appendix - springer978-1-4419-9216-1... · 2017-08-25 · appendix note. for abbreviations ... j,...
TRANSCRIPT
APPENDIX
Note. For abbreviations and explanations in Table A.I., the reader is referred to the chapter on PharmacokineticlPharmacodynarnic modeling in drug development authored by Shashank Rohatagi, Nancy E. Martin, Jeffrey S. Barrett.
529
Tab
le A
.I.
PK
lPD
Mod
els
and
Der
ived
Par
amet
ers
Use
d in
Var
ious
The
rape
utic
Are
aslD
rug
Cla
ss:
A P
arti
al L
ist.
Dru
g/C
lasS
/lndl
catlo
n(
Dos
ing
. Pha
rmac
:oki
netic
·P
O-M
odel
' -
-P~Marke?
Rtl
lmen
' P
aram
eten
1,2.
>
d-tu
bocr
arin
e (S
kele
tal
mus
cle
rela
xant
)·
Panc
uron
ium
(S
kele
tal
mus
cle
rela
xant
)
Vec
uron
ium
(S
kele
tal
mus
cle
rela
xant
)
Atra
curiu
m
(Ske
leta
l m
uscl
e re
laxa
nt
in r
enaV
hep
atic
impa
ired
patie
nts)
Dox
acur
ium
(S
kele
tal
mus
cle
rela
xant
, m
aint
ain
hem
odyn
amic
st
abili
ty
Pipe
curo
nium
Miv
acur
ium
0.5-
0.6
mgl
kg
IM,I
VQ
40-
60 m
in
0.06
-0.1
mgl
kg
IV m
aint
ain
0.01
mgl
kgQ
60
-100
min
.
O.O
S-O
.I m
glkg
IV
the
n O
.oI
O.o
I 5 m
glkg
Q
25-4
0 m
in.
0.4-
0.5
mgl
kg
IV th
en O
.OS-
0.1
mgl
kgQ
20
-45
min
to
rela
x sk
elet
al
mus
cles
0.05
-O.0
S m
glkg
IV t
hen
0.00
05-0
.01
mgl
kgto
0.07
-O.0
S5
mgl
kg th
en
0.01
-0.0
15 Q
50
-120
min
0.15
-0.2
5 m
glkg
IV
bol
us
then
0.1
mgl
kg
Q 1
5 m
in.
Vd: 0
.39±
O.1
4lJk
g C
L: 1
.9t 0
.6 m
Um
inlk
g T
,ll:
2.0±
I.I
h
V.:
0.26
iO.0
7 lJ
kg
CL:
I.S
iO.4
mU
min
lkg
Vd: 0
.2IiO
.OS
lJkg
C
L: 3
.0±0
.1 m
Um
inlk
g
V d:
O.l6
iO.0
6lJk
g C
L: 6
.2±2
.0 m
Um
inlk
g
Vd: 0
.35i
O.O
S C
L: [
jkg
2.1
iO.5
mU
min
lkg
Ane
sthe
tlcs:
Neu
rom
uscu
lar
Blo
ckin
g A
gent
s In
dire
ct L
ink
Sigm
oid
Ner
omus
cula
r bl
ock
E,..
, Mod
el
% M
uscu
lar
Para
lysi
s
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
,..,M
odel
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
,..,M
odel
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
,..,M
odel
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
,..,M
odel
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
,..,M
odel
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
max
Mod
el
Ner
omus
cula
r bl
ock
% M
uscu
lar
Para
lysi
s
Ner
omus
cula
r bl
ock
% M
uscu
lar
Para
lysi
s
Ner
omus
cula
r bl
ock
% M
uscu
lar
Para
lysi
s
Ner
omus
cula
r bl
ock
% M
uscu
lar
Para
lysi
s
Ner
omus
cula
r blo
ck
% M
uscu
lar
Para
lysi
s
Ner
omus
cula
r bl
ock
% M
uscu
lar
Para
lysi
s
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
P
aram
eten
E.. ..
: 100
"10
E,.,
0.6O
±O.2
2 m
cg/m
L
N:
-T
'IlK
e0=
4.7t
I.2
min
E..,
: 10
0"10
E
,.,O
.2IiO
.OS
mcg
/mL
N
: 5.4
Stl
.64
T,IlK
eo:
1.43
min
E,..
,: 10
0"10
E
,.,O
.lIiO
.02m
cg/m
L
N: -
T,"
Keo
: 6.
1 m
in
E...:
100%
E
,.,0.
24iO
.04m
cg/m
L
N: 3
.4iO
.37
T,IlK
eo: 5
.1 m
in
E..,
: 10
0"10
E
,. 34
.9t1
2.0
ng/m
L
N: 3
.3iO
.7
T'Il
Keo
=I0.
7±4.
4 m
in
E,. .
. : 1
00"1
0 E
,.6
3 n
g/m
L
N: -
T,,,
Keo
: -
E,..
,: 10
0%
E",
67.
3±30
.4 n
g/m
L
N: 4
.4t1
.3
T,,,
Keo
: 4.
9t2.
3 m
in
I.
Lacy
CF,
Ann
stro
ng L
L, G
oldm
an M
P, L
ance
LL.
D
rug
info
rmat
ion
hand
book
. 19
99-2
000.
2.
H
ardm
an J
G, L
imba
rd L
E, G
ilman
AG
. Th
e ph
arm
acol
ogic
al b
asis
of t
hera
peut
ics.
10
· edi
tion,
McG
raw
Hill
, New
Yor
k.
2001
. 3.
D
eren
dorf
H a
nd H
ochh
aus
G.
Han
dboo
k of
pha
rmac
okin
etic
lpha
rmac
odyn
amic
cor
rela
tion.
CR
C P
ress
, Boc
a R
aton
, 199
5.
Ref
eren
ces
Stan
ski
DR
, Ham
J, M
iller
RD
, She
iner
LB
. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
and
phar
mac
odyn
amic
s of
dtu
bocu
rarin
ne in
man
. A
nest
hesi
olog
y 19
72: 3
6: 2
13.
Evan
s M
A, S
hank
s C
A, B
row
n K
F, T
riggs
EJ.
Phar
mac
okin
etic
s an
d ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic m
odel
ing
with
pan
curo
nium
. Eu
r J C
lin P
harm
acol
. 19
84: 2
6:
243.
Sohn
YJ,
Ben
cini
AF,
Sca
f AH
J, K
erst
en U
W,
Ago
ston
S.
Com
para
tive
phar
mac
okin
etic
s an
d dy
nam
ics
ofve
curo
nium
and
pan
curo
nium
in
anae
sthe
tized
pat
ient
s. A
nest
h A
nalg
198
6: 6
5: 2
33.
Don
ati
F, V
arin
F, D
ucha
rme
J, G
ill S
S, T
heor
et Y
, B
evan
DR
. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
and
phar
mac
odyn
amic
s of
atra
curiu
m o
btai
ned
with
arte
rial a
nd v
enou
s bl
ood
sam
ples
. C
lin P
harm
acol
The
r 19
91: 4
9: 5
15.
Schm
idt V
D, L
ai A
, Dre
ssne
r DL,
Bas
ta S
J, Ja
mes
CD
, W
argi
n W
A, S
avar
ese
JJ.
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
mod
elin
g o
f dox
acur
ium
in y
oung
adu
lt an
d el
derly
pat
ient
s.
Phar
Res
199
1: S
: S-2
76.
Orn
stei
n E,
Mat
teo
RS,
Sch
war
tz A
E, J
amda
r SC
, Dia
z J.
Phar
mac
okin
etic
s an
d ph
arm
acod
ynam
ics
of
pipe
curiu
m b
rom
ide
(Ard
uan)
in e
lder
ly s
urgi
cal
patie
nt
Phill
ips
L, S
chm
idt V
D, L
ien
CA
, Em
bree
PB
, Jam
es
CD
, Lai
A,
Sava
rese
JJ.
M
ivac
uriu
m s
teri
oiso
mer
ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic ...
Ph
arm
Res
199
2: 9
: S-3
56.
~ > :: l"l
2!
t:I ><
Dru
glC
I.,s
Ilnd
l •• t
ion '
D
o,ln
g P
harm
a.ok
inet
l.
PO-M
oder
' P
O-M
arke
r'
Riv
astig
min
e
Ace
tam
inop
hen-
ibup
rofe
n-
Fent
anyl
(an
esth
etic
)
Alfe
ntan
il (a
nest
hetic
)
Sufe
ntan
il (f
or a
nalg
isia
la
nest
hetic
)
Reg
imen
1 P
aram
ctcr
sl.1
.J
1-6m
gpoB
ID
12.5
mgl
leg
po
5-\0
ngl
leg
po
0.5-
1.0
meg
llegl
dose
1M
, IV
; 25
meg
lh
trans
derm
al
8-40
meg
lleg
IV
1-2m
eglle
g IV
an
d 10
-25
meg
pm
F: 2
2-11
9"10
Y
.: 23
6 L
C
L: 1
26lJ
hr
F: 8
8"10
V
.: 0.
15 i
O.0
2 U
kg
CL:
0.7
5iO
.2 m
Um
inlk
g T,
ll: 2
.0±0
.5 h
F: 8
0"10
Y
,: 0.
95 i
O.l2
Ukg
C
L: 5
.OtI
.4 m
Um
inlk
g T,
ll: 2
.0±0
.4 h
Y.:
4.0±
0.4
Ukg
C
L: 1
3±2
mU
min
lkg
Y.:
0.8i
O.3
Ukg
C
L: 6
.7±2
.4 m
Um
inlk
g
Y.:
1.7i
O.6
Ukg
C
L: 1
2.7±
2.5
mU
min
lkg
Cho
line
ster
ase
Inbl
blto
n Si
gmoi
d E
... M
odel
C
ogni
tive
chan
ge
(mea
sure
d by
the
Com
pute
rised
N
euro
psyc
holo
gica
l Te
st B
atte
ry i.
e C
NT
Bsc
ore
Ant
ipyr
etic
s Si
gmoi
d E
... M
odel
N
erom
uscu
lar b
lock
"10
Mus
cula
r Par
alys
is
Sigm
oid
E..
. Mod
el
Ner
omus
cula
r blo
ck
"10 M
uscu
lar P
aral
ysis
Opl
old
Ane
sthe
tics
In
dire
ct L
ink
Sigm
oid
Elec
troen
c:eph
alogn
m
E.. ..
Mod
el
(EEG
)
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
"..M
odel
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d E
...M
odel
E1ec
troen
eeph
alog
nm
(EEG
)
Elec
troen
ceph
alog
nm
(EEG
)
Pba
rmac
odyn
lmk
Par
amet
ers
E...
:lOO
"lo
E ..
,5.4
2 m
e&'L
N
=O.5
sco
re/y
ear
E ..
, 4.6
3± 0
.39
meg
lmL
E..
I 1.3
3± 1
.35
meg
lmL
E,..
.: 14
.1±1
.8 H
z E
,. 6.
9±1.
5 ng
lmL
N: 4
.9±1
.0
T'Il
Keo
=6.4
±1.3
min
Eo
: 19.
2±1.
6 H
z
Em .. :
14.
7±3.
l H
z E
,., 5
20t 1
63 n
glm
L N
: 4.8
±1.5
T
'IlK
eo=l
.IiO
.3m
in
Eo: 2
0.1±
3.4
Hz
Em .. :
14.
7±3.
1 H
z E
,.,0.
68iO
.31
nglm
L N:
3.1
±.09
T
'IlK
eo=6
.2±2
.8m
in
Eo: 2
4.3±
2.7
Hz
Ref
eren
ces
Gob
buru
NS
, Tam
mar
a Y
, et a
l. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
Mod
elin
g of
Riv
astig
min
e, a
C
holin
este
rase
Inhi
bito
r, in
Pat
ient
s w
ith A
lzhe
imer
's D
isea
se.
J C
lin P
harm
acol
200
1;41
: I 08
2-1 0
90.
Bro
wn
RD
, et a
l. In
tegr
ated
pha
rmac
okin
etic
ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic m
odel
for
ace
tam
inop
hen,
ib
upro
fen,
and
pla
cebo
ant
ipyr
esis
in c
hild
ren.
J
Phar
mac
okin
et B
ioph
arm
. 19
98 O
ct;2
6(5)
:559
-79.
Bro
wn
RD, e
t al.
Inte
grat
ed p
harm
acok
inet
ic
phar
mac
odyn
amic
mod
el f
or a
ceta
min
ophe
n,
ibup
rofe
n, a
nd p
lace
bo a
ntip
yres
is in
chi
ldre
n. J
Ph
arm
acok
inet
Bio
phar
m.
1998
Oct
;26(
5):5
59-7
9.
Scot
t JC
, Pon
gani
s K
Y, S
tans
ki D
R.
EEG
Q
uant
ifica
tion
of na
rcot
ic e
ffec
t: th
e co
mpa
rativ
e ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic e
ffec
t of f
enta
nyl a
nd a
lfent
anil.
A
nest
hesi
olog
y 19
91: 7
4: 3
4.
