arguments (part 1)

38
Zaid Ali Alsagoff [email protected] Module 3: Module 3: Arguments Arguments Part 1 Part 1

Upload: zaid-alsagoff

Post on 26-Dec-2014

6.079 views

Category:

Technology


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Module 3 - Arguments (Part 1)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Arguments (Part 1)

Zaid Ali Alsagoff

[email protected]

Module 3:Module 3:ArgumentsArguments

Part 1Part 1

Page 2: Arguments (Part 1)

All-Star Wrestling = Real?All-Star Wrestling = Real?

Is All-Star Wrestling real?

Do you watch Wrestling?

Do you like Wrestling?Why do you like

Wrestling?

Page 3: Arguments (Part 1)

Do You Agree? Why?Do You Agree? Why?

The National Education Blueprint is aimed at bringing about a major change in the education system. Below we compare the characteristics of a student today and what the blueprint promises in 2010 (NST, 18/01-2007).

The Student in 2007 The Student in 2010

Lacks confidence Self-confident

Lacks communication skills Able to communicate well

Lacks leadership skills Has leadership skills

May not be able to speak proper English Able to speak good English

Too dependent on tuition Won’t be dependent on tuition

Does not mix freely with students of other races Mixes freely with students of other races

Studies in a very exam-oriented environment Studies in an environment that is not too exam-oriented

Not IT-savvy Is IT-savvy

Not creative and innovative Is creative and innovative

May not take part in co-curricular activities Takes part in more co-curricular activities

May not know how to read, write and count Has no problems with reading, writing orcounting

Is not very marketable More marketable

You must unlearn

what you have

learned.

Page 4: Arguments (Part 1)

Module 3: Arguments - Part 1 (of 3)Module 3: Arguments - Part 1 (of 3)

1. Distinguishing Fact & Opinion

7. Evaluating Arguments

2. What is an Argument?

5. Deduction &Induction

6. Analyzing Arguments

8. Writing Arguments

3. Identifying Premises & Conclusions

4. What Is Not an Argument?

Page 5: Arguments (Part 1)
Page 6: Arguments (Part 1)

3.1 Distinguishing Fact & Opinion 3.1 Distinguishing Fact & Opinion

Vince Carter is a Vince Carter is a Basketball Player. He Basketball Player. He plays in the NBA and plays in the NBA and

represented USA in the represented USA in the Sydney Olympic Games Sydney Olympic Games 2000. He is currently the 2000. He is currently the best player in the NBA.best player in the NBA.

Facts and Facts and Opinions, Opinions,

please please identify.identify.

Page 7: Arguments (Part 1)

3.1 Distinguishing Fact & Opinion3.1 Distinguishing Fact & Opinion

Fact = Can be proved or disproved

Opinion = Personal Belief

“Gubra starts at 9.00 pmGubra starts at 9.00 pm. . It’s a great movieIt’s a great movie!”

Page 8: Arguments (Part 1)

3.1 Facts3.1 Facts

Tell who, what, when, where, or how much.

Have a verifiable truth value.

Can be quantified and is specific.

Are supported by evidence.

FactFact OpinionOpinion

KL is the capital of Malaysia. KL is the best city in the world.

UNITAR is a University in Malaysia.

I love studying at UNITAR.

Yao Ming is more than 7 feet tall.

Yao Ming is very good looking.

(Source: The Oxford American Dictionary of Current English in English Dictionaries and Thesauruses; 2003)

"A fact is a thing that is occurred, to exist,

or to be true."

"A fact is a thing that is occurred, to exist,

or to be true."

Page 9: Arguments (Part 1)

3.1 Opinions3.1 Opinions

Tend to be vague.

Are personal beliefs or value judgments.

FactFact OpinionOpinionKL is the capital of Malaysia. KL is the best city in the world.

UNITAR is a University in Malaysia.

I love studying at UNITAR.

Yao Ming is more than 7 feet tall. Yao Ming is very good looking.

An opinion is a view about a particular issue. It is what the person believes or thinks, and

is not necessarily the truth.

An opinion is a view about a particular issue. It is what the person believes or thinks, and

is not necessarily the truth.

