appreciation to ndt 3.1.ppt

5/19/2018 Appreciation to NDT 3.1.ppt

1/162

Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology

NDT

Tr

aining


2/162


Appreciationto NDT


3/162


NDT Methods

Penetrant Testing Magnetic Particle

Testing

Eddy Current Testing

Ultrasonic Testing

Radiographic Testing

Magnetic Flux Leakage

Acoustic Emission

Infrared Testing Visual Testing Other methods


4/162Copyright 2003, TWI Ltd World Centre for Materials Joining Technology

NDT

Which method is the best ?Depends on many factors andconditions



NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING

NDT

Definition:

A procedure, which covers the inspection and/or testing of any

mater ial, component or assembly by means, which do not affect

i ts ultimate serviceabil i ty.



NDT

Industries involved with NDT:

Oil and Gas

Construction

Metal Fabrication

Chemical

Aerospace

Power Generation

Transportation

Medical

Electronic

Metal Manufacturing

Composite Manufacturing

Inspection and Testing

Research and Development

Training and Certification



CERTIFICATIONS ANDQUALIFICATIONS

NDT personnels should posses high credibilityand integrity

Proper training and certification required

Training : By qualified training personnels andaccredited training centres

International Certification Schemes available:



Penetrant Testing

Surface Testing method

For detecting surface breaking defects (opened tosurface)

Applicable to all materials -except for excessivelyporous (absorbing) materials

Also known asDye Penetrant Inspection (DPI)

Penetrant Flaw Detection (PFD)

Liquid Penetrant Inspection (LPI)



