arata isozaki is one of the most influential architects working today (addt'l info)

8/4/2019 Arata Isozaki is One of the Most Influential Architects Working Today (Addt'l Info)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arata-isozaki-is-one-of-the-most-influential-architects-working-today-addtl 1/8

Arata isozaki is one of the most influential architects working today. Over the last four decades, he has designed an

extraordinary series of projects and buildings that have made a significant contribution to the evolution of contemporary

architecture worldwide. His highly original approach replaces the purely rationalist(berdasarkanapa) precept(aturan) underlying

modern architecture with more personal, even idiosyncratic(istimewa), aesthetic- one that is synthesis of historical symbolism

and the most advanced developments in technology and communication. His architecture neither blatantly quotes from a

romantic past nor wholly embraces these forces in a specific contemporary context.

The architect work was installed in 5 thematic groups: Theme 1 : genesis of imagination, featured proposal for Tokyo from

the 1960s, including such schemes as clusters in the air. These projects demonstrated isozaki's early interest in mergingtechnology with urban design, and showed an already imagination working to address the challenges of contemporary urban

existence. The evolution of isozaki work over the following decades was explored in 3 successive phrases, beginning with theme

2: birth of an architect. This section, which focused on the early concrete buildings and those public structures of bold

geometric. These designs include fukuoka city bank head office, the fujimi country clubhouse, kitakyushu city museum of art,

the kitakyushu central library. Theme 3: catastrophe japan, explored isozaki¶s search for a more individual architectural

expression, one that also incorporated isozaki references to past historical. Among the buildings included in this period are the

gunma prefectural museum of fine arts, kamioka town hall, the tsukuba center building and the art tower of mito. Theme 4:

architect as world citizen, included the phoenix municipal government center,the museum of contemporary art, los angeles,

saint jordi sports hall.

Theme 5 : hyper- technology, comprising isozaki¶s proposal for the Tokyo city hall, ueno station, and the ntv plaza

redevelopment plan. These projects presented his mature thoughts for greatly changed Tokyo in the 1990s, three decades after

initial proposals shown in theme 1 of the exhibition Irony and its fulfillment( david b stewart)The perspective view of isozaki¶s

submission for the 1980 tegel harbor competition inberlin was freely adapted from plate 115 of karl schikel¶s collection of architectural drawing, which depicts the berlin building academy, finished by schinkel in 1836. The engraving by mandel, after

schinkel, published in 1833- a year after the buildingacademy was begun- is the last of the great architect¶s much loved

topographical complex, the building academy project was conceived in a spirit of urban improvement, and schinkel actually lists

the advantages that ³ will come about as a natural consequence of this project, ³ the school itself widening, the provision of the

new amenities, and the disengagement of urban vistas, none of which schinkel wishes to have escape public notice. Still,

despite the fact that the ensemble of schinkels works, such as were built, profoundly changed the face of berlin in the course of

the architects lifetime, he was never allowed freerein(kendali) of his instinct as an urban planner. Instead of being called upon

by his sovereign(berdaulat) to redesign the whole berlin, the Prussian capital- or even isolated spatial tracts- schinkel was, even

as state architect, obliged(terpaksa) to live by his wits(akal). Fortunately, he built widely enough within the city that his works

docoalesce(bergabung) , leaving berlin with his inevitable stamp- just as isozaki¶s three major buildings in kita-kyushu city

endow(menmberkahi) th at to wn wi th an architectural character rare in modern-day japan Arata isozaki joined his studio

at Tokyoi=university in 1953 as a fourth year undergraduate and remained under the older architect¶s tutelage(pengawasan)

for a decade, eventually founding his own firm in1963.

During these formative years, isozaki crossed the straits of metabolism that had opened in 1960, and about which more will be

said, however, fitting together the pieces of this early formalist period and tracing ther eciprocity(timbal balik) of influence

between isozaki and tange, isozaki¶s first mature work, the oita prefectural library, had more todo with aesthetic theories

of schiller than of schinkel. We need to bear in mind that, for all the sophistication of the architecture of japan style during the

1950s as practiced by maekawa, sakakura, and others, the advisability(kelayakan) of using modern western architectural

solutions in Japanese buildings had not been seriously questioneduntil the imposition of fascist architectural guidelines in the

early years of showa. In his long poem´ the artist´(1789), schiller traces the development of artistic sensibility from a condition

of unreflective happiness to a state which a divided consciousness divorces a rupture between the beauty of phenomena and

abstract truth and finally, reconciles these poles through a process of acculturation and a deeper understanding of the arts.

