april 16, 2013 state board of education action...
TRANSCRIPT
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Action Item April 16, 2013
SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment to 6A-1.09981, Implementation of Florida’s System of School Improvement and Accountability
PROPOSED BOARD ACTION
For Approval
AUTHORITY FOR STATE BOARD ACTION
Sections 1001.02, 1008.22, 1008.33, 1008.34, 1008.345, Florida Statutes
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Section 1008.34, Florida Statutes, requires the State Board of Education to specify, by rule, the grading criteria and point system used for school grades. In order to be aligned with the requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) waiver, the rule is brought forward with an amendment to revise the definition of “graduates” for the five-year high school graduation rate in the school grades calculation. The definition of “graduates” for the five-year graduation rate will be changed to include only standard diploma recipients as graduates. For 2012, the five-year graduation rate counted special diploma recipients as graduates (they are counted as non-graduates in the federal four-year rate).
Supporting Documentation Included: Proposed Rule 6A-1.09981, Implementation of Florida’s System of School Improvement and Accountability and School Grades Rule Changes Presentation
Facilitator/Presenter: Jane Fletcher, Interim Deputy Commissioner, Accountability, Research, and Measurement
6A-1.09981 Implementation of Florida’s System of School Improvement and Accountability.
(1) through c. No change.
d. For high schools, when data for the elements described in paragraph (4)(c) of this rule is available for ten (10)
or more students, the accountability system will also include graduation rates as measured by the federal uniform
graduation rate according to 34 CFR § 200.19 (http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-01332),
which rate calculation is incorporated herein by reference, a five-year federal uniform rate, modified to include
special diploma graduates, an at-risk graduation rate, participation and performance in accelerated mechanisms, and
college readiness as measured by the Postsecondary Education Readiness Test (P.E.R.T.), or other common
placement tests authorized under Rule 6A-10.0315, FAC., which is incorporated by reference herein.
2. through (4)(b) No change.
(c) Additional components that apply to high schools:
1. Fifty (50) percent of school grades for high schools (schools that include grades 9 through 12 among grades
taught) shall be based on the following components in addition to the components previously described in paragraph
(4)(a) of this rule:
a. High school graduation rate. School grade points for the high school graduation rate will be based on a
combination of two graduation rate calculations. The first graduation rate component shall be a four-year adjusted
cohort rate using criteria for the federal uniform graduation rate defined in the Code of Federal Regulations at 34
C.F.R. § 200.19(b). The second graduation rate component shall be a five-year adjusted federal uniform cohort
graduation rate. The five-year graduation rate will apply the same criteria as for the four-year graduation rate, except
that fifth-year standard diploma recipients will also be counted as graduates with one exception: Students with
disabilities who earn a special diploma will be counted as graduates in the five-year graduation rate component for
Florida's high school grades.
b. through f. No change.
2. The school grading measures and requirements described in subparagraph (4)(c)1. of this rule, shall be
applied to high schools for which there are at least ten (10) students included in the denominator of each component
described in paragraph (4)(c) of this rule. For high schools in which there are fewer than ten (10) students in the
denominator of any one of these components, except for the four-year graduation rate for at risk students and the
five-year graduation rate the school grade shall be determined using the components described in paragraph (4)(a) of
this rule and shall not include any of the components described in subparagraphs (4)(c)1. of this rule. However, for
high schools in which there are fewer than ten (10) students in the denominator of the four-year high school
graduation rate for academically at-risk students (sub-subparagraph (4)(c)1.b. of this rule), the grade point
component defined in sub-subparagraph (5)(c)1.a. of this rule shall be substituted for the grade point component
defined in sub-subparagraph (4)(c)1.b. of this rule. For high schools with at least ten (10) students in the four-year
graduation rate cohort but with fewer than ten (10) students in the five-year modified graduation rate cohort, the
five-year modified graduation cohort will be replaced by the four-year graduation rate modified to count special
diploma recipients as graduates.
(5) through 3. No change.
(c) Points for high schools in addition to the points described in paragraph (5)(a) of this rule (800 points
available).
1. Graduation Rate (200 points). The total possible points awarded for the combined graduation rate component
is 200 points: 100 possible points awarded for the four-year federal uniform graduation rate and 100 points for the
five-year modified federal uniform graduation rate. School grade points for annual growth or decline as described in
subparagraph (5)(c)7. of this rule will be applied to the points earned for the combined graduation rate component.
2. At-Risk Graduation Rate (100 points). The total possible points awarded for the at-risk graduation rate
component is 100 points. For this component, 0.5 grade points shall be awarded for each percent of students counted
as on-time graduates in the four-year graduation rate, and 0.5 grade points shall be awarded for each percent of
students counted as graduates in the 5-year cohort in the modified five-year graduation rate. School grade points for
annual growth or decline as described in subparagraph (5)(c)7. of this rule will be applied to the points earned for
the combined graduation rate component for at-risk students.
3. through (9) No change.
