archaeological excavation report - e2054 loughbown 2, co. galway
DESCRIPTION
Excavation Report of archaeological site at Mackney, Co. Galway. Ringfort with Earlier Ringditch.TRANSCRIPT
Archaeological Excavation ReportE2054 - Loughbown 2, Co. Galway
Ringfort with Earlier Ringditch
Issue 2 [ISSN 2009-2237]
Eachtra Journal
Contact details:The Forge,Innishannon, Co. Cork.Tel.: 021 470 16 16Fax: 021 470 16 28E-mail: [email protected] Site: www.eachtra.ie
June 2009
Written by:
Client:
Archaeological Excavation Report,Loughbown 2,Co. Galway
Ringfort with Earlier Ringditch
Galway County Council National Roads Design Office,National Roads Authority
Nik Bower
Nik Bower
Excavation Director
A024Ministerial Directions:
E2054E No.:
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
iii
Copyright Notice: Please note that all original information contained within this report, including all original drawings, photographs, text and all other printed matter deemed to be the writer’s, remains the property of the writer and Eachtra Archaeological Projects and so may not be reproduced or used in any form without the written consent of the writer or Eachtra Archaeological Projects.
Table of Contents
i Summary ....................................................................................................................1
ii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................1
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................2
2 Site Location, Topography and Soils ....................................................................2
3 Background to the development...........................................................................3
4 Previous Archaeological Works ............................................................................3
5 Archaeological and Historical Background ..........................................................4
5.1 The Irish Iron Age .............................................................................................4
5.2 Early medieval landscape around Balliansloe and Aughrim ...............................4
5.3 Tribes and Mythology ........................................................................................5
5.4 Ecclesiastical activity ..........................................................................................6
5.5 Secular activity ...................................................................................................7
5.6 Medieval Period .................................................................................................8
6 Excavation Methodology .....................................................................................9
7 Results of Excavation ..........................................................................................10
7.1 Natural subsoils ................................................................................................10
7.2 Sub-circular slot trench and associated features in the north-west quadrant .......10
7.3 Construction of the enclosure ...........................................................................11
7.4 The interior .......................................................................................................14
7.5 Backfilling and abandonment of the site ............................................................14
7.6 Modern period ..................................................................................................17
7.7 Plant remains ....................................................................................................17
7.8 Charcoal ...........................................................................................................18
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
iv
7.9 Animal bone ....................................................................................................18
7.10 Radiocarbon dates .............................................................................................19
7.11 Lithics ...............................................................................................................19
8 Discussion ..........................................................................................................20
8.1 Phasing .............................................................................................................20
8.2 Construction .....................................................................................................20
8.3 Internal features and evidence of occupation .....................................................21
9 References ...........................................................................................................22
10 Figures ................................................................................................................25
11 Plates ..................................................................................................................38
Appendix 1: Stratigraphic Index ...................................................................................43
Appendix 2: Stratigraphic Matrix.................................................................................69
Appendix 3: Groups and sub-groups text .....................................................................73
Appendix 4: Finds Register ..........................................................................................93
Appendix 5: Plant remains ..........................................................................................95
Appendix 6: Charcoal .................................................................................................98
Appendix 7: Animal Bone ...........................................................................................114
Appendix 8: Radiocarbon Dates ..................................................................................122
Appendix 9: Lithics .....................................................................................................123
Appendix 10: Finds catalogue ..................................................................................... 125
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
v
List of FiguresFigure 1: Discovery series OS map showing the route of the new N6 Galway to Ballinasloe road (Contract 4) and the location of all excavation sites. ............................................................. 25
Figure 2: The route of the new N6 Galway to Ballinasloe road (Contract 4) overlaid on the 1st edition OS map. .................................................................................................................... 26
Figure 3: The route of the new N6 Galway to Ballinasloe road (Contract 4) overlaid on the RMP map (Sheet 87). ........................................................................................................... 27
Figure 4: Location of the ringfort GA087-177 at Loughbown. .............................................. 28
Figure 5: Post-excavation plan of the ringfort at Loughbown 2 E2054.................................. 29
Figure 6: Post-excavation plan of the ringfort at Loughbown 2 showing the main features. .. 30
Figure 7: Plan of structure C.18. ........................................................................................... 31
Figure 8: Plan of causeway and entrance at Loughbown 2. ................................................... 32
Figure 9: Sections of the bank and ditch at Ditch Slots 1, 2 and 3. ....................................... 33
Figure 10: Section of the bank and ditch at Ditch Slots 4, 8 and 10. ..................................... 34
Figure 11: Section of the bank at Ditch Slot 4. ...................................................................... 35
Figure 12: Knife Blade (E2054:150:1). .................................................................................. 36
Figure 13: Bracelet (E2054:45:3). .......................................................................................... 37
List of PlatesPlate 1: Aerial view of Loughbown II. ................................................................................... 38
Plate 2: Sub-circular structure C.18 from southeast. ............................................................. 38
Plate 3: View of internal bank revetment trench C.110. ........................................................ 39
Plate 4: View of ditch in Ditch Slot 3 from east. ................................................................... 39
Plate 5: View of ditch in Ditch Slot 4 from east. ................................................................... 40
Plate 6: View of ditch in Ditch Slot 4 from west. .................................................................. 40
Plate 7: Knife Blade (E2054:150:1). ....................................................................................... 41
Plate 8: Blade (E2054:64:1). .................................................................................................. 41
Plate 9: Bracelet (E2054:45:3). .............................................................................................. 42
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
1
i Summary
The site excavated at Loughbown 2 comprised a ringfort with scant evidence of occupa-tion. Evidence of Iron Age activity pre-dated the construction of the enclosure. Charcoal from the site yielded radiocarbon dates that spanned the 4th century BC to the 17th century AD. Very few plant remains were present, mostly hazelnut shell fragments and finds included a lignite/shale bracelet, quernstone and a knife blade.
Townland LoughbownParish ClontuskertBarony ClonmacnowenCounty GalwayMinisterial Direction no. A024/21E no. E2054RMP GA087-177National Grid Reference 181730 228729Elevation 83 m ODSite type Ringfort
ii Acknowledgements
The excavation director was Nik Bower and the field crew included John Olney site su-pervisor, with assistants Piotr Szmyd, Simon Bolton, Dermot Ryan, Micheal Kilgannon, Owen Kavannagh, Nicole Laverne-Smith, Luke Ryalls, Lucas Balaga, Jack Bender and Joan-na Pilszyk. The senior archaeologist was John Tierney and the post-excavation managers were Penny Johnstown and Jacinta Kiely. Fiona Greene and Choryna Kiely were involved in the administration of the project. llustrations are by Ben Blakeman, Lesley Davidson, Enda O’Mahony and Robin Turk. Specialist analysis was carried out by Margaret McCarthy, Fa-rina Sternke, Mary Dillon, and the 14 Chrono Centre at Queen’s University Belfast. Aerial photography by Cloin Boyd of Hawkeye. Artefact photography was by John Sunderland and artefact illustration by Fiachra Dunne. The artefact catalogues were compiled by Sara Cam-plese. Ross Macleod and Niall Healy acted as resident archaeologist and liaison officer respec-tively for the consultant engineers RPS. The project was commissioned by Galway County Council and was funded the National Roads Authority under the National Development Plan (2000-2006). The project archaeologist was Jerry O’Sullivan and the assistant project archaeologist was Martin Jones.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
2
1 Introduction
This report presents the results of an eight-week excavation of a disturbed ringfort (GA087-177) or enclosure in the townland of Loughbown, Ballinasloe, County Galway. The site had an internal bank, partly protected on its southern side by an extant field boundary and an external V-shaped ditch enclosing the site. The site was largely levelled before excava-tion except where incorporated into an early modern field dyke. The interior, once topsoil was stripped away, comprised mostly rock with subsoil in some areas (Plate 1).
The excavation was undertaken by Eachtra Archaeological Projects for Galway County Council and the National Roads Authority and forms part of wider archaeological excava-tion programme undertaken by Eachtra along approximately 15 km of the proposed N6 dual carriageway (Contract 4, Figures 1-3). The site was protected as a Recorded Monument under the National Monument (Amendment) Act, 1994.
2 Site Location, Topography and Soils
The site was located in the townland of Loughbown at NGR 181730 228729, 2.5 km east of Aughrim and 4.5 km south-west of Ballinasloe. It was located to the west of the ringforts at Loughbown 1 (E2442) and Mackney (E2444). The site is situated on the brow of a hill with a maximum height of 83 m O.D. The archaeological site is marked on both the first and second-edition Ordnance Survey maps (RMP: GA87-177), with changes to the field system evident on comparison of the maps (Figure 4). To the north-west at a distance of 150 m is a conjoined cillín and ringfort, marked on both the first and third-edition O.S. maps as ‘Lismurtagh, Children’s Burial Ground.’ There are unobstructed views from the site except to the north.
The area where the site was located is underlain by Carboniferous limestones which are covered by glacial deposits and bog. The published geology of the area indicates that the sites are located on drift covered Upper Limestone which is bordered to the north and south by Lower Limestone and to the west and east by bog. The site was located on soils classified as gleys, with associated grey brown podzolics, derived from limestone glacial till (Gardiner et al. 1980, 95). Grey brown Podzolics are good all-purpose soils and are highly suited to pasture production. It should be noted that the site itself was effectively situated on a rock outcrop, with extremely thin soil cover, but that the grey brown podzolics would have been located immediately to the north, west and east of the site, while down slope to the south, wetter peaty soils would have been prevalent. A spring is still in evidence some 200 m to the east of the enclosure along level ground. An esker runs close by to the south, which would have been a thoroughfare from earliest times up to the modern era.
Dr Martin Feely, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, NUI, Galway, visited the site to identify the two major stone types present in ditch fills; these are recorded in the report as
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
3
C.100 and C.101. C.100 is described as a light grey fossiliferous limestone, that does not ap-pear present at the site, but presumably is present within a radius of a few kilometers, as it is typical of Carboniferous deposits in the Irish midlands. C.101 is described as a finer grained dark grey limestone that is not very fossiliferous and is rather shaley in places. A rock outcrop of this limestone type was identified on site and possibly indicates shallowly buried bedrock of this type throughout the immediate area of the site.
3 Background to the development
The excavation was carried out in advance of the construction of the proposed N6 Gal-way to Ballinasloe road, a dual carriageway, 56 km in length, extending from the east side of Galway city at Doughiska to the east side of Ballinasloe, at Kilgarve, in Co. Roscommon. The new road will form part of an arterial route between the east and west of Ireland and will thus be a very significant contribution to infrastructural development under the National Development Plan 2000-2006, and the Transport 21 initiative that succeeds this.
4 Previous Archaeological Works
Test excavations were undertaken by Martin Jones (2004) under excavation Licence No. 03E1875 in which two slot trenches were opened, one to investigate the interior of the site and the ditch, the other to examine the surviving bank remains on the south-western side of the site. Simple stratigraphy was noted in the V-shaped ditch and some evidence of banking was present. Two further trenches were excavated on an adjacent knoll, 30 m to the south-west, though no evidence of archaeological activity was found.
A geophysical survey of the field containing the enclosure was undertaken as part of a large-scale geophysical survey across the length of the entire scheme (ArchaeoPhysica 2004). The geophysical survey results suggested that the possible enclosure appeared to be asso-ciated with anomalies indicative of rubble footings. The anomalies appeared to be mostly sub-rectangular rather than circular in plan. In the same field there are some faint positive-gradient anomalies suggesting the presence of small ditches, probably elements of a former field system.
Phase 1 Test Excavations were undertaken by Finn Delaney of Eachtra Archaeological Projects on behalf of Galway County Council and the National Roads Authority (2005). The excavation formed part of a wider archaeological assessment by Eachtra of approximately 15 km of the proposed N6 motorway (Contract 4). The excavation included careful stripping of the topsoil in spits by a 13 ton tracked excavator, down to the uppermost archaeological deposits, followed by targeted hand-cleaning and test excavation.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
4
5 Archaeological and Historical Background
The local history of the area around Ballinasloe is well documented thanks in large part to the work of local historian Patrick Egan, whose detailed history of Ballinasloe parish was published in 1960. Much of the information presented below is based on his work.
5.1 The Irish Iron Age
The Irish Iron Age is very difficult to identify in the archaeological record. We know almost nothing of Iron Age settlement and burial outside the major complexes of royal and ritual sites. The majority of the evidence elsewhere consists of unassociated finds of La Tene decorated metalwork and some pieces of stone sculpture. The Turoe Stone located close to Loughrea in east Galway is a famous example of this spiral-carved La Tene stone sculpture. According to Edwards (1990, 1) ‘the general paucity of archaeological evidence for the Irish Iron Age means that it is currently impossible to reconstruct a coherent picture of the period. It is therefore extremely difficult to determine the nature and extent of continuity between the Iron Age and the early middle ages’.
A large hillfort was discovered at Rahally, County Galway, and was excavated under Contract 3 by Gerry Mullins, managed by CRDS Ltd along the same road project. It had a diameter of approximately 450 m, the defences include four large sub-circular ditches and some remnants of bank. A preliminary radiocarbon date indicates a date of cal 900 BC. The site has an elevation of 104 m OD, but commands a view of the countryside to the west, north and east. Finds include a late La Tène metal artifact, Late Bronze Age pottery and a small number of as yet unidentified stone tools. No associated domestic or industrial activity has yet been identified. There is strong evidence of later reuse in the early medieval period, as a ringfort and annex were constructed within the inner citadel of the hillfort.
The Iron Age dates returned for Loughbown make an important contribution to the cor-pus of Iron Age sites in Galway.
5.2 Early medieval landscape around Balliansloe and Aughrim
The modern Catholic parish of Ballinalsoe reflects a combination of two medieval par-ishes, Kilcloony and Creagh, which were situated either side of the river Suck. Kilcloony is located on the western side of the Suck and is located within Co. Galway and the barony of Clonmacowen. Creagh is located on the east side of the river Suck and is located within Co. Roscommon and the barony of Moycarn. The parishes of Aughrim and Kilconell did not join together until the 14th century and form part of the barony of Kilconell.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
5
The townland of Kellysgrove and that part of Mackney townland now within the parish of Clontuskert may have at one time been located in the parish of Kilcloony. An early draft of the Books of Survey and Distribution identify both townlands as being in the parish of Kilcloony. Egan (1960, 13) states that the Ballinure River south of Kellysgrove may well have been the earlier parish boundary.
The river Suck creates a natural boundary and territorial dividing line, and consequently the ford across the river at Ballinasloe has always assumed a strategic importance. The Slí Mór, an ancient east to west highway crosses the river at this point and passes along the hill of Dunlo towards Kilconell and onwards to Clarenbridge (Geissel 2006, 94-5). The Slí Mór has been identified as running partly along the Eiscir Riada, a natural ridge consisting of gravel and rocks deposited during the last Ice Age, which became one of the great natural boundary lines of ancient Ireland.
According to Geissel (2006, ix) the Slí Mór dates to the early medieval period and was primarily used by students moving between the great ecclesiastical centres along its route, such as Clonmacnoise and Clonard and the seaports of Dublin and Galway. Another large esker runs north-west from Clontuskert Abbey and may well have linked the abbey with the great Slí Mór. A togher/trackway, published in JGHAS, also seems to lead from Clontuskert to Ballinasloe across Pollboy bog, and is shown on the RMP map (RMP GA088:014) (Pren-dergast 1946, 15-18).
5.3 Tribes and Mythology
The origins of the tribes and people who made up this thriving early medieval commu-nity are prehistoric and so by definition it is difficult to attribute tribal names and families to distinct areas. St Grellan is purported to have intervened between the Hy Many (Uí Máine), of Lagenian descent, and the earlier inhabitants around Kilcloony when he came to Magh Seincheineoil or the ‘the plain of the ancient kin’. The Uí Máine established an exceedingly powerful kingdom; however, they remained tributary to the line of Cruchain, the Goedelic kings who dominated Connacht from protohistoric times until the coming of the Normans. The chief family descended from the Uí Máine, the O’Kellys, established themselves as direct occupiers of the land around Ballinasloe during the medieval period and the descendants of the Goiedel kings also reappear in the area during the 12th century when the O’Connors bridged the river Suck in 1120 and built a castle at Dun Leodha.
According to the mythologies one group of people located on the banks of the river Suck, who were in occupation before the Uí Máine, survived there until the 12th century. These were the Cattraige who are said to have descended like the Uí Máine from the Lagenians. The Cattraige, however, were reduced to servitude and were concentrated on the river Suck in the parishes of Kilcloony and Creagh. They maintained a separate existence as a subject people at least until the time of the Norman invasion.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
6
5.4 Ecclesiastical activity
St Grellan is associated with the establishment of Christianity in the area around Bal-liansloe. It is recorded that St Grellan became the patron of the parish of Kilcloony and of the Uí Máine of Connacht. St Grellan founded a church at Kilcloony which is possibly lo-cated at the site of a later ruin on the west side of the town (RMP GA074:058A). According to the Life of St Grellan the saint was intimately associated with the Uí Máine and helped the tribe overcome local adversaries in their establishment of a large territory in Connacht (O’Donovan 1843). St Grellan’s staff became a treasured relic amongst the Uí Máine and was used as a battle standard. St Grellan’s church in Kilcloony appears to have led an independ-ent existence until the 12th century and may have been supported directly by the Ui Maine. St Grellan’s well (RMP GA087:212) in Kilcloony is located in the townland of Tobergrellan to the south-west of the church.
Teampaill Raoileann (RMP GA074:011C) is located in Creagh parish on the east bank of the river Suck and to the north-west of Ballinasloe. The townland name is Ashford and the earlier name for this townland was Tuaimsrutha. The church was founded by Raoiriu, later known as Raoiliu and finally as Raoilinn. Raoilinn was associated with the Cineal Dobhta who ruled a territory in Co. Roscommon bordering the Shannon above Lough Ree. The church was yielded to the monastery of Clonmacnoise in the sixth century by Cairbe Crom chief of the Uí Máine (Egan 1960, 12).
In the parish of Aughrim St Commedan established a community of monks in the sixth century at Kilcommadan (RMP GA087:126).
In east Galway the two primary movers in the monastic world were the abbots of Clon-macnoise and Clonfert. Clonmacnoise exerted a great influence on the area around Balli-nasloe. A registry of Clonmacnoise refers to Cairbre Crom chief of the Uí Máine bestow-ing on St Kieran of Clonmacnoise 17 townlands and three houses. Some of the townlands bestowed have been identified by Egan (1960, 12-13) as being located within the parishes of Creagh and Kilcloony. According to the Book of Leacan the connection between Clon-macnoise and the tribal leaders of the area around Ballinasloe was based on the fact that Clonmacnoise and the abbot had the right of burial for the Uí Máine and tribute needed to be paid for this honour.
Just to the south of Kilcloony parish, located close to the banks of the river Suck, is the 12th century Augustinian Priory of Clontuskert (RMP GA088:001). This foundation had an earlier incarnation as a monastic centre founded by St Beatain in the eighth-century. Beatain’s successors were ranked in the 12th century as one of the seven chief Comharbaí of the Uí Máine. The relationship between the eighth-century foundation and the surround-ing territory cannot be fully determined; however, in light of the fact that after the Synod of Kells in 1152 the monastery appears as the rector of the whole parish of Kilcloony some earlier relationship can be inferred (Egan 1960, 14).
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
7
Other possible early institutions in the area include Teampoilín in the townland of Poll-boy, which survives as the ruins of a medieval church (RMP GA088:020). It was thought by Egan (1960, 25-6) to have an early incarnation however Gwynn & Haddcock (1970) have thrown some doubt on this assertion. Egan (1960) also refers to evidence for a church in the townland of Dunlo in the ninth and tenth centuries (RMP GA087:083). A number of adult burials associated with a bronze harp-peg and pin and a bone spindle-whorl, uncovered dur-ing the building of St. Joseph’s terrace, point to the existence of a Christian burial ground and an associated church. The townland named Killeen possibly refers to an early church and an enclosure named Lismurtagh on the Ordnance Survey maps, in Loughbown townland, is associated with a children’s burial ground (RMP GA087:176).
Prior to the 12th-century reorganisation of the church, property in the area of Kilcloony-Creagh was extensive due to the patronage of the Uí Máine chiefs. The relationships and political affiliations that connected the three early ecclesiastical institutions of Clonmacnoise, Kilcloony and Clontuskert cannot be fully ascertained, but clearly they had in common a high degree of Uí Máine patronage, with all the endowments and obligations that this may have conferred.
5.5 Secular activity
This ecclesiastical activity would necessarily reflect a high level of secular activity within the same area. The greatest identifiable indicator of this secular activity is the number of ring-forts and enclosures located within the pastoral territory of the ecclesiastical foundations.
Ringforts are the classic early medieval (c. 500 AD to 1100) settlement type, and are among the most common archaeological monuments in the country. Stout (1997, 81) has shown that south-east Galway is located in an area of high ringfort density.
Ringforts consist of circular areas, defined by banks and external ditches, and excava-tion often reveals the remains of dwelling houses and outbuildings for extended families. According to Stout (1997, 20) ringforts were not built to repel prolonged sieges, or designed to annex territories and populations, but rather as a defence against lightning raids for cattle and slaves. A full ringfort in the townland of Mackney (E2444), approximately one half of another (E2442) and an enclosure (E2054) both in the townland of Loughbown have been excavated during the course of the present archaeological excavation programme. The results from these excavations have yielded valuable information on the early medieval society oc-cupying these ringforts and enclosures.
Souterrains are underground structures that can either be simple or complex in form, ranging from a short length of undifferentiated passage/chamber to a labyrinthine arrange-ment of passages and chambers. Clinton (2001, 59-61) suggests that while the majority of souterrains were primarily built as refuges they would also have served as ad hoc storage fa-cilities. Alcock et al. (1999) contend that souterrains were not isolated monuments, though they often survive as such today, rather they originally formed part of complex habitations
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
8
as is testified by their frequent association with ringforts and early ecclesiastical settlements. Clinton (2001, 95) argues that based on the available evidence souterrains date from roughly 500 -1200, with a floruit in the period between c. 750 and c. 1250.
There are two recorded souterrains (RMP GA087:016B and GA087:087:111D) associated with ringforts located in the nearby townlands of Grange and Caher and both of the ring-forts excavated during the course of the most recent archaeological excavation programme have revealed hither to unrecorded souterrains.
5.6 Medieval Period
The ecclesiastical parishes of Kilcloony and Creagh owe their origins to the 12th-century Church reform movement, which was initiated with the Synod of Raith Breasail in 1111. Both parishes lie on the eastern boundary of the dioceses of Clonfert. After the reforms of the 12th century four churches were retained: Kilcloony and Teampolilín in Kilcloony and Creagh and Teamplerellan in Creagh.
The first community of monks to arrive in Aughrim were the Canons Regular of St Augustine. They built a priory at Aughrim in the late 12th century which was dedicated to St Catherine (MacLochlainn 1980). Clontuskert Priory was also founded by Augustin-ian Cannons, and dedicated to St Mary, some time after 1140. There is the tradition of a togher running between Teampoilínn and Clontuskert Abbey to the south. A togher (RMP GA088:014) was uncovered to the north of Clontuskert Abbey during land commission operations in 1946 (Prendergast 1946). It ran from north to south for at least 1.5 km and consisted of a double row of parallel oak logs in a bed of brushwood on a layer of gravel. These were joined at each end by vertical pointed hazel stakes. Clontuskert came under the direct control of the O’Kelly family in the 15th century and became a prime example of the abuse of lay patronage. After the dissolution of the monasteries in 1551 the priory and its lands were taken over by the de Burgos, the Earls of Clanrickard.
The townland of Dunlo derives its name from ‘Dún Leodha’, the fort of Leodha. This fort may have been a ringfort located on the western bank of river Suck; however, Holland (1996) suggests that the O’Connors may have then constructed a pre-Norman motte at this location. Turlough O’Connor then built a castle (RMP GA088:028) close to the fording point on the river Suck in 1124. This castle was not built of mortared stone as it was burned in 1131. A small urban settlement developed around the castle and a bridge (RMP GA088:047), which was built in 1130. There is a strong local tradition that the present Catholic church occupies the site of Dún Leodha.
Richard de Burgo succeded in the 13th century in having the O’Connor lands in Con-nacht declared to him by the Crown which amounted to twenty-five cantreds in the area of Roscommon, Sligo and Galway. This left the O’Connors with five cantreds, including Omany, within which lay the parishes of Kilcloony and Creagh.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
9
The Normans built a castle in Ballinasloe in 1245 on the eastern bank of the river Suck. It became the centre of a Norman manor which, along with a manor at Aughrim, was granted to Sir Richard de Rupella in 1253. The castle standing at Ballinasloe today was built by the O’Kelly sept in the 14th century and probably replaced the earlier Norman castle. Irish law and custom prevailed in the area around Aughrim and Ballinasloe from the mid 14th century until the end of the 16th century, with members of the O’Kelly family the direct occupiers of the land in the area during this period. However, the Reformation signalled tremendous change in the area. Land and property belonging to the monasteries and the Church were confiscated and re-granted to Protestants and others who recognized the English monarch as head of the church. The upheavals of the time are evident in the records for occupancy of Ballinalsoe Castle towards the end of the 16th century. In 1572 the castle was held by the Earl of Clanricard, one of the Clanricard Burkes, who successfully transformed from Anglo-Norman lords to English-style landlords (Mulloy 1996, 213). Soon after it was taken over by the Crown and in 1579 it was made the residence of the English governor of Connacht, Sir Anthony Brabazon (Egan 1960, 40, 69-70).
Not all land was transferred from the Gaelic lords: in 1578 Sean na Maighe O’Kelly ac-cepted land granted to him at Clanmacowen under the surrender and regrant scheme (Egan 1960, 39). However, Feardorcha O’Kelly of Aughrim was less successful and he was forced to seek a lease from the Earl of Ormond for land his family had occupied for several hundred years (Egan 1960, 40). In general, by the middle of the 17th century, the Old Irish families like the O’Kellys, while still retaining some vestiges of their old privileges, were suffering declining fortunes (Mulloy 1996, 213).
In October 1641 an insurrection broke out and heralded the beginning of a war that was to last eleven years, spanning the period of the English Civil War in England (1642-1651). It was fought by a loose amalgamation of the Old Irish lordships and what became known as the Old English. In Galway the Earl of Clanrickard, though Catholic and Royalist, refused to join forces with the confederation and had such an influence that the rebellion in Connacht in general lacked coherency. By 1653, however, the country was devastated by Cromwell’s army and the ensuing confiscations and transplantations resulted in a great change of land-ownership. The Act of Settlement (1662) and the Act of Explanation (1665), passed under the Restoration monarchy, generally reconfirmed the adjustments made in landownership after the original Cromwellian settlements. The O’Kellys, who were the main landowners in the area prior to the settlements, were the big losers. They were later forced to sell much of the land they retained in the parishes of Kilcloony and Creagh (Egan 1960, 90-1).
6 Excavation Methodology
The site was divided into four quadrants. Ten sections were excavated through the ditch and the bank (Ditch Section 1-10), ranging in size from 1 to 8 m in width. All archaeo-
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
10
logical features revealed after cleaning were fully excavated by hand and recorded using the single context recording system with plans and sections being produced at a scale of 1:20 or 1:10 as appropriate. A complete photographic record was maintained throughout the excava-tion. These photos were supplemented by aerial photographs taken after the final excavation stage.
7 Results of Excavation
The site comprised an enclosure, 42 m in diameter. It was oval in plan, with an entrance to the south-east (Figure 5, Plate 1). Full details of all deposits and features are available in the stratigraphic index (Appendix 1), the stratigraphic matrix (Appendix 2) and the groups and sub-groups text (Appendix 3).
7.1 Natural subsoils
Due to the thin soils in this area, (0.1 m to 0.2 m in depth) and the shallow bedrock, subsoil was absent in 40% of the interior. Boulder clay, greenish grey in colour, with angular pebbles and 50% muddy carboniferous limestone, was present around this outcrop. A light brownish orange clay silt, was present in places above the boulder clay. In places where the bedrock was high, especially in the south-eastern quadrant of the enclosure, there was no soil cover.
Two types of limestone were identified on site by Dr Martin Feely, NUI, Galway. C.100 is described as a light grey fossiliferous limestone, typical of Carboniferous deposits in the Irish midlands. This did not occur naturally on site. C.101 is described as a finer grained dark grey limestone that is not very fossiliferous and is rather shaley in places. A rock outcrop of this limestone type was identified on site.
7.2 Sub-circular slot trench and associated features in the north-west quadrant
Sub-circular slot trenchSituated directly on the crown of the hill at a height of 83 m O.D. was a sub-circular slot
trench C.18 (Figure 7, Plate 2). It was on average 0.4 m wide and 3 m in diameter. It was cut through by the later enclosing ditch, C.25. An Iron Age date of 396 to 211 cal BC (UB-7758) was returned from charcoal retrieved from the fill. A post-hole C.21 was located at the western end of the slot. There was no evidence for in situ burning in the area surrounded by the slot trench.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
11
A deposit of burnt animal bone was recovered from a small layer C.40 between the ditch and the slot trench C.18. The bone represented the greatest quantity of material to the bone assemblage. Sheep was the only identified species.
Three external pitsThree pits (C.151, C.176 and C178) were located in close proximity to the sub-circular
slot trench. All lay just outside the ringfort ditch to the west and were similar in size (Figure 6). The fills of the pits were light yellowish brown soft sandy silt and included occasional charcoal flecks. Hazel charcoal was present within pit C.176. It is likely that the pits were associated with the slot trench C.18 and pre-date the enclosure.
7.3 Construction of the enclosure
Preparation of the siteThe topsoil is very thin and just below the surface is boulder clay. Broken bedrock was
visible in the south-east quadrant of the enclosure. Due to the geology and the position of the site, it was very well drained. The earliest material present consistently along the length of the enclosing bank was a deposit of hard, grey-white charcoal-rich silt. This soil was directly above the boulder clay subsoil or above an orange silt subsoil which overlays the boulder clay in some places. These earliest deposits within the bank have been interpreted as the remains of scrub clearance from the interior during preparation of the site.
Construction of the ditch and bank
The Ditch
The ditch C.25 was oval in plan, being 37 m in diameter north to south and 48 m east to west, with a circumference of c. 132 m, enclosing 0.4 ha (Figures 5, 9 and 10). The construc-tion of the ditch involved digging a V-shaped trench around the area to be enclosed leaving a 6 m wide causeway to the south-east. The ditch termini sloped up from the base of the ditch to the ground surface at a 45-degree angle, maintaining their shape and size. In profile the ditch was an average of 1.88 m wide by 1 m deep. The excavation of the ditch entailed dig-ging through a thin layer of orange silt subsoil and into a very robust boulder clay beneath.
The Bank
The upstanding remains of a bank were present in the south part of the enclosure only (Figures 4, 5 and 9-11, Plate 1). It survived due to its incorporation into a modern field boundary. This preserved the structure of the bank. This surviving sector of the bank meas-ured c. 40 m in length east to west.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
12
An Iron Age date of 361 to 102 cal BC (UB_7361) was retrieved from a layer C.147 in the bank in Ditch Section 4. A second Iron Age date of 392 to 205 cal BC (UB-7360) was returned from layer C.69 in Ditch Section 4.
Bank construction featuresOn the southern side of the site a post-hole C.149 and a linear gulley ran parallel to the
ditch, on the outer edge of the bank. A second post-hole C.181 was present to the east. These posts and the gulley appeared to be used as a form of shoring for the bank, suggesting vertical posts with cross braces of either planks or beams, perhaps to produce a vertical rampart and prevent it slipping down-slope into the ditch. Along the inner edge of the bank two further post-holes C.189 and C.191 were recorded cut into rock. These post-holes probably fulfilled a similar function along the inside edge of the bank. The distance between the inner and outer post-holes suggest a bank width of 3 m.
