64.26 2106.98 4150.98

Medium 19.50 5494.09 10.83 627.38 49.46 61.59 199.09 22.42 268.60 34.91 28.94 307.05 63.70 315.07 327.93 2176.30 3317.78

Small 16.05 4504.84 12.56 705.50 181.44 40.76 231.04 24.30 248.80 15.09 6.42 135.34 22.44 172.57 306.46 2010.05 2494.78

Marginal 18.09 4999.04 9.09 630.95 228.57 54.28 344.52 38.80 441.42 42.85 85.71 430.95 87.14 90.95 250.47 2590.71 2408.33

Landless 17.17 4823.22 6.85 415.09 306.19 52.20 319.82 30.62 420.26 55.62 21.57 236.06 119.03 128.56 400.84 2367.45 2455.76

Total 17.63 4947.04 10.02 595.36 206.56 48.49 258.96 27.70 338.46 33.59 20.68 221.44 69.46 177.80 322.96 2209.75 2737.28

Table: 40 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Aus HYV according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 27.66 9153.45 25.96 1429.99 79.54 54.81 345.32 56.15 835.13 0.0 0.0 938.81 151.81 177.81 308.89 4267.34 4886.10

Medium 26.18 8120.97 16.99 982.44 33.89 49.98 311.01 25.07 422.50 6.25 0.0 511.05 166.01 440.09 527.31 3394.33 4726.63

Small 26.22 8062.55 21.44 1361.68 155.90 88.30 554.34 57.85 836.69 38.64 0.0 962.02 186.13 271.37 709.02 5037.19 3025.36

Marginal 24.80 6484.19 16.98 1008.84 128.86 61.07 357.97 46.76 668.54 11.69 0.0 504.42 167.70 163.85 387.42 3387.63 3096.55

Landless 24.46 6685.88 15.68 1094.54 236.81 62.28 397.58 41.99 591.67 11.12 17.74 789.13 150.04 266.02 416.54 3960.09 2725.78

Total 25.21 7270.62 17.69 1129.68 163.74 64.61 404.20 43.65 634.08 15.09 7.85 739.16 162.30 275.31 480.01 3996.36 3274.26




Table: 41 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Boro Local according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others

Mds Tk No Tk Kg Tk Kg Tk Kg Tk Tk Tk Tk k Tk Tk

Large 42.22 11822.22 20.00 1333.33 400.00 88.88 533.33 35.55 497.77 62.22 373.33 1111.11 106.66 133.33 88.88 4577.77 7244.44

Medium 40.77 11556.54 23.80 1726.19 438.98 81.10 486.60 57.14 800.00 0.0 0.0 1056.54 125.00 491.07 528.27 5652.67 5903.86

Small 38.85 11332.60 14.16 708.15 596.08 84.78 511.59 51.39 722.10 0.0 0.0 1318.13 205.58 300.00 541.94 4903.58 6429.01

Marginal 34.02 10206.76 9.54 680.45 214.28 90.22 565.03 35.71 687.96 0.0 0.0 1146.61 218.98 142.85 571.42 4227.63 5979.13

Landless 31.43 8866.29 12.26 811.77 459.10 92.51 671.14 74.35 722.27 0.0 0.0 1004.05 210.92 140.53 623.02 4642.84 4223.45

Total 35.37 10151.81 14.02 873.69 475.91 88.64 587.69 60.20 715.96 2.82 16.96 1126.58 197.40 223.02 559.64 4776.90 5374.91

Table: 42 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Boro HYV according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,

weeding, harvesting


etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 55.36 13127.50 27.68 1679.16 269.25 69.79 460.00 44.43 648.33 10.00 60.00 1906.33 167.33 306.66 466.91 5964.00 7163.50

Medium 53.70 15667.37 23.72 1333.25 437.35 71.95 464.35 64.04 1028.44 9.25 0.0 1366.96 121.62 381.49 446.92 5580.41 10086.96

Small 49.09 14621.65 21.51 1342.66 293.23 81.12 567.92 79.91 1047.97 1.63 19.86 1655.50 280.88 324.93 436.08 5969.08 8652.57

Marginal 42.60 12008.46 24.61 1624.04 414.06 92.13 605.62 78.28 1053.84 6.80 13.60 1212.18 203.05 367.49 578.20 6072.11 5936.34

Landless 38.34 10680.55 17.90 1091.31 407.01 78.61 562.32 71.92 897.24 8.46 40.28 1149.09 276.74 366.32 636.97 5427.32 5253.22

Total 45.26 12800.22 21.40 1307.55 360.46 79.24 544.33 71.13 958.80 7.05 25.95 1357.23 230.17 356.57 539.10 5700.19 7100.02




Table: 43 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for B. Amon according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 29.27 8703.12 25.25 1446.18 26.04 55.24 348.95 23.26 362.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.08 282.96 446.87 2965.62 5737.50

Medium 24.78 6076.92 15.89 794.81 28.57 36.64 222.61 20.34 283.58 0.0 0.0 142.85 30.03 161.96 451.89 2116.34 3960.58

Small 23.33 7724.31 21.64 1132.69 68.45 36.06 217.34 51.30 390.26 45.63 0.0 168.25 23.80 223.64 619.66 2844.12 4880.18

Marginal 19.86 5904.54 18.26 1100.37 0.0 34.72 219.82 15.34 204.57 37.87 0.0 0.0 52.75 220.83 499.75 2298.12 3606.42

Landless 25.57 7739.12 19.03 1080.53 269.34 36.43 219.11 41.37 554.01 0.0 0.0 177.53 108.00 211.36 575.97 3195.89 4543.22

Total 24.24 7377.74 19.85 1091.90 125.97 37.31 227.24 37.89 412.85 20.02 0.0 136.77 60.71 215.72 558.87 2830.06 4547.87

Table: 44 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for T. Amon according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 34.49 9852.20 21.23 1456.99 0.0 51.10 306.62 14.10 207.69 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 319.17 383.27 2673.77 7178.43

Medium 33.54 9897.64 22.06 1406.09 0.0 54.24 329.64 41.94 612.86 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 176.28 664.34 3189.23 6708.41

Small 25.21 6692.97 20.74 1160.16 0.0 39.34 242.03 7.56 82.58 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 344.50 576.24 2405.53 4287.43

Marginal 27.14 7203.87 24.91 1456.50 500.00 35.41 215.97 6.94 97.22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 875.00 1041.00 4185.70 3018.16

Landless 26.96 6946.55 18.30 981.78 183.33 33.25 204.12 63.21 719.00 0.0 0.0 500.00 83.33 81.63 844.88 3598.10 3348.45

Total 28.12 7670.87 21.09 1235.35 93.93 41.54 253.78 24.46 307.86 0.0 0.0 90.90 15.15 328.12 679.89 3005.02 4665.85




Table: 45 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for T. Amon HYV according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category T

otal

Pro

duct

ion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,



etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 39.16 10638.88 22.22 1111.11 0.0 59.72 366.66 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 166.66 1644.44 8994.44

Medium 32.71 9588.75 18.20 1232.04 93.69 102.81 328.88 137.28 495.62 0.0 0.0 272.70 173.01 374.66 756.13 3726.76 5861.99

Small 30.30 8818.45 22.81 1396.15 73.95 54.81 374.44 50.23 673.48 0.0 0.0 46.87 74.24 379.51 577.30 3595.97 5222.47

Marginal 27.42 8162.58 17.36 905.98 56.39 50.65 322.75 31.91 431.86 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.38 200.52 450.14 2437.04 5725.53

Landless 30.77 9156.64 15.89 878.00 255.28 53.17 333.10 71.07 656.77 0.0 0.0 178.85 87.18 195.80 665.86 3250.90 5905.74

Total 30.62 9005.85 18.43 1067.80 143.98 59.67 342.47 64.54 575.80 0.0 0.0 118.83 88.30 258.35 597.68 3193.26 5812.58

Table: 46 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Oil Seed according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Val

ue (

Tk)

Hired Labor (transplation,

weeding, harvesting, threshing & storing,

etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 3.64 2266.51 6.65 375.92 0.00 10.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.40 55.55 578.88 1689.62

Medium 9.82 6191.52 16.54 931.48 362.88 16.84 104.04 41.10 566. 38 0.00 0.00 583.33 95.31 451.64 494.95 3590.04 2601.48

Small 5.67 2156.17 0.75 33.33 140.83 10.83 70.85 26.38 227.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.25 275.00 778.35 1377.82

Marginal 5.76 3082.14 4.76 238.09 0.00 23.80 142.85 23.80 333.33 0.00 0.00 238.09 119.04 0.00 238.09 1309.52 1772.61

Landless 6.89 2478.47 5.39 248.73 66.31 34.85 229.81 27.18 385.92 0.00 0.00 45.87 15.29 0.00 273.73 1265.69 1212.78

Total 6.56 3304.38 6.96 375.29 147.16 17.49 111.42 25.10 305.75 0.00 0.00 169.31 34.13 139.06 286.30 1568.45 1735.93




Table: 47 Per Acre Yield, Cost and Gross Income for Pulses according to Land Category in Narail

Land

Category

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n V

alue

(Tk)

Hired Labor

(transplation,

weeding, harvesting


etc.)

See

d/ s

eedl

ings

(T

k)


Manure

Irrig

atio

n

Pes

t Con

trol

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Land

Pre

para

tion

Tot

al P

rodu

ctio

n C

ost

(Tk)

Gro

ss In

com

e

Urea Others


Large 10.86 4693.33 13.40 672.00 166.66 13.33 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 566.66 83.33 1568.66 3124.66

Medium 8.41 3200.96 4.38 219.90 4.05 0.00 0.00 0.92 13.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.03 16.20 291.08 2909.88

Small 8.78 2481.66 6.37 309.70 22.77 3.34 21.35 1.06 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.80 68.66 27.22 489.52 1992.13

Marginal 8.94 3278.16 5.67 360.64 222.22 1.03 6.81 4.14 60.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 216.66 164.44 1030.94 2247.22

Landless 5.47 1833.80 5.48 386.36 510.10 5.06 30.90 2.90 87.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.09 142.04 1180.93 652.86

Total 8.20 2816.80 6.53 365.67 191.53 3.95 24.38 1.97 39.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.76 133.38 86.18 852.20 1964.59

Table 48 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household according to Fishing Sources of Narail

Fish

Sources

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Pond 50.83 2431.54 180.27 519.95 55.97 70.75 3.39 0.00 13.20 0.00 3.77 2.64 677.86 2063.52 53

Beel 32.41 1548.44 0.00 3.04 0.27 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.00 0.00 8.04 1540.40 148

Ditch/Drain 36.33 1766.66 0.00 316.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 316.66 1450.00 6

Canal 16.76 844.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 844.00 84

Flood Plain 19.03 958.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 958.98 89

River 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




Table 49 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Pond According to Land Category for Narail Sub-

project

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other Disease Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 38.71 1693.57 17.14 224.07 0.00 14.28 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 261.21 1346.64 14

Marginal 49.00 2859.37 25.00 462.50 25.00 50.00 12.50 0.00 62.5 0.00 .25 17.50 655.00 2309.37 8

Small 77.66 3266.66 25.00 775.00 33.00 87.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 754.16 2145.83 12

Medium 68.85 3265.00 128.00 627.00 14.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 934.00 2436.00 14

Large 81.20 3420.00 0.00 980.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 980.00 2440.00 5

Total 50.83 2431.54 180.27 519.95 55.97 70.75 3.39 0.00 13.20 0.00 3.77 2.64 677.86 2063.52 53

Table 50 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Beel According to Land Category for Naraili Sub-

project

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other Disease Control Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 32.69 1517.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 0.00 7.05 1510.82 85

Marginal 33.05 1658.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1658.28 17

Small 28.03 1453.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1453.84 26

Medium 36.31 1786.25 0.00 28.12 2.50 6.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.87 1749.37 16

Large 36.5 1875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1875.00 4

Total 32.41 1548.44 0.00 3.04 0.27 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.00 0.00 8.04 1540.40 148




Table 51 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Ditch According to Land Category for Narail

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 10.00 350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 2

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Small 60.00 3000.00 0.00 850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 850.00 2150.00 2

Medium 28.00 1400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1400.00 1

Large 50.00 2500.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 2300.00 1

Total 36.33 1766.66 0.00 316.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 316.66 1450.00 6

Table 52 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Canal According to Land Category for Narail

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 14.98 754.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 754.54 55

Marginal 22.85 1157.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1157.14 7

Small 15.09 763.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 763.63 11

Medium 23.77 1188.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1188.88 9

Large 22.00 1100.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1100.00 2

Total 16.76 844.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 844.40 84




Table 53 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from Flood Plain According to Land Category for Narail

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 17.47 885.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 885.84 53

Marginal 21.11 105.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.55 9

Small 18.66 933.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 933.33 12

Medium 23.83 1191.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1191.66 12

Large 22.66 1133.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1133.33 3

Total 19.03 958.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 958.98 89

Table 54 Average Annual Value (Taka) of Fish Catch, Costs and Income per Household from River According to Land Category for Narail

Land Category

Tot

al C

atch

Tot

al V

alue

Pre

para

tion

cost

Fry

/ Fin

gerli

ngs

Lime/ Other

Disease

Control

Chemicals

Fis

h F

eed

Fis

h G

ears

Irrig

atio

n

Har

vest

ing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Hired labor

Tot

al C

ost

Gro

ss In

com

e

N=

num

ber

of H

Hs


Landless 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0




Table: 55 Average sale, cost and gross income from Cow/bullock/ Ox by land category in

Narail

Household Category

Gross Sale Feed costs

Treatment Costs

Hired labor Other Cost Total Costs

Gross Income

N= No of HH


Large 2.25 13500.00 1125.00 50.00 0.0 0.0 125.0 1300.00 12200.00 4

Medium 1.50 7750.00 685.00 12.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 697.50 7052.50 4

Small 1.25 7500.00 225.00 20.00 0.0 0.0 62.50 307.50 7192.50 8

Marginal 1.00 5750.00 250.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.00 300.00 5450.00 2

Landless 1.30 6366.00 730.00 20.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 750.00 5616.00 10

Total 1.43 7862.85 601.42 21.78 0.0 0.0 39.28 662.50 7200.36 28

Table: 56 Average sale, cost and gross income from Goat by land category in Narail