Some Opinion Clues

Judging

Good, Better, Best, Bad, Worse, Worst, Should, Must

Predicting

Will

Shall

Page 10: Arguments (Part 1)

3.1 Exercise I: 3.1 Exercise I: iPhone

“Every once in a while a revolutionary product comes along that changes everything… It's the ultimate digital device. It's like having your life in your pocket.“

“The iPhone will be ultra-slim - less than half-an-inch (1.3cm) thick - boasting a phone, Internet capability and an MP3 player as well as featuring a two megapixel digital camera”

Facts and Facts and Opinions, Opinions,

please please identify.identify.

I am Steve Jobs, so you

can trust me.

Page 11: Arguments (Part 1)

3.1 Exercise I: 3.1 Exercise I: iPhone

“This is a leapfrog product with a revolutionary new interface with software five years ahead of any other phone and desktop class applications, not those crippled applications you find on those other phones”

"Most advanced phones are called smart phone. But they are actually not so smart, and really not so easy to use. When you get a chance to get your hands on it, I think you'll agree, we've reinvented the phone.”

Facts and Facts and Opinions, Opinions,

please please identify.identify.

I am Steve Jobs, so you

can trust me.

Page 12: Arguments (Part 1)

3.1 Exercise II: Read the Article3.1 Exercise II: Read the Article

““Making of the Creative Student”Making of the Creative Student”

Facts and Facts and Opinions, Opinions,

please please identify.identify.

Page 13: Arguments (Part 1)
Page 14: Arguments (Part 1)
Page 15: Arguments (Part 1)

3.2 What Is an Argument? 3.2 What Is an Argument?

Argument - A form of thinking in which certain statements (reasons) are offered in support of another statement (a conclusion).

Premises (Reasons) - Statements that support another statement (known as a conclusion), justify it, or make it more probable.

Conclusion - A statement that explains, asserts, or predicts on the basis of statements (known as reasons) that are offered as evidence for it.

A Claim Defended with Reasons.A Claim Defended with Reasons.

Page 16: Arguments (Part 1)

3.2 Example – A Simple Argument3.2 Example – A Simple Argument

1. Lawyers earn a lot of money. (Premise)

2. I want to earn a lot of money. (Premise)

3. I should become a Lawyer. (Conclusion)

Page 17: Arguments (Part 1)
Page 18: Arguments (Part 1)

TIPS

3.3 Identifying Premises & Conclusions3.3 Identifying Premises & Conclusions

Look for premise indicators that provide clues when premises are being offered. Examples: because, since, for, given that, as, judging from, and seeing that.

Look for conclusion indicators that provide clues when conclusions are being offered. Examples: therefore, thus, hence, so, as a result, accordingly, consequently, and which shows that.

Page 19: Arguments (Part 1)

3.3 Identifying Premises & Conclusions3.3 Identifying Premises & Conclusions

If the passage contains no indicator words, try these two strategies:

Ask yourself, "What claim is the writer or speaker trying to prove?" That claim will be the conclusion.

Try putting the word "therefore" before each of the statements in turn. The statement it fits best will be the conclusion.

TIPS

Page 20: Arguments (Part 1)

3.3 Exercise 13.3 Exercise 1

Make a will. Otherwise, the state Make a will. Otherwise, the state will determine who gets your stuff.will determine who gets your stuff.

(Andrew Tobias, "Isn't It Time You Faced the Future?" 2001)(Andrew Tobias, "Isn't It Time You Faced the Future?" 2001)

Identify the premise(s)

and conclusion

of this argument.

Page 21: Arguments (Part 1)

3.3 Exercise 23.3 Exercise 2

Research universities also must aggressively Research universities also must aggressively support teaching. After all, a significant support teaching. After all, a significant percentage of their students are percentage of their students are undergraduates, and such institutions are undergraduates, and such institutions are clearly obligated to provide them a quality clearly obligated to provide them a quality education. education.

Ernest L. Boyer, Ernest L. Boyer, Scholarship ReconsideredScholarship Reconsidered, 1990), 1990)

Identify the premise(s)

and conclusion of

this argument.

