application of food defense software tools for the ......western asia western europe polynesia...
TRANSCRIPT
Application of Food Defense Software
Tools for the Purposes of Informing
Intervention Strategies
20/5/2015
Jessica Cox CTRA Program Manager Chemical Security Analysis Center Science and Technology Directorate
Presentation Overview
Presentation Objectives
Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) Overview
Risk Perception and Risk Reality
•Natural Hazard Example
• Interactive Risk Visualization Tool Example
Quantitatively Assessing Options Using Software-Based Tools
•Conceptual Approach Overview
•Results Generation and Sanitization
•Results
Summary
2
Presentation Overview
Presentation Objectives
Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) Overview
Risk Perception and Risk Reality
•Natural Hazard Example
• Interactive Risk Visualization Tool Example
Quantitatively Assessing Options Using Software-Based Tools
•Conceptual Approach Overview
•Results Generation and Sanitization
•Results
Summary
3
Presentation Objectives
Provide a brief overview of the Chemical
Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA)
Discuss how perception can skew
assessments of risk and demonstrate a
risk visualization tool that provides an
interactive means of viewing and
analyzing multidimensional risk
Demonstrate how software-based tools
can be used to inform mitigation
strategies using food safety and defense
as an example
4
Presentation Overview
Presentation Objectives
Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) Overview
Risk Perception and Risk Reality
•Natural Hazard Example
• Interactive Risk Visualization Tool Example
Quantitatively Assessing Options Using Software-Based Tools
•Conceptual Approach Overview
•Results Generation and Sanitization
•Results
Summary
5
CTRA Overview (1/2)
The Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) is a DHS CSAC program that estimates injury, fatality, and economic risk of a wide array of chemical terrorism attack scenarios against the US homeland and assists in prioritizing mitigation and risk-reduction strategies.
The CTRA is a quantitative, end-to-end assessments focused on a broad range of risks incorporating known hazards, emerging technologies, intelligence and law enforcement community input, and available countermeasures, to evaluate the acute risk to human health due to a chemical terrorism attack on the U.S. Homeland.
6
Chemical Security Analysis Center. 2012
Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment;
12-006; CSAC; 31 July, 2012.
CTRA Overview (2/2)
7
Presentation Overview
Presentation Objectives
Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) Overview
Risk Perception and Risk Reality
Natural Hazard Example
Interactive Risk Visualization Tool Example
Quantitatively Assessing Options Using Software-Based Tools
•Conceptual Approach Overview
•Results Generation and Sanitization
•Results
Summary
8
Assessing Risk and Risk Perception
Assessing risk in situations of
uncertainty can be challenging
9
Individual’s (and Organization’s!)
assessment of risks is often
skewed by perception
•What was particularly recently
•What was particularly sensational
•What was particularly impactful
•What is getting attention/talk right
now
Assessing Risk and Risk Perception:
Natural Disaster Example
As an example of risk perception, consider natural
disaster risk
10
Natural disasters data from the EM-DAT International
Disaster Database [http://www.emdat.be]
•Hierarchical categorical data used included disaster type,
region, and year from 1900 to 2014 excluding events that had
zero people affected or zero deaths.
Risk Perception: Natural Disasters What?
Which of these Natural Disaster Types represents the highest
fatality risk, worldwide from the 1900s through present?
Earthquake (Seismic Activity)
Miscellaneous Accident
Drought
Volcano
Epidemic
Transport Accident
Industrial Accident
11
Storm
Flood
Mass Movement Wet
Extreme Temperature
Wildfire
Mass Movement Dry
Risk Perception: Natural Disasters Where?
Which of these Regions of the world possessed the highest fatality risk across all disaster types from the 1900s through present?
Southern Europe Western Africa Eastern Africa Central America Caribbean South America Eastern Asia Southern Africa South-Eastern Asia Northern Europe Middle Africa
12
Melanesia
Southern Asia
Central Asia
Eastern Europe
Northern America
Northern Africa
Western Asia
Western Europe
Polynesia
Australia And New Zealand
Russian Federation
Micronesia
Risk Perception: Natural Disasters When?
Which of these Timeframes is characterized by the highest fatality risk across all disaster types and regions of the world?