Household Category

Gross Sale Feed costs Treatment Costs

Hired labor Other Cost

Total Costs

Gross Income

N= No of HH


Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 1.00 1700.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1700.0 3

Marginal 2.00 1416.66 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.00 1366.66 3

Landless 1.57 1242.85 0.0 7.14 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.14 1235.71 7

Total 1.54 1388.46 0.0 15.38 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.38 1373.07 13

Table: 57 Average sale, cost and gross income from Poultry by land category in Narail

Household Category



Total Costs

Gross Income

N= No of HH


Large 6.00 633.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 633.33 3

Medium 6.00 900.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 900.00 1

Small 6.60 660.00 0.0 4.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.00 656.33 5

Marginal 13.00 1025.00 0.0 127.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 127.50 897.50 4

Landless 6.57 604.04 40.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.00 564.04 21

Total 7.26 673.06 24.70 15.58 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.29 632.79 34

Table: 58 Average sale, cost and gross income from Milk by land category in Narail

Household Category



Total Costs

Gross Income

N= No of HH


Large 391.67 4600.00 2253.33 300.00 0.0 0.0 133.33 2686.66 1913.33 3

Medium 336.00 3320.00 945.00 70.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1015.00 2305.00 5

Small 274.63 2096.25 615.62 25.00 0.0 0.0 37.50 678.12 1418.12 8

Marginal 270.00 3240.00 1800.00 200.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 2000.00 1240.00 1

Landless 328.89 3604.44 88.88 22.22 0.0 0.0 0.0 111.11 3493.33 9

Total 318.54 3186.53 731.15 71.15 0.0 0.0 26.92 829.23 2357.30 26

Table: 59 Average sale, cost and gross income from Egg by land category in Narail

Household Category



Total Costs

Gross Income

N= No of HH


Large 150.00 450.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 450.00 1

Medium 230.00 591.66 83.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.33 508.33 3

Small 317.57 826.42 81.07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.07 745.35 14

Marginal 314.00 820.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 820.00 5

Landless 175.33 482.40 45.18 20.44 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.62 416.77 27

Total 231.80 618.40 52.10 11.04 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.14 555.26 50




CROP DAMAGE:

Table: 60 Average crop damage in percentage-(who had damage) according to household category and crop season in Narail

Household Category Kharif-I Kharif-II Rabi

Mean No of HH Had Damage

Mean No of HH Had

Damage

Mean No of HH Had Damage

Large 13.33 3 23.75 4 30.00 1

Medium 14.21 14 24.11 9 27.50 2

Small 20.38 13 33.88 9 25.00 2

Marginal 23.36 19 33.33 3 25.00 3

Landless 19.91 34 47.30 13 22.83 6

Total 19.57 83 36.38 34 24.33 12

Table: 61 Distribution of households who had crop damage in different crop season

according to reasons for crop damage by household category in Narail

3 6 9

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

12.5% 13.3% 7.9%

2 4 3 2 11

18.2% 36.4% 27.3% 18.2% 100.0%

11.1% 17.4% 12.5% 4.4% 9.6%

1 3 3 6 13

7.7% 23.1% 23.1% 46.2% 100.0%

5.6% 13.0% 12.5% 13.3% 11.4%

5 2 4 5 16

31.3% 12.5% 25.0% 31.3% 100.0%

27.8% 8.7% 16.7% 11.1% 14.0%

2 3 6 7 8 26

7.7% 11.5% 23.1% 26.9% 30.8% 100.0%

50.0% 16.7% 26.1% 29.2% 17.8% 22.8%

1 3 1 10 15

6.7% 20.0% 6.7% 66.7% 100.0%

5.6% 13.0% 4.2% 22.2% 13.2%

1 2 1 2 6

16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 100.0%

25.0% 11.1% 4.3% 4.4% 5.3%

1 4 4 3 6 18

5.6% 22.2% 22.2% 16.7% 33.3% 100.0%

25.0% 22.2% 17.4% 12.5% 13.3% 15.8%

4 18 23 24 45 114

3.5% 15.8% 20.2% 21.1% 39.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Pest Attack

Excessive Rainfall

High Wind



Facilities

Draught


Others

DAMAGE

REASONS

Total


Household Category

Total




PADDY MARKETING PROBLEMS: Table: 62 Distribution of households who sold-out their crop according to reasons

for not getting fair price by household category in Narail

4 6 4 9 23

17.4% 26.1% 17.4% 39.1% 100.0%

66.7% 60.0% 80.0% 40.9% 50.0%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

4.5% 2.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

4.5% 2.2%

1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

16.7% 10.0% 4.5% 6.5%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

10.0% 4.5% 4.3%

3 1 2 1 9 16

18.8% 6.3% 12.5% 6.3% 56.3% 100.0%

100.0% 16.7% 20.0% 20.0% 40.9% 34.8%

3 6 10 5 22 46

6.5% 13.0% 21.7% 10.9% 47.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


during the season

Middleman

Advance Sale

Financial Crisis


To Avoid Transportation

Cost

Reasons

for not

Getting

Fair Price

Total


Household Category

Total

ACCESS TO INFORMATION:

Table: 63 Percentage of households received training on Agriculture by Land

category in Narail


DAE DOF & Livestock

Youth Ministry

NGO TV/ Radio



Large 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 29.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.9 0.0 5.2 0.6 0.0 0.0

Total 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 2.2 0.0 4.4 0.4 0.0 0.0




Table: 64 Percentage of households received training on Fishery by Land category in Narail


DAE DOF & Livestock

Youth Ministry

NGO TV/ Radio



Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Table: 65 Percentage of households received training on Livestock by Land category in Narail


DAE DOF & Livestock

Youth Ministry

NGO TV/ Radio



Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Small 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Landless 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Table: 66 Percentage of households received training on Health by Land category

in Narail Areas Sources of Training (Give Tick )

DAE DOF & Livestock

Youth Ministry

NGO TV/ Radio



Large 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5

Medium 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 10.0

Small 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 6.3 2.1 4.2 0.0 0.0 2.9 12.5

Marginal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 2.9 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8

Landless 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.6 1.3 2.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 18.7

Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 3.6 1.5 3.3 0.4 0.0 0.7 15.6

Table: 67 Average annual income (in Taka) per household according to source in Narail




Large 32954.00 29292.81 3998.75 4337.38 0.00 0.00

Medium 23217.97 13439.18 1787.66 4823.04 240.00 1314.53

Small 13159.98 9651.40 1934.12 3546.45 543.75 2011.76

Marginal 7060.91 5891.66 645.00 1623.94 1157.35 4196.57

Landless 3496.90 7614.67 667.21 1801.26 3225.48 6811.14

Total (Average) 8632.51 12376.01 1104.74 2791.39 2082.18 5552.53




Large 0.00 0.00 12450.00 26699.75 3487.50 4673.46

Medium 770.00 2309.07 2474.66 7645.63 2960.00 2617.67

Small 2035.41 3830.75 3381.25 10373.36 1821.87 1935.22

Marginal 1905.88 3791.61 2235.29 8467.61 1955.14 3486.06

Landless 2897.41 4875.50 2189.03 6078.33 1528.21 1816.34

Total (Average) 2308.00 4337.87 2732.50 8677.20 1845.44 2348.77







Large 83875.00 40072.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 37333.33 36939.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 20979.17 25814.80 0.00 0.00 686.45 2718.27

Marginal 23323.53 19728.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 18470.97 17343.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 23469.09 25660.79 0.00 0.00 119.81 1155.68




Large 0.00 0.00 3767.50 4113.30 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 1733.50 4839.98 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 1657.60 3364.18 131.25 909.32

Marginal 0.00 0.00 506.76 1465.47 529.41 2608.09

Landless 20.25 215.56 532.70 1736.11 1887.74 4802.35

Total (Average) 11.41 161.91 950.94 2704.66 1152.36 3826.77




Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 263.52 1346.42

Landless 19.35 240.96 30.96 385.54 613.29 2390.53

Total (Average) 10.90 180.90 17.45 289.45 378.25 1872.97




Large 0.00 0.00 4650.00 9304.83 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 8180.00 18454.22 0.00 0.00

Small 54.16 375.27 4341.66 11553.09 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 4282.35 12220.02 105.88 617.39

Landless 54.83 682.73 1723.22 7293.18 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 40.36 535.46 3286.18 10649.34 13.09 217.08


Others Total Income

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 4250.00 9696.98 149432.80 55303.09

Medium 936.66 1325.03 79633.80 52941.76

Small 293.75 820.84 51020.46 31267.22

Marginal 767.64 1376.14 44738.71 26317.99

Landless 479.27 1073.93 37836.90 22149.43

Total (Average) 642.13 2001.93 48797.43 37044.69

Table: 68 Average annual income (in Taka) per household according to source in

Narail (EXCLUDING ABROAD INCOME MORE THAN TK.55000)




Large 32954.00 29292.81 3998.75 4337.38 0.00 0.00

Medium 23217.97 13439.18 1787.66 4823.04 240.00 1314.53

Small 13159.98 9651.40 1934.12 3546.45 543.75 2011.76

Marginal 7060.91 5891.66 645.00 1623.94 1157.35 4196.57

Landless 3519.61 7634.24 671.54 1806.32 3246.42 6828.35

Total (Average) 8664.02 12387.61 1108.78 2795.69 2089.78 5561.26







Large 0.00 0.00 12450.00 26699.75 3487.50 4673.46

Medium 770.00 2309.07 2474.66 7645.63 2960.00 2617.67

Small 2035.41 3830.75 3361.25 10373.36 1821.87 1935.22

Marginal 1905.88 3791.61 2235.29 8467.61 1955.14 3486.06

Landless 2916.23 4885.75 2203.24 6095.58 1538.13 1818.04

Total (Average) 2316.42 4343.55 2.42.48 8691.50 1852.18 2350.41




Large 4500.00 12727.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 2000.00 9157.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 41.66 288.67 0.00 0.00 686.45 2718.27

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Landless 324.67 2654.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 540.14 4221.89 0.00 0.00 120.25 1157.77




Large 0.00 0.00 3767.50 4113.30 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 1733.50 4839.98 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 1657.60 3364.18 131.25 909.32

Marginal 0.00 0.00 506.76 1465.47 529.41 2608.09

Landless 20.38 216.26 536.16 1741.24 1900.00 4815.59

Total (Average) 11.45 162.21 954.41 2709.00 1156.56 3833.13




Large 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Small 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 263.52 1346.42

Landless 19.48 241.94 31.16 386.79 617.27 2397.82

Total (Average) 10.94 181.23 17.51 289.97 379.63 1876.25




Large 0.00 0.00 4650.00 9304.83 0.00 0.00

Medium 0.00 0.00 8180.00 18454.22 0.00 0.00

Small 54.16 375.27 4341.66 11553.09 0.00 0.00

Marginal 0.00 0.00 4282.35 12220.02 105.88 617.39

Landless 55.19 684.94 1734.41 7315.64 0.00 0.00

Total (Average) 40.51 536.43 3298.17 10666.97 13.13 217.48


Others Total Income

Mean SD Mean SD

Large 4250.00 9696.98 70057.75 47418.77

Medium 936.66 1325.03 44300.47 29306.18

Small 293.75 820.84 30082.96 22027.83

Marginal 767.64 1376.14 21415.18 15945.86

Landless 482.38 1076.73 19816.36 12307.98

Total (Average) 644.48 2005.21 25960.93 21653.22





by land category in Narail Table: 70 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range

by HH member size in Narail

64 17 7 88

72.7% 19.3% 8.0% 100.0%

44.4% 21.0% 20.0% 32.0%

45 29 9 4 87

51.7% 33.3% 10.3% 4.6% 100.0%

31.3% 35.8% 25.7% 26.7% 31.6%

24 22 6 3 55

43.6% 40.0% 10.9% 5.5% 100.0%

16.7% 27.2% 17.1% 20.0% 20.0%

8 6 9 2 25

32.0% 24.0% 36.0% 8.0% 100.0%

5.6% 7.4% 25.7% 13.3% 9.1%

3 7 4 6 20

15.0% 35.0% 20.0% 30.0% 100.0%

2.1% 8.6% 11.4% 40.0% 7.3%

144 81 35 15 275

52.4% 29.5% 12.7% 5.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

1-4 5-6 7-9 10 +

HH Member Size

Total

0 0 8 5 22 35

.0% .0% 22.9% 14.3% 62.9% 100.0%

.0% .0% 16.7% 14.7% 14.2% 12.7%

0 6 2 3 30 41

.0% 14.6% 4.9% 7.3% 73.2% 100.0%

.0% 20.0% 4.2% 8.8% 19.4% 14.9%

0 5 11 7 43 66

.0% 7.6% 16.7% 10.6% 65.2% 100.0%

.0% 16.7% 22.9% 20.6% 27.7% 24.0%

0 3 10 12 39 64

.0% 4.7% 15.6% 18.8% 60.9% 100.0%

.0% 10.0% 20.8% 35.3% 25.2% 23.3%

8 16 17 7 21 69

11.6% 23.2% 24.6% 10.1% 30.4% 100.0%

100.0% 53.3% 35.4% 20.6% 13.5% 25.1%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Income in Tk

Total


Household Category

Total





by total earning member of the family in Narail

1 74 10 3 88

1.1% 84.1% 11.4% 3.4% 100.0%

50.0% 43.5% 13.3% 10.7% 32.0%

50 32 5 87

57.5% 36.8% 5.7% 100.0%

29.4% 42.7% 17.9% 31.6%

34 17 4 55

61.8% 30.9% 7.3% 100.0%

20.0% 22.7% 14.3% 20.0%

6 9 10 25

24.0% 36.0% 40.0% 100.0%

3.5% 12.0% 35.7% 9.1%

1 6 7 6 20

5.0% 30.0% 35.0% 30.0% 100.0%

50.0% 3.5% 9.3% 21.4% 7.3%

2 170 75 28 275

.7% 61.8% 27.3% 10.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

No One Two Three +


Total




Table: 72 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by primary occupation of household head in Narail

