appendix l ruby’s draft restoration and revegetation plans: … · 2010/1/8 · pipeline...
TRANSCRIPT
APPENDIX L
Ruby’s Draft Restoration and Revegetation Plans: Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon
Draft Restoration and
Revegetation Plan: Wyoming
FERC Docket No. CP09-54-000
October 2009
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
i October 2009
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................... 1-1
2.0 Purpose .................................................................................. 2-1
3.0 Plan Goals and Objectives ................................................... 3-1
4.0 Restoration Schedule ........................................................... 4-1
5.0 Restoration Process ............................................................. 5-15.1 Restoration Study Plots ............................................................................. 5-15.2 Restoration Treatments ............................................................................. 5-1
5.2.1 Clearing, Grading, and Topsoil Removal ....................................... 5-15.2.2 Right-of-Way, Extra Workspaces, and Access Road Restoration . 5-35.2.3 Revegetation .................................................................................. 5-5
5.3 Restoration Treatment of Erodible Soils .................................................. 5-13
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance ........................... 6-16.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria ............................................................ 6-26.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance ............................................................ 6-36.3 Reporting ................................................................................................... 6-3
7.0 Off-Highway Vehicle and Grazing Control .......................... 7-17.1 Restoration Treatments for Off-Highway Vehicle Access .......................... 7-17.2 Livestock Grazing Control ......................................................................... 7-1
8.0 References ............................................................................. 8-1
Appendix
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Wyoming ................................................. A-1
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
ii October 2009
List of Tables
Table Page
Table 5.2-1 Seed Mix for Salt Desert Shrub Vegetation Type ...................................... 5-8Table 5.2-2 Seed Mix for Basin Big Sagebrush Plant Community ................................ 5-8Table 5.2-3 Seed Mix for Mountain Big Sagebrush Plant Community .......................... 5-9Table 5.2-4 Seed Mix for Low Sagebrush Plant Community ...................................... 5-10Table 5.2-5 Seed Mix for Wyoming Big Sagebrush Plant Community ........................ 5-10Table 5.2-6 Seed Mix for Grassland Vegetation Type ................................................ 5-11Table A-1 Wyoming Ecological Sites ................................................................................... A-3
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
iii October 2009
List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route in Wyoming and Utah ........................................ 1-2Figure 2 Vegetation map of the Ruby Pipeline in Lincoln and Uinta counties,
Wyoming. ................................................................................................... 5-7
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
iv October 2009
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms BLM Bureau of Land Management FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement MP mile post NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NRCS National Resource Conservation Service OHV off-highway vehicle Plan Restoration and Revegetation Plan POD Plan of Development Project Ruby Pipeline Project ROW right-of-way Ruby Ruby Pipeline, LLC USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFS USDA Forest Service USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service WGFD Wyoming Game and Fish Department
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
1-1 October 2009
1.0 Introduction The Ruby Pipeline Project (Project), proposed by Ruby Pipeline, LLC (Ruby), is comprised of approximately 675.4 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas pipeline, along with associated compression and measurement facilities, located between Opal, Wyoming and Malin, Oregon (see Figure 1). An approximately 2.5-mile lateral would also be constructed north to the Malin Hub in Klamath County, Oregon. The Project right-of-way (ROW) will traverse four states: Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon. Four new compressor stations will also be installed as part of the Project. Ruby would utilize a 115-foot-wide nominal construction ROW for installation of both the mainline and the lateral. A state-specific restoration and revegetation plan (Plan) is being developed for each of the four states crossed by the Project. This plan is for Wyoming.
Federal lands that will be crossed include the Wyoming Bureau of Land Management [(BLM]) Rocks Springs Field Office and Kemmerer Field Office and the Utah BLM West Desert District. The focus of this Plan is federal lands. The Plan will also be applicable to privately-owned lands pending approval by landowners.
Ruby compiled a technical team to provide input on the Plan’s for each state. Ruby sought input from specialists from the Rocks Springs Field Office, Kemmerer Field Office West Desert District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); and Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) in the development of this Plan.
This Plan utilizes restoration methods developed for other large-diameter pipeline projects that were approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (Dames and Moore 1990, E & E 2007). Ruby has adapted and updated the Plan by incorporating recent technical standards and published long-term restoration monitoring information associated with similar habitats (E & E 2002, 2007). The Plan also incorporates Ruby’s Noxious and Invasive Weed Control Plan and Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan, Appendices H and D, respectively, of the Plan of Development (POD).
The POD for the Project will include additional reclamation measures for visually sensitive areas and off-highway vehicle (OHV) control, as identified by the BLM during their review of this Plan. These measures include serrating the ROW’s edge with shrubs and trees to break up the perception of a straight line. Additional landowner or other land management agency requirements, as well as any special conditions or recommendations of FERC as it completes its environmental review and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), will be incorporated into this Plan.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
1-2 October 2009
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route in Wyoming and Utah
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
2-1 October 2009
2.0 Purpose The Plan describes the reclamation process and measures that will be implemented following construction to mitigate impacts to habitat crossed by the Project. The Plan describes the processes and measures that will be implemented following construction to mitigate impacts from the Project in Lincoln and Uinta counties. This Plan is applicable to the ROW, extra workspaces, and sections of access roads that require restoration. No eligible or unevaluated cultural site would be disturbed during restoration without a data recovery (mitigation) plan. Revegetation criteria standards are presented to judge plant establishment success. The Plan does not address Ruby’s compensatory or off-site mitigation efforts, as they will be fully described in a separate plan. Construction of the Project would affect approximately 1,326 acres of land in Wyoming.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
3-1 October 2009
3.0 Plan Goals and Objectives The short-term goal of pipeline ROW restoration is to stabilize soils through achieving the objectives of terrain re-contouring, spreading stockpiled topsoil, strategically placing erosion control devices, establishing temporary vegetation cover, and abating noxious and invasive weed establishment. ROW restoration would commence upon pipeline trench closure. Re-contouring of the ROW would occur to blend with adjacent undisturbed terrain. Erosion control devices, such as water bars and/or certified weed-free straw bales or wattles, would be strategically placed to limit and/or direct overland water flow. Herbicide control of noxious or invasive weeds may be necessary following BLM or U.S. Forest Service (USFS) regulations and timing.
The long-term restoration goal is to establish a permanent vegetation cover with similar species densities and compositions of adjacent undisturbed lands in accordance with 18 CFR § 380.15 and FERC guidelines. Additionally, BLM has noted that disturbance within the “Sage” Sage-Grouse Core Reproduction Area crossed by the ROW be revegetated/restored within five years after pipeline construction.
Establishment of a perennial plant cover is essential to restore sage-grouse habitat and provide resiliency to resist invasive annual grasses and forbs. The long-term goal will be achieved through maintaining or adding new or existing erosion control devices, continuing noxious weed abatement, minimizing livestock grazing, minimizing OHV travel, and implementing a monitoring program. Long-term restoration efforts will be deemed complete with successful establishment of the perennial plant cover. Determination of ROW restoration success will be the responsibility of the appropriate agency that administers the land with monitoring data provided by the Ruby. Ruby will negotiate with private landowners regarding restoration requirements for their land Ruby.
Ruby’s restoration efforts will meet short- and long-term goals by implementing the following measures
� Brush hogging the ROW in sufficient time prior to pipeline construction to limit migratory bird nesting, in accordance with the Voluntary Conservation Measures for migratory birds;
� Pre-treating the ROW with approved herbicides in applicable areas for noxious and invasive weeds prior to pipeline construction;
� Using proper soil management techniques including stripping, stockpiling, and reapplying topsoil to establish surface conditions that would enhance development of diverse, stable, and self-generating plant communities;
� Establishing stable surface and drainage conditions and the use of erosion control devices should minimize soil erosion and sedimentation;
� Re-establishing terrain compatible with the surrounding landscape;
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
3-2 October 2009
� Establishing a perennial plant cover of shrubs, grasses, and forbs along the ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads. Native plant species will be used for revegetation, unless it is determined that: (1) suitable native species are not available, (2) the natural biological diversity of the affected area would not be diminished, (3) exotic and naturalized species can be confined within the proposed management area;(4) analysis of the site indicate that native species are unable to compete with invasive weeds,
� All seeds used are approved by the USDA, � No seeds from plants that are listed as noxious or invasive weeds by states or on the USDA
federal list (PLANTS website) will be planted; � Using BLM, WGFD, and landowner-approved seed mixes (which also includes container-
grown or bare-root transplants) will be correlated with NRCS ecological sites and pipeline mileposts (MPs) (see Appendix A);
� Monitoring during the construction and operation phases to ensure the achievement of both short-term and long-term restoration goals and objectives;
� Minimizing construction impacts along the route by, where practical and safe, limiting ROW width to avoid impacts to native vegetation, sage-grouse leks, and pygmy rabbit habitat; and
� Where longer-term impacts occur to certain sensitive environments and habitats, Ruby will work with the BLM, USFWS, WGFD, and landowners to develop a plan for compensatory mitigation to offset ROW impacts. The plan would include proposed types of mitigation to be performed and areas to receive the treatments. The need for an appropriate level of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis will be determined in consultation with federal agencies.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
4-1 October 2009
4.0 Restoration Schedule The Project is scheduled to begin late first quarter or early second quarter 2010 after finalization of the NEPA process, anticipated for November 2009. The FERC Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and the BLM Record of Decision for the selected route must be issued before construction can begin. The POD presents specifics on construction procedures and timing. Pipeline construction will take approximately one year after initiation, and restoration on a given pipeline segment will be initiated upon trench closure.
Restoration will include cleaning up, backfilling, surface grading, topsoiling, installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and establishing a perennial plant cover. Areas that will not be seeded with within 14 days following final grading because of seasonal limitations, slopes greater than 10 percent, erosive soils, or aesthetically sensitive areas will be seeded with a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass immediately after seedbed preparation in accordance with Rocks Springs Field Office, Kemmerer Field Office, or Utah BLM West Desert District policy. The seeding or transplanting of native plants to establish the permanent vegetation cover will occur during late fall to early winter to take advantage of winter and spring precipitation (Monsen 2000, 2005; Plummer 1977). The temporary plant cover will be incorporated into the soil before the permanent plant cover is seeded.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-1 October 2009
5.0 Restoration Process The restoration process includes steps to satisfy short- and long-term goals described in Section 3 of this Plan. The Plan incorporates lessons learned from the Kern Expansion Project restoration effort (E & E 2002, 2007) and the experiences of subject-matter experts in arid and semi-arid land restoration (Plummer 1977; Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Wallace et al. 1980; Monsen 2000, 2005; EDAW 2002; Monsen et al. 2004; and Sheley et al. 2008). Considerable information is also available through BLM’s Great Basin Restoration Initiative projects (BLM 1999, 2000), which are applicable to Wyoming.
5.1 Restoration Study Plots The Project will establish restoration study plots along the ROW to identify ways to improve the success of vegetation establishment in sagebrush-steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation. Plant establishment in these vegetation types is challenging due to limited and unpredictable precipitation and invasive annual weeds out-competing desirable plants (Monsen 2000). Potential areas for study plots include the “Sage” Sage-Grouse Core Reproduction Area, Wyoming. Examples of treatments include the use of a BLM-approved herbicide to control annual grasses, application of straw mulch, and mycorrhizal soil inoculation. The focus of the research would be to improve sage-grouse, pygmy rabbit, and big game habitat by increasing forbs through the restoration process. The study plots would be selected following clean-up and established and seeded in the fall of 2010.
5.2 Restoration Treatments This Plan is applicable to the ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads in Wyoming. Reference to the ROW restoration is inclusive of extra workspaces and access roads. Measures implemented to ensure successful restoration include ROW brush hogging, topsoil and subsoil segregation of the ditchline and spoilside areas and stockpiling during construction, cleanup, backfilling, appropriate surface re-contouring, soil erosion control, seedbed preparation, application of ecological site-specific seed mixes, plant establishment, weed abatement, and monitoring. Seed sources will include commercial vendors and local collections. Container-grown plants will be transplanted in specific locations as agreed upon with the BLM. Shrub seeds will be purchased from commercial vendors and collected from local sources. Shrubs to be grown in containers for transplanting at appropriate sites include shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, big sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry. ROW alignments in visually sensitive areas will have uneven or serrated edges by either leaving shrubs in place when clearing or planting shrub groupings after cleanup.
5.2.1 Clearing, Grading, and Topsoil Removal Initial construction activities include surveying and staking the temporary construction ROW, brush hogging the ROW, clearing vegetation, stripping, and grading the ROW for safe construction passage, as described in the FEIS and POD. Dense stands of noxious and
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-2 October 2009
invasive weeds identified during 2009 field surveys conducted by Ecology and Environment, Inc. will be pretreated with BLM-approved or landowner approved herbicides before vegetation clearing begins. ROW surveying and staking will identify the width of excavation and blade work, including cut and fill locations.
ROW brush hogging will occur in sufficient time to limit migratory bird nesting, in accordance with the Ruby Pipeline Voluntary Conservation Measures for migratory birds. Brush hogging will remove aboveground vegetation without disturbing root systems and limited topsoil resources (Watson October 9, 2009). Many grasses, forbs, and shrubs (but not sagebrush taxa) will root sprout after pipeline construction is completed. This procedure should facilitate ROW restoration and revegetation.
Vehicle travel and equipment operation will be kept within the surveyed work areas. Vegetation will be cleared from the staked ROW and stockpiled within the ROW for later use as soil mulch, OHV controls, and/or wildlife shelters. Large shrubs and trees over the trench line and spoil side of the ROW will be stored at the edge of the ROW, followed by topsoil and subsoil. Vegetation will be cleared and both topsoil and vegetation will be stored on the spoil side. On the working side, only the vegetation will be cleared to the ROW’s edge.
In selected areas of high-quality habitat, as agreed upon by Ruby and the affected land management agency, where: (1) existing access roads to the ROW are numerous (one per mile or more) for a distance of one to five miles; and, (2) the terrain is relatively level, the width of the ROW may be decreased from 115 feet to 90 feet with the allowance of one-way traffic only. These areas will be based on safety and constructability and upon Ruby’s discussions with the appropriate land management agency or landowner.
In some areas, parallel access roads physically adjacent to the Project ROW, not used by the public, and not under county or state jurisdiction, may be used as the working side passing lane, decreasing the amount of habitat disturbed by 10 to 15 feet. In Wyoming, these reaches extend from MP 3.1 to MP 52.1 (the Utah border). Their use will again depend on safety and constructability requirements as well as local use of the road and the road’s alignment compared to the ROW. The pipeline cannot be bent or contoured to follow the road. In selected areas of high-quality visually sensitive areas, the ROW will have an uneven edge accomplished by either leaving shrubs in place when clearing or planting shrubs into the ROW following cleanup.
Topsoil thickness varies throughout the ROW depending on soil type. Environmental inspectors in the field will identify topsoil thickness for removal and stockpiling, where applicable. Areas that are planned for topsoil segregation and stockpiling are noted in the POD. Topsoil containing the seed reservoir will be stripped from over the ditchline and spoilside locations and from any areas involving cut and fill. In cut and fill areas and in agricultural or pasture land as
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-3 October 2009
requested by the landowner or appropriate land management agency, (i.e., Wyoming BLM), Ruby will segregate topsoil (no more than 12 inches) taking care not to mix it with the underlying sub-soil horizons and stockpile it separately from all trench spoil material. Certified weed-free erosion control blankets, straw bales, wood fiber, or straw wattles will be used as appropriate to limit erosion. Topsoil and sub-soils will be replaced in the proper order during backfilling and final grading operations.
Surface rocks, where present and where useful for restoration, will be windrowed adjacent to the topsoil stockpile. After backfilling, the rock will be separated from the topsoil and then placed on the construction ROW in non-agricultural lands, in a manner that visually blends with the adjacent undisturbed area for use as erosion control (rock) mulch, or for OHV control if requested by BLM or the landowner. Salvaged rock will be used to re-create rock outcrops and rock faces to the extent possible. Excess rock, including rock excavated to the surface in active agricultural lands, will be removed and disposed of at a landowner or BLM-approved location.
During construction of the Project, all vehicle travel will be within the identified (approved) construction ROW and workspaces and on approved access roads. Cross-country vehicle travel outside the approved construction ROW and workspaces or on non-approved, existing access roads will not be allowed.
5.2.2 Right-of-Way, Extra Workspaces, and Access Road Restoration Restoration of the ROW will involve backfilling to the excavated trenchline, replacing stockpiled subsoils and the topsoil/vegetation mixture, restoring pre-existing terrain contours, installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. ROW restoration will begin within 20 days after pipeline trench closure and final cleanup. In visually sensitive areas the ROW alignment will have an uneven edge by either leaving shrubs in place when clearing or randomly seeding/planting clumps of shrubs along the ROW perimeter.
Extra workspace restoration will follow similar steps as ROW restoration including contouring, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. This restoration would occur within a few days after the area is no longer needed.
Access roads will be reclaimed according to landowner directions. BLM and WFGD have requested that all improved roads on public lands be returned to their original status after the road was no longer needed. Access road restoration will include grading, preparing the seed bed, and seeding. Road restoration will occur within a few days after the road is no longer needed.
Backfilling Backfilling of subsoil materials will be required after the pipeline is aligned in the trench and packed with screened subsoil or other appropriate materials. The excavated subsoils will be
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-4 October 2009
used to backfill the trench. To avoid settling of surface soils below the contours of adjacent lands, the backfill material will be mounded. Excessive ditch spoil will be feathered and blended across the construction corridor, creating a roughened surface to capture precipitation, decrease erosion, and provide safe sites for plant establishment.
Decompaction Compacted soils would typically be associated with the ROW travel lane, pipe laydown locations, and access roads. Subsoil decompaction will occur as necessary to reduce soil bulk density. Identified locations will be decompacted to a minimum depth of 6-12 inches prior to surface soil replacement. “Soil ripping” will occur along contours to minimize soil erosion and facilitate soil-water retention to aid revegetation. Extra workspaces and access roads will also be ripped to reduce soil compaction.
Recontouring The ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads will be contoured to blend within the surrounding landscape. Contouring will emphasize restoration of existing drainage and landform patterns, to the extent practicable.
Topsoil/Vegetation Mixture Replacement The stockpiled topsoil/vegetation mixture will be respread over the ditchline and spoilside areas after recontouring is completed. The topsoil/vegetation mixture will provide seeds, vegetative propagules, and soil microbiota to facilitate plant establishment.
MulchA mulch cover minimizes soil erosion, conserves soil moisture, and moderates surface temperatures to improve the chances of seedling establishment (Sheley et al. 2008). BLM has requested that crimped straw mulch not be used for restoration purposes. However, to protect erodible soils, limited mulching materials such as certified weed-free straw, woodchips, soil tackifiers, and fabrics may be needed in localized areas. These materials would be used with BLM or landowner approval.
Soil Erosion Control Soil erosion control will occur through vegetation, certified weed-free mulch, soil tackifiers and water control devices (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978, Sheley et al. 2008). Ruby will establish a desirable plant cover as quickly as possible following construction. Mulch, erosion control blankets, soil tackifiers, and water bars (slope breakers) will be used as appropriate and approved by BLM. Water bars will likely be implemented often for controlling soil erosion since Ruby has found them to be effective, cost efficient, and low maintenance.
Water bars or slope breakers are earth-berms established to control the flow of surface water (University of Minnesota Extension 1998). Water bars will be installed in all areas, except
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-5 October 2009
agricultural and pasture land and lawns, using spacing recommendations obtained from the local soil conservation authority or land management agency. In the absence of recommendations, Ruby will use the minimum spacing requirements outlined in Ruby’s Upland Erosion Control and Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan (Appendix D, POD). Additionally, permanent water bars may extend slightly (about four feet) beyond the edge of the construction ROW to effectively drain water off the disturbed area. Where slope breakers extend beyond the edge of the construction ROW, they are subject to compliance with all applicable survey requirements.
Water bars will consist of a one-foot-high berm with an upslope swale. Water bars will be reseeded. Water bars will be gently angled downslope to divert stormwater runoff to a stable upland discharge point or to a “j” hook created at the outfall point.
The purposes of water bars are:
� To decrease overland water velocities through disturbed lands by reducing slope lengths; � To remove water from the disturbed area in a controlled manner and at frequent intervals to
reduce its erosive power; � To direct water into a stabilized location to minimize surface scour; � To maximize water infiltration along the Project ROW; and � To slow water flow across the ROW to help maintain soil moisture for restoration efforts.
Noxious and Invasive Weed Abatement Noxious and invasive weeds will reduce the success of ROW revegetation through competition for soil water, nutrients, space, and sunlight. Field crews have identified areas where noxious and invasive weeds occur within the ROW. Noxious and invasive weed control will occur prior to ROW brush hogging. The Noxious and Invasive Weed Control Plan (Appendix H, POD) will be followed for weed abatement.
Cheatgrass, medusahead ryegrass, and annual mustards, such as Dyer’s woad, are anticipated to be the prevailing weeds impacting revegetation success (Shaw and Monsen 2000). The Project will use BLM or landowner approved herbicides to reduce annual weed presence and competition before seeding (Sheley et al. 2008). Application rates will follow the manufacturer’s recommendations and will be approved by agency or the landowner. A Pesticides Use Permit will be secured from the BLM and Lincoln or Uinta County prior to any application.
5.2.3 Revegetation Vegetation types within the Project area vary according to soil types, topography, climatic conditions, and land management practices. Several seed mixes will be used to accommodate the varying conditions along the route. These mixes are based on input from the BLM’s Kemmerer District in Wyoming and Salt Lake City District in Utah, the NRCS in both states, as
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-6 October 2009
well as the USFWS, WGFD, UDWR, and private landowners. Other resources include the USDA-NRCS Plants Database (http://plants.usda.gov) and VegSpec (http://vegspec.nrcs.usda.gov/vegSpec/index.jsp), a decision support system for planning revegetation projects.
The proposed seed mixtures were designed to be compatible with the dominant vegetation and land uses currently found along the proposed ROW. All disturbed areas will be seeded using the location-specific species and seeding rates for the various vegetation types found along the Project ROW. Seed will be obtained from commercial vendors or collected locally by seed collectors.
The criteria used for selecting the seed mix were based on the following: � Erosion-control capability; � NRCS ecological site descriptions; � Sage-grouse and pygmy rabbit habitat requirements; � Land use; � Availability of seed; � Wildlife habitat value; � Livestock management; and � Restoration of traditional food and medicine gathered by Native Americans.
Seeds will be tested for purity and viability, and certified as weed free to ensure compliance with local, state, and federal seed requirements (Monsen 2000).
Seedbed Preparation Seedbed preparation will consist of decompacting, recontouring, and topsoil replacement, as described in Section 5.2.2, above. The ground surface will be manipulated by equipment to create pockets that allow collection of moisture and leave the soil surface in a roughened condition to enhance soil water infiltration and seedling establishment by providing “safe sites” for seed germination (Monsen 2000, 2005). The seedbed will be firm but not compacted, nor will it have a crusted surface.
The pipeline will cross sagebrush-steppe vegetation, salt-desert shrub, and grasslands. Native seeds mixes will be used to restore vegetation on public lands, to the extent possible and according to BLM field office policy. The seed mix for private lands will be based on previous or adjacent land uses and approved by the landowner.
Re-establishing vegetation in arid and semi-arid sagebrush-steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation types can be more challenging than other vegetation types because of unpredictable precipitation and noxious or invasive weed competition (Monsen 2000). Proper seedbed preparation, mulch, adapted seed mixes, mycorrhizal fungi inoculation, seeding during the late-
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-7 October 2009
fall and early winter, and weed abatement are all ways to improve the chances of successful plant establishment (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Monsen 2000, 2005; Plummer 1977; Sheley et al. 2008). These steps are necessary to establish vegetation cover within five years in the “Sage” Sage-Grouse Core Breeding Area, as required by BLM. The seed mixes are based on the various vegetation types that the ROW will cross (Figure 2) and NRCS ecological site descriptions that are available for parts of the ROW (Appendix A).
Figure 2 Vegetation map of the Ruby Pipeline in Lincoln and Uinta counties, Wyoming.
Salt Desert Shrub The salt desert shrub community is composed primarily of low, widely spaced Gardner’s saltbush, fourwing saltbush, trident saltbush, and greasewood with assorted grasses and forbs. The selected species and rates are designed to provide erosion control and suitable livestock and wildlife forage. On federal land, the following seed mix will be used at the specified rate per acre. The seeding rate is based on drill seeding. If broadcast or hydroseeding is used, the rate per acre will be doubled.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-8 October 2009
Table 5.2-1 Seed Mix for Salt Desert Shrub Vegetation Type
Species Cultivar Percent Seed Mix
Composition
Pure Live Seed Pounds
per Acre
Western wheatgrass 17 2.0
Indian ricegrass 17 2.0
Thickspike wheatgrass 8 1.0
Slender wheatgrass 8 1.0
Fourwing saltbush 17 2.0
Gardner’s saltbush 8 1.0
Trident saltbush 8 1.0
Winterfat 8 1.0
Common yarrow 4 0.5
Scarlet globemallow 4 0.5
TOTAL 100% 12.0
Sagebrush-Steppe Sagebrush-steppe is the predominant vegetation type that the ROW will cross in Wyoming. The sagebrush steppe vegetation is subdivided into basin big sagebrush, mountain big sagebrush, low sagebrush, and Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities based on ecological site descriptions (Appendix A). The following seed mixes are specific to each of the different sagebrush communities.
Table 5.2-2 Seed Mix for Basin Big Sagebrush Plant Community
Species Cultivar Percent Seed Mix
Composition
Pure Live Seed Pounds
per Acre
Western wheatgrass 17 2.0
Blue bunch wheatgrass 17 2.0
Indian ricegrass 17 2.0
Sandberg bluegrass 17 2.0
Basin big sagebrush 4 0.5
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-9 October 2009
Table 5.2-2 Seed Mix for Basin Big Sagebrush Plant Community
Species Cultivar Percent Seed Mix
Composition
Pure Live Seed Pounds
per Acre
Yellow rabbitbrush 4 0.5
Winterfat 8 1.0
Common yarrow 4 0.5
Arrowleaf balsamroot 4 0.5
TOTAL 100% 12.0
Table 5.2-3 Seed Mix for Mountain Big Sagebrush Plant Community
Species Cultivar Percent Seed Mix
Composition
Pure Live Seed Pounds
per Acre
Western wheatgrass 17 2.0
Blue bunch wheatgrass 17 2.0
Needle and thread 17 2.0
Letterman needlegrass 17 2.0
Mountain big sagebrush 4 0.5
Yellow rabbitbrush 4 0.5
Bitterbrush 8 1.0
Common yarrow 4 0.5
Arrowleaf balsamroot 4 0.5
TOTAL 100% 12.0
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-10 October 2009
Table 5.2-4 Seed Mix for Low Sagebrush Plant Community
Species Cultivar Percent Seed Mix
Composition
Pure Live Seed Pounds per
Acre
Western wheatgrass 25 3.0
Fenderler’s bluegrass 25 2.0
Indian ricegrass 25 3.0
Bottlebrush squirreltail 17 2.0
Winterfat 4 0.5
Yellow rabbitbrush 4 0.5
Common yarrow 4 0.5
Scarlet globemallow 4 0.5
TOTAL 100 12.0
Table 5.2-5 Seed Mix for Wyoming Big Sagebrush Plant Community
Species Cultivar Percent Seed Mix
Composition
Pure Live Seed Pounds per
Acre
Slender wheatgrass 25 3.0
Thickspike wheatgrass 17 2.0
Indian ricegrass 17 2.0
Bottlebrush squirreltail 17 2.0
Wyoming big sagebrush 2 0.25
Basin big sagebrush 2 0.25
Serviceberry 8 1.0
Yellow rabbitbrush 4 0.5
Common yarrow 4 0.5
Scarlet globemallow 4 0.5
TOTAL 100 12.0
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-11 October 2009
GrasslandThe grassland vegetation type is minimal in the ROW in Wyoming. This vegetation type is composed of widely spaced bunchgrass and forbs. The seed mix is based on grass and forb occurrence in the grassland vegetation type (Appendix A).
Table 5.2-6 Seed Mix for Grassland Vegetation Type
Species Cultivar Percent Seed Mix
Composition
Pure Live Seed Pounds per
Acre
Slender wheatgrass 17 2.0
Thickspike wheatgrass 17 2.0
Indian ricegrass 17 2.0
Bottlebrush squirreltail 17 2.0
Western wheatgrass 17 2.0
Common yarrow 5 0.5
Scarlet globemallow 5 0.5
TOTAL 100 11.0 Shrub Transplants Shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming big sagebrush, basin big sagebrush bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry will be grown in containers and transplanted in selected areas during late fall or early winter into sagebrush habitat (as agreed upon with the BLM) that receives at least 10 inches of average annual precipitation and soils at least six inches deep. Cages will be placed around the transplants to limit livestock and wildlife grazing. The shrubs will be planted into a small basin, approximately 24 inches in diameter and four inches deep to concentrate precipitation and surface runoff near the plant roots. Transplants will be watered monthly during the first growing season. Additional waterings will occur as needed.
Local seed ecotypes for these species may not be commercially available, and production is unpredictable. Local ecotypic seed will be collected within the same ecological site as the ROW, or from other similar ecological sites, and grown in containers at nurseries. Shrubs will be planted to replicate patterns of the surrounding area, to the degree possible.
Seeding Methods The NRCS guidelines for seeding native plants in arid and semi-arid rangelands will be followed. These guidelines call for at least 20-40 pure live seeds per square foot for drilled seed (Dreesen no date). The number of pure live seed per square foot would be doubled for broadcast seedings.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-12 October 2009
The main purpose of all seeding methods is to place the seed in direct contact with the soil at average depths of 0.5 inch, but not exceeding a depth of one inch, to cover the seed with soil, and to firm the soil around the seed in order to eliminate air pockets. Some methods of seeding are more effective at seed placement than others. The type of terrain has an impact on the type of seeding method that is practicable; therefore, the exact method of seeding will be flexible. Seeding will be used in all areas that have replaced topsoil or surface fines, which will include all disturbed areas except exposed rock faces.
Broadcast seeding may be accomplished with (1) a hand-operated, cyclone-type seeder; (2) a mechanical broadcast seeder attached to the imprinting device; or (3) a specially designed blower. This method distributes the seed on top of the surface without mulch. The seeds must be covered by raking or dragging a chain or harrow over the seedbed. Imprinting with straw punch treatment also may be used to place seed in the soil. The cyclone-type seeder can be used on any slope that can be reached by foot; however, the blow seeder is limited by equipment access.
Drill seeding places seed into the soil at a uniform depth, but can be used only on moderate slopes. Depth bands will be used on the drilling equipment with consideration of drill row spacing. While drill seeding is the best method for seed placement, broadcast seeding followed by imprinting or straw punching will also provide effective seed placement where slope does not permit drill seeding.
Hydroseeding/hydromulching uses water with a slurry of seed, mulch, and tackifier, if required by land management agencies, which are sprayed over the restored topsoil surface. Hydroseeding alone sprays only the seed on the soil surface. This method often does not allow good soil-to-seed contact, leaves seed exposed to desiccating wind and temperatures, and increases seed loss by rodent and avian foraging. Both methods are limited by equipment access. Slopes that cannot be straw punched or hydroseeded/hydromulched will be broadcast seeded and hand-raked.
Soil Amendments/Weed Control/Fencing/Grazing Deferment Soil amendments consist of fertilizers, wood or straw mulches, tackifying agents, or soil stabilizing emulsions. Ruby does not anticipate the need for application of fertilizers as part of its post-construction restoration activities because elevated levels of soil nitrogen may encourage weedy plant colonization (Sheley et al. 2008). Mycorrhizal fungi will be used to inoculate the soil to aid shrub establishment. Application of the mycorrhizal inoculums will be in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations.
Ruby may use pre-emergent herbicide to minimize annual germination of weeds such as cheatgrass, medusahead rye, halogeton, and mustards, which will allow time for the perennial
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
5-13 October 2009
herbaceous species to become established (Shaw and Monsen 2000). Appropriate application rates will be determined by the land management agency, NRCS, or landowners.
5.3 Restoration Treatment of Erodible Soils Erodible soils have been identified in the Project area (see DEIS Section 4.2.1). Erodible soils may require additional restorative inputs to minimize wind and water erosion. The objective will be to rapidly stabilize erodible soils through the establishment of erosion control measures including a vegetation cover. Erosion control measures will include one or more techniques, such as a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass, certified weed-free straw bales or wattles, fiber mats on highly erosive surfaces and steep slopes, silt fencing, water bars, soil tackifier, and/or wetting compounds to decrease erosion. Appropriate reclamation action will commence immediately after trench closure.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
6-1 October 2009
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance
The purpose of post-rehabilitation monitoring is to evaluate the long-term soil stability, vegetative cover and density, habitat quality, and levels of noxious weeds in areas that have been restored. Restoration monitoring for the Ruby ROW will include both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Ruby will ensure that BLM has the opportunity to participate in designing and carrying out post-restoration monitoring.
The primary objectives of monitoring are: � Assess the effectiveness of temporary and permanent erosion-control structures (e.g.,
slope breakers) to ensure the stability of the ROW and extra workspaces and to ensure that runoff is naturally controlled in place, with no accelerated erosion or wash-outs. The first year monitoring will focus on qualitative analysis of the ROW restoration efforts. Locations where additional remedial work may be required should be apparent and will be identified by MP. The monitoring of the ROW for significant and/or new erosion or third-party damage is an element of Ruby’s routine aerial surveillance that will be conducted throughout the life of the pipeline. It is anticipated that any active erosion will be apparent during the first two years following restoration or after the first runoff event.
� Assess the effectiveness of erosion-control structures (e.g., water bars) to ensure soil stability with no accelerated erosion or wash-outs. Locations where additional remedial work may be required would be identified by MP. The monitoring of the ROW for significant and/or new erosion or third-party damage is an element of Ruby’s routine aerial surveillance that will be conducted throughout the life of the pipeline. It is anticipated that any active erosion will be apparent during the first two years following reclamation or after the first runoff event.
� Monitor and assess, through quantitative analysis, the success of the reseeding and transplanting efforts during the second third, fourth, and fifth growing seasons in the core area. Vegetation sampling plots will be used to measure plant density, cover, bare ground, vegetation litter, and rock in comparison with adjacent undisturbed areas (Brower and Zar 1977, Elzinga et al. 1998).
� Monitor the survival of special plantings for visual restoration, if applicable, and the extent to which the restored ROW blends in with the adjacent undisturbed areas.
� Monitor and assess targeted weeds in accordance with the noxious and invasive weed control plan (Appendix H, POD). Newly established weed colonies will be reported to the appropriate BLM office immediately. Identify places where other vegetation control may be needed. Note that with the exception of noxious weed control, vegetation maintenance, including mowing of non-agricultural lands or tree removal, is not anticipated. Ruby will, however, selectively remove trees and large shrubs from the permanent 50-foot wide ROW to facilitate aerial surveillance and inspection. Grass, forb, and low-growing shrub growth within the 50-foot wide ROW will be facilitated.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
6-2 October 2009
� Monitor and identify other disturbances that may hinder reclamation success, such as excessive livestock grazing or unauthorized OHV travel. Determine ways to take corrective actions in consultation with BLM and WGFD.
