approved by aicte, affiliated to vtu, iso 9001:2008

Department of Information

Science & Engineering

Welcomes

NBA Expert Team

BNM Institute of TechnologyApproved by AICTE, Affiliated to VTU, ISO 9001:2008 Certified and Accredited as grade A

Institution by NAAC

Institute Vision and Mission

VisionTo be one of the premier Institutes of Engineering and Management

education in the country.

Mission To provide Engineering and Management education that meets the

needs of human resources in the country.

To develop leadership qualities, team spirit and concern for

environment in students.

Objectives To achieve educational goals as stated in the vision through the

mission statements which depicts the distinctive characteristics of

the Institution.

To make teaching-learning process an enjoyable pursuit for the

students and teachers.

Dept. of ISE 2

Department of Information Science &

Engineering

Sl.

No.

Program

Name

Name of

the Department

Year

of

start

IntakeAccreditation

Status

Total Number

of Students

Total number

of Faculty

1

B.E. in

Information

Science &

Engineering

Information

Science &

Engineering

2001 60Applying first

time172 12

Dept. of ISE 3

Department Highlights

Permanent Affiliation from 2014-15 to 2018-19

Five Ranks in University Examinations

Three VTU approved Research Supervisors

75% of the faculty are involved in research

Two Faculties have obtained Ph.Ds in the past two years

Department has produced Four Entrepreneurs

Unique Initiative – Course Beyond Syllabus

Department regularly organizes Workshops and Technical Talks

Dept. of ISE 4

Dr. Girisha G S and Dr. Surabhi Narayan have obtained Ph.D. during the

academic year 2017-18 and 2016-17 respectively.

Mrs. Madhura Prakash has secured First rank in MTech (SE)

Ms. Harini has secured Second rank in M.Tech (CSE)

Dr. Saritha Chakrasali and Dr. Girisha G S have received Appreciation Letters for

their performance in Faculty Appraisal.

Dr. Surabhi Narayan was the Co-investigator for the funded project titled “Code

Generation for Document images based on Handwritten Components” under VTU

Research Grant Scheme for the period 2011-14. The grant amount was Rs. 9.92

Lakhs

Staff Achievements

Dept. of ISE 5

Ranks in VTU Examinations

Aparna B V

6th Rank

(2014-15)

Anusha V

4th Rank

(2016-17)

Akanksha

Bharadwaj

6th Rank

(2016-17) Neetu Purba

7th Rank

(2016-17)

Rajalakshmi K R

1th Rank

M.Tech SSE

(2016-17)

Dept. of ISE 6

Student Achievements

Ron Astle Lobo, J Shesha Shankar,

Sridhar Suresh Bhat won 2nd prize in

Tech Horizon’18, National Level

Project Exhibition for the project titled

“Development of Tourism Information

System using Content based Filtering”

Sukriti Sharma, Apurva V S and Vidya

Meenakshi K won the Best Project

Award worth prize amount of Rs 75,000

at JEDi Project Challenge for the project

titled “Traffic Density Estimation with a

boosted SVM classifier”

Project Champions Akshay H Pai,

Mridula Venkatesh, Nirupama Suresh,

Nithin S Nadig, Mr. C S Srikanth,

Director Technology Auto TEC

Systems Pvt Ltd.

Akshay Anand of VII Semester has

received Bharat Ratna Dr. M.S

Subbulakshmi Fellowship of Rs 1 Lakh

consecutively for 2 years

Hiranmayee S Dixit of V Sem

has won many prizes in VTU

Youth Festival

Sumukh Venugopal of VII Sem has won

many prizes in VTU Youth festivalThanusha S P has represented

VTU in National Level Archery

Competitions

Dept. of ISE 7

Student Achievements - Entrepreneurs

Mr. Pavan

Entrada solutions Pvt. Ltd

https://www.entradasolutions.com/

Mr. Deekshith

Centura Technologies

http://centuratechnologies.azurewebsites.net

Mr. Sreedhar Gundappa

Local cube Commerce Pvt. Ltd

http://storeking.in/

Mr. Hassan Raza

Useful Social Network

https://www.usocl.com

Dept. of ISE 8

PEO-Mission Correlation Matrix

PEO/Mission elements

M1 M2 M3 M4

Needs of industry, Higher Education, Core Competency

Innovative Thinking & Self-

Learning

Individual & Team Spirit, Leadership

Quality

Societal needs, Environmental

Concern

PEO1:Analyze, design and

implement solutions in the field of

Information Science and

Engineering and adapt to changes

in technology by self-learning.