Penetrant Testing:SurfaceTesting

OPEN TO SURFACE/

SURFACE BREAKING

SUBSURFACE

INTERNAL

Penetrant Testing can only detect surface breaking defects

Penetrant must be able to enter the defect to form indication

Cannot be detected by

Penetrant Testing

Maybe detected by Penetrant Testing



Penetrant Testing

Not suitable for porous or very absorbentmaterials

Examples:Wood

Cloth

Unglazed ceramic /pottery



Basic Steps

Penetrant application

Removal of excess

penetrant

Pre-cleaning

Application of

Developer

Inspection

Post-cleaning



Penetrant Testing

Penetrating fluid (penetrant) applied tocomponent

Aerosol Spraying Immersion Brushing Electrostatic



Penetrant Testing

Penetrating fluid (penetrant) applied tocomponent and drawn into defect by

capillary action



Principle : Capillary Action

Interaction of adhesive and cohesiveforces

meniscus



Capillarity

The ability of a material to enteropening examples: tube or defects

The formula= 2S Cos

W

= Capillary pressure

S = Surface tension

= Contact angle

W = Width of opening



Penetrant Testing

Removal of excess penetrant



Removal of excess penetrant



Penetrant Testing

Application of developer



Penetrant Testing

Penetrant drawn back out of the defect by

reverse capillary action



Penetrant Testing

Penetrant which pulled out from the defect by the

developer forms indication of the defect

Indications


22/162



23/162


Advantages of PT

Applicable to non-ferromagnetics

Able to test large parts with a portablekit

Batch testing Applicable to small parts with complex

geometry

Simple,cheap easy to interpret Sensitivity


24/162


Disadvantages of PT

Will only detect defects open to thesurface

Careful surface preparation required

Not applicable to porous materials Temperature dependant

Cannot retest indefinitely

Compatibility of chemicals


25/162


System classification

PENETRANT

Colour Contrast

Fluorescent

Dual sensitivity


26/162


Colour Contrast Penetrant

Also known as Visible Dye Penetrant

Uses white light : Daylight or artificial white light

Bright coloured dye : usually RED


27/162


Fluorescent v Colour Contrast

Fluorescent moresensitive

Less operator fatiguewith fluorescent

More difficulty inmonitoringfluorescentpenetrant removal


28/162


Water Washable Penetrant

Also known as SELF-EMULSIFIED PENETRANT

Pre-mixed penetrant and emulsifier

Easily washed by water rinse

Oily

Penetrant

Emulsifier

+=

Water

Washable

Penetrant


29/162


Water WashablePenetrant


30/162


PENETRANT

WATER

SPRAY


31/162


Penetrant been washed off

Shallow wide defectsDeep or gross defects

shows


32/162


Water Washable Penetrant

ADVANTAGES Ideal for rough

surfaces

Suitable for batch

testing Cheaper than other

methods

DISADVANTAGES Susceptible to over

washing

Least sensitive

method Requirement for a

water source

Corrosion problems


33/162


Solvent Removable

ADVANTAGES Portability

No water supplyneeded

DISADVANTAGES Not suited to batch

testing

Requires hand wiping

so time consuming More expensive than

water washable

Potentially hazardous

chemicals


34/162


Solvent Removable


35/162


Post Emulsifiable Penetrant

StagesImmerse component in penetrant

Immerse component in emulsifier

Emulsifier diffuses into the penetrant making

it water washable

Water wash removes excess penetrantmixed with emulsifier

Penetrant in defects left unaffected


36/162


Post emulsifiable

Post Emulsifiable

Penetrant

Emulsifier

Now the surfacepenetrant is

water washable


37/162


Post emulsifiable

Penetrant

EmulsifierPenetrant mixed with emulsifier

Water

Spray


38/162


Penetrant in defect not mixed with emulsifier :

NOT REMOVED

Only penetrant on the surface removed


39/162


Post emulsifiable

ADVANTAGES

High Sensitivity

Maximumpenetrating ability

Greater control overpenetrant removal

DISADVANTAGES

Not suitable forrough surfaces

More expensive

More timeconsuming


40/162


Developer Sensitivity

Dry powder 100 - 140 % Aqueous solution 110 - 150 %

Aqueous suspension 120 - 200%

Non-Aqueous 120 - 240%


41/162


Penetrant Systems

PENETRANT

Colourcontrast

Fluorescent

Dual

REMOVAL

Solvent

Waterwashable

Postemulsifiable

DEVELOPERS

Dry powder

Aqueous

Non-Aqueous


42/162


Selection of System

Nature of discontinuities (size and type) Geometry and intricacy

Surface condition

Component material

Size and position

Equipment and expertise available Cost

Number of components to be tested


43/162


Selection of System

Inspection of a large number of

threaded components

Fluorescent for mass inspections

Water washable more suited than solvents tobatch inspections

Post emulsifiable difficult to remove fromthreads

What method will you select and why ?

Fluorescent water washable with drypowder developer


44/162


Selection of System

Inspection of turbine blades for fatigue

cracks

Fluorescent more sensitive than colour contrast Post emulsifiable more sensitive than water

washable

Non-aqueous developer most sensitive

What method will you select and why ?

Fluorescent post emulsifiable with non-aqueous developer


45/162


Penetrant Testing

Penetrant Testing of large aircraft components


46/162


Penetrant Testing

Fluorescent Penetrant Testing of small components


47/162


Penetrant Testing

Penetrant Testing of various small components


48/162


Magnetic Particle Testing

Part 2

NDT Training & Certification


49/162



M i


50/162


Magnetism

The phenomenon of certain materials which attract

certain other materials e.g.. pieces of iron to themselves

NS NS


51/162


Test method for the detection of

surface and sub-surfacedefects

in ferromagnetic materials



52/162


Ferromagnetic Material

Surface Defect Subsurface Internal

MT MTCANNOT BE

DETECTED BY

Magnetic Particle

Testing


M ti P ti l T ti


53/162



Basic Steps

Magnetic field inducedin component

Defects disrupt themagnetic flux

Defects revealed byapplyingferromagneticparticles

Li f f


54/162


Lines of force

By convention they flow from North toSouth outside and South to North inside

Form closed loops

Never cross

Field is strongest where most numerous

Follow path of least resistance


55/162


N S

Definitions

Magnetic field : Region in whichmagnetic forcesexist

D fi iti


56/162


Definitions

Flux : line of magnetic force existing

in a magnetic circuit


57/162


Flux Density : Magnetic flux perunit cross-section area

(measured in Teslas)

Definitions

High Flux Density:

More Flux per unit

area

Low Flux Density: LessFlux per unit area


58/162


Definitions

1 cm

1 cm

1 Tesla = 10 000 gauss

How many line of force are there in an 1 cm area with a

Flux Density of 1 Tesla?

