asbestos survey and tclp sampling · pdf fileasbestos survey and tclp sampling mcmullen valley...

Asbestos Survey and TCLP SamplingMcMullen Valley - Former Manganese Ore Site

Northeast of 5th Street and Santa Fe AvenueNear Wenden, La Paz County, Arizona

COP Project No. 8429100000, EAS #7963June 7, 2017

Terracon Project No. 65177262

Prepared for:City of Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona

Prepared by:Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Tempe, Arizona

Terracon Consul tants, Inc. 4685 S. Ash Ave. Suite H-4 Tempe, Ar izona 85282-6767P 480-897-8200 F 480-897-1133 terracon.com

June 7, 2017

City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department200 West Washington Street, 5th FloorPhoenix, Arizona 85003-1611

Attn: James Marshall, Environmental Quality SpecialistD: (602) 534-3747M: (602) [email protected]

Re: Asbestos Survey and TCLP SamplingMcMullen Valley - Former Manganese Ore SiteNortheast of 5th Street and Santa Fe AvenueNear Wenden, La Paz County, ArizonaCOP Project No. 8429100000, EAS #7963Terracon Contract No. 143529Terracon Project No. 65177262

Dear Mr. Marshall:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to submit the attached report for the abovereferenced site to City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department. The purpose of this report isto present the results of an asbestos survey and Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)RCRA 8 Metals sampling performed at the site on May 11, 2017. This asbestos survey and TCLPsampling was conducted in general accordance with our proposal dated May 5, 2017 and yournotice to proceed dated May 10, 2017. We understand that this asbestos survey and TCLPsampling was requested due to planned renovation or remedial activities within the abovereferenced area.

Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide this service to City of Phoenix StreetTransportation Department. If you have any questions regarding this report please contact theundersigned at (480) 897 8200.

Sincerely,Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Craig Townsend David M. Matson, CHMMAssistant Scientist Environmental Department Manager

Senior Associate

mailto:[email protected]

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... i1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Project Objective ............................................................................................................ 11.2 Reliance ......................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 13.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................................... 2

3.1 Visual Assessment ......................................................................................................... 23.2 Physical Assessment ...................................................................................................... 23.3 Sample Collection........................................................................................................... 23.4 Sample Analysis ............................................................................................................. 33.5 Visual Mold Assessment ................................................................................................. 3

4.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................... 45.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 56.0 LIMITATIONS/GENERAL COMMENTS ...................................................................................... 7

APPENDIX A ASBESTOS SURVEY SUMMARY

APPENDIX B ANALYTICAL LABORATORY DATA

APPENDIX C LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS

APPENDIX D SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos survey and TCLP sampling of thearea located northeast of 5th Street and Santa Fe Avenue near Wenden in La Paz County,Arizona. We understand this asbestos survey and TCLP sampling was requested due to theplanned renovation or removal of the on-site concrete structures. The purpose of this survey wasto sample and identify suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and provide informationregarding the identity, location, condition, and approximate quantities of ACM associated with theexterior suspect materials. The survey was performed on May 11, 2017, by asbestos inspectorCraig Townsend, who is an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard EmergencyResponse Act (AHERA) accredited building inspector for asbestos, in general accordance with ourproposal dated May 5, 2017, and the survey protocols established in USEPA 40 Code of FederalRegulations (CFR) Part 763, Subpart E, known as AHERA. Terracon collected 45 bulk samplesfrom 15 homogeneous areas of suspect ACM.

As a result of laboratory analysis, no asbestos was reportedly detected in the samples collectedfrom the site. As such, these materials are not considered ACM. Also, the results of the TCLPRCRA 8 sample analyses indicated concentrations of metals were either below detection limitsor well below regulatory levels.