On the opposing northern side of the site another more substantial internal revetment feature was visible. This linear feature C.110, had dimensions east to west of 10.96 m by 0.54 m in width by 0.67 m in depth (Plate 3). It ran parallel to the ditch and may have been contemporary with the ditch. A small amount of ash charcoal and two animal bone were retrieved from the fills. This slot trench also suggests a bank width of 3 m. It contained post-holes, with stone packing, and traces of some stake-holes. This has been interpreted as a revetment which was present on the internal edge of the bank along the northern side of the enclosure. There was sufficient soil cover in this section of the site for the feature to leave sub-surface structural remains. The revetment was not recorded elsewhere on the internal face of the bank. It is possible that where the ground surface was rock and construction of a trench was problematic, that an inner revetment of stone may have been used instead. These and other construction features would have been truncated during ploughing, land improvement or other disturbances in the intervening years.
Pre-bank material The earliest material present consistently along the length of the bank was a deposit of
hard, grey-white charcoal-rich silt. It varied in depth from 0.09 m to 0.6 m and in width from 0.75 m to 2.4 m. This soil was directly above the boulder clay subsoil or above an or-ange silt subsoil which overlays the boulder clay in some places. These earliest deposits within the bank have been interpreted as the remains of scrub clearance from the interior during preparation of the site. It is also possible that pre-bank sod or soils survived later erosion due to the protection of the bank. The charcoal rich nature of this deposit and its depth makes it unlikely to have been naturally deposited. In some places there is more than one deposit of this material, such as in Ditch Section 4. Charcoal analysis suggests the presence of crab apple or some such species (Pomoideae) and oak in these layers.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
13
Bank MaterialThe second largest deposit was an orange silt clay, with small angular pebbles in the ma-
trix. It varied in depth from 0.25 m to 0.6 m and varied in width from 2 m to 4 m (due to slump of the bank). One fragment of oak charcoal was retrieved from samples of these fills. The lack of charcoal or plant remains in these fills suggests that they were obtained from a sterile location, such as the subsoil.
Larger stones and boulders appear to have been separated out from the subsoil. These may have been used for other construction purposes, for example, an embankment and fac-ing stones for the bank. Tip lines were visible in this deposit in the longitudinal section through the bank were it was best preserved to the south. It seems plausible, considering ero-sion and the often short-lived nature of these sites, that the bank and ditch were constructed quickly, with a large team.
Stone EmbankmentThe third element comprised small, angular limestone stones, ranging in size from 0.05
m to 0.15 m and some angular gravel. This deposit was c. 1.8 m wide by 0.25 m deep and lay along the inside edge of the basal bank deposit described above. Some larger limestone stones measuring 0.15 m to 0.2 m were visible above this deposit on the bank at Ditch Section 6.
This deposit was notable because it did not lie directly on top of the bank, where it would increase the height of the bank. This material was clearly sorted and the dimensions along the width and length would be sufficient to construct an embankment c. 1.5 m high. Much larger limestone rocks were available in the immediate vicinity inside the enclosure, but do not generally appear to have been used. The bank did not extend beyond the south-west ditch terminus.
Entrance FeaturesTwo large post-holes were cut into the boulder clay just inside the entrance causeway,
C.218 and C.216, with a gap of 1.5 m between them (Figure 8). The two post-holes were located just inside the enclosure overlooking the causeway. The gap between them may indicate a constricted entranceway, possibly with a guard tower (as the causeway itself was 6 m wide) or they may have functioned as gateposts. A small quantity of animal bone was recovered from the fill of C.218.
Around these two post-holes and covering the whole of the causeway area was a layer C.225. It comprised light orange-grey silt, containing moderate small, medium and coarse pebbles. It measured 5 m north-east to south-west and c. 8 m north-west to south-east, with a maximum depth of 0.4 m.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
14
A metalled surface C.193 overlay the whole area of the causeway. This was composed of 60% C.100-type limestone and 40% C.101-type limestone. The metalled surface was imbed-ded in a layer of soil, C.225, which may have helped to hold the stones in place.
The entranceway opened out into a trackway. It was visible for at least 15 m and was c. 5 m wide. It led south-east from the causeway sloping towards the lower ground below. The trackway may have functioned as a drove-way.
7.4 The interior
Exposed bedrock was recorded in some 60% of the interior. No evidence of rock cut fea-tures was recorded in the interior. This would suggest that either the interior was never exten-sively occupied or it was scarped out by later improvements. The presence of butchered, burnt and unburnt animal bone, a rotary quernstone (E2054:72:1) and lignite braclet (E2054:45:3) indicates habitation of the site.
The main focus of activity was in the north-west quadrant of the site. A slot trench, post-holes and three pits were described in Group 1. Ten post-holes (C.6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 31, 34, 36 and 108) were located to the south-east of the slot trench C.18 and formed an irregular arc (Figure 7). They were similar in size with an average diameter of 0.25 m and depth of 0.3 m. Charcoal analysis of the fills indicated a consistent dominance of hazel. A medieval radiocarbon date of 1022-1164 cal AD (UB-7760) was returned from C.30, from charcoal in the fill of post-hole C.31.
A small pit C.91 was located in the northern interior of the site. With the exception of post-holes associated with bank material and the entrance causeway this was the only other feature in the interior of the enclosure. The fill included burnt and unburnt bone fragments. Charcoal recovered included ash, elder and pomoideae.
7.5 Backfillingandabandonmentofthesite
A series of sections (Ditch Sections 1-10) was excavated across the ditch at regular inter-vals, to provide an accurate and uniform picture of the enclosure as a whole (Figure 5, Plates 4 & 5). A detailed picture of the ditch was recorded. Two stone types were found to domi-nate the fills. The first was a white, fossiliferous, carboniferous limestone, (C.100) which was not available on site. The second was a muddy, carboniferous limestone, (C.101) which was angular, bluish grey and was available onsite in great quantities.
An early medieval date of cal AD 882-904 and 913-970 (UBA-8103) was retrieved from a bone sample from the base of Ditch Section 4. A later medieval date of cal AD 1467 to 1640 (UB-7759) was returned from charcoal from the basal ditch fill C.70 in Ditch Section 5.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
15
Primary Silting of ditch Primary silting deposits (C.57, 128, 139, 142, 168 and 198) were recorded in four of the
nine slots excavated. These deposits were most prevalent to the north-west, and where there appeared to be less stone present in the ditch fills. The fills ranged from a mid grey soft sandy silt to a dark brown friable silt with occasional angular gravel and infrequent inclusions of bone. The average dimensions were 0.4 m in width by 0.3 m in depth. Hazel, willow/popu-lar and pomoideae charcoal was present in just one sample from C.139. Animal bone was included in the basal ditch fills in Ditch Section 4, in C.139 in Ditch Section 7 and C.198 in Ditch Section 6. These fills may have accumulated if the ditch stood open after initial con-struction, and the wind and rain washed material from the bank and the sides of the ditch into the bottom of the ditch. The relative scarcity of charcoal and general domestic deposits in the ditch suggests that either the ditch was cleaned out on a regular basis or that the ditch was backfilled shortly after its construction. Alternatively, the dearth of occupation material, e.g. charcoal and bone, may be because the primary function of the ringfort was that of a corral and not a homestead.
Primary ditch fillsThe primary fills (C.70, 73, 85, 117, 141, 158, 192, 199 and 223) of the ditch comprised
fragments of limestone bedrock. The fills measured on average 1 m wide by 0.4 m deep. Both types of limestone, C.100 and C.101, were recorded within the fills. C.100 was present almost exclusively in the east and north-eastern area of the ditch. The stones ranged in size from 0.15 m to 0.3 m. There were voids between the stones. Three of these fills included ash, Prunus sp., oak and Pomoideae charcoal. It is possible that the stone could have formed a revetment for the bank and was deliberately backfilled into the ditch.
Secondary silting of the ditchThese fills (C.66, 85 and 156) range from a dark brown soft silty-sand to a dark brown
soft clay. The fills measured c. 0.4 m in width by 0.2 m in depth. A burnt hazelnut shell and a Persicaria seed were identified in a sample from C.66.
The fills did not constitute a substantial deposit. They were prevalent in Ditch Section 1, in between two stone fills. The stone in the earlier fill was mostly C.100 type and the stone in the later fill was mostly C.101 type. The thin layer of silting in between major episodes of stone backfilling is likely to be the result of weathering, the bank slumped after a fall of rain.
Secondary ditch fills These fills (C. 94, 104, 167, 200, 202, 203 and 224) were predominately made up of
C.101 type limestone, with some of C.100 type also present, especially in the north and east
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
16
of the ditch where C.100 predominated. The stones ranged from 0.15 m to 0.3 m in size. The fills were c. 1.2 m in width by 0.4 m in depth.
It is possible that the stone could have formed a revetment for the bank and was backfilled into the ditch. There may have been some time between the first and second episode of back-filling during which time a thin lens of silt accumulated. C.101 type limestone made up the majority of these fills, except in the ditch to the north and east where C.100 type limestone dominated the fills.
Upper ditch fillsThe upper ditch fills (C.56, 93, 97, 152, 155 and 221) were mostly sandy-silt fills measur-
ing c. 0.8 m in width by 0.35 m in depth. They were only recorded in Ditch Section 1, 2 and 4. They were similar to the main body of bank material and may have slipped from the bank into the ditch.
Bank slippageThese clay and silt fills (C.55, 103, 150, 170, 196, 197 and 201) included fragments of
charcoal and bone. The charcoal retrieved included pomoideae, hazel and alder. They were on average from 0.45 m to 1 m in width by 0.3 m in depth. They are similar to bank material and may have slipped from the bank into the ditch.
Bank slippage in the west to north-east section of the ditchThese fills (C.26, 49, 102 and 187) vary from dark brown pebbly silt to light brown silty-
clay. The dimensions varied from 0.3 m in width by 0.1 m in depth to 2 m in width by 0.2 m in depth. The fills were recorded in the west to north-east side of the site, where the enclosure appears most exposed, and where a slight down slope could have facilitated slumping of mate-rial from the bank into the ditch.
Post-abandonment ditch fillsThese fills (C. 54, 113, 124, 136, 137 and 138) were found from the north to the north-
west of the enclosure, comprising a light greyish-brown silt. The dimensions were 1.1 m in width by 0.2-0.3 m in depth. Hazel and pomoideae charcoal was retrieved. The fills were very mixed which would suggest that these deposits may have been shovelled into the ditch. The recovery of two fragments of clay pipe (E2054:124:1 and E2054:124:2) would suggest a modern date for the last phase of activity associated with the ditch.
The North-west CausewayA layer, C.47, of metalling was recorded overlying a portion of the north-west section
of the ditch. It was 2.21 m in length by 1.88 m in width by 0.31 m in depth. Flanking this
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
17
deposit was a double line of large limestone blocks C.226. It measured 2 m north-east to south-west across the ditch, by 0.5 m in width by 0.4 m in depth. Two courses of stone were recorded, the upper course being C.100 type limestone and the lower course being mainly C.101 type limestone. These stones varied in size from 0.15 m to 0.4 m.
7.6 Modern period
First edition (1838) OS mapThe enclosure is illustrated on Sheet 87 of the first edition (1838) Ordnance Survey map
for Co. Galway. A field boundary adjoins the enclosure to the south-west. This 19th-century boundary was recorded in Ditch Section 3. It overlay the enclosure ditch fill C.117.
Second edition (1946) OS mapThe enclosure is illustrated on Sheet 87 of the second edition (1946) Ordnance Survey
map for Co. Galway (Figure 4). It has been incorporated in the southern extent of a field boundary. The children’s burial ground at Lismurtagh is located in the north-western corner of the same field. The field boundary was recorded in Ditch Section 3. The change in the field pattern probably reflected changes in land ownership, function and farming methods in this period.
Modern disturbanceThere is some evidence of ploughing to the north of the site. Modern agricultural debris
from mechanised machinery, blades from a plough and metal pieces from a tractor, were recovered from the topsoil. According to the Galway Inventory entry the site was bulldozed in recent years (Alcock et al. 1999, 209). This may help explain the presence of so much shattered rock on the site. Anecdotal evidence for modern quarrying on the site was provided by local landowners, who visited the enclosure during excavation. One of these farmers had personally quarried stone from the site for the construction of stone walls in the area.
7.7 Plant remains
The plant remains were examined by Mary Dillon (Appendix 5). A total of 130 samples were scanned and only two samples were found to contain plant remains. A sample from C.66 (fill of ditch C.25) contained a hazel nut shell fragment and a Persicaria spp. seed and a sample from C.17 (fill of slot C.18) contained a Persicaria spp. seed and two indeterminate cereal grains. The cereal grains were very degraded.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
18
Loughbown 1 (E2442) and Mackney (E2444), two nearby ringforts - which returned dates for the early medieval period right through to later medieval times - produced large quantities of plant remains, primarily cereals and weeds associated with growing in crop fields (Dillon 2007; Tierney 2007). These sites produced typical ringfort assemblages, of wheat, barley and oat. The virtual absence of plant remains from Loughbown 2 is in stark contrast to Loughbown 1 and Mackney ringfort, and reflects the general absence of occupa-tion deposits at this site.
7.8 Charcoal
The charcoal from Loughbown was analysed by Mary Dillon (Appendix 6). The number of bulk soil samples with charcoal was low, 43 out of 130 samples, so all samples with char-coal wree included in the analysis. The assemblage was dominated by Pomoideae (rowan, hawthorn and crab apple) (35% / 55%, which means 35% percentage fragment frequency / 55% percentage weight) followed by oak (16% / 22%), hazel (16% / 9%), ash (13% / 9%), and Prunus (7% / 3%) (includes wild cherry, bird cherry and blackthorn). Other wood types identified in small amounts were hazel/alder, alder, elder, diffuse porous wood, ivy, elm wil-low/poplar and holly.
The charcoal from Loughbown 2 is very different from that from Loughbown 1 (E2442) and Mackney (E2444) ringforts. Charcoal was much more scarce and in much smaller frag-ments from Loughbown 2 than from the other sites. Oak formed only 16% / 22% of the assemblage at Loughbown 2 and pomoideae, which was not so common on the other sites, dominated the assemblage at 35% / 55%. The reasons for the large differences in the assem-blages are most likely a reflection of the difference in functions between Loughbown 2 and the other sites.
7.9 Animal bone
The animal bone from Loughbown was analysed by Margaret McCarthy (Appendix 7)A small assemblage of animal bones was recovered from Loughbown II. The most preva-
lent remains are those of food species. Many of the bones are calcined from being in contact with intense heat and this has contributed to the fragmentation rate as the burning process reduces bones into small undiagnostic fragments. The bulk of the sample is too small to be taken to species level. The most frequently occurring species are cattle and sheep/goat fol-lowed by considerably smaller amounts of pigs. 80% of the cattle and 75% of the sheep/goat were recovered from the fills of the ditch. The sample of bones recovered during the excava-tion is obviously too small to be able to reconstruct the local animal husbandry at the time the site was occupied. There is no evidence however that the faunal material accumulated by means other than the disposal of domestic refuse and this is borne out by the dominance of cattle and sheep bones of high food value.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
19
7.10 Radiocarbon dates
Radiocarbon analysis was carried out by the 14 Chrono Centre in Queen’s University Belfast. Dates were calibrated using Calib Rev5.0.2 (©1986-2005 M.Stuiver & P.J. Reimer) and in conjunction with Stuiver & Reimer 1993 and Reimer et al. 2004.
Table 1: Radiocarbon dates from Loughbown 2
Lab code Context Material Un-calibrat-ed date
δ13 C 2 sigma calibration
1 sigma calibration
Period
UBA-8103
Base of Ditch Section 4
BoneBovie vertebrae, 40 g
1159 ± 29 BP
-24.1 cal AD 778-903914-969
cal AD 782-788812-845857-898920-945
Early medieval
UB-7360
C.69, fill of enclosure bank
CharcoalPomoideae, 0.19 g, 1 frag
2245 ±33 BP
-26.0 cal BC 392-345323-205
cal BC384-354291-231217-215
Iron Age
UB-7361 C.147, post-hole fill
CharcoalDiffuse po-rous, 1 frag, 0.07 g
2162 ±34 BP
-29.0 cal BC 361-272263-102
cal BC353-294229-219212-167
Iron Age
UBA-7759
C.70 (Ditch Section 5)
Charcoal,Prunus and Pomoideae,
342 ± 32 BP
-28.8 cal AD 1467-1640
cal AD 1488-15251557-16041608-1632
Late medieval
UBA-7760
C.30, post-hole fill
CharcoalHazel
941 ±33 BP
-21.0 cal AD1022-1164
cal AD 1033-10521080-11291132-1153
Early/high medieval
UBA 7758
C.17, fill of slot trench
CharcoalHazel
2266 ±24 BP
-22.9 cal BC396-352295-228221-211
cal BC 391-358279-258242-236
Iron Age
7.11 Lithics
The lithics were examined by Dr. Farina Sternke (Appendix 9). The lithics are a natural chunk of chert (E2054:65:1), a natural chunk of limestone (E2054:37:1) and a small piece of flint debitage (E2054:24:3). The flint debitage is undiagnostic in terms of its technology and dating. Overall, there is negligible evidence for chipped stone tool-making on this site.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
20
8 Discussion
8.1 Phasing
Two phases of activity are indicated by the radiocarbon dates returned for the enclosure at Loughbown, prehistoric and medieval. Prehistoric activity, dating to the Iron Age, pre-dated the construction of the enclosure. Three Iron Age dates were returned, two from bank layers and one from a slot trench in the north-west quadrant of the site. It is likely that earlier mate-rial was disturbed when the bank of the enclosure was constructed and charcoal associated with prehistoric occupation deposits was re-deposited in the bank.
Although the nature of Iron Age activity at Loughbown 2 has not been identified the radiocarbon dates from the site indicate that some form of anthropogenic activity occurred during the Iron Age. The three Iron Age dates, obtained from the north-west and the south of the site, all overlap and in that sense they are the only coherent set of dates from the site.
The enclosure was constructed in the medieval period. A sample of animal bone from the base of the ditch returned a medieval date of cal AD 778 to 969 (UBA-8103), which gives the terminus ante quem for the backfilling of the ditch. Stout (2000, 24) suggests that the construction of the majority of ringforts produce a date range between AD 600 and 900. Other medieval radiocarbon dates were also returned from the site. A date of cal AD 1022 to 1164 (UBA-7760) was returned from one of the post-holes in the north-west quadrant. A late medieval date of cal AD 1467 to 1640 (UBA-7759) was returned from a ditch fill. These indicate that activity at the site continued after the primary period of ringfort occupation was over. Excavations at nearby ringforts Mackney (E2444) and Loughbown 1 (E2442) also indicated that the ringforts were constructed in the early medieval period but that occupation continued in the later medieval period.
8.2 Construction
A charcoal-rich grey/white soil was visible at the base of bank and it was probably the result of removing and burning vegetation from the interior of the site prior to construction of the enclosure. The clearance of the interior would have produced some of the soil necessary for the construction of an earthern bank or rampart, with the remainder of the material com-ing from the construction of the ditch. A stone revetment was constructed on the internal and external face of the bank. This was probably designed to prevent the soil falling directly back into the ditch and slumping into the interior. These features were evident where the bank was best preserved on its south-western side in Ditch Section 4. In addition, a slot trench was cut into the natural subsoil and ran parallel to the bank along its inside edge in the northern area of the site. This may indicate that the revetments were constructed differently along the northern side of the enclosure. No opposing slot trench was recorded on the inner edge of the
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
21
ditch, making it difficult to determine how the bank was prevented from slumping into the ditch. The presence of so much stone in the northern ditch fills suggests that the revetments along the northern side were constructed of stone.
The construction of the oval enclosing ditch was undertaken on difficult stony ground. Its purpose appears to have been to enclose the site and to contribute to the construction of the interior rampart. The strenuous nature of the work entailed, particularly in this very stony boulder clay, hints at the importance of the site. The ringfort was univallate, the most common form of ringfort: Stout (2000, 17) claims that 80% of ringforts in most areas are univallate. The overall diameter of the enclosing ditch was 42 m. This is smaller than the di-mensions of the univallate ringfort at Mackney (58 m north–south and 55 m east–west) and it was smaller than the bivallate ringfort nearby at Loughbown 1, where the external ditch was 63 m in diameter. However, the internal ditch at Loughbown 1 was exactly the same diameter as the Loughbown 2 ditch, 42 m. The causeway entrance in the south-east, com-mon to a majority of ringforts (Stout 2000, 18), appears to have had a constricted entrance as evidenced by post-holes likely to represent a gate structure.
After occupation of the site the uppermost section of a stone embankment was appar-ently pushed into the enclosing ditch in one episode, either after a change in function of the site or its discontinued use. The embankment appears to have been faced with C.100 type limestone, especially in the east and north-eastern area of the site. Subsequent erosion at the site completed the in-filling of the ditch: the upper stone ditch fills comprised C.101 type limestone (probably the result of erosion and slippage of the base of the stone embankment into the ditch) and this was overlain by bank material. This indicated that the site was left open to decay for an extended period of time.
8.3 Internal features and evidence of occupation
The remains of a slot trench were positioned directly on the crown of the hill and it com-prised a slot trench and some post-holes. The post-hole at the western terminus may be for a door, a roof support or to define the entrance to this feature (Figure 6). A radiocarbon date from the slot trench suggests that this was Iron Age in date. It was truncated by the construc-tion of the enclosure. However, the slot trench was surrounded by post-holes which respected the curve of the slot trench and therefore appeared to be part of the same feature, perhaps a structure, yet a medieval date (11th to 12th century) was obtained from one of the post-holes. Another problem in the interpretation of this group of features as a structure is the fact that, if the arc of the slot trench continued it would form a structure with an internal diameter of roughly 2.25 m. It would therefore have been a very small hut. One of the smallest examples of circular structures was excavated at Knockhouse Lower, Co. Waterford, a Middle Bronze Age hut that had an internal diameter of approximately 3.2 m (McQuade 2006). The size of the area enclosed by the arc at Loughbown 2 appears very small and it is therefore question-able whether this was a structure at all.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
22
Material evidence indicating domestic occupation of the enclosure was scant It is possible that above ground structures built entirely out of stone may have existed within the area of the enclosure. The very limited nature of occupational debris within the ditch, other than in much later upper fills, would suggest that the enclosure was not occupied on a long term basis. A number of excavations of other ringforts have produced no evidence for occupation, examples include Garryduff II Co. Cork, Lisdrumchor and Tullyallan, Co Armagh and Li-snararagh Co Down (Stout 2000, 33).
Artefacts from the site that may be contemporary with its occupation included an incom-plete shale bracelet (E2054:45:3) from an upper layer in the bank, a quern stone (E2054:72:1), one undiagnostic flint flake (E2054:24:3), a knife blade (E2054:150:1), possibly 13th century in date and a hammer stone (E2054:170:1) from ditch fills (Appendix 10, Figures 12 and 13, Plates 7-9). No pottery was recovered from the site and virtually no plant remains were found in the archaeological deposits. The quern stone (E2054:72:1) from this site resembles a similar find from Loughbown 1.
9 References
Alcock, O., de hOra, K. and Gosling, P. 1999 Archaeological Inventory of County Galway, Vol 11 North Galway.
Clinton, M. 2001 The Souterrains of Ireland. Bray, Wordwell.
Crombie, D. 1985 Children’s Burial Grounds in the Barony of Dunmore: A Preliminary Note, JGHAS, Vol. 40.
Delaney, F. 2005. N6 Galway to Ballinasloe PPP Scheme Archaeological Excavation Contract 4, Phase 1 Test Excavations, Archaeological Test Excavation Report Loughbown 2 Enclosure A024/4.8. Unpublished Eachtra Archaeological Projects report submitted to the DoEHLG & Galway County Council.
Dillon, M. 2007. Plant remains from Mackney Ringfort - E2444. Unpublished report produced for Eachtra Archaeological Projects.
Edwards, N. 1990. The Archaeology of Early Medieval Ireland. London..
Egan, P.K. 1960 The Parish of Ballinasloe. Its history from the earliest times to the present day. Dublin, Clonmore and Reynolds.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
23
Gardiner, M.J. and Radford, T. 1980 Soil Associations of Ireland and their Land Use Potential. Dublin, An Foras Talúntais.
Geissel, H. 2006 A Road on the Long Ridge. Newbridge, CRS Publications.
Gwynn, A. and Haddcock, R.N. 1970 Medieval Religious Houses in Ireland. London.
Holland, P.1996 ‘The Anglo-Normans and their Castles in County Galway’, in Moran, G. & Gillespie, R. (eds.) Galway History and Society. Interdisciplinary essays on the history of an Irish county. Dublin, Geography Publications.
Jones, M. 2004 Archaeological test excavations at a possible ringfort at Loughbown, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway, on the route of the proposed N6 Galway to East Ballinasloe road scheme (Licence No.03E1875). Unpublished excavation report Galway County Council.
MacLochlainn, T. 1980. The Parish of Aughrim & Kilconnell.
McQuade, M. 2006 Archaeological Excavation of Pre-historic settlement sites at Knockhouse Lower and Carrickpherish, Co. Waterford, Decies 62, 21-48.
Mulloy, S. 1996 ‘The transfer of power: Galway 1642-1703’, pp. 213-228 in Moran, G. & Gillespie, R. (eds.) Galway History and Society. Interdisciplinary essays on the history of an Irish county. Dublin, Geography Publications.
O’Donovan, J. 1843 Tribes and Customs of the Hy Many. Dublin, The Irish Archaeological Society.
Ó Súilleabháin, S. 1939 ‘Adhlacadh leanbhai’, JRSAI Vol. 69
Prendergast, E. 1946 Togher at Kellysgrove Co. Galway, JGAHS Vol. XXII (1946-1947), 15-18.
Reimer, P.J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Bertrand, C., Blackwell, P.G., Buck, C.E., Burr, G., Cutler, K.B., Damon, P.E., Edwards, R.L., Fairbanks, R.G., Friedrich, M., Guilderson, T.P., Hughen, K.A., Kromer, B., McCormac, F.G., Manning, S., Bronk Ramsey, C., Reimer, R.W., Remmele, S., Southon, J.R., Stuiver, M., Talamo, S., Taylor, F.W., van der Plicht, J. and Weyhenmeyer, C.E. 2004 IntCal04 Terrestrial Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 0–26 Cal Kyr BP, Radiocarbon 46, 1029-1058.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
24
Roseveare, A. and M. (ArchaeoPhysica) 2004 Archaeological geophysical survey on the route of the proposed N6 Galway to Ballinasloe National Road scheme. Unpublished report for Galway County Council.
RPS-MCOS & Ryan Hayden, 2004 N6 Galway to Ballinasloe Environmental Impact Statement. Unpublished report.
Stout, M. 2000 The Irish Ringfort. Dublin, Four Courts Press.
Stuiver, M., and Reimer, P.J. 1993 Extended (super 14) C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 (super 14) C age calibration program, Radiocarbon 35, 215-230.
Tierney, M. 2007. A Preliminary Analysis of Charred Plant Remains from Loughbown 1, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. (E2442). Unpublished report produced for Eachtra Archaeological Projects.
Urr
aghr
yB
urn
t m
ou
nd
Lou
ghbo
wn
IR
ing
fort
(sit
e o
f) &
fo
rge
Coo
lolla
Lim
e ki
ln &
Lin
en m
ill
Coo
ltym
urra
ghy
Bu
rnt
mo
un
d
Bar
nacr
agh
Bu
rnt
mo
un
d
Lou
ghbo
wn
IIR
ing
fort
(sit
e o
f)
Mac
kney
Pits
& s
add
le q
uer
n
Mac
kney
Rin
gfo
rt w
ith
ske
leta
l rem
ain
s
Mac
kney
Mas
on
ry, p
its
& d
itch
es
Coo
lolla
Au
gh
rim
bat
tlef
ield
169
1: L
utt
rel’s
Pas
s
Pol
lboy
& T
ulru
shU
nd
erw
ater
su
rvey
at
Suck
cro
ssin
g
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
25
10 Figures
Figu
re 1
: Dis
cove
ry s
erie
s O
S m
ap s
how
ing
the
rout
e of
the
new
N6
Gal
way
to B
allin
aslo
e ro
ad (C
ontr
act 4
) and
the
loca
tion
of a
ll ex
cava
tion
site
s.
E24
48C
oolty
mur
ragh
yB
urn
t m
ou
nd
E24
47C
oolo
llaLi
me
kiln
& fo
rge
E24
49U
rrag
hyB
urn
t m
ou
nd
E24
42
Loug
hbow
n I
Rin
gfo
rt &
fo
rge
E24
46
Bar
nacr
agh
Bu
rnt
mo
un
d
E20
54
Loug
hbow
n II
Rin
gfo
rt
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
26
Figu
re 2
: The
rout
e of
the
new
N6
Gal
way
to B
allin
aslo
e ro
ad (C
ontr
act 4
) ove
rlai
d on
the
1st
edi
tion
OS
map
.
E24
48
Coo
ltym
urra
ghy
Bu
rnt
mo
un
d
E24
47
Coo
lolla
Lim
e ki
ln &
forg
e
E24
49
Urr
aghy
Bu
rnt
mo
un
d
E24
42
Loug
hbow
n I
Rin
gfo
rt &
fo
rge
E24
46
Bar
nacr
agh
Bu
rnt
mo
un
d
E20
54
Loug
hbow
n II
Rin
gfo
rt
E24
45
Mac
kney
Pits
E24
43
Mac
kney
Pits
& d
itch
es
E24
44
Mac
kney
Rin
gfo
rt w
ith
ske
leta
l rem
ain
s
Sto
ne G
roup
/Insc
ibed
Sto
ne
Togh
er
Can
al
Bur
ial G
roun
d/G
rave
yard
Folly
Fiel
d sy
stem
Ear
thw
ork
Ecc
lesi
astic
al S
ite/H
oly
wel
lC
astle
/Tow
er
Enc
losu
reM
otte
Mon
umen
t
Rin
gfor
t
Lege
nd
0 K
m2
Km
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
27
Figu
re 3
: The
rout
e of
the
new
N6
Gal
way
to B
allin
aslo
e ro
ad (C
ontr
act 4
) ove
rlai
d on
the
RM
P m
ap (S
heet
87)
.
Lismurtagh Childrens burial ground and enclosure
0 100 m
N
Limits of excavation
Enclosure GA 087-177
GA 087-176001GA 087-176002
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
28
Figure 4: Location of the ringfort GA087-177 at Loughbown.
Baulk
Baulk
Baulk
BaulkC.60
C.25
C.178C.151
C.40
C.176
C.18 C.34C.36
C.47
C.16
C.108C.14
C.31C.12C.10
C.21
C.6C.8
C.90
C.91
C.110
C.214
C.4
C.216
C.218C.193
C.219
C.149 C.181
Limits ofexcavation
DitchSondages
Legend
Bank material
DS 7DS 8 DS 1
DS 5
DS 10
DS 2
DS 2
DS 9
DS 3
DS 6DS 4
A B
5 m 20 m0 m
N
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
29
Figure 5: Post-excavation plan of the ringfort at Loughbown 2 E2054.
Enclosure ditch
Sub-circular structure
BankMaterial
Track-way
Causeway
Causeway
Gate posts
Rock outcrop
Internal bank revetment
Ditch
Legend
Bank material 5 m 20 m0 m
N
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
30
Figure 6: Post-excavation plan of the ringfort at Loughbown 2 showing the main features.
Enclo
sure
ditc
h
Sub-
circu
lar s
truct
ure
enclo
sing
ditc
h
Bank
Mat
eria
l
Trac
k-wa
y
Caus
eway
Gat
e po
sts
Rock
out
crop
Inte
rnal
ban
k pa
lisad
e
C.60
C.25
C.17
8
C.15
1
C.40
C.17
6
C.18C.
