arboricultural report · freelance arborist for various companies. sheffield, south yorkshire 2002...
TRANSCRIPT
ARBORICULTURAL REPORT to BS 5837:2012 at:
Todber Valley Caravan Park,
Burnley Road,
Clitheroe,
Lancashire,
BB7 4JJ
Prepared For:
GVA: Retail, Hotels and Leisure,
3 Brindleyplace,
Birmingham,
B1 2JB
July 2015
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 2 of 15
Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Instructions and Brief ................................................................................................................3
1.2 Survey Details.............................................................................................................................3
2. The Site ................................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Location ......................................................................................................................................4
2.2 Site Description..........................................................................................................................4
3. The Trees ............................................................................................................................................. 5
3.1 Legal ............................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Summary of Results ..................................................................................................................5
3.3 Arboricultural Impact Assessment .......................................................................................6
3.4 Protection of the Retained Trees .........................................................................................7
4. Signature ........................................................................................................................................... 8
Appendix 1: Authors Qualifications & Experience ..................................................................... 10
Appendix 2: Survey Methodology and Limitations of Report ................................................. 11
Appendix 3: Explanation of Tree Descriptions ............................................................................. 12
Appendix 4: Tree Data ....................................................................................................................... 13
Appendix 5: Tree Constraints Plan .................................................................................................. 14
Appendix 6: Tree Impacts Plan ........................................................................................................ 15
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 3 of 15
1. Introduction
1.1 Instructions and Brief
1.1.1 I am instructed by Rachel Whaley, Associate at Retail, Hotels and Leisure,
GVA, on behalf of Park Resorts Ltd, to visit the site and prepare my findings
in a report.
1.1.2 The report is required in accordance with BS 5837:2012 Trees in relation to
design, demolition and construction –Recommendations, to provide
detailed, independent, arboricultural advice on the trees present, in the
context of potential development.
1.2 Survey Details
1.2.1 The survey took place during May 2015 by Adam Winson, Chartered
Arboriculturist, MSc, BSc (Hons) MICFor, AIEEM (the author’s qualifications
and experience are included within Appendix 1).
1.2.2 The trees were surveyed visually from the ground using “Visual Tree
Assessment” techniques and in accordance with the guiding principles of
British Standard 5837:2012 (explanatory details regarding the survey
methodology are included within Appendix 2).
1.2.3 A full explanation of the tree data can be found at Appendix 3. Full details
of all the trees surveyed are found in Appendix 4. For tree locations please
refer to the Tree Constraints Plan at Appendix 5 and for detail on the impact
of the development on the trees refer to Appendix 6.
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 4 of 15
2. The Site
2.1 Location
2.1.1 The site is located near to Clitheroe, a town and civil parish in the Borough
of Ribble Valley in Lancashire, England.
2.1.2 The tree survey was limited to the area within and adjacent to the blue line,
shown in the (2003) image below:
2.2 Site Description
2.2.1 The site currently consists of an open grassed area, adjacent to an existing
caravan site, with associated access tracks.
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 5 of 15
3. The Trees
3.1 Legal
3.1.1 Due to the large potential penalties for illegally carrying out work to
protected trees, before authorising any tree works a check should be made
with the Local Planning Authority to see if the trees are covered by a Tree
Preservation Order or if they are within a Conservation Area. If either
applies, then statutory permission is required before any works can take
place.
3.1.2 When appointing a tree surgeon, only properly qualified and experienced
companies should be used, who have adequate Public Liability and
Employer’s Liability Insurance. All tree work should be carried out according
to British Standard 3998: 2010 Tree Work - Recommendations.
3.2 Summary of Results
3.2.1 The tree survey revealed 23 items of vegetation, comprised of 16 individual
trees, and 7 groups of trees and hedges.
3.2.2 Of the surveyed vegetation: 1 tree is retention category ‘A’; 9 trees or
groups are retention category ‘B’, and the remaining 13 trees or groups are
retention category ‘C’ (explanatory details regarding the retention
categories are included within Appendix 3).
3.2.3 The central areas of the site contain little of arboricultural significance. The
majority of the surveyed vegetation is situated along or beyond the main
development site boundary. Any additional off-site trees that could have
an effect on a new development design have been included in the tree
survey parameters.
3.2.4 The most significant trees surveyed are formed by 3 mature Oaks situated
along the western boundary (T1, T3 and T4). Collectively these trees form
an important part of the landscape and should be retained and
incorporated into any new development.