10 000 = 10 lines

BS 6072


59/162


BS 6072

The FLUX DENSITY on the surface of thecomponent must be at lease 0.72 T

Below that the indication will be too

weak

Below 0.72 TESLA Above 0.72 TESLA


60/162


AMMETER

000001000500

In General:

Increasing the Magnetising Force

will increase the Magnetic FieldMeasured inAmpere per meter ( A/m)


61/162


Permeability

The ease with which a material can bemagnetised


62/162


Permeability

A B

Magnetised using 100 amps Magnetised using 100 amps

High Permeability:

Easy to be magnetised

Low Permeability:

Difficult to be magnetised

Materials Behaviours in


63/162


Materials Behaviours inMagnetic Field

Diamagnetic: Slightly repelled by magneticfield

Examples Gold, Copper, Water andmost non-metal

DIAMAGNETIC

Unable to be Magnetically tested



64/162


Paramagnetic: Weakly attracted by magneticfield

Examples Aluminium, Tungsten andmost metals

PARAMAGNETIC

Unable to be Magnetically tested




65/162


Ferromagnetic: Strongly attracted by magneticfield

Examples Iron, Cobalt, Nickelandtheir alloys

FERROMAGNETIC

Suitable to be Magnetically tested


Permeability


66/162


Permeability

A unit of comparison: compared tofree space

Examples:

Air 1 Iron 560 Steel 1000 Mu Metal 80 000 Paramagnetics Slightly > 1 Diamagnetics Slightly < 1 Ferromagnetics 240 +

Oth F f M t


67/162


Other Forms of Magnet

N S

HorseshoeMagnet

Ring

Magnet

Equipment


68/162


Equipment

Electromagnetism


69/162


Electromagnetism

A current flows through a conductor and

sets up a magnetic field around it

Field is at 90oto the direction of theelectrical current

Directionof current

flow

Direction of magnetic field

Coil Magnetisation


70/162


Coil Magnetisation

Changes circular filed into longitudinal

Increases the strength of the field

Coil Magnetisation


71/162


Coil Magnetisation

Longitudinal Magnetic Field

Detect transverse defects

Principle of MT : Flux Leakage


72/162


Principle of MT : Flux Leakage

Ring Magnet Ring Magnet

Magnetic field is Fullycontained: No Poles

Flux Leakage occurs:Poles created

Flux

LeakageN

S

Ferromagnetic

Particles

Attractedat poles

Principle of MPI : Flux


73/162


pLeakage

N S

No Defect Defect

The change in permeability causes flux leakage

N SFlux Leakage



74/162


pLeakage

N S

No Flux Leakage because No change in

permeability

STEEL = 1000



75/162


pLeakage

The change in permeability causes flux leakage

Flux LeakageN S

STEEL = 1000

AIR = 1

N S

Factors Affecting Flux Leakage


76/162


Factors Affecting Flux Leakage

Depth of defect

Orientation of defect shape of defect

Size of defect

Permeability of material Amount of flux available

Depth below surface


77/162


Depth below surface

SN SN

Defect Orientation


78/162


Defect Orientation

Defect at 90 degrees to flux : maximum

indication

Defect Orientation


79/162


Defect Orientation

>45 Degrees to Flux: Acceptable

indication

Defect Orientation


80/162


Defect Orientation

How to detect the ones missed?

All surface defects form indications


81/162


But not all indications are

caused by defects

Non-relevantindications

Due to flux leakage but

arising from design features orgeometry

Changes in section

Changes inpermeability

Furring

Splines

Keyway

Rivet

Toe of welds

Rough

Surface

Chisel

Furring


82/162


Furring

Caused by:

Sharp change of contour

FurringFurring


83/162


Furring

Caused by:

Excessive flux on the surface or ends of

component

Furring


84/162


Magnetic Writing

Caused by:

