april 2020 - nj.gov · 15/11/2016 · cw visits with parent 2x/month february '20 71% 90%...

Commissioner’s Monthly Report

April 2020

Commissioner

Christine Beyer

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2

SUSTAINABILITY AND EXIT PLAN SUMMARY 3

SUSTAINABILITY AND EXIT PLAN - KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 4

DCF AT A GLANCE - DASHBOARD 5

SECTION I: CHILD PROTECTION & PERMANENCY 6-8

SECTION II: ADOLESCENT SERVICES 9

SECTION III: INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE INVESTIGATION UNIT 9

SECTION IV: CHILDREN'S SYSTEM OF CARE 10

SECTION V: FAMILY & COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS 11

SECTION VI: DIVISION ON WOMEN 11-12

ADDENDUM 1: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BY CPP LOCAL OFFICE 13

ADDENDUM 2: CASELOAD COMPLIANCE 14

Monthly ReportTable of Contents

2

Month 1 PerformanceExit Plan

Target

% to Meet

Target

CW Visits with Parent 2x/Month February '20 71% 90% -19%

Month PerformanceExit Plan

Target

% to Meet

Target

Initial FTMs within 45 days January '20 87% 80% 0%

Subsequent FTMs within 12 Months February '20 87% 80% 0%

Subsequent FTMs after 12 Months - Reunification Goal (n=22) February '20 73% 90% -17%

Subsequent FTMs after 12 Months - Other than Reunification Goal February '20 93% 90% 0%

Investigation Timeliness CP&P 60 Days December '19 85% 85% 0%

Investigation Timeliness CP&P 90 Days December '19 95% 95% 0%

Investigation Timeliness IAIU February '20 90% 80% 0%

Initial Case Plans February '20 90% 95% -5%

Ongoing Case Plans February '20 97% 95% 0%

Child Visit with Siblings February '20 78% 85% -7%

Parent-Child Weekly Visit 2 February '20 59% 60% -1%

Parent-Child Visits Biweekly February '20 71% 85% -14%

CW Visits Child Monthly (at placement site) 3 February '20 96% 93% 0%

CW Visits Child 2x/Month for first 2 Months in Placement December '19 91% 93% -2%

Ind. Living Assessments 14-18 Years Old February '20 93% 90% 0%

Supervisor Worker Ratio February '20 100% 95% 0%

Caseloads: IAIU Investigators February '20 100% 95% 0%

Caseloads: Intake February '20 94% 90% 0%

Caseloads: Permanency February '20 100% 95% 0%

Caseloads: Adoption February '20 100% 95% 0%

¹ Reported performance understates actual performance in some measures because data does not exclude all instances where an event could not occur.2 Compliance for Parent-Child Weekly Visits is measured by percent of children with weekly visits averaged over the number of weeks in the month.3 Caseworker visits with Children in Placement (all locations) February 2020: 98%.

The blue bar indicates DCF performance in the current month.

The red bar indicates the difference between the current performance and the Exit Plan target.

SUSTAINABILTY AND EXIT PLAN

Key Performance Indicators

On or About February 29th, 2020

"To Be Maintained" Measures

"To Be Achieved" Measures

4

84,422 39,576

44,846 14,075

42,963 MRSS: Dispatches in the month 2,349

4,174 MRSS: Interventions (includes prior dispatches) 1,573

38,789 99%

1,883

289 Care Management: Children Served 14,972

1,594 OOH Behavioral Health Settings: Children Served 932

FCP: Total Clients Served3 (November) 16,397 0

1,830

28,187 12,050

22,397

5,790

14,684 2,199

37% 3,591

11% 10,607

98% 1,145

96% Residential 17%

184 Non-Residential 83%

685

0 673

100% 18%

15,623 5,625

Youth 18-21

1,789

In-Home Setting (>18)

Children Under 18

Placed out of State

FSCs: Families Served 9 (November)

8 Appropriate use of shelters include 1) alternative to detention 2) short term placement of an adolescent in crisis not to extend beyond 30 days 3) a basic center for homeless youth.

2 The definition for "Youth Open with CSOC" reflects youth who are involved and eligible to receive services through CSOC.

