apply and innovate 2018 honda murata - ipg automotive · masato kikuchi honda r&d co., ltd....
TRANSCRIPT
Vehicle Simulation for Engine Calibration
to Enhance RDE Performance
Dr. Yutaka Murata
Yui Nishio
Dr. Yukihisa Yamaya
Masato Kikuchi
Honda R&D Co., Ltd.
Automotive R&D Center
1
IPG Apply & Innovate 2018
11st and 12nd of September, Karlsruhe, Germany
Background
Concept of model based simulation environment
Vehicle simulation model- Vehicle model
- Driver model
- Route model
- Traffic model
Application results in RDE-compliant powertrain development
Summary
Contents
2
New Civic diesel
Passed RDE regulation and achieved 91 g/km
91 g/km (6MT, Sedan)
93 g/km (6MT, Hachback)
109 g/km (9AT)
Fuel economy (CO2)
Exhaust emissions
Euro6d-TEMP
Modified NEDC
Civic
1.6L diesel engine
3
RDE definition
Difficulty to check RDE performance at all conditions during development
4
Chassis
dynamometer
RDE
Vehicle speed profile Fixed Depends on vehicle, driver, route, and traffic
Environment (Ta, Pa) Fixed Depends on season, weather, wind, and altitude
Road load forceStraight, w/o gradient
(w/o PEMS)
Depends on curves, altitude, road surface, passengers,
and baggage (with PEMS)
Repeatability with w/o
Method for RDE simulation and calibration
Necessity of model utilization for efficient development
5
Tests on road
Chassis dynamometer
(vehicle)
+ vehicle simulation
Engine test bed
(engine)
+ vehicle simulation
Model
(engine)
+ vehicle simulation
Vehicle simulation: consideration of road load force change
due to curves, altitude, road surface (weather, wind),
driver behavior, and traffic conditions
PEMS
Easy to simulate
and calibrateValidation in real world
EiL (Engine in the loop) MiL (Model in the loop)
Contents
6
Background
Concept of model based simulation environment
Vehicle simulation model- Vehicle model
- Driver model
- Route model
- Traffic model
Application results for RDE compliant powertrain development
Summary
Vehicle tests in (environmental) chassis dynamometer
Engine bench tests (EiL: Engine in the loop)
RDE-compliant engine development method
Engine calibration timeline
First
engine
First
vehicle
Vehicle model (virtual)
Target vehicle speed
- Fixed (NEDC, WLTC, etc) profile
- Vehicle simulation output profile
Model based simulation (MiL: Model in the loop)
Vehicle tests on road with PEMS
Engine
hardware
fix
SOPEngine
software
fix
Engine simulation environment
- ECU model
- Combustion model
- Catalyst model
Vehicle simulation environment
- Vehicle model
- Driver model
- Route model
- Traffic model
Validation phase
Vehicle simulation for engine hardware/calibration fix and RDE validation
7
Flowchart of model utilization
Coupling of vehicle simulation and engine simulation
8
Verification
Vehicle
test
Experiment
definition
Boundary
finderDynamic
DoE
Transient
measurement
(environmental
engine bench)
Dynamic
statistical
combustion
model
ECU
model
Catalyst
model
Vehicle simulation
(NEDC, WLTC, RDE)
Ne, Te, etc.
Simulation and
optimization
Synthetic
gas flow
test bed
Vehicle model
Driver model
Route model
Traffic model
Base maps, environmental
corrections, controllers,
aftertreatment control etc.
Calibration target
Engine simulation
Vehicle simulation
Predictive accuracy of engine model
Achievement of quantitative emissions prediction at RDE
9
NOx (mg/s)
Soot (mg/s)
gfuel (g/s)
Urban Rural
Motorway
Measurement
Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
Ve
hic
le
sp
ee
dN
Ox
(mg/s
)S
oo
t (m
g/s
)gfu
el(g
/s)
Engine
outlet
Tailpipe
Model input: engine speed, brake torque,
coolant temp., ambient temp., and ambient pressure
Contents
10
Background
Concept of model based simulation environment
Vehicle simulation model- Vehicle model
- Driver model
- Route model
- Traffic model
Application results in RDE-compliant powertrain development
Summary
Vehicle speed (km/h) Vehicle speed (km/h)
Co
astin
g tim
e (
se
c)
Ro
ad
lo
ad
fo
rce
(N
)
Road load force of vehicle model
Confirmation of the road load force accuracy by coasting simulation
Model input: Vehicle specification (F0, F1, F2)
11
Vehicle simulation
Vehicle simulation
Predictive accuracy of NEDC simulation
Measurement
Vehicle simulation
..