3 3 - 2

PEO2: Work effectively as an

individual and in a team,

exhibiting leadership qualities to

meet the goals of the organization.

3 - 3 -

PEO3: Keep abreast with the

technology and pursue higher

education.

3 3 - 2

PEO4: Work with professionalism

to meet societal needs along with

concern for environment.

3 - 2 3

Dept. of ISE 9

Process to identify Curriculum Gap

Program Curriculum and

Teaching – Learning Process

Batch Curriculum Evaluation

2012-162010 scheme

Non CBCS

Scheme

25 + 1002013-17

2014-18

2015-19

CBCS scheme20 + 80

2016-20

2017-21 40 + 60

Dept. of ISE 10

Compliance of University Curriculum

Program Outcome

Curriculum

Gap in

percentage

(%)

PO7 : Environment and

Sustainability33.33

PO8 : Ethics 33.33

PO9 : Individual and Team

Work08.33

PO10 : Communication 50.00

PO11 : Project Management

and Finance66.66

PO12 : Life-long Learning 83.33

Curriculum Gap 2010 Scheme

Program Outcome

Curriculum

Gap in

percentage

(%)

PO6: Engineer and

Society67

PO7 : Environment and

Sustainability42

PO11 : Project

Management and

Finance

33

PO12 : Life-long

Learning 25

Curriculum Gap CBCS Scheme

Dept. of ISE 11

Sl.

NoInitiative 2017-18 2016-17 2015-16

1Course Beyond

Syllabus

1. Embedded Systems and

IOT

2. Project Management

1. Python

Programming

2. Machine Learning

Agile

Technologies

2Innovative Project

Lab winners5 4 2

3Workshops,

Technical Talks9 5 4

4Online Course

Certifications95 (4 courses) - -

5Innovative Teaching

Method

Cross words, Peer Review,

Activity, Case Studies, Mini-

projects

Peer Review, Activity,

Case StudiesCase Studies

6 T5/ TW5 III sem and V sem - -

Pedagogical Initiatives

Dept. of ISE 12

Sl.