1 Some children may be served by both CP&P and CSOC and are over-represented in the final count of children served in the month.

Remained in same Living situation

CP&P Quick Facts FCP & DoW Quick Facts7

Response Timeliness

Entries to Care

OOH Setting (>18)

Home Visiting: Families Served 9 (November)

SBYSP: Clients Served (November)

DV Services: Clients Served (November)

Children under 13 placed in shelters

Number of Human Trafficking Referrals7

OOH Behavioral Health Settings: Children Served - Excludes Youth in Detention Alternatives and Diagnostic Settings.

Effective June 2017, All DoW data is reported Monthly except for Residential DV shelters and Unmet Needs Data.

Shelter Placements (November 2019)

Hotline Referrals

Subsidized Adoptions/KLG(Includes Subsidized Adoptions and subsidized KLGs)

Rape Prevention Clients Served (April)

Monthly Staff Contacts/Children OOH

CPS Reports

CWS Referrals

6 FCP quick facts are based on new families for FSCs, but both new and ongoing clients for Home Visiting and SBYSP. DoW quick facts are based on new clients for DV Services, but both new

and ongoing clients served for SAARC , Displaced Homemakers and Rape Prevention Education.7 The cumulative number of human trafficking referrals between November 2013 and December 2019 was 941. This figure could change depending on when the data is extracted.

3 FCP measures clients served in SBYSP and DV Services. Since Family Success Centers and Home Visitation programs report data in terms of families served, each family is assumed to have at

least one client.4 Families served by DCF includes CP&P families and FCP families. FCP families served data has a one month lag. 5 CSOC Children may receive multiple services and are counted multiple times.

DCF At A Glance Dashboard

CP&P

FCP (Family Success Centers & Home Visiting) (April 2019)

DOW: Total Clients Served (November) Excludes DH and RPE

DCF: Families Served in the Month4

PerformCare Calls

On or About February 29th

, 2020

DCF At a Glance CSOC5 Quick Facts

DCF: Total Children Served in the Month1

Youth Open with CSOC 2

(unduplicated count)

DD Related Calls

CP&P: Children/Youth Served DD Eligible Children (unduplicated count)

OOH Setting (< 18)

In-Home Setting (< 18)

9 Due to system upgrades within DCF, FCP and DOW data will not be available beginning May 2019 . DCF will resume reporting on these data after the new systems have been updated with

these data.

Displaced Homemaker: Clients Served (April)

Youth > 13 in shelters less than 30 days8

New Clients

SAARC: Clients Served (November)

5

Feb-20∆ from Feb

'19

22,397 -8%

44,846 -7%

40,383 -6%

50.8% 2,265

39.6% 1,769

7.7% 342

1.9% 87

862 -18%

79 -28%

1,584 -9%

14,039 0%

184 -24%

202 -27%

Release Date: November 15, 2016

Children in Subsidized Adoptions

CP&P Quick Facts

Data in this chart includes children up to age 20.99

Families Under CP&P Supervision

Finalized Adoptions to date (CY2020) - As of 2/29/2020

Section I: Child Protection & Permanency

Entries to Care

Exits from Care

-19%

Resource Family (non-Kin)

Resource Family Kinship

Group and Residential

Independent Living

Children Legally Free for Adoption (Excludes TPR Appeals)

Children Under CP&P Supervision

Children Receiving CP&P In-Home Services

Children in CP&P Out-of-Home Placement

4,463

Children in Subsidized Kinship Legal Guardianship

4,463

2,625

3,699

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

CY2006 CY2007 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 CY2017 CY2018 CY2019 Jan'20

Feb'20

Children in Out-of-Home Placement:Annual Entries, Exits and Monthly Point in Time Children in Placement

Children in Placement-Point in Time Entries Exits

Point In Time data is based on data as of the last day of each month. Axis begins at 2,000 to enhance separation of data.