Rulemaking Authority 1001.02, 1008.22, 1008.34, 1008.345 FS. Law Implemented 1008.22, 1008.34, 1008.345,
1008.36 FS. History–New 10-11-93, Amended 12-19-95, 3-3-97, 1-24-99, 2-2-00, 2-11-02, 12-23-03, 5-15-06, 6-
19-08, 11-26-08, 11-12-09, 6-21-11, 7-16-12, 1-17-13,
SBE RULE 6A‐1.09981 School Grades Rule Changes State Board of Education
April 2013
Jane Fletcher Interim Deputy CommissionerAccountability, Research, and MeasurementFlorida Department of Education
Overview
History of School Grades Changes School Grades Basic Models ‐ Models by school type (Change in Models)
Changes Scheduled for 2013
Proposed Rule Adjustment for 2013
Revision to meet ESEA requirements for reporting graduation rates
Florida School Grades’ History of Change
School Grades Basic Model‐Assessment‐Based Measures Included in School Grades for All School Types
Basic Elements of School Grades (800 Points)
• Performance – Reading, Mathematics, Science and Writing: ‐ Percentage of students scoring satisfactory or higher
• Learning Gains – Reading and Mathematics: ‐ Percentage of students
• Increasing an achievement level • Maintaining a satisfactory achievement level • Remaining at achievement levels below satisfactory who increased performanceenough to exceed expected growth Plus extra weighting for students who move up to level 4 or 5 on FCAT 2.0 or EOCs, and forprevious year’s low performers who make greater‐than‐expected gains ‐ Note: Students who decrease a level are not counted as making gains.
• Learning Gains of Lowest 25% – Reading and Mathematics: ‐ Percentage of students in lowest 25% who meet learning gains criteria (withextra weighting for students moving to the highest levels or making greater‐than‐expected gains)
Elementary Schools 2012‐13 (New for 2013 underscored ‐‐ already adopted in rule.)
Middle Schools 2012‐13
High Schools 2012‐13*
* K‐12 and 6‐12 combination schools are graded on a 1700‐point model, which adds the middle‐school acceleration measure to the high school model.
“Other” Elements of High School Grades
• Acceleration – Participation in accelerated courses
• Percentage of students in AP, IB, and AICE exams, Industry Certifications, and Dual Enrollment – Performance in accelerated courses
• Percentage of students eligible to earn college credit
• Graduation Rate – Four‐Year Graduation Rate (Federal Rate)
• Percentage of students graduating within 4 years w/standard diploma – Five‐Year Graduation Rate
• Percentage of students graduating within 5 years w/standard diploma or special diploma (subject to revision for 2012‐13)
– At‐risk graduation rate • Percentage of at‐risk students graduating using both rates above
• College Readiness – Reading
• Percentage of on‐time graduates scoring college ready – Mathematics
• Percentage of on‐time graduates scoring college ready
School Grades Changes for 2013 (Pending Measure Underscored)
• FCAT Writing Standard re‐set at 3.5 • Scores for students at alternative schools electing a school improvement rating are
credited back for performance as well as learning gains for inclusion in the home schools’ grades.
• Reading performance threshold (25%) begins. • New achievement Level Standards for Science (FCAT 2.0) • New assessments (EOCs) and achievement levels – Biology, Geometry • Additional EOCs and Industry Certifications are included in middle school acceleration. • Geometry and Biology EOCs are included in math and science performance measures.
– Biology provides points for science for high schools. • Geometry is included in learning gains calculations for math. • Algebra 1 is included in determining Low 25% group for math. • Provision for One‐Letter‐Grade Drop Limit expires. • Learning gains requirement for the Low 25% will be reinstated. • The definition of “graduates” for the five‐year graduation rate must be revised to meet
ESEA requirements – standard diplomas only.
Five‐Year Graduation Rate
• Calculated as a follow‐up to the prior year four‐year federal rate. • Uses the same denominator as the prior‐year four‐year federal rate, but accounts for
additional graduates in Year 5. • For 2012, counted special diploma recipients as graduates (they are counted as non‐
graduates in the federal four‐year rate). • We counted special diploma recipients in the five‐year rate to provide incentive for
schools/districts to continue to focus on this group of students. • However, as recently clarified by the U.S. Department of Education, ESEA requirements do
not allow Florida to count special diploma recipients as graduates in an accountability system that is used to meet federal reporting requirements.
• Under federal requirements, a student may be counted as a graduate only if the student meets all state requirements for a standard diploma. CFR Title 34, Part 200, Section 200.19
• Florida must therefore revise its definition of “graduate” in the five‐year graduation rate measure to conform with federal regulations.
Five‐Year Graduation Rate: Proposed Revision
• Calculate the five‐year graduation rate as a follow‐up to the federal four‐year graduation rate cohort from the prior year, but count only standard
diploma recipients as graduates (includes 5th year graduates).
• The five‐year at‐risk graduation rate would be
calculated the same way (counting only standard
diplomas in the numerator).
Five‐Year Graduation Rate: Additional Information
• Because the five‐year rate is a follow‐up to the prior year’s four‐year federal rate, the current year’s four‐year federal rate cohort is a completely different group of students. – In some cases, points earned for the four‐year rate (current year)
could be higher than for the five‐year rate (following up the prior‐year’s four‐year cohort).
– However, the five‐year rate can never be lower than the prior year’s four‐year rate.
Five‐Year Graduation Rate: Additional Information
• Difference between average points earned on the five‐year rate as currently calculated and average points that would have been earned if special diploma recipients were classified as non‐graduates:
Five‐Year Graduation Rate: Additional Information
• How would high school grades have changed in 2012 if special diploma recipients were non‐graduates in the five‐year rates?
– 12 schools would have lowered grades: 3 A’s to B’s, and 9 B’s to C’s