apple in 2008 case

Upload: axl-hext-solon

Post on 04-Jun-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    1/14

    1Apple in 2008

    Introduction

    In 1997, Apple Computer was in deep trouble. The

    company that had pioneered the personal com-

    puter (PC mar!et with its easy-to-use Apple II in

    197" and introduced the #irst $raphical user inter-#ace (%&I with the 'acintosh in 19" was bleedin$

    red in!. Apple)s worldwide mar!et share, which had

    been #luctuatin$ between 7* and 9* since 19",

    had sun! to *. +ales were declinin$. Apple was on

    trac! to lose 7" million on reenues o# 7 billion,

    on top o# a 7/ million loss in 1990. In uly 1997,

    the co#ounder o# the company, +tee obs, who had

    been #ired #rom Apple in 19"2, returned as C34. At

    an inestor con#erence, 'ichael 5ell, C34 o# 5ell

    Computer, was as!ed what obs should do as head

    o# Apple. 5ell 6uipped I)d shut it down and $ie the

    money bac! to shareholders.81

    y ://", the situation loo!ed ery di##erent.

    Apple was on trac! to boo! record sales o# more than

    : billion and net pro#its o# close to .7 billion.

    The stoc! price, which had traded as low as 0 a

    share in :// was about 17/, with the mar!et capi-

    tali;ation at 1/ billion, which #ar surpassed that o#

    5ell Computer which was about 1 billion. 5riin$

    the trans#ormation were stron$ sales o# Apple)s iPod

    music player, music downloads #rom the iTunes

    store, and Apple)s iPhone. In addition, stron$ sales o#

    Apple)s i'ac laptop and des!top computers hadli#ted Apple)s mar!et share in the &nited +tates PC

    busi- ness to ".2*, up #rom a low o# under * in

    ://.:

    Apple now ran!ed third in the &nited +tates PC mar-

    !et behind 5ell with :* and

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    2/14

    C13

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    3/14

    Case 1 Apple in ://" C14

    to ?o;, but it did to obs. obs persuaded a reluctant

    ?o; to #orm a company and sell the machine. The

    location o# the company was +tee obs) $ara$e. obs

    su$$ested they call the company Apple and their #irst

    machine, Apple I. They sold about :// computers at

    000 each. The price point was pic!ed as somethin$o# apran!.

    The Apple I had seeral limitationsE no case, !ey-

    board, or power supply bein$ obious ones. It also

    re6uired seeral hours o# laborious assembly by hand.

    y late 1970, ?o; was wor!in$ on a replacement

    to the Apple I, the Apple II. In 4ctober 1970, with

    the Apple II under deelopment, obs and ?o; were

    introduced to 'i!e 'ar!!ula. 4nly , 'ar!!ula

    was already a retired millionaire, hain$ made a

    small #ortune at =airchild and Intel. 'ar!!ula had

    no plans to $et bac! into business anytime soon, buta isit to obs) $ara$e chan$ed all that.

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    4/14

    company)s C34, ill %ates. %ates, still in his early

    :/s, persuaded I' to adopt a 10-bit processor

    (ori$inally I' had been considerin$ a less-power#ul

    "-bit processor.

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    5/14

    Andy

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    6/14

    mar!et had $rown, stabili;ed at "*. The company

    had a stron$ balance sheet and was the most pro#it-

    able personal computer manu#acturer in the world.

    5urin$ this period eFecuties at Apple actiely

    debated the merits o# licensin$ the 'ac operatin$

    system to other computer manu#acturers, allowin$them to ma!e 'ac clones. +culley was in #aor o#

    this moe. +o was 'icroso#t)s ill %ates, who wrote

    two memos to +culley layin$ out an ar$ument #or

    licensin$ the 'ac 4+. %ates ar$ued that the closed

    architecture o# the 'acintosh preented indepen-

    dent inestment in the standard by third parties,

    and put Apple at a disadanta$e a$ainst the I' PC

    standard.

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    7/14

    portable, the Poweroo! noteboo!, which was

    shipped in late 1991 and $arnered ery #aorable

    reiews, and the Apple Kewton handheld computer,

    which bombed. =i#th, Apple entered into an alliance

    with I', whose mana$ers reali;ed that it had lost

    its hold on the PC mar!et to companies such asIntel, 'icroso#t, and Compa6.

    The I' alliance had seeral elements. 4ne was

    the decision to adopt I')s Power PC microproces-

    sor architecture, which I' would also use in its

    own o##erin$s. A second was the establishment o#

    two @oint enturesE Tali$ent to create a new oper-

    atin$ system, and Oaleida to deelop multimedia

    applications. A third was a pro@ect to help I' and

    Apple machines wor! better to$ether.