34
C.36
C.25
C.16
C.10
8C.
14
C.31
C.12
C.10
C.21
C.6
C.8
C.90
C.91
C.11
0
C.21
4
C.4
C.21
6
C.21
8
C.10
0
C.10
1
C.19
3
C.21
9
C.14
9C.
181
-Bur
nt b
one
depo
sit
-Enc
losu
re d
itch
-Eva
luat
ion
trenc
h
Lege
nd
-Ban
k m
ater
ial
DS 7
DS 8
DS 1
DS 5 DS
10
DS 2
DS 2
DS 3
DS 6
DS 4
5 m20
m0 m
N
0 5
m
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
31
Figu
re 7
: Pla
n of
str
uctu
re C
.18.
Baul
k
Baul
k
Baul
k
Baul
k
Enclo
sure
ditc
h
Sub-
circu
lar s
truct
ure
enclo
sing
ditc
h
Bank
Mat
eria
l
Trac
k-wa
y
Caus
eway
Gat
e po
sts
Rock
out
crop
Inte
rnal
ban
k pa
lisad
e
C.60
C.25
C.17
8
C.15
1
C.40
C.17
6
C.18C.
34
C.36
C.25
C.16
C.10
8C.
14
C.31
C.12
C.10
C.21
C.6
C.8
C.90
C.91
C.11
0
C.21
4
C.4
C.21
6
C.21
8
C.10
0
C.10
1
C.19
3
C.21
9
C.14
9C.
181
-Bur
nt b
one
depo
sit
-Enc
losu
re d
itch
-Eva
luat
ion
trenc
h
Lege
nd
-Ban
k m
ater
ial
DS 7
DS 8
DS 1
DS 5 DS
10
DS 2
DS 2
DS 3
DS 6
DS 4
5 m20
m0 m
N
0 5
m
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
32
Figu
re 8
: Pla
n of
cau
sew
ay a
nd e
ntra
nce
at L
ough
bow
n 2.
Eas
t-fac
ing
sect
ion
of d
itch
in D
S 1
Nor
th-fa
cing
sec
tion
of d
itch
in D
S 2
Wes
t-fac
ing
sect
ion
of d
itch
in D
S 3
C.2
5
C.2
5
C.2
5
C.2
3
C.2
6
C.5
4
C.2
4C
.72
C.4
2C
.43
C.9
3
C.9
4
C.1
34C
.50
C.7
4C
.135
C.7
5C
.74
C.5
1
C.1
17
Fiel
d bo
unda
ry
C.7
3
C.3
C.9
7
C.9
8
C.3
C.1
18C
.119
C.5
5
C.5
7
C.5
6
0
5 m
Lege
nd
C.1
00
C.1
01
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
33
Figu
re 9
: Sec
tion
s of
the
ban
k an
d di
tch
at D
itch
Slot
s 1,
2 a
nd 3
.
Eas
t-fac
ing
sect
ion
of b
ank
and
ditc
h in
DS
4
Wes
t-fac
ing
sect
ion
of b
ank
and
ditc
h in
DS
4
Sou
th-fa
cing
sec
tion
of d
itch
in D
S 8
Eas
t-fac
ing
sect
ion
of d
itch
in D
S 1
0
#
Lege
nd
C
.101
C.1
00
char
coal
#
C.2
5
C.1
59
C.2
5
C.1
74
C.1
81
C.2
5
C.2
5
C.2
25
C.2
24
C.2
21
C.8
6
C.1
46C
.147
C.1
62
C.1
31
C.4
5
C.6
4C
.76
C.1
50
C.1
52
C.1
56C.1
55
C.4
5
C.8
9C
.69
C.9
0
C.6
8
C.1
79C
.66
C.1
80
C.5
3
C.2
22C
.174
C.1
60C
.161
C.6
2
C.1
30C
.132
C.1
29
C.1
63
C.1
33
C.8
0
C.6
3
C.7
8
C.6
3
0 5 m
C.4
8C
.49
C.1
96
C.1
95C
.171
C.1
97C
.45
C.2
01C
.201
C.1
44
C.1
40
C.1
25C
.194
C.1
70
C.2
00 C.1
99
C.1
98
C.1
67 C.1
58C
.168
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
34
Figu
re 1
0: S
ecti
on o
f the
ban
k an
d di
tch
at D
itch
Slot
s 4,
8 a
nd 1
0.
AB
.5 m
3 m
0 m
Lege
nd ston
e
cha
rcoa
l
Nor
th-fa
cing
sec
tion
of b
ank.
Bur
row
Bur
row
C. 6
9
C. 2
04
C. 6
2C
. 45
C. 2
07C
. 206
C. 2
05
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
35
Figu
re 1
1: S
ecti
on o
f the
ban
k at
Ditc
h Sl
ot 4
.
0 50mm
Loughbown II, E2054:150:1
Iron Knife Blade
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
36
Figure 12: Knife Blade (E2054:150:1).
0 50mm
Loughbown II, E2054:45:3
Lignite Bracelet
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
37
Figure 13: Bracelet (E2054:45:3).
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
38
11 Plates
Plate 2: Sub-circular structure C.18 from southeast.
Plate 1: Aerial view of Loughbown II.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
39
Plate 4: View of ditch in Ditch Slot 3 from east.
.
Plate 3: View of internal bank revetment trench C.110.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
40
Plate 6: View of ditch in Ditch Slot 4 from west.
Plate 5: View of ditch in Ditch Slot 4 from east.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
41
Plate 8: Blade (E2054:64:1).
Plate 7: Knife Blade (E2054:150:1).
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
42
Plate 9: Bracelet (E2054:45:3).
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
43
Appe
ndix
1: S
tratig
raph
ic In
dex
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
1A
LLLa
yer
Dar
k br
owni
sh-b
lack
, silt
y-cl
ayTo
psoi
l2
ALL
Laye
rG
reen
ish-g
rey,
peb
bly-
clay
Boul
der c
lay
sub-
soil
3Se
e C
.65:
Lig
ht b
row
n to
ora
nge
clay
ey
silt.
4A
llD
epos
itD
ark
grey
dep
osit
of la
rge
angu
lar l
ime-
ston
e &
gra
vel.
See
C.1
00 &
C.1
01.
F.4:
1 iro
n na
il, F
.4:2
m
etal
obj
ect,
F.4:
3 iro
n5
1/11
Bfil
l of p
ost-h
ole
C.6
0.28
x0.2
5x0.
06Br
own
soft
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
angu
lar
fine
pebb
les.
SS60
40
61/
11B
cut o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
28x0
.25x
0.06
Circ
ular
feat
ure.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p I i
n ev
ery
dire
ctio
n. G
entle
smoo
th si
de a
t N
, mod
erat
e co
nvex
at S
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe
base
I at
N a
nd S
. Poi
nted
bas
e in
pro
file.
O
rient
atio
n N
-S. F
ill C
.5
40
71/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.80.
46x0
.44x
0.02
Dar
k br
own
soft
cla
yey
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r med
ium
peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal
char
coal
incl
osio
ns.
SS19
, SS6
141
81/
12A
cut o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
46x0
.44x
0.02
Circ
ular
feat
ure.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p G
in
ever
y di
rect
ion.
Gen
tle c
onca
ve si
des a
t W
and
S. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e I i
n ev
ery
dire
c-tio
n. C
ircul
ar in
pla
n an
d fla
t in
prof
ile
base
. Orie
ntat
ion
N-S
. Fill
C.8
41
91/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.10
0.32
x0.3
2x0.
09D
ark
brow
nish
bla
ck so
ft c
laye
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es.
Occ
asio
nal c
harc
oal i
nclu
sions
. Und
erla
ys
C.1
SS20
, SS6
241
101/
12A
cot o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
32x0
.32x
0.09
Circ
ular
feat
ure.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p s i
n ev
ery
dire
ctio
n. G
entle
irre
gula
r sid
e at
N
, gen
tle sm
ooth
side
at S
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe
base
S in
eve
ry d
irect
ion.
Poi
nted
bas
e in
pr
ofile
. Orie
ntat
ion
N-S
. Fill
C.9
41
111/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.12
0.2x
0.2x
0.05
Mid
bro
wn
soft
silt.
Mod
erat
e an
gula
r fin
e pe
bble
s. U
nder
lays
C.1
SS21
, SS6
341
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
44
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
121/
12A
cut o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
2x0.
2x0.
05C
ircul
ar fe
atur
e. B
reak
of s
lope
G a
t N
and
S at
S. M
oder
ate
smoo
th si
de a
t N
and
vert
ical
smoo
th si
de a
t S. B
reak
of
slope
bas
e I a
t N a
nd S
at S
. Con
cave
bas
e in
pro
file.
Orie
ntat
ion
N-S
. Fill
C.1
1
41
131/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.14
0.4x
0.37
x0.0
7D
ark
brow
n so
ft si
lt. F
requ
ent a
ngul
ar
fine
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar
smal
l sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
.1
SS26
, SS6
641
141/
12A
cut o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
4x0.
37x0
.07
Ova
l fea
ture
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p S
at N
an
d S.
Ste
ep sm
ooth
side
at N
and
stee
p co
ncav
e sid
e at
S. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e I a
t N
and
S. F
lat b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rient
atio
n N
-S. F
ill C
.13
41
151/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.16
0.98
x0.8
5x0.
1M
id b
row
n so
ft c
laye
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l su
b-ro
unde
d m
ediu
m a
nd su
b-an
gula
r co
arse
peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar
smal
l sto
nes.
Occ
asio
nal c
harc
oal i
nclu
-sio
ns. U
nder
lays
C.1
SS22
, SS6
4,
BS65
ani
mal
bo
ne
41
161/
12A
cut o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
98x0
.85x
0.1
Ova
l fea
ture
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p G
in
ever
y di
rect
ion.
Mod
erat
e sm
ooth
side
at
W, g
entle
irre
gula
r sid
e at
E. B
reak
of
slope
bas
e I i
n ev
ery
dire
cton
. Fla
t bas
e in
pr
ofile
. Orie
ntat
ion
E-W
. Fill
C.1
5
41
171/
12A
,7C
fill o
f fou
ndat
ion
tren
ch C
.18
__x0
.35x
0.16
Mid
bro
wn
soft
cla
yey
silt.
Occ
asio
nal a
n-gu
lar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l in
cusio
ns. U
nder
lays
C.1
SS3,
SS4
36,4
1,1,
2
181/
12A
,7C
cut o
f fou
ndat
ion
tren
ch__
x0.3
5x0.
16Li
near
cur
vey
feat
ure.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p S
at E
and
W. S
teep
con
cave
side
s at W
an
d E.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe b
ase
G a
t E a
nd W
. Ta
pere
d ro
unde
d po
int b
ase
in p
rofil
e.
Orie
ntat
ion
E-W
. Fill
C.1
7
36,4
1,1,
2
191/
7AFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
top
fill o
f ditc
h9
201/
12A
fill o
f pos
sible
pos
t-ho
le C
.21
1.06
x0.6
x0.2
Mid
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l an
gula
r coa
rse
pebb
les.
Und
erla
ys C
.1SS
5, S
S936
,3,4
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
45
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
211/
12A
cut o
f pos
sible
pos
t-ho
le1.
06x0
.6x0
.2O
val f
eatu
re. B
reak
of s
lope
top
G a
t N, S
at
S, I
at E
and
W. M
oder
ate
step
ped
side
at N
, ste
ep c
onca
ve si
de a
t S, m
oder
ate
conc
ave
side
at E
and
mod
erat
e sm
ooth
sid
e at
W. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e I i
n ev
ery
dire
ctio
n. C
onca
ve b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rien-
tatio
n N
W-S
E, N
E-SW
. Fill
C.2
0
36,3
,4
221/
7Ala
yer -
fill o
f ditc
hsa
me
as C
.136
SS2
923
1:3c
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
1.4x
0.19
Mid
ora
ngish
bro
wn
soft
cla
yey
silt.
Occ
asio
nal m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r peb
-bl
es. O
ccas
iona
l coa
rse
sub-
angu
lar &
su
b-ro
unde
d pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l med
ium
su
b-ro
unde
d st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.1.
Ove
rlays
C.5
4.
SS7
10D
S 1
242/
15B
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x2
x0.2
5M
id b
row
n so
ft si
lt. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
-la
r fin
e, o
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
med
ium
pe
bble
s. O
verla
ys C
.72
F.24
:1-2
iron
, 24:
3 fl
int
BS41
ani
mal
bo
nes
13D
S 2
25A
ll Q
uadr
ants
.C
ut o
f Enc
losin
g D
itch.
125.
6x2.
10x1
.00
Ova
l cut
. Cor
ners
squa
red
at te
rmin
us
(Grid
20)
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p sh
arp.
Sid
es
gene
rally
stee
p, sm
ooth
& c
onca
ve b
ut
occa
siona
lly c
onve
x or
stra
ight
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe b
ase
varie
s fro
m sh
arp
to im
perc
ep-
tible
. Sha
pe o
f bas
e in
pla
n ov
al; i
n pr
ofile
ta
pere
d po
int g
ener
ally
(V-s
hape
d). F
illed
by
: See
fills
of D
S 1-
10.
C.2
5: T
his i
s the
cut
of
the
encl
osur
e di
tch
as a
w
hole
. It a
ppea
rs fr
om
the
10 sl
ots e
xcav
ated
th
at th
e cu
t is u
nifo
rmly
V-
shap
ed. T
he d
imen
-sio
ns a
re a
vera
ged
from
th
e slo
ts e
xcav
ated
but
do
n’t a
ppea
r to
vary
co
nsid
erab
ly a
cros
s the
sit
e.26
1:3c
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
52.
5x2.
1x0.
45M
id o
rang
ish g
rey
to b
row
n fir
m c
laye
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l fle
cks.
Oc-
casio
nal f
lint f
leck
s. M
oder
ate
med
ium
su
b-an
gula
r & su
b-ro
unde
d pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l coa
rse
sub-
angu
lar &
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
mal
l sub
-an
gula
r sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
.54.
Ove
rlays
C
.55,
C.5
8
SS8
10D
S 1
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
46
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
271:
11b
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
50.
45x0
.40x
0.04
Mid
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. Bo
ne in
clu-
sions
. Occ
asio
nal f
leck
s of s
nail
shel
l. O
c-ca
siona
l fin
e an
gula
r peb
bles
& m
ediu
m
angu
lar &
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. M
oder
ate
smal
l ang
ular
ston
es.
BS11
SS10
8C
.27:
Thi
s is a
sub-
circ
ular
lens
visi
ble
on
the
surf
ace
of th
e di
tch
at W
side
of s
ite.
281:
6bFi
ll of
Pos
thol
e.0.
42x0
.27x
0.17
Ligh
t yel
low
ish b
row
n lo
ose
sand
. M
oder
ate
med
ium
& c
oars
e su
b-an
gula
r pe
bble
s. Fr
eque
nt w
ell-s
orte
d sm
all s
ub-
angu
lar &
sub-
roun
ded
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C
.1 (t
opso
il). O
verla
ys C
.2 (n
atur
al).
SS95
8,20
291:
11b
Fill
of P
it C
.151
0.91
x0.6
0x0.
18Li
ght b
row
nish
yel
low
loos
e sil
ty sa
nd.
Mod
erat
e fle
cks &
smal
l pie
ces o
f cha
r-co
al. M
oder
ate
med
ium
& c
oars
e su
b-an
-gu
lar &
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal
smal
l sub
-ang
ular
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C.1
(to
psoi
l). O
verla
ys C
.2 (n
atur
al).
SS92
8
301/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.31
0.38
x0.3
x0.0
9M
id b
row
n lo
ose
sand
. Mod
erat
e an
gula
r fin
e pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
larg
e st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.1
SS23
, SS6
741
311/
12A
cut o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
38x0
.3x0
.09
Ova
l fea
ture
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p S
at N
an
d S.
Gen
tle sm
ooth
side
at N
, mod
erat
e co
ncav
e sid
e at
S. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e I a
t N
and
S. C
onca
ve b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rien-
tatio
n N
-S. F
ill C
.30
41
321:
12a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
50.
40x0
.300
.06
Ligh
t bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
fine
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. O
ccas
iona
l coa
rse
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es.
C.3
2: P
ossib
ly re
mai
ns
of a
pos
thol
e. A
lens
vis-
ible
on
the
surf
ace
of th
e di
tch
at W
side
of s
ite.
See
C.2
733
1/7C
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.34
0.38
x0.3
8x0.
16M
id b
row
n so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-ro
unde
d an
d su
b-an
gula
r med
ium
, oc
casio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. U
nder
lays
C.1
SS23
, SS6
836
341/
7Ccu
t of p
ost-h
ole
0.38
x0.3
8x0.
16C
ircul
ar fe
atur
e. B
reak
of s
lope
top
G a
t N
and
S a
t S. M
oder
ate
conc
ave
side
at N
an
d st
eep
conc
ave
side
at S
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe
base
I at
N a
nd S
. Fla
t bas
e in
pro
file.
O
rient
atio
n N
-S. f
ill C
.33
36
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
47
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
351/
7Cfil
l of p
ost-h
ole
C.3
60.
28x0
.25x
0.2
Mid
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar f
ine
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar
med
ium
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C.1
SS25
, SS6
936
.6
361/
7Ccu
t of p
ost-h
ole
0.28
x0.2
5x0.
2C
ircul
ar fe
atur
e. B
reak
of s
lope
top
I at
N a
nd G
at S
. Ste
ep sm
ooth
side
at N
, ve
rtic
al u
nder
cut s
ide
at S
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe
base
S a
t N a
nd S
. Fla
t bas
e in
pro
file.
O
rient
atio
n N
-S. F
ill C
.35
36.6
371/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.39
0.26
x0.2
5x0.
13M
id b
row
n so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r med
ium
and
coa
rse
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar sm
all
ston
es. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l inc
lusio
ns.
Und
erla
ys C
.38
F.37
:1 st
one
arte
fact
SS12
, SS7
041
.5
381/
12A
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.39
0.07
x0.0
7x0.
07D
ark
brow
n fr
iabl
e cl
ayey
silt.
Mod
er-
ate
char
coal
incl
usio
ns. O
verla
ys C
.37,
un
derla
ys C
.1
SS12
, SS7
041
.5
391/
12A
cut o
f pos
t-hol
e0.
26x0
.25x
0.13
Circ
ular
feat
ure.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p S
at
NE
and
SW. V
ertic
al sm
ooth
side
at S
W
and
stee
p sm
ooth
side
at N
E. B
reak
of
slope
bas
e S
at N
E an
d SE
. Circ
ular
in
plan
an
flat i
n pr
ofile
bas
e. O
rient
atio
n N
E-SW
. Fill
s C.3
7, C
.38
41.5
401/
7CD
epos
it0.
3x0.
26x0
.08
Ligh
t bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. U
nder
lays
C.1
SS13
soil
with
bu
rnt
bone
s36
.7
411/
7CEr
rono
usly
issu
ed0.
3x0.
26x0
.08
Circ
ular
feat
ure.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p I a
t E
and
W. M
oder
ate
smoo
th si
des a
t E
and
W. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e I a
t E a
nd W
. C
onca
ve b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rient
atio
n E-
W.
Fill
C.4
0
36.7
Sam
e as
C.4
0
422/
15B
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x1
.6x0
.4M
id b
row
n fir
m si
lt. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-an-
gula
r fin
e an
d m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es. O
verla
ys
C.9
3, u
nder
lays
C.7
2. T
runc
ated
by
C.9
8
F.42
:1 ir
on,
42:
2-3
clay
pip
e,
BS42
ani
mal
bo
nes
13D
S 2
432/
15B
fill o
f cut
98
with
in
the
ditc
h C
.25
__x1
.2x0
.45
Mid
blu
ish g
rey
sub-
rect
angu
lar s
tone
s. U
nder
lays
C.7
213
DS
2
44al
lba
nk m
ater
ial
__x_
_x__
Ligh
t bro
wni
sh y
ello
w so
ft si
lty c
lay.
45
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x6,7
x0.3
Dar
k bl
ack
very
soft
silt.
Mod
erat
e an
gula
r peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar
ston
es. O
ccas
iona
l sna
il sh
ell i
nclu
sions
. U
nder
lays
C.1
. Ove
rlays
C.1
60
F.45
:1-2
iron
, 42:
3
SS14
25.2
6D
S 4
-laye
r pre
sent
in
both
sect
ion
face
s
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
48
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
461/
7Asa
me
as C
.25
DS
847
1/7A
laye
r -st
ones
2.2x
1.88
x0.3
1Su
b-ro
unde
d, su
b-an
gula
r sm
all a
nd
med
ium
ston
es. O
verla
ys C
.49
F.47
:1 M
etal
obj
ect.
9
481:
7aFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x1.
88x0
.21
Dar
k br
own
fria
ble
clay
ey si
lt. F
requ
ent
smal
l & m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r & su
b-ro
unde
d st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.1 (t
opso
il).
Ove
rlays
C.4
9.
SS48
23
491:
7aFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x2.
15x0
.30
Mid
bro
wn
hard
peb
bley
cla
y. O
cca-
siona
l fle
cks &
med
ium
ang
ular
peb
bles
. O
ccas
iona
l med
ium
sub-
angu
lar s
tone
s. U
nder
lays
C.4
8. O
verla
ys C
.167
F.49
:1 m
etal
obj
ect
SS18
23D
S 8:
SW
faci
ng
sect
ion.
504/
17C
laye
r in
the
bank
__x5
x0.3
Ligh
t bro
wni
sh y
ello
w st
iff sa
ndy
silt.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-r
ound
ed, s
ub-a
ngul
ar
smal
l sto
nes.
Occ
asio
nal a
nim
al b
one
and
char
coal
incl
usio
ns. O
verla
ys C
.2, C
.74,
C
.75,
C.1
35, C
.74
SS15
, BS3
0 an
imal
bon
es16
.19
DS
3 la
yer p
rese
nt in
bo
th se
ctio
ns
514/
17C
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.7x0
.3D
ark
brow
nish
bla
ck si
ft si
lty c
lay.
Occ
a-sio
nal s
ub-r
ound
ed, s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar
fine
and
med
ium
peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal
sub-
roun
ded,
sub-
angu
lar s
mal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C.6
0, u
nder
lays
C.5
0
SS16
16.1
9D
S 3
laye
r pre
sent
in
both
sect
ions
524/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
x0.5
Mid
yel
low
ish b
row
n ha
rd si
lty/p
ebbl
ey
clay
. Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar
fine,
mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r me-
dium
peb
bles
. Ove
rlays
C.7
9, C
.81,
C.6
7,
C.7
8, u
nder
lays
C.6
2
SS54
DS
4
533/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x2
,54x
0.36
Dar
k br
owni
sh b
lack
loos
e sa
ndy
pebb
les/
ston
es. F
requ
ent s
ub-r
ound
ed, s
ub-a
ngu-
lar,
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent s
ub-r
ound
-ed
, sub
-ang
ular
, ang
ular
ston
es. O
verla
ys
C.7
8, u
nder
lays
C.4
5
25D
S 4
541:
3cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x2.
50x0
.06
Ligh
t gre
yish
bro
wn
stiff
peb
bley
silt.
M
oder
ate
fine
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Mod
erat
e m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
. O
ccas
iona
l coa
rse
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
mal
l sub
-ang
ular
ston
es.
Und
erla
ys C
.23.
Ove
rlays
C.2
10D
S 1
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
49
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
551:
3cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x2.
00x0
.20
Mid
gre
y to
bro
wn
hard
ston
y cl
ay. O
c-ca
siona
l fle
cks &
smal
l pie
ces o
f cha
rcoa
l. O
ccas
iona
l sm
all b
one
incl
usio
ns.
Med
ium
& c
oars
e su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
. Fr
eque
nt m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
.26.
Ove
rlays
C.C
.56,
C.5
7.
10D
S 1
561:
3cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
60x0
.20
Mid
yel
low
ish b
row
n st
iff sa
ndy
silt.
Occ
asio
nal f
lint f
leck
s. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e &
m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal
smal
l sub
-ang
ular
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C.5
5.
Ove
rlays
C.5
7
10D
S 1
571:
3cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
20x0
.15
Dar
k br
own
soft
cla
yey
silt.
Occ
asio
nal
med
ium
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. U
nder
lays
C
.55,
C.5
6. O
verla
ys C
.2 (n
atur
al)
10D
S 1
581:
3cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x2.
5x1.
6La
rge
(>.3
0) su
b-ro
unde
d w
eath
ered
whi
te
foss
ilife
rous
lim
esto
ne (C
.100
) & a
ngul
ar
blue
/gre
y m
uddy
lim
esto
ne (C
.101
) mix
ed
thro
ugh
with
ver
y so
ft b
row
n sil
t & m
od-
erat
e sm
all t
o m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
.26.
10D
S 1
592:
10a/
5c/9
b/4d
Fill
of D
itch
Re-
cut
C.2
20?x
0.30
x0.3
5M
id o
rang
ish b
row
n st
iff si
lty c
lay.
Cha
r-co
al in
clus
ions
. Occ
asio
nal f
lint f
leck
s. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e &
med
ium
ang
ular
peb
-bl
es 7
smal
l sto
nes.
F.59
:1-2
iron
, 59:
3 co
pper
C
S33
SS28
11D
S 5:
C.5
9 fil
ls re
-cut
C
.220
604/
17C
Bank
mat
eria
l__
x1.5
x0.5
Dar
k br
own
firm
silt.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-
roun
ded,
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar f
ine
pebb
les.
Freq
uent
sub-
roun
ded,
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar m
ediu
m a
nd o
ccas
iona
l su
b-an
gula
r lar
ge st
ones
. Occ
asio
nal
anim
al b
one
incl
usio
ns. O
verla
ys C
.117
, un
derla
ys C
.51
SS27
DS
3 co
ntex
t is n
ot o
n se
ctio
n dr
awin
g, it
is a
co
nstr
uctio
n of
183
8 O
.S. f
ield
bou
ndar
y
611/
7Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x__x
__M
id b
row
n so
ft p
ebbl
ey si
lt. F
requ
ent
sub-
roun
ded,
sub-
angu
lar,
fine
and
me-
dium
peb
bles
. Und
erla
ys C
.49
SS21
9
623/
18D
depo
sit__
x1.4
x0.1
Brow
nish
gre
en c
ompa
ct si
lty sa
nd.
Freq
uent
ang
ular
fine
, mod
erat
e an
gula
r m
ediu
m a
nd c
oars
e pe
bble
s. Li
mes
tone
. O
verla
ys C
.130
, und
erla
ys C
.161
SS31
25D
S 4
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
50
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
634/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
x0.4
Mid
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
angu
lar f
ine
and
med
ium
, sub
-ang
ular
, an
gula
r coa
rse
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal
angu
lar s
mal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C.1
31,
unde
rlays
C.8
0
SS32
25D
S 4
643/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.06x
0.24
Ligh
t bro
w lo
ose
sand
y/pe
bble
y st
ones
. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
, ang
ular
fine
and
m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent s
ub-r
ound
ed,
sub-
angu
lar s
mal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C.7
6,
unde
rlays
C.4
5
F.64
:1 m
etal
obj
ect
25.2
6D
S 4
-laye
r pre
sent
in
both
sect
ion
face
s
652/
15B
sam
e as
C.3
*se
e C
.3F.
65:1
ston
e*
662/
9Bfil
l of d
itch
C.2
50.
6x0.
33x0
.18
Dar
k br
own
soft
cla
y. O
ccas
iona
l su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r fin
e, m
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es.O
ccas
iona
l su
b-ro
unde
d, su
b-an
gula
r sm
all s
tone
s. Fr
eque
nt c
harc
oal i
nclu
sions
. Ove
rlays
C
.70,
und
erla
ys C
.2
SS33
DS
5 no
t on
the
sect
ion
draw
ing
674/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
x0.4
Mid
yel
low
ish b
row
n co
mpa
ct c
laye
y/sil
ty
sand
. Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar fi
ne a
nd
med
ium
peb
bles
. Ove
rlays
C.8
1, u
nder
-la
ys C
.78.
Tru
ncat
ed b
y C
.88
SS35
NO
D
RAW
.D
S 4
684/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.8x0
.55
Mid
bro
wn
soft
silt.
Ove
rlays
C.2
, und
er-
lays
C.4
5SS
3626
DS
4
694/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x2
.4x0
.17
Whi
te st
rong
ly c
emen
ted
silty
sand
. Oc-
casio
nal a
ngul
ar fi
ne p
ebbl
es a
nd sm
all
ston
es. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l inc
lusio
ns.
Ove
rlays
C.9
0, u
nder
lays
C.8
9
SS37
26D
S 4
702:
10a/
5c/9
b/4d
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
0.50
x0.4
0D
ark
brow
n fir
m c
lay
mix
ed th
roug
h C
.100
& C
.101
. Bon
e in
clus
ions
. Und
er-
lays
C.1
04.
SS40
11D
S 5,
Rat
io o
f lim
esto
ne in
this
slot:
C.1
00:C
.101
= 40
%:6
0%71
4/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x__x
__D
ark
brow
n ve
ry so
ft si
lt. O
verla
ys C
.2,
unde
rlays
C.6
9D
S 4
722/
15B
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x3
x0.3
Mid
bro
wn
loos
e sil
ty sa
nd. O
ccas
iona
l su
b-an
gula
r fin
e an
d m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es.
Occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar sm
all s
tone
s. O
verla
ys
C.4
3, C
.42,
und
erla
ys C
.24
F.30
que
rn st
one
BS44
ani
mal
bp
nes
13D
S 2
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
51
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
732/
15B
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x0
.8x0
.6M
id g
reyi
sh b
row
n ve
ry so
ft sa
ndy/
ston
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
angu
lar s
mal
l, fr
eque
nt
angu
lar m
ediu
m st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.94.
Ba
sal f
ill o
f thi
s slo
t.
SS45
, BS4
3 an
imal
bon
es13
DS
2: P
rimar
y fil
l (sil
t-in
g) in
this
slot.
744/
17C
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.4x0
.3M
id b
row
nish
yel
low
soft
sand
y sil
t. O
c-ca
siona
l sub
-rou
nded
, sub
-ang
ular
smal
l st
ones
. Ove
rlays
C.2
, und
erla
ys C
.75
16.1
9D
S 3
laye
r pre
sent
in
both
sect
ions
754/
17C
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.75x
0.1
Ligh
t yel
low
ish w
hite
stiff
cla
y. O
verla
ys
C.1
35, u
nder
lays
C.5
016
.19
DS
3 la
yer p
rese
nt in
bo
th se
ctio
ns76
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x__x
0.2
Dar
k br
own
com
pact
peb
bley
. Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar s
mal
l and
med
ium
st
ones
. Ove
rlays
C.2
, und
erla
ys C
.64
SS48
25D
S 4
774/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x_
_x__
Ligh
t yel
low
ish b
row
n so
ft si
lty c
lay.
U
nder
lays
C.6
3, C
.64,
C.7
8D
S 4
783/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.8x0
.22
Mid
bro
wn
loos
e sa
ndy
soft
silt.
Mod
erat
e pe
bble
s in
ever
y sh
ape.
Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r sm
all s
tone
s. O
verla
ys
C.8
0, u
nder
lays
C.6
2. T
runc
ated
by
C.8
8 in
pre
viou
s sec
tion.
25D
S 4
794/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.4x0
.7M
id b
row
n fir
m sa
ndy
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r fin
e, m
oder
ate
sub-
roun
ded
med
ium
and
occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
verla
ys C
.85,
C.8
0, u
nder
lays
C
.52
SS55
DS
4
803/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.6x0
.3W
hite
wea
kly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar fi
ne a
nd c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
verla
ys C
.162
, und
erla
ys c
.130
. Tr
unca
ted
by C
.88
in p
revi
ous s
ectio
n.
SS78
25D
S 4
814/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.05x
0.27
Mid
gre
enish
bro
wn
wea
kly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es. O
verla
ys C
.2, u
nder
lays
C
.67.