NoYear Course Resource Person

Target

AudienceRelevance to POs Evaluation Impact Analysis

1 2017-18

Embedded

Systems and

IOT

Mr. Sandeep

Engineers NookIII Sem

PO1, PO2, PO3,

PO5, PO6, PO8,

PO9, PO12, PSO2

Test

Student Feedback

Max Score : 13/20

Avg Score : 11.07

Implementation of

Remote control

vehicle

2 2017-18

Embedded

Systems and

IOT

Mr. Sandeep

Engineers Nook V Sem

PO1, PO2, PO3,

PO5, PO6, PO8,

PO9, PO12, PSO2

Test

Student Feedback

Max Score : 7/20

Avg Score : 5.42

3 IPL Projects

Manish Y M

Sarthak Surekha

Srikanth Katti

3 2017-18Project

Management

Dr. Shubra Banerji

IBMVII Sem PO2, PO9, PO11

Test

Max Score: 36/50

Avg Score: 18

Project

Management Skills

4 2016-17Python

Programming

1. Mr. Muralidhar

Dell Systems

2. Mr. Subash

Dell Systems

V Sem

PO1, PO2, PO5,

PO6, PO11, PO12,

PSO1

Test

Max Score: 30/30

Avg Score: 27.58

Final year project

Implementations (4

projects)B5,B7,B9,

B15

5 2016-17Machine

Learning

Dr. Kumar T

Rajamani

Robert Bosch

Mr. Viraj Ghorpade

Robert Bosh

VI Sem

PO1, PO2, PO5,

PO6, PO11, PO12,

PSO1

Test

Max Score: 8/10

Avg Score: 3.13

Final year project

Implementations (6

Projects)B1,B6,B9,

B11,B14,B3

6 2015-16Agile

Technologies

Mr. Karthik

Suryanarayan

Ellucian Systems

VI SemPO3, PO5, PO11,

PO12

Test

Max Score: 29/41

Avg Score: 7.22

Project

Management Skills

Course Beyond Syllabus

Dept. of ISE 13

Adherence to Calendar of Events

College calendar of Events

VTU calendar of Events

Dept calendar of Events

University Calendar of

Events

Institute Calendar of

Events

Department Calendar of

Events

Dissemination

among stakeholdersCompliance Report

Dept. of ISE 14

Assistance to slow learners and

Encouragement to Bright students

Encouragement to Bright students

Question Banks

Remedial Classes

Monitoring the progress

Distinction holders are appreciated with Mementos

Awards to Top 3 Students in the department every

semester

University Rank Holders are awarded Gold

Medals by the Institution

Encouraged to take Internships

CSI Membership is sponsored by the institution to

top 3 students

Assistance to Slow Learners

Dept. of ISE 15

Final Year Projects

YearTotal Number of

Batches

Best Project

Awards

Best

Presentation

Awards

Project Awards

in inter institute

Project

Competitions

Publications

2017-18 16 1 2 1 4

2016-17 19 2 3 - 1

2015-16 22 2 9 - 2

Broad Areas• Machine Learning

• Image Processing

• Data Mining

• Computer Networks

Area of Core Competency• Machine Learning

• Product Development

• Computer Networks

Dept. of ISE 16

Attainment of Program outcomes

Type Components Weightage (%) Total weightage (%)

Direct Attainment Course Attainment 80

100Indirect Attainment

Program Exit Survey

20Alumni Survey

Employer Survey

Type Components Sub-ComponentsWeightage

(%)

Total

weightage (%)

TheoryDirect Attainment

Three Internal Assessment 5090

Semester End Examination 50

Indirect Attainment Course Exit Survey 10 10

LaboratoryDirect Attainment

Continuous evaluation through Observation, Record +

Viva Voce. Two Internal Assessments.50

90

Semester End Examination 50

Indirect Attainment Course Exit Survey 10 10

Project Attainment

Feasibility Seminar

50100

Three Progress Seminars + Final demonstration of

project.

External Evaluation of project. 50

Technical seminar Attainment Seminar and Report evaluation. 100 100

Attainment of Course Outcomes

Program Attainment

Dept. of ISE 17

Steps Process to compute CO attainment through Internal Assessment

1 The marks scored by the students in internal assessment and assignment questions is segregated based on COs and is recorded.

2The marks scored [IA + Assignment questions] and the maximum applicable marks for each CO for every student are

calculated.

3The percentage of attainment is calculated as [=marks scored / max marks]. The step 2 and 3 is calculated for every CO and for

every student. Two best IA scores of three IA scores is considered for computations of course outcome.

4

Attainment levels are defined within the department as:

Level 5 – 70% of students scored >= 60% [in IA + Assignment questions] (50% in SEE)





5 Based on the percentage obtained in step 4 the attainment level for each of the CO is computed.

Attainment of Course Outcome (Theory)

Steps Final CO attainment calculation for Theory Courses

1 50% of attainment from internal assessment is calculated (A).

2 50% of the attainment from semester end examination is calculated (B).

3 Sum of A+B is computed and is reduced to 90% (D=90% (A+ B))

4 10% of Course Exit Survey is calculated(C). Level 1 – 50% of students rating satisfactory or above)

5

Attainment = D+C.

** If all the course outcomes in a course are attained, then the target is increased by 4% in internal

assessment and university examination.

Dept. of ISE 18

Steps Process of calculating attainment through Internal Assessment

1

The marks scored by the students during Laboratory work is by continuous evaluation process

through observation and record + viva voce. Observation is evaluated for 10 marks and record for 5

marks for every experiment/program. These marks are segregated based on CO’s and recorded.

2 The marks scored by the students in internal assessment is segregated based on COs and recorded.

3

The marks scored [Observation + record +internal assessment] and the maximum applicable score for

each CO for every student is calculated. Observation+record contribute for 15 marks and Test

contributes to 10 marks.

4 The percentage of attainment is calculated as [=marks scored / max marks].

5

The total number of students contributing for the CO and the no. of students scoring >= 70% marks is

identified. Percentage is calculated as:

[No. of students scoring >=70% marks/ Total no. of students contributing for that CO]

6

Attainment levels are defined in the department as:

Level 5 – 70% of students scored >= 70% of maximum marks.





7 Attainment level is computed.

Attainment of Course Outcome

(Laboratory)

Dept. of ISE 19

Course Outcomes with PO/PSO Mapping

Course

OutcomesDescription

Bloom’s

Cognitive

level

POs/PSOs

10IS661.1

Acquire Knowledge of

• Operations Research

• Simplex method used to solve the Linear Programming Problems.