Scot
t JC
, Pon
gani
s K
Y, S
tans
ki D
R. E
EG
Qua
ntifi
catio
n of
narc
otic
eff
ect:
the
com
para
tive
phar
mac
odyn
amic
eff
ect o
f fen
tany
l and
alfe
ntan
il.
Ane
sthe
siol
ogy
1985
: 62:
.
Scot
t JC
, Coo
ke J
C, S
tans
ki D
R.
Ele
ctro
ence
phal
ogra
phic
qua
ntifi
catio
n of
opio
id
effe
ct:
com
para
tive
phar
mac
odyn
amic
eff
ect o
f fe
ntan
yl a
nd s
ufen
/&ni
l. A
nest
hesi
olog
y 19
91: 7
4: 3
4.
>
."
~ :2 ~ ~ ...
Dru
g/C
lass
llnd
i<at
ion'
--D
osin
g Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic
Reg
imen
l P
aram
eter
sl.l.
l
Dia
zepa
m (
anxi
ety,
2-
10 m
g p.
o. 2
-F:
100
"10
seda
tion,
or
mus
cle
4 tim
es/d
ay, 2
-V
,: l.
ltO
J U
kg
rela
xatio
n)
10m
g1M
, IV
C
L: 0
.38t
O.0
6 m
Um
inlk
g Q
3-4h
or 5
-10
mg
IV Q
10-
20
min
, up
to 3
0 m
g/8h
Mid
azol
am (
seda
tion)
P
reop
erat
ive
F:44
%
seda
tion:
0.0
7-V
,: I.
ltO
.06
Ukg
0.
08 m
g/kg
1M
C
L: 6
.6±1
.8 m
Um
inlk
g or
0.0
2-0.
04
mg/
kg I
V Q
5
min
. up
to
0.I-
O.2
mg/
kg
Oxa
zepa
m
10-3
0 m
g po
F:
100
%
q6h
Fb: 8
6-99
%
Tl/
2: 2
.8-5
.7 h
Lor
azep
am
2t0
4m
gp
o
Fb:
88-9
2%
daily
V
,: 1.
3 U
kg
Tl/
2:
10-2
0 h
PD-M
odel
' P
D-M
arke
r'
Ben
zodi
azel
!ine
s-se
dativ
es, a
ntic
onvu
lsan
ts
Sigm
oid
E""
,Mod
el
SA
-lV
: ap
erio
dic
sign
al
PSA
b: P
ower
sp
ectru
m a
naly
sis
of
alph
a w
aves
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d S
A-l
V: a
perio
dic
E,.
" M
odel
si
gnal
.
Indi
rect
Lin
k Si
gmoi
d SA
-TN
W: a
perio
dic
E,."
Mod
el
sign
al a
naly
sis
of
tota
l num
ber o
f w
aves
.
Sigm
oid
E"",
Mod
el
PSA
-b: p
ower
sp
ectru
m a
naly
sis
of
beta
-wav
es
Sigm
oid
E"",
Mod
el
Ant
icon
vuls
ant
in th
e PT
Zm
odel
Sigm
oid
E"",
Mod
el
CN
S im
pairm
ent
mea
sure
d by
co
mpu
teriz
ed
track
ing
syst
em
(TR
KN
)
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
P
aram
eter
s
E,.,
,: 13
4±57
E
", 9
58±2
oo n
glm
L
N:
J.6±
.0.6
T
II,K
eo=J
.6tO
.5 m
in
E0:
39±
17
E,.,
,: 20
.2%
E
,., 2
70 n
glm
L
N:2
.1
E"",
: 12
5±13
E
,., 1
52±4
8 ng
lmL
N
: 1.
9±.0
.2
T,12
Ke0
=4.8
±1.5
min
Eo
: 40±
18
E"",
: 9.7
±1.5
E
,., 2
90±9
8 ng
lmL
N
: 3.
1±.1
.0
T'I2
Kco
=1.7
tO.7
min
Eo
: 0.7
±0.
3
E,..
,: 22
.4%
EC
,., 3
5 ng
lmL
N
: 2.2
EC
",
99
± 1
9n9l
mL
R
ecep
tor
bind
ing
to
GA
BA
: 86
± 1
5 ng
/mL
E,.,
,: 41
8 E
C,.
35.8
ngl
mL
N
: 6.2
9 T
II,K
eo=O
.43
h
Ref
eren
ces
Buh
rer M
, Mai
tre P
O, C
revo
isie
r C, S
tans
ki D
R.
Ele
ctro
ence
phal
ogra
phic
eff
ects
of b
enzo
diad
epin
es n
. Ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic m
odel
ing
of th
e el
ectro
ence
phal
ogra
phic
eff
ects
of m
idaz
olam
and
di
azep
am. C
lin P
harm
acol
The
r 19
90: 4
8: 5
55.
Gre
enbl
att O
J, E
hren
berg
BL,
Gun
derm
an J
, Loc
nisk
ar
A, S
cavo
ne J
M, H
anna
tz J
S, S
hade
r RI
. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic a
nd e
ncep
halo
grap
hic
stud
y of
in
trave
nous
dia
zepa
m, m
idaz
olam
and
pla
cebo
. C
lin
Phar
mac
ol T
her
1989
: 45:
356
.
Phar
mac
okin
etic
and
enc
epha
logr
aphi
c st
udy
of
intra
veno
us d
iaze
pam
, mid
azol
am a
nd p
lace
bo.
Clin
Ph
arm
acol
The
r 19
89: 4
5: 3
56.
Brie
rncr
LTM
, Hen
nis
PJ, B
urm
AG
L, D
anho
fM,
Bov
ill J
G, S
pier
dijk
J, V
lette
r A
A.
Qua
ntifi
catio
n of
th
e EE
G e
ffec
t of m
idaz
olam
by
aper
iodi
c an
alys
is in
vo
lunt
eers
: ph
arm
acok
inet
iclp
harm
acod
ynam
ic
mod
elin
g. C
lin P
harm
acok
inet
199
0: 1
8: 2
45.
Gre
enbl
att O
J, E
hren
berg
BL,
Gun
derm
an J
, Loc
nisk
ar
A, S
cavo
ne J
M, H
arm
atz
JS, S
hade
r RI
. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic a
nd e
ncep
halo
grap
hic
stud
y of
in
trave
nous
dia
zepa
m, m
idaz
olam
and
pla
cebo
. C
lin
Phar
mac
ol T
her
1989
: 45:
356
.
Man
dem
a JW
, San
som
LN
, Dio
s-V
ieite
z, M
C,
Hol
land
er-J
anse
n M
, and
Dan
hof M
. Pha
rmac
okin
etic
ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic m
odel
ing
of th
e EE
G e
ffec
ts o
f b
enzo
dia
zep
ines
. C
orre
lati
on w
ith
rece
ptor
bin
din
g an
d w
ith a
ntic
onvu
lsan
t act
ivity
. J P
harm
acol
Exp
The
r 19
91: 2
57: 4
72.
Gup
ta S
I(, E
llenw
ood
EH, N
ikai
do A
M, H
eath
erly
0
0.
Sim
ulta
neou
s m
odel
ing
of th
e ph
arm
acok
inet
ic
and
phar
mac
odyn
amic
pro
perti
es o
fben
zodi
azep
ines
I.
Lor
azep
am. J
Pha
rmac
okin
et B
ioph
arm
199
0: 1
8: 8
9.
~
N > ~ 2 t:l ><
>
DruglClassllndication~oslng
Phar
mac
okln
etic
PD
-Mod
et'
PD-M
arke
l"
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
R
efer
ence
s ::
Reg
imen
' P
aram
eter
s''''
' P
aram
eten
l!I!J
:z T
riaz
olam
0.125~.25mg
Fb: 8
9-94
%
Sigm
oid
E..
. Mod
el
CN
S im
pairm
ent
EC5O
. 4.6
5 ng
lmL
Sm
ith R
B, K
robo
th P
O, V
arne
r PD
. 1:1
po
dai
ly
V.:
0.8-
1.3
Ukg
m
easu
red
by D
SS
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
s of
tria
zola
m a
fter
intra
veno
us
- >< T
l/2:
2.3
h
(psy
chom
otor
ad
min
istra
tion.
J C
lin P
harm
acol
198
7: 2
7: 9
71.
perf
orm
ance
) tes
t sc
ore
Alp
razo
lam
0.
25-l
mg
Fb: 8
0%
Sigm
oid
E..
. Mod
el
CN
S im
pairm
ent
EC
5O.lO
nglm
L
Schm
ith V
D, P
irain
o B
, Sm
ith R
B, K
robo
th P
D.
po T
ID
V.:
1.1
Ukg
m
easu
red
by D
SS
Alp
razo
lam
in e
nd s
tage
rena
l dis
ease
II.
Tl/
2: 1
2-15
h
(psy
chom
otor
Ph
arm
acod
ynam
ics,
Clin
Pha
rmac
ol T
her
1992
: 5 I:
pe
rfor
man
ce) t
est
533.
sc
ore
Flum
azen
il 0.
2 m
g/kg
ove
r F
:80%
C
ompe
titiv
e an
tago
nist
EE
G
E50
Mid
azol
am :
30
Man
dem
a JW
, Tuk
ker
Eo D
anho
f M.
In v
ivo
(ben
zodi
azep
ine
IS s
ec. w
ith
V.:
0.95
Ukg
of
M id
azol
am u
sing
ng
lrnL
ch
arac
teriz
atio
n of
phar
mac
odyn
amic
inte
ract
ion
of a
an
tago
nist
) m
axim
um
CL:
hig
h ba
sed
on l
iver
E
,."
mod
el
E50
flum
azen
il: 2
6 ng
lml
benz
odia
zepi
ne a
goni
st a
nd a
ntag
onis
t: m
idaz
olam
and
cu
mul
ativ
e bl
ood
flow
bu
t has
no
effe
ct o
n flu
maz
enil.
J
Phar
mac
ol E
xp T
her
1992
: 260
: 36.
d
ose
ofl
mg
T'll
: 241
-79
min
E
EG
alon
e A
ntic
onvu
lsan
t all
!nts
Ph
enob
arbi
tal
30-1
20m
gpo
F: 1
00 ±
11%
Si
gmoi
d E
...M
odel
A
ntic
onvu
lsan
t PTZ
E
...:
120m
glL
ofP
TZ
D
inge
man
se J
, Van
Bre
e JB
MM
and
Dan
hof M
. da
ily in
2-3
Fb
:51
±3%
m
odel
EC
50 (f
ree)
: 44
± 5
mgI
L Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic m
odel
ing
of an
ticon
vuls
ant r
espo
nse
divi
ded
dose
s V
.: 0.
54 ±
0.0
3 U
kg
(pen
tyle
nete
trazo
l of
Phe
noba
rbita
l in
rat
s. J
Pha
rmac
ol E
xp T
her
1989
: C
L: 0
.062
± 0
.013
th
resh
old
249:
601
m
l/min
lkg
conc
entra
tion)
T,n
:99
± 1
8h
Ane
sthe
tic a
sent
s Pr
opof
ol (
seda
tive,
gen
eral
2-
2.5
mg/
kg iv
V
.: 1.
7±O
.7 U
kg
E..
Mod
el
% o
f pat
ient
s th
at
EC5O
: 0.9
5-1.
07
Vuy
k J,
Eng
bers
FH
M, L
emm
ons
HJM
, Bur
m H
GL,
an
esth
etic
) un
til o
nset
of
CL:
276
±S m
Um
inlk
g w
ere
awak
e af
ter
mcg
lmL
V
Iette
r A
A, G
ladi
nes
MPR
R, B
ovil
JG.
indu
ctio
n T,
n: 3
.5t1
.2 h
su
rger
y Ph
arm
acod
ynam
ics
of pr
opof
ol in
fem
al p
atie
nts.
A
nest
hesi
olog
y 19
92: 7
7: 3
. Fi
xed
Eff
ect
adeq
uate
ane
sthe
sia
Shaf
er A
, Doz
e V
A, S
hafe
r SL,
Whi
te P
F.
for s
urge
ry
Mea
n C
once
ntra
tions
> Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
and
phar
mac
odyn
amic
s of
prop
ofol
4.
01 m
cglm
L fo
r m
ajor
in
fusi
ons
durin
g ge
nera
l ane
sthe
sia.
Ane
sthi
logy
su
rger
y an
d> 2
.97
1988
: 69:
348
. m
cglm
L f
or n
on-m
ajor
su
rger
y
Etom
idat
e (g
ener
al
0.2-
0.6
mg/
kg
F.: 7
6%
Inhi
bito
ry S
igm
oid
Med
ian
freq
uenc
y El
O: t
hiop
enta
lnO
A
rden
JR
, Hol
ley
FO, S
tans
ki D
R, E
blin
g W
F.
Dos
e an
esth
esia
, hyn
otic
) ov
er 3
0-60
sec
. V
.: 3.
6-4.
5 U
kg
E..-
Mod
el
calc
ulat
ed f
rom
po
tenc
y co
mpa
rison
of t
hiop
enta
l an
d st
omid
ate.
T,
~: 2
.6 h
sp
ectra
l ana
lysi
s of
A
nest
hesi
olog
y 19
85: 6
3: A
286.