37%

11%

52%

CPS Reports

CWS Referrals

Non CPS/CWS Child Related Calls

Total SCR Intakes n = 14,684

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

7,500

8,000

Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

CPS & CWS Referrals

2017 2018 2019 2020

500

700

900

1,100

1,300

1,500

1,700

1,900

Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

CWS Referrals Assigned to Local Offices

2017 2018 2019 2020

6


10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Caseload Compliance(Individual Worker Level)

Sup/Wkr Ratio - Target 95%

Adoption - Target 95%

Permanency - Target 95%

Intake - Target 90%

79%

21%

Referrals to Early InterventionOctober 2019-February 2020

n = 405

Referred Not Referred

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Parent - Child Visits

Parent/child VisitsWeeklyTarget - 60%

Parent/child VisitsBi-weeklyTarget - 85%

75% 80% 85% 90% 95%

Jul2019

Aug2019

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Worker - Child Visits

Wkr-Child Contacts -1st 2 Mnth In PlcmntTarget - 93%

Out of Home Visitsat Plcmnt SiteTarget 93%

In Home Visits

50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Response and Investigation Timeliness

Investigation Timeliness 0-90 Days(Target 95%)

Investigation Timeliness 0-60 Days(Target 85%)

CPS Response Timeliness Time from SCR to Field

7


10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Initial & Subsequent Family Team Meetings

Subsequent FTM after12 Months(Other than reunification goal)Target 90%

Subsequent FTM after12 Months(Reunification Goal)Target 90%

Subsequent FTM within12 MonthsTarget 80%

Initial FTM within 45 daysTarget 80%

40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Initial & Ongoing Case Plans

Ongoing Case PlanTarget 95%

Initial Case PlanTarget 95%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Worker- Parent Visits & Sibling Visits

Wkr-ParentContacts -Reun. Goal (2x/month)Target - 90%

Child Visitswith SiblingsTarget - 85%

40%

60%

80%

100%

June2019

July2019

August2019

Sep2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Medical Assessments forChildren in Out of Home Placement (OOHP)

Pre-Placement Medical Assessments in Appropriate Settings

Comprehensive Medical Examinations Within 30 Days

40% 60% 80% 100%

Q1 '19

Q2 '19

Q3 '19

Q4 '19

Immunizations forChildren in OOHP

Immunizations Up To Date

85%

12%3%

Children in OOHP with Annual Dental Exams

January - June 2018n=3,637

Semi Annual Dental Exam CompletedAnnual Exam CompletedNo Evidence of Dental Exam

8

1,883

(39.1%) 113

(11.1%) 32

Congregate Care Setting (25.3%) 73

Independent Living (24.6%) 71

930

Nov-16

Release

Date:

Resource Family Kinship

Section III: Institutional Abuse Investigation Unit

Section II: Adolescent ServicesOAS Quick Facts (February 2020)

Youth 18-21

Youth 18-21 years old served by CP&P⁴

Youth served “In Home” living with a parent/relative or living

independently⁵1,594

Youth served "Out-of-Home"

289

Youth Receiving Adoption or KLG Subsidy

4 The data includes all 18-21 year olds who are active participants in an open CP&P case as of the end of the month.

5 The terms “out-of-home” and “in-home” may not be appropriate for all 18-21 year olds. Youth identified as “in-home”

can either be residing with a parent/relative, or living independently. Any of these youth may be receiving services. These

definitions are currently being reviewed to better understand how we capture DCF’s work with this population. The goal

of this ongoing work is to create three meaningful categories for 18-21 year olds 1) Youth in a formal out-of-home

placement setting, 2) Youth that achieved permanency, and 3) Youth that never achieved permanency.

Resource Family (non-Kin)

0

100

200

300

400

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Nu

mb

er

of

Re

po

rts

Pe

r M

on

th

IAIU Child Protective Service Reports

2017 2018 2019 2020

40%

60%

80%

100%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

IAIU Investigation Timeliness

Exit PlanTarget(80%)

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

IAIU Caseload ReportStatewide

No more than 8 new investigations and 12 cases/month

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central

Metro

Northern

Southern

IAIU Caseload Report by RegionFebruary 2020

96% 95%

94% 93% 93% 93%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Sept2019

Oct2019

Nov2019

Dec2019

Jan2020

Feb2020

Completed Independent Living Assessmentsof Youth Ages 14-18 years

Exit PlanTarget= 90%

9

Nov-16


Section IV: Children’s System of Care

14,972

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

16,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Children in Care ManagementFebruary 2020

