argo monthly report 2016/11

93
JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016 Argo Status M. Belbéoch, Argo Technical Coordinator [email protected] http://argo.jcommops.org

Upload: jcommops

Post on 19-Feb-2017

46 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Argo Status

M. Belbéoch, Argo Technical [email protected]

http://argo.jcommops.org

Page 2: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

• Executive Summary• Overview• Implementation• Data Flow• Instrumentation• Operations

• Biogeochemical Argo• Deep Argo

• Communication

Outline

Page 3: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Argo is doing very well but some substantial gaps are anticipated and challenges remain to optimize and sustain the array:

• Making deployment strategy and planning more cooperative• Address the upcoming gaps in the Pacific Ocean• Distribute excess of North Atlantic Ocean floats in Gulf Stream, South

Atlantic and possibly in South West Indian Ocean• Making data distribution more automatic (and reach 4000 by AST#18)• Keep delayed mode data distribution on track

We can note additionally that:• Iridium is now the major telecommunication system on use • All float models do not perform equally

Open questions for next AST: Could more AST members commit to chartered ship time for 2017?

Executive Summary

Page 4: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Overview

Page 5: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Implementation – Activity

• Global array optimal (quantitatively) – on light increase

• Atlantic Ocean optimal - stable• Indian Ocean optimal - 10 % increase• Pacific Ocean lightly optimal - light decrease• Southern Ocean half implemented - stable

Performance Indicators

Page 6: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Implementation – Activity (%)

Performance Indicators

(%)

Page 7: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Implementation – Intensity of deployments(this KPI had some errors – now corrected)

• Global array deployments slightly low – continued decrease for a year

• Atlantic Ocean optimal (over seeding in North Atlantic)• Pacific Ocean too low – continued decrease for a year • Indian Ocean over seeding – was required• Southern Ocean too low

Performance Indicators

Page 8: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Implementation – Intensity of deployments (%)

Performance Indicators

(%)

Page 9: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Yearly DeploymentsDeployment nb is appropriate but on decrease.

Nb

of d

eplo

ymen

t

Page 10: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Yearly DeploymentsNorth Atlantic:Target = 83 / year

Average last three years = 135 (70% over seeding)

Nb

of d

eplo

ymen

t

Page 11: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Implementation – Data Spatial CoverageMonthly

• Global: good – 48% of the array is well sampled - stable

• Atlantic Ocean - good • Pacific Ocean - good.• Indian Ocean - good• Southern Ocean – poor (should improve soon with summer season)

Key Performance Indicators

Page 12: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Implementation – Data Spatial CoverageMonthly

Key Performance Indicators

(%)

Page 13: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

National contributions3915 fully operational floats

Page 14: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

NetworksArgo Equivalent (10%), Argo BGC (7.5%), Argo Deep (0.6%).

Page 15: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Spatial CoverageLatest monthly observations (gaps in blue).

Page 16: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Network GrowthNetwork evolution – light increase

Distinct floats distributing observations at GDACs (monthly).

(nb)

Page 17: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Implementation

Page 18: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationDistribution of operational floats by country

Page 19: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationOperational floats evolution, by national contribution.

(nb)

Page 20: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationOperational floats evolution, by national contribution.

Zoom (no USA).

(nb)

Page 21: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationSimple float density as of 2016-12-01, 6°x6°.

Page 22: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationAge = (Latest Observation date – Deployment date).

Page 23: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationOld (red) / young (blue) spatial clusters.

Page 24: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Pacific OceanOperational Floats > 4 years removed

This is how the Pacific Ocean could look like in a couple of years from now …

Page 25: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationFloat density: decimal floats, weighted by their probability to survive one year

Page 26: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationPlease update your deployment plans for 2017 before AST meeting

Page 27: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ImplementationSimple density including deployment plans (to optimize dark green zones).

Page 28: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data Flow

Page 29: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowA month of observations (at IFREMER) by DAC.

Page 30: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data flowA month of observations (at IFREMER), distribution by DAC.

Page 31: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Performance IndicatorsDelivery on decrease.

Timeliness improving (+5%)

Page 32: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data DeliveryPlease release data from pending floats (~100)

in order to reach 4000 operational units by next AST meeting 2017- 03http://www.jcommops.org/ftp/Argo/Doc/2016-PENDING.csv

Floats registered

Floats registered and active

PROGRAM #PENDING FLOATSArgo UK 22Argo PMEL 15Argo UK Bio 12MOCCA-EU 9BioArgo UMaine 8Argo ITALY 6Argo INDIA 5Argo WHOI 5Argo BSH 4Argo eq. NAVOCEANO 4MOCCA-NETH 4Argo eq. CHINA 3Argo NIMS/KMA 3Argo SIO 3NAOS-Canada 3NAOS-France 2Argo BRAZIL Navy 1Argo CHINA 1Coriolis 1Coriolis-BIOArgo 1Coriolis-OVIDE 1Coriolis-remOcean eq. 1TOTAL 114

Page 33: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowConfirm float status (e.g. deployment failure) or enable data distribution.

