asbestos investigation technical memorandum … · 2014. 7. 1. · asbestos investigation technical...

ASBESTOS INVESTIGATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT SURVEY

Prepared for

New York State Department of Transportation PIN 2650.40.101

Region 2 – Superstructure Replacement Chenango Road over Sauquoit Creek

BIN 2206680 Bridge Rehabilitation

Town of New Hartford and City of Utica Oneida County

SCE Project No. R10282.D7

By

430 Court Street

Utica, NY 13502

Telephone No.: (315) 724-0100 Fax No.: (315) 724-3715

January 2014

i

V:\2010\R10282.D7REG2SuperChenagoRdoverSquoitCreek\Report\R10282.D7_Report-F.doc

01/17/14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY ............................................................................... 2-1 3.0 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL .................................................................................... 3-1 4.0 RESULTS .................................................................................................................. 4-1

4.1 CHENANGO ROAD OVER SAUQUOIT CREEK, BIN 2206680, TOWN OF NEW HARTFORD AND CITY OF UTICA, ONEIDA COUNTY, NY .............................................................................. 4-1

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................... 5-1

5.1 CHENANGO ROAD OVER SAUQUOIT CREEK, BIN 2206680, TOWN OF NEW HARTFORD AND CITY OF UTICA, ONEIDA COUNTY, NY ............................................................................... 5-1

6.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6-1

FIGURES Figure No.

3.1 ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL FLOWCHART

APPENDICES APPENDIX A: ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET APPENDIX B: ANALYTICAL LABORATORY RESULTS APPENDIX C: BLANKET VARIANCE 14 (BV 14) APPENDIX D: CERTIFICATIONS

1-1


01/17/14

1.0 BACKGROUND

The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), Region 2 is in the design phase

of the Region 2 – Superstructure Replacement project, PIN 2650.40.101. The project includes

bridge rehabilitation of the Chenago Road over Sauquoit Creek Bridge (BIN 2206680) in the

Town of New Hartford and City of Utica, Oneida County, New York.

Shumaker Consulting Engineering & Land Surveying, D.P.C. (SCE) was contracted by the

NYSDOT to complete an Asbestos Assessment Survey for the identification of ACM at the

bridge and to recommend asbestos removal measures, if needed, prior to demolition,

reconstruction, and replacement activities.

This “Asbestos Assessment Investigation Technical Memorandum” identifies materials that were

determined to be ACM from sampling and testing performed. This report describes the work

performed and the analytical results obtained. The survey was limited to materials that were

exposed or accessible. SCE was granted access to the structures for the purpose of bulk sample

collection by NYSDOT. SCE maintained safety standard policies as set forth by NYSDOT.

2-1


01/17/14

2.0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

ASBESTOS SURVEY REQUIREMENT: New York State Department of Labor Industrial

Code Rule 56 (ICR 56) requires an asbestos survey to be completed by a licensed asbestos

contractor using inspectors certified in compliance with Section 56-3.2(d), to determine whether

or not the building or structure, or portion(s) thereof to be demolished, renovated, remodeled, or

have repair work, contains asbestos-containing material (ACM), presumed ACM (PACM), or

suspect ACM (SACM).

The asbestos survey includes a thorough inspection for and identification of all PACM, SACM,

or known asbestos material throughout the building/structure or portion thereof to be demolished,

renovated, remodeled, or to have repair work. The required inspection must be performed by a

certified asbestos inspector and include identification of materials by the following methods:

(1) Review of building/structure plans and records, if available, for references to

asbestos, ACM, PACM, or miscellaneous SACM used in construction,

renovation, or repair; and

(2) Visual inspection for PACM and miscellaneous SACM throughout the

building/structure or portion thereof to be demolished, renovated, remodeled, or

repaired. All PACM and miscellaneous SACM observed is assumed to be ACM

and must be treated and handled as ACM, unless bulk sampling is conducted as

per standard USEPA and OSHA accepted methods (including multi-layered

systems sampling protocols); the subsequent analyses are performed by a

laboratory that meets the requirements of ICR 56; and the analyses satisfies both

New York State and federal requirements to document the material as non-ACM.

2-2


01/17/14

Prior Department bulk sample analysis records generated by either in-house or consultant

inspection staff are considered in the inspector’s review, but not exclusively accepted as evidence

of negative results. Materials shall be additionally sampled when plans, records, contributing

uses/locations or visual observations identify a material as SACM. Similarly, if the prior

documentation is not sufficient to definitively indicate the material is asbestos, or the prior

sampling and/or analysis does not meet currently accepted protocols (such as NYSDOH

requirements), then additional sampling is warranted.

If additional sampling is not deemed necessary, an inspector’s narrative will discuss reasoning

behind decision. All narrative discussions are broken down by bridge.

SCE conducted this asbestos assessment in accordance with the above described methodology.

Sample locations were randomly chosen from each homogeneous sample area so as not to bias

sample results. However, samples were preferentially collected from damaged areas and/or

easily/safely accessible locations. The sample was then placed in a referenced numbered vial or

sample bag. The chain-of-custody information was completed, including the location, material

type, and analyses to be performed. Samples obtained by SCE were sent to Fibers I.D., Inc. of

Albany, New York and Eastern Analytical Services, Elmsford, New York for analyses.

3-1


01/17/14

3.0 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL

A material is considered to be asbestos-containing under OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.1101, if

it is demonstrated by approved laboratory techniques that bulk samples from a homogeneous

sampling area contain greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos by weight or if it is a presumed

asbestos-containing material (PACM). A PACM is defined as thermal system insulations and

surfacing material in a structure constructed no later than 1981. The designation of PACM may

be refuted by the collection and analysis of bulk samples in accordance with the triple-sampling

and the 3-5-7 Rule protocol established in the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

(AHERA).

In New York State, bulk samples are divided into three categories: 1) friable materials, 2) non-

friable materials, and 3) non-friable organically bound materials (NOBs). Asbestos bulk samples

can be analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). PLM utilizes a light microscope to

identify asbestos fibers based on visual properties of the sample. Each is divided into sub-

samples and mounted on four slides in the same refractive index oil. A stratified point count

method is then performed to determine asbestos content. This enables the analyst to determine

accurately the percentage of asbestos and non-asbestos components. This method is effective in

determining asbestos content for friable and many non-friable materials.

Non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials encompass a wide range of building materials

that have an embedded flexible to rigid asphalt or vinyl matrix such as floor tiles, mastics, and

roofing. The matrix composition of these materials limits the effectiveness of PLM analysis. In

order to more accurately determine asbestos content, NOB samples are first Gravimetrically

Reduced (GR) in accordance with NYS ELAP 198.4 protocol. After an initial sample weight is

determined, the sample is reduced organically in a muffle furnace and then digested in acid. The

sample is weighed again and compared to its initial weight. If the post-reduction (residue)

3-2


01/17/14

weight is less than or equal to one percent (≤1%) of the initial weight, it cannot be defined as an

ACM.

