arm: north south road corridor investment program tranche 2 · z ze o vo ui de Àelop ue vt a vd...

Social Monitoring Report Final Compliance Report October 2014

ARM: North–South Road Corridor Investment

Program–Tranche 2

Subsection 3: Agarak, Aghdzq, Ujan, and Kosh (km 31+140 – km 46+208)

Subsection 2: Talin (km 69+700 – km 69+710)

Prepared by “North–South Road Corridor Investment Program Implementation Organization” State Non-Commercial Organization and Economic Development and Research Center for the Republic of Armenia and the Asian Development Bank.

This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

E o o i De elop e t a d ‘esear h Ce ter , .EDRC.am

2

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................... ................................................... .............................. 5

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................... ................................................... ....................7

II. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE COMPLIANCE REPORT ................................................... .......................... 8

III. COMPLIANCE REVIEW METHODOLOGY ................................................... ................................................ 9

IV. COMPLIANCE REVIEW FINDINGS ................................................... ................................................... ..... 11

A. ASSESSMENT OF THE LARP IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES ................................................... ...........11

a) Policy and Operational Procedures ................................................... ............................................. 11

b) Determination of the Actual Scope of Project Impact ................................................... ................. 11

c) Minimizing Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impact ................................................... ............... 17

B. ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION DELIVERY ................................................... ................................... 18

a) Compensation Eligibility ................................................... ................................................... .......... 18

b) Compensation for Permanent Loss of Land ................................................... ................................. 18

c) Compensation for Affected Crops, Trees and Vineyards ................................................... .............. 21

d) Compensation for Leaseholders and Informal Tenants ................................................... ............... 23

e) Compensation Entitlements for Vulnerable groups ................................................... ..................... 25

f) Entitlements for the Cases of Severe Impact ................................................... ............................... 26

g) Entitlements for the Cases of Relocation ................................................... .................................... 27

h) Compensation for Buildings and Structures Loss ................................................... ......................... 28

i) Compensation for Business and Employment Loss ................................................... ...................... 29

j) Summary of LARP Implementation Actual Budget in the 3rd Subsection ........................................ 30

k) “u a of LARP I ple e tatio A tual Budget i the d “u se tio ’s Tali o u it k 69+700 – k + a d ases u de the d “u se tio ’s A tio Pla .............................................. 32

C. COMPENSATION DELIVERY PROCESS ................................................... .................................................. 34

a) Public Consultations and Awareness Raising ................................................... ............................... 34

b) Complaints & Grievance Redress Mechanism ................................................... ............................. 34

c) Expropriation and Measures taken ................................................... ............................................. 36

d) D. ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC SATISFACTION ................................................... ................................. 38

V. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT ................................................... ................................................ 40

Appe di . PMU: Refe e e o T LARP i ple e tatio p og ess as of . . i A e ia ........ 43

Appendix 2. PMU: E pla atio of ha ges of P oje t LAR i pa ts a d o pe satio p i es e e ged du i g the T LARP i ple e tatio ................................................... ................................................... ................ 46

Appendix 3. PMU: App oa hes app o ed ADB a d to e app o ed GoA ega di g so e ases e e ged du i g the LARP i ple e tatio ................................................... ................................................... ........... 47

Appendix 4. Sample Copies of the Land, Business and Structures Description Protocols ................................ 49

Appendix 5. Sample Copy of Contract on Acquisition of Property for Public and State Purposes (in Armenian) ....... 59

Appendix 6. Sample Copy of Agreement on Additional Compensation of APs for Acquisition of Property for

Public and State Purposes (in Armenian) ................................................... ................................................... . 63

Appendix 7. Sample Copy of Valuation Report (in Armenian) ................................................... ..................... 65

Appendix 8. PMU: Action Plan and Timetable for Unresolved cases ................................................... ........... 74


3

Appendix 9. Confirmation Letter by PMU on Corrective Measures (in Armenian) .......................................... 87

Appe di . PMU: Refe e e o the implementation status of Corrective Measures under the 3rd

Subsection's p eli i a Co plia e Repo t i A e ia ................................................... ...................... 89

Appe di . PMU: Refe ence on Tranche 2 (Ashtarak-Tali LARP I ple e tatio “tatus i A e ia . 93

A) The implementation status of Action plan for the 2nd Subsection's LARP implementation ................ 93

B) The Compensation and Expropriation procedures initiated under the Action Plan for the 3rd

Subsection's LARP implementation ................................................... ................................................... . 95

Appe di . PMU: Refe e e o the Fi al A tio Pla a d Co e ti e Measu es u de the d subsection's Final Compliance Report (in Armenian) ................................................... .................................. 97

A) The Final Action Plan under the 3rd Subsection's Compliance Report ............................................... 98

B) The Final List of Corrective Measures under the 3rd Subsection's Compliance Report ....................... 98


4

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AHs Affected Households

AMD Armenian Dram

AP Affected Person

DMS Detailed Measurement Survey

EA Executing Agency (also MOTC)

EDRC Economic Development and Research Center

EM External monitoring

CR Compliance Review

FGD Focus Group Discussion

GoA Government of Armenia

GRG Grievance Redress Group

HH Household

IA Implementing Agency

IT Implementation Team

IMA Independent Monitoring Agency

LAR Land Acquisition & Resettlement

LARF Land Acquisition & Resettlement Framework

LARP Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan

LGBs Local Self- Governing Bodies

M&E Monitoring & Evaluation

MFF Multi-Tranche Financing Facility

MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communications

NGO Non-Government Organization

NSRC North-South Road Corridor

NSS National Statistical Service

PC Public Consultancy

PGC Project Governing Council

PRAs Participatory Rapid Appraisals

PKs Road Pickets

PMU Project Management Unit

PMC Project Management Consultant

KIIs Key Informant Interviews

RA Republic of Armenia

RP Resettlement Plan

SCREC State Committee of Real Estate Cadastre of the GoA

SES Socio-Economic Survey

SEU Social and Environmental Unit

SNCO State Non-Commercial Organization

SPS Safeguard Policy Statement

T2 Second Tranche of the North-South Road Corridor Investment Program


5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Tranche 2 of the North-South Road Corridor Investment Program covers Ashtarak-Talin section of

about 42 km of existing M1 highway (km 29+600 - 71+500). The civil works within the framework of the

Tranche 2 require substantial land acquisition and resettlement. The Government of Armenia approved the

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) of Tranche 2 in September 2012.

The Tranche-2 LARP is being implemented by 3 separate subsections. LARP implementation in Subsections

1 and 2 started in October 2012: it was completed in January 2013 in Subsection 1 and in July 2013 - in

Subsection 2. The 3rd Subsection covers 15.068 km (km 31+140 – 46+208) with 4 rural communities:

Agarak, Aghdzq, Ujan and Kosh. LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection started in April 2013 and

completed in August 2014.

The E o o i De elop e t a d Resea h Ce te EDRC se ed as a I depe de t Mo ito i g Age (IMA) and carried out the external monitoring of the LARP. To that end, desk reviews and field visits were

carried out, project documents were studied, and relevant data was collected and analyzed. In addition,

the following documents were studied: Monthly Progress Report № , as well as Final Report on LARP

Implementation (as of November 2013) of the Implementation Team; Semi-Annual Internal Monitoring

Report (for April-September, 2013) of the PMU; References on LARP implementation Progress of the

PMU. In addition, the IMA conducted Compliance Review Survey utilizing the stratified, random selection

techniques, and used Compliance Review Survey Questionnaire, as face-to-face interview instrument with

AH members, to determine the APs satisfaction.

The present Final Compliance Report summarizes the results and findings of the Compliance

Review/External Monitoring. The Report provides description of external monitoring process and

comparative analysis of the entitlements stipulated under the LARP and results of land acquisition and

delivery of compensations for the 3rd Subsection of the Tranche 2. The Report presents satisfaction of APs,

and draws lessons and recommendations for further improvements.

LARP implementation on Subsection 3 was implemented in 2 stages, the first of which was implemented

during April-September 2013 and the second one was implemented from September 2013 to August

2014. The monitoring results of the LARP implementation of the first stage were summarized by IMA in

No e e i P eli i a Co plia e Repo t fo “u se tio . As pe the esults of o ito i g of the mentioned stage: (i) the list of Corrective Measures to be implemented by PIU was defined (ii) the

Action Plan for lands in-process of acquisition for Subsection 3 was developed.

This Report summarizes the results and findings of the Compliance Review/External Monitoring of: (i)

LARP implementation on the 3rd Subsection; (ii) LARP implementation for Talin community (km 69+700 –

km 69+710) road PK under the 2nd Subsection; (iii) LARP implementation for cases regulated by the

Action Plan under the 2nd Subsection.

The IMA revealed that compensations for informal tenant in Aghdzq community (1 AH), as well as

compensation to a private land owner in Kosh (1 AH) do not comply with what was envisaged under the

LARP. Moreover, IMA revealed that severe impact allowance was paid to Kosh community, which, again,

does not comply with the LARP requirements.

Under recommended Corrective Measures, the PMU intends to implement the following measures: a)

payment of compensation to the private land owner in Kosh for the loss of wood trees and vineyards, as

well as payment of severe impact allowance, b) payment of compensation to the informal tenant on

Aghdzq community land for the Program severe impact, c) supplemental agreement to be signed with the

Kosh community to receive back the severe impact allowance (see Appendix 12, letter from the PMU

dated September 26, 2014).


6

As a consequence, based on detailed monitoring and evaluation of the project implementation data and

applied procedures the IMA states that, after the completion of Corrective Measures, LARP

implementation in Subsection 3 (except for the cases subject to regulation under PMU Final Action Plan)

can be considered as compliant with the stipulations of the LARF/ LARP and in adherence of the SPS and

ADB guidelines, and with the satisfaction of the APs. All AHs, who signed contracts, have received cash

compensation. For each AP under the Expropriation process, compensation amounts were lodged with

courts. In accordance with the defined policy and operational procedures, Compensation program for

the 3rd

Subsection (except for the cases subject to regulation under the PMU Action Plan) should be

considered efficiently completed.


7

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND

1. The Government of Armenia initiated North-South Road Corridor Investment Program (the Program).

North-South road corridor extends for 556 km, starting from Bavra (a neighbouring area of Georgia)

lasting to Gyumri, Talin, Yerevan, Goris and Kapan, and ends in Meghri (next to the border of Iran). The

Asian Development Bank (ADB) agreed to support the RA Government in this initiative. In particular, the

ADB has agreed to provide with a US$ 500 million Multi-Tranche Financing Facility, to finance the

Program. The RA Ministry of Transport and Communication (MOTC) has been assigned to be an

E e uti g Age fo the P og a , a d the No th-“outh Road Co ido I est e t P og a PMU SNCO - I ple e ti g Age .

2. The Program is implemented by separate financial tranches. The Tranche 2 (the T2) of the Program starts

at km 29+600 in Ashtarak and ends at km 71+500 near Talin. The principal goal of the T2 is to build a

4-lane dual carriageway road along the existing M1 highway between the Ashtarak and Talin section of

about 42 km (Km 29+600 - 71+500).

Figure 1: Tranche 2 Project Location

3. Two bypasses will be constructed in Agarak starting at km 29+934 to km 32+600, and in Ujan from km

36+600 to km 40+300. The T2 Project will also have a new road alignment (8.95 kilometres) at Verin

Sasnashen starting from km 59+950 to km 68+900 that will be located on the left side of the existing

highway and re-join the existing alignment near Talin. There are three deviations from the line of the

existing road: one at each of the communities of Agarak and Ujan, which are aimed at improving the

safety of the community by moving the high speed traffic away from the developed existing road; and to

avoid the sensitive archaeological site of Zakari Berd, near the community of Katnaghbyur. T2 includes

the provision of 18 agricultural underpasses of which 8 are 3m high x 5m wide for animals and

pedestrians, and 10 which are 4.5m high x 6m wide for agricultural machinery. The nine grade separated

interchanges provide connection between the new highway and the local roads and communities. Three

of these interchanges comprise over-bridges and the remaining six are underpasses.

4. The Civil works within the framework of the T2 require substantial land acquisition and resettlement,

therefore the T2 P oje t has ee lassified as Catego A for the involuntary resettlement safeguard

ased o ADB’s Ope atio Ma ual OM Section F1/OP (2013)1. The MOTC has prepared Land

Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) for the T2, which has been approved by the Government of

Armenia in September 2012.

1 As per the ADB Operation Manual (OM) Section F1/OP (2013 a p oje t is lassified as Catego A if or more Affected

Persons suffer significant impacts (relocation or loss of 10% or more of productive assets).


8

5. The purpose of the LARP is to identify all those who will be affected by the construction of the T2

highway, assess the extent of the affect, and how they will be compensated to ensure that they are not

adversely affe ted o left i a o se situatio tha i a ithout p oje t situatio .

6. According to the LARP the entire impact along the T2 road entails the acquisition of 1,734,144 sq. m of

land in 15 villages and 1 town community that equalled a total of 838 land plots. In total, the T2 affects

536 AHs comprising 2,263 APs (including owners, leaseholders and informal tenants). Among them

severely affected will be 326 AHs, including 324 AHs who will lose more than 10% of their agricultural

land and 2 AHs who will have to be relocated.

7. The Tranche 2 LARP is being implemented subsection by subsection. The 3rd Subsection covers 15.068

km (road sections km 31+140 - 46+208) within 4 rural communities. The scope of LARP impacts of the

3rd Subsection accounts for 47.1 % of total land plots, 37.1 % of total land areas, and 51.1% of total

affected households.

Table 1: Road Pickets for the 3rd Subsection communities

N Community Road PKs

1 Agarak km 31+140 – km 33+512

2 Aghdzq km 33+512 – km 36+961

3 Ujan km 36+961 – km 40+563

4 Kosh km 40+563 – km 46+208

8. The i ple e tatio of the LARP as o ito ed oth i te all a d e te all . The E o o i De elop e t a d Resea h Ce te EDRC se es as a I depe de t Mo ito i g Age IMA a d is implementing the External monitoring of the LARP.

9. The Inception Report of IMA (approved by PMU and ADB) serves as a key methodological base for

implementation of the External Monitoring. The IMA monitored LARP implementation for the 3rd

Subsection in detail and documented its findings in t his Final Compliance Report. The Final Compliance

Report is communicated to PMU (MOTC) and ADB.

II. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE COMPLIANCE REPORT

10. The External Monitoring of the LARP for the Tranche 2 of the North-South Road Corridor Investment

Program entails short-term and long-term M&E activities. The short term M&E refers to the LARP

implementation Compliance Review. The long-term M&E refers to the long-run impact of the LARP,

which includes (i) changes in livelihoods of all APs in real terms relative to pre-project levels; (ii) changes

in standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups. The long-term M&E will be

carried out a year after the LARP completion, to find out whether the rehabilitation objectives of the

LARP were attained or not.

11. The main objective of the Compliance Review is to provide independent assessment of LARP

implementation and impacts mitigation, to verify results of internal monitoring, and to suggest

adjustments of delivery mechanisms and procedures as required. The Compliance Review will indicate

whether the compensation program has been carried out based on the provisions of the LARF/LARP and

ADB policy, and with the satisfaction of the APs.

12. The present Final Compliance Report summarizes the findings from the Compliance Review for the 3rd

Subsection of the Tranche 2. It presents assessment of the implementation and completion of the LARP

for the 3rd Subsection. This Report also summarizes LARP implementation data monitoring for Talin

community (km 69+700 – km 69+710) of T2 2nd Subsection for Private land plots with the following


9

lot-codes 212-010, 053-015, 213-002 and 058-021; (ii) LARP data monitoring for Talin (216-030), Aruch

(110-014, 112-043), Kaqavadzor (202-119, 203-001, 204-078, 204-160), Shamiram (119-001) and

Voskevaz (102-021) regulated by Action Plan of T2 2nd Subsection.

13. The Report provides description of monitoring process and comparative analysis of the LARP

implementation planned and actual tallies, delivery of compensations and the entitlements stipulated

under the approved LARP and LARF.

14. This Final Compliance Report is a precondition to start of the physical civil works under the 3rd

Subsection of Tranche 2.

III. COMPLIANCE REVIEW METHODOLOGY

15. The methodological basis for the Compliance Review was the approved IMA Inception Report. IMA has

performed the full range of possible activities stipulated by the methodology.

16. The IMA studied the approved LARP, collected and collated necessary information, reviewed the project

related documents (financial and non-financial) and the Internal Monitoring Reports, carried out a

sample household survey, organized Key Informant Interviews and direct contacts with APs. The details

on figures are presented in p.22 and p.23.

17. During the performed desk reviews IMA studied the following program documents:

Description Protocols, including the description of the affected assets for each AP, i.e. description of

land plots and crops/trees; description of structures/buildings and real estate; description of

business and company;

Valuation Reports, with detailed representation of the results of assets subject to acquisition by

licensed valuators;

Contracts on Acquisition of Property for Public and State Purposes, where together with all the

required provisions lot- ode, su fa e, o pe satio a ou t a d a k a ou t, a d the pe so ’s name are clearly mentioned; It must be signed by all co-owners or by their authorized people.

Agreements on Additional Compensation of APs for Acquisition of Property for Public and State

Purposes, clearly indicating the loss of assets subject to compensation as per the LARP;

compensation amount according to separate assets and their total; bank account (in compliance

with what is mentioned in Contract on Property Acquisition), the name of the person as well as

signatures of all co-owners or their authorized people.

Payment documents for the Property Acquisition Contracts and Agreements (Payment

Agreements) indicating compensation aim, bank account, amount, person and date of the

agreement or contract signing and payment/compensation date.

Internal Monitoring Report (April-September 2013). The PMU Internal Monitoring Report

comprehensively describes the internal monitoring findings of the 3rd Subsection LARP

implementation during April-September 2013.

Implementation Team-reports: Monthly Progress Reports (№ 9) prepared by the Implementation

Team of Social, Resettlement and Environmental Unit of PMU describe the activities carried out by

the Implementation team under 3rd Subsection of the Project implementation during the period of

June 29 - July 28, 2013. The final results of the Implementation team activities for the LARP

implementation per all T2 Subsections are included in the Final Report (as of November 2013) of the

Implementation Team.


10

Other documents and datasets.

18. For all communities 30% of documents and profiles of APs were studied (randomly chosen). At the same

time, in order to verify that compensation had been paid to all APs, the IMA reviewed payment orders of

all APs, except ones whose land plots were subject to Expropriation as of the date of the preparation of

the present Report. For all APs under the expropriation cases, compensation lodging documentation

were checked in order to confirm that relevant acquisition compensation amounts were lodged with

ou ts fo ea h APs’ la d a d othe assets .

