arnne sty inrternat i 0 nal. - home | amnesty international · pakistan ordnance factories (pof)...
TRANSCRIPT
Arnne styINrTERNAT I 0 NAL.
,/u/y 2000 l'o/. No.4
N EWS
ISRAEL/LEBANONKHIAM DETENTION CENTRE'S
n HOR TE FIRST TIME IN MY LIFE, IF1 eel I am alive... For the first
time since her detention. I
talked to (:osette. For the first time in
ow life I believed that Suleiman
Ramadan is still alive.., for the first
time in Inv life, the tears falling now
from my eves are tears of jt)y..."
Uhina Nahlawi, a volunteer for the
I,ebanese Font 'RV U p Committee for
the Support of Lebanese DetaMees in
Israeli Prisons, posted these words on
a Khiam internet discussion site on
23 May. Earlier that day the gates of
Khiam Detention Centre had at last
been Nwced open and 144 prisoners.
men and women, iliost of whom had
languished there for years, were finally
released.
Suleiman Ramadan spent nearly 15
years in Khiam from the time of his
arrest at the age of 20. lie is said to
have spent three years in solitary con-
finement and had a leg amputated
while he was in prison. The detention
of Cosette Ibrahim, a journalist, in
September 1999 sparked worldwide
protests and demonstrations.
DOORS FORCED OPEN
Then, in the wake of Israel's with-
Irom south Lebanon, the vil-
lagers of Khiani stormed the detent-
ion centre, freeing the prisoners.
These limments when detainees
walk from darkness into the sun are
what AI is all about. For years, Al
gomps and thotisands of its members
wrote to the detainees of Khiam; not
one of their letters was ever passed on
to am' of the prisoners. For seven
years, until 1995, detainees were even
denied visits from families and from
the International (:ommittee of the
Red Cross (I(RC).
- rhe freedom of the Khiam
detainees was the culmination of
other releases of Lebanese from
Israeli ,jails: 13 Lebanese hostages
were released on 19 April after spend-
ing almost 14 years detained ill Israel.
Some, like the detainees of Khiam.
had never been carged or tried:
others had been held for up to 12
years after the expiry of their sen-
tences. Around 1990, some were told
that thev were being held as "bargain-
ing chips" ni exchange for the return
of Israeli soldiers — including airforce
navigator Ron Arad — missing after
capture by armed groups during the
1,ehanese war. It was only in 1995 that
the hostages began to receive letters
from the Al groups who had been
writing for three years and were cam-
paigning for their release.
AI delegates who visited Lebanon
in May were overjoyed to meet many
of these fOrmer hostages with their
families. "We now feel wc have friends
in many places", said Ahmad Taleb,
one of- those who, during 13 years'
detention ni Israel, was never charged
with or tried for any offence.
At the time of the fall of Khiam,
other IA-bancse continued to be held
in Israel, including Mustafa al-Dirani,
severely tortured after his arrest in
1994 and held without even access to
the ICRC.AI calls for the release of all those
Lebanese nationals still held as
hostages M Israel. The organization
also continues to campaign on behalf
of the missing Israeli nationals.
A prisoner learns of his imminent releasefrom Khiam ejoceph Barrak/AFP
INSIDEImmacul&e 2
Birhaheka
receives htunanrights award
Iran 2
WORLDWIDEAPPEALSHondurasMyanmarGuinea
Mexico
Malaysia 8
IMMACULEE BIRHAHEKARECEIVES MARTIN ENNALSAWARD
IRANCLAMPDOWN ON FREEDOM OF
N A PERIOD OF HIGH POLITICAL TENSIONas the second round of parliamentary
elections took place in Iran, journalists,intellectuals, a student leader nid
human rights advocates were arrested,and at least 13 newspapers — mans: per-ceived to he allied to reformist candid-ates — were closed down.
Among those detained were twowomen — Mehrangit Kar, .1 lawyer. andShahla I aitit. a publisher. They were ini-tially held incommunicado, and thoughtto be at risk ot ill-treatment. ShahlaAhiji has a history of health problems.
Both are campaigners for women's midother human rights. They were arrestedon 20 April, shortly after taking part inan academic and cultural conference inBerlin. Germany, where political andsocial reform in Iran Were publicly debat-ed. At the Mile of writing, their lawyer,Shirin Hradi, also a well-known humanrights advocate, had not been Ahnyed tosee them. Both women were refused hail.
'Hie Berlin conference was inter-rupted by strong protests by Iranianpolitical groups in exile. It receivedenormous publicity within Iran, andsome religious figures reportedlyaccused sonic of (hose who attended ofapostasy, or turning away from Islam.Some members of the Iranian.judiciars:apparently considered attendance at theconference to have been -harmful tonational StTlIFity. Other people arrestedfollowing their participation ;it the con-ference nicluded Hamid Reza.lalaipour,a journalist for ,A.ti-eAzatlegan (Era of the
Immaculee Birhaheka (lift) andMary Robinson
EXPRESSIONFree): Ezzatollah Sahabi, publisher of
Farda (Tomorrt/IV's Iran) andAlireza Alavitabar, editor of Sobh-e Emrouz(This Morning). All three were detained,interrogated and later released on bail.jamileh hadivar, a member of parlia-ment, was also summoned and WaS
I.C1)0F1C(Ily SchedlIksd to appear beforethe Revolutionary Court shortly there-aller.