If the post-reduction (residue) weight is greater than one percent (>1%) of the original sample

weight, the sample is analyzed by PLM analysis. If the PLM analysis results in asbestos

concentrations greater than one percent (>1%), the sample is identified as an ACM. If the

analysis indicates asbestos concentrations less than or equal to one percent (≤1%), the sample

then must be analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) in order to finally determine

if the NOB sample is an ACM.

Any one positive sample from a homogeneous sampling area determines the material to be

classified as asbestos-containing. In accordance with NYSDOT protocol, a “positive stop

approach” is utilized. The laboratory is instructed to not analyze remaining samples from a given

homogeneous sampling area following the first positive result. Any NOB homogeneous

sampling area that yields all negative results by PLM after GR must have all samples undergo

TEM analyses on a first positive basis. The material is determined not to be asbestos-containing

if all samples are analyzed by TEM and found to be less than or equal to one percent (≤1%)

asbestos. The sampling and analytical protocols are depicted in Figure 3.1.

3-3


01/17/14

4-1


01/17/14

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 CHENANGO ROAD OVER SAUQUOIT CREEK, BIN 2206680, TOWN OF NEW

HARTFORD AND CITY OF UTICA, ONEIDA COUNTY, NY

ACM was identified at this bridge structure (BIN 2206680) located on Chenango Road over

Sauquoit Creek in the Town of New Hartford and City of Utica, Oneida County, New York. The

bridge is a steel girder structure, with two (2) concrete abutments spanning Sauquoit Creek.

SCE reviewed record plans dated 1969 and identified suspect ACMs are summarized in the

following table:

RECORD PLAN DATE

SUSPECT ACM

LOCATION/COMMENTS

1969 Premoulded Bituminous Joint Filler

At wingwalls and abutment backwall joints.

1969 Bituminous Material (Item 61)

Applied to the backs of all abutments and wingwalls from the tops of footing to the bottom of pavement.

Premoulded Bituminous Joint Filler was indicated to be present between the bridge deck and

wingwall joints. This material was identified as suspect Cheekwall Packing and sampled during

the field assessment. Bituminous Material (Item 61) applied to the backs of all abutments and

wingwalls from the tops of footing to the bottom of pavement was indicated to be present at the

bridge structure. This material was not visually evident; therefore, not sampled during the field

assessment.

SCE performed asbestos assessment and sample collection on December 12, 2013. A total of

nine (9) samples were collected of three (3) homogeneous materials for the bridge structure. An

additional assessment and sample collection was performed on January 10, 2014 and six (6)

4-2


01/17/14

samples were collected of two (2) homogeneous materials beneath two (2) ACM pipe wraps

previously identified for the bridge structure. Copies of the chain-of-custody and analytical

results are included in Appendix B.

Analytical results determined that the following items are ACM:

• Bituminous Pipe Wrap – 1 (Top Layer, 16” Pipe)

• Bituminous Pipe Wrap – 2 (Middle Layer, 12” Pipe)

Analytical results determined that the following materials are not ACM:

• Bearing Pad

• Girder/Bearing Pad

• Cheekwall Packing

• Bituminous Coating (24” Pipe Sleeve)

• Tan Pipe Wrap (Top Layer, 12” Pipe)

• Bituminous Tar Coating – 2 (Bottom Layer, 12” Pipe)

Detailed information including location, suspect materials, approximate quantities, determination

of condition, removal options, and NYSDOT specification numbers can be found in Appendix A.

The laboratory reports for the bridge are attached in Appendix B. Refer to these appendices for

more detailed information.

5-1


01/17/14

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 CHENANGO ROAD OVER SAUQUOIT CREEK, BIN 2206680, TOWN OF NEW

HARTFORD AND CITY OF UTICA, ONEIDA COUNTY, NY

ACM was identified at this bridge structure as Bituminous Pipe Wrap –1 (Top Layer, 16” Pipe)

and Bituminous Pipe Wrap – 2 (Middle Layer, 12” Pipe). The proposed work consisting of a

superstructure replacement as reported by Region 2, is anticipated to impact the Bituminous Pipe

Wrap – 1 (Top Layer, 16” Pipe) and Pipe Wrap – 2 (Middle Layer, 12” Pipe). Remove all

Bituminous Pipe Wrap – 1 (Top Layer, 16” Pipe) and Bituminous Pipe Wrap – 2 (Middle Layer,

12” Pipe), prior to rehabilitation activities.

Removal, transport, and disposal of ACM shall be performed in accordance with federal, state,

and local regulations, including, but not limited to, those of the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (USEPA), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), New

York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), and New York State

Department of Labor (NYSDOL). Applicable regulations include National Emission Standards

for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) promulgated by USEPA and NYSDOL Industrial Code

Rule 56 (ICR 56).

6-1


01/17/14

6.0 LIMITATIONS

The services described in this report were performed consistent with generally accepted

professional principles and practices and with our agreement with our client. This report is for

the use and information of our client, unless otherwise noted. Reliance on this report by another

must be at their risk, unless, of course, we are consulted on the use or limitations.

Opinions and recommendations contained in this report apply to conditions existing when

services were performed and are intended for our client, within the purposes, locations, time

frames, and project parameters indicated. We cannot be responsible for the impacts of any

changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations subsequent to performance of

services without our further consultation. We can neither vouch for the accuracy of information

supplied by others, nor accept consequences for unconsulted use of segregated portions of this

report.

The Asbestos Assessment Survey assessed the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect

ACMs. Although due diligence was given during the assessment, suspect ACMs may exist

behind or beneath inaccessible spaces.