19. Thus, the PMU database was analyzed, as well as data on assets and related documents and information

on AHs/APs were compared /reconciled.

20. Existence of all contracts, agreements and payment orders were checked, moreover, data contained in

them were checked for adequacy and compliance, in particular: (i) signatures of all owners and

verification by the notary, (ii) compliance of compensation and additional compensation amounts, (iii)

adequacy of bank accounts, (iv) compliance of notary verification dates of documents (activities

implementation) to the existing procedure (implementation schedule).

21. The process of public hearings and consultations was studied. Grievance redress procedures were also

studied: all written complaints and responses to them were studied in detail.

22. Key Informant Interviews with PMU of NSRC and PMC staff, LARP Implementation Team, and

Community officials (in total 8 informants) were carried out during monitoring as a result of which

clarifications and interpretations were provided to individual issues and questions.

23. 31% of all AHs (or 84 out of 272 AHs) were randomly selected from all communities of the 2nd

Subsection ensuring proportional inclusion of severely affected and vulnerable AHs in the sample.

Statistical sample survey based on face-to-face interviews was carried out in these AHs by using the

Compliance Review Survey Questionnaire (methodological details and questionnaire are presented in

the IMA Inception Report).

24. The data and results received through quantitative and qualitative studies were compared and, when

necessary, relevant APs were contacted and additional clarifications received.

25. Findings of external monitoring allowed concluding upon the reliability, comprehensiveness and

accuracy of data, as well as compliance and efficiency for compensation delivery process for the

compensated APs/AHs as of the date of the preparation of the present Report. Information on land plots

subject to expropriation is comprehensive. Respective conclusions and recommendations were

developed. The findings of monitoring are reflected in the present Compliance Report.


11

IV. COMPLIANCE REVIEW FINDINGS

A. ASSESSMENT OF THE LARP IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES

a) Policy and Operational Procedures

26. In total, Tranche 2 affects 536 AHs, comprising 2,263 APs (including owners, leaseholders and informal

tenants). Among them severely affected will be 326 AHs, including 324 AHs who will lose more than 10%

of their agricultural land and 2 AHs who will have to be relocated. The T2 Project has therefore been

lassified as Catego A for the involuntary resettlement safeguard ased o ADB’s Ope atio Ma ual (OM) Section F1/OP (2013)2.

27. According to the approved LARF, LARF Addendum and Armenian legislation, a LARP was developed and

approved in September 2012. LARP implementation commenced in October 2012 and was completed in

August 2014. For the purposes of process simplification and management efficiency, the LARP was

decided to be implemented in separate subsections. As compared to Subsections 1 and 2, Subsection 3 is

the most complex with regard to implementation, since it contains also relocation and expropriation

cases, structure / building acquisition, as well as business / employment loss cases.

b) Determination of the Actual Scope of Project Impact

28. The project impacts were determined and identified the cases of loss of land and other assets (crops,

trees, vineyards, structure / building, business, employment) resulted from the construction needs along

the 3rd Subsection (km 31+140 - 46+208). Compensation and rehabilitation measures have been

reviewed and assessed based on these impacts.

29. As per the approved LARP, the scope of project impact in the 3rd Subsection entailed 395 land plots

(including 2 State owned, 148 Community and 245 Private plots) with total size of land take for project

needs 643,402 sq.m., which makes 37.1% of 1,734,144 sq.m. land and 47.1% of total land plots

envisaged by the LARP.

30. For the purpose of contract signing with the APs during LARP implementation it was necessary to split

real estate units and to register in State Committee of the Real Estate Cadastre before the Contract

signing. To that end, additional measurements were taken and cadastre maps were adjusted accordingly

(for details, please see Appendix 2).

31. During the LARP implementation phase, cadastre maps were verified (for both private and public lands).

As a result, 1) acquired land sizes, 2) characteristics of acquired lands (such as, incline, rockiness, and

surface condition), (3) functional meanings (usage purpose) of acquired lands (4) number of acquired

land plots were changed (some land plots were excluded from the acquisition area, meanwhile new

plots were added). Based on the changes in the measurement data some land plots were also revaluated

with unit rates stipulated in the LARP (for details, please see Appendices 2 and 3): Finally, this led to

changes in impacts and total compensation amount for these land plots.

32. As of the preparation date of the 3rd Subsection Compliance Report, acquisition of 73 land plots (18.3%

of all land plots) is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process, thus, acquisition and

compensation terms for them may change (for more details please see Expropriatio a d Measures Take Section and Appendix 11, p. B).

2 As per ADB Operation Manual (OM) Section F1/OP (2013 a p oje t is lassified as Catego A if or more Affected Persons

suffer significant impacts (relocation or loss of 10% or more of productive assets).


12

Table 2: Summary of LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection3

(Comparison of LARP planned and Implementation tallies)

Item:

Permanent loss of land

a. Planned under LARP b. Implementation tallies Difference (b-a)

Plots No Area sq.m. AHs Plots No Area sq.m. AHs Plots No Area sq.m. AHs

State land 2 3,540 0 9 30,722 0 7 27,182 0

Community land 148 291,590 12 (k,h) 145 305,446 11 (g,l) -3 13,855 -1

Private land 245 348,272 264 (r) 244 439,119 261 (q) -1 90,847 -3

Not acquired land 45 44,823 25 (b) 0 0 0 -45 -44,823 -25

Acquired land 288 492,222 187 (e,p) 325 671,209 201 (o) 37 178,986 14

Expropriation 62 106,357 64 (e,l) 73 104,077 71 (g,m) 11 -2,279 7

Agarak 97 154,718 65 (j) 89 141,234 64 (a,f) -8 -13,484 -3

Aghdzq 32 116,629 15 (a,d) 37 184,954 17 (a,b) 5 68,325 2

Ujan 146 229,458 150 (a,l) 151 264,494 150 (n) 5 35,037 0

Kosh 120 142,598 44 (i,l) 121 184,604 41 (c,l) 1 42,006 -3

Total for the 3rd Subsection 395 643,402 276 (k,s) 398 775,286 272 (g,s) 3 131,884 -4

Note: (a) 1 Leaseholder AH; (b) 1 Informal Tenant; (c) 3 Leaseholder AHs; (d) 2 Informal Tenants; (e) 4 Leaseholder AHs; (f) 3 Informal Tenants; (g) 5 Leaseholder AHs; (h) 4 Informal Tenants; (i) 6 Leaseholder AHs; (j) 5 Informal Tenants; (k) 8 Leaseholder AHs; (l) 6 Informal Tenants; (m) 8 Informal Tenants; (n) 9 Informal Tenants; (o) 11 Informal Tenants; (p) 12 Informal Tenants; (q) 13 Informal Tenants; (r) 15 Informal Tenants; (s) 19 Informal Tenants:

33. As per approved LARP, 2 State-owned land plots (3,540 sq.m.) were included in the affected area in the

3rd Subsection. Meanwhile, during the LARP implementation 9 State-owned land plots (30,722 sq.m.)

were affected. The increase in the number of land plots was the result of cadastre map verification

which revealed 2 new State-owned land plots (1 in Kosh and 1 in Agarak Community), while 5 land plots

in Agarak (4 Private and 1 Community land) changed their ownership and became State-owned land. As

a result of cadastre map verification, the area of land plots was adjusted (see Table 3). No compensation

for the State-owned lands is planned under the LARP.

Table 3: LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection by State owned lands


Item:

Permanent loss of

land


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Agarak 0 0 0 0 6 18,341 0 0 6 18,341 0 0

Aghdzq 1 1,733 0 0 1 1,733 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kosh 1 1,807 0 0 2 10,648 0 0 1 8,841 0 0

Total State land 2 3,540 0 0 9 30,722 0 0 7 27,182 0 0

34. As per approved LARP, it was planned to acquire 148 Community land plots (291,590 sq.m.). As a result

of the LARP implementation, 145 Community land plots are subject to acquisition (305,446 sq.m.). The

latter is explained by a number of factors (see Table 4). In particular:

(a) As a result of cadastre map verification (i) 1 Community land changed its ownership and became

State-owned land (in Agarak); (ii) 2 Private land plots (1 in Agarak, and 1 in Kosh) changed their

ownership and became Community-owned lands; (iii) 9 additional land plots were included in the Project

impact area and acquired respectively; (iv) 12 Community land plots initially subject to acquisition were

excluded from the impact area and, thus, were not acquired.

(b) 1 additional land plot was not acquired due to the design adjustment works aimed at reducing impact

of land acquisition.

3 The difference between numbers of land plots and AHs entitled to compensation is explained by (i) the fact that some AHs held

joint ownership title to certain land plots; and (i i) some AHs are owners of more than one land plot.


13

35. As a result of cadastre maps verification, functional meaning (usage purpose) of 12 Community land plots

was changed: 5 land plots previously registered as agricultural were redefined as non-agricultural ones, while

7 non-agricultural plots – to agricultural. All 145 Community land plots are subject to compensation in

accordance with the approved LARP.

36. As of the preparation date of the 3rd Subsection Compliance Report, acquisition of 12 land plots is

currently being regulated under the Expropriation process fo o e details please see E p op iatio a d Measu es Take “e tio a d Appendix 11, p. B).

37. 8 leaseholders and 4 informal tenant AHs were identified on Community lands under Subsection 3 LARP.

Cadastre map verification revealed that the leased area of 4 land plots was out of the acquisition area

(therefore 4 leaseholder AHs were excluded from the Project impact area). While 1 new leaseholder and

1 new informal tenant AHs were identified on 2 Other land plots. At the same time (i) 1 new informal

tenant AH was identified on 1 new land plot; (ii) 1 new leaseholder and 1 new informal tenant were

identified on 2 former Private now registered as Community land plots; (iii) 1 leaseholder AH and 1

informal tenant AH became owners of their leased and used parts of Community lands, respectively.

These adjustments took place within the cut-off date defined for the cases regulated under the Action

Plan; therefore all AHs are entitled to compensation in accordance with LARP4. Consequently, the total

number of leaseholder AHs decreased by 3 during the LARP implementation totalling 5 AHs, while the

number of informal tenant AHs increased by 2 reaching 6 AHs (Table 4)5.

Table 4: LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection by Community lands


Item:




Not acquired land 13 8,261 0 0 0 0 -13 -8,261 0

Became RA land 1 8,943 0 0 0 0 -1 -8,943 0

Became Community land 0 0 0 2 4,429 2 (a,b) 2 4,429 2

New land 0 0 0 9 5,492 1 (b) 9 5,492 1

Other land 134 274,386 12 (k,h) 134 295,525 8 (e,h) 0 21,138 -4

Agarak 27 46,620 1 (b) 19 15,543 1 (a) -8 -31,077 0

Aghdzq 17 95,499 2 (a,b) 21 138,973 2 (a,b) 4 43,474 0

Ujan 28 59,978 2 (a,b) 26 40,266 2 (d) -2 -19,712 0

Kosh 76 89,494 7 (i,b) 79 110,664 6 (c,f) 3 21,170 -1

Not acquired land 13 8,261 0 0 0 0 -13 -8,261 0

Acquired land 126 237,303 7 (e,f) 133 259,997 3 (f) 7 22,694 -4

Expropriation 9 46,027 5 (e,b) 12 45,449 8 (g,f) 3 -578 3

Total Community Land 148 291,590 12 (k,h) 145 305,446 11 (g,j) -3 13,855 -1

Note: (a) 1 Leaseholder AH; (b) 1 Informal Tenant; (c) 3 Leaseholder AHs; (d) 2 Informal Tenants; (e) 4 Leaseholder AHs; (f) 3 Informal Tenants; (g) 5 Leaseholder AHs; (h) 4 Informal Tenants; (i) 6 Leaseholder AHs; (j) 6 Informal Tenants; (k) 8 Leaseholder AHs.

38. 245 Private land plots were subject to acquisition under the approved LARP (348,272 sq. m.). As a result

of LARP implementation, only 244 Private land plots are subject to acquisition with a total area of

439,119 sq.m. (Table 5). Thus, 32 Private land plots initially subject to acquisition were excluded from

the Project impact area and were not acquired due to the cadastre maps verification (30 land plots with

23 AHs) and due to applied design adjustment works (2 land plots with 2 AHs). Again, due to cadastre

map verifications (i) 4 land plots listed as Private under the LARP (5 AHs), in fact, were state owned

lands, (ii) 2 land plots listed as Private under the LARP (2 AHs), in fact, were Community-owned lands,

and (ii) 37 new Private land plots were included in the acquisition area (39 AHs).

4 For more details, please see Compensation Eligibility Section and Appendix 11, p. B.

5 For more details, please see Compensation for Leaseholders and Informal Tenants “ectio .


14

39. As of the preparation date of the 3rd Subsection Compliance Report, acquisition of 61 land plots (15.3%

of all land plots or 25% of private plots) is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process (for

o e details please see E p op iatio a d Measu es Take “e tio a d Appendix 11, p. B).

Table 5: LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection by Private lands


Item:




Not acquired land 32 36,562 25 (a) 0 0 0 -32 -36,562 -25

Became RA land 4 8,752 5 (a) 0 0 0 -4 -8,752 -5

Became Community land 2 22,088 2 0 0 0 -2 -22,088 -2

New land 0 0 0 37 79,247 39 (b) 37 79,247 39

Other land 207 280,869 232 (i) 207 359,872 222 (h) 0 79,003 -10

Agarak 70 108,098 66 (c) 64 107,350 63 (b) -6 -748 -3

Aghdzq 14 19,397 13 (a) 15 44,248 15 1 24,851 2

Ujan 118 169,480 148 (d) 125 224,229 148 (e) 7 54,748 0

Kosh 43 51,297 37 (d) 40 63,292 35 (b) -3 11,995 -2

Not acquired land 32 36,562 25 (a) 0 0 0 -32 -36,562 -25

Acquired land 160 251,380 180 (g) 183 380,490 198 (f) 23 129,110 18

Expropriation 53 60,330 59 (d) 61 58,629 63 (d) 8 -1,701 4

Total Private Land 245 348,272 264 (j) 244 439,119 261 (i) -1 90,847 -3

Note: (a) 1 Informal Tenant; (b) 3 Informal Tenants; (c) 4 Informal Tenants; (d) 5 Informal Tenants; (e) 7 Informal Tenants; (f) 8 Informal Tenants; (g) 9 Informal Tenants; (h) 10 Informal Tenants; (i) 13 Informal Tenants; (j) 15 Informal Tenants:

40. According to the approved LARP, 15 AHs were classified as informal tenants on Private lands. As a result

of cadastre map verification, 3 informal tenant AHs were taken out from the acquisition area (one from

Agarak, Aghdzk and Ujan communities). During LARP implementation, 3 informal tenant AHs were

legalized (in Kosh community) who registered their property rights and were compensated as

landowners. Additional field observations revealed that 2 land plots with informal tenants (one from

Agarak and one from Ujan), as noted in LARP, do not have any improvement or use traces. As a result,

the number of informal tenants decreased by another 2 AHs. At the same time, (i) 3 new informal tenant

AHs were revealed on 3 land plots (in Ujan community); (ii) additional 3 land plots included in the

acquisition area had 3 informal tenant AHs (one in each of Agarak, Kosh and Ujan communities). As a

consequence, the number of informal tenants of private land plots decreased by 2 during the

implementation phase and totalled to 13 AHs (Table 5)6:

41. Thus, the number of AHs under the Subsection 3, without double counting reached 272, of which 254

AHs were land owners, 5 AHs – leaseholders of Community land and 19 AHs – informal tenants (6 AHs

Community and 13 – Private land users). At the same time, acquisition process of 71 AHs is not

completed yet (26% of AHs), 62 of which are land owners, 5 – leaseholders and 8 – informal tenants.

42. By summarizing the results of the LARP implementation, the total number of affected land plots increased

by 3 (reaching 398); as a result, the size of land taken for project needs grew by 131,884 sq.m. reaching

775,286 sq.m, from which 744,564 sq.m. is subject to compensation either as Community or as Private

Lands. The Table 6 summarizes the LARP implementation results by the types of AHs in the 3rd Subsection.

Table 6: LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection by the types of AHs (No)

N Community Total AHs*

Land owners

Leaseholders Informal Tenants

Severely AHs

Total Vulnerable

AHs*

Vulnerable Poor AHs

Vulnerable Female/Elderly

headed AHs

Relocated AHs

1 Agarak 64 60 1 3 28 20 13 7 0

2 Aghdzq 17 15 1 1 2 2 0 2 0

3 Ujan 150 144 0 9 40 34 29 6 0

4 Kosh 41 35 3 6 21 6 4 2 2

Total 272 254 5 19 91 62 46 17 2

Note: * without double counting.

6 For more details, please see Compensation for Leaseholders and Informal Tenants Section.


15

43. 8 leaseholder AHs were listed under the Subsection 3 LARP as Community land leaseholders. During the

LARP implementation, their number decreased by 3. As of the preparation date of the 3rd Subsection

Compliance Report, compensation to all 5 leaseholders is currently being regulated under the

Expropriation process.

44. According to the approved LARP, 19 AHs were classified as informal tenants, including 4 – on Community

land and 15 – on Private land. The total number of informal tenants did not change, meanwhile, the

number of tenants on community land increased by 2 and the number of private land informal tenants –

decreased by 2. As of the preparation date of Subsection 3 Compliance Report, compensation to

informal tenants on 3 community land plots and 5 private land plots is currently being regulated under

the Expropriation process.

45. According to the approved LARP, 92 AHs (73 land plots) were listed as entitled to compensation for the

loss of crops from 16,886 sq.m. Community land and 99,598 sq.m. Private land (Table 7). During the

implementation phase, (i) 6 AHs (6 land plots) eligible for compensation were excluded from the

acquisition area, (ii) 7 new AHs (5 new land plots) were included in the acquisition area and (iii) 31 AHs

(25 land plots) are no longer subject to compensation for crops as a result of impact adjustment carried

out under the PMU Action plan, meanwhile another 11 AHs (11 land plots) became eligible for

compensation. As a consequence, 64 AHs (49 land plots) were compensated in accordance with LARP

requirements out of total 73 AHs (58 land plots) eligible for compensation for crops. Compensation to

the remaining 9 AHs (9 land plots) is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Table 7: Affected crops in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Affected crops


Plots No Area

sq.m. AHs Plots No Area sq.m. AHs Plots No

Area

sq.m. AHs

Affected crops 73 116,485 92 (a,e) 58 107,442 73 (f) -15 -9,043 -19

Not acquired land 6 1,772 6 0 0 0 -6 -1,772 -6

Not subject to compensation 25 41,437 31 0 0 0 -25 -41,437 -31

Community land 3 16,886 3 (a,c) 0 0 0 -3 -16,886 -3

Private land 22 24,551 28 (c) 0 0 0 -22 -24,551 -28

Acquired land 38 71,368 51 49 99,503 64 11 28,135 13

Community land 0 0 0 1 4,280 1 (b) 1 4,280 1

Private land 38 71,368 51 48 95,223 63 (d) 10 23,855 12

Expropriation 4 1,907 4 9 7,940 9 5 6,033 5

Community land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Private land 4 1,907 4 9 7,940 9 (b) 5 6,033 5

Community land 3 16,886 3 1 4,280 1 -2 -12,606 -2

Not subject to compensation 3 16,886 3 (a,c) 0 0 0 -3 -16,886 -3

Compensated 0 0 0 1 4,280 1 (b) 1 4,280 1

Expropriation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Private land 70 99,598 89 57 103,162 72 -13 3,564 -17


Not subject to compensation 22 24,551 28 (c) 0 0 0 -22 -24,551 -28

Compensated 38 71,368 51 48 95,223 63 (d) 10 23,855 12

Expropriation 4 1,907 4 9 7,940 9 (b) 5 6,033 5

Note: (a) 1 Leaseholder AH; (b) 1 Informal Tenant; (c) 2 Informal Tenants; (d) 3 Informal Tenants; (e) 4 Informal Tenants;

(f) 5 Informal Tenants.