3.2.5 Much of the vegetation is comprised of Hawthorn shrubs under varying
forms of historical management. This ranges from naturalistic regeneration,
previously managed hedges that have now reverted into occasional
shrubby trees and more intensively managed boundary hedges.
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 6 of 15
3.2.6 When considered as a larger network, the Hawthorn groups do provide
some moderate landscape value. However, as smaller groups or individual
trees they are generally of low or average quality and value. Opportunities
exist for replanting the boundary groups and improving the structure of the
unmanaged hedge groups.
3.2.7 Limited access or dense ivy prevented some trees to be fully inspected (as
detailed in appendix 4), and as such the measurements were estimated
and the condition values are indicative only.
3.3 Arboricultural Impact Assessment
3.3.1 It is proposed to develop the site as a caravan park with associated hard-
standing, access drives, footpaths and other facilities.
3.3.2 The proposals for the new development have been provided by my client
and inform this arboricultural impact assessment and the tree impact plan
at Appendix 6.
3.3.3 From assessing the new development proposals, no significant trees will
require removal to facilitate the new development. The better value trees
and groups have been incorporated into the development design and so
the proposals have no significant negative arboricultural impacts.
3.3.4 New footpaths are proposed close to the higher value Oak trees (T3 & T4)
and the Ash tree (T8) The location and route of these footpaths have been
informed by the trees on site and avoid the trees detailed root protection
areas. If required, special construction methods could be used for any
drives or paths between existing trees, employing ‘no-dig’ type
construction methods with a porous final surface so as to avoid root
damage.
3.3.5 The development proposals require the removal of T15, a low value
Hawthorn. While it may be possible to retain the hawthorn shrubs adjacent
to T15, it is recommended to use the development as an opportunity to
remove the low value hawthorn G12, T14, T15 and T16 as they have very
limited long term prospects and would be unsuitable for retention as part
of the new development.
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 7 of 15
3.3.6 A lack of management to the eastern and southern groups has led to
degeneration. The vegetation within these groups are forming into lines of
separated individual shrubby trees, and so losing value as a linear group
feature. As such, the new development at this site provides the opportunity
to undertake management and restoration planting of the groups and so
improve the quality and long term value.
3.3.7 The new development includes extensive soft landscaping proposals
including additional tree planting, as such the development will improve
the sites long term tree cover.
3.4 Protection of the Retained Trees
3.4.1 Most retained trees will require protection by fencing in accordance with
BS 5837: 2012, during the development phase. The protective fencing
should protect the Root Protection Area (RPA) of the trees as highlighted
on the plan at Appendix 5.
3.4.2 If required by the Local Planning Authority, an associated Arboricultural
Method Statement, detailing protective fencing specifications can be
provided.
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 8 of 15
4. Signature
I trust this report provides all the required information.
Signed
..................................................................
Adam Winson, Chartered Arboriculturist, MSc, BSc (Hons), MICFor, AIEEM.
29th July 2015
AWA Tree Consultants Limited
Union Forge
27 Mowbray Street
Sheffield
S3 8EN
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 9 of 15
Appendices
Appendix 1: Authors Qualifications and Experience
Appendix 2: Survey Methodology and Limitations
Appendix 3: Explanation of Tree Descriptions
Appendix 4: Tree Data
Appendix 5: Tree Constraints Plan
Appendix 6: Tree Impacts Plan
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 10 of 15
Appendix 1: Authors Qualifications & Experience
Mr Adam Winson Chartered Arboriculturist, MSc, BSc (Hons), ND, MICFor, AIEEM.
Experience
I have worked within the tree care profession for 18 years. I am a Chartered
Arboriculturist and a Registered Consultant with the Institute of Chartered Foresters.
My work ranges from individual expert tree inspections to managing trees on major
multimillion pound housing and park developments and highway and infrastructure
projects. My work often involves trees with Preservation Orders, insurance claims,
subsidence claims and litigation. In 2010 I obtained an MSc in Arboriculture and
Urban Forestry (with distinction), also gaining the top student award, and have had
articles published in industry magazines and have original research published by
the UK Forestry Commission.