Tru
ncat
ed b
y C
.84
and
C.8
8
SS74
DS
4
824/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.3x0
.3Su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r med
ium
and
larg
e st
ones
. Lay
s with
in C
.52
DS
4
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
52
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
834/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.65x
0.3
Mid
bro
wn
firm
silty
/peb
bley
cla
y. F
re-
quen
t sub
-ang
ular
, ang
ular
fine
, mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r med
ium
and
coa
rse
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar
smal
l sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
.63.
It is
a fi
ll of
DS
4
844/
18D
cut w
ithin
ban
k m
ater
ial
__x0
.65x
0.3
Brea
k of
slop
e to
p S
at N
and
S. M
oder
ate
irreg
ular
side
s. Br
eak
of sl
ope
base
G a
t N
and
S. C
onca
ve b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rient
a-tio
n N
-S. F
ill C
.83.
Tru
nkat
es C
.76
and
C.8
1
DS
4
854/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
x0.8
5M
id b
row
n so
ft si
lt. F
requ
ent s
ub-a
ngul
ar
fine,
freq
uent
sub-
roun
ded
med
ium
pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l ang
ular
smal
l sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
.79
DS
4
863/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.8x0
.52
Ligh
t bro
wn
soft
silty
/peb
ley
clay
. Fre
-qu
ent s
ub-r
ound
ed, s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar
fine,
mod
erat
e su
b-ro
unde
d, su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r med
ium
peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal a
n-gu
lar s
mal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C.1
62, C
.147
. Tr
unca
ted
by C
.88
in p
revi
ous s
ectio
n.
SS73
25D
S 4:
Thi
s rep
rese
nts
the
late
r fie
ld b
ound
ary
activ
ity tr
unca
ting
the
fills
of th
e ba
nk.
874/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.5x0
.34
Ligh
t yel
low
ish b
row
n st
rong
ly c
emen
ted
silty
sand
. Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r coa
rse
pebb
les.
Ove
rlays
C.2
. Tru
ncat
ed b
y C
.88
SS77
DS
4
884/
18D
cut w
ithin
ban
k m
ater
ial
__x1
.55x
0.84
Brea
k of
slop
e to
p G
at N
and
S. V
ertic
al
smoo
th si
de a
t N, m
oder
ate
smoo
th si
de
at S
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe b
ase
G a
t N a
nd I
at S
. Fl
at b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rient
atio
n N
-S. F
ills
C.5
2, C
.79,
C.8
5, C
.82.
Tru
nkat
es C
.78,
C
.67,
C.8
1, C
.80,
C.8
7, C
.86
DS
4
894/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.5x0
.2M
id g
reen
ish b
row
n w
eakl
y ce
men
ted
silty
sand
. Occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
verla
ys C
.69,
C.1
80, u
nder
lays
C
.45
SS81
, BS
anim
al
bone
s26
DS
4
904/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x3
.4x0
.5Li
ght y
ello
wish
bro
wn
wea
kly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd. M
oder
ate
angu
lar f
ine,
occ
a-sio
nal a
ngul
ar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l su
b-an
gula
r sm
all a
nd la
rge
ston
es. L
ime-
ston
e. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l inc
lusio
ns.
Ove
rlays
C.2
, und
erla
ys C
.69
SS80
26D
S 4
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
53
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
911:
8dC
ut o
f Pit/
Post
hole
0.45
x0.4
0x0.
30O
val c
ut. C
orne
rs ro
unde
d. B
reak
of s
lope
to
p sh
arp.
Sid
es st
eep,
smoo
th c
onca
ve.
Brea
k of
slop
e ba
se g
radu
al. B
ase
circ
ular
, co
ncav
e. O
rient
ated
NE-
SW. F
illed
by
C.9
2, C
.95
14C
.91:
The
cut
of a
smal
l po
stho
le o
r pit
in th
e in
terio
r. Is
olat
ed fe
atur
e S
of C
.110
.
921:
8dFi
ll of
Pit/
Post
hole
C
.91
0.45
x0.4
0x0.
15M
id o
rang
ish b
row
n fir
m c
laye
y sil
t. Fr
e-qu
ent f
leck
s & sm
all p
iece
s of c
harc
oal.
Mod
erat
e fin
e an
gula
r & su
b-an
gula
r pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l sm
all s
ub-a
ngul
ar &
su
b-ro
unde
d st
ones
. Fill
s C.9
1. U
nder
lays
C
.1. O
verla
ys C
.95.
SS49
14C
.92:
The
upp
er fi
ll of
C
.91.
932/
15B
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x2
.6x0
.3M
id b
row
n fir
m sa
ndy
silt.
Occ
asio
nal
sub-
angu
lar f
ine
and
med
ium
peb
bles
. O
verla
ys C
.94,
und
erla
ys C
.42.
Tru
n-ca
ted
by C
.98
13D
S 2
942/
15B
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x2
x0.4
Blui
sh g
rey/
whi
te st
ones
with
sub-
angu
lar
fine
and
med
ium
peb
bles
. Ove
rlays
C.7
3,
unde
rlays
C.9
3
13
951:
8dFi
ll of
Pit/
Post
hole
C
.91
0.38
x0.3
5x0.
15M
id y
ello
wish
bro
wn
stiff
silty
cla
y. B
one
incl
usio
ns (b
urnt
& u
nbur
nt).
Occ
asio
nal
fleck
s & m
oder
ate
smal
l pie
ces o
f cha
r-co
al. F
requ
ent f
ine
angu
lar &
sub-
angu
lar
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal m
ediu
m a
ngul
ar
pebb
les.
Und
erla
ys C
.92.
Ove
rlays
C.2
(n
atur
al).
BS51
SS50
14C
.95:
The
prim
ary
fill
of C
.91.
961/
7Bla
yer -
soil
__x_
_x__
Ora
ngish
bro
wn
firm
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-ro
unde
d m
ediu
m,
freq
uent
sub-
roun
ded,
su
b-an
gula
r coa
rse
pebb
les.
Freq
uent
su
b-ro
unde
d, su
b-an
gula
r sm
all s
tone
s. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l inc
lusio
ns. U
nder
lays
C
.2
SS52
9
972/
15B
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x0
.5x0
.3Li
ght y
ello
wish
/bro
wni
sh g
rey
com
pact
sil
ty/c
laye
y sa
nd. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar
fine,
occ
asio
nal m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es. O
ver-
lays
C.9
3, u
nder
lays
C.1
19. T
runc
ated
by
C.9
8
13D
S 2
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
54
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
982/
15B
re-c
ut o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x1
.9x0
.5Br
eak
of sl
ope
top
G a
t E a
nd W
. Mod
er-
ate
irreg
ular
side
at E
and
W. B
reak
of
slope
bas
e G
at E
and
W. C
onca
ve b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rient
atio
n E-
W. F
ill C
.43.
Tr
unka
tes C
.97
and
C.4
2
13D
S 2
99nu
mbe
r not
use
d10
0A
llLi
mes
tone
Ligh
t gre
y fo
ssili
fero
us li
mes
tone
, it w
as
not n
atur
ally
occ
urin
g on
site
but
is ty
pi-
cal o
f Car
boni
fero
us d
epos
its in
the
Irish
m
idla
nds.
101
All
Lim
esto
neFi
ner g
rain
ed li
ght g
rey
limes
tone
, a ro
ck
outc
rop
of th
is ty
pe w
as id
entif
ied
on si
te.
102
2:10
a/5c
/9b/
4dFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
29x0
.10
Ligh
t bro
wn
soft
silty
cla
y. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e an
gula
r peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal m
ediu
m
angu
lar &
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es &
smal
l st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.1 (t
opso
il). O
verla
ys
C.1
03, C
.104
.
11D
S 5:
Upp
erm
ost f
ill o
f D
itch
C.2
5 in
this
slot.
103
2:10
a/5c
/9b/
4dFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
20x0
.30
Dar
k gr
eyish
bro
wn
soft
ston
y, si
lty c
lay.
Fr
eque
nt fi
ne &
med
ium
ang
ular
&
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent s
mal
l &
med
ium
ang
ular
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C. 1
(to
psoi
l), C
.102
. Ove
rlays
C.1
04. T
run-
cate
d by
C.1
06
11D
S 5
104
2:10
a/5c
/9b/
4dFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x1.
20x0
.40
Dar
k br
own
firm
peb
bley
cla
y. B
utch
-er
ed b
one
incl
usio
ns. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e &
m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
. Mod
erat
e sm
all &
med
ium
ang
ular
ston
es. U
nder
-la
ys C
.1 (n
atur
al) O
verla
ys C
.70,
C.1
00,
C.1
01. T
runc
ated
by
C.1
06, C
.220
11D
S 5
105
2:10
a/5c
/9b/
4dFi
ll of
Re-
cut C
.106
?x0.
40x0
.40
Mid
yel
low
ish b
row
n fir
m st
ony
clay
. M
oder
ate
coar
se a
ngul
ar p
ebbl
es. F
re-
quen
t sm
all &
med
ium
ang
ular
ston
es.
Und
erla
ys C
.1 (t
opso
il)
11D
S 5
106
2:10
a/5c
/9b/
4dR
e-cu
t in
Ditc
h?x
0.40
x0.4
0Se
en in
sect
ion
only
. Cor
ners
roun
ded.
Br
eak
of sl
ope
top
shar
p at
NE,
SW
. Sid
es
stee
p sm
ooth
at S
W, N
E. B
reak
of s
lope
ba
sesh
arp
at S
W, N
E. B
ase
conc
ave.
O
rient
ated
in se
ctio
n N
E-SW
. Fill
ed b
y C
.105
. Tru
ncat
es C
.103
, C.1
04.
11D
S 5
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
55
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
107
1/12
Afil
l of p
ost-h
ole
C.1
080.
19x0
.16x
0.24
Mid
bro
wn
soft
cla
yey
silt.
Occ
asio
nal
sub-
roun
ded
coar
se p
ebbl
es. U
nder
lays
C
.1
SS71
41
108
1/12
Acu
t of p
ost-h
ole
0.19
x0.1
6x0.
24O
val f
eatu
re. B
reak
of s
lope
topS
in e
very
di
rect
ion.
Gen
tle c
onca
ve si
des.
Brea
k of
slo
pe b
ase
I in
ever
y di
rect
ion.
Con
cave
ba
se in
pro
file.
Orie
ntat
ion
N-S
. Fill
C
.107
41
109
4/17
Cfil
l of p
ossib
le p
it1x
1x0.
1M
id b
row
n so
ft si
lty c
lay.
Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r sm
all s
tone
s. O
ccas
iona
l ch
arco
al in
clus
ions
. Und
erla
ys C
.50
SS46
DS
3
110
1,2:
8a/
b, 9
a.C
ut o
f lin
ear f
eatu
re10
.96x
0.54
x0.6
7Li
near
cut
. Cor
ners
roun
ded
at W
. Bre
ak
of sl
ope
top
shar
p at
N, S
& W
. Sid
es v
er-
tical
irre
gula
r at N
, S &
W, u
nder
cut a
t W
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe b
ase
grad
ual a
t N, S
&
W. B
ase
sub-
rect
angu
lar,
conc
ave.
Fill
ed
by C
.210
, C.2
08, C
.211
, C.2
12.
37C
.110
: Lin
ear f
eatu
re
runn
ing
E-W
par
alle
l to
Ditc
h C
.25
in th
e in
te-
rior o
f the
site
. Pos
sibly
re
pres
ents
a sl
ot tr
ench
fo
r a p
alisa
de/ b
ank
reve
tmen
t evi
denc
ed b
y po
st h
oles
cau
ght i
n se
c-tio
n du
ring
exca
vatio
n.11
11/
7Bfil
l of d
itch
C.2
5*
see
C.1
37*
*11
21/
7Bfil
l of d
itch
C.2
5*
see
C.1
36*
*11
31:
7aFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x2.
35x0
.15
Mid
bro
wn
stiff
silt.
Mod
erat
e fin
e &
m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r & su
b-ro
unde
d pe
b-bl
es. U
nder
lays
C.1
37. O
verla
ys C
.138
.
SS58
15D
S 7
114
VO
ID11
52:
9aFi
ll of
Lin
ear f
eatu
re
C.1
10Li
ght g
reyi
sh o
rang
e ha
rd si
lty c
lay.
Oc-
casio
nal c
harc
oal f
leck
s. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e an
gula
r & su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
. Occ
a-sio
nal s
mal
l sub
-ang
ular
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C
.3. O
verla
ys C
.116
SS12
737
/38
C.1
10: U
pper
mos
t fill
of
C.1
10 in
this
grid
.
116
2/9A
fill o
f C.1
10*
Ora
nge
silty
cla
y. U
nder
lays
C.1
1511
74/
17C
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x2
x1.5
SS
76, B
S75
anim
al b
one
16D
3
118
2/15
Bla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x1.3
x0.3
5Li
ght y
ello
wish
/gre
yish
bro
wn
stiff
cla
yey/
pebb
ley
silt.
Freq
uent
fine
and
med
ium
pe
bble
s. O
verla
ys C
.3
13D
S 2
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
56
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
119
2/15
Bfil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.2
x0.2
Ligh
t bro
wn
firm
cla
yey
silt.
Occ
asio
nal
sub-
angu
lar f
ine
pebb
les.
Ove
rlays
C.9
7,
unde
rlays
C.7
2
13D
S 2
120
2/9A
spre
adsa
me
as C
.173
121
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x1.2
8x0.
18Li
ght y
ello
wish
bro
wn
firm
silty
cla
y.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar fi
ne
pebb
les a
nd sm
all s
tone
s. O
verla
ys C
.143
, un
derla
ys C
.45
DS
6
122
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk1.
6x3x
0.4
Mid
blu
ish g
rey
sub-
angu
lar s
tone
s. O
verla
ys C
.140
DS
6 st
one
laye
r in
bank
123
4/17
Ccu
t of a
ditc
h sa
me
as C
.25
*se
e C
.25
**
*D
S 3
124
1:7a
/cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x1.
10x0
.20
Ligh
t bro
wn
firm
ston
y cl
ay. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e, m
ediu
m &
coa
rse
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
mal
l & m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
.1. O
verla
ys
C.1
65.
F.12
4:1-
2 C
lay
pipe
SS
8423
/24
DS
8: N
E fa
cing
se
ctio
n.
125
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.7
x0.3
Ligh
t bro
wn
firm
silty
cla
y. M
oder
ate
sub-
roun
ded,
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar f
ine
and
med
ium
peb
bles
. Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r sm
all s
tone
s. O
verla
ys C
.140
, un
derla
ys C
.45
27D
S 6
126
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk3.
07x1
.43x
__Li
ght y
ello
wish
bro
wn
hard
silty
cla
y.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-r
ound
ed fi
ne a
nd m
ediu
m
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-r
ound
ed m
ediu
m
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C.1
25
DS
6
127
4/17
Cfil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x1x0
.3M
id b
row
n so
ft si
lt. M
oder
ate
sub-
roun
d-ed
, sub
-ang
ular
, ang
ular
fine
, occ
a-sio
nal s
ub-r
ound
ed, s
ub-a
ngul
ar a
ngul
ar
med
ium
and
occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
verla
ys C
.117
, und
erla
ys C
.51
16D
S 3
128
1:7a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
1.00
x0.3
0D
ark
brow
n fr
iabl
e sil
t. Bo
ne in
clus
ions
. O
ccas
iona
l coa
rse
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es.
Occ
asio
nal s
mal
l & m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r st
ones
. 1 la
rge
(0.3
0) su
b-ro
unde
d st
one.
U
nder
lays
C.1
39, C
.142
. Ove
rlays
C.2
(n
atur
al)
BS85
15D
S 7
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
57
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
129
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.8
x0.2
5M
id y
ello
wish
bro
wn
wea
kly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd. F
requ
ent s
ub-r
ound
ed,
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar f
ine
and
med
ium
, O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
, ang
ular
coa
rse
pebb
les.
Ove
rlays
C.1
33, u
nder
lays
C.1
32
25D
S 4
130
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x1x0
.21
Ligh
t bro
wn
firm
peb
bley
cla
y. M
oder
-at
e su
b-ro
unde
d, su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-rou
nded
, sub
-an
gula
r sm
all s
tone
s. O
velra
ys C
.132
, un
derla
ys C
.62
25D
S 4
131
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.4
6x0.
14M
id y
ello
wish
bro
wn
firm
silty
/cla
yey
sand
. Occ
asio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar
fine
pebb
les.
Ove
rlays
C.2
und
erla
ys C
?
25D
S 4
132
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x1x0
.22
Ligh
t yel
low
ish b
row
n fir
m si
lty c
lay.
Fr
eque
nt su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r fin
e, o
c-ca
siona
l sub
-ang
ular
, ang
ular
med
ium
pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-rou
nded
smal
l st
ones
. Ove
rlays
C.1
29, u
nder
lays
C.1
30
25D
S 4
133
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.8
x0.3
Ligh
t yel
low
ish b
row
n fir
m si
lty c
lay.
M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar f
ine
and
med
ium
ston
es. O
verla
ys C
.80,
und
erla
ys
C.1
29
25D
S 4
134
4/17
Cla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.8
x0.2
5M
id b
row
n cl
ayey
silt.
Ove
rlays
C50
19D
S 3
135
4/17
Cla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.5
5x0.
38Li
ght w
hite
stiff
cla
y. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ro
unde
d sm
all s
tone
s. O
verla
ys C
.2,
unde
rlays
C.7
5
19D
S 3
136
1:7a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
0.40
x0.1
9Li
ght g
reyi
sh/o
rang
ish b
row
n st
iff c
laye
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
fine
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es.
Occ
asio
nal m
ediu
m &
coa
rse
sub-
angu
lar
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
ub-r
ound
ed st
one.
U
nder
lays
C.1
. ove
rlays
C.1
37.
SS57
15D
S 7:
Upp
erm
ost f
ill.
Sim
ilar t
o ba
nkin
g m
ater
ial.
137
1:7a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
0.85
x0.0
4M
id b
row
n fir
m p
ebbl
ey si
lt. M
oder
ate
fine
& m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
. U
nder
lays
C.1
36, C
.1. O
verla
ys C
.113
.
SS56
15D
S 7:
App
ears
to b
e ol
d to
psoi
l ben
eath
C.1
36.
138
1:7a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
.6x0
.26
Dar
k br
own
firm
ston
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l fle
cks o
f cha
rcoa
l. M
oder
ate
fine
sub-
an-
gula
r & su
b-ro
unde
d pe
bble
s. M
oder
ate
med
ium
& c
oars
e su
b-ro
unde
d pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l med
ium
sub-
roun
ded
ston
es.
Und
erla
ys C
.113
. Ove
rlays
C.1
41, C
.139
.
SS98
15D
S 7
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
58
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
139
1:7a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
0.90
x0.3
2Li
ght o
rang
ish b
row
n st
iff p
ebbl
ey si
lt.
Mod
erat
e fin
e, m
ediu
m &
coa
rse
sub-
an-
gula
r & su
b-ro
unde
d pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l sm
all s
ub-r
ound
ed st
ones
. Und
erla
ys
C.1
38, C
.141
. Ove
rlays
C.1
28, C
.142
SS83
(Bon
e ric
h)15
DS
7
140
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x2x0
.2Li
ght y
ello
wish
/gre
yish
har
d sil
ty c
lay.
O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
fine
and
med
ium
pe
bble
s. O
verla
ys C
.144
, und
erla
ys C
.125
27D
S 6
141
1:7a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
0.80
x0.1
580
% C
.100
, 20%
C.1
0115
DS
714
21:
7aFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
28x0
.20
Mid
ora
ngish
bro
wn
stiff
silt.
Mod
erat
e fin
e &
med
ium
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Und
erla
ys C
.139
, C.1
38. O
verla
ys C
.128
, C
.2 (n
atur
al)
15D
S 7:
Thi
s con
text
is
simila
r to
C.1
39.
143
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk1.
8x2x
0.09
Dar
k br
own
silty
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-ro
unde
d fin
e, O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent s
ub-a
ngul
ar
med
ium
, fre
quen
t sub
-rou
nded
larg
e st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.121
DS
6
144
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.7
8x0.
4Li
ght y
ello
wish
bro
wn
firm
sand
y sil
t. Fr
eque
nt su
b-ro
unde
d st
ones
. Ove
rlays
C
.2, u
nder
lays
C.1
40
27D
S 6
145
num
ber n
ot u
sed
146
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.4
7x0.
25Ye
llow
ish w
hite
stro
ngly
cem
ente
d sil
ty
sand
. Occ
asio
nal
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar
fine
and
med
ium
peb
bley
s. Fr
eque
nt
char
coal
incl
usio
ns. O
verla
ys C
.147
, un
derla
ys C
.162
SS93
25D
S 4
147
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x1.5
x0.3
Mid
redd
ish b
row
n ha
rd si
lty c
lay.
Oc-
casio
nal s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar fi
ne a
nd
med
ium
peb
bles
. Ove
rlays
C.2
, und
erla
ys
C.1
46
25D
S 4
148
4/18
Dan
imal
act
ivity
-NA
149
4/18
Dcu
t of p
ost-h
ole
0.47
x0.3
7x0.
3Su
b-ci
rcul
ar fe
atur
e. B
reak
of s
lope
top
S in
eve
ry d
irect
ion.
Ste
ep c
onca
ve si
des.
Brea
k of
slop
e ba
se G
in e
very
dire
ctio
n.
Subc
ircul
ar in
pla
n an
d co
ncav
e in
pro
file
base
. Orie
ntat
ion
N-S
47D
S 4
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
59
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
150
4/18
Dfil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.9
5x0.
7D
ark
brow
n ve
ry so
ft si
lt. F
requ
ent
sub-
angu
lar l
arge
ston
es. L
imes
tone
. O
ccas
iona
l sna
il sh
ell i
nclu
sions
. Ove
rlays
C
.155
, und
erla
ys C
45
F.15
0:1
iron
knife
bl
ade
SS10
126
DS
4
151
1:11
bC
ut o
f Pit
0.91
x0.6
0x0.
18Ir
regu
lar p
osth
ole.
Cor
ners
roun
ded.
Br
eak
of sl
ope
top
impe
rcep
tible
. Sid
es
gent
le c
onve
x at
W, g
entle
con
cave
at E
. Br
eak
of sl
ope
base
gra
dual
Bas
e co
ncav
e.
Orie
ntat
ed E
-W. F
illed
by
C.2
9
18C
.151
: Irr
egul
ar p
it ly
ing
just
to th
e ou
tsid
e of
the
ditc
h at
NW
side
of
the
site.
Rel
ated
to
C.2
8, C
.176
, C.1
78.
152
4/18
Dfil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0,8
x0.3
Ligh
t gre
enish
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. O
c-ca
siona
l ang
ular
med
ium
peb
bles
. Occ
a-sio
nal s
nail
shel
l and
cha
rcoa
l inc
lusio
ns.
Ove
rlays
C.1
56, u
nder
lays
C.1
50
SS10
226
DS
4
153
1/7B
SS89
, BS9
0 an
imal
bon
esD
S 9
not c
ompl
eted
154
1/7B
SS91
DS
9 no
t com
plet
ed15
54/
18D
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x0
,75x
0.35
Ligh
t gre
enish
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l ang
ular
fine
peb
bles
. Ove
rlays
C
.156
, und
erla
ys C
.150
SS10
426
DS
4
156
4/18
Dfil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.4
x0.2
Dar
k br
own
soft
silty
sand
. Occ
asio
nal
sub-
angu
lar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. Fr
eque
nt
angu
lar m
ediu
m st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.152
, C
.155
SS10
326
DS
4
157
1:7a
/cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
30x0
.17
Dar
k br
own
firm
pea
t. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
& sm
all s
tone
s.Un-
derla
ys C
.1 (t
opso
il). O
verla
ys C
.166
SS96
23/2
4D
S 8:
NE
faci
ng
sect
ion.
Thi
s lay
er o
f pe
at se
ems t
o ru
n in
a
narr
ow b
and
at b
oth
sides
of t
he d
itch
on th
e su
rfac
e.15
81:
7a/c
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
1.80
x0.2
0M
id b
row
n fir
m st
ony
clay
. Fre
quen
t m
ediu
m &
coa
rse
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. O
c-ca
siona
l med
ium
ang
ular
ston
es. F
requ
ent
larg
e (>
0.30
) ang
ular
& su
b-an
gula
r st
ones
(C.1
00 &
C.1
01).
Und
erla
ys C
.167
. O
verla
ys C
.168
.
23/2
4D
S 8:
SW
& N
E fa
cing
se
ctio
ns.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
60
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
159
4/18
Dcu
t of a
ban
k__
x5.5
x__
Brea
k of
slop
e to
p I a
t N a
nd S
. Mod
er-
ate
smoo
th si
des.
Brea
k of
slop
e ba
se
I at N
and
S. F
lat b
ase
in p
rofil
e. F
ills
C.9
0, C
.68,
C.1
79, C
.69,
C18
0, C
.89,
C
.64.
Pro
babl
y re
pres
ents
scar
ping
. See
co
mm
ents
.
26D
S 4:
Pos
sibili
ty th
at
the
site
was
scra
ped
free
of
silt
in p
repa
ratio
n fo
r th
e di
ggin
g of
the
ditc
h &
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
bank
. Ie:
scar
ping
.16
03/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x1
.9x0
,15
Mid
bro
wn
firm
silty
/peb
bley
cle
y. F
r-qu
ent s
ub-r
ound
ed, s
ub-a
ngul
ar, a
ngul
ar
fine,
med
ium
, sub
-ang
ular
, ang
ular
co
arse
peb
bles
. Occ
asio
nal s
mal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C.1
61, u
nder
lays
C.4
5
25D
S 4
161
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.5
6x0.
11Li
ght y
ello
wish
bro
wn
stiff
silty
/peb
bley
cl
ay. M
oder
ate
sub-
roun
ded,
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar f
ine,
med
ium
, oc
casio
nal
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l ang
ular
smal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C
.62,
und
erla
ys C
.160
25D
S 4
162
4/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x2.1
x0.4
1Br
owni
sh w
hite
stro
ngly
cem
ente
d sa
nd.
Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r med
ium
pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l ang
ular
smal
l sto
nes.
Lim
esto
ne. O
verla
ys C
.146
, C.1
47, C
.2,
unde
rlays
C.8
0, C
.164
25D
S 4
163
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.3
6x0.
34Li
ght y
ello
wish
bro
wn
firm
sand
y cl
ay.
Occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
c-ca
siona
l sub
-ang
ular
smal
l and
med
ium
st
ones
. Ove
rlays
C.1
64, u
nder
lays
C.8
0
25D
S 4
164
3/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.8
x0.2
Brow
nish
whi
te w
eakl
y ce
men
ted
silty
sa
nd. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar f
ine
pebb
les.
Ove
rlays
C.1
62, u
nder
lays
C.1
64
25D
S 4
165
1:7a
/cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x1.
40x0
.20
Ligh
t gre
yish
bro
wn
fim si
lty c
lay.
Fre
-qu
ent f
ine
& c
oars
e su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
&
med
ium
ston
es. F
requ
ent m
ediu
m
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent s
mal
l sub
-ro
unde
d st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.1, C
.124
. O
verla
ys C
.166
.
23/2
4D
S 8:
NE
faci
ng
sect
ion.
Thi
s con
text
po
ssib
ly c
orre
late
s with
C
.137
in D
S 7.
166
1:7a
/cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x1.
60x0
.16
Mid
bro
wn
firm
cla
y. O
ccas
iona
l med
ium
&
larg
e (>
0.30
) sub
-rou
nded
ston
es. U
n-de
rlays
C.1
57, C
.165
. Ove
rlays
C.1
67.
23/2
4D
S 8:
NE
faci
ng se
c-tio
n. P
ossib
ly c
orre
late
s w
ith C
.113
in D
S 7.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
61
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
167
1:7a
/cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x2.
40x0
.18
Mid
bro
wn
firm
peb
bley
/ston
y cl
ay. B
one
incl
usio
n (1
pce)
. Fre
quen
t med
ium
&
coar
se a
ngul
ar p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent m
ediu
m
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent s
mal
l &
med
ium
ang
ular
& su
b-an
gula
r sto
nes.
Occ
asio
nal l
arge
(>0.
30) a
ngul
ar st
ones
(C
.100
). U
nder
lays
C.4
9, C
.1(to
psoi
l).
Ove
rlays
C.1
58, C
.2 (n
atur
al).
23/2
4D
S 8:
SW
& N
E fa
cing
se
ctio
ns.
168
1:7a
/cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x1.
8x0.
40M
id g
rey
soft
sand
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l m
ediu
m a
ngul
ar p
ebbl
es &
smal
l sto
nes.
Freq
uent
larg
e (>
0.30
) sub
-ang
ular
ston
-es
s (C
.100
& C
.101
) Und
erla
ys C
.158
. O
verla
ys C
.2 (n
atur
al).
23/2
4D
S 8:
SW
& N
E fa
cing
se
ctio
ns.
169
1:7a
/cFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
40x0
.06
Mid
ora
ngish
bro
wn
stiff
cla
y. M
oder
ate
fine
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. F
requ
ent m
e-di
um su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
& sm
all s
tone
s. U
nder
lays
C.1
, C.1
65. O
verla
ys C
.165
.
23/2
4D
S 8:
NE
faci
ng
sect
ion.
Thi
s con
-te
xt is
a n
arro
w le
ns
with
in C
.165
. Sim
ilar t
o C
.124
.17
03/
20A
fill o
f ditc
h C
.25
__x0
.5x0
.3M
id b
row
n fir
m/so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Freq
uent
su
b-ro
unde
d, su
b-an
gula
r med
ium
and
la
rge
ston
es. O
verla
ys C
.200
, und
erla
ys
C.2
01
F.17
0:1
ston
e27
DS
6
171
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.8
x0.5
Ligh
t bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l su
b-an
gula
r sm
all p
ebbl
es. U
nder
lays
C
.197
27D
S 6
172
1/7B
**
*SS
100
DS
9 no
t com
plet
ed17
32:
9aSp
read
3.4x
3.2x
0.14
Ligh
t gre
y ha
rd to
stiff
silt.
Fre
quen
t cha
r-co
al fl
ecks
. Mod
erat
e co
arse
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les &
smal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C.2
(n
atur
al).
Trun
cate
d by
C.1
10, C
.25.
SS11
238
Sam
e as
C.1
20
174
3/18
Dcu
t of a
ban
k__
x0.3
7x0.
3Br
eak
of sl
ope
top
I at N
and
S. M
oder
ate
irreg
ular
side
at N
, mod
erat
e sm
ooth
side
at
S. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e I a
t N a
nd S
. C
onca
ve/f
lat b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rient
atio
n N
-S. F
ills C
.53,
C64
25D
S 4:
Pos
sibili
ty th
at
the
site
was
scra
ped
free
of
silt
in p
repa
ratio
n fo
r th
e di
ggin
g of
the
ditc
h &
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
bank
. ie:
scar
ping
.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
62
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
175
1:6d
Fill
of P
it C
.176
0.84
x0.4
4x0.
27Li
ght y
ello
wish
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l fle
cks.
Occ
asio
nal
coar
se su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
& sm
all
ston
es. F
ills C
.176
. Und
erla
ys C
.1 (t
op-
soil)
. Ove
rlays
C.2
(nat
ural
)
SS10
521
C.1
75: F
ill o
f irr
egul
ar
pit (
C.1
76) l
ying
just
to
the
outs
ide
of th
e di
tch
(C.2
5) a
t NW
side
of
site.
Rel
ated
to C
.28,
C
.151
, C.1
78.
176
1:6d
Cut
of P
it0.
84x0
.44x
0.27
Irre
gula
r cut
. Cor
ners
roun
ded.