Isozaki¶s programmatic attempt to refound the principle or modern architecture beyond the reach of conventional japanizing

impulses, and notably the sensuous appeal of tea garden aesthecism, if sukiyaramification( percabangan) can be so

characterized, was in some sense a latter day equivalent. It is true that tange had attempted to formulate the basis of a new

critical self consciousness, but always in terms that now seem either downright( benar2) bizarre( witness the proposal toexplicate(menjelaskan) le Corbusier viaMichelangelo), or overtly(terusterang)politicized ± like the antithesis he designated

between the archaeologically descriptive jomon and yayoi stles of ancient Japanese arts. Isozaki case, this provides a narrower,

more poignant(pedih) interpretation of his retreat into maniera. This dates from the late 1960sand the early 1970s, the time of

his works for the fukuoka city bank, which overlap with the official planning undertaken in collaboration with tange's office for

expo 70 at Osaka, including isozaki¶s realization of a robot-activated´ cybernetic environment´ for the festival plaza there.

Through the interiors of the various bank branches and the head office were semipublic, they are introverted and lyrical-

sometimes to the point of hermeticism, as emphasized by dramatic, even jarring(gemuruh), effects manifestation of japan, inc

and the festival plaza was a super mechanized, stage like development of tange¶s earliest ideas on the uses of public space in

the greek agora. This near schizophrenic separation of roles has been stressed by isozaki himself. Isozaki born in 1931, was old



enough to have remembered something of the upheaval(pergolakan) of world war 2 andcoming from west japan, as did

tange he was particularly vulnerable to the trauma of the atomic destruction of Nagasaki andHiroshima. Indeed, these were

immortalized un the electric labyrinth, exhibited briefly by isozaki at the 1968 triennale in Milan. Similarly, the notion of the

destruction of architecture relates, in one of its possible interpretations, to this exposure. Yet the traumas of the war in the

context of the show a era have generally been played down; without necessarily being repressed(ditekan) they were

integrated into the cultural of japan¶s entry, over the space of four generations, into the modern world. In literature, the cycle

of this transformation was eloquently dealt with from the beginning, while architecture-hardly surprisingly there had never

been aJ apanese wren or schinkel, at the level of national aspirations. Instead, there were the semi programmatic aims of Japanese modern architecture of the 1950s and the early 1960s, which however, after 1968seemed to lead precisely

nowhere.It is no wonder, then, that an artist and theorist as sensitive as arata isozaki had, by the time of his own coming of

age( in japan, something like thirty years) taken up a stand³ reflective´ not only in the schillerian sensebut also committed to

romantic irony. Inspite of schinkels known familiarity with the writings of friedrich and august- and, indeed, despite his

romanticism- irony was visibly not a means of expression open to him. However, irony in the new romantic usage at the turn of

the eighteenth century derives in part from schiller;s play-concept of art, and for friedrich schlegel the term is closely related to

paradox, as isozaki shows himself-aware in the epigraph to this essay.

By the 1980s, things have calmed down, so that isozaki¶s realizations like the tsukuba center building of 1983 or, in Tokyo, the

renovation now known as the ochanomizyu square of 1987, do, actually, in their serenity and complexity- and, above a;;, in

their neoclaccissim-resemble the late work of schinkel, such as the ideal capital city or the palaces near yalta and in Athens. Of

early works by isozaki, the last to retain traces of the mode initiated in the 1962 compositions of ruins all capriccio of Hiroshima

of 1968was the kita Kyushu city museum of art of 1974. This was also the first of six large public buildings after oita work, all of

which add up to isozaki¶s beings the first of the post 1950s generation to complete a substantial corpus at a national scale, thuscomparable with, say, the ouvre of maekawaor tange. The iota sequence, from the now to be destroyed medical hall of 1960

thorugh the branch there of the fukuoka city bank, was executed in form-faced reinforced concrete and aggressively delineated

in thrusting trabeated forms, the bank branch adding precast panels to this idiom, in 1971the bank¶s head office at hakata was

the first

isozaki¶s works to be faced in redstone, a material that reappears in 1986 in the MOCA, los angeles. The kita Kyushu city

museum of art, which added an annex(caplokan) in 1986, is built atop a r idge and was destined to be reappropriated by the fast

