Chapter 7: Acute Respiratory Distress

Syndrome

Chapter 7: Acute Respiratory Distress

SyndromeJames D. Fortenberry, MD, FCCM, FAAP

Medical Director, Critical Care Medicine and Pediatric/Adult ECMO

Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston

ARDS: What Is It?

Term first introduced in 1967

Acute respiratory failure with non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, capillary leak after diverse insult

Adult RDS defined to differentiate from neonatal surfactant deficiency

Problems with definition troubled literature

Murray score 1988: CXR, PEEP, Hypoxemia, Compliance

Synonyms Shock lung Da Nang Lung Traumatic wet lung

New and ImprovedNew and Improved

Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

ARDS: New Definition

Criteria Acute onset Bilateral CXR infiltrates PA pressure < 18 mm Hg Classification

Acute lung injury - PaO2 : F1O2 < 300

Acute respiratory distress syndrome - PaO2 : F1O2 < 200

- 1994 American - European Consensus Conference

ARDS - Epidemiology

New criteria allow better estimate of incidence

• 1994 criteria in Sweden: ALI 17.9/100,000; 13.5/100,000 ARDS

• US: may be closer to 75/1000,000

• Prospective data pending

• Incidence in children appears similar

• 5-9% of PICU admissions

Clinical Disorders Associated with ARDS

Direct Lung Injury Indirect Lung Injury

Common causes Common Causes

Pneumonia SepsisAspiration of gastriccontents

Severe trauma with shock ,multiple transfusions

Less common causes Less common causes

Pulmonary contusion Cardiopulmonary bypassFat emboli Drug overdoseNear-Drowning Acute pancreatitisI nhalational injury Transfusions of blood productsReperfusion pulmonaryedema

The Problem: Lung Injury

Etiology In Children

Other 4%

Hemorrhage 5%

Trauma 5%

Non-infectious Pneumonia 14%

Cardiac Arrest 12%

Septic Syndrome 32%

Infectious Pneumonia 28%

Davis et al., J Peds 1993;123:35

ARDS - Pathogenesis

Instigation

• Endothelial injury: increased permeability of alveolar - capillary barrier

• Epithelial injury : alveolar flood, loss of surfactant, barrier vs. infection

• Pro-inflammatory mechanisms

ARDS Pathogenesis: Resolution Phase

Equally important

• Alveolar edema - resolved by active sodium transport

• Alveolar type II cells - re-epithelialize

• Neutrophil clearance needed

ARDS - Pathophysiology

• Capillary leak:non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema

• Inflammatory mediators

• Diminished surfactant activity and airway collapse

• Reduced lung volumes

• Heterogeneous

• “Baby Lungs”

• Altered pulmonary hemodynamics

ARDS:CT Scan View

ARDS - Pathophysiology: Diminished Surfactant Activity

• Surfactant production and composition altered in ARDS: low lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio

• Components of edema fluid may inactivate surfactant

ARDS - Pathophysiology: Diminished Surfactant Activity• Surfactant product of Type II

pneumocytes

• Importance of surfactant: P = 2T/r (Laplace equation; P:

trans-pulmonary pressure, T: surface tension, r: radius)

• Surfactant proportions surface tension to surface area: thus

ARDS - Pathophysiology: Lung Volumes

• Reduced lung volumes, primarily reduced FRC

• FRC = ? Nl =

• Low FRC-large intrapulmonary shunt, hypoxemia

• Implies lower compliance = flatter PV curve marked hysteresis PV curve concave above FRC and inflection

point at volume > FRC closing volume in range of tidal volume resistance increased primarily due to

mechanical unevenness (vs. airway R): high flow rates helpful

ARDS - Pathophysiology: Lung Volumes

• FRC = Volume of gas in lungs at end of normal tidal expiration; outward recoil of chest wall = inward recoil of lungs

• Normal FRC =

• FRC decreased by 20-40% in ARDS

• FRC decreased by 20-30% when supine: elevate head!

ARDS - Pathophysiology: Mediators

• Massive literature

• Mediators involved but extent of cause/effect unknown

• Cellular: neutrophils-causative: depletion in

models can obliterate lesion; ARDS can occur in neutropenic patient; direct endothelial injury, release radicals, proteolytic enzymes

macrophages-release cytokines

ARDS - Pathophysiology: Mediators

• Humoral: Complement Cytokines: TNF, IL-1 PAF, PGs, leukotrienes NO Coagulant pathways

ARDS - Pathophysiology:Pulmonary Edema• Non-cardiogenic pulmonary

edema-Starling formula

• What changes in ARDS? Q = K(Pc - Pis) - (pl - is)

Q = K = Pc = ; Pis = = pl = ; is =

Phases of ARDS

• Acute - exudative, inflammatory: capillary congestion, neutrophil aggregation, capillary endothelial swelling, epithelial injury; hyaline membranes by 72 hours

(0 - 3 days)