• Duality and sensitive analysis.

• Transportation and Assignment problem

• Game theory and metaheuristics.

Understand PO1,PSO2

10IS661.2

Apply simplex method ,Vogel’s Approximation Method and Hungarian

Assignment Method to solve Linear Programming Problems (LPP),

Transportation, Assignment and Game theory problems.

ApplyPO1,PO2,PO3,

PO4,PSO2

10IS661.3Make use of Graphical method to solve LPP, Game theory problems and in

sensitivity analysis.Apply

PO1,PO2,PO3,

PSO2

10IS661.4Analyze the duality theory of LPP and compare the results with Simplex

method of the associated LPP.Analyze

PO1,PO2,PO3,

PSO2

10IS661.5

Formulate a LPP for a real world problem and solve the LPP using the

following suitable methods to obtain an optimal solution:

• Simplex Method

• Two-Phase Method

• Big M Method

• Vogel’s Approximation method

• Hungarian Method

Create PO6,PO7,PSO2

Sub: Operations Research Sub Code: 10IS661 Year: 2016-17

Dept. of ISE 20

Course Outcomes with PO/PSO Mapping

Sub: Operations Research Sub Code: 10IS661 Year: 2016-17

Cos PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

10IS661.1 3 3

10IS661.2 3 3 3 2 3

10IS661.3 3 3 3 3

10IS661.4 3 3 3 3

10IS661.5 2 2 3

Average 3 3 3 2 2 2 3

COs

A =

IA-

Test

(100%)

B =

External

Assessment

(100%)

C = Exit

Survey

(100%)

Interna

l (A)

50%

Extern

al (B)

50%

D=Total

direct

Attainment

100%

90% of

Direct

10% of

Indirect

100% of

CO

Attainment

10IS661.1 4 5 5 2 2.5 4.5 4.05 0.5 4.55

10IS661.2 4 5 5 2 2.5 4.5 4.05 0.5 4.55

10IS661.3 5 5 5 2.5 2.5 5 4.5 0.5 5

10IS661.4 2 5 5 1 2.5 3.5 3.15 0.5 3.65

10IS661.5 5 5 5 2.5 2.5 5 4.5 0.5 5

Dept. of ISE 21

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

Direct

Attainment3.71 3.41 3.36 3.16 3.85 3.37 3.26 3.51 3.66 4.59 4.17 2.50 3.65 3.19

Indirect

Attainment5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.56 5 5

Final

Attainment3.97 3.72 3.69 3.53 4.08 3.70 3.60 3.81 3.93 4.67 4.33 2.91 3.92 3.55

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

Direct

Attainment3.94 3.47 3.83 3.68 3.95 2.80 3.11 3.30 3.32 3.76 3.08 3.08 3.91 3.57

Indirect

Attainment5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.44 5 5

Final

Attainment4.15 3.78 4.06 3.94 4.16 3.24 3.48 3.64 3.66 4.01 3.46 3.35 4.13 3.79

PO Attainment 2013-2017


Dept. of ISE 22

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO 1 PSO 2

2012-16

Batch3.97 3.72 3.69 3.53 4.08 3.7 3.6 3.81 3.93 4.67 4.33 2.91 3.92 3.55

2013-17

Batch4.15 3.78 4.06 3.94 4.16 3.24 3.48 3.64 3.66 4.01 3.46 3.35 4.13 3.86

2014-18

Batch4.01 3.69 3.91 3.65 4.18 3.50 3.40 4.27 3.82 4.36 3.53 3.42 3.89 3.53

PO Attainment


PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO 1 PSO 2

Direct PO

Attainment 3.76 3.36 3.63 3.32 3.97 3.13 3.01 4.09 3.52 4.20 3.16 3.03 3.62 3.16

Indirect

PO

Attainment

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

20% of

Indirect1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

80% of

Direct3.01 2.69 2.91 2.65 3.18 2.50 2.40 3.27 2.82 3.36 2.53 2.42 2.89 2.53

Final PO

Attainment4.01 3.69 3.91 3.65 4.18 3.50 3.40 4.27 3.82 4.36 3.53 3.42 3.89 3.53

Consolidated PO Attainment 2012-16, 2013-17, 2014-2018

Dept. of ISE 23

PO Attainment

PSO Attainment

Comparative Analysis

PO and PSO attainments

Dept. of ISE 24

Item

(Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts

with explicit headings, wherever applicable)CAY

(2017-18)