46. According to the approved LARP, 102 AHs (100 land plots) were entitled to the compensation for the loss

of fruit/wood trees, together with Agarak (3 plots), Aghdzq (5 plots), Ujan (2 plots) and Kosh (2 plots)

communities which were entitled to the compensation of fruit trees and vineyards of total areas of

87,579 sq.m. During the implementation phase, (i) 13 AHs (15 land plots) eligible for compensation were


16

excluded from the acquisition area, (ii) 17 new AHs (18 new land plots) were included in the acquisition

area and (iii) 7 AHs (11 land plots) are no longer subject to compensation for trees and vineyard as a

result of impact adjustment carried out under the PMU Action plan, meanwhile another 20 AHs (23 land

plots) became eligible for compensation.

Table 8: Affected trees and vineyards in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Affected trees and vineyards



Affected trees and vineyards (a) 100 230,806 103 115 332,113 120 15 101,308 17

Community land (a) 16 94,450 6 14 109,261 8 -2 14,811 2

Fruit trees 10 48,862 6 10 85,960 8 0 37,098 2

Wood trees 11 80,310 3 7 74,523 2 -4 -5,787 -1

Vineyards 2 2,363 2 2 1,234 2 0 -1,129 0

Private land (a) 84 136,356 97 101 222,852 112 17 86,496 15

Fruit trees 77 124,669 91 92 200,228 99 15 75,559 8

Wood trees 14 30,459 15 23 77,937 26 9 47,478 11

Vineyards 17 52,904 20 19 64,972 26 2 12,068 6


Not subject to compensation 11 38,421 7 0 0 0 -11 -38,421 -7

Compensated 65 147,264 74 91 283,212 95 26 135,948 21

Expropriation 9 24,041 9 24 48,901 25 15 24,860 16

Note: (a) without double counting.

47. As a result of the LARP implementation, 95 AHs (91 land plots) were paid compensations for trees and

vineyard out of total 120 AHs (115 land plots) entitled to this type of compensation, while all 7

Community land plots entitled to compensation were compensated. Among those, compensation to 1

AH (1 land plot) does not comply with the LARP requirements. Corrective Measures are planned (see

Appendix 12, Part B). Compensation to the remaining 25 AHs (24 land plots) is currently being regulated

under the Expropriation process.

48. According to the approved LARP, the number of vulnerable AHs (poor AHs and AHs headed by a

woman/elderly) under Subsection 3 was 53. During the LARP implementation, the number of vulnerable

AHs increased by 9. 49 vulnerable AHs out of total 62 were compensated for being vulnerable in

accordance with LARP requirements. Compensation to the remaining 13 AHs is currently being regulated


49. According to the LARP, the number of severely AHs that were estimated to lose more than 10% of their

agricultural income was 121. During the implementation process, the number of severely AHs decreased

by 29 AHs. Out of remaining 92 severely AHs, 82 were compensated during the implementation,

compensation to 80 of them complies with the LARP requirements. In order to bring the compensation

of 2 severely AHs into compliance with the LARP, the PMU envisages Corrective Measures (see Appendix

12, Part B). Compensation to the remaining 10 severely AHs is currently being regulated under the


50. There are 2 cases of relocation under Subsection 3. During the implementation all relocated AHs were

compensated in accordance with the entitlements stipulated under the approved LARP.

51. 8 cases of structure / building acquisition were identified under the approved LARP for Subsection 3. The

number of cases eligible for compensation increased by 2 during the implementation phase. 5 AHs were

compensated out of 10 AHs (10 private lands) eligible for compensation. Compensation complies with

LARP requirements. Compensation to the remaining 5 AHs is currently being regulated under the



17

52. 4 cases of business loss (3 AHs and 1 Community-owned land plot) were included in the Subsection 3

LARP. The number of cases eligible for compensation did not change during implementation, meanwhile,

the number of AHs increased by 1 and totalled to 4 AHs. 2 AHs of them were compensated in

compliance with LARP requirements. Compensation to the other 2 AHs is currently being regulated


53. 1 case of employment loss was identified under the approved LARP for Subsection 3. During the

implementation, it was not feasible to verify loss of employment cases, together with compensation

calculations, under the PMU Action Plan: the reasons are presented in the PMU Reference on Subsection

3 LARP Final Action Plan (see Appendix 12, p. 1). Verification of the number of AHs with employment loss

cases, as well as calculations of relevant compensation amounts are regulated by the Subsection 3 Final

Action Plan (see Appendix 12, p. 2).

c) Minimizing Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impact

54. Due considerations have been given during the alignment selection and engineering design to minimize

the adverse impacts of land acquisition and involuntary resettlement: in fact, recommendations, made

on behalf of affected communities, were taken into account; as well as, alignment options, preferred for

communities, were selected. As result of public consultations held in Agarak and Ujan communities of

the 3rd Subsection (organized by the initiative of affected communities), it was revealed that the most

preferred option is widening the existing road to the left, along with the construction of a bypass road.

Thus, in the 3rd Subsection two bypasses will be constructed in Agarak (km 29+934 - km 32+600), and in

Ujan (km 36+600 - km 40+300) (i) to avoid acquisition of lands and constructions (buildings) of public

purpose, as well as (ii) to improve the safety of the communities by moving the high speed traffic away

from the developed existing road.

55. Thus, efforts have been put to incorporate the best engineering solution in avoiding large scale land

acquisition and resettlement in the 3rd Subsection. T2 Project line goes align with the main existing

highway in order to mitigate total adverse impact. As a result, only 2 cases of relocation are planned in

the whole T2 Project (in Kosh Community). In the 3rd Subsection, land acquisition and resettlement

impact has been minimized.


18

B. ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION DELIVERY

a) Compensation Eligibility

56. Compensation eligibility was limited by a cut-off date: it was set June 17, 2011 for the overall Project,

which is the date when the Detailed Measurement Survey commenced. As for areas subject to Public

Domain Law regulation, the cut-off date was determined to be November 11, 2013 which is the date to

commence measurement verification, field observations and description protocols formulation (see

Appendix 11, p. B).

57. As a result of 100% inventory of Project affected assets, the LARP determined the types of assets and

income loss subject to compensation and entitlements. As per approved LARP, entitlement provisions

for APs include provisions for land losses, building/structure losses, crops, plants, (or other objects

attached to the land), and a business/employment losses based on tax declarations and/or lump sums,

as well as allowance for severe impact, relocation and vulnerability.

58. The reporting below describes the accomplishment in respect of compensation for lost land, lost crops,

trees and vineyards, including the additional rehabilitation measures for severe impact, vulnerability and

relocation.

b) Compensation for Permanent Loss of Land

59. The LARP determined replacement cost of land based on existing market value determined by a survey

of land transactions or, if land markets are absent, productive value/reproduction cost of affected plot.

The unit compensation rates were assessed by a certified independent evaluator based on

methodologies acceptable to ADB. Compensation for agricultural and non-agricultural land has been

derived based on the evaluation reports from the independent valuator. Compensation to the owners

was calculated at replacement value +15% at market rates.

60. The agricultural, as well as non-agricultural lands were valued by the Independent valuator based on

la d a ket sales t a sa tio s’ su e . Du i g the LARP p epa atio the e e e o plai ts f o APs. Following these complaints ADB recruited an accredited independent valuation company to verify and

validate the valuation results. The valuator reported that the plots in Talin region have been correctly

assessed, while the value of land in Ashtarak region needs to be adjusted. As a consequence, the value of

land plots in Ashtarak region, upon ADB proposal, was increased by 80%.

61. Overall, 398 land plots were affected (775,286 sq.m.), of which 389 (744,564 sq.m.) are subject to

acquisition, while the remaining land plots were State-owned property. 335 land plots (677,549 sq.m.)

are subject to compensation as agricultural land, while 54 (67,016 sq.m.) – as non-agricultural land. 145

land plots among those subject to acquisition were Community land (305,446 sq.m.), while 244 (439,119

sq.m.) were Private.

62. As of the preparation date of the 3rd Subsection Compliance Report, 325 out of total 389 land plots

(81.7% of total) subject to acquisition were actually acquired, 316 of which were compensated, including

133 Community and 183 Private land plots. State-owned land plots are not subject to compensation

(Table 9).

63. Compensation to the 73 AHs is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process. Overall, 4

communities are entitled to the compensation for the permanent loss of 12 land plots, while 63

land-owner AHs are entitled to the compensation for the permanent loss of 61 Private land plots.


19

Table 9: Compensation for Permanent Loss of Land in the 3rd Subsection by Land Type


Item:

Permanent Loss of Land


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Total Affected lands 395 643,402 394,106,520 276 398 775,286 638,395,091 273 3 131,884 244,288,571 -3

Not acquired land 45 44,823 44,394,180 25 0 0 0 0 -45 -44,823 -44,394,180 -25

Community land 13 8,261 22,475,376 0 0 0 0 0 -13 -8,261 -22,475,376 0

Private land 32 36,562 21,918,805 25 0 0 0 0 -32 -36,562 -21,918,805 -25

Acquired land 288 492,222 282,907,372 187 325 671,209 526,126,550 201 37 178,986 243,219,178 14

State land 2 3,540 0 0 9 30,722 0 0 7 27,182 0 0

Community land 126 237,303 60,599,428 7 133 259,997 61,935,002 3 7 22,694 1,335,575 -4

Private land 160 251,380 222,307,944 180 183 380,490 464,191,548 198 23 129,110 241,883,604 18

Expropriation 62 106,357 66,804,968 64 73 104,077 112,268,541 71 11 -2,279 45,463,573 7

Community land 9 46,027 22,711,539 5 12 45,449 31,817,245 8 3 -578 9,105,706 3

Private land 53 60,330 44,093,429 59 61 58,629 80,451,296 63 8 -1,701 36,357,867 4

64. According to the approved LARP, compensation for 148 Community land plots was estimated to reach

AMD 105,786,342 (Table 10). 13 land plots were not acquired during the LARP implementation, 1 land

plot became State-owned property, 9 new land plots were added, while 2 Private land plots changed

their ownership and became Community-owned property, resulting in the final number of plots reaching

145, while the compensation amount was adjusted to AMD 93,752,247.

65. Acquisition of 133 Community land plots with the total area of 259,997 sq.m. was compensated during

the implementation in total amount of AMD 61,935,002. Compensation complies with the LARP

requirements. Compensation to 12 Community-owned land plots with total area of 45,449 sq.m. is

currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Table 10: Compensation for Permanent Loss of Land in the 3rd Subsection by Community Lands


Item:

Permanent loss of

Community Land


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensatio

n AMD

Not acquired land 13 8,261 22,475,376 0 0 0 -13 -8,261 -22,475,376

Became RA land 1 8,943 1,118,566 0 0 0 -1 -8,943 -1,118,566

Became Community land 0 0 0 2 4,429 2,766,261 2 4,429 2,766,261

New land 0 0 0 9 5,492 2,145,217 9 5,492 2,145,217

Other land 134 274,386 82,192,400 134 295,525 88,840,769 0 21,138 6,648,369

Agarak 27 46,620 34,763,543 19 15,543 7,550,379 -8 -31,077 -27,213,163

Aghdzq 17 95,499 14,135,693 21 138,973 16,311,383 4 43,474 2,175,690

Ujan 28 59,978 7,585,016 26 40,266 5,715,965 -2 -19,712 -1,869,051

Kosh 76 89,494 49,302,090 79 110,664 64,174,519 3 21,170 14,872,429


Acquired land 126 237,303 60,599,428 133 259,997 61,935,002 7 22,694 1,335,575

Expropriation 9 46,027 22,711,539 12 45,449 31,817,245 3 -578 9,105,706

Total Community lands 148 291,590 105,786,342 145 305,446 93,752,247 -3 13,855 -12,034,095

66. According to the approved LARP, compensation for 245 Private land plots was estimated at AMD

288,320,178 (Table 11). As described in Deter i atio of the Actual “cope of Project I pact Section

(paragraph 38), during the implementation stage, 32 land plots were not acquired, 4 plots became

State-owned property, 2 Private land plots changed their ownership and became Community-owned

property, 37 new land plots were added: thus the total number of land plots was adjusted to 244.


20

67. Although the total number of private land plots decreased by 1 (from 245 to 244), compensation amount

increased almost twice (from AMD 288,320,178 to AMD 544,642,844) (see Table 11). This occurred due

to the following reasons (i) 36 land plots (67,402 sq.m.), which were not acquired or compensated for as

private land during the LARP implementation, initially were entitled to compensation of AMD

37,270,511. Meanwhile, compensation for 37 land plots (79,247 sq.m.) identified during the

implementation phase to be eligible for compensation, constitutes AMD 144,617,290. Therefore, the

total area of land to be compensated for is higher by 18% which, together with correction of land plots

functional meanings (usage purpose), resulted in the increase of total compensation amount almost 4

times; (ii) the total area of the remaining 207 private land plots increased by 28% which, together with

correction of land plots functional meanings, resulted in an increase of compensation amount by 59%.

68. Acquisition of 183 Private land plots with the total area of 380,490 sq.m. was compensated during the

implementation stage with the total amount of AMD 464,191,548. Compensation complies with the

LARP provisions. Compensation to 61 private land plots with total area of 58,629 sq.m. is currently being

regulated under the Expropriation process.

Table 11: Compensation for Permanent Loss of Land in the 3rd Subsection by Private Lands


Item:

Permanent loss of Private

Land


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD


Became RA land 4 8,752 6,485,180 0 0 0 -4 -8,752 -6,485,180

Became Community land 2 22,088 8,866,526 0 0 0 -2 -22,088 -8,866,526

New land 0 0 0 37 79,247 144,617,290 37 79,247 144,617,290

Other land 207 280,869 251,049,667 207 359,872 400,025,553 0 79,003 148,975,886

Agarak 70 108,098 95,343,616 64 107,350 162,960,249 -6 -748 67,616,633

Aghdzq 14 19,397 13,512,855 15 44,248 93,500,981 1 24,851 79,988,126

Ujan 118 169,480 126,394,824 125 224,229 222,430,220 7 54,748 96,035,396

Kosh 43 51,297 53,068,883 40 63,292 65,751,393 -3 11,995 12,682,510


Acquired land 160 251,380 222,307,944 183 380,490 464,191,548 23 129,110 241,883,604

Expropriation 53 60,330 44,093,429 61 58,629 80,451,296 8 -1,701 36,357,867

Total Private Lands 245 348,272 288,320,178 244 439,119 544,642,844 -1 90,847 256,322,666

69. As it was mentioned in Determination of the Actual Scope of Project Impact Section, during the

verification of cadastre maps, together with surface changes, some land plots were revaluated in

accordance with the unit rates stipulated by the LARP (for more details, see Appendices 2 and 3). This

implies that, as a result of implementation, the unit compensation rates for some land plots may differ

from the ones stipulated by the LARP.

70. The IMA reviewed 30% of APs profiles, including description protocols, valuation reports, contracts and

agreements signed with the APs, as well as payments documents in order to be assured that with all AHs

contracts were signed and compensations were paid according to contract and LARP provisions.

71. For all AHs, except ones whose land plots are subject to Expropriation, payment orders, compliance of

compensation amount (mentioned there) with the bank account, existence of all owners' signatures and

validity certified by notary public were checked. Compliance of validation dates (implementation of

actions) of documents was compared with the existing procedure (implementation time-table). The IMA

ascertained that all AHs were compensated by the amount mentioned in the signed contracts.

72. For all APs under the Expropriation cases, compensation lodging documentation were checked in order

to o fi that ele a t a uisitio o pe satio a ou ts e e lodged ith ou ts fo ea h APs’ la d acquisition.


21

Findings: Acquisition of 325 land plots out of total 398 plots subject to acquisition under Subsection 3 is

completed (includes 9 State-owned land plots), while acquisition of 73 land plots is currently being regulated


Land acquisition contracts were signed with all AHs and Communities whose land plots were acquired. All AHs

and Communities who signed contracts were compensated in accordance with the LARP requirements.

Compensation to 61 Private land plots (63 land-owner AHs and 5 informal tenants) and 12 Community land

plots (with 5 leaseholder AHs and 3 informal tenants) is currently being regulated under the Expropriation

process. Calculated compensation amounts for each AP under the Expropriation process were lodged with

courts. Compensations comply with the LARP requirements.

Compensation for the permanent loss of land under Subsection 3 is in compliance with the LARP requirements.

c) Compensation for Affected Crops, Trees and Vineyards

73. According to the LARP Entitlements all AHs regardless of legal status (including legalizable and informal

users) were eligible to be compensated for crops and trees.

74. Crop compensation was calculated as cash compensation at current gross market rate (inclusive of inputs)

alue of ea ’s ha est default. Additio al ea s of op losses e e alued at et alue ithout inputs). The unit rate has been determined based on the yield of major crops for the 2011 period.

75. During project implementation, 73 AHs were eligible for compensation for the loss of crops out of 58

land plots7. 63 AHs (48 land plots) were compensated for crops with the total amount of AMD 7,501,715.

Compensation unit rates correspond to the ones approved by the LARP.