growing localv egetation except for two massive caissons, square in section , aimed like a pair of binoculars at the distant

landscape. Kitakyushu was prewar japan¶s prime industrial city, formerly an amalgam(campuran) of townships that went ton to

make up a heavy industrial complex, targeted by the us for destruction, in place of which, by miscalculation, Nagasaki was

struck. Within the art museum much play is made with black-and ±white marble paving and cascading staircases, while the twin

oversize flying beams are clad in gridded cast alumunium in order to heighten a powerful sense of abstraction. The remnants of

the city¶s industrial monuments contrast with the no utilitarian play of the museum in repose, as pure cultural infrastructure-and artifact, a giant toy in the landscape.

The library and art museum in kita Kyushu fully exploit the circle and the square, or rather the sphere and the cube, that were

isozaki¶s main formal repertoire during the mid 1970s. instead of opposing the site, as the museum does, the big volume of the

library are sculpturally integrated and set off by means of a meandering staircase, also the principal landscaping element. The

fujimi clubhouse was derived from palladio¶s front for the villa poiana, itself descended from roman architecture through

barmante. Modern museum of modern art in gunma is surely isozaki statemnt about the nature and effects of naïve. In the

sculptural arrangement of giant cubical frames, which appear to make up the framing of the museum. Isozaki arguably comes

closer then elsewhere to the resonant of the new neoclassicism of schinkels mature phase and the neo-neoclassicism of loos.

The building fully embraces paradox at an experiential level while eschewing irony.

The 1960s= system The thinking behind Japanese architecture in the 1950s had been to attempt to unify traditional Japanese

wooded structures with modernist architectural space, in which interior and exterior could interpenetrate. It could be termed aJapanese version of the new empiricism and new brutalism popular in the Europe. Metabolists architecture celebrated an

industrial society. These architects believed that architecture was a durable consumer item. Consequently, their use of exterior

capsules, units and panels was not necessarily a solution founded in theory but lauded in industrial society by displaying mass-

produced elements and indicating the ways, which they could be replaced and altered. At about that time, I was given a chance

to publish a project entitled´ incubation process´ in art magazine. In this context, I abandoned all the technical condiserations

with which, as an architect and planner, I had been compelled to deal, and concentrated solely on the materialization of a

concept that was given in the process of genesis.



Later this work was frequently cited as a representative metabolist work. But while I was certainly thinking in metabolist terms

in this montage, as I dealt with the flux of generation and the destruction of the city. I was never a member of the metabolist

group. Indeed, I always tried to make clear distinction between myself and their technological orientation, their somewhat

naïve pragmatism which allowed the to believe that a social revolution could be achieved by means of new technology. To

discover the concept, I sought the ideas for the interpretation of space, time, and matter(architecture and cities). All three

solely as metaphors. My equations for the mare space= darkness time=termination(eschatology) and matter, or architecture

and cities= ruin and ashes. Counterpoise(menyeimbangkan)invisibilityand darkness with highly visible and substantial cities and

architecture made my methodology more conceptual and metaphorical. Architectural design is the process of giving concreteform to intangible concepts. In this process it necessary to pick out all the things that denote architectural elements then it is

necessary to create a mechanism that will give new meaning to these now neutralized elements. This is the starting point of my

architecture1970s : the metaphorism Making multidimensional spaces from concrete objects necessitates basic lines and

compositional units to serve as minimal clues. Through they were my ultimate concepts, from the standpoint of physical

architecture; blankness and twilight can be nothing but from metaphors achieved by means of neutralized geometry and

meticulously controlled conditions of light beam distribution. The device that I ultimately hit on was the use of a grid composed

of homogeneous, limitless, square compartments to cover exterior surfaces. My entire visible world was to be covered with this

grid of equal squares

RUINS

The combined effect was psychology traumatic. Etched into my very retina in that moment when suddenly time stopped, those

burnt ruins would come back to me every time I confronted a white sheet a drawing paper. Back in the early 1960sworking on

the city of the future, I could do little more that leave the white paper white. All I could draw were broken fragments, melted

and fused, deformed, and distorted, which created objects that were only formed by chance. The concept of ruins is a potentidea found in the west, well represented by countless historical remains. Japan also has the same kind of concept, though, of

course, the physical environment is very different. My interest in ruins, however, could never be just a question of architectural

or archaeological study. I could never escape the connection with the ruins that surrounded and almost engulfed me on that

unforgettable day.