� Ruby will fund WGFD restoration Project oversight position. The purpose of the positions would be to monitor post-construction reclamation and plant establishment, unauthorized OHV activity, and excessive livestock grazing. Ruby would work with the WGFD to determine the appropriate level of funding. The position would be funded for a predetermined number of years, the cost and number of year of which would be agreed upon by Ruby and WGFD.
6.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria Upland reclamation of non-agriculture land will generally be considered successful when vegetation within the reclaimed ROW supports non-noxious plants that are similar in forb, graminoid, and woody plant density and cover to those growing on adjacent undisturbed lands. Mutually acceptable relinquishment could occur as ROW acreage is no longer required for operational and/or reclamation purposes. Where initial reclamation and plant establishment efforts fail to meet plant establishment standards, reseeding may be necessary on portions of the ROW. Ruby will re-seed areas where initial plant establishment efforts fail. BLM will be consulted with regards to any proposed changes in seeding mixes and application methods on federal lands. If successful plant establishment is not achieved within ten years, appropriate compensatory mitigation will be discussed with BLM.
A quantitative vegetative monitoring program will document the reclamation progress in the ROW. BLM will be invited to participate in the selection of the monitoring and control plots. Monitoring plots will be established randomly within different vegetation types along the ROW and control plots on adjacent undisturbed lands. The monitoring and control plots will be similar in aspect, slope, and soils and approximately one acre in size. The control plots will have similar dimensions as the ROW monitoring plots and be established in undisturbed vegetation adjacent to the ROW. Global positioning system coordinates will located all plots within and outside the ROW. A quadrant sampling (2 x 2 meters in size) method will be used to assess species cover in the monitoring and control plots (Brower and Zar 1977, Elzinga et al. 1998). Approximately 25 quadrants will be randomly placed each in the monitoring and control plots to measure species density and cover. A one-tailed independent-sample t-test will compare total grass, forb, and woody plant density and cover between the monitoring and control plots. Negligible disturbance to soil and vegetation will occur during sampling.
Vegetation monitoring will occur for a minimum of five years. The first, third, and fourth years will monitor the presence of noxious weeds, settling, and erosion. The second and fifth years will focus on plant success and documenting any additional seeding requirements. Vegetative plots will be monitored for five years. Additional monitoring will occur as necessary and agreed upon by Ruby and the land managing agency or landowner.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
6-3 October 2009
As stated above, Ruby will quantitatively document reclamation success within the ROW. Parameters will include a species list and estimates of species density and percentage of plant cover, vegetation litter, rock, and bare ground. Observations of soil disturbance, occurrence of noxious and invasive weeds, plant growth stages, animal use, and grazing impacts will be documented. Qualitative analysis methods will be incorporated at established monitoring locations to provide visual documentation of all quantitative data.
6.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance Ruby will address identified erosion problems as soon as practical based on evaluation of conditions outside the permanent ROW against the original erosion control work. Additional erosion control work will be performed by applying the same basic restoration techniques identified in this Plan, based on site-specific conditions. It is also noted that temporary erosion control structures, such as straw bale or sediment barriers, will be removed when sites are deemed stable and restoration is determined to be successful.
Reseeding or replanting efforts, including supplemental mulching, if necessary, will occur in agreement with the landowner or BLM in any area where monitoring during the third growing season identifies a restoration failure, particularly where accompanied by observed increases in water or wind erosion or excessive OHV use. Noxious weed control is also included in maintenance and would be performed in accordance with Ruby’s Noxious Weed Control Plan(Appendix H of the POD).
6.3 Reporting Ruby will document its observations of restoration success following the field inspections and provide summary reports to the BLM, WGFD, and FERC. Areas that need remedial action will also be identified by MP and will include a description of additional erosion controls or restoration work anticipated. Reports, including a summary of corrective actions proposed, will be submitted within three months of identifying these conditions. Areas where control applications for noxious weeds are needed will also be reported.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
7-1 October 2009
7.0 Off-Highway Vehicle and Grazing Control
7.1 Restoration Treatments for Off-Highway Vehicle Access The BLM, USFWS, WFGD, and private landowners are concerned that the reclaimed ROW will be used for unauthorized OHV travel, which could thwart reclamation efforts and promote erosion. To discourage OHV use of the ROW, Ruby will use the following deterrents, in consultation with BLM and WFGD.
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition, especially within 200 feet from entry ways such as roads;
� Establish “keep off” signs with an explanation at entry ways onto the ROW; � Install rock barriers, earthen berms, or other barricades at existing authorized OHV routes
that cross the ROW; and � Work closely with the BLM and private landowners, grazing lessees, local law
enforcement personnel, and adjacent landowners to monitor and eliminate unauthorized access to the ROW.
Ruby will coordinate with land management agencies, landowners, and appropriate law enforcement personnel to determine adequacy and appropriateness of proposed countermeasures. Ruby will maintain, repair, or replace countermeasures during life of the Project.
7.2 Livestock Grazing Control The Project will traverse through livestock grazing allotments on BLM land. Succulent grass and forb growth could attract these grazing animals. Excessive grazing may cause plant establishment efforts to fail. The following management practices for livestock grazing will be implemented.
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition. � Include low palatable plant species in the seed mix such as sagebrush and western
yarrow.� Negotiate with allotment permittees the need to limit livestock grazing in the ROW by
doing such things as herding or placing salt licks and/or protein blocks one mile from the ROW, possible deferring grazing, closing pastures, implementing seasonal deferments, and/or reducing stocking preference. Ruby may compensate permittees if reduced stocking preference or pasture closures occur.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
8-1 October 2009
8.0 References
Bainbridge, D.A. 2007. A Guide for Desert and Dryland Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International. Tucson, Arizona.
Belnap, J. 2003. The world at our feet: desert biological soil crusts. Frontiers in Ecology and in the Environment. 1(4): 181-189.
Brower, J.E. and J.H. Zar. 1977. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology., Dubuque, Iowa: Wm.C. Brown Company Publishers.
Dames and Moore, Inc. 1990. Kern River Pipeline Reclamation Plan, Dixie National Forest Portion, Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
__________. September 2007. Right-of-Way Reclamation Monitoring Report Year 2007.Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
Dreesen, D.R. Not Dated. Basic Guidelines for Seeding Native Grasses In Arid and Semi-Arid Ecoregions. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center, Los Lunas, New Mexico.
Ecology and Environment, Inc (E & E). March 2002. Reclamation Plan, Utah Portion 2003 Expansion Project. Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
EDAW, 2002. Falcon to Gonder 345 kV Transmission Project Construction, Operation and Maintenance Plan: Appendix C3, Reclamation and Habitat Restoration Plan. Prepared by EDAW, Inc., San Francisco, California.
Elzinga, C.L., D. W. Salzer, and J.W. Willoughby. 1998. Measuring & Monitoring Plant Populations. BLM Technical Reference 1730-1. Bureau of Land Management, National Business Center, Denver, Colorado.
Institute for Land Rehabilitation. 1978. Rehabilitation of western wildlife habitat: a review. USDI, Fish and wildlife Service, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Ft. Collins, Colorado.
Monsen, Stephen B. 2005. Restoration Manual for Colorado Sagebrush and Associated Shrubland Communities. Colorado Division of Wildlife. Denver, Colorado.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
8-2 October 2009
Monsen, S.B., R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw. 2004. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-136, Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Monsen, S. B. 2000. Establishment of Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) in Semiarid Environments. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K.Steenof, compilers. Proceedings: Sagebrush-Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Plummer, A.P., 1977. Revegetation of disturbed Intermountain area sites. In Thames, J.L., ed. Reclamation of disturbed land in the southwest. Tucson, Arizona: University Arizona Press; Pages 302-339.
Shaw, N. L., and S. B. Monsen. 2000. Controlling annual grasses with Oust® herbicide. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J. H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenof, compilers. Proceedings: Sagebrush-Steppe Ecosystems Symposium, BLM Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, ID.
Sheley, R., J. Mangold, K. Goodwin, and J. Marks. 2008. Revegetation guidelines for the Great Basin: Considering invasive weeds. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C. Public. No. ARS-168.
Siegel, S. and S. Donaldson. 2003 Measures to prevent the spread of noxious and invasive weeds during construction activities. Univ. Nevada, Cooperative Extension. Reno, Nevada. Fact sheet FS-03-59.
University of Minnesota Extension, 1998. Earth-Berm Water Bars. FS-06972. University of Minnesota.
Wallace, A., E.M. Romney, and R.B. Hunter. 1980. The Challenge of a Desert: Revegetation of Disturbed Desert Lands. In Soil-Plant-Animal Relationships Bearing on Revegetation and Land Reclamation in Nevada Deserts. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs (4): 214-225.
Watson, Dave. October 9, 2009. Lands and Realty Specialist. Personal Communication. Bureau of Land Management. Salt Lake Field Office. Telephone conversation with Jerry Barker, Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC, Boulder, Colorado.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING
A-1 October 2009
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Wyoming
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
Pseu
doroegne
ria�
spicata�
Hespe
rostipa�
comata�
Achnatherum
�hymen
oide
s�
Achillea�
millefolium�
Anten
naria�
rosea�Arenaria�
sp.��
Kraschen
innikovia�
lanata�Artem
isia�
frigida��������Artem
isia�
triden
tata�
6,00
0�7,20
0�ft.��
Basin�big�
sagebrush��
1��
R034
AY122
WY�
7�9"�
Gravelly�
5�30
%Lincoln
Wyoming
Achillea�
milfolium,�
Allium
�textile,�
Sphaeralcea�
coccinea�
Artem
isia�arbuscula�
ssp.�longiloba,��
Atriplex�gardne
ri,�
Kraschen
innikovia�
lanata�
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Poa�fend
leriana,��
Elym
us�elymoide
s�
Range
,�0�
60%�
Shallow�
Clayey�
6,50
0�7,50
0�ft.�
Low�
sagebrush�
2�26
5�C�2�
RO34
XY25
8WY�
10�14"�
Lincoln
Wyoming
Achillea�
milfolium,�
Allium
�textile,�
Sphaeralcea�
coccinea�
Artem
isia�arbuscula�
ssp.�longiloba,��
Atriplex�gardne
ri,�
Kraschen
innikovia�
lanata�
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Poa�fend
leriana,��
Elym
us�elymoide
s�
Range
,�0�
60%�
Shallow�
Clayey�
6,50
0�7,50
0�ft.�
Low�
sagebrush�
3�26
5�C�1�
RO34
XY25
8WY�
10�14"�
Lincoln
Wyoming
4���
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
5���
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
A-3
Oct
ober
200
9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
6�16
1�E�1�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
7���
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
8���
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
9���
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
10�
���
��
��
�
Salt�de
sert�shrub
�vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Salt�de
sert�
Shrub�
��
11�
���
��
��
�
Salt�de
sert�shrub
�vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Salt�de
sert�
Shrub�
��
A-4
Oct
ober
200
9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
12�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
13�
���
��
��
�
Grassland
�vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
Grassland
�
14�
���
��
��
�
Grassland
�vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
Grassland
�
15�
���
��
��
�
Grassland
�vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
Grassland
�
16�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
17�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
A-5
Oct
ober
200
9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
18�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
19�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
��
20�
���
��
��
�
Salt�de
sert�shrub
�vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Salt�de
sert�
Shrub�
��
21�
���
��
��
�
Salt�de
sert�shrub
�vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Salt�de
sert�
Shrub�
��
Range
,�1�
25%�
Avera
ge,�1�
10%�
Elym
us�elymoide
s,Acm
natherum
�hymen
oide
s,�
Hespe
rostipa�
comata�
Astragalus�sp.,
Erigeron
�sp.,�
Oen
othe
ra�
caespitosa�
Atriplex�gardne
ri,��
Picrothamnu
s�de
sertorum
,��Artem
isia�ped
atifida�
Saline�
Upland�
6,00
0�7,20
0�ft.�
Salt�de
sert�
Shrub�
22�
144�
RO34
AY144
WY�
7�9"�
Uinta�
Wyoming
Elym
us�elymoide
s,Acm
natherum
�hymen
oide
s,�
Hespe
rostipa�
comata�
Range
,�1�
25%�
Avera
ge,�1�
Astragalus�sp.,
Erigeron
�sp.,�
Oen
othe
ra�
caespitosa�
Atriplex�gardne
ri,��
Picrothamnu
s�de
sertorum
,��Artem
isia�ped
atifida�
Saline�
Upland�
6,00
0�7,20
0�ft.�
Salt�de
sert�
Shrub�
23�
144�
RO34
AY144
WY�
7�9"�
Uinta�
Wyoming
A-6
Oct
ober
200
9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
10%�
24�
140�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
�Uinta�
Wyoming
25�
140�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
�Uinta�
Wyoming
26�
140�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Sagebrush�
step
pe�
�Uinta�
Wyoming
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Pseu
doroegne
ria�
spicata,�
Achnatherum
�lettermanii�
Achillia�
millfolium,��
Anten
naria�
rosea,�
Glycyrrhiza�
lepido
ta�
Artem
isia�triden
tata,�
Chrysotham
nus�
viscidiflorus,�
Kraschen
inno
kovia�
lanata�
Range
,�0�
30%�
6,50
0�7,50
0�ft.�
Basin�big�
sagebrush��
27�
103�
RO34
AY222
WY�
10�14"�
Loam
y�Uinta�
Wyoming
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
28�
140�
RO34
AY144
WY�
��
��
��
��
�
A-7
Oct
ober
200
9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
Mou
ntain�
Loam
�(M
ountain�
Big�
Sagebrush)�
Acnathe
rum�
nelson
ii,�
Hespe
rostipa�
comata,�
Pascop
yrum
�smith
ii
Balsam
orhiza�
sagittata,��
Crep
is�
acum
inata�
Artem
isia�triden
tata�
ssp.�vaseyana,�
Eriogonu
m�
microthecum
�
Range
,�3�
30%�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
7,00
0�9,50
0�ft.�
29�
211�
RO47
XA43
0UT�
14�25"�
Uinta��
Wyoming
30�
225�21
1�Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
31�
226�21
1�Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
32�
226�21
1�Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
33�
226�21
1�Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
34�
226�21
1�Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
A-8
Oct
ober
200
9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
35�
226�21
1�Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
��
��
��
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
36�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
37�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
38�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
39�
���
��
��
�
Sagebrush�step
pe�
vegetatio
n�based�
on�th
e�E&
E�June
�20
09�field�survey�
Ecological�site
�de
scription�no
t�available��
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
��
Amelanchier�
utahen
sis,�
Artem
isia�triden
tata�
ssp.�vaseyana,��
Cercocarpu
s�mon
tanu
s�
Carex�geyeri,�
Poa�ne
vade
nsis,�
Pseu
doroegne
ria�
spicata�
Mou
ntain�
Ston
y�Loam
�(Browse)�
Range
,�9�
60%�
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
Balsam
orhiza�
sagittata�
6,80
0�9,40
0�ft.�
40�
212�
RO47
XC46
0UT�
14�20"�
Uinta�
Wyoming
A-9
Oct
ober
200
9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Mile�
Post�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Pseu
doroegne
ria�
spicata,�
Achnatherum
�lettermanii�
Achillia�
millfolium,��
Anten
naria�
rosea,�
Glycyrrhiza�
lepido
ta�
Artem
isia�triden
tata,�
Chrysotham
nus�
viscidiflorus,�
Kraschen
inno
kovia�
lanata�
Range
,�0�
30%�
6,50
0�7,50
0�ft.�
Basin�big�
sagebrush��
41�
106�
RO34
AY222
WY�
10�14"�
Loam
y�Uinta�
Wyoming
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Pseu
doroegne
ria�
spicata,�
Achnatherum
�lettermanii�
Achillia�
millfolium,��
Anten
naria�
rosea,�
Glycyrrhiza�
lepido
ta�
Artem
isia�triden
tata,�
Chrysotham
nus�
viscidiflorus,�
Kraschen
inno
kovia�
lanata�
Range
,�0�
30%�
6,50
0�7,50
0�ft.�
Basin�big�
sagebrush��
42�
106�
RO34
AY222
WY�
10�14"�
Loam
y�Uinta�
Wyoming
Pseu
doroegne
ria�
spicata�Po
a�secund
a�����
Achnatherum
�hymen
oide
s�
Achillea�
millefolium�
Allium
�textile������
Anten
naria�
rosea�
Junipe
rus�scop
ulorum
��Artem
isia�triden
tata�����
Artem
isia�nova�
Shallow�
Breaks�
6,50
0�7,50
0�ft.�
Basin�big�
sagebrush��
43�
54�
RO34
AY256
WY�
10�14"��
1�70
%Uinta�
Wyoming
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Pseu
doroegne
ria�
spicata,�
Achnatherum
�lettermanii�
Achillia�
millfolium,��
Anten
naria�
rosea,�
Glycyrrhiza�
lepido
ta�
Artem
isia�triden
tata�
Chrysotham
nus�
viscidiflorus,�
Kraschen
inno
kovia�
lanata�
Range
,�0�
30%�
106�
(104
)�6,50
0�7,50
0�ft.�
Basin�big�
sagebrush��
44�
RO34
AY222
WY�
10�14"�
Loam
y�Uinta�
Wyoming
Artem
isia�arbuscula�
ssp.�arbuscula,�
Chrysotham
nus�
viscidiflorus�ssp.�
viscidiflorus,��
Eriogonu
m�
microthecum
�
Upland�
Loam
y�Shale�
(Low
�Sagebrush)�
Acnathe
rum�
lettermanii,��
Elym
us�elymoide
s,Po
a�fend
leriana�
Aster�
occide
ntalis,��
Linu
m�peren
ne,�
Phlox�ho
odii�
Range
,�10�
30%�
6,20
0�7,70
0�ft.�
Low�
sagebrush�
45�
202�
RO47
XA32
5UT�
12�16"�
Uinta��
Wyoming
A-1
0O
ctob
er 2
009
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
WYO
MIN
G
A-1
1O
ctob
er 2
009
Tabl
e A
-1 W
yom
ing
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Mile�
Post�
Soil�
Map
ping�
Unit�
NRC
S�ID�
(Prelim
inary)�
Precipitation�
(Mean�
Ann
ual)�
Ecological�
Site�Nam
e�Dom
inan
t�Graminoid�
Dom
inan
t�Forb
Dom
inan
t�Shrub�
Slop
eElevation
Coun
tyState�
Seed
�Mix�
46�
102�
RO47
XC31
0UT�
9�14
"�
Upland�
Loam
�(M
ountain�
big�
sagebrush)�
Herpe
rostipa�
comata,�
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Poa�ne
vade
nsis�
Achillia�
millfolium,�
Allium
�acum
inatum
,�Anten
naria�
microph
ylla�
Artem
isia�triden
tata�
ssp.�vaseyana,��
Purshia�triden
tata�
Range
,�2�
15%�
6,20
0�8,00
0�ft.�
Uinta�
Wyoming
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
47�
102�
RO47
XC31
0UT�
9�14
"�
Upland�
Loam
�(M
ountain�
big�
sagebrush)�
Herpe
rostipa�
comata,�
Pascop
yrum
�sm
ithii,�
Poa�ne
vade
nsis�
Achillia�
millfolium,�
Allium
�acum
inatum
,�Anten
naria�
microph
ylla�
Artem
isia�triden
tata�
ssp.�vaseyana,��
Purshia�triden
tata�
Range
,�2�
15%�
6,20
0�8,00
0�ft.�
Uinta�
Wyoming
Mou
ntain�
big�
sagebrush��
48�
202�
RO47
XA32
5UT�
12�16"�
Upland�
Loam
y�Shale�
(Low
�Sagebrush)�
Acnathe
rum�
lettermanii,��
Elym
us�elymoide
s,Po
a�fend
leriana�
Aster�
occide
ntalis,��
Linu
m�peren
ne,�
Phlox�ho
odii�
Artem
isia�arbuscula�
ssp.�arbuscula,�
Chrysotham
nus�
viscidiflorus�ssp.�
viscidiflorus,��
Eriogonu
m�
microthecum
�
Range
,�10�
30%�
6,20
0�7,70
0�ft.�
Uinta��
Wyoming
Low�
sagebrush�
Draft Restoration and
Revegetation Plan: Utah
FERC Docket No. CP09-54-000
October 2009
October 2009
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 i
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Purpose .................................................................................. 2-3
3.0 Plan Goals and Objectives ................................................... 3-1
4.0 Restoration Schedule ............................................................ 4-1
5.0 Restoration Process .............................................................. 5-15.1 Restoration Study Plots .............................................................................. 5-15.2 Restoration Treatments .............................................................................. 5-1
5.2.1 Clearing, Grading, and Topsoil Removal ........................................ 5-25.2.2 Right-of-Way, Temporary Extra Workspaces, and Access Road
Restoration ..................................................................................... 5-25.2.3 Revegetation .................................................................................. 5-5
5.3 Restoration Treatment Erodible Soils ...................................................... 5-11
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance ........................... 6-16.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria ............................................................ 6-26.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance ............................................................ 6-36.3 Reporting .................................................................................................... 6-3
7.0 Off-Highway Vehicle and Grazing Control .......................... 7-17.1 Restoration Treatments for Off-Highway Vehicle Access .......................... 7-17.2 Livestock Control ........................................................................................ 7-1
8.0 References ............................................................................. 8-1
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Utah ........................................................ A-1
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 ii
List of Tables
Table Page
Table 5.2-1. BLM-Recommended Seed Mix For Rich County, Utah, MP 48.1 - 73.2. ................................................................................................. 5-6
Table 5.2-2. BLM-Recommended Seed Mix For Box Elder County, Utah, MP 100.9 – 230.7. ...................................................................................... 5-7
Table 5.2-3. NRCS-Recommended Seed Mix For Sagebrush And Pinyon-Juniper Vegetation Types On Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache And Rich Counties, UT-1. ............................................................... 5-8
Table 5.2-4. NRCS-Recommended Seed Mix For Desert Shrub Vegetation Type On Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache And Rich Counties, UT-2 ................................................................................... 5-8
Table 5.2-5 NRCS Recommended Seed Mix For Grassland Vegetation Type on Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache and Rich Counties, UT-3 ........................................................................................... 5-9
Table A-1 Utah Ecological Sites ........................................................................................... A-1
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 iii
List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route in Wyoming and Utah ........................................ 1-2
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 iv
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms BLM Bureau of Land Management FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement MP milepost NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NRCS National Resource Conservation Service OHV off-highway vehicle Plan Restoration and Revegetation Plan POD Plan of Development Project Ruby Pipeline Project ROW right-of-way Ruby Ruby Pipeline, LLC USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFS U.S. Forest Service USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UDWR Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 1-1
1.0 Introduction The Ruby Pipeline Project (Project), proposed by Ruby Pipeline, LLC (Ruby), is comprised of approximately 675.2 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas pipeline, along with associated compression and measurement facilities, located between Opal, Wyoming and Malin, Oregon (see Figure 1). The Project would include an approximately 2.6-mile lateral to be constructed north to the Malin Hub in Klamath County, Oregon. The Project right-of-way (ROW) would traverse four states: Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon. Four new compressor stations would also be installed as part of the Project. Ruby would utilize a 115-foot-wide nominal construction ROW for installation of both the mainline and the lateral. A state-specific restoration and revegetation plan (Plan) is being developed for each of the states crossed by the Project. This plan is for Utah.
Federal lands that will be crossed include the Utah Bureau of Land Management (BLM) West Desert District, and U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. The focus of this Plan is federal lands. The Plan will also be applicable to privately owned lands pending approval by landowners.
Ruby compiled a technical team to provide input on the Plan’s for each state. Ruby sought input from specialists from the West Desert District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS); and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) in the development of this Plan.
This Plan utilizes restoration methods developed for other large-diameter pipeline projects that were approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (Dames and Moore 1990, E & E 2007). Ruby has adapted and updated the Plan by incorporating recent technical standards and published long-term restoration monitoring information associated with similar habitats (E & E 2002, 2007). The Plan also incorporates Ruby’s Noxious and Invasive Weed Control Plan and Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan, Appendices H and D, respectively, to the Plan of Development (POD).
The BLM POD for the Project will include additional reclamation measures for specific visually sensitive areas and off-highway vehicle (OHV) control, as identified by the BLM and USFS during their review of this Plan. These measures include but are not limited to serrating the ROW’s edge leaving shrubs and trees along the ROW edge to break up the perception of a straight line. Additional landowner or other land management agency requirements, as well as any special conditions or recommendations of FERC as it completes its environmental review and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), will be incorporated into this Plan.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 2-2
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route in Wyoming and Utah
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 2-3
2.0 Purpose The Plan describes the reclamation process and measures that will be implemented following construction to mitigate impacts to habitat crossed by the Project. The Plan describes the processes and measures that will be implemented following construction to mitigate impacts from the Project in Box Elder, Cache, and Rich counties. This Plan is applicable to the ROW, extra workspaces, and sections of access roads that require restoration. No eligible or unevaluated cultural site would be disturbed during restoration without a data recovery (mitigation) plan. Revegetation criteria standards are presented to judge plant establishment success. The Plan does not address Ruby’s compensatory or off-site mitigation efforts, as they will be fully described in a separate plan. Installation of the Project would affect approximately 4,854 acres in Utah.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 3-1
3.0 Plan Goals and Objectives
The short-term goal of pipeline ROW restoration is to stabilize soils through achieving the objectives of terrain re-contouring, spreading stockpiled topsoil, strategically placing erosion control devices, establishing temporary vegetation cover, and abating noxious and invasive weed establishment. ROW restoration would commence upon pipeline trench closure. Re-contouring of the ROW would occur to blend with adjacent undisturbed terrain. Erosion control devices such as water bars and/or Utah certified weed-free straw bales or wattles would be strategically placed to limit and/or direct overland water flow. Herbicide control of noxious or invasive weeds may be necessary following BLM or USFS regulations and timing.
The long-term restoration goal is to establish a permanent vegetation cover with similar species densities and compositions of adjacent undisturbed lands in accordance with 18 CFR § 380.15 and FERC guidelines. Establishment of a perennial plant cover is essential to provide resiliency to resist invasive annual grasses and forbs. The long-term goal would be achieved through maintaining or adding new or existing erosion control devices, continuing noxious weed abatement, minimizing livestock and grazing, minimizing OHV travel, and implementing a monitoring program. Long-term restoration efforts would be deemed complete with successful establishment of the perennial plant cover. Determination of ROW restoration success would rest with the BLM and USFS on UDNR lands and landowners on private lands.
Ruby’s restoration efforts would meet short- and long-term goals by:
� Brush hogging the ROW in sufficient time prior to pipeline construction to limit migratory bird nesting, in accordance with the Voluntary Conservation Measures for migratory birds;
� Pre-treating the ROW with approved herbicides in applicable areas for noxious and invasive weeds prior to pipeline construction;
� Using proper soil management techniques including stripping, stockpiling, and reapplying topsoil to establish surface conditions that would enhance development of diverse, stable, and self-generating plant communities;
� Establishing stable surface and drainage conditions and the use of erosion control devices, which should minimize soil erosion and sedimentation;
� Re-establishing terrain compatible with the surrounding landscape; � Using native plant species for revegetation, unless it is determined that: (1) suitable
native species are not available, (2) the natural biological diversity of the proposed action would not be diminished, (3) exotic and naturalized species can be confined within the proposed management area, (4) analysis of the site indicate that native species are unable to compete with invasive weeds;
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 3-2
� All seeds used are approved by the USDA; � No seeds from plants that are listed as noxious or invasive weeds by states or on the
USDA federal list (PLANTS website) will be planted; � Monitoring during the construction and operation phases to ensure the achievement of
both short-term and long-term restoration goals and objectives; and � Minimizing construction impacts along the route by, where practical and safe, limiting
ROW width to avoid impacts to native vegetation, sage-grouse leks, and pygmy rabbit colonies.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 4-1
4.0 Restoration Schedule
Construction on the Project is scheduled to begin late first quarter or early second quarter 2010. The POD will present specifics on construction procedures and timing. Pipeline construction is planned to be completed by March 1, 2010.
Restoration will include cleaning up, backfilling, surface grading, topsoiling, installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and establishing a perennial plant cover. Areas that will not be seeded with within 14 days because of seasonal limitations, slopes greater than 10 percent, erosive soils, or aesthetically sensitive areas will be seeded with a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass immediately after seedbed preparation in accordance with Utah BLM West Desert District policy. The seeding or transplanting of native plants to establish the permanent vegetation cover will occur during late fall to early winter to take advantage of winter and spring precipitation (Monsen 2000, 2005; Plummer 1977). The temporary plant cover will be incorporated into the soil before the permanent plant cover is seeded.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-1
5.0 Restoration Process
The restoration process includes steps to satisfy short- and long-term goals described in Section 3 of this Plan. The Plan incorporates lessons learned from the Kern Expansion Project restoration effort (E & E 2002, 2007) and the experiences of subject matter experts in arid and semi-arid land restoration (Plummer 1977; Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Wallace et al. 1980; Monsen 2000, 2005; EDAW 2002; Monsen et al. 2004; and Sheley et al. 2008). Considerable information is also available through BLM’s Great Basin Restoration Initiative projects (BLM 1999, 2000), which are applicable to Utah.
5.1 Restoration Study Plots The Project will establish restoration study plots along the ROW to identify ways to improve the success of vegetation establishment in sagebrush-steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation. Plant establishment in these vegetation types is challenging due to limited and unpredictable precipitation and invasive annual weeds out-competing desirable plants (Monsen 2000). Potential areas for study plots include the Hogup area and Terrace Basin, Utah. The focus of the research would be to improve sage-grouse, pygmy rabbit, and big game habitat by increasing forbs through the restoration process. The study plots would be selected following clean-up and established and seeded in the fall of 2010. Federal and state agencies will be involved with Ruby in site selection and monitoring.
5.2 Restoration Treatments This Plan is applicable to the ROWs, extra workspaces, and access roads in Utah. Reference to the ROW restoration is inclusive of extra workspaces and access roads. Measures implemented to ensure successful restoration include topsoil and subsoil segregation and stockpiling during construction, cleanup, backfilling, appropriate surface re-contouring, soil erosion control, seedbed preparation, application of ecological site-specific seed mixes, plant establishment, weed abatement, and monitoring. Plants will be established mainly by seed from local sources. Container-grown plants will be transplanted in locations such as key sage-grouse habitats where successful establishment may be expected (i.e., ecological sites with greater than 10 inches of annual precipitation and soils deeper than six inches). Shrub seeds will be purchased from BLM or collected from local seed sources, if possible. Shrubs to be grown in containers for transplanting in appropriate sites include shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry. ROW alignments will have uneven or serrated edges by either leaving shrubs in place when clearing or planting shrub groupings after cleanup. Small water catchment basins will be established around each transplanted shrub.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-2
5.2.1 Clearing, Grading, and Topsoil Removal Initial construction activities include surveying and staking the temporary construction ROW, clearing vegetation, stripping, and grading the ROW for safe construction passage, as described in the FEIS and POD. Dense stands of noxious and invasive weeds identified during 2009 field surveys conducted by Ecology and Environment, Inc. will be pretreated with an herbicide approved by the land management agency or landowner, as appropriate, before vegetation clearing begins.
The surveying and staking of the temporary construction ROW will identify the width of the excavation and blade-work along the ROW, including cut and fill locations. Vehicle travel and equipment operation will be kept within the surveyed work areas. Vegetation will be cleared from the staked ROW and stockpiled within the ROW for later use as soil mulch, OHV controls, and/or wildlife shelters. Large shrubs and trees over the trench line and spoil side of the ROW will be stored at the edge of the ROW, followed by topsoil and subsoil.
Topsoil thickness varies throughout the ROW depending on soil type. Environmental inspectors in the field will identify topsoil thickness for removal and stockpiling, where applicable. Where topsoil segregation is implemented, Ruby will segregate the entire topsoil layer up to 12 inches, taking care not to mix it with the underlying sub-soil horizons and stockpile it separately from all trench spoil material. Topsoil and sub-soils will be replaced in the proper order during backfilling and final grading operations. Should it become necessary, these erosion control devices will be replaced or redesigned for the life of the project.
Surface rocks, where present and where useful for restoration, will be windrowed adjacent to the topsoil stockpile. After backfilling, the rock will be separated from the topsoil and then placed on the construction ROW or in non-agricultural lands, in a manner that visually blends with the adjacent undisturbed area for use as erosion control (rock) mulch, or for OHV control if requested by the land management agency or the landowner. Rock will also be used to restore cliff faces or rock outcrops to retain natural and visual character of the area. Such restoration on public land will be determined by the BLM or UDNR. All excess rock, including rock excavated to the surface in active agricultural lands, will be removed and disposed of at a landowner- or land management agency-approved location.
During construction of the Project, all vehicle travel will be within the identified (approved) construction ROW and workspaces and on approved access roads. Cross-country vehicle travel outside the approved construction ROW and workspaces or on non-approved, existing access roads will not be allowed.
5.2.2 Right-of-Way, Temporary Extra Workspaces, and Access Road Restoration Restoration of the ROW will involve backfilling to the excavated trenchline, replacing stockpiled subsoils and the topsoil/vegetation mixture, restoring pre-existing terrain contours,
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-3
installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. ROW restoration will begin within 20 days after pipeline trench closure and final cleanup. ROW alignment will have an uneven edge by either leaving shrubs in place when clearing or randomly seeding/planting clumps of shrubs along the ROW perimeter.
Extra workspace restoration will follow similar steps as ROW restoration including contouring, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. This restoration would occur within a few days after the area is no longer needed.
Access roads will be reclaimed according to landowner directions. BLM and UDWR have requested that all improved roads on public lands be returned to their original status after the road was no longer needed. Access road restoration could include removing previously added gravel, grading, preparing the seed bed, and seeding, as appropriate. Road restoration will occur within a few days after the road is no longer needed.
Backfilling Backfilling of subsoil materials will be required after the pipeline is aligned in the trench and padded with screened subsoil or other appropriate materials. The excavated subsoils will be used to backfill the trench. To avoid settling of surface soils below the contours of adjacent lands, the backfill material will be mounded. Excessive ditch spoil will be feathered and blended across the construction corridor, creating a roughened surface to capture precipitation, decrease erosion, and provide safe sites for plant establishment.
Decompaction Compacted soils would typically be associated with the ROW travel lane, pipe laydown locations, and access roads. Subsoil decompaction will occur as necessary to reduce soil bulk density. Identified locations will be decompacted to a minimum depth of 6-12 inches prior to surface soil replacement. “Soil ripping” will occur along contours to minimize soil erosion and facilitate soil-water retention to aid revegetation. As needed extra workspaces and access roads will also be ripped to reduce soil compaction.
Soils in western Box Elder County, Utah, will likely require compaction rather than decompaction following disturbance, especially in greasewood vegetation types. This will be done using dust control and tackifying agents to control the loose soils and imprint seeding.