76. Compensation to the remaining 9 AHs eligible for crops on 9 private land plots is currently being


Table 12: Compensation for affected crops in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Affected crops

a. Planned under LARP b. Implementation tallies Difference (b-a) Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Affected crops 73 116,485 19,977,610 92(a,e) 58 107,442 7,859,320 73 (f) -15 -9,043 -12,118,289 -19

Not acquired land 6 1,772 740,977 6 0 0 0 0 -6 -1,772 -740,977 -6

Not subject to compensation 25 41,437 14,294,966 31 0 0 0 0 -25 -41,437 -14,294,966 -31

Community land 3 16,886 772,871 3 (a,c) 0 0 0 0 -3 -16,886 -772,871 -3

Private land 22 24,551 13,522,094 28 (c) 0 0 0 0 -22 -24,551 -13,522,094 -28

Acquired land 38 71,368 4,809,790 51 49 99,503 7,538,507 64 11 28,135 2,728,717 13

Community land 0 0 0 0 1 4,280 36,792 1 (b) 1 4,280 36,792 1

Private land 38 71,368 4,809,790 51 48 95,223 7,501,715 63 (d) 10 23,855 2,691,925 12

Expropriation 4 1,907 131,877 4 9 7,940 320,813 9 5 6,033 188,936 5

Community land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Private land 4 1,907 131,877 4 9 7,940 320,813 9 (b) 5 6,033 188,936 5

Community land 3 16,886 772,871 3 1 4,280 36,792 1 -2 -12,606 -736,079 -2

Not subject to compensation 3 16,886 772,871 3 (a,c) 0 0 0 0 -3 -16,886 -772,871 -3

Compensated 0 0 0 0 1 4,280 36,792 1 (b) 1 4,280 36,792 1

Expropriation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Private land 70 99,598 19,204,738 89 57 103,162 7,822,528 72 -13 3,564 -11,382,210 -17

Not acquired land 6 1,772 740,977 6 0 0 0 0 -6 -1,772 -740,977 -6

Not subject to compensation 22 24,551 13,522,094 28 (c) 0 0 0 0 -22 -24,551 -13,522,094 -28

Compensated 38 71,368 4,809,790 51 48 95,223 7,501,715 63 (d) 10 23,855 2,691,925 12

Note: (a) 1 Leaseholder AH; (b) 1 Informal Tenant; (c) 2 Informal Tenants; (d) 3 Informal Tenants; (e) 4 Informal Tenants;

(f) 5 Informal Tenants.

7 The number of AHs entitled to compensation exceeds the number of land plots because of joint ownership of assets among AHs.


22

77. Monetary compensation for trees was calculated at the current market prices based on various valuation

methodologies depending on whether it is a fruit tree or wood tree. Fruit trees were valued as different

categories (i) young trees/layers, (ii) not fruit trees yet; (iii) fruit trees. Wood trees were evaluated based

on the type, age and wood volume of tree per 3 categories (i) layers, (ii) trees of medium maturity and

(iii) mature trees. The quality and volume of wood was taken into account. Compensation for vineyards

was calculated based on the yield of vineyards and number of years that are necessary for vineyard to

reach full maturity and yield age. Compensation also includes auxiliary structures per linear meters of

vineyards.

Table 13: Compensation for affected trees and vineyards in the 3rd Subsection


Item:



Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Affected trees and vineyards (a) 100 230,806 472,287,036 103 115 332,113 612,671,538 120 15 101,308 140,384,502 17


Not subject to compensation 11 38,421 34,918,525 7 0 0 0 0 -11 -38,421 -34,918,525 -7

Compensated 65 147,264 299,650,786 74 91 283,212 568,451,963 95 26 135,948 268,801,177 21

Expropriation 9 24,041 32,366,460 9 24 48,901 44,219,575 25 15 24,860 11,853,115 16

Community land (a) 16 94,450 56,029,040 6 14 109,261 20,540,360 8 -2 14,811 -35,488,680 2

Fruit trees 10 48,862 55,259,490 6 10 85,960 19,956,472 8 0 37,098 -35,303,018 2

Wood trees 11 80,310 476,000 3 7 74,523 274,221 2 -4 -5,787 -201,779 -1

Vineyards 2 2,363 293,550 2 2 1,234 309,667 2 0 -1,129 16,117 0

Private land (a) 84 136,356 416,257,996 97 101 222,852 592,131,178 112 17 86,496 175,873,182 15

Fruit trees 77 124,669 382,133,960 91 92 200,228 541,242,979 99 15 75,559 159,109,019 8

Wood trees 14 30,459 1,522,960 15 23 77,937 21,859,771 26 9 47,478 20,336,811 11

Vineyards 17 52,904 32,601,076 20 19 64,972 28,787,797 26 2 12,068 -3,813,279 6

Note: (a) without double counting

78. Based on Project implementation results 95 AHs (91 land plots) out of 120 AHs (115 land plots) eligible

for compensation for the loss of trees and vineyards in Subsection 3 were compensated (see Table 13).

In particular, 92 AHs (82 Private land plots) were compensated with AMD 558,925,980 and 3 Informal

tenants (on 3 Community land plots) were compensated with AMD 5,425,350. 94 AHs out of 95 were

compensated in accordance with the LARP requirements.

Table 13-1: Adjustment need for Compensation for affected trees and vineyards in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Adjustment need



Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensatio

n AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensatio

n AMD AHs

Wood trees 0 0 0 0 1 852 15,000 1 1 852 15,000 1

Vineyards 0 0 0 0 1 852 124,500 1 1 852 124,500 1

Private land (a) 84 136,356 416,257,996 97 101 222,852 592,131,178 112 17 86,496 175,873,182 15

Private land Adjustment (a) 84 136,356 416,257,996 97 101 222,852 592,270,678 112 17 86,496 176,012,682 15

Community land (a) 16 94,450 56,029,040 6 14 109,261 20,540,360 8 -2 14,811 -35,488,680 2

Total Adjustment 100 230,806 472,287,036 103 115 332,113 612,811,038 120 15 101,308 140,524,002 17

Note: (a) without double counting

79. Compensation to the owner of 130-004 private land plot from Kosh community does not comply with

the LARP requirements: the owner was not compensated for the loss of wood trees (AMD 15,000) and

vineyards (AMD 124,500). The PMU envisages Corrective Measures to be implemented during October 1

– October 30, 2014, in order to bring compensation to the above AH in compliance with the LARP

requirements (see Appendix 12, p. B).

80. Compensation to the remaining 25 AHs (24 land plots) eligible for compensation is currently being



23

81. As a result of Subsection 3 implementation, 7 land plots out of 7 plots eligible for compensation for

wood trees and vineyards were compensated. In particular, AMD 3,885,552 was paid for 5 land plots in

Aghdzq and AMD 655,931 were paid for 2 land plots in Kosh community which complies with the LARP

requirements.

Findings: During the LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection, 64 AHs out of total 73 AHs eligible for

compensation for the loss of crops were compensated in accordance with the LARP requirements.

Compensation to the remaining 9 AHs is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Compensation for the loss of crops under Subsection 3 is in compliance with the LARP requirements.

During the LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection, 95 AHs and 7 community-owned land plots were

compensated for the loss of wood trees and vineyards in accordance with the LARP requirements.


Compensation to 1 AH (Kosh, 130-004 lot-code) does not comply with the LARP requirements: the PMU

envisages Corrective Measures (Appendix 12, p. B). The IMA will monitor the envisaged processes. Upon

completion of the Corrective Measures, compensation for wood trees and vineyards under Subsection 3 will

comply with the LARP requirements.

d) Compensation for Leaseholders and Informal Tenants

82. A o di g to the LARP E title e ts leaseholde s’ o pe satio as al ulated ased o the a ket value of the affected land + 15% in the following proportions based on the remaining years of lease: (for

years 1-15 – 14%, years 15-25 – 20%, while for 25 years and more – 25%). The compensation for

leaseholders and informal tenants included the loss of crops, trees and vineyards, as well as allowances

for severe impact and vulnerability.

83. Approved LARP for Subsection 3 includes 8 leaseholder AHs. All of them are leaseholders of Community

lands: 1 in Aghdzq and Ujan, and the remaining 6 in Kosh community.

84. During the LARP implementation, it turned out that leased parts of 4 land plots are not included in the

acquisition area (all plots in Kosh community); therefore 4 leaseholders were taken out from the

acquisition area. 1 leaseholder AH became the owner of the leased plot in Ujan community and, thus, is

eligible for compensation as land-owner in accordance with the LARP requirements. At the same time, 2

new leaseholder AHs were included (one from Kosh and one from Agarak) as a consequence of which

the final number of leaseholders is 5 AHs (Table 14).

85. As of the date of preparation of the present Report, compensation agreements were not signed with

leaseholder AHs since the leased Community land plots are under the Expropriation process.

Compensation to all 5 leaseholder AHs is currently being regulated by the Expropriation process.

Table 14: Compensation for leaseholders in the 3rd Subsection

(Comparison of LARP planned and Implementation tallies) Item:

Leaseholder on

Community Land


Plots

No

Compensation

AMD

o/w Loss

of land AHs

Plots

No

Compensation

AMD

o/w Loss

of land AHs

Plots

No

Compensation

AMD

o/w Loss

of land AHs

No longer leaseholders 5 10,004,309 437,075 5 0 0 0 0 -5 -10,004,309 -437,075 -5

Expropriation 3 9,905,604 447,704 3 5 3,231,087 373,312 5 2 -6,674,516 -74,391 2

Aghdzq (124-017/124-001) 1 166,111 166,111 1 1 11,816 9,016 1 0 -154,295 -157,095 0

Kosh (056-001) 1 9,675,697 217,797 1 1 2,708,213 48,238 1 0 -6,967,484 -169,559 0

Kosh (107-003) 1 63,796 63,796 1 1 26,839 26,839 1 0 -36,957 -36,957 0

Kosh (153-001) 0 0 0 0 1 252,436 252,436 1 1 252,436 252,436 1

Agarak (202-030/ 202-010) 0 0 0 0 1 231,783 36,783 1 1 231,783 36,783 1

Total 8 19,909,912 884,779 8 5 3,231,087 373,312 5 -3 -16,678,825 -511,467 -3


24

86. 19 AHs in Subsection 3 are classified as Informal tenants / usufruct users as per approved LARP (Table

15). During LARP implementation (i) 1 private land plot with an informal tenant AH in Aghdzq community

were taken out from acquisition area; (ii) 4 informal tenant AHs (3 –in Kosh and 1 – in Agarak

community) were legalized. These APs registered their property rights during LARP implementation and

are eligible for compensation as land-owners as prescribed by LARP; (iii) as a result of cadastre map

verification and additional field observations, the number of informal tenants decreased by 4 AHs (two

from Agarak and two from Ujan communities).

87. At the same time, (i) 4 new informal tenants were identifies on 4 land plots (in Ujan community); (ii) 4

new land plots included in the acquisition area have 4 informal tenant AHs (one in Agarak, one in Ujan

and 2 – in Kosh); (iii) formerly private land plot re-classified as community has 1 tenant.

88. As a result, the total number of informal users remained unchanged during LARP implementation – 19 AHs.

Table 15: Compensation for informal tenants in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Informal tenants

(usufructs)


Plo

ts N

o

Are

a s

q.m

.

Co

mp

en

s.

AM

D

o/w Crops,

fruit & wood

trees,

vineyards

o/w

allowance

for severe

impact

o/w

vulnera-

bility

allowance

AH

s Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD AHs

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD AHs

Acquired land 6 12,898 4,520,178 2,862,339 1,267,839 390,000 6 11 31,050 7,726,340 11 5 18,152 3,206,162 5

Agarak 212-015 1 3,783 390,000 0 195,000 195,000 1 1 4,800 390,000 1 0 1,017 0 0

Aghdzq 128-001 1 5,486 1,395,000 600,000 600,000 195,000 1 1 10,717 3,195,000 1 0 5,231 1,800,000 0

Ujan 237-004 1 578 396,900 198,450 198,450 0 1 1 604 396,900 1 0 26 0 0

Ujan 225-002 1 1,223 195,000 0 195,000 0 1 1 1,514 195,000 1 0 291 0 0

Kosh 116-001 1 1,517 1,984,500 1,984,500 0 0 1 1 1,364 1,984,500 1 0 -153 0 0

Kosh 115-002 1 311 158,778 79,389 79,389 0 1 1 479 244,290 1 0 168 85,512 0

o/w New land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5,152 1,018,668 3 3 5,152 1,018,668 3

o/w New Tenant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6,420 301,982 2 2 6,420 301,982 2

No longer tenants 9 10,170 41,205,537 39,121,512 1,889,025 195,000 9 0 0 0 0 -9 -10,170 -41,205,537 -9

Expropriation 4 17,223 1,468,665 688,665 195,000 585,000 4 8 17,516 11,261,301 8 4 294 9,792,636 4

Total 19 40,291 47,194,381 42,672,517 3,351,864 1,170,000 19 19 48,567 18,987,641 19 0 8,276 -28,206,739 0

89. As of the preparation date of the 3rd Subsection Compliance Report, 11 Informal tenants out of 19 were

compensated. Compensation agreements with 8 tenants have not been signed since, because respective

Community and Private land plots are under the Expropriation process. Compensation to all 8 informal

tenants is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

90. Compensation for 10 Informal tenants out of 11 corresponds to the LARP requirements. In order to

comply the compensation of the remaining 1 Informal tenant with the LARP provisions, the PMU

envisages Corrective Measures. In particular, compensation (AMD 3 million) for fruit trees was paid to

the informal tenant of Community land in Aghdzq (128-001) as well as allowance for vulnerability was

paid (AMD 195,000), but additional AMD 500,000 shall be paid for the Project severe impact, as well

(Appendix 12, p. B).

91. The owner of 130-003 and 130-004 land plots who registered his right of property was compensated for

loss of land and fruit trees in accordance with the LARP requirements. However, the owner is subject to

additional compensation for loss of decorative trees (AMD 15,000) and vineyards (AMD 124,500), he

also shall get allowance for severe impact in the amount of AMD 692,245. In total, AMD 831,745 shall be

additionally paid to AHs for which the PMU envisages Corrective measures (Appendix 12, p. B). As a

result the total amount of compensation to the owner will make AMD 11,698,503 and will comply with

the LARP provisions.


25

Findings: During the LARP implementation in Subsection 3, the number of leaseholders decreased by 3

compared with the number recorded in the LARP and amounted in 5 AHs. Compensation to all leaseholders is


During the LARP implementation in Subsection 3, the number of Informal tenants remained unchanged: 19 AHs.

1 Informal tenant changed his status becoming the land owner. But his compensation does not correspond to

the LARP provisions and according to the LARP Entitlement Matrix the AH shall be additionally compensated

with AMD 831,745 for which the PMU envisaged Corrective Measures (Appendix 12, p. B).

11 Informal tenants out of 19 were compensated and compensation of 10 of them corresponds to the LARP

requirements. In order to comply the compensation of the remaining 1 AH with the LARP requirements, the

PMU envisages Corrective Measures. Informal tenant on Aghdzq community land (128-001) shall be

additionally paid AMD 500,000. Compensation to the remaining 8 Informal tenant AHs is currently being


The IMA will monitor the processes envisaged by Corrective Measures.

After the compensation of 1 Informal tenant on Aghdzq community land (128-001), the compensation for

informal tenants and leaseholders of Subsection 3 will correspond to the LARP requirements.

e) Compensation Entitlements for Vulnerable groups

92. As per approved LARP, additional allowances were considered for vulnerable groups, particularly for

female-headed AHs, elderly headed AHs as well as AHs registered in Family Benefit System (FBS). The

allowance was equivalent to 6 months of minimum salary (AMD 32,500 per month) as well as

employment priority in project-related jobs.

93. According to the approved LARP in the 3rd Subsection 53 AHs were classified as socially vulnerable. 32 of

them were poor AHs, 22 – were headed by female or elderly AP.

94. As a result of cadastre map verification, land plots of 3 vulnerable AHs were excluded from the

acquisition area during the LARP implementation. As a result of impact adjustments under the Action

Plan, 15 AHs were taken out of socially venerable AHs list; meanwhile 27 other AHs were included in that

list. As a result, 62 AHs were classified as vulnerable during the LARP implementation, 46 of them were

poor, while 17 of them were headed by female or elderly AP.

95. 49 out of 62 AHs received vulnerability allowances and were compensated in accordance with their

entitlements stipulated in the LARP (AMD 195,000 per vulnerable AH). The total amount of vulnerability

allowances paid to the eligible AHs totalled to AMD 2,925,000. Compensation to the remaining 13

vulnerable AHs is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Table 16: Allowances for socially vulnerable AHs in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Vulnerability

Poor AHs,

No

Female/Elderly

headed AHs,

No

Total Vulnerable AHs

without double

counting, No

Compensation,

AMD

a. Planned under LARP 32 22 53 10,335,000

No longer vulnerable 9 9 18 3,510,000

Acquired land 16 11 26 5,070,000

Expropriation 7 2 9 1,755,000

b. Implementation tallies 46 17 62 12,090,000

No longer vulnerable 0 0 0 0

Acquired land 35 14 49 9,555,000

o/w New vulnerable AHs 19 3 23 4,485,000

Expropriation 11 3 13 2,535,000

o/w New vulnerable AHs 4 1 4 780,000

Difference (b-a) 14 -5 9 1,755,000

No longer vulnerable -9 -9 -18 -3,510,000

Acquired land 19 3 23 4,485,000

Expropriation 4 1 4 780,000


26

Findings: During the LARP implementation in the 3rd Subsection, the number of socially vulnerable AHs

increased by 9. 49 out of 62 vulnerable AHs were compensated in accordance with their entitlements.

Compensation to the remaining 13 vulnerable AHs is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Compensation to vulnerable AHs under Subsection 3 complies with the LARP requirements.

f) Entitlements for the Cases of Severe Impact

96. In accordance with the Entitlement Matrix, an AH under severe impact was eligible for one additional

crop compensation covering 1- ea ’s ield. AHs ho did ot ha e a op du i g the assets inventory

process, but had a crop in the previous year, receive the allowance equivalent to 6 months of minimum

salary (AMD 32,500 per month).

97. Under the LARP, severely AHs losing more than 10% of their agricultural income were reported 121. 91

of them (5 informal tenants, 2 leaseholders and 84 land owners) were meant to be compensated in

amount equivalent to the annual yield, while 30 AHs (5 informal tenants and 25 land owners) were

entitled to receive allowances equivalent to 6 months of minimum salary (AMD 195,000 per AHs).

98. During the implementation stage, (i) 8 severely AHs (8 land plots) were removed from acquisition area;

(ii) 10 new severely AHs (10 land plots) were added; (iii) as a result of impact adjustments under the

Action Plan, 37 AHs are no longer considered as severely AHs, while other 6 AHs are now considered

severely AHs. Thus, according to the LARP implementation results, 92 AHs were severely affected

(without double counting).

99. During the implementation period, 10 AHs (1 informal tenant and 9 land owners) were compensated

with amount equivalent to the minimal semi-annual salary, while 70 AHs (land owners) were

compensated in amount equivalent to the annual yield as stipulated under the Entitlement Matrix.