Page 34: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowDelays at IFREMER

Page 35: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowDelays at NRL-MRY

Page 36: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowGDACs Delays (average), by DAC.

November 2016.

Page 37: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowGDACs Delays (median), by DAC.

November 2016

Page 38: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowGDACs Delays on target (24h), by DAC.

November 2016

Page 39: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data Flow

Page 40: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowA view on sampling levels.

Page 41: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowLower quality PSAL profiles.

Page 42: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowLower quality TEMP profiles.

Page 43: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowDelayed-Mode QC Achieved/DMQC_ELIGIBLE ratio = 68%.

Page 44: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data FlowDelayed-Mode QC stable over last months (68%)

(%)

Page 45: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Instrumentation

Page 46: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Instrumentation

Page 47: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

InstrumentationDistribution of operational floats by model

Page 48: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

InstrumentationModels evolution.

Page 49: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

InstrumentationModels evolution (nb operational floats by month)

(nb)

Page 50: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

InstrumentationModels evolution (nb deployments by year)

(nb)

Page 51: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Instrumentation51% Iridium, 48% Argos.

Page 52: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

InstrumentationIridium is today the major telecommunication system used on floats

Page 53: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

ReliabilityBy float model, floats deployed since 2005

Page 54: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Target: 75 profiles distributed

Page 55: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Target: 150 profiles distributed

Page 56: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Performance Indicators75 profiles distributed (top): 73% stable

150 profiles distributed (bottom): 39% on decrease over last months

Page 57: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

5. Operations

Page 58: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

HistoryOcean is well shared by Argo partners.

But do we see still too much color patches ?

Page 59: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

HistoryRegions sometimes unnecessarily over sampled and regions never visited.

Logistics sometimes drive implementation

Page 60: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

HistoryRegions never visited show however some observations from floats that

drifted in, but still show some regular gaps.

Page 61: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

HistoryRegions never visited show however some observations from floats that

drifted in, but still show some regular gaps.

Page 62: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

HistoryRegions never visited show however some observations from floats that

drifted in, but still show some regular gaps.

Page 63: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

HistoryRegions never visited show however some observations from floats that

drifted in, but still show some regular gaps.

Page 64: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

2016 ShipsKaharoa is the ship of the year (Nb deployments)

Page 65: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Biogeochemical Argo

Page 66: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Biogeochemical Argo needs to double the effort to reach its target and implement the full package (6 sensors) on all floats.

IMPLEMENTATION• Activity stabilizing at 30%• Intensity of deployments 45% to be doubled• 1000th BGC float will be soon deployed …DATA FLOW• Optimize real-time distribution and delays, in cooperation with existing

Argo National Data Centres• Metadata improving (SENSOR_MODEL critical to track capabilities)INSTRUMENTATION• Sensor diversity progressing (data availability by sensor to be checked)• But 45% of the network is Oxygen only• Life expectancy of BGC floats is lower than others (2.5 years in 2015 vs

4.8)

Executive Summary

Page 67: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Biogeochemical ArgoPerformance Indicators

Page 68: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

National ContributionsSome key Argo national programmes are missing

Page 69: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Biogeochemical ArgoGrowth of operational floats

(monthly distinct floats at GDACs)

(nb)

Page 70: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

National ContributionsGrowth of operational floats

(monthly distinct floats at GDACs)

(nb)

Page 71: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Yearly deployments(n

b)

Page 72: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Sensor Types

Page 73: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Oxygenstable

Page 74: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Fluorometer+5

Page 75: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Scatterometer+8

Page 76: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Radiometer+2

Page 77: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

pH+4

Page 78: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Nitrate+46

Page 79: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Life ExpectancyA BGC float deployed in 2015 has a 2.5 years life expectancy

Page 80: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Deep Argo

Page 81: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

National Contributions25 operational floats

Page 82: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

National contributionsYearly deployments

(nb)

Page 83: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Planning 2017

Page 84: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Data flowMore than 2000 deep profiles available

Page 85: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Communication

Page 86: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Website NewsNotify tens of floats in a couple of minutes through metdata upload (CSV, US

meta, netCDF). Immediate update on interactive map.Overwrite existing records.

Page 87: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Website NewsSearch, Inspect floats by location status (iced/beached)

Updated at each new location comparing with land and monthly ice extent polygons.Tag a float for recovery.

Page 88: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Website NewsNew sections for Links and Documents

Page 89: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Website NewsInclude any set of monthly maps or KPIs on your own website.Can be done for interactive map and Platform Inspect page too.

Page 90: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Website NewsAccess float models statistics

Page 91: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Website NewsCompare KPIs for different basin on same graph

Page 92: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Website newsAddition of Scripps Argo atlas in interactive map. First tests.

Page 93: Argo Monthly Report 2016/11

JCOMM in situ Observations Programme Support Centre December 2016

Best wishes for 2017 from JCOMMOPS!