• Sub-acute - proliferative: proliferation of type II pneumocytes (abnormal lamellar bodies with decreased surfactant), fibroblasts-intra-alveolar, widening of septae

(4 - 10 days)

• Chronic - fibrosing alveolitis: remodeling by collagenous tissue, arterial thickening, obliteration of pre-capillary vessels; cystic lesions

( > 10 days)

ARDS - Outcomes

• Most studies - mortality 40% to 60%; similar for children/adults

• Death is usually due to sepsis/MODS rather than primary respiratory

• Mortality may be decreasing

53/68 % 39/36 %

ARDS - Principles of Therapy

•Provide adequate gas exchange

•Avoid secondary injury

Therapies for ARDS

Innovations:NOPLVProningSurfactantAnti-Inflammatory

Mechanical Ventilation Gentle

ventilation:

Permissive hypercapnia

Low tidal volume

Open-lung

HFOV

ECMOIVOX

IV gas exchange

AVCO2R

Total Implantable Artificial Lung

ARDS

Extrapulmonary Gas Exchange

The Dangers of Overdistention

• Repetitive shear stress

• Injury to normal alveoli

• inflammatory response

• air trapping

• Phasic volume swings: volume trauma

• compliance

• intrapulmonary shunt

• FiO2

• WOB

• inflammatory response

The Dangers of Atelectasis

0

10

20

13 33 38

Airway Pressure (cmH20)

Lun

g V

olum

e (m

l/kg)

AtelectasisAtelectasis

““Sweet Sweet Spot”Spot”

OverdistentioOverdistentionn

Lung Injury Zones

ARDS: George H. W. Bush Therapy

“Kinder, gentler” forms of ventilation:

•Low tidal volumes (6-8 vs.10-15 cc/kg)

•“Open lung”: Higher PEEP, lower PIP

•Permissive hypercapnia: tolerate higher pCO2

Lower Tidal Volumes for ARDS

• Multi-center trial, 861 adult ARDS

• Randomized:

Tidal volume 12 cc/kg

Plateau pressure < 50 cm H2O

vs

Tidal volume 6 cc/kg

Plateau pressure < 30 cm H2O

ARDS Network,

NEJM, 342: 2000

Lower Tidal Volumes for ARDS

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Percent

Death

Ven

t freed

ays

Traditional Lower

*

*

* p < .001

ARDS Network,NEJM, 342: 2000

22% decrease

Is turning the ARDS patient “prone” to be

helpful?

Is turning the ARDS patient “prone” to be

helpful?

Prone Positioning in ARDS

• Theory: let gravity improve matching perfusion to better ventilated areas

• Improvement immediate

• Uncertain effect on outcome

Prone Positioning in Adult ARDS

• Randomized trial

• Standard therapy vs. standard + prone positioning

• Improved oxygenation

• No difference in mortality, time on ventilator, complications

Gattinoni et al., NEJM, 2001

Prone Positioning in Pediatric ARDS:Longer May Be Better

• Compared 6-10 hrs PP vs. 18-24 hrs PP

• Overall ARDS survival 79% in 40 pts.

Relvas et al., Chest 2003

Brief vs. Prolonged Prone Positioning in Children

0

5

10

15

20

25

Pre- PP Brief PP Prolonged PP

Oxygen

ati

on

In

dex

(OI)

- Relvas et al., Chest 2003

*

***

High Frequency High Frequency Oscillation:Oscillation:A Whole Lotta A Whole Lotta Shakin’ Goin’ Shakin’ Goin’ OnOn

- Reese Clark- Reese Clark

It’s not absolute pressure, but volume or

pressure swings that promote lung injury or

atelectasis.

It’s not absolute pressure, but volume or

pressure swings that promote lung injury or

atelectasis.

•Rapid rate

•Low tidal volume

•Maintain open lung

•Minimal volume swings

High Frequency Ventilation

High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

HFOV is the easiest way to find the ventilation

“sweet spot”

HFOV: Benefits Vs. Conventional Ventilation

HFOV vs. CMV in Pediatric Respiratory Failure: Results

• Greater survival without severe lung disease

• Greater crossover to HFOV and improvement

• Failure to respond to HFOV strong predictor of death

Arnold et al, CCM, 1994

0

20

40

HFOV CV CV toHFOV

HFOV toCV

Sur

viva

l wit

h CL

D%

- - Arnold et al, Arnold et al, CCMCCM, , 19941994

**

HFOV vs. CMV in Pediatric Respiratory Failure

HFOV

• Reduces need for ECMO, chronic lung disease in neonates

• Improves survival without CLD in pediatric ARDS

HFOV: Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials

Pediatric ECMO

• Potential candidates

• Neonate - 18 years

• Reversible disease process

• Severe respiratory/cardiac failure

• < 10 days mechanical ventilation

• Acute, life-threatening deterioration

Impact of ECMO on Survival in Pediatric Respiratory Failure

• Retrospective, multi-center cohort analysis

• 331 patients, 32 hospitals

• Use of ECMO associated with survival (p < .001)

