are race

2
 Are race-specific drugs unethical? With BiDil on the market, experts weigh the moral implications Since being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in June, BiDil, the f irst drug marketed s pecifically for tre atm ent of heart failure among African Am ericans, has aroused suspicion about its safety and set off a debate about attitudes surrounding race and medical research. In clinical tria ls, BiDil r educed deaths by 43% and decreased hospitalization by 39% among African Am erican heart failure patients. It also reduced hea rt failure symptoms . The trials were halted after r esults showed a significant su rvival benefit. Researche rs are uncertain why the drug works better a mong blacks than other races. Although preliminary results were success ful, s ome in the African American community say the marketing of BiDil may expand this move towa rd personalized medicine and increase the number of race -specific d rugs in the marketplace. "We need to understand the biology of this drag and the genetic basis unde r which this drug w orks and the people it would apply to. We feel very s trongly that those individuals would not be lim ited to the people we call black or A frican American," says Char les Rotimi, Ph.D. , director of the National Hum an Genome Center at Howard Universi ty in Washington, D.C. Furthermore, adds Rotimi, the notion of a race -specific drug will g ive the impression that the biology of black people is different than others. Historically, says D r. Winston Price, former president of the National Medical Ass ociation, clinical trials and drug research have focused on wh ite males, wh ich may contribute to health disparities among whites and other races . But limiting s tudies solely to blacks is equally amiss, claims P rice. "The A -Heft trial showed the medicati on to be effective in treating severe heart failure. More than 1,000 African Americans in the trial s howed significant improvement with the drug," he said. "Lack of dive rsity in the makeup of the s ubjects and researchers in c linical trials limits the abili ty to address and elim inate health issues." More than 5 mill ion Americans, 750,000 of wh om are black, suff er from h eart failure, a h ighly fatal condition that weakens th e heart and prevents it f rom pumping enough blood. The FDA originally rejected BiDil, w hen it was s ubmitted for approval in 1997 as a generic drug for treatment of heart failure, citing there was no concl usive evidence showing it was effective. But in a controversial move, the FDA approved BiDil --which drugmakers cla im allows the hear t to pu mp easier by relaxing blood vessels -- for self-identified African American patients, marking the first ever ethnic drug to hit t he market. B. Waine Kong, CEO of the Association of Black Cardiologists Inc. , which co -sponsored the BiDil study, says clinical r esults back the marketing of B iDil among African Am ericans. "I'm aw are of the issues that BiDil has raised , but if a m edication works, wh at's wrong with that? It doesn't mean we won't stop monitoring the drug to see its effect on t he black community." Charmaine Royal, Ph.D., director of the GenEthics Unit at the National Human Genome Center, says despite BiDil's initial success, African Americans should not be treated as a m onolith when it comes to drug therapy. "I see the e thical issues intertwined w i th the scientific issues . There is no jus tification, on the basis of s cience, to assume that a drug will wo rk for all people in a pa rticular ethnic or sociodemographic group, and race m akes the assumption that everyone in a group is the same. Based on wha t we k now about human genome variation, a drug w ill not work for everyone in a particular group and there are people in o ther groups for w hom it might work." There are also economic issues, claims Royal, w hich are not being widely discussed, name ly that NitroMed Inc., BiDil's manufacturer, has a monopoly on this patent, wh ich was due to expire in 2007 but has n ow been extended to 2020 as a result of the drug-maker re-marketing BiDil for use among African Ame ricans. Another issue is cost. BiD il sells for $1.80 per pill, far m ore than generic drugs at 30 cents a pill. But William "BJ" Jones,  NitroMed's vice president of m arketing, says no one will pay r etail price. "B iDil will be f ree for people whose income is und er the  poverty level." While Jones and others market ing new drug treatments see a big future in personalized medicines, those in the medical community who remain skeptical of ethnic drugs say long -term research will be the true determ inant. "I don't think it's going to evolve at a pace that might increase t he number of available drugs for select populations because of the negative feedback that has arisen,  particularly among constituents who cu rrently control the purse s trings for research. " says Price. "I think it will continue to be a topic of discussion for the next five to 10 years, but will move slowly in terms of turning out research -based clinical trials that is race-specific." COPYRIGHT 2005 Earl G. Graves Publishing Co., Inc. COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group y 1 

Upload: sharma-rahul

Post on 09-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

8/8/2019 Are race

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/are-race 1/2

 Are race-specific drugs unethical? With BiDil on themarket, experts weigh the moral implications

Since being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in June, BiDil, the first drug marketed specifically for treatm ent of 

heart failure among African Americans, has aroused suspicion about its safety and set off a debate about attitudes surrounding race

and medical research.