Membership of Professional Bodies
Professional Member and Registered Consultant of the Institute of Chartered
Foresters
Associate of the Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management
Education and Qualifications
MSc Arboriculture and Urban Forestry (Distinction) University of Central Lancashire -
Myerscough College. 2006 -2009
BSc (Hons) Environmental Conservation 2:1. Sheffield Hallam University. 2002 2005
National Diploma in Arboriculture University of Lincoln/ Riseholme.1996-1998
Previous Experience
Consulting Arboriculturist at JCA Ltd. Halifax, Yorkshire 2005 to 2012
Freelance Arborist for various companies. Sheffield, South Yorkshire 2002 - 2005
Arborist for AAA Arbor /Sydney City Council Australia 2001- 2002
Arborist for The Tree Surgeon, Brisbane, Australia 2000- 2001
Groundsman/Climber at Lindsey Tree Services, Grimsby, Lincolnshire 1998 -2000
Groundsman/Climber at Freelance Baumpflege, Frankfurt, Germany 1998
Freelance Groundsman/Climber for various companies, Lincoln Area 1996-1998
Training, Awards & Qualifications
MSc Top Student Award University of Central Lancashire 2010
Bats and Bat Surveys- a foundation course for ecological consultants. BCT 2007
Arboriculture & Bats: A Guide for Practitioners BCT and AA 2007
CPRE: Prize for best BSc dissertation on the theme of land management 2006
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 11 of 15
Appendix 2: Survey Methodology and
Limitations of Report
The survey was undertaken in accordance with British Standard 5837 (2012) Trees
in relation to design, demolition and construction –Recommendations. The trees were
assessed objectively and without reference to any proposed site layout. The trees
were surveyed from the ground using ‘Visual Tree Assessment’ (VTA)
methodology. VTA is appropriate and is endorsed by industry guidance. It is used
by arboriculturists to evaluate the structural integrity of a tree, relying on
observation of trees biomechanical and physiological features. Measurements
are obtained using a diameter tape, clinometer, distometer and loggers tape.
Where this is not practical measurements are estimated. Tree groups have been
identified in instances as defined in BS 5837 (2012). Shrubs and insignificant trees
may have been omitted from the survey.
This report represents a BS5837 tree survey and should not accepted as a detailed
tree safety inspection report; however, tree related hazards are recorded and
commented upon where observed, yet no guarantee can be given as to the
absolute safety or otherwise of any individual tree. All recommended tree work
must be to BS 3998: 2010 - ‘Tree Work: Recommendations’.
The findings and recommendations contained within this report are valid for a
period of twelve months from the date of survey. The author shall not be
responsible for events which happen after this time due to factors which were not
apparent at the time, and the acceptance of this report constitutes an
agreement with these guidelines and terms.
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 12 of 15
Appendix 3: Explanation of Tree Descriptions
HEIGHT of the tree is measured from the stem base in metres. Where the ground has a
significant slope the higher ground is selected.
CROWN HEIGHT is an indication of the average height at which the crown begins and
includes information of the first significant branch and direction of growth.
STEM DIAMETER is measured at 1.5 metres above (higher) ground level. Where the tree
is multi-stemmed at this point; the diameter is measured close to ground level or else a
combined stem diameter is calculated.
CROWN SPREAD is measured from the centre of the stem base to the tips of the branches
in all four cardinal points.
AGE CLASS of the tree is described as young, semi-mature, early-mature, mature, or
over-mature.
PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION is classed as good, fair, poor, or dead. This is an indication
of the health of the tree and takes into account vigour, presence of disease and
dieback.
STRUCTURAL CONDITION is classed as good, fair or poor. This is an indication of the
structural integrity of the tree and takes into account significant wounds, decay and
quality of branch junctions.
LIFE EXPECTANCY is classed as; less than 10 years, 10-20 years, 20-40 years, or more than
40 years. This is an indication of the number of years before removal of the tree is likely
to be required.
Retention Categories
A (marked green on Appendix 5) = retention most desirable. These trees are of very high
quality and value with a good life expectancy.
B (marked in blue on Appendix 5) = retention desirable. These trees are of good quality
and value with a significant life expectancy.
C (marked in grey on Appendix 5) = trees which could be retained. These trees are of
low or average quality and value, and are in adequate condition to remain until new
planting could be established.
U (marked in red on Appendix 5) = trees for removal. These trees are in such a condition
that any existing value would be lost within 10 years.