1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s
13
1990s
2000s
2010s
Assessing Risk and Risk Perception:
Natural Disaster (Perception) Risks
Disaster type with the highest risk worldwide from the
1900s to present: _______________
14
Region of the world with the highest risk of disaster
from the 1900s to present: _______________
Decade with the highest risk of disaster: ___________
Assessing Risk and Risk Perception:
Natural Disaster (Actual) Risks
Disaster type with the highest risk worldwide from the
1900s to present: Drought (56% of fatality risk)
15
Region of the world with the highest risk of disaster from the 1900s
to present: Southeastern Asia (37% of fatality risk)
Decade with the highest risk of disaster: 1920s (26% of
fatality risk)
DHS Risk Analysis Tools:
RiViT
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Chemical Security
Analysis Center (CSAC) has developed an interactive Risk
Visualization Tool (RiViT) to allow analyst the ability to view the
combination of frequency, consequences, and risk in one easy to
digest interactive application that accurately conveys the
complexities of the data while resonating with stakeholders such
as policy makers improves communication and increases the use
of the CTRA
16
RiViT Risk Analysis Tool (Video)
17
Presentation Overview
Presentation Objectives
Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) Overview
Risk Perception and Risk Reality
Natural Hazard Example
Interactive Risk Visualization Tool Example
Quantitatively Assessing Options Using Software-Based
Tools
Conceptual Approach Overview
Results Generation and Sanitization
Results
Summary
18
Conceptual Approach Road Map
Evaluate post-event
mitigation strategies using a
subset of food scenario-
chemical contaminant pairs to
represent all possible
chemical food defense
scenarios
19
10 Food Clusters Represented by 10
Food-Contamination Point Scenarios
9 Toxidromes Represented
by 9 Chemicals
5 Post-Event Mitigation Strategies
10 Food Clusters Represented by 10
Food-Contamination Point Scenarios
9 Toxidromes Represented
by 9 Chemicals
5 Post-Event Mitigation Strategies
Conceptual Approach Road Map
The 10 food clusters in the 2012
CTRA, represented by 10 exemplar
food scenarios, were selected to
represent the variety of foods
consumed in the US.
20
Food Clusters
Ready-to-eat (RTE), primary component foods
Assembled companion dishes
Produce
Packaged, processed, cold chain ready-to-eat (RTE)
Multi-component assembled foods, not thermally processed in the home
Home ingredients
Main Dishes, single component foods
Industrial ingredients
Multi-component assembled foods, thermally processed in the home
Beverages
Exemplars foods were chosen by food
SMEs to represent a cluster based on
average serving size and market penetration
10 Food Clusters Represented by 10
Food-Contamination Point Scenarios
9 Toxidromes Represented
by 9 Chemicals
5 Post-Event Mitigation Strategies
Conceptual Approach Road Map
Toxidromes from the 2012 CTRA,
which can be represented by
exemplar chemicals, were selected
to represent the wide variety of
chemicals that could be involved in
a terrorist attack on the US
21
Chemicals were chosen by analysts
to represent toxidromes based on
average impact (number of injuries)
Toxidrome
Blood
Cholinergic (CWA)
Cholinergic (Other)
Convulsant
Hemolytic / Metabolic
Opioid
Pulmonary (Lower)
Pulmonary (Upper)
Vesicant
10 Food Clusters Represented by 10
Food-Contamination Point Scenarios
9 Toxidromes Represented
by 9 Chemicals
5 Post-Event Mitigation Strategies
Conceptual Approach Road Map
This study then examined the
impact of 5 post-event mitigation
strategies, specifically:
22
Post-Event Mitigation Strategies
Baseline
Improved Investigation
Improved Recall Dissemination
Improved Compliance
All Improvements (All of the Above)
Post-Event Mitigation Options (1/4)
Improved Investigation • Concept: What if one could more quickly identify the contaminated food and contaminant involved?
• Parameters Adjusted: Dimensionless recall investigation parameter space was adjusted to reflect the most rapid investigations from the 2012 CTRA dataset
• Dimensionless Time: Investigation Time (tinv) divided by the average Time to Symptom Onset (tTSO,ave)
• Dimensionless Number of Injuries/Illnesses: Number of Injuries/Illness (Ninjured/ill) divided by the Baseline Number Similar Injuries/Illnesses (NBaseline)
• Examples of How this Could Be Achieved:
• Improved medical diagnostics
• Targeted training of medical personnel (symptom recognition)
• Integrated public health data systems that aid recognition of illness/injury clusters
23
Post-Event Mitigation Options (2/4)
Improved Recall Dissemination
• Concept: What if one could more quickly and more widely
disseminate an intervention (e.g., a recall or public health warning)?