CAYm1

(2016-17)

CAYm2

(2015-16)

Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 60 60 60

Total number of students admitted in first year minus number

of students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of

students migrated to this program (N1)

49 55 58

Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via

lateral entry (N2)− 01 03

Separate division students, if applicable (N3) 03 03 03

Total number of students admitted in the Program

(N1 + N2 + N3)52 59 64

Enrolment Ratio 81.67% 91.67% 96.67%

Average Enrolment Ratio 90%

Student Enrolment

Dept. of ISE 25

Success rate without back logs in any year of study =0.566

Students’ Performance

Graduation without Backlog

Year of entry

N1 + N2 + N3

(As defined above)

Number of students who have successfully graduated

without backlogs in any semester/year of study

(Without Backlog means no compartment or failures in

any semester/year of study)

I Year II Year III Year IV Year

CAY (2017-18) 49+0+3=52

CAYm1(2016-17) (55-1-5+5+2) +01+03=60 42

CAYm2(2015-16) (58-7+6) +3+3=63 54 42

CAYm3(2014-15) (57-6+1) +12+3=67 41 35 33 33

CAYm4(LYG)

(2013-14)(55-1+3) +10+3= 70 52 41 39 35

CAYm5(LYGm1)

(2012-2013) (60-3+6) +9+3=75 46 46 41 40

CAYm6(LYGm2)

(2011-12)(59-4+2) +12+3=72 54 49 49 48

Dept. of ISE 26

Year of entryN1 + N2 + N3

(As defined above)

Number of students who have

successfully graduated (Students

graduated within stipulated period of

study)

I Year II Year III Year IV Year

CAY (2017-18) 49+0+3=52

CAYm1(2016-17) (55-1-5+5+2) +01+03=60 55

CAYm2(2015-16) (58-7+6) +3+3=63 59 60

CAYm3 (2014-15) (57-6+1) +12+3=67 54 57 57 48

CAYm4(LYG)

(2013-14)(55-1+3) +10+3= 70 58 62 59 52

CAYm5(LYGm1)

(2012-2013)(60-3+6) +9+3=75 61 69 67 64

CAYm6(LYGm2)

(2011-12) (59-4+2) +12+3=72 62 69 65 59

Success rate =0.78

Students’ Performance

Graduation within the stipulated period

Dept. of ISE 27

Students Performance

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

Graduation within the stipulated period

2012-16 2013-17 2014-18

45.00

50.00

55.00

Graduation without backlog in any year of

study

2012-16 2013-17 2014-18

Per

cen

tag

e

Per

cen

tag

e

Dept. of ISE 28

Placement, Higher Studies and

Entrepreneurship

Average Placement=0.80

Item CAYm1

(2016-17)

CAYm2

(2015-16)

CAYm3

(2014-15)

Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 59 67 65

No. of students placed in companies or Government Sector

(x)42 51 50

No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid

qualifying scores (GATE or equivalent State or National

Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y)

2 2 3

No. of students turned entrepreneur in

engineering/technology (z)1 1 1

x + y + z = 45 54 54

Placement Index: (x + y + z)/NP1

0.76

P2

0.80

P3

0.83

Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.80

Dept. of ISE 29

Professional Societies/Chapters

Professional Societies/Chapters

Events conducted under professional

Societies/Chapters

CAY

(2017-18)

CAYm1

(2016-17)

CAYm2

(2015-16)

Computer Society of India (CSI) 04 02 02

Board for IT Education Standards (BITES) 02 - -

Institute of Electrical and Electronics

Engineers (IEEE)06 07 07

Association of Computer Science &

Information Science Engineering (ACSIS)/

Association of Information Science &

Engineering (ISEA)