Ali Afshari, a representative of the sundent organization Dallar-e Tabk0n-c%UMW, and Akbar Ganji, a well-kninvn
journalist, were also arrested after theconference. Akbar Gariji reportedlyfaced 10 charges relating to articles hewrote implicating senior Iranian politi-cal figures in the 1998 killnigs of a num-ber of intellectuals and writers, and tostatements he made at the Berlin confer-ence. lie Was believed to be at risk of ill-treatment OF even torture.
• WHAT YOU CAN DO:Please write, calling for the inimediateand unconditional release of Mehrangizkar, Shahla Lahiji, Ali Afshari and AkbarGanji as prisoners of conscience if theycontinue to be detained. Write to:Leader of the Islamic Republic, his
Excellency Ayatollah Saved 'AliKhamenei. The Presidency, PalestineAvenue, Azerbaijan Intersection, Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran, and to: Head ofJudiciary, Ilis Excellency AyatollahNiahnumd Hashemi-Shahrudi, MinistryoLlustice, Park-e Shahr, Tehran, IslamicRepublic of Iran.
T HIS YEAR'S MARTIN ENNALS AWARD FORuman Rights Defenders was given tolinmacuIC:e Birhaheka, Director ofPromotion and Support of: Women'sInitiatives (PAIF) in the Democratic:Republic of the (:ongo. ImmaculdeBirhaheka has worked for many years toinform Congolese W0111(11 of their rightsand to empower them to deal with the:authorities and the gender discriminationin the legal system. She has taught themself-help methods, initiated commutnty-funded projects, and helped womenresist illegal taxes and extortion. She wasone of the few with the courage to con-front the authorities on sensitive issuessuch as rape. In 1995 she and her col-leagues began producing a weekly radioprogram M Kiswahili on women's rights.
In recent Years Immaculee Birhahekahas spliken out strongly against humanrights abuses occurring in her country,not hesitating to publicly denounce masskillings and ethnic intolerance. As aresult she has received increasing threatsfrom both rebel groups and theRwandesc military ill Goma. On 16January 2000, she was arrested and heldin a military detention centre where shewas humiliated and beaten. Shc wasreleased the same day, but has receivedfurther threats from rebel soldiers.
The UN High Commissioner forHuman Rights. Mary Robinson, pres-ented the award at a ceremony inGeneva. Swityerland, on 13 April, saying:- I have a real sense of the need for thekind of commitment ImmaculeeBirhaheka has shown, and I know fromour offices in Kinshasa and in Gomahow important that work adding: 'When the Declaration on HtunanRights Defenders was adopted inDecember 1998. we all knew that it wasnot enough. and that a practical meas-ure is now needed to ensure that humanrights defenders have adequate protec-tion and support... I lupe the step willhe taken for a Special Rapporteur onhuman rights defenders.-
The Martin Ennals Award fin- HumanRights Defenders. created in 1993, is aresult of a collaboration of 10 leadinghuman rights organizations, includingAl. It is granted annually to someonewho has demonstrated an exceptionalrecord of combating human rights abusesby courageous and innovative means.The prize is CSS17,000, and is aimed toencourage human rights defenders whoare in need of: protectitm.
(From WOMehrangiz Kar, Shahla Lahiji, Akbar Ganji, Mi Afshari and Jamileh Kadivar © Heinrich Boll Foundation
i, - - v
,.6 0July 2000 Vol. 30 No.4 AMNESTY INTFRN.ATION11. NEWS
G OVERNMENT MINISTERS FROM BRUNEI, CAMBODIA,
Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines.Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam will converge on
Bangkok. Thailand, on 24 July 2000 for the annual meeting of,Association Of South-East Asian Nations — ASEAN. They willalso be,joined Ily a range of dialogue partners inchidingAustralia, Canada, the European Union (EU), Japan, NewZealand and the USA to discuss issues of regional and interna-tional concern. One issue which AI will press to be put highon the agenda will bc that of controlling the arms and securitytrade. This meeting brings together several of the world'sleading arms manufacturing and exporting states, togetherwith a number of Asian states which have imported (or manu-factured their own) military and security equipment whichhave been used to violate human rights. The meeting pro-vides an ideal opportunity to combat the trade in repressionin Asia.
It is almost a Year since the world looked on in horror asarmed militia groups, assisted by the Indonesian securityforces, unleashed a wave of violence and unlawfUl killingsagainst the East Timorese people who were seeking independ-ence. Although the international community condemned theviolence — and the EU, USA and Australia finally imposedarms embargoes in September 1999 — for many it was too lit-tle, too late.