Recontouring The ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads will be contoured to blend within the surrounding landscape. Contouring will emphasize restoration of existing drainage and landform patterns, to the extent practicable.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-4
Topsoil/Vegetation Mixture Replacement The topsoil/vegetation mixture will be respread over the ROW in areas where it was stockpiled after recontouring is completed. The topsoil/vegetation mixture will provide seeds, vegetative propagules, and soil microbiota to facilitate vegetation establishment on the ROW.
MulchA mulch cover minimizes soil erosion, conserves soil moisture, and moderates surface temperatures to improve the chances of seedling establishment (Sheley et al. 2008). BLM has requested that crimped straw mulch not be used for restoration purposes. However, to protect erodible soils, limited mulching materials such as certified weed-free straw, woodchips, soil tackifiers, and fabrics may be needed in localized areas. These materials would be used with BLM or landowner approval.
Soil Erosion Control Soil erosion control will occur through vegetation, mulch, soil tackifiers and water control devices (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978, Sheley et al. 2008). Ruby will establish a desirable plant cover as quickly as possible following construction. Mulch, erosion control blankets, fiber mats, soil tackifiers, and water bars (slope breakers) will be used as appropriate. Water bars will likely implemented often for controlling soil erosion since Ruby has found them to be effective, cost efficient, and low maintenance.
Water bars or slope breakers are earth-berms established to control the flow of surface water (University of Minnesota Extension 1998). Water bars will be installed in all areas, except agricultural and pasture land and lawns, using spacing recommendations obtained from the local soil conservation authority or land management agency. In the absence of recommendations, Ruby will use the minimum spacing requirements outlined in Ruby’s Upland Erosion Control and Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan (Appendix D, POD). Additionally, permanent water bars may extend slightly (about four feet) beyond the edge of the construction ROW to effectively drain water off the disturbed area. Where slope breakers extend beyond the edge of the construction ROW, they are subject to compliance with all applicable survey requirements.
Water bars will consist of a one-foot-high berm with an upslope swale. Water bars will be reseeded. Water bars will be gently angled downslope to divert stormwater runoff to a stable upland discharge point or to a “j” hook created at the outfall point.
The purposes of water bars are:
� To decrease overland water velocities through disturbed lands by reducing slope lengths;
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-5
� To remove water from the disturbed area in a controlled manner and at frequent intervals to reduce its erosive power;
� To direct water into a stabilized location to minimize surface scour; � To maximize water infiltration along the Project ROW; and � To slow water flow across the ROW to help maintain soil moisture for restoration
efforts.
Noxious and Invasive Weed Abatement Noxious and invasive weeds will reduce the success of ROW revegetation through competition for soil water, nutrients, space, and sunlight. Field crews have identified areas where noxious and invasive weeds occur within the ROW. The Noxious and Invasive Weed Control Plan (Appendix H, POD) will be followed for weed abatement.
Playas Playas occur in sagebrush-steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation types. Restoration will need to be specific to these areas to properly restore function. The crusts stabilize soil surfaces on arid landscapes, conserve soil moisture, discourage annual weed growth, improve soil organic matter, and facilitate nutrient cycling (Belnap 2003).
Playas are the lower part of desert drainage basins that periodically hold alkaline and briny water washed in from surrounding terrain. Vegetation surrounding playas are adapted to growing in alkaline and saline soils. These unique landforms may require the use of soil amendments for restoration. The Project avoids playas to the extent possible. The majority of the construction would occur in the early summer to late fall timeframe, which should help minimize the chance of crossing playas when significant water is present. Any playas that are disturbed would be returned to their preconstruction condition, to the extent practicable, through soil compaction using heavy equipment. However, these soils need sufficient water for compaction and the proper soil moisture is difficult to achieve. The addition of bentonite clay to the subsurface or bentonite patches may be useful in certain types of playas to restore preconstruction soil infiltration and drainage rates if compaction is not possible.
The approach to playa restoration will also apply to spring and seep areas to prevent interception of subsurface water into the pipeline trench.
5.2.3 Revegetation Vegetation types within the Project area vary according to soil types, topography, climatic conditions, and land management practices. Several seed mixes will be used to accommodate the varying conditions along the route. These mixes are based on input from the Salt Lake City District BLM and the NRCS in Utah, as well as the USFWS, UDWR, and private landowners. Other resources include the USDA-NRCS Plants Database
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-6
(http://plants.usda.gov) and VegSpec (http://vegspec.nrcs.usda.gov/vegSpec/index.jsp), a decision support system for planning revegetation projects.
The proposed seed mixtures were designed to be compatible with the dominant vegetation and land uses currently found along the ROW. All disturbed areas will be seeded using the location-specific species and seeding rates for the various vegetation types found along the Project ROW, unless otherwise directed by a private landowner. The criteria used for selecting the seed mix were based on the following: � Erosion-control capability; � Plant dominance of surrounding vegetation; � Land use; � Availability of seed; � Wildlife habitat value; � Livestock management; and � Restoration of traditional food and medicine gathered by Native Americans.
Seeds will be tested for purity and viability, and certified as weed free to ensure compliance with local, state, and federal seed requirements (Monsen 2000).
Seedbed Preparation Seedbed preparation will consist of decompacting, recontouring, and topsoil replacement, as described in Section 5.2.2, above. The ground surface will be manipulated by equipment to create pockets that allow collection of moisture and leave the soil surface in a roughened condition to enhance soil water infiltration and seedling establishment by providing “safe sites” for seed germination (Monsen 2000, 2005). The seedbed will be firm but not compacted, nor will it have a crusted surface.
Seed Mixes Two seed mixtures were recommended by the Utah BLM: the Stabilization Seed Mix 2008 for use in Rich County, MP 48.1-73.2 (Table 5.2-1) and the Fire Prevention Seed Mix 2008 for Box Elder County (Table 5.2-2).
Table 5.2-1. BLM-Recommended Seed Mix For Rich County, Utah, MP 48.1 - 73.2.
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Crested wheatgrass 2.0
Siberian wheatgrass 2.0
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-7
Table 5.2-1. BLM-Recommended Seed Mix For Rich County, Utah, MP 48.1 - 73.2.
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Russian wildrye 1.0
Western or Thickspike wheatgrass 2.0
Canby bluegrass 1.0
Lewis flax 0.75
Alfalfa 0.5
Western yarrow 0.25
TOTAL 9.5 Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
Table 5.2-2. BLM-Recommended Seed Mix For Box Elder County, Utah, MP 100.9 – 230.7.
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Crested wheatgrass 3.0
Siberian wheatgrass 2.0
Forage kochia 1.0
Western or Thickspike wheatgrass 2.0
Lewis flax 0.75
Yarrow or suitable native forb 0.25
TOTAL 9.0 Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
For private lands, the NRCS recommended three seed mixes. The first is Seed Mixture UT-1, which provides the recommended seeding mixture and rate for the revegetation of sagebrush shrub and pinyon-juniper communities (Table 5.2-3). The exact seeding mixture may differ depending on seed availability. Sagebrush was included to mitigate visual and
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-8
wildlife habitat impacts, even though this species may encroach naturally from the adjacent undisturbed lands. Yellow sweetclover may be substituted for alfalfa. Any additional changes to the seed mixture will first be cleared with the landowner.
Table 5.2-3. NRCS-Recommended Seed Mix For Sagebrush And Pinyon-Juniper Vegetation Types On Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache And Rich Counties, UT-1.
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Intermediate wheatgrass Oahe 3.0
Indian ricegrass Nezpar 5.0
Big sagebrush 2.0
Fourwing saltbush 2.0
Lewis flax Apar 2.0
Alfalfa 2.0
TOTAL 16.0 Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
Shrub and tree species that are appropriate for transplanting to mitigate visual impacts of this vegetative type include rabbitbrush, skunkbush, bitterbrush, fourwing saltbush, winterfat, cliffrose, serviceberry, Utah juniper, and pinyon pine. Black sagebrush may be substituted for fourwing saltbush.
Utah Mixture UT-2 (Table 5.2-4) provides the seeding mixture and rate for the revegetation of desert shrub. The exact mix to be used may differ from the proposed mixture, depending on seed availability.
Table 5.2-4. NRCS-Recommended Seed Mix For Desert Shrub Vegetation Type On Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache And Rich Counties, UT-2.
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Indian ricegrass Nezpar 5.0
Basin wildrye 2.0
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-9
Table 5.2-4. NRCS-Recommended Seed Mix For Desert Shrub Vegetation Type On Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache And Rich Counties, UT-2.
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Fourwing saltbush 2.0
Low sagebrush 2.0
Winterfat 1.0
Globemallow 3.0
Penstemon 3.0
TOTAL 18.0 Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
Shrub species that are appropriate for transplanting to mitigate visual impacts of this vegetation type include bud sagebrush, fourwing saltbush, big sagebrush, winterfat, rabbitbrush, and greasewood.
Mixture UT-3 (Table 5.2-5) shows the recommended seeding mixture and rate for the revegetation of the Utah grassland vegetation type. Yellow sweetclover may be substituted or added to the mixture.
Table 5.2-5 NRCS Recommended Seed Mix For Grassland Vegetation Type on Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache and Rich Counties, UT-3
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Indian ricegrass 2.0
Galleta grass 2.0
Winterfat 2.0
Forage kochia 1.0
Alfalfa Dryland 1.0
TOTAL 8.0 Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-10
Table 5.2-5 NRCS Recommended Seed Mix For Grassland Vegetation Type on Private Lands In Box Elder, Cache and Rich Counties, UT-3
Species Cultivar PLS Seeding Rate, lbs/acre
Shrub Transplants Shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry will be grown in containers and transplanted the during late fall or early winter into specific areas of high-quality sagebrush habitat (agreed upon by the Ruby and BLM) that receives at least 10 inches of average annual precipitation and soils are at least six inches deep. Cages will be placed around the transplants to limit livestock and wildlife grazing. The shrubs will be planted into a small basin approximately 24 inches in diameter and four inches deep to concentrate precipitation and surface runoff neat the plant roots. Transplants will be watered monthly during the first growing season, as practical. Seeding Methods The NRCS guidelines for seeding native plants in arid and semi-arid rangelands will be followed. These guidelines call for at least 20-40 pure live seeds per square foot for drilled seed (Dreesen no date). The number of pure live seed per square foot would be doubled for broadcast seeding.
The main purpose of all seeding methods is to place the seed in direct contact with the soil at average depths of 0.5 inch, but not exceeding a depth of one inch, to cover the seed with soil, and to firm the soil around the seed in order to eliminate air pockets. Some methods of seeding are more effective at seed placement than others. The type of terrain has an impact on the type of seeding method that is practicable; therefore, the exact method of seeding will be flexible. Seeding will be used in all areas that have replaced topsoil or surface fines, which will include all disturbed areas except exposed rock faces.
Broadcast seeding may be accomplished with (1) a hand-operated, cyclone-type seeder; (2) a mechanical broadcast seeder attached to the imprinting device; or (3) a specially designed blower. This method distributes the seed on top of the surface without mulch. The seeds must be covered by raking or dragging a chain or harrow over the seedbed. Imprinting with straw punch treatment also may be used to place seed in the soil. The cyclone-type seeder can be used on any slope that can be reached by foot; however, the blow seeder is limited by equipment access.
Drill seeding places seed into the soil at a uniform depth, but can be used only on moderate slopes. Depth bands will be used on the drilling equipment with consideration of drill row spacing. While drill seeding is the best method for seed placement, broadcast seeding
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 5-11
followed by imprinting or straw punching will also provide effective seed placement where slope does not permit drill seeding.
Hydroseeding/hydromulching uses water with a slurry of seed, mulch, and tackifier, if required by land management agencies, which are sprayed over the restored topsoil surface. Hydroseeding alone sprays only the seed on the soil surface. This method often does not allow good soil-to-seed contact, leaves seed exposed to desiccating wind and temperatures, and increases seed loss by rodent and avian foraging. Both methods are limited by equipment access. Slopes that cannot be straw punched or hydroseeded/hydromulched will be broadcast seeded and hand-raked.
Soil Amendments/Weed Control/Fencing/Grazing Deferment Soil amendments consist of fertilizers, wood or straw mulches, tackifying agents, or soil stabilizing emulsions. Ruby does not anticipate the need for application of fertilizers as part of its post-construction restoration activities because elevated levels of soil nitrogen may encourage weedy plant colonization (Sheley et al. 2008). Mycorrhizal fungi will be used to inoculate the soil to aid shrub establishment; soil microorganisms should remain viable during stockpiling. Application of the mycorrhizal inoculums will be in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations.
Ruby may use pre-emergent herbicide to minimize annual germination of weeds such as cheatgrass, medusahead rye, halogeton, and mustards, which will allow time for the perennial herbaceous species to become established (Shaw and Monsen 2000). Appropriate application rates will be determined by the land management agency or landowner. There are sections of the line in Box Elder County, Utah where, due to the difficulty in establishing vegetation, deferred grazing for two years will be considered for specific vegetation types.
5.3 Restoration Treatment Erodible Soils Erodible soils have been identified in the Project area (see DEIS Section 4.2.1). Erodible soils may require additional restorative inputs to minimize wind and water erosion. The objective will be to rapidly stabilize erodible soils through the establishment of erosion control measures including a vegetation cover. Erosion control measures will include one or more techniques such as a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass, certified weed-free straw bales or wattles, fiber mats, silt fencing, water bars, soil tackifier, and/or wetting compounds to decrease erosion. The application of a sterile annual grass will be approved by BLM, USFS, UDNR, or the landowner, as applicable. Appropriate reclamation action will commence immediately following recontouring and replacement of topsoil.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 6-1
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance The purpose of post-rehabilitation monitoring is to evaluate the long-term soil stability, vegetative cover and density, habitat quality, and levels of noxious weeds in areas that have been restored. Ruby will ensure that BLM, UDNR, and landowners have the opportunity to participate in designing and carrying out post-restoration monitoring. Restoration monitoring for the Ruby ROW would include both qualitative and quantitative analysis.
The primary objectives of monitoring are: � Assess the effectiveness of temporary and permanent erosion-control structures (e.g.,
slope breakers) to ensure the stability of the ROW and extra workspaces and to ensure that runoff is naturally controlled in place, with no accelerated erosion or wash-outs. The first year monitoring will focus on qualitative analysis of the ROW restoration efforts. Locations where additional remedial work may be required should be apparent and will be identified by MP. The monitoring of the ROW for significant and/or new erosion or third-party damage is an element of Ruby’s routine aerial surveillance that will be conducted throughout the life of the pipeline. It is anticipated that any active erosion will be apparent during the first two years following restoration or after the first runoff event.
� Assess the effectiveness of erosion-control structures (e.g., water bars) to ensure soil stability with no accelerated erosion or wash-outs. Locations where additional remedial work may be required would be identified by MP. The monitoring of the ROW for significant and/or new erosion or third-party damage is an element of Ruby’s routine aerial surveillance that will be conducted throughout the life of the pipeline. It is anticipated that any active erosion will be apparent during the first two years following reclamation or after the first runoff event.
� Monitor and assess, through quantitative analysis, the success of the reseeding and transplanting efforts during the third growing season, with subsequent follow-up surveys in the third and fifth growing seasons and additional monitoring as agreed upon by Ruby and the BLM. Vegetation sampling plots will be used to measure plant density, cover, bare ground, vegetation litter, and rock in comparison with adjacent undisturbed areas (Brower and Zar 1977, Elzinga et al. 1998).
� Monitor the survival of special plantings for visual restoration, if applicable, and the extent to which the restored ROW blends in with the adjacent undisturbed areas.
� Monitor and assess targeted weeds in accordance with the noxious and invasive weed control plan (Appendix H, POD). Newly established weed colonies will be reported to
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 6-2
the appropriate BLM, NF, UDNR office immediately. Identify places where other vegetation control may be needed. Note that with the exception of noxious weed control, vegetation maintenance, including mowing of non-agricultural lands and general tree removal, is not anticipated. Ruby will, however, selectively remove trees and large shrubs from the permanent 50-foot wide ROW to facilitate aerial surveillance and inspection. Grass, forb, and low-growing shrub growth within the 50-foot wide ROW will be facilitated.
� Monitor and identify other disturbances that may hinder reclamation success, such as excessive livestock grazing or unauthorized OHV travel. Determine ways to take corrective actions in consultation with BLM and UDWR.
� Ruby will fund UDNR restoration project oversight position. The purpose of the position would be to monitor post-construction Project reclamation and plant establishment, unauthorized OHV activity, and excessive grazing. The position would be funded for a predetermined number of years, the cost and number of years of which would be agreed upon by Ruby and UDNR.
6.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria Upland reclamation of non-agriculture land will generally be considered successful when vegetation within the reclaimed ROW supports non-noxious plants that are similar in forb, graminoid, and woody plant density and cover to those growing on adjacent undisturbed lands. However, determination of upland and other area reclamation success rests with the Authorized Officer of the agency granting the ROW. Mutually acceptable relinquishment could occur as ROW acreage is no longer required for operational and/or reclamation purposes. Where initial reclamation and plant establishment efforts fail to meet plant establishment standards, reseeding may be necessary on plots and portions of the ROW.Because initial reseeding and restoration efforts may not be successful, reseeding may be necessary on plots and portions of the ROW that fail to meet objectives. Ruby will re-seed areas where initial plant establishment efforts fail. BLM will be contacted with regards to any proposed changes in seeding mixes and application methods on BLM lands. If successful plant establishment is not achieved within ten years, appropriate compensatory mitigation will be discussed with BLM.
A quantitative vegetative monitoring program will document the reclamation progress in the ROW. BLM will be invited to participate in the selection of the monitoring and control plots. Monitoring plots will be established randomly within different vegetation types along the ROW and control plots on adjacent undisturbed lands. The monitoring and control plots will be similar in aspect, slope, and soils and approximately one acre in size. The control plots will have similar dimensions as the ROW monitoring plots and be established in undisturbed vegetation adjacent to the ROW. Global positioning system coordinates will located all plots within and outside the ROW. A quadrant sampling (2 x 2 meters in size) method will be used
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 6-3
to assess species cover in the monitoring and control plots (Brower and Zar 1977, Elzinga et al. 1998). Approximately 25 quadrants will be randomly placed each in the monitoring and control plots to measure species density and cover. A one-tailed independent-sample t-test will compare total grass, forb, and woody plant density and cover between the monitoring and control plots. Negligible disturbance to soil and vegetation will occur during sampling.
Vegetation monitoring will occur for a minimum of five years. The first, third, and fourth years will monitor the presence of noxious weeds, settling, and erosion. The second and fifth years will focus on plant success and documenting any additional seeding requirements. Vegetative plots will be monitored for five years. Additional monitoring will occur as necessary and agreed upon by Ruby and the land managing agency or landowner.
As stated above, Ruby will quantitatively document reclamation success within the ROW. Parameters will include a species list and estimates of species density and percentage of plant cover, vegetation litter, rock, and bare ground. Observations of soil disturbance, occurrence of noxious and invasive weeds, plant growth stages, animal use, and grazing impacts will be documented. Qualitative analysis methods will be incorporated at established monitoring locations to provide visual documentation of all quantitative data.
6.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance Ruby will address identified erosion problems as soon as practical based on evaluation of conditions outside the permanent ROW against the original erosion control work. Additional erosion control work will be performed by applying the same basic restoration techniques identified in this Plan, based on site-specific conditions. It is also noted that temporary erosion control structures, such as straw bale or sediment barriers, would be removed when sites are deemed stable and restoration is determined to be successful.
Reseeding or replanting efforts, including supplemental mulching, if necessary, will occur in agreement with the landowner or land management agency in any area where monitoring during the second growing season identifies a restoration failure, particularly where accompanied by observed increases in water or wind erosion or excessive OHV use. Noxious weed control is also included in maintenance and would be performed in accordance with Ruby’s Noxious Weed Control Plan (Appendix H, POD).
6.3 Reporting Ruby will document its observations of restoration success following the field inspections and provide summary reports to the BLM, USFS, UDNR, and FERC. Areas that need remedial action will also be identified by MP and will include a description of additional erosion controls or restoration work anticipated. Reports, including a summary of corrective actions
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 6-4
proposed, will be submitted within three months of identifying these conditions. Areas where control applications for noxious weeds are needed will also be reported.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 7-1
7.0 Off-Highway Vehicle and Grazing Control
7.1 Restoration Treatments for Off-Highway Vehicle Access The BLM, USFWS, UDWR, and private landowners are concerned that the reclaimed ROW will be used for unauthorized OHV travel, which could thwart reclamation efforts and promote erosion. To discourage OHV use of the ROW, Ruby will use the following deterrents, in consultation with BLM and UDWR.
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition, especially within 200 feet from entry ways such as roads;
� Establish “keep off” signs with an explanation at entry ways onto the ROW; � Install rock barriers, earthen berms, or other barricades at existing authorized OHV
routes that cross the ROW; and � Work closely with the BLM and private landowners, grazing lessees, local law
enforcement personnel, and adjacent landowners to monitor and eliminate unauthorized access to the ROW.
Ruby will coordinate with BLM, UDNR, FS, landowners and appropriate law enforcement personnel to determine adequacy and appropriateness of proposed countermeasures. Ruby will maintain, repair, or replace countermeasures during life of the Project.
7.2 Livestock Control The Project will traverse through livestock grazing allotments on BLM land. Succulent herbaceous grass growth could attract these grazing animals. Excessive grazing may cause plant establishment efforts to fail. The following management practices for livestock grazing will be implemented.
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition. � Include low palatable plant species in the seed mix such as sagebrush and western
yarrow. � Negotiate with allotment permittees the need to limit livestock grazing in the ROW by
implementing one or more of the following: herding or placing salt licks and/or protein blocks one-mile distance from the ROW, deferring grazing for three-years, closing pastures, utilizing seasonal deferments, and/or reducing stocking preference. Ruby may compensate permittees if reduced stocking preference or pasture closures occur.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 8-1
8.0 References
Bainbridge, D.A. 2007. A Guide for Desert and Dryland Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International. Tucson, Arizona.
Belnap, J. 2003. The world at our feet: desert biological soil crusts. Frontiers in Ecology and in the Environment. 1(4): 181-189.
Brower, J.E. and J.H. Zar. 1977. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology., Dubuque, Iowa: Wm.C. Brown Company Publishers.
Dames and Moore, Inc. 1990. Kern River Pipeline Reclamation Plan, Dixie National Forest Portion, Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
Dreesen, D.R. Not Dated. Basic Guidelines for Seeding Native Grasses In Arid and Semi-Arid Ecoregions. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center, Los Lunas, New Mexico.
__________. September 2007. Right-of-Way Reclamation Monitoring Report Year 2007.Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
Ecology and Environment, Inc (E & E). March 2002. Reclamation Plan, Utah Portion 2003 Expansion Project. Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
EDAW, 2002. Falcon to Gonder 345 kV Transmission Project Construction, Operation and Maintenance Plan: Appendix C3, Reclamation and Habitat Restoration Plan. Prepared by EDAW, Inc., San Francisco, California.
Elzinga, C.L., D. W. Salzer, and J.W. Willoughby. 1998. Measuring & Monitoring Plant Populations. BLM Technical Reference 1730-1. Bureau of Land Management, National Business Center, Denver, Colorado.
Institute for Land Rehabilitation. 1978. Rehabilitation of western wildlife habitat: a review. USDI, Fish and wildlife Service, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Ft. Collins, Colorado.
Monsen, Stephen B. 2005. Restoration Manual for Colorado Sagebrush and Associated Shrubland Communities. Colorado Division of Wildlife. Denver, Colorado.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT UTAH
October 2009 8-2
Monsen, S.B., R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw. 2004. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-136, Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Monsen, S. B. 2000. Establishment of Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) in Semiarid Environments. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K.Steenof, compilers. Proceedings: Sagebrush-Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Plummer, A.P., 1977. Revegetation of disturbed Intermountain area sites. In Thames, J.L., ed. Reclamation of disturbed land in the southwest. Tucson, Arizona: University Arizona Press; Pages 302-339.
Shaw, N. L., and S. B. Monsen. 2000. Controlling annual grasses with Oust® herbicide. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J. H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenof, compilers. Proceedings: Sagebrush-Steppe Ecosystems Symposium, BLM Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, ID.
Sheley, R., J. Mangold, K. Goodwin, and J. Marks. 2008. Revegetation guidelines for the Great Basin: Considering invasive weeds. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C. Public. No. ARS-168.
Siegel, S. and S. Donaldson. 2003 Measures to prevent the spread of noxious and invasive weeds during construction activities. Univ. Nevada, Cooperative Extension. Reno, Nevada. Fact sheet FS-03-59.
University of Minnesota Extension, 1998. Earth-Berm Water Bars. FS-06972. University of Minnesota.
Wallace, A., E.M. Romney, and R.B. Hunter. 1980. The Challenge of a Desert: Revegetation of Disturbed Desert Lands. In Soil-Plant-Animal Relationships Bearing on Revegetation and Land Reclamation in Nevada Deserts. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs (4): 214-225.
Watson, Dave. October 9, 2009. Lands and Realty Specialist. Personal Communication. Bureau of Land Management. Salt Lake Field Office. Telephone conversation with Jerry Barker, Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC, Boulder, Colorado.
DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT WYOMING AND UTAH
October 2009 A-1
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Utah
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
bron
ia fr
agra
ns
Atri
plex
can
esce
ns
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
a ss
p.
com
ata
Erio
gonu
m
Arte
mis
iafil
ifolia
H
ymen
opap
pus
filifo
lius
Aris
tida
purp
urea
C
oleo
gyne
ram
osis
sim
a M
acha
eran
ther
a ca
nesc
ens
Eph
edra
cut
leri
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Oen
othe
ra
palli
da
Sem
ides
ert
San
d(F
ourw
ing
Sal
tbus
h)
Gut
ierr
ezia
sar
othr
ae
R03
4XY2
12U
T A
vera
ge, 7
-12"
R
ange
, -30
%
4,20
0-6,
700
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
49
.1
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-1
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
bron
ia fr
agra
ns
Atri
plex
can
esce
ns
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
a ss
p.
com
ata
Erio
gonu
m
Arte
mis
iafil
ifolia
H
ymen
opap
pus
filifo
lius
Aris
tida
purp
urea
C
oleo
gyne
ram
osis
sim
a M
acha
eran
ther
a ca
nesc
ens
Eph
edra
cut
leri
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Oen
othe
ra
palli
da
Sem
ides
ert
San
d(F
ourw
ing
Sal
tbus
h)
Gut
ierr
ezia
sar
othr
ae
R03
4XY2
12U
T A
vera
ge, 7
-12"
R
ange
, -30
%
4,20
0-6,
700
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
50
.1A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
bron
ia fr
agra
ns
Atri
plex
can
esce
ns
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
a ss
p.
com
ata
Erio
gonu
m
Arte
mis
iafil
ifolia
H
ymen
opap
pus
filifo
lius
Aris
tida
purp
urea
C
oleo
gyne
ram
osis
sim
a M
acha
eran
ther
a ca
nesc
ens
Eph
edra
cut
leri
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Oen
othe
ra
palli
da
Sem
ides
ert
San
d(F
ourw
ing
Sal
tbus
h)
R51
.1
Gut
ierr
ezia
sar
othr
ae
R03
4XY2
12U
T A
vera
ge, 7
-12"
R
ange
, -30
%
4,20
0-6,
700
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-2
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LMS
tabi
lizat
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
R
047X
B00
8UT
R52
.1
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
a ss
p.
com
ata
Aris
tida
purp
urea
B
LMS
tabi
lizat
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
R03
4XY0
16U
T R
53.1
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
bron
ia fr
agra
ns
Atri
plex
can
esce
ns
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
a ss
p.
com
ata
Erio
gonu
m
Arte
mis
iafil
ifolia
H
ymen
opap
pus
filifo
lius
Aris
tida
purp
urea
C
oleo
gyne
ram
osis
sim
a M
acha
eran
ther
a ca
nesc
ens
Eph
edra
cut
leri
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Oen
othe
ra
palli
da
Sem
ides
ert
San
d(F
ourw
ing
Sal
tbus
h)
Gut
ierr
ezia
sar
othr
ae
R03
4XY2
12U
T A
vera
ge, 7
-12"
R
ange
, -30
%
4,20
0-6,
700
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
R
54.1
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-3
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
bron
ia fr
agra
ns
Atri
plex
can
esce
ns
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
a ss
p.
com
ata
Erio
gonu
m
Arte
mis
iafil
ifolia
H
ymen
opap
pus
filifo
lius
Aris
tida
purp
urea
C
oleo
gyne
ram
osis
sim
a M
acha
eran
ther
a ca
nesc
ens
Eph
edra
cut
leri
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Oen
othe
ra
palli
da
Sem
ides
ert
San
d(F
ourw
ing
Sal
tbus
h)
Gut
ierr
ezia
sar
othr
ae
R03
4XY2
12U
T A
vera
ge, 7
-12"
R
ange
, -30
%
4,20
0-6,
700
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
55
.1A
chna
ther
umth
urbe
rianu
m
Abr
onia
frag
rans
A
tripl
ex c
anes
cens
Fe
stuc
aid
ahoe
nsis
E
riogo
num
A
rtem
isia
filif
olia
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Hym
enop
appu
s fil
ifoliu
s C
oleo
gyne
ram
osis
sim
a M
acha
eran
ther
a ca
nesc
ens
Eph
edra
cut
leri
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Oen
othe
ra
palli
da
Sem
ides
ert
San
d(F
ourw
ing
Sal
tbus
h)
Gut
ierr
ezia
sar
othr
ae
R03
4XY2
12U
T A
vera
ge, 7
-12"
R
ange
, -30
%
4,20
0-6,
700
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
56
.1
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-4
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Alli
umne
vade
nse
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a va
r. w
yom
inge
nsis
(Syn
) H
espe
rost
ipa
com
ata
ssp.
co
mat
aA
nten
naria
dim
orph
a C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
ristid
a pu
rpur
ea
Erio
gonu
m m
icro
thec
um
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taU
plan
d Lo
am
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
) R
025X
Y31
4UT
Ave
rage
, 12
-17
" R
ange
, 0-
20%
5,
000-
7,50
0 ft.
57.1
Ran
uncu
lus
jovi
s A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
bron
ia fr
agra
ns
Atri
plex
can
esce
ns
Poa
se
cund
a (S
yn)
Erio
gonu
m
Arte
mis
iafil
ifolia
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Hym
enop
appu
s fil
ifoliu
s C
oleo
gyne
ram
osis
sim
a M
acha
eran
ther
a ca
nesc
ens
Eph
edra
cut
leri
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Oen
othe
ra
palli
da
Sem
ides
ert
San
d(F
ourw
ing
Sal
tbus
h)
Gut
ierr
ezia
sar
othr
ae
R03
4XY2
12U
T A
vera
ge, 7
-12"
R
ange
, -30
%
4,20
0-6,
700
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
58
.1
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-5
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
A
ster
occi
dent
alis
(Syn
) A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taP
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
C
repi
sac
umin
ata
Erio
gonu
mbr
evic
aule
Lith
ospe
rmum
rude
rale
U
plan
dS
hallo
w
Loam
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
)
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Pen
stem
onhu
mili
s A
vera
ge,
11-
16"
Ran
ge,
4-70
%
5,40
0-8,
000
ft.59
.1R
047X
A32
0UT
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
mol
lissi
mus
A
rtem
isia
big
elov
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii Ip
omop
sis
poly
clad
on
Eph
edra
torr
eyan
a B
LMS
tabi
lizat
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Pla
ntag
opa
tago
nica
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(S
hads
cale
)
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
R
ange
, 30
-50
%
4,60
0-6,
900
ft.R
035X
Y242
UT
Ave
rage
, 8-1
2"
60.1
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
stra
galu
sut
ahen
sis
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
4,90
0-5,
700
ft.R
047X
B25
2UT
Ave
rage
, 8-1
2"
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-6
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
B
LMS
tabi
lizat
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Phl
ox h
oodi
i K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
61.1
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
B
LMS
tabi
lizat
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R04
7XB
252U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 62
.1P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
stra
galu
sut
ahen
sis
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Bal
sam
orhi
zaho
oker
iE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
R04
7XB
252U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
63
.1
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-7
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
stra
galu
sut
ahen
sis
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Bal
sam
orhi
zaho
oker
iE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
R04
7XB
252U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
64
.1A
chna
ther
umle
tterm
anii
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Bal
sam
orhi
zaho
oker
iA
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
S
emid
eser
tS
tony
Lo
am
(Bla
ck
sage
brus
h)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R04
7XB
252U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 65
.1P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
A
chna
ther
umth
urbe
rianu
m
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Fest
uca
idah
oens
isA
llium
acum
inat
umC
erco
carp
us m
onta
nus
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Mou
ntai
nS
tony
Lo
am
(Mou
ntai
nB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Ger
aniu
m
visc
osis
sim
um
Ave
rage
, 13
-18
" R
ange
, 5-
70%
5,
500-
8,40
0 ft.
R04
7XA
461U
T 66
.1
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-8
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Ach
nath
erum
thur
beria
num
A
llium
neva
dens
eA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
var.
wyo
min
gens
is (S
yn)
Fest
uca
idah
oens
isA
nten
naria
dim
orph
a C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a A
stra
galu
sca
lyco
sus
Erio
gonu
m m
icro
thec
um
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taU
plan
d Lo
am
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
) R
025X
Y31
4UT
Ave
rage
, 12
-17
" R
ange
, 0-
20%
5,
000-
7,50
0 ft.
67.1
Ran
uncu
lus
jovi
s
Ach
nath
erum
thur
beria
num
A
llium
neva
dens
eA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
var.
wyo
min
gens
is (S
yn)
Fest
uca
idah
oens
isA
nten
naria
dim
orph
a C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a A
stra
galu
sca
lyco
sus
Erio
gonu
m m
icro
thec
um
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taU
plan
d Lo
am
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
) R
025X
Y31
4UT
Ave
rage
, 12
-17
" R
ange
, 0-
20%
5,
000-
7,50
0 ft.
68.1
Ran
uncu
lus
jovi
s U
plan
d Lo
am
(Wyo
min
g B
igA
vera
ge,
12-
17"
Ach
nath
erum
lette
rman
ii A
llium
neva
dens
eA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
var.
wyo
min
gens
is (S
yn)
Ran
ge,
0-20
%
5,00
0-7,
500
ft.R
025X
Y314
UT
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-9
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
S
ageb
rush
) E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Ant
enna
riadi
mor
pha
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
P
oa
neva
dens
is
(Syn
) A
stra
galu
sca
lyco
sus
Erio
gonu
m m
icro
thec
um
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
69.1
Ran
uncu
lus
jovi
s A
chna
ther
umle
tterm
anii
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s A
llium
acum
inat
umC
erco
carp
us m
onta
nus
Mou
ntai
nS
tony
Lo
am
(Mou
ntai
nB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taB
LMS
tabi
lizat
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
R04
7XA
461U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
18"
Ran
ge,
5-70
%
5,50
0-8,
400
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Ger
aniu
m
visc
osis
sim
um
70.1
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Alli
umac
umin
atum
Cer
coca
rpus
mon
tanu
s B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
BLM
Sta
biliz
atio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Mou
ntai
nS
tony
Lo
am
(Mou
ntai
nB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Ger
aniu
m
visc
osis
sim
um
Ave
rage
, 13
-18
" R
ange
, 5-
70%
5,
500-
8,40
0 ft.