Despite the trauma, it seemed natural to associate the views of those burnt ruins with the ruins found in the west. The first

structure that I dominated my thinking in my work as an architect was that of the ruin. Ruins can be seen as fragments within

the complex of absolute and imaginative time, forming definite proof of past facts, facts broken and destroyed. We see the mas

once having formed part of completed, finished structures. Chance has conveyed them to us through the ravages of time.

Extending imaginative time into the past generates such thoughts. Although they can never give us an accurate image of the

complete structures to which the testify, none of this can diminish the fascination of ruins or the temptation to speculate that

they offer. They have hidden effects on us, stimulating fantasies, visions and i llusions; the elevated gardens of Babylon, Easter

Island, it is no exaggeration to say that we live within endless series of such fantasies. In 1962, my future city photomontage

showed the city of the future formed amid the ruins of the past. I assumed ruins of the present persisting into the future andtime inverted or deranged by combining constructions left to be completed in the future. Scales were distorted and distinct

structural elements were coupled with opaque and invisible elements. It was a partial future and partially it was the past. None

of it was clear in the present, for it was actually interstitial between latency(keadaan yg terpendam) in the present and non-

existence.

GENESIS

The strategy behind the concept of genesis consists of identifying and defining the origins or architecture as the basis for

further expansion and manipulation. For isozaki, the discovery of the platonic solid was not simply the adoption of western

form but rather a means to blur the differences between east and west, past and present. It also meant the introduction in his

design vocabulary of the cube and the sphere-as the three-dimensional extensions of the square and the circle-as well as the

rectangular volumes with a square section and barrel vaults.

Looking at the works in this chapter, one can see an interesting progression in the continued manipulation of the circle and thesquare. Both the kamioka town hall and the museum of contemporary art, los angeles are civic institutions whose design

derives from isozaki¶sresearch into the platonic solids. Formally, the 2projects employ a cubic frame entrance- MOCA¶S barrel-

vaulted entrance retains the section of the original Kamioka Town hall competition entry scheme. And one is led through the

entry sequence for both along a characteristic marilyn Monroe curve low wall to enhance dynamic movement. Yet, the small

mining town of kamioka cannot be mistaken for downtown

Los Angeles where MOCA is located. While the shiny exterior of Kamioka Town hall represents the authority of a western

inspired image landing in this small mining town. Moca¶s distinctive red Indian sandstone and pyramidal skylight could not be

construed as japanese in and of themselves. However, its overall asymmetrical composition can be related to the Japanese

precedents of hryuji temple or nikko shrine and thus remains open to multiple meanings and interpretations A traditional



feature in Japanese architecture is the tateokoshi plan drawing, in which all of the surfaces of a space are analyzed as if they

were floor plans. The theory is that the person examining them will mentally raise the drawings of the walls to their position in

the completed rooms and in this way imagine the way that the space will look. This mental act easily allows the observer to

visualize the elevations. The room the is the result of raising development drawings into place from all four directions. Yet, the

actual space of the room is never presented in the drawings and from the standpoint of the drawings is a leftover. In other

words, this method of producing architectural drawings does not result in an objectification of the space of the room.

PURE FORMSWhen the pure cubic form is placed on an actual site, transformations must be worked on it. First, the names of its constituent

elements alter. Naturally, the vertical lines become posts and the horizontal lines connection the tops of the vertical elements

become beams. The lines on the surface of the ground are then called foundations. Since the frame must occupy a definite

place, its abstract linear components must be given concrete names. This primitive question became the key to the solutions of

all problems arising on the morphological level in connection with the gunma museum. For instance, the horizontal and vertical

linear elements in the imaginary cube- the post and beam frame-ought to assume the same form. But when the frame is

expanded to reinforced concrete framework 12 meters to a side, the dynamic conditions at work in the posts are vastly

different from those at work on the beams .Although the cross section of the posts may be square, it is not necessarily true that

the cross section of the beams will be the same. Unless one thickens or pads the parts, there is likely to be a discrepancy in their

measurements. Covering the exterior with alumunium panels and thus allowing the discrepancies to be apparent only on the

interior can compensate for this. This is the policy-followed gunma.