21 22 22 8 9 82

25.6% 26.8% 26.8% 9.8% 11.0% 100.0%

23.9% 25.3% 40.0% 32.0% 45.0% 29.8%

14 6 5 2 1 28

50.0% 21.4% 17.9% 7.1% 3.6% 100.0%

15.9% 6.9% 9.1% 8.0% 5.0% 10.2%

14 13 10 2 3 42

33.3% 31.0% 23.8% 4.8% 7.1% 100.0%

15.9% 14.9% 18.2% 8.0% 15.0% 15.3%

8 13 1 22

36.4% 59.1% 4.5% 100.0%

9.1% 14.9% 1.8% 8.0%

8 2 1 11

72.7% 18.2% 9.1% 100.0%

9.1% 2.3% 1.8% 4.0%

3 8 4 15

20.0% 53.3% 26.7% 100.0%

3.4% 9.2% 7.3% 5.5%

6 6 3 2 17

35.3% 35.3% 17.6% 11.8% 100.0%

6.8% 6.9% 5.5% 8.0% 6.2%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

2.3% 1.1% 1.1%

1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1% 4.0% 1.1%

2 2 4

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.3% 3.6% 1.5%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1.1% 4.0% .7%

3 1 4

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

3.4% 1.8% 1.5%

1 3 2 4 1 11

9.1% 27.3% 18.2% 36.4% 9.1% 100.0%

1.1% 3.4% 3.6% 16.0% 5.0% 4.0%

1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

1.8% 4.0% 5.0% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% .4%

6 7 3 4 5 25

24.0% 28.0% 12.0% 16.0% 20.0% 100.0%

6.8% 8.0% 5.5% 16.0% 25.0% 9.1%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1% .7%

88 87 55 25 20 275

32.0% 31.6% 20.0% 9.1% 7.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Tailor-Handi

Service

Teacher

Homeo Doc

HH Work

Boatmanship

Primary

Occupation

Total

Up to

15000

15001-25

000

25001-40

000

40001-60

000 60001 +


Total





by type of latrine used in Narail

41 49 26 13 11 140

29.3% 35.0% 18.6% 9.3% 7.9% 100.0%

46.6% 56.3% 47.3% 52.0% 55.0% 50.9%

20 18 4 42

47.6% 42.9% 9.5% 100.0%

22.7% 20.7% 7.3% 15.3%

20 14 16 5 55

36.4% 25.5% 29.1% 9.1% 100.0%

22.7% 16.1% 29.1% 20.0% 20.0%

7 6 9 7 9 38

18.4% 15.8% 23.7% 18.4% 23.7% 100.0%

8.0% 6.9% 16.4% 28.0% 45.0% 13.8%

88 87 55 25 20 275

32.0% 31.6% 20.0% 9.1% 7.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total

Up to

15000

15001-25

000

25001-4

0000

40001-6

0000

60001

+


Total


by number of months food is available in Narail

7 11 27 43 88

8.0% 12.5% 30.7% 48.9% 100.0%

35.0% 42.3% 45.0% 25.4% 32.0%

8 9 23 47 87

9.2% 10.3% 26.4% 54.0% 100.0%

40.0% 34.6% 38.3% 27.8% 31.6%

5 4 9 37 55

9.1% 7.3% 16.4% 67.3% 100.0%

25.0% 15.4% 15.0% 21.9% 20.0%

2 1 22 25

8.0% 4.0% 88.0% 100.0%

7.7% 1.7% 13.0% 9.1%

20 20

100.0% 100.0%

11.8% 7.3%

20 26 60 169 275

7.3% 9.5% 21.8% 61.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

Upto 3 4-6 7-9 10 -12


Total




TABLE EXCLUDING ABROAD CASES MORE THAN TK.55000

Table: 75 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by land category in Narail

13 13 62 88

14.8% 14.8% 70.5% 100.0%

27.1% 38.2% 40.3% 32.1%

8 12 11 56 87

9.2% 13.8% 12.6% 64.4% 100.0%

26.7% 25.0% 32.4% 36.4% 31.8%

2 11 11 5 26 55

3.6% 20.0% 20.0% 9.1% 47.3% 100.0%

25.0% 36.7% 22.9% 14.7% 16.9% 20.1%

1 5 8 4 7 25

4.0% 20.0% 32.0% 16.0% 28.0% 100.0%

12.5% 16.7% 16.7% 11.8% 4.5% 9.1%

5 6 4 1 3 19

26.3% 31.6% 21.1% 5.3% 15.8% 100.0%

62.5% 20.0% 8.3% 2.9% 1.9% 6.9%

8 30 48 34 154 274

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total


Household Category

Total


by HH member size in Narail

64 17 7 88

72.7% 19.3% 8.0% 100.0%

44.4% 21.3% 20.0% 32.1%

45 29 9 4 87

51.7% 33.3% 10.3% 4.6% 100.0%

31.3% 36.3% 25.7% 26.7% 31.8%

24 22 6 3 55

43.6% 40.0% 10.9% 5.5% 100.0%

16.7% 27.5% 17.1% 20.0% 20.1%

8 6 9 2 25

32.0% 24.0% 36.0% 8.0% 100.0%

5.6% 7.5% 25.7% 13.3% 9.1%

3 6 4 6 19

15.8% 31.6% 21.1% 31.6% 100.0%

2.1% 7.5% 11.4% 40.0% 6.9%

144 80 35 15 274

52.6% 29.2% 12.8% 5.5% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

1-4 5-6 7-9 10 +

HH Member Size

Total




Table: 77 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by total earning member in Narail

1 74 10 3 88

1.1% 84.1% 11.4% 3.4% 100.0%

50.0% 43.8% 13.3% 10.7% 32.1%

50 32 5 87

57.5% 36.8% 5.7% 100.0%

29.6% 42.7% 17.9% 31.8%

34 17 4 55

61.8% 30.9% 7.3% 100.0%

20.1% 22.7% 14.3% 20.1%

6 9 10 25

24.0% 36.0% 40.0% 100.0%

3.6% 12.0% 35.7% 9.1%

1 5 7 6 19

5.3% 26.3% 36.8% 31.6% 100.0%

50.0% 3.0% 9.3% 21.4% 6.9%

2 169 75 28 274

.7% 61.7% 27.4% 10.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

No One Two Three +


Total




Table: 78 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by primary occupation of household head in Narail

21 22 22 8 9 82

25.6% 26.8% 26.8% 9.8% 11.0% 100.0%

23.9% 25.3% 40.0% 32.0% 47.4% 29.9%

14 6 5 2 1 28

50.0% 21.4% 17.9% 7.1% 3.6% 100.0%

15.9% 6.9% 9.1% 8.0% 5.3% 10.2%

14 13 10 2 3 42

33.3% 31.0% 23.8% 4.8% 7.1% 100.0%

15.9% 14.9% 18.2% 8.0% 15.8% 15.3%

8 13 1 22

36.4% 59.1% 4.5% 100.0%

9.1% 14.9% 1.8% 8.0%

8 2 1 11

72.7% 18.2% 9.1% 100.0%

9.1% 2.3% 1.8% 4.0%

3 8 4 15

20.0% 53.3% 26.7% 100.0%

3.4% 9.2% 7.3% 5.5%

6 6 3 2 17

35.3% 35.3% 17.6% 11.8% 100.0%

6.8% 6.9% 5.5% 8.0% 6.2%

2 1 3

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

2.3% 1.1% 1.1%

1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1% 4.0% 1.1%

2 2 4

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

2.3% 3.6% 1.5%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1.1% 4.0% .7%

3 1 4

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

3.4% 1.8% 1.5%

1 3 2 4 1 11

9.1% 27.3% 18.2% 36.4% 9.1% 100.0%

1.1% 3.4% 3.6% 16.0% 5.3% 4.0%

1 1 1 3

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

1.8% 4.0% 5.3% 1.1%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

1.1% .4%

6 7 3 4 4 24

25.0% 29.2% 12.5% 16.7% 16.7% 100.0%

6.8% 8.0% 5.5% 16.0% 21.1% 8.8%

1 1 2

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

1.1% 1.1% .7%

88 87 55 25 19 274

32.1% 31.8% 20.1% 9.1% 6.9% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Agri-Own

Agri-Share

Agri-Sh & Own

Ag.Lab

Non-Ag.Lab

Rick/Van

Small Busi

Fisherman

Busi Large

Rajmistri

Carpenters

Tailor-Handi

Service

Teacher

Homeo Doc

HH Work

Boatmanship

Primary

Occupation

Total

Up to

15000

15001-25

000

25001-4

0000

40001-6

0000

60001

+


Total




Table: 79 Distribution of households according to their annual gross income range by type of latrine used in Narail

41 49 26 13 11 140

29.3% 35.0% 18.6% 9.3% 7.9% 100.0%

46.6% 56.3% 47.3% 52.0% 57.9% 51.1%

20 18 4 42

47.6% 42.9% 9.5% 100.0%

22.7% 20.7% 7.3% 15.3%

20 14 16 5 55

36.4% 25.5% 29.1% 9.1% 100.0%

22.7% 16.1% 29.1% 20.0% 20.1%

7 6 9 7 8 37

18.9% 16.2% 24.3% 18.9% 21.6% 100.0%

8.0% 6.9% 16.4% 28.0% 42.1% 13.5%

88 87 55 25 19 274

32.1% 31.8% 20.1% 9.1% 6.9% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total

Up to

15000

15001-

25000

25001-4

0000

40001-

60000

60001

+


Total


by member of food available in Narail

7 11 27 43 88

8.0% 12.5% 30.7% 48.9% 100.0%

35.0% 42.3% 45.0% 25.6% 32.1%

8 9 23 47 87

9.2% 10.3% 26.4% 54.0% 100.0%

40.0% 34.6% 38.3% 28.0% 31.8%

5 4 9 37 55

9.1% 7.3% 16.4% 67.3% 100.0%

25.0% 15.4% 15.0% 22.0% 20.1%

2 1 22 25

8.0% 4.0% 88.0% 100.0%

7.7% 1.7% 13.1% 9.1%

19 19

100.0% 100.0%

11.3% 6.9%

20 26 60 168 274

7.3% 9.5% 21.9% 61.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Annual

Gross

Income (Tk)

Total

Upto 3 4-6 7-9 10 -12


Total




HOUSEHOLD ANNUAL EXPENDITURE Table: 81 Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to

source in Narail




Large 17292.50 5784.34 19250.00 52849.52 17500.00 49497.47

Medium 14970.33 9482.10 366.66 1303.92 0.0 0.0

Small 11195.73 8443.96 718.75 2441.01 250.00 1732.05

Marginal 13434.85 12304.10 152.94 476.88 147.05 857.49

Landless 11065.64 6977.23 150.32 607.56 32.25 401.60

Total (Average) 11988.38 8416.77 829.09 9112.79 589.09 8478.94




Large 1062.50 2077.73 2375.00 3946.33 4837.50 5551.56

Medium 11266.67 54649.78 2465.00 2659.76 2840.00 2021.24

Small 2129.16 10283.68 2198.95 4134.93 1786.45 1650.39

Marginal 307.35 975.31 1230.88 1349.63 1685.29 1518.74

Landless 716.64 4161.31 1333.41 2809.13 1278.25 949.81

Total (Average) 2073.56 18839.06 1625.56 2992.11 1691.20 1733.03



Large 462.50 1040.51 1727.50 1431.20 1250.00 3535.53

Medium 266.66 996.66 1101.73 1003.51 500.00 1592.00

Small 188.54 481.49 867.54 569.72 2691.45 7510.74

Marginal 14.70 50.04 826.64 827.53 1330.58 2396.36

Landless 44.99 142.06 653.91 469.53 1254.81 2142.81

Total (Average) 102.63 441.66 792.64 684.81 1432.45 3732.35




Large 375.00 1060.66 17769.13 11991.50 0.0 0.0

Medium 278.33 765.54 13860.07 8269.84 0.0 0.0

Small 605.72 2101.66 10569.40 7463.44 62.50 433.01

Marginal 1335.76 7104.54 5826.90 3689.03 518.82 2547.59

Landless 285.66 739.36 3421.65 4517.72 344.38 2830.70

Total (Average) 473.16 2711.91 6498.42 7170.11 269.16 2312.11


Total Expenditure

Mean SD

Large 88276.63 116339.70

Medium 48983.47 59923.18

Small 34714.23 25786.26

Marginal 28369.94 19672.11

Landless 20977.91 12502.66

Total (Average) 29302.38 35063.29




Table: 82 Average annual gross expenditure (Tk.) per household according to

source in Narail (EXCLUDING ABROAD MONEY CASES MORE THAN TK.55000)




Large 17292.50 5784.34 19250.00 52849.52 17500.00 49497.47

Medium 14970.33 9482.10 366.66 1303.92 0.0 0.0

Small 11195.73 8443.96 718.75 2441.01 250.00 1732.05

Marginal 13434.85 12304.10 152.94 476.88 147.05 857.49

Landless 11128.40 6955.96 151.29 609.42 32.46 402.91

Total (Average) 12027.02 8407.70 832.11 9129.33 591.24 8494.38




Large 1062.50 2077.73 2375.00 3946.33 4837.50 5551.56

Medium 11266.67 54649.78 2465.00 2659.76 2840.00 2021.24

Small 2129.16 10283.68 2198.95 4134.93 1786.45 1650.39

Marginal 307.35 975.31 1230.88 1349.63 1685.29 1518.74

Landless 399.87 1204.51 1329.09 2817.77 1270.32 947.75

Total (Average) 1900.47 18648.31 1624.19 2997.50 1688.24 1735.51




Large 462.50 1040.51 1727.50 1431.20 1250.00 3535.53

Medium 266.66 996.66 1101.73 1003.51 500.00 1592.00

Small 188.54 481.49 867.54 569.72 2691.45 7510.74

Marginal 14.70 50.04 826.64 827.53 1330.58 2396.36

Landless 41.36 648.81 648.81 466.73 1262.96 2147.39

Total (Average) 100.81 441.44 790.28 684.94 1437.65 3738.17




Large 375.00 1060.66 17769.13 11991.50 0.00 0.00

Medium 278.33 765.54 13398.07 8510.90 0.00 0.00

Small 605.72 2101.66 10569.40 7463.44 62.50 433.01

Marginal 1335.76 7104.54 6052.67 3863.88 518.82 2547.59

Landless 287.51 741.41 3443.87 4523.96 346.62 2839.80

Total (Average) 474.88 2716.72 6523.99 7169.47 270.14 2316.29


Total Expenditure


Mean 88276.63 48983.47 34714.23 28369.94 21062.57 29380.34

Standard Dev. 116339.70 59244.23 25530.35 19568.72 11661.18 33806.86




Table: 83 Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure range by land category in Narail