Target vehicle speed
Simulated vehicle speed
Upper limit
Lower limit
..
Engine speed and torque are well simulated (gear shift profile is given)
Measurement
Vehicle simulation
Model input: Vehicle specification (F0, F1, F2)
Target vehicle speed and gear shift profile
12
Predictive accuracy of WLTC simulation
Model input: Vehicle specification (F0, F1, F2)
Target vehicle speed profile
13
Target vehicle speed
Simulated vehicle speed
Upper limit
Lower limit
..
Engine speed and torque are well simulated (gear shift position is calculated)
Measurement
Vehicle simulation
..
Measurement
Vehicle simulation
Gear 1st->2nd
Gear 2nd->3rd
Gear 3rd->4th
Gear 4th->5th
Gear 5th->6th
Center
Vehicle speed distribution
Gear shift up timing distribution
Minimum
Center
Center
Maximum
Acceleration / deceleration distribution
Statistical analysis with big driving data
Extraction of driver behavior to reproduce real driving
14
Max. acceleration Max. shift up engine speed Max. acceleration &
shift up engine speed
15
Influence of driver model parameter on dynamic behavior
Succeed in targeting assumed driver characteristics
Too aggressive
Urban
Rural
Motorway
V*a pos: Vehicle speed multiplied by maximum positive acceleration
RPA: Relative positive acceleration
Too smooth
Urban
Rural Motorway
Route models for RDE performance validation
Introduction of detailed digital map information (traffic sign, curve, altitude)
16
n1
n2
n3 Simulation
Traffic flow model
Standard traffic
Heavy traffic
Simulation
Utilization of stochastic based traffic model to reproduce real driving
17
Standard traffic Heavy traffic
Contents
18
Background
Concept of model based simulation environment
Vehicle simulation model- Vehicle model
- Driver model
- Route model
- Traffic model
Application results in RDE-compliant powertrain development
Summary
Vehicle simulation for RDE route
Generation of vehicle speed by vehicle, driver, route, and traffic models
19
Digital map Simulation
Altitude
Urban
Rural
Motorway
Route
SimulationDigital map
Urban Rural MotorwayMotorwayUrban Rural
RDE measurement vs. simulation
Vehicle speed profiles at RDE conditions are well expressed in simulation
20
Simulation
Urban Rural
MotorwayReal driving
n1
n2
n3
Realization of vehicle simulation within RDE dynamic criteria regulation
21
Too aggressive
Too smoothUrbanRural
Motorway
Urban Rural
Motorway
Too aggressive
Too smoothUrban
Rural
Motorway
Urban
RuralMotorway
Real driving
Simulation
Real driving
Simulation
Driving characteristics at RDE
Simulation
9AT transmission model
6MT
9AT
22
Introduction of automatic transmission logic in the vehicle simulation
9AT Simulink
model
9AT6MT
Model based RDE performance evaluation
Achievement of emission prediction with vehicle and engine simulation
23Time (sec)
Engin
e s
peed (
rpm
)
To
rque (
Nm
)
Altitude (m
)
Vehic
le s
peed
(km
/h)Altitude
Vehicle speed
Tailpipe NOx
Gear shift position Brake torqueEngine speed
Vehicle, driver, route, and traffic models
Vehicle speed, engine speed, brake torque, and gear shift position
NOx, Soot, CO2 etc.
←Engine simulation
←Vehicle simulation
Urban
Rural
Motorway
Evaluation of emission robustness
Validity confirmation of hardware selection and calibration data settings
24
Total
(Urban+Rural+Motorway)
Urban
9AT
6MT
Realization of model based validation before actual measurement
Simulation
6MT Total
(Urban+Rural+Motorway)
Summary
Thank you very much for your kind attention.
25
It is a challenge to sufficiently validate RDE performance under all conditions through
road tests during vehicle development due to wide range of validating conditions.
A model based development technology was established to simulate, verify and
calibrate the emissions performance of a vehicle.
RDE performance could be accurately predicted by coupling a vehicle driving
simulation with an engine simulation that includes an ECU model, combustion model
(dynamic data based statistical model), and exhaust aftertreatment catalyst model.
Use of the simulation model enabled robust validation of RDE performance under
various conditions that assume driving on actual roads.
**
**
26