A-1


01/17/14

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET

ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION

Project: Region 2 - Superstructure ReplacementBridge Address: Chenango Road over Sauquoit Creek

County: Oneida Town of New Hartford and City of Utica Inspected By: A. MarsdenPIN: 2650.40.101 BIN: 2206680 T. Zotta

SCE No: R10282.D7 Inspection Date: 12-Dec-1310-Jan-14

AREA LOCATION TYPE OF MATERIAL APPROXIMATE QUANTITY

CONDITION ACM Y/N ASSUMED

FRIABLE F/NF

REMOVAL OPTIONS

SPECIFICATION ITEM NUMBER

Underside Under Bridge Bearings at Abutments Bearing Pad - Fair N NF - -Underside Between Bottom Bridge Bearing Plate

and Bridge Bearing at AbutmentsGirder/Bearing Pad - Fair N NF - -

Topside At Abutment Cheekwalls Cheekwall Packing - Fair N NF - -Underside Between Girder 2 and Girder 3 on 16"

Pipe (top layer)Bituminous Pipe Wrap - 1 (16" Pipe)

104 Ln.Ft. Fair Y NF BV 14 210.3211

Underside Between Girder 2 and Girder 3 on 16" Pipe (bottom layer)

Bituminous Tar Coating - 1 (16" Pipe)

- Fair N NF - -

Underside West and East Abutment Between Girder 2 and Girder 3 / 24" Corrugated Pipe Sleeve

Bituminous Coating (24" Pipe Sleeve)

- Fair N NF - -

Underside Between Girder 4 and Girder 5 on 12" pipe (top layer)

Tan Pipe Wrap (12" Pipe) * Fair N NF BV 14 210.3211

Underside Between Girder 4 and Girder 5 on 12" pipe (middle layer)

Bituminous Pipe Wrap - 2 (12" Pipe)

104 Ln.Ft. Fair Y NF BV 14 210.3211

Underside Between Girder 4 and Girder 5 on 12" pipe (bottom layer)

Bituminous Tar Coating - 2 (12" Pipe)

- Fair N NF - -

NOTE: * Where Multiple Layers of ACM Exist, Payment will be based on the Pipe Length.

Shumaker Consulting Engineering & Land Surveying, D.P.C.

430 Court StreetUtica, New York 13502

A-2


01/17/14

APPENDIX B

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY RESULTS

! l

= d , >

d. auc L * ql v -

e b9o , 9 o )o . = of e ao t r oo ? 0 )o ) = o )I 6 9t r a EO = j 3 Of3= fg.$ H s.O . n O q )> v - >

EgSEEFFEEs s sU) crt co U)

*Y\o(n+

"5 1; r \H@tr. S

q\\orn -<Y l-Xa )= ca\

{.

4l \nELI O

.l ,\tg l No.=l - Cfl>lgl >q.= l ZN

?Al >', Y?- i l g \

f l Sa'F'! F

clrl d .nE l

" r V.= l 5 x r^FI Fd: F'g {= $s'51 :aX cjES.El Ed 3e *=l Es j{S

E l - , ^ . q g

.El 3= .EAe l \ n q 1 q n ZEl

Fv Hi*

=l EnE=i Ee=utl

EoL

oCLot

Ho:ac-coq)

t l

, l

1l l

\Eic)ooEOooo

INlqNI

BINI

=*lg ,vlEsIO '\ l

ael=

' - ) l

u, tilb3l,F Nll . . 1

H'i6tr F ooJ=c'6 .0).coC)

E-E [Rr I

*tell|EJ

g5

o ooo s o 6 { I->

troooooot!'trotu=

hn\

\

$-l

4d

L{,

EsdQ

\)

J

$\\

N"J*

$e1

ooF

troooo

J

$q\5

b-'ta-(l-s3

l71

. tt-)€-aN

$l-'

*

3{

hL$3

N

6sl--

RJ

DA

k

J-l

$I*S

I5gbr&

$\

q

l ' l

t$

{

€\9

h\' 1J

NHl-13-l

f,

\

YffiFp{-,rt

$s(

h3

{

$$Hv,b\

J{

\vl

Lt

$b

JJJ

tBs-.^

R$ts

+*cl?o

OI

O

NI

.o

t ,

.\J

t

=

>o

a

NO

l.oq)

I

Fl-a

*g?No

t-.Ir-la

srr4a

(>-o

Irr\\J

N(Do(Eo!gaho=ctoEc)Etr:ctC

g(oE5

F

oo

.Y

o>

c)oo&

PLM.NOB ANALYTICAL REPORTPage I of I

Shumaker Engineering & Land Surveying, P.C.I 5 l0 Central AvenueAlbany, NY 12205

DATE COLLECTED:DATE RECEIVED:DATE ANALYZED:DATE REPORTED:

12i l2^3t 2 / t 3 / 1 3t2 /17 /13t2/24/13

CLIENT PROJECTT

SCE #:

Region 2-Superstr5ucture Replacement-Chenango Road Over Sauquoit Creek

R10282.D2 PIN #: 2650.40.101 BIN #: 2206680

LAB # CLIENT #

ANALYTICAL METHOD NYS DOH 03101191 (Item 1986)

NOTEBOOK: M.HAY NYSDOHELAP # I I I 29

DESCRIPTION

PLM TEST RESULTSEST. CALC. TOTALASB ASB ASB

68006o

68007o

68008r

68009o

6801 0.

6801 I o

680 I 2r

68013o

68014o

0t -01

0l-02

0r-03

02-Q4

02-05

02-06

03-07

03-08

03-09

BEARING PAD

BEARING PAD

BEARING PAD

GIRDER/BEARING PAD

GIRDER/BEARING PAD

GIRDER/BEARING PAD

CHEEKWALL PACKING

CHEEKWALL PACKING

CHEEKWALL PACKING

77.88o/o 12.61%

75.05o/o 12.490

7Q.40o/o 05.690/o

07.860/o 00.260/o

07.95% 00.960/o

05.99% 00.76yo

91.75o/o 02.54%

84.80% 07.520/o

76.35% 12.93%

09.51o/o

13.45o/o

23.92%

91.88%

9l.09Yo

93.25vo

05.71%

07.670/o

10.72o/o

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

TNC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

TNC

INC

INC

INC

INC

GRAVIMETRIC TESTRESULTS

A%ID.SOL.ORGANIC INORGANIC

C:CHRYSOTILE A:AMOSITE CR=CROCIDOLITE AN=ANTHOPHYLITENAD = NO ASBESTOS DECTECTED PLM = POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPYINC_INCONCLUSIVE T=TRACE' CLIENTREQUESTEDTEM.

TR=TREMOLITE AC=ACTINOLITE N/A=NOTAIALYZEDNOB = NONFRIABLE ORGANICALLY BOUND MATERIALS

..POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY IS NOT CONSISTANTLY RELIABLEiN DECTECTING ASBESTOS TN FLOOR COVERINGS AND SIMILAR NONFRIABLE LYBOUND MATERIALS. QUANTITATIVE TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY IS CURRNETLY THE ONLY METHOD THAT CAN BE USED TO DETERMINEIF THIS MATERIAT CAN BE CONSIDERED OR TREATED AS NONASBESTOS CONTAINING" (ELAP 198.66.3.2.I)

Analytical results reported on samples not collected by Fibers LD. Inc.. Report data dependent on information supplied by client andchain of custody. Liability limited to cost of analysis.Any and all reports, chain ofcustodies and/or professional opinions generated by Fibers 1.D., Inc. and transmitted via electronic medianare to be considered preliminary in nature and are not intended or utilizedforfinal reports. They are strictlyfor the convenience oftheclient.