EE
G
Ket
amin
e (R
,S)
(gen
eral
1-
4.5
mg/
kg iv
In
hibi
tory
Sig
moi
d M
edia
n fr
eque
ncy
E5O:
(R
-):
1.8
mcg
lmL
Sc
huttl
er J,
Sta
nski
DR
, Whi
te P
F, T
revo
r A
J, H
orai
Y,
anes
thes
ia, h
ynot
ic)
or 3
-8 m
g/kg
E
.a-M
odel
ca
lcul
ated
fro
m
ElO:
(S+
): 0.
8 m
cglm
L
Ver
ona
0, S
hein
er L
B.
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
mod
elin
g im
in a
dults
or
spec
tral a
naly
sis
of
ElO:
(R
,S):
2.0
mcg
lmL
of
the
EEG
eff
ects
of k
etam
ine
and
its e
nant
iom
ers
in
6-10
mg/
kg o
ral
EEG
E
.. w
as d
iffer
ent f
or
man
. J
Phar
mac
okin
et B
ioph
arm
198
7: 7
1: 3
34.
in c
hild
ren,
th
e th
ree
anal
yles
U
I \0
0 \0
0
Dru
g/C
lass
/Ind
icat
ion'
D
osin
g P
harm
acok
inet
ic
PO
-Mod
el'
-P
D-M
ark
e7
Reg
imen
' P
aram
eter
s',l,
3
Mor
phin
e (a
nalg
esia
)
Met
hado
ne (
anal
gesi
a)
Ket
obem
idon
e (a
nalg
esia
)
15-3
Om
gPO
ev
ery
8-I 2
h; 1
0 m
g/do
se 1
M,
IV, S
C e
very
4h
; 0.8
-IO
mg/
h IV
cont
. in
fusi
on; 5
mg
epid
ural
up
to
IOm
g/24
h; 1
0-20
mgr
ccta
l ev
ery4
h
Ana
lges
ia:
2.S-
10 m
g PO
, 1M
, SC
eve
ry 3
-8h;
D
etox
ifica
tion:
IS
-4O
mgl
day
PO;
Opi
ate
depe
nden
ce:
20-1
20m
glda
y
F: 2
4±12
%
Fb: 3
S±2%
V
.: 3.
3±O
.9 U
kg
CL:
24±
10 m
Um
inlk
g T'
I2:
1.9±
O.S
h
F: 9
2±21
%
Fb: 8
9±2.
9"1o
V
.: 3.
6±1.
2Ukg
C
L: 2
.3±1
.2 m
Um
inlk
g T
",:
27±1
2 h
Opl
old
Ana
lges
ics
Log
istic
lPro
bit a
naly
sis
Cum
ulat
ive
Fixe
d E
ffec
t
Log
istic
lPro
bit a
naly
sis
Fixe
d E
ffec
t
Log
istic
lPro
bit a
naly
sis
Fixe
d E
ffec
t
freq
uenc
y o
f pat
ient
s at
tain
ing
com
fort
scor
e of
2.
Mea
n ef
fect
co
ncen
tratio
n (M
EC
) w
hich
is th
e co
ncen
tratio
n at
the
time
rem
edic
atio
n is
requ
ired.
Cum
ulat
ive
freq
uenc
y of
pat
ient
s at
tain
ing
com
fort
sc
ore
of2.
Mea
n ef
fect
co
ncen
tratio
n (M
EC
) w
hich
is th
e co
ncen
tratio
n at
the
time
rem
edic
atio
n is
re
quire
d.
Cum
ulat
ive
freq
uenc
y of
patie
nts
atta
inin
g co
mfo
rt sc
ore
of2.
Mea
n ef
fect
co
ncen
tratio
n (M
EC
) w
hich
is th
e co
ncen
tratio
n at
the
time
rem
edic
atio
n is
re
quire
d.
Pha
rmac
odyn
amic
P
aram
eten
E,.:
12.S
-i3.
1 ng
lmL
N
: 3.6
4-6.
89
MEC
: IS
±5 n
glm
L
E,.:
SO.
4 ng
lmL
N
:4.2
8
MEC
: S9±
24 n
glm
L
E,.:
22.
S ng
lmL
N
:4.6
4
MEC
: 2S
±11
nglm
L
Ref
eren
ces
Gou
rlay
GK
, Will
is R
J, La
mbe
rty J
. A
dou
ble-
blin
d co
mpa
rison
of t
he e
ffic
acy
of m
etha
done
and
mor
phin
e in
pos
tope
rativ
e pa
in c
ontro
l. A
nest
hesi
olog
y 19
86:
64: 3
22.
Dah
lstro
m B
, Tam
sen
A, P
aalz
ow L
, H
artv
ig P
. Pa
tient
con
trolle
d an
alge
sic
ther
apy
III.
Phar
mac
okin
etic
s an
d an
alge
sic
plas
ma
conc
entra
tions
of
mor
phin
e. C
lin P
harm
acok
inet
19
82: 2
66: 7
.
Dah
lstro
m B
, Tam
sen
A, P
aalz
ow L
, H
artv
ig P
. Pa
tient
con
trolle
d an
alge
sic
ther
apy
III.
Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
and
anal
gesi
c pl
asm
a co
ncen
tratio
ns
of m
orph
ine.
Clin
Pha
rmac
okin
et 1
982:
266
: 7.
Tam
sen
A, B
onde
sson
U, D
ahls
trom
B, H
artv
ig P
. Pa
tient
-con
trol1
ed a
nalg
esic
the
rapy
III.
Ph
arm
acok
ient
ics
and
anal
gesi
c pl
asm
a co
ncen
tratio
ns
of ke
to m
id on
e. C
lin P
harm
acok
inet
ic
1982
: 266
: 7.
~ >
~
~
l'"l Z
I:' ><
Dru
g/C
lass
/Ind
icat
ion'
D
osin
g Ph
arm
acok
inet
lc
PO-M
odet
' PO
-Mar
!<e?
R
etllm
en'
P.r
.m.t
ers'
....
Ph.
rm.c
odyn
.mlc
P
.ram
eter
s M
eper
idin
e (a
nalg
esia
)
Hyd
rom
orph
one
(ana
lges
ic, a
ntitu
ssiv
e)
Ace
tam
inop
hen
Asp
irin
Indo
met
haci
n
50-I
SO m
gldo
se
F: 5
2:1:
3%
PO,I
M, I
V, S
C
F.:
58±9
%
ever
y 3-
4 ho
urs
V.:
4.4i
O.9
Ukg
l-4m
gQ4-
6h
po, i
m, i
v sc
, pm
325-
500
mg
po
q6
h;u
pto
4
iVda
y
325-
6SO
mg
po
q4
-6h
up
to4
iV
daily
0.2
mlfk
g in
ne
onat
es f
or
pate
nt d
uctu
s ar
terio
sus
CL:
17±
S m
Um
inlk
g T
1/2: 3
.W.8
h
F: 4
2±23
%
F.: 7
.1%
V
.: 2.
9O±1
.31
Ukg
C
L: 1
4.6±
7.6
mU
min
lkg
T'I2
: 2.4
iO.6
h
F: 8
8±15
%
F.:
20%
V
.: 0.
95±
O.l2
Ukg
C
L: 5
.Ot1
.4 m
Um
inlk
g T'
I2: 2
.0i0
.4 h
F: 6
8 ±
3%
F.: 4
9%
V.:
0.15
iO.0
3 U
kg
CL:
9 .3
± t.
t m
Um
inlk
g T
,12:
0.2
5iO
.03
h
F: 9
8±21
%
F.: 9
0%
V.:
0.29
±O.0
4 U
kg
CL
:I.4
± 0
.2m
Um
inlk
g T'
I2: 2
.4iO
.2 h
Log
istic
lPro
bit a
naly
sis
Fixe
d E
ffec
t
Fixe
d E
ffec
t
Cum
ulat
ive
freq
uenc
y o
f pat
ient
s at
tsin
ing
com
fort
scor
eof2
.
Mea
n ef
fect
co
ncen
ttatio
o (M
EC)
whi
ch is
the
conc
entta
tion
at th
e tim
e re
med
icat
ioo
is
requ
ired.
Pain
Coo
trol
Non
oplo
ld A
na1&
es1e
s E
".-U
nk M
odel
P
.in c
ootro
V
Ana
lges
ia
E ..
: 253
niV
mL
N:4
.3.8
MEC
: 3II
±18
8 nW
mI-
Hyd
rom
orph
one
conc
entta
tions
> 4
niV
mL
prov
ided
goo
d pa
in c
ootro
l in
pat
ient
s w
ith b
one
or s
oft t
issu
e in
jury
but
not
eff
ectiv
e in
neu
ropa
thic
pai
n.
EC
,., 1
34-2
67 m
ciV
mL
T, 12
Keo
-7-1
3 m
in
Non
st.r
olda
l Ant
i-ln
O.m
m.to
ry D
roll
-An.
lges
lc e
ffec
ts
Sigm
oid
E".
-Unk
Pa
in m
odel
with
third
E
".:
100%
M
odel
m
olar
sur
gery
E
C,.,
5.3
mci
Vm
L N
: 1.
35
T,1
2Kco
=20
min
Fixe
d E
ffec
t Pa
tenc
y of
duct
us
arte
riosu
s E
ffec
t see
n in
neo
nate
at
conc
entta
tions
abo
ve
200
mcg
lI.;
No
corr
elat
ion
for
anal
gesi
a
Ref
eren
ces
Gly
nn C
J, M
.ther
LE,
Cou
sins
MJ,
Gra
ham
JR
, W
illon
PRo
Per
idur
al m
eper
idin
e in
hum
ans:
ana
lget
ic
resp
onse
, pha
rmac
okin
etic
s an
d tta
nsm
issi
oo i
nto
CSF
. A
nest
hesi
olog
y 19
81: 5
5: 5
20.
Rci
denb
erg
MM
, Goo
dman
H, e
rIe
H, G
ray
G,
Lore
nzo
B, L
eipz
ig R
M, M
eyer
BR
, Dra
yer D
E.
Hyd
rom
orph
one
leve
ls a
nd p
ain
cont
rol i
n pa
tient
s w
ith s
ever
e ch
roni
c pa
in.
Clin
Pha
nnac
ol T
hor
1988
: 44
: 376
.
Col
burn
W A. S
imul
tane
ous
phan
naco
kine
tic a
nd
phan
naco
dyna
mic
mod
elin
g. J
Pha
nnac
okin
et
Bio
pila
nnI9
81:9
:367
.
Vcl
agap
udi R
, Har
ter J
C, B
ruec
ker R
, Pec
k C
C.
Phar
mac
okin
etic
pha
nnac
odyn
amic
mod
els
in
anal
gesi
c st
udy
desi
gn, i
n ad
vanc
es in
pai
n re
sear
ch
and
ther
apy.
Vol
18.
MIX
M, P
orte
noy
R, a
nd L
aska
E,
Eds.
Rav
en P
ress
, New
Yor
k 19
91,5
59.
Bcr
ash
A, H
icke
y D
, Gra
ham
T, S
tahl
am M
, Oat
es J
, an
d C
otto
n R
B. P
hann
acok
inet
ics
of in
dom
etha
cin
in
the
neon
ate:
rel
atio
n o
f pla
sma
indo
niet
haci
n le
vels
to
resp
onse
of d
uctu
s ar
terio
sus.
N E
ng J
Med
19
81:3
05:6
7.
~ ~ ~
Dru
g/C
I .. S
/indi
catio
n'
Dos
ing
Pha
rmac
okln
etic
I'D
-Mod
el'
. PD
-Mar
ker'
R
egim
en'
Par
amet
ers'
''''
Ibup
rofe
n 40
0-80
0 m
g po
F:
80"
..1.
E...
-Mod
el
Pain
rel
ief a
fter
Flur
bipr
ofen
Tol
men
tin
Sele
gilin
e
tid o
r qid
with
F.
: 99%
de
ntal
sur
gery
m
axim
um d
ose
Y.:
0.IS
:tO.0
2 ()
kg
of 3
.2 g
/d
CL
: 0.
7S:tO
.20
mU
min
lkg
200-
300
mgl
day
po in
2,
3, o
r 4 d
ivid
ed
dose
s
60
0-1
80
0 m
g po
dai
ly in
di
vide
d do
ses
5 m
gpo
twic
e da
ily a
t br
eakf
ast a
nd
lunc
h
T,"
: 2
±O
.S h
F:9
2%
F.:
99.5
%
Y.:
O.lS
± 0.
02()
kg
CL
: 0.3
S± O
.09m
Um
inlk
g T
,":
S.S±
1.4
h
F.:
99%
T
,":
Sh
F: n
eglig
ible
F.
: 94
%
Y.:
1.9
()kg
C
L:
ISO
Om
Um
inlk
g T
,":
1.9
± 1
.0 h
E.. ..
-Mod
el w
ith t
ime
dela
y (T
..,)
E.. ..
-Mod
el w
ith t
ime
dela
y {T
,..>
No
mod
el i
dent
ifie
d
Ant
iinfl
amm
ator
y ef
fect
link
ed w
ith
plat
elet
agg
rega
tion
Ant
iinfl
amm
ator
y ef
fect
link
ed w
ith
plat
elet
agg
rega
tion
Syno
vial
flu
id
pros
tagl
andi
n E
MA
O I
nhib
itor
E
...M
odel
Pl
atel
et M
AO
B
inhi
bito
n
Pha
rmac
odyn
amic
P
aram
et.n
E
C..