Discrepancies and intersections of moderate degree are apparent in the entrance hall- a place in which the interior of the cube

can be experienced in its true size. Pure abstract form and actual architectural structure follow different codes. Although the

architect suppresses the differences between them to the greatest extent possible, places where they disagree will emerge. It istherefore impossible to maintain perfectly pure forms in architecture, and the gap between the pure form and the form made

expedient by conditions grows greater when the composition involves materials of great gravitational mass.

Tom heleghan

Unlike most of his international peers, his work follows no expressive formula. Approaching his architecture with considerable dedication,

intell igence, and even humility. I sozaki constantly changing architecture might be seen as almost: autobiographical:- expressing the oscillation and

development of his thoughts, his many inspirations, and occasionally quoting openly from the architecture of his heroes, his friends and from his own

works of earlier periods. But, while: autobiography ́might be considered to be part of isozaki¶s self-expression ,́ the definitive ́self: of isozaki

remains elusive. In the many changes in the expressions of his works, we are unable to judge his buildings as the symbols of particular person,

we

must judge them as the products of mind. Based in country in which- as he has written ±architecture has sometimes been seen as merely: a production

technology ³. Isozaki has constantly asserted that architecture can be a philosophy in itself, and an ideology with its own cultural legacy. He roots his

works in a response,which is simultaneously intellectual, physical, emotional, and cultural. In national context, his works can be seen as attempts

to develop and indicate an appropriate direction for the architecture of a rapidly changing japan. Unlike, the west, where spatial concepts,

and even building techniques, have progressively transmogrified to meet of the time, the historic architecture of japan is difficult to reconcile with the

scale, requirements, and technologies of modern building programmes. In

seeking to uncover this new: national language, isozaki has had occasion to adapt and quote freely

From western classicism- earning him crit icism as a post modernism- an allegation he refutes. Indeed, his works cannot be

justifiably bracketed with those by, for example, graves and stern, in which- both intellectually and physically- the veneer is cut

very thin. Perhaps this criticism shows as light miss reading of isozaki intent. At his controversial tsukuba center building- a

project that was effectively the foundation stone of a new city- isozaki emphatically proclaimed the projects future urban

centrality by overstating architectural symbols or codes, which are instantly-,legible, even by a public unfamiliar with ledoux

and romano. On the absence of any comparable japanese¶ codes of urban hierarchy¶. He referred to western models-resorting, as he explained´ to the evocative power of stylistic fragments as kitch:. The irony of this proposition should not be

ignored( irony being one of isozaki¶s habitual tools). He subsequently compared tsukubato his team

Disney building, suggesting that what was required at Disney was a representation of entertainment, while what was required

at tsukuba was a representation of state. That tsukuba is- for isozaki-almost a parody, which simultaneously satisfied

and debunked the pretensions of that state, is emphasized by the projects grouping around a symbolic central oval piazza-,

which he intentionally left void, and without purpose. Interestingly, now that a large body of isozaki¶s works can be formal

outside japan, it can be seen that-paradoxically-these western ¶over¶ or µundertones¶ are more prevalent I his works within

japan. It seem likely that isozaki perceives the µ western classical¶ code to have a different meaning for the Japanese than for

westeners- who have become desensitized by its famil iarity by its historical association. Isozaki works can never be judged by



appearance a one. His search for language of architecture appropriate to modern japan is coupled with a continuing

investigation of prototypical solutions to functional issues and to be the dilemma of urban response. Isozaki attempts to lock his

Kyoto symphony

hall into the historical context by ordering the principal elements of his composition along three axes, µ excavated from the

ancient pattern of Kyoto- the true north/south grid of the city, its deviation from magnetic north, and the line of the kamo river,

close to the site.T he contextual device of referring beyond the sometimes-confused surroundings of the site is repeated at

other projects, including Nara, and the extraordinary Nagi Museum of Contemporary Art. Two recent projects show,unambiguously, isozaki¶s continuing skill as a master of the µ modernist¶ tradition, with a delicate sense for locality.