2 8 7 48 65

3.1% 12.3% 10.8% 73.8% 100.0%

6.7% 16.7% 20.6% 31.0% 23.6%

2 4 13 14 71 104

1.9% 3.8% 12.5% 13.5% 68.3% 100.0%

25.0% 13.3% 27.1% 41.2% 45.8% 37.8%

12 15 8 28 63

19.0% 23.8% 12.7% 44.4% 100.0%

40.0% 31.3% 23.5% 18.1% 22.9%

2 7 8 2 5 24

8.3% 29.2% 33.3% 8.3% 20.8% 100.0%

25.0% 23.3% 16.7% 5.9% 3.2% 8.7%

4 5 4 3 3 19

21.1% 26.3% 21.1% 15.8% 15.8% 100.0%

50.0% 16.7% 8.3% 8.8% 1.9% 6.9%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Expenditure Tk

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 84 Distribution of households according to their annual gross expenditure range by land category in Narail (EXCLUDING ABROAD CASES)

2 8 7 47 64

3.1% 12.5% 10.9% 73.4% 100.0%

6.7% 16.7% 20.6% 30.5% 23.4%

2 4 13 14 71 104

1.9% 3.8% 12.5% 13.5% 68.3% 100.0%

25.0% 13.3% 27.1% 41.2% 46.1% 38.0%

12 15 8 28 63

19.0% 23.8% 12.7% 44.4% 100.0%

40.0% 31.3% 23.5% 18.2% 23.0%

2 7 8 2 5 24

8.3% 29.2% 33.3% 8.3% 20.8% 100.0%

25.0% 23.3% 16.7% 5.9% 3.2% 8.8%

4 5 4 3 3 19

21.1% 26.3% 21.1% 15.8% 15.8% 100.0%

50.0% 16.7% 8.3% 8.8% 1.9% 6.9%

8 30 48 34 154 274

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.2% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Up to 15000

15001-25000

25001-40000

40001-60000

60001 +

Total Household

Expenditure Tk

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 85 Average annual gross income, expenditure, debt and use of other sources by land category in Narail


Large 70057.75 88276.63 23000.00 4781.12

Medium 44300.47 48983.47 16176.67 11493.67

Small 30082.96 34714.23 13130.67 8499.40

Marginal 21415.18 28369.94 4799.66 -2155.10

Landless 20140.13 20977.91 2798.77 1960.99

Total 26121.07 29302.38 5625.74 2444.43 Note: Others (Savings/Asset Sale/Mortage/Lease Out/Stock)

Table: 86 Average annual gross income, expenditure, debt and use of other sources

by land category in Narail (excluding abroad cases more than Tk.55,000)


Large 70057.75 88276.63 23000.00 4781.12

Medium 44300.47 48983.47 16176.67 11493.67

Small 30082.96 34714.23 13130.67 8499.40

Marginal 21415.18 28369.94 4799.66 -2155.10

Landless 19816.36 21062.57 2798.77 1552.56

Total 25960.93 29380.34 5625.74 2206.33 Note: Others (Savings/Asset Sale/Mortage/Lease Out/Stock)

FOOD SECURITY Table 87 Distribution of households according to the number of months food

available for the households by land category in Narail.

1 19 20

5.0% 95.0% 100.0%

2.9% 12.3% 7.3%

2 4 20 26

7.7% 15.4% 76.9% 100.0%

4.2% 11.8% 12.9% 9.5%

6 7 47 60

10.0% 11.7% 78.3% 100.0%

12.5% 20.6% 30.3% 21.8%

8 30 40 22 69 169

4.7% 17.8% 23.7% 13.0% 40.8% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 83.3% 64.7% 44.5% 61.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Upto 3

4-6

7-9

10 -12

Number of

Months Food

Available

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 88 Distribution of households who had food shortage according to reasons for food shortage by land category in Narail

4 24 28

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

19.0% 21.2% 18.3%

3 5 35 43

7.0% 11.6% 81.4% 100.0%

17.6% 23.8% 31.0% 28.1%

1 3 4

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

4.8% 2.7% 2.6%

6 6 19 31

19.4% 19.4% 61.3% 100.0%

35.3% 28.6% 16.8% 20.3%

8 8

100.0% 100.0%

7.1% 5.2%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

4.8% .7%

3 1 4 8

37.5% 12.5% 50.0% 100.0%

17.6% 4.8% 3.5% 5.2%

2 5 3 20 30

6.7% 16.7% 10.0% 66.7% 100.0%

100.0% 29.4% 14.3% 17.7% 19.6%

2 17 21 113 153

1.3% 11.1% 13.7% 73.9% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%



Water Logging

Frequent Illness




Storm in April-May


Seasonal Drought

Others

Reasons

for Food

Shortage

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 89 Per capita per day major food item consumed according to Land Category in Narail


Rice (kg) 0.550 0.570 0.600 0.540 0.520 0.540

Wheat (kg) 0.050 0.007 0.009 0.000 0.002 0.005

Meat (kg) 0.105 0.081 0.049 0.045 0.032 0.044

Egg (no) 0.780 0.500 0.550 0.600 0.480 0.520

Fish (kg) 0.140 0.120 0.110 0.110 0.100 0.110

Milk (kg) 0.150 0.085 0.060 0.042 0.022 0.042

Vegetables(kg) 0.091 0.095 0.099 0.145 0.134 0.124

Pulses (kg) 0.055 0.039 0.026 0.035 0.041 0.034

Oil (kg) 0.024 0.019 0.021 0.028 0.030 0.027

Fruits (kg) 0.212 0.050 0.051 0.035 0.051 0.054

HOUSEHOLD VULNERABILITY

Table: 90 Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on type of vulnerability context affected their well-being in Narail




Cyclone 4.7 Salinty 23.3

Draught (Seasonal) 39.3 River Erosion .04

Loss of Bio-diversity 9.5 Others (death, disease etc.) 12.7





Table 91 Percentage Distribution of households according to their responses on

Coping Strategies followed to address food insecurity and vulnerability: in Narail

Coping Strategies In Percentage Coping Strategies In Percentage


Adjustment to meal 25.5 32.4 Labor selling 19.3 2.2

Food substitution 6.9 7.6 Loan from money lender 4.4 1.5

Sale of assets 4.0 1.5 Loan from NGO 2.9 7.6

Borrowing from relatives/friends 20.0 6.9 Use current net 1.1 0.0

Credit from Bank 2.9 1.5 Mortgage out land 0.7 0.4

Consumption of wild/unusual foods 2.9 2.9 Use saved money 10.2 2.5

Alternative employment 1.8 0.4 Use stocked food 0.4 0.4

Out-Migration (seasonal) 0.4 0.4 Re-distribution of Children 0.4 0.7

VGD/WFP 0.4 1.1 Sell animals (cow, goat, poultry) 2.9 4.0

Illegal activities 0.0 0.0 Others (specify) 0.0 0.0

SAVINGS AND CREDIT

Table 92 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted by land category in Narail

6 24 33 22 84 169

3.6% 14.2% 19.5% 13.0% 49.7% 100.0%

75.0% 80.0% 68.8% 64.7% 54.2% 61.5%

2 6 15 12 71 106

1.9% 5.7% 14.2% 11.3% 67.0% 100.0%

25.0% 20.0% 31.3% 35.3% 45.8% 38.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

TOUT

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 93 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted with Bank by land category in Narail

6 28 44 32 145 255

2.4% 11.0% 17.3% 12.5% 56.9% 100.0%

75.0% 93.3% 91.7% 94.1% 93.5% 92.7%

2 2 4 2 10 20

10.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 50.0% 100.0%

25.0% 6.7% 8.3% 5.9% 6.5% 7.3%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

BANK

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 94 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted with Money Lender by land category in Narail

8 30 47 34 147 266

3.0% 11.3% 17.7% 12.8% 55.3% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 100.0% 94.8% 96.7%

1 8 9

11.1% 88.9% 100.0%

2.1% 5.2% 3.3%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

MONEY

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 95 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted with Relatives/Friends by land category in Narail

8 30 46 29 149 262

3.1% 11.5% 17.6% 11.1% 56.9% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 85.3% 96.1% 95.3%

2 5 6 13

15.4% 38.5% 46.2% 100.0%

4.2% 14.7% 3.9% 4.7%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

RELAT

Total


Household Category

Total


with NGOs by land category in Narail

8 30 44 33 129 244

3.3% 12.3% 18.0% 13.5% 52.9% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 91.7% 97.1% 83.2% 88.7%

4 1 26 31

12.9% 3.2% 83.9% 100.0%

8.3% 2.9% 16.8% 11.3%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

NGO

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 97 Percentage distribution of households according to if they are indebted with Other Sources (shops, dealers, etc.) by land category in Narail

8 29 45 31 144 257

3.1% 11.3% 17.5% 12.1% 56.0% 100.0%

100.0% 96.7% 93.8% 91.2% 92.9% 93.5%

1 3 3 11 18

5.6% 16.7% 16.7% 61.1% 100.0%

3.3% 6.3% 8.8% 7.1% 6.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

OTHER

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 98 Average amount of debt (Taka) per households who have taken loan from different sources according to their sources and land category in Narail


Bank 23000.00 7280.00 26786.00 3450.00 6996.20 12228.30

Money Lender 0.00 0.00 6100.00 0.00 2533.12 2929.44

Relatives 0.00 0.00 14500 6200.00 2166.66 5616.38

NGOs 0.00 0.00 8604.00 1872.00 4107.61 4615.67

Others 0.00 1500.00 6450.00 6141.33 3064.16 4054.44

Total 23000.00 16176.67 13130.67 4799.66 2798.77 5625.74

Table 99 Average interest rate (Taka) imposed per households who have taken

loan from different sources according to their sources and land category in Narail


Bank 12.00 19.00 11.25 10.00 13.00 12.90

Money Lender 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 54.00 52.88

Relatives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NGOs 0.00 0.00 20.00 12.00 21.46 21.03

Others 0.00 15.00 16.00 5.00 13.36 12.00

HEALTH AND HYGEINE Table: 100 Distribution of households according to type of latrine used by land

category in Narail

2 19 24 23 72 140

1.4% 13.6% 17.1% 16.4% 51.4% 100.0%

25.0% 63.3% 50.0% 67.6% 46.5% 50.9%

4 3 35 42

9.5% 7.1% 83.3% 100.0%

8.3% 8.8% 22.6% 15.3%

1 11 7 36 55

1.8% 20.0% 12.7% 65.5% 100.0%

3.3% 22.9% 20.6% 23.2% 20.0%

6 10 9 1 12 38

15.8% 26.3% 23.7% 2.6% 31.6% 100.0%

75.0% 33.3% 18.8% 2.9% 7.7% 13.8%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ring Slab

Open Defication

Hanging

Sanitary Latrine

LATTYPE

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 101 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Water to wash hands before eating by land category in Narail

1 1 3 5

20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 100.0%

3.3% 2.1% 1.9% 1.8%

8 29 47 34 152 270

3.0% 10.7% 17.4% 12.6% 56.3% 100.0%

100.0% 96.7% 97.9% 100.0% 98.1% 98.2%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

WATER

Total


Household Category

Total


hands before eating by land category in Narail

8 30 47 34 155 274

2.9% 10.9% 17.2% 12.4% 56.6% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% 99.6%

1 1

100.0% 100.0%

2.1% .4%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

ASH

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 103 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Soap to wash hands before eating by land category in Narail

8 26 47 32 149 262

3.1% 9.9% 17.9% 12.2% 56.9% 100.0%

100.0% 86.7% 97.9% 94.1% 96.1% 95.3%

4 1 2 6 13

30.8% 7.7% 15.4% 46.2% 100.0%

13.3% 2.1% 5.9% 3.9% 4.7%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

SOAP

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 104 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Mud to wash hands before eating by land category in Narail

8 30 48 34 153 273

2.9% 11.0% 17.6% 12.5% 56.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.7% 99.3%

2 2

100.0% 100.0%

1.3% .7%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

MUD

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 105 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Water to wash hands after defecation by land category in Narail

5 18 20 10 72 125

4.0% 14.4% 16.0% 8.0% 57.6% 100.0%

62.5% 60.0% 41.7% 29.4% 46.5% 45.5%

3 12 28 24 83 150

2.0% 8.0% 18.7% 16.0% 55.3% 100.0%

37.5% 40.0% 58.3% 70.6% 53.5% 54.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

WATER

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 106 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Ash to wash hands after defecation by land category in Narail

6 20 38 26 128 218

2.8% 9.2% 17.4% 11.9% 58.7% 100.0%

75.0% 66.7% 79.2% 76.5% 82.6% 79.3%

2 10 10 8 27 57

3.5% 17.5% 17.5% 14.0% 47.4% 100.0%

25.0% 33.3% 20.8% 23.5% 17.4% 20.7%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

ASH

Total


Household Category

Total




Table 107 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Soap to wash hands after defecation by land category in Narail

6 16 42 29 142 235

2.6% 6.8% 17.9% 12.3% 60.4% 100.0%

75.0% 53.3% 87.5% 85.3% 91.6% 85.5%

2 14 6 5 13 40

5.0% 35.0% 15.0% 12.5% 32.5% 100.0%

25.0% 46.7% 12.5% 14.7% 8.4% 14.5%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

SOAP

Total


Household Category

Total

Table 108 Distribution of households according to responses if they use Mud to wash hands after defecation by land category in Narail

2 17 17 10 47 93

2.2% 18.3% 18.3% 10.8% 50.5% 100.0%

25.0% 56.7% 35.4% 29.4% 30.3% 33.8%

6 13 31 24 108 182

3.3% 7.1% 17.0% 13.2% 59.3% 100.0%

75.0% 43.3% 64.6% 70.6% 69.7% 66.2%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

MUD

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 109 Distribution of households according to their responses on if family members use Sandal while going to Toilet by land category in Narail

1 7 16 10 76 110

.9% 6.4% 14.5% 9.1% 69.1% 100.0%

12.5% 23.3% 33.3% 29.4% 49.0% 40.0%

7 23 32 24 79 165

4.2% 13.9% 19.4% 14.5% 47.9% 100.0%

87.5% 76.7% 66.7% 70.6% 51.0% 60.0%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