30 m
cglm
L
EC ..
, 3
mcg
lmL
T
".:
2-6
min
EC
,., 0
.2 m
cglm
L
T".
: 2-6
min
No
corr
elat
ion
obse
rved
as
rec
omm
ende
d do
ses
too
high
E..
.: 1
00"..
1. E
.. ,2
3 ng
lmL
M
AO
. act
ivity
as
defi
ned
by p
lasm
a M
HPG
con
cent
ratio
n wa
s IO
OO
-fold
low
er
Ref
eren
c.s
Las
ka E
M, S
unsh
ine
A, M
arre
ro I
, Ols
en N
, Sie
gel C
, an
d M
c C
orm
ick
N. T
he c
orre
latio
n be
twee
n bl
ood
leve
ls o
f ibu
prof
en a
nd c
linic
al a
nalg
esic
res
pons
e.
Clin
Pha
rmac
ol T
her
1986
: 40:
I.
Cox
SR
, Yen
bder
Lug
t JT,
Gum
blet
on T
J, S
mith
RB
. R
elat
ions
hips
bet
wee
n th
rom
boxa
ne p
rodu
ctio
n,
plat
elet
agg
rega
bilit
y, a
nd s
erum
con
cent
ratio
ns o
f ib
upro
fen
and
flurb
ipro
fen.
Clin
Pha
nnac
ol T
her
1987
: 41
:510
. C
ox S
R, Y
enbd
erL
ugt J
T, G
umbl
eton
TJ,
Sm
ith R
B.
Rel
atio
nshi
ps b
etw
een
thro
mbo
xane
pro
duct
ion,
pl
atel
et a
ggre
gabi
lity,
and
ser
um c
once
ntra
tions
of
ibup
rofe
n an
d fl
urbi
prof
en. C
lin P
hann
acol
The
r 19
87:
41:
510.
Dro
mgo
ole
SH, F
irst
DE
, Des
iraj
u R
K,
Nay
ak R
K,
Jirs
henb
aum
MA
, and
Pau
lus
HE.
Tol
men
tin k
inet
ics
and
syno
vial
pro
stag
land
in E
,leve
ls in
rhe
umat
oid
arth
ritis
. Clin
Pha
nnac
ol T
hCr
1982
: 32:
371
.
Pres
sor
Res
pons
e to
Tyr
amin
e A
fter
24-
Hou
r A
pplic
atio
n O
f A S
eleg
iline
Tra
nsde
rmal
Sys
tem
In
Hea
lthy
Mal
es. 1
.S. B
arre
tt, T
. Hoc
hade
l, S.
Roh
atag
i, K
.E.
DeW
itt, S
.K. W
atso
n, J
. D
amow
, A.J.
Azz
aro
and
A.R
. D
iSan
to. J
. Clin
Pha
nnac
ol.,
37: 2
38-2
47,
1997
.
~
CI'I >
"1:1 ~ 2!
t:I ><
>
Dru
g/C
lass
/Ind
icat
ion'
D
osin
g P
harm
acok
inct
ic
PO-M
odO
i' P
D-M
arke
? Ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic
Rer
eren
ces
"1:1
"1:1
R~men'
Para
met
ers'
,J,l
Par
amet
ers
l'"l
Ant
ibio
tic.
Z
A
mpi
cilli
n S
OO
mgp
oQ6
F: 5
0%
Mod
ified
E...
Mod
el
E. C
oli b
acre
rial
AN
... :
·3.6
IogC
FU/m
L
Whi
te C
A, T
ooth
aker
RD
, Sm
ith A
L, S
latte
ry JT
. In
=
-h
F.:
15·2
5%
N ..
. ·M
ax n
umbe
r of
surv
ival
dilu
tion
AN
,. 1.
9 vi
tro e
valu
atio
n of
the
dete
rmin
ants
of t
he b
acre
ricid
al
>< T
, ,,:
1·1.
8 h
bacr
eria
with
out d
ilutio
n fa
ctor
B
AU
C:
1061
01
activ
ity o
fam
pici
llin
dosi
ng re
gim
ens
agai
nst
N,=
Mea
sure
d nu
mbe
r of
CFU
*hlm
L
Esc
heric
hia
Col
i. A
ntim
icro
b A
gent
s C
hern
othe
r ba
crer
ia
CFU
: Col
ony
fonn
ing
1989
: 33:
104
6.
A=C
hang
e un
it K
... li
min
atio
n m
te
cons
tant
B
AU
C=R
atio
of a
rea
unde
r the
bac
reria
l co
ncen
tratio
n tim
e cu
rve
and
the
initi
al
inoc
ulum
siz
e
N'=
N
.N
, ,
(N _
_ ;,
') ..
. -A
"+N
.
Rifa
mpi
cin
600
mg
per d
ay
F.: 6
0·90
",1,
Sigm
oida
l E
... M
odel
S.
aur
eus
bacr
eria
l E
... 6
6·7S
mg/
mL
H
ooge
rterp
JJ,
Mat
tie H
, Kru
l A
M, v
an F
urth
R. T
he
V,:
0.97
±0.
36I.
/kg
surv
ival
dilu
tion
effi
cacy
of r
ifam
pici
n ag
ains
t Sta
phyl
ococ
cus
aure
us in
C
L: 3
.5 ±
1.6
mL
lmin
lkg
fact
or
vitro
and
in a
n ex
perim
enta
l in
fect
ion
in n
orm
al a
nd
T, ,,
: 3.
5 ±
0.8
h gI
llDlu
ocyt
open
ic m
ice.
Sta
nd J
Inf
ect D
is 1
998:
20:
64
9.
Gen
tam
icin
1·
2.5
mgl
kg
F ,M: 1
00%
Si
gmoi
dal E
... M
odel
K.
pne
umon
ia"
E.g:
4.8
7 ±
0.1
5 L
egge
tt JE
, Fnt
in B
, Ebe
rt S,
Tot
suka
K, V
ogel
man
B,
per d
ose
iv/im
q
F.: <
10%
ba
crer
ial s
urvi
val
EC ..
. 2.3
4 to
.26
mgl
kg
Cal
ame
W, M
attie
H, C
raig
WA
. C
ompa
mtiv
e 8h
V
,: 0.
31 ±
0.1
0 I./
kg
dilu
tion
fact
or
antib
iotic
s do
sc-«
:lTec
t rel
atio
ns a
t sev
eral
dos
ing
CL:
0.8
2*C
rcat
inin
e in
terv
als
in m
urin
e pn
eum
oniti
s an
d th
igh
infe
ctio
n cl
eara
nce
+ 0
.11
mod
els.
J In
fect
Dis
198
9: I
S: 2
81.
mU
min
lkg
T, ,,
: 2·
3 h
Cel
\azi
dim
e 50
0-20
00 m
g F ,
M:91
%
Sigm
oida
l E
... M
odel
K.
pne
umon
iae
E.g:
4.6
9 ±
0.3
0 L
egge
tt JE
, Fnt
in B
, Ebe
rt S,
Tot
suka
K, V
ogel
man
B,
iv/i
mq
8 F.
: 21
±6%
ba
crer
ial s
urvi
val
EC ..
, 61.
4 ±
8.8
mgl
kg
Cal
ame
W, M
attie
H, C
raig
WA
. C
ompa
rativ
e V
,: 0.
23 ±
0.0
2 I./
kg
dilu
tion
fact
or
antib
iotic
s do
sc-«
:lTec
t rel
atio
ns a
t sev
eral
dos
ing
CL:
-C
reat
inin
e cl
ealll
Dce
in
terv
als
in r
oorin
e pn
eum
oniti
s an
d th
igh
infe
ctio
n m
Um
inlk
g m
odel
s. J
Infe
ct D
is 1
989:
IS
: 281
.
Til,
: 1.
6±0.
lh
Net
ilmic
in
\.S·2
mgl
kg p
er
Sigm
oida
l E
... M
odel
K.
pne
umon
iae
E...
: 4.8
7 ±O
.IS
Leg
gett
JE, F
ntin
B, E
bert
S, T
otsu
ka K
, Vog
elm
an B
, do
se m
g iv
/im q
T
, ,,:
2·3
h bl
crer
ial s
urvi
val
EC ..
, 2.3
4 to
.26
mgI
kg
Cal
ame
W, M
attie
H, C
mig
WA
. C
ompa
rativ
e 8
dilu
tion
fact
or
anllb
iotic
s do
se-«
:lTec
t rel
atio
ns a
t sev
ellli
dos
ing
inte
rval
s in
mur
ine
pneu
mon
itis
and
thig
h in
fect
ion
mod
els.
J In
fect
Dis
198
9: I
S: 2
81.
VI
\.0 -..J
~
QO
Dru
g/C
I.ss1
lndl
cado
nl
Dos
ing
Ph.
rm.c
okln
etlc
PO
oMod
eJ>
POoM
.rlc
e?
Ph.
rm.e
odyn
.m1c
R
efer
enc .
. R
glm
en'
P.r
. met
ers'
'''''
Para
met
ers
Bis
ehoa
ehon
ates
Pa
mid
rona
le (o
steo
poro
sis)
15
mgl
day
IV
V.:
29.5
L
E,..
Mod
el
Urin
ary
Cre
mer
s S,
et a
l. A
PK
and
PO
mod
el f
or in
inlv
enou
s in
fusi
on
CL:
181
± 7
8 m
Um
in
hydr
oxyp
rolin
e bi
spho
spho
nate
(pam
idro
nate
) in
ost
eopo
rosi
s. Eu
r J
Clin
Pha
rmac
ol 2
002;
57:8
83·8
90.
AC
E In
hibi
tors
C
ilaza
pril
2.5
rngp
oQO
F:
77.
5%
Sigm
oid
E...
Mod
el
Inhi
bitio
n of
plas
ma
E,.-E~
Bel
z G
O, K
irch
W, K
1ein
bloe
sem
CH
. A
ngio
tens
in-
(Cila
zcpr
ilat)
V.:
25.4
L
angi
oten
sin-
conv
ertin
g en
zym
e in
hibi
tors
: rel
atio
nshi
p be
twee
n C
L: 1
4.28
Uh
conv
ertin
g en
zym
e ph
arm
acod
ynam
ics
and
phar
mac
okin
etic
s. C
lin
(AC
E) a
ctiv
ity
Phar
mac
okin
etic
s 19
88:
IS: 2
95.
Cap
topr
il 12
.S-IS
O m
g po
F:
60-
75%
Si
gmoi
d E
... M
odel
In
hibi
tion
of pl
asm
a E,.-~
Bel
z G
O, K
irch
W, K
1ein
bloc
sem
CH
. A
ngio
tens
in-
TID
F.
: 25-
30%
an
giot
ensi
n-co
nver
ting
enzy
me
inhi
bito
rs: r
elat
ions
hip
betw
een
V.:
0.7
Ukg
co
nver
ting
enzy
me
phar
mac
odyn
amic
s an
d ph
arm
acok
inet
ics.
Clin
T'
I2:
1.9
h (A
CE)
act
ivity
Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
1988
: IS
: 29
5.
Lis
inop
ril
10-4
0mgp
o F:
2S±
10"A
. Si
gmoi
d e..
.. Mod
el
Inhi
bitio
n o
f pla
sma
E ....
E~
Bel
z G
O, K
irch
W, K
lein
bloe
sem
CH
. A
ngio
tens
in-
QO
F.
: 0%
an
giot
ensi
n-co
nver
ting
enzy
me
inhi
bito
rs: r
elat
ions
hip
belw
een
V.:
2.4±
1.1.
4 U
kg
conv
ertin
g en
zym
e ph
arm
acod
ynam
ics
and
phar
mac
okin
etic
s. C
lin
CL:
4.2
±2.2
mU
min
/kg
(AC
E) a
ctiv
ity
Phar
mac
okin
etic
s 19
88:
IS: 2
95.
T'I2
: 12
h
Enal
april
10
-40
mg
or
F:41
±15%
Si
gmoi
d Eo
... M
odel
In
hibi
tion
of pl
asm
a .E
....
E~
Bel
z G
O, K
irch
W, K
1ein
bloe
sem
CH
. A
ngio
tens
in-
divi
ded
dose
F.
: 50-
60%
an
giot
ensi
n-co
nver
ting
enzy
me
inhi
bito
rs: r
elat
ions
hip
betw
een
V.:
1.7±
O.7
Ukg
co
nver
ting
enzy
me
phar
mac
odyn
amic
s an
d ph
arm
acok
inet
ics.
Clin
C
L: 4
.9±I
.S m
Um
inlk
g (A
CE)
act
ivity
Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
1988
: 15
: 29S
. T
,12: I
I h
Perin
dopr
il 4-
16m
gpoQ
O
F: 6
S-9S
%
Sigm
oid
E....
Mod
el
Inhi
bitio
n of
plas
ma
Bel
z G
O, K
irch
W, K
lein
bloe
sem
CH
. A
ngio
tens
in-
(Per
indo
prila
l) F.