Analyst:

ru167O Westem Aue. BIdg. B, Albang, Nettt York 12203

Laboratory / Office Phone (5 1 8) 4 5 6-4 59 1' [email protected]

Michael H. HayT. Morrison

f t . - l ' I-^ --t-

Eastern Analytical Services, Inc.Bulk SamPle Results

RE: CPN R10282.D7 - Region 2 Superstructure Replacement

68006

22623t8

Not Given

Not Given

Tem

NoNoNoReduced by Client

68007

22623t9

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


0.00.00.0

0.0

0.0

86.6

t3.4

Not Given

Tem


0,00.00.0

0.0

0.0

7 6 . 1

23.9

Pagc I of3

68009

2262321

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


Date Collected :Collected By :Date Received :Date Analyzed :Analyzed By:Signature :Analytical Method :

NVLAP Lab No.NYS Lab No.

Sample ID Number

Layer Number

Lab ID Number

Sample Location

Sample Description

Analytical Method

Appearance LayeredHomogenousFibrousColor

Not GivenNot Givent2/19/2013t2/20t20t3Ghayath Elias

"#-NYS-DOH I98.4101646-01085 I

Client Fibers 1.D., Inc.1670 Western Avenue - Building "8"Albany, NY 12203

68008

2262320

Not Given

AsbestosContent

OtherMaterialsPresent

% Amosite% Chrysotile% Other

o/oTotal Asbestos

0.00.00.0

0.0

0.00.00.0

0.0

0.0%o Organic 0.0

% Carbonates 90.5

% Other Inorganic 9.5

8 . 1

9 l . 9

Rcsl l tsAppl icsblcToThoscltemsT4tcd. RcpodCaMotbcRcproduced,ExccPtEnt irel t ,WilhoutWri l tcnAPProvslof lhcLaboralory.

Li"ui i i iy l i i " i "afoc"stofAnrlysis. ThisReiorrMusrNolbrUscdbythccl ienttocl . imProduclEndorsemenlbyNVLAPorAnyAtencyoft lEUScovcmmcnl.

AIHA Accreditation No. t0026l Rbde Island DOH No. AAL-0?2T3 M.lrschuictts DOL No. A A O0O0?2 Comecticut DOH No. PH-0622 Msinc DEP No LA-024 Vcmnt DOH No AAS-2095

4 Westfl hrlritr,rr Plar7..fl Hinrskrrci, Nr:w York 10523 i6 10 (914) 592 8l l f j0 nll l):/r 'elv1w. EAS!t.](:.conl

Sample Description

Analytical Method


68010

2262322

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


6801 I

2262323

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


0.00.00.0

0.0

0.0

6 .8

q ? ?

68012

2262324

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


Page 2 of 3

6801 3

226232s

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


0.00.00,0

0,0

0.0

92.3

7.7

l n t - r rI v - n l - ' !.--^ -E-

Eastern Analytical Services, Inc.Bulk SamPle Results

RE: CPN R10282.D7 - Region 2 Superstructure Replacement

Date Collected :Collected By :Date Received :Date Analyzed :Analyzed By:Signature :Analytical Method:NVLAP Lab No.NYS Lab No.

Sample ID Number

Layer Number

Lab ID Number

Sample Location

AsbestosContent


Not GivenNot Givent2/19/2013t2t2012013Ghayath Elias

-/ i77?NYS-DOH I98.4101646-0r085 I

Client Fibers I.D,, Inc.1670 Western Avenue - Building "B"Albany, NY 12203


ohTotal Asbestos

0.00.00.0

0.0

0.00.00.0

0.0

0.0

94.3

) . /

Yo Organic 0.0

7o Carbonates 8.9

% Other lnorganic 9l. l

RcsulrsAppl icoblcToThoscl lmTeslcd. RcponCamolbcRcprodlced,Exc.ptEnt irely,WithoslWri l t .nApprovalofth.Ltbo.atory.

Ll"ui i iydi inir"afoc"stofAnstyr i r . ThisReportMusrNotbeiJsedbythecl ient. toCtaimProductEndorse@nlbyNVLAPorAnyAgencyoftheUsGovtt l l j l l '

AIHA Accredil8tion No. lo026t Rhodc lsland DoH No. AAL-072T3 Mssrchus[s DOL No. A A 0000?2 comccticut Doit No. PH-0622 M6irc DEP No LA-024 Vemnl DOH No' AAS'2095

4. West#heste! Plili,n Elrnsfc)r'rl, New Ycrrh 10523 1S10 (3141592-Bll{r0 irtto:lrwurw.EAS:'lc.cor]l

Eastern Analytical Services,Bulk SamPle Results

RE: CPN R10282.D7 - Region 2 Superstructure

Inc.

Replacement

Page 3 of 3

Date Collected :Collected By :Date Received :Date Analyzed :Analyzed By :Signature :Analytical Method :

NVLAP Lab No.NYS Lab No.

Sample ID Number

Layer Number

Lab lD Number

Sample Location

Sample Descript ion

Analyical Method


Not GivenNot Givent2n9/20t312t20/20t3Ghayath Elias

./'GZ?'NYS.DOH I98.4101646-01085 I

Client Fibers I.D., Inc.1670 Western Avenue - Building "8"Albany, NY 12203

AsbestosContent


% Amosite

% Chrysotile% Other

oh Total Asbestos

%o Organic

% Carbonates

68014

2262326

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


0.00.00.0

0.0

0 .0

89.3

% Other lnorganic 10.7

ResutsAppl ic.bleToTho$ltctrTestcd, Rcpof,CrMolbeRcproduced,ExccplErt i t . ly,WithoutW.i t tenAPProvl lof thcL.boralory.

Li"uiiiiy iiluit"a ro c"sr ofAnaltsis. This Report Musr Not be Used by the clicnt to chim Prodrct EndoBemil by NVLAP or Any Agcncy ofthe Us cov€mm:li'

AIHA Accrcdilrrion No, t00261 Rhodc tsb;d DOH No. AA!-072T1 Marsachusetts DOL No. A A 00oo?2 comcclicut DOH No. PH"0622 Mline DtsF No LA'024 vemnl DoH No' A s-2095

4 $lr*ilfl hoster Plirzir Lj'rsbrci, Nerw Ycrrh 1fi523 i0i0 {$ 1 4} 5'J2 8380 irlto:1,/rvww.EASi'li:.(;onl

$a

? sFs 'ae3 ESe b9o ) 9 o ,a t , = ( '5 e ao t r oo t oo ) ; c DI 69t r 6 Eo < j = of 5= f8.$ H 8.( l ) r n O q )> v - >

EggEESBEI , ' l , o I9-b b e 'U) cr, o U)

BIr [8U I

\n- $

t ( n

rj*'RI ti!! tE rn IRZl f ' r .