Localised polarization when magnetised object

induced the magnetic field into another object

Sp rio s / F lse Indic tions


85/162


Spurious / False Indications

Indications caused by operator errorsNot due to flux leakage

Lint

Dirt Hairs

Relevant/ True Indications


86/162


Relevant/ True Indications

Indications caused by defects



87/162



Cracks indications by Fluorescent Ink

Inks and Powders


88/162


Inks and Powders

MT Inks

Black and

Fluorescent

MT Powders

Colour

contrast and

Fluorescent

Particles in Inks or Powders



89/162



Usage of Fluorescent Ink on weld



90/162



Usage of Ultraviolet Light with

Fluorescent Ink in weld testing



91/162



Cracks indications by Fluorescent Ink



92/162


ag et c a t c e est g

Usage of a.c. Electromagnetic Yoke with Black Ink



93/162


g g

Usage of MT Bench Unit with Fluorescent Ink



94/162


g g

Component under test with currentflow and fluorescent ink



95/162


g g

Usage of Prods with black ink on weld


96/162






97/162


y g

An alternating

current is passedthrough a coil



98/162



An alternating current is

passed through a coil A.C. generates an

alternating field

Alternating fieldgenerates eddycurrents in conductors



99/162



An alternating current is

passed through a coil A.C. generates an

alternating field

Alternating fieldgenerates eddycurrents in conductors

Eddy currents generateopposing field whichmodifies current in coil



100/162


y g

Defects will interrupt the eddy current

Interruption in the coil current is displayed on the set

Eddy Current Testingi


101/162


y gEquipment

Eddy Current


102/162


y

Electrical currents induced in metals byalternating magnetic fields

The size of the current is affected by

Electrical conductivity

Stand off distance

Flaws

Permeability

Specimen dimensions

Advantages of ET


103/162


g

Sensitive to surface defects Can detect through several layers

Can detect through surface coatings

Accurate conductivity measurements Can be automated

Little pre-cleaning required

Portability

Disadvantages of ET


104/162


Very susceptible to permeability changes

Only on conductive materials

Will not detect defects parallel to surface

Not suitable for large areas and/orcomplex geometry's

Signal interpretation required

No permanent record (unless automated)

Expensive equipment


105/162


Ultrasonic Testing


Ultrasonic Testing


106/162


High frequencysound sound wavesare introduced into amaterial

Reflected soundgives information onthe material undertest and signalsdisplayed on a CRT

Principle

Basic Principles of Ultrasonic Testing


107/162


Sound is transmitted in the material to be testedThe sound reflected back to the

probe is displayed on

the Flaw Detector



108/162


The distance the sound traveled can be displayed on the Flaw Detector

The screen can be calibrated to give accurate readings of the distance

Bottom / Backwall

Signal from the backwall


109/162




110/162


The presence of a Defect in the material shows up on the screen of

the flaw detector with a less distance than the bottom of the material

The BWE signal

Defect signal

Defect


111/162


The depth of the defect can be read with reference

to the marker on the screen

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

60 mm

Thickness / depth measurement


112/162


A

A

B

B

C

C

The THINNER the material

the less distance the sound

travel

The closerthe reflectorto the surface, the

signal will be more to

the leftof the screen

The thickness is read from the screen

684630


113/162



114/162


Ultrasonic Testing Applications


115/162


Probes


116/162


Probe Design


117/162


Compression Probe

Normal probe

0

Damping

Transducer

Electricalconnectors

Housing

Probe Design


118/162


Shear Probe

Angle probe

DampingTransducer

Perspex wedge

Backing

medium

ProbeShoe

Probe Design


119/162


Twin Crystal

Advantages

Can be focused Measure thin plate

Near surfaceresolution

Disadvantages

Difficult to use oncurved surfaces

Sizing small defects Signal amplitude /

focal spot length

Transmitter Receiver

Focusing

lensSeparator /

Insulator

Gap Scanning


120/162


Probe held a fixed

distance above thesurface (1 or 2mm)

Couplant is fed intothe gap

Immersion Testing


121/162


Component is placed

in a water filled tank Item is scanned with

a probe at a fixeddistance above the

surface

Immersion Testing


122/162


Waterpath

distance

Water path distance

Front surface Back surface

Defect

AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC TESTING SYSTEM

C Scan Presentation


123/162


C-Scan Presentation



124/162


P-Scan Scanner



125/162


P-Scan Image Presentation


126/162


T-Scan Image Presentation


127/162


TOFD Time of Flight Diffraction


128/162


TOFD Images


129/162


rea Monitoring


130/162


May 1999: tmin = 29.6 mm Dec. 1999: tmin = 29.6 mm

June 2000: tmin = 29.4 mm April 2001: tmin = 29.2 mm

Methods of Setting Sensitivity


131/162


g y

Smallest defect at maximum test range Back wall echo

Disc equivalent

Grass levels Notches

Side Drilled Holes, DAC Curves

Scanning Procedure


132/162


Parent Material

0 degree both sides

To maximum range for angle probes

Full skip distance for 60 or 70 probes

Scanning Procedure


133/162


Scanning Procedure

Weld RootHalf skip from both sides

For PCN exams :