: 60%
an
giot
enSi
n-co
nver
ting
enzy
me
inhi
bito
rs: r
elat
ions
hip
betw
een
CL
:9.3
6 U
h co
nver
ting
enzy
me
phar
mac
odyn
amic
s an
d ph
arm
acok
inet
ics.
Clin
T'
I2: 2
S-30
h (A
CE)
act
ivity
Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
1988
: IS
: 29S
.
Ram
ipril
2.
5-20
mgp
o F:
SO
-6O
%
Sigm
oid
E...
Mod
el
Inhi
bitio
n of
plas
ma
E ....
~
Bel
z G
O, K
irch
W, K
lein
bloc
sem
CH
. A
ngio
tens
in-
(Ram
ipril
at)
QO
F.
: 56%
an
giot
ensi
n.
conv
ertin
g en
zym
e in
hibi
tors
: rel
atio
nshi
p be
twee
n C
L:6
Uh
conv
ertin
g en
zym
e ph
arm
acod
ynam
ics
and
phar
mac
okin
etic
s. C
lin
T,12
: 2.4
±O.6
h
(AC
E) a
ctiv
ity
Phar
mac
okin
etic
, 198
8: I
S: 2
95.
AnB
lote
nsln
II
Reo
eeto
r A
ntaB
!DIs
ts
Losa
rtan
2S-I
OO
mgp
o F:
3S.
8 ±
IS.S
%
E..
Lin
k M
odel
Sy
stol
ic b
lood
E
...: 2
7.2
mm
Hg
Csa
jka
C, B
uclin
, T, F
attin
ger K
. Bru
nner
HR
, Bio
llaz
QO
Fb
: 98.
7%
pres
sure
(SB
P)
E ... 2
28 m
cglL
J.
Popu
latio
n Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic-P
harm
acod
ynam
ic
Vd:
0.4
5 ±
0.2
4 U
kg
K.,=
S.9h
· ' M
odel
ling
of A
ngio
tens
in R
ccep
tor B
lock
ade
in
CL:
8.1
± 1
.8 m
llmin
lkg
E...
: 23.
3 m
mH
g H
ealth
y V
olun
teer
s. C
lin P
harm
acok
in 2
002:
41
(2):
>
Tlf
2: 2
.5 ±
I h
D
iast
olic
blo
od
E ... I
S9m
cglL
13
7-15
2.
"CI
pres
sure
(OB
P)
K.,=
6.1
h"
"CI
l!I!J
2!
0 S<
Dru
glC
lass
l1nd
icat
ion'
D
osin
g Ph
orm
aeok
inet
lc
PD-M
odel
' P
D-M
arke
r' R
egim
en'
Plr
amet
ers"
'"
Can
desa
rtan
Irbe
sarta
n
Kle
rval
Abc
ixim
ab (
angi
opla
sty)
4-32
RIg
po
QD
F:
42%
E
.. L
ink
Mod
el
Syst
olic
blo
od
150-
300
RIg
po
QD
Ora
l and
in
trave
nous
ad
min
istra
tion
5-12
0 m
c&lk
g
O.2S
m&f
kg iv
bo
lus:
0.1
25
mc&
lkgl
min
for
12
h
Fb:
99.8
%
pteS
Sure
(SB
P)
Vd:
0.1
3 11
kg
CL:
0.3
7 m
Vm
inlk
g T
lI2: 9
.7 h
F: 6
0-80
%
F.: 9
0%
Vd:
0.7
2 t
0.20
11k
g C
L: 2
.12
to.5
4 m
Vm
inlk
g T1
/2: 1
3 t
6.2
h
V.:
23.0
-25.
9 L
C
L: 1
1.2-
15.5
lJh
T,
n: \
.2-2
.1
h
CL:
183
+/-
72 m
Vm
in
T,n
:0.5
h
E..
Un
kM
od
el
Dia
stol
ic b
lood
pr
essu
re (D
BP)
Syst
olic
blo
od
pres
sure
(SB
P)
Dia
stol
ic b
lood
pr
essu
re (D
BP)
GP
llb
lIlI
. an
t.p
nls
t E
..-M
odel
In
hibi
tion
of pl
atel
et
aggr
egat
ion
E..-
Mod
el
Rec
epto
r occ
upan
cy
% in
hibi
tion
of
plat
elet
agg
rega
tion
5-m
icro
moV
L ad
enos
ine
diph
osph
ate
(AD
P)
Phar
mae
odyn
amlc
Pa
.. m
eten
E
..:
30.2
mm
Hg
E ..
, 122
mcg
IL
K.,=
O.4
h·'
E,,;
.: 25
.1 m
mH
g E
,.,8
mcg
IL
K..=
O.3
h"
E..:
28.
7mm
Hg
E,.,
124
mcg
IL
K.,=
O.8
h·'
E..
: 26
.8 m
mH
g E
.. ,8
9mc fL
K
..=O
.8h·
E..
:10
0%
E
,., 5
8 ng
lmL
E,.,
72.
8± 6
.4 n
g/m
L
E ..
, 68.
9 t
9.2
ng/m
L
% in
hibi
tion
of
E .. , 1
41 t
16.
8 ng
/mL
pl
atel
et a
ggre
gatio
n 20
-mic
rom
oVL
AD
P
Ref
eren
ces
Csa
jka
C, B
uclin
, T, F
Illin
ger K
, Bru
nner
HR
, Bio
llaz
J. Po
pula
tion
Phar
mac
okin
etic
-Pha
rmac
odyn
amic
M
odel
ling
of A
ngio
tens
in R
ecep
tor B
lock
ade
in
Hea
lthy
Vol
unte
ers.
Clin
Pha
rmac
okin
200
2: 4
1 (2
): 13
7-15
2.
Csa
jb C
, Buc
lin, T
, Fat
tinge
r K, B
runn
er H
R, B
iolla
z J.
Popu
latio
n Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic-P
harm
acod
ynam
ic
Mod
ellin
g of
Ang
iote
nsin
Rec
epto
r Blo
ckad
e in
H
ealth
y V
olun
teer
s. C
lin P
harm
acok
in 2
002:
41
(2):
137-
IS2.
Phar
mac
okin
etic
s, P
harm
acod
ynam
ics
and
Safe
ty o
f a
Plat
elet
GPI
IblIl
Ia A
ntag
onis
t, R
GD
891,
Fol
low
ing
Intra
veno
us A
dmin
istra
tion
in H
ealth
y M
ale
Vol
unte
ers.
P.N
. Zan
niko
s, S.
Roh
atag
i, B
.K. J
ense
n,
S. D
ePhi
llips
, D. M
assi
gnon
, F. C
alic
, Mic
hel S
ibill
e an
d St
epha
ne K
irkes
seli.
J. C
lin P
harm
acol
., 40
: 12
45-
1256
,200
0.
Phar
mac
okin
etic
s an
d C
once
ntra
tion-
Eff
ect A
naly
sis
of I
ntra
veno
us R
GD
891,
A P
late
let G
Pllb
lllla
A
ntag
onis
t, U
sing
Mix
ed E
ffec
ts M
odel
ing
(NO
NM
EM
). P
.N. Z
anni
kos,
S. R
ohat
agi,
B.K
. Je
nsen
, S. D
ePhi
llips
, and
G. R
. Rho
des.
J. C
lin
Phar
mac
ol.,4
O:
1129
-114
0,20
00.
Abe
rnet
hy D
R, P
ezzu
llo J
, Mas
celli
MA
, Fre
deric
k B
, K
leim
an N
S, F
reed
man
J.
Phar
maC
odyn
amic
s o
f abc
ixim
ab d
urin
g an
giop
last
y:
com
paris
on to
hea
lthy
subj
ects
. C
lin P
harm
acol
The
r. 20
02 M
ar;7
1(3
): 18
6-95
.
> ~ ~ ~
Dru
giC
lasl
llnd
icat
lon'
---D
osin
g P
harm
amld
netl
e PD
-Mod
el'
PD
-Mar
ker'
Rea
lmen
' P
aram
eten
'''''
Ver
apam
il (d
+.I-
) (a
ntia
ngin
a.
anti a
rrhy
thm
ia.
antih
yper
tens
ive)
Nis
oldi
pine
.
Lans
opra
zole
Om
epra
zole
S-I
Om
giv
80-\
20 m
g Q
8h
20-6
0 m
g po
qd
IS-3
0 m
g po
qd
20-4
0 m
&'d
ay
qd
F: 2
2±8%
F.
: 90±
2% (d
+ 2.
S-fo
ld
high
er F
than
1-)
V.:
5.00
.1 U
kg
CL:
I S±
6 m
Um
inlk
g (d
+ is
O.S
-fold
low
er th
an 1
-) T'
I2: 4
.0±\
.S h
F:5
%
T'I2
:7-1
2 h
F:8
1%
F.: 9
7%
V.:
0.35
iO.O
S U
kg
CL:
6.2
3± 1
.6 m
Um
inlk
g T'
I2: 0
.9±
0.44
h
F: S
3±29
%
F.: 9
5%
V.:
0.34
iO.0
9 U
kg
CL:
7.5
± 2.
7 m
Um
inlk
g T
'I2:0
.7±
0.S
h
Cal
dum
Cha
nnel
Blo
cker
E
...-M
odel
E..-
Mod
el
PR-I
nter
val
prol
onga
tion
Supi
ne S
ysto
lic
Blo
od P
ress
ure
(SB
P) c
hang
e fro
m
base
line
Supi
ne D
iast
olic
B
lood
Pre
ssur
e (O
BP)
cha
nge
from
ba
selin
e P
roto
n P
amp
Inbl
blto
n M
odifi
ed E
... M
odel
H
IK A
TPas
e K
: app
aren
t rea
ctio
n ra
te c
onst
ant
k: a
ppar
ent t
urno
ver
rate
con
stan
t kI
K x
fjI:
appa
rent
di
ssoc
iatio
n co
nsta
nt
corr
ecte
d fo
r pla
sma
free
frac
tion
(fjI)
tll
2: h
alf-
life
of ef
fect
Mod
ified
E..
Mod
el
HIK
ATP
ase
K: a
ppar
ent r
eact
ion
rate
con
stan
t k:
app
aren
t tum
over
ra
te c
onst
ant
klK
x fjI
: app
aren
t di
ssoc
iatio
n co
nsta
nt
corr
ecte
d fo
r pla
sma
free
frac
tion
(fjI)
tll
2: h
alf-
life
of e
ffec
t
Phar
mae
odyn
amle
P
aram
eten
E,.O
l"'E
,o (d
YII
E
,.,po
(d.Il
"'12O
O0
nglm
L
E.o.
iv (d
.I)0-
4OO
S nw
mL
E...
:27.
9%
E,o
,0.9
9-2.
62 m
cWm
L
E...
:36.
4%
E,o
,0.9
9-2.
62 n
wm
L
K :
0.33
9 ±
0.0
02 m
MIh
k
: 0.0
537
± 0.
0006
h"
klK
xfjl
: I
nM
tll2
eff
ect:
12.9
h
K:
I.3H
O.1
7mM
1h
k: 0
.025
2 ±
0.0
019
h"
klK
xfj
l:ln
M
tll2
eff
ect:
27.S
h
Ref
eren
ees
Echi
zen
H. V
ogel
gesa
ng B
. Eic
helb
aum
M.
Eff
ects
of
d.l-v
erap
amil
on a
rtrio
vent
ricul
ar c
ondu
ctio
n in
re
latio
n to
its
ster
oese
lect
ive
first
-pas
s m
etab
olis
m.
Clin
Pha
rmac
ol T
her
1985
: 38
: 71.
Scha
efer
HG
. Hei
nig
R, A
hr G
. Ade
lman
n H
. Tet
zlof
f W
. Kuh
lman
n J.
Phar
rnac
okin
etic
-pha
rrna
cody
nam
ic
mod
ellin
g as
a to
Ql t
o ev
alua
te th
e cl
inic
al re
leva
nce
of
a dr
ug-f
ood
inte
ract
ion
for a
nis
oldi
pine
con
trolle
dre
leas
e do
sage
form
. Eu
r J C
lin P
harm
acol
. 19
97;5
1(6)
:473
-80
Kat
ashi
ma
M. Y
amam
oto
K. T
okum
a Y
. Hat
a T.
Sa
wad
a Y
.1ga
T.
Com
para
tive
phar
mac
okin
etic
l ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic a
naly
sis
of pr
oton
pum
p in
hibi
tors
om
epra
zole
. Ian
sopr
azol
e an
d pa
ntop
razo
le. i
n hu
man
s. E
ur J
Dru
g M
etab
Pha
rrna
coki
net.
1998
Jan
M
ar;2
3(1)
:19-
26.
Kat
ashi
ma
M. Y
amam
oto
K. T
okum
a Y
. Hat
a T.
Sa
wad
a Y
.1ga
T.
Com
para
iive
phar
mac
okin
etic
l ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic a
naly
sis
of pr
oton
pum
p in
hibi
tors
om
epra
zole
. lan
sopr
azol
e an
d pa
ntop
razo
le. i
n hu
man
s. E
ur J
Dru
g M
etab
Pha
rrna
coki
net.