04 01 02

Dept. of ISE 30

Technical Talk on Introduction

to Machine Learning on 27th

April 2018

Workshop on Virtual Reality 16th ,17th

March 2018

Professional Managerial

Communication 25th and 26th Feb

2018

Students of ISE at IOT Exhibition at

KPTO Trade Center 9th Feb 2018

Events under Professional

Societies/Chapters

2015-16 2015-16 2016-17

2017-18 2017-182016-17

Department Newsletter INSPIRE

Dept. of ISE 31

Sl

No.Name Qualification Designation

1 Dr. Surabhi Narayan B.E, M.Tech, Ph.D Professor & HOD

2 Dr. Krishnamurthy G N B.Tech, M.Tech, Ph.D Principal

3 Dr. Saritha Chakrasali B.Tech, M.Tech, Ph.D Professor

4 Dr. Girisha G S B.E, M.Tech, Ph.D Professor

5 Mrs. Srividhya S B.Tech M.Tech, (Ph.D) Assistant Professor

6 Ms. Bilvika K M B.Tech M.Tech Assistant Professor

7 Mrs. Jagruthi H B.E, M.Tech, (Ph.D) Assistant Professor

8 Mrs. Basavarajeshwari B.E, M.Tech Assistant Professor

9 Ms. Harini S B.E, M.Tech, (Ph.D) Assistant Professor

10 Mr. Vijaykumar S B.E, M.Tech Assistant Professor

11 Mr. Manjunath G S B.E, M.Tech Assistant Professor

12 Mrs. Madhura Prakash M B.E, M.Tech Assistant Professor

Faculty Details

Dept. of ISE 32

Student Faculty Ratio

YearCAY

(2017-18)

CAYm1

(2016-17)

CAYm2

(2015-16)

U1.1(2nd year) 61 63 72

U1.2(3rd Year) 63 72 70

U1.3(4th Year) 72 70 69

UG1 (Total UG Students) 196 205 211

PG1.1(1st year) - 18 18

PG1.2(2nd Year) 18 18 18

PG1(Total PG Students) 18 36 36

Total No. of Students in the

department(S)214 241 247

No. of faculty in the department

(F)13 16 16

Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) 16.46 15.06 15.43

Average SFR SFR= 15.65

Marks obtained 18Dept. of ISE 33

Faculty Cadre Proportion

Year

Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors

Required F1 Available Required F2 Available Required F3 Available

CAY

(2017-18)1.18 3 2.37 1 7.13 9

CAYm1

(2016-17)1.33 3 2.67 0 8.03 13

CAYm2

(2015-16)1.38 3 2.76 0 8.23 13

Average

Numbers RF1=1.29 AF1=3.0 RF2=2.6 AF2=0.33 RF3=7.79 AF3=11.66

Cadre Proportion Marks= [3.0/1.29] + [0.33/2.6 *0.6] + [11.66 / 7.79 * 0.4] x 12.5= 37.50

Dept. of ISE 34

Faculty Qualification and Retention

YearsX( no. of Faculty

with PhD)

Y( no. of Faculty

with M.Tech)

F ( no. of Faculty required

to comply 20:1)FQ=2.5x[(10X+4Y)/F)]

CAY

(2017-18)4 9 10.7 17.75

CAYm1

(2016-17)3 13 12.05 17.01

CAYm2

(2015-16)3 13 12.45 16.46

Average Assessment 17.07

No. of Faculty in base

year CAYm3

(2014-15)

No. of Faculty retained in

CAYm2

2015-16

CAYm1

2016-17

CAY

2017-18

12 12 11 10

Percentage of

Retention

100% 91.66% 83.33%

Average percentage 91.66%

Marks obtained 25

Dept. of ISE 35

Publications 2016-17 2017-18 2015-16

Staff Publications 11 6 21

Award of PhD 1 1 -

FDP Attended 14 10 13

Training in Industry 3 6 2

Staff Achievements

Sl.

No.Name of the Guide Number of Research Scholars

1. Dr. Krishnamurthy G N 7

2. Dr. Surabhi Narayan 1

3. Dr. Saritha Chakrasali 1

Guides guiding Research Scholars

Dept. of ISE 36

Consultancy

Name of the

ConsultantOrganization Year Type of Work

Income

Generated

Dr. Saritha Chakrasali Vee Technologies 2017-18Academic Technical

Support Rs. 10,125

Laboratory Facilities

Laboratory Hardware ConfigurationNumber of

SystemsInstructors

M201 Dell Optiplex 3040 27 Mr. Srinanda P

M202 Dell Optiplex 3040 27 Mrs. Meena G

M205 Dell Optiplex 3050 28 Mrs. Meena M

M104 Dell Optiplex 3040 24 Mr. Abhishek K

M207 Dell Optiplex 3050 28 Ms. Ashwini B J

N503

Lenovo M70 think centre - 12 nos

Dell Optiplex 520 - 9 nos

Dell Optiplex 520 - 2 nos

Dell Optiplex 520 - 1 no

12+9+2+1= 24 Mrs. Prasanna N

Dept. of ISE 37

Laboratory Facilities

Analog & Digital Electronics Lab Data Structures Lab Project Lab

Microprocessors Lab Networks Lab Web Technology Lab

Dept. of ISE 38

Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning

experience in laboratories

Sl.