Distant but formally related, his nara convention hall and his interactive museum about humans, in la coruna, spain are set

carefully into their different contexts, and appear destined-upon completion- to join the register of his undisputed

masterworks. At nara-as at iota and nagi-isozaki has dissected and reinvented the building¶s functional programme. The main

hall becomes a mechanism. With adjustable µ flying balconies¶ allowing infinite possible uses of the space. The smaller concert

hall becomes

a visually transparent, but acoustically opaque glass-encased¶object within an object¶. Wrapping the whole, a block ceramic-

tiled shell, elliptical in plan and section, harmonizes with the forms and colors of the principal temple roofs, and reduces the

scale of this large building-allowing its dignified, coherent form to be read in contrast with the surrounding µ visual noise¶. In

this , isozaki might be compared to the late sir james stirling- the only other architect of this period who shared the power of his

intellect, his formal virtuosity, and his complete disregard for histrionics and posturing. Of approximately similar age, they have

both carried the heavy burden of their generation- the nedd to extend and re-direct early µ modernism¶ to engage with

their very different social, cultural, and physical contexts. Both have seemed willing to take risks which architects of similar

status might consider hazardous-perpetually challenging our preconceptions and their own reputations. God s and menDavid b. stewart

When compared with arata isozaki entry for the 1980 tegel harbor competition in berlin,the splendid copperplate engravings

commissioned between 1819 and 1840 by the Prussian neoclassical architect arl friedrichschinkel after his own works seem

rather inadequate. This is partly because the tegle area redevelopment comprised, within a single project, housing, a cultural

center, and sports and other recreational facilities. It is also because, according to isozaki, the low rise housing in his scheme

was set off by precast-concrete panels that were to have been exact replicas of façade motifs designed by schinkel. In the

panoramic restaurant overlooking the tegeler see,isozaki seized the rationale for dummy façade replicating the

humblotdt schloss integel, the house that schinkel remodeled and extended from 1820 to 1824 for his friend the philologist

and diplomat Wilhelm von Humboldt, former Prussian ambassador to rome. The perspective view of isozaki¶s submission for

the harbor complex was freely adapted from plate 115 of schinkel¶s collection of architectural designs, which depicts the berlin

building academy finishedby schinkel in 1836. The engraving by

mandel, after schinkel, published in 1833- a year after the building academy was begun-is the last of the great architect¶s much

loved topographical views drawn from the banks of the river spree.

L

ike the tegel harbor complex, the building academy project was conceived in a spir it urban improvement, and schinkel actually

lists the advantages that´ will come about as a natural consequence of this project.´ The school itself occupies the former site of

a customs depot, and its planning suggests various street widenings, the provision of new amenities, and the disengagement of

urban vistas, none of which schinkel wishes to have escape public notice. Still, despite the fact that ensemble of schinkels

works, such as were built, profoundly changed the face of berlin in the course of architect lifetime, he was never allowed free

rein himself as urban planner. Arata isozaki after 1980From mannerism to the picturesque Hajime yatsuka The tsukuba center

building, designed and constructed between 1979 and 1983, was a

major turning point in the career of arata. For some it indicated the end of his mannerist period; for others, the beginning of his

postmodernism phase. In fact, this huge complex perpetuated the manneristic handling of themes and forms that had

characterized most of isozaki¶s works in the1970s, but it also contained quotations of western classical, or neoclassical, idiomsnever before introduced by the architect in such an overt and literal way. Arata isozaki inspired by Rudolf wittkower¶s study

of renaissance neoplatonic architecture-proved to be a decisive influence of peter eisenman, who was to become a close friend

of isozaki¶s in the course of 1980s. however, while eisenman unearthed similarities between the works of paladdio and those

of terragni in terms of syntaz, isozaki¶s development was largely without theoretical background. It seems, rather, that the

modernist-classicist paradigm formed an unconscious base for his work. A comparison of tange¶s Hiroshima peace center and

isozaki¶s tsukuba center building uncovers common characteristics-as well as major differences-between the 2 architects.



As an architect of the symbolic public building, isozaki was to some extent asuccessor to the modernist-classicist legacy of his

former teacher. Compared with authentic modernists, tange, like le Corbusier, was a mannerist in his tendency toward the

dramatic. He transgressed the modernist sense of discipline, and was never afraid of his buildings appearing symbolic beyond

the dictates of program. The tsukuba center building was designated as the central element of the new town called tsukuba

science city, one of the most pointed attempts on the part of the Japanese government to restructure the country¶s postwar

society. The program was such that the building, if monumentally designed, would appear as an authoritative representation of

the ³ will of the nation´, independent of stylistic aspirations on the part of the architect himself. At the same time, since it would

be the only major public space in the new town, the building nevertheless needed to take the form of a symbolic center.Responding to this´ double ±bind´ had become something of an automatic reflex for the Japanese intelligentsia of the period,

