are barcelona’s advanced zones for motorcycles effective?
TRANSCRIPT
AreBarcelona’sAdvancedZonesforMotorcycles
Effective?
Katherine Pérez,MPH,PhDElenaSantamariña-Rubio,MPH,PhD
International Conference on Transport & Health� 2017 27-29 June 2017 Barcelona
Backgroundandobjectives
Methods
ResultsPhaseI
ResultsPhaseII
LimitationsandConclusions
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
AdvancedZonesforMotorcycles
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Background• Streetsintersections:50%roadtrafficcrashes• InBarcelona:• >60.000mopedand>200.000motorcycles• 66%trafficcrashesincludeaPowerTwoWheel
• InNovember2009,36intersectionswereadaptedtohaveanadvancedzoneformotorcyclesandmopeds(ZAM).(PhaseI)
• Andduringtheyears2010and2011,16intersectionsmorezoneswereadapted.(PhaseII)
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Objectives
ToassesstheeffectivenessofAdvancedZonesforMotorcycles(ZAM)inBarcelonaon:• Roadtrafficcollisions• Peopleinjured• Motorcyclistsdrivers• Roadtrafficcollisionswithmotorcyclistsormopedinvolved
InPhaseIandPhaseII
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Design
Quasi-experimentalstudyoftimeseriesevaluationwithacomparisongroup.
Population
PeoplewhotraveledthroughthecityofBarcelona,duringtheperiodJanuary2002- December2014.
Intervention
Implementationofadvancedareasformotorcyclesandmopeds(ZAM)
• Interventiongroup:IntersectionswithZAM(areaandintersection)
• Comparisongroup:IntersectionswithoutZAM(areaandintersection)
Methods
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Zam area
30m ZAM
INTERVENTION (ZAM)
Zam intersection
Intersection
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Zam area
30m ZAM
COMPARISON GROUP (No ZAM)
Area without ZAM
34m Intersection
INTERVENTION (ZAM)
Zam intersection
Intersection
Intersection without ZAM
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Population
PeoplewhotraveledthroughthecityofBarcelona,duringtheperiodJanuary2002- December2014.
Methods
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Pre-Intervenció:2002-2009 Post-Intervenció:2010-2014
ZAMImplementation
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Pre-Intervenció:2002-2010 Post-Intervenció:2010-2014
Pre-intervention:2002-2009 Post-intervention:2010-2014
Pre-intervention:2002-2010 Post-intervention:2011-2014
Phase I
Phase II
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
• Sources of information• Local Police Register of road traffic crashe• Municipal statistics :
• Annual average daily traffic (AADT)• Inventory INCA. Information on Street characteristics
Outcomes• Road traffic collisions• People injured• Motorcyclists drivers• Road traffic collisions with motorcyclists or moped involved
Explained variables• Year, period (pre-intervention, post-intervention) and type of zone (ZAM, NO_ZAM)• Street characteristics: AADT, Width of the road, Number of lanes, Number of lanes ofService, Number of lanes for bus
• Characteristics of collisions: Collision type (pedestrian, lateral, etc.), action of thedriver (disobeying the traffic light, improper spin, etc.).
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Statisticalanalysis
Poïsson-Lognormalmixedmodels,witharandomfactorthatcollectsvariabilityduetorepeatedobservationsperyear,andadjustforoverdispersion
Fixedfactors:year,period(preandpost-intervention)andzone(ZAM,NO_ZAM)
Adjusted:AADTandbycharacteristicsofthestreets
Aninteractionisintroducedbetweenthezoneandtheperiodtoevaluatetheeffectivenessoftheintervention
Therelativerisk(RR)ofcollisioninthepost-interventionperiodwithrespecttothepre-interventionperiod,inZAMareasandNO_ZAM
Thepercentageofannualchangeinthepost-interventionperiodwithrespecttothepre-interventionperiod,thenumberofcollisions,injuredpersonsanddriversinvolved,inZAMareasandNO_ZAM
Methods
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Results Phase I
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
ZAM NO_ZAM
38,6 49,828,8 26,0 21,5 26,8 17,3 14,9
49,8 63,439,4 36,0 25,2 36,4 20,6 16,8
04080120160200240280
Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention
174,6
233,9
148,3 134,1125,4
172,4
93,4 87,0
155,8
196,8
142,4 125,0108,4
142,4
80,8 73,2
04080120160200240280
ZAM(34M)
Intersection
Annual mean of crashes, people injured and drivers involved
Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
Pre and Post-intervention period comparison. Phase I
(2002-2009) (2010-2014)
Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
ZAM NO_ZAM
38,6 49,828,8 26,0 21,5 26,8 17,3 14,9
49,8 63,439,4 36,0 25,2 36,4 20,6 16,8
04080120160200240280
Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention
174,6
233,9
148,3 134,1125,4