100.Compensation to 10 AHs eligible fo o pe satio of ea ’s op i fo al te a t a d land-owners) is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Table 17: Allowances for severe impact in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Severe Impact


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compensation

AMD

AHs

No

Total 121 213,677 63,125,744 121 91 174,725 58,429,260 90 -30 -38,952 -4,696,485 -31

6 months of minimum salary 30 42,566 5,850,000 30 10 21,027 1,950,000 10 -20 -21,538 -3,900,000 -20

Not acquired land 1 916 195,000 1 0 0 0 0 -1 -916 -195,000 -1

No longer severely AHs 16 20,961 3,120,000 16 0 0 0 0 -16 -20,961 -3,120,000 -16

Expropriation (a) 11 19,248 2,145,000 11 10 21,027 1,950,000 10 -1 1,779 -195,000 -1

Expropriation (b) 2 1,440 390,000 2 0 0 0 0 -2 -1,440 -390,000 -2

1- ear s ield 91 171,111 57,275,744 91 81 153,697 56,479,260 80 -10 -17,414 -796,485 -11


No longer severely AHs 21 37,842 1,641,219 21 1 4,280 123,692 0 -20 -33,562 -1,517,527 -21

Acquired land (a1) 58 106,721 43,818,528 58 70 132,741 52,652,391 70 12 26,020 8,833,863 12

Expropriation (b1) 5 9,584 4,786,639 5 10 16,677 3,703,177 10 5 7,093 -1,083,462 5

Note: a t pe of o pe satio as adjusted du i g i ple e tatio : o pe satio as paid fo ea ’s op a d is al ulated under (a1). (b) type of o pe satio to AHs as adjusted du i g i ple e tatio : the a e eligi le fo ea ’s op a d compensation is calculated under (b1).

101.Another 2 severely AHs were not compensated during implementation phase (1 informal tenant and 1

land-owner) which were eligi le fo o pe satio of ea ’s op. I this ega d, the PMU pla s Corrective Measures. In particular, for the Project severe impact (i) allowance in amount of AMD

500,000 will be paid to the Informal tenant on Aghdzq Community land (under the lot-code 128-001); (ii)

allowance in amount of AMD 692,245 will be paid to the land owner of Private plot 130-004 in Kosh

(Table 17-1).


27

102.At the same time, Kosh community received AMD 123,692 compensation for severe impact for land plot

127-002 with total area of 4,280 sq. m. (Table 17-1). The latter does not comply with the LARP

requirements and the amount of compensation shall be revoked: the PMU took Corrective Measures.

Table 17-1: Adjustment need for Severe impact compensation in the 3rd Subsection

(Comparison of LARP planned and Implementation tallies) Item:

Adjustment need

Severe Impact


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Kosh 127-002 0 0 0 0 -1 -4,280 -123,692 0 -1 -4,280 -123,692 0

Aghdzq 128-001 0 0 0 0 1 10,717 500,000 1 1 10,717 500,000 1

Kosh 130-004, 130-003 0 0 0 0 1 852 692,245 1 1 852 692,245 1

1- ea ’s ield 91 171,111 57,275,744 91 81 153,697 56,479,260 80 -10 -17,414 -796,485 -11

1- ear s ield, Adjusted 91 171,111 57,275,744 91 82 160,986 57,547,813 82 -9 -10,125 272,068 -9

6 months of minimum salary 30 42,566 5,850,000 30 10 21,027 1,950,000 10 -20 -21,538 -3,900,000 -20

Total, Adjusted 121 213,677 63,125,744 121 92 182,013 59,497,813 92 -29 -31,663 -3,627,932 -29

Findings: According to the LARP, the number of severely AHs in the 3rd Subsection was 121. During the

implementation, the number of severely AHs in the 3rd Subsection decreased by 29 compared to the approved

LARP (reaching 92 HHs). 80 out of 92 severely AHs were compensated according to their entitlements stipulated

under the Entitlement Matrix of the LARP.

Compensation of 2 severely AHs (one from Kosh 130-004 and the other from Aghdzq 128-001) does not comply

with the LARP stipulations. During October 1 – October 30, 2014 the PMU will undertake Corrective Measures in

order to compensate those AHs according to the LARP stipulations (Appendix 12, p. B). IMA will monitor the

implementation of Corrective Measures.

Compensation to remaining 10 AHs (1 informal tenant and 9 land-owners) is currently being regulated under


Once implementation of Corrective Measures is completed, the compensation of severe AHs in the 3rd

Subsection will comply with the LARP provisions.

g) Entitlements for the Cases of Relocation

103. Under the approved LARP, in the whole T2 Project only 2 cases of relocation are planned in Kosh

Community of Subsection 3. During implementation, all 2 AHs were relocated.

104. Area of land plot 132-013 was adjusted during implementation (decreased from 1,999 sq. m. to 1,994

sq. m.); while as a result of additional field observations compensation was adjusted for fruit trees and

loss of structure as compared to the approved LARP. As a result, the relocated AH on land plot 132-013

in Kosh was overall paid AMD 30,649,389 which complies with LARP requirements.

Table 18: Compensation for relocation in the 3rd Subsection (AMD)


Item: Relocation Total

Compens. Land

Fruit

trees

Wood

trees Vineyards Structures Business

Severe

Impact Relocation

Transport

ation

Improve

ment

a. Planned under

LARP 83,149,200 6,068,731 22,197,875 29,000 86,700 49,238,094 390,000 4,506,300 390,000 242,500 0

Kosh 132-013 27,220,903 936,677 2,338,875 5,000 0 22,725,476 390,000 537,375 195,000 92,500 0

Kosh 050-026 55,928,297 5,132,054 19,859,000 24,000 86,700 26,512,618 0 3,968,925 195,000 150,000 0

b. Implementation

tallies 62,617,649 5,793,584 9,592,791 5,000 131,062 44,162,014 390,000 1,985,795 227,500 163,000 166,903

Kosh 132-013 30,649,389 934,381 2,360,836 5,000 0 26,134,297 390,000 537,375 195,000 92,500 0

Kosh 050-026 31,968,260 4,859,203 7,231,955 0 131,062 18,027,717 0 1,448,420 32,500 70,500 166,903

Difference (b-a) -20,531,552 -275,148 -12,605,084 -24,000 44,362 -5,076,080 0 -2,520,505 -162,500 -79,500 166,903

Kosh 132-013 3,428,486 -2,296 21,961 0 0 3,408,821 0 0 0 0 0

Kosh 050-026 -23,960,037 -272,851 -12,627,045 -24,000 44,362 -8,484,901 0 -2,520,505 -162,500 -79,500 166,903


28

105. Acquisition of private land plot 050-026 was implemented under the PMU Action Plan. Therefore, as

priority for public interest land, impact on land plot 050-026 were reviewed and adjusted, estimated

units for compensation for land, structure and temporary impact also changed as compared to the LARP

data see E p op iatio a d Measu es take “e tio a d Appendix 11, p. B).

106. Thus, as a result of additional field observations of land plot 050-026 during the implementation phase,

(i) compensation for land; (ii) compensation for fruit trees, wood trees, vineyard and structure; (iii)

compensation for severe impact, relocation and transportation; were changed as compared to the

approved LARP, as well as (iv) compensation was paid for damaged water pipes and cost of repair of

electricity lines which was not envisaged by the LARP. As a result, overall AMD 31,968,260 was paid as

relocation compensation for land plot 31,968,260 in Kosh which complies with the LARP requirements.

107. According to Compliance Survey for Subsection 3, one of the relocated AHs – owner of land plot

132-013 is dissatisfied with the LARP implementation processes and submitted a written complaint

which was related to the total acquisition of the land plot instead of the partial acquisition. The

complai t as ot satisfied fo o e details, please see Co plai ts & G ie a e Red ess Me ha is Section, p. 125). The other relocated AH - owner of land plot 050-026 is satisfied with compensation

amount. Both AHs confirmed the receipt of compensation.

Table 18-1: Satisfaction of relocated AHs from the LARP implementation processes

Kosh 132-013 Kosh 050-026

Processes of Measurement and Description Protocol formulation Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied

Assets and property valuation Very dissatisfied Partially satisfied

Additional compensation amount (crop, trees and allowances) Partially satisfied Partially satisfied

Total amount of compensation Dissatisfied Partially satisfied

Payment procedure Partially satisfied Partially satisfied

Grievance Yes No

Findings: Compensation of all AHs subject to relocation in Subsection 3 is carried out in accordance with the

LARP provisions.

h) Compensation for Buildings and Structures Loss

108. According to the approved LARP, there are 8 building/structure acquisition cases under Subsection 3

which implies compensation to 7 AHs (6 private land plots), 1 community land leaseholder AH and Ujan

community for land plot 217-001.

109. During the implementation phase, cases eligible for compensation increased by 2. In particular, (i) 4 new

private land plots (4 AHs) were added in the acquisition area; (ii) 2 community land plots (1 leaseholder

AH) and 2 private plots (2 AHs) are no longer eligible for buildings/structures compensation as a result of

impact adjustment measures carried out under the PMU Action Plan, meanwhile 2 other AHs (2 private

land plots) became eligible for such compensation. 5 AHs out of 10 AHs (10 private land plots) eligible

for compensation were compensated during the implementation phase. Compensation to the remaining

5 AHs is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.


29

Table 19: Compensation for buildings / structures loss in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Buildings & Structures


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Not eligible for compensation 4 33,308 20,403,834 5 0 0 0 0 -4 -33,308 -20,403,834 -5

New land 0 0 0 0 4 25,755 175,816,907 4 4 25,755 175,816,907 4

New AHs eligible for compensation 0 0 0 0 2 22,266 10,323,701 2 2 22,266 10,323,701 2

Main land plots 4 5,529 66,174,321 4 4 15,219 45,841,480 4 0 9,690 -20,332,841 0

Not eligible for compensation 4 33,308 20,403,834 5 0 0 0 0 -4 -33,308 -20,403,834 -5

Compensated 2 3,693 49,238,094 2 5 27,749 156,557,455 5 3 24,056 107,319,361 3

Expropriation 2 1,836 16,936,227 2 5 35,492 75,424,632 5 3 33,656 58,488,406 3

Total 8 38,837 86,578,155 9 10 63,240 231,982,087 10 2 24,403 145,403,933 1

Findings: During the implementation, the number of AHs eligible for compensation for the loss of

buildings/structures increased by 1. 5 AHs out of 10 were compensated in compliance with the LARP.

Compensation to the remaining 5 AHs is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process. Loss of

buildings/structures compensation to AHs under Subsection 3 complies with the LARP.

i) Compensation for Business and Employment Loss

110. According to the approved LARP, there are 4 affected business cases under Subsection 3 LARP: 3 AHs (3

private land plots) are entitled to compensation, as well as Kosh community (with land plot 151-001).

111. The number of cases eligible for compensation did not change during implementation, while the

number of AHs increased by 1. In particular, (i) as a result of field observations, the absence of a

business on land plot 151-001 in Kosh was revealed, (ii) 1 new private land plot (1 AH) was added in the

acquisition area; (iii) 1 private land plot (1 AH) is no longer eligible for buildings/structures

compensation as a result of impact adjustment measures carried out under the PMU Action Plan, while

another 1 AH (1 private land plot) became eligible for such compensation. 2 AHs out of 4 AHs (4 private

land plots) eligible for compensation were compensated during the implementation phase.

Compensation complies with the LARP. Compensation to the remaining 2 AHs is currently being


Table 20: Compensation for business loss in the 3rd Subsection


Item:

Business


Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Plots

No

Area

sq.m.

Compens.

AMD

AHs

No

Not eligible for compensation 2 17,588 582,200 1 0 0 0 0 -2 -17,588 -582,200 -1

New land 0 0 0 0 1 467 52,071 1 1 467 52,071 1

New AHs eligible for compensation 0 0 0 0 1 11,900 495,780 1 1 11,900 495,780 1

Main land plots 2 3,608 1,534,000 2 2 3,448 2,189,800 2 0 -160 655,800 0

Not eligible for compensation 2 17,588 582,200 1 0 0 0 0 -2 -17,588 -582,200 -1

Compensated 1 1,999 390,000 1 2 13,894 885,780 2 1 11,895 495,780 1

Expropriation 1 1,609 1,144,000 1 2 1,921 1,851,871 2 1 312 707,871 1

Total 4 21,196 2,116,200 3 4 15,815 2,737,651 4 0 -5,380 621,451 1

112. According to the approved LARP, there is one case of employment loss under Subsection 3, thus, 1 AH

(land plot 050-027) was entitled to compensation in amount of AMD 300,000. During the

implementation, it was not feasible to verify loss of employment cases, together with compensation


30

calculations, under the PMU Action Plan: the reasons are presented in the PMU Reference on

Subsection 3 LARP Final Action Plan (see Appendix 12, p. 1). Verification of the number of AHs with

employment loss cases, as well as calculations of relevant compensation amounts are regulated by the

Subsection 3 Final Action Plan (Appendix 12, p. 2).

Findings: During the LARP implementation under Subsection 3, the number of AHs entitled to compensation for

loss of business increased by 1, reaching 4 AHs, 2 of which were compensated in accordance with the LARP.


Compensation for loss of business under Subsection 3 complies with LARP requirements. Verification the

number of employment loss cases and calculation of relevant compensation is regulated by the Subsection 3

Final Action Plan. The IMA will monitor processes under the Final Action Plan.

j) Summary of LARP Implementation Actual Budget in the 3rd Subsection

113.The Table below summarizes the final findings and provides comparison of LARP planned budget and the

actual implementation results in the 3rd Subsection communities. It should be noted that in order to

comply compensation forms with the LARP provisions, the PMU plans Corrective Measures to be

implemented during October 1 – October 30, 2014 (Appendix 12). The IMA will monitor these processes.

Table 21: Comparison of LARP planned budget versus the actual implementation results in the 3rd Subsection

Item

Planned under LARP

Implementation tallies

o/w Actual tallies

o/w In-process

(Action Plan)

Adjustment required

Adjusted Implementation

tallies Difference Note

a. b. b.1 b.2 c. d. b - a d - a

No

Total Land plots 395 398 325 73 0 398 3 3 1, 2

Private Land plots 245 244 183 61 0 244 -1 -1 2

Community Land plots 148 145 133 12 0 145 -3 -3 2

Total size of land takes

(sq.m.) 643,402 775,286 671,209 104,077 0 775,286 131,884 131,884 3

Compensation, AMD

Land compensation 394,106,520 638,395,091 526,126,550 112,268,541 0 638,395,091 244,288,571 244,288,571 4

Private Land plots 288,320,178 544,642,844 464,191,548 80,451,296 0 544,642,844 256,322,666 256,322,666 4

Community Land plots 105,786,342 93,752,247 61,935,002 31,817,245 0 93,752,247 -12,034,095 -12,034,095 4

Structures and buildings 86,578,155 231,982,087 156,557,455 75,424,632 0 231,982,087 145,403,933 145,403,933 5

Vulnerability 10,335,000 12,090,000 9,555,000 2,535,000 0 12,090,000 1,755,000 1,755,000 6

Severe impact 63,125,744 58,429,260 54,602,391 3,826,869 1,068,553 59,497,813 -4,696,485 -3,627,932 7

Leaseholders (for land) 884,779 373,312 0 373,312 0 373,312 -511,467 -511,467 8

Crops 19,977,610 7,859,320 7,538,507 320,813 0 7,859,320 -12,118,289 -12,118,289 9

Trees and vineyards 472,287,036 612,671,538 568,451,963 44,219,575 139,500 612,811,038 140,384,502 140,524,002 10

Relocation 390,000 227,500 227,500 0 0 227,500 -162,500 -162,500 11

Transportation 1,242,500 1,717,000 1,059,250 657,750 0 1,717,000 474,500 474,500 12

Business 2,116,200 2,737,651 885,780 1,851,871 0 2,737,651 621,451 621,451 13

Employment 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 -300,000 -300,000 14

Registration services 11,926,640 7,174,600 7,174,600 0 0 7,174,600 -4,752,040 -4,752,040 15

Contingency 0 71,362,575 56,036,017 15,326,558 0 71,362,575 71,362,575 71,362,575 16

Total (AMD) 1,063,270,183 1,645,019,935 1,388,215,013 256,804,922 1,741,826 1,646,761,761 581,749,751 583,491,577

Note 1: Also includes State-owned lands which are not subject to compensation.

Note 2: (i) The number of land plots was adjusted during implementation due to cadastre map verification and actual design

adjustments.


31

(ii) Acquisition of 73 land plots (61 Private and 12 Community land plots) is currently being regulated under the


Note 3: (i) During the implementation stage, cadastre map verification as well as actual design adjustments resulted in

modification in total surface of land subject to acquisition for the Project needs.

(ii) Acquisition of land area of 104,077 sq. m. (Private-58,629 sq.m, Community-45,449 sq.m.) is currently being regulated


Note 4: (i) Total compensation amount increased by AMD 244,288,571 due to number, surface and unit rate adjustment of

Community and Private land plots subject to acquisition.

(ii) During the implementation stage, compensation of AMD 526,126,550 was factually provided (AMD 464,191,548 for

Private, AMD 61,935,002 for Community lands acquisition). Whereas compensation provision of AMD 112,268,541 (AMD

80,451,296 for 61 Private and AMD 31,817,245 for 12 Community lands) is currently being regulated under the


Note 5: Compensation amount grew by AMD 145,403,933. The number of AHs entitled to compensation increased by 1 (2 land

plots) as a result of field observations, as well as impact adjustment under the PMU Action Plan. AMD 75,424,632

compensation to 5 AHs is being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 6: Compensation amount increased by AMD 1,755,000. As a result of cadastre map verification and impact adjustment

under the PMU Action Plan, the number of vulnerable AHs increased by 9. AMD 2,535,000 compensation to 13 AHs is

being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 7: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 3,627,932. As a result of cadastre map verification and impact adjustment

under the PMU Action Plan, the number of AHs entitled to compensation decreased by 29 AHs (29 land plots).

(i) During the implementation the informal tenant of Aghdzq 128-001 Community land (AMD 500,000) and the owner of

Private land with Kosh 130-004 lot-code (AMD 692,245) were not compensated, they will be compensated in accordance

with PMU Corrective Measures (Appendix 12).

(ii) Compensation of AMD 3,826,869 to 10 severely AHs (1 informal tenant and 9 land-owners) is being regulated under


Note 8: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 511,467. During the implementation, due to verification of cadastre maps

composition and surface of acquired as well as rental land plots were modified. The number of leaseholders decreased by

3. Compensation of AMD 373,312 to all 5 leaseholders is being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 9: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 12,118,289. As a result of cadastre map verification and impact adjustment

under the PMU Action Plan, the number of AHs entitled to compensation decreased by 19 AHs (15 land plots).