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1

ASBESTOS SURVEY AND TCLP SAMPLINGMcMullen Valley - Former Manganese Ore SiteNortheast of 5th Street and Santa Fe Avenue

Near Wenden, La Paz County, ArizonaTerracon Project No. 65177262

June 7, 2017

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos survey and TCLP sampling of theconcrete structures located at the above location northeast of Wenden, La Paz County, Arizona.The survey was conducted on May 11, 2017, by asbestos inspector Craig Townsend, in generalaccordance with Terracon Proposal No. P65177262 dated May 5, 2017. The components slatedfor disturbance during renovation construction were sampled, and homogeneous areas of suspectasbestos-containing materials (ACM) were visually identified and documented. Suspect ACMsamples were collected in general accordance with the survey protocols outlined in USEPA 40CFR Part 763, Subpart E, known as AHERA. Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratoryfor analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

1.1 Project Objective

We understand this asbestos survey and TCLP sampling was requested due to the plannedrenovation or removal of the on-site concrete structures, to satisfy requirements of the USEPA 40CFR Part 61, Subpart M, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants(NESHAP).

1.2 Reliance

This report is for the exclusive use of City of Phoenix for the project being discussed. Reliance byany other party on this report is prohibited without written authorization of Terracon and City ofPhoenix. Reliance on this report by City of Phoenix and all authorized parties will be subject tothe terms, conditions, and limitations stated in the proposal, this report, and Terracon’s Agreementfor Services. The limitations of liability defined in Terracon’s Agreement for Services is theaggregate limit of Terracon’s liability to City of Phoenix.

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The structures are located roughly a quarter mile northeast of the unincorporated town of Wendenin La Paz County, Arizona. The concrete structures are remnants of a former metal refining plant.The concrete structures consisted of large ground level pads at the southern area, in the middlearea was a concrete circular raised platform along with another flat ground level platform. At the

Asbestos Survey and TCLP SamplingMcMullen Valley ■ La Paz County, ArizonaJune 7, 2017 ■ Terracon Project No. 65177262


northern end of the area, concrete saddle blocks are located just north of a raised concreteplatform with concrete blocks located on top the platform.

It should be noted that during the inspection, the inspector dealt with numerous areas containingbees. Reasonable efforts were made to sample observed homogenous areas of suspectmaterials.

3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES

The asbestos survey and TCLP sampling was conducted by asbestos building inspector CraigTownsend. A copy of Mr. Townsend’s asbestos inspector certificate is included in Appendix C.The survey was conducted in general accordance with the sample collection protocols establishedin USEPA 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Section 763.86, AHERA. A summary of survey activitiesis provided below.

3.1 Visual Assessment

Survey activities were initiated with visual observation of the exterior features to identifyhomogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area (HA) consists of building materialsthat appear similar throughout in terms of color and texture with consideration given to the dateof application. Exterior assessment was conducted in visually accessible areas of the siteproposed for renovation.

3.2 Physical Assessment

A physical assessment of each HA of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the friability andcondition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the USEPA as a material which can becrumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Friability was assessedby physically touching suspect materials.

3.3 Sample Collection

Based on results of the visual observation, bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in generalaccordance with USEPA AHERA survey protocols. Samples of suspect materials were collectedfrom randomly selected locations in each homogeneous area. Bulk samples were collected usingwet methods as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed insealable containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.



The selection of sample locations and frequency of the survey were based on Terracon’sobservations and the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous incontent.

Terracon collected 45 bulk samples from 15 homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A summary ofsuspect ACM samples collected during the survey is included as Appendix A. A Sample LocationMap is included in Appendix D.

Additionally, per client request, a Terracon EPA-certified lead-based paint Inspector collected tworepresentative samples from painted surfaces at the site, including substrate material, to becomposited and submitted to an ADHS-licensed analytical laboratory for RCRA 8 metals TCLPtesting to help characterize the demolition waste stream for proper disposal.

3.4 Sample Analysis

Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to EMLab P&K, (EMLab) of Phoenix,Arizona for analysis by polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining techniques per USEPAmethodology 600/R-93/116. The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, was determined bymicroscopic visual estimation. EMLab is accredited under the National Voluntary LaboratoryAccreditation Program (NVLAP) Accreditation No. 500031-0. The analytical laboratory data isprovided in Appendix B.

The composite representative samples of concrete waste materials and completed chain-of-custodyform were relinquished to APEX Environmental Laboratory in Phoenix, Arizona (ADHS License No.AZ0768). The samples were submitted for RCRA 8 Metals TCLP analysis by EPA Method1311/6020A.