2017 2018 2019 2020

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Rate of Children in Care Management by CountyMarch 2020

n=14,972

Residential Treatment Center (RTC)

Specialty Bed

Treatment Home

Psychiatric Community Home

Group Home

Intensive RTC

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Children in Out-of-Home Treatment Settings February 2020

n=932

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400


Children in Out of Home Treatment SettingsFebruary 2020

2017 2018 2019 2020

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000


Mobile Response Stabilization Services (MRSS) Dispatched

2017 2018 2019 2020

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Jan'19

Mar'19

May'19

Jul'19

Sep '19 Nov'19

Jan'20

PerformCare Total Calls Behavioral Health Related Calls I/DD Related Calls

10

Nov-16


Section V: Family & Community Partnerships

Section VI: Division on Women

465

465

483

361

459

347

278

326

284

289

333

263

56

80

58

73

59

42

59

29

52

38

48

33

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Sexual Assault, Abuse and Rape Care Programs (SAARC)

# Ongoing Victims Served # New Victims Served

# Ongoing Significant Others Served # New Significant Others Served

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

18,000

June July Aug Sep Oct Nov

School-Based Youth Services Programs -New and Ongoing Clients Served

2016 2017 2018 2019

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

Displaced Homemaker ProgramClients Served

n= 673

New Clients Served Ongoing Clients Served

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500


Family Success Centers - Families Served

2016 2017 2018 2019

2%

16%

82%

0.1%

Individuals Served by Rape Prevention and Education Programs (RPE)April 2019n = 5,625

Curriculum Multi Session DoseAttendees

Curriculum Single Dose SessionAttendees

Outreach Events Attendees

Coalition/Community MobilizationMeeting Attendees

11

Section VI: Division on Women

* Effective June 2017, All DoW data is reported Monthly except for Residential DV shelters and Unmet Needs Data.

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600


Domestic Violence Services - Adults and Children Admitted to Residential and Non-Residential Services

Total New Clients

2016 2017 2018 2019

0

50

100

150

200

250

Morris Salem Union Passaic Middlesex

Q4 '18 Q1 '19 Q2 '19 Q3 '19

Non-admitted clients are offered referrals to other counties.

Graph represents the 5 counties with most clients not admitted during the entire time period (sum of four quarters).

Top 5 Counties with Residential DV Shelters Over CapacityWomen and Children Not Admitted to Domestic Violence Shelters Due to Insufficient Space

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

2016 2017 2018 2019

Residential Domestic Violence Programs: Victims' Average Length of Stay (days)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Union Passaic Bergen Mercer Sussex

Q4 '18 Q1 '19 Q2 '19 Q3 '19

Graph represents the 5 counties with most DV victims waiting for services during the entire time period (sum of four

quarters).

Top 5 Counties with Unmet Need for Non-Residential DV ServicesDomestic Violence Victims Waiting for Non-Residential Services

12

Local OfficeMeasure

6

Measure

9

Measure

10

Measure

13

Measure

14

Measure

16

Measure

17

Measure

18

Measure

19

Measure

22

Measure

28

Measure

29

Measure

30

Measure

31

Atlantic East 97% 98% 98% 90% 93% 94% 82% 100% 100% 95% 68% 56% 69% 82%

Atlantic West 95% 100% 97% 96% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 81% 73% 74% 76%