1998
Jan
M
ar;2
3(1)
:19-
26.
~ > "0 ;g 2: ~
Dru
giC
lass
/lnd
leat
lon'
D
osln
l P
hlrm
aeok
lnet
le
-p
D-M
od
er-
-p
j):M
ark
er'
Panl
opra
zole
Nob
eras
tine
Feno
tero
l
Alb
uter
ol
Rea
imen
l P
aram
eten
l ,1,
J
4Om
gpoq
d F
:77%
10 m
g po
IV b
olus
, in
fusi
on, n
asal
2-4
mgl
dose
O
ral 3
-4
times
/day
up
to
32 m
glda
y; 1
·2
inha
latio
ns
ever
y 4-
6 h
up
to 1
2 in
hala
tions
/day
or
ora
l su
blin
gual
F,:9
8%
v.: 1
1·24
L
CL:
7.5
± 2.
7 m
Um
inlk
g T
'Il:
I h
VjF
:192
8±32
L
T'Il
: IS
h
V.:
14
0±
70
L
CL:
63
± 2
4 LI
b T
,":
3.3
± 1
.2 h
V.:
156±
38L
C
L: 2
9± 7
LIb
T
,":
3.9
± 0.
8 h
Mod
ified
E..
Mod
el
K: a
ppar
enl r
eaet
ion
rale
con
stan
t k:
app
aren
t tur
nove
r ra
te c
onst
ant
kIK
x fp
: ap
pare
nt
diss
ocia
tion
cons
tant
co
m:c
ted
for p
lasm
a fre
e fr
actio
n (f
p)
tll2
: hal
f-lif
e o
f eff
ect
HlK
AT
Pase
Ant
lbls
tam
ln ..
: H,B
1ock
en
SiJll
llOid
E..
Lin
k Pl
aceb
o co
rrect
ed
Mod
el
hist
amin
e in
duce
d w
heal
inhi
bitio
n
Plac
ebo
corr
ecte
d hi
stam
ine
indu
ced
nan:
inhi
bitio
n
Bet
arA
dren
ergi
c A
lOnl
sts:
Bro
aebl
odll
aton
Si
JllllO
id E
... L
ink
Airw
ay re
sist
ance
M
odel
(R
AW
)
SiJll
llOid
E...
Mod
el
Hea
rt ra
te (H
R)
Forc
ed e
xpira
tory
vo
lum
e in
I s
ec
(FE
VI)
Hea
rt ra
te (H
R)
Pha
rmae
odya
amle
P
aram
eten
K
: O
.I34±
o.o0
6mM
1h
k : 0
.1>15
1 ±
0.00
02 h
·' kI
K x
fp:
2.3
nM
tl/2
eff
ect:
45.9
h
E..:
9O%
E
,., 1
.2:1
:0.2
ngl
mL
N
: 1.
0±.0
.2
Keo
=O.3
9±O
.13
h·'
E...:
9O%
E
,o,0
.3:l(
).\ n
glm
L
N:0
.8±.
0.2
Keo
-O.0
9±O
.03
h·'
E,.,
0.38
ngl
mL
N
:I
Keo
=12h
·'
E,.,
\.I
ngl
mL
N
:I
1<,,:
12 h
·'
E,.,
S n
glm
L N
:2
EIO,
18
nglm
L N
:I
Ref
eren
e ..
Kat
ashi
ma
M, Y
amam
oto
K, T
okum
a Y
, Hat
a T,
Sa
wad
a Y
, 19a
T.
Com
para
tive
phar
mac
okin
etie
l ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic a
naly
sis
of pr
oton
pum
p in
hibi
tors
om
epra
zole
, lan
sopr
azol
e an
d pa
ntop
razo
le, i
n hu
man
s. E
ur J
Dru
g M
etab
Pha
rmac
okin
et. 1
998
Jan·
M
ar,2
3(1)
: 19-
26.
Hey
kant
s et
al.
The
in v
ivo
stud
y of
drug
act
ion.
Van
D
oxte
l CJ,
Hol
ford
NH
G, D
anho
f, cd
s. El
sevi
er:
1992
: 33
5.
Hoc
hhau
s G
, Sch
mid
t EW
, Rom
inge
r KL,
Mol
lman
n H
. Phl
rmac
okin
etie
ldyn
amic
cor
rela
tion
of p
ulm
onar
y an
d ea
rdia
c ef
fect
s of
feno
tero
l in
asth
mat
ic p
atie
nts
afte
r diff
eren
t rou
tes
of a
dmin
istra
tion.
Pha
rm R
es
1992
: 9: 2
91.
Hoc
hhau
s G
, Mol
lman
H. P
KlP
D a
naly
sis
of a
lbut
erol
ac
tion:
app
licat
ion
to a
com
para
tive
asse
ssm
ent o
f ~
adre
nerg
ic d
rugs
. Eur
J P
harm
Sci
199
3: I
.
> ~ Z =
5< ~ -
Dru
g/C
lass
/Ind
icat
ion'
D
oiln
g Ph
.,.m
acok
lnet
ic
PD-M
odeJ
' P
D-M
arkU
' R
egim
en'
Par
amet
en',u
T
erbu
talin
e 0.
25 m
g/do
se
Vd:
79
± 2
7L
Sigm
oid
E..
Unk
A
irway
resi
stan
ce
Subc
utan
eous
C
L: 2
2 ±
6.7
lJh
M
odel
(R
AW
) re
peat
ed o
nce
at
TlI2
: 2.5
± 0
.5 h
15
-30
min
utes
or
sub
cuta
neou
s or
2.5
-10
mew
'min
In
fusi
on
effe
ctiv
e m
axim
um d
ose
17.5
-30
mew
'min
E...
Mod
el
Forc
ed e
xpira
tory
vo
lum
e in
I s
ec
(FE
VI)
Hea
rt ra
te (
HR
)
Cor
tIco
ster
oIds
(aD
ti-iD
Dam
mal
ory/
asth
ma)
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
P
aram
eten
El
O, 3
.7 n
w'm
L N
:I
Kco
-7.S
h"
E,.,
2.3
nw
'mL
N:I
K
co-5
.5 h
"
ElO,
II
nw'm
L
*RR
A=
rela
tive
gluc
ocor
ticoi
d re
cept
or a
ffin
ity [d
exam
etha
sone
-IO
OI
Pred
niso
ne
Met
hylp
redn
isol
one
17-B
eclo
met
haso
ne
mon
opro
pion
ate
(adm
inis
tere
d as
B
eclo
met
haso
ne
dipr
opri
onat
e)
Bud
elon
ide
5-60
mgp
o da
ily i
n I
10 4
di
vide
d do
ses
2-60
mgp
o da
ily in
110
4 di
vide
d do
ses
168-
S40
meg
in
hale
d in
one
or
two
div
ided
do
ses
200-
600
meg
in
hale
d in
one
or
two
divi
ded
dose
s
F:SO
%
F(in
hale
d): N
/A
F.: 7
5%
Vd:
70L
C
L: 1
5lJh
T
",:
3.2h
F:99
%
F(in
hale
d):
F.:
77%
V
d: S
OL
CL:
21l
Jh
T'I2
:2.6
h
F:2
6%
F(in
hale
d): 3
6%
F.:
Vd:
424L
C
L: 1
20 l
Jh
T'I2
: 6.5
h
F: 1
\%
F(in
hale
d): 2
S%
F.:S
8%
Vd:
IS3
-217
.5L
C
L: 8
0-84
lJh
T
'I2:2
.8h
Indi
rect
Res
pons
e M
odel
Indi
rect
Res
pons
e M
odel
Indi
rect
Res
pons
e M
odel
Indi
rect
Res
pons
e M
odel
Lym
phoc
yte
Supp
ress
ion
(LS)
G
ranu
locy
te
Indu
ctio
n (G
I)
Cor
tisol
Sup
pres
sion
(C
S)
Lym
phoc
yte
Supp
ress
ion
(LS)
G
ranu
locy
te
Indu
ctio
n (G
I)
Cor
tisol
Sup
pres
sion
(C
S)
Lym
phoc
yte
Supp
ress
ion
(LS)
G
ranu
locy
te
Indu
ctio
n (G
I)
Cor
tisol
Sup
pres
sion
(C
S)
Lym
phoc
yte
Supp
ress
ion
(LS)
G
ranu
locy
te
Indu
ctio
n (G
I)
Cor
tisol
Sup
pres
sion
(C
S)
E ...
.. : I 8
.6 ±
8.0
ng/
mL
E5
OG':
16.7
± 6
.8 n
w'm
L E.
..LS.
cs: 1
00%
E.
..G':
0.68
±0.
12%
K
.,.:
0.35
± 0
.07
h"
RR
A":
16
E,..
..:4.
8 ±
2.7
nw
'mL
E50G
,: 3.6
± 2
.0 n
w'm
L E.
..LS.
cs: 1
00%
E.
..G':
0.68
±0.
12%
K
.,.: 0
.35
± 0
.07
h"
RR
A":
42
RR
A":
134
5
RR
A":
935
Ref
eren
ces
Oos
terh
uis
B, B
raat
P, R
oos
VM
, Wer
ner J
and
van
Box
tel C
J. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ic-p
harm
acod
ynam
ic
mod
elin
g of
terb
utal
ine
bron
chod
ilatio
n is
ast
hma.
Clin
Ph
arm
acal
Tho
r 19
86: 4
0: 4
69.
Mol
lman
n H
, Hoc
hhau
s G
, Roh
atag
i S, B
arth
J,
Der
cndo
rf H
. Pha
rmac
okin
etic
lpha
rmac
odyn
amic
ev
alua
tion
of de
Daz
acar
t in
com
paris
on 1
0 m
ethy
lpre
dnis
olon
e an
d pr
edni
solo
ne. P
harm
Res
. 19
95 J
ul;1
2(7)
:I096
-100
.
Mol
lman
n H
, Hoc
hhau
s G
, Roh
atag
i S, B
arth
J,
Der
cndo
rf H
. Pha
rmac
okin
etic
lpha
rmac
odyn
amic
ev
alua
tion
of de
flaza
cort
in c
ompa
rison
to
met
hylp
redn
isol
one
and
pred
niso
lone
. Pha
rm R
es.
1995
Jul
;12(
7):I0
96-1
00.
Roh
atag
i S. P
hD T
hesi
s. P
harm
acok
inct
ic a
nd
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
mod
ellin
g of
mC
!hyl
pred
niso
lone
an
d pr
edni
solo
ne a
fter s
ingl
e an
d m
ultip
le
adm
inis
tratio
n, 1
995.
Roh
atag
i S. P
hO'T
hesi
s. P
harm
acok
inet
ic a
nd
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
mod
ellin
g o
f mC
!hyl
pred
niso
lone
an
d pr
edni
solo
ne a
fter s
ingl
e an
d m
ultip
le
adm
inis
tratio
n, 1
995.
t >
~ ~ ~
>
"'1:1
Dru
g/O
assl
lndi
catio
n'
Dos
ing
Phar
mac
okin
etic
PD
-Mod
et'
PO-M
arke
r>
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
R
efer
ence
s "'1:
1 I.!
'l R
!JIlm
en'
Par
amet
ersl
,u
Par
amet
en
Z
Flun
isol
ide
500-
2000
meg
F:
7%
Indi
rect
Res
pons
e ly
mph
ocyt
e R
RA
": I
SO
Roh
alag
i S. P
hD T
hesi
s. Ph
arm
acok
inct
ic a
nd
1:1
inha
led
in o
ne
F(in
hale
d): 3
9"4
Mod
el
Supp
ress
ion
(LS)
Ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic m
odel
ling
of m
ethy
lpre
dnis
olon
e ><
or tw
o di
vide
d F.
: 80
%
Gra
nulo
cyte
an
d pr
edni
solo
ne a
fter s
ingl
e an
d m
ultip
le
dose
s V
d: 6
1-96
l In
duct
ion
(01)
ad
min
islJ
atio
n, 1
995.
C
l: 5
6·65
IJh
C
ortis
ol S
uppr
essi
on
Till:
1.
2-1.
9h
(CS)
Flut
icas
one
Prop
iona
te
88-6
60 m
eg
F: 1
%
Indi
rect
Res
pons
e ly
mph
ocyt
e E
......
.a:0
.34
±0.
16
Dyn
amic
Mod
elin
g of
Cor
tisol
Red
uctio
n A
fter
inha
led
in tw
o F(
inha
led)
: 26%
M
odel
Su
ppre
ssio
n (L
S)
ng/m
L In
hale
d A
dmin
istra
tion
of F
lutic
ason
e Pr
opio
nate
. S.
di
vide
d do
ses
F.: 9
0%
Gra
nulo
cyte
E
....c
s: 1
00%
R
ohal
agi,
A. B
ye, C
. Fal
coz,
A.E
. Mac
kie,
B.
Vd:
318
L In
duct
ion
(01)
R
RA
": 1
800
Mei
bohm
, H. M
Ollm
ann
and
H. D
eren
dorf
. 1. C
lin.