70 degree probe at half skip from both sides

Scanning ProcedureWeld Fusion Faces


134/162


Weld Fusion Faces

Half to full skip from both sides

A probe which strikes fusion faces at 90 degrees

Probe angle = 90 - (1/2 Root angle)

Scanning Procedure


135/162


Weld Body

Half skip to full skip from both sides

Full Skip 1/2 Skip

Scanning Procedure


136/162


Transverse

70 degree

Nozzle Welds


137/162


Scanning procedure

Tee butt welds


138/162


Pulse Echo Technique


139/162


Single probe sends

and receives sound Gives an indication

of defect depth anddimensions

Not fail safe

Defect Position


140/162


No indication from defect A (wrong orientation)

AB

B

Through Transmission Technique

T


141/162


Transmitting and

receiving probes

on opposite sidesof the specimen

Tx Rx

Presence of defect

indicated by

reduction intransmission signal

No indication of

defect location

Fail safe method


142/162


Through Transmission Technique


143/162


Advantages

Less attenuation

No probe ringing

No dead zone Orientation does not

matter

Disadvantages

Defect not located

Defect cant be

identified Vertical defects dont

show

Must be automated

Need access to bothsurfaces

Transmission with Reflection


144/162


RT

Also known as:

Tandem Techniqueor

Pitch and Catch Technique

Advantages of UT


145/162


Sensitive to cracks at various

orientations Portability

Safety

Able to penetrate thick sections Measures depth and through wall

extent

Disadvantages


146/162


No permanent record (unless automated)

Not easily applied to complex geometriesand rough surfaces.

Unsuited to course grained materials

Requires highly skilled and experiencedtechnicians


147/162






148/162


Electromagnetic radiation is imposedupon a test object

Radiation is transmitted to varyingdegrees dependant upon the density ofthe material through which it istravelling

Variations in transmission detected by

photographic film or fluorescent screens Applicable to metals,non-metals and

composites



149/162


Lower

density

Higher

density

Radiation Source

Film

Specimen



150/162


PlacingFilm to be radiographed

Radiation Sources


151/162


Isotopes produce Gamma rays

Examples: Co60, Ir192, Yb169

X-Ray Tube

Radiographic Image


152/162


TechniquesPanoramic


153/162


Panoramic

Single Wall Single Image

Double Wall Double Image

Gamma Rays vs X-Rays


154/162


Safety

X-ray machines is normally safer: can be switched off/onGamma source: constant emission

CapabilitiesGamma source have very high penetrating power

X-ray: intensity and wavelength can be adjusted

Quality of imagesIn general: x-ray produces better quality

HandlingGamma sources are easier to handle

X-ray machine are bulky, fragile and requires electricity

CostGamma source are cheaper

Radiographic Variables


155/162


Density

The degree of film darkness Contrast

The differences in density between theregions of the film

Advantages of Radiography


156/162


Permanent record Detection of Internal flaws

Can be used on most materials

Direct image of flaws

Real - time imaging

Disadvantages of Radiography Health hazard


157/162


Sensitive to defect

orientation Limited ability to detect fine

cracks

Access to both sides

required Limited by material

thickness

Skilled interpretation

required Relatively slow

High capital outlay andrunning costs

Acoustic Emission


158/162


Transient stress waves from micro

structural changes detected by sensors

Stress waves

Stress

Vacuum Box Testing


159/162


Vacuum created within a perspex box

Soapy liquid applied to surface

Vacuum Box Testing


160/162


Bubbles indicate through thicknessdefect

Vacuum created within a perspex box

Soapy liquid applied to surface

Training & Certification


161/162


Any Questions Please ?

Training & Certification


162/162

appreciation to ndt 3.1.ppt

Documents

world centre

methods5192018 appreciation

certification requiredtraining

technologyndtwhich method

technologyndt methodspenetrant

bypenetrant testingmaybe

tosurface applicable