If use

Sandal

Total


Household Category

Total




Table: 110 Distribution of households according to their responses on if any of the <5 children of the family suffering from diarrhea during the last 14 days by land category in Narail

8 28 46 31 139 252

3.2% 11.1% 18.3% 12.3% 55.2% 100.0%

100.0% 93.3% 95.8% 91.2% 89.7% 91.6%

2 2 3 16 23

8.7% 8.7% 13.0% 69.6% 100.0%

6.7% 4.2% 8.8% 10.3% 8.4%

8 30 48 34 155 275

2.9% 10.9% 17.5% 12.4% 56.4% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

No

Yes

If <5

children

has

diarrhea

Total


Household Category

Total

Table: 111 Percentage Distribution of Households Using different Water Sources according to Use Pattern in Narail



Tube–well 81.0 99.0 52.0 19.0 0.0

Pond 13.0 0.0 37.0 53.0 3.0

DTW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0

STW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.0

Well/Kua 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4

Rain Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Surface Water 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.4 11.0

Others (specific) 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 5.0

Table 112 Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on their sufferings during the last one year by major diseases and land category in Narail


ARI-Fever-Cough 37.5 23.3 27.1 44.1 38.7 35.6


Gastric 0.0 23.3 14.6 20.6 8.4 12.4

Arthritis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.1

X-thma 10.0 4.2 2.9 1.9 3.3

Exima 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.7

Typhoid 0.0 10.0 2.1 2.9 5.2 4.7

Zondish (Hepa-B) 0.0 3.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 1.1

Female Diseases 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.4

Table 113 Percentage distribution of households according to their responses on

where do they visit for treatment with level of satisfaction in Narail

Service Centers Percentage of HH

visited the given center

Satisfaction Level on services (in percentage)

High Moderate Low Not

Govt. Hospital 32.4 6.2 13.5 10.5 4.0

M.B.B.S Doctor 10.5 5.5 3.3 1.5 1.1

Traditional Healer/Kabiraj 2.9 0.0 1.8 0.7 0.4

TBA 2.2 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.0

FWA 6.2 1.1 5.1 0.0 0.0

NGO Health Clinic 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Private Clinic 10.2 2.5 6.2 0.4 1.1

Village Doctor 56.4 14.2 42.5 5.1 0.7

Homeo Doctor 6.2 1.1 5.1 0.7 0.0




GENDER DIMENSIONS AND PARTICIPATION Table: 114 Percentage distribution of respondents according to participation of

Women and male Counterpart by major dimensions of participation in Narail


No L M H No L M H


2. Mobility inside the community (relative, shop, group

meeting, etc.)

15.3 36.0 38.5 9.8 2.2 17.5 32.7 44.7

3. Mobility outside the community (market, labor, crop field,

hospital, bank, fair, movie, etc.)

29.5 40.7 24.7 3.3 1.5 6.2 32.4 57.1



















Table: 115 Percentage of Household According to their Access and Participation in the Different Service Centers by Sex in Narail



















PROBLEMS AND SUGGESTIONS Table 116 Percentage distribution of households according to major problems by

land category in Narail

Major Problems

Agriculture

Land Category Total


Drought 18.06 41.18 29.17 16.67 25.00 22.91

Heavy Rain 10.97 20.59 10.42 10.00 12.50 12.00


Water logging 16.77 26.47 14.58 40.00 37.50 20.73

Salinity 12.26 17.65 31.25 40.00 25.00 19.64






Irrigation irregular/ Irrigation cost high 7.10 11.76 12.50 10.00 12.50 9.09






7.74 23.53 2.08 0.00 0.00 7.64


Water crisis/ Pick Boro Season Water layer go

down

10.32 32.35 14.58 26.67 62.50 17.09

Loss of soil fertility/ Natural soil/land losted fertility

gradually

4.52 14.71 6.25 6.67 25.00 6.91

Agri labor wage rate is poor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Crop Production Cost Higher than Production

Values/Prices

5.16 14.71 8.33 6.67 25.00 7.64

Canal/River/Beel silted 9.03 35.29 14.58 16.67 37.50 14.91

Existing Sluice Gate Problems/It does not work

properly

5.81 17.65 10.42 13.33 37.50 9.82

No Cultivatable land 5.81 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00

Fish: Major Problems Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total

Pond /canal silted /dried Up / No fish/less fish 14.19 20.59 25.00 13.33 25.00 17.09

Fish diseases 7.74 20.59 25.00 16.67 37.50 14.18

Fish stolen/breading fish catching 3.87 11.76 6.25 6.67 25.00 6.18

Limited fishing pond/canal/Beel 3.87 11.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.64

Excess/Over fishing 3.23 11.76 4.17 3.33 12.50 4.73

Fish fry cost high/Poor farmer can not purchased

fish fry/Disease or infected Fry/Poor quality of fish fry

3.87 11.76 6.25 10.00 12.50 6.18

Pond bank inundated / fish moves to other place 1.29 2.94 6.25 6.67 25.00 3.64


Local Fish Spices reduced gradually 4.52 14.71 8.33 10.00 37.50 8.00


Unstable daily income/less labor work-income/Lack

of work(labor)/Low wage rate for day labor/expense

higher than income

10.97 32.35 8.33 0.00 0.00 11.64



4.52 8.82 4.17 10.00 12.50 5.82

Poor quality of earthen/pacca broken road/rough

road

17.42 41.18 20.83 20.00 50.00 22.18

Fish /Money Stolen/ Robbing /Mastan 9.68 20.59 18.75 26.67 37.50 15.27






Early Marriage/Dowry 10.32 23.53 22.92 30.00 50.00 17.45


Social Insecurity 3.23 8.82 8.33 3.33 12.50 5.09


After election o\rulling party threaten/ Put Political

Pressure

0.00 0.00 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.36

Less work scope for Women /Poor wage rate for

women

2.58 11.76 4.17 3.33 0.00 4.00

Table 117 Percentage distribution of households according to major suggestions by

land category

Major Suggestions

Land Category Total


Govt. should control poor/inferior quality of fertilizer/Seed/ Insecticide

5.81 17.65 4.17 6.67 25.00 7.64



Ensure Agriculture Loan for poor/landless farmer with low interest rate from Govt./NGO. Easy access to get loan from NGO/Bank with low interest rate

8.39 20.59 4.17 3.33 12.50 8.73

Canal/Beel/River needs to re-excavate /Irrigate agri. field from canal/Irrigation(Modern) system introduce by Govt.

14.19 20.59 20.83 20.00 50.00 17.82

Reduce the price of fertilizer/seed/ insecticide/fuel/within purchase capacity/available

18.06 26.47 8.33 10.00 25.00 16.73

Training/suggestion needs on modern agriculture from Agri.Dept. at community level

1.94 5.88 2.08 0.00 12.50 2.55

Ensure Electricity for all houses 3.87 26.47 8.33 6.67 12.50 8.00

Ensure health services in the community level specially for poor/Ensure Medicine & ensure qualified doctor for poor community

7.10 20.59 12.50 13.33 25.00 10.91

Stop early marriage/ control multi marriage /control dowry and reduce illiteracy

7.10 17.65 8.33 10.00 12.50 9.09


Training/encourage the community on cattle/poultry/aquaculture /agriculture HYV

1.94 5.88 2.08 3.33 12.50 2.91

Construct environmentally sound and qualitative bridge/road

13.55 35.29 18.75 20.00 62.50 19.27

More VGD card for poor/Financial help for poor 5.81 11.76 4.17 6.67 12.50 6.55

Govt. should initiate to supply Fish Fry for Beel area with out cost to improve fish cultivation.

3.23 8.82 4.17 0.00 0.00 3.64

Embankment & Sluice gate should construct/repair with proper environmental assessment.

22.58 47.06 58.33 36.67 75.00 34.91

Create job opportunity for youth/women & also increased their wage rate.

7.10 8.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.09

Khash land should be distributed among landless farmer.

8.39 8.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.82

Govt. should control the Mastan/corruption/illegal activities

3.23 8.82 4.17 3.33 12.50 4.36


Build Public Toilet for poor community 0.65 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73

Alternate Job/Business can be created by Govt. 1.29 2.94 2.08 0.00 0.00 1.45


Stop Political harassment 1.94 5.88 2.08 0.00 0.00 2.18

Introduce Salinity tolerant variety paddy seed with subsidy price.

1.29 2.94 2.08 0.00 0.00 1.45

Govt. should provide agri. subsidy 1.94 5.88 2.08 3.33 12.50 2.91

Community involved in development process/UP should improve their services

3.87 5.88 4.17 3.33 0.00 4.00




ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS Table 118 Percentage distribution of households according to major food taken during

normal time by land category in Narail



Rice 56.92 88.24 100.00 86.70 100.00 94.55

Vegetable 54.50 76.47 75.00 56.70 87.50 68.73

Fish 53.61 76.47 77.10 66.70 87.50 70.55

Pulses 53.40 17.65 52.10 40.00 62.50 37.45

Milk 30.77 5.88 25.00 30.00 50.00 14.18

Meat 39.13 17.65 41.70 36.70 62.50 25.09

Fruits 50.00 2.94 2.08 6.67 12.50 3.64

Roti/Ata/Wheat 25.00 2.94 4.17 0.00 0.00 1.45

Egg 48.75 29.41 39.60 26.70 50.00 29.09

Table 119 Percentage distribution of households according to major food taken during

food shortage period by land category in Narail



Rice 64.5 58.82 58.30 40.00 62.50 60.00

Extra/Small piece of Rice (Khud) 10.30 14.71 2.08 0.0 0.0 8.00

Liquid Rice(Jao) 7.74 17.65 2.08 0.0 0.0 6.91

Roti/Ata/Wheat 18.7 20.59 29.2 6.67 25 19.64

Vegetable 36.8 23.53 31.3 10 12.5 30.55

Small Amount of Food 10.3 20.59 4.17 0.0 0.0 9.09

Pulses 9.03 2.941 16.7 0.0 0.0 8.36

Potato/Boiled Potato 4.52 2.941 2.08 0.0 0.0 3.27

Fish/Small Fish/Dry Fish 9.68 8.824 14.6 0.0 0.0 9.09

Fat Rice (Mori/Chira) 7.1 5.882 8.33 0.0 0.0 6.18

Egg 2.58 0.0 6.25 0.0 0.0 2.55

Fan(Boiled Rice extra water) 5.81 8.824 2.08 0.0 0.0 4.73

Wild leafs (Shapla/ Kachu/ Kalmi) 13.5 32.35 8.33 0.0 0.0 13.09

One time in a day 1.94 2.941 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.45

Fruits/Jack fruitsBanana 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00

Kalai/Chhola 1.29 5.882 0.0 3.33 12.5 2.08

Table: 120 Different fish species available in Beel and River in Narail


Puti

Taki

Shing

Kai

Chuchri

Pabda

Royna/Bheda

Shoul

Tengra

Kholisha

Magur

Roi

Kathol

Silver Carp

Mrigel

Japani Puti

Japani Roi

Telapia

Grass carp

Sharputi

American Roi





Mirer Carp/Minar carp

Bele

Chela

Baing

Paisha/Faisha

Chingri

Chaina Puti

Elisha

Pangash

Boyal

Bacha

Mola

Ayeir

Chitol

Common carp

Gajar

Guzi

Golsha

Chapila

Chanda

Kakle

Vetki

Gule

Fali

Bashpata

African Magur

Naylotika

Rita

Kholla

Cheng

Briged

Tepa

Nola

Dankina

Baoush

Gochai/Gochi

Gotum

Kachki

Fema

Koicha

Dogra/Doga

Kakra

Table 121 Name of different Wild Animals available in Narail


1 Bak 25 Badur

2 Tiya 26 Ghoghu

3 Shalik 27 Biya

4 Bezi 28 Kura Dhunkor

5 Bano Biral 29 Pat Shiyal

6 Moyna 30 Bagdasha

7 Babai 31 Guishap

8 Machh Ranga 32 Tota

9 Pecha 33 Finge

10 Kat Birali 34 Dahuk

11 Shiyal 35 Baz pakhi

12 Charai 36 Oud

13 Doyel 37 Bele Hash

14 Chil 38 Hutum Pecha (Butum Pecha)

15 Kak 39 Shamu Bhanga

16 Shap (Snake) 40 Ghargosh

17 Kukur (Dog) 41 Kakatua







20 Payra/Kabutar 44 Khadash

21 Baipakhi 45 Golbagh

22 Haldia 46 Kadthukra

23 Kokil 47 Bano Hash

24 Tara

Table: 122 Trees available in Narail


Aym (mango) Bakul Kalomagh

Jam (Black Barry) Shisgu Niem

Kathal (jackfruit) Segun Siaten

Jamrul Jibonmora Harikot (Hartoki)

Jambura Tetul Shish fal

Bel Shirish Baira

Gabh Mehogoni Amloki

Lichu Shishuful Nishinda

Sobeda Kadam Tulshi

Tal Papor Kelakuj

Coconut Bat Dhutkomar (leaf only)

Lebu Epilapil Orjun

Barai Chambol Mehedi

Payara Mandar Pathor kuchi

Ata Karai (Rendi) Thankuni pata

Khejur Chatka Helanchi

Shirij Harol gachh

Sada Akond

Shish Ande

Table: 123 Vegetable available in Narail


Data Tomato

Misty Kumra Fulkafi

Chal Kumra Batha Kafi

Potol Lao (Bottle Guard)

Derosh Misty Kumra

Kakrol Pape

Lalshak Oul / oul kafi

Puishak Misti Alu

Baro shim Gol Alu

Kancha kola Palonshak

Osta Lalshak

Jhinga Shim (country beans)

Chichinga/Kushi Mula

Begun Begun

Lati Gazor

Lao Shalgom

Pape Batboti (labey Beans)

Batboti (labey Beans) Khira

Kachu Motor shiti

Dundol Motor shak

Mughi

Gadi

Getkoli

Karolla

Getkolshak

Shasha

Patshak

Halencha shak



Appendix 6

Appendix 6

Pre-Assessment Survey Results (Chenchuri & Narail)



Appendix 6: Pre-Assessment Survey Results 1

PRE-ASSESSMENT SURVEY RESULTS Chenchuri

Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project (Narail District)

Serial

No

Name of Upazila

Name of

Union

Area covered

within the project

1

Narail

Chandibarpur Full

Auria Full

Banshgram Full

Bhadrabila Full

2

Lohagara

Lakshmipasha Full

Kashipur Partial

Mallikpur Partial

Dighalia Partial

3

Kalia

Chanchari Full

Purulia Full

Mauli Full

Babra Hachla Full

Peruli Partial

Khasial Partial

Benda Partial

Narail Sub-Project

Serial

No

Name of Upazila

Name of

Union

Area covered

within the project

1

Narail

Maizpara Full

Sahabad Full

Tularampur Full

Mulia Full

Narail Paurashava Full

Shaikhati Full

Kalora Full

Singasolpur Full

Bichhali Full

2 Kalia Peruli Partial

3

Abhoynagar

Sreedharpur Full

Baghutia Full

Subhapara Full

Siddhipasha Full




JUSTIFICATIONS OF SELECTING SAMPLE UNIONS AND VILLAGES

FOR HH SURVEY

Chenchuri Sub Project

Union Justifications

Village Justifications

Bansgram Representating Upazila as the Union is fully under the Sub-project;

Distance from Upazila- 7km

Different type of professional group (farmer, fisherman, businessman, labor, Rickshaw Puller, female headed HH);

Vulnerable due to Water Logging and seasonal draught and Salinity;

Both Hundu and Muslisms resides

Migrate for outside work

Mostly double crop

Water level in Rainy Season up to 5 feet

Dariapur Total HH-264

Different type of professional group (farmer, fisherman, businessman, Rickshaw/van Puller, labor, female headed HH)

Varity types of land criteria exist (ie, high land, medium and low land);

Half of the year all roads are not passable

The village is exposed to flash flood, water logging and draught;

Most of the cannel are siltied;

Most of the peoples are marginal; and

Water level goes up to 6 ft.