Arboricultural Report at: Todber Valley Caravan Park Ref: AWA1327
Page 13 of 15
Appendix 4: Tree Data
Appendix 4 Page 1 TODBER TREE DATA AWA Ref:1327
Tree Species
Tree ID
Common Name Latin Name
Matu
rity
Heig
ht (m
)
Stem
s
Stem
Dia (m
m)
Estim
ated
First b
ranch
Ave H
eigh
t
N E S W Roots Stem Crown Comments
Ph
ysiolo
gy
Stru
ctural
Life E
xpectan
cy
Am
enity
Categ
ory
Works
Prio
rity (Mth
s)
T1 Oak Quercus cerris Mature 12 1 650 No 2e 1 7 11 9 6
Situated along boundary area on
beck banking, land drops to east;
Soil erosion; Waterlogged; Exposed roots
Single stemmed; Twin stemmed at 2m; Slight lean; Metal on stem causing minor bark damage
Normal; Minor deadwood; Crown overhanging road
Situated in hedge shrubs - stem
diameter estimated
Good Fair>40 yrs
High B
No urgent action (crown
lift over road to maintain
clearance for traffic in future)
NA
H2 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Early-mature
1.5 1 80 No 0 0 No visual defectsMultiple stemmed;
Old pruning wounds
Normal
Well managed hedge feature
along boundary -occasional gaps.
Occasional blackthorn & holly
Good Good20 to 40 yrs
Mod B No action NA
T3 Oak Quercus robur Mature 16 1 870 No 3w 4 10 14 8 8
Historical movement around rooting area, yet appears stable.
Soil erosion
Single stemmed; Multiple stemmed at 3m; Slight lean into site - away from road; Ivy covered; Minor
cavities
Normal; Slightly unbalanced;
Minor deadwood
Situated along boundary area. Ivy prevented detailed
inspection
Good Fair>40 yrs
High B
No urgent action (crown
lift over road to maintain
clearance for traffic in future)
NA
T4 Oak Quercus cerris Mature 16 1 750 No 3w 5 5 12 12 8 No visual defects
Single stemmed; Vertical; Ivy
covered; Minor cavity
Normal; Minor deadwood;
Overhanging road
Situated along boundary area in hedge feature -Stem diameter
estimated
Good Good>40 yrs
High A
No urgent action (crown
lift over road to maintain
clearance for traffic in future)
NA
T5 Sycamore Acer
pseudoplatanusSemi-mature
8 1 300 No 4n 4 4 4 4 4 No visual defectsSingle stemmed;
Vertical; Ivy covered
Normal
Situated along boundary area in
hedge. Ivy prevented detailed
inspection. Reasonable prospects
Good Good>40 yrs
Mod C No action NA
See Plan
Crown (m)Measurements Management Tree Condition Value
Appendix 4 Page 2 TODBER TREE DATA AWA Ref:1327
Tree Species
Tree ID
Common Name Latin Name
Matu
rity
Heig
ht (m
)
Stem
s
Stem
Dia (m
m)
Estim
ated
First b
ranch
Ave H
eigh
t
N E S W Roots Stem Crown Comments
Ph
ysiolo
gy
Stru
ctural
Life E
xpectan
cy
Am
enity
Categ
ory
Works
Prio
rity (Mth
s)
Crown (m)Measurements Management Tree Condition Value
G6 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Mature 4.5 1 300 Yes 2n 2No visual defects;
Soil erosion
Slight lean; Old pruning wounds; Minor cavities; Minor decay
Small / sparse
Situated along boundary area - beyond fence. Fragments of former hedge
feature
Fair Fair20 to 40 yrs
Mod C No action NA
G7 Holly Ilex aquifolium Mature 3 1 200 Yes 1n 1 1 1 1 1No visual defects;
DecayMultiple stemmed at 1m; Slight lean
80% dead / absent
Group of 2 stems along boundary. Fragments of old hedge, 80/ dead.
Decline
Poor<10 yrs
Low C
No urgent action
consider future removal if site
becomes occupied
NA
T8 Ash Fraxinus excelsior Mature 14 1 650 No 3n 4 9 7 7 8
Ditch to south of stem base; No
visual defects; Soil erosion
Single stemmed; Vertical; Multiple stemmed at 3m; Bark damage; Minor cavities
Normal; Minor deadwood
Situated along boundary area - beyond fence.
Good Fair20 to 40 yrs
Mod B No action NA
G9 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Early-mature
3.5 1 200 No 0 0No visual defects;
Soil erosion
Single stemmed & Multiple stemmed;
Vertical; Slight lean; Minor
cavities; Minor decay
Normal; Minor dieback;
Occasional small dead tree
Line of trees shrubs along
boundary. Former hedge feature
long since unmanaged,
spaced around 3m apart, gaps throughout.
