army social media_campaign_(final)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation of PR Campaign for The United States ArmyTRANSCRIPT
Army Seeks Recruits in Social Media
06 JUN 2011
Social Media Campaign AnalysisRon Algood & Tony Stickeler
Social Media Campaign
SITUATION:
Traditional advertisement methods (television commercials, radio, and news print) are not as successful at reaching a target audience as the emerging social media sites.
When our country is at war or involved in overseas conflicts, recruiting numbers tend to drop.
It has become more imperative to broadcast the Army message correctly and efficiently, but also to distribute the message by people of similar age groups that are already involved (in this new media.)
Campaign Objectives
• RAISE AWARENESS • CHANGE ATTITUDES & BELIEFS towards the U.S. ARMY by highlighting the positive aspects of a soldier’s life to include:
I. EducationII. Leadership, andIII. Opportunity
MAIN OBJECTIVE: To build onto the current campaign theme/image “Army Strong,” that was introduced in 2006 and add a stronger focus on the Army uniform as a “symbol of strength” as well as gain new members in social media sites to “extend the dialog.”
Twitter Home Page
Social Media Sites
Social Media Sites
Arm
y Stron
g Blog
Social Media Sites
EvaluationSWOT ANALYSIS (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats)
INTERNAL
Strengths:• Campaign has a well established target market (potential recruits are age 17-24 years old)• The uniform = a strong symbol of patriotism / coincides with “Army Strong” campaign• Solid financial resources (The Government) to fund the campaign• Co-op advertising with Hollywood films during the summer / peak movie season
Weakness:• Seven agencies participating in campaign / strategy could become fragmented• Army Accessions Command are not Twitter savvy / could lack source credibility• The movie portion of the campaign lacks control / what happens if the movie flops?• Real soldiers communicating with potential soldiers / relinquished oversight and control
EvaluationSWOT ANALYSIS (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats)
EXTERNAL
Opportunities:• Chance to expand target audience beyond typical demographics • As unemployment remains high, the military continues to be an attractive option• Good timing / the interactive media market is growing at a blistering pace • The growth of PR (24 percent over the next ten years) reinforces the campaign validity
Threats:• Campaign funding could be affected by defense budget cuts• Campaign could be subjected to clutter / too much information in the digital world• Extended foreign wars abroad could negate a positive military image• A change in leadership (like the 2012 elections) could lead to a change in policy
EvaluationUsing Professor Kirk Hallahan’s Integrated PR Media Model
CHARACTERISTIC PUBLIC MEDIA INTERACTIVE MEDIA CONTROLLED MEDIA EVENTS/GROUPS ONE-ON-ONE Key use Build awareness Respond to queries;
exchange information Promotion; provide detailed information
Motivate attendees; reinforce attitudes
Obtain commitments; resolve problems
Examples Newspapers, magazines, radio, TV
Computer-based: WWW; databases; email listservs; newsgroups; chat rooms; bulletin boards
Brochures, newsletters, sponsored magazines, annual reports, books, direct mail, point-of-purchase displays, video-brochures
Speeches, exhibits, meetings/conferences, demonstrations, rallies, sponsorships, anniversaries
Personal visits, lobbying, personal letters, telephone calls, telemarketing
Nature of Communication
Nonpersonal Nonpersonal Nonpersonal Quasi-personal Personal
Direction of Communication
One-way Quasi-two-way One-way Quasi-two-way Two-way
Technological Sophistication
High High Moderate Moderate Low
Channel ownership Media organizations Common carrier or institution
Sponsor Sponsor or other organization
None
Messages chosen by: Third parties and producers
Receiver Sponsor Sponsor or join organization
None
Audience involvement Low High Moderate Moderate High
Reach High Moderate-low Moderate-low Low Low Cost per impression High Moderate-low Moderate-low Low Low Key challenges to effectiveness
Competition, media clutter
Availability, accessibility
Design, distribution Attendance, atmosphere Empowerment, personal
CHARACTERISTIC INTERACTIVE MEDIA Key use Respond to queries; exchange information Examples Computer-based: WWW; databases; email
listservs; newsgroups; chat rooms; bulletin boards
Nature of Communication Nonpersonal (DON’T AGREE!)Direction of Communication
Quasi-two-way
Technological Sophistication
High
Channel ownership Common carrier or institution Messages chosen by: Receiver Audience involvement High Reach Moderate-low Cost per impression Moderate-low Key challenges to effectiveness Availability, accessibility
EvaluationPERSONAL OVERALL ASSESSMENT
The U.S. Army is gaining hundreds + of fans (Facebook), followers (Twitter), and bloggers DAILY through the vast amount of social media sites.
According to Kantar Media, the shift to this new media unit is saving the Army $168.7 million in 2007 to $41.8 million last year.
The personal nature of communication in advertisements and the interactive sites increases the likely hood of accomplishing the campaign objectives.
Main Objectives: To enhance the current campaign theme/image “Army Strong,” that was introduced in 2006 and add a stronger focus on the Army uniform as a “symbol of strength” as well as gain new members in social media sites to “extend the dialog.”
ENDQuestions? Tony Stickeler
Wordpress https://stickeler.wordpress.com
Twitter@TStickeler
LinkedInTony Stickeler
Ron AlgoodWordpress https://ralgood.wordpress.com
Twitter @ralgood
LinkedInralgood