• 53 diagnosis and risk-matched pairs:

ECMO decreased mortality (26% vs 47%, p < .01)

-Green et al, CCM, 24:1996

I mpact of ECMO on Survival inPediatric Respiratory Failure

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Mortality %

< 25% 25 - 50%

50 -75%

> 75%

ECMO

Non-ECMO

*

p < .05 - Green et al., CCM, 1996

Pediatric Respiratory ECMO - Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta

Diagnosis Number Survival % ELSO Survival%

ARDS/ARF 38 71 51

BacterialPneumonia

9 85 79

ViralPneumonia

24 86 53

Trauma 5 80 63

Burns 4 75 52

TOTAL 86 79% 62%

Other Cost Intensive Therapies

Therapy Cost/Patient

Pediatric ECLS $ 232, 941

Pediatric Liver Transplant $ 206, 375

Pediatric Heart Transplant $ 126,695

ECMO: Comparison to Other Expensive Therapies

4.19

43.5

62.5

26.5

16.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Cos

t/Li

fe -

Yea

r

(Thou

sand

s of

Dol

lars

)

ECLS Liver BoneMarrow

Cardiac Renal

Vats et al., CCM, 1998

If you think about ECMO,

it is worth a call to consider ECMO

If you think about ECMO,

it is worth a call to consider ECMO

Surfactant in ARDS

• ARDS: surfactant deficiency surfactant present is

dysfunctional

• Surfactant replacement improves physiologic function

Calf’s Lung Surfactant Extract in Acute Pediatric Respiratory

Failure

• Multi-center trial-uncontrolled, observational

• Calf lung surfactant (Infasurf) – intra-tracheal

• Immediate improvement and weaning in 24/29 children with ARDS

• 14% mortality-Willson et al,CCM, 24:1996

Surfactant in Pediatric ARDS

•Current randomized multi-center trial

•Placebo vs calf lung surfactant (Infasurf)

•Children’s at Egleston is a participating center-study closed, await results

Steroids in ARDS

• Theoretical anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic benefit

• Previous studies with acute use (1st 5 days)

No benefit

Increased 2 infection

Effects of Prolonged Steroids in Unresolving ARDS

• Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

• Adult ARDS ventilated for > 7 days without improvement

• Randomized: Placebo Methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day x 4

days, tapered over 1 month

Meduri et al, JAMA 280:159, 1998

Steroids in Unresolving ARDS

• By day 10, steroids improved: PaO2/FiO2 ratios Lung injury/MOD scores Static lung compliance

• 24 patients enrolled; study stopped due to survival difference

Meduri et al, JAMA, 1998

Steroids in Unresolving ARDS

0102030405060708090

100

ICUsurvival

Hospitalsurvival

Steroid Placebo

* *

p<.01*- Meduri et al., JAMA, 1998

Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Respiratory Failure

Neonates Beneficial in term neonates with

PPHN Decreased need for ECMO

Adults/Pediatrics Benefits - lowers PA pressures,

improves gas exchange Randomized trials: No difference

in mortality or days of ventilation

ECMO and NO in Neonates

• ECMO improves survival in neonates with PPHN (UK study)

• NO decreases need for ECMO in neonates with PPHN: 64% vs 38% (Clark et al, NEJM, 2000)

Effects of Inhaled Nitric Oxide In Children with AHRF

• Randomized, controlled, blinded multi-center trial

• 108 children with OI > 15

• Randomized: Inhaled NO 10 ppm vs. mechanical ventilation alone

Dobyns, Cornfield, Anas, Fortenberry et al., J. Peds, 1999

Inhaled NO and HFOV In Pediatric ARDS

5853

58

71

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Sur

viva

l %

Dobyns et al., Dobyns et al.,

J PedsJ Peds, 2000, 2000

*

Partial Liquid Ventilation

Partial Liquid Ventilation

Mechanisms of action oxygen reservoir recruitment of lung volume alveolar lavage redistribution of blood flow anti-inflammatory

Liquid Ventilation

Pediatric trials started in 1996 Partial: FRC (15 - 20 cc/kg)

Study halted 1999 due to lack of benefit

Adult study (2001): no effect on outcome

ARDS- “Mechanical” Therapies

ARDS- “Mechanical” Therapies

Prone positioning - Unproven outcome benefit

Low tidal volumes - Outcome benefit in large study

Open-lung strategy - Outcome benefit in small study

HFOV -Outcome benefit in small study

ECMO - Proven in neonates unproven in children

Pharmacologic Approaches to ARDS: Randomized Trials

Glucocorticoids

- acute - no benefit

- fibrosing alveolitis - lowered mortality, small study

Surfactant - possible benefit in children

Inhaled NO - no benefit

Partial liquid ventilation - no benefit

“…We must discard the old approach and continue to search for ways to improve mechanical ventilation. In the meantime, there is no substitute for the clinician standing by the ventilator…”

- Martin J. Tobin, MD