=fq Rf - . o € S9=; *q

r {

eia

h.;

aF{FOts

4l (nE.I O

d No.=l # cngl >sgl Z e.r2l esEl Sa'

-"! tsc E l { n

FI HX9ll 6 rr.

El istiil = r-sl X tt?

EI ENdl (JsEl o f i '

E J I F -

El :e- l< l- l= l- lvirl

o

oo-c)tr

Ho:gcC)o

I

- l

r . l

l lN

r{l:itc)o-a)oOo(uo

oc)'6"o-

=dlo+,ooCLoJ

aLorFEo+,o5oq-

o-.Gs

o

t)i'l\ho(tro

[-

\

kR\\t

+toltoJ

9oVq

s r 01 o € s E rr)q-)

coo(,oooG'co|E=

r - l\\ll

I

-L9

<-To,

I

-\

$k'sh5

{

I

Ha{

N\

6/l

3g

t

l

NNN

s$qi:

R

+

{

ooF

coG(,oJ

N,\.$

-\2.

*J\5

ARIsq.

\9i

l--I

Rq:(LR3

*0NI,\9

5

H'qN'N5*

.J

\N--{.

b'S

tr4)'\9

N$-l

E.

ftAa-\4-

\s

t'RtIhs

suu(us\

N

{*

Rr\i\ -

$sg$

rytvAl'.{

d

tN-/

JrNb+\sq d ,

FI1.. $

$N

sJ.uI

$\,NJU

-rt'{ t'rpr3+\\r$n'hI\\ERUI

V\5$?

\I

\ba?nh

ffi

Hn-,N

L-dl\

$$3

t?. q

€.

Tv"|-.(

AHs)tl--J(.

vI

r$f,

l{l\b

Ta,

7(..{(*j

),tssa-tNl:-Ja{s

cA{l,-q

${*oIto

I+\

I

a

NI

NMTg

=, I

lJ)a

u*()

:I

\)e

\J

$a

qC

;SJ

:th

o

(1)

PLM-NOB ANALYTICAL REPORT

CLIENT:ADDRESS:

Page I of I

Shumaker Engineering & Land Surveying, P.C'l5l0 Central AvenueAlbany, NY 12205

DATE COLLECTED:DATERECEIVED:DATEANALYZED:DATE REPORTED:

tz l t2 l t3t2/t3lt3t2il'tlt312t24/13

CLIENT PROJECT:

SCE #:

Region 2-superstr5ucture Replacement-Chenango Road Over Sauquoit Creek

R10282.D2 PIN #: 2650.40.101 BIN #: 2206680

LAB # CLIENT #

ANALYTICAL METHOD NYS DOH 03101/97 (ltem 198.6)

NOTEBOOK: M.HAY NYSDOHELAP # I I I 29

DESCRIPTTON


680r 5

68016

680 r7

68018 r

680 I 9o

68020o

6802 l

68022o

68023

04-10

04- l I

04-12

05 -13

05 -14

05 - r5

06-r6

06-17

06-18

BITUMINOUS PIPE WRAP-I

BITUMINOUS PIPE WRAP-I

BITUMINOUS PIPE WRAP.I

BITUMINOUS COATING

BITUMINOUS COATING

BITUMINOUS COATING

TAN PIPE WRAP

TAN PIPE WRAP

TAN PIPE WRAP

4l.59Vo 06.55Yo

96.84o/o 02.17%

74.92% 07.16%

96.12% 02.23o/o

94j0% 04.11%

63,90o/o 08.34o/o

97.92% 0l.85%

97.10% 01.340/o

48.630/o Ql.21Vo

51.860/o 66.66o/o-C

00.99o/o <01.00%

t7.92% N/A

0t.6s% INc

01 .18% INC

2716% INC

00.23% <01.00%

01.560/o INC

00.160/o <01.00%

34.57%-C

RESIDUE

IST

TNC

INC

INC

RESIDUE

INC

RESIDUE

34.57o/o-C

NON-ACM

POSITryE

INC

INC

INC

NON.ACM

INC

NON-ACM

GRAVTMETRIC TESTRESULTS

A%ID-SOL.ORGANIC INORGANIC

RESIDUE

C=CHRYSOTILE A-AMOSITE CR=CROCIDOLIE AN=ANTHOPHYLITENAD = NO ASBESTOS DECTECTED PLM = POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPYrNC-INCONCLUSIVE T=TRACE' CLIENTREQUESTEDTEM.

TR=TREMOLITE AC=ACTINOLITE N/A=NOTANALYZEDNOB = NONFRIABLE ORGANICALLY BOUND MATERIALS

.POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY IS NOT CONSISTANTLY RELIABLE IN DECTECTING ASBESTOS IN FLOOR COVERINGS AND SIMILAR NONFRIABLE LY

BOUND MATERIALS, QUANTITATIVE TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY IS CURRNETLY THE ONLY METHOD THATCAN BE USED TO DETERMINE

IF THIS MATERIAL CAN BE CONSIDERED OR TREATED AS NONASBESTOS CONTAINING' (ELAP 198.66.3.2.I)

Analytica! results reported on sanples not collected by Fibers I.D. Inc., Report data dependent on information supplied by client and

chain of custody. Liability limited to cost of analysis.Any and all reports, chain ofcustodies and/or professional opinions generated by Fibers LD., Inc. and transmittedvia electonic median

orl to b, cons:idered preliminary in nature and are not intended or utilizedforfinal reports. They are strictlyfor the convenience ofthe

client.

Analyst: Laboratorv

4IEEBS /. D. INC.167O Western Aue. Bldg. B, Albang, Neut York 12203

Laboratory/ OJfice Plwne (5 1 8) 456-4 59 1' fbersid@teri'z'on'net

T. Morrison

....'".'.'...,...4 z g

l r t - - rI ? . r n l ' r !

IlJ* jh:*a

Eastern Analytical Services, Inc.Bulk Sample Results

RE: CPN Rl0282.D7 - Region 2 Superstructure Replacement

68018

2262327

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


68019

2262328

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


0.00.00.0

0.0

0.0

98.8

1 . 2

68020

2262329

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


Pagc I of I

68022

2262330

Not Given

Not Given

Tem


0.00.60.0

0.6

0.0

98.4

1 .0

Date Collected :

Collected By :Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

Analyzed By :

Signature :

Analytical Method:

NVLAP Lab No.