One of those was pro-independence activist BernardinoGuterres. The 25-year-old was seized on the streets of Dili on26 August 1999 by the Indonesian police, kicked and beaten.He knew his life was in danger and tried to flee. But as heran, a police officer shot him in the head.
The picture of his killing, published in Time magazine twoweeks later, showed the police officer with a weapon resem-bling an SSI-V1 assault rifle. These weapons had been man-tifsctured in Indonesia by PT Pindad under licence fr()rn theBelgian company EN Herstal.
Earlier in the year, on 15 July, the (Thief of the IndonesianArmed Forces admitted that a UK-made Hawk jet flew twiceover Dili ill a clear attempt to intimidate the populationbelow. The flyover occurred despite repeated assurances by
it II s .."
the Indonesian authorities that UK-supplied military equip-ment would not be used against civilians in East Tinuir.
Further evidence of foreign arms transfers aiding the
Palden Gyatso with the instruments with repression of East Timor arose when an Al research mission
which he was tortured in Nfav 1999 uncovered the casings of bullets for assault rifles
David Hqffmann left after an attack on civilians in Dili. The bullets had beenJD manufactured by the Finnish company Patria 1:aptia Oy.
During the 1990s, governments including those of the USA,Australia, Belgium, China, France, Germany and the UK
allowed arm(nired persontwl carriers, water cannon, fighterand transport aircraft, helicopters, light weapons, tear gas,enned control and other security equipment to be transferredto Indonesia. Over the last decade. many of these weaponshave been turned on political activists, journalists and humanrights workers in East Timor and elsewhere in Indonesia.
The case of East Timor is sadly not unique. Mass human
Com ba tir ights violations are still being carried out in many armed
n g conflicts around the world by government and armed opposi-
tion forces who are given virtually unrestricted access to small
A arms, light weapons and associated military equipment and sia's trade in training. Even in lands nominally at peace, the same easy availability
of small arms — pistols, assault rifles, sub-machine guns, land-
repression allows many governments to arbitrarily detain, murder, tor-mines, mortars — and of paramilitary equipment and services
lure and ill-treat th()se civilians identified as political oppo-nents. They know the arms supplies will continue.
Al is seeking to highlight the international complicity in
C
governments and companies who have placed electro-shocksuch human rights violations, and to shine a spotlight on those
batons in the hands of the torturer or sub-machine guns in the
security equipment, training and expertise are never sent tocountries where they will be used for human rights violati ons.
hands of the "death squads". Although Al takes no position onthe arms trade, the organization works to ensure that arms and
There are some items of equipment that Al considers tohave one primary use: to commit human rights violations.Equipment such as leg irons, shackles, thumbscrews, and
juIN 2000 Vol.30 No.4
D D • •
/et
landmines — in the mining of villages to
prevent resettlement and of border areas
to prevent refugee flows. Government
forces have also used civilians as a mine
removal tool — human mine-sweepers.
Other Asian states, such as China,
India, Pakistan and South Korea have
produced landmines for their own
national use. In March 1997, Pakistan
stated that it would observe a moratori-
um on the export of anti-personnel land-
mines. However, the state-owned
Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF) con-
tinued to advertise landmines in their
December 1998 brochure and 1999 cal-
endar. In December 1999, POF offered
to sell landmines to an investigative jour-
nalist posing as an arms dealer.
Indonesian army
officer examines machine guns
mounted on specially modified
jeeps C Reuters
F
electro-shock belts are used for torture
or ill-treatment and must be banned.
Gallows, the hangman's rope, gas cham-
bers, the guillotine, the electric chair
and other execution equipment must be
banned. Anti-personnel landmines must
be banned, and their manufacture, trans-
fer and use prohibited absolutely.
U undreds of thousands of men,
women and children have already
lost limbs, been deafened, blinded and
otherwise disabled by landmines. Every
year, landmines claim thousands of new
victims.
One of those is Yoeurng Choeurng,
aged 14, who lives with his grandfather
in Bang Ampil, to the west of
Battambang town in Cambodia. He said:
"My parents were killed in a landmine
accident in the 1980s. Since then my sister
and I have been living with my grandfather
here in Bang Ampil. We cannot return home
because there are so many mines in the village
where I lived with my parents. But there are
landmines here as well.
"My grandfather has lost his leg because he
was trying to rescue me. I stood on a mine
when I was herding cows that belong to a
neighbour I don't remember very much of
what happened. I was just walking with the
cows. I was bleeding and crying and my
grandfather saw me and came to help me but
he stood on a mine a,s well."
According to the Mines Advisory
Group, they had trodden on Type 72a
anti-personnel blast mines. They each
had one leg torn apart from below the
knee. A 1998 US State Department
report estimated that there were
between four to six million mines in
Cambodia. They were laid by both gov-
ernment and non-government armed •
forces. Thirty-six different types of land-
mines have been found in Cambodia —
mines which were manufactured in
Cambodia itself but also by China,
Hungary, the former Soviet Union,
Thailand, the USA and Viet Nam,
among many others. From 1971-75
alone, Cambodia imported over 622,000
landmines from the USA. Many of these
mines remain in the ground, waiting to
kill or maim.