Bergen Central 100% 88% 99% 97% 99% 100% 100% 86% 100% 74% 55% 69% 71%

Bergen South 100% 100% 99% 96% 98% 94% 100% 100% 100% 100% 84% 77% 81% 74%

Burlington East 94% 96% 98% 86% 96% 80% 95% 50% 94% 100% 85% 51% 68% 84%

Burlington West 97% 92% 98% 65% 92% 84% 76% 0% 70% 100% 78% 63% 70% 83%

Camden Central 87% 91% 92% 86% 94% 98% 85% 60% 100% 78% 69% 54% 72% 78%

Camden East 98% 95% 98% 73% 91% 92% 90% 100% 95% 94% 63% 57% 69% 75%

Camden North 90% 86% 95% 66% 86% 87% 58% 0% 90% 93% 64% 67% 76% 81%

Camden South 93% 90% 97% 73% 94% 74% 89% 100% 56% 91% 69% 52% 72% 57%

Cape May 98% 100% 95% 87% 95% 93% 83% 100% 83% 82% 66% 81% 91%

Cumberland East 100% 92% 98% 65% 91% 75% 88% 100% 100% 100% 66% 54% 62% 75%

Cumberland West 99% 100% 97% 65% 92% 86% 96% 80% 100% 100% 77% 55% 65% 78%

Essex Central 84% 93% 92% 81% 96% 47% 100% 50% 38% 88% 68% 67% 75% 79%

Essex North 87% 91% 98% 89% 98% 50% 33% 0% 54% 75% 49% 63% 71% 83%

Essex South 98% 90% 90% 89% 96% 77% 76% 82% 100% 56% 41% 61% 80%

Gloucester East 100% 100% 97% 74% 91% 79% 79% 0% 30% 100% 69% 66% 83% 83%

Gloucester West 99% 89% 95% 86% 96% 100% 89% 50% 92% 100% 58% 68% 77% 77%

Hudson Central 100% 82% 96% 72% 86% 93% 77% 60% 85% 84% 69% 53% 64% 73%

Hudson North 100% 100% 98% 96% 98% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 79% 70% 69% 79%

Hudson South 100% 100% 96% 89% 94% 60% 91% 100% 89% 70% 62% 72% 85%

Hudson West 100% 100% 95% 94% 98% 100% 86% 82% 100% 83% 55% 82% 71%

Hunterdon 100% 93% 90% 94% 98% 40% 20% 100% 69% 52% 46% 45%

Mercer North 91% 63% 86% 76% 93% 79% 76% 100% 93% 94% 51% 46% 55% 74%

Mercer South 93% 74% 87% 78% 95% 90% 100% 50% 100% 93% 49% 66% 71% 60%

Middlesex Central 96% 55% 95% 75% 91% 79% 0% 100% 60% 63% 75% 78% 86%

Middlesex Coastal 94% 97% 97% 91% 96% 77% 50% 100% 96% 61% 45% 60% 67%

Middlesex West 87% 71% 83% 81% 94% 64% 53% 75% 50% 71% 48% 58% 71% 75%

Monmouth North 100% 100% 99% 94% 99% 94% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 64% 81% 90%

Monmouth South 100% 100% 99% 95% 98% 92% 100% 100% 100% 91% 85% 83% 89%

Morris East 89% 73% 100% 93% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 96% 83% 100%

Morris West 95% 92% 98% 77% 92% 94% 100% 100% 100% 71% 55% 88% 79%

Newark Center City 100% 95% 97% 82% 96% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 64% 60% 67% 85%

Newark Northeast 99% 98% 93% 92% 98% 84% 95% 92% 94% 100% 72% 49% 65% 86%

Newark South 98% 92% 94% 93% 98% 90% 92% 95% 100% 94% 48% 52% 63% 76%

Ocean North 97% 95% 100% 93% 97% 83% 100% 100% 95% 76% 65% 68% 73%

Ocean South 95% 96% 98% 90% 97% 92% 100% 100% 96% 100% 74% 59% 73% 76%

Passaic Central 92% 94% 99% 90% 96% 100% 90% 100% 100% 77% 83% 66% 82% 83%

Passaic North 95% 91% 97% 85% 94% 73% 50% 0% 100% 100% 74% 56% 71% 73%

Salem 99% 100% 98% 75% 92% 88% 94% 100% 100% 88% 81% 62% 72% 82%

Somerset 100% 75% 96% 91% 98% 67% 90% 100% 100% 67% 43% 72% 93%

Sussex 97% 100% 97% 88% 96% 90% 100% 100% 82% 94% 84% 92% 92%

Union Central 100% 97% 90% 77% 94% 85% 82% 100% 100% 93% 58% 48% 67% 79%

Union East 95% 100% 94% 84% 94% 41% 55% 50% 37% 100% 60% 45% 63% 69%

Union West 95% 91% 99% 77% 91% 53% 50% 100% 88% 54% 28% 44% 52%

Warren 85% 100% 84% 80% 90% 30% 55% 50% 71% 100% 65% 56% 69% 74%

Statewide 96% 92% 95% 85% 95% 84% 84% 77% 91% 93% 68% 58% 70% 78%

Blank cells mean that the office did not have any children eligible for that measure during that period.