4.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW

The Asbestos NESHAP program in Arizona is enforced by state and county Asbestos NESHAPCoordinators. For projects occurring in La Paz County, the Arizona Department of EnvironmentalQuality (ADEQ) has been delegated authority from the EPA to enforce the Asbestos NESHAPwithin its respective jurisdictional boundaries, excluding tribal lands.

The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions andasbestos waste disposal practices. The asbestos NESHAP regulation also requires theidentification and classification of existing ACM according to friability prior to demolition orrenovation activity. Friable ACM is a material containing more than 1% asbestos that, when dry,can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. All friable ACM isconsidered regulated asbestos containing material (RACM).



The asbestos NESHAP regulation classifies material subject to demolition or renovation as eitherRACM, Category I non-friable ACM, or Category II non-friable ACM. RACM includes all friableACM (pre-disturbance), along with Category I non-friable ACM that becomes friable (duringdisturbance), and Category I non-friable ACM subject to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading,or Category II non-friable ACM with a high probability of becoming crumbled, pulverized, orreduced to powder by forces expected to act on the material during disturbance. Category I non-friable ACM are exclusively asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, andasphalt roofing products that contain more than 1% asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM are allother non-friable materials (other than Category I non-friable ACM) that contain more than 1%asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM generally includes (but is not limited to) cementitiousmaterial such as: cement pipes, cement siding, cement panels, glazing, mortar, and grouts.

The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) asbestos standard forconstruction (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standardrequires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos must not exceed 0.1 fibers per cubiccentimeter of air (0.1 f/cc) as an eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) and not exceed 1.0fibers per cubic centimeter of air (1.0 f/cc) over a 30-minute time period known as an excursionlimit (EL). The TWA and EL are known as OSHA’s asbestos permissible exposure limits (PELs).The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities which could disturb ACM,and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging ineach class of regulated work.

5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Asbestos

As a result of laboratory analysis, no asbestos was reportedly detected in the samples collectedfrom the site. As such, these materials are not considered ACM. The summary of materialssampled and their locations is presented in Appendix A. Laboratory analytical reports are includedin Appendix B.

TCLP

The results of the TCLP RCRA 8 sample analyses indicated concentrations of metals were eitherbelow detection limits or well below regulatory levels. Based on the TCLP analytical results, thewaste would not be considered hazardous and materials may be disposed of as generalconstruction/demolition waste.



6.0 LIMITATIONS/GENERAL COMMENTS

Reasonable efforts to access suspect materials within known areas of restricted access (e.g.,crawl spaces) were made; however, confined spaces or areas which may pose a health or safetyrisk to Terracon personnel were not sampled. The survey did not include suspect materials whichcould not be safely reached with available ladders/man-lifts.

This asbestos survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skillordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions inthe same locale. The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in thisreport are based on conditions observed during our survey of the site. The information containedin this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be reliedupon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of andexclusively for use by City of Phoenix for specific application to their project as discussed. Thisreport is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw theirown conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. Terracondoes not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories, or other third parties supplyinginformation which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express orimplied is made.

APPENDIX AMcMullen Valley - Former Manganese Ore SiteNortheast of 5th Street and Santa Fe Avenue