Worldwide, there are more than 60
million landrnines in the ground. The
figure is notoriously hard to estimate as
the majority were laid at random. Mines
can be found anywhere — in fields, city
streets, along riverbanks, in wells, outside
schools, in villages and on roads used by
refugees.
To combat this scourge, more than
1,300 non-governmental organizations
(NG05) formed the International
Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL).
After an inspiring campaign, which
showed the power of worldwide public
opinion to influence governments, an
international treaty to ban the use, pro-
duction, stockpiling, sale, transfer or
export of landmines was signed in 1997.
It came into force on 1 March 1999. By
25 May 2000, 137 states had signed the
Mine Ban Treaty, but many have still to
sign — many of them major producers or
stockpilers such as China, India,
Pakistan, Russia and the USA. Eighteen
other Asian states have also yet to sign.
Al, as a supporter of the ICBL, has called
on all the world's governments to sign,
ratify and implement the Treaty and to
specifically ban the use, production,
stockpiling, sale and transfer of anti-
personnel landmines.
In some countries, the use of anti-
personnel mines is actually increasing. In
Myanmar, both the government forces
and military forces of different ethnic
groups reportedly use mines. It was
reported in January 1999 that Myanmar
government troops admitted to laying
7,000 mines since August 1998 along the
Thai border to deter an anticipated
advance by opposition forces. The 1999
ICBL Landmine Monitor reports that
government troops have specifically
targeted the civilian population with
I n December 1993, the Philippines re-
introduced the death penalty and the
government began a search for new exe-
cution equipment. Two years later, Al
contacted two US companies following
reports that they were considering the
sale of an electric chair and a gas cham-
ber to the Philippines. The spokesperson
of one company was reported as saying:
"Does it bother me? No, not really, I'm
not doing the executing."
In March 1996, President Fidel Ramos
of the Philippines signed a law allowing
execution by lethal injection (whereby a
prisoner is strapped to a bed and an
injection machine delivers a lethal cock-
tail of sodium thiopental, pancuronium
bromide and potassium chloride
through a needle in the arm. The pris-
oner dies of suffocation and cardiac
arrest). Although no details are available
of the origin of these injection devices,
such technology has been used in the
USA since lethal injection executions
began in 1977. Similar lethal injection
executions have subsequently taken
place in China and are planned in
Taiwan.
Since 1990 electro-shock torture andill-treatment have reportedly been
carried out in the prisons, detention
centres or police stations of at least 58
countries — including Afghanistan,
Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, the
Philippines, Sri Lanka and Taiwan. In
over 20 countries, hand-held electro-
shock batons specifically designed for
use on humans have been used.
"This is the worst thing — an electric cattle
prod. They use this on your body% If they press
that button, your whole body will be in shock.
If they do it for too long, you lose conscious-
ness but you do not die. If they press this but-
ton, you can die. They used it all the time on
my body. They tortured me because I was
speaking out for independence and I will con-
tinue to speak out."
These are the words of Palden Gyatso,
a Tibetan monk who had spent 33 years
in Chinese prison and labour camps. He
is one of numerous prisoners who have
suffered electro-shock torture at the
July 2000 Vol.30 No.4 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL FOCUS
hands of Chinese security forces. He fled
to India, smuggling with him some of
the electro-shock instruments which
have become a favoured tool of Chinese
torturers.
The fear and pain that flow from the
electro-shock baton have led other pris-
oners to acts of desperation. On 15
August 1996, (Then Longde, a pro-
democracy activist imprisoned at
Luoshan labour camp, was visited by one
of the prison guards. The guard kickedand punched him and then tortured
him with electric shocks from a baton.Two days later the guard with the shock
baton returned and the beatings
resumed. Chen Longde could take nomore. He jumped straight through a
third-storey window, driven to suicide by
his treatment. He survived the fall but
suffered serious injuries.
Electro-shock stun technology was ini-
tially developed in the USA during the
1970s. Al's research shows that during
the last decade over 120 companies,
operating in 22 countries, have manufac-tured, sold, advertised or sought to pro-
cure electro-shock weapons. One of
these countries, Taiwan, subsequentlybecame a leading producer and exporter
of electro-shock weapons, and a
Taiwanese company reportedly set up
manufacturing facilities in mainland
China. In 1995, the UK's role in this
trade was highlighted when the manag-
ing director of a Scottish company, ICLTechnical Plastics, admitted selling
electro-shock batons to China in 1990,
stating that: 'The Chinese wanted to
copy them." Chinese factories now mass
produce electro-shock batons. Reportsindicate that Chinese companies have
exported electro-shock weapons to
Cambodia and Indonesia — both coun-
tries where electro-shock torture hasbeen documented by AI. The uncon-
trolled trade in such weapons must be
halted. AI is campaigning for the imme-
diate global suspension of the manufac-
ture, export and use of electro-shockweapons until independent medical
investigations have been carried out intotheir use and effects.
killed and dozens more wounded.