Compensation of AMD 320,813 to 9 AHs is being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 10: Compensation amount increased by AMD 140,524,002. As a result of cadastre map verification and impact

adjustment under the PMU Action Plan, the number of AHs entitled to compensation increased by 17, while the number of

land plots – by 15. (i) The owner of the land plot 130-004 in Kosh community was not compensated (wood trees – AMD

15,000, vineyards – AMD 124,500) during the implementation. Compensation is regulated under the PMU corrective

Measures (Appendix 12).

(ii) Compensation of AMD 44,219,575 to 25 AHs is being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 11: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 162,500 as a result of cadastre map verification and impact adjustment

under the PMU Action Plan.

Note 12: Compensation amount increased by AMD 474,500 as a result of cadastre map verification and impact adjustment

under the PMU Action Plan.

Note 13: Compensation amount increased by AMD 621,451. As a result of cadastre map verification and impact adjustment

under the PMU Action Plan, the number of AHs entitled to compensation increased by 1 AH. Compensation of AMD

1,851,871 to 2 AHs is being regulated under the expropriation process.

Note 14: During the implementation, it was not feasible to verify loss of employment cases, together with compensation

calculations, under the PMU Action Plan: the reasons are presented in the PMU Reference on Subsection 3 LARP Final

Action Plan (see Appendix 12, p. 1). The IMA will monitor processes under the Final Action Plan.

Note 15: This item includes costs for the legalization of incomplete documents of landowners: state registration of property

rights, provision of credentials, as well as inheritance certificates. Due to changes in rates for cadastre and notary services


32

in 2012, the total amount paid for these services decreased by AMD 4,752,040․ The difference is due to decreased rates

during LARP implementation as compared to the planned.

Note 16: This item includes compensations for cases not included in the initial LARP but for project impact cases identified

during the implementation. Those, in particular, include compensations for improvements carried out by AHs, such as

damaged metal fences, communal infrastructure and communications, as well as improvements to the ground area

(asphalt, tiles etc.) and non-movable other structures which are not real estate.

Under this article, 28 land-owners of 20 private plots were compensated in amount of AMD 56,036,017. Contingency

expenses for land plots under the Expropriation process totalled to AMD 15,326,558 (10 land-owner AHs of 8 private plots

and 2 informal tenant AHs of 2 community land plots in Ujan.

k) Summary of LARP Implementation Actual Budget i the 2 d “u se tio s Tali o u it (km 69+700 – k 9+ a d ases u der the 2 d “u se tio s A tio Pla

114.The Table below summarizes the final findings and provides comparison of LARP planned budget and the

actual implementation results for Talin community (km 69+700 – km 69+710) of T2 2nd Subsection for

Private land plots with the following lot-codes 212-010, 053-015, 213-002 and 058-021; (ii) LARP data

monitoring for Talin (216-030), Aruch (110-014, 112-043), Kaqavadzor (202-119, 203-001, 204-078,

204-160), Shamiram (119-001) and Voskevaz (102-021) regulated by Action Plan of T2 2nd Subsection.

115.Subsection 2 compensation plan (without cases regulated under the PMU Final Action Plan) is

considered as effectively completed.

Table 22: Comparison of LARP planned budget versus the actual implementation results in the 2nd Subsection

Talin community (km 69+700 – k 9+ a d ases u der the 2 d “u se tio s A tio Pla

Item

Planned under LARP

Implementation tallies

o/w Actual tallies

o/w In-process

(Action Plan)

Adjustment required

Adjusted Implementation

tallies Difference

Note

a. b. b.1 b.2 c. d. b - a d - a

No

Total Land plots 13 13 5 8 0 13 0 0 1

Private Land plots 11 12 5 7 0 12 1 1 1

Community Land plots 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1

Total size of land takes

(sq.m.) 24,885 36,945 16,566 20,379 0 36,945 12059.95 12,060 2

Compensation, AMD

Land compensation 17,459,781 56,532,343 10,315,932 46,216,411 0 56,532,343 39,072,562 39,072,562 3

Private Land plots 16,197,592 55,639,950 10,315,932 45,324,018 0 55,639,950 39,442,358 39,442,358 3

Community Land plots 1,262,189 892,393 0 892,393 0 892,393 -369,796 -369,796 3

Structures and buildings 250,644,771 491,231,151 149,375,405 341,855,746 0 491,231,151 240,586,380 240,586,380 4

Vulnerability 0 195,000 0 195,000 0 195,000 195,000 195,000 5

Severe impact 420,325 340,280 195,000 145,280 0 340,280 -80,045 -80,045 6

Leaseholders (for land) 252,438 0 0 0 0 0 -252,438 -252,438 7

Crops 3,319 0 0 0 0 0 -3,319 -3,319 8

Trees and vineyards 6,533,375 8,907,029 0 8,907,029 0 8,907,029 2,373,654 2,373,654 9

Relocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transportation 2,380,000 1,326,300 128,550 1,197,750 0 1,326,300 -1,053,700 -1,053,700 10

Business 9,993,866 710,192 0 710,192 0 710,192 -9,283,674 -9,283,674 11

Employment 2,655,000 0 0 0 0 0 -2,655,000 -2,655,000 12

Registration services 90,500 90,500 90,500 0 0 90,500 0 0

Contingency 0 233,743,804 37,560,000 196,183,804 0 233,743,804 233,743,804 233,743,804 13

Total (AMD) 290,238,375 792,881,599 197,665,387 595,216,212 0 792,881,599 502,643,224 502,643,224


33

Note 1: (i) The number of land plots was adjusted during implementation due to cadastre map verification and actual design

adjustments.

(ii) Acquisition of 8 land plots (7 Private and 1 Community land plots) is currently being regulated under the Expropriation

process.

Note 2: (i) During the implementation stage, cadastre map verification as well as actual design adjustments resulted in

modification in total surface of land subject to acquisition for the Project needs.

(ii) Acquisition of land area of 20,379 sq. m. (Private-15,518 sq.m, Community-4,861 sq.m.) is currently being regulated


Note 3: (i) Total compensation amount increased by AMD 39,072,562 due to number, surface and unit rate adjustment of

Community and Private land plots subject to acquisition.

(ii) During the implementation stage, compensation of AMD 10,315,932 was factually provided for Private lands

acquisition. Whereas compensation provision of AMD 46,216,411 (AMD 45,324,018 for 7 Private and AMD 892,393 for

Aruch community1 land plot) is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 4: During the implementation, compensation amount grew by AMD 240,586,380 as a result of additional field

observations, as well as impact adjustment under the PMU Action Plan. AMD 341,855,746 compensation to 3 AHs is being


Note 5: Compensation amount increased by AMD 195,000. As a result of impact adjustment under the PMU Action Plan, the

number of vulnerable AHs increased by 1. Compensation to the mentioned AH is being regulated under the Expropriation

process.

Note 6: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 80,045 as a result of impact adjustment under the PMU Action Plan. AMD

145,280 compensation to 1 severely AH is being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 7: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 252,438. During the implementation, due to verification of cadastre maps

leased part of the land plot was excluded from the acquisition area.

Note 8: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 3,319. As a result of impact adjustment under the PMU Action Plan, there

was no AH eligible for crop compensation.

Note 9: Compensation amount increased by AMD 2,373,654. As a result of cadastre map verification and impact adjustment

under the PMU Action Plan, the number of AHs entitled to compensation increased by 2, while the number of land plots –

by 2. Compensation of AMD 8,907,029 to 5 AHs is being regulated under the Expropriation process.

Note 10: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 1,053,700 as a result of impact adjustment under the PMU Action Plan.

Note 11: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 9,283,674. During the implementation, it was not feasible to verify the

cases of business loss, together with compensation calculations, under the PMU Action Plan: the reasons are presented in

the PMU Reference on Subsection 3 LARP Final Action Plan (see Appendix 12, p. 1). The IMA will monitor processes under

the Final Action Plan.

Note 12: Compensation amount decreased by AMD 2,655,000. During the implementation, it was not feasible to verify loss of

employment cases, together with compensation calculations, under the PMU Action Plan: the reasons are presented in

the PMU Reference on Subsection 3 LARP Final Action Plan (see Appendix 12, p. 1). The IMA will monitor processes under

the Final Action Plan.

Note 13: This item includes compensations for cases not included in the initial LARP but for project impact cases identified

during the implementation. Under this article, 1 land-owner AH was compensated in amount of AMD 37,560,000.

Contingency expenses for land plots under the Expropriation process totalled to AMD 196,183,804 (2 land-owner AHs of 3

private plots).


34

C. COMPENSATION DELIVERY PROCESS

a) Public Consultations and Awareness Raising

116. Public consultations and awareness raising process started before the LARP implementation.

Particularly, awareness raising and public consultations were organized in all 16 communities of T2

(including 4 communities of the 3rd Subsection) during 17-24 August, 2011. Representatives from the

PMU, design and valuation consultants, and ADB Country Office participated to those meetings. During

this period, the process was thoroughly explained to the AHs and necessary information on their rights

was provided.

117. Since the LARP implementation launched, from September 2012, staff of the Implementation Team has

had meetings with the heads of all communities of the 3rd Subsection, to inform them about the

starting of LARP implementation and on the purpose of provision of approved LARP complete

document.

118. Simultaneously, official notification were sent to all APs of the 3rd Subsection, on starting of LARP

implementation process, clear details on real estate acquisition conditions (entitlements and

compensation), as well as the LARP Information Pamphlet was provided to each of them.

119. Consultation and assistance was given to APs in all legal and organizational issues. In case of deceased

owners: regulation of heritage right recognition, right registration. In case of absence of the owner from

the country, regulation of the provision of power of attorneys, etc.

120. During the meetings with APs, also was updated the information on APs (presence of all the owners,

availability and validity of necessary documents, etc.).

121. Public awareness raising meetings (during the Action Plan implementation) were repeated in November

2013 in all affected communities. APs of land plots of priority public interest (as defined by the GoA

Decree8), PMU representatives, as well as experts of the Uptime LLC consulting company hired under

the LAR process participated in these meetings. Organization and implementation progress of land

acquisition and relocation process, phases thereof, principles of compensation payment to affected

individuals, rights and responsibilities of the latter were presented during meetings, as well as potential

grievance redress mechanisms were presented and clarified.

Finding: Awareness raising and public consultations process was properly organized based on LARP

requirements.

b) Complaints & Grievance Redress Mechanism

122. To assess the grievance redress process, the IMA requested all the copies of submitted Complaints. The

PMU ensured provision of all (47) complaints. The IMA studied the contents, character and relevance of

these complaints. Notably, Complaints were studied per 2 phases of the LARP implementation under

Subsection 3: prior to the Action Plan implementation (April-September, 2013) and during its

implementation (September 2013-September 2014). When studying the Complaints, it was taken into

account that the Expropriation processes were envisaged by the Action Plan which implied

expropriation of those land plots complaints about which were not feasible to satisfy by the PMU and

which were subject to court decisions.

8 Government of Armenia Decree N 1186 dated September 26, 2013.


35

b1) Prior to the Action Plan implementation (April-September, 2013)

123. 17 complaints were submitted to the Community Grievance Redress Group (GRG): 6 complaints were

submitted to Ujan, 5 – to Agarak and Kosh, 1 – to Aghdzk Community GRG. In GRGs, complaints were

properly recorded in the grievance register books. The day of the complaint submission was recorded as

well. GRG representatives responded to the submitted complaints in written form within defined dates

(7 days).

124. All 17 complaints submitted to the GRG were forwarded to PMU/MOTC. Decisions were taken within

defined timeframes (15 days) with regard to complaints forwarded to PMU/MOTC: 8 complaints were

satisfactorily addressed in favour of the claimants and 9 were rejected. The nature and details of the

complaints, as well as decisions taken upon them are presented below. The IMA agrees with the

decisions taken.

125. o plai ts e e elated to the AP’s desi e to a ui e the total la d plot i stead of the affe ted pa t; or, in case of separating into several parts, to the acquisition of the land parts not accessible for

cultivation. 4 of these requests were satisfied, the other 3 were rejected (violation of timeframes:

complaints should have been submitted within 2-month period after notification about land

acquisition), and moreover, rejection reasons were clarified to the complainants. The IMA agrees with

the decision taken.

126. 7 complaints were related to the valuation of land, trees or crops. In the result of field survey

implemented by a licensed company engaged by the PMU, 1 of the complaints was satisfied, 6 were

rejected. (i) 5 of the remaining 6 rejected applications referred to disagreement with the price of land

valuation. Complaints were rejected since valuation consultancy results confirmed the actuality of

initially valuated prices. (ii) 1 of the rejected 6 applications referred to compensation for crops. It was

rejected because in the description protocol, signed by the owner, crops were not recorded, and in

accordance with LARP principles any improvements made after the Description Protocols signing, are

not compensated. Rejection reasons were clarified to the complainants. The IMA agrees with the

decisions taken.

127. 1 complaint was related to the partial acquisition of the land plot instead of the total acquisition. The

complaint was satisfied. One more complaint was related to the wrong notification of the

compensation amount to the AH. During verification process the error of technical nature was

corrected, and the AH was informed about the real compensation amount.

128. 1 AH requested the PMU to accelerate the acquisition process as well as termination of its banking loan

commitment. The request was satisfied. The IMA agrees with the decisions taken.

b2) Action Plan implementation phase (September 2013-September 2014)

129. All 30 complaints during this phase were directly submitted to the PMU/MOTC. This is explained by the

fact that acquisition process under the Action Plan was carried out in accordance with the Law on

Eminent Domain (hereinafter – the Law) which also defines the terms and deadlines for complaints

submission by property owners or persons holding any other property rights during various phases of

the process. Notably, the agency submit the complaints is the same agency responsible for acquisition

(in this particular case – MOTC on behalf of which the PMU operates) or the court.

130. 16 complaints were submitted by APs from Agarak and 7 complaints from each of Ujan and Kosh

communities. Decisions were taken on these complaints within the set time limits and a written

response was sent to each complaining AP.

131. 5 complaints related to the APs preference to divest the land plot entirely instead of only affected parts

(when the land plot was subject to dividing into several parts). 1 complainant was satisfied, while 4 –


36

were rejected: rejection grounds were explained to relevant APs (breach of Article 5 part 2 of the Law)9.

The IMA agrees with decisions taken. Among the rejected complaints, 1 land plot was acquired in

mutual agreement, while for the other 3 land plots, expropriation process was initiated.

132. 1 complaint referred to the acquisition of the entire land plot instead of partial acquisition. The

complaint was satisfied.

133. 3 complaints related to the demand to be paid compensation as a vulnerable HH. 2 complaints were

satisfied based on documentation presented for being a vulnerable HH. 1 complaint was rejected on the

grounds of insufficient basis for being considered a vulnerable HH. The IMA agrees with the decisions

taken in this regard.

134. 2 APs submitted complaints attaching their Property certificates and requesting to consider their land

plots during the acquisition and compensation process. Both complaints were satisfied and

compensation was recalculated and notified.

135. 3 complaints related to the inconsistencies between the actual measurements and visual improvement

records. The PMU submitted these complaints to Uptime LLC who carries out measurement, visual

inspection and evaluation under the Action Plan and asked to review the raised cases. Uptime LLC

carried out field visits and double-checked the measurements together with APs. As a result of

double-checks, initial findings were confirmed: 2 APs agreed with the findings and signed relevant

documents. For 1 complaint, improvement records were adjusted and compensation amount was

re-calculated. The IMA agrees with the measures and decisions taken in this regard.

136. 1 complaint was submitted with a request to clarify the methodology of land evaluation. The request

was satisfied. The IMA agrees with the decisions taken in this regard.

137. 2 complaints were submitted by the same AP land plot of which was already acquired. The AP

complained on the number of (trees) improvements initially recorded: the AP believed the quantity was

higher. The complaint was not satisfied; the AP was clarified the process of Description protocol and

Grievance redress process thereof.

138. 1 complaint was submitted by an informal user of community land requesting to compensate for

non-legal structures constructed on the community land plot. The complaint was rejected based on

LARF principles, in accordance to which, illegal structures are subject to compensation only after their

legalization/registration. The IMA agrees with the decisions taken in this regard.

139. 1 complaint related to the disagreement with valuation of grape units. The complaint was forwarded to

Uptime LLC asking to clarify the calculation methodology. The clarification is not yet received from

Uptime LLC. At the same time, expropriation process is initiated. The IMA agrees with the steps taken in

this regard.

140. 10 complaints were repeating and were submitted by 5 APs or lawyers representing their rights. For

such cases, the PMU submitted a number of clarifying responses; however the complainants were not

satisfied: they will be directed to the court as part of expropriation proceedings. The IMA agrees with

the decisions taken in this regard.

Findings: 16 out of 47 complaints, submitted to the GRG and PMU in the 3nd Subsection, were solved for benefit

of the applicant, while 1 complaint was under the discussion by the date of the present report submission. 10

9 In accordance with the RA Law on Public Domain (N- dated . . , A ti le , pa t , if a pa t of the p ope t is a ui ed, the e ai i g

part of the property shall also be acquired upon the request of the owner. Such a request can be submitted by the o e ithi t o o th’ pe iod sta ti g f o the date of the Go e e t de isio o e og itio of pu li do ai . As part of the North-South Road Corridor Investment program,

the respective Government Decree on Public Domain N 1186-N, dated 26.09.2013 became effective on 16.11.2013. Whereas 2 of the mentioned

complaints were submitted after the completion of the 2-month grievance period (violation of timeframes) and the other 2 complaints were

submitted by persons who are not owners or only by some of the owners (in case of mutual ownership).


37

rejected complaints will be directed to the court as part of expropriation proceedings. Grievance redress was

conducted in compliance with defined procedures and within defined dates, answers were properly reasoned.

The quality of revision verifies the efficiency of Grievance Redress Mechanism.

c) Expropriation and Measures taken

141. According to the GoA Decree N 1186-N dated September 26, 2013, 189 land plots subject to acquisition

under Subsection 3 of the Action plan were determined as priority public interest.

142. Thus, according to the Law on Eminent Domain, the PMU initiated court proceedings for land plots

under the Action Plan not acquired due to disagreements with AHs or for other reasons (Expropriation).

In particular, (i) calculated compensation amount for each AP was lodged with the court, (ii) thereafter,

if the contract was not signed within 7 days, a court appeal on property acquisition is submitted with a

o th’s ti e. Effe ti e ess of the ou t de isio upo o pe satio a ou t fo the la d plot to e acquired is a basis for the acquisition of land with the compensation amount determined by a court

decision. The rights of the previous owner with regard to the land plot are thus terminated.