172,4
93,4 87,0
155,8
196,8
142,4 125,0108,4
142,4
80,8 73,2
04080120160200240280
ZAM(34M)
Intersection
Annual mean of crashes, people injured and drivers involved
* p<0,05 Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
Pre and Post-intervention period comparison. Phase I
(2002-2009) (2010-2014)
Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
* * * *
* * * *
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
0,94 0,90 1,04 0,99 0,90 0,86 0,85 0,88
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
0,01
0,10
1,00
10,00
1,34 1,26 1,39 1,44 1,24 1,42 1,26 1,19
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
0,01
0,10
1,00
10,00
ZAM NO_ZAM
ZAM(34M)
Intersection
Relative Risk of crashes, people injured and drivers involved Post vs Pre intervention
Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
Pre and Post-intervention period comparison. Phase I
Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
0,94 0,90 1,04 0,99 0,90 0,86 0,85 0,88
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
0,01
0,10
1,00
10,00
1,34 1,26 1,39 1,44 1,24 1,42 1,26 1,19
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
0,01
0,10
1,00
10,00
ZAM NO_ZAM
ZAM(34M)
Intersection
Percentage change of crashes, people injured and drivers involved post versus pre-intervention period
Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
Pre and Post-intervention period comparison. Phase I
Crashes PeopleInjured
DriverPTW CrashesPTW
34,3% 26,2% 38,9% 44,1% 41,8%
-14,3%
-14,7%
Results Phase II
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
ZAM NO_ZAM
ZAM(34M)
Intersection
Annual mean of crashes, people injured and drivers involved
* Differences are not statistically significant
Crashes PeopleInjured DriverPTW CrashesPTW
Pre and Post-intervention period comparison. Phase I
Crashes PeopleInjured DriverPTW CrashesPTW
22,830,2
17,3 16,17,8 9,8 6,3 5,4
24,835,0
22,8 18,8
7,0 9,8 5,3 5,3
0102030405060708090100
Pre-intervention Post-intervention
71,2
90,1
68,758,8
49,1
63,3
43,3 38,9
65,5
87,5
63,053,8 54,5
69,8
50,344,0
0102030405060708090100
(2002-2010) (2011-2014)
1,02 1,12 1,24 1,10 0,85 0,95 0,81 0,93
0102030405060708090100
0,0
0,1
1,0
10,0
Pre-intervención Post-intervención RRZAM NO_ZAM
Intersection
Crashes PeopleInjured DriverPTW CrashesPTW
Pre and Post-intervention period comparison. Phase I
Crashes PeopleInjured DriverPTW CrashesPTW
(2002-2010) (2011-2014)
0,85 0,89 0,87 0,85 1,05 0,86 1,11 1,07
0102030405060708090100
0,0
0,1
1,0
10,0
ZAM(34M)
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
Relative Risk of crashes, people injured and drivers involved Post vs Pre intervention
Discussion
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
§ Thestudyareasaresmall,sothenumberofcasesisalsosmallandtherearealargenumberofareaswithzerocollisions.
§ ComparisonzonesarenotalwaysonthesamepathastheZAMzones
• Differentcharacteristics.Overall,showlessmobility(AADT)andnumberofcollisionsThereisnospecificIMDformotorcyclesandmopeds
• Hasnotbeenadjustedforpossiblechangesinthemobilityofthesevehicles,whicharethefocusoftheintervention.
Limitations
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
§ Inspiteofthelownumberofcases,thehighnumberofareaswithzerosandtheoverdispersionthatusuallypresentthistypeofdata,themethodologyusedhasprovidedrobustandunbiasedestimates.HasallowedtoevaluatetheZAMwithsufficientstatisticalpowertoextractConclusionsaboutitseffectiveness.
§ Havingacomparisongroupforevaluation.AlthoughtherearedifferencesbetweenZAMandNO_ZAMzones,variableshavebeenintroducedtotrytoadjustthem(variablesonthecharacteristicsofthestreet).
§ HavinganexposuremeasuresuchastheAADT,althoughonlyavailableformotorvehicles,hasallowedtoadjustthechangeinmobilitythataninterventionsuchZAMcanproduceeveninotherroadsnearby.
Strengths
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
§ TheAdvancedZonesforMotorcyclesarenoteffectivetoimprovetheroadsafetyofthecityofBarcelona:
§ ZAMsmayleadtoanincreasedriskoftrafficcollisionincertaincircumstances:theZAMareaandtheprevious30mofZAMphaseI(butnotinphaseII)
§ ThisincreaseinriskisnotobservedintheareaofpedestriancrossingandsubsequentintersectionoftheZAMsofPhaseI
Conclusions
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions
§ TostudythecharacteristicsofZAMsthatpresentgreaterrisk
§ PilottestaZAMaccesslane
§ TheresultsoftheBarcelonaexperiencecanbeusedforothercitiesthatarelaunchingZAM.Itwouldbeusefultodisseminatetheresultsoftheevaluation,showinghowinsomecircumstancestheZAMdoesnotshowchangesinthecrashrate,butinsteadinothercircumstancesincreasetherisk.
Recommendations
Backgroundandobjectives Methods ResultsPhaseI ResultsPhaseII Limitationsand
Conclusions