CL:
6S-
691J
h C
ortis
ol S
uppr
essi
on
Phar
mac
ol. 3
6: 9
38-9
41,
1996
. Ti
ll: 1
1.5
(CS)
Tna
mei
nolo
ne A
ceto
nide
40
0 -
2000
meg
F:
23%
In
dire
ct R
espo
nse
lym
phoc
yte
E ...
.. : 0
.24
± 0
.7 n
g/m
L Ph
arm
acok
inet
iclP
ham
eody
nam
ic E
valu
atio
n of
in
hale
d in
one
F(
inha
led)
: 22%
M
odel
Su
ppre
ssio
n (L
S)
E ...
. , : 0
.22
± 0
.06
ng/m
L Tr
iam
eino
lone
AC
elon
ide
Afte
r In
lJav
enou
s, O
ral a
nd
or tw
o di
vide
d F.
: 71%
G
ranu
locy
te
E,..
.: 0
.14
± O
.04n
g/m
L In
hale
d A
dmin
islJ
atio
n. S
. Roh
alag
i, O
. Hoc
hhau
s, H
. do
ses
V.:
103l
In
duct
ion
(GI)
E.
."LS:
55%
M
Ollm
ann,
J. B
arth
, H. S
ourg
ens,
M. E
rdm
ann
and
H.
Cl:
371
Jh
Cor
tisol
Sup
pres
sion
E
....c
s: 1
00%
D
eren
dorf
. J. C
lin. P
harm
acol
. 35:
118
7-11
93, 1
995.
Ti
ll: 2
.0h
(CS)
E.
."GI:
60±
7%
K...:
0.6
4 ±
0.1
3 h·
1
RR
A: 2
33-3
46
Bet
a-B
loek
en
Prop
rano
lol
10-3
0 m
gpo
Q
F:2
6±10
%
E...
.Mod
el
Exer
cise
Ind
uced
E
....:
83 ±
6 b
eats
/min
B
rynn
e L,
Paa
lzow
LK
, Kar
lsso
n M
O. M
echa
nism
-(a
ntia
rrhy
thm
ia)
6-Sh
F.
: 87
±6%
T
achy
card
ia
E,.:
18.
! ±
4.3
ng/
ml
base
d m
odel
ing
of re
boun
d la
chyc
ardi
a af
ter c
hron
ic I
-V
.: 4.
3 ±
0.6
Ukg
pr
opra
nolo
l inf
usio
n in
spo
ntan
eous
hyp
erte
nsiv
e ra
ts.
Cl:
16
± 5
mU
min
lkg
J Ph
arrn
acol
Exp
The
r. 19
99 A
ug;2
9O(2
):664
-71.
Ti
ll: 3
.9 ±
0.4
h
Line
ar M
odel
Ex
erci
se I
nduc
ed
S10J
IC"'2
S.9
± 2
.S
Tac
hyca
rdia
be
ats"
min
/(m
in· m
eg)
Met
opro
lol
100-
450
F: 3
8± 1
4%
E."
Mod
el
Exer
cise
Ind
uced
E
,...:
103
± 6
bea
ts/m
in
Bry
nne
L, P
aalz
ow L
K, K
arls
son
MO
. Mec
hani
sm-
(ant
iarr
hyth
mia
) m
gida
y in
2-3
F.
: II
± 1
%
Tac
hyca
rdia
E
,.: 5
0.6
± 1
52 n
g/m
l ba
sed
mod
elin
g of
rebo
und
tach
ycar
dia
afte
r chr
onic
1-
divi
ded
dose
s V
.: 4.
2 ±
0.7
Ukg
pr
opra
nolo
l inf
usio
n in
spo
ntan
eous
hyp
erte
nsiv
e ra
ts.
CL:
15
± 3
mU
min
lkg
J Ph
arm
acol
Exp
The
r. 19
99 A
ug;2
9O(2
):664
-71.
Till:
3.2
± 0
.2 h
Li
near
Med
el
Exer
cise
Ind
uced
Sl
ope=
4.48
± 0
.39
Tac
hyca
rdia
be
ats·
min
/!m
in"
mes
l Im
mun
osul
!l!re
ssaD
ts
Cyc
losp
orin
(T
rans
plan
t) I 5
mgl
kg/d
ay
F:2
8± 1
8%
Fixe
d Ef
fect
N
ephr
otox
icity
N
ephr
otox
icity
>200
R
ohal
agi S
, Cal
ic F
, Har
ding
N,
Ozo
ux M
-L,
po
F.: 9
3 ±
2%
ng/m
L fo
r sle
ady-
slat
e K
irkes
scli
S, D
eLei
j L,
Jen
sen.
BK
Pha
rmac
okin
etic
s, V
.: 4.
5 U
kg
troug
h co
ncen
tratio
ns
Phar
mac
odyn
amic
s an
d Sa
fety
of I
nhal
ed C
yclo
spor
in
CL:
5.7
mU
min
lkg
A (A
DI6
28)
Afte
r Sin
gle
and
Rep
eate
d Ti
ll: 1
0.7h
Fi
xed
Effe
ct
Imm
unos
uppr
essi
on
Imm
unos
uppr
essi
on>
20
Adm
inis
lJat
ion
in H
ealth
y M
ale
and
Fem
ale
Subj
ects
o n
g/m
L fo
r ste
adY
-Sla
te
And
Ast
hmat
ic P
atie
nts.
J C
lin P
harm
acol
., 20
00:4
0:
troug
h co
ncen
lJat
ions
12
11-1
226.
U
I eo
Dru
g/C
I •• s
IInd
ic.d
on'
Dos
ing
Ph.
rm.c
okin
etic
-P
D-M
odef
-P
));.M
ariie
r' R
egIm
en'
P.r
amet
er.' .
....
Dau
noru
bici
n (a
cute
no
n lym
phoc
ytic
leuk
emia
, ly
mph
oma)
Dox
orub
icin
(br
east
ca
ncer
, ant
ineo
plas
tic
agen
t)
5-Fl
uoro
urac
il (tr
eatm
ent
of so
lid tu
mor
s su
ch a
s br
east
can
cer)
Cyt
arab
ine
(lym
phom
as
and
leuk
emia
s)
Cis
plat
in
30-6
0 m
g/m
' iv
fo
r 3-
5 da
ys,
repe
at d
ose
in
3-4
wee
ks
(pro
toco
l ba
sed)
60-7
5 ril
r/m' iv
si
ngle
, rep
eat
dose
eve
ry 2
1 da
ys (p
roto
col
base
d)
400-
500
mg/
m'/d
ay iv
fo
r 4-5
day
s
200
mg/
m'/d
ay
iv f
or 5
day
s at
2
wee
k in
terv
als
50-7
0 m
g/m
' iv
ever
y 3-
4 w
eeks
V.:
40 U
kg
T,n:
24-
48 h
F:5
%
F.: 7
6%
V.:
682
±433
Um
' C
L: 6
66±3
39 m
Um
ini ~
T,n
: 26±
17 h
F.: 9
4%
V.:
35±2
1 U
kg
CL:
9.6
±6.9
mU
min
lkg
T,n
: 53±
41 h
F:<2
0%
F.:
13%
V
.: 3.
0±1.
9 U
kg
CL:
13±
4 m
Um
inlk
g T
,n:
2.6±
0.6
h
V.:
0.28
tO.0
7 U
kg
CL:
6.3
±1.2
mU
min
lkg
T,n
: 0.5
3tO
.10
h
Fixe
d Ef
fect
Mod
el
Une
arM
odel
Une
arM
odel
E...
and
expo
nent
ial
Fixe
d-E
ffec
t /lo
gist
ic
regr
essi
on
Fixe
d Ef
fect
Onc
olO
&)'
Mye
lobl
ast:
eryt
hroc
yte
activ
ity
ratio
Sho
rt-te
rm tu
mor
re
spon
se
Nad
ir W
hite
blo
od
cells
(WB
C)
Freq
uenc
y o
f St
omat
itis
Rem
issi
on r
ate
Res
pons
e to
The
rapy
Gas
troin
test
inal
to
xici
ty
Ph.r
mac
odyn
amlc
P
aram
eten
Res
pond
ers
to C
OJl1
lIete
hc
mat
oloi
c re
spon
se
have
gre
ater
myl
eblo
st:
eryt
hroc
yte
activ
ity ra
tio
Plas
ma
AU
Cu
shor
tte
rm tu
mor
resp
onse
(r
'-o.6
7)
Css
u N
adir
WB
C (
r'--
0.28
)
C.S
O (
"=-(
).85
)
Hig
her c
ompl
ete
rem
issi
on ra
te >
75
roM
co
ncen
tratio
n
AU
C>
SO
H 1
87
resp
onde
d to
ther
apy
AU
C >
451
had
gre
ater
ga
stro
inte
stin
al to
xici
ty
Ref
eren
ces
Gre
ene
W, H
ulTm
an D
, Wie
mik
PH
, Sch
miff
S,
Ben
jam
in R
, Bac
hur N
. H
igh-
clos
e da
unor
ubic
in
ther
apy
for a
cute
non
lym
phoc
ytic
leuk
emia
: co
rrel
atio
n of
resp
onse
and
toxi
city
with
ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
and
intra
cellu
lar d
auno
rubi
cin
redu
cllS
cact
ivity
. C
ance
r 19
72: 3
0: 1
419.
Rob
ert J
, Dlia
dis
A, H
aem
i B, C
ano
JP, D
uran
d M
and
Lan
grad
c C
. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
of ad
riam
ycin
in
patie
nts
with
pat
ient
s w
ith b
reas
t can
cer:
corr
elat
ion
betw
een
phar
amco
kine
tics
para
met
ers
and
shor
t-ter
m
clin
ical
resp
onse
. E
urjC
ance
rClin
Onc
ol
1982
: 18
-73
9.
Ack
land
SP,
Rat
ain
MJ,
Vog
elza
ng N
J, C
hoi K
E,
Rua
ne M
, Sin
kule
JA
. Ph
arm
acok
inet
ics
and
phan
naco
dyna
mic
s of
long
-term
cO
ntin
uous
-infu
sion
do
xoru
bici
n. C
lin P
hara
mco
l The
r 19
89: 4
0: 4
5.
Trum
p D
I., E
gorin
MJ,
Forr
est A
, Wils
on J
KV
, R
emic
k S,
Tut
sch
KD
. Pha
rmac
okin
etic
and
ph
arm
acod
ynam
ic a
naly
sis
of f1
uoro
cil d
urin
g 72
hou
r co
ntin
uous
infu
sion
with
and
with
out d
ipyr
idam
ole.
J
C1in
000
0119
91: 9
: 202
7.
Plun
keU
W, I
acob
oni S
, Est
ey E
, Dan
hous
er 1
., U
llicm
ark
JO, K
eatin
g M
J. Ph
arm
acol
ogic
ally
di
rect
ed a
ra-C
ther
apy
for r
elia
c:to
ry le
ukem
ia.
Sem
in
0nc0
1198
S: 1
2 (s
uppI
3):
20
Des
oizc
B, M
arec
hal F
, Mill
art H
, Cat
tan
A.
Cor
rela
tiono
f clin
ical
pha
rmac
okin
etic
par
amet
ers
of
cisp
latin
with
eff
icac
y an
d to
xici
ty.
Bio
med
Ph
arm
acot
her
1991
: 45:
203
.