Peruli Represent ting Upazila as the Union is fully under the project and divided into to two sub-project;


Different type of professional group (farmer, fisherman, businessman, labor, Rickshaw/Van puller, female headed HH)

Vulnerable due to Flash flood, Water Logging and excessive rainfall, seasonal draught



Mostly single crop


Badly arsenic affected area

Most of the people used open latrine

Satbaria Total HH-279

Different type of professional group (farmer, fisherman, businessman, rickshaw/van puller, labor, female headed HH);

Varity types of land criteria exist (ie, high land, medium and low land);

Half of the year all roads are not passable;

Most of the cannel are silted;

Vulnerable to Water logging, and draught; rainfall affected area

Both Hundu and Muslisms reside;

Arsenic contaminated Tub-wells.

Mollikpur Represent ting Upazila as the Union is under the Sub-project


Different type of professional group (farmer, fisherman, businessman, labor, female headed HH)

Vulnerable due to Flash flood, Water Logging and seasonal draught



Mostly single crop


Badly arsenic affected area

Most of the people used ring slab latrine

Pachuria Total HH – 300


Varity types of land criteria exist (ie, high land, medium and low land)

Eight months of the year most of the road are passable

Vulnerable to Water logging, flash flood and draught;


Mostly double crop area;

Water level goest up to 4 ft;

Most of the households use Riung Slub Latrine.




Union Justifications

Village Justifications

Chanchuri Represent ting Upazila as the Union is under the Sub-project






Mostly single crop


Most of the people used hanging latrine

Electricity covered most of the villages

Chapuliya Total HH- 202

Different type of professional groups (farmer, fisherman, businessman, labor, female headed HH)


Nine months of the year most of the road are passable

Most of the peoples are marginal

Flash flood and draught affected area


Babra- Hachla Represent ting Upazila as the Union is under the Sub-project






Mostly single crop


Most of the people used hanging latrine

Most of the Tube-wells are arsenic contaminated (402 tube-wells are arsenic contaminated out of 417).

Hachla Total HH - 224

Different type of professional group (farmer, fisherman, businessman,pottery, labor, female headed HH)


Nine months of the year most of the road are passable

Most of the peoples are landless and marginal

Water logging, Excessive rainfall and draught affected area


Distance from UP 1km

Mostly single crop area;

Water level goes up to 3 ft;

Mos to f the Hhs use Hanging Latrine (47-50%).

Chandibarpur The Unions is 10km from the Upazila;

Mostly farmers, labor, rickshaw/van puller, female headed HHs;

Most of the land in medium topography;

Vulnerable to flash flood, water logging and draught;

Mostly Kacca road;

Out of 1215 Tube-wells there are 106 tube-wells are arsenic contaminated;

Mos to f the people use Hang Latrine;

Water level goes up to 6 ft.

Ratodanga Total HH-390

The village is about 8 km from the Union Parishad;

Mos t of the HHs are of farmers, small business, labor, Bania, Pottery, etc.

The village has electricity;

There is a local Market;

All types of paddy are grown;

Both Hundu and Muslims reside;

A portion of the villagers migrates for outside work.

Note: Unions and villages are selected considering the geographical features, vulnerability types, remoteness, community diversity, diverse professional groups and cropping practices. Union locations may be seen from the Map-A.




PRE-ASSESSMENT SURVEY RESULTS

TABLE 1: TOTAL CROP LAND AREA (IN ACRE)

UPAZILA UNION SINGLE DUBLE TRIPPLE OTHERS TOTAL

NARAIL CHANDIBARPUR 1012 1837 1023 0 3872

AURIA 1500 1800 800 0 4100

BANCHGRAM 650 50 30 0 730

BHADRABILA 4900 2600 0 0 7500

SUB-TOTAL= 8062 6287 1853 0 16202

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 350 700 250 0 1300

KASHIPUR 463 2060 720 0 3243

MALLIKPUR 255 4485 545 0 5285

DIGHALIA 1700 1700 2100 0 5500

SUB-TOTAL= 2768 8945 3615 0 15328

KALIA CHANCHARI 5000 2000 0 0 7000

PURULIA 2500 1000 0 0 3500

MAULI 500 400 30 0 930

BABRA-HACHLA 3700 1255 0 0 4955

PERULI 7457 100 0 0 7557

KHASIAL 120 700 430 0 1250

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 105 2120 101 0 2326

SUB-TOTAL= 19382 7575 561 0 27518

TOTAL= 30212 22807 6029 0 59048

TABLE 2: LAND TYPE

SINGLE DOUBBLE TRIPPLE OTHERS

UPAZILA UNION C CL S SL C CL S SL C CL S SL C CL S SL


AURIA 1 1 1 0 0

BANCHGRAM 1 1 1 0 0

BHADRABILA 1 1 1 1 0 0

SUB-TOTAL= 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

KASHIPUR 1 0 1 0 1 0 0

MALLIKPUR 1 0 1 0 1 0

DIGHALIA 1 1 1 0

SUB-TOTAL= 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0

KALIA CHANCHARI 1 0 1 0 0 0

PURULIA 1 1 0 1 0 0 0

MAULI 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

BABRA-HACHLA 1 0 1 0 0 0

PERULI 1 0 1 0 0 0

KHASIAL 1 0 1 1 0

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 1 0 1 0 1 0 0

SUB-TOTAL= 2 6 0 1 1 5 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0

TOTAL= 2 11 0 6 1 10 0 7 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0




TABLE 3: WATER LEVEL IN FEET

UPAZILA UNION SINGLE DUBLE TRIPPLE OTHERS TOTAL


AURIA 3 4 3.5 0 10.5

BANCHGRAM 5 2 0 0 7

BHADRABILA 4 2 0 0 6

SUB-TOTAL= 18 12 5.5 0 35.5

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 5 3.5 2 0 10.5

KASHIPUR 5 3 1 0 9

MALLIKPUR 4 4 0 0 8

DIGHALIA 6.5 4.5 2.5 0 13.5

SUB-TOTAL= 20.5 15 5.5 0 41


PURULIA 7 3 0 0 10

MAULI 5 4.5 2.5 0 12

BABRA-HACHLA 3 1 0 0 4

PERULI 6 4 0 0 10

KHASIAL 4.5 2.5 1.5 0 8.5

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 6 5 2 13

SUB-TOTAL= 37.5 24 6 0 67.5

TOTAL= 76 51 17 0 144

TABLE 4A: MAJOR KHARIF-1 PADDY CROP AND YIELD (MDS/ACRE) AND PRICE

SEASON SL CROP NAME YIELD F.PRICE MKT.PRICE

AUS LOCAL 1 HASA RATUL 20 280 295

BAROLAKSHMI 18 275 285

NARAI 16 260 270

JAGLI 17 250 275

GAMBHIR 12 270 280

SODESH 14 260 270

KAZAL LATA 18 255 270

BAKAI 20 260 275

SABANA 20 240 255

ASHA 18 260 280

KATAKTARA 15 255 270

NAYANMONI 16 250 265

PARANGI 24 260 270

KALABURI 25 265 275

BANAZER 20 280 290

KARCHAMURI28 28 265 275

SHIREBALIN 20 270 280

AUS HYV RATNA 25 270 290

BIPLOB 30 265 275

BR-30 35 260 270

GAZI 35 260 270

BR-11 40 275 300

KAIJORE-BORO 15 260 280





BORO LOCAL KAILI-BORO 16 255 275

RAIDA-BORO 14 250 265

BHAJAN 16 250 260

BR-26 55 275 320

BORO HYV BR-28 60 280 300

BR-29 60 275 290

BR-14 50 285 310

BR-30 35 260 270

GS-1 70 290 320

JAGARANI 70 275 310

SONARBANGLA 75 300 320

AFTAB 75 265 275

TABLE 4B: MAJOR KHARIF-II PADDY CROP AND YIELD (MDS/ACRE) AND PRICE


AMON LOCAL 1 JABRA 35 240 265

BAKAI 25 250 270

MONOHAR 20 240 265

DAPO 20 255 260

PAIZAM 25 250 270

NAJIRSHAIL 20 250 260

SARNALATA 20 230 250

MASRANGA 20 240 250

KALADOMA 25 240 250

MOTASHAIL 25 230 240

KACHUI 25 250 255

TOSA 22 250 265

LALBALAM 22 245 265

SADABALAM 20 240 250

DIGHA 25 250 265

ZHMUR 25 240 250

GOUR-KAZAL 30 250 260

RAJAMOROL 22 240 255

KALAMONA 30 250 260

MAITSHAIL30 260 275

GANDOCASTARY40 260 270

URICHADRA30 265 275

MOHISKANDI30 265 280

PALLBIRA30 270 280

BIRPALA 25 275 290

AMON HYV BR-11 40 270 285




TABLE 4C: MAJOR RABI CROP AND YIELD (MDS/ACRE) AND PRICE


RABI CROP KHESHARI 12 550 600

LENTIL 15 1200 1220

MASTARD 12 800 820

WHEAT 12 850 875

TIL 8 500 530

TISHI 10 600 610

MOTOR 20 480 500

CHOLA 15 1150 1200

OTHERS JUTE 30 300 350

SUGARCANE

GROUND NUT 20 600 620

WATER MELLION 150 80 100

ONION 30 490 500

POTATO 300 200 240

BETTLELEAF

CHILLI 30 470 480

TABLE 5: FISH SPECIES WITH SEASONALITY

FISH SPECIES NAME SUMMER RAINY WINTER

AIR FISH 1 1

BAIN 1 1 1

BALA 1 1 1

BOAL 1

CHANDA 1 1 1

CHUCHURU 1 1

CHAPILA 1 1

GAZAR/ GAZAL 1 1

HILSA 1

JEIAL 1

KAI 1 1 1

KAILLA 1 1

KATLA 1 1 1

KHAIRA 1 1

KHALISA 1 1

MAGUR 1 1

MINERCARP 1 1 1

MRIGEL 1 1

NAILATIKA 1 1 1

PABDA 1 1

PANGAS 1 1 1

PUTI 1 1 1

RAINA 1 1 1

RUI 1 1 1

SAIL 1 1

SILVERCARP 1 1 1

SING 1 1 1




FISH SPECIES NAME SUMMER RAINY WINTER

SMALL CHINGRI 1 1 1

TAKI 1 1

TALAPIA 1 1

TANGRA 1 1 1

TABLE 6: FISH PRICE BY SOURCHES OF CATCH

CHANDIBARPUR PER KG AURIA BHADRABILA

SOURCES FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET

GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA

RIVER 50 55 80 100 80 110

CANAL 55 60 40 60 65 85

PONDS 40 45 0 0 90 120

FLOODPLAIN 0 0 0 0 80 100

BEEL 45 50 40 45 80 100

DITCH 40 45 40 55 80 100

OTHERS(BAOR/GHER) 0 0 0 0 0 0

BANSGRAM LAKSHMIPASA KASHIPUR MALLIKPUR DIGHULIA

FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET

GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA

0 0 40 50 55 60 60 75 60 75

80 100 40 50 50 60 110 120 110 120

40 60 35 45 70 80 50 65 50 65

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

40 55 40 50 65 70 110 120 110 120

40 55 40 45 65 70 100 110 90 100

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CHANCHURI PURULIA MAULI BABRAHASLA PERULI



80 90 60 80 55 60 90 120 70 80

75 85 60 80 55 60 40 50 70 80

70 80 55 70 70 80 40 60 0 0

90 120 0 0 0 0 40 60 0 0

80 90 70 80 65 70 0 0 80 110

80 90 75 80 60 70 45 50 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

KHASHIAL HAMIDPUR-BENDA

FARM MARKET FARM MARKET

GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA

90 100 120 140

70 80 45 60

65 70 40 55

0 0 35 45

75 80 30 35

75 80 40 55

0 0 0 0




SOURCES FARM MARKET

GATE (TK) TAKA

RIVER 66 80

CANAL 64 77

PONDS 48 60

FLOODPLAIN 16 22

BEEL 62 72

DITCH 58 67

OTHERS(BAOR/GHER) 0 0

TABLE 7: DISEASE TYPE BY SEASONS

DISEASE NAME COST/HH (ONE TIME)