• Parameters Adjusted: Information diffusion associated with
interventions (recall) was adjusted to represent the fastest known
instance of information diffusion (i.e., 9/11 attacks) and the widest
possible dissemination (all people)
• Information Diffusion Rate
• Ultimate Fraction Informed
• Examples of How this Could Be Achieved:
• Application of social media to communicating interventions
• Targeted intervention communication systems (e.g., integration with
retail consumer frequent shopper databases)
24
Post-Event Mitigation Options (3/4)
Improved Compliance
•Concept: What if one could persuade consumers and retailers
to better comply with interventions?
•Parameters Adjusted: Recall compliance was adjusted to the
highest possible rate (100%)
• Retailer Compliance
• Consumer Compliance
•Examples of How this Could Be Achieved:
• Application of social media to communicating interventions
• Targeted intervention communication systems (e.g., integration
with retail consumer frequent shopper databases)
• Consumer education programs targeting compliance
25
Post-Event Mitigation Options (4/4)
All Improvements
•Description: Combination of Improved
Investigation, Improved Recall Dissemination, and
Improved Compliance
Baseline
•Description: The best estimate of the potential
impact of a foodborne chemical terrorism attack
(2012 CTRA)
26
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1P
ub
lic H
eal
th Im
pac
t
Baseline Improved InvestigationImproved Recall Dissemination Improved ComplianceAll Improvements
Example Legend
Results Generation
For each of the 450 combinations of 10 exemplar food scenarios,
9 exemplar chemicals, and 5 post-event mitigation strategy
options, an ensemble of 10,000 simulations were performed using
the CTRA Tool
•Average runtime of each ensemble was approximately 30s
Results tables for each ensemble were saved to excel,
summarized using plots and statistics, and analyzed to identify
relevant trends
Total time to generate the results and create this presentation was
approximately 2 weeks
27
CTRA Consequence Tool (Video)
28
Results Sanitization
To prevent revealing any potential vulnerability or potentially
aiding the planning of a terrorist attack, results were normalized
for each food-chemical combination by the baseline value
The values created have been termed Impact as they are
generally indicative of consequences but are not specifically
consequences
The Impact metric then provides a quantitative evaluation of
various post-event mitigation options that can be presented in an
open forum
29
Example Results
Sets of bar plots were created in Excel® for each food showing
the average estimated impact for each toxidrome and post-event
mitigation option
•Sets of bar plots were made for both life-threatening impact
and total public health impact (all lethal and non-lethal
injuries)
Given the excitement created by flipping through 20 slides
containing approximately 900 bars worth of information, an
example of the results will be displayed and then the results of
further analysis will be presented today
• If you are interested in the more detailed set of bar plots,
please contact Jessica Cox of CSAC at
30
Beverages
Impact Analysis
31
Post-Event Mitigation Options
Improved Compliance was identified as the most effective post-
mitigation option examined
• Further studies could be done to quantify the benefits of incremental
improvements in compliance
32
Intervention (Recall) Trends
Model results reflect intuitive trends with respect to public health
interventions as a function of human health consequences
• Contamination scenarios with increasing human health consequences result
in earlier interventions (recalls); however significant variability exists
33
Presentation Overview
Presentation Objectives
Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) Overview
Risk Perception and Risk Reality
Natural Hazard Example
Interactive Risk Visualization Tool Example
Quantitatively Assessing Options Using Software-Based Tools
Conceptual Approach Overview
Results Generation and Sanitization
Results
Summary
34
Summary
The Department of Homeland Security is committed to protecting
the US Homeland through informing risk-based decisions
• The risk of CBRN terrorism includes a wide range of threat scenarios
and is a complex challenge
Interactive tools, such as RiViT, that allow both analysts and
policy makers to better digest multi-faceted results promote a
better understanding of the risks facing the nation
Analytical tools, such as the CTRA Consequence Tool, that allow
analysts to explore the potential impact of post-event mitigation
strategies and inform prioritized decision making
35