According to one news report, police
spokesman Ghazali Mohamed Amin said
the operation was targeted at the
Acehnese "because they have been here
for too long."
Between late 1998 and 2000 a series of
predominantly peaceful demonstrations
in support of imprisoned former Deputy
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim were sup-
pressed with force by Malaysian police
using tear gas and water cannon spraying
water laced with chemical irritants.
Peaceful demonstrators were also beaten
by police wielding batons. In September
1999 a number of demonstrators were
reported to have been treated in hospital
for injuries caused by beatings and the
after-effects of the chemicals used in the
water cannon.
Amid mounting intimidation of civil-
ians by Indonesian militia and securityforces in East Timor, some 2,000 men,
women and children sought refuge in
the grounds of the Liquica Parish
Church, west of Dili. On 6 April 1999,
they were surrounded by members of the
security forces, including Brimob, the
Police Mobile Brigade, who fired tear gas
canisters into the church grounds to
flush the terrified and confused civiliansout into the open. Armed members of
the militia group Besi Merah Putih were
lying in wait. There have been reports
indicating that at least 200 people werekilled.
New techniques for crowd control are
evolving all the time. UK company
Cochrane has advertised a mobile carri-
er that, in 15 to 20 seconds, can eject
200 metres of razor wire sharp enough
to slice through human flesh. The
machine provides security forces with
the capacity to encircle an entiredemonstration in a ring of steel. Such a
system has already been marketed by
French, South African and UK compa-
nies and exported to several countrieswhere police have used excessive force
against peaceful protesters. Cochrane
has also advertised "electrocoil" — razor
wire with an electro-shock element of up
to 5,000 to 7,000 volts built in.
•
Telephone tapping, bugging devices,communication interception systems,
closed circuit television cameras and
vehicle recognition systems can also be
used to perpetuate human rights viola-
tions. They allow security forces to moni-
tor, track and better target for action
individuals deemed to be a threat to the
state. Sometimes such targets are human
rights workers, trade unionists, students
and parliamentarians.
In July 1997, Aberson Sihaloho, a
member of Indonesia's national parlia-
ment, was sentenced to nine months in
prison for "insulting" former President
Suharto. He was one of 200 hundred
people arrested for speaking at a Free
Speech Forum following the ousting of
Megawati Sukarnoputri, leader of the
main opposition party. Videotape was
used in evidence at Aberson Sihaloho's
trial which, according to his lawyers,
could easily have been re-edited. A mem-
ber of the Indonesian Armed Forces, tes-
tifying for the prosecution, said he had
been ordered to monitor and tape the
proceedings of the Forum.
There have been unconfirmed reports
that Indonesian security forces have used
state-of-the-art telephone tapping and
call monitoring systems to help pressur-
ize people during interrogations by con-fronting them with details of the people
they have telephoned or who have tele-
phoned them.
Sometimes technology with a legiti-
mate civilian use is abused by securityforces to aid their task of repression. In
the days following the massacre in
Beijing on 4 June 1989, the Chinese
authorities used images from a comput-
erized closed circuit television system —
originally supplied by the USA and theUK with World Bank assistance to be
Malaysian police advancing with tear gas
and water cannon at a peaceful demonstra-
tion on 26 September 1998
11 • '• •"• D•
A lthough security equipment such aswater cannon, tear gas and plastic
bullets may in certain limited circum-
stances have a legitimate use, evidence
shows that such equipment is also being
used to punish peaceful protest and facil-
itate human rights violations. Despite
this evidence, foreign companies and
governments have been busy marketing
and selling crowd control equipment to
countries such as Malaysia and
Indonesia.
On 26 March 1998, Malaysian police
officers, wielding batons and armed with
water cannons and tear gas, entered the
Semenyih detention camp intending to
forcibly repatriate hundreds of asylum-
seekers who had fled the repression inAceh. A riot ensued in which at least
eight refugees and a policeman were
• •
. A•
used for traffic control. Security forces
created instant "wanted" posters from
close-up frozen images of student
activists which were broadcast on state-
run television with a telephone number
asking viewers to report those portrayed.
Arrests of prisoners of conscience and
unfair trials followed. The authorities
also broadcast footage which had been
carefully edited and manipulated to
show "counter-revolufionary" demonstra-
tors as the instigators of the violence in
efforts to justify thc crackdown. In 1993,
a similar "traffic control" system was
installed in Lhasa, capital of Tibet
Autonomous Region. The system had
been installed in the central square — a
pedestrianized area, not known for its
traffic problems but an area where
Tibetan pro-independence demonstra-
tions have taken place.
, , • • •,
A is not just concerned about theexport of arms and security equip-
ment but also the transfer of personnel,
expertise and training. A number of gov-
ernments such as the USA and the UK
train the military, security and police
forces of Asian nations. Unless such
training is stringently controlled there is
a danger of it being used to facilitate
human rights violations. However, much
of this training occurs in secret so that
the public and parliamentari-
ans rarely discover who is
being trained in what and by
whom.