ARTHARITIES 300

ALERGY 100

CHICKEN POX 500

DIABETIC 250

DIARRHEA 200

DYSCENTRY 100

EYE INFECTION 150

HEADACHE 100

MOUTH INFECTION 200

FEVER 50

GASTRIC 500

IRREGULAR MEANSTRATION 500

MEASEALS 100

PHENUMENEA 100

SKIN DISEASE 150

T.B 600

TYPHOID 600

X-THAMA 250

ZONDISH 100




TABLE 8: TYPE OF SERVICE INSTITUTIONS AVAILABLE IN THE UNION

UPAZILA UNION GRAMEEN BANK ASA BRAC PROSHIKA.COM BANSTESHEKHA

NARAIL CHANDIBARPUR 1 1 1 1

AURIA 1 1

BANCHGRAM 1 1 1 1

BHADRABILA 1 1 1 1

SUB-TOTAL= 3 4 4 1 2

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 1 1 1

KASHIPUR 1 1 1 1

MALLIKPUR 1 1 1 1

DIGHALIA 1 1 1


KALIA CHANCHARI 1 1 1 1

PURULIA 1 1 1 1

MAULI 1

BABRA-HACHLA 1 1 1 1

PERULI 1 1 1 1

KHASIAL 1 1 1

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 1 1 1


TOTAL= 12 14 15 4 6

BRDB RRF AGRANI BKB SONALI RRC F.MITA CARE-RMP FWV ASARALO

1 1

1 1 1 1

1

1 1

1 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 1

1

1

1 1

1 1 1

1 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0

1 1

1 1

1 1 1

1

1 1

1

1 0 1 4 4 0 1 0 0 0

3 1 4 7 7 0 1 2 1 1




IRDP SANIRVAR Y.MINISTRY JANATA RUPALI MANAB SOCIL-WEL JAGORANI JANAKALAYAN PRODIPAN

1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 1 1

1 1

0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1

1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 9: KHASH LAND, KHASH POND AND WATER BODY IN ACRE BY UNION

UPAZILA UNION LAND POND WATER.B

NARAIL CHANDIBARPUR 150 2 15

AURIA 300 1 500

BANCHGRAM 96 1 0

BHADRABILA 105 2 6

SUB-TOTAL= 651 6 521

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 26 2 0

KASHIPUR 55 0 0

MALLIKPUR 201 1 198

DIGHALIA 102 2 0


KALIA CHANCHARI 87.05 0 2700

PURULIA 55 0 2

MAULI 100 0 30

BABRA-HACHLA 211 1 147

PERULI 241 2 36

KHASIAL 60 3 42

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 125 1 105

SUB-TOTAL= 879.05 7 3062

TOTAL= 1914.05 18 3781




TABLE 10: MIGRATION PICTURE BY UNION

MIGRATION OUT NUMBER MIGRATION IN

UPAZILA UNION MALE FEMALE CHILD MALE FEMALE

NARAIL CHANDIBARPUR 510 210 150 2200

AURIA 720 160 135 400

BANCHGRAM 400 150

BHADRABILA 125 50 25 60

SUB-TOTAL= 1755 420 310 2810 0

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 60 20 25 150

KASHIPUR 500 0 25 1000

MALLIKPUR 500 0 60 1000

DIGHALIA 500 0 150 250

SUB-TOTAL= 1560 20 260 2400 0


PURULIA 1500 2000 200 400 0

MAULI 250 100 0 0

BABRA-HACHLA 1000 500 300

PERULI 200 300

KHASIAL 130 75 150 110

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 3000 800 100 225

SUB-TOTAL= 7180 3775 950 1835 0

TOTAL= 10495 4215 1520 7045 0

NUMBER MIGRATION OUT TAKA MIGRATION IN TAKA

CHILD MALE FEMALE CHILD MALE FEMALE CHILD

10500 5100 4500 9600

12600 2000 700 20000

15000 1500

4000 3000 1200 2000

0 42100 10100 6400 33100 0 0

5000 4800 3000 4800

6720 0 4200 7800

13440 0 2400 8960

12000 1500 3500

0 37160 4800 11100 25060 0 0

0 2700 1800 1500 2200 0 0

0 8000 7200 6400 2400 0

6000 3000

8000 10000 5600

5000 3300

3500 1800 1500 3000

9500 6720 4480 7840

0 42700 30520 13880 24340 0 0

0 121960 45420 31380 82500 0 0




AGRICULTURE

PEAK OFF

UPAZILA UNION MALE FEMALE CHILD MALE FEMALE CHILD

NARAIL CHANDIBARPUR 80 50 45 60 45 45

AURIA 60 40 30 45 35 25

BANCHGRAM 80 35 0 40 20 0

BHADRABILA 80 60 60 50 40 40

SUB-TOTAL= 300 185 135 195 140 110

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 80 60 40 60 45 30

KASHIPUR 100 60 60 70 40 50

MALLIKPUR 100 0 80 50 0 45

DIGHALIA 85 45

SUB-TOTAL= 365 165 180 180 85 125

KALIA CHANCHARI 80 60 50 50 40 0

PURULIA 60 50 50 50 30 30

MAULI 65 0 30 60 0 0

BABRA-HACHLA 100 40 0 30 20

PERULI 100 50 50 40 30 20

KHASIAL 60 0 0 40 0 0

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 80 40 40 60 30 30

SUB-TOTAL= 545 240 220 330 150 80

TOTAL= 1210 590 535 705 375 315

NON-AGRICULTURE

PEAK OFF

MALE FEMALE CHILD MALE FEMALE CHILD

70 45 45 50 40 40

50 30 25 40 30 20

70 40 0 40 25 0

60 40 40 40 30 30

250 155 110 170 125 90

80 50 40 50 40 30

100 50 60 70 40 50

70 0 60 40 0 30

90 75

340 100 160 235 80 110

120 30 25 80 25 0

80 30 45 70 25 25

100 0 25 80

100 40 0 45 20 0

80 40 40 40 30 20

90 0 0 80 0 0

70 30 30 50 30 30

640 170 165 445 130 75

1230 425 435 850 335 275




PRIMARY SCHOOL MADRASA

UPAZILA UNION BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH

NARAIL CHANDIBARPUR 0 0 12 0 0 5

AURIA 7 1 0 7

BANCHGRAM 16 4

BHADRABILA 12 1 1 1

SUB-TOTAL= 0 0 47 2 1 17

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 0 0 12 0 0 1

KASHIPUR 11 4

MALLIKPUR 15 7

DIGHALIA 14 2 12

SUB-TOTAL= 0 0 52 0 2 24

KALIA CHANCHARI 0 7 2

PURULIA 1 4 1 5

MAULI 12 1 3

BABRA-HACHLA 11 2

PERULI 15 4

KHASIAL 8 1 6

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 8 3

SUB-TOTAL= 0 0 62 8 1 23

TOTAL= 0 0 161 10 4 64

HIGH SCHOOL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE OTHERS

BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH

0 0 3 0 0 1 12

3

1 5 1 8

2

0 1 13 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 20

1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

1 1

2 1

2 1

1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10

1

1 3 1

1

1 6

1 3 1

1 2 1

1

0 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7

1 6 28 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 37




TABLE 11: ARSENIC STATUS BY UNION

ARSENIC STAUS

UPAZILA UNION HTW ARSENIC %

NARAIL CHANDIBARPUR 1215 106 8.7

AURIA 300 220 73.3

BANCHGRAM 1160 456 39.3

BHADRABILA 2000 1600 80.0

SUB-TOTAL= 4675 2382 51.0

LOHAGARA LAKSHMIPASHA 2025 1596 78.8

KASHIPUR 2120 1908 90.0

MALLIKPUR 3221 3051 94.7

DIGHALIA 2000 1600 80.0

SUB-TOTAL= 9366 8155 87.1

KALIA CHANCHARI 650 127 19.5

PURULIA 800 300 37.5

MAULI 700 500 71.4

BABRA-HACHLA 417 402 96.4

PERULI 2100 1320 62.9

KHASIAL 600 550 91.7

HAMIDPUR(BANDA) 656 197 30.0

SUB-TOTAL= 5923 3396 57.3

TOTAL= 19964 13933 69.8




PRE-ASSESSMENT SURVEY RESULTS Narail

Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project (Narail District)

Serial

No

Name of Upazila

Name of

Union

Area covered

within the project

1

Narail

Chandibarpur Full

Auria Full

Banshgram Full

Bhadrabila Full

2

Lohagara

Lakshmipasha Full

Kashipur Partial

Mallikpur Partial

Dighalia Partial

3

Kalia

Chanchari Full

Purulia Full

Mauli Full

Babra Hachla Full

Peruli Partial

Khasial Partial

Benda Partial

Narail Sub-Project

Serial

No

Name of Upazila

Name of

Union

Area covered

within the project

1

Narail

Maizpara Full

Sahabad Full

Tularampur Full

Mulia Full

Narail Paurashava Full

Shaikhati Full

Kalora Full

Singasolpur Full

Bichhali Full

2 Kalia Peruli Partial

3

Abhoynagar

Sreedharpur Full

Baghutia Full

Subhapara Full

Siddhipasha Full




SAMPLE UNIONS AND VILLAGES FOR HH SURVEY

Narail Sub Project

Union Justifications Village Justifications

Maizpara Households are mostly vulnerable to Water Logging, Seasonal Draught;

In the Union, different types of professionals resides (Farmer, Fisherman, Businessman, Female Headed HHs, etc.);

Distance from Sadar Upazila is 13km;

There are both Muslims and Hindus in the Union;



People from the Union migrates for outside work seasonally.

Adampur Total HH= 137

All professional groups are there (farmer, small businessman, fisherman, etc.);

Households of the village is vulnerable to Water Logging and Draught;

Village is connected with both Kacha (earthen) and Pacca (pave) road;

Remote village;

Arsenic contamination is very high in the Tube-well.

Mulia Vulnerable to flash flood and water logging;

There are farmers, labors, small businessman;

Distance from Sadar Upazila 8 km;



People migrate for outside work.

Koregram Total HH= 298

There are mostly Hindu communities;

Village is vulnerable to water logging and flash flood’

Different professional groups reside in the village;

Kacca (earthen) road;

More remote;

There is Arsenic in the Tube-well;

Singasolepur The Union is vulnerable to flash flood, water logging and draught;

There are farmers, labors and businessman;

Distance from Sadar Upazila is 15 km;


Water level goes up to 8=ft;

People migrates for outside work.

Chunkhola Total HH- 440

There are both Muslim and Hindu communities with different professions;

The village is vulnerable to water logging, flash flood and draught;

There are 25 female headed HHs;

Village road is Kacca and semi-pacca;

Remote area;

There is arsenic in the tube-well water;

Sridharpur The Union is vulnerable to Water Logging and Draught;

There are mainly farmers, labour, fisherman, businessman;

The distance of the Union is about 6km from the Upazila;


Water level goes up to 10ft;

People of the Union migrate for work.

Sridharpur Total HH- 400

There are both Hindu and Muslim communities;

Total HHs is about 400 and most of them are farmers, businessman;

The village is vulnerable to water logging and draught;

There are 30 female headed HHs;

Village roads are of both Kacca and Pucca;

The village is in the remote area;

Most of the tube-well is arsenic contaminated.

Shiddhipasha The Union is exposed to water logging and salinity;

Most to fthe households belongs to farmers and labor;

The Unions is far from the Upazila (about 25 km)

Mostly single crop;

Water level is upto 10ft;

Villagers migrate for outside work.

Chandgati Total HH- 190

Total HHs is about 190 and both Hindu and Muslim community reside in the village;

The village is vulnerable to water logging and salinity;

There are female headed households;

Roads are of Kacca;

Remote area;

Most of the Tube-well is arsenic contaminated.




Union Justifications Village Justifications

Kalora The union is about 10km from the Upazila;

Exposed to water logging, draught and salinity;

Water level is 5-7 ft;

Mostly farmers, businessman, labors, etc.

Migrates for outside work.

Ramnagar Char Total HH- 260

Water level of the village goes up to 5ft;

Bell area and mostly single crop;

Village roads are of Kacca;

There are fallow land;

Villagers are of farmers, fisherman and small business;

The village 4km from the Union;

Relatively arsenic is low. Note: Unions and villages are selected capturing community diversity, remoteness, representativeness of the area (from all side with diverse geo-physical features), physical and natural vulnerability etc. Locations of the Unions may be seen in Map-B.