Near Wenden, La Paz County, ArizonaTerracon Project No. 65177262

ASBESTOS SURVEY SUMMARYHA No. Material Description Sample

Number Sample Location Lab Results

1 Main Concrete Pad 1-MA5-1 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material1 Main Concrete Pad 1-MA5-2 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material1 Main Concrete Pad 1-MA5-3 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material2 Concrete Wall – Short 2-MA5-4 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material2 Concrete Wall – Short 2-MA5-5 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material2 Concrete Wall – Short 2-MA5-6 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material3 Concrete Wall – Tall 3-MA5-7 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material3 Concrete Wall – Tall 3-MA5-8 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material3 Concrete Wall – Tall 3-MA5-9 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material4 Rocky Concrete Pad 4-MA5-10 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material4 Rocky Concrete Pad 4-MA5-11 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material4 Rocky Concrete Pad 4-MA5-12 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material5 Concrete Bowl Structure 5-MA5-13 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material5 Concrete Bowl Structure 5-MA5-14 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material5 Concrete Bowl Structure 5-MA5-15 South Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material6 Manganese Rock and Soil 6-MA5-16 South Area None Detected – Black Compound6 Manganese Rock and Soil 6-MA5-17 South Area None Detected – Black Compound6 Manganese Rock and Soil 6-MA5-18 South Area None Detected – Black Compound7 Outhouse Concrete Slab 7-MA5-19 West Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material7 Outhouse Concrete Slab 7-MA5-20 West Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material7 Outhouse Concrete Slab 7-MA5-21 West Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material8 Concrete Well Pad 8-MA5-22 West Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material8 Concrete Well Pad 8-MA5-23 West Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material8 Concrete Well Pad 8-MA5-24 West Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material



HA No. Material Description SampleNumber Sample Location Lab Results

9 Circular Concrete Platform 9-MA5-25 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material9 Circular Concrete Platform 9-MA5-26 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material9 Circular Concrete Platform 9-MA5-27 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material10 Concrete Saddle Blocks 10-MA5-28 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material10 Concrete Saddle Blocks 10-MA5-29 North Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material10 Concrete Saddle Blocks 10-MA5-30 North Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material11 Top Layer Concrete - Castle 11-MA5-31 North Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material11 Top Layer Concrete - Castle 11-MA5-32 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material11 Top Layer Concrete - Castle 11-MA5-33 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material12 Bottom Layer Concrete - Castle 12-MA5-34 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material12 Bottom Layer Concrete - Castle 12-MA5-35 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material12 Bottom Layer Concrete - Castle 12-MA5-36 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material13 Castle Concrete Blocks 13-MA5-37 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material13 Castle Concrete Blocks 13-MA5-38 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material13 Castle Concrete Blocks 13-MA5-39 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material14 Broken Concrete Pile 14-MA5-40 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material14 Broken Concrete Pile 14-MA5-41 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material14 Broken Concrete Pile 14-MA5-42 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material15 Smaller Concrete Slab and Walls 15-MA5-43 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material15 Smaller Concrete Slab and Walls 15-MA5-44 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material15 Smaller Concrete Slab and Walls 15-MA5-45 Central Area None Detected – Gray Cementitious Material

APPENDIX B

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY DATA

Approved by:

Approved SignatoryRenee Luna

Report for:

Mr. Rod PawloskiTerracon: AZ4685 S Ash Avenue, Suite: H-4Tempe, AZ 85282

Regarding: Project: 65177262; Cop-McMullen ValleyEML ID: 1726451

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:Asbestos PLM: 05-15-2017

Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (EPA Methods 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020, SOP EM-AS-S-1267)

EMLab ID: 1726451, Page 1 of 12Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

EMLab P&K1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027

(800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.comClient: Terracon: AZC/O: Mr. Rod PawloskiRe: 65177262; Cop-McMullen Valley

Date of Sampling: 05-11-2017Date of Receipt: 05-12-2017Date of Report: 05-15-2017

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Total Samples Submitted: 45Total Samples Analyzed: 45

Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 0

Location: 1-MA5-1, McMullen Valley Lab ID-Version‡: 8055118-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentGray Cementitious Material ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good














The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".




ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: 2-MA5-6, McMullen Valley Lab ID-Version‡: 8055123-1

























Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Compound ND








2105 S. 48th St., Suite 102

Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762

Rod Pawloski A1705059

Terracon

4685 S. Ash Ave., Suite H-4

Tempe, AZ 85282

Client Project Name: McMullen Valley

Client Project Number: 65177262

Dear Rod Pawloski

May 18, 2017

Workorder #:

Dear Rod Pawloski

Apex Analytical Laboratory received 2 sample(s) for analysis on 05/11/17 .

All analyses met laboratory QA/QC requirements with any exceptions addressed in the Case Narrative.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding the analysis of your samples, please contact the laboratory

at (602) 437-0762.