NYS Lab No.

Sample ID Number

Layer Number

Lab ID Number

Sample Location

Sample Description

Analytical Method


Not GivenNot Givent2/19/201312t20/2013Ghavath Elias

:#NYS-DOH I98.4101646-01085 I

Client Fibers I.D., Inc.1670 Westem Avenue - Building "8"Albany, NY 12203

AsbestosContent



ohTotal Asbestos

0.00.00.0

0.0

0.00.00.0

0.0

0.0

72.2

27.8

o/o Organic 0.0

% Carbonates 98.4

% Other lnorganic 1.6

Resuhs Appliclble To Thosc ltem Testcd. R.pon Cailot bc Rlprcduccd, Exlrpt Entirely. Withoul Wrillcn Approvsl oflhc Ltbontory.

Li"-u,iiiv ili.i,"o f" crsr of Anol'fis. This Reporr Musr Not bc iJrcd by the Cliint to Claim Product Endorscrenl by NVLAP or Atrv Agscy of lhe Us cove|ment'

AIHA Acc.cdirltion No. 10026l Rhod? Ishnd DoH No. AAL-0?2TI Msss.chu$(s DoL No. A A 000072 comeclicut Doit l'to Pil'0622 Msinc DEP No LA'024 Vemtrl DoH No AAs-2095

,l We{iti}heslfi r P}aui.} Hi,r$torc,, N*.rw t/r:rk 10523 i6 :o (91 4) 502 B3fJ0 nl t!l:././rveliv.FAS;t'li:. ct)rll

e aEq * o -

I b9c t o c D. h . E o5 e Ao t r oo E oo ) = o )

E :Eo < j = ofa=fg$ H sO r n O 0 )> v # >

EggEEBBE

"'t g g

( / ) c f ) ( f , ( h

B[ r]8-[ [

\ns\ns

t\orr)aa6X

= li i l.+ l-\6 r j\n t:

JI\I

=A\

I

cbb 9l

-= c\oNd+ .>=<iEI9.1 6)nZ>$F - 39?

r i

Rta

''.ira

4l (nELI A

d No.= l - COgl >$=l Z c.l

=l bsE l c d aq l . o o o

-'! -cnl d rn

EI HXSl 6 rr'.'e is

r+r-l = f-sl ir tt?

EI ENa lu< fE I ^ , ^Ell r-, QO

C J I - -

El :e- l< l- l= l- l?AI

(!o

.Y

o

=oo*,ooo.o=ol-

o|{-!to{.,o=ota-o?'6

o

Y\9

$2-RN

N\;

\I

t"-..-lKf,vb3

h\9

l

\9

Rf,Hr{+r

qI-N

rl(

+s

(.+\

CLIENT:ADDRESS:

PLM-NOB ANALYTICAL REPORTPage I of I

Shumaker Engineering & Land Surveying, P.C.I 5 l0 Central AvenueAlbany, NY 12205

DATE COLLDCTED:DATE RECEIVED:DATE ANALYZED:DATEREPORTED:

t2/t2lt312/t3lt3t2/17n3t2/24113

CLIENT PROJECT:

SCE #r

Region 2-Superstr5ucture Replacement-Chenango Road Over Sauquoit Creek

R10282.D2 PIN #: 2650.40.101 BIN #: 2206680

ANALYTICAL METHOD NYS DOH 03/0t/97 (Item 1986)

LAB #

68024

68025

68026

CLIENT #

07-19

07-20

0'7-21

NOTEBOOK: M.HAY

DESCRIPTION

BITUMINOUS PIPE WRAP-2

BITUMINOUS PIPE WRAP.2

BITUMINOUS PIPE WRAP-2

NYS DOH ELAP #11129

03.65% 33.560/o

01.95% 42.510

00.04% 40.52Vo


62.79%

55.53o/o

59.44%

26.66Vo-C

N/A

N/A

08.94%-C

IST

IST

08.94%,C

POSITryE

POSITryE


A%ID-SOL.ORGANIC INORGANIC

RESIDUE

C=CHRYSOTILE A=AMOSITE CR=CROCIDOLITE AN=ANTHOPHYLITENAD = NO ASBESTOS DECTECTED PLM= POLARIZED LIGHTMICROSCOPYINC - INCONCLUSIVE T=TRACE ' CLIENT REQIJESTED TEM,

-POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY IS NOT CONSISTANTLY RELIABLE IN DECTECTING ASBESTOS IN FLOOR COVERINGS AND SIMILAR NONFRIABLE LY

BOUND MATERIALS. QUANTITATIVE TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPYIS CURRNETLY THE ONLY METHOD THAT CAN BE USED TO DETERMINE

IF THIS MATERIAL CAN BE CONSIDERED OR TREATED AS NONASBESTOS CONTAINING' (ELAP I98,66.3.2.I)

Analytical results reported on samples not collected by Fibers LD. Inc.. Report data dependent on idormation supplied by client and

chain of custody. Liability limited to cost of analysis.

Any an-d all reports, chain ofcustodies ani/or professional opinions generated by Fibers 1.D., Inc. and tansmitted via electronic median

ori to b, coniidered preliminary in nature ancl are not intended or uiitizedforfinal reports. They are strictlyfor the convenience ofthe

client.

Analyst:

T. Morrison

F/BERS_/.D. llrc7670 Western Aue, Bld.g. B, Albang, Neu't Yotk 12203

Laboratory / Olfice Plwne (5 1 8) 4 5 6-4 5Q I' fibersid@terizon'net

TR=TREMOLITE AC=ACTINOLITE N/A=NOTANALYZEDNOB = NONFRIABLE ORGANICALLY BOUND MATERIALS

Laboratory Director,

Michael H. Hay

II

I

I

= Efis aao - = o -- v -

I b9o) () ct)a . c of e ao t r oo E a )o ) ^ o )I 69E a Eo < j = o: =>:s.*H s.O . n O O> v s >' F

A A E

I 33Io t r t r oVF$EetfsU ) o < e U )

[&[ [

(n

c.lc.t o'-i CO. C.lF O \17 lFi C.l>- lt?a - vF^ ,

-o oo< ..,n r V V )

5 4 r^ i lE . : " l , n $crE{ E- t .A

{g -d,s$\ C Q E = I

Eq sqs;d . . l r <9 t xc ; t l \ Z F c d

Q s ^ r { F r

=E' EE rst r t q 1 r a k Z Ys\/ Nif$sRg.lt s r n F *\ J ( . . ,

f,qEntr

j:tEoo-ot,

co:qc-coo-=t

ilqIir(D

+,()ooogoo

e

Trlc lo lJ l

dlIot

c lL lo lo lc lutc lrrl Iotc lP I

5 lU l lt r l

8l ..ild,l o-lEt s=t il=l =lut l ln l

=mo{r,ooCLo5ol-ortsEo+,o5ortsotr(E-co

ido

.Yo

+hci+,c.qo

EN

ltott(E

J

oooo(E'.o(E=

NooEq)

oo=o(Dto)EtrEcf

e(UcL

fF

\\

\

\

t\.\

\.