No.Facility Name Details

Reason (s) for

creating facilityUtilization

Areas in which

students are

expected to have

enhanced learning

Relevance to

POs/PSOs

1Mat Lab Full Suite

(Software)

Image processing and

Data mining tool Project

VII and VIII

semester

students

Image Processing,

Data Mining

PO1, PO2, PO3,

PO5, PO12,

PSO1

2 IoT Components

Platform for

developing IoT

solutions

Life Long

learning,

innovative

projects

III & V Sem

Students

implement IoT

based projects

Embedded Systems

and IoT

PO1, PO2, PO3,

PO5, PO12,

PSO1, PSO2

3Scala SDK

(Software)

Tool for

concurrent

programming, parsing

of files

Mini Project

VI Sem

Students

implement File

structures based

projects

File Structures

PO1, PO2, PO3,

PO5, PO12,

PSO1

4Python

(Software)

A language for

software development

Mini Project &

Project

V to VIII

Semester

students

Data Mining,

Networking,

Machine Learning

PO1, PO2, PO3,

PO5, PO12,

PSO1

Dept. of ISE 39

Continuous Improvement 2012-16

POAttain

mentAction Plan

PO1 3.97It is planned to increase the number of classes to cover the fundamentals in core information science and engineering

courses. It is planned to solve more problems/programs in classroom sessions.

PO2 3.72Mini projects are planned to improve the analytical skills of the students. Workshops / Hands on training are planned to

improve the analytical skills of students.

PO3 3.69

It is planned to include Sample experiments/programs in laboratories to improve the design and development skills of

students. It is planned to inculcate activities that emphasize the impact of the designed solutions on public health, safety,

culture and environment.

PO4 3.53

Mini projects shall be introduced to improve their skills to design and analyze experiments and interpret results.

Students are encouraged to carry out thorough literature survey before designing solutions to the problem identified during

the final year projects. Students are encouraged to present research work from referred journals as part of technical seminar.

PO6 3.70

It is planned to include case studies in activities wherein students assess the impact of engineering solutions on society,

health, safety, legal and cultural issues. Students are encouraged to consider the impact of engineering solutions on society,

health, safety, legal and cultural issues while implementing their final year projects

PO7 3.60 Students are encouraged to take up projects related to environment and design sustainable solutions.

PO8 3.81It is planned to conduct Technical talk on professional ethics. During interaction with industry experts as part of workshops

students inculcate professionalism and ethics.

PO9 3.93 Mini projects are planned as part of courses to inculcate team building skills.

PO12 2.91Course teachers plan activity as part of the course wherein students are encouraged to engage in self-learning.

Students are encouraged to undergo online certification courses to keep themselves abreast with technology.

PSO1 3.92 Case studies are planned as part of the curriculum. Practice programs are inculcated in contact and laboratory sessions.

PSO2 3.55 Sample programs shall be made mandatory in laboratory sessions.

Dept. of ISE 40

Continuous Improvement 2013-17

PO Attainment Action Plan

PO2 3.78

Mini projects are planned in courses to improve the analytical skills of the students.

The number and variety of problems solved during class room sessions shall be increased.

Activities and open-ended experiments/programs are planned in theory and laboratory courses to bring in adaptability

to real world scenarios.

PO4 3.94

Mini projects are planned to improve their skills to design and analyze experiments and interpret results well.

Students are encouraged to carry out thorough literature survey before designing solutions to the problem defined

during the final year projects. Students are encouraged to present research work from referred journals as part of

technical seminar. Case studies are inculcated as part of activity in curriculum courses

PO6 3.24

Case studies are planned in activities planned by course teachers wherein students assess the impact of engineering

solutions on society, health, safety, legal and cultural issues.

Students are encouraged to consider the impact of engineering solutions on society, health, safety, legal and cultural

issues while implementing their final year projects

PO7 3.48 Students are encouraged to take up projects related to environment and design sustainable solutions.