In clinical trials, BiDil reduced deaths by 43% and decreased hospitalization by 39% among African American heart failure patients.

It also reduced heart failure symptoms. The trials were halted after results showed a significant survival benefit. Researche rs are

uncertain why the drug works better among blacks than other races.

Although preliminary results were successful, s ome in the African American community say the marketing of BiDil may expand

this move toward personalized medicine and increase the number of race -specific drugs in the marketplace.

"We need to understand the biology of this drag and the genetic basis unde r which this drug works and the people it would apply to.

We feel very strongly that those individuals would not be limited to the people we call black or African American," says Char les

Rotimi, Ph.D., director of the National Human Genome Center at Howard University in Washington, D.C.

Furthermore, adds Rotimi, the notion of a race -specific drug will give the impression that the biology of black people is differentthan others. Historically, says Dr. Winston Price, former president of the National Medical Association, clinical trials and drug

research have focused on white males, which may contribute to health disparities among whites and other races. But limiting s tudies

solely to blacks is equally amiss, claims Price. "The A -Heft trial showed the medicati on to be effective in treating severe heart

failure. More than 1,000 African Americans in the trial showed significant improvement with the drug," he said. "Lack of dive rsity

in the makeup of the subjects and researchers in clinical trials limits the abili ty to address and eliminate health issues."

More than 5 million Americans, 750,000 of whom are black, suffer from heart failure, a highly fatal condition that weakens th e

heart and prevents it from pumping enough blood. The FDA originally rejected BiDil, w hen it was submitted for approval in 1997

as a generic drug for treatment of heart failure, citing there was no conclusive evidence showing it was effective. But in a

controversial move, the FDA approved BiDil --which drugmakers claim allows the heart to pu mp easier by relaxing blood vessels --

for self-identified African American patients, marking the first ever ethnic drug to hit the market.

B. Waine Kong, CEO of the Association of Black Cardiologists Inc., which co -sponsored the BiDil study, says clinical r esults back 

the marketing of BiDil among African Americans. "I'm aware of the issues that BiDil has raised, but if a medication works, wh at's

wrong with that? It doesn't mean we won't stop monitoring the drug to see its effect on the black community."

Charmaine Royal, Ph.D., director of the GenEthics Unit at the National Human Genome Center, says despite BiDil's initial success,

African Americans should not be treated as a monolith when it comes to drug therapy. "I see the ethical issues intertwined wi th the

scientific issues. There is no justification, on the basis of science, to assume that a drug will work for all people in a pa rticular ethnic

or sociodemographic group, and race makes the assumption that everyone in a group is the same. Based on what we k now about

human genome variation, a drug will not work for everyone in a particular group and there are people in other groups for whom it

might work."

There are also economic issues, claims Royal, which are not being widely discussed, namely that NitroMed Inc., BiDil's

manufacturer, has a monopoly on this patent, which was due to expire in 2007 but has now been extended to 2020 as a result of the

drug-maker re-marketing BiDil for use among African Americans.

Another issue is cost. BiDil sells for $1.80 per pill, far more than generic drugs at 30 cents a pill. But William "BJ" Jones,

 NitroMed's vice president of marketing, says no one will pay retail price. "BiDil will be free for people whose income is und er the

 poverty level."

While Jones and others market ing new drug treatments see a big future in personalized medicines, those in the medical community

who remain skeptical of ethnic drugs say long -term research will be the true determinant. "I don't think it's going to evolve at a pace

that might increase the number of available drugs for select populations because of the negative feedback that has arisen,

 particularly among constituents who currently control the purse strings for research." says Price. "I think it will continue to be a

topic of discussion for the next five to 10 years, but will move slowly in terms of turning out research -based clinical trials that is

race-specific."

COPYRIGHT 2005 Earl G. Graves Publishing Co., Inc.

COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group

y  1 

8/8/2019 Are race

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/are-race 2/2

y  2