application to the rice production in southeast asia rice production research program...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
Application to the rice Application to the rice productionproduction
in Southeast Asiain Southeast Asia
Rice Production Research ProgramAgro-meteorology Division
National Institute forAgro-Environmental Sciences
research project:“Modeling rice growth and paddy ecosystem responses to climate change and risk assessment of rice production”Period: FY2006-2010Funded by Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council Secretariat, MAFF
Our purpose within the framework of MAHASRI activities
•To model rice growth and paddy ecosystem responses to water conditions due to intraseasonal, seasonal, and annual changes of the amount of precipitation brought about by the effect of the Asian monsoon variation.•To develop the method of prediction of rice production on the regional scale in South-Eastern Asia.
Our target area
Northeastern Thailand (mostly rain-fed lowland with large spatial variation in precipitation, soil and hydrological conditions).
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
M A M J J A S O N D J
S o w in g
Tra n s p la n t in g
H e a d in g
H a rves t in g
Fre
qu
en
cy
D a te
I r r ig a t i o n
R a in fe d
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
M A M J J A S O N D J
S o w in g
Tra n s p la n t in g
H e a d in g
H a rves t in g
Fre
qu
en
cy
D a te
I r r ig a t i o n
R a in fe d
Sowing
Transplanting
Heading
Harvest
Wide sowing and transplanting windows.
vs
Narrow heading and harvest windows.
•90% of paddy field are rainfed•Transplanting date is decided by water condition•highly photosensitive cultivar(RD6, KDML105, etc.) developing according to day length planted
•Frequency distribution of major cultural and developmental events in NE Thailand
cDLDLDF exp1
DFTTGDD baseDF
Because highly photosensitive cultivars are planted, delay in transplanting date results in shorter growth duration, and thereby limits the productivity.
Growth duration to flowering expressed by the growing degree days (GDD) corrected by a daylength factor (DF).
•Transplanting date and heading (flowering) date
•Estimating transplanting date and expansion of transplanting area
0
10 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
0
10
2 0
3 0
1 0 0
0M a y J u n J u l A u g
10
-da
ys
pre
cip
ita
tio
n
c
um
ula
tiv
e %
of
10
-da
ys
pre
cip
ita
tio
n
% o
f p
ad
dy
fi
eld
tra
ns
pla
nte
d
cum
ula
tiv
e %
of
pa
dd
y
f
ield
s t
ran
sp
lan
ted
D a t e
1 0 0
00
10 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
0
10
2 0
3 0
1 0 0
0M a y J u n J u l A u g
10
-da
ys
pre
cip
ita
tio
n
c
um
ula
tiv
e %
of
10
-da
ys
pre
cip
ita
tio
n
% o
f p
ad
dy
fi
eld
tra
ns
pla
nte
d
cum
ula
tiv
e %
of
pa
dd
y
f
ield
s t
ran
sp
lan
ted
D a t e
1 0 0
0 Cum
ula
tive p
reci
pit
ati
on
fr
om
Jun
e 1
(%
rela
tive t
o
the 3
- m
onth
s to
tal)
Month
Cum
ula
tive %
of
pad
dy fi
eld
s tr
ansp
lante
d
10
-day p
reci
pit
ati
on (
mm
)%
of
paddy fi
eld
s tr
ansp
lante
d
% of paddy fields transplanted follows a similar pattern to cumulative precipitation
0 .0 0 .5 1.00 .0
0 .5
1.0
c
um
ula
tiv
e %
of
pa
dd
y f
ield
s t
ran
sp
lan
ted
c u m u l a t i v e p r e c i p i t a t i o n f r o m J u n e 1 , r e l a t i v e t o 3 m o n t h s t o t a l
0 . 7 5
1 . 5 0
0 .0 0 .5 1.00 .0
0 .5
1.0
c
um
ula
tiv
e %
of
pa
dd
y f
ield
s t
ran
sp
lan
ted
c u m u l a t i v e p r e c i p i t a t i o n f r o m J u n e 1 , r e l a t i v e t o 3 m o n t h s t o t a l
0 . 7 5
1 . 5 0
Cum
ula
tive r
ati
o
of
padd
y fi
eld
s tr
ansp
lan
ted
Cumulative precipitation from June 1 normalized by the 3-months total
(from June-August)
•model description
0
10 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
0
5 0
10 0
J u n
J u n
J u l
J u l
A u g
A u g
Gra
in y
ield
e
sti
ma
ted
(g
m-2
) P
lan
ted
are
a
es
tim
ate
d (
%)
T r a n s p l a n t i n g d a te
D a t e
1 9 8 0
1 9 9 0
2 0 0 0
1 9 8 0
1 9 9 0
2 0 0 0
0
10 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
0
5 0
10 0
J u n
J u n
J u l
J u l
A u g
A u g
Gra
in y
ield
e
sti
ma
ted
(g
m-2
) P
lan
ted
are
a
es
tim
ate
d (
%)
T r a n s p l a n t i n g d a te
D a t e
1 9 8 0
1 9 9 0
2 0 0 0
1 9 8 0
1 9 9 0
2 0 0 0
Yi= Biomass x HI
Biomass=WUE x ∑Tr
Tr = FCC x Ep
Yi; yeld obtained at specific transplanting date (i)
HI; harvest indexWUE; water use efficiencyTr; transpirationEp; potential evapotranspiration (Pe
nman-Monteith method)FCC; fraction of canopy cover as a f
unction of N input and GDD (growing degree day)
Finally, regional yield YR is obtained as;