PO8 3.64Case studies are planned in activities as part of curriculum to inculcate ethical principles and its impact on society.

Workshops and Technical Talk are planned to inculcate professionalism and ethics.

PO9 3.66Mini projects are planned as part of courses to improve the team building skills.

Team work is encouraged while implementing solutions to activities as part of the curriculum.

PO11 3.46 A course beyond syllabus on project management is planned.

PO12 3.35Course teachers plan activity as part of the course wherein students are encouraged to engage in self-learning.

Students are encouraged to take up internships and online certification courses.

PSO2 3.79 Course beyond syllabus on through adjunct/visiting faculty is planned.

Dept. of ISE 41

Academic Assessment & Audit

Dept. of ISE 42

Department Advisory Board (DAB)and Program Assessment

and Audit Committee Composition

Department Advisory Board Role

Head of the Department Chairman

Management Representative

(2 Nos)

Member

Academic Advisors (2 Nos) Advisors

Industry Representatives (2 Nos) Member

Alumni Representatives (2 Nos) Member

Student Representatives (3 Nos) Member

Parent Representatives (2 Nos) Member

Senior Faculty in the Department

(2 Nos)

Member

Special Invitees (2 Nos)

Meets once a Year

Department

Advisory Board

Role

Head of the Department Chairman

Scrutinizer II Year Member

Scrutinizer III Year Member

Scrutinizer IV Year Member

Counselor – in charge Member

Meets 5 times in a Semester

Dept. of ISE 43

YearName of Industry expert with

affiliation

Suggestions for Program

design

Is suggestion

implemented?If yes, Details of implementation

2017-18

7/12/2017

Mr. Sreenivas Ramanujan

Academic Relationship

Manager, TCS

Part of Regular Course to be

taught by industry.YES

Mr. Bharghava D Bhat a lawyer has taught Cyber Law,

part of the course “Cryptography and Network

Security” for VI semester students.

Course beyond syllabus on

Project Management, Finance

and Project Management Tools

YES

Dr. Shubra Banerji

Project Manager, IBM, Bengaluru has taught Project

Management course for VII semester students.

Encourage students to take up

Online CoursesYES

95 students have successfully completed Online

certification Courses on C, Cpp, Advanced Cpp, Java

and Python.

2016-17

7/10/2016

Mr. Sreenivas Ramanujan

Academic Relationship

Manager, TCS

Internship to be taken by

studentsYES

3 Students carried out internship in reputed

organizations.

2015-16

29/8/2015

Mr. Yashwanth

Hewlett Packard

Inter disciplinary projects to be

initiated.NO -

Session highlighting health

benefit to be conductedYES

Professional Counselor is appointed.

Yoga & meditation classes are initiated

Implementation Details of Suggestions in

DAB Meetings

Dept. of ISE 44

Meeting 1 - Before the commencement of

the semester (Classes)

• Approval of Lesson Plan – Theory, Lab

• Activity approval

• Slow Learner list approval

• Approval of Counselor list

• Approval of Project calendar

• Approval of Seminar calendar

• Approval of Counselor calendar

• Project Report Format approval

• Approval of special Lab dates

• Department Calendar of Events

• Teaching Aids – Quiz, NPTEL Videos

• Approval of Lab Manual & pedagogy

• Approval of Project/Seminar Rubrics

Meeting 2- Before the First Internals

• Portion coverage

• Approval of Internal Test Question

Paper

• Activity Question approval

• Special classes if any

• Work done statement

• ISO Audit

• Special Test

• Project/Mini project/ Seminar

progress

Meeting 3 – Before the second Internals


• Question Paper

• Activity Question



• ISO Audit

• Special Test

Meeting 4 – Before the Third Internals


• Question Paper

• Activity Question



• ISO Audit

• Special Test

• Attendance Finalization

Meeting 5 - End of the Semester

• Impact Analysis of ACSIS Events

• Impact Analysis of CSI Events

• Impact Analysis of Adjunct

Course/Course Beyond Syllabus

• Closing of the Loop

• DAB arrangements

• CO-PO-PSO Attainments

• Closure summary Approval

• Newsletter

PAAC Agenda

Dept. of ISE 45

Thank You

Dept. of ISE 46

approved by aicte, affiliated to vtu, iso 9001:2008

Documents