After the 1991 massacre in
Dili, East Timor — where
mourners attending the
funeral of a Timorese inde-
pendence activist were killed
by Indonesian security forces
— US military training for
Indonesia was cut. In 1995,
the US Congress agreed to
re-establish a limited pro-
gram of training in human
rights. However, in March
1998, leaked official docu-
ments revealed that the US
government had secretly
begun to train the
Indonesian army — including its notori-
ous special forces command, Kopassus —
in close quarters combat, sniper tech-
niques, demolitions, psychological and
urban operations. Following the mass
human rights violations in East Timor,
US military assistance was cut again on 9
September 1999. However, on 23 May
2000. the NPW YOrk TinteC reported that
the USA had resumed military coopera-
tion with Indonesia — inviting military
observers to,joint exercises in Thailand.
Private companies have also been
involved in the provision of such train-
ing. The UK company Nitor has devel-
oped a computerized training program
for marksmen with technical advice from
a UK police force — some scenarios
include trainees firing on unarmed civil-
ians. A version has been supplied to the
Indonesian military. Nitor has also pro-
vided training facilities for the Malaysian
special forces, the Hong Kong Police
and the Singapore Police. While such
training may have the potential to bene-
fit communities by providing better
skilled police and security forces, those
giving such training must ensure that it
does not contribute to human rights vio-
lations. Public transparency and account-
ability, together with screening of stu-
dents and stringent end-use monitoring
is essential to ensure that such expertise
transfers, whether by governments or
private companies, do not result in
human rights violations.
In February 1997, Al reported on seri-ous human rights violations in
Bougainville, Papua New Guinea (PNG),
by thc Defence Force and government-
backed Paramilitary Resistance Forces.
At least 44 people had been unlawfnlly
killed or had "disappeared" in 1996
Acme but no onc had been bniught to
account. Instead, in March 1997, UK-
based security consultant Sandline
International was brought in by the PNG
government to provide military training,
expertise, advice and equipment for
operations on Bougainville. When the
move became known it caused a military
revolt within the defence forces and the
44 foreign trainers were forced to leave.
Private military and security compa-
nies operate outside the normal criminal
. justice system and on the fringes of mili-
tary command structures. If human
rights violations result from their deploy-
ment it is much harder to hold them to
account than the regular security forces,
not least because such personnel can
leave the country at any time. Al believes
that such companies must be registered
and that they require government
authorization for any transfer of person-
nel or training.
•
I •
T he effective control of the arms andsecurity' trade is not something that
can be left in the hands of governments
alone. Civil society and the NGO move-
ment in particular must continually keep
the pressure on governments to abide by
their international commitments and the
promises they gave to protect their citi-
zens under the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights and in the Geneva
ConvenMins.
Al members across the world are now
lobbying for strict and effective national
and regional controls on military, securi-
ty and police transfers. Controls which
are transparent. accountable and will
ensure that states are never allowed to
export weapons, training or personnel to
customers who might use them to violate
human rights.
If you wish to become part of an AIactivist network in your country to cam-
paign on issues relating to the arms and
security trade, please contact us now.
Either email us at: MSP4amnesty.org
or write to:
Military. Security and Police Team,
Amnesty International,
International Secretariat,
1 Easton Street. London WC1X ODW,
United Kingdom.
Right, Brochure advertizing electro-
shock batons
July 2000 VoL30 No.4 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL FOCUS
W6DRLDWIDEappeals
A
HONDURAS STILL NO JUSTICE IN
LOCANDER OBANDO REYES, a 17-year-
old orphan, was shot dead on 10
April 1999 in a public park in
Tegucigalpa, capital of Honduras.
According to reports, a police officer was
responsible for his death.
Alexander Obando and a friend fell
into an argument with the officer, who
fired "warning shots" into the air. When
the boys tried to escape in a taxi, the
officer fired at the vehicle and then at
Alexander Obando as he tried to get out,
hitting him in the abdomen and chest.
The policeman fled and Alexander
Obando was taken to hospital where he
died the following day.
Six prosecutors from the Public
Ministry's Office of the Special
Prosecutor for Human Rights have been
involved in the case. Reportedly, a wit-
ness has identified the police officer
POLICE SHOOTING OF CHILD
responsible, and a ballistics test showed
that the bullets came from the rifle
assigned to the identified officer. Despite
this, no measures have been taken to
detain him.
AI continues to receive information
about serious human rights violations
against children in Honduras, including
police shootings. The persistence of such
abuses highlights the failure of the
authorities to adequately train law
enforcement officials, to investigate
reported abuses in which state agents are
allegedly involved, and to effectively
prosecute those responsible.
Please write, calling for an independ-
ent and impartial investigation into the
death of Alexander Obando Reyes and
for his killer to be brought to justice.