R04
7XA
461U
T
71.1
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-10
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LMS
tabi
lizat
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
R
047X
A50
8UT
72.1
73.1
no d
ata
74.1
no d
ata
75.1
no d
ata
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s U
nkno
wn
Leym
us c
iner
eus
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a F0
47X
A50
8UT
77.1
Unk
now
n A
chill
eam
illef
oliu
m
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
B
rom
us c
arin
atus
R04
7XA
454U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
19"
Mou
ntai
nS
tony
C
lay
(Sle
nder
Whe
atgr
ass)
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s W
yeth
ia
ampl
exic
aulis
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Ran
ge,
3-30
%
4,50
0-8,
000
ft.78
.1Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s Lu
pinu
sca
udat
us
ssp.
ca
udat
us
Unk
now
n
Bro
mus
car
inat
us
Arte
mis
ia a
rbus
cula
H
igh
Mou
ntai
nC
lay
(Sle
nder
Whe
atgr
ass)
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s W
yeth
ia
ampl
exic
aulis
Sym
phor
icar
pos
oreo
philu
s A
vera
ge,
25-
30%
R
ange
, 3-
30%
5,
300-
7,20
0 ft.
R04
7XA
504U
T 79
.1Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s H
igh
Mou
ntai
nC
lay
R04
7XA
504U
T A
vera
ge,
25-
30%
Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Unk
now
n R
ange
, 3-
30%
5,
300-
7,20
0 ft.
Arte
mis
ia a
rbus
cula
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-11
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
(S
lend
erW
heat
gras
s)
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Wye
thia
am
plex
icau
lisS
ymph
oric
arpo
s or
eoph
ilus
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 80
.1U
nkno
wn
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
Mou
ntai
nLo
am(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Ast
raga
lus
argo
phyl
lus
R04
7XA
430U
T A
vera
ge,
15-
21"
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Ran
ge,
2-60
%
5,10
0-8,
400
ft.B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
81.1
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Unk
now
n
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aP
oa fe
ndle
riana
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
82.1
F047
XA
508U
T U
nkno
wn
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s A
chill
eam
illef
oliu
m
Arte
mis
ia a
rbus
cula
A
ster
occi
dent
alis
(Syn
) Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s A
mel
anch
iera
lnifo
liaP
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Cry
ptan
tha
torre
yana
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Mou
ntai
nS
hallo
w
Loam
(L
ow
Sag
ebru
sh)
R04
7XA
442U
T A
vera
ge,
12-
19"
Ran
ge,
30-
60%
6,
000-
8,50
0 ft.
Erio
gonu
mbr
evic
aule
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-12
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Lu
pinu
sca
udat
us
ssp.
ca
udat
us83
.1U
nkno
wn
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Mou
ntai
nS
tony
C
lay
(Sle
nder
Whe
atgr
ass)
R
ange
, 3-
30%
4,
500-
8,00
0 ft.
Ave
rage
, 13
-19
" W
yeth
ia
ampl
exic
aulis
R04
7XA
454U
T
84.1
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Unk
now
n 85
.1F0
47X
A50
8UT
Unk
now
n 86
.1F0
47X
A50
8UT
Unk
now
n P
oa fe
ndle
riana
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
no d
ata
87.1
Unk
now
n P
oa fe
ndle
riana
S
teno
tus
acau
lisA
rtem
isia
arb
uscu
la
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a M
ount
ain
Sha
llow
Lo
am
(Cur
l-le
af M
ount
ain
Mah
ogan
y)
Phl
ox h
oodi
i C
erco
carp
us le
difo
lius
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Pen
stem
onhu
mili
s P
ursh
iatri
dent
ata
Ave
rage
, 19
-27
" R
ange
, 30
-70
%
5,20
0-8,
500
ft.88
.1E
riger
on e
aton
ii R
047X
A44
0UT
Unk
now
n P
oa fe
ndle
riana
S
teno
tus
acau
lisA
rtem
isia
arb
uscu
la
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a M
ount
ain
Sha
llow
Lo
am
(Cur
l-le
af M
ount
ain
Mah
ogan
y)
Phl
ox h
oodi
i C
erco
carp
us le
difo
lius
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Pen
stem
onhu
mili
s P
ursh
iatri
dent
ata
Ave
rage
, 19
-27
" R
ange
, 30
-70
%
5,20
0-8,
500
ft.89
.1E
riger
on e
aton
ii R
047X
A44
0UT
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-13
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
U
nkno
wn
Bro
mus
car
inat
us
Ste
notu
s ac
aulis
Arte
mis
ia a
rbus
cula
E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Mou
ntai
nS
hallo
w
Loam
(C
url-
leaf
Mou
ntai
n M
ahog
any)
Phl
ox h
oodi
i C
erco
carp
us le
difo
lius
Pen
stem
onhu
mili
s Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s P
ursh
iatri
dent
ata
Ave
rage
, 19
-27
" R
ange
, 30
-70
%
5,20
0-8,
500
ft.90
.1R
047X
A44
0UT
Erig
eron
eat
onii
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Unk
now
n
Leym
us c
iner
eus
Arte
mis
ia a
rbus
cula
H
igh
Mou
ntai
nC
lay
(Sle
nder
Whe
atgr
ass)
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Wye
thia
am
plex
icau
lisS
ymph
oric
arpo
s or
eoph
ilus
R04
7XA
504U
T A
vera
ge,
25-
30%
R
ange
, 3-
30%
5,
300-
7,20
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 91
.1U
nkno
wn
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
Mou
ntai
nLo
am(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Ast
raga
lus
argo
phyl
lus
R04
7XA
430U
T A
vera
ge,
15-
21"
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Ran
ge,
2-60
%
5,10
0-8,
400
ft.B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
92.1
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s U
nkno
wn
Leym
us c
iner
eus
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
047X
A31
6UT
93.1
Unk
now
n A
vera
ge,
13-
19"
Mou
ntai
nS
tony
C
lay
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Ran
ge,
3-30
%
4,50
0-8,
000
ft.R
047X
A45
4UT
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-14
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
(S
lend
erW
heat
gras
s)
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Wye
thia
am
plex
icau
lisP
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
P
oa
neva
dens
is
(Syn
) P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
94.1
Unk
now
n E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Oen
othe
ra
caes
pito
sa
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Upl
and
Loam
(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Ave
rage
, 13
-19
" R
ange
, 0-
30%
4,
200-
6,50
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
028A
Y31
0UT
95.1
Unk
now
n E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Aga
stac
heur
ticifo
lia
Am
elan
chie
r aln
ifolia
P
oa
neva
dens
is
(Syn
) B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Cre
pis
acum
inat
aP
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
E
riogo
num
brev
icau
leS
ymph
oric
arpo
s or
eoph
ilus
Mou
ntai
nLo
am(S
hrub
) A
vera
ge,
23-
30%
R
ange
, 15
-70
%
5,00
0-8,
000
ft.G
eran
ium
vi
scos
issi
mum
R
047X
A43
4UT
96.1
Unk
now
n A
gast
ache
urtic
ifolia
B
rom
us c
arin
atus
A
mel
anch
ier a
lnifo
lia
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
M
ount
ain
Loam
(Shr
ub)
Ave
rage
, 23
-30
%
Ran
ge,
15-
70%
5,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Cre
pis
acum
inat
aR
047X
A43
4UT
Leym
us c
iner
eus
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-15
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
E
riogo
num
brev
icau
leS
ymph
oric
arpo
s or
eoph
ilus
Ger
aniu
m
visc
osis
sim
um
97.1
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Unk
now
n A
chna
ther
umle
tterm
anii
Arte
mis
ia a
rbus
cula
E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Wye
thia
am
plex
icau
lisS
ymph
oric
arpo
s or
eoph
ilus
Hig
hM
ount
ain
Cla
y (S
lend
erW
heat
gras
s)
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
R04
7XA
504U
T A
vera
ge,
25-
30%
R
ange
, 3-
30%
5,
300-
7,20
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 98
.1U
nkno
wn
Ach
nath
erum
lette
rman
ii A
chill
eam
illef
oliu
m
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Alli
umac
umin
atum
Cer
coca
rpus
mon
tanu
s M
ount
ain
Sto
ny
Loam
(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taP
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
R04
7XA
461U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
18"
Ran
ge,
5-70
%
5,50
0-8,
400
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Ger
aniu
m
visc
osis
sim
um
99.1
Unk
now
n A
chna
ther
umne
lson
iiA
chill
eam
illef
oliu
m
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
A
llium
acum
inat
umE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s C
erco
carp
us m
onta
nus
Mou
ntai
nS
tony
Lo
am
(Mou
ntai
nB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Pas
copy
rum
smith
ii B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
R04
7XA
461U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
18"
Ran
ge,
5-70
%
5,50
0-8,
400
ft.G
eran
ium
vi
scos
issi
mum
P
oa fe
ndle
riana
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-16
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
100.
1 A
chill
eam
illef
oliu
m
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s P
oa
neva
dens
is
(Syn
) A
stra
galu
sar
goph
yllu
s P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
A
ster
occi
dent
alis
(Syn
) P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Sym
phor
icar
pos
oreo
philu
sB
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Cas
tille
jalin
ariif
olia
M
ount
ain
Sha
llow
Lo
am(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
A
vera
ge,
17-
24"
Ran
ge,
3-70
%
5,20
0-8,
500
ft.E
riogo
num
brev
icau
leR
047X
A44
6UT
101.
1 A
chill
eam
illef
oliu
m
Leym
us c
iner
eus
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Ast
raga
lus
argo
phyl
lus
Mou
ntai
nLo
am(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Ave
rage
, 15
-21
" A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Ran
ge,
2-60
%
5,10
0-8,
400
ft.10
2.1
R04
7XA
430U
T A
vera
ge,
15-
21"
Mou
ntai
nLo
amR
047X
A43
0UT
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Ran
ge,
2-60
%
5,10
0-8,
400
ft.
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-17
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aA
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
Ast
raga
lus
argo
phyl
lus
Poa
fend
leria
na
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
ta10
3.1
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
rtem
isia
arb
uscu
la
Ast
eroc
cide
ntal
is(S
yn)
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aA
mel
anch
iera
lnifo
liaC
rypt
anth
a to
rreya
na
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
P
oa fe
ndle
riana
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Erio
gonu
mbr
evic
aule
Mou
ntai
nS
hallo
w
Loam
(L
ow
Sag
ebru
sh)
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Ave
rage
, 12
-19
" R
ange
, 30
-60
%
6,00
0-8,
500
ft.R
047X
A44
2UT
104.
1 E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
arb
uscu
la
Ast
eroc
cide
ntal
is(S
yn)
Pas
copy
rum
smith
ii A
mel
anch
iera
lnifo
liaP
oa
neva
dens
is
(Syn
) C
rypt
anth
a to
rreya
na
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
M
ount
ain
Sha
llow
Lo
am
(Low
S
ageb
rush
) R
047X
A44
2UT
Ave
rage
, 12
-19
" R
ange
, 30
-60
%
6,00
0-8,
500
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Erio
gonu
mbr
evic
aule
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-18
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
R10
5.1
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
va
r. oc
cide
ntal
isA
mel
anch
ier a
lnifo
lia
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a ss
p.
cand
ican
sA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taU
plan
dG
rave
lly
Loam
(Bon
nevi
lleB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
C
repi
sac
umin
ata
Ave
rage
, 14
-20
" R
ange
, 1-
45%
5,
000-
7,50
0 ft.
106.
3 R
028A
Y306
UT
107.
3 no
dat
a
108.
4 no
dat
a C
arex
ne
bras
cens
isC
arex
pra
egra
cilis
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
no d
ata
109.
2 D
istic
hlis
spic
ata
Car
ex
nebr
asce
nsis
Arg
entin
aan
serin
aA
llenr
olfe
a oc
cide
ntal
is
R02
8AY0
24U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-14"
W
et
Sal
ine
Mea
dow
R
ange
, 0-2
%
3,00
0-6,
500
ft.A
stra
galu
sdi
vers
ifoliu
sC
arex
pra
egra
cilis
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s al
bidu
s
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-19
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Ast
er p
auci
floru
s (S
yn)
Dis
tichl
is s
pica
ta
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
A
scle
pias
spec
iosa
110.
3 C
astil
leja
min
iata
A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
rgen
tina
anse
rina
Alle
nrol
fea
occi
dent
alis
A
stra
galu
sdi
vers
ifoliu
sE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s C
hrys
otha
mnu
s al
bidu
s
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Ast
er p
auci
floru
s (S
yn)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
A
scle
pias
spec
iosa
R02
8AY0
24U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-14"
W
et
Sal
ine
Mea
dow
3,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
Ran
ge, 0
-2%
11
1.3
Cas
tille
ja m
inia
ta
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Cry
ptan
tha
hum
ilis
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a [s
ic]
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Le
pidi
umpe
rfolia
tum
K
ram
eria
lanc
eola
ta [s
ic]
R02
8AY1
32U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Flat
(s
hads
cale
)
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
112.
3 S
uaed
a m
oqui
nii
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-20
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
A
gros
tisst
olon
ifera
Car
ex p
raeg
raci
lis
Junc
us a
rctic
us
Leym
us c
iner
eus
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
asco
pyru
msm
ithii
no d
ata
113.
3 P
oapr
aten
sis
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Equ
iset
umar
vens
eA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
tri
dent
ata
Arg
entin
aan
serin
aC
hrys
otha
mnu
s na
useo
sus
(Syn
) E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Ast
er p
auci
floru
s (S
yn)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a P
lant
ago
erio
poda
R
osa
woo
dsii
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Sen
ecio
stre
ptan
thifo
lius
(Syn
) S
emiw
et
Fres
hM
eado
w
R02
8AY0
12U
T A
vera
ge, 6
-16"
R
ange
, 0-2
%
4,50
0-7,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eagr
ossu
larii
folia
11
4.3
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Upl
and
Loam
(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Car
ex d
ougl
asii
R02
8AY
310U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
19"
Ran
ge,
0-30
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.O
enot
hera
ca
espi
tosa
D
istic
hlis
spi
cata
P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-21
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Leym
us c
iner
eus
Spo
robo
lus
airo
ides
115.
3 A
tripl
ex a
rgen
tea
[sic
] C
arex
dou
glas
ii S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
Bas
sia
hyss
opifo
lia
Dis
tichl
is s
pica
ta
Alle
nrol
fea
occi
dent
alis
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
tride
ntat
a Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s C
repi
s ru
ncin
ata
Spo
robo
lus
airo
ides
A
lkal
i B
otto
m
(Alk
ali
Sac
aton
) R
028A
Y001
UT
Ave
rage
, 6-1
2"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
4,
250-
5,90
0 ft.
Iva
axill
aris
116.
3 M
alve
lla le
pros
a A
tripl
ex a
rgen
tea
[sic
] C
arex
dou
glas
ii S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
Bas
sia
hyss
opifo
lia
Dis
tichl
is s
pica
ta
Alle
nrol
fea
occi
dent
alis
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
tride
ntat
a Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s C
repi
s ru
ncin
ata
Spo
robo
lus
airo
ides
A
lkal
i B
otto
m
(Alk
ali
Sac
aton
) R
028A
Y001
UT
Ave
rage
, 6-1
2"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
4,
250-
5,90
0 ft.
Iva
axill
aris
117.
3 M
alve
lla le
pros
a A
lkal
i B
otto
m
(Alk
ali
Car
ex
nebr
asce
nsis
Atri
plex
arg
ente
a [s
ic]
4,25
0-5,
900
ft.R
028A
Y001
UT
Ave
rage
, 6-1
2"
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
R
ange
, 0-3
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-22
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
S
acat
on)
Bas
sia
hyss
opifo
lia
Car
ex p
raeg
raci
lis
Alle
nrol
fea
occi
dent
alis
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
tride
ntat
a D
istic
hlis
spi
cata
C
repi
s ru
ncin
ata
Iva
axill
aris
118.
3 M
alve
lla le
pros
a A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s A
rgen
tina
anse
rina
Alle
nrol
fea
occi
dent
alis
A
stra
galu
sdi
vers
ifoliu
sE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s C
hrys
otha
mnu
s al
bidu
s
Koe
leria
mac
rant
ha
Ast
er p
auci
floru
s (S
yn)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
A
scle
pias
spec
iosa
P
oa fe
ndle
riana
R02
8AY0
24U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-14"
W
et
Sal
ine
Mea
dow
R
ange
, 0-2
%
3,00
0-6,
500
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
119.
3 C
astil
leja
min
iata
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Phl
ox h
oodi
i A
rena
ria fe
ndle
ri P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
A
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
Upl
and
Sto
ny
Loam
(Mou
ntai
nB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Cas
tille
jalin
ariif
olia
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ave
rage
, 11
-16
" R
ange
, 1-
50%
4,
300-
6,00
0 ft.
Cha
enac
tisdo
ugla
sii
R02
8AY
334U
T
120.
3
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-23
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
121.
3 no
dat
a E
lym
us
trach
ycau
lus
Pas
copy
rum
smith
i B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
028A
Y309
UT
122.
3 A
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
ssp.
ca
ndic
ans
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
isC
repi
sac
umin
ata
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Upl
and
Gra
velly
Lo
am(W
yom
ing
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Koe
leria
mac
rant
ha
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Poa
fend
leria
na
Ave
rage
, 12
-16
" R
ange
, 1-
30%
4,
400-
5,40
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
028A
Y30
7UT
123.
3 A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Phl
ox h
oodi
i A
rena
ria fe
ndle
ri P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
A
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
Upl
and
Sto
ny
Loam
(Mou
ntai
nB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Cas
tille
jalin
ariif
olia
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ave
rage
, 11
-16
" R
ange
, 1-
50%
4,
300-
6,00
0 ft.
Cha
enac
tisdo
ugla
sii
R02
8AY
334U
T
124.
3
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-24
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
125.
3 R
028A
Y025
UT
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
12
6.3
R02
8AY0
25U
T B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
127.
3 R
028A
Y332
UT
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
12
8.3
R02
8AY3
09U
T A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s H
espe
rost
ipa
com
ata
Leym
us c
iner
eus
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
129.
3 R
028A
Y312
UT
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
R04
7XA
308U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
17"
Upl
and
Loam
(B
asin
B
ig
Sag
ebru
sh)
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a ss
p.
ludo
vici
ana
Ran
ge,
4-70
%
4,80
0-7,
400
ft.P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-25
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
C
haen
actis
doug
lasi
i13
0.3
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
131.
3 R
047X
A46
0UT
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Oen
othe
ra
caes
pito
sa
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
R02
8AY
310U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
19"
Upl
and
Loam
(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Ran
ge,
0-30
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.13
2.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
Ave
rage
, 13
-19
" U
plan
d Lo
am
(Mou
ntai
nA
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
R
ange
, 0-
30%
4,
200-
6,50
0 ft.
R02
8AY3
10U
T
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-26
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
igS
ageb
rush
) E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s O
enot
hera
ca
espi
tosa
S
eed
Mix
20
08
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 13
3.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aO
enot
hera
ca
espi
tosa
P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
Lu
pinu
sca
udat
us
ssp.
ca
udat
usU
plan
d Lo
am
(Mou
ntai
nB
igS
ageb
rush
)
Poa
fend
leria
na
R02
8AY
310U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
19"
Ran
ge,
0-30
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
134.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Cre
pis
acum
inat
aA
mel
anch
ier u
tahe
nsis
A
stra
galu
sut
ahen
sis
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Cas
tille
jalin
ariif
olia
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a C
aloc
hortu
snu
dus
Upl
and
Sto
ny
Loam
(Sin
gle-
leaf
Pin
yon,
Uta
h Ju
nipe
r)
Eph
edra
neva
dens
is
Cre
pis
runc
inat
a P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
R02
8AY
338U
T A
vera
ge,
12-
16"
Ran
ge,
20-
60%
6,
200-
8,50
0 ft.
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
R
135.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nA
vera
ge,
13-
19"
Upl
and
Loam
(M
ount
ain
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Ran
ge,
0-30
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.R
028A
Y310
UT
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-27
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
igS
ageb
rush
) E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s O
enot
hera
ca
espi
tosa
S
eed
Mix
20
08
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 13
6.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Bal
sam
orhi
zasa
gitta
taA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Oen
othe
ra
caes
pito
sa
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Upl
and
Loam
(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Lupi
nus
caud
atus
ss
p.
caud
atus
Ave
rage
, 13
-19
" R
ange
, 0-
30%
4,
200-
6,50
0 ft.
R02
8AY
310U
T
137.
3
138.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
139.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Koe
leria
mac
rant
ha
Poa
fend
leria
na
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
028A
Y309
UT
140.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
R02
8AY
334U
T A
vera
ge,
11-
16"
Upl
and
Sto
ny
Loam
(Mou
ntai
nB
ig
Phl
ox h
oodi
i A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Ran
ge,
1-50
%
4,30
0-6,
000
ft.H
espe
rost
ipa
com
ata
Are
naria
fend
leri
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-28
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
S
ageb
rush
) A
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
Poa
fend
leria
na
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a C
astil
leja
linar
iifol
ia
Cha
enac
tisdo
ugla
sii
141.
4 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Cre
pis
acum
inat
aA
mel
anch
ier u
tahe
nsis
H
espe
rost
ipa
com
ata
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a C
astil
leja
linar
iifol
ia
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
Le
ymus
cin
ereu
s P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Cal
ocho
rtus
nudu
sU
plan
d S
tony
Lo
am(S
ingl
e-le
afP
inyo
n, U
tah
Juni
per)
Eph
edra
neva
dens
is
Cre
pis
runc
inat
a P
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
R02
8AY
338U
T A
vera
ge,
12-
16"
Ran
ge,
20-
60%
6,
200-
8,50
0 ft.
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
14
2.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ach
illea
mill
efol
ium
A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a ss
p.
ludo
vici
ana
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aP
ursh
ia tr
iden
tata
B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Upl
and
Loam
(B
asin
B
ig
Sag
ebru
sh)
Leym
us c
iner
eus
R04
7XA
308U
T A
vera
ge,
13-
17"
Ran
ge,
4-70
%
4,80
0-7,
400
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Cha
enac
tisdo
ugla
sii
143.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nA
vera
ge,
13-
17"
Upl
and
Loam
(B
asin
B
ig
Ely
mus
tra
chyc
aulu
s A
chill
eam
illef
oliu
m
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
R
ange
, 4-
70%
4,
800-
7,40
0 ft.
R04
7XA
308U
T
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-29
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
S
ageb
rush
) A
rtem
isia
ludo
vici
ana
ssp.
lu
dovi
cian
a
See
d M
ix
2008
P
asco
pyru
msm
ithi
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
sagi
ttata
Cha
enac
tisdo
ugla
sii
144.
3 U
plan
dG
rave
lly
Loam
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
)
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a ss
p.
cand
ican
s
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
is
Ave
rage
, 12
-16
" R
ange
, 1-
30%
4,
400-
5,40
0 ft.
Cre
pis
acum
inat
aR
028A
Y30
7UT
14
5.3
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
146.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
147.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
148.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
14
9.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
15
0.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nA
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
4,20
0-5,
00
ft.R
028A
Y004
UT
Ave
rage
, 5-8
" A
llium
text
ile
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 0-5
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-30
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
G
reas
ewoo
d)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
S
eed
Mix
20
08
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
K
oele
riam
acra
ntha
S
tanl
eya
pinn
ata
Poa
fend
leria
na
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 15
1.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
isP
hlox
hoo
dii
Are
naria
fend
leri
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a U
plan
d S
tony
Lo
am(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Cas
tille
jalin
ariif
olia
A
vera
ge,
11-
16"
Ran
ge,
1-50
%
4,30
0-6,
000
ft.C
haen
actis
doug
lasi
iR
028A
Y33
4UT
15
2.3
153.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
154.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
155.
3 R
028A
Y309
UT
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Koe
leria
mac
rant
ha
Poa
fend
leria
na
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
028A
Y309
UT
156.
3
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-31
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Phl
ox h
oodi
i A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Are
naria
fend
leri
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Koe
leria
mac
rant
ha
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a U
plan
d S
tony
Lo
am(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Cas
tille
jalin
ariif
olia
P
oa fe
ndle
riana
R02
8AY
334U
T A
vera
ge,
11-
16"
Ran
ge,
1-50
%
4,30
0-6,
000
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Cha
enac
tisdo
ugla
sii
157.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
isP
hlox
hoo
dii
Are
naria
fend
leri
Pur
shia
trid
enta
ta
Arte
mis
ialu
dovi
cian
a U
plan
d S
tony
Lo
am(M
ount
ain
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Cas
tille
jalin
ariif
olia
A
vera
ge,
11-
16"
Ran
ge,
1-50
%
4,30
0-6,
000
ft.R
028A
Y334
UT
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Cha
enac
tisdo
ugla
sii
158.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
15
9.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
16
0.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-32
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
16
1.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Alk
ali
Flat
(B
lack
G
reas
ewoo
d)
Poa
ne
vade
nsis
(S
yn)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
4,20
0-5,
00
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
16
2.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
lent
igin
osus
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
isC
rypt
anth
a hu
mili
s E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s E
phed
rane
vade
nsis
S
emid
eser
tS
hallo
w
Loam
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
)
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
P
ursh
ia m
exic
ana
Lom
atiu
m g
rayi
R
ange
, 10
-35
%
5,50
0-6,
200
ft.P
enst
emon
hum
ilis
R02
8AY2
43U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
16
3.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
164.
3 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nD
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 0-3
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-33
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
S
eed
Mix
20
08
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
165.
3 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
16
6.3
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
B
assi
a am
eric
ana
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
167.
3 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Alk
ali
Flat
(B
lack
G
reas
ewoo
d)
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
16
8.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nD
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
R02
8AY1
32U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 0-3
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-34
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
C
rypt
anth
a hu
mili
s S
eed
Mix
20
08
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a [s
ic]
Lepi
dium
perfo
liatu
m
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
[sic
]
169.
3 S
uaed
a m
oqui
nii
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
17
0.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Alk
ali
Flat
(B
lack
G
reas
ewoo
d)
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
17
1.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Cry
ptan
tha
hum
ilis
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a [s
ic]
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Lepi
dium
perfo
liatu
m
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
[sic
] D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
4,20
0-4,
800
ft.17
2.3
Sua
eda
moq
uini
i P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
R02
8AY1
32U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
R02
8AY1
32U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Flat
(s
hads
cale
)E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s R
ange
, 0-3
%
4,20
0-4,
800
ft.C
rypt
anth
a hu
mili
s B
assi
a am
eric
ana
[sic
]
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-35
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Le
pidi
umpe
rfolia
tum
K
ram
eria
lanc
eola
ta [s
ic]
173.
3 S
uaed
a m
oqui
nii
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
Alk
ali
Flat
(B
lack
G
reas
ewoo
d)
Pas
copy
rum
smith
ii
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a
174.
3 P
oase
cund
aB
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Cry
ptan
tha
affin
isS
emid
eser
tB
ould
ery
Loam
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
)
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Des
cura
inia
pi
nnat
aG
rayi
a sp
inos
a
R02
8AY2
08U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 10
-50
%
4,50
0-5,
500
ft.E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Tetra
dym
ia s
pino
sa
175.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
176.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nD
eser
t Lo
am
(sha
dsca
le)
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s 4,
200-
6,50
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 0-6
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-36
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
See
d M
ix
2008
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a E
riger
on p
umilu
s P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
17
7.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ara
bis
holb
oelli
i A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Cry
ptan
tha
hum
ilis
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
S
emid
eser
tG
rave
lly
Loam
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
)
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
Li
nant
hus
pung
ens
Ave
rage
, 9-
13%
R
ange
, 2-
15%
4,
400-
6,50
0 ft.
R02
8AY
215U
T 17
8.3
Phl
ox h
oodi
i B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ara
bis
holb
oelli
i A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Cry
ptan
tha
hum
ilis
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
S
emid
eser
tG
rave
lly
Loam
(Wyo
min
g B
igS
ageb
rush
)
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
Li
nant
hus
pung
ens
Ran
ge,
2-15
%
4,40
0-6,
500
ft.A
vera
ge,
9-13
%
R02
8AY
215U
T 17
9.3
Phl
ox h
oodi
i B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
R02
8AY
215U
T A
vera
ge,
9-13
%
Sem
ides
ert
Gra
velly
Lo
am(W
yom
ing
Big
Sag
ebru
sh)
Ara
bis
holb
oelli
i A
rtem
isia
tri
dent
ata
ssp.
w
yom
inge
nsis
Cry
ptan
tha
hum
ilis
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 2-
15%
4,
400-
6,50
0 ft.
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-37
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Li
nant
hus
pung
ens
180.
3 P
hlox
hoo
dii
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
181.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
182.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
183.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nD
eser
t Lo
am
(sha
dsca
le)
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s 4,
200-
6,50
0 ft.
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 0-6
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-38
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
See
d M
ix
2008
K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
184.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Alk
ali
Flat
(B
lack
G
reas
ewoo
d)
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
18
5.3
Sta
nley
a pi
nnat
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
186.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
187.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nD
eser
t Lo
am
(sha
dsca
le)
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s 4,
200-
6,50
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 0-6
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-39
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
H
espe
rost
ipa
com
ata
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
S
eed
Mix
20
08
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
188.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
lent
igin
osus
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Bal
sam
orhi
zaho
oker
iE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Ipom
opsi
sco
nges
ta
ssp.
co
nges
ta
Sem
ides
ert
Sha
llow
Lo
am
(Bla
ck
Sag
ebru
sh)
Ran
ge,
5-45
%
4,50
0-6,
700
ft.R
028A
Y236
UT
Ave
rage
, 8-1
2"
189.
3 P
acke
ra c
ana
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aE
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
190.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
lent
igin
osus
Sem
ides
ert
Sha
llow
Lo
am
(Bla
ck
Sag
ebru
sh)
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
R02
8AY2
36U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 5-
45%
4,
500-
6,70
0 ft.
Bal
sam
orhi
zaho
oker
iE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-40
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Ipom
opsi
sco
nges
ta
ssp.
co
nges
ta
R19
1.3
Pac
kera
can
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aE
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
R19
2.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
lent
igin
osus
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Bal
sam
orhi
zaho
oker
iE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Ipom
opsi
sco
nges
ta
ssp.
co
nges
ta
Sem
ides
ert
Sha
llow
Lo
am
(Bla
ck
Sag
ebru
sh)
Ran
ge,
5-45
%
4,50
0-6,
700
ft.R
193.
3 R
028A
Y236
UT
Ave
rage
, 8-1
2"
Pac
kera
can
a B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nD
eser
t Lo
am
(sha
dsca
le)
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s 4,
200-
6,50
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
R
ange
, 0-6
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-41
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
See
d M
ix
2008
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
R19
4.3
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
D
eser
t Lo
am
(sha
dsca
le)
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-6%
R
195.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
iiK
ram
eria
lanc
eola
taD
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
R
196.
3 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
R19
7.3
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-42
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
D
eser
t Lo
am
(sha
dsca
le)
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-6%
R
198.
3 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R19
9.3
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R
028A
Y119
UT
Ave
rage
, 5-8
" R
ange
, 0-3
%
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R20
0.3
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R
028A
Y119
UT
Ave
rage
, 5-8
" R
ange
, 0-3
%
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
Poa
sec
unda
K
ram
eria
lanc
eola
ta
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-43
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
R20
1.3
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
lent
igin
osus
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
isLe
pidi
umpe
rfolia
tum
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
P
oa s
ecun
da
Sem
ides
ert
Alk
ali
Loam
(B
lack
G
reas
ewoo
d)
Sym
phyo
trich
um
chile
nse
var.
chile
nse
4,25
0-5,
800
ft.R
202.
3 R
028A
Y202
UT
Ave
rage
, 8-1
2"
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
lent
igin
osus
Arte
mis
ia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
isLe
pidi
umpe
rfolia
tum
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
S
emid
eser
tA
lkal
i Lo
am
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sym
phyo
trich
um
chile
nse
var.
chile
nse
4,25
0-5,
800
ft.R
203.
3 R
028A
Y202
UT
Ave
rage
, 8-1
2"
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
iiK
ram
eria
lanc
eola
taD
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
R
028A
Y119
UT
Ave
rage
, 5-8
" R
ange
, 0-3
%
4,20
0-4,
800
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
R20
4.3
Pic
roth
amnu
sde
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
emid
eser
tS
tony
Lo
am
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sR
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
A
rtem
isia
nov
a
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-44
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
See
d M
ix
2008
A
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
205.
3 P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
206.
1 P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a R
207.
1 P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
205.
6 P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
R
028A
Y252
UT
Ave
rage
, 8-1
2"
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-45
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
206.
6 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
20
7.6
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
208.
6 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a D
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
R
028A
Y119
UT
Ave
rage
, 5-8
" R
ange
, 0-3
%
4,20
0-4,
800
ft.P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
iiK
ram
eria
lanc
eola
ta
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-46
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
209.
6 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 21
0.6
Phl
ox h
oodi
i K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 21
1.6
Phl
ox h
oodi
i K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Pse
udor
oegn
eria
sp
icat
a 21
2.6
Phl
ox h
oodi
i K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sS
emid
eser
tS
tony
Lo
am
(Bla
ck
sage
brus
h)
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Bal
sam
orhi
zaho
oker
iE
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
tripl
exco
nfer
tifol
ia
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-47
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
ii E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
213.
6 P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
E
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Chr
ysot
ham
nus
visc
idifl
orus
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
R21
4.6
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s P
hlox
hoo
dii
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
ia la
nata
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
R
215.
6 S
tanl
eya
pinn
ata
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
R
216.
6 S
tanl
eya
pinn
ata
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Alli
um te
xtile
A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
A
lkal
i Fl
at
(Bla
ck
Gre
asew
ood)
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Sar
coba
tus
verm
icul
atus
4,
200-
5,00
ft.
R02
8AY0
04U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-5%
R
217.
6 S
tanl
eya
pinn
ata
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
Des
ert
Flat
(s
hads
cale
) A
chna
ther
umhy
men
oide
s S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
4,20
0-4,
800
ft.R
028A
Y119
UT
Ave
rage
, 5-8
" A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-48
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
S
eed
Mix
20
08
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a
Kra
mer
ia la
nceo
lata
R21
8.6
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
iiK
ram
eria
lanc
eola
taD
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
R
219.
6 P
icro
tham
nus
dese
rtoru
m
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
R22
0.6
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
D
eser
t Lo
am
(sha
dsca
le)
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
R22
1.6
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-6%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-49
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Prec
ipita
tion
(Ann
ual)
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Atri
plex
con
ferti
folia
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Bas
sia
amer
ican
a P
leur
aphi
sja
mes
iiK
ram
eria
lanc
eola
taD
eser
t Fl
at
(sha
dsca
le)
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
4,
200-
4,80
0 ft.
