approaches to language testing
TRANSCRIPT
Mohammed PazhouheshKhayyam University of Mashhad
M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University 1
Teaching-testing Relationship
2M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
3M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
Teaching-testing Relationship
4M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
Grammar Translatio
n
Teaching-testing Relationship
5M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
Teaching-testing Relationship
6M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
Teaching-testing Relationship
7M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
Approaches to Language Testing
• Background– Close relations between– linguistic views & Teaching methods –Psychological views & Teaching methods –Teaching Approaches & Testing Approaches
• Historical Trends in Language Testing Intuitive/ pre-scientific / Traditional / Essay-
Translation EraPsychometric / Structuralist / Scientific /
Discrete-point EraPsycholinguistic / Pragmatic / Integrative EraSociolinguistic / Functional / Communicative Era
8M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
9M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
I. ESSAY-TRANSLATION APPROACH
M. PAZHOUHESH KHAYYAM UNIVERSITY 10
A. Background1. It is also called pre-scientific / intuitive stage
No requirement for testing skills was requiredTests relied on subjective/ intuitive judgment of teacherTeachers were untrained in testing
B. Characteristics of intuitive Tests1. Tests were mainly subjective which required
Labeling parts of a sentenceMemorizing lists of language patterns
2. Tests demanded abundant writing 3. Tests relied on knowledge of grammar and analysis
I. ESSAY-TRANSLATION APPROACH
M. PAZHOUHESH KHAYYAM UNIVERSITY 11
1. Tests were heavily loaded with literary content
2. The test structure were mostly open-ended items of • Reading comprehension
• Essay writing
• Dictation
• Precise
• Translation
II. STRUCTURALIST APPROACH
M. PAZHOUHESH KHAYYAM UNIVERSITY 12
A. Background It is also called discrete-point stage
Application of psychometric principles is dominant
Teachers are required to be trained in linguistics & measurement principles
Development of objective items is advocated
The approach is rooted in structuralism & behaviorism
II. SRTUCTURALIST APPROACH
M. PAZHOUHESH KHAYYAM UNIVERSITY 13
B. Characteristics of DP Tests Language abilities are tested through subtests
Language skills are cut up into discrete points for testingEach item is to measure one language point each timeLanguage is divided into (sub)skills & components
DP Tests should be highly reliable & objective
DP tests are mostly decontextualized in multiple-choice format appropriate for diagnostic purposes quantifiable in terms of results
Language Skills and ComponentsLanguage Skills and Components
componentcomponentss
Language skillsLanguage skillsListeninListenin
ggSpeakinSpeakin
ggReadinReadin
ggWritinWritin
g g Phonology, Phonology, orthographorthograph
y y
Vocabulary Vocabulary
Structure Structure
14M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
III. INTEGRATIVE APPROACH
M. PAZHOUHESH KHAYYAM UNIVERSITY 15
A. Background John W. Oller is the originator It integrates linguistic & extra-linguistic aspects It is rooted in cognitivism & generativism It regards language ability indivisible It tends to test language skills integratively
B. Characteristics of IN Tests Integrative tests
assess language in meaningful , contextualized contexts provide real-life situations in tests
III. INTEGRATIVE APPROACH
M. PAZHOUHESH KHAYYAM UNIVERSITY 16
tend to integrate linguistic & extra-linguistic aspects Adopts a holistic / global view of language t and testing Measure several levels & components simultaneouslyAre concerned for communicative effect of discourse Assess the ability to use 1 or 2 skills simultaneouslyAre in the forms of
Cloze passagesdictationOral interviewTranslationEssay writing
III. Pragmatic Approach
Background PR tests are
rooted in Pragmatics & Psycholinguistics
adopt a holistic pragmatic approach
are concerned with pragmatic mapping o Emphasize correspondence between linguistic & extra-linguistic
aspects of language
17M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
o Characteristics of PR TestsoPR tests tend tooTest language in meaningful , natural contexto meet naturalness criteria by requiring learners• To utilize normal contextual clues in the language• To comprehend linguistic & extra-linguistic contexts• To map pragmatically linguistic features with extra-
linguistic aspectsoHave learners employ their pragmatic expectancy
grammar
18M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
19M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
IV. Communicative Approach Background o Communicative tests
are rooted in Social constructivism & Functional view of language
Focus on social interaction & transactionEmerged after functional-notional approach to TEFLTend to assess communicative competence• Grammatical Competence( linguistic aspects)• Textual Competence( cohesion & coherence)• Illocutionary Competence( functional use of language)• Sociolinguistic Competence ( extra-linguistic aspects)
20M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
Characteristics of Communicative TestsoCommunicative tests tend to
Measure language ability in meaningful, communicative context Are concerned with real life ,communicative use of language Focus on tapping language use rather than language usage
oAdopt the Divisibility Hypothesis by • obtaining Learner’s language proficiency profiles • Matching and tailoring instruction with the learner’s needs
o be culturally loaded o use authentic language in testso Show a Preference for qualitative (rather than quantitative)
modes of assessmentoTo be in the forms of :
• Oral interview• Essay writing• Comprehension questions on an authentic passage• Reading an article and reacting to it• Listening to a lecture & reacting to it
21M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University
Characteristics of a communicative test It should be interactive. It should be direct in nature with tasks reflecting
realistic discourse processing activities. Texts and tasks should be relevant to the
intended situation. Ability should be sampled within meaningful
and developing contexts. The test should be based on an a priori
specification, so what is to be tested and how it is to be tested should be laid down at the test design stage. [Adapted from Weir, 1993]
22M. Pazhouhesh Khayyam University