Fair Fair20 to 40 yrs
Mod B
No urgent action -
consider future replanting of
gaps
NA
G10 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Mature 4 1 270 No 0 0No visual defects;
Soil erosion
Single stemmed; Multiple stemmed;
VerticalNormal
Former hedge feature now
unmanaged, few gaps, occasional
holly.
Fair Fair20 to 40 yrs
Mod B No action NA
See Plan
See Plan
See Plan
Appendix 4 Page 3 TODBER TREE DATA AWA Ref:1327
Tree Species
Tree ID
Common Name Latin Name
Matu
rity
Heig
ht (m
)
Stem
s
Stem
Dia (m
m)
Estim
ated
First b
ranch
Ave H
eigh
t
N E S W Roots Stem Crown Comments
Ph
ysiolo
gy
Stru
ctural
Life E
xpectan
cy
Am
enity
Categ
ory
Works
Prio
rity (Mth
s)
Crown (m)Measurements Management Tree Condition Value
T11 Alder Alnus glutinosa Mature 9 1 450 Yes 2s 2.5 5 5 6 6No visual defects;
Soil erosion
Single stemmed; Multiple stemmed at 2m; Slight lean;
Minor cavities
Normal; Minor deadwood
Situated along boundary area -
beyond ditch Fair Fair
20 to 40 yrs
Low B No action NA
G12 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Semi-mature
2 1 180 No 1s 1 1 1 1 1No visual defects; Soil compaction
Slight lean; significant old
pruning wounds; Bark damage
Small / sparse; 25% dead /
absent
2 former hedge trees, heavily
lopped - in decline with no long term
value .
Poor Fair <10 Low CRemove to
facilitate new development
NA
G13 Birch Betula pendula Young 3.5 1 80 No 0 1 1 1 1 1 No visual defects Single stemmed Normal Recent plantings. Fair Good>40 yrs
Low C No action NA
T14 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Mature 3.5 1 350 No 1s 1 3 3 4 3 Soil erosion
Single stemmed; Multiple stemmed at 1m; Slight lean;
Minor decay
Small / sparse; Minor dieback
Limited long term value
Poor Fair10 to 20 yrs
Low CRemove to
facilitate new development
NA
T15 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Mature 4 7 80 No 1s 1 2 2 3 3No visual defects;
Soil erosion
Multiple stemmed at base; Minor
decaySmall / sparse
Limited long term value
Poor Fair10 to 20 yrs
Low CRemove to
facilitate new development
NA
T16 HawthornCrataegus monogyna
Mature 5 1 300 Yes 2s 2 2 3 4 3No visual defects; Soil compaction
Twin stemmed at 1m; Vertical; Old pruning wounds
Small / sparse; Minor deadwood;
Minor dieback
Limited long term value
Poor Fair10 to 20 yrs
Low CRemove to
facilitate new development
NA
Appendix 4 Page 4 TODBER TREE DATA AWA Ref:1327
Tree Species
Tree ID
Common Name Latin Name
Matu
rity
Heig
ht (m
)
Stem
s
Stem
Dia (m
m)
Estim
ated
First b
ranch
Ave H
eigh
t
N E S W Roots Stem Crown Comments
Ph
ysiolo
gy
Stru
ctural
Life E
xpectan
cy
Am
enity
Categ
ory
Works
Prio
rity (Mth
s)
Crown (m)Measurements Management Tree Condition Value
T17 Sycamore Acer
pseudoplatanusMature 16 1 600 Yes 3s 2.5 5 5 7 5 No visual defects
Single stemmed; Vertical
Normal; Overhanging into
site
Situated in adjacent land
Fair Good20 to 40 yrs
Mod B No action NA
T18 Sycamore Acer
pseudoplatanusMature 16 1 500 Yes 3n 5 6 5 4 4 No visual defects
Single stemmed; Vertical; Stubs; Minor cavities
Small / sparse; Slightly
unbalanced
Situated in adjacent land
Fair Fair10 to 20 yrs
Mod C No action NA
T19 Ash Fraxinus excelsiorSemi-mature