Page 22: Arguments (Part 1)

3.3 Exercise 33.3 Exercise 3

No one who observes people can pretend No one who observes people can pretend that in fact they always seek anything like that in fact they always seek anything like their own long-run advantage. If this were the their own long-run advantage. If this were the case only stupidity could explain how case only stupidity could explain how frequently and obviously they act contrary to frequently and obviously they act contrary to their own long-run advantage. People are not their own long-run advantage. People are not that stupid! that stupid! (Charles Hartshorne and Creighton Peden, (Charles Hartshorne and Creighton Peden, Whitehead's View of RealityWhitehead's View of Reality, 1981), 1981)

Identify the premise(s)

and conclusion of

this argument.

Page 23: Arguments (Part 1)

3.3 Exercise 43.3 Exercise 4

We have good reason to believe that people will exist We have good reason to believe that people will exist in the future and that they will be similar enough to us in the future and that they will be similar enough to us that we can have a good idea of what their well-being that we can have a good idea of what their well-being requires. Knowing this and knowing that our present requires. Knowing this and knowing that our present actions can influence their future well-being, it is actions can influence their future well-being, it is reasonable to conclude that future people must be reasonable to conclude that future people must be given some ethical consideration by presently living given some ethical consideration by presently living human beings.human beings.

(Joseph R. DesJardins, (Joseph R. DesJardins, Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to EnvironmentalEnvironmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental PhilosophyPhilosophy, 3rd ed., 2001), 3rd ed., 2001)

Identify the premise(s)

and conclusion of

this argument.

Page 24: Arguments (Part 1)
Page 25: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 What Is Not an Argument?3.4 What Is Not an Argument?

More precisely, a passage is an argument if and only if:

It is a group of two or more statements.

One of those statements (the conclusion) is claimed or intended to be supported by the other(s) (the premises).

AnAn argumentargument is a claim defended with reasonsis a claim defended with reasons..

Page 26: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 What Is Not an Argument?3.4 What Is Not an Argument?

• Notice three important things that follow from this definition:

Arguments consist entirely of statements (sentences that it makes sense to regard as either true or false). Questions, commands, and other kinds of non-statements cannot be parts of arguments (Keep in mind, however, that rhetorical questions should be treated as statements.).

No single statement is an argument. Arguments always consist of at least two statements.

Nothing counts as an argument unless it is claimed or intended that one statement follows from one or more other statements in the passage. In other words, a passage is an argument only if the speaker or writer intends to offer evidence or reasons why another statement should be accepted as true.

Page 27: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 What Is Not an Argument?3.4 What Is Not an Argument?

Five kinds of passages that are sometimes confused with arguments are:

Reports A statement or group of statements intended simply to convey information about a subject.

Unsupported statements of belief or opinions

Is a statement or set of statements in which the speaker or writer expresses his or her personal opinion, but offers no reasons or evidence to back up that opinion.

Illustrations Is a passage intended to provide examples that illustrate or support a claim, not to provide convincing evidence that the claim is true.

Conditional Statements Is an if-then statement. It is an assertion that such-and-such is true if something else is true.

Explanations Is a statement or set of statements that seeks to provide an account of why something has occurred or why something is the case.

Page 28: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 Example: Report3.4 Example: Report

Planet Earth was much drier in the Triassic than it is now, and there were large deserts in inland areas. There were no flowering plants or grasses--they

evolved much later. The most common trees were conifers, similar to today's pines. Other large plants included yews, ginkgos, and the palmlike cycads.

Moisture-loving ferns and horsetails thrived by lakes and rivers.

(Philip Whitfield, Simon & Schuster's Children's Guide to Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals, 1992)

Page 29: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 Example: Unsupported statements of 3.4 Example: Unsupported statements of belief or opinionbelief or opinion

For the person who called and said Larry Bird was better than Michael Jordan, wake up. No one was ever better than Michael Jordan, not even Kareem in his glory and not even Dr. J.