R02
8AY1
19U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Ran
ge, 0
-3%
22
2.5
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.S
phae
ralc
eaco
ccin
ea
223.
5 B
LM
Fire
P
reve
ntio
nS
eed
Mix
20
08
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
caly
cosu
s A
tripl
ex c
onfe
rtifo
lia
Erio
gonu
mov
alifo
lium
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
Ple
urap
his
jam
esii
Erig
eron
pum
ilus
Pic
roth
amnu
s de
serto
rum
R02
8AY1
24U
T A
vera
ge, 5
-8"
Des
ert
Loam
(s
hads
cale
) R
ange
, 0-6
%
4,20
0-6,
500
ft.P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Sph
aera
lcea
cocc
inea
22
4.5
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ast
raga
lus
utah
ensi
sA
rtem
isia
nov
a B
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Sem
ides
ert
Sto
ny
Loam
(B
lack
sa
gebr
ush)
Ely
mus
ely
moi
des
Atri
plex
conf
ertif
olia
R
ange
, 2-
30%
4,
900-
5,70
0 ft.
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aE
riogo
num
oval
ifoliu
m
R02
8AY2
52U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-50
DR
AFT
RE
STO
RA
TIO
N A
ND
RE
VE
GE
TATI
ON
PLA
N
RU
BY
PIP
ELI
NE
PR
OJE
CT
UTA
H
Oct
ober
200
9 B
-51
Tabl
e A
-1 U
tah
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n (A
nnua
l) Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant F
orb
Dom
inan
t Shr
ub
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
225.
5 P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Phl
ox h
oodi
i K
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
R02
8AY2
32U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
Sem
ides
ert
Sha
llow
H
ardp
an(U
tah
Juni
per)
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Ant
enna
riam
icro
phyl
la
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Ran
ge,
3-15
%
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s A
stra
galu
sle
ntig
inos
usC
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aB
alsa
mor
hiza
hook
eri
Eph
edra
neva
dens
is
226.
5 P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Ipom
opsi
sco
nges
ta
ssp.
co
nges
taK
rasc
heni
nnik
ovia
lana
ta
R02
8AY2
32U
T A
vera
ge, 8
-12"
Sem
ides
ert
Sha
llow
H
ardp
an(U
tah
Juni
per)
Ach
nath
erum
hym
enoi
des
Arte
mis
ia n
ova
Ran
ge,
3-15
%
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
BLM
Fi
re
Pre
vent
ion
See
d M
ix
2008
E
lym
us e
lym
oide
s C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Hes
pero
stip
aco
mat
aE
phed
rane
vade
nsis
227.
5 P
seud
oroe
gner
ia
spic
ata
Kra
sche
ninn
ikov
iala
nata
Draft Restoration and
Revegetation Plan: Nevada
FERC Docket No. CP09-54-000
October 2009
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Purpose .................................................................................. 2-1
3.0 Goals and Objectives ............................................................ 3-1
4.0 Restoration Schedule ............................................................ 4-1
5.0 Restoration Planning Process .............................................. 5-15.1 Restoration Study Plots ............................................................................. 5-15.2 Restoration Approach ................................................................................ 5-1
5.2.1 Pre-Restoration Activities ............................................................... 5-25.2.2 ROW, Extra Workspace, and Access Road Restoration ................ 5-35.2.3 Revegetation .................................................................................. 5-6
5.3 Reclamation Treatment for Erodible Soils ................................................ 5-21
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance ........................... 6-16.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria ............................................................ 6-26.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance ............................................................ 6-36.3 Reporting ................................................................................................... 6-3
7.0 Off-highway Vehicle Control ................................................. 7-1
8.0 Livestock and Wild Horse Grazing Control ......................... 8-1
9.0 References ............................................................................. 9-1
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Nevada ............................... A-1
List of Tables
October 2009 i
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table Page
Table 5.2-1 Shadscale Seed Mix .................................................................................. 5-8Table 5.2-2 Black Greasewood/Shadescale Seed Mix ................................................. 5-9Table 5.2-3 Wyoming Big Sagebrush Seed Mix ........................................................... 5-9Table 5.2-4 Fuel Break Seed Mix ................................................................................ 5-10Table 5.2-5 Wyoming Big Sagebrush Seed Mix ......................................................... 5-11Table 5.2-6 Salt-Desert Shrub .................................................................................... 5-12Table 5.2-7 Low Sagebrush ........................................................................................ 5-12Table 5.2-8 Jakes Creek Allotment (West End of “Midas Road” to “Kelly
Creek Road”) – Salt Desert Vegetation Type........................................... 5-13Table 5.2-9 Little Humboldt and Squaw Valley Allotments Area – Kelly
Creek Road to Summit Creek South of Midas ......................................... 5-14Table 5.2-10 Squaw Valley Allotment Area – Summit Creek (South of
Midas) to Ivanhoe Creek .......................................................................... 5-15Table 5.2-11 Squaw Valley Allotment area – Ivanhoe Creek to Tuscarora
Allotment Boundary at Willow Creek ........................................................ 5-16Table 5.2-12 Low Sagebrush Vegetation Type – Gray Low Sagebrush
(Artemesia arbuscula arbuscula) or Early Low Sagebrush (Artemesia arbuscula longiloba) Seed Collected Locally* ........................ 5-17
Table 5.2-13 Big Sagebrush – Bitterbrush Vegetation Type (Willow Creek area starting west on Tuscarora Allotment/Private Lands) – Primarily Loamy 10-12 PZ. Eco Site (with other eco sites as associated sites) ...................................................................................... 5-19
Table A-1 Elko District Office Ecological Sites ..................................................................... A-1Table A-2 Winnemucca District Office Ecological Sites ..................................................... A-36Table A-3 Surprise Field Office Ecological Sites................................................................ A-71
October 2009 ii
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route for Nevada ......................................................... 1-2
October 2009 iii
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
October 2009 iv
Acronyms and Abbreviations
BLM Bureau of Land Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement EDO Elko District Office EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission MP milepost NDEP Nevada Division of Environmental Protection NDOW Nevada Department of Wildlife NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NRCS National Resource Conservation Service OHV off-highway vehicle POD Plan of Development Plan Restoration and Revegetation Plan Project Ruby Pipeline Project ROW right-of-way Ruby Ruby Pipeline, LLC SFO Surprise Field Office USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service WDO Winnemucca District Office
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
1.0 Introduction
The Ruby Pipeline Project (Project), proposed by Ruby Pipeline, LLC (Ruby), is composed of approximately 675.2 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas pipeline, along with associated compression and measurement facilities, located between Opal, Wyoming and Malin, Oregon (Figure 1). The Project would include an approximate 2.6-mile lateral to be constructed in Klamath County, Oregon. Four new compressor stations would also be installed as part of the Project. Ruby would utilize a 115-foot wide construction right-of-way (ROW) for installation of both the mainline and the lateral, and the final ROW width is 50 feet. The ROW will cross through four states: Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon. A reclamation plan (Plan) is being developed for each state the Project crosses. This Plan is for Nevada.
In addition to the pipeline ROW, the Project will require temporary extra workspaces and access roads to the ROW (See the Plan of Development [POD]). Extra workspaces are required for the crossings of waterbodies, roads, railroads, and other utilities; terrain constraints; and staging areas. The Project will use existing public and private roads to access the pipeline ROW and extra workspaces. There are no plans for the construction of new access roads in Nevada. However, some existing roads will be widened to 30 feet and/or upgraded to accommodate heavy construction equipment. Some road sections may require extra grading to allow for adequate turning radius. All temporary road impacts will be reclaimed and seeded.
Nevada federal lands that will be crossed include Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Elko and Winnemucca District Offices (EDO and WDO); and the Surprise Field Office (SFO), California (Project lands are located in Nevada but managed by the SFO). The focus of this Plan is public lands. The Plan will also be applicable to privately owned lands pending approval by landowners.
The Project organized a technical team to provide input for the Nevada Plan. Team members are reclamation specialists from the BLM Winnemucca District, Elko District, and Cedarville Field Office, as well as the Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW). Team members reviewed this Plan, provided important reclamation guidance, and recommended appropriate revegetation seed mixes.
October 2009 1-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route for Nevada
October 2009 1-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
October 2009 1-3
This Plan utilizes reclamation methods developed for other large-diameter pipeline projects that were approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (Dames and Moore 1990; Ecology & Environment, Inc. 2002). Ruby incorporated into the Plan recent technical standards and published long-term restoration monitoring information associated with similar habitats (Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2002). The Plan also incorporates Ruby’s Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan and Noxious and Invasive Weed Control Plan (POD Appendices D and H, respectively).
The BLM POD for the Project includes specifics regarding pipeline construction and clean-up procedures. This plan also incorporates additional landowner or other land management agency requirements, as well as any special conditions or recommendations of FERC as it completes its environmental review and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
2.0 Purpose
The Plan describes the processes and measures that will be implemented following construction to mitigate impacts from the Project in Elko, Humboldt, and Washoe counties. This Plan is applicable to the ROW, extra workspace, and sections of access roads that require reclamation. No eligible or unevaluated cultural sites would be disturbed during reclamation without a data recovery (mitigation) plan. Revegetation criteria standards are presented to judge plant establishment success. The Plan does not address Ruby’s compensatory or off-site mitigation efforts, as they will be fully described in a separate plan.
The purpose of the Plan is to provide guidance for reclaiming lands disturbed by pipeline construction. The Project ROW in Nevada is 357.4 miles, which translates to approximately 4,962 acres with a 115-foot ROW (See POD). Extra workspace would disturb approximately 1,214 acres. Access roads would disturb approximately 1,407 acres.
October 2009 2-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
3.0 Goals and Objectives
The short-term goal of pipeline reclamation is to stabilize soils by recontouring terrain, spreading stockpiled topsoil, strategically placing erosion control devices, establishing temporary vegetation cover, and abating noxious and invasive weed establishment. ROW reclamation would be initiated within 20 days after pipeline trench closure and final cleanup. The ROW would be recontoured to blend with adjacent undisturbed terrain. Erosion control devices such as water bars and/or certified weed-free straw bales or wattles would be strategically placed to limit and/or direct overland water flow. Herbicide control of noxious or invasive weeds may be necessary following BLM regulations and timing.
The long-term reclamation goal is to establish a permanent vegetation cover with similar species densities and compositions of adjacent undisturbed lands in accordance with 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 380.15 and FERC guidelines. Establishment of a perennial plant cover is essential to provide resiliency to resist invasive annual grasses and forbs. This long-term goal would be achieved through maintaining or adding new or existing erosion control devices, providing continuing noxious weed abatement, minimizing livestock and wild horse/burro grazing, minimizing off-highway vehicle (OHV) travel, and implementing a monitoring program. Long-term restoration efforts would be deemed complete with successful establishment of the perennial plant cover. Determination of ROW restoration success would rest with the BLM on public lands and landowners on private lands.
Ruby would employ the following restoration measures to meet short- and long-term goals. � Brush hog the ROW in sufficient time prior to pipeline construction to limit migratory
bird nesting in accordance with the Ruby Pipeline Voluntary Conservation Measures for migratory birds.
� Pre-treat the ROW with approved herbicides in applicable areas for noxious and invasive weeds prior to pipeline construction.
� Use proper soil management techniques, including stripping, stockpiling, and reapplying topsoil to establish surface conditions that would enhance development of diverse, stable, and self-generating plant communities. Topsoil management will apply to the ditchline and spoilside areas.
� In areas where surface rock will hinder reseeding, remove rocks greater than 10 inches in diameter to a depth of 12 inches to create a suitable seed bed. In some areas soil and/or certified weed free mulch will be brought in to supplement existing, limited soils.
October 2009 3-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
October 2009 3-2
� Establish stable surface and drainage conditions and the use of erosion control devices should minimize soil erosion and sedimentation.
� Re-establish terrain compatible with the surrounding landscape. � Use native plant species for revegetation unless it is determined that: (1) suitable
native species are not available; (2) the natural biological diversity of the proposed action would not be diminished; (3) exotic and naturalized species can be confined within the proposed management area; (4) analysis of the site indicates that native species are unable to compete with invasive weeds;
� All seeds used are approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); � No seeds from plants that are listed as noxious or invasive weeds by states or on the
USDA federal list (PLANTS website) will be planted. � Use monitoring during the construction and operational phases to ensure the
achievement of both short-term and long-term restoration goals and objectives. � Minimize construction impacts along the route by, where practical and safe, limiting
ROW width to avoid impacts to native vegetation; and sage-grouse leks and pygmy rabbit habitat.
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
4.0 Restoration Schedule
The Project is scheduled to begin late first quarter or early second quarter 2010 after finalization of the NEPA process, anticipated for November 2009. The FERC Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and the BLM Record of Decision on the selected route must be finalized before construction begins. The POD presents specifics on construction procedures and timing. Pipeline construction will take approximately one year after initiation, and restoration on a given pipeline segment will be initiated within 20 days after trench closure and final cleanup.
Restoration will include cleanup, backfilling, surface grading, topsoiling, installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and establishing a perennial plant cover. Areas that will not be seeded with native plants within 14 days because of seasonal limitations, slopes greater than 10 percent, erosive soils, or aesthetically sensitive areas will be seeded with a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass immediately after seedbed preparation, in accordance with BLM field office policy; landowner approval would be obtained for private lands. The seeding or transplanting of native plants to establish the permanent vegetation cover will occur during late fall to early winter to take advantage of winter and spring precipitation (Monsen 2000, 2005; Plummer 1977). The temporary plant cover will be incorporated into the soil before the permanent plant cover is seeded.
October 2009 4-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
5.0 Restoration Planning Process
The restoration process includes steps to satisfy the short- and long-term goals described in Section 3. The Plan incorporates lesson learned from the Kern Expansion Project restoration effort (Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2002, 2007) and the experiences of subject-matter experts in arid and semi-arid land restoration (Plummer 1977; Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Wallace et al. 1980; Monsen 2000, 2005; EDAW 2002; Monsen et al. 2004; and Sheley et al. 2008). Considerable information is available through BLM’s Great Basin Restoration Initiative projects (BLM 1999, 2000).
The Nevada Guidelines for Revegetation present revegetation standards for planning, conservation, and plant selection (Nevada State Clearinghouse 1998). The goal of revegetation is to return the land to conditions and productive uses similar to pre-disturbance conditions or to a desired site-specific plant community. The use of local seed and plant material sources is encouraged. This restoration plan adheres to the Nevada Guidelines.
In addition, the SFO, under BLM California revegetation policy, calls for the use of local sources of native seed and plant materials, to the greatest extent possible (BLM 2001).
5.1 Restoration Study Plots The Project will establish restoration study plots in Nevada to identify ways to improve the chances of vegetation establishment in sagebrush-steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation. These vegetation types can be challenging because of limited and unpredictable precipitation and competition from invasive annual weeds (Monsen 2000). Plant establishment in areas treated with herbicides to eliminate invasive annual weeds and areas with less than eight inches of annual precipitation will be recorded. Furthermore, different seeding mixes with varying strategies for establishment will be studied. Potential areas for study plots are Elko County and the area near the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge in Nevada.
5.2 Restoration Approach This Plan is applicable to the ROWs, extra workspaces, and access roads in Nevada, and reference to the ROW restoration includes extra workspaces and access roads. Measures implemented to ensure successful restoration include topsoil and subsoil segregation and stockpiling during construction, cleanup, backfilling, appropriate surface re-contouring, soil erosion control, seedbed preparation, application of ecological site-specific seed mixes, plant establishment, weed abatement, and monitoring. Plants will be established mainly by seed from local sources. Container-grown plants will be transplanted in locations such as key
October 2009 5-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
sage-grouse and pygmy rabbit habitats where successful establishment may be expected (i.e., ecological sites with greater than 10 inches of annual precipitation and soils deeper than six inches). Shrub seeds will be purchased from commercial vendors or collected from local seed sources. Shrubs to be grown in containers for transplanting in appropriate sites include shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry. ROW alignments will be given uneven edges by either leaving shrubs in place when clearing or planting shrub groupings after cleanup. 5.2.1 Pre-Restoration Activities Initial construction activities include surveying and staking the ROW, brush hogging the ROW in non-surface rock areas, topsoil stockpiling, grading for safe construction passage, trenching, and pipeline alignment, as described in the POD. Dense stands of noxious and invasive weeds will be treated with an approved herbicide prior to vegetation clearing occurs, in accordance with Ruby’s Noxious Weed Control Plan (Appendix H, POD). ROW surveying and staking will identify the width of excavation and blade work, including cut and fill locations.
ROW brush hogging will occur in sufficient time to limit migratory bird nesting, in accordance with the Voluntary Conservation Measures for migratory birds. Brush hogging will remove aboveground vegetation without disturbing root systems and limited topsoil resources (Watson October 9, 2009). Many grasses, forbs, and shrubs (but not sagebrush taxa) will root sprout after pipeline construction is completed. This procedure should facilitate ROW restoration and revegetation.
Topsoil will be stockpiled from the ditchline and spoilside areas. Surface soil thickness will vary throughout the ROW, depending on soil type. Environmental inspectors will identify surface soil thickness for removal and stockpiling, where applicable. Surface soil containing the seed reservoir and existing vegetation will be scraped and stored along the ROW. The topsoil/vegetation mixture will not be mixed with underlying subsoil horizons. Certified weed-free erosion control blankets and/or weed-free straw bales will be used to limit erosion as needed. Surface soil and sub-surface soils will be replaced in the proper order during backfilling and final grading operations.
Surface rocks, where present and where useful for restoration, will be windrowed adjacent to the topsoil stockpile. In some areas, significant surface rock will limit the effectives of drill and broadcast seeding. Surface rocks in areas larger than 10 inches in diameter will be removed to a depth of 12 inches to create suitable seedbed for seeding and plant establishment. Salvaged surface rock will be redistributed on the ROW in size, density, and distribution similarly to adjacent areas not disturbed by construction. Subsurface rock will be separated from the subsoil. Salvaged rock will be used to re-create rock outcrops and rock
October 2009 5-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
faces, to the greatest extent possible. Salvaged rock will also be used as an OHV travel deterrent, if requested by BLM. Excessive rock excavated on BLM or agricultural lands and not used for restoration purposes will be removed and disposed of at approved locations.
During construction, all vehicle travel and equipment operation will be within the ROW or on approved access roads. Cross-country vehicle travel outside the ROW or on non-approved, access roads will not be allowed. 5.2.2 ROW, Extra Workspace, and Access Road Restoration Restoration of the ROW will involve backfilling to the excavated ditchline, replacing stockpiled subsoils and the topsoil/vegetation mixture, restoring pre-existing terrain contours, installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. ROW restoration will begin within 20 days after pipeline trench closure and final cleanup. In visually sensitive areas, the ROW will be given an uneven edge either by leaving shrubs and/or trees in place when clearing or randomly seeding and/or planting clumps of shrubs along the ROW perimeter.
Extra workspace restoration will follow similar steps as ROW restoration including contouring, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. Extra workspace restoration will commence within a few days after the area is no longer needed.
Access roads will be reclaimed according to landowner directions. BLM and NDOW have requested that all improved roads on public lands be returned to their original status after they are no longer needed. Access road restoration will include grading, preparing the seed bed, and seeding. Road restoration will begin within a few days after the road is no longer needed. Backfilling Backfilling of subsoil materials will be required after the pipeline is aligned in the trench and padded with screened subsoil or other appropriate materials. The excavated subsoils will be used to backfill the trench. Excessive ditch spoil will be feathered and blended across the construction corridor, creating a roughened surface to capture precipitation, decrease erosion, and provide safe sites for plant establishment. Compacted Soils Compacted soils would typically be associated with the ROW travel lane, pipe laydown locations, and access roads. Subsoil de-compaction will occur as necessary to reduce soil bulk density. Identified locations will be de-compacted to a minimum depth of 6-12 inches prior to surface soil replacement. “Soil ripping” will be used along contours to minimize soil
October 2009 5-3
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
erosion and facilitate soil-water retention to aid revegetation. Extra workspace and access roads will also be ripped as needed to reduce soil compaction. Terrain Contouring The ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads will be contoured to blend in with the surrounding landscape. Contouring will emphasize restoration of existing drainage and landform patterns, to the greatest extent practicable.
Topsoil/Vegetation Mixture Replacement The stockpiled topsoil/vegetation mixture will be re-spread over the trench and spoilpile area after re-contouring is completed. The topsoil/vegetation mixture will provide seeds, vegetative propagules, and soil microbiota to facilitate vegetation establishment on the ROW.
In areas where significant surface rock may limit the effectiveness of drill and broadcast seeding, rocks greater than 10 inches in diameter will be removed to a depth of at least 12 inches and windrowed along the ROW, to create a seedbed suitable for seeding. In addition, topsoil and/or certified weed-free mulch may be brought in to supplement the local soil. The supplemental topsoil would be sourced from an areas approved by BLM or the landowner, as appropriate. MulchA mulch cover minimizes soil erosion, conserves soil moisture, and moderates surface temperatures to improve the chances of seedling establishment (Sheley et al. 2008). BLM has requested that crimped straw mulch not be used for restoration purposes. However, to protect erodible soils, limited mulching materials such as certified weed-free straw, woodchips, soil tackifiers, and fabrics may be needed in localized areas. These materials would be used with BLM or landowner approval.
Soil Erosion Control Soil erosion control can occur through establishing desirable vegetation, mulch, soil tackifiers, or water control devices (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Sheley et al. 2008). The Project will establish a desirable plant cover as quickly as possible after pipeline construction, according to directions by the Nevada BLM or landowner, to minimize soil erosion. Mulch, erosion control blankets, certified weed-free straw bales and wattles, soil tackifiers, and/or water bars may also be used as appropriate. Water bars will likely be the main approach for controlling soil erosion because they are effective and cost efficient. All organic mulches, blankets, and wattles will be certified weed-free by the appropriate state agency or BLM.
October 2009 5-4
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Water bars or slope breakers are earth-berms established to control the flow of surface water (University of Minnesota Extension 1998). Water bars will be installed in all areas, except agricultural and pasture land and lawns, using spacing recommendations obtained from the local soil conservation authority or land management agency. In the absence of recommendations, Ruby will use the minimum spacing requirements outlined Ruby’s Upland Erosion Control and Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan (POD Appendix D). Additionally, permanent water bars may extend slightly (about four feet) beyond the edge of the construction ROW to effectively drain water away from the disturbed area. Where slope breakers extend beyond the edge of the construction ROW, they are subject to compliance with all applicable survey requirements.
Water bars will consist of a one-foot-high berm with an upslope swale. Water bars will be reseeded. Water bars will be gently angled downslope to divert stormwater runoff to a stable upland discharge point or to a “j” hook created at the outfall point. The purposes of water bars are to:
� Decrease overland water velocities on disturbed lands by reducing slope lengths; � Remove water from the disturbed area in a controlled manner and at frequent
intervals to reduce its erosive power; � Direct water into a stabilized location to minimize surface scour; � Maximize water infiltration along the Project ROW; and, � Slow water flow across the ROW to help maintain soil moisture for restoration efforts.
Noxious and Invasive Weed Abatement Noxious and invasive weeds may reduce the success of ROW revegetation through competition for water, soil nutrients, space, and sunlight (Monsen 2000). Field crews have identified areas where noxious and invasive weeds occur within the ROW and abatement measures (see POD Appendix H). Biological Soil Crusts and Playas Biological soil crusts and playas occur in sagebrush steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation types. Biological soil crust stabilize soil surfaces on arid landscapes, conserve soil water, discourage annual weed growth, improve soil organic matter, and facilitate nutrient cycling (Belnap 2000; Belnap et al. 2001).
The highest concentration of biologic crusts are on silt loam or very fine sandy loam soil textures and occur in the Wyoming big sagebrush and shadscale plant communities. The Winnemucca BLM District has developed a map showing potential (low, moderate, high) for biological crust occurrence. These locations are general, but should help in biological crust conservation. Ruby will determine if EDO and SFO also have maps of biological soil crust occurrence in their lands. Brush hogging the ROW will facilitate the recovery of biological
October 2009 5-5
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
soil crusts because topsoils will not be removed and stockpiled except for the ditchline and spoilside areas.
Playas are the lower parts of desert drainage basins that periodically hold alkaline and brine water washed in from surrounding terrain. Vegetation surrounding plays is adapted to growing in alkaline and saline soils. Playas are unique land forms that may require the use of soil amendments for restoration.
Playas will be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Also, the majority of pipeline construction will occur in the early summer to late fall timeframe, which should help minimize the chance of crossing playas when significant water is present. All playas that are disturbed will be returned to their preconstruction condition, to the greatest extent practicable. Ruby would segregate and store any impermeable soil layer from the top soil (or surface soil) if it is determined that caliche or an impermeable soil layer is present and important in the surface hydrology of the playa. Playas would remain barren of vegetation, as a line of vegetation would distract from the natural playa condition.
The approach to playa restoration will also apply to spring and seep areas to prevent infiltration of subsurface water into the pipeline trench. 5.2.3 Revegetation Vegetation types within the ROW vary according to soil types, topography, climatic conditions, and land management practices. Several seeding mixes are necessary to accommodate the range of variability in soils, elevation, terrain, and annual precipitation (Sheley et al. 2008). Plants will be re-established by seeding and by planting container-grown plants. The different mixes of species for seeding and transplanting were developed with input from the WDO, EDO, SFO, and NDOW and individual landowners. Analysis of ecological sites along the ROW also informed the development of seeding mixes and appropriate locations for their application (Appendix A).
Seeding will be the main method of reestablishing plants within the ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads. Container-grown plants will be used to re-establish important shrubs such as low or little sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry in specific critical habitat areas agreed upon by Ruby and the BLM. Reference to seeding mixes also includes container-grown plants, as appropriate.
Seeds for the seeding mixes will be purchased from commercial vendors or collected by professional seed collectors following BLM seed collecting policy. Seed sources will be from the ROW, immediately adjacent to the ROW, or similar ecological sites, where possble. Ecotypic variation within species is important for successful plant establishment (Plummer
October 2009 5-6
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
1977; Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978). Commercially available seed will be purchased to provide the remaining seed requirements and will be from ecological sites similar to the ROW. BLM will be informed of commercially available seed sources and any major changes to the seed mixes will be communicated to BLM, NDOW and individual landowners.
Other resources to help define the seed mixes include the USDA-NRCS Plants Database (http://plants.usda.gov) and VegSpec (http://vegspec.nrcs.usda.gov/vegSpec/index.jsp), which is a decision support system that assists in planning and designing revegetation projects (Sheley et al. 2008).
The proposed seed mixtures were designed to be compatible with the dominant vegetation and land uses currently found along the ROW. The criteria used for selecting the seed mixes were based on the following:
� Erosion-control capability; � Plant dominance of surrounding vegetation; � Land use; � Availability of seed; � Wildlife habitat value; � Livestock management; and � Restoration of traditional food and medicine gathered by Native Americans.
Seeds will be tested for purity and viability, and certified as weed free to ensure compliance with local, state, and federal seed requirements (Monsen 2000).
Seedbed Preparation and Seed Mix Seedbed preparation will consist of recontouring, decompacting, and restoring surface soil as described in Section 5.2.2. The soil surface will be worked with heavy equipment to create a roughened surface (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978, Monsen 2000, 2005, Sheley et al. 2008). The roughened soil surface will facilitate the collection of precipitation to enhance soil water percolation, reduce erosion, and provide safe sites for seedling establishment. The seedbed will be firm but not compacted, nor will it have a crusted surface.
The pipeline will cross sagebrush-steppe vegetation, salt-desert shrub, pinion-juniper riparian/wetland, and agricultural vegetation types. Native seeds mixes will be used to restore vegetation on public lands to the extent possible and according to BLM field office policy. The seed mix for private lands will be based on previous or adjacent land uses and approved by the landowner. Vegetative propagules will be used to reestablish plants in riparian and wetland areas. All seed mixes will be approved by BLM and NDOW or private landowners on their respective lands.
October 2009 5-7
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Re-establishing vegetation in arid and semi-arid sagebrush-steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation types can be challenging because of unpredictable precipitation and noxious or invasive weed competition (Monsen 2000). Proper seedbed preparation, mulch, adapted seed mix, mycorrhizal fungi inoculation, and weed abatement are all ways to improve the chances of successful plant establishment (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Monsen 2000, 2005; Plummer 1977; Sheley et al. 2008).
Tables 5.2-1 through 5.2-4 present the seed mixes provided by the BLM WDO for use on public lands under its jurisdiction (these mixes are still under discussion with the WDO and therefore are only partially complete as of this draft 10.30.09).
Table 5.2-1 Shadscale Seed Mix
Species PLS LBS/Acre Bulk LBS/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 3.00 5.00 4Fourwing saltbush 3.00 5.00 4Shadscale 1.0Slender wheatgrass 1.00 1.25 4Indian ricegrass 1.00 1.25 4Bottlebrush squirreltail 0.5Western Yarrow 0.5Gooseberry leaf
Globemallow 10.0 Totals
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-8
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-2 Black Greasewood/Shadescale Seed Mix
Species PLS LBS/Acre Bulk LBS/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 2.0Four-wing saltbush 2.0Shadscale 2.0Black greasewood 2.0Indian ricegrass 2.0Bottlebrush squirreltail 0.5Western yarrow 0.5Gooseberry leaf mallow
10.00 TotalsKey: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
Table 5.2-3 Wyoming Big Sagebrush Seed Mix
Species PLS LBS/Acre Bulk LBS/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 1.50 3.00 2Four-wing saltbush 4.00 5.00 13 Bluebunch wheatgrass
variety Secar 0.25 Wyoming big sagebrush
2Slender wheatgrass 2Indian ricegrass 2Bottlebrush squirreltail
0.25 Western yarrow (Idaho cultivar)
0.25 Blue flax (Appar) 9.75 Totals
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-9
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-4 Fuel Break Seed Mix
Species PLS LBS/Acre Bulk LBS/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 5.00 6.00 25 Crested wheatgrass
varieties of Hycrest, Kirk, Nordan, Roadcrest, or Siberian
0.50 0.75 5Forage kochia 5.50 6.75 30 Totals
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
The fuel break mix would be used in areas dominated by invasive annual grasses such as cheatgrass and medusahead wildrye. Annual grasses are highly flammable and carry fire through the landscape. Crested wheatgrass and forage kochia are introduced perennial species with low flammability characteristics. The crested wheatgrass and forage kochia plantings would reduce fuel continuity and flammability. Native plants could be interseeded by BLM into the crested wheatgrass and kochia plantings after a few years to increase plant diversity.
Tables 5.2-6 and 5.2-7 present the seed mixes that were provided by the BLM SFO for use on public lands under its jurisdiction (Ruby MPs 528.8 to 586.2).
October 2009 5-10
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-5 Wyoming Big Sagebrush Seed Mix
Species PLS LBS/Acre Bulk LBS/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 2Thurber’s needlegrass 2Indian ricegrass 2Nevada bluegrass 2Bottlebrush squirreltail
0.5Western yarrow (Idaho cultivar)
1Blue flax (appar) 0.5Wyoming big sagebrush
(local)10.0 Totals
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-11
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-6 Salt-Desert Shrub
Species PLS LBS/Acre Bulk LBS/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 1.0Thurber’s needlegrass 2.0Indian ricegrass 2.0Nevada bluegrass 1.0Bottlebrush squirreltail 1.0Great Basin wildrye
(Magnar) 0.25 Western Yarrow 1.0Fourwing saltbush (Smoke
Crk) 1.0Shadscale (local)
9..25TotalsKey: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
Table 5.2-7 Low Sagebrush
Species PLS LBS/Acre Bulk LBS/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 2.0Thurber’s needlegrass 2.0Indian ricegrass 2.0Nevada bluegrass 2.0Bottlebrush squirreltail 1.0Western yarrow (Idaho
cultivar)0.5Blue flax (Appar) 0.25 Low sagebrush (local) 9.75 Totals
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-12
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Tables 5.2-8 to 5.2-13 present the seed mixes and recommendations for seeding provided by the BLM EDO for use on public lands under its jurisdiction.
Table 5.2-8 Jakes Creek Allotment (West End of “Midas Road” to “Kelly Creek Road”) – Salt
Desert Vegetation Type SALT DESERT VEGETATION TYPE-DOMINATED AREAS
Jakes Creek Allotment Mileposts X to XX
# PLS Seeds
per acre
Total Bulk lbs
(rounded)
Min % PLS per BLM standard
Rate Bulk
lbs/acre
Rate Pure Live Seed (lbs/acre)
# PLS Seeds/sq .ft
Species/Variety1
Drill Seeding Seed Mix
Siberian wheatgrass (Vavilov)
4.0 680,000 16
Russian wildrye (Boizoisky)2 2.0 350,000 8Gooseberry-leaf globemallow
0.50 250,000 6
Drill Seeding Seed Mix-Partitioned in Drill or seeded using HANSEN SEED DRIBBLERS on ends of Drills/Tractor over wheels equal to approx. 10% of drill row Four-wing saltbush (Smoke Crk)3 1.5 78,000 2
Shadscale (Local Source)3 1.5 97,350 2Aerial/Ground Broadcast Seeding5
Forage kochia (Immigrant)4 0.75 305,775 7Rice hulls (Seed Carrier)5 ?
41 Rounded Total Notes:1Species could be substituted due to availability or future knowledge regarding better cultivars or similar species for the site(s). 2Recommend seeding by itself in separate drill rows through partition in the drill to increase potential for establishment. 3Shadscale and four-wing saltbush in separate drill rows through partition in the drill or in seed dribblers over drill/tractor tires.4Aerial/Ground broadcast-seeded over the drill seeding area after drill-seeding operations. 5Rice hulls, as needed, as a seed carrier.
Key:
BLM = Bureau of Land Management lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-13
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-9 Little Humboldt and Squaw Valley Allotments Area – Kelly Creek Road to Summit Creek South of Midas
PRE-DISTURBANCE BIG SAGEBRUSH VEGETATION TYPE-DOMINATED AREAS Majority of area Affected by Cheatgrass/Other Invasive Exotic Annual Weeds - Kelly Creek Road to
Summit Creek south of Midas - Mileposts X to XX
Species/Variety1 # PLS Seeds/sq.ft.
# PLS Seeds
per acre
Total Bulk lbs
(rounded)
Min % PLS per BLM standard
Rate Pure Live Seed (lbs/acre)
Rate Bulk
lbs/acre
Drill Seeding Seed Mix Siberian wheatgrass (Vavilov)
3.0 510,000 12
Russian wildrye (Boizoisky) 2.0 350,000 8Sandberg bluegrass 0.5 462,500 11 Thickspike wheatgrass (Bannock)
1.5 231,000 5
Blue flax (Appar) 0.50 146,500 3Gooseberry-leaf globemallow
0.50 250,000 6
Drill Seeding Seed Mix-Partitioned in Drill or seeded using HANSEN SEED DRIBBLERS on ends of Drills/Tractor over wheels equal to approx. 10% of drill row Four-wing saltbush (Smoke Crk)3 1.5
Aerial/Ground Broadcast Seeding5 Forage kochia (Immigrant)4 0.75 305,775 7Rice hulls (Seed Carrier)5 ?