I- 1 .

tto!to

CLIENT:ADDRESS:

CLIENT PROJECT:

SCE #:

LAB # CLIENT #

PLM-NOB ANALYTICAL REPORTPage I of I

Shumaker Engineering & Land Surveying, P.C.1510 Central AvenueAlbanv. NY 12205

DATE COLLECTED:DATE RECEIVED:DATE ANALYZED:DATE REPORTED:

01/tolt40v13/L40Ut5t140t/t6/14

Region 2 Superstructure Replacement-Chenango Road Over Sauquoit Creek

R10282.D7 PIN #:2650.40.101 BIN #: 2206680

ANALYTICAL METHOO trtvS oOH O:lOtlgZ (tt.. tg8.0)

NOTEBOOK: M. HAY NYS DOH ELAP #lll29


ACID-SOL.


68333 o

68334r

68335o

68336o

68337o

68338r

08-22

08-23

08-24

09-25

09-26

09-27

DESCRIPTION

BITUMINOUS TAR COATING- I

BITUMINOUS TAR COATING-I

BITUMINOUS TAR COATING.I

BITUMINOUS TAR COATING-2



RESIDUE

72.04o/o 01.35o/o 26.61%0

71.92% 00.68% 27.4l%o

71.92o/o 0l.l3%o 25.95o/o

70.l6Yo 02.54o/o 27.30o/o

66.360/o 00.38% 33.260/o

28.84% 58.91o/o l2.25%o

INC INC

INC INC

INC INC

INC INC

T/C INC T/C N{C

INC INC

INC

INC

INC

INC

T/C/ INC

INC

C=CHRYSOTILE A=AMOSITE CR=CROCIDOLITE AN=ANTHOPHYLITE TR=TREMOLITE AC=ACTINOLITE N/A=NOTANALYZEDNAD = NO ASBESTOS DECTECTED PLM = POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY NOB = NONFRIABLE ORGANICALLY BOUND MATERIALSINC_INCONCLUSIVE T=TRACE' CLIENTREQUESTEDTEM,

."OLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY IS NOT CONSISTANTLY RELIABLE IN DECTECTING ASBESTOS IN FLOOR COVERINGS AND SIMILAR NONFRIABLE LYBOUND MATERIAIS. QUANTITATIVE TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY IS CI,R.RNETLY THE ONLY METHOD THAT CAN BE USED TO DETERMINEIF THIS MATERIAL CAN BE CONSIDERED OR TREATED AS NONASBESTOS CONTAINING" (ELAP 198.66,3.2,I)

Analytical results reported on samples not collected by Fibers LD. Inc.. Report data dependent on information supplied by client and

chain of custody. Liability limited to cost of analysis.

Any and all reports, chain ofcustodies and/or professional opinions generated by Fibers 1.D., Inc. and transmitted via electronic median

are to be consideredpreliminary in nature and are not intended or utilizedforfinal reports. They are strictlyfor the convenience ofthe

client.

Analyst:

T. Morrison

FIBERS I.D. INC.1670 WesternAue. Bldg- B, Albang, Neut York 12203

Inboratory/ OJfice Phone (5 1 8) 456-45Q I' fibersid@terizon'net

Laboratory Director,

Sarrple Descriptbn

ArulytlalMetbd

Appeararce LaSuedHornogenor:sFibror.rsColor

68333

2766269

Not Gil,en

NotGi"en

Tm

NoNoNoReduced byClbrrt

68334

2266270

Not Given

Not Gir,en

Tm

NoNoNoRedr:ced byCliers

0.00.30.0

0.3

0,0

72.6

z7. l

NotGiren

Tern

NoNoNoRedrred byCliert

Page I of2

68336

2266272

Not Given

NotGhen

Im

NoNoNoRedr.aed by Clbrt

0.0< 0.3

0.0

< 0.3

0.0

12_',7

* - 3 f f i * *ffi *rn t : r

n t * m * " q n.--*, GE .".

Easteru Analvtical Services. Inc.Bulk Saryle Resufts

RE: CPN R10283.D7 - Regbn2 Srperstnrtue Rephcerrnt

Date Colbcted :Colbcted By:Date Receired :Date Arrallzed :Anal5aed By :Sipgunrre :AnatttfualMetlrodNVLAP Lab No.NYS Lab No.

Sarrrcle ID Nurrber

LasvNumber

Lab ID Nuniber

Sarrple Location

AsbestosCorrtent

OtherMaterialsPresett

Not GivenNot Gi'.enaLlrc/20t40I/t6/2013Kevin Stascavaee*5!'.'{.#^NYS-DOH 198.4101646-01085 I

Clbru Fibers I.D.. Irr^1670 \tr:estem Arera-re - Bufldi€ '8"

Albarr. NY 12?03

68335

2266271

Not Giren

9lo Arrpsie% Chr:sotib% Otltr

7o TotalAsbestos

%Orynb

0,6 Cacbonates

0,0< 0.3

0.0

.< 0.3

0.0

?4. I

2,5.9

0.00.J0.0

0.3

0.0

7o Otlrr hmrcarrb 26.3

Reru&r _{pptabl To Thoe lrm Tstid. RrFfr clmr br RlFodurd, Estr Eilirt, $'i*Fu wria-{t+orz!4t}r LabqretLiulb.iit*oa:oC*ttr.{nt}n. Thi'Rlimttr$S}rb€U*db}*EClinECbinltodrrtEdssmh'\-11--l,Pv.1$'Agen'tftrUSGosro'-*:tt.co.dinriro)io. 1c0163- Rbod!:stodDori]iq..{tt-'.ii.Jli t*+r&hstsDoL}io.-4-{c{80?l c+irds}l}ia.Pl{-s6:} $tisDLp$o.L-{-s:{ 1:f*pci{r-o-.tLs-?s9i

,1 tJfi $1{,}is$q4r Pl{tts [i*x$f*f{t. f*i+w Ytrrk 1*5?3. 14 1 |] '$'!41 5?l Ai'iclli h: l l r . iwwvr . l i rA$ i r : . ( ' t f r

* . * ** * f f i *

I t , : : l| | l l r r f f i * " q m

* # * # f f i , -

Easte m Analytical Services, Inr.Bulk Sanple Resuhc

RE: CPN R1028f .D7 - Regbn2 Srgerskr.rcture Repheerx=nt

Pagc 2 of2

Date Colhcted :Collected By:Date Recei\€d :Date Anallzed :Aml1ad By :Sigunrre:AnalyticalMettndNVLAP LabNo.NYS Lab No.