    Althou$h +culley)s $ame plan helped to boost the

    top line, thebottom line shrun! in 199 due to a com-bination o# low $ross mar$ins and continuin$ hi$h

    costs. In 199, +culley le#t Apple.

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    8/14

    The Return of Steve Jobs

    =ollowin$ Amelio)s departure, +tee obs was

    appointed interim C34. In April 199", he too! the

    position on a permanent basis, while stayin$ on at

    PiFar as C34. obs moed 6uic!ly to #iF the bleedin$.

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    9/14

    pro#essionals and i'oie #or consumers. KeFt was

    iBi#e, a bundle o# multimedia pro$rams preinstalled

    on eery 'ac, which included i'oie, i5G5, iPhoto,

    %ar$a$e and, and the iTunes di$ital @u!eboF. Apple

    also deeloped its own ?eb browser, +a#ari.

    'eanwhile, Apple continued to update its com-puter lines with eye-catchin$ o##erin$s. In ://1,

    Apple introduced its Titanium Poweroo! % note-

    boo!s. Cased in Titanium, these ultrali$ht and #ast

    noteboo!s #eatured a clean post-industrial loo! that

    mar!ed a distinct shi#t #rom the whimsical loo! o#

    the i'ac and ioo!. As with the i'ac, onathan

    Ie)s desi$n team played a central part in the prod-

    ucts deelopment. A core team o# desi$ners set up

    a desi$n studio in a +an =rancisco warehouse, #ar

    away #rom Apple)s main campus. They wor!ed #or

    siF wee!s on the basic desi$n, and then headed toAsia to ne$otiate #or widescreen #lat panel displays

    and to wor! with tool ma!ers.17

    The Titanium noteboo!s were #ollowed by a rede-

    si$ned des!top line that appealed to the company)s

    $raphic desi$n customers, includin$ the o##erin$ o#

    ele$antly desi$ned ery wide screen cinema displays.

    In ://, Ie)s desi$n team came out with yet another

    ele$ant o##erin$, the i'ac %2 computer, which PC

    Magazine described as a simple stunnin$ all in one

    desi$n.81" This was #ollowed in ://" with the release

    o# yet another stron$ desi$n, the ultra-thin 'acoo!Air that wei$hed @ust pounds and was only /.70 o#

    an inch thic! at its widest point.

    =or all o# Apple)s undisputed desi$n eFcellence

    and the loyalty o# its core user base, $raphic artists

    and students, durin$ the early :///s Apple)s $lobal

    mar!et share remained anemic, trailin$ #ar behind

    industry leaders 5ell,

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    10/14

    C1 ,ection A usiness Beel CasesE 5omestic and %lobal

    older applications on Intel-based 'acs. 'oreoer,

    Apple went a step #arther by issuin$ a utility pro-

    $ram, !nown as oot Camp, which enabled 'ac

    owners to run ?indows JP on their machines. oot

    Camp was included was part o# 4+ J Beopard, and

    allows 'ac owners to run ?indows JP or Gista i#they should so chose.

    Deiews o# Apple)s Intel-based machines were

    $enerally #aorable, with many reiewers notin$ the

    speed improement oer the older PowerPC 'acs.:/

    In the #all o# ://0, Apple reported that its transition

    to an Intel-based architecture was complete, some

    siF months ahead o# schedule. The moe to Intel

    architecture may hae helped Apple to close the price

    di##erential that had lon$ eFisted between ?indows-

    based PCs and Apple)s o##erin$s. Accordin$ to one

    analysis, by +eptember ://0, Apple)s products weresellin$ at a discount to comparable product o##erin$s

    #rom 5ell and

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    11/14

    The iPod 6e5ol%tion

    In the late 199/s and early :///s, the music indus-

    try was $rapplin$ with the implications o# two

    new technolo$ies. The #irst was the deelopment o#

    ineFpensie portable 'P players that could storeand play di$ital music #iles, such as 5iamond 'edia)s

    Dio, which was introduced in 1997 and could hold

    two hours o# music. The second was the rise o# peer-

    to-peer computer networ!s, such asKapster, Oa;aa,

    %ro!ster, and 'orpheus, that enabled indiiduals to

    e##iciently swap di$ital #iles oer the Internet. y the

    early :///s, millions o# indiiduals were download-

    in$ music #iles oer the Internet without the permis-

    sion o# the copyri$ht holders, the music publishin$

    companies. =or the music industry, this deelopment

    had been deastatin$. A#ter years o# steady $rowth,$lobal sales o# music pea!ed in 1999 at ".2 billion,

    #allin$ to : billion in ://. 5espite the #all in

    sales, the International =ederation o# the Phono-

    $raphic Industry (I=PI claimed that the demand

    #or music was hi$her than eer, but the decline in

    sales re#lected the #act that the commercial alue o#

    music is bein$ widely dealued by mass copyin$ and

    piracy.8:(

    The music industry had tried to counter piracy

    oer the Internet by ta!in$ le$al action to shut down

    the peer-to-peer networ!s, such as Kapster, and#ilin$ lawsuits a$ainst indiiduals who made lar$e

    num-bers o# music #iles aailable oer the Internet.