Bre
ak
of sl
ope
top
grad
ual a
t SE
& N
W. S
ides
m
oder
ate
conc
ave.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe b
ase
grad
ual.
Base
irre
gula
r con
cave
. Orie
n-ta
ted
NW
-SE.
Fill
ed b
y C
.175
21C
.176
: Irr
egul
ar p
it ly
-in
g ju
st to
the
outs
ide
of
the
ditc
h (C
.25)
at N
W
side
of si
te. R
elat
ed to
C
.28,
C.1
51, C
.178
.17
71:
11b
Fill
of P
it C
.178
0.88
x0.5
0x0.
24Ye
llow
ish b
row
n so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Mod
erat
e co
arse
sub-
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. O
ccas
iona
l sm
all s
ub-a
ngul
ar st
ones
. Fill
s C.1
78.
Und
erla
ys C
.1 (t
opso
il). O
verla
ys C
.2
(nat
ural
).
SS10
622
C.1
77: F
ill o
f ova
l pit
(C.1
78) l
ying
just
to
the
outs
ide
of th
e di
tch
(C.2
5) a
t NW
of s
ite.
Rel
ated
to C
.28,
C.1
51,
C.1
78.
178
1:11
bC
ut o
f Pit
0.88
x0.5
0x0.
24O
val c
ut. C
orne
rs ro
unde
d. B
reak
of s
lope
to
p gr
adua
l. Si
des g
entle
con
vex
at N
&
S. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e im
perc
eptib
le. B
ase
flat.
Orie
ntat
ed N
-S. F
illed
by
C.1
77
22C
.178
: Cut
of o
val p
it ly
ing
just
to th
e ou
tsid
e of
the
ditc
h (C
.25)
at
NW
of s
ite. R
elat
ed to
C
.151
, C.2
8, C
.176
. 17
94/
18D
laye
r in
the
bank
__x0
.33x
0.26
Dar
k br
own
soft
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
angu
lar f
ine,
mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r coa
rse
pebb
les.
Ove
rlays
C.2
, und
erla
ys C
.1
26D
S 4
180
4/18
Dla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x1.1
7x0.
24Li
ght b
row
nish
yel
low
wea
kly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd. O
ccas
iona
l sub
-ang
ular
fine
, m
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es.
Occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar sm
all s
tone
s. O
verla
ys
C.6
9, u
nder
lays
C.8
9
26D
S 4
181
4/18
Dcu
t with
in b
ank
mat
eria
l__
x1x0
.15
Brea
k of
slop
e to
p I a
t N a
nd S
. Gen
tle
irreg
ular
side
s. Br
eak
of sl
ope
base
I at
N
and
S. F
lat b
ase
in p
rofil
e. O
rient
atio
n N
-S
25D
S 4
182
NO
N-A
RCH
AEO
LOG
ICA
L18
3N
ON
-ARC
HA
EOLO
GIC
AL
184
NO
N-A
RCH
AEO
LOG
ICA
L18
5N
ON
-ARC
HA
EOLO
GIC
AL
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
63
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
186
1:11
a/b
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
1.1x
0.20
Dar
k br
own
very
soft
pea
ty si
lt. C
harc
oal
incl
usio
ns. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e an
gula
r &
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Und
erla
ys C
.1
(Top
soil)
. Ove
rlays
C.2
02, C
.187
.
SS11
028
DS
9b: U
pper
fill
of th
is slo
t. Pr
obab
ly a
nat
ural
sil
ting
up o
f a d
epre
s-sio
n ca
used
by
root
ac
tivity
of d
ryin
g ou
t of
low
er fi
lls.
187
1:11
a/b
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
2.00
x0.2
0D
ark
brow
n so
ft p
ebbl
ey si
lt. O
ccas
iona
l fin
e &
coa
rse
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Un-
derla
ys C
.186
. Ove
rlays
C.2
02.
SS11
128
DS
9b
188
4/18
Dfil
l of p
ost-h
ole
C.1
890,
25x0
.16x
0.43
Mid
gre
enish
bro
wn
soft
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar,
angu
lar m
ediu
m
and
angu
lar c
oars
e pe
bble
s. M
oder
ate
sub-
angu
lar s
mal
l sto
nes
SS11
547
DS
4
189
4/18
Dcu
t of p
ost-h
ole
0,25
x0.1
6x0.
43O
val f
eatu
re. B
reak
of s
lope
top
S in
eve
ry
dire
ctio
n. V
ertic
al sm
ooth
side
s. Br
eak
of
slope
bas
e S
in e
very
dire
ctio
n. F
lat b
ase
in p
rofil
e. F
ill C
.188
47D
S 4:
The
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
the
laye
rs in
th
e E
faci
ng se
ctio
n fa
ce (d
rg 2
5) a
nd th
is po
stho
le is
n’t r
ecor
ded.
T
he p
osth
ole
is cu
t int
o na
tura
l.19
04/
18D
fill o
f pos
t-hol
e C
.191
0.25
x0.2
x0.3
**
*47
DS
4
191
4/18
Dcu
t of p
ost-h
ole
0.25
x0.2
x0.3
Ova
l fea
ture
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p S
in e
very
di
rect
ion.
Ste
ep a
nd v
ertic
al si
des.
Brea
k of
slop
e ba
se S
in e
very
dire
ctio
n. F
lat
base
in p
rofil
e. F
ill C
.190
47D
S 4:
The
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
the
laye
rs in
th
e E
faci
ng se
ctio
n fa
ce (d
rg 2
5) a
nd th
is po
stho
le is
n’t r
ecor
ded.
T
he p
osth
ole
is cu
t int
o na
tura
l.19
21:
11a/
bFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
?x0.
40x0
.26
Mid
bro
wni
sh/g
reen
ish g
rey
firm
sand
y sil
t. M
oder
ate
fine
sub-
roun
ded
pebb
les.
Freq
uent
med
ium
& c
oars
e su
b-ro
unde
d pe
bble
s. M
oder
ate
smal
l sub
-rou
nded
st
ones
. Occ
asio
nal m
ediu
m su
b-ro
unde
d &
roun
ded
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C.2
03.
Ove
rlays
C.2
(nat
ural
)
SS11
628
DS
9b
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
64
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
193
3:20
a/15
cLa
yer o
f sto
nes o
n C
ause
way
.6.
00x1
.82x
?A
laye
r of C
.100
(60%
) & C
.101
(40%
) ov
erla
ying
C.2
25 fo
rms t
his c
onte
xt a
cros
s th
e ca
usew
ay. O
verla
ys C
.225
. Sea
ls C
216,
C.2
18. U
nder
lays
C.4
5.
44/4
9/50
Cau
sew
ay: A
laye
r of
wel
l sor
ted
larg
e st
ones
(a
ll C
.100
) lai
d do
wn
on c
ause
way
as p
ossib
le
surf
ace.
194
3/20
Ala
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x0.7
x0.2
6M
id b
row
n so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Freq
uent
su
b-an
gula
r coa
rse
pebb
les.
Freq
uent
sub-
angu
lar s
mal
l sto
nes.
DS
6 th
is la
yer c
onta
ins
ston
es C
.122
195
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.9
x0.5
Dar
k br
own
soft
sand
y sil
t. Fr
eque
nt su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r med
ium
and
coa
rse
peb-
bles
. Fre
quen
t sub
-ang
ular
and
ang
ular
sm
all a
nd m
ediu
m st
ones
. Ove
rlays
C.2
, un
derla
ys C
.196
. Tru
ncat
ed b
y C
.25.
27D
S 6
196
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.9
5x0.
2Li
ght b
row
n so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Occ
asio
nal
sub-
roun
ded,
sub-
angu
lar f
ine
pebb
les.
Und
erla
ys C
.45.
Ove
rlays
C.1
97, C
.196
27D
S 6
197
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.4
5x0.
23M
id b
row
n fir
m sa
ndy
silt.
Ove
rlays
C
.171
, C.1
95, u
nder
lays
C.1
9627
DS
6
198
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x 1x
0.4
Mid
bro
wn
sand
y sil
t. Fr
eque
nt su
b-an
-gu
lar f
ine,
mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
rmed
ium
an
d fr
eque
nt a
ngul
ar p
ebbl
es. O
ccas
iona
l su
b-an
gula
r sm
all s
tone
s. U
nder
lays
C
.199
& C
.171
.
BS12
2 an
imal
bo
nes
27D
S 6
199
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.8
5x0.
45M
id b
luish
gre
y an
gula
r, su
b-an
gula
r m
ediu
m a
nd la
rge
ston
es. O
verla
ys C
.198
, un
derla
ys C
.200
BS12
3 an
imal
bo
nes
27D
S 6
200
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x0.9
x0.3
Mid
bro
wni
sh/b
luish
gre
y st
ones
. Fr
e-qu
ent s
ub-a
ngul
ar sm
all a
nd m
ediu
m
ston
es. O
verla
ys C
.199
, und
erla
ys C
.170
BS12
4 an
imal
bo
nes
27D
S 6
201
3/20
Afil
l of d
itch
C.2
5__
x1x0
.3M
id b
luish
gre
y fir
m sa
ndy
silt.
Freq
uent
su
b-an
gula
r sm
all a
nd m
ediu
m st
ones
. O
verla
ys C
.170
, C.2
00, u
nder
lays
C.4
5
BS12
5 an
imal
bo
nes
27D
S 6
202
1:11
a/b
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
1.20
x0.3
6M
id o
rang
ish b
row
n fir
m si
lt. C
.100
in
clus
ions
. Mod
erat
e sm
all s
ub-r
ound
ed
ston
es. F
requ
ent m
ediu
m su
b-ro
unde
d st
ones
. Und
erla
ys C
.186
, C.1
87. O
verla
ys
C.2
03.
28D
S 9b
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
65
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
203
1:11
a/b
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5?x
0.74
x0.3
4D
ark
oran
gish
bro
wn
fria
ble
silt.
Freq
uent
sm
all &
med
ium
sub-
roun
ded
ston
es.
Und
erla
ys C
.202
. Ove
rlays
C.1
92.
28D
S 9b
204
3/19
Cla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x__x
0.51
Mid
bro
wn
wea
kly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd.
Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r, an
gula
r coa
rse
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal a
ngul
ar m
ediu
m
ston
es. O
verla
ys C
.69,
und
erla
ys C
.62
29.3
1co
ntex
t sim
ilar t
o C
.130
205
3/19
Cla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x__x
0.28
Mid
bro
wni
sh y
ello
w w
eakl
y ce
men
ted
silty
sand
. Mod
erat
e su
b-an
gula
r fin
e,
occa
siona
l sub
-ang
ular
med
ium
peb
bles
. O
verla
ys C
.62,
und
erla
ys C
.45
SS12
629
, 30
206
3/19
Cla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk5x
__x0
.45
Ligh
t red
dish
bro
wn
wea
kly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l inc
lusio
ns.
Ove
rlays
C.2
, und
erla
ys C
.69
29
207
3/19
Cla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk1.
1x__
x0.1
2D
ark
brow
n so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-ro
unde
d m
ediu
m p
ebbl
es. O
cca-
siona
l ang
ular
smal
l sto
nes.
Ove
rlays
C.2
, un
derla
ys C
.206
29
208
1:8b
Fill
of P
osth
ole
C.2
090.
34x0
.30x
0.49
Mid
yel
low
ish b
row
n co
mpa
ct sa
ndy
silt.
Occ
asio
nal s
mal
l pie
ces o
f sna
il sh
ell.
Mod
erat
e m
ediu
m &
coa
rse
sub-
angu
lar
pebb
les.
Occ
asio
nal s
mal
l ang
ular
ston
es.
SS11
737
C.1
10
209
1:8b
Cut
of P
osth
ole
in
linea
r fea
ture
C.1
100.
34x0
.30x
0.49
Sub-
circ
ular
cut
. Cor
ners
roun
ded.
Bre
ak
of sl
ope
top
shar
p at
N &
S. S
ides
ver
tical
sm
ooth
at N
& S
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe b
ase
grad
ual a
t N &
S. B
ase
sub-
circ
ular
, con
-ca
ve. O
rient
ated
N-S
. Fill
ed b
y C
.208
37
C.1
10: C
.209
is th
e cu
t of
a p
osth
ole
seen
in
sect
ion
with
in th
e lin
ear
feat
ure
tow
ards
W e
nd.
210
1:8a
/bFi
ll of
line
ar fe
atur
e C
.110
2.38
x0.4
6x0.
40Li
ght b
row
nish
yel
low
com
pact
silty
sand
. O
ccas
iona
l fle
cks o
f sna
il sh
ell.
Occ
a-sio
nal m
ediu
m su
b-an
gula
r peb
bles
.
SS11
837
C.1
10: C
.210
fills
this
cut b
ut th
e st
ratig
raph
y isn
’t re
cord
ed.
211
1:8a
/bFi
ll of
line
ar fe
atur
e C
.110
0.46
x0.5
8x0.
54Li
ght b
row
nish
yel
low
stro
ngly
cem
ente
d sil
ty sa
nd. M
oder
ate
med
ium
sub-
angu
lar
pebb
les &
smal
l sto
nes.
SS11
937
C.1
10: C
211
fills
this
cut b
ut th
e st
ratig
raph
y isn
’t re
cord
ed.
212
1:8a
/bFi
ll of
line
ar fe
atur
e C
.110
3.80
x0.5
4x0.
67M
id b
row
n so
ft si
lty c
lay.
Bon
e in
clus
ions
. O
ccas
iona
l cha
rcoa
l fle
cks.
Freq
uent
fle
cks &
mod
erat
e sm
all p
iece
s of s
nail
shel
l.Mod
erat
e m
ediu
m &
coa
rse
sub-
an-
gula
r peb
bles
. Fre
quen
t sm
all &
med
ium
su
b-an
gula
r & su
b-ro
unde
d st
ones
.
SS12
0
BS12
137
C.1
10: C
.212
fills
this
cut b
ut th
e st
ratig
raph
y isn
’t re
cord
ed.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
66
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
213
3/19
Cla
yer i
n th
e ba
nk__
x__x
0.33
Dar
k br
own
soft
cla
yey
silt.
Mod
erat
e su
b-ro
unde
d co
arse
peb
bles
. Mod
er-
ate
roun
ded
larg
e st
ones
. Ove
rlays
C.2
, un
derla
ys C
69, C
.205
, C.6
4
29, 3
0
214
rem
oved
cut
VO
ID :
rem
oved
cut
for C
173
3821
53:
15c
Fill
of P
osth
ole
C.2
160.
70x0
.40x
0.40
Mid
bro
wn
very
soft
silty
cla
y. B
one
in-
clus
ion
(1pc
e). M
oder
ate
fine
& m
ediu
m
angu
lar,
sub-
angu
lar &
sub-
roun
ded
peb-
bles
. Mod
erat
e m
ediu
m a
ngul
ar &
sub-
roun
ded
ston
es. U
nder
lays
C.1
93/C
.45.
O
verla
ys C
.2 (n
atur
al).
Fills
C.2
16.
SS13
044
C.2
15: T
his f
ills C
.216
.
216
3:15
cC
ut o
f Pos
thol
e0.
70x0
.40x
0.40
Sub-
rect
angu
lar c
ut. C
orne
rs ro
unde
d at
N
& S
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p sh
arp
at N
&
S., g
radu
al a
t E &
W. S
ides
stee
p irr
egu-
lar.
Brea
k of
slop
e ba
se sh
arp.
Bas
e ov
al
conc
ave.
Orie
ntat
ed N
-S. F
illed
by
C.2
15.
Trun
cate
s C.2
25. S
eale
d by
C.1
93.
44C
.216
: The
cut
of
a po
stho
le o
n th
e ca
usew
ay. M
ay re
late
to
C.2
18 fo
rmin
g a
poss
ible
ent
ranc
eway
fe
atur
e 21
73:
15c
Fill
of C
.218
1.00
x0.5
0x0.
55D
ark
brow
nish
bla
ck so
ft sa
ndy
silt.
Occ
asio
nal f
leck
s & sm
all p
iece
s of
char
coal
. Fre
quen
t fle
cks &
smal
l pie
ces
of sn
ail s
hell.
Fre
quen
t fin
e &
med
ium
su
b-ro
unde
d pe
bble
s. M
oder
ate
smal
l su
b-an
gula
r sto
nes.
Und
erla
ys C
193/
C.4
5.
Ove
rlays
C.2
(nat
ural
). Fi
lls C
.218
.
SS12
8 (B
one
rich)
44C
.217
: Thi
s is t
he fi
ll of
po
stho
le C
.218
218
3:15
cC
ut o
f Pos
thol
e1.
00x0
.50x
0.55
Ova
l cut
. Cor
ners
roun
ded.
Bre
ak o
f slo
pe
top
shar
p. S
ides
stee
p co
ncav
e at
N &
S,
mod
erat
e co
ncav
e at
E &
W. B
reak
of
slope
bas
e sh
arp.
Bas
e ci
rcul
ar fl
at. O
ri-en
tate
d E-
W. F
illed
by
C.2
17. T
runc
ates
C
.225
. Sea
led
by C
.193
.
44C
.218
: A la
rge
post
hole
cu
t int
o th
e ce
ntre
of
the
caus
eway
.
219
3/26
A,
laye
r/fe
atur
e__
x5x0
.15
Trac
kway
whi
ch le
ads f
rom
the
caus
eway
in
to th
e va
lley
to th
e so
uth
50
220
2:10
a/5c
/9b/
4dR
e-cu
t in
Ditc
h?x
0.60
x0.4
0Se
en in
sect
ion
only
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p gr
adua
l at N
E, sh
arp
at S
W. S
ides
stee
p,
step
ped
at S
W, m
oder
ate
conv
ex a
t NE.
Br
eak
of sl
ope
base
impe
rcep
tible
. Bas
e ta
pere
d po
int.
Orie
ntat
ed in
sect
ion
NE-
SW. F
illed
by
C.5
9. T
runc
ates
C.1
04.
11D
S 5:
C.2
20: A
re-c
ut a
t th
e N
E ar
ea o
f the
ditc
h po
ssib
ly fo
r dra
inin
g or
ag
ricul
tura
l act
ivity
.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
67
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
25a
3:20
aSW
Ter
min
us o
f D
itch
C.2
5?x
2.3x
0.90
Sub-
rect
angu
lar,
linea
r cut
. Cor
ners
sq
uare
. Bre
ak o
f slo
pe to
p sh
arp.
Sid
e at
N
E st
eep
smoo
th. B
reak
of s
lope
bas
e sh
arp.
Bas
e su
b-ci
rcul
ar, t
aper
ed b
lunt
po
int.
Orie
ntat
ion
NW
-SE.
49C
.25a
: Thi
s rep
re-
sent
s the
cut
of t
he S
E ca
usew
ay. N
atur
al m
ate-
rial w
as le
ft in
situ
to
form
the
caus
eway
with
C
.193
ove
rlayi
ng th
is.22
14:
24a/
19c
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5D
ark
blac
k ve
ry so
ft si
lt. M
oder
ate
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. O
ccas
iona
l ang
ular
st
ones
. Occ
asio
nal s
nail
shel
l inc
lusio
ns.
Und
erla
ys C
.1. O
verla
ys C
.224
. Sim
ilar
mat
eria
l to
C.4
5.
25D
S 4:
Thi
s is s
imila
r m
ater
ial t
o C
.45
but i
t ha
s slu
mpe
d do
wn
from
th
e ba
nk to
ove
rlay
the
fille
d up
ditc
h. T
he
cont
inui
ty is
inte
rrup
ted
by C
.86
whi
ch p
roba
bly
repr
esen
ts th
e la
ter f
ield
bo
unda
ry.
222
4:19
cLa
yer o
f ban
kD
ark
blac
k ve
ry so
ft si
lt. M
oder
ate
angu
lar p
ebbl
es. O
ccas
iona
l ang
ular
st
ones
. Occ
asio
nal s
nail
shel
l inc
lusio
ns.
Und
erla
ys C
.1. O
verla
ys C
.53.
Sim
ilar
mat
eria
l to
C.4
5.
25D
S 4:
Thi
s is s
imila
r m
ater
ial t
o C
.45
but
it ha
s slu
mpe
d do
wn
inte
rnal
ly fr
om th
e ba
nk
to o
verla
y th
e st
one
elem
ent o
f the
ban
k co
nstr
uctio
n.22
34:
24a
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5Ba
sal f
ill o
f ditc
h co
ntai
ning
freq
uent
sm
all &
med
ium
size
d C
.100
& m
oder
-at
e sm
all &
med
ium
size
d C
.101
. (75
%
C.1
00 to
25%
C10
1). O
verla
ys C
.2.
Und
erla
ys C
.224
.
25D
S 4
224
4:24
aFi
ll of
Ditc
h C
.25
Fill
of D
itch
C.2
5 co
ntai
ning
freq
uent
la
rge
(>.3
0) C
.100
& m
oder
ate
med
ium
&
larg
e C
.101
. (75
% C
.100
to 2
5% C
.101
). U
nder
lays
C.2
21. O
verla
ys C
.223
.
25D
S 4
225
3:15
/20
Laye
r on
Cau
sew
ayLi
ght o
rang
ish g
rey
silt.
Mod
erat
e sm
all,
med
ium
& c
oars
e pe
bble
s. O
ccas
iona
l m
ediu
m su
b-ro
unde
d st
ones
. Situ
ated
on
the
caus
eway
bet
wee
n th
e te
rmin
i. Ex
-te
nds S
E on
to th
e tr
ackw
ay C
.219
. Ove
r-la
ys C
.2. U
nder
lays
C.1
93. T
runc
ated
to
war
ds th
e in
terio
r by
C.2
16 &
C.2
18.
Cau
sew
ay: L
aid
bene
ath
a la
yer o
f wel
l sor
ted
larg
e st
ones
(C.1
93) l
aid
dow
n on
cau
sew
ay a
s po
ssib
le su
rfac
e.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
68
C. n
o.A
rea/
Gri
dT
ype
Dim
ensi
ons
(Met
ers)
Des
crip
tion
Find
sE
nvir
onm
enta
l m
ater
ial
Plan
Com
men
ts
226
3:7a
/bD
epos
it2.
0x0.
5x0.
4D
oubl
e lin
e of
larg
e lim
esto
ne b
lock
s m
akin
g up
the
rem
nant
s of a
a w
all a
cros
s up
per f
ills o
f Ditc
h cu
t C.2
5. U
pper
laye
r co
nsist
s of C
.100
type
lim
esto
ne, l
ower
la
yer c
onsis
ts o
f C.1
01 ty
pe li
mes
tone
15,2
3T
his d
epos
it ap
pear
s to
hav
e be
en la
id to
m
aint
ain
an e
ntra
nce/
exit
from
the
encl
osur
e in
the
NW
are
a of
th
e sit
e, a
t its
clo
sest
pr
oxim
ity to
the
Cill
in
150
m N
W.
It is
rela
ted
to th
e so
rted
smal
l sto
ne
caus
eway
laid
at t
his
poin
t C.4
7, b
etw
een
DS
7 an
d D
S 8
227
All
Laye
rFi
ne o
rang
e sil
t, no
t cle
ar w
heth
er th
is is
prim
ary
bank
rem
ains
, or n
atur
al su
bsoi
l, un
derly
ing
bank
.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
69
Appendix 2: Stratigraphic Matrix
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
70
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
71
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
72
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
73
Appendix 3: Groups and sub-groups text
Due to the thin soils in this area, (0.1 m to 0.2 m in depth,) and the exposed position of the site, it is likely that some features have been truncated or destroyed completely, by erosion, farming or quarrying.
Group 1. Structure and associated features in the north-west quadrant
1.1 Sub-circular structure Cut numbers 17 and 21. Fills 18 and 20.Grid: 7C, 12ADrawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 51.Photos 1 (40, 42, 43,), 4 (1, 2, 3.)
Description:
A slot trench, C.18, is semi-circular in plan and U-shaped in profile. It has an average width is 0.4 m and depth 0.2 m, diameter 3.0 m. Its fill C.17, is a mid brown soft clay silt, with occasional angular coarse pebbles and occasional charcoal inclusions. This structure ap-peared to have been abutting or truncated by the enclosing ditch, C.25.
Two degraded cereal grains of indeterminate type were found in fill C17. Charcoal analy-sis identified a dominance of ash and hazel. A radiocarbon date was obtained from fill C.17, producing the earliest date range on the site of 396 to 211 cal BC (UB-7758). At the slots western terminus is a contemporary post-hole (C.21), with dimensions 1.06 m x 0.6 m x 0.2 m, containing fill C.20. Centrally located within the area enclosed by C18 is C.40 (Photo 1 (38), a deposit of burnt bone.
Discussion:
The structure is positioned directly on the crown of the hill at a height of 83 m O.D. Here it would have been afforded little protection from the elements, but would accord the best view possible and maximum visibility. There is no evidence of a hearth or of burning in situ, either inside the structure or nearby. The deposition of burnt bone within the area enclosed by the slot trench cut 18 would appear deliberate as would the cereal grains. The post hole at the western terminus may be for a door, a roof support or to define the entrance to this structure. It is quite common in hilltop enclosures that habitation structures abut the inside revetment wall of the enclosing ramparts. Here however, the sub-circular structure appears to be cut by the enclosing ditch and its location suggests that it would have been underneath the rampart. This structure may be a monument of some kind. It has been positioned for maximum visibility in the surrounding landscape, with little natural protection from the ele-ments. Limestone is in plentiful supply for the construction of a cairn or similar feature.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
74
At least 11 of the known univallate sites have burial mounds within their enclosures (Raftery 1994, 38-48) presumed to be of Neolithic or early Bronze Age date. Interestingly here the date obtained for this structure pre-dates that of early layers of the bank by only a few years, suggesting that the sub-circular structure, if it is the remains of a burial mound, is Iron Age in date.
1.2 Three external pitsCuts numbers 151, 176 and 178. Fill numbers 29, 175 and 177. Grids: 6, 7, 11 and 12.Drawings: 18, 21 and 22.Photos 2 (46, 47.)Description:These three pits are in close proximity to the sub-circular structure, all lie just outside the
ringfort ditch to the west and have similar dimensions, approximately 0.88 m x 0.50 m x 0.24 m. They have similar fills of light yellowish brown soft sandy silt, with occasional charcoal flecks and occasional coarse sub-angular pebbles & small stones. The pit cuts have similar profiles of an oval cut, corners rounded, with a sharp break of slope at the top, steep, smooth, concave sides, gradual break of slope at base, with a concave or flat base. Charcoal analysis indicates hazel only is present in the cut (C.176).
Discussion:
There is nothing other than charcoal in the fill of these pits to suggest their function. Proximity to the sub-circular feature and the clustered post holes and the fact that there are no pits cut into the enclosure’s ditch fills in this area of the site, suggest these pits may predate the infilling of the upper layers of the enclosure ditch. It is possible though that these features are unrelated and may represent an opportunistic use of a strategic location. Little can be said about these pits, they do not appear to contain domestic refuse. The presence of hazel domi-nance in the fill, could suggest a link to the clustered post-holes, but this is not clear.
1.3 Burnt layerDeposit C.173 (same as deposit C.120.)Grid: 9ADrawing: 38Photo 4 (32.)
Description:
Deposit 173 is rectangular in plan, with rounded corners, with dimensions of 3.4 m length (northwest to southeast) x 3.2 m width x 0.14 m depth. This deposit is of light grey
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
75
hard silt, containing frequent charcoal flecks. The deposit 173 is very similar to the early burnt fills of the enclosure’s bank (see fills C.69, C.75, C.80, C.121, C.135, C.140, C.146, C.162 and C.164.) Deposit C.173 is truncated by both the linear feature (C.110) and the ditch (C.25). Charcoal analysis indicated Prunus (2), ash (1) and the only incidence of holly (1) on the site in deposit (C.173).
Discussion:
The charcoal-rich appearance of this large deposit during excavation suggested a substan-tial amount of burning. However the charcoal analysis suggested only four fragments. There is no evidence of burning in situ. Since the deposit C.173 is truncated by both the enclosure ditch (C.23) and the linear, internal, bank-related feature (C.110), it is clear that the deposit predates the construction of the enclosure. The regular shape of the deposit in plan is sug-gestive of a small building or enclosed space, but no supporting features such as post or stake holes were visible. The deposit predates the enclosing ditch element of this site and most likely construction of the internal bank. It is possible that this deposit was used as an early layer within the bank as the matrix is very similar to early bank layers, but this could just be the same activity of burning, for example of brushwood, during different phases of activity at the site. The deposit may be related to the sub-circular structure, C.17 located in grids 7c and 12a, which also predates the enclosing ditch and confines a deposit of burnt bone.
Group 2. Construction of the enclosure
2.1 Preparation of the site
Description:
The site is located at the top of a hill at 83 m OD. The topsoil is very thin and just below the surface is boulder clay, containing approximately 50% ‘muddy’, carboniferous limestone. Bedding planes of this limestone are visible northeast of grid 5 and limestone bedrock is per-haps 5 to 10 m below the ground surface. Due to the geology and the position of the site, it would have been very well drained, with little or no tree cover.
Discussion:
It is likely that the site would need to be cleared of vegetation prior to the commence-ment of construction works. It is also possible that a pre-existing monument may have been visible (see subgroup 1.1) and may have been removed before construction work could begin. The only evidence we have for these activities are the burnt deposits present at the base of the bank (see fill C.69, C.75, C.80, C.121, C.135, C.140, C.146, C.162 and C.164) and possibly deposit C.173. None of these deposits show evidence of burning in situ, suggesting three pos-
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
76
sible explanations: that there was only light scrub clearance necessary, that the materials were burnt outside the area excavated, or, that materials were burnt on-site and that the topsoil was subsequently removed prior to construction work. It seems likely that materials were burnt on-site and that the topsoil was subsequently removed from the interior of the site. This is suggested by the lack of organic debris within the enclosure and the charcoal rich grey/white soils visible only at the base of the internal bank. The clearance of the interior would have produced some of the soil necessary for the construction of an earthern rampart, with the remainder of the material coming from the construction of the ditch cut 25
2.2 Construction of the ditch and bankDrawings: 16, 19, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 44, 49
1.1.1 The Ditch: Cut C.25 (same as C.123.)
Description:
The ditch cut C.25 is oval in plan, being 42 m outer edge to outer edge from southeast to northwest and 35 m northeast to southwest, with a circumference of approximately 132 m. The construction of the ditch involved digging a V-shaped trench around the area to be enclosed leaving a 6m wide section not excavated to the southeast. The ditch termini sloped up from the base of the ditch to the ground surface at a 45 degree angle, maintaining their shape and size (Photo 3 (25).) In profile the ditch is an average of 1.88 m width at the top by 1 m depth. The removal of soil entailed digging through a thin layer of orange silt subsoil (variously numbered as C.63, C.90, C.131, C.143, C.144, C.207, C.213 and C.227) and dig-ging into a very robust boulder clay (C.2) beneath. Breaking of C.101, the ‘muddy’ limestone boulders to remove them from the boulder clay, is evident in the sides of the cut C.25, where strike marks are visible on the remaining limestone protrusions. (Photo folder 3, shot 25.)
Discussion:
This morphology of the enclosure ditch may have been intentional or may have been due to the limitations of the site (sharp downward slopes to the south and west.) Strike marks visible on boulders left in situ suggest that the excavators of the ditch were very familiar with the qualities of this material and competent in its removal. The ditch appears to have been dug in sections as evidenced by the tip lines visible in the bank, Photo 4 (4). Either a large number of people were excavating the enclosing ditch or it was completed by a small number of people over a long period of time. The area in which the ditch was not dug, would sug-gest access and egress from the site (see below). A V-shaped oval enclosing ditch, dug through difficult ground. Its purpose was to contribute to the construction of the interior rampart, to allow for the selection of stone for the stone embankment and revetment features. The
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
77
strenuous nature of the work entailed, particularly in this very stony boulder clay, hints at the importance either of this site or perhaps the expectations that were placed upon constructors of the site. The selection of this location sets it apart from similarly constructed ringforts, in that it incorporates the crown of the hill, on a relatively flat plateau, where the soil cover appears extremely thin (0.10 m to 0.15 m depth). It should be noted however that though the site does not appear to have the advantages sought by ringfort builders, such as a gradual slope for drainage and observation, good soil cover, that there is water in the form of a spring 200 m to the east on flat ground. This may have been essential at a defended site.