143. According to the calculations based on the PMU Database provided to the IMA, 73 land plots in

Subsection 3 were under the Expropriation proceedings, including 61 private land plots (63 owner AHs

and 5 informal users) and 12 community-owned plots (5 tenant AHs and 3 informal land-users). All data

related to the Expropriation process under Subsection 3 are presented in relevant sections of the

present report.

Findings: 73 land plots in Subsection 3 were under the Expropriation proceedings, including 61 private land plots (63

owner AHs and 5 informal users) and 12 community-owned plots (5 tenant AHs and 3 informal land-users).

Information on land plots subject to expropriation is comprehensive.


38

d) D. ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC SATISFACTION

144. The IMA conducted a Compliance Review survey in all affected communities under the 3rd Subsection.

Survey sample covered more than 31 percent of all AHs or 84 AHs that were randomly selected during

the sample construction under the Baseline Survey. At the same time, during the LARP implementation

of Subsection 3, 4 private land plots (2 – in Agarak, 1 – in Aghdzk and another one in Ujan communities)

were taken out from the acquisition area, as consequence 4 AHs were randomly replaced with the same

community AHs in the Compliance Survey.

145. As of the preparation date of the Report, compensations of 15 AHs (17.9% of the sample) were not paid

because Expropriation proceedings were in process. From the perspective of the Compliance Report

coverage, the IMA replaced these AHs with such AHs acquisition process from which was completed, as

noted in the PMU data. The replacement will not affect the sample of the Impact Assessment survey of

the project implementation.

146. Face-to-face interviews were successfully completed with 82 AHs out of total 84 in the sample:

Compliance Review questionnaire was used for the interviews. 2 AHs that did not participate in the

interviews (one from Ujan and another one – from Agarak) were not in the country.

147. Then, the results obtained from 82 AHs or 30.1% of all AHs were inputted in the database, data were

logically checked and verified. Accordingly, data was compared with desk review results and other data

from the PMU where necessary. In certain cases, AHs were contacted to check and verify data and

information.

148. All interviewed AHs stated that they had received official notification on compensation amount and

entitlements.

149. All 82 AHs mentioned that they had received the Description Protocols. Nevertheless, 1 AH from Agarak

community noted that he does not agree with the description/measurement data in the Description

Protocol and, therefore, has not signed it. The other 81 AHs signed Description Protocols.

150. Contracts were signed by all 82 AHs, and all of them confirmed the receipt of compensation amount. All

82 AHs preferred to receive the compensation via bank transfer, which had been considered a

convenient way for all.

151. Overall satisfaction from the LARP implementation processes is summarized in Table 23 below. About

40% of respondents are fully or partially satisfied by various processes of LAP implementation, while

20% - are not very satisfied.

152. As can be seen from Table 23, about 40% of respondents were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the

evaluation of assets and property, as well as overall compensation amount. About 34% were

dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with Measurement, Description protocol preparation process, as well as

additional compensation amount.

Table 23: Satisfaction of AHs from the LARP implementation processes

Completely

satisfied

Partially

satisfied

Not so

satisfied Dissatisfied

Very

dissatisfied

Not

Applicable Total

1) Processes of Measurement and

Description Protocol formulation 8 26 21 13 14 0 82

2) Assets and property valuation 5 23 20 18 15 1 82

3) Additional compensation amount

(crop, trees and allowances) 8 17 13 13 7 24 82

4) Total amount of compensation 7 24 18 16 17 0 82

5) Payment procedure 35 28 8 9 2 0 82


39

153. 13 AHs out of 29 dissatisfied with various LARP implementation processes submitted written

complaints. Majority of complaints – 11 AHs (5 AHs from Agarak, 4 – from Ujan and 2 – from Kosh)

related to the overall compensation amount. Written responses were received from Social and

Environmental Unit/PMU. 8 AHs were fully dissatisfied with the responses (for such cases, please see

Grievance Redress Mechanism section).

154. 16 AHs who had disagreements, but did not submit written complaints mentions that grievance

procedures are too complex (8 AHs) or they did not trust the procedures (8 AHs).

155. All respondents noted that public hearings and consultations were held in their communities.

Nevertheless, 16 AHs (about 20%) did not attend the meetings due to time constraints or did not view

them important (9 AHs) or were absent (3 AHs). Only 4 AHs were not aware of such hearings or

consultations.

156. According to the 66 AHs attended the public hearings, they were comprehensive and covered the

answers to important questions. 65 AHs assessed the public hearings and consultations process:

according to 30 AHs, they were very useful, to 46 AHs – useful, while for 6 AHs - useless (3 –from Ujan,

1 from Agarak, Aghdzk and Kosh each)

157. 20 AHs out of 82 interviewed AHs were vulnerable, and 43 were severely AHs. Overall, 368 APs lived in

those 82 AHs, of which 177 were female. The survey results identified, that LARP implementation

corresponds to gender and social characteristics of AHs.

Findings: Survey findings were compared with desk review analyses findings and database provided by the

PMU to the IMA. Thus, according to the Compliance Review Survey, all LARP processes were complied

with; there are no cases identified when compensation was not paid (for those AHs compensation to which

is not regulated under the Expropriation process). All interviewed APs confirmed the receipt of

compensation. 40% of respondents were fully or partially satisfied with the LARP implementation various

processes, while about 20% - were not very satisfied. According to the methodology presented in the IMA

Inception Report, M&E findings of long-term impact of Tranche 2 LARP implementation will be

summarized in the Ex-Post Evaluation Report.


40

V. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT

158. Based on the Inception Report and approved methodology, the IMA carried out detailed monitoring and

assessment of LARP implementation under North-South Road Corridor Investment Program Tranche 2

(Subsection 3, km 31+140 - 46+208), Talin community (km 69+700 – km 69+710) under Subsection 2, as

well as LARP implementation cases regulated under Subsection 2 Action Plan.

159. Applied methodology allowed collecting reliable data for monitoring and evaluation and drawing

conclusions and recommendations. In particular, the IMA findings are presented below:

i) 398 land plots were affected by the Project (in all 4 affected communities), 9 of them were RA land

plots, 145 – Community and 244 – Private land plots. Out of 389 Private and Community land plots

subject to acquisition and compensation, acquisition of 73 (61 Private and 12 Community) land

plots is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

ii) 272 HHs were affected, 254 of which permanently lost their land plots, and 5 were leaseholders of

Community land and 19 AHs Informal tenants (4 Community and 15 Private land informal tenants).

2 AHs were relocated. Based on LARP implementation results, the compensation to 63 AHs owners

and 5 Informal tenants of 61 Private lands, as well as 5 leaseholders and 3 Informal tenants of 12

Community lands plots is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

iii) Description Protocols and Valuation Reports were prepared for all affected land plots. Cadastre

map verification resulted in significant adjustments in impact types and magnitudes. Respectively,

Description Protocols and Valuation reports were reviewed. Nevertheless, these documents for

land plots identified or corrected during the LARP implementation are kept at PMU only in

electronic format, while the hard copies are not there.

iv) Except for cases regulated by the Expropriation process, contracts were signed and compensation

was received by all AHs. Compensation amounts for each AP under the Expropriation process were

lodged with courts.

v) According to the IMA HH survey findings, all AHs received Description Protocols and Evaluation

Reports: AHs agree with the information and data contained in these documents.

vi) According to implementation results, compensation for the permanent loss of 244 Private land

plots to 261 AHs totalled to AMD 544,642,844. During the LARP implementation the acquisition of

183 Private plots with total surface of 380,490 sq.m. was compensated (AMD 464,191,548). The

compensation complies with the LARP provisions. Compensation for 61 Community land plots with

total area of 58,629 sq.m. is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

vii) According to implementation results compensation for permanent loss of 145 Community land

plots was totalled to AMD 93,752,247. During the implementation period, the acquisition of 133

Community plots with total surface of 259,997 sq.m. was compensated (AMD 61,935,002). The

compensation complies with the LARP provisions. Compensation for 12 Community land plots with

total area of 45,449 sq.m. is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

viii) During LARP implementation for the 3rd Subsection, 64 out of 73 AHs eligible for crops were

compensated in accordance with LARP provisions. Compensation to 9 AHs is currently being


ix) During LARP implementation for the 3rd Subsection, 95 AHs and 7 Community land plots were

compensated for the loss of trees and vineyards in accordance with the LARP provisions.


41

Compensation for 1 AH does not comply with the LARP. Compensation to 25 AHs is currently being


x) The number of leaseholders decreased by 3 and equalled 5 AH. Compensation to all AHs is currently

being regulated under the Expropriation process.

xi) During LARP implementation 11 out of 119 Informal tenants were compensated. Compensation to 1

Informal tenant does not comply with LARP provisions. Compensation to 8 informal tenant AHs is


xii) 92 AHs were severely affected by the Project. 82 severely AHs were compensated according to their

entitlements stipulated by the LARP Entitlements Matrix. 2 AHs were not compensated.

Compensation to 10 severely AHs (1 informal tenant and 9 land-owners) is currently being


xiii) During LARP implementation, 62 AHs were classified as socially vulnerable; 46 of them were poor,

while 17 - were headed by female or elderly AP. 49 vulnerable AHs out of total 62 were

compensated for being vulnerable (AMD 195,000 per vulnerable AH) in accordance with the LARP

requirements. Compensation to 13 vulnerable AHs is currently being regulated under the


xiv) Compensation to two relocated AHs is in compliance with the LARP provisions.

xv) During LARP implementation, the number of AHs eligible for compensation for buildings/structures

increased by 1. 5 AHs out of 10 were compensated in compliance with the LARP. Compensation to

the remaining 5 AHs is currently being regulated under the Expropriation process.

xvi) During the LARP implementation, the number of AHs entitled to compensation for loss of business

increased by 1, reaching 4 AHs, 2 of which were compensated in accordance with the LARP.


xvii) During the implementation, it was not feasible to verify loss of employment cases, together with

compensation calculations, under the PMU Action Plan: the reasons are presented in the PMU

Reference on Subsection 3 LARP Final Action Plan (see Appendix 12, p. A).

xviii) Prior to the LARP implementation, public hearings were held in all communities. All AHs received

official notifications about public hearings. Implementation Team members met APs during the

LARP implementation. Public hearings and consultancy notification processes were organized as

required by the LARP.

xix) 47 complaints were received during implementation of the 3rd Subsection, 16 of which were

resolved in favour of claimants, while 1 complaint is under the discussion. 10 rejected complaints

will be directed to the court as part of expropriation proceedings. Grievance redress was conducted

in compliance with defined procedures and within defined dates, answers were properly reasoned.

The quality of revision verifies the efficiency of Grievance Redress Mechanism.

xx) 73 land plots in Subsection 3 were under the Expropriation proceedings, including 61 private land

plots (63 owner AHs and 5 informal users) and 12 community-owned plots (5 tenant AHs and 3

informal land-users). Information on land plots subject to expropriation is comprehensive.

xxi) Findings of interviews with 30% of AHs proved that APs were satisfied with the LARP

implementation and compensation plan. 40% of respondents were fully or partially satisfied with

various LARP implementation processes, while about 20% - were not very satisfied.


42

158. Although findings showed that LARP was successfully implemented, nevertheless the IMA considers the

following Corrective Measures as important:

1. To pay allowance according to the LARP for the Project severe impact to Informal tenant

of 128-001 Community land in Aghdzq in amount of AMD 500,000;

2. To compensate according to the LARP to owner of 130-004 Private land for the loss of wood trees

(AMD 15,000) and vineyards (AMD 124,500) as well as to pay allowance for severe impact (AMD

692,245);

3. To sign a supplemental agreement with Kosh community (127-002) to receive back AMD 123,692

paid as severe impact allowance to comply with LARP.

159. Summarizing external monitoring findings, IMA believes that with implementation of the suggested 3

Corrective Measures by the PMU, LARP implementation under the 3rd Subsection (excluding cases

regulated by the PMU Final Action plan) should be considered efficiently completed in compliance with

defined policy and operational procedures and with the consent of APs. In that case, the stipulations of

approved LARF/LARP will be ensured, in adherence of the SPS and ADB guidelines.

160. Full implementation of Corrective Measures will serve a precondition to launch civil works along the

road section km 31+140 - 46+208 of the M1 highway.


43

Appendix 1. PMU: Reference on T2 LARP implementation progress (as of 20.08.2014) (in Armenian)

: 3- 2013 .

-

,

,

( 3-

8 9):

26.09.2013 . 1186-

189 :

-

:

« »

.

,

,

- (

- , -

)

,

- , -

- ,

«

» ,

. -

:

189 21

,

26.09.2013 . 1186- ( 27.03,2014 . 344- )

, -

( 1):


44

1. 26.09.2013 . 1186-

14 225-005, 221-020, 221-021, 221-07, 221-028, 221-029, 255-001,

237-002, 225-003, 233-002, 255-002, 224-003, 255-007,

218-023, 218-024

2 050-024, 115-002

4 212-034, 212-015, 211-017

(2-

)

1 112-043

21

, 26.09.2013 . 1186-

,

( 2).

2.

4 201-004,

201-006, 201-007,

617-003

3- , 1-

3 056-003

221-019

155-024

,

155-024

15 127-010, 127-011,

050-025

245-060,

245-061, 245-062,

245-063, 245-064,

245-065, 245-066,

245-067, 229-002,

224-016, 233-010,

237-039

127-010, 127-011 050-025

,

245-010

,

7

245-060- 245-067

;

237-001

.

,

237-009 ,

;


45

,

195 , 13- 2- , 182- 3- :

.

,

,

: /

3- :

3.

/

/

/

/

8 5 107-003, 056-001, 153-001

202-030

124-017

11 17 127-002, 127-011, 050-025, 115-002,

149-003

214-023, 033-022, 212-015

217-001, 218-018, 225-002, 228-008,

231-002, 233-001, 245-063, 669-001

110-014

195 4- :

4.

26.09.2013

. 1186-

( )

26.09.2013 . 118 6-

( )

( )

4 17 20

0 4 4

14 47 47

2 11 12

0 4 0

1 0 1

0 0 1

0 0 1

0 0 5

21 8 3 91

( + + ) 195


46

Appendix 2. PMU: E pla atio of ha ges of Proje t LA‘ i pa ts a d o pe satio pri es e erged

duri g the T2 LA‘P i ple e tatio

Explanation of changes of Project LAR impacts and compensation prices emerged during the T2 LARP

implementation

1. For the purpose of contract signing with the APs during LARP implementation it was necessary to split real

estate units and to register in State Committee of the Real Estate Cadaster before the Contract signing.

2. In order to split the real estate units it was necessary to carry out measurement in order to divide the maps.

During the measurement some discrepancies between the previous and present measurement data were

identified (surface to be acquired). According to the specialists this was because of the changes in the

cadastral maps of the communities. In the framework of LARP preparation the measurement was carried out

by Mar-Mos LLC based on the cadastral maps provided by State Committee of the Real Estate Cadaster.

However, they were later changed which resulted in some discrepancies.

3. Based on measurement data some land surfaces to be acquired were changed and some lands were removed

from the acquisition list and others were added.

4. Based on the changes in the measurement data it became necessary to re-valuate real estate on the basis of

measurement and survey results. Besides, measurement was carried out for the newly added land plots. An

appropriate licensed company was recruited to carry out revaluation. Revaluation was done both for private

and community lands. After revaluation compensation prices were changed.

5. After the extensive discussions with ADB, the decision was made to apply the general approach under which

the recalculation according to the unit rates fixed in LARP is needed to address the measurement changes,

but not re-evaluation which can affect the unit prices. The detailed approaches for each type of changes

du i g the LARP i ple e tatio app o ed ADB a d a e p ese ted i Approaches approved by ADB

regarding some cases emerged during the T2 LARP implementation .


47

Appendix 3. PMU: Approa hes appro ed ADB a d to e appro ed GoA regarding some cases

e erged duri g the LA‘P i ple e tatio

Based on the agreed approach, the followings are a summary of measures or steps to be taken by PMU

when affected losses defined by LARP were changed after verification.

Possible changes and their possible solutions are presented below:

1. If the surface of land plots to be acquired have changed during the LARP implementation.

Recalculation of compensation price will be made using the price for 1m2 fixed by the

valuation report of Mar-Mos LLC and by multiplying it by new surface (see example in Table

1).

Table 1. Recalculation of compensation prices according to new surface

Community Lot-code Land type Price for 1m2

of

land according to

the Valuation

Report of Mar-Mos

Surface to be

acquired

according to

new

measurement

Compensati

on price

Including

+15%

80% addition for

arable lands of

Ashtarak region

(see LARP, point

141)

Compensation

price/ total

Agarak 212-010 Arable

land

250 1670 417.500 480.125 384.100 864.225

Talin 050-028 Pasture 68 680 46.240 53.176 0 53.176

Re-calculation will be made by the PMU specialists according to the above-mentioned formula fixing the

calculation in LARP database (monitoring can be carried out only by checking the database).

2. During LARP implementation new lands to be acquired have been added which do not have

valuation reports:

New valuation will be realized for such lands by the valuation company using sales data for

2011 according to the RA valuation standard and LARF principles and based on the current

measurement and survey data (If the unit rate after valuation is different from the unit rates

for that region fixed in LARP the multiplier for arable lands of Ashtarak region will be applied

according to the LARP.)6

3. During LARP implementation it was identified that the category of lands to be acquired has changed

(purpose of use), it was wrongly presented by Cadaster or previous valuator and needs to be

changed, (e.g. agricultural land should be industrial).

New valuation will be realized for such lands by the valuation company using sale data for

2011 according to the RA valuation standard and LARF principles and based on the current

measurement and survey data (If the unit rate after valuation is different from the unit rates

for that region fixed in LARP the multiplier for arable lands of Ashtarak region will be applied

according to the LARP.)7

4. During LARP implementation the complaints were received from APs regarding the valuation of their

lands/assets. In this case two possible solutions can be applied:

6 This approach was presented by ADB during the preliminary discussion as the only acceptable way of addressing the issue. 7 The same.


48

The PMU will transfer the compensation to court deposit account based on state priority

legislation which requires new valuation (based on current market prices) 1 week prior to

the depositing for launching the court case, or

The PMU initiates the process of review the measurement of affected plots, categorization

of affected assets, and validation of the rates in the LARP.

5. During LARP implementation the complaints were received from APs regarding the incorrect

measurement and/or survey of impacts (land area, structures, improvements on land, crops/trees

etc.) which affects the compensation price. In this case two possible solutions can be applied:

The PMU initiates verification of measurement and/or observation of impacts, and rates in

the final LARP, which lead to a new contract for compensation.

6. During implementation some cases raised when there are obvious mistakes in the asset valuation

prices (including mistakes of technical nature). In this case the valuation reports will be revised and

verified by respective licensed valuation specialists (as a result of verification the unit rates fixed in

LARP for those lands can be changed).