    Its suc- cess had been limited, in part because peer-

    to-peer networ!s o##ered tremendous utility to

    consumers. They were #ast, immediate, and enabled

    consumers to unbundled albums, downloadin$ @ust

    the trac!s they wanted while i$norin$ @un! #iller

    trac!s. And, o# course, they were #ree.

    The music industry was desperate #or a le$al

    alternatie to ille$al downloadin$. Its own initia-

    ties, introduced in ://:, had $ained little traction.

    'usicKet, which o##ered son$s #rom ?arner 'usic,

    '%, and 3'I, had a sin$le subscriptionplanE 9."2

    a month #or 1// streams and 1// downloads. A#ter

    / days downloads eFpired and could not be played.

    Pressplay, which o##ered music #rom +ony, &niersal,

    and 3'I, had #our subscription plans, #rom 9.92

    to :.92 a month, #or up to 1,/// streams and 1//

    downloads. The hi$her subscription #ee serice #rom

    Pressplay allowed users to burn up to :/ son$s a

    month onto C5s that would not eFpire, but no more

    than two son$s could be burned #rom any one artist.:2

    Then alon$ came the iPod and iTunes. These

    products were born out o# an oersi$htE in the late

    199/s, when consumers were startin$ to burn their

    #aorite C5s, 'acs did not hae C5 burners, or

    so#tware to mana$e their di$ital music collections.

    Deali;in$ the mista!e, C34 +tee obs orderedApple)s so#tware deelopers to create the iTunes

    pro$ram to help 'ac users mana$e their $rowin$

    di$ital music collections. The #irst iTunes pro$ram

    led to the concept o# the iPod. I# people were $oin$

    to maintain the bul! o# their music collection on

    a computer, they needed portable 'P players to

    ta!e music with themNa +ony ?al!man #or the

    di$ital a$e. ?hile there were such deices on the

    mar!et already, they could only hold a #ew do;en

    son$s each.

    To run the iPod, Apple licensed so#tware #romPortalPlayer. Apple also learned that Toshiba was

    buildin$ a tiny 1."-inch hard drie that could hold

    more than 1,/// son$s. Apple 6uic!ly cut a deal

    with Toshiba, $iin$ it eFclusie ri$hts to the drie

    #or 1" months. 'eanwhile, Apple #ocused on desi$n-

    in$ the user inter#ace, the eFterior stylin$, and the

    synchroni;ation so#tware to ma!e it wor! with the

    'ac. As with so many product o##erin$s uneiled

    since obs had returned to the helm, the desi$n team

    led by onathan Ie played a piotal role in $iin$

    birth to the iPod. Ie)s team wor!ed in secrecy in +an=rancisco. The members, all paid eFtremely well by

    industry standards, wor!ed to$ether in a lar$e open

    studio with little personal space. The team was able

    to #i$ure out how to put a layer o# clear plastic oer

    the white and blac! core o# an iPod, $iin$ it tre-

    mendous depth o# teFture. The #inish was superior to

    other 'P players, with no isible screws or obious

    @oins between parts. The serial number o# the iPod

    was not on a stic!er, as with most products, it was

    ele$antly etched onto the bac! o# the deice. This

    attention to detail and desi$n ele$ance, althou$h not

    with cost implications, was to turn the iPod into a

    #ashion accessory.:0

    The iPod was uneiled in 4ctober ://1 to miFed

    reiews. The price o# 99 was si$ni#icantly aboe

    that o# competin$ deices, and because the iPod only

    wor!ed with Apple computers, it seemed destined

    to be a niche product.

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    12/14

    ?indows. A#ter it was introduced in mid-://:, sales

    too! o##.

    y this time, obs was dealin$ with a bi$$er

    strate$ic issueNhow to persuade the music compa-

    nies to ma!e their music aailable #or le$al down-

    loads. obs met with eFecuties #rom the ma@orlabels.

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    13/14

  • 8/13/2019 Apple in 2008 case

    14/14

    mar!et, and a lon$ tail o# small enterprises that

    produce unbranded or locally branded white boF8

    computers, o#ten sellin$ their machines at a si$ni#i-

    cant discount to $lobally branded products.

    Amon$ the lar$er players, consolidation has been

    a theme #or seeral years. In ://:,