most of whom still nurtured a leftist view of society. By contrast, in designing the Hiroshima peace center, tange was able to be

far more straightforward and optimistic about the relationship between architecture as symbolic form and society, its symbolic

content. Isozaki¶ strategy for the tsukuba center building was to try to bridge the contradictory, half ± hidden gap in the nature

of modern architecture. Just as modernism had wanted its buildings to appear free of imposing symmetry and authoritarian

character, isozaki, though adopting more literal classical vocabulary, tried to avoid an excessively hierarchical ordering the

composition. He did this by presenting avoid- a sunken plaza- in the center, where one would expect the most monumental

element of the composition. Although perhaps not by intention, this refusal of the monumental seems to have fulfilled

hanssedlmeyers apocalyptic view of modernismas ³ loss of the center´ the tsukuba building demonstrates the impossibility of

any´ center´ for architecture in contemporary society. But despite the intellectual underpinnings, because it uses classical

language and is simply monument ar, the omplex offers an easier reading, and we are left with two ways of interpreting it: we

can see it as manifestation of the architect¶s uncertainty or as a successful attempt to inspire a plurality of readings, depending

on the observer¶s own preoccupation and interests. Isozaki work in tsukuba would generate two types of reactions. The first

was from such younger architects as had been much influenced by isozaki during the1970s. for them, the undeniable

monumentality of the tsukuba center building signaled blatant commitment to the idea of the public realm, a notion that in

their minds had lost all validity. Compared with stirling, gehry, or rossi. Isozaki has never been an architect with local bias. Even

with his extensive general knowledge of traditional Japanese art, he has rarely used the vocabulary of traditional Japanese

architecture. He continued to use geometric elements such as cubes, cones, and pyramids- a tendency inspired by the works of

enlightenment architects like boulle and ledoux. But these forms act as episodes in the loosely composed whole and they are

treated not as stark geometrical objects

inhabitants, which is, in a certain sense, a rather orthodox strategy whereby the picturesque is invoked. It is not a superficialadoption of a vernacular idiom, like the approach taken by the tourism industry, for there must also be a hedonistic play

of imagery and icons within the picturesque. But isozaki provocative gesture-adopting a space of pueblo origin instead of the

classical western cliché of the European civic plaza-may have been interpreted by local authorities as uneccessarily critical

of the significant anglo establishment. That an urban form originating in ancient Greece was judge more appropriate to phoenix

than that of an indigenous culture is curious. But it is also a paradoxical conclusion for isozaki, who chose to eschew Japanese

forms in the tsukuba center building. The architecture of isozaki is discernible. In this respect, isozaki¶s most recently

completed work, the art tower mito, is informative. This is a cultural complex consisting of a theater, a concert hall, an art

museum, and other facilities. The huge triangulated tower covered in silver titanium panels dominates the whole complex, an

exceptional condition in isozaki¶s recent projects. It appears,

however, not as the summit in a proposed hierarchical order but a sudden protrusion above the low volumes of the other

masses, which are moderate, restrained, and classizingParadoxical process For over half century, arata isozaki has followed an

architectural design process that engages the realms of the unbuilt and built, east and west, the future and the past.Throughout his career- including more than40 projects that span the globe- each work has been shaped by the technological

and cultural of its respective time. Yet, transcending a single master narrative a personal method links these projects from the

early visionary proposal for cities in the air that rose above the congestion of 1960sTokyo to the nara centennial hall, which

used the latest panta-up construction process developed in the 1990s. isozaki¶s design process gives concrete form to elusive

concept that embraces constant change.T his is evident both in specific designs, including theatrical spaces such as thefestival

plaza expo with moving stages and

seating, and with the changes between successive designs from decade to decade. But rather than just creating new form.

Isozaki¶s process engenders new meanings of using µ ruins¶- actual ruins of structures from the past and existing



building falling into a state of ruin- as a starting point of his architecture. Isozaki¶s critical and creative process relies on a series

of constrasts that evoke open-ended change. For isozaki, this corresponds to an understanding of the world based of the

Buddhist notion of mujo, which means µ mutability, uncertainty, transience, impermanence, uncertainty. Ashe noted in his

1972 essay µ about my method¶ ultimately then, the only thing that can control the design is a concrete method and this

method is linked throughout the whole process with the original image in what might be called dilectic. Transcending strict

functional and progressive modernist paradigms. Isozaki¶s architecture embraces the complexities of the experience

of architecture, its perception and the meanings it conveys. This work acknowledge the chaos of the contemporary experience

aspiring towards multiple focal points rather than unity or universality.

consequently, isozaki¶s process cannot be reduced to a single overarching theme, paradigm or god. It imagines the world as

collage, a mosaic or even a kaleidoscope. These metaphors are all conceptually important assemblages that go beyond the

divisionsa between the disciplines of architecture, art and literature, and the dichotomies of east and west, and past and future.