52Rounded Total Notes:1Species could be substituted due to availability or future knowledge regarding better cultivars or similar species for the site(s). 2Recommend seeding by itself in separate drill rows through partition in the drill to increase potential for establishment. 3Shadscale and four-wing saltbush in separate drill rows through partition in the drill or in seed dribblers over drill/tractor tires.4Aerial/Ground broadcast-seeded over the drill seeding area after drill-seeding operations. 5Rice hulls, as needed, as a seed carrier.
Key:
BLM = Bureau of Land Management lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-14
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-10 Squaw Valley Allotment Area – Summit Creek (South of Midas) to Ivanhoe Creek
PRE-DISTURBANCE BASIN BIG SAGEBRUSH VEGETATION TYPE-DOMINATED AREAS Summit Creek south of Midas to Ivanhoe Creek Mileposts X to XX
Species/Variety1 # PLS Seeds/sq.ft.(rounded)
# PLS Seeds
per acre
Total Bulk lbs
(rounded)
Min % PLS per
BLM standard
Rate Pure Live Seed (lbs/acre)
Rate Bulk
lbs/acre
Drill Seeding Seed Mix
Siberian wheatgrass (Vavilov)
1.5 255,000 6
Great Basin wildrye (Magnar)
2.0 260,000 6
Sandberg’s bluegrass (Mtn Home, ID)
0.5 462,500 11
Thickspike wheatgrass (Bannock)
3.0 462,000 11
Blue flax (Appar) 0.25 73,250 2Aerial/Ground Broadcast Seeding2 Western Yarrow (Idaho cultivar)
0.15 415,500 10
Wyoming big sagebrush 0.05 125,000 3Basin big sagebrush 0.10 250,000 6Rice hulls (Seed Carrier)3 ?
55 Rounded Total
Notes:1Species could be substituted due to availability or future knowledge regarding better cultivars or similar species for the site(s). 2Aerial/Ground broadcast-seeded over the drill seeding area after drill-seeding operations.3 Rice hulls, as needed, as a seed carrier at around 2 lbs/acre depending on contractor’s seeding equipment and the ability to seed without the
carrier. Otherwise, this seed could also be included in the drills during any drill-seeding efforts per consultation with BLM on procedures.
Key:
BLM = Bureau of Land Management lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-15
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-11 Squaw Valley Allotment area – Ivanhoe Creek to Tuscarora Allotment Boundary at Willow Creek
PRE-DISTURBANCE WYOMING BIG SAGEBRUSH VEG TYPE-DOMINATED AREAS – Ivanhoe Creek to Tuscarora Allotment Boundary at Willow Creek Mileposts X to XX
Species/Variety1 Total Bulk lbs
(rounded)
# PLS Seeds
per Acre
# PLS Seeds/sq.ft(rounded)
Rate Pure Live Seed
(lbs/ac)
Rate Bulk
lbs/ac
Min % PLS per
BLM standard
Drill Seeding Seed Mix
Siberian wheatgrass (Vavilov)
1.5 255,000 6
Great Basin wildrye (Magnar)
2.0 260,000 6
Sandberg’s bluegrass (Mtn Home, ID)
0.5 462,500 11
P-7 Bluebunch wheatgrass 1.5 210,000 5Thickspike wheatgrass (Bannock)
1.5 231,000 5
Blue flax (Appar) 0.25 73,250 2Aerial/Ground Broadcast Seeding 2 Western Yarrow (Idaho cultivar)
0.15 415,500 10
Wyoming big sagebrush 0.15 375,000 9Rice hulls (Seed Carrier)3 ?1 Species could be substituted due to availability or future knowledge regarding better cultivars or similar species for the site(s).2 Aerial/Ground broadcast-seeded over the drill seeding area after drill-seeding operations.3 Rice hulls, as needed, as a seed carrier at around 2 lbs/acre depending on contractor’s seeding equipment and the ability to seed without the
carrier. This seed could also be included in the drills during any drill-seeding efforts per consultation with BLM on procedures.
Key:
BLM = Bureau of Land Management lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed
sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-16
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-12 Low Sagebrush Vegetation Type – Gray Low Sagebrush (Artemesia arbuscula arbuscula) or Early Low Sagebrush (Artemesia arbuscula longiloba) Seed Collected Locally*
PRE-DISTURBANCE LOW SAGEBRUSH VEGETATION TYPE-DOMINATED AREAS – ECO SITES BETWEEN WILLOW CREEK RESERVOIR EAST TO hd SUMMIT NORTH OF WELLSa - Mileposts X to XX
Species/Variety1 # PLS Seeds/sq.ft(rounded)
# PLS Seeds
per Acre
Total Bulk lbs
(rounded)
Min % PLS per
BLM standard
Rate Pure Live Seed
(lbs/ac)
Rate Bulk
lbs/ac
Drill Seeding Seed Mix
P-7 Bluebunch wheatgrass 2.5 350,000 8Great Basin wildrye (Magnar) 1.0 130,000 3Sandberg’s bluegrass (Mtn Home, ID)
0.4 370,000 8
Bottlebrush squirreltail (Sand Hollow or local source)2 1.0 192,000 4
Idaho fescue (Joseph)2 1.0 450,000 10 Antelope bitterbrush3
(local NE NV source) 1–2 15,000
1(0.3 to 0.6)
Arrowleaf balsamroot 1.0 55,000 1Blue flax (Appar) 0.25 73,250 2Aerial/Ground Broadcast Seeding 2 Western Yarrow (Idaho cultivar)
0.15 415,500 10
Gray low sagebrush/early low sagebrush4 0.15 375,000 9
Rice hulls (Seed Carrier)5 ?50–56 Rounded Total
October 2009 5-17
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-12 Low Sagebrush Vegetation Type – Gray Low Sagebrush (Artemesia arbuscula arbuscula) or Early Low Sagebrush (Artemesia arbuscula longiloba) Seed Collected Locally*
Notes:* Would have to be completed under a bid contract; this is a specialty item from experience on Elko District. Otherwise, seed from outside of northeastern Nevada would likely not be suitable for reclamation. aClaypan 10-12” and Claypan 12-16” P.Z. eco sites. These eco sites between Willow Creek Reservoir east to HD Summit north of Wells. Both eco
sites, but primarily the Claypan 12-16” P.Z. eco site, potentially have antelope bitterbrush as a shrub component (see footnote #3). Early low sagebrush might actually be the sole or dominant low sagebrush subspecies on some sites. 1Species could be substituted due to availability or future knowledge regarding better cultivars or similar species for the site(s).
2Bottlebrush squirreltail: Claypan 10-12” P.Z. eco site sites. Idaho fescue: Claypan 12-16” P.Z. eco site sites. 3 Lower rate on Claypan 10-12” P.Z. site and higher rate on Claypan 12-16” P.Z. site, as needed, where bitterbrush was documented to occur prior
to the project. Recommend seeding by itself in separate drill rows through partition in the drill to increase potential for establishment.4Aerial/Ground broadcast-seeded over the drill seeding area after drill-seeding operations.5 Rice hulls, as needed, as a seed carrier at around 2 lbs/acre depending on contractor’s seeding equipment and the ability to apply sagebrush seed
without the carrier. This seed could also be included in the drills during any drill-seeding efforts per consultation with BLM on procedures. Key: BLM = Bureau of Land Management lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-18
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Table 5.2-13 Big Sagebrush – Bitterbrush Vegetation Type (Willow Creek area starting west on Tuscarora Allotment/Private Lands) – Primarily Loamy 10-12 PZ. Eco Site (with other eco sites as associated sites)
PRE-DISTURBANCE BIG SAGEBRUSH – BITTERBRUSH VEGETATION TYPE-DOMINATED AREAS Mileposts X to XX
Species/Variety1 # PLS Seeds/sq.ft(rounded)
# PLS Seeds
per Acre
Total Bulk lbs
(rounded)
Min % PLS per
BLM standard
Rate Pure Live Seed
(lbs/ac)
Rate Bulk
lbs/ac
Drill Seeding Seed Mix Secar Snakeriver wheatgrass
1.5 210,000 5
Bannock thickspike wheatgrass
1.5 231,000 5
P-7’Bluebunch wheatgrass 2.0 280,000 6‘Magnar’ Great Basin wildrye
1.0 130,000 3
‘Canbar’ Canby bluegrass 0.5 463,000 11 Arrowleaf balsamroot 1.0 55,000 1Blue flax (Appar) 0.25 73,250 2Antelope Bitterbrush – local NE NV source2 3.0 45,000 1
Aerial/Ground Broadcast Seeding 3
Western Yarrow (Idaho cultivar)
0.15 415,500 10
Mountain big sagebrush 0.05 125,000 3Basin big sagebrush 0.05 125,000 3Wyoming big sagebrush 0.05 125,000 3Rice hulls (Seed Carrier)4 ?
53 Rounded TotalNotes1Species could be substituted due to availability or future knowledge regarding better cultivars or similar species for the site(s). Fairway crested
wheatgrass (sod-forming capability) could be considered. Adjustments in overall grass mix would be needed to where crested wheatgrass is applied at about 2.0 PLS lbs/ac
2Recommend seeding by itself in separate drill rows through partition in the drill to increase potential for establishment.3Aerial/Ground broadcast-seeded over the drill seeding area after drill-seeding operations. 4Rice hulls, as needed, as a seed carrier at around 2 lbs/acre depending on contractor’s seeding equipment and the ability to complete seeding
operations without the carrier. The seed shown above could also be included in the drills during any drill-seeding efforts per consultation with BLM on procedures.
Key: BLM = Bureau of Land Management, lbs = pounds, PLS = pure live seed, sq. ft. = square foot
October 2009 5-19
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Shrub Transplants Shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry will be grown in containers and transplanted during late fall or early winter into sagebrush habitat that receives at least 10 inches of average annual precipitation and soils are at least six inches deep and are agreed upon between Ruby and the NV BLM. Cages will be placed around the transplants to limit livestock and wildlife grazing. The shrubs will be planted into a small basin, approximately 24 inches in diameter and 4 inches deep, to concentrate precipitation and surface runoff near the plant roots. Transplants will be watered monthly during the first growing season, as practical.
Local seed ecotypes for these species may not be commercially available, and production is unpredictable. Local ecotypic seed would be collected within the same ecological site as the ROW, or from other similar ecological sites, and grown in containers at nurseries such as the NRCS Fallon Plant Materials Center, Winnemucca Middle School, Washoe State Nursery, and Lucky Peak Nursery in Boise, Idaho. Planting density would be similar to adjacent undisturbed plant communities. Shrubs will be planted to replicate patterns of the surrounding area, to the greatest extent possible. Seeding Methods The NRCS guidelines for seeding native plants in arid and semi-arid rangelands were followed (Dreesen, not dated). These guidelines call for at least 20-40 pure live seeds per square foot for drilled seed. The number of pure live seeds per square foot would be doubled for broadcast seedings.
The main purpose of seeding methods is to place the seed in direct contact with the soil, cover the seed with soil, and firm the soil around the seed to eliminate air pockets (Sheley et al. 2008). Drill and broadcasting seeding techniques will be used. Most species can be successfully drill seeded into the soil. Seeding depth in the soil depends on seed size. Grass and forb seed will be planted at a soil depth greater than 0.5 and 0.25 inch, respectively. Sagebrush seed is best planted on the soil surface because it usually germinates better from broadcast seeding.
Direct seeding will be the primary method for seeding within the ROW. Direct seeding uses specialized equipment such as a rangeland seeder. The advantages of direct seeding are efficiency at placing seed at the proper soil depth and economy of bulk seed. Its disadvantages are terrain limitations such as slopes greater than 15 percent and rocky soils. Broadcast seeding distributes the seed on top of the soil surface using a hand-held or all-terrain vehicle-mounted cyclone-type seed spreader, seed blower, hydroseeding, and/or aerial application. Broadcast seed is not as efficient as direct seeding because in this
October 2009 5-20
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
October 2009 5-21
method seeds are not buried in the soil, and it requires approximately twice the bulk seed. In areas where broadcast seeding occurs, a harrow will be used to cover the seed, where possible.
Hydroseeding/hydromulching uses water with a slurry of seed, mulch, and tackifier, if required by land management agencies, which are sprayed over the restored topsoil surface. Hydroseeding alone sprays only the seed on the soil surface. This method often does not allow good soil-to-seed contact, leaves seed exposed to desiccating wind and temperatures, and increases seed loss by rodent and avian foraging. Both methods are limited by equipment access. Slopes that cannot be straw punched or hydroseeded/hydromulched will be broadcast seeded and hand-raked. Fertilizer, Soil Amendments, and Weed Control Ruby does not anticipate the need for application of fertilizers as part of its post-construction restoration activities because elevated levels of soil nitrogen may encourage weedy plant colonization (Sheley et al. 2008). Mycorrhizal fungi will be used to inoculate the soil to aid shrub establishment; soil microorganisms should remain viable during stockpiling. Mycorrhizal inoculums will be applied in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. Pre-emergent herbicides will be used to minimize germination of noxious and annual weeds such as cheatgrass, medusahead wildrye, halogeton, and mustards. Herbicide selection, applications rates, and timing will be conducted in compliance with product use directions and approved by the BLM field offices or private landowner.
5.3 Reclamation Treatment for Erodible Soils Erodible soils have been identified in the Project area (See Ruby’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement [DEIS] section 4.2.1). Erodible soils may require additional restorative inputs to minimize wind and water erosion. The objective will be to rapidly stabilize erodible soils by means of erosion control measures, including a vegetation cover. Erosion control measures will include one or more techniques, such as the planting of a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass according to BLM policy, certified weed-free straw bales or wattles, silt fencing, water bars, soil tackifier, and/or wetting compounds to decrease erosion. The application of a sterile annual grass will be approved by BLM, or the landowner on private lands. Appropriate reclamation action will be commenced immediately after pipeline trench closure.
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance
The purpose of restoration monitoring is to evaluate long-term soil stability, vegetative composition and cover, and occurrence of noxious weeds within the ROW. Restoration monitoring would include both qualitative and quantitative measures. Issues such as erosion control and plant establishment failures will be identified and appropriately addressed. Ruby will ensure that BLM has the opportunity to participate in the design and implementation of restoration monitoring. The primary objectives of monitoring and anticipated actions are listed below.
� Assess the effectiveness of erosion-control structures (e.g., water bars) to ensure soil stability with no accelerated erosion or wash-outs. Locations where additional remedial work may be required would be identified by MP. The monitoring of the ROW for significant and/or new erosion or third-party damage is an element of Ruby’s routine aerial surveillance that will be conducted throughout the life of the pipeline. It is anticipated that any active erosion will be apparent during the first two years following reclamation or after the first runoff event.
� Monitor and assess, through quantitative analysis, the success of the reseeding efforts during the third growing season, with subsequent follow-up surveys in the fourth and sixth growing seasons or additional if vegetation is deemed unsuccessful. Vegetation sampling plots will be used to measure plant density, cover, bare ground, vegetation litter, and rock in comparison with adjacent undisturbed areas (Brower and Zar 1977, Elzinga et al. 1998).
� Monitor the survival of special plantings for visual restoration, if applicable, and the extent to which the restored ROW blends in with the adjacent undisturbed areas.
� Monitor and assess targeted weeds in accordance with the noxious and invasive weed control plan (see POD Appendix H). Newly established weed colonies will be reported to the appropriate BLM office or landowner immediately. Identify places where other vegetation control may be needed. Note that with the exception of noxious weed control, vegetation maintenance, including mowing of non-agricultural lands and general tree removal, is not anticipated. Ruby will, however, selectively remove trees and large shrubs from the permanent 50-foot-wide ROW to facilitate aerial surveillance and inspection. Grass, forb, and low growing shrub growth within the 50-foot-wide ROW will be facilitated.
October 2009 6-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
� Monitor and identify other disturbances that may hinder reclamation success, such as excessive livestock or wild horse/burro grazing or unauthorized OHV travel. Determine ways to take corrective actions in consultation with BLM and NDOW.
� Ruby will fund an NDOW reclamation project oversight position. The purpose of this position will be to monitor post-construction reclamation and plant establishment, unauthorized OHV activity, and excessive livestock and wild horse/burro grazing. The position would be funded for a predetermined number of years and associated cost as agreed upon between Ruby and NDOW.
6.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria Upland reclamation of non-agriculture land will generally be considered successful when vegetation within the reclaimed ROW supports non-noxious plants that are similar in forb, graminoid, and woody plant density and cover to those growing on adjacent undisturbed lands. However, determination of upland and other area reclamation success rests with BLM or the landowner, as applicable. Mutually acceptable relinquishment could occur as ROW acreage restoration and revegetation are deemed successful. Where initial reclamation and plant establishment efforts fail to meet plant establishment standards, reseeding may be necessary on plots and portions of the ROW.
Because initial reseeding and reclamation efforts may not be successful, reseeding may be necessary on plots and portions of the ROW that fail to meet objectives. Ruby will re-seed areas where initial plant establishment efforts fail. BLM or landowner will be consulted regarding any proposed changes in seeding mixes and application methods. If successful plant establishment is not achieved within 10 years, appropriate compensatory mitigation will be discussed with BLM.
A quantitative vegetative monitoring program will document the reclamation progress in the ROW. BLM will participate in the selection of the monitoring and control plots. Monitoring plots will be established randomly within different vegetation types along the ROW and control plots on adjacent undisturbed lands. The monitoring and control plots will be similar in aspect, slope, and soils and approximately one acre in size. The control plots will have similar dimensions as the ROW monitoring plots and will be established in undisturbed vegetation adjacent to the ROW. Global positioning system (GPS) coordinates will be located at all plots within and outside the ROW. A quadrant sampling (2 x 2 meters in size) method will be used to assess species cover in the monitoring and control plots (Brower and Zar 1977; Elzinga et al. 1998). Approximately 25 quadrants will be randomly placed in the monitoring plots and 25 in the control plots to measure species density and cover. A one-tailed independent-sample t-test will compare total grass, forb, and woody plant density and cover between the monitoring and control plots. Negligible disturbance to soil and vegetation will occur during monitoring and plant sampling.
October 2009 6-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
October 2009 6-3
Vegetation monitoring will occur for a minimum of five years. The first, third, and fourth years will monitor the presence of noxious weeds, settling, and erosion. The second and fifth years will focus on plant success and documenting any additional seeding requirements. Vegetative plots will be monitored for five years. Additional monitoring will occur as necessary and agreed upon by Ruby and the land managing agency or landowner.
As stated above, Ruby will quantitatively document reclamation success within the ROW. Parameters will include a species list and estimates of species density and percentage of plant cover, vegetation litter, rock, and bare ground. Observations of soil disturbance, occurrence of noxious and invasive weeds, plant growth stages, animal use, and grazing impacts will be documented. Qualitative analysis methods will be incorporated at established monitoring locations to provide visual documentation of all quantitative data.
6.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance Ruby will address identified erosion problems as soon as practical based on evaluation of conditions outside the permanent ROW and conditions prior to ROW construction. The same technique could be re-applied or a new approach taken based on site-specific conditions. Erosion control structures, such as certified weed-free straw bale or sediment fences, will be removed when sites are deemed stable and reclamation is determined to be successful.
Reseeding or replanting efforts, if necessary, will occur in agreement with the landowner or BLM in areas where monitoring identifies plant establishment failure, particularly where accompanied by observed increases in water or wind erosion. Discussions will occur with BLM to determine actions required to limit livestock and wild horse/burro grazing or OHV use, where needed.
Noxious and invasive weed control is also included in maintenance and would be performed in accordance with the Ruby’s Noxious Weed Control Plan (see POD Appendix H).
6.3 Reporting Ruby will document its observations of reclamation success following the field inspections and provide summary reports to the BLM, NDOW, and FERC. Areas that need remedial action will also be identified by MP and will include a description of additional erosion controls or revegetation work anticipated. Reports including a summary of corrective actions proposed will be submitted within three months of identifying these conditions. Areas where control applications for noxious and invasive weeds are needed will also be reported.
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
7.0 Off-highway Vehicle Control
The BLM, USFWS, NDOW, and private landowners have expressed concerns that the reclaimed ROW will be used for unauthorized OHV travel, which could thwart reclamation efforts and promote erosion. To minimize OHV access on the ROW, Ruby will install OHV barriers at appropriate locations in coordination with BLM or landowner. Ruby will submit to BLM for review and approval site-specific designs for OHV barriers. All designs will meet agency standards and may include dirt/rock berms, log barriers, vegetative screens, signs, fencing, and locked gates. The proposed OHV barriers will be constructed in a manner that attempts to prevent unauthorized motor vehicle/OHV use to and along the ROW. BLM understands that unauthorized OHV trespass can be difficult to control in remote, heavy OHV use areas. Efforts to control unauthorized OHV use will be monitored throughout the life of the Project and additional measures implemented as necessary to control OHV use.
To discourage OHV use of the ROW, Ruby will use the following deterrents, in consultation with BLM, NDOW, and landowner:
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition, especially within 200 feet from entryways such as roads;
� Establish “keep off” signs with an explanation at entryways onto the ROW; � Install rock barriers, earthen berms, or other barricades at existing authorized OHV
routes that cross the ROW; and � Work closely with the BLM and private landowners, grazing lessees, local law
enforcement personnel, and adjacent landowners to monitor and eliminate unauthorized access to the ROW.
Ruby will coordinate with BLM, NDOW, landowners, and appropriate law enforcement personnel to determine the adequacy and appropriateness of proposed countermeasures. Ruby will maintain, repair, or replace countermeasures during life of the Project.
October 2009 7-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
8.0 Livestock and Wild Horse Grazing Control
The ROW will cross through livestock grazing allotments and wild horse/burro management areas on BLM land. Succulent grass and forb growth will attract livestock. Excessive grazing may cause plant establishment efforts to fail. The following management practices for livestock grazing will be implemented:
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition; � Include low palatable plant species in the seeding mix such as sagebrush and
western yarrow; and � Negotiate with allotment permittees to limit livestock grazing in the ROW by using one
or more of the following options: herding or placing salt licks and/or protein blocks one-mile distance from the ROW, fencing crucial habitat areas, deferring grazing for two to three years, closing pasture, implementing seasonal deferment, and/or reducing stocking preference. Ruby may compensate permittees if reduced stocking preference or pasture closure occurs.
Ruby will work with the BLM to limit wild horse/burro grazing along the reclaimed ROW for three years. A possible management action would be to provide water sources away from the ROW.
October 2009 8-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
9.0 References
Bainbridge, D.A. 2007. A Guide for Desert and Dryland Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International. Tucson, Arizona.
Belnap, J., R. Rosentreter, S. Leonard, J.H. Kaltenecker, J. Williams, and D. Eldridge, 2001. Biological Soil Crusts: Ecology and Management. Technical Reference 1730-2. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Denver, Colorado.
Belnap, J., 2000. Structure and Function of Biological Soil Crusts. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenhof, compilers. 2000. Proceedings: Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Brower, J.E. and J.H. Zar, 1977. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown Company Publishers.
Bureau of Land Management, 1999. Out of Ashes, An Opportunity – Great Basin Restoration Initiative. Prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management National Office of Fire and Aviation. Boise, Idaho. October.
Bureau of Land Management, 2001. Use of Plant Materials in California. BLM Manual Handbook 1745-1, California BLM State Office.
Bureau of Land Management, 2000. T he Great Basin: Healing the Land. Bureau of Land Management.
Dames and Moore, Inc. 1990. Kern River Pipeline Reclamation Plan, Dixie National Forest Portion, Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
Dreesen, D.R. Not Dated. Basic Guidelines for Seeding Native Grasses in Arid and Semi-Arid Ecoregions. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Materials Center, Los Lunas, NM.
Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2002. Reclamation Plan, Utah Portion 2003 Expansion Project. Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
Ecology and Environment, Inc, 2007. Right-of-Way Reclamation Monitoring Report Year 2007. Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
EDAW, 2002. Falcon to Gonder 345 kV Transmission Project Construction, Operation and Maintenance Plan: Appendix C3, Reclamation and Habitat Restoration Plan. Prepared by EDAW, Inc., San Francisco, California.
October 2009 9-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
Elzinga, C.L., D. W. Salzer, and J.W. Willoughby, 1998. Measuring & Monitoring Plant Populations. BLM Technical Reference 1730-1. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Business Center, Denver, Colorado.
Foree, Steve. April 10, 2009. Personal Communication. Wildlife Biologist. Nevada Division of Wildlife. Elko, Nevada. Email to Jerry Barker, Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC, Boulder, Colorado, and Noreen Roster, Ecology and Environment, Inc., Portland, Oregon.
Institute for Land Rehabilitation, 1978. Rehabilitation of Western Wildlife Habitat: A Review. FWS/OBS-78/86. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Monsen, S.B., 2000. Establishment of Big Sagebrush (Artemisia Tridentata) in Semiarid Environments. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenhof, compilers. 2000. Proceedings: Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Monsen, Stephen B., 2005. Restoration Manual for Colorado Sagebrush and Associated Shrubland Communities. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, Colorado.
Monsen, S.B., R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw. 2004. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-136, Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. Not Dated. Nevada, Guidelines for Successful Revegetation for the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, The Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S.D.A. Forest Service. http://ndep.nv.gov/bmrr/reveg.pdf.
Nevada State Clearing House. 1998. Nevada Guidelines for Revegetation. http://heritage.nv.gov/reveg.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009.
Plummer, A.P., 1977. Revegetation of disturbed Intermountain area sites. In Thames, J.L., ed. Reclamation of disturbed land in the southwest. Tucson, Arizona: University Arizona Press; Pgs 302-339.
Shaw, N. L. and S. B. Monsen, 2000. Controlling Annual Grasses with OUST® Herbicide. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenhof, compilers. 2000. Proceedings: Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Sheley, R., J. Mangold, K. Goodwin, and J. Marks. 2008. Revegetation Guidelines for the Great Basin: Considering Invasive Weeds. ARS-168. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C.
October 2009 9-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN NEVADA
October 2009 9-3
Siegel, S. and S. Donaldson, 2003. Measures to Prevent the Spread of Noxious and Invasive Weeds During Construction Activities. Fact Sheet FS-03-59, Cooperative Extension, University of Nevada, Reno.
University of Minnesota Extension, 1998. Earth-Berm Water Bars. FS-06972. University of Minnesota.
Wallace, A., E.M. Romney, and R.B. Hunter. 1980. The Challenge of a Desert: Revegetation of Disturbed Desert Lands. In Soil-Plant-Animal Relationships Bearing on Revegetation and Land Reclamation in Nevada Deserts. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs (4): 214-225.
Watson, Dave. October 9, 2009. Lands and Realty Specialist. Personal Communication. Bureau of Land Management. Salt Lake Field Office. Telephone conversation with Jerry Barker, Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC, Boulder, Colorado.
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and
Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Nevada
A-1
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
228
.5
R02
4XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
6,00
0-7,
500
ft.
Bla
cksa
ge b
rush
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
spin
y ho
psag
e In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
230
.5
R02
4XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
6,00
0-7,
500
ft.
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
spin
y ho
psag
e In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
230
.5
R02
4XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
6,00
0-7,
500
ft.
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
spin
y ho
psag
e In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
231
.5
R02
4XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
6,00
0-7,
500
ft.
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
spin
y ho
psag
e In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
232
.5
R02
4XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
6,00
0-7,
500
ft.
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
spin
y ho
psag
e In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
M
P 2
33.5
Sh
allo
w
calc
areo
us
loam
6,
000-
7,50
0 ft.
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
R
024X
Y03
1NV
10
-14"
P.Z
. B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
A-1
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
sp
iny
hops
age
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass
milk
vetc
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
234
.5
R02
5XY
057N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
cl
ay lo
am
bals
amro
ot,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
70%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
dow
ny
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
sp
iny
hops
age
5,50
0-7,
000
ft.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass
erio
gonu
m
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
alka
li sa
cato
n,
inla
nd s
altg
rass
, th
elyp
ody
shad
scal
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh
Ran
ge,
<2-2
%
4,50
0-5,
800
ft.
MP
235
.5
R02
8BY
020N
V
5-8"
S
odic
flat
ba
sin
wild
rye
S
alt-d
eser
t shr
ub
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
alka
li sa
cato
n,
inla
nd s
altg
rass
, th
elyp
ody
shad
scal
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh
Ran
ge,
<2-2
%
4,50
0-5,
800
ft.
MP
236
.5
R02
8BY
020N
V
5-8"
S
odic
flat
ba
sin
wild
rye
S
alt-d
eser
t shr
ub
cree
ping
wild
rye,
S
ierra
clo
ver,
will
ow,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
4%A
vera
ge,
<2%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
cinq
uefo
il,
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s M
P 2
37.5
R
025X
Y00
1NV
no
t lis
ted
Moi
stflo
odpl
ain
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
aste
rsi
lver
sage
brus
h
cree
ping
wild
rye,
S
ierra
clo
ver,
will
ow,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
4%A
vera
ge,
<2%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
cinq
uefo
il,
Moi
stflo
odpl
ain
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s M
P 2
38.5
R
025X
Y00
1NV
no
t lis
ted
aste
rsi
lver
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-2
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
R03
4X03
1NV
C
anno
t fin
d th
is
IDW
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h M
P 2
39.5
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
240
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
241
.5
R02
4XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
6,00
0-7,
500
ft.
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
spin
y ho
psag
e In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
Ran
ge,
10-
75+%
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
U
tah
juni
per,
Lith
ic,
dept
h to
be
droc
k ra
nge
= 5-
20"
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
sing
lele
af
piny
on
Ave
rage
, 15
-50%
bl
ack
sage
brus
h 5,
700-
8,20
0 ft.
M
P 2
42.5
F0
28B
Y06
0NV
10
-14"
In
dian
rice
gras
s B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
MP
243
.5
R02
4XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
6,00
0-7,
500
ft.
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
spin
y ho
psag
e In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Sh
allo
w
calc
areo
us
loam
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
M
P 2
44.5
R
024X
Y03
1NV
10
-14"
P.Z
. 6,
000-
7,50
0 ft.
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
lupi
ne,
win
terfa
t, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-3
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
sp
iny
hops
age
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass
milk
vetc
h
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
ne
edle
andt
hrea
d,ph
lox,
5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
MP
245
.5
R02
8BY
010N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
pain
tbru
sh
four
win
g sa
ltbru
sh
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
0-15
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, ba
lsam
root
,
MP
246
.5
R02
4XY
017N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
andy
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
247
.5
R02
4XY
017N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
andy
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
248
.5
R02
4XY
017N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
andy
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-4
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
gl
obem
allo
w,
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
need
lean
dthr
ead,
phlo
x,
5,00
0-6,
500
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il M
P 2
49.5
R
028B
Y01
0NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Loam
y pa
intb
rush
fo
urw
ing
saltb
rush
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
250
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
251
.5
R02
4XY
030N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
ph
lox
spin
y ho
psag
e
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
N
o P
rimar
y ID
,
R02
5XY
019N
V
is
Seco
ndar
y ID
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
MP
252
.5
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
M
P 2
53.5
R
025X
Y01
9NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Loam
y gl
obem
allo
w
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-5
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
254
.5
R02
4XY
030N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
phlo
x sp
iny
hops
age
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
255
.5
R02
4XY
030N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
5,00
0-6,
500
ft.
phlo
x sp
iny
hops
age
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
MP
256
.5
R02
4XY
030N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
ph
lox
spin
y ho
psag
e
wes
tern
w
heat
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
, si
ckle
saltb
rush
,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
m
ilkve
tch,
w
inte
rfat,
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il Sa
line
terr
ace
Ran
ge,
0-2%
4,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
po
verty
wee
d sh
adsc
ale
MP
257
.5
R02
8BY
047N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
258
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-6
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
259
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
glob
emal
low
, bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
th
elyp
ody,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Sod
icte
rrac
eR
ange
, 0-
4%
4,00
0-5,
500
ft.
Basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
MP
260
.5
R02
4XY
022N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
gl
obem
allo
w,
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
thel
ypod
y,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h S
odic
terr
ace
Ran
ge,
0-4%
4,
000-
5,50
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h M
P 2
61.5
R
024X
Y02
2NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass
milk
vetc
h Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
262
.5
R02
4XY
030N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
5,00
0-6,
500
ft.
phlo
x sp
iny
hops
age
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
263
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-7
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
264
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
alka
li sa
cato
n,
arro
wgr
ass,
R
ange
, 0-
4%A
vera
ge,
<2%
silv
erbu
ffalo
berr
y,
alka
li m
uhly
, po
verty
wee
d,
Ave
. an
nual
6-
10"
Salin
e m
eado
w
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
MP
265
.5
R02
4XY
009N
V
blue
gras
s sp
. do
ck s
p.
will
ow
Gre
asew
ood
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
266
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
267
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
268
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-8
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
269
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
mou
ntai
n br
ome,
ge
rani
um,
slen
der
whe
atgr
ass,
gr
ound
sel,
mou
ntai
n sn
owbe
rry,
Lo
amy
slop
e ca
rrot
leaf
lom
atiu
m
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
MP
270
.5
R02
5XY
004N
V
16+"
P.Z
. Id
aho
fesc
ue
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
271
.5
R02
5XY
057N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
cl
ay lo
am
bals
amro
ot,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
70%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
dow
ny
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
sp
iny
hops
age
5,50
0-7,
000
ft.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass
erio
gonu
m
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
272
.5
R02
5XY
057N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Shal
low
cl
ay lo
am
bals
amro
ot,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
70%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
dow
ny
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
sp
iny
hops
age
5,50
0-7,
000
ft.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass
erio
gonu
m
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
273
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ot
her
pere
nnia
l W
yom
ing
big
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
MP
274
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-9
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
fo
rbs,
sage
brus
h,
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
MP
275
.5
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
276
.5
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
277
.5
R02
5XY
031N
V
not l
iste
d
ston
y m
ahog
any
sava
nna
phlo
x,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
75%
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, 7,
000-
8,50
0 ft.
M
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h
Idah
o fe
scue
, sn
owbe
rry,
A
vera
ge,
15-5
0%
need
legr
ass
gold
enw
eed
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
gold
enw
eed,
H
ooke
r ba
lsam
root
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, <3
0%
blue
gras
s sp
., m
ock
gold
enw
eed
6,00
0-8,
000
ft.
MP
278
.5
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
sp
ike-
fesc
ue
win
terfa
t
Low
sag
ebru
sh
Mou
ntai
n rid
ge
MP
279
.5
R02
5XY
024N
V
not l
iste
d Id
aho
fesc
ue,
gold
enw
eed,
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-75
%
7,00
0-9,
500
ft.
Low
sag
ebru
sh
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-10
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
H
ooke
r ba
lsam
root
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
bl
uegr
ass
sp.,
moc
kgo
lden
wee
d sp
ike-
fesc
ue
win
terfa
t
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
75%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
gold
enw
eed,
H
ooke
r ba
lsam
root
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
bl
uegr
ass
sp.,
Mou
ntai
n rid
ge
moc
kgo
lden
wee
d 7,
000-
9,50
0 ft.