2.2.2 The Bank The only upstanding remains of bank are present in the south part of the enclosure. It
survived due to its incorporation into a modern field boundary as seen on the 1946 OS map. This has preserved the structure of the bank and made it easy to recognize in the landscape. The ditch and bank were effectively constructed in tandem, as the ditch could not be dug without there being somewhere to dispose of the soil, the bank could not be constructed without a large volume of soil being available.
2.2.2.a Bank Construction Features: Cuts 110, 149, 181, 189, 191 and 209.
Description:
Evidence was found on the southern side of the site at ditch section four of a large stone packed post hole cut context 149 (Photo folder 2, shot 40) and a linear gulley running paral-lel to the ditch. Set into this was a second post hole cut context 181, with fill context 147. A radiocarbon date was obtained from fill C.147 of cal 361 to 102 BC (UB_7361).
Along the inner edge of the bank in the same ditch section were found two more post-holes (C.189 and C.191, with fills C.188 and C.190 respectively) cut into rock. These post holes suggest a width for the rampart from inside to outside edge of approximately 3 m.
Directly across the site from DS 4, in grids 7, 8 and 9 another more substantial internal revetment feature is also visible. This linear feature with C.110, with dimensions east to west of 10.96 m by 0.54 m width by 0.67 m depth, it runs parallel to the ditch and also suggests a rampart width of 3 m (Photos : 3(16), 3(17), 3(18), 3(19) ). This feature appears to be a substantial slot trench containing stone packed post-holes such as post-hole C.209, with fill C.208 (Photo 3(15) and traces of some stake-holes, Photo 2(13). This feature was not visible either in the western or eastern area of the site.
Charcoal analysis indicated the presence of ash (2).
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
78
Discussion:
The features present at ditch section four are suggestive of a line of substantial posts, with a gulley running between them, with either horizontal timbers or planking laid in the gul-ley, along the outside edge of the bank, to shore up the bank, perhaps to produce an impos-ing vertical rampart and prevent it slipping into the ditch C.25. Post-holes with C.189 and C.191, suggest a similar feature, running parallel on the inner edge of the bank. Deposit C.110 seems to be related to the construction of the earthen bank element, revetting the bank from the inside, possibly using a palisade of posts to prevent the bank slipping into the interi-or of the site. These features are evident because they were deeply cut or were well covered by the slumped bank. Other construction features may have been truncated during ploughing or other disturbance. The banks construction began with a revetting feature along its outside edge, designed to prevent the soil falling directly back into the ditch C.25. These features were most evident where the bank was most protected on its south-western side in DS 4, Photo 4 (5) The east-west slot trench C.110, was deeply cut into the natural subsoil running parallel to the bank along its inside edge in the northern area of the site. Other construction elements that may have been present, appear to have been destroyed in more vulnerable areas of the site, especially to the west.
2.2.2.b Pre-Bank material: (Fill contexts 69, 75, 80, 121, 135, 140, 146, 162 and 164.)
Description:
The earliest material present consistently along the length of the bank is a deposit of hard, greyish-white charcoal rich silt. It varies in depth from 0.09 m (Photo 2(55)) to 0.60 m (Photo 4 (6) it varies in width from 0.75 m to 2.40 m (Photo 2 (35). This soil is directly above the boulder clay subsoil in and above an orange silt subsoil which overlays the boulder clay in some places. Charcoal analysis suggests the presence of Pomoideae and oak in these layers. A radiocarbon date obtained from layer (C.69) gives a date range 392 to 205 cal BC (UB-7360).
Discussion:
The charcoal rich nature of this deposit and its depth makes it unlikely to have been naturally deposited. In some places there is more than one deposit of this material, such as in Ditch Section 4. The radiocarbon date obtained is very close to that obtained in the sub-circular slot trench fill C.17, suggesting that either that the two activities were contempora-neous or that site function changed dramatically in a very short period of time. This deposit appears to be the remains of scrub clearance from the site, which was then deposited along with the thin topsoil to make up the earliest layers of the bank.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
79
2.2.2.c Bank material: (Fills contexts 50, 62, 122, 125, 129, 130, 132, 133, 180, 204 and 205.)
Description:
This second larger deposit is an orange silty-clay, with small angular pebbles in the ma-trix. It makes up the baulk of the bank and varies in depth from 0.25 m to 0.60 m and varies in width from 2 m to 4 m. Tip lines are visible in this deposit in the longitudinal section through the bank, Photo 4 (7). Only one fragment of charcoal was retrieved from these fills in fill C.205, this was oak.
Discussion:
This soil appears to have the matrix of boulder clay subsoil, with the larger limestone boulders and stones removed, but have the colour of the orange silt subsoil, visible in places above the boulder clay. The lack of charcoal or plant remains in these fills suggests that they were obtained from a sterile location, such as the subsoil. This deposit is a mixture of orange silt subsoil and greyish-yellow boulder clay subsoil, dug out during the construction of the enclosing ditch. The larger limestone boulders, rocks and stones have been removed from the soil before the soil has been deposited on the bank. Tip lines visible in the longitudinal sec-tion, Photo 4 (7), suggest that the bank (and ditch) were likely constructed in sections, rather than all at once. The boulders were then used during construction of a stone embankment (see below.)
2.2.2.d Stone Embankment: (Fills 53, 64, 78, 134 and 194.)
Description:
The third element is small, angular ‘muddy’ carboniferous limestone stones, ranging in size from 0.05 m to 0.15 m and some angular gravel. This deposit is approximately 1.80 m width by 0.25 m depth and lies along the inside edge of the remaining orange silty-clay bank deposit described above. Some larger surrounding fossiliferrous carboniferous lime-stone stones measuring 0.15 m to 0.20 m are visible laying above this deposit in ditch section number 6, Photo 2 (2).
Discussion:
This deposit is notable because it doesn’t lie directly on top of the bank, where it would increase the banks height. This material is clearly sorted with little evidence of soil and has consistent dimensions along its length. Much larger muddy limestone rocks are available in
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
80
the immediate vicinity inside the enclosure, but do not generally appear to have been utilised. The deposit ends at the southwest ditch terminus as does the earthen bank. It may be that erosion and destruction of the ramparts over time have substantially changed their morphol-ogy. There are several different techniques that may be used for rampart construction: a rub-ble core may be used to anchor the soil of the bank, vertical ramparts may be constructed or an internal wall was constructed directly behind the rampart to act as a revetment to prevent collapse into the interior. This wall may also have been used as walkway to patrol the perimeter of the enclosure. This sorted small angular stone may be the remains of a stone embankment, an inner revetment or a rubble core. Much larger rectangular limestone blocks were immediately available, which could have been used to construct a substantial stone wall or footings for a stone wall but were not used, Photo 4 (8). This feature doesn’t appear to have been constructed directly on the crown of the earthen bank, as some of the footing stone would be likely to slip into the ditch and undermine the embankments stability. The embankment has consistent dimensions along its length and its width, which would be suf-ficient to construct an embankment approximately 1.50 m high. The construction of the bank above its base of smaller angular muddy limestone, would have been with larger muddy limestone stones (C.101) such as those sorted from the soil during the construction of the ditch and in some places of imported, visually very appealing white, surrounded, fossilifer-rous carboniferous limestone stones, (C100) (Photo 4 (9)) both with dimensions of 0.20 m to 0.40 m. These two stone types will be discussed further in the interpretation of the ditch fills, which contain this stone embankment as back fill. It is also possible that the embankment was a later addition to the site, as it appears to be cut into the side of the earthern bank.
2.2.3 Entrance Features:Drawings 50Grid 26
Description:
Two large post-holes were cut into the boulder clay just inside the causeway. One at the northern side of the causeway, with cut C.218 with fill C.217, with dimensions 0.70 m x 0.40 m x 0.40 m. The other at the southern side of the causeway with cut C.216, with fill C.215, with dimensions 1 m x 0.5 m x 0.55 m, they are approximately 2 m apart, Photo 4 (10). Around these two post-holes and covering the whole of the causeway area was a deposit C.225, composed of light orange-grey silt, containing moderate small, medium and coarse pebbles. This deposit measured 5 m northeast to southwest from terminus to terminus and approximately 8 m northwest to southeast, with a maximum thickness 0.40 m, Photo 4 (11, 12 and 13). Above this near the south-western terminus was a deposit context 126, of light yellowish-brown, silty –clay. Overlaying the whole area of the causeway was a sorted deposit of angular and subrounded stones context 193. This was composed of 60% fossiliferrous
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
81
and 40% muddy limestone, Photo 3 98 and 4 (13). The track way C.219 is clearly visible in the landscape. It leads south-east from the causeway C.193 and probably runs down into the valley. It is visible for at least 15 m, is about 5 m wide and the boulder clay subsoil is 0.15 m below the track way surface, Photo 4 (14).
Discussion:
The two large post-holes are centrally located, just inside the enclosure overlooking the causeway, with the gap between these two posts of 1.5 m. This may indicate a constricted entranceway, possibly with a guard tower (as the causeway itself was 6 m wide) or centrally lo-cated gateposts. The deposit of soil C.225, underlay the stone layer C.193 which made up the surface of the causeway. This soil may have helped to hold the stones in place, as depositing them directly onto the subsoil would have resulted in the surface being loose and unstable. These stones do not appear to be collapsed revetment from the ramparts, as they appear to be concisely constricted by the width of the causeway itself and are imbedded in soil C.225. The trackway leads up from the valley to the south and appears wide enough for a cart. The trackway is overlooked immediately to the southeast by a ridge, indicating that the approach to the enclosure was dominated by high ground, both east and west, which could easily be defended. This is the entrance to and exit from the enclosure. The post-holes likely represent either a gate structure or perhaps a small gate tower. The metalled surface of stone is quite substantial and suggests the possibility of heavy traffic, as does the width of the causeway. It is possible that stone was quarried inside the enclosure and the track way C.219 was used for transportation down into the valley to the south and beyond. The location of the trackway between two areas of easily defended high ground and its orientation sweeping around to-wards the valley to the south, may indicate that this is a territorial boundary.
Group 3. The Interior
1.1 Internal FeaturesCut 91, fills 92 and 95.Grid 8dDrawing 14, 37 and Post-ex
Description:
A small pit with cut C.91, Photo 1 (67) has dimensions of 0.45 m x 0.40 m x 0.30 m, is oval in plan and u-shaped in profile. It has two fills 92 and 95, the primary fill 95 contain-ing burnt and unburnt bone fragments. Charcoal included ash (13), elder (3) and Pomoideae (2).
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
82
Discussion:
There is no structural evidence of habitation on the site during the life of the enclosure. Habitation features may have been less substantial in nature, such as timber houses. Even a stone house may have been obliterated by subsequent quarrying (known to have happened from at least the 1950s onwards and perhaps in the late medieval period also.) Habitation features may also have been destroyed by ploughing and other land improvements due to the presence of very thin topsoil. Other occupational debris such as charcoal and butchered/burnt animal bone may indicate habitation of the site. Finds such as a rotary quernstone, lignite bracelet and a hammer stone, Finds 30, 10 and 31, Photos 4 (15, 16) may also relate to occupation of the enclosure, other items made of iron were also found but are indeterminate in nature. Only a small number of hilltop enclosures contain clear evidence of permanent oc-cupation. This may be due to methods of construction, later re-use of construction materials elsewhere and damage by modern farming methods.
3.2 Group of post-holesCut numbers 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 31, 34, 36 and 108. Fill numbers 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 30, 33, 35, 37, 38, 107. Grids: 11B, 7C, 12ADrawings: 35, 36, 40, 41 and 54Photographs 1 (7, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41.)
Description:
All of the post holes have similar diameters of approximately 0.25 m diameter and 0.3 m depth. They have mostly fills of dark brownish black soft clayey silt, moderate sub-angular medium pebbles, occasional unburnt bone and occasional charcoal inclusions. They are ap-proximately 1.0 m apart and are mostly directly to the south east of the sub-circular structure. Post-hole (C.10), contained stone packing, but was otherwise similar to the other post-holes. Charcoal analysis of the fills indicates a consistent dominance of hazel in these features. A radiocarbon date obtained from fill C.30 produced a date range for this cluster of post-holes of cal AD 1022 to 1164 (UB-7760).
Discussion
These features may have been truncated by farming activity in modern times and some other features may have been destroyed. These post holes are all in close proximity to the sub-circular structure cut 18, but this appears to be due to the strategic location directly on the crown of the hill. The radiocarbon date gained from fill C.30 indicates approximately 1400 years hiatus from the construction of the enclosure to the next phase of known activity
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
83
at the site. These post holes do not make up a discernable pattern and may represent the lo-cation of a single feature such as a tethering post that has been repositioned over a number of years on the crown of the hill. They could also represent the remains of a simple structure, such as a lean-to, that may have been fashioned at a much later date within the ruins of the enclosure. This would be a good location for observing and protecting domestic animals.
Group4.Backfillingandabandonmentofthesite
A series of sections were archaeologically excavated across the ditch at regular intervals, to provide an accurate and uniform picture of the enclosure as a whole. Though the fills vary from ditch slot to ditch slot, we were able to gather a detailed picture about the ditch as a whole. The fills referred to, relate to phases or activities on the site, rather than to a specific fills geographic location on site. If location is of particular interest, then this will be men-tioned accordingly in the text. Nine ditch sections were excavated and recorded.
The ditch and its fills, being by far the largest sub-surface feature on the site, retains the most data regarding the enclosures construction, occupation, possible habitation and even-tual destruction. It also contains data about post-occupation activities on and near the site, such as attempts to level the monument or infill the depression left by the ditch. The ditch also informs us about other changes in the landscape, such as changes to the field system in the area since early-modern times. Changes shown on the 1838 and 1946 Ordnance Survey of Ireland maps to the field system, were discovered as stratigraphical relationships during the archaeological excavations on-site. Two stone types were found to dominate the fills: white, fossiliferous, carboniferous limestone, (C.100 for description of the stone type only) which was in solution, sub-rounded and imported from elsewhere (this may have been supplied lo-cally, but isn’t present on the site) and muddy, carboniferous limestone, (C.101 for description of the stone type only) which was angular, bluish grey and was available onsite in the subsoil in great quantities and was also visible in bedding planes on the surface.
1.1 Primary Silting(Fills 57, 128, 139, 142, 168 and 198.)
Description
This fill ranges from a mid grey soft sandy silt to a dark brown friable silt with occasional angular gravel and very infrequent bone inclusions, but is generally very sterile. With dimen-sions 0.40 m width by 0.30 m depth. Charcoal was present in just one sample from fill C.139, with a small amount of hazel (1), willow/poplar (1) and Pomoideae (1). An early medieval date of cal AD 882-904 and 913-970 (UBA-8103) was retrieved from a bone sample from the base of DS 4.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
84
Discussion
Primary silting deposits appear only in four of the nine slots excavated, these deposits are most prevalent to the north-west, and where there appears to be less (lime) stone present in the ditch fills. This fill may be representative of the ditch standing open after initial con-struction, with subsequent erosional factors such as wind and rain washing material from the bank and the sides of the ditch into the bottom of the ditch. The relative scarcity of these deposits in the ditch may suggest that either the ditch was cleaned out on a regular basis or that the ditch was backfilled shortly after its construction. It is also possible that this silt is in fact wash from the very stony fills above, if this was so, the silt would in fact be a secondary deposit. This seems unlikely as there is bone present in fill C.139 and C.198 which would not wash into the fill through the stone deposits above.This is primary ditch fill. The bone fragments present are too large to have filtered down through the limestone rich fills above. It is possible that the ditch has been cleaned out on a regular basis, as such a large construc-tion, even if left open for a short period of time would contain more eroded material. If the site contained habitation features, these would likely have contributed to debris in the ditch, such as bone and charcoal. The relative scarcity of this material, despite the fact that char-coal rich soil was found at the base of the bank, also suggests that these deposits may have been removed from the ditch or that there were not habitation related activities at the site.
1.2 Primary backfilling of the ditchFills 70, 73, 85, 117, 141, 158, 192, 199 and 223.
Description
This is a deposit of context 100 and 101 type limestone, but appears to consist mainly of context 100 type, Photo 4 (21, 31). This deposit contains limestone stones ranging from 015 m to 0.30 m. The fill dimensions are 1 m width by 0.4 m depth. This stone fill contains little or no soil and in most places has cavities between the stones, angular pebbles and bone inclusions are present. Three of these fills contained charcoal which included ash (6), Prunus (5), oak (3), diffuse-porous (3), Pomoideae (1), but due to the stony nature of these fills it is possible that these charcoal fragments have washed in from the fills above. A radiocarbon date was obtained from fill context 70, producing a date of cal AD 1022 to 1164 (UB-7760). This further illustrates the unreliable nature of stony ditch fills.
Discussion
There is evidence in some of the sections excavated that this fill of stone has been depos-ited into the ditch from inside the enclosure, Photo 1 (65). Grey ‘muddy’ angular type 101 limestone was used, this would have been quarried from the site. White imported type 100 limestone is not angular and flat like the large slabs available within the enclosure. This type
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
85
100 limestone is present almost exclusively in the east and north-eastern area of the ditch. Use of the imported limestone, rather than the local muddy grey limestone may be for one of two reasons: the white 100 type limestone is visually more appealing and adds some aesthet-ic value to the enclosing rampart, especially on the northern side and near the entranceway to the East or white limestone may have come from a prehistoric monument, such a cairn previously present, which may have been covered with white limestone, to make it more vis-ible in the landscape. The volume of stone making up this fill is quite substantial, though not as substantial as the later embankment fill. The lack of soil in the fill and the uniform nature of the fill in most areas of the ditch, do not suggest a collapse of stone as a result of natural erosion forces. If this white limestone were the remains of a revetment fronting the ramparts on the northeastern and eastern areas of the site, which had subsequently collapsed into the ditch, a substantial amount of soil from the rampart would be visible in the fill also. It seems most likely that this stone has come from a feature made entirely of stone, such as the stone embankment, which runs along the inside edge of the earthern bank, which used a concentration of white stone on one side of the enclosure. This is the uppermost section of a stone embankment, which has been pushed into the enclosing ditch in one episode, either after a change in function of the site or its discontinued use. The stone used does not represent the remains of a wall, it isn’t regular in shape or size, such as that available inside the enclosure and where type 101 has been used, smaller pieces and broken pieces have been used. These would be more suitable to construct an embankment, as a wall would have re-quired stone footings not visible on the site. The embankment appears to have been topped and or fronted with white limestone, especially in the east and north-eastern area of the site. Either the eastern side of the entranceway had a particular visual importance, such as power-ful neighbours or the white limestone was used until it was no longer available and then the local type was used instead.
1.3 Secondary SiltingFill contexts 66, 85 and 156.
Description
These fills range from a dark brown soft silty-sand with occasional sub angular coarse pebbles and frequent angular medium stones to a dark brown soft clay, with occasional an-gular, sub angular, fine and medium pebbles and also occasional surrounded and sub angu-lar small stones, frequent charcoal inclusions were also present. This deposit has dimensions of 0.40 m width by 0.20 m depth. A burnt hazelnut shell and a Persicaria seed were identified in fill C.66.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
86
Discussion
These deposits may be the result of soil erosion. Perhaps this soil was loosened during the destruction of the uppermost levels of the stone embankment. It contains some small stones which may have been part of the embankment. This soil is only visible in three places and does not make up a substantial deposit. It is most prevalent in ditch section one, where it sat between two backfills of stone, the earlier stone backfill being mostly C.100 type, the later stone backfill being mainly C.101 type. It was evident in excavation but is not visible in the recording (all three fills recorded as C.85). A thin layer of silting in between major episodes of stone backfilling, it possibly represents a hiatus in this activity.
1.4 Secondary ditch fillsFills 94, 104, 167, 200, 202, 203 and 224
Description
These fills were predominately made up of 101 type angular grey limestone, with some of the subrounded 100 type also present, especially in the north and east of the ditch where type C.100 predominates. This deposit contains limestone stones ranging from 015 m to 0.30 m.
Bone is present including butchered bone (see fill C.104) and some brown pebbly clay. These fills are aproximately1.20 m width by 0.40 m depth.
Discussion
The presence of a much higher percentage of local limestone in these fills perhaps sug-gests that the imported white 100 type was either not available or not necessary. This less presentable grey limestone may have underlain the white limestone or may have made up the embankment where it was less visible. The presence of almost 100% of the white type 100 limestone in the ditch to the north and east, Photo 4 (22), in all the fills containing stone, suggests either an area of special importance or perhaps proximity to a source of the imported limestone. This fill is the remains of the upstanding stone embankment pushed or slumped into the ditch. There may have been some time between the first episode of backfilling and the second, during which any soil which may have accumulated amongst the stones eroded into the ditch. The stone type 101 makes up the majority of this fill, suggesting that it made up the core and base of the embankment. The presence of almost 100% type 100 imported white limestone in the ditch to the north and east, would have made for a very impressive stone embankment when viewed from the north and east. The use of this ‘white-washed’ effect has been noted at other monuments, such as at Newgrange, the presence of this stone only on one quarter of the ramparts may suggest a unique importance accorded to that portion of the site, such as view, access to the spring for water or orientation.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
87
1.5 Upper ditch fillsFill contexts 56, 93, 97, 152, 155 and 221.
Description
These mostly sandy-silt fills with colours grey-green to yellowish-brown, contain angular pebbles, charcoal and some snail shell, with dimensions of 0.80 m width by 0.35 m depth. They appear in only three ditch sections. Charcoal analysis indicated Pomoideae (42) in fill context 155.
Discussion
These fills are similar to the main corpus of the bank. Snail shell in the fill suggests that the ditch may have been open at this level for some time, with water present. There is some evidence of slippage in the bank on the southern side of the site in more recent times in ditch section four, where slippage has resulted in the bank ‘bearing down’ on the ditch. These fills represent slipped bank material. The backfilling of the ditch with the embankment of stone may have signalled the end of the maintenance of the bank, subsequent slippage may then not have been cleared out.
1.6 Bank SlippageFills 55, 103, 150, 170, 196, 197 and 201.
Description
These fills of clay and silt, contain sub angular coarse pebbles and stones, with occasional inclusions of charcoal and bone. Dimensions vary from 0.45 m to 1 m width by 0.30 m depth. Charcoal retrieved from fill C.150 included Pomoideae (12), hazel (3) and alder (1)
Discussion
These fills are similar in their matrix to the remnants of the base of the embankment, still visible on the top of an intact section of the bank to the south. (See upper most dark stony fill of photo 4 (23). With the bank no longer maintained, erosion and slippage of the outer edge of the bank would have eventually resulted in the base of the embankment be-ing undermined and subsequently slipping into the ditch. Charcoal and bone in these fills may indicate habitation onsite during the construction phase of the enclosure, as bone is evident all through the stone embankment in moderation. These fills represent the erosion and slippage of the base of the stone embankment into the ditch, perhaps during a period of abandonment of the site.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
88
1.7 Bank slippage in the west to north-east section of the ditch Fills 26, 49, 102 and 187.Photo 4 (30.)
These fills vary from dark brown pebbly silt at the north-western area of the ditch to light brown silty-clay, with small and medium angular pebbles and stones. Dimensions vary from 0.30 m width by 0.10 m depth to 2 m width by 0.20 m depth. Charcoal retrieved from fill C.187 was identified as diffuse-porous (2).
Discussion
All these fills are along the west to north-east side of the site, where the enclosure ap-pears most exposed, and where a slight down slope would facilitate the slumping of eroding material into the ditch. The matrix of these fills of angular pebbles, silt and clay is the same as the matrix of the major fill of the bank i.e. the silt and boulder clay dug out from the ditch during the construction phase of the enclosure. Lack of charcoal in this fill might suggest that there is no prolonged activity at the enclosure, at this time. This material is the eroded and slumped remains of the major earthen bank fills, deposited in the ditch after the enclo-sure has been abandoned.
4.8 Post-abandonment ditch fills4.8.1 Levelling the upper ditch fillsFills 54, 113, 124, 136, 137 and 138.
Description
These fills were found from the north to the north-west of the enclosure, comprising of a light greyish-brown silt, with moderate angular and surrounded pebbles and occasional angular and surrounded stones. Dimensions were 1.10 m width by 0.20-0.30 m depth. Finds of clay pipe in fill 124 (see Find 25 and 26) were found. Charcoal retrieved from fill C.124 included Pomoideae (5) and hazel (3).
Discussion
The soil matrix appears to be a mix of all materials, suggesting these deposits may have been shovelled into the ditch to fill up any remaining depression, left by its presence. The clay pipe found in fill C.124 would suggest a late medieval or post medieval date. The fills represent an attempt to level off the land, perhaps levelling bank and ditch for farming purposes.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
89
1.1.2 The North-west CausewayFills 47, 48 and 226.Drawings 23 and 24.
Description
In grid: 7b, overlaying the northwest area of the ditch above the levelling fills, was a deposit of sorted sub angular and surrounded, small and medium stones C.47, Photo 4 (24). This layer was 2.21 m length by 1.88 m width by 0.31 m depth and contained a metal object (see Find 27) . A deposit of dark brown friable clay-silt overlay and was interspersed with the sorted stone. Beside this deposit was a double line of large limestone blocks C.226, this line was approximately 2 m length north-east to south-west across the ditch, by 0.50 m width by 0.40 m depth. The stone was two stone courses in depth, with the upper course being imported white type 100 limestone and the lower course being mainly grey local type C.101 limestone. These stone varied in size from 0.15 m to 0.40 m.
Discussion
The metalled surface context 47 appears to be ‘flanked’ by the remains of a stone wall context 226. The presence of the stone wall remains at topsoil level, suggest a feature un-disturbed by modern farming practices, (as is Lismurtagh itself.) The deposits face directly toward Lismurtagh (GA87:176): 100m to the north-west, which is recorded on the 1838 Ord-nance Survey of Ireland as ‘Children’s Burial Ground’. Burials may have continued here un-til recent times, so the monument may have retained an importance with local people until modern times. The presence of both sites in close visual proximity and evidence of features relating the two monuments, may perhaps inform us of the monuments relationship in the early Christian period. A similar metalled feature was found on Loughbown I (GA87:178): 300-400m to the north-north-east, overlaying upper ditch fills, possibly used for access to post medieval buildings just outside the enclosure. This feature is a post medieval metalled causeway giving access/egress to the enclosure and/or to the Lismurtagh Burial Ground to the north-west, perhaps forming part of the ritual process of interment.
1.1.3 Cut in DS 2Cuts 98, 106 and 220. Fills 43, 59 and 105.Drawings 11 and 13.
Description
A cut is visible in DS 2 (cut number 98, grid 15d) and DS 5 (cuts 106 and 220, grids 4d and 9b.) In ditch section 2 this cut is roughly U-shaped in profile 1.20 m width by 0.50 m depth containing fill C.43, comprised of angular medium limestone of the C.101 type.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
90
In DS 2 there are two cuts, one C.106 is also U-shaped in profile with similar dimen-sions and contains fill C.105, comprising angular and surrounded limestone of both 100 and 101 types. A V-shaped cut is visible in DS 5 with cut C.220 and fill C.59 comprised of mid orange-brown silty-clay, occasional charcoal, flint pieces, fine and medium angular pebbles. This fill also contained two iron (Finds 17 and 23) and one copper-alloy find (Find 21). Charcoal retrieved from fill C.59 included ash (2) and Pomoideae (2).
Discussion
The U-shaped cut may represent an attempt to enclose the site in a stone wall, either to protect site remains or to keep animals out of difficult ground. It may also represent an at-tempt to quarry for stone from enclosing ditch fill. The V-shaped cut may relate to plough-ing in the vicinity of the site, other plough marks were visible to the north of the site during testing, but were not investigated during site excavation. Late-medieval or post-medieval finds from the fill may suggest a date for this activity. The U-shaped cut is likely an attempt to quarry for stone, which could be used for buildings or land enclosure. The V-shaped cut is a plough furrow.
Group 5. Modern Period
5.1 1838 Ordnance Survey of IrelandMap Reference GA087 (Photo 4 (25))Context 60
Description
A field boundary is visible abutting the enclosure. This field boundary is physically present in the form of a bank, tree line and some dry stone walling. It starts at the southwest end of the site in grid 22a and travels in a south-westerly direction for approximately 200 m, where it joins another field boundary perpendicularly, Photo 4 (26). In DS 3 this boundary consisting of dark brown silt, containing frequent surrounded pebbles and medium stones. It overlays the enclosure ditch fill 117 and is perpendicular to the ditch.
Discussion
On the 1838 OS map a single field boundary is shown abutting the enclosure, perhaps suggesting the only upstanding remains of an earlier field system, where the enclosure may have been positioned in one field, which also enclosed Lismurtagh. Stone types 100 and 101 from bank remains and ditch fills were probably used in this area. A field boundary dating
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
91
to at least 1836 (when the survey was undertaken) corroborated by both excavation and car-tographic sources. This boundary may be substantially older than 1836.
5.2 1946 Ordnance Survey of IrelandMap Reference GA087 (Photo 4 (27, 28.))Context 51, 86 and 127.Drawing 25.
Description
On the 1946 OS map field boundaries are shown linking up with the south side of the en-closure to the east and west. This field boundary is physically present in the form of a bank, tree line, some stone work and at least two fences (one replacing the other earlier fence.) The tree line incorporates the southern part of the enclosure bank, thereby protecting it from erosion. In ditch section three the field boundary overlays the earlier 1838 field boundary and is comprised of large angular and surrounded stones of both 100 and 101 types, above which are layers of dark humic material deposited by the tree line present on the bank.
Discussion
This field boundary clearly shows large scale changes in field morphology in the last 170 years. This may also reflect change in the lands ownership, function and farming methods in this period. Continuing recognition of these monuments and their incorporation into the landscape, suggests that their importance is recognized and perhaps exploited (for example used as graveyards and to recover building materials). Post-war field boundaries showing further subdivision of the land.
5.3 Modern Ploughing, Bulldozing, Quarrying and Topsoil
5.3.1 PloughingThere is some evidence of ploughing as mentioned above to the north of the site. Mod-
ern agricultural debris from mechanized machinery was also found, such as blades from a plough and metal pieces from a tractor. These were recovered from topsoil. Ploughing will have affected the remnants of the bank and smaller subsurface features in the thin topsoil present, especially to the north where the enclosure is not protected by a tree line, but will have had less impact on the ditch.
5.3.2 BulldozingThe Sites and Monuments Record makes reference to the site having been bulldozed in
modern times and may help explain the presence of so few habitation related feature and so much shattered rock on the site (Archaeological Inventory of County Galway (North) P.209.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
92
Monument #2663). Bulldozing will have affected the remnants of the bank and smaller subsurface features in the thin topsoil present, especially to the north where the enclosure is not protected by a tree line, but will have had less impact on the ditch as the later fills of the ditch appear to be late medieval or early modern in nature (see finds mentioned in 4.8.1.).
5.3.3 QuarryingAnecdotal evidence for modern quarrying on the site is provided by local landowners,
who visited the enclosure during excavation. One of these farmers had personally quarried stone from the site for the construction of stone walls in the area. Inside the site to the south, stone was visible sticking out through the topsoil, suggesting that the proximity to a good source of building material would have been self-evident. This activity would have had greatest impact on intact internal structural stone features, where suitable stone for building could be removed and reused with little or no effort.
1.1.4 TopsoilContexts 1, 23, 24, 45, 72 and 86This deposit was mainly dark brownish-black, silty-clay, with no more than 0.20 m depth.