10 1 300 Yes 3n 3 5 4 3 3 No visual defectsSingle stemmed;
Slight lean
Normal; Overhanging into
site
Situated in adjacent land
Fair Fair20 to 40 yrs
Low C No action NA
T20 Horse ChestnutAesculus
hippocastanumMature 16 1 500 Yes 3w 3 6 5 5 6 No visual defects
Single stemmed; Vertical; Bark
damageNormal
Situated in adjacent land crown over
hanging , limited access around
stem base
Fair Fair20 to 40 yrs
Mod B No action NA
T21 Oak Quercus roburSemi-mature
4.5 1 150 No 2n 2 3 2 2 2 No visual defectsSingle stemmed;
VerticalNormal
Reasonable prospects
Good Good>40 yrs
Low C No action NA
T22 Willow Salix capreaEarly-mature
9 7 150 No 3s 3 6 6 5 5No visual defects; Soil compaction
Multiple stemmed at base; Tight
unionNormal
No major visible defects
Good Fair10 to 20 yrs
Mod C No action NA
Appendix 4 Page 5 TODBER TREE DATA AWA Ref:1327
Tree Species
Tree ID
Common Name Latin Name
Matu
rity
Heig
ht (m
)
Stem
s
Stem
Dia (m
m)
Estim
ated
First b
ranch
Ave H
eigh
t
N E S W Roots Stem Crown Comments
Ph
ysiolo
gy
Stru
ctural
Life E
xpectan
cy
Am
enity
Categ
ory
Works
Prio
rity (Mth
s)
Crown (m)Measurements Management Tree Condition Value
T23 Willow Salix capreaEarly-mature
8 8 130 No 3s 3 6 7 5 6No visual defects; Soil compaction
Multiple stemmed at base; Old
pruning wounds; Tight union
NormalNo major visible
defects, yet limited long term value
Fair Fair10 to 20 yrs
Mod C No action NA
T23
T22
T21
Birch sapling
Oak sapling
T20
Ash saplings
T19
T18
T17
Adjacent hawthorn
shrubs
Adjacent Sycamore
Wild rose
shrubs
Adjacent Fir
trees x 3
8m tall
Alder saplings
T16T15
T14
G13
G12
Small dead
stem
T11
G10
T8
G7
G6
T5
T4
T3
H2
T1
H2
G7
G9
G9
G9
G10
G13
Appendix 5:Tree Constraints PlanTodber Valley Holiday Park, GisburnRef: AWA1325
CATEGORY A: HIGH VALUERETENTION MOST DESIRABLE
CATEGORY B: MODERATE VALUERETENTION DESIRABLE
SCALE :1:500 PAPER: A1
TREE STEM
CATEGORY C:LOWER VALUECOULD BE RETAINED
CATEGORY U:FOR REMOVAL
RPA: ROOT PROTECTION AREA
BRITISH STANDARD 5837:2012
RETENTION CATEGORIES
Definitions of these catagories can befound in Appendix 2 of the report.
N O R T H
T23
T22
T21
Birch sapling
Oak sapling
T20
Ash saplings
T19
T18
T17
Adjacent hawthorn
shrubs
Adjacent Sycamore
Wild rose
shrubs
Adjacent Fir
trees x 3
8m tall
Alder saplings
T16T15
T14
G13
G12
Small dead
stem
T11
G10
T8
G7
G6
T5
T4
T3
H2
T1
H2
G7
G9
G9
G9
G10
G13
Todber Valley Holiday Park, GisburnRef: AWA1325
N O R T H
Appendix 6:Tree Impacts Plan
TREE/HEDGE TO BE RETAINED
TREE/HEDGE TO BE REMOVED
SCALE 1:500 PAPER: A1
TREE STEM
RPA: ROOT PROTECTION AREA
BRITISH STANDARD 5837:2012
185
183.928
ST03
184.60invt
Amenity
Block
GUTank
188.23
MH
Private
Residence
Pipe
GU
180
.200
182.50
postSP
IL:181.75
MH
IL:180.58181.20180.992
ST01MH
180
180.35f/p
MH-NL
182.31MH
181.48Stop Tap
GU
195
GU
190
190
187.80invt
195
190
188.03f/p
LP
post
EC
190
LP
184.66Duct
LPSV
Water
Tank
LP
post
IL:182.72184.67Chamber
IL:184.89186.16
188.53
bol
GU
CO
MH 190
GU
190.68f/p
191.55
191.54
EP
EP
188.19invt
COSV
IL:188.37
188.29
189.45MH
SV
190
186.63invt
188.003
ST02
184.87invt
185
190
190
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B B
B
B
NEW TREE PLANTING