Sincerely,

Robert Woods

Laboratory Director

ADHS License No. AZ0768

Page 1 of 9

2105 S. 48th Street, Suite 102

Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


Client: Terracon Project Name: McMullen Valley

Workorder: A1705059 Project Number: 65177262

B1 = Target analyte detected in method blank at or above the method reporting limit.

Case Narrative

All samples and QC associated with your samples met the quality control objectives. Any discrepancies will be

addressed in this case narrative. Data qualifiers in this report are in accordance with ADEQ Data Qualifiers.

Page 2 of 9


Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


CCV Continuing Calibration Verification: A solution of one or more compounds used to

evaluate the performance of the instrument system with respect to a defined set of

method criteria.

Duplicate Two aliquots of the same sample analyzed separately with identical procedures.

Analyses of the sample and duplicate indicates precision associated with

laboratory procedures.

LCS Laboratory Control Sample: An aliquot of a blank matrix to which known quantities

of the method analytes are added in the laboratory. The LCS is analyzed exactly like

a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the methodology is in control,

and whether the laboratory is making accurate and precise measurements.

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate: A duplicate analyses of an LCS.

It is an indication of precision and accuracy.

MS Matrix Spike: An aliquot of an environmental sample to which known quantities

of the method analytes are added in the laboratory. The MS is analyzed

exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the sample matrix

contributes bias to the analytical results.

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate: A duplicate analyses of an MS. It also is an indication of

precision and accuracy.

RPD Reported Percent Difference. RPD is simply a QC measurement used by taking

the difference of two results, and dividing by the average of the two results, and

converting that number to a percent.

Definitions

Page 3 of 9


Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


Client Contact: Rod Pawloski Work Order #: A1705059

Company: Terracon Project Name: McMullen Valley

Address: 4685 S. Ash Ave., Suite H-4 Project Number: 65177262

Address: Tempe, AZ 85282 Received Date: 05/11/17

Sample Temperature, ⁰C: Ambient

Samples received intact: Yes

Correct container: Yes

Correct preservation: Yes

Comments regarding sample receipt: Sample(s) received in good condition

LAB ID MATRIX

SAMPLE

DATE SAMPLE TIME

A1705059-01 Solid 5/11/17 11:00

A1705059-02 Solid 5/11/17 11:30

Total number samples received: 2

SAMPLE SUMMARY

CLIENT ID

South Area

Central Area

Page 4 of 9


Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


Client ID: Client: Terracon

Workorder: Project Name: McMullen Valley

Lab ID: Project Number:

Sample Date: Matrix: Solid

Sample Time: Prep Date:

CAS No.

Report

Limit,

mg/L Dilution

Sample

Result,

mg/L Qual

Analysis

Date Analyst

TCLP

Regulatory

Level, mg/L

7440-38-2 0.05 1 0.10 5/15/17 PS 5.0

7440-39-3 0.05 1 1.5 5/15/17 PS 100.0

7440-43-9 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 1.0

7440-47-3 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 5.0

7439-92-1 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 5.0

7439-97-6 0.005 1 <0.005 5/15/17 PS 0.2

7782-49-2 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 1.0

7440-22-4 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 5.0

Arsenic

Barium

Cadmium

Analyte QC Batch

051517_3010

051517_3010

051517_3010

Selenium

Chromium

Mercury

Silver

051517_3010

051517_3010

051517_3010

051517_3010

051517_3010Lead

5/11/17

11:00

Sample Report

TCLP Metals - Method 1311/6020A

South Area

A1705059

A1705059-01 65177262

5/15/17

Page 5 of 9


Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


Client ID: Client: Terracon

Workorder: Project Name: McMullen Valley

Lab ID: Project Number:

Sample Date: Matrix: Solid

Sample Time: Prep Date:

CAS No.