Sanrrle ID Nr:rr$er

LalxNumbcr

Lab ID Nurrber

Sarrple Locatiron

AsbestosContent

OtlxrMaterialsPresenf

Not GiverNot Gir,en0I/16/2014AUrcDO13Kevin Stascavase-_-,*r."'.* tj#"NYS-DOH 198.4101646-01085 I

Clbrrt FSers I.D.. Irc^1670 lltestem Arerar - BuilCirg '8"

Albmy. bIY 1f,203

Sarrple Descriptbn

AnalltbalMetlpd

Appeararce LayeredHormgersusFibrorsColor

6833 7

2266273

NotGir,en

NotGi'*en

Tam

NoNoNoRedr:ced by Clbnt

68338

2266274

NotGirnn

NotGiren

Tcrn

N oNoNoRedrred byClbnt

9/o Annsie% Clrrrotib% Other

7o ToialAsbestos

%Ogantu

o/o Cabormtes

0.0U , J

0.0

0.3

0.0

66.7

0.0< 0.1

0.0

< 0,1

0.0

8? .8

1) .27o Other Irorcafib 33.0

Re*rlaApplizb*ToTbo*lttr?qt.d. [email protected]€dsd,EE?FE**V,E'i&o\rllith-{pFolzldtlELabqrlo*:Lib.iti!'LirirdtoC$rttr3Etil TbirF€pod}.trsNatb€UE*Clry*EClisbChimlodrEtEdsrffib'\"i'I--4Fs.rr-a',q.EFoc)'dfEUSCffiftEd,A:!l{Aer.ii!tba:;o.tc0?6i ibcd.LbdDO!t!b..ll!-0.:tli !!.t*elaef$ml-}io.A,Lt4G0'-l Coffiti|r:(DOHSo.FE$6!l \'qieDEP:-o.L-1-01.1 \:mg(XiNo..4-{S-lti95

.1'.Vetldl:$slrr l l la/ir firlsi*rd. *er, Yrrrit : *ir?3. iS ! fJ t$1;ll f:?ir"S*fS i\11p :.','v{w"i.f &,1ir:f .cnr{r

A-3


01/17/14

APPENDIX C

BLANKET VARIANCE 14 (BV 14)

A-4


01/17/14

APPENDIX D

CERTIFICATIONS

unry von*.,$f*r,g:';ogP*,nr'mrntr,(}F tlEArTx .,'i, ': ' 'r''r,'i,: " = "::":::"1::;i:',::,W4O$IIUQRT.H..CEH.T,ER

i : t : t : : ' : : : : t : : : : ! : : ! : . ! ! : . ! i ! ! ! ! : ! : ! ! : : ! ! ! : : ! ! : : : : :

:iii

ii:i:l:'i::rii ra.

,' e*nrmrcn#'orippnouAii'ox..#[ ..be**ce ,ii.,,.:., ;r,::lsgtedirt: acrcrdus,,udfi,affi,Furffif,fo'ga@-n s2 Publi,c,Wh tawof fSew y.s#;$effi..'.'''..''''

.,

. . :,,,:,...,.:.,.''.:,',::' ::.,:'..,,:..,',.:,,..,,',' ,'..,:..::'

: : . i : : : . . : : i . . . . : : : . : : : : . . : . : : . . , : : : -_ , , . . , . . . ' , , . ' . , . ' . . , , . , . , , , , , , , , : , , . , , , , : ' , . , , , , : , . , . .

:;, ,:,, ,, ';:,,Expirs$ilZ:gt,,AM *tri{:,,CIf , 20t.4,,,,,,,, , . ' ,,ts5ued: Apfi1.01 ,2O13,..- ' ,, ' , ' ,

,,,,,...,,i,,,,,, i,,.,.,,,, .,..,,.,:NYLa6 :ttd.'Ii#l:,,l tr1|;29,. , ; ' . . ' . . l ; , ' , , , , . , , , , . , , . , , ' . , ' ' ' , , , , , ' ' . , . , , , , , , r ' , , , . , . ' ' , , , , i '

. : : . ' : : ' : : ' : : ' ' : ' : ' : ' ' : : ' ' '

: : ' ' : : ' ' : : l ' ' : : : : ' ' : : : ' : : : . . , , . , , , . : : , : , . :_

'.,MR,,;W1CUAIE+,,,I{, ttiif:,:',:', ; ;, ,, ,,:i : ,:,,;',',',,':,,,,,,' 'FIBERE'IdrwG,. '

' , ' , ; , , , i , ' , i , i i , , ' , ' ' . i

7 67? lggSIFRAt *VF iBf.DG,; BALEAIIV,,',,NY.,.,," 1 2203427 8,:"',"'

.:.:14...Ill\,,i;:ii;i:ii;i:rl :ii;::ii;::i;: : : : : : ! t : : I : : : I t : : : : : :: : : i i : : : : : : : : ry : : : ! : i :

, : . i : l : : : :. . : r - - : - , . : i ! , . ! ! , . !,, i ' ; - ,: ' : ": "

' : ' i i : :: ::]:

. ! ; r * * : : l

r_r',3llai:ililllliiiili:liiiiia:ii:6

tlpcBnaneous,:: ,.,:,,,1:,, , . , l:rt,::,: ,, ,, 1 ,:,,,; ,:

Asb :io,Friailo,MatErtat .'. '

. . '[email protected]#*ry'rarariarrum

;t;:;r:;;rrrr;;*iiiill .,rrrr:. . t . t i - : , . . . .i '.,,.i ',,,., ,....:.i: ; --'1,,

....., . r.... ..' ' l ..... ..,,l i ; : i r : - . , ; . l r : ' r : : : : ':'::.::,*:J.':lii;:iiilil:::::":.:li:l:iii:illi:i;:.lt:i;:

',rrlr,ii ltili'i irr

:ii:ili:j:l:

ar*,na|id- qltfi f, fs,.WFi;iiliic.rcpi#il:itr{:t{i*tei.}* opnFd8

m €fe,@.6 cdl:(51flIneF''7oto :

asbestos investigation technical memorandum … · 2014. 7. 1. · asbestos investigation technical...

Documents