Express concern, too, at the illegal use of
firearms by police officers in situations
where the vic-
tim is neither
armed nor a
threat to oth-
ers. Send
appeals to: SE
Carlos Roberto
Flores Facussé,
Presidente de
la Republica de
Honduras,
Casa
Presidencial,
Tegucigalpa, Honduras (fax: +504 235
6949/234 1484, e-mail: law_bureau@hot-
mail.com).
For further information, see Honduras:
Human rights violations against children —
update (Al Index: AMR 37/02/00).
MYANMAR TEACHER IMPRISONED FOR HUSBAND'S POLITICAL ACTIVITIES
MA KHIN RHIN LEH, a teacher, andher three-year-old daughter were
arrested in July 1999 along with 17 others,
in Bago, central Myanmar. Her daughter
was subsequently released, but Ma Khin
Khin Leh was sentenced to life imprison-
ment.
Ma Khin Khin Leh's husband, Kyaw
Wunna, is a member of the All Burma
Federation of Student Unions. He and
other pro-democracy activists in Bago
were planning a peaceful march on 19
July, the 52nd anniversary of the assas-
sination of independence hero General
Aung San, the father of Daw Aung San
Sim Kyi, leader of Myanmar's main
opposition party, the National League
for Democracy.
T ADIGBE TRAORE was suspended by herhands and feet by four soldiers, while
a further two inflicted 50 lashes on her
back and buttocks. She told an AI dele-
gation visiting Guinea recently that this
agonizing ordeal lasted more than 10
minutes, and was then repeated a few
hours later. She was unable to lie on her
back for several days afterwards.
Tadigbe Traore, a member of the
opposition Rassemblement do peuple de
Guime (RPG), Guinean People's Rally,
had been arrested on 21 December 1998
while attending a march calling for the
release of Alpha Conde, President of the
Pamphlets were distributed prior to the
planned march, and the local Military
Intelligence began to look for Kyaw
Wunna. On 19 July, when they could not
locate him, they arrested Ma Khin Khin
Leh and their daughter, Thaint Wanna
Khin. Her daughter was released after five
days, but Ma Khin Khin Leh and others
arrested in subsequent days were taken to
Military Intelligence headquarters in
Bago.
Ma Khin Khin Leh was transferred to
Insein Prison in Yangon and on 3
December she was sentenced to life
imprisonment for "disrupting security"
and "contact with illegal organizations".
In January 2000 she was transferred to
an undisclosed prison. She suffers from a
RPG. She was released without charge
after four days.
Alpha Conde had been arrested in
December 1998 and accused, with 47
other detainees, of attempting to desta-
bilize Guinea. Al considers him a prisoner
of conscience. His trial began in April
2000. During the march hundreds of peo-
ple, including women, were arrested and
tortured. Some of the women told an Al
delegation that they had been subjected
to torture, including rape, while held at
the military barracks at Kankan. Most of
them were released within days of their
arrest but others spent more than three
lung problem
and it is not
known if she is
receiving med-
ical care.
7 Please write,
asking for her
immediate and
unconditional
release as a
prisoner of
conscience.
Send appeals
to: Colonel
Hla Min, Office of Strategic Studies,
Department of International Affairs, c/o
Ministry of Defence, Signal Pagoda
Road, Yangon, Union of Myanmar.
months in detention and were sentenced
to prison terms after unfair trials.
Please write, asking for prompt and
impartial investigations into these allega-
tions of torture and calling for those
responsible to be brought to justice. Send
appeals to: Son Excellence le General de
Brigade, Lansana Conte, Président de la
Republique et Chef du gouvernement,
Presidence de la Republique, Conakry,
Guinea (fax: +224 41 16 73), and to: Son
Excellence, Monsieur Maurice Zoglemou
Togba, Ministre de la Justice, Ministere
de la Justice, Conakry, Guinea (fax: +224
41 16 17).
GUINEA WOMEN TORTURED AFTER DEMONSTRATION
Ma Khin Khin Leh with her
husband and daughter
An appeal to theauthorities am helpthe vms ofhuman rightsviolations whosestories are told here.You am help free aprisoner o f am-science or stoptorture. You ambring liberty to avidim
"disappearance".You may prevent anexecution. Everyappeal counts.
Remember:Al nwmbers shouldnot take up casesfrom their owncountries.
AMNESTY INTERNATIONALAPPEALS July 2000 Vol.30 No.4
MEXICOPEASANT ENVIRONMENTALISTS DETAINED AND TORTURED
is published in cpArabic, English,and French tohring you newsof Alis concernsand campaignsworldwide, aswell as in-depthreports.Available fromAmnestyInternational(address below)
Rodolfo Montiel Flores (top) andTeodoro Cabrera Garcia CA/
MALAYSIAOPPOSITION LEADERSCHARGED WITH SEDITION
N A CASE CARRYING SERIOUS IMPLICATIONS
for the independence of lawyers inMalaysia and their ability to carry outtheir duties free of fear of intimidation,Karpal Singh, leading human rightslawyer and Deputy Chairman of theDemocratic Action Party (DAP). is dueto go on trial in July on charges of sedi-tion.