t ~ ~
AAPS, 23 Absorbable dose, Dabs, 61 Absorption, 144, 177-178, 251 ACAT, 149,237 Accuracy/precision, 28 Acetaminophen, 80-81, 211, 531 Active metabolite, 13, 90 Acyl glucuronide, 39,40,42 ADME, 1,3,54,75 Ah,119 AIC, 355 Albuterol, 541 Alendronate, 427
biopharmaceutics, 452 clinical pharmacology, 439 dose proportionality, 461 drug-drug interactions, 466 human phannacokinetics, 451 mechanism of action, 431 preclinical pharmacokinetics, 437 preclinical phannacology, 434
Alfentanil, 531 Allometric scaling (see interspecies scaling), 99,
138 Alprazolam, 533 Alzheimer, I, 26+-265 Amikacin therapy, 490 Analytical qualifiers, 29 ANDA,209 Angiotensin, 13 Animal exposure, 7 Animal models, 9 APCI,22 API,22 Apolysichrons, 142 Aptamers, 10 Artificial organ systems, 10 Assay error, 375 Atorvastatin, 32, 77-78 Atracurium, 530 Autoinduction, 316
INDEX
BA,226 BAlBE, 3, 225 Basiliximab, 256 Bayes' theorem or Bayesian, 374, 481, 483 BCS, 196,198-199,228,230-231 BE,226 Benzodiazepines, 261 Beta-blockers, 543 Bile-duct cannulated, 87 Biliary clearance, 163 Bioanalytical methods, 21 Bioavailability, 197 Biological license application, 6 Biological matrix, 28 Biomarker, 3, 12, 14,338,351 Biotechnology, 8, 10 Biowaivers, 225, 234 Bisphosphonates, 436 BMD,429 Bootstrap, 40 I Boxenbaum approach, 160 Brain weight or BRW, 99, 143, 159 Bridging data package, 280 Bridging studies, 364 Bupropion, 36 Busulfan therapy, 493
14C mass effects, 36 Caco-2, 237,313 Caloric load, 203 Captopril, 538 CAR,119 Carbohydrate meals, 200 Carcinogenicity, 3 Carrier-mediated, 55, 200 Cassette dosing, 29, 87 CAT, 57-58,60,63 CDER,248 Cefprozil, 274 Celecoxib, 405
allometric scaling, 418
545
546
Celecoxib (continued) clinical dose prediction, 418 drug~gintemctions,408 food effects, 421 metabolism, 406 PM, EM,413 toxicokinetics, 409 2C9,408--409
21CFR,225 Chemical derivatization, 21 Child-Pugh, 293 Chromatographic, 22, 28 Chronothempeutic, 189 CI-I007, 104 CID,25 Ciprofloxacin, 289 Clearance, 75 Clinical development, 2, 7 Clinical trial simulation, 365 CLND,43,44 Clockwise hysteresis, 344 Clozapine, 45 CMC, 226, 228 cMOAT,206 Cocktail, 320 Co-elution, 36 Common technical document, 17 Compartment modeling, 53-54, 335 Corticosteroids, 349, 542 Cortisol, 359, 366 Covalent binding, 88, 91 COx, 405 Creatinine clearance, 378 CRF,8 CRIMS,45 Cryopreserved, 85 Cyclosporine, 252, 543 CVP, 77, 80, 307
induction, 311 inhibition, 308 2CI9,277 2C9,277 206,9, 82, 277 3A4,I80-181
Dso. 349 Data transformation, 353 Data warehousing, 8, 10 Dedrick plot, 142-143 Demographics, 246 Detection limit, 29 Dialysis, 286 Diazepam, 37,532 Diffusion coefficient, 59--60 Diffusion rate limited, 134 Digoxin thempy, 491 Direct injection, 24 Direct link, 341 Direct response, 341 Disopyramide. 215 Dispersion model, 62 Dissolution, 54-55, 60
Dissolution time, 61 Distribution, 151, 252 DMP-728,32 DMPK, 133 Dofetilide, 326 Dosagefonn, 55, 195,201 Dose. 201 Dose adjustment, 246, 288, 298 Dose individualization, 477 Dose proportionality, 3 Dose selection, 167 Doxacurium, 530 Doxorubicin, 544 DRso, 349 Drug development, I Drug-disease intemction, 364
INDEX
Drug~g intemction, 9, 75, 105,307,364 Drug
flux, 196 interaction, 3 intemctions, elderly, 264 metabolism, 75 metabolizing enzyme, 75-76 particle dissolution, 59 property, 196 solubility, 196, 198
Drug-food effects, 196 Drug-nutrient interaction, 195 Duodenum, 55-56, 181
e-ADME,71 ECso, 336 Effective permeability, 61 Efficacy bridging, 280 Efflux transporters, 57 Electrospray ionization (ESI), 22 Elimination, 252 Emax,340, 346-347 End of phase I meeting, 2 End of phase II meeting, 2 Endogenous ligand, 13 Enterion, 178, 182-184 Enzyme induction, 115 Enzyme inhibition, 107, III Epimers,32 Ethnicity, 246, 275 Everolimus, 295 Exposure, 337 Exposure-response, elderly, 263 Extended release, 188 Extensive metabolizers, 102 Extraction ratio, 155
F2,239 FaSSIF,237 Fat meals, 199 FDA, 23,54 FDA modernization Act or FDAMA, 5,248 Fentanyl, 531 FeSSIF,237 FEV .. 360 Fexofenadine, 320 Fick's law, 59
INDEX
First in human, 3, 363 First order kinetics, 55 First-pass metabolism, 55, 196,205 Fisher information, 376, 483 Fixed effect, 339 Fluid volume, 202 Flumazenil, 533 Fluvoxamine,270 FO,375 FOCE,374 Food effect, 363 Food effect BNBE, 209 Food-drug interaction, 195 Fosinopril, 25-27 Fosinoprilat, 25-27 Fraction absorbed, 57,146-148 Functional proteomics, 8
Gabapentin, 216 Ganciclovir, 61, 62 Gastric emptying, 55,196-197,203 Gastric pH, 55,214 Gastroplus™, 149-150 Gauss-Newton, 354 GC,21 GCIMS,22 Gender effect, 363 Gentamicin therapy, 487, 489,537 Geriatric labeling guidance, 266 Geriatric population, 246, 260 Gl residence time, 203 Gl tract, 145 GLP, 12,30,315 Gonadal steroids, 271 Goodness of fit, 354 Grapefruit juice, 327
Hard link, 343 Hepatic clearance, 86, 96, 98-99 Hepatic extraction ratio, 86, 98 Hepatic function, 293 Hepatic impairment, 291 Hepatic metabolism, 62 Hepatocytes, 35, 84-85 HepG2, 85, 119 HER2,9 Herceptin®,9 High frequency capsule, 182 HPLC,21 HPMC,215 HTS,8 Human drug absorption (HDA), 177 Human metabolic clearance prediction, 96 Human oral bioavailability, 53-54 Hysteresis loop, 357
Ibuprofen, 531, 536 ICso and 1(;, 109 Ileum, 55-56, 181 IMMC,203 Immediate release (lR), 53,225 Impurities, 31 In silico, 8, 53
IND,2,76 Indinavir, 213 Indirect link, 341 Indirect response, 342-343 Indomethacin, 41,535 Induction, 75, 77 Influx transporters, 57 Inhibition, 75, 77 Inhibition kinetics, 108 Initial estimates, 354 Innovation, II In-source hydrolysis, 28 Intelisite capsule, 182 International Conference on Harmonization
(lCH),4 Interspecies scaling, 133, 137 Intestinal absorption, 56, 196 Intestinal eft1ux, 55, 179, 186 Intestinal metabolism, 180 Intestinal transit, 55-56 Intestine, 55 Intrinsic clearance, 97, 154-155 Investigator's brochure. 1-2 IR,191 Irbesartan. 539 Isolated perfused liver, 86 Isomers. 32 rvIVC,64,157,227,229-231 IX-SPE.32
Jejunum, 56, 181
K.,336,379 Kaletra, 329 Kallynochrons, 142 K." 336 K..,346 Ketamine, 533 Ketoconazole.318 1(;,309.311 K...309 Kp,153
Labeling. 195,323 Labile. 38 Lactation, 267, 274 LCIMSIMS,23 LCM,187 Lead identification, 8 Lead optimization, 8 Lidocaine therapy, 493 Line extension, 225, 365 Linear model, 339, 355 Link model, 357 Linked pharmacodynamic models, 500 Lipinski's Rule of Five, 66 Liposomal, 10 Liquid scintillation counting, 45 Liver
microsomes,35 necrosis, 94 slices. 85
Local minima, 374
547
548
~ log D,68 LogP, 66 Logistic regression, 345 Log-likelihood, 374 Log-linear, 339, 355 Lopinavir, 328 Lorazepam, 532 Losartan,538 Low clearance drugs, 96 LY303366,216 Lysylpyridinoline,447
MALDI,38 MAP, 374,483 Matrix, 96 Matrix effects, 36 Maturation, 251 Maximum life span, 99 Maximum likelihood, 385 MDR,I64 Meal,I95 Meal type, 204 Meal viscosity, 204 Mechanism-based inactivation, 113 Metabolic
clearance, 154 profiling, 77 stability, 77
Metabolism dependent inhibition, 113 Metabolite, 21
identification, 89 quantitation, 29 standards, 30
Methadone, 534 Methylprednisolone, 356 Mibefradil, 113 MIC,336 Microsomal protein, 98 Microsome, 83 Midazolam, 259, 318, 532 Mivacurium, 530 MLP, 143, 159 MLR,65 Model,54 Model misspecification, 377 Model validation, 358 Modeling and simulation, II, 14 Modeling drug diffusion, 500 Modified release, 233 Morphine, 534 MRI,8,I0 MRP,206 Multiple model, 523
Nanotechnology, 8,10 NDA, 2, 76, 209 Nefazodone, 325 Neider-Mead, 354 New molecular entity (NME), I, 185 N-in-I, 29, 87 Nitrazepam, 281 NMR,30--31 NOAEL, 167
Non-clinical,2 Noncompartmental,335 Non-linear pharmacokinetics, 86 NONMEM, 354, 375 Nonparametric model, 383-384 NPAG,390 NPEM,386 NPML, 386 NSAIDs,405 NTI, 229, 232 NTR.232
OATP, 164,308 OCT,I64 Omapatrilat, 39 Omeprazole, 279, 540 Oral drug product, 196 Organ impairment, 246, 263 Osteocalcin,447 Osteoporosis, 427, 430 Oxazepam, 532
Paget's disease, 428 Pancuronium, 530 Paracellular, 56, 179,200 Paracetamol, 36 Parallel tube model, 62 Parameter space, 395 Parametric population modeling, 374 Parkinson's disease, I PBPK, 133,134 Pediatric drug fonnulation, 254 Pediatric labeling, 259 Pediatrics, 246, 247 Pelf, 57, 61 Perfusion rate limited, 134 Peristaltic waves, 55 Permeability, 55,60, 196, 198,226,236 Permeability coefficient, 136 Permeation, 179 PET,8,lO
INDEX
p-glycoprotein (or Pgp; see Transporter), 179, 180,206,308,314
Pharmacodynamic, 3,333 Pharmacoeconomics,4 Pharmacoepidemiology, 4 Pharmacogenetics, 8 Pharmacogenomics, 8 Pharmacokinetic,3,333 Pharmacology/toxicology, 6 Phase I enzymes, 77, 82 Phase II enzyynes, 77,79,82 Phenobarbital, 533 Phenytoin, 80--81,212 Physiological time scales, 140 Physiologically based direct scaling, 156 Pioglitazone, 324 Pipecuronium,530 PKJPD,I0--12,333,351,374,481 pKa,32 Plasma drug concentration, 12 Plasma protein binding, 13 Polymorphism, 102
INDEX
Poor metabolizers, 102 Population, 373 Population PKlPD, 7,481 Post-column photolysis, 36 Post-marketing studies, 4, 361 Potency, 63 Power, 355 PPAR,119 Pravastatin,40 Pre-clinical development, 2, 76, 361 Pregnancy, 267,273 Pre-IND,2 Pre-NDA meeting, 2 Probe inhibitors, 310 Probe substrates, 3 I 0, 3 15 Probenecid, 41 Product extension, 4 Product labeling, 245 Proof of concept, 360 Protein binding, 137 Protein meals, 200 Protein precipitation, 36 PXR,119
QSAR,54,66 QSBR, 54, 65, 68, 70 QT prolongation, 307
R, S-enantiomer, 41 Reaction phenotyping, 77, 85,101,312 Reactive metabolites, 77 Reactive thiol. 39 RBC/plasma partitioning, 39 Receptor binding, 13 Region-dependent absorption, 207 Regioselectivity, 83 Remifentanil, 40 Renal clearance, 165 Renal function. 283 Renal impairment, 282 Residence time, 56 Retention time. 28 Rezulin (troglitazone), 120 Rifampicin. 537 Ritonavir, 213 Rivastigmine. 264, 531 Roxifiban, 31-33 Roxifiban metabolites. 31-35 Run times, 23
S9.35 St. John's wort. 320. 326-327 Saquinavir. 213 Saturable. 57 SAX. 32 Scaling factors. 98 Schwartz criteria. 355 Selectivity. 22 Selegiline. 536 SELEX.IO Sensitivity. 22 Separation principle. 383 Sex. 246
Sigmoidal Emax, 340, 357 Sigmoidicity. 507 Sildenafil, 325 Soft link, 343 Solid dosage form, 226 Sparse sampling, 13 Special populations. 245 Specificity. 22 SPECT, 8.10 SRM.25 Stable isotope internal standards, 32 Standard two-stage, 374 Starting dose. 167 Stationary phase, 24 Structural model, 353 Subcellular fractions, 83 Sufentanil, 531 Suicide inhibition, 113 SUPAC, 227-228, 233 Surrogate end points. 9, 338, 351
Tamoxifen. 36 Target-oriented. model-based approach, 487 Temporal, 12 TGA.31 Therapeutic drug monitoring. 495 Therapeutic index. 364 Therapeutic range, 478 Tight junction. 56 Time invariant. 344 Time variant, 344 Tissue binding. 151 Tissue-to-plasma, 137 TOF,44 Tolerance model, 344 Toxic metabolite. 90 Toxicokinetics, 3 Toxicology. 2. 3 Transcellular, 56-57, 179 Transporter, 54. 313 Transporter/absorption. 9 Triazolam, 533 Triple-quadrupole technology, 22 Troglitazone. 77 Trough. 13 Tubocurarine, 530 Two-peak. ranitidine. 58
Ultrarapid metatabo lizers. 102 Unbound drug. 137 Unstable metabolites. 38 Urinary hydroxyproline. 441 US FDA (see FDA). 5 USC*PACK. 375. 377
Valdecoxib.324 Vancomycin therapy. 490 Vecuronium.530 Verapamil.540 Vrnax,97 VODE.382 Vss.151 Vssu.153
549
550 INDEX
Warfarin, 355 Well stirred model, 62 Women in bioequivalence studies, 268
Xenobiotic, 76
Zwitterion, 31-32