The topsoil was issued with several numbers due to differences in position on site and stone content. In some areas, especially nearer to the intact enclosure bank to the south, the top-soil appeared to consist of mostly broken muddy limestone and organic material, with almost no soil (C.45.)
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
93
Appe
ndix
4: F
inds
Reg
ister
Con
text
N
o.N
MI
Find
No.
Old
Fin
d N
o.Q
uad
Grid
Type
Des
crip
tion
Dat
eIn
itial
sN
otes
Co-
ords
: RL/
OD
11
222
4DM
etal
Iron
nai
l hea
d6/
30/2
006
DR
12
242
4DM
etal
Iron
nai
l 6/
30/2
006
DR
31
72
4M
etal
Iron
Obj
ect -
foun
d in
gen
-er
al su
rfac
e cl
eanb
ack
6/20
/200
6JO
41
33
14D
Met
alIr
on b
lade
6/19
/200
6LR
129.
1E 1
01.8
4N 8
0.98
8M4
22
314
DM
etal
Iron
nai
l6/
19/2
006
LR12
9.29
E 10
1.98
N 8
0.97
5M4
31
314
DM
etal
Iron
nai
l hea
d6/
19/2
006
AD
127.
35E
102.
5N 8
1.09
7M24
14
215
BM
etal
Iron
obj
ect
6/21
/200
6LR
Con
serv
ed24
212
215
DM
etal
Iron
nai
l fra
gmen
ts6/
27/2
006
LR13
6.55
E 10
8.57
N 7
9.93
9M24
35
215
BSt
one
Flin
t deb
itage
6/21
/200
6LR
371
91
12A
Ston
eN
atur
al st
one
6/23
/200
6JP
421
112
15D
Met
alIr
on o
bjec
t (po
ssib
le n
ail)
6/27
/200
6LR
108.
75N
135
.3E
79.9
27M
422
142
15D
Cla
y pi
peC
lay
pipe
stem
6/27
/200
6N
LS13
5.53
E 10
8.1N
79.
861M
423
132
15D
Cla
y pi
peC
lay
pipe
bow
l fra
gmen
t6/
7/20
06LR
135.
53E
107.1
7N 7
9.86
1M
451
163,
418
DM
etal
Iron
obj
ects
(x3)
- po
ssib
le
rivet
s6/
27/2
006
PS
452
163,
418
DM
etal
Iron
nai
l6/
27/2
006
PS45
310
418
Dsto
neJe
t/Li
gnite
/Sha
le? b
race
let
6/26
/200
6PS
119.
74E
97.7
3N 8
1.33
547
127
17A
/CM
etal
Iron
obj
ect
7/7/
2006
MK
102.
82E
117.
25N
82.
098
491
181
7O
rgan
icU
nide
ntifi
ed m
ater
ial -
or
gani
c - p
ossib
le? F
ungu
s/ba
rk?
6/29
/200
6JO
591
172
10A
/CM
etal
Piec
e of
iron
6/29
/200
6M
K13
0.3E
120
N 7
9.90
359
223
24D
Met
alPi
ece
of Ir
on6/
30/2
006
MK
593
212
4DM
etal
Cop
per b
uckl
e (m
oder
n)6/
30/2
006
DR
641
293
18A
Met
alIr
on k
nife
bla
de7/
18/2
006
LBC
onse
rved
122.
90E
94.2
0N/ R
.L.8
1,13
5
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
94
Con
text
N
o.N
MI
Find
No.
Old
Fin
d N
o.Q
uad
Grid
Type
Des
crip
tion
Dat
eIn
itial
sN
otes
Co-
ords
: RL/
OD
651
152
15D
Ston
eN
atur
al st
one
6/28
/200
6LR
135.
5E 1
06.8
5N 7
9.48
772
130
2,3
15C
/DSt
one
Rot
ary
quer
n sto
ne (B
otto
m
- gra
nite
)13
4.8E
105
.02N
, R.L
. 80.
305
124
125
17A
/CC
lay
pipe
Cla
y pi
pe st
em
7/6/
2006
MK
103E
116
.50N
81.
5
124
226
17A
/CC
lay
pipe
Cla
y pi
pe
7/6/
2006
MK
104.
10E
115.
6N 8
1.97
150
128
423
BM
etal
Iron
kni
fe b
lade
(pro
babl
y fr
om to
p of
DS
4)7/
17/2
006
PSC
onse
rved
89.8
7N 1
19.3
0E 7
9.19
5
170
131
320
ASt
one
Poss
ible
ham
mer
-sto
ne fr
om
DS
6 in
wal
l bet
wee
n fil
ls an
d bo
ulde
r cla
y (n
ear d
itch
term
inus
)23
61
3CD
ISC
AR
DED
2419
215
DD
ISC
AR
DED
358
17C
DIS
CA
RD
ED42
202
15D
DIS
CA
RD
ED
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
95
Appendix 5: Plant remains
By Mary Dillon
IntroductionA total of 130 samples were scanned from Loughbown 2. Loughbown 2 was excavated
in advance of the N6 Galway to Ballinasloe road scheme. The site was located in the town-land of Loughbown, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. The oval enclosure measured 58 m in diam-eter north-south and 55 m in diameter east-west. Approximately 30% of the interior bank survived intact along the southern side of the site, protected by and incorporated into field boundaries. A sub-circular trench was situated inside the enclosure, but was truncated by the main ditch. There is no evidence of a hearth or of burning in situ, either inside the trench or nearby. Post-holes and pits are scattered within the enclosure forming no discernable pattern. Radiocarbon dates indicated occupation between the 4th century BC and the 17th century AD. Only two samples were found to contain plant remains.
Methodology Bulk soil samples were collected on site and were processed post-excavation using a
simple flotation method. Each sample was saturated in water to allow the carbonised plant material to float, which was then poured off into a series of sieves (1 mm and 250 µm), trap-ping the ‘flot’ (floating material). This was air-dried and stored in air-tight plastic bags. The flots were sorted and scanned for plant material and charcoal using a low-powered binocular microscope (magnification x 10 to x 40). Nomenclature and taxonomic orders follows Stace (1997). All soil samples were scanned for botanical material.
ResultsIn total, 130 samples were scanned and two samples contained a small amount of plant
remains. In Table 1 the data is presented. Sample 33 from C.66 contained a hazel nut shell fragment and a Persicaria spp. seed and sample 87 from C.17 contained a Persicaria spp. seed and two indeterminate cereal grains. The cereal grains were very degraded.
DiscussionOne hazel nut shell fragment was recovered from the fill of the enclosing ditch at Lough-
bown 2. Hazel nut shell has been recovered from Irish archaeological sites of all ages. The main reason for the preservation of carbonised hazel shell is that, once the nut was extracted, the shell was thrown into domestic fires as waste (Monk 2000, 75). Clearly gathering of foods provided an important supplement to the diet down through all archaeological peri-ods. However, as carbonised hazel nut shells survive well this may lead to a bias in their fa-
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
96
vour. Hazel nuts are extremely nutritious as they have a high protein and high lipid content. In the Breatha Comaithchesa, the main law-text on farming from the early medieval period, hazel is renowned as being the ‘food-provider of the woods’ (Kelly 1998, 382). In this case it is unlikely that the nut had been attached to branches that were burnt on the site as the charcoal from this sample was 100% oak.
Persicaria spp. (a genus of plants in the family Polygonaceae) was found in both samples. Persicaria plants are common weeds of arable fields and waste ground. The seeds may have been harvested with a crop or have been growing in close range to the site.
Two degraded cereal grains of indeterminate type were found in the sample from the internal circular ditch at Loughbown 2. This sample contained only a small amount of char-coal and seeds and it is difficult to interpret the remains in the context of such sparse re-trieval rate.
Comparison studiesLoughbown 1 (E2442) and Mackney (E2444), two nearby ringforts - which returned
dates for the early medieval period right through to later medieval times - produced large quantities of plant remains, primarily cereals and weeds associated with growing in crop fields (Dillon 2007; Tierney 2007). These sites produced typical ringfort assemblages, al-though the results suggested that wheat, barley and oat were of equal importance in contrast to a study from a range of ringforts and cashels from Munster which suggested that wheat was quite rare (Monk et al. 1998, 72). The virtual absence of plant remains from Loughbown 2 is in stark contrast to Loughbown 1 and Mackney ringfort. This can probably be explained by a combination of the earlier dates (although the site was also used in medieval times) from Loughbown 2 and by the different functions of the sites.
Table 1: Identified plant remains from Loughbown 2.Site Loughbown 2 Context 66 17Sample 33 87Hazel nut shell fragments (Corylus avellana L.) 1Persicaria spp. 1 1Indeterminate cereal grains 2
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
97
References
Dillon, M. 2007. Plant remains from Mackney Ringfort - E2444. Unpublished report produced for Eachtra Archaeological Projects.
Dillon, M. and Tierney, M. 2007. A Preliminary Analysis of Charred Plant Remains from Loughbown 1, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. (E2442). Unpublished report produced for Eachtra Archaeological Projects.
Kelly, F. 1998 Early Irish Farming. Dublin, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
Mitchell, G F 1951 ‘Studies in Irish Quaternary deposits’. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 53B, 111-206.
Monk, M. Tierney, J. & Hannon, M. 1998 Archaeobotanical studies and early medieval Munster. In Monk M. and Sheehan J. (eds.) Early Medieval Munster Archaeology, History and Society. Cork University Press, Cork.
Monk, M.A. 2000 Seeds and Soils of Discontent: an Environmental Archaeological Contribution to the Nature of the Early Neolithic. In: A. Desmond et. al. New Agendas in Irish Prehistory: Papers in Commemoration of Liz Anderson. Wordwell, Dublin, 67-87.
Stace, C.A. 1997 New Flora in the British Isles. (2nd edition) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
98
Appendix 6: Charcoal
By Mary Dillon
IntroductionA total of 130 samples were scanned from Loughbown 2 and 43 samples were found to
contain charcoal. Loughbown 2 was excavated in advance of the N6 Galway to Ballinasloe road scheme. The site was located in the townland of Loughbown, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. The oval enclosure measured 58 m in diameter north-south and 55 m in diameter east-west. Approximately 30% of the interior bank survived intact along the southern side of the site, protected by and incorporated into field boundaries. A sub-circular trench was situated in-side the enclosure, but was truncated by the main ditch. There is no evidence of a hearth or of burning in situ, either inside the trench or nearby. Post-holes and pits are scattered within the enclosure forming no discernable pattern. Radiocarbon dates indicated occupation be-tween the 4th century BC and the 17th century AD. The charcoal results are considered in relation to past woodland environment, woodland exploitation and wood-type selection. The results of the charcoal analysis are compared to a pollen diagram from from Ballinphuill Bog (Molloy, et. al., 2008), which lies about 15 km east of the site.
Methodology Bulk soil samples were collected on site and were processed post-excavation using a sim-
ple flotation method. Each sample was saturated in water to allow the carbonised plant mate-rial to float. This was then poured off into a series of sieves (1 mm and 250 µm), trapping the ‘flot’ (floating material). This was air-dried and stored in air-tight plastic bags. All charcoal fragments of 2 mm or greater were identified. Each fragment was prepared for microscopic examination by fracturing it by hand and thereby exposing a clean surface along transverse, radial and tangential planes. All three planes were examined at a range of magnifications (x 5 to x 120) under a Nikon stereo microscope. For reference literature the website ‘wood anatomy’ (www.woodanatomy.ch) was consulted. The number and weight of fragments were recorded for each wood type.
ResultsIn total, 417 fragments were analysed from 43 samples. In Figs 1, 2, 3 and 4 the percent-
age fragment frequency, percentage weight, fragment count and weight count of the various wood types are given (see Table 1. for complete data).
The assemblage was dominated by pomoideae (35% / 55%) followed by oak (16% / 22%), hazel (16% / 9%), ash (13% / 9%), and Prunus (7% / 3%). The results are given as percentage fragment frequency and percentage weight respectively.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
99
Figure 1: Percentage fragment counts in charcoal assemblage
Prunus7.49%
Pomoideae34.54%
Holly 0.23%
Elder 1.15%Diffuse Porous
2.17%
Oak 16.17%
Ash 13.16%
Ivy 0.92%
Willow /Pop0.23%
Elm 0.23%
Hazel 15.94%
Alder 2.08%
Hazel / Alder 3.23%
Figure 2: Percentage weight of the charcoal assemblage
Diffuse Porous0.44%
Prunus2.60%
Pomoideae55.25%
Elder 0.54%
Holly 0.21%
Oak 21.64%
Elm 0.04%
Ivy 0.17%
Willow/Pop0.02%
Ash 6.65%
Hazel 8.45%
Hazel / Alder 1.32%
Alder 0.96%
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
100
Figure 3: Fragment counts in charcoal assemblage
Figure 4: Weight (grams) of different wood types in the charcoal assemblage
0.000
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
Oak
Ash
Elm
Hazel
Hazel /
Alder
Alder
Willo
w/Pop
ular Ivy
Pomoid
eae
Prunus
Diffuse
P.
Holly
Elder
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Oak
Ash
Elm
Hazel
Hazel /
Alder
Alder
Willo
w/Pop
ular Ivy
Pomoid
eae
Prunus
Diffuse
P.
Holly
Elder
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
101
Other wood types identified in small amounts were hazel/alder, alder, elder, diffuse porous wood, ivy, elm willow/poplar and holly. As regards the individual contexts, there is considerable variation between context types (see Figs 5-10 at end of document). The frag-ments of charcoal from Loughbown 2 were very small in size.
Palaeo-environmental studies in the area - Pollen diagram from Ballinphuill Bog
Pollen coring was carried out from Ballinphuill Bog as part of the archaeological works in advance N6 Ballinasloe to Galway road scheme by the Palaeoenvironmental Research Unit in NUI, Galway. Aside from this there has been little palaeoenvironmental research carried out in this region, although cores were taken for two different palaeoenvironmental studies in Mongon Bog near Clonmacnoise, some 12 miles from Ballinasloe, (Parkes & Mitchell, 2000; Hall 2005). Hall’s diagram, however, only deals with AD 400 onwards, while Parkes & Mitchells diagram stops before 1000 BP. The Ballinphuill Bog pollen curve describes the vegetation history of the area from Mesolithic to modern times (Molloy et. al., 2008).
The diagram indicates that there was extensive forest cover in the Neolithic with large oak and elm woodlands, which were somewhat reduced in the Neolithic Landnam and again in the late Bronze Age. This intensification of farming, continues through the early centuries of the Iron Age. The earliest date from Loughbown II corresponds with this era. In the first two centuries AD there is a distinct decline in farming activity that continues into the Late Iron Age Lull. According to the diagram, woodland dominated the landscape in the early medieval era. An intensive period of farming around 800 AD is indicated by widespread clearance of hazel. At the beginning of the 13th century there is a noticeable decline in pollen of Quercus and Fraxinus which were the main tall canopy trees. From 1500 AD to the late nineteenth century the pollen diagram illustrates the final clearances and the start of planting of exotics, mainly pine and beech. In the diagram, hazel oak, ash, alder and birch were the most common trees represented during the early medieval period (although alder and birch were probably over represented as a result of high pollen production and dispersal).
When comparing the pollen and charcoal records several considerations should be borne in mind. In the pollen record, it can be assumed that pomoideae and Prunus (collectively know as Rosaceae) are greatly under-represented.
DiscussionPomoideae - Sorbus (rowan/whitebeam), Crataegus (hawthorn) and Malus (crab
apple) This charcoal type was consistently present in nearly all of the samples (forming 35% / 55% by weight of the assemblage). Woodlands and woodland-related environments are the normal habitats for the various woody plants that may be represented in this wood type, although Sorbus includes trees with quite different ecological preferences such as rowan (S. aucuparia) and whitebeams (e.g. S. hibernica, S. aria and S. rupicola. An important habitat, espe-cially for hawthorn (Crataegus), is the so-called Mantel or edge communities of woodlands (cf.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
102
Wilmanns & Brun-Hool 1982). The spines of hawthorn afford it a degree protection from grazing and enable it to establish and survive in the face of light grazing. Pomoideae was poorly represented in the pollen record (it is insect pollinated).
Quercus (oak) Oak is well represented in the assemblage (16% / 22%) especially in samples from bank/ditch contexts. In the Iron Age period, oak was widespread and com-mon according to the pollen diagram from Mongon Bog. There are two native species of oak in Ireland, namely Q. petraea and Q. robur. Unfortunately, it is difficult to distinguish these species on the basis of wood anatomy (Grosser 1977).
Corylus avellana (hazel) Hazel accounts for 16% (or 9% percentage weight) of all char-coal fragments identified. Hazel was widely exploited in both prehistory and historical times for its nutritious nuts and supple rods which were widely used for building. Its coppice-like growth form makes it relatively easy to cut and there are normally substantial quantities of dead wood available near ground level. According to the pollen diagram hazel was abundant in the landscape throughout prehistory and history, by far the most common tree. Given this it is surprising that it was not more utilized on site.
Fraxinus excelsior (ash) Fraxinus (accounting for 13% / 9% by weight) is present in small amounts in many of the samples, but dominates samples from the bank. Ash makes great fuel, burnt green or dead, and it is surprising that it was not more common in the assem-blages. According to the pollen diagram, levels of ash fluctuated, but it remained relatively common before the medieval period. Ash declined at the beginning of the medieval period and again (with oak) at the beginning of the 13th century (Molloy et. al., 2008). It should also be noted that ash is probably under-represented in the pollen record vis-a-vis oak. Interest-ingly ash forms 38% / 37% of the bank charcoal assemblage which is far above the average presence.
Prunus spp. (includes wild cherry (P. avium), bird cherry (P. padus) and blackthorn (P. spinosa)) Prunus charcoal is present in small amounts in many of the samples (forming 7% / 3% by weight of the assemblage). Blackthorn may have been common in Mantel vegetation while wild cherry would be expected to occur in the woodlands. Bird cherry may also have been represented. Today, it is largely confined to the northern part of Ireland (Preston et al. 2002). Webb et al. (1996) regard it as introduced though this view is not universally accepted. Prunus was poorly represented in the pollen record (it is insect pollinated).
Alnus glutinosa (alder) Alder wood (2% / 1%) was present in small amounts in a num-ber of samples. Alder is quite common in the local diagram, but was probably largely con-fined to damp/wet areas. Its diminutive presence in the assemblage is likely due to the fact that alder doesn’t burn very well.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
103
Sambucas nigra (elder) Elder (0.04% / 0.01%) was present in two samples. Elder is one of the first trees to invade a new hedgerow and grows in most conditions but prefers damp ground. It was highly reputed in the past as a source for herbal medicines (Feehan 2003, 338).
Hedera helix (ivy) Ivy (0.92% / 0.17%) was only recorded in on sample. It may have been brought on to site attached to wood. There are references in the archaeological literature to the use of ivy as firesticks (Gale & Cutler, 2000). Ivy was also used as animal fodder in winter and still is in some remote parts of Switzerland (Rasmussen 1989).
Ulmus glabra (elm) Elm (0.23% / 0.04%) was recorded in only one sample (where only one fragment was present). The pollen diagram shows the elm curve oscillated considerably; due to phases of clearance in the context of farming activity (disease may also have been involved) followed by phases with strong regeneration, until it became scarce around 1500 BP (Molloy et. al., 2008). In the early Holocene woodlands of the midlands of Ireland, elm made a major contribution.
Ilex aquifolium (holly) Holly (0.23% / 0.21%) was present in one sample. Holly has a wide ecological amplitude in Ireland today and was thus probably available in the locality at the time. It is recorded as being used as winter animal fodder (Gale & Cutler, 2000, 139; Neeson, 1991, 29).
Salix/Populus (willow/poplar) Willow/poplar charcoal (0.23% / 0.02%) was was pres-ent in one sample. Poplar is seldom recorded in Irish pollen diagrams and then mainly in the early Holocene. It is assumed that willow (one or more of several possible willow species) is mainly represented in the charcoal records.
Comparative studies It is useful to compare these results with those from Loughbown 1 ringfort (E2442)
and Mackney ringfort (E2444) (Dillon, 2007a; 2007b). These ringforts were situated close to Loughbown 2 although three of the radiocarbon dates from Loughbown 2 are earlier than the medieval ringforts. The assemblage at Loughbown 1 was also dominated by oak (62% / 37%), though not to the same degree as at Mackney Ringfort (62% / 70%). While Loughbown 1 showed high frequency (98%) of oak from samples from a bowl furnace, all the hearths/firings from Mackney Ringfort had a high percentage of oak (77%). It would seem likely that the high percentage of oak from Mackney is connected to the high degree of metalworking that took place on site. However, it would also seem plausible that oak was generally widely used on Mackney ringfort. In contrast to Loughbown 1 where ash (15%/
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
104
22%), hazel (14% / 13 %) and pomoideae (12% / 16%) were important, trees other than oak are not so significant at Mackney ringfort. Ash, which was important at Loughbown 1, made up only 7% of the fragment count at Mackney, while hazel made up just 8% of the fragment count.
The charcoal from Loughbown 2 is very different from that from Loughbown 1 and Mackney ringforts, even though the later dates from the site tie in with those from these ringforts. Charcoal was much more scarce and in much smaller fragments from Loughbown 2 than from the other sites. Oak formed only 16% / 22% of the assemblage at Loughbown 2 and pomoideae, which was not so common on the other sites, dominated the assemblage at 35% / 55%. The reasons for the large differences in the assemblages are most likely a reflec-tion of the difference in functions between Loughbown 2 to the other sites.
An Iron Age enclosure at Raffin in Co. Meath, consisted of a large ditch with an external bank, an internal ring ditch, which was surrounded by postholes, and a late Iron age skull burial (Newman 1993a). The ring ditch, which was 6 m in diameter, had a bronze La Tène fibula (second century AD) and a small glass bead, in the interior. Ring ditches are associ-ated with funerary activity elsewhere in Iron Age Ireland. The Raffin site has similarities to the Loughbown 2 site, and for this reason it is interesting to compare the charcoal from both sites (Dillon 2006). The charcoal from the ditch was dominated by ash, followed by alder, oak and a small amount of hazel. The charcoal from the skull burial, of which there was quite an amount, was dominated by hazel, followed by almost equal amounts of ash and oak with a variety of wood types such as pomoideae making up the rest of the assemblage. Charcoal from the ring ditch was scarce but was dominated by ash, with a small amount of diffuse porous wood. Hazel, ash, oak, alder and pomoideae were the most common woods from Raffin fort, which is somewhat similar to the case at Loughbown 2 were pomoideae, hazel, oak, ash and Prunus dominated.
Further post-excavation work will allow the excavator to come to more conclusions about the nature and date of the site. With no domestic habitation layers, and with its possible ring ditch (which had a burnt bone deposit in the centre) it might be considered that the site was ceremonial in nature. All aspects of the site, including the charcoal, must then be considered in this light. Archaeological and historical evidence emphasises the particular cultural and religious importance of trees, wood and woodlands during the Iron Age, compared with other times period. Religious practices in Iron Age Ireland compare well to those known from Britain and Western Europe (Cunliffe 1997). Insights into the social and religious significance of wood and trees among Iron Age peoples on the Continent, obtained from Classical writers and from archaeological sources, are of potential relevance to the analysis of the wood and charcoal from Irish Iron Age sites. Trees, woodlands and wood, in particu-lar, played an important role in the belief systems of the Iron Age people. Classical sources attest to a wealth of sacred groves in continental Europe. Lucan, writing in the 1st century AD, describes a sacred grove in the town of Massilia (Marseille) (Duff 1928 - Pharsalia III, 400-493), There is good correlation between the archaeological evidence and written sources
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
105
in this regard, including depictions of trees on coins, altars and in metalwork from later Iron Age Europe. An Iron Age shaft well at Ashill in Norfolk contained urns placed on layers of hazel leaves and nuts (Ross 1967, 28). Characterisation of trees, leading to the selection of certain wood types for particular social or religious activities, is also evidenced. Boughs of oak, for example, accompanied a burial in an oak coffin at Gristhorpe, near Scarborough (ibid, 33.) Likewise, the recurrence of hazel in the context of late Iron Age bog bodies has also been noted (Aldhouse-Green 2000, 16). Wood lore thus permeated many aspects of Irish life during the early centuries AD. Nowhere is this better illustrated than in the case of the Ogham alphabet (Ir. In Beitheluis-nin, trans. ‘the Birch-Rowan-Ash’), a stroke script invented sometime in the late Iron Age (McManus 1997). Surviving until into the medieval period, Ogham provides compelling evidence for the complex significance of wood and trees in pre-Christian Ireland. In addition, the reader is instructed to read the inscription in the same manner as he/she would climb a tree, namely ascending upwards from the lower right side (ibid).
ConclusionThe results of the charcoal analysis from Loughbown 2 gives us information on both the
palaeo-woodland environment of the area around Loughbown and the use of such wood-lands during the Iron Age period and afterwards. Pomoideae was represented most fre-quently in the assemblage. Presence in the charcoal assemblage does not necessarily indicate abundance in the local landscape. However, while they may not have been the most impor-tant trees in the area, hawthorn, whitebeams, rowan, and crab apple were growing in the Loughbown district. Oak, hazel and ash were all reasonably well represented - these trees would have been abundant in the environment at the time.
The large amount of trees represented in the assemblage gives us a good indication of the trees that were present in the environment at the time (some of which will not be represented in pollen diagrams as they are insect pollinated) as well as the large number of different types of trees which were used by the settlement. The charcoal assemblage was very different to the assemblages from Mackney and Loughbown 1 ringforts. Interestingly there is no real difference in the charcoal identifications from the Iron Age features and that from the later medieval features. This possibly indicates continuity in the function of the site over time.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
106
References
Aldhouse-Green, M. 2000 Seeing the woods for the trees: the symbolism of trees and wood in ancient Gaul and Britain. University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Dillon, M. 2006 People and the Environment. Towards an Anthropology of Woodlands in Prehistoric and Early Historic Ireland. Unpublished thesis, NUI, Galway.
Dillon, M. 2007a Analysis of plant remains from Mackney ringfort - E2444. Unpublished report produced for Eachtra Archaeological projects.
Dillon, M. 2007b Charcoal analysis from Loughbown 1 - E2442. Unpublished report produced for Eachtra Archaeological projects.
Duff, J.D. 1928 Lucan. The civil war. Books 1-X (English translation). Harvard
University Press, Cambridge (Mass.)
Feehan, J. 2003 Farming in Ireland. History, Heritage and Environment. UCD, Dublin.
Gale, R. & Culter, D. 2000 Plants in Archaeology.Westbury, Otley.
Grosser, D. 1977. Die Holzer Mitteleuropas. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Hall, V. 2006 The vegetation history of monastic and secular sites in the midlands of Ireland over the last two millennia, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 12 (1), 1-12.
McManus, D. 1997 A guide to Ogam. An Sagart, Maynooth.
Molloy K., Feeser I. & O’Connell M. 2008. Pollen analytical investigations at Ballinphuill, east Galway: towards reconstruction of vegetation and land-use history on the route of the N6, Galway to Ballinasloe national route. Draft Version.
Neeson, E. 1991 A history of Irish forestry. Lilliput Press, Dublin.
Newman, C. 1993a Sleeping in Elysium, Archaeology Ireland, 7 (3), 20-23.
Parkes, H.M. & Mitchell, F.J.G. 2000 Vegetation History at Clonmacnoise, Co.Offaly, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 100B (1), 35-40.
Preston, C.D., Pearman, D.A. & Dines, T.D. 2002 New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
107
Ross, A. 1967 Pagan Celtic Britain: studies in iconography and tradition. London, Routledge.
Webb, D.A., Parnell, J. & Doogue, D. 1996. An Irish Flora, 7th edn. Dundalgan Press, Dundalk.
Wilmanns, O. & Brun-Hool, J. 1982. Irish Mantel and Saum vegetation, pp. 167-74 in White, J. (ed.) Studies on Irish Vegetation. Dublin, Royal Dublin Society.
‘Wood Anatomy’ at http//:www.woodanatomy.ch
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
108
Figs 5-10 The percentage fragment frequency and percentage weight of wood types from the various context types from Loughbown II
Percentage weight from pits/postholes ass. w ith internal ditch
Oak 2.80%
Ash 7.32%
Hazel / Alder 1.83%
Hazel 22.68%
Alder 2.07%
Prunus1.46%
Pomoideae61.83%
Percentage weight from bank contexts
Oak 41.54%
Ash 36.92%
Hazel 12.31%
Pomoideae9.23%
Percentage weight from ditch contexts
Pomoideae39.36%
Diffuse Porous1.10%
Prunus1.83%
Ash 3.56%
Oak 50.73%
Willow /Pop 0.05%
Alder 0.42%
Hazel / Alder 1.26%
Hazel 1.68%
Percentage fragment count from pits/postholes ass. w ith internal ditch
Hazel 37.04%
Hazel / Alder 3.70%
Alder 4.32%
Pomoideae34.57%
Prunus4.32%
Oak 4.32% Ash
11.73%
Percentage fragment count from bank contexts
Hazel 6.25%
Pomoideae12.50%
Ash 37.50%
Oak 43.75%
Percentage fragment count from ditch contexts
Alder 0.50%
Hazel / Alder 2.49%
Hazel 5.47%
Willow /Popular
0.50%
Ash 7.46%
Oak 28.86%
Diffuse Porous5.47%
Prunus4.48%
Pomoideae44.78%
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
109
Tab
le 1
Frag
men
t cou
ntC
210,
S11
8C
112,
S57
C12
6, S
88C
15, S
22C
63, S
32C
7, S
61C
175,
S10
5C
59, S
28C
96, S
52C
17, S
87
Oak
(Que
rcus
spp.
)
4
2
1A
sh (F
raxi
nus e
xcels
ior)
2
1
6
13
Elm
(Ulm
us gl
abra
)
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
ave
llena
)
105
3H
azel
(Cor
ylus
) / A
lder
(Aln
us)
1
Ald
er (A
lnus
glut
inos
a)
3
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
Ivy
(Hed
era
helix
)
Po
moi
deae
14
1
2
1
Prun
us
1
4
D
iffus
e Po
rous
2
Hol
ly (I
lex
aqui
foliu
m)
Elde
r (Sa
mbu
cas n
igra
)
W
eigh
t cou
ntC
210,
S11
8C
112,
S57
C12
6, S
80C
15, S
22C
63, S
32C
7, S
61C
175,
S10
5C
59, S
28C
96, S
52C
17, S
87
Oak
(Que
rcus
spp.
)
0.
12
0.
030
0.
010
Ash
(Fra
xinu
s exc
elsio
r)0.
005
0.00
50.
12
0.00
50.
130
Elm
(Ulm
us gl
abra
)
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
ave
llena
)
0.34
0.16
0
0.
150
Haz
el (C
oryl
us) /
Ald
er (A
lnus
)
0.
005
A
lder
(Aln
us gl
utin
osa)
0.
06
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
Ivy
(Hed
era
helix
)
Po
moi
deae
0.02
4.00
0.01
0.03
0
0.02
0Pr
unus
0.
005
0.07
0
Diff
use
Poro
us
0.00
5
H
olly
(Ile
x aq
uifo
lium
)
El
der (
Sam
buca
s nig
ra)
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
110
Frag
men
t cou
ntC
124,
S84
,C
115,
S12
7C
2P, S
92C
13, S
26C
68, S
36C
45, S
14C
66, S
33C
11, S
63C
20, S
5C
205,
S12
6
Oak
(Que
rcus
spp.