M
P 2
80.5
R
025X
Y02
4NV
no
t lis
ted
spik
e-fe
scue
w
inte
rfat
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-50
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, ba
lsam
root
,
MP
281
.5
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
282
.5
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
283
.5
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ph
lox,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-11
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
lupi
ne,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
8-30
%
Gra
velly
lo
am
6,00
0-8,
000
ft.
Mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
MP
284
.5
R02
5XY
007N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-50
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, ba
lsam
root
,
MP
285
.5
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
286
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
287
.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h M
P R
288.
5 R
025X
Y01
9NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Loam
y
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-12
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
gl
obem
allo
w
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Sand
berg
's
blue
gras
s sp
iny
hops
age
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
gl
obem
allo
w
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e 4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h M
P R
289.
5 R
025X
Y01
9NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Loam
y
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R29
0.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R29
1.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R29
2.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
D
ry
flood
plai
n M
P R
293.
5 R
024X
Y00
6NV
no
t lis
ted
basi
n w
ildry
e,
pove
rtyw
eed,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
0-4%
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-13
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
w
este
rn
whe
atgr
ass,
m
ilkve
tch,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, <2
%
cree
ping
wild
rye
thel
ypod
y sh
adsc
ale
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R29
4.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R29
5.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R29
6.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R29
7.5
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h M
P R
299.
2 R
025X
Y01
9NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Loam
y
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-14
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
gl
obem
allo
w
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Sand
berg
's
blue
gras
s sp
iny
hops
age
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
300
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
301
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
gl
obem
allo
w
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, 4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e M
P 3
02.3
R
025X
Y01
9NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Loam
y
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
303
.3
RO
25X
Y01
5NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
Sout
hsl
ope
Ran
ge,
15-7
5%
Ave
rage
, 30
-50%
erio
gonu
m,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
basi
n w
ildry
e lu
pine
So
uth
slop
e bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
Wyo
min
g bi
gR
ange
, 15
-75%
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h M
P 3
04.3
R
O25
XY
015N
V
8-12
" P.Z
.
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-15
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
sa
gebr
ush,
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
erio
gonu
m,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,A
vera
ge,
30-5
0%
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
ba
sin
wild
rye
lupi
ne
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
R
ange
, 15
-75%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
305
.3
RO
25X
Y01
5NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
Sout
hsl
ope
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
erio
gonu
m,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,A
vera
ge,
30-5
0%
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
ba
sin
wild
rye
lupi
ne
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
306
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
307
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
308
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-16
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
309
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
310
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
311
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
312
.3
R02
5X60
19N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
313
.3
R02
5X60
19N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-17
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
314
.3
R02
5X60
19N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
315
.3
R02
4X60
30N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
5,00
0-6,
500
ft.
phlo
x sp
iny
hops
age
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
316
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
317
.3
R02
4X60
30N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
5,00
0-6,
500
ft.
phlo
x sp
iny
hops
age
B
lack
sag
ebru
sh
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
MP
318
.3
R02
4X60
30N
V
8-10
" P.Z
.
Shal
low
ca
lcar
eous
lo
am
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
win
terfa
t, 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
Bla
ck s
ageb
rush
ph
lox
spin
y ho
psag
e
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
othe
rpe
renn
ial
Wyo
min
g bi
gR
ange
, 2-
50%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h M
P 3
19.3
R
025X
6019
NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
Loam
y
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-18
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
fo
rbs,
sage
brus
h,
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
MP
320
.3
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
321
.3
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
322
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
323
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ot
her
pere
nnia
l W
yom
ing
big
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
MP
324
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-19
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
fo
rbs,
sage
brus
h,
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
325
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
lu
pine
, po
verty
wee
d,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
8%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s,
MP
326
.3
R02
5XY
003N
V
8-14
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
botto
m4,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h
grou
ndse
l ru
bber
ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-4%
st
ream
bank
w
heat
gras
s W
ood'
s ro
se
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
327
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
328
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-20
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
329
.3
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
330
.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
331
.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
MP
332
.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
333
.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-21
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
MP
334
.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
335
.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
336
.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
337
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
338
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ph
lox,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-22
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
339
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
340
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
341
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
342
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ph
lox,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-23
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
343
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
344
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
345
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
75%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
gold
enw
eed,
H
ooke
r ba
lsam
root
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
bl
uegr
ass
sp.,
Mou
ntai
n rid
ge
moc
kgo
lden
wee
d M
P 3
46.2
R
025X
Y02
4NV
no
t lis
ted
spik
e-fe
scue
w
inte
rfat
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-24
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-75
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, go
lden
wee
d,
Hoo
ker
bals
amro
ot,
blac
ksa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
blue
gras
s sp
., M
ount
ain
ridge
m
ock
gold
enw
eed
7,00
0-9,
500
ft.
MP
347
.2
R02
5XY
024N
V
not l
iste
d sp
ike-
fesc
ue
win
terfa
t
Low
sag
ebru
sh
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
75%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
gold
enw
eed,
H
ooke
r ba
lsam
root
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
bl
uegr
ass
sp.,
Mou
ntai
n rid
ge
moc
kgo
lden
wee
d 7,
000-
9,50
0 ft.
M
P 3
48.2
R
025X
Y02
4NV
no
t lis
ted
spik
e-fe
scue
w
inte
rfat
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-50
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, ba
lsam
root
,
MP
349
.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
R35
0.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
MP
R35
1.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-25
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
R35
2.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
R35
3.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
R35
4.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
Mou
ntai
n rid
ge
MP
R35
5.2
R02
5XY
024N
V
not l
iste
d Id
aho
fesc
ue,
gold
enw
eed,
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-75
%
7,00
0-9,
500
ft.
Low
sag
ebru
sh
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-26
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
H
ooke
r ba
lsam
root
, bl
ack
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
bl
uegr
ass
sp.,
moc
kgo
lden
wee
d sp
ike-
fesc
ue
win
terfa
t
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
R35
6.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
lupi
ne,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
8-30
%
6,00
0-8,
000
ft.
Mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
Gra
velly
lo
am
M
P R
357.
2 R
025X
Y00
7NV
12
-16"
P.Z
. lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-50
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, ba
lsam
root
,
MP
R35
9.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
R36
0.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ph
lox,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-27
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
30-7
5%
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,A
vera
ge,
30-5
0%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
Sout
hsl
ope
6,00
0-8,
500
ft.
Mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s M
P R
361.
2 R
025X
Y00
9NV
12
-14"
P.Z
. lu
pine
ru
bber
ra
bbitb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
R36
2.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
MP
R36
3.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R36
4.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
30%
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
M
P R
365.
2 R
025X
Y01
4NV
10
-12"
Lo
amy
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-28
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s lu
pine
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
30%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
MP
R36
6.2
R02
5XY
014N
V
10-1
2"
Loam
y 5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass
lupi
ne
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R36
7.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R36
8.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
4-50
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, ba
lsam
root
,
MP
R36
9.2
R02
5XY
017N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h A
vera
ge,
<30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
R37
0.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
ba
lsam
root
, lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-50
%
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
Low
sag
ebru
sh
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-29
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
bl
uebe
lls,
early
sa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
8-30
%
Web
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s as
ter
ante
lope
sa
gebr
ush
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
MP
R37
1.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
ba
sin
wild
rye,
lu
pine
, N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass,
MP
R37
1.2
R02
5XY
003N
V
8-14
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
botto
m
Ran
ge,
0-8%
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
pove
rtyw
eed,
ru
bber
ra
bbitb
rush
, 4,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h st
ream
bank
w
heat
gras
s gr
ound
sel
Woo
d's
rose
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
MP
R37
2.2
R02
5XY
018N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Cla
ypan
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
blue
bells
, ea
rly
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 8-
30%
W
ebbe
r's
need
legr
ass
aste
ran
telo
pe
sage
brus
h
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
an
telo
pe
bitte
rbru
sh,
Ran
ge,
15-3
0%
5,80
0-8,
000
ft.
Mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
Loam
y sl
ope
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
MP
R37
3.2
R02
5XY
012N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
basi
n w
ildry
e lu
pine
Lo
amy
slop
e M
P R
374.
2 R
025X
Y01
2NV
12
-16"
P.Z
. Id
aho
fesc
ue,
bals
amro
ot,
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 15
-30%
5,
800-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w s
ageb
rush
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-30
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
phlo
x,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,ea
rly
sage
brus
h ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
sp.
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R37
5.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R37
6.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R37
7.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R37
8.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-31
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
0-8%
ba
sin
wild
rye,
lu
pine
, N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass,
MP
R37
9.2
R02
5XY
003N
V
8-14
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
botto
m4,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h
pove
rtyw
eed,
ru
bber
ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-4%
st
ream
bank
w
heat
gras
s gr
ound
sel
Woo
d's
rose
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
0-8%
ba
sin
wild
rye,
lu
pine
, N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass,
MP
R38
0.2
R02
5XY
003N
V
8-14
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
botto
m4,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h
pove
rtyw
eed,
ru
bber
ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-4%
st
ream
bank
w
heat
gras
s gr
ound
sel
Woo
d's
rose
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R38
1.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R38
2.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R38
3.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-32
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R38
4.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
MP
R38
5.2
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
R38
6.2
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
R38
7.2
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
R38
8.2
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-33
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
MP
R38
9.2
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R39
0.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R39
1.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
MP
R39
2.2
R02
5XY
019N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
Sa
ndbe
rg's
bl
uegr
ass
spin
y ho
psag
e
MP
R39
4.2
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-34
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-1 E
lko
Dis
tric
t Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilepo
st
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
MP
R39
5.2
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
, A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-35
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Basi
n w
ildry
e,
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s,
stre
amba
nk
whe
atgr
ass
Basi
n bi
g
sage
brus
h,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
Woo
d’s
rose
Ran
ge ,
0-8%
,A
vera
ge,
2-4%
Lupi
ne,
pove
rtyw
eed,
gr
ouns
el
Loam
y bo
ttom
4,50
00-
7,00
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h M
PR
395.
2 R
O25
XY
003N
V
8-14
” P.Z
.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber’s
ne
edle
gras
s,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%,
aver
age,
4-
15%
Glo
bem
allo
w,
phox
, bi
scui
troot
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
MP
R39
6.2
RO
24X
Y02
0NV
8-
10” P
.Z.
Dro
ught
y lo
am
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber’s
ne
edle
gras
s,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%,
aver
age,
4-
15%
Glo
bem
allo
w,
phox
, bi
scui
troot
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
MP
R39
7.2
RO
24X
Y02
0NV
8-
10” P
.Z.
Dro
ught
y lo
am
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sp
iny
hops
age,
bu
d
Thur
ber’s
ne
edle
gras
s,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%,
aver
age,
4-
15%
Glo
bem
allo
w,
phox
, bi
scui
troot
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
MP
R39
8.2
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
RO
24X
Y02
0NV
8-
10” P
.Z.
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-36
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
sa
gebr
ush
Dro
ught
y lo
am
Oth
erpe
renn
ial
forb
s,gl
obem
allo
w,
othe
r ann
ual
forb
s
Sha
dsca
le,
bud
sage
brus
h,
spin
y ho
psag
e
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
ne
edle
and
thre
ad
Ran
ge, 0
-3-
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
MP
R39
9.2
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
RO
24X
Y00
2NV
5-
8”P
.Z.
W
Sha
dsca
le
Oth
erpe
renn
ial
forb
s,gl
obem
allo
w,
othe
r ann
ual
forb
s
Sha
dsca
le,
bud
sage
brus
h,
spin
y ho
psag
e M
PR
400.
2 R
O24
XY
002N
V
5-8”
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
ne
edle
and
thre
ad
Ran
ge, 0
-3-
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Sha
dsca
le
Oth
erpe
renn
ial
forb
s,gl
obem
allo
w,
othe
r ann
ual
forb
s
Sha
dsca
le,
bud
sage
brus
h,
spin
y ho
psag
e M
PR
401.
2 R
O24
XY
002N
V
5-8”
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
ne
edle
and
thre
ad
Ran
ge, 0
-3-
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Sha
dsca
le
Sha
dsca
le,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,
bud
sage
brus
h
Bot
tlebr
ush
squi
rrelta
il,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ba
sin
wild
rye
Ran
ge, 0
-15
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Mite
rwor
t, th
elyp
ody,
pr
ince
splu
me
MP
R40
2.2
Sod
icTe
rrace
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
R
O24
XY
003N
V
6-8”
P.Z
. S
hads
cale
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-37
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Sha
dsca
le,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,
bud
sage
brus
h
Bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ba
sin
wild
rye
Ran
ge, 0
-15
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Mite
rwor
t, th
elyp
ody,
pr
ince
splu
me
MP
R40
3.2
Sod
icTe
rrace
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
R
O24
XY
003N
V
6-8”
P.Z
. S
hads
cale
Iodi
nebu
sh,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,
seep
wee
d
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
MP
R40
4.2
RO
24X
Y01
0NV
Aver
age
annu
al
6-10
”
Alk
ali s
acat
on,
inla
nd s
altg
rass
, ba
sin
wild
rye
Pov
erty
wee
d,
mite
rwor
t, th
elyp
ody
Sod
icflo
odpl
an
4,00
0-5,
000
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
d
Sha
dsca
le,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,
bud
sage
brus
h
Bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ba
sin
wild
rye
Ran
ge, 0
-15
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Mite
rwor
t, th
elyp
ody,
pr
ince
splu
me
MP
R40
5.2
Sod
icTe
rrace
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
R
O24
XY
003N
V
6-8”
P.Z
. S
hads
cale
Oth
erpe
renn
ial
forb
s,gl
obem
allo
w,
othe
r ann
ual
forb
s
Sha
dsca
le,
bud
sage
brus
h,
spin
y ho
psag
e M
PR
406.
2 R
O24
XY
002N
V
5-8”
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uire
elta
il,
need
lean
d th
read
Ran
ge, 0
-3-
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
4,00
0-6,
000,
ft.
Sha
dsca
le
Oth
erpe
renn
ial
forb
s,gl
obem
allo
w,
othe
r ann
ual
forb
s
Sha
dsca
le,
bud
sage
brus
h,
spin
y ho
psag
e M
PR
407.
2 R
O24
XY
002N
V
5-8”
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uire
elta
il,
need
lean
d th
read
Ran
ge, 0
-3-
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
4,00
0-6,
000,
ft.
Sha
dsca
le
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-38
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Sha
dsca
le,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,
bud
sage
brus
h
Bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ba
sin
wild
rye
Ran
ge, 0
-15
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Mite
rwor
t, th
elyp
ody,
pr
ince
splu
me
MP
R40
8.2
Sod
icTe
rrace
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
R
O24
XY
003N
V
6-8”
P.Z
. S
hads
cale
Oth
erpe
renn
ial
forb
s,gl
obem
allo
w,
othe
r ann
ual
forb
s
Sha
dsca
le,
bud
sage
brus
h,
spin
y ho
psag
e M
PR
409.
2 R
O24
XY
002N
V
5-8”
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uire
elta
il,
need
lean
d th
read
Ran
ge, 0
-3-
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
4,00
0-6,
000,
ft.
Sha
dsca
le
Sha
dsca
le,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,
bud
sage
brus
h
Bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ba
sin
wild
rye
Ran
ge, 0
-15
%,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Mite
rwor
t, th
elyp
ody,
pr
ince
splu
me
MP
R41
0.1
Sod
icTe
rrace
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
B
lack
grea
sew
ood
RO
24X
Y00
3NV
6-
8” P
.Z.
Ran
ge, 0
-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
gl
obem
allo
w,
shad
scal
e,
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
M
P 4
10.9
R
024X
Y00
2NV
5-
8" P
.Z.
Loam
y ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
Sha
dsca
le
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
gl
obem
allo
w,
MP
411
.9
R02
4XY
022N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
4,
000-
5,50
0 ft.
B
lack
grea
sew
ood
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
thel
ypod
y,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-39
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
gl
obem
allo
w,
MP
412
.9
R02
4XY
022N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
4,
000-
5,50
0 ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
thel
ypod
y,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
MP
412
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
MP
R40
9.2
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
Ran
ge,
15-7
5%
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Sout
hsl
ope
5,50
0-7,
000
ft.
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n sa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
30-5
0 M
P 4
14.9
R
024X
Y02
8NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-40
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
blue
gras
s lu
pine
sp
iny
hops
age
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
413
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
No
desc
riptio
nM
P 4
15.9
R
024X
Y02
8NV
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h N
ode
scrip
tion
MP
416
.9
R02
4XY
028N
V
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
R
ange
, 4-
75%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Sand
berg
's
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, lu
pine
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
15-5
0%
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
5,00
0-7,
000
ft.
10-1
4"
P.Z
.Sh
allo
w
loam
U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
M
P 4
17.9
R
024X
Y03
5NV
bl
uegr
ass
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-41
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
418
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
MP
419
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ev
enin
g pr
imro
se,
Ran
ge, 0
-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
need
lean
dthr
ead,
star
lily,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h sp
iny
hops
age
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
MP
420
.9
R02
4XY
017N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
andy
ba
sin
wild
rye
glob
emal
low
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
MP
421
.9
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
gl
obem
allo
w,
bud
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-42
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
MP
422
.9
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
MP
423
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
424
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
425
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-43
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
glob
emal
low
,
MP
426
.9
R02
4XY
022N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
4,
000-
5,50
0 ft.
B
lack
grea
sew
ood
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
thel
ypod
y,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
pove
rtyw
eed,
m
iterw
ort,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
si
ckle
saltb
ush,
in
land
sal
tgra
ss,
milk
vetc
h To
rrey
's
quai
lbus
h R
ange
, 0-
2%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
27.9
R
024X
Y01
1NV
6-
8"
Sod
ic fl
at
alka
li sa
cato
n po
verty
wee
d,
mite
rwor
t, bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
sick
lesa
ltbus
h,
inla
nd s
altg
rass
, m
ilkve
tch
Ran
ge, 0
-2%
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
B
lack
grea
sew
ood
Torr
ey's
qu
ailb
ush
MP
428
.9
R02
4XY
011N
V
6-8"
S
odic
flat
al
kali
saca
ton
pove
rtyw
eed,
m
iterw
ort,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
si
ckle
saltb
ush,
in
land
sal
tgra
ss,
milk
vetc
h To
rrey
's
quai
lbus
h R
ange
, 0-
2%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
29.9
R
024X
Y01
1NV
6-
8"
Sod
ic fl
at
alka
li sa
cato
n
cree
ping
wild
rye,
S
ierra
clo
ver,
will
ow,
Aver
age
annu
al
6-10
" M
oist
flood
plai
n ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h M
P 43
0.9
R02
5XY0
01N
V
basi
n w
ildry
e,
cinq
uefo
il,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-44
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass
aste
rsi
lver
sage
brus
h po
verty
wee
d,
mite
rwor
t, bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
Gen
eral
ly
leve
l, bu
t re
achi
ng
=/<
2% a
t pe
rimet
ers
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
alka
li sa
cato
n,
milk
vetc
hAv
erag
e an
nual
6-
10"
Salin
e bo
ttom
4,00
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
31.9
R
024X
Y00
7NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
seep
wee
d po
verty
wee
d,
mite
rwor
t, bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
Gen
eral
ly
leve
l, bu
t re
achi
ng
=/<
2% a
t pe
rimet
ers
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
alka
li sa
cato
n,
milk
vetc
hAv
erag
e an
nual
6-
10"
Salin
e bo
ttom
4,00
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
32.9
R
024X
Y00
7NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
seep
wee
d ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
MP
433
.9
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
MP
434
.9
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-45
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
435
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
436
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a er
iogo
num
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
437
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-46
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
438
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
439
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a er
iogo
num
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
440
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-47
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
MP
441
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
442
.9
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
MP
443
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
444
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-48
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
445
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
446
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
447
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
448
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-49
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
451
.9
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
MP
450
.9
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
MP
449
.9
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
Sha
dsca
le
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrel
tail,
MP
452
.9
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Sha
dsca
le
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
To
rrey
's
quai
lbus
h,
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
ba
sin
wild
rye,
gl
obem
allo
w,
Aver
age
annu
al
6-10
" D
eep
sodi
c fa
nbl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
53.9
R
024X
Y01
5NV
al
kali
saca
ton,
po
verty
wee
d,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-50
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h in
land
sal
tgra
ss
mite
rwor
t
Torr
ey's
qu
ailb
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
4%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
glob
emal
low
, bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
alka
li sa
cato
n,
pove
rtyw
eed,
Av
erag
e an
nual
6-
10"
Dee
p so
dic
fan
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
54.9
R
024X
Y01
5NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
mite
rwor
t
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrel
tail,
MP
455
.9
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
B
lack
grea
sew
ood
bud
sage
brus
h ba
sin
wild
rye
prin
cesp
lum
e
pove
rtyw
eed,
m
iterw
ort,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
si
ckle
saltb
ush,
in
land
sal
tgra
ss,
milk
vetc
h To
rrey
's
quai
lbus
h R
ange
, 0-
2%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
56.9
R
024X
Y01
1NV
6-
8"
Sod
ic fl
at
alka
li sa
cato
n po
verty
wee
d,
mite
rwor
t, bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
sick
lesa
ltbus
h,
inla
nd s
altg
rass
, m
ilkve
tch
Ran
ge, 0
-2%
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
B
lack
grea
sew
ood
Torr
ey's
qu
ailb
ush
MP
457
.9
R02
4XY
011N
V
6-8"
S
odic
flat
al
kali
saca
ton
pove
rtyw
eed,
m
iterw
ort,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
si
ckle
saltb
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
2%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
58.9
R
024X
Y01
1NV
6-
8"
Sod
ic fl
at
inla
nd s
altg
rass
, m
ilkve
tch
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-51
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
To
rrey
's
quai
lbus
h al
kali
saca
ton
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
MP
R45
9.9
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
MP
R46
0.9
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrel
tail,
MP
R46
1.9
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
R46
2.9
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Sha
dsca
le
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
M
PR
463.
9 S
odic
terr
ace
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrel
tail,
R
024X
Y00
3NV
6-
8" P
.Z.
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-52
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
R46
4.9
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Sha
dsca
le
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
465
.7
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
466
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
No
desc
riptio
n M
P 4
67.8
R
024X
Y01
1NV
S
hads
cale
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
468
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
Sh
adsc
ale
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-53
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
469
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
470
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Sha
dsca
le
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
471
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
472
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Sha
dsca
le
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
473
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
Sh
adsc
ale
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-54
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
474
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
475
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Sha
dsca
le
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
476
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
477
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
Sha
dsca
le
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
478
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
Sh
adsc
ale
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-55
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
479
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
S
odic
terr
ace
bud
sage
brus
h S
hads
cale
M
P 4
80.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirr
elta
il,
MP
481
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 10
-12"
P.
Z.
whi
te
ston
esee
d 5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h M
P 4
82.8
R
023X
Y02
0NV
Lo
amy
basi
n w
ildry
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-56
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 10
-12"
P.
Z.
whi
te
ston
esee
d 5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
B
asin
Big
sa
gebr
ush
MP
483
.8
R02
3XY
020N
V
Loam
y ba
sin
wild
rye
ot
her
pere
nnia
l fo
rbs,
MP
484
.8
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
othe
rpe
renn
ial
forb
s,
MP
485
.8
R02
4XY
002N
V
5-8"
P.Z
. Lo
amy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
30%
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
S
hads
cale
glob
emal
low
, bu
dsa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
spin
y ho
psag
e ne
edle
andt
hrea
d
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
S
odic
terr
ace
bud
sage
brus
h S
hads
cale
M
P 4
86.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-57
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
po
verty
wee
d,
mite
rwor
t, bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
Gen
eral
ly
leve
l, bu
t re
achi
ng
=/<
2% a
t pe
rimet
ers
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
alka
li sa
cato
n,
milk
vetc
hAv
erag
e an
nual
6-
10"
Salin
e bo
ttom
4,00
0-5,
500
ft.
Bla
ckgr
ease
woo
dM
P 4
87.8
R
024X
Y00
7NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
seep
wee
d po
verty
wee
d,
mite
rwor
t, bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
sick
lesa
ltbus
h,
inla
nd s
altg
rass
, m
ilkve
tch
Ran
ge, 0
-2%
3,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
B
lack
grea
sew
ood
Torr
ey's
qu
ailb
ush
MP
488
.8
R02
4XY
011N
V
6-8"
S
odic
flat
al
kali
saca
ton
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Sod
icte
rrac
ebu
dsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
M
P 4
89.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
S
hads
cale
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
S
odic
terr
ace
bud
sage
brus
h S
hads
cale
M
P 4
90.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Sod
icte
rrac
ebu
dsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
M
P 4
91.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
S
hads
cale
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-58
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Sod
icte
rrac
ebu
dsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
M
P 4
92.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
S
hads
cale
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
S
odic
terr
ace
bud
sage
brus
h S
hads
cale
M
P 4
93.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Sod
icte
rrac
ebu
dsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
M
P 4
94.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
S
hads
cale
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
S
odic
terr
ace
bud
sage
brus
h S
hads
cale
M
P 4
95.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Sod
icte
rrac
ebu
dsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
M
P 4
96.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
S
hads
cale
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-59
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
sh
adsc
ale,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
prin
cesp
lum
e,Av
erag
e an
nual
4-
8"
Sod
icte
rrac
ebu
dsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge, 0
-4%
3,
300-
4,50
0 ft.
M
P 4
97.8
R
027X
Y02
4NV
in
land
sal
tgra
ss
glob
emal
low
S
hads
cale
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 10
-12"
P.
Z.
whi
te
ston
esee
d 5,
500-
6,50
0 ft.
Ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h M
P 4
98.8
R
023X
Y02
0NV
Lo
amy
basi
n w
ildry
e
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrel
tail,
MP
499
.8
R02
4XY
003N
V
6-8"
P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
mite
rwor
t, sh
adsc
ale,
R
ange
, 0-
15%
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
Ave
rage
, 2-
4%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bu
dsa
gebr
ush
3,50
0-5,
500
ft.
basi
n w
ildry
e pr
ince
splu
me
S
hads
cale
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
even
ing
prim
rose
, R
ange
, 0-
15%
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
2-8%
ne
edle
andt
hrea
d,st
arlil
y,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
spin
y ho
psag
e 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
M
P 5
00.8
R
024X
Y01
7NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
San
dy
basi
n w
ildry
e gl
obem
allo
w
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
even
ing
prim
rose
, R
ange
, 0-
15%
4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
M
P 5
01.8
R
024X
Y01
7NV
8-
10" P
.Z.
San
dy
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-60
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
need
lean
dthr
ead,
star
lily,
sp
iny
hops
age
basi
n w
ildry
e gl
obem
allo
w
MP
502
.8
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
MP
503
.8
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
La
hont
an
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 4
-50
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, sh
adsc
ale,
A
vera
ge,
8-3-
%
Laho
ntan
bi
gsa
gebr
ush
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
MP
504.
8 R
023X
Y037
NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
Cla
y sl
ope
blue
gras
s er
iogo
num
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
La
hont
an
big
sage
brus
h bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
Laho
ntan
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 4-
50%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
M
P 5
05.8
R
023X
Y03
7NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
Cla
y sl
ope
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-61
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, sh
adsc
ale,
A
vera
ge,
8-3-
%
blue
gras
s er
iogo
num
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
La
hont
an
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 4
-50
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, sh
adsc
ale,
A
vera
ge,
8-3-
%
Laho
ntan
bi
gsa
gebr
ush
MP
506
.8
R02
3XY
037N
V
8-12
" P.Z
. C
lay
slop
e 4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
bl
uegr
ass
erio
gonu
m
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
MP
507
.8
R02
4XY
020N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. D
roug
hty
loam
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
000-
6,00
0 ft.
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail
bisc
uitro
ot
bud
sage
brus
h
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
La
hont
an
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 4
-50
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, sh
adsc
ale,
A
vera
ge,
8-3-
%
Laho
ntan
bi
gsa
gebr
ush
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
MP
508.
8 R
023X
Y037
NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
Cla
y sl
ope
blue
gras
s er
iogo
num
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-62
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
La
hont
an
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 4
-50
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, sh
adsc
ale,
A
vera
ge,
8-3-
%
Laho
ntan
bi
gsa
gebr
ush
MP
509
.8
R02
3XY
037N
V
8-12
" P.Z
. C
lay
slop
e 4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
bl
uegr
ass
erio
gonu
m
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
La
hont
an
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 4
-50
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, sh
adsc
ale,
A
vera
ge,
8-3-
%
Laho
ntan
bi
gsa
gebr
ush
MP
510
.8
R02
3XY
037N
V
8-12
" P.Z
. C
lay
slop
e 4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
bl
uegr
ass
erio
gonu
m
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
aste
r,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
,A
vera
ge,
2-8%
14-1
6"
P.Z.
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
MP
511
.8
R02
3XY
017N
V
Cla
ypan
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
lupi
ne
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
aste
r,
MP
512
.8
R02
3XY
017N
V
14-1
6"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
H
ooke
r's
bals
amro
ot,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-63
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s lu
pine
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, as
ter,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
,A
vera
ge,
2-8%
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
MP
513
.8
R02
3XY
017N
V
14-1
6"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
lupi
ne
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
aste
r,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
,A
vera
ge,
2-8%
14-1
6"
P.Z.
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
MP
514
.8
R02
3XY
017N
V
Cla
ypan
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
lupi
ne
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
aste
r,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
,A
vera
ge,
2-8%
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
MP
515
.8
R02
3XY
017N
V
14-1
6"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
lupi
ne
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-64
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
MP
516
.8
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4"
Sto
ny lo
am
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
lupi
ne
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s 6,
000-
7,20
0 ft.
M
ount
ain
Shr
ub
MP
517
.8
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4"
Sto
ny lo
am
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
lupi
ne
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
6,00
0-7,
200
ft.
Mou
ntai
n S
hrub
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s
MP
518
.8
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4"
Sto
ny lo
am
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
lupi
ne
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s 6,
000-
7,20
0 ft.
M
ount
ain
Shr
ub
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-65
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
519
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d 5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h bl
uegr
ass
squa
wap
ple
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
520
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d 5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h bl
uegr
ass
squa
wap
ple
N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass,
po
verty
wee
d,
silv
ersa
gebr
ush,
ev
enin
g pr
imro
se,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
Aver
age
annu
al,
1-14
" bl
ack
grea
sew
ood
Ran
ge,
<2%
5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
S
ilver
sage
brus
h M
P 52
1.8
R02
3XY0
03N
V
Cla
y ba
sin
cree
ping
wild
rye
dock
N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass,
po
verty
wee
d,
silv
ersa
gebr
ush,
ev
enin
g pr
imro
se,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
basi
n w
ildry
e,
Aver
age
annu
al,
1-14
" R
ange
, <2
%
5,50
0-7,
000
ft.
Sliv
ersa
gebr
ush
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d M
P 52
2.8
R02
3XY0
03N
V
Cla
y ba
sin
cree
ping
wild
rye
dock
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-66
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
Ran
ge,
15-5
0%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
an
telo
pe
bitte
rbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 30
-50%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 10
-14"
P
.Z.
Loam
y sl
ope
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
MP
523.
8 R
023X
Y039
NV
ba
sin
wild
rye
erio
gonu
m
m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, m
ilkve
tch,
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
an
telo
pe
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
M
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h 6,
000-
8,00
0 ft.
M
P 5
24.8
R
023X
Y06
6NV
14
-16"
P
.Z.
Ash
y lo
am
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s er
iogo
num
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
525
.8
R02
4XY
005N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
glob
emal
low
,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
ph
lox,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a 5,
000-
6,50
0 ft.
er
iogo
num
14-1
6"
P.Z.
m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
6,00
0-8,
000
ft.
Mou
ntai
n bi
gM
P 5
26.8
R
023X
Y06
6NV
A
shy
loam
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
milk
vetc
h,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-67
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
sa
gebr
ush
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
an
telo
pe
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s er
iogo
num
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
MP
527
.8
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4"
Sto
ny lo
am
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
lupi
ne
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
M
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
6,00
0-7,
200
ft.
MP
528
.8
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4"
Sto
ny lo
am
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
lupi
ne
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 6,
000-
7,20
0 ft.
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
MP
529
.8
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4"
Sto
ny lo
am
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
6,00
0-7,
200
ft.
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-68
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
lupi
ne
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s
MP
530
.8
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4"
Sto
ny lo
am
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
30%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
lupi
ne
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
6,00
0-7,
200
ft.
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
531
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d 5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h bl
uegr
ass
squa
wap
ple
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
532
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-69
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-2 W
inne
muc
ca D
istr
ict O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Prec
ip-
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b M
ilePo
st
NR
CS
ID
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d bl
uegr
ass
squa
wap
ple
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
MP
533
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4"
P.Z.
Cla
ypan
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge, 2
-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d 5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h bl
uegr
ass
squa
wap
ple
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-70
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Ta
ble
A-3
Sur
pris
e Fi
eld
Offi
ce E
colo
gica
l Site
s En
viro
n-m
enta
l M
P A
lignm
ent
Shee
t MP
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid
Dom
inan
t Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
NR
CS
ID
Prec
ipita
tion
Slop
e El
evat
ion
Seed
Mix
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
537
MP
534
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Cla
y pa
n
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
C
anby
's
blue
gras
s ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d 5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h sq
uaw
appl
e
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
538
MP
535
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Cla
y pa
n
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h C
anby
's
blue
gras
s ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d sq
uaw
appl
e
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
539
MP
536
.8
R02
3XY
031N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
Cla
y pa
n
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 2-
15%
C
anby
's
blue
gras
s ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d 5,
500-
7,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h sq
uaw
appl
e
540
MP
537
.8
R02
3XY
006N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
erio
gonu
m,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bi
squi
troot
, W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h W
ebbe
r's
riceg
rass
4,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
lu
pine
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, as
ter,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
,A
vera
ge,
2-8%
6,
500-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
541
MP
R53
8.8
lupi
ne
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
R02
3XY
017N
V
14-1
6"
Cla
y pa
n
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-71
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
aste
r,bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
H
ooke
r's
bals
amro
ot,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s lu
pine
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
54
2 M
P 53
9.8
R02
3XY0
17N
V
14-1
6"
Cla
y pa
n bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
543
MP
540
.7
R02
3XY
015N
V
12-1
4" P
.Z.
Sto
ny lo
am
bals
amro
ot,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,R
ange
, 2-
30%
w
este
rn
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s 6,
000-
7,20
0 ft.
lu
pine
U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 6,
500-
8,50
0 ft.
w
hite
st
ones
eed
544
MP
541
.7
R02
3XY
007N
V
14-1
6" P
.Z.
Loam
y ba
sin
wild
rye
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
Ave
rage
, 4-
30%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h w
hite
st
ones
eed
6,50
0-8,
500
ft.
545
MP
542
.7
R02
3XY
007N
V
14-1
6" P
.Z.
Loam
y ba
sin
wild
rye
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
50%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
6,50
0-8,
500
ft.
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
A
vera
ge,
4-30
%
546
MP
543
.7
R02
3XY
007N
V
14-1
6" P
.Z.