(From a newspaper call-in column)

Page 30: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 Example: Illustration3.4 Example: Illustration

Almost all groups agree in holding other groups to be inferior to themselves. The American Indians looked upon themselves as the chosen people,

specially created by the Great Spirit as an uplifting example for mankind. One Indian tribe

called itself "The Only Men"; another called itself "Men of Men"; the Caribs said, "We alone are

people."

(Will Durant, Our Oriental Heritage, 1935)

Page 31: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 Example: Conditional Statement3.4 Example: Conditional Statement

If Aida comes to the wedding then I will come to the wedding.

Page 32: Arguments (Part 1)

3.4 Example: Explanation3.4 Example: Explanation

I speak good English because my parents encouraged me to practice it everyday.

Page 33: Arguments (Part 1)

Group ActivityGroup Activity

Break into groups of 4 - 6, read the article provided (Title: “Making of the Creative Student”, NST, 18/01-2007) and then reflect, discuss and answer the following questions:

Yes? – Which of the “The Student in 2007” characteristics do you have (your perception)?

Why? – Please discuss “Why do you think that you lack this/these characteristic(s)?”

How? – How can the education system (or student) encourage/facilitate “The Student in 2010” characteristics?

* Use the template provided by your lecturer.

20 min Group discussion

5 min Summarize discussion findings

15 min Group presentation & discussionThe Group leader must submit their findings in hard or soft-copy format to the lecturer before or during the next class.

Page 34: Arguments (Part 1)

SummarySummary

1. Distinguishing

Fact & Opinion

Fact = Can be proved or disproved

Opinion = Personal Belief

2. What is an Argument? An argument is a claim defended with reasons.

3. Identifying Premises

& Conclusions

Look for premise indicators that provide clues when premises are being offered (e.g. because, since, for).

Look for conclusion indicators that provide clues when conclusions are being offered (e.g. therefore, thus, hence, so).

If the passage contains no indicator words, try these two strategies: 1) Ask yourself, "What claim is the writer or speaker trying to prove?" That claim will be the conclusion. 2)Try putting the word "therefore" before each of the statements in turn. The statement it fits best will be the conclusion.

4. What Is Not

an Argument?

Five kinds of passages that are sometimes confused with arguments are: Reports, Unsupported statements of belief or opinions, Illustrations, Conditional Statements, and Explanations

Page 35: Arguments (Part 1)

Any Questions? Any Questions?

Page 36: Arguments (Part 1)

The EndThe End

Page 37: Arguments (Part 1)

Contact DetailsContact Details

Zaid Ali AlsagoffZaid Ali Alsagoff

UNIVERSITI TUN ABDUL RAZAK 16-5, Jalan SS 6/1247301 Kelana Jaya

Selangor Darul EhsanMalaysia

E-mail: [email protected]

Tel: 603-7627 7238 Fax: 603-7627 7246

Page 38: Arguments (Part 1)

ReferencesReferences

Online ResourcesOnline ResourcesCourseware Module 7: http://cw.unitar.edu.my/ugb2013/c7/index.htm

BooksBooksChapter 2: G Bassham, W Irwin, H Nardone, J M Wallace, Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction, McGraw-Hill International Edition, 2007Chapter 10: John Chaffee, Thinking Critically, 6th Edition, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 2000

GraphicsRock Cartoon: http://www.homestead.com/jasonpaulhamus/files/wrestling/rock3.jpgRock Bottom slam: http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/e/ee/250px-Rockbottom.jpg John Cena: http://www.photosleeve.com/d/42473-1/cena.JPG Batista: http://sportsmedia.ign.com/sports/image/article/635/635699/batista-animal-unleashed-20050721053017434.jpgTriple H: http://www.thestunner.4mg.com/images/cool%20triple%20h%20cut.gifStone Cold: http://images.quizilla.com/A/AjLake/1074381314_sStoneCold.jpg Hulk Hogan: http://sportsmedia.ign.com/sports/image/article/630/630882/hulk-hogan-interview-20050701022156947.jpg Vince Carter Dunk: http://www.usabasketball.com/images/carter_dunk_france_220.jpg Yoda: http://swg.stratics.com/content/lore/personas/images/yoda.gif