)
1
50
6
1A
sh (F
raxi
nus e
xcels
ior)
1
Elm
(Ulm
us gl
abra
)
1
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
ave
llena
)3
20
1
6
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
) / A
lder
(Aln
us)
6
Ald
er (A
lnus
glut
inos
a)
1
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
Ivy
(Hed
era
helix
)
Po
moi
deae
5
50
Prun
us
1
D
iffus
e Po
rous
Hol
ly (I
lex
aqui
foliu
m)
Elde
r (Sa
mbu
cas n
igra
)
W
eigh
t cou
ntC
124,
S84
,S1
27, C
115
C2P
, S92
C13
, S26
C68
, S36
C45
, S14
C66
, S33
C11
, S63
C20
, S5
C20
5, S
126
O
ak (Q
uerc
us sp
p.)
0.00
5
4.70
0.22
0.
005
Ash
(Fra
xinu
s exc
elsio
r)
0.
005
El
m (U
lmus
glab
ra)
0.
010
Haz
el (C
oryl
us a
velle
na)
0.04
0
0.
720
0.
04
0.13
Haz
el (C
oryl
us) /
Ald
er (A
lnus
)
0.
15
Ald
er (A
lnus
glut
inos
a)
0.02
0
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
Ivy
(Hed
era
helix
)
Po
moi
deae
0.17
0
4.98
0
Prun
us
0.
02
Diff
use
Poro
us
H
olly
(Ile
x aq
uifo
lium
)
El
der (
Sam
buca
s nig
ra)
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
111
Frag
men
t cou
ntC
5, S
60C
70, S
40C
73, S
45C
150,
S10
1C
33, S
68C
111,
S56
C18
7, S
111
C15
2,
S102
C11
7, S
76C
48, S
17
O
ak (Q
uerc
us sp
p.)
2
1
Ash
(Fra
xinu
s exc
elsio
r)10
6
El
m (U
lmus
glab
ra)
Haz
el (C
oryl
us a
velle
na)
2
3
1
Haz
el (C
oryl
us) /
Ald
er (A
lnus
)
A
lder
(Aln
us gl
utin
osa)
4
1
Will
ow/P
opul
ar (S
alix
/Pop
ulus
)
Iv
y (H
eder
a he
lix)
Pom
oide
ae1
1
12
3Pr
unus
2
1
3
3
Diff
use
Poro
us
22
3
H
olly
(Ile
x aq
uifo
lium
)
El
der (
Sam
buca
s nig
ra)
Wei
ght c
ount
C5,
S60
C70
, S40
C73
, S45
C15
0, S
101
C33
, S68
C11
1, S
56C
187,
S11
1C
152,
S1
02C
117,
S76
C48
, S17
O
ak (Q
uerc
us sp
p.)
0.
070.
005
A
sh (F
raxi
nus e
xcels
ior)
0.39
0.
11
Elm
(Ulm
us gl
abra
)
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
ave
llena
)0.
05
0.
07
0.00
5
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
) / A
lder
(Aln
us)
Ald
er (A
lnus
glut
inos
a)0.
11
0.
04
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
Ivy
(Hed
era
helix
)
Po
moi
deae
0.01
0.00
5
0.50
0.
005
Prun
us
0.04
0.00
5
0.
090.
04
Diff
use
Poro
us
0.00
50.
02
0.07
H
olly
(Ile
x aq
uifo
lium
)
El
der (
Sam
buca
s nig
ra)
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
112
Frag
men
t cou
ntC
109,
S46
C2,
S11
2C
156,
S10
3C
157,
S96
C22
, S2
C95
, S50
C15
5, S
104
C17
2, S
100
C30
, S30
C27
, S10
O
ak (Q
uerc
us sp
p.)
1
Ash
(Fra
xinu
s exc
elsio
r)
1
22
13
22
3El
m (U
lmus
glab
ra)
Haz
el (C
oryl
us a
velle
na)
12
Haz
el (C
oryl
us) /
Ald
er (A
lnus
)2
5
A
lder
(Aln
us gl
utin
osa)
Will
ow/P
opul
ar (S
alix
/Pop
ulus
)
Iv
y (H
eder
a he
lix)
4
Pom
oide
ae
13
1
242
3
Pr
unus
92
41
Diff
use
Poro
us
H
olly
(Ile
x aq
uifo
lium
)
1
El
der (
Sam
buca
s nig
ra)
2
3
Wei
ght c
ount
C10
9, S
46C
2, S
112
C15
6, S
103
C15
7, S
96C
22, S
2C
95, S
50C
155,
S10
4C
172,
S10
0C
30, S
30C
27, S
10
Oak
(Que
rcus
spp.
)
0.00
5
A
sh (F
raxi
nus e
xcels
ior)
0.
04
0.07
0.05
0.48
0.
070.
030.
04El
m (U
lmus
glab
ra)
Haz
el (C
oryl
us a
velle
na)
0.3
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
) / A
lder
(Aln
us)
0.04
0.
12
Ald
er (A
lnus
glut
inos
a)
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
Ivy
(Hed
era
helix
)0.
04
Pom
oide
ae
0.
370.
005
0.
072.
410.
04
Pr
unus
0.19
0.04
0.09
0.00
5D
iffus
e Po
rous
Hol
ly (I
lex
aqui
foliu
m)
0.
05
El
der (
Sam
buca
s nig
ra)
0.02
0.11
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
113
Frag
men
t cou
ntC
146,
S93
C13
9, S
83C
37/3
8, S
12
Oak
(Que
rcus
spp.
)1
Ash
(Fra
xinu
s exc
elsio
r)
2
Elm
(Ulm
us gl
abra
)
Haz
el (C
oryl
us a
velle
na)
1
2H
azel
(Cor
ylus
) / A
lder
(Aln
us)
A
lder
(Aln
us gl
utin
osa)
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
1
Iv
y (H
eder
a he
lix)
Po
moi
deae
1
Pr
unus
D
iffus
e Po
rous
H
olly
(Ile
x aq
uifo
lium
)
Elde
r (Sa
mbu
cas n
igra
)
Wei
ght c
ount
C14
6, S
93C
139,
S83
C37
/38,
S12
Oak
(Que
rcus
spp.
)0.
005
Ash
(Fra
xinu
s exc
elsio
r)
0.
04El
m (U
lmus
glab
ra)
H
azel
(Cor
ylus
ave
llena
)
0.00
50.
01H
azel
(Cor
ylus
) / A
lder
(Aln
us)
A
lder
(Aln
us gl
utin
osa)
W
illow
/Pop
ular
(Sal
ix/P
opul
us)
0.
005
Iv
y (H
eder
a he
lix)
Po
moi
deae
0.
02
Prun
us
Diff
use
Poro
us
Hol
ly (I
lex
aqui
foliu
m)
El
der (
Sam
buca
s nig
ra)
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
114
Appendix 7: Animal Bone
Margaret McCarthy, MA, MIAI
IntroductionThis report provides an account of the faunal remains recovered during archaeological
excavations at Loughbown II by Eachtra Archaeological Projects on behalf of the National Roads Authority. The bones were found in a total of 25 separate contexts which date vari-ously from the Bronze Age, Iron Age and Early Medieval periods. The bulk of the remains were collected from the fills of the ditched enclosure while lesser quantities of bones were found in slots, the bank and postholes. Some contexts contained reasonable quantities of bone and consisted of a mixture of remains from the major domestic animals together with a few non-food domestic species. A detailed analysis of the individual bone elements recovered was not considered worthwhile given the small sample sizes included. The remains from the individual contexts are described separately below.
MethodsAll bone fragments were identified to species, or as nearly as possible, using the mod-
ern collections of mammals at the Department of Archaeology, University College Cork. Details, including body parts, fragmentation rates and age were recorded. Bones for which specific identifications could not be made were classified in terms of size and morphological character. The unidentifiable, fragmentary specimens were classified as ‘large-sized mammal’ and ‘medium-sized’ mammal’ remains. Fragments listed as ‘large mammal’ in Table 1 could be distinguished as cattle, horse or red deer but no closer. Similarly, specimens that in all probability were pig but which may also have originated from sheep, goat or large dog were classified as ‘medium mammal’ remains. Ageing evidence was derived from the eruption and wear patterns of teeth using Grant’s (1975) stages and the less accurate method of the fusion of the epiphyses to the shafts of long bones with reference to Silver’s (1971) data. The relative abundance of the species was determined using total fragment numbers for each individual species.
ConditionThe preservation of the animal remains is consistently fair throughout the assemblage.
The degree of fragmentation is high in all deposit types and much of the assemblage is in-determinate with a large proportion of the bones also being classified into the two main size groupings described in the methods section. The comparatively small number of measurable specimens and the fact that sizeable numbers of loose teeth were recovered from all areas of the site suggests that the material was in a fragmentary state. Although the animal bones are
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
115
reasonably well preserved, many have undergone a considerable erosion of the surface due to post-depositional processes, which is an indication that they were not buried extremely rap-idly. Settlement indicators such as charring and gnawing are noted on some of the fragments although there are very few traces of butchery due to the fragmentary nature of the assem-blage and the presence of erosion on much of the bone. Some specimens show severe burning associated with food preparation and perhaps refuse disposal. Traces of gnawing so often as-sociated with poor preservation and reduction of the identifiable sample by canids is noted on seven bones. Dogs are represented in the samples, supporting the notion that the assemblage is likely to have been effected by canid consumption indicating that dogs had access to, either through scavenging or being deliberately fed, the food waste of the occupants. Food waste appears to have been left lying around on the surface for a considerable time before it was deposited into the ditch or accumulated naturally in the ditches. There was also evidence for recent contamination through the recovery of 41 rabbit bones from three separate contexts.
AnalysisIn all, 1166 bones were recovered during the excavations and almost half of these came
from C40. A relatively large sample was also recovered from C15 and the remaining 23 con-texts all yielded less than a hundred bones each. The assemblage has been interpreted as being associated with Bronze Age, Iron Age and Early Medieval domestic activity at the site. The quantities of actual identifiable bone are extremely small and can only be used to indicate the species present. The majority of the identified cattle and sheep/goat bone was recovered from the fills of the ditch C.25. The material is described below according to the individual contexts from which bone was recovered and the data are summarised in Table 1 in terms of fragment numbers for each species and context. In general the contexts do not differ greatly from each other in terms of patterning in the animal bones recovered from them. Some contexts had a higher density of animal bone remains but the composition of the samples was similar throughout with cattle and sheep/goat predominating followed by considerably smaller amounts of pigs. Additionally, dog, cat and rabbit bones are present but the latter are undoubtedly intrusive because there is no evidence for rabbit in Ireland until the 13th century.
Context 1
The topsoil yielded just three bones, a single tooth each of pig and sheep and a small frag-ment of a long bone from a medium-sized animal.
Context 15
A total sample of 107 bones was retrieved from the fill of posthole C.16 of which 77 represented the remains of at least two cats. In terms of skeletal element representation, the
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
116
identified bones include upper and lower limb bones as well as vertebrae. No mandibles or skulls were recovered and an assessment of the age of the individuals attests to the presence of an adult cat and an individual less than six months of age at death. The remainder of the bones are too small to be diagnostic to species but they probably originated from the two cat skeletons present in this feature. Metrical analysis, using the comparative data provided by Teichert (1978) suggests domestic cat but none of the specimens were measurable so it cannot be determined whether they were wild or domestic.
Context 24
The ditch fill contained just 18 bones and 17 of these were identified as the remains of rabbit. These are undoubtedly modern animals that burrowed their way into the upper fills of the ditch. The remaining specimen was identified as a worn third molar of a cow.
Context 27
Just eight bones were recovered from the ditch fill and five of these were too fragmentary to identify to species. Sheep is attested from a portion of a pelvis and two other pelvic frag-ments are identified as a small sheepdog.
Context 40
A small layer in the area enclosed by the sub-circular slot trench C.18 contributed the greatest quantity of material to the bone assemblage. Most of the remains represent non-specific cremated animal bones. A total of 528 bones are present but fragmentation rates are extremely high and just seven of the bones are identifiable to species. Sheep is the only identi-fied species being represented by two fragments of a femur and four metapodial bones. All of the specimens are unfused and come from animals that were slaughtered for their meat at less than 2 years of age. The remainder of the sample consists of 70 fragments of long bones from a medium-sized animal. Over 85% of the sample represents comminuted fragments of long bones and skulls, which are too small for specific identification.
Context 42
A total of 55 bones were recovered from the ditch fill and 13 of these can be identified with certainty. Cattle are the dominant species being represented by seven loose teeth, two skull fragments, a tibia and a first phalanx. The tibia is unfused proximally and belongs to an individual less than 3.5 years of age at death. Sheep and pig are each represented by a single bone and the remainder of the sample can only be classified as remains of medium mammals (10) and large mammals (20). Twelve fragments are unidentifiable.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
117
Context 50
This layer of the bank contained 24 bones but all of the identified remains are rabbit and the sample can therefore be considered as intrusive. The only other bone from this feature is classified as a fragment of a large mammal.
Context 60
A total of 68 bones were recovered from this layer of the bank. Identification rates are once again low and the sample is dominated by larger mammal (16) and indeterminate (37) fragments. The identified sample consists of five cattle bones including eroded remains of scapula, tibia, calcaneum and loose teeth.
Context 72
Excavation of the ditch fill yielded a total of 49 animal bones of which six are diagnostic to species. Five represent long bone fragments from cattle including humerus, calcaneum, mandible and loose teeth. Sheep is attested from a single molar of an adult individual. There are 21 fragments variously representing skulls and long bones of a large-sized animal and 22 fragments are too small to take to either species or element.
Context 73
In all, 20 bones were recovered from this ditch fill and 11 of these were taken to species level. Sheep are the dominant species with cattle and pig each being present as just a single bone. The sample of sheep bones is represented almost entirely by skull fragments and loose teeth are abundant. Cattle and pig are also represented by skull fragments and there is a sug-gestion that this feature contains remains from the primary phase of butchery. The remainder of the sample consists of nine bones from a medium-sized animal.
Context 89
This bank layer produced one cattle bone, the unfused distal portion of a tibia and be-longing to an animal that was under two years of age at death.
Context 95
Just three bones were recovered from the fill of posthole C.91 but they are too fragmen-tary to take to species level. One represents a fragment of a long bone from a medium-sized animal and the other two bones are indeterminate.
Context 128
Just one animal bone occurred in this ditch fill and this is identified as a fragment of a cow vertebra.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
118
Context 150
This ditch fill contained 50 fragments of burnt bone and eight of these are identifiable to species. The sample is dominated by tiny fragments of unidentifiable bone (23). Nineteen fragments can be placed into size groupings and represent nine long bone fragments of a large-sized mammal and ten medium-sized mammal remains. Sheep are most abundant in the identified sample and consist of primary butchery waste including mandible fragments and loose teeth. Cattle are represented by fragments of a femur and an ulna and by a loose tooth. The femur belongs to an individual over 3.5 years of age at slaughter.
Context 153
This ditch fill produced just five fragments of bone and identified specimens include sin-gle bones each of cattle and rabbit, the latter presumably being intrusive. The cattle bone is identified as a femur from a mature individual. A mixture of large and medium-sized mam-mal fragments are also recorded.
Context 158
There were just six sheep bones in this sample from a ditch fill. The sample consists of a radius, a metacarpus, a thoracic vertebra and some loose teeth. The radius came from an individual that was around 2-2.5 years of age at slaughter.
Context 170
This ditch fill produced just one bone identified as a portion of a cow vertebra.
Context 174
A partial skeleton of a small-sized adult dog was the only species present in this bank layer. The total sample consists of 27 bones including vertebrae, scapula, mandible, metapo-dia, ribs and phalanges. The remaining 16 indeterminate fragments also probably originated from this individual.
Context 198
This ditch fill produced a total faunal sample of 66 bones representing the remains of cat-tle (10 specimens) and sheep (2 specimens). At least two cattle are present including a young individual slaughtered at less than six months of age. The two sheep bones also represent a young individual indicating that meat acquisition was significant at this site. The bulk of the sample is not species specific with indeterminate fragments (35 specimens) predominating. There are 16 long bone fragments from a larger animal such as cow or horse and three frag-ments of bone represent a medium-sized mammal.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
119
Context 199
A total of 17 animal bones were recovered from this ditch fill. Indeterminate fragments once again dominate the sample and the only two identified species are cattle (5 specimens) and sheep (2 specimens). The cattle sample consists of two radii, two vertebrae and a scapula and epiphyseal fusion data indicates the presence of two individuals, one adult over 2.5 years of age and a juvenile less than six months old at slaughter. The two sheep bones are identified as fragments of a pelvis.
Context 200
In all, 22 bones were recovered from this ditch fill but just two of these could be identified to species level. These consist of very eroded fragmentary teeth from an adult cow. The feature also contained three large-mammal fragments and 17 indeterminate specimens.
Context 201
The midshaft portion of small porous metatarsus from a calf was the only bone recovered from this ditch fill.
Context 212
The fill of C.110, the internal bank revetment trench, produced two cattle bones, identi-fied as a metatarsus and a metacarpus. Both belong to adult individuals and the distal portion of the metacarpus is split axially caused presumably during the extraction of marrow.
Context 217
In all, 33 bones were presented for examination from the fill of posthole C.218 and of these just three were diagnostic to species representing single specimens each of cattle, sheep and pig. Cattle are represented by the fused proximal portion of a radius and sheep and pig by loose teeth from adult individuals. The remainder of the sample is made up of indeterminate fragments (21 specimens) and large-mammal remains (9 specimens).
DiscussionA small assemblage of animal bones was recovered from Loughbown II during excava-
tions in 2006. The most prevalent remains are those of food species, as is usual on most archaeological sites. Many of the bones are calcined from being in contact with intense heat and this has contributed to the fragmentation rate as the burning process reduces bones into small undiagnostic fragments. The bulk of the sample is too small to be taken to species level and most of the bones are either placed into a size category or have to be left unidentified. The most frequently occurring species both in terms of NISP and MNI are cattle and sheep/
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
120
goat. It was not possible to identify the sheep/goat group further because none of the elements present allowed for this. It is interesting to note that there were actually more dog fragments combined than pig, indicating that the local environmental conditions were not suitable to the keeping of pigs. The relatively large number of cat bones is artificially inflated as all bones are from a single context and almost certainly represent two individuals. Dog bones were also recovered from the site representing small and medium-sized individuals.
Analysis of the age structure of the livestock is made difficult by the small numbers of bones recovered and by the absence of teeth-bearing mandibles. Epiphyseal fusion data from the major limb bones indicates that cattle were mostly killed between 2.5 to 3.5 years although younger individuals were also slaughtered. The size of the animals kept cannot be assessed, as none of the bones are sufficiently complete for their dimensions to be measured. The sample of bones recovered during the excavation is obviously too small to be able to re-construct the local animal husbandry at the time the site was occupied. There is no evidence however that the faunal material accumulated by means other than the disposal of domestic refuse and this is borne out by the dominance of cattle and sheep bones of high food value.
Bibliography
Grant, A. 1975 ‘The Animal Bones’ and ‘Appendix B: The use of tooth wear as a guide to the age of domestic animals’ In: B. Cunliffe (ed), Excavations at Portchester Castle, Vol. 1: Roman. 378-408, 437-50. London.
Silver, I.A. 1971 ‘The Ageing of domestic animals’ In: In D.R. Brothwell and E. Higgs (eds), Science in Archaeology, a survey of progress and research. Bristol.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
121
Table 1: Representation of species by contextCOW S/G PIG DOG CAT RAB-
BITLM MM INDET TOTAL
1 1 1 1 315 77 30 10724 1 17 1827 1 2 5 840 7 70 451 52842 11 1 1 20 10 12 5550 23 1 2460 5 16 37 5872 5 1 21 22 4973 1 9 1 9 2089 1 195 1 2 3223 3 3 11 28 45128 1 1150 3 5 9 10 23 50153 1 1 2 1 5158 6 6170 1 1174 27 16 43198 10 2 16 3 35 66199 5 2 10 17200 2 3 17 22201 1 1212 2 2217 1 1 1 9 21 33
TOTAL 54 36 4 32 77 41 108 105 709 1166
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
122
Appe
ndix
8: R
adio
carb
on D
ates
Lab
code
Con
text
Prov
enan
ceM
ater
ial
Un-
cali-
brat
ed d
ate
δ 13
C2
sigm
a ca
libra
tion
1 sig
ma
calib
ratio
nPe
riod
UBA
-810
3Ba
se o
f D
S 4
Bone
Bovi
e ve
rteb
rae,
40
g
1159
±
29 B
P-2
4.1
cal A
D
778-
903
914-
969
cal A
D
782-
788
812-
845
857-
898
920-
945
Early
m
edie
val
UB-
7360
69C
harc
oal
Pom
oide
ae,
0.19
g, 1
frag
2245
±33
BP
-26.
0ca
l BC
39
2-34
532
3-20
5
cal B
C38
4-35
429
1-23
121
7-21
5
Iron
Age
UB-
7361
147
Cha
rcoa
lD
iffus
e po
-ro
us, 1
frag
, 0.
07 g
2162
±34
BP
-29.
0ca
l BC
36
1-27
226
3-10
2
cal B
C35
3-29
422
9-21
921
2-16
7
Iron
Age
UBA
-775
970
(DS
5)C
harc
oal,
Prun
us a
nd
Pom
oide
ae,
342
± 32
BP
-28.
8ca
l AD
14
67-1
640
cal A
D
1488
-152
515
57-1
604
1608
-163
2
Late
m
edie
val
UBA
-77
6030
Cha
rcoa
lH
azel
941
±33
BP
-21.
0ca
l AD
1022
-116
4ca
l AD
10
33-1
052
1080
-112
911
32-1
153
Early
/hig
h m
edie
val
UBA
775
817
Cha
rcoa
lH
azel
2266
±24
BP
-22.
9ca
l BC
396-
352
295-
228
221-
211
cal B
C
391-
358
279-
258
242-
236
Iron
Age
Dat
es c
alib
rate
d us
ing
radi
ocar
bon
calib
ratio
n pr
ogra
mm
e C
alib
REV
5.0.
2 (©
M. S
tuiv
er a
nd P
.J. R
eim
er 1
986-
2005
).
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
123
Appendix 9: Lithics
By Farina Sternke
Introduction
Three lithic finds from the archaeological investigations along the route of the N6 Gal-way-Ballinasloe Road at Loughbown 2, Co. Galway, were presented for analysis. The finds are associated with a ringfort.
Find
Num
ber
Site
Cont
ext
Mat
eria
l
Type
Corte
x
Cond
ition
Leng
th (m
m)
Wid
th (m
m)
Thic
kn. (
mm
)
Com
plet
e
Reto
uch
E2054:24:3 Loughbown II 24 Flint Debitage No Patinated 11 12 3 Yes NoE2054:37:1 Loughbown II 37 Limestone Natural Chunk Yes Rolled 24 19 14 Yes NoE2054:65:1 Loughbown II 65 Chert Natural Chunk No Rolled 30 19 11 No No
Table 1 Composition of the lithic assemblage from Loughbown II (E2054)
MethodologyAll lithic artefacts were examined visually and catalogued using Microsoft Excel. The
following details were recorded for each artefact: context information, raw material type, artefact type, the presence of cortex, artefact condition, length, with and thickness measure-ments, fragmentation and the type of retouch (where applicable). The technological criteria recorded are based on the terminology and technology presented in Inizan et al. 1999. The general typological and morphological classifications are based on Woodman et al. 2006.
QuantificationThe lithics are a natural chunk of chert (E2054:65:1), a natural chunk of limestone
(E2054:37:1) and a small piece of flint debitage (E2054:24:3) (Table 1).
ProvenanceThe finds were recovered from the topsoil (E2054:65:1), the fill of a ditch (E2054:24:3)
and the fill of a post-hole (E2054:37:1).
Condition:The two natural chunks survive in rolled condition, while the flint debitage is patinated.
One chunk (E2054:65:1) shows edge damage, while the other two finds are complete.
Technology/Morphology: The only flaked artefact is the small piece of flint debitage. This flake is completely un-
diagnostic in terms of its technology and dating.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
124
ConservationLithics do not require specific conservation, but should be stored in a dry, stable envi-
ronment. Preferably, each lithic should be bagged separately and contact with other lithics should be avoided, so as to prevent damage and breakage, in particular edge damage which could later be misinterpreted as retouch. Larger and heavier items are best kept in individual boxes to avoid crushing of smaller assemblage pieces.
DiscussionThe lithic finds from the archaeological investigations at Loughbown 2, Co. Galway are
two natural chunks and a piece of debitage all of which have no archaeological significance.
BibliographyInizan, M.-L., M. Reduron-Ballinger, H. Roche and J. Tixier 1999 Technology and
Terminology of Knapped Stone 5. CREP, Nanterre.
Woodman, P. C., Finlay, N. and E. Anderson 2006 The Archaeology of a Collection: The Keiller-Knowles Collection of the National Museum of Ireland. National Museum of Ireland Monograph Series 2. Bray, Wordwell.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
125
Appendix 10: Finds catalogue
By Sara Camplese
Metal Finds
ConservedKnife Blade (E2054:150:1) (plate 7) Fe. L. 90.92 mm., W. 12.7 mm., Th. 5.07 mm. Com-
plete. Slightly convex back, sloping shoulder. Whittle tang central on blade, rectangular in section (Plate 7). Conserved. Similar to examples found in Cork, dated 13th Century. Cfr. Scully 1997, pag.167, Fig.75:19 and Carroll & Quinn 2003, pag.259, Fig.5.1:8.
Blade (E2054:64:1) (plate 8) Fe. L. 69.8 mm., W. 14.5 mm., Th. 5.6 mm. Incomplete. Triangular in section, with convex back. Possible knife blade. Tang broken, rectangular in section and in line with the inner part of the blade (Plate 8). Conserved.
Iron Object (E2054:24:1) Fe. L. 21.68 mm., W. 19.5 mm., Th. (of section) 9.2 mm. Incomplete. Sub-rectangular in shape. Cell-shaped in section. Moulded piece, function un-known. Conserved.
Not Conserved
Nails
Nail (E2054:4:2) Fe. L. 34.1 mm., Th. (of shank) 5.2 mm., W. (of head) 11.9 mm. In-complete. Flat rectangular head. Shank rectangular in section. Shank slightly bent. Very corroded.
Possible Nail (E2054:4:1) Fe. L. 35.5 mm., Th. (of possible shank) 10 mm. Incomplete. Stick-shaped piece of iron. Rectangular in section. Very corroded.
Nail Head (E2054:1:1) Fe. L. 13.1 mm., D. (of head) 13.9 mm. Incomplete. Flat circular head. Hollow interior. Corroded.
Nail (E2054:45:2) Fe. L. 80 mm., D. (of shank) 7.8 mm., D. (of head) 13 mm. Complete. Probable carpentry nail. Slightly rounded circular head. Shank circular in section. Shank slightly bent. Small iron ring hooked up the shank. Corroded.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
126
Nail (E2054:1:2) Fe. L. 61.2 mm., D. (of shank) 8.3 mm., D. (of head) 18 mm. Incom-plete. Probable carpentry nail. Flat circular head. Shank circular in section. Shank straight but broken. Corroded.
Nail Head (E2054:4:3) Fe. L. 18.9 mm., D. (of head) 10 mm. Incomplete. Flat sub-circular head. First part of shank present. Corroded.
Possible Nail (E2054:24:2) Fe. L. 35.8 mm., D. (of possible shank) 8.6 mm. Incomplete. Headless. Circular in section. Very corroded.
Other Objects
Piece of Iron (E2054:59:1) Fe. L. 26.9 mm., W. 26.2 mm., Th. 4.3 mm. Incomplete. Sub-triangular in shape. Corroded.
Iron Object (E2054:47:1) Fe. L. 66.2 mm., W. 37 mm., D. (in section) 9.1 mm. Incom-plete. Sub-elliptical in shape. Circular in section. Very corroded.
Blade (E2054:4:1) Fe. L. 70 mm., W. 11.5 mm., Th. 5.5 mm. Incomplete. Slightly bent. Possible knife or razor blade (according to the presence of a little nook at one end, as for hanging a handle). Corroded.
Buckle (E2054:59:3) Cu. L. 35 mm., W. 44.1 mm., Th. 2.6 mm. Complete. Sub-rect-angular in shape with two rounded ends on the wider side. Wavy decirated edge. Double squared loop. Very good condition.
Iron Object (E2054:3:1) Fe. L. 58.1 mm., W. 26 mm., Th. 5.4 mm. Incomplete and slightly damaged. V-shaped object with rounded borders. Broken at both ends of longer side4. Corroded.
Iron Objects (E2054:45:1) Fe. L. 31.8 mm., W. between 18.9 mm. and 21.5 mm., D. (in section) 4.4 mm. Complete. Three probable rivets. Circular in section. U-shaped with pointed ends. Corroded.
Piece of Iron (E2054:59:2) Fe. L. 39.8 mm., W. 29 mm., Th. 4.5 mm. Incomplete. Flat plate of iron. Rhombus-shaped with rounded angles. Corroded.
Clay Pipes
Stem (E2054:124:1) L. 48 mm., Th. 6.4 mm. Incomplete.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
127
Stem (E2054:42:2) L. 26.6 mm., Th. 9.8 mm. Incomplete.
Bowl fragment (E2054:42:3) L. 27.7 mm., W. 16.2 mm., Th.(in section) 3.4 mm. Incom-plete and slightly burnt.
Bowl* (E2054:124:2) L. 44.4 mm., D. 20 mm., Th.(of stem) 6.7 mm. Incomplete. Rim broken. Spur present. First part of stem present. Small spur, slightly bulbous bowl. Probable dating: Late 18th/Early 19th century.
* The diameter considered is the maximum diameter of the bowl. When the bowl lip is present the diameter is taken on the rim of the bowl.
Stone Finds
Hammerstone? (E2054:170:1) D. 119.7 mm. Complete. Possible hammerstone. Round-ed and slightly triangular in shape. Elliptical in section.
Bracelet (E2054:45:3) (plate 9) D. 72.9 mm., Th. (in section) 9.3 mm. Incomplete (half part missing and partially damaged). Col. N 3/ (very dark gray). Plain bracelet, D-shaped section. Polished surface and rounded edge (Plate 9). Considering the lightness of the item and the layers-structure visible through its section, it is probably made of shale. Jet, lignite and shale bracelet were manufactured since Bronze Age, though Early Medieval examples can often be distinguished by their D-shaped sections. Bracelets of this kind were made by splitting slabs of the requisite thickness and trimming them into discs. The interior was removed by cutting a V-shaped groove with a narrow chisel on either side of the disc. The bracelet was then finished by smoothing and polishing. Cfr. Edwards (1990, 96).
Quernstone (E2054:72:1) L. 480 mm., Th. 140 mm., D. (of perforation) 34 mm., Dph. (of perforation) 56 mm. Rotary granite quernstone, square in shape, with a circular perfora-tion in the centre. Lower part of a so called ‘disc quern’. Complete. The disc quern was first introduced to Ireland in the first or second century AD and continued in use until modern times. It has a widespread distribution. This type of rotary quern consists of two flat, thin circular discs of large diameter. In this case the spindle setting (that holds the spindle on which the upper stone revolves) is a socket. Upper part missing.
Permalink: http://eachtra.ie/index.php/journal/e2054-loughbown2-co-galway/
Archaeological Excavation Report, Loughbown 2, Co Galway ISSUE 2: Eachtra Journal - ISSN 2009-2237E2054
128
ReferencesCarroll M. & Quinn A. 2003 Ferrous and non-Ferrous Artefacts, pp 257-98 in Cleary,
R.M. and Hurley, M.F. Cork City Excavations, 1984-2000. Cork, Cork City Council.
Edwards N. 1990 The Archaeology of Early Medieval Ireland. London 1990.
Lane S., 1995 Clay Pipes, pp.102-5 in Hurley, M.F. Excavation at North Gate, Cork 1994. Cork, Cork Corporation.
Scully O.M.B., 1997a Ferrous and non-Ferrous Metal Artefacts, pp.165-90 in Cleary, R. M. Skiddy’s Castle and Christ Church, Cork: Excavations 1974/77 by D.C. Twohig. Cork, Department of Archaeology University College Cork and Cork Corporation.