Measure # Final Target

M# 6 95%

M# 9 93%

M# 10 93%

M# 13 85%

M# 14 95%

M# 16 80%

M# 17 80%

M# 18 90%

M# 19 90%

M# 22 95%

M# 28 90%

M# 29 60%

M# 30 85%

M#31 85%

September'19-February '20


Weekly Parent/Child Visits - Average weekly visits for 6 weeks.

Sibling Visits September'19-February '20

Bi-weekly Parent-Child Visits

Initial Case Plans within 30 Days of Child Removal

01/25/2020-02/29/2020


Caseworker visits Parent 2x/Month

Description of the Measure

Caseworker Visits with Children 2x/Month in 1st& 2nd Months of placement

CP&P Key Performance Indicators by Local Office - 6 Months View

Met Target Within 10% of Meeting Target < 60% of Final Target

Time Period Analyzed


July '19-December '19

Monthly Caseworker Visits with Children at child's placement site

Ongoing Case Plans

Investigation Completion within 90 days




3 Subsequent FTMs after 12 Months in Placement - Reunification Goal September'19-February '20

2 Subsequent FTMs after 12 Months in Placement - Non - Reunification Goal

Initial Family Team Meeting (FTMs) within 45 days of Child Removal

Investigation Completion within 60 days

August '19-January '20

September'19-February '20 3 Subsequent FTMs within 12 Months of Child Removal


13

Met Target < 70% of workers in compliance

Worker

Compliance

Office

Compliant?

Yes/No

Worker

Compliance

Office

Compliant?

Yes/No

Worker

Compliance

Office

Compliant?

Yes/No

Atlantic East 79% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Atlantic West 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Bergen Central 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Bergen South 97% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Burlington East 96% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Burlington West 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Camden Central 83% No 100% Yes 67% No

Camden East 68% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Camden North 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Camden South 63% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Cape May 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Cumberland East 91% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Cumberland West 81% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Essex Central 95% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Essex North 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Essex South 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Gucester East 83% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Gucester West 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Hudson Central 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Hudson North 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Hudson South 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Hudson West 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Hunterdon 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Mercer North 100% Yes 96% Yes 100% Yes

Mercer South 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Middlesex Central 74% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Middlesex Coastal 87% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Middlesex West 97% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Monmouth North 97% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Monmouth South 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Morris East 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Morris West 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Newark Center City 100% Yes 96% Yes 100% Yes

Newark Northeast 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Newark South 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Ocean North 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Ocean South 97% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Passaic Central 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Passaic North 94% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Salem 67% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Somerset 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Sussex 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Union Central 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Union East 90% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Union West 76% No 100% Yes 100% Yes

Warren 100% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

Statewide⁴ 94% Yes 100% Yes 100% Yes

4 Statewide

- Performance is based on total workers in compliance for the month, not an average. Percentages are rounded to the whole number.

1 Intake

- Intake worker compliance: % of workers with no more than 8 new intakes in the month, no more than 12 Primary families and no more than a total of 14

families . Target=90%

- Office Compliance: % of offices that meet the casead standards of no more than 8 new intakes and 12 total families. Target = 95%

2 Permanency

- Permanency worker compliance: % of workers who meet the casead standards of no more than 15 families and 10 children in placement. Target = 95%

- Office Compliance: % of offices that meet the casead standards of no more than 15 families and 10 children in placement. Target = 95%

3 Adoption

- Adoption worker compliance: % of adoption workers who meet the casead standards of 15 or fewer children. Target = 95%

- Office Compliance: % of offices that meet the casead standards of 15 or fewer children. Target = 95%

- Offices with blank data do not carry adoption caseads , however adoption cases in those offices are handled by other offices in that area.

Worker and Office Caseads by Worker Type and by cal Office -February 2020

cal Office

1 Intake 2 Permanency 3 Adoption

14

april 2020 - nj.gov · 15/11/2016 · cw visits with parent 2x/month february '20 71% 90%...

Documents