Ruins: past, present and future Ruins were symbolizing the past and some proposed structures of the future. The past and the

future had to be together in the present. This is not the image of the future, nor the image of the past; this was an image of the

present (arata isozaki) Isozaki has persistently considered the potential of ruins to be the foundation of his dynamic design

process. His ironical stance questions whether the constant evolution of ruins- of a city, a building or even an abandoned design

approach- is a source of growth or decay. Are ruins objects falling down or a framework for the future? Isozaki asserts, since

change is half-destructive and half- constructive, it should be permissible for architecture to create the exact appearance of

ruins. Architecture as ruins isboth fundamentally linked to the past and open to the future changes. This fatalist position takes

into account the gravity of the seen and unseen forces that actually shaped the built environment and thereby Remains critical

of a native belief in progress- whether of the modern movement in architecture or of post war japan in general. This worldviewof the city and architecture was shaped by isozaki¶s experiences coming of age in japan during the pacific war, of which he has

written: throughout my youth, until I began to study architecture, I was constantly confronted with the destruction

and elimination of the physical objects that surround me. Japanese cities went up inflames. Forms that had been there

An instant earlier vanished in the next. Between east and west The fusion of classical greek and japanese ruins in cit ies in the air

highlights a wider

dialectic between east and west within isozaki¶s wok as a means of breaking down borders to draw critically from an

international context. This is not a singular and homogeneous notion of international comparable to the international style

codified by the New York use of modern art in 1932. It is rather a distinct position between nations whereby one is able to

borrow selectively from different cultures and ideologies. This interstitial position has allowed isozaki to see both

commonalities and differences between japan, asia, Europe and America. Isozaki¶s education at Tokyo university further

expanded his horizons, intellectually, geographically, and temporally. He came to study architecture and city planning.

Later, his understanding of modern architectural history was shaped by the European and American accounts of banister

fletcher From 1954 , he become a member of thestudio of kenzo tange, who was searching for a methodology to synthesizeEurope and japan , or modern architecture and Japanese tradition, according to isozaki. In effect, isozaki was able to draw

equally from

classical European and Japanese traditions and history. A consciousness of Japanesearchitecture and city spaces emerged in

the1950s in reference to this international euro-American context among tange and his group of students, including isozaki.

Tange, together with 12 other members including isozaki and architectural historian teiji ito, subsequently formed the city

design research group and first published their research as Japanese city space. This research began with a survey of euro-

American urban planning and design examples as a basis of a comparison with Japanese context. Based on the four levels of

analysis of the physical, functional, structural, and symbolic city, they surveyed cities including georges-eugenehaussmann¶s

paris, Ebenezer howard¶s garden city, the mars group¶s 1938 london plan and Alison and peter smithson¶s cluster city. To this

group they added their own proposal and finally isozaki¶s city in the air as an example responding to the invisible city,

particularly rampant in the µhazy¶ conditions of japan. Isozaki concluded, ³ this study revealed that many of the characteristics

of Japanese cities cannot beadequately explained on the basis of western urban concept

Terence Riley, ed., The Changing of the Avant-Garde: Visionary Architectural Drawings from theHoward Gilman Collection, New

York: The Museum of Modern Art, 2002, p. 49

In Arata Isozaki's unrealized design for the Joint Core System spatial construction, massive pylons support elevated

transportation, housing, and office systems as well as parks and walkways, suspended above the existing city. This scheme was

undertaken at a time when Kenzo Tange and a group of five young architects working in his office, known as the Metabolists,

were creating radical solutions forrestructuring Tokyo's rapid and uncontrolled postwar growth. As a member of Tange's office,

Isozaki was inspired by Tange's proposal for a multilevel urban construction above the city. But, unlike Tange's plan,in which a

square support system limits expansion to four directions, Isozaki's round columns permit growth in any direction. Bevin Cline

and Tina di Carlo

arata isozaki is one of the most influential architects working today (addt'l info)

Documents