)( YipYR iPi; planted area obtained at specific transplanting date (i)
•Simulated and actual grain yields of sixteen provinces in Northeast Thailand between 1976 and 2000
5 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
5 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
5 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 05 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0 1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0 1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0
Gra
in y
ield
(g
m-2
)
N o n g K h a i
L o e i
U d o n T h a n i
S a k o n N a k h o n
R M S E = 1 6 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 1 0 2 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 3 2 . 7 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 1 . 1 g ・ m - 2
Y e a r
N a k h o n P h a n o m
K h o n K a e n
K a l a s i n
M a h a S a r a k h a m
R M S E = 2 2 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 1 9 . 8 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 8 . 1 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 1 . 7 g ・ m - 2
R o i E t
C h a i y a p h u m
N a k h o n R a tc h a s i m a
B u r i R a m
R M S E = 2 6 . 8 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 4 0 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 5 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 8 . 8 g ・ m - 2
S u r i n
S i S a K e t
U b o n R a tc h a s i m a
Y a s o th o n
R M S E = 3 1 . 1 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 9 . 9 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 3 3 . 7 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 4 . 1 g ・ m - 2
5 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
5 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
5 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 05 0
15 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0 1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0 1 9 7 5 1 9 8 0 1 9 8 5 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0
Gra
in y
ield
(g
m-2
)
N o n g K h a i
L o e i
U d o n T h a n i
S a k o n N a k h o n
R M S E = 1 6 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 1 0 2 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 3 2 . 7 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 1 . 1 g ・ m - 2
Y e a r
N a k h o n P h a n o m
K h o n K a e n
K a l a s i n
M a h a S a r a k h a m
R M S E = 2 2 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 1 9 . 8 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 8 . 1 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 1 . 7 g ・ m - 2
R o i E t
C h a i y a p h u m
N a k h o n R a tc h a s i m a
B u r i R a m
R M S E = 2 6 . 8 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 4 0 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 5 . 4 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 8 . 8 g ・ m - 2
S u r i n
S i S a K e t
U b o n R a tc h a s i m a
Y a s o th o n
R M S E = 3 1 . 1 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 9 . 9 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 3 3 . 7 g ・ m - 2
R M S E = 2 4 . 1 g ・ m - 2
•Actual yields (in white circle) were from Agricultural Statistics in Thailand.•Weather data were from The Climate Resource Unit dataset.
4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 110 0
5
6
7
8
9
~
P re c ip i ta t i o n a m o u n ts f r o m J u n e to A u g u s t (m m )
Mo
nth
of
Tra
ns
pla
nti
ng
4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 110 0
5
6
7
8
9
~
P re c ip i ta t i o n a m o u n ts f r o m J u n e to A u g u s t (m m )
Mo
nth
of
Tra
ns
pla
nti
ng
Tra
nsp
lan
tin
g d
ate
3-month cumulative precipitationfrom June to August
Sep.
Aug.
Jul.
Jun.
May.
•Large spatial variation exists in Northeastern Thailand.•Large variation in transplanting date exists even at the same precipitation level.
•Transplanting date vs 3-month cumulative precipitation
Next step
Latitude 14N°-19NLongitude 100E-106E
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
A preliminary attempt to estimate submerged (water saturated) area by the simple water balance model (Ishigooka unpublished)
Our experimental filed established in Khon Kaen (16o27’44.30”N, 102o32’22.33”E)to make clear the water condition in paddy field(2004.11.)
wet season
dry season
Meteorological observation (lower)air temperature and humiditysolar radiation and precipitation soil temperature (6 depth)wind direction and speed
Hydrological observation (lower, middle, and upper paddy)Water tableWater content in soilmiddle
upper
lower
Khon Kaen CityObservation site
Thank youfor your attention!!