The charge followed a statement hemade in court while acting as the leaddefence counsel in the trial of AnwarIbrahim (former Deputy Prime Minister)in September 1999. He claimed thatsomebody may have poisoned AnwarIbrahim with arsenic, and he feared that"people its high places" might be respon-sible. The charge against Karpal Singhthreatens Anwar Ibrahim's right to a fairtrial, and contravenes internationalhuman rights standards. Karpal Singh isa former prisoner of conscience — he wasimprisoned without trial in 1987 underthe Internal Security Act.
The prosecutions of Marina Yusoffand Mohamad Ezam Noor, respectivelyVice-President and Youth Leader of theopposition Path Keadilan Nasional,
National Justice Party, are other recentexamples of what AI believes to bc thegovernment's selective and politicallymotivated use of restrictive laws. MarinaYusoff has been charged with seditionand Mohamad Ezam Noor has beencharged under the Official Secrets Act.Both pleaded not guilty.
R ODOLFO MONTIEL FLORES AND TEODOROCabrera Garcia have languished inprison srace their arbitrary arrest by theMexican army over a year ago. Theyhave been forced under torture to signselkncriminating statements andcharged with crimes they have notcommitted.
Founders of Ilse Organi:aenen de
Compesinas Ecologistas de la Sierra de
Petalkin Coynca de Catakin, PeasantEnvironmentalist Organization of theMountains of Petatkin and (;ovuca de(:atalan, Rodolfo Montiel and TeodoroCabrera were arbitrarily detained afterleading a campaign against excessive log-ging in Guerrero state, which was threat-ening the environment and the liveli-hood of local peasant communities.Following a number of peaceful demon-strations by the organization, protestersbegan to receive threats. A locallandowner reportedly accused them ofbelonging to an armed oppositiongroup, following which army units sta-tioned in the state reportedly initiated acampaign of harassment against theorganization's MCITIhers.
Rodolfo Monne] cenivened a meetingof peasant farmers in the village ofPizotla on 2 May 1999. It was here that
• ••
Karpal Singh's arrest in January 1999
Opposition newspapers have alsocome trader attack: Zulkifli Sulong andCheah Lim Thye, respectively editor andpublisher of tlw opposition Parti IslamicSeMalaysia newspaper Harakah, went ontrial in May, charged with publishing aseditious article. If convicted and impris-oned, Al would Oillsider all of the ahtweprisoners of conscience.
Under the current broadly definedterms of the Sedition Act, both govern-ment and opposition figures have madestatements in the course of public andelectoral debate which could be inter-preted as potentially seditious.However, only opposition membershave been charged. deepening con-cerns that these prosecutions are a pre-text to curb the peaceful expression ofdissenting opinion.
he and Teodoro (:abrera were arrestedby members of the army, who allegedlyshot dead another of the villagers. Theywere held in incommunicado detentionfor five days, during which time theywere reptrtedly tied and beaten, andwere subjected to mock executions inorder to extract self-incriminating state-ments. They were subsequently chargedwith drugs offences and illegal petsses-Sion of weapons.
Three organizations: AI. Sierra Club —a US environmental non-governmentalorganization — and thc Miguel AgustinPro jutirez Human Rights Centre fromMexico,,joined forces in April 2000 topublish an open letter in the Mexicanmagazine Prows° and newspaper ReJorma,
addressed to President Ernest() Zedillo,calling for the immediate and uncondi-tional release of the two men as prison-ers of conscience.
On 6 April, Rodolfo Montiel wasawarded the Goldman environmentalprize of USS125.000, with which he plansto create a trust for the purchase ofgation equipment in the regi(in wherehe lives. His wife, who collected theaward on Isis behalf, said: 1\7e arc proudof our Rodolfo, but I hope this prizedoesn't end up getting hins killed."
UZBEKISTANGOOD NEWS!
A RSEN ARUTYUNYAN AND DANIS SIRAZHEY( see li'orlflwide .-Appeals„ipril 2000)
have had their death sentences commut-ed. The two men were transferred fromtheir death cell in a pristra in Tashkentto a pristra colony 111 the town ofAndizhan in May.
Arsen Arutvurwan's sister wrote: "Hadit not been for the work of your organ-izatitm, your approaches to the media,your persistent work, we couldn't havehoped for a good outcome. When I firstturned to you, my whole family and Iwere desperate and, to tell the truth,didn't think that anything or anybodycould help. But the miracle came true,a miracle worked not by God, but bypeople."
Thanks to all who sent appeals.
marsly International, 1 Easton Street. I,ndon tILl S MM. 1 "sited kingdom. E-mail: stioletbe-bamneity.org: http://zeuheamnestr.mg
Printed in the k Interlace. :Available on .mh.teriplirm at £7 (n412.0(1) fe, one spar ISSN 0308 h,S87. AI Index: .VIIS 21 /04 /0(1