Since changes in impact and corresponding compensation are recorded during LARP implementation,

summary of all these changes will be reflected in the internal and external monitoring reports for LARP.


49

Appendix 4. Sample Copies of the Land, Business and Structures Description Protocols

P R O T O C O L D E S C R I P T I O N

L A N D

LOT N ___________________

CADASTRE CODE N ___________________

1. Status of land

1. Private 2. Rented 3. Community 4.Other /specify/__________________

2. Land user’s personal data. In case of rent or non-legal use, please identify land owner personal

data

Name, surname Address

1. Land owner/s

1.

2.

3.

2. Renter/s

1.

2.

3.

3. Non legal user/s

1.

3. Lease or illegal use 1. Type of land use

2. Duration

(.... – ....)

3.Size of

the area

4. Name of the

owner and user

5. Lessee

6. Purpose of

the use 7. Tax and

rent fee

payment *

1. Written agreement on

rent

2. Number of certificate on

rent of real estate

3. Written agreement

without notary

verification

4. Verbal agreement

5. Illegal use

6. Other

* Payments made in AMD and by natural products shall be presented in AMD equivalent on annual basis


50

4. Description of acquired land plot

Land type 1. Land type by

cadastre

certificate

2. Land

category

3 1. Irrigable

2.Non-irrigable 4. Total

(sq.m)

5 Acquired

(sq.m)

6. Way of usage

1. homestead

2. arable land

3. vineyard

4. Orchard

5. meadow

6. pasture

7. arable land

8. other /specify/

5. Preference for acquisition

1.Total land plot 2.Only affected part 99Don’t know

6. Crop cultivated on the affected land by type and quantity

1. Type of cultivated

crops /specify/

2. Space on the

total land: how many sq.metres

3. Space on the

affected part: how many sq.metres

4. Quantity of crop

produced per 1 sq.m /kg./

5. Average price

(kg./drams)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

7. Type of fruit trees on the affected land, how many and how old are they

Type 1.Total land 2.Affected part

1.1Sapling/ how

many years/

1.2Productive 1.3Non

productive

2.1 Sapling/

how many

years/

2.2Producti

ve

2.2Non

productive

1.Apple 2. Peach 3. Apricot 4. Pear 5. Nuts 6. Cherry 7. Plum 8. 9. 10.

8. Vineyards on the affected land

1. Total number of 2. Total Length, l/m 3.Lenght on the affected part, l/m


51

rows 2.1Sapling/ how

many years/

2.2Productive 2.3Non

productive

3.1 Sapling/

how many

years/

3.2Producti

ve

3.2Non

productive

9. Type of non fruit trees on the affected land, how many and how old are they

Type 1.Total land 2.Affected part

1.1Sapling/ how

many years/

1.2Productive 1.1Sapling/

how many

years/

1.2Producti

ve

1.Poplar 2. Willow 3. 4. /

INFORMATION ON USER FAMILIY COMPOSITION

No Name, surname Date of birth

Kinship link Address and registration

date

Property right

Passport/ birth certificate

data

Social security

number

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Receiving poverty family benefit

Women headed family

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

COPY OF DRAWING FROM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE

ATTACHED DOCUMENTS

___________________________________________________________________________


52

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

PHOTOGRAFS

The description was composed by:

______________________________ ____________

(first name, family name) (signature)

______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________


Property Owner/Lessee/Illegal user

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________

(status) (first name, family name)

(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)

Purchaser Republic of Armenia

___/ ____________ 2010


53

DESCRIPTION PROTOCOL

BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES

Address: ____________________________________________________________________

Property holder/s: ______________________________________________________________

name, surname

No Construction dimensions Document

confirming

property

right

Total,

m2

With legal title Under lease Without

status

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

OBJECT DESCRIPTION

1. Designated purpose(in terms of being a

monument )

2. Number of property certificate and date of

issue

Basis for giving certificate

3. Number of floors, floor

4. Roof

5. Load-bearing walls

6. Bridging between floors

7. Floor altitude

8. Construction foundation

9. Basement

10. Warehouse

11. Cowshed

12. Garage

13. Description of decoration

bathroom unit

doors, windows


54

floor

ceiling

the presence of necessary

facilities in the area

fence

14. Potable water

Irrigation water

15. Electricity

16. Sewerage

17. Telephone

18. Additional notes

19.

20.

21.

INFORMATION ON USER FAMILIY COMPOSITION

No Name, surname Date of birth Kinship link Address and

registration date

Property right Passport/ birth

certificate data

Social

security

number

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

Receiving poverty family benefit

Women headed family


___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________


55


ATTACHED DOCUMENTS

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

PHOTOGRAFS


______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________ (first name, family name) (signature)

______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________



______________________________ ______________________________ ____________ (status) (first name, family name)

(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)


___/ ____________ 2010


56

D E S C R I P T I O N P R O T O C O L

Company Description

1. Business form and Contacts of the Company

Full name of the organization

(SP first name, last name)

Business form

1. SP

2. LLC

3. CJSC

4. OJSC

5. Not registered in the state register of legal entities

6. Other ____________________________

Legal address

Actual location address

When was the company established/ actual year of

establishment

Registration year

No and copy of registration certificate

Director

Contacts

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2. Type of business

Sector Please detail the type of activates

1 Industry and other branches of productive

industry

2 Construction

3 Energy

4 Transport

5 Education/Science

6 Trade

7 Services

8 Other/note

3. List of Company Owners

First name, last name Share Passport Data Social security

data

Address

4. Submission of the tax report for 2009.


57

1. Yes 2. No

5. Taxes that organization paid for 2009.

1. Income tax

2. Social tax

3. Profit tax

4. VAT

5. Assets’ tax

6. Environmental fee

7. Customs’ tax 8. Customs’ service fee

9. Nothing

10. Other/specify/

6. Number of employees for whom the employer paid social taxes. __________________ employees

7. Positions of the employees and their addresses.

First name, last name Position Address (note the

community, region)

When started working

month/year

8. List of machines and equipments

Name 1. Movable

2. Not

removable

2.Owned,

attached a copy of

purchase

document

3.Rented, attached

a copy of rent

contract

4.No

purchase/rent

document

5. Balance value

(drams)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.


___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________



58

ATTACHED DOCUMENTS

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

PHOTOGRAFS



______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________


______________________________ ____________




______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________

(status) (first name, family name) (signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)

______________________________ ______________________________ ____________


(signature)


___/ ____________ 2010


59

Appendix 5. Sample Copy of Contract on Acquisition of Property for Public and State Purposes (in Armenian)

2012 _____________

.

-________________, . .

. ______, ._______ . _____________ ,______________, . .

. ____________, .____________ .____________ . _______- ,____________,

. .__________, .___________ . ________________ . _________- ( ՝ և/ ):

, և

, « -

» և

, __________________ - ( ___________- ,

) ____________,

____________ ., ____- , ՝______________,

.

և :

1.

1.1 ( ) ,

( ՝ ), _______ /_______________/

. ( ) ( - ____): և

1 և

:

1.2 ___________________

:

1.1 ,

__________2012 . _________

:

1.3 , , ,

, և ,

-_______________________ , ՝ _______ 2012 .

:

և 2010

16- N 1274- -

և և

և 2012

6- N 1139- -2 ( - )

և :

1.4 և և

, 1.3 և


60

և, և

,

:

1.5 և ,

և և , և/

և :

2. Ղ Ե Ե Ե Ե

2.1 ,

2.1.1

և

411- :

2.1.2 և

:

2.2

2.2.1 5 , -

:

2.2.2 , և

:

2.2.3 :

2.2.4 և

:

2.2.5 Ե և

, :

2.2.6 և 10

1.5- :

2.3

2.3.1 ,

2.2.1 :

2.3.2

:

2.3.3 Ե 1-

,

, ,

:

2.3.4

1.5- :

2.4 ՝


61

2.4.1

30 .

2.4.2 3- ,

և :

2.4.3 - :

3. Ե

3.1 , _____________ /_____________/

( ),

: ,

:

( , , ) :

3.2 և ,

3.1- , և

, և /

և և :

3.3-

/ :

3.3 , 10

և :

/

3.4 և :

4. Ե Ց

4.1

:

5. Ղ Ե

5.1 և

:

5.2

:

6. Ղ

6.1 և և ՝

,

1.4 և 1.5 , 2.2.6 և 2.3.4 , 5.1, 5.2 և 6.1 ,

:


62

7. Ղ Ե ԵՑ ( - )

,

, , և

:

:

8. Ե Ե

8.1 և

:

8.2 ՝

3.1-

___________________ և

: , ,

:

8.3 և

:

8.4 30

:

9. Ղ Ե ՑԵ Ե , Ե Ե Ե Ե

Ղ Ե Ե Ե Ե

և

« -

» և

______________________________________

Ե և 0010, 28

/ -15100 0901786 0100

02708921»:


63

Appendix 6. Sample Copy of Agreement on Additional Compensation of APs for Acquisition of Property for

Public and State Purposes (in Armenian)

_____________ - Ղ Ե Ց

ԵՑ Ե Ց Ց Ց Ց

Ղ և և

____ և ____ - N ___

և .

1.

1.1 , --------------- , ____________

____________ . . ( _________)

_________ . , :

1.2 Ե ____

- N ___ ,

, /

, /

1.3 Ե - Ե Ե

, /

Ց

1.4 Ե Ե Ղ

1.5 Ց Ե -

____ : Ց

և .

.

.

.

. /

. /

.

.

.

.

. ,


64

Ց _____________ :

2. Ց

2.1 Ե Ե Ղ Ե - Ց ,

1.3-

__

:

2.2 Ե - , Ց

Ե - և,

1.5- Ց և

և :

2.3 Ե - , 1.3- Ց

և :

3. Ե - .

3.1 Ե - , 1.3- և

, Ց :

3.2 Ե - և

Ե Ե Ղ և ,

Ե Ե Ղ Ե - և :

4. և

4.1. :

4.2. __ (___) ,

Ե - և Ե Ե Ղ Ղ Ց :

5.

________________________________

________________________________

________________________________

6.

6.1 Ե Ե Ղ

« -

» և , Ե Ե Ղ

և : « -

»

և

____________________-

_______________________

6.2 Ե

_______________________ /, / /

___________- /

_______________________

_______________________ /, / /

___________- /

_______________________»:

NN

1 2 3

1 212-010 " -1"

2 053-015

3 213-002 " "

4 213-021 (058-021) " "

5 216-030 ,

, During the LARP implementation in 2nd subsection this land

was removed from the list of affected lands by design solution,

but after the engineering team verifed it and concluded the

impossibility of design solution. The decition was made to acquire

the little affected part of the land. Taking into account that the

owners of land are out of RA it is planned to initiate expropriation

procedure for this land.

6 204-078 ,

7 204-160 (204-001-

01)

8 203-001 ,

9 202-119 ,

10 119-001 / During the LARP implementation in 2nd subsection this land


but after the engineering team verifed it and concluded the

impossibility of design solution. The decition was made to acquire

the little affected part of the land. The owner of the land should be

additionaly verifies with Cadaster.

T2 LARP IMPLEMENTATION - ACTION PLAN FOR UNRESOLVED CASES

List of lands under the LARP Action Plan

Included in Action Plan for 2nd subsection (Annex 8, Compliance

report for 2nd subsection).

Shamiram (2nd subsection)

Kaqavadzor (2nd subsection)

Talin (2nd subsection)

Lot-code Name of owners Comments

11 155-024 “ և ” During the LARP implementation in 2nd subsection this land


but after the engineering team verifed it and concluded that

addtional survey should be done during the preparation of side for

construction. Only after this the design solution for this land can

be finaly approved. At the same time it was decided to include the

land in Eminent Domain list taking into account the possible

acquision of land after the survey.

12 110-014

13 112-043

14 102-021 Included in Action Plan for 2nd subsection (Annex 8, Compliance


15 153-001

16 056-001

17 056-003

18 107-003

19 117-005

20 111-001

21 112-001

22 050-024 և .

23 050-028 .

24 115-002 ., ,

, Ց

25 127-002

26 148-001

27 149-003 .

Included in Action Plan for 2nd subsection (Annex 8, Compliance


Kosh (3rd subsection)

Voskevaz (2nd subsection)

Aruch (2nd subsection)

Parpi (2nd subsection)

28 149-004 և ,

և ,

,

,

29 149-005 .,

,

30 149-006 .,

,

31 149-007

32 150-009

33 050-026 և .

34 050-027 .

35 106-028 Ե

36 113-003

37 113-004

38 222-010 Ե ,

39 225-005 ,

,

,

,

40 228-010

41 237-009

42 245-015 ,

,

, ,

43 217-002 Ե ,

,

Ե ,

Ե ,

Ե44 218-009 ,

,

, ,

և

45 218-010

46 221-003 ,

,

47 221-020 ,

Ղ , և

,

48 221-021

Ujan (3rd subsection)

49 221-027 ,

,

,

, ,

և

50 221-028 ,

,

51 221-029 ,

,

,

52 222-007 Ղ , Ե

Ե , Ղ

, Ղ ,

Ղ

53 222-008 Ե ,

, Ե

54 228-002 , Ղ

, ,

,

55 228-008 , Ղ

Ղ , Ղ

, Ղ

56 230-010 ,

57 230-013 ,

58 231-002 ,

,

59 233-009 ,

Ղ ,

, ,

60 245-014 , Ե

,

,

61 255-001 և , և

, և

, և ,

և

62 255-003 Ե ,

,

,

63 255-004 ,

,

,

64 221-002 ,

65 228-003 ,

66 228-005

67 237-002 ,

,

, ,

68 233-007 Ե ,

69 245-002

70 245-003 ,

,

, ,

71 245-004. Ե

72 218-005 (

և )

73 218-004

74 218-014

75 218-013

76 225-003

77 225-002

78 255-006 Ե79 221-024 ,

80 221-025

81 233-002

82 245-007

83 255-002 ,

,

84 228-004 ,

,

,

85 237-006 ,

,

,

86 218-016 (

`

, ,

,

, ,

)

87 218-015

88 218-006 Ղ

89 221-019

90 218-011

91 679-001

92 230-012

93 245-009 Ե , Ե

94 224-002 ,

, ,

95 224-003

96 224-005

97 225-001 և

98 228-001

99 230-015 ,

,

100 233-003 և

101 241-001

102 245-006 Ե

103 245-008 Ե

104 245-011 ,

105 245-012

106 245-013 ,

,

,

107 246-001 ,

108 255-005

109 255-007

110 230-011 ,

,

,

Ե

111 233-001 ,

,

112 222-009 Ե

113 218-023

114 218-024

115 669-001

116 217-001

117 237-001 /

Ե /

118 218-017

119 218-018 ,

120 225-006 ,

, /

/, / /

121 225-007 ,

122 225-008

123 256-005 Ղ ,

,

Ղ , Ղ ,

Ղ ,

Ղ ,

Ղ124 256-006 / /

125 256-007 / /

126 245-010 (

, ,

, ,

, ,

, )

127 231-007 ,

,

, ,

128 221-022 ,

129 221-023 ,

,

130 237-007,

,

,

,

131 237-008

132 237-011

133 218-003 , ,

,

134 228-011

135 224-007

136 229-002

137 124-017

138 129-010 , ,

, :

139 119-005

140 119-007

141 120-002

142 130-026

143 130-014

144 132-535

145 212-010 ØºÉùáÝ ²½ÇÏÛ³Ý146 212-009 Ü³ñ»Ï ²½ÇÏÛ³Ý147 209-005 ê³Ùí»É ´³¹³ÉÛ³Ý148 212-034 È³ñÇë³ ´³ÉáÛ³Ý/ և149 212-033 Ø³ñïÇÝ ´³ÉáÛ³Ý150 209-004 Ø³ÝáõÏ Ð³ÏáµÛ³Ý151 209-003 Øáõñ³¹ Ð³ÏáµÛ³Ý152 214-020 Ð³ÛÏ³½ èá½ÇÏÛ³Ý

Aghdzq (3rd subsection)

Agarak (3rd subsection)

153 212-021 Ð³ëÙÇÏ ÐáíÝ³ÝÛ³Ý154 212-024 º÷ñ»Ù Î³ñ³å»ïÛ³Ý155 214-023 ÜáõÝ» Î³ñ³å»ïÛ³Ý156 212-014 ê³Õ³Ã»É Î³ñ³å»ïÛ³Ý157 217-005 ÜáñÇÏ Ê³ã³ïñÛ³Ý158 218-005 ¶³ñ»·ÇÝ Ø³ñïÇñáëÛ³Ý159 218-007 Î³ñÇÝ» Ø³ñïÇñáëÛ³Ý160 214-046 (214-013) È¨áÝ Øáõñ³¹Û³Ý161 212-015 Øáõñ³¹ Øáõñ³¹Û³Ý162 218-010 Þ³Ñ»Ý Ü³ßÇÏÛ³Ý163 212-017 ²ñ¨ß³ï Ü³½³ñÛ³Ý164 209-007 (209-014) Üáñ³Ûñ ²½Ç½µ»ÏÛ³Ý165 216-007 Üí»ñ Ü³ßÇÏÛ³Ý166 216-004 Ð³ÛÏ³½ èßïáõÝÛ³Ý167 216-005 ØÇë³Ï èßïáõÝÛ³Ý168 211-005 ì³Ñ»-¼³ñ»Ñ ê³é³çÛ³Ý169 216-002 ²ÝÝ³ Â³Ù³½Û³Ý170 211-017 (211-007) ¼áñÑ³µ áíÙ³ëÛ³Ý171 201-006 .172 201-007 Ե173 201-004 .174 212-020 ¶³·ÇÏ ²ëÉ³ÝÛ³Ý175 209-006 ê³Ùí»É ´³¹³ÉÛ³Ý176 217-003 ¸»ñ»ÝÇÏ Ø³ÝáõÏÛ³Ý177 217-002 ÐáíÑ³ÝÝ»ë Ø³ÝáõÏÛ³Ý178 216-006 èßïáõÝ èßïáõÝÛ³Ý179 202-010 180 202-030 181 207-042 182 201-011 ., և ,

183 034-019 184 617-003

185 221-034 186 207-001 187 033-022 (033-015) The affected part of this land have already been acquired

according to LARP, but then the engeeniring team revealed that

for the construction of an underpasse at Agarak community more

land area is needed, so it was decided to acquire also the

remaining part of the land (the agreement with the owner was

reached ).

188 034-017 Ղ., 189 201-012

1 Ե և

և

, ՝ :

arm: north south road corridor investment program tranche 2 · z ze o vo ui de Àelop ue vt a vd...

Documents