NARAIL SUB-PROJECT PRE ASSESMENT RESULT

TABLE 1: TOTAL CROP LAND AREA IN ACRE

UPAZILA SLNO UNION SINGLE DOUBBLE TRIPPLE OTHERS TOTAL

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 1710 2293 1146 0 5149

2 SHAHBAG 100 150 80 0 330

3 TULARAMPUR 306 408 275 0 989

4 MULIA 80 200 20 0 300

5 POURASHAVA 50 100 25 0 175

6 SHAIKATHI 3000 1090 1000 0 5090

7 KALORA 2720 4270 5000 1600 13590

8 SINGHASOLEPUR 300 400 300 0 1000

9 BACHALI 300 1500 500 100 2400

SUB-TOTAL= 8566 10411 8346 1700 29023

AVAYNAGAR 10 SREEDEHARPUR 5000 5500 4000 0 14500

11 BAGHUTIA 1313 1955 1722 693 5683

12 SHUBHARARA 2500 2000 100 0 4600

13 SHIDDHIPASA 5000 1000 0 0 6000

SUB-TOTAL= 13813 10455 5822 693 30783

TOTAL= 22379 20866 14168 2393 59806

TABLE 2: LAND TYPE

SINGLE DOUBBLE TRIPPLE OTHERS

UPAZILA SLNO UNION C CL S SL C CL S SL C CL S SL C CL S SL

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 SHAHBAG 1 0 1 1 0 0

3 TULARAMPUR 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0

4 MULIA 1 1 1

5 POURASHAVA 1 1 1

6 SHAIKATHI 1 1 1

7 KALORA 1 1 1

8 SINGHASOLEPUR 1 1 1

9 BACHALI 1 1 1 1

SUB-TOTAL= 5 3 1 1 1 5 0 4 2 5 0 2 1 0 0 0

AVAYNAGAR 10 SREEDEHARPUR 1 1 1

11 BAGHUTIA 1 1 1

12 SHUBHARARA 1 1 1 1

13 SHIDDHIPASA 1 1 1

SUB-TOTAL= 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0

TOTAL= 6 5 1 2 2 8 0 5 2 7 0 3 2 0 0 0




TABLE 3: WATER LEVEL IN FEET


NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 7 2 0 0 9

2 SHAHBAG 6 4 2 0 12

3 TULARAMPUR 6 2.5 1.5 0 10

4 MULIA 2 4 1 0 7

5 POURASHAVA 7 4 0 0 11

6 SHAIKATHI 6 2 0 0 8


7 KALORA 0 5 1 2 8

8 SINGHASOLEPUR 8 6 4 0 18

9 BACHALI 4 3 1 1 9

SUB-TOTAL= 46 33 11 3 92

AVAYNAGAR 10 SREEDEHARPUR 10 8 0 0 18

11 BAGHUTIA 3 1 1 0 5

12 SHUBHARARA 7 4 0 0 11

13 SHIDDHIPASA 7 5 0 12

SUB-TOTAL= 27 18 1 0 46

TOTAL= 73 51 12 3 138

TABLE 4: MAJOR KHARIF-1 PADDY CROP AND YIELD (MDS/ACRE) AND PRICE

MDS


AUS LOCAL 1 HASA RATUL 20 280 295

BAROLAKSHMI 18 275 285

NARAI 16 260 270

JAGLI 17 250 275

GAMBHIR 12 270 280

SODESH 14 260 270

KAZAL LATA 18 255 270

BAKAI 20 260 275

SABANA 20 240 255

ASHA 18 260 280

KATAKTARA 15 255 270

NAYANMONI 16 250 265

AUS HYV RATNA 25 270 290

BIPLOB 30 265 275

BR-30 35 260 270

GAZI 35 260 270

BR-11 40 275 300

KAIJORE-BORO 15 260 280

BORO LOCAL KAILI-BORO 16 255 275

RAIDA-BORO 14 250 265

BHAJAN 16 250 260

BR-26 55 275 320

BORO HYV BR-28 60 280 300

BR-29 60 275 290

BR-14 50 285 310

BR-30 35 260 270

GS-1 70 290 320

JAGARANI 70 275 310

SONARBANGLA 75 300 320




TABLE 4: MAJOR KHARIF-II PADDY CROP AND YIELD (MDS/ACRE) AND PRICE

MDS


AMON LOCAL 1 JABRA 35 240 265

BAKAI 25 250 270

MONOHAR 20 240 265

DAPO 20 255 260

PAIZAM 25 250 270

NAJIRSHAIL 20 250 260

SARNALATA 20 230 250

MASRANGA 20 240 250

KALADOMA 25 240 250

MOTASHAIL 25 230 240

KACHUI 25 250 255

TOSA 22 250 265

LALBALAM 22 245 265

SADABALAM 20 240 250

DIGHA 25 250 265

ZHMUR 25 240 250

GOUR-KAZAL 30 250 260

RAJAMOROL 22 240 255

KALAMONA 30 250 260

AMON HYV BR-11 40 270 285

TABLE 5: MAJOR RABI CROP AND YIELD (MDS/ACRE) AND PRICE

MDS


AMON LOCAL KHESHARI 12 550 600

LENTIL 15 1200 1220

MASTARD 12 800 820

WHEAT 12 850 875

TIL 8 500 530

TISHI 10 600 610

MOTOR 20 480 500

CHOLA 15 1150 1200

PER KG

SHIDDHIPASA SHOVARARA BAGHUTIA SHRIDHARPUR

SOURCES FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET

GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA

RIVER 60 80 75 90 50 60 70 90

CANAL 50 70 55 70 40 50 45 65

PONDS 40 60 50 60 50 60 70 80

FLOODPLAIN 30 40 60 80 40 50 40 55

BEEL 80 100 45 65 50 55 50 60

DITCH 25 35 50 60 45 55 35 45





BICHARI NARAIL POURASHAVA SAIKATHI SINGASOLPUR KOLORA



0 0 0 0 60 80 50 70 55 70

40 70 50 60 60 90 80 100 80 90

60 80 60 65 50 70 50 70 80 100

50 80 50 55 30 50 80 120 70 90

60 80 20 25 25 40 60 80 30 40

40 60 50 55 25 40 60 80 40 50

0 0 400 450 0 0 0 0 0 0

MULIA TULARAMPUR SHAHABAD MAIZPARA

FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET FARM MARKET

GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA GATE (TK) TAKA

40 60 45 50 80 90 40 50

60 80 40 50 50 70 40 55

20 30 70 80 40 70 40 55

50 80 50 60 35 50 45 60

40 50 50 70 70 80 45 50

40 50 70 80 70 90 50 55

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SOURCES FARM MARKET

GATE (TK) TAKA

RIVER 48 61

CANAL 53 71

PONDS 52 68

FLOODPLAIN 48 67

BEEL 48 61

DITCH 46 58


TABLE 6: DISEASE TYPE BY SEASONS

DISEASE NAME COST/HH (ONE TIME)

DIARRHEA 200

CHICKEN POX 500

DYSCENTRY 100

FEVER 50

PHENUMENEA 600

SKIN DISEASE 150

GASTRIC 500

X-THAMA 200

ARTHARITIES 150

MEASEALS 100

ZONDISH 100

MALNUTRITION 200

TYPHOID 600

MALARIA 1500

T.B 500

DIABETIC 250




TABLE 7: SERVICE PROVIDERS BY UNION

UPAZILA SLNO UNION PROSIKAH ASA BRAC GSS H&FWC GRAMEEN

BANK SONALI BRDB

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 1 1

2 SHAHBAG

3 TULARAMPUR 1 1 1 1

4 MULIA

5 POURASHAVA

6 SHAIKATHI 1 1

7 KALORA

8 SINGHASOLEPUR

9 BACHALI

AVAYNAGAR 10 SREEDEHARPUR

11 BAGHUTIA

12 SHUBHARARA

13 SHIDDHIPASA

BKB LIFE

INSURANCE PADAKHEP RRC GAGORANI

CHAKRA IRDB SAWNIRVAR BANSTESHEKHA RUPANTOR SOCIAL

WELFARE

1

1 1

VOSD

ASHER ALO MOHILA UNNION

SANGASTA ADD-DIN C.PROSHIKA JANATA

BANK

1




TABLE 8: KHASH LAND

ACRE

UPAZILA SLNO UNION KHASH LAND

KHASH POND-no

WATER BODY

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 50 0 40

2 SHAHBAG 12 5 30

3 TULARAMPUR 50 3 40

4 MULIA 20 3 10

5 POURASHAVA 2.5 0 0

6 SHAIKATHI 613 7 205

7 KALORA 10 1 0


9 BACHALI 150 4 300

SUB-TOTAL= 917.5 24 630


11 BAGHUTIA 50 4 7

12 SHUBHARARA 5 2 200

13 SHIDDHIPASA 338 1 157


TOTAL= 1337.5 32 1178

TABLE 9: MIGRATION STATUS

MIGRATION OUT NUMBER MIGRATION IN NUMBER

UPAZILA SLNO UNION MALE FEMALE CHILD MALE FEMALE CHILD

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 200 30 500 3500 0 0

2 SHAHBAG 1500 200 0 500 0 0

3 TULARAMPUR 2000 0 0 500 0 0

4 MULIA 200 1000

5 POURASHAVA 7 25

6 SHAIKATHI 400 100 250 50

7 KALORA 800 50 200


9 BACHALI 1000 70 500

SUB-TOTAL= 6207 475 500 6675 50 0

AVAYNAGAR 10 SREEDEHARPUR 500 400

11 BAGHUTIA 400 500

12 SHUBHARARA 100 30 300

13 SHIDDHIPASA 500 200

SUB-TOTAL= 1500 230 0 1200 0 0

TOTAL= 7707 705 500 7875 50 0

MIGRATION OUT TAKA MIGRATION IN TAKA


3000 1000 3000 2500

4000 1500 0 3500

2500 4000

3000 2000

5000 1800

4000 2000 5000 3000

4500 3000 3000

2000 1500 3000

8000 6000 4000

36000 15000 3000 28800 3000 0

5000 5000

4000 4000

2000 1000 2000

3000 7000

14000 8000 0 11000 0 0

50000 23000 3000 39800 3000 0




TABLE 10: WAGE RATE

AGRICULTURE

PEAK OFF

UPAZILA SLNO UNION MALE FEMALE CHILD MALE FEMALE CHILD

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 50 30 30 40 20 20

2 SHAHBAG 60 35 0 40 25

3 TULARAMPUR 70 35 0 50 15

4 MULIA 80 60 50 25

5 POURASHAVA 70 50 50 50 50

6 SHAIKATHI 80 60 60 30

7 KALORA 80 60 40 30

8 SINGHASOLEPUR 100 50 60 30

9 BACHALI 70 50 40 50 30

SUB-TOTAL= 660 430 120 440 255 20

AVAYNAGAR 10 SREEDEHARPUR 100 50 50 30

11 BAGHUTIA 80 60



SUB-TOTAL= 340 140 0 210 85 0

TOTAL= 1000 570 120 650 340 20

NON-AGRICULTURE

PEAK OFF


40 20 20 40 20 20

65 20 30 15

50 20 30 15

50 35 30 15

120

100 60 80 40

150 30 100 50

60 25 50 15

50 40 30 50 30

565 250 50 530 200 20

80 40 60 35

50 50

100 50 40 15

100 40 80 30

330 130 0 230 80 0

895 380 50 760 280 20




TABLE 11: EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

PRIMARY SCHOOL MADRASA HIGH SCHOOL

UPAZILA SLNO UNION BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 14 4 2 2

2 SHAHBAG 6 2 1 3

3 TULARAMPUR 6 3 5

4 MULIA 8 1

5 POURASHAVA

6 SHAIKATHI 14 12 2 5

7 KALORA 12 1 1 2 3


9 BACHALI 14 5 3

SUB-TOTAL= 0 0 82 5 1 32 2 7 22


11 BAGHUTIA 20 15 4 1



SUB-TOTAL= 0 0 55 0 0 36 4 3 10

TOTAL= 0 0 137 5 1 68 6 10 32

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE OTHERS

BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH BOYS GIRLS BOTH

1 1

1 1 1

1

1

1 2 20

1

1 1

0 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 23

1 1

3

1 1 1

1 3

1 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 4

1 2 8 0 0 7 0 0 27




TABLE 12: PERCENTAGE OFHH USE THE FOLLOWING WATER SOURCES BY USE PATTERN

SIDDHIPASA SHUVORARA BAGHUTIA

WATER SOURCES DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA

HTW 100 5 5 95 40 30 0 100 20 5

STW 90 80 95

RIVER 20 20 20 10 10

CANAL 10 20 5 5

POND/DITCH 75 75 5 60 70 50 80

RAIN WATER

BEEL WATER

WELL

OTHER 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

SRIDHARPUR BICHALI NARAIL-POURASAVA SEIKHATI

DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA

90 50 30 90 20 10 100 65 35 98 60 10

80 10 5 2 38 90 2 95

10 20 10 20 5

40 50 20 10 10 60 10 5 5

60 70 2 35 65 25 65

10

5

5 3

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

SINGASOLPUR KOLARA MULIA TULARAMPUR

DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA

95 10 100 50 10 98 5 4 100 50 10

50 50 2 1 60 5 5 90

60 55 10 25 15 50 10 10 20 20 25 5

15 40 20 25 20 5 10 5

35 20 25 75 60 60 20 50

5 5

5

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

SHAHABAD MAIZPARA

DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA

100 40 25 2 95 40 10

93 5 2 5

10 10 20 10 95

10 10 5

30 45 38 80

10 10

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100




NARAIL-SUB PROJECT

WATER SOURCES DRINK WASH BATH IRRIGA

HTW 89.69 38.69 14.54 0.46

STW 4.92 0.92 0.62 70.15

RIVER 3.85 13.46 15.00 9.23

CANAL 0.00 8.46 11.54 15.38

POND/DITCH 0.38 36.54 56.54 4.77

RAIN WATER 1.15 0.38 0.38 0.00

BEEL WATER 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00

WELL 0.00 1.15 1.00 0.00

OTHER 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

TABLE 13: ARSENIC CONTAMINATION

UPAZILA SLNO UNION HTW ARSENIC %

NARAIL 1 MAIZPARA 422 222 52.61

2 SHAHBAG 1800 20 1.11

3 TULARAMPUR 350 175 50.00

4 MULIA 1000 131 13.10

5 POURASHAVA 38 7 18.42

6 SHAIKATHI 2000 60 3.00

7 KALORA 1400 44 3.14

8 SINGHASOLEPUR 2500 80 3.20

9 BACHALI 2637 230 8.72

SUB-TOTAL= 12147 969 7.98

AVAYNAGAR 10 SREEDEHARPUR 4000 3000 75.00

11 BAGHUTIA 2500 500 20.00

12 SHUBHARARA 400 100 25.00

13 SHIDDHIPASA 1000 600 60.00

SUB-TOTAL= 7900 4200 53.16

TOTAL= 20047 5169 25.78

TABLE 14: TOILET USE PATTERN (% OF HH USING THE SOURCES BY SEASON

SIDDHIPASA SHUBORARA BAGUTIA SRIDHARPUR

SOURCES RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR

HANGING 13 10 10 50 50 50 20 20 20 30 10

WATER SEAL 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 10

RING SLUB 80 80 80 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 40 40

HOLE 0 5 5 5 10 10 10

OPEN DEFECATION 2 5 5 40 40 40 60 60 60 10 40 30

OTHER 0

TOTAL 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100




BICHALI NARAIL POURASAVA SEIKHATI SINGASOLEPURE KOLORA

RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR

25 25 20 75 75 75 5 5 5 0 0 0 35 10 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 30 30 30 22 22 22

40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 25 25 25

10 10 10 10 5 5 2 5 5 8 18 13

20 20 25 25 25 25 20 25 25 8 5 5 10 25 35

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

MULIA TULARAMPUR SHAHBAD MAIZPARA TOTAL

RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR RAINY OTHER YEAR

5 10 0 5 5 5 20 20 15 21.77 17.69 16.54

10 10 10 10 10 10 15 13 13 10 10 10 9.77 9.62 9.62

20 20 20 60 60 60 25 25 25 65 65 65 38.08 38.08 38.08

10 10 5 5 5 10 17 17 5 5 5 5.00 6.92 6.54

65 50 60 20 20 20 30 25 30 20 20 20 25.38 27.69 29.23

asian development bank bangladesh water...

Documents