Report

Limit,

mg/L Dilution

Sample

Result,

mg/L Qual

Analysis

Date Analyst

TCLP

Regulatory

Level, mg/L

7440-38-2 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 5.0

7440-39-3 0.05 1 0.54 5/15/17 PS 100.0

7440-43-9 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 1.0

7440-47-3 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 5.0

7439-92-1 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 5.0

7439-97-6 0.005 1 <0.005 5/15/17 PS 0.2

7782-49-2 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 1.0

7440-22-4 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 5.0

Silver 051517_3010

Lead 051517_3010

Mercury 051517_3010

Selenium 051517_3010

Barium 051517_3010

Cadmium 051517_3010

Chromium 051517_3010

Arsenic 051517_3010

Sample Report


Central Area

A1705059

A1705059-02 65177262

5/11/17

11:30 5/15/17

Analyte QC Batch

Page 6 of 9


Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


Work Order: Project Name:

Client: Project Number:

Prep Date: 5/15/17

CAS No.

Report Limit,

mg/L Dilution

Sample Result,

mg/L Qual

Analysis

Date Analyst QC Batch

7440-38-2 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

7440-39-3 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

7440-43-9 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

7440-47-3 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

7439-92-1 0.05 1 0.05 B1 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

7439-97-6 0.005 1 <0.005 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

7782-49-2 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

7440-22-4 0.05 1 <0.05 5/15/17 PS 051517_3010

Lead

Mercury

Selenium

Silver

Analyte

Arsenic

Barium

Cadmium

Chromium

65177262

Quality Control Data - Method Blank


A1705059

Terracon

McMullen Valley

Page 7 of 9


Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


Work Order: A1705059 Prep Date: 5/15/17

QC Batch ID: 051517_3010 Analysis Date: 5/15/17

Analyst: PS

Spiked Sample ID: A1705050-01

Sample MS MS MSD MSD Spike

Analyte Result, mg/L Result, mg/L % Rec Result, mg/L % Rec Added Limits % RPD Qual

Arsenic <0.05 0.499 100 0.485 97 0.500 75-125 3%

Barium 1.0 1.55 111 1.51 103 0.500 75-125 3%

Cadmium <0.05 0.503 101 0.498 100 0.500 75-125 1%

Chromium 0.06 0.561 100 0.545 97 0.500 75-125 3%

Lead <0.05 0.513 103 0.503 101 0.500 75-125 2%

Mercury <0.005 0.0192 96 0.0200 100 0.020 75-125 4%

Selenium <0.05 0.470 94 0.523 105 0.500 75-125 11%

Silver <0.05 0.519 104 0.507 101 0.500 75-125 2%


Quality Control Data - MS/MSD

Page 8 of 9


Tempe, AZ 85282

(602) 437-0762


Work Order: Prep Date: 5/15/17

QC Batch ID: Analysis Date: 5/15/17

Analyst: PS

LCS LCSDResult,

mg/L

LCS

% Rec

Result,

mg/L

LCSD

% Rec Limits % RPD Qual

0.490 98 0.505 101 0.500 80-120 3%

0.482 96 0.491 98 0.500 80-120 2%

0.497 99 0.516 103 0.500 80-120 4%

0.482 96 0.488 98 0.500 80-120 1%

0.506 101 0.512 102 0.500 80-120 1%

0.0195 98 0.0195 98 0.020 80-120 0%

0.497 99 0.517 103 0.500 80-120 4%

0.519 104 0.524 105 0.500 80-120 1%

Barium

Silver

Selenium

Mercury

Lead

Chromium

Cadmium

Quality Control Data - LCS/LCSD


A1705059

051517_3010

Arsenic

Analyte

True Value,

mg/L

Page 9 of 9

PD

F p

roce

ssed

with

Cut

ePD

F e

valu

atio

n ed

ition

ww

w.C

uteP

DF

.com

http://www.cutepdf.com

APPENDIX C

LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS

Issue Date : 27-Jul 2016

Expiration Date : 27-Jul 2017

25511-2353410-255436

Certifies that CRAIG TOWNSEND

has attended the EPA approved course

Building Inspector Refresher

and successfully passed and completed the competency exam.

This training meets all requirements for asbestos accreditation under TSCA Title II.

20033 N. 19th Avenue, Building 6, Phoenix, AZ 85027602 -8 64 - 6564 - www.theasbestosinstitute.com

APPENDIX D

SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

asbestos survey and tclp sampling · pdf fileasbestos survey and tclp sampling mcmullen valley...

Documents