Loam
y
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-72
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
whi
te
ston
esee
d ba
sin
wild
rye
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, R
ange
, 15
-50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,A
vera
ge,
3-50
%
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Loam
y sl
ope
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
547
MP
544
.7
R02
3XY
039N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
basi
n w
ildry
e er
iogo
num
548
MP
545
.7
R02
3XY
006N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
erio
gonu
m,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bi
squi
troot
, W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h W
ebbe
r's
riceg
rass
4,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
lu
pine
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
549
MP
546
.7
R02
3XY
006N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
erio
gonu
m,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bi
squi
troot
, W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h W
ebbe
r's
riceg
rass
4,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
lu
pine
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
Ave
rage
, 4-
15%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h w
hite
st
ones
eed
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
4,50
0-5,
500
ft.
550
MP
547
.7
R02
3XY
020N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Loam
y ba
sin
wild
rye
C
usic
k's
blue
gras
s,
lupi
ne,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
551
MP
548
.7
R02
3XY
082N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Loam
y fa
n R
ange
, 2-
4%
5,50
0-6,
700
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-73
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
Cus
ick'
sbl
uegr
ass,
lu
pine
, ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
552
MP
549
.7
R02
3XY
082N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Loam
y fa
n R
ange
, 2-
4%
5,50
0-6,
700
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
need
lean
dthr
ead,
erio
gonu
m,
com
mon
pric
klyg
ilia,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
8%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s co
mm
onst
arlil
ysp
iny
hops
age
553
MP
550
.7
R02
3XY
051N
V
8-12
" P.Z
. S
andy
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
need
lean
dthr
ead,
erio
gonu
m,
com
mon
pric
klyg
ilia,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
8%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s co
mm
onst
arlil
ysp
iny
hops
age
554
MP
551
.7
R02
3XY
051N
V
8-12
" P.Z
. S
andy
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, m
ount
ain
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
15-7
5%
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
w
este
rn
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
Ave
rage
, 30
-50%
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 6,
500-
8,00
0 ft.
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
Sout
hsl
ope
erio
gonu
m
555
MP
552
.7
R02
3XY
016N
V
12-1
6" P
.Z.
Cus
ick'
sbl
uegr
ass,
55
6 M
P 55
3.7
R02
3XY0
82N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Loam
y fa
n lu
pine
, ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-4%
5,
500-
6,70
0 ft.
W
yom
ing
big
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-74
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
sage
brus
h
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ne
edle
andt
hrea
d,er
iogo
num
, co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge,
2-8%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
com
mon
star
lily
spin
y ho
psag
e 55
7 M
P 5
54.7
R
023X
Y05
1NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
San
dy
558
MP
555
.7
R02
3XY
006N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. Lo
amy
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
erio
gonu
m,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
sp
iny
hops
age,
A
vera
ge,
4-15
%
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
bi
squi
troot
, W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h 4,
500-
5,50
0 ft.
W
ebbe
r's
riceg
rass
lu
pine
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
need
lean
dthr
ead,
erio
gonu
m,
com
mon
pric
klyg
ilia,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
8%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s co
mm
onst
arlil
ysp
iny
hops
age
559
MP
556
.7
R02
3XY
051N
V
8-12
" P.Z
. S
andy
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h,
need
lean
dthr
ead,
erio
gonu
m,
com
mon
pric
klyg
ilia,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h,
Indi
an ri
cegr
ass,
W
yom
ing
big
sage
brus
h R
ange
, 2-
8%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s co
mm
onst
arlil
ysp
iny
hops
age
560
MP
557
.7
R02
3XY
051N
V
8-12
" P.Z
. S
andy
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-75
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ne
edle
andt
hrea
d,er
iogo
num
, co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge,
2-8%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
com
mon
star
lily
spin
y ho
psag
e 56
1 M
P 5
58.7
R
023X
Y05
1NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
San
dy
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ne
edle
andt
hrea
d,er
iogo
num
, co
mm
onpr
ickl
ygili
a,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
In
dian
rice
gras
s,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Ran
ge,
2-8%
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
com
mon
star
lily
spin
y ho
psag
e 56
2 M
P 5
59.7
R
023X
Y05
1NV
8-
12" P
.Z.
San
dy
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
gl
obem
allo
w,
563
MP
560
.7
R02
4XY
022N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
Ran
ge,
0-4%
4,
000-
5,50
0 ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
thel
ypod
y,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,R
ange
, 0-
8%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
pove
rtyw
eed,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
564
MP
561
.7
R02
4XY
008N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
flat
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Sal
t-de
sert
shru
b
prin
cesp
lum
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
spin
y ho
psag
e in
land
sal
tgra
ss
thel
ypod
y
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,R
ange
, 0-
8%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
pove
rtyw
eed,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
565
MP
562
.7
R02
4XY
008N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
flat
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Sal
t-de
sert
shru
b
prin
cesp
lum
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
spin
y ho
psag
e in
land
sal
tgra
ss
thel
ypod
y
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-76
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,R
ange
, 0-
8%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
pove
rtyw
eed,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
566
MP
563
.7
R02
4XY
008N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
flat
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Sal
t-de
sert
shru
b
prin
cesp
lum
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
spin
y ho
psag
e in
land
sal
tgra
ss
thel
ypod
y
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,R
ange
, 0-
8%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
pove
rtyw
eed,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
567
MP
564
.7
R02
4XY
008N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
flat
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Sal
t-de
sert
shru
b
prin
cesp
lum
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
spin
y ho
psag
e in
land
sal
tgra
ss
thel
ypod
y
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,R
ange
, 0-
8%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
pove
rtyw
eed,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
568
MP
565
.7
R02
4XY
008N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
flat
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Sal
t-de
sert
shru
b
prin
cesp
lum
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
spin
y ho
psag
e in
land
sal
tgra
ss
thel
ypod
y
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,R
ange
, 0-
8%
basi
n w
ildry
e,
pove
rtyw
eed,
bo
ttleb
rush
sq
uirre
ltail,
569
MP
566
.7
R02
4XY
008N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
flat
4,
500-
6,00
0 ft.
Sal
t-de
sert
shru
b
prin
cesp
lum
e,
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh,
Ave
rage
, 0-
2%
spin
y ho
psag
e in
land
sal
tgra
ss
thel
ypod
y
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,ba
sin
wild
rye,
gl
obem
allo
w,
570
MP
567
.7
R02
4XY
022N
V
8-10
" P.Z
. S
odic
terr
ace
Ran
ge,
0-4%
4,
000-
5,50
0 ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
bottl
ebru
sh
squi
rrelta
il,
thel
ypod
y,
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
ba
sin
big
sage
brus
h In
dian
rice
gras
s m
ilkve
tch
571
MP
568
.7
R02
3XY
005N
V
Aver
age
annu
al, 8
-12"
D
ry
flood
plai
n ba
sin
wild
rye,
po
verty
wee
d,
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 0-
2%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
g
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-77
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
sage
brus
h w
este
rn
whe
atgr
ass,
th
elyp
ody,
bl
ack
grea
sew
ood,
thre
adle
af
rubb
er
rabb
itbru
sh
Nev
ada
blue
gras
s ot
her a
nnua
l fo
rbs
basi
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
ba
sin
wild
rye,
po
verty
wee
d,
wes
tern
w
heat
gras
s,
thel
ypod
y,
blac
kgr
ease
woo
d,th
read
leaf
ru
bber
ra
bbitb
rush
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
572
MP
569
.7
R02
3XY
005N
V
Aver
age
annu
al, 8
-12"
D
ry
flood
plai
n N
evad
a bl
uegr
ass
othe
r ann
ual
forb
sR
ange
, 0-
2%
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush,
bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
ar
row
leaf
ba
lsam
root
, R
ange
, 15
-50%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
ta
perti
pha
wks
bear
d,
ante
lope
bi
tterb
rush
,A
vera
ge,
3-50
%
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Loam
y sl
ope
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush
4,50
0-6,
000
ft.
573
MP
570
.7
R02
3XY
039N
V
10-1
4" P
.Z.
basi
n w
ildry
e er
iogo
num
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
aste
r,bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
H
ooke
r's
bals
amro
ot,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry,
Ave
rage
, 2-
8%
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s lu
pine
D
ougl
as'
rabb
itbru
sh
57
4 M
P 57
1.7
R02
3XY0
17N
V
14-1
6"
Cla
y pa
n lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Idah
o fe
scue
, as
ter,
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
,A
vera
ge,
2-8%
6,
500-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
575
MP
572.
7 R
023X
Y017
NV
14
-16"
C
lay
pan
lupi
ne
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
low
sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 2-
30%
6,
500-
8,00
0 ft.
Lo
w
sage
brus
h 57
6 M
P 5
73.7
R
023X
Y01
7NV
14
-16"
C
lay
pan
Idah
o fe
scue
, as
ter,
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-78
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
, U
tah
serv
iceb
erry
,A
vera
ge,
2-8%
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass
lupi
ne
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s,
arro
wle
af
bals
amro
ot,
mou
ntai
n bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
R
ange
, 15
-75%
an
telo
pe
bitte
rbru
sh,
Uta
hse
rvic
eber
ry
wes
tern
ne
edle
gras
s,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
A
vera
ge,
30-5
0%
Wyo
min
g bi
gsa
gebr
ush
Sout
hsl
ope
6,50
0-8,
000
ft.
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s 57
7 M
P 5
74.7
R
023X
Y01
6NV
12
-16"
P.Z
. er
iogo
num
57
8 M
P 5
75.7
57
9 M
P 5
76.7
58
0 M
P 5
77.7
58
1 M
P 5
78.7
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
582
MP
579
.7
R02
3XY
059N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Gra
velly
cl
aypa
n
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Web
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
5,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
milk
vetc
h,
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-15
%
Can
by's
bl
uegr
ass
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
sp
iny
hops
age
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
583
MP
580
.7
R02
3XY
059N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Gra
velly
cl
aypa
n
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
Web
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
5,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
milk
vetc
h,
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-15
%
Can
by's
bl
uegr
ass
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
sp
iny
hops
age
Th
urbe
r's
need
legr
ass,
584
MP
581
.7
R02
3XY
059N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Gra
velly
cl
aypa
n
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
5,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Web
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-15
%
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-79
RU
BYPI
PELI
NE
PRO
JEC
T
DR
AFT
RES
TOR
ATIO
NAN
DR
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLAN
N
EV
AD
A
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-80
Tabl
e A
-3 S
urpr
ise
Fiel
d O
ffice
Eco
logi
cal S
ites
Envi
ron-
men
tal
MP
Alig
nmen
t Sh
eet M
P N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itatio
n Ec
olog
ical
Si
te N
ame
Dom
inan
t G
ram
inoi
d D
omin
ant
Forb
D
omin
ant
Shru
b Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nSe
ed M
ix
Can
by's
bl
uegr
ass
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
sp
iny
hops
age
585
MP
582
.7
R02
3XY
059N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Gra
velly
cl
aypa
n
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
5,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Web
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-15
%
Can
by's
bl
uegr
ass
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
sp
iny
hops
age
586
MP
583
.7
R02
3XY
059N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Gra
velly
cl
aypa
n
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
5,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Web
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-15
%
Can
by's
bl
uegr
ass
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
sp
iny
hops
age
587
MP
584
.7
R02
3XY
059N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Gra
velly
cl
aypa
n
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
5,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Web
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
milk
vetc
h,
Dou
glas
' ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-15
%
Can
by's
bl
uegr
ass
Hoo
ker's
ba
lsam
root
sp
iny
hops
age
588
MP
585
.7
R02
3XY
059N
V
10-1
2" P
.Z.
Gra
velly
cl
aypa
n
Thur
ber's
ne
edle
gras
s,
aste
r,lo
w
sage
brus
h,
Ran
ge,
2-30
%
5,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Low
sa
gebr
ush
Web
ber's
need
legr
ass,
milk
vetc
h,
Dou
glas
'ra
bbitb
rush
, A
vera
ge,
2-15
%
Can
by's
blu
egra
ss
Hoo
ker's
bals
amro
ot
spin
y ho
psag
e
Draft Restoration and
Revegetation Plan: Oregon
FERC Docket No. CP09-54-000
October 2009
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Purpose .................................................................................. 2-1
3.0 Goals and Objectives ............................................................ 3-1
4.0 Restoration Schedule ............................................................ 4-1
5.0 Restoration Planning Process .............................................. 5-15.1 Restoration Approach ................................................................................ 5-1
5.2.1 Pre-Restoration Activities ............................................................... 5-15.2.2 ROW, Extra Workspace, and Access Road Restoration ................ 5-25.2.3 Revegetation .................................................................................. 5-5
5.3 Restoration Treatment for Erodible Soils ................................................. 5-15
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance ........................... 6-16.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria ............................................................ 6-26.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance ............................................................ 6-36.3 Reporting ................................................................................................... 6-4
7.0 Off-highway Vehicle Control ................................................. 7-1
8.0 Livestock Control .................................................................. 8-1
9.0 References ............................................................................. 9-1
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Oregon ............................... A-1
ii
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
List of Tables
Table Page
Table 5.2-1 Sagebrush Steppe Seed Mix ..................................................................... 5-7Table 5.2-2 Low Sagebrush Vegetation Type ............................................................... 5-8Table 5.2-3 Basin Big Sagebrush Vegetation Type ...................................................... 5-8Table 5.2-4 Juniper Vegetation type ............................................................................. 5-9Table 5.2-5 Pine Vegetation type ................................................................................ 5-10Table 5.2-6 Mixed Conifer Forest ................................................................................ 5-11Table 5.2-7 Low sagebrush Seed Mix ......................................................................... 5-12Table A-1 Lake County Ecological Sites .................................................................... A-2Table A-2 Klamath County Ecological Sites ............................................................. A-21 List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route in Oregon........................................................... 1-2
iii
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
iv
Acronyms and Abbreviations
BLM Bureau of Land Management EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FWNF Fremont-Winema National Forest GPS Global Positioning System KFRA Klamath Falls Resource Area LDO Lakeview District Office LRA Lakeview Resource Area MP milepost NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NRCS National Resource Conservation Service ODFW Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife OHV off-highway vehicle Plan Restoration and Revegetation Plan POD Plan of Development Project Ruby Pipeline Project Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation ROW right-of-Way Ruby Ruby Pipeline, LLC USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFS U.S. Forest Service USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
1.0 Introduction
The Ruby Pipeline Project (Project), proposed by Ruby Pipeline, LLC (Ruby), is composed of approximately 675.2 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas pipeline, along with associated compression and measurement facilities, located between Opal, Wyoming and Malin, Oregon (Figure 1). The Project would include an approximate 2.6-mile lateral to be constructed in Klamath County, Oregon. Four new compressor stations would also be installed as part of the Project. Ruby would utilize a 115-foot wide construction right-of-way (ROW) for installation of both the mainline and the lateral, and the final ROW width is 50 feet. The ROW will cross through four states: Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon. A restoration and revegetation plan (Plan) is being developed for each state the Project crosses. This Plan is for Oregon.
In addition to the pipeline ROW, the Project will require jurisdictional facilities, temporary extra workspaces, and access roads to the ROW (See the Plan of Development [POD]). Extra workspaces are required for the crossings of waterbodies, roads, railroads, and other utilities; terrain constraints; and staging areas. The Project will use existing public and private roads to access the pipeline ROW and extra workspaces. Ruby would construct a number of access roads in order to access National Forest lands. Further, some existing roads will be widened to 30 feet and/or upgraded to accommodate heavy construction equipment. Some road sections may require extra grading to allow for adequate turning radius. All temporary road upgrades will be reclaimed and seeded.
Oregon federal lands that will be crossed include Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Lakeview Resource Area (LRA) and Klamath Falls Resource Area (KFRA) of the Lakeview District Office (LDO), Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Fremont-Winema National Forest (FWNF). The focus of this Plan is federal lands. The Plan will also be applicable to privately owned lands pending approval by landowners.
The Project organized a technical team to provide input for the Oregon Plan. Team members are reclamation specialists from the LRA, KFRA, FWNF, Reclamation, and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Team members reviewed this Plan, provided important restoration guidance, and recommended appropriate revegetation seed mixes.
October 2009 1-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Figure 1 Ruby Pipeline Proposed Route in Oregon
October 2009 1-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
October 2009 1-3
This Plan utilizes restoration methods developed for other large-diameter pipeline projects that were approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (Dames and Moore 1990; Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2002). Ruby incorporated into the Plan recent technical standards and published long-term restoration monitoring information associated with similar habitats (Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2002). The Plan also incorporates Ruby’s Noxious and Invasive Weed Control Plan and Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan, POD Appendices D and H, respectively.
The POD for the Project includes specifics regarding pipeline construction and clean-up procedures. This plan also incorporates additional landowner or other land management agency requirements as well as any special conditions or recommendations of FERC as it completes its environmental review and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
2.0 Purpose
The Plan describes the processes and measures that will be implemented following construction to mitigate impacts from the Project in Lake and Klamath counties. This Plan is applicable to the ROW, extra workspace, and sections of access roads that require restoration. No eligible or unevaluated cultural sites would be disturbed during restoration without a data recovery (mitigation) plan. Revegetation criteria standards are presented to judge plant establishment success. The Plan does not address Ruby’s compensatory or off-site mitigation efforts, as they will be fully described in a separate plan.
The purpose of this Plan is to provide guidance for restoring lands disturbed by pipeline construction. The Project ROW in Oregon is 87.0 miles, which translates to 1,213 acres with a 115-foot ROW (see POD)). Extra workspace acres are 1,142. Access roads acres are approximately 607.
October 2009 2-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
3.0 Goals and Objectives
The short-term goal of pipeline ROW restoration is to stabilize soils by recontouring terrain, spreading stockpiled topsoil, strategically placing erosion control devices, establishing temporary vegetation cover, and abating noxious and invasive weed establishment. ROW restoration would be upon pipeline trench closure. The ROW would be recontoured to blend with adjacent undisturbed terrain. Erosion control devices such as water bars and/or Oregon certified weed-free straw bales or wattles would be strategically placed to limit and/or direct overland water flow. Herbicide control of noxious or invasive weeds may be necessary following U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), BLM, Reclamation, and USFS regulations and timing. The long-term restoration goal is to establish a permanent, vegetation cover with similar species densities and compositions of adjacent undisturbed lands in accordance with 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 380.15 and FERC guidelines. Establishment of a perennial plant cover is essential to provide resiliency to resist invasive annual grasses and forbs. This long-term goal would be achieved through maintaining or adding new or existing erosion control devices, providing continuing noxious weed abatement, minimizing livestock and grazing, minimizing off-highway vehicle (OHV) travel, and implementing a monitoring program. Long-term restoration efforts would be deemed complete with successful establishment of the perennial plant cover. Determination of ROW restoration success would rest with the BLM, Reclamation, USFS on public lands and landowners on private lands.
Ruby would employ the following restoration steps to meet short- and long-term goals.
� Brush hog the ROW in sufficient time prior to pipeline construction to limit migratory bird nesting, in accordance with Ruby’s Voluntary Conservation Measures for migratory birds.
� Pre-treat the ROW in applicable areas for noxious and invasive weeds prior to pipeline construction.
� Use proper soil management techniques, including stripping, stockpiling, and reapplying topsoil to establish surface conditions that would enhance development of diverse, stable, and self-generating plant communities. Topsoil management will apply to the ditchline and spoilside areas.
� In areas where surface rock will hinder reseeding such as scablands, remove or windrow on the side of the ROW, rocks greater than 10 inches in diameter to a depth of 12 inches to create a suitable seed bed. In some areas soil and/or certified weed-free mulch will be brought in to supplement existing, limited soils.
October 2009 3-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
October 2009 3-2
� Establish stable surface and drainage conditions and the use of erosion control devices should minimize soil erosion and sedimentation.
� Re-establish terrain compatible with the surrounding landscape. � Use native plant species for revegetation unless it is determined that: (1) suitable
native species are not available; (2) the natural biological diversity of the proposed action would not be diminished; (3) exotic and naturalized species can be confined within the proposed management area; (4) analysis of the site indicates that native species are unable to compete with invasive weeds;
� All seeds used are approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); � No seeds from plants that are listed as noxious or invasive weeds by states or on the
USDA federal list (PLANTS website) will be planted. � Use monitoring during the construction and operational phases to ensure the
achievement of both short-term and long-term restoration goals and objectives. � Minimize construction impacts along the route by, where practical and safe, limiting
ROW width to avoid impacts to native vegetation.
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
4.0 Restoration Schedule
The Project is scheduled to begin late first quarter or early second quarter 2010 after finalization of the NEPA process, anticipated for November 2009. The FERC Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and BLM Record of Decision on the selected route must be finalized before construction can begin. The POD presents specifics on construction procedures and timing. Pipeline construction will take approximately one year after initiation and restoration on a given pipeline segment will be initiated upon trench closure.
Restoration will include cleanup, backfilling, surface grading, topsoiling, installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and establishing a perennial plant cover. Areas no seeded with native plants within 14 days because of seasonal limitations, slopes greater than 10 percent, erosive soils, or aesthetically sensitive areas would be seeded with a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass immediately after seedbed preparation, in accordance with LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, or FWNF policy or with landowner input. The seeding or transplanting of native plants to establish the permanent vegetation cover will occur during late fall to early winter to take advantage of winter and spring precipitation (Monsen 2000, 2005; Plummer 1977). The temporary plant cover will be incorporated into the soil before the permanent plant cover is seeded.
October 2009 4-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
5.0 Restoration Planning Process
The restoration process includes steps to satisfy the short- and long-term goals described in Section 3 of this Plan. The Plan incorporates lesson learned from the Kern Expansion Project restoration effort (Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2002, 2007) and the experiences of subject-matter experts in arid and semi-arid land restoration (Plummer 1977; Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Wallace et al. 1980; Monsen 2000, 2005; EDAW 2002; Monsen et al. 2004, and Sheley et al. 2008).
5.1 Restoration Approach This Plan is applicable to the ROWs, extra workspaces, and access roads in Oregon, and reference to the ROW restoration include extra workspaces and access roads. Measures implemented to ensure successful restoration include topsoil and subsoil segregation and stockpiling during construction, cleanup, backfilling, appropriate surface recontouring, soil erosion control, seedbed preparation, application of ecological site-specific seed mixes, plant establishment, weed abatement, and monitoring. Plants will be established mainly by seed from local sources. Bare-root stock will be used to establish forest trees. Container-grown plants will be transplanted in key locations where successful establishment may be accepted (e.g., ecological sites with greater than 10 inches of annual precipitation and soils deeper than six inches). Seeds will be purchased from commercial vendors and FWNF or collected from local seed sources, if possible, and grown at nursery sites. Trees and shrubs to be grown as bare-root stock or in containers for transplanting in appropriate sites include shrubs such as ponderosa pine, low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry. ROW alignments will have uneven edges created by either leaving shrubs and trees in place when clearing or planting shrub and tree groupings after cleanup. Ruby will adhere to FWNF guidelines for blending the ROW boundary in with the surrounding undisturbed forest. 5.2.1 Pre-Restoration Activities Initial construction activities include surveying and staking the ROW, brush hogging the ROW, topsoil stockpiling of the ditchline and spoilside areas, grading for safe construction passage, trenching, and pipeline alignment, as described in the POD. Dense stands of noxious and invasive weeds will be treated with approved herbicides prior to vegetation clearing, in accordance with the Noxious Weed Control Plan (Appendix H, POD). ROW surveying and staking will identify the width of excavation and blade work, including cut and fill locations.
October 2009 5-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
ROW brush hogging will occur in sufficient time to limit migratory bird nesting, in accordance with Ruby’s Voluntary Conservation Measures for migratory birds. Brush hogging will remove aboveground vegetation without disturbing root systems and limited topsoil resources (Watson October 9, 2009). Many grasses, forbs, and shrubs (but not sagebrush taxa) will root sprout after pipeline construction is completed. This procedure should facilitate ROW restoration and revegetation.
Topsoil will be stockpiled from the ditchline and spoilside areas.. Surface soil thickness will vary throughout the ROW, depending on soil type. Environmental inspectors will identify surface soil thickness for removal and stockpiling, where applicable. Surface soil containing the seed reservoir and existing vegetation will be scraped and stored along the ROW. The topsoil/vegetation mixture will not be mixed with underlying subsoil horizons. Oregon-certified weed-free erosion control blankets and/or certified weed-free straw bales will be used to limit erosion as needed. Surface soil and sub-surface soils will be replaced in the proper order during backfilling and final grading operations.
Surface rocks, where present and where useful for restoration, will be windrowed adjacent to the topsoil stockpile. In some areas, significant surface rock will limit the effectives of drill and broadcast seeding. Surface rocks in these areas larger than 10 inches in diameter will be removed to a depth of 12 inches as practical to create suitable seedbed for seeding and plant establishment. Salvaged surface rock will be redistributed on the ROW in size, density, and distribution similarly to adjacent areas not disturbed by construction. Subsurface rocks will be separated from subsoils. Salvaged rock will be used to re-create rock outcrops and rock faces, to the greatest extent possible. Salvaged rock will also be used as an OHV travel deterrent, if requested by BLM, Reclamation, or FWNF. Excessive rock excavated but not used for restoration purposes will be removed and disposed of at approved locations.
During construction, all vehicle travel and equipment operation will be within the ROW or on approved access roads. Cross-country vehicle travel outside the ROW or on non-approved, access roads will not be allowed. 5.2.2 ROW, Extra Workspace, and Access Road Restoration Restoration of the ROW will involve backfilling to the excavated ditchline, replacing stockpiled subsoil and the topsoil/vegetation mixture, restoring pre-existing terrain contours, installing erosion control devices, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. ROW restoration will begin within 20 days after pipeline trench closure and final cleanup. ROW alignment will be given an uneven edge by either leaving shrubs/trees in place when clearing or randomly seeding/planting clumps of shrubs/trees along the ROW perimeter.
October 2009 5-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Extra workspace restoration will follow similar steps as ROW restoration including contouring, preparing the seedbed, and seeding. Extra workspace restoration would begin within a few days after the area is no longer needed.
Access roads will be restored according to landowner directions. LRA, KFRA, FWNF, Reclamation, and ODFW have requested that all improved roads on public lands be returned to their original status after they are no longer needed. Access road restoration will include grading, preparing the seed bed, and seeding. Road restoration will begin within a few days after the road is no longer needed. Backfilling Backfilling of subsoil materials will be required after the pipeline is aligned in the trench and padded with screened subsoil or other appropriate materials. The excavated subsoil will be used to backfill the trench. To avoid settling of surface soils below the contours of adjacent lands, the backfill material will be mounded. Excessive ditch spoil will be feathered and blended across the construction corridor, creating a roughened surface to capture precipitation, decrease erosion, and provide safe sites for plant establishment. Compacted Soils Compacted soils would typically be associated with the ROW travel lane, pipe laydown locations, and access roads. Subsoil de-compaction will occur as necessary to reduce soil bulk density. Identified locations will be de-compacted to a minimum depth of 6-12 inches prior to surface soil replacement. “Soil ripping” will be used along contours to minimize soil erosion and facilitate soil-water retention to aid revegetation. Extra workspaces and access roads will also be ripped to reduce soil compaction.
Terrain Contouring The ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads will be contoured to blend within the surrounding landscape. Contouring will emphasize restoration of existing drainage and landform patterns, to the greatest extent practicable.
Topsoil/Vegetation Mixture Replacement The stockpiled topsoil/vegetation mixture will be re-spread over the ROW after re-contouring is completed. The topsoil/vegetation mixture will provide seeds, vegetative propagules, and soil microbiota to facilitate vegetation establishment on the ROW.
In areas were significant surface rock may limit the effectiveness of drill and broadcast seeding, rocks greater than 10 inches in diameter will be removed to a depth of at least 12 inches to create a seed bed suitable for seeding. In addition, topsoil and/or certified weed-
October 2009 5-3
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
free mulch may be brought in to supplement the local soil. The supplemental topsoil would be sourced from areas approved by LDO, KFDO, Reclamation, and/or FWNF, as appropriate. Mulch A mulch cover minimizes soil erosion, conserves soil water, and moderates surface temperatures to improve the chances of seedling establishment (Sheley et al. 2008). The native plant materials that were mixed with topsoil during its removal and then spread over the ROW will serve as mulch. In addition, Oregon certified weed-free straw may be used as a surface mulch on terrain with a slope less than 10 percent. The straw mulch would be applied so it sufficiently covers approximately 75 percent of soil (Dreesen, not dated). This rate of application corresponds to approximately 1-2 tons per acre. Rate of application will depend on the amount of native vegetation within the topsoil/vegetation mix. The use of a straw mulch will be evaluated with LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, and FWNF. Straw mulch could entice livestock and big game to graze on the ROW. Soil Erosion Control Soil erosion control will occur through establishing desirable vegetation, mulch, soil tackifiers, or water control devices (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Sheley et al. 2008). The Project will establish a desirable plant cover as quickly as possible after pipeline construction according to directions by the land management agency or landowner to minimize soil erosion. Mulch, certified weed-free erosion control blankets and wattles, and certified weed-free straw bales, soil tackifiers, and/or water bars may also be used as appropriate. Water bars will likely be the main approach for controlling soil erosion because they are effective and cost efficient. All organic mulches, blankets, and wattles will be certified weed-free by the appropriate state agency or BLM.
Water bars or slope breakers are earth-berms established to control the flow of surface water (University of Minnesota Extension 1998). Water bars will be installed in all areas, except agricultural and pasture land and lawns, using spacing recommendations obtained from the local soil conservation authority or land management agency. In the absence of recommendations, Ruby will use the minimum spacing requirements outlined Ruby’s Upland Erosion Control and Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan (Appendix D, POD). Additionally, permanent water bars may extend slightly (about four feet) beyond the edge of the construction ROW to effectively drain water away from the disturbed area. Where slope breakers extend beyond the edge of the construction ROW, they are subject to compliance with all applicable survey requirements.
October 2009
Water bars will consist of a one-foot-high berm with an upslope swale. Water bars will be reseeded. Water bars will be gently angled downslope to divert stormwater runoff to a stable
5-4
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
upland discharge point or to a “j” hook created at the outfall point. The purposes of water bars are to:
� Decrease overland water velocities on disturbed lands by reducing slope lengths;
� Remove water from the disturbed area in a controlled manner and at frequent intervals to reduce its erosive power;
� Direct water into a stabilized location to minimize surface scour;
� Maximize water infiltration along the Project ROW; and
� Slow water flow across the ROW to help maintain soil moisture for restoration efforts.
Noxious and Invasive Weed Abatement Noxious and invasive weeds may reduce the success of ROW revegetation through competition for water, soil nutrients, space, and sunlight (Monsen 2000). Field crews have identified areas were noxious and invasive weeds occur within the ROW (see POD, Appendix H). 5.2.3 Revegetation Vegetation types within the ROW vary according to soil types, topography, climatic conditions, and land management practices. Several seeding mixes are necessary to accommodate these differences (Sheley et al. 2008). Plants will be re-established by seeding and by planting of bare-root and/or container-grown plants. The different mixes of species for seeding and transplanting were developed with input from the KFRA, LRA, FWNF, and ODFW. Analysis of ecological sites along the ROW also informed the development of seeding mixes and appropriate locations for their application (Appendix A).
Seeding will be the main method of reestablishing plants within the ROW, extra workspaces, and access roads. However, container-grown shrubs and bare-root conifer trees will be transplanted in appropriate locations. Container-grown plants will be used to re-establish important shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry in critical habitat areas such as sage-grouse nesting and pygmy rabbit colonies. Bare-root ponderosa pine seedlings will be transplanted along the ROW where ponderosa pine trees were removed in the clearing operation. Container-grown shrubs and bare-root trees will be planted at stocking rates similar to those prior to ROW clearing. Tubing will be used to protect the seeding from livestock and wildlife browsing.
Reference to seeding mixes also include container-grown plants, as appropriate. Seeds for the seeding mixes will be purchased from commercial vendors and FWNF or collected by professional seed collectors following BLM and USFS seed collecting policy. Ruby is
October 2009 5-5
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
currently working to identify seed sources, seed collectors, seed growers, and nurseries. Seeds will be sourced from the ROW, immediately adjacent to the ROW, or similar ecological sites, where possible. Ecotypic variation within species is important for successful plant establishment (Plumber 1977; Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978). FWNF-purchased and field-collected seed will be increased by contracted seed growers. Commercially available seed will be sourced from ecological sites similar to the ROW to the extent possible. LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, and FWNF will be informed of commercially available seed sources, and any major changes to the seed mixes will be communicated to these federal agencies and private landowners.
Other resources to help define the seed mixes include the USDA-NRCS Plants Database (http://plants.usda.gov) and VegSpec (http://vegspec.nrcs.usda.gov/vegSpec/index.jsp), which is a decision support system that assists in planning and designing revegetation projects (Sheley et al. 2008).
The proposed seed mixtures were designed to be compatible with the dominant vegetation and land uses currently found along the ROW. The criteria used for selecting the seed mixes were based on the following:
� Erosion-control capability;
� Plant dominance of surrounding vegetation;
� Land use;
� Availability of seed;
� Wildlife habitat value;
� Livestock management; and
� Restoration of traditional food and medicine gathered by Native Americans.
Seeds will be tested for purity and viability, and certified as weed free to ensure compliance with local, state, and federal seed requirements (Monsen 2000). Seedbed Preparation and Seed Mix Seedbed preparation will consist of recontouring, decompacting, and restoring surface soil as described in Section 5.2.2. The soil surface will be worked with heavy equipment to create a roughened surface (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978, Monsen 2000, 2005, Sheley et al. 2008). The roughened soil surface will facilitate the collection of precipitation to enhance soil water percolation, reduce erosion, and provide safe sites for seedling establishment. The seedbed will be firm but not compacted, nor will it have a crusted surface.
October 2009 5-6
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
The pipeline will cross sagebrush-steppe vegetation, salt-desert shrub, pinion-juniper, forest, riparian/wetland, and agricultural vegetation types in Oregon. Native seeds mixes will be used to restore vegetation on public lands to the extent possible and according to BLM and USFS policy. The seed mix for private lands will be based on previous or adjacent land uses and approved by the landowner. Vegetative propagules will be used to re-establish plants in riparian and wetland areas. All seed mixes will be approved by LRA, KFRA, FWNR, Reclamation and ODFW, or private landowners on their respective lands.
Re-establishing vegetation in arid and semi-arid sagebrush-steppe and salt-desert shrub vegetation types can be challenging because of unpredictable precipitation and noxious or invasive weed competition (Monsen 2000). Proper seedbed preparation, mulch, adapted seed mix, mycorrhizal fungi inoculation, and weed abatement are ways to improve the chances of successful plant establishment (Institute for Land Rehabilitation 1978; Monsen 1999, 2005; Plummer 1977; Sheley et al. 2008).
The sagebrush steppe seed mix presented in Table 5.2-1 was developed by the LRA and ODFW Lakeview Field Office. The mix is targeted to improve obligatory sage-grouse habitat with a variety of grasses and forbs that occur in the surrounding ecological sites.
Table 5.2-1 Sagebrush Steppe Seed Mix
Species PLS lbs/Acre Bulk lbs/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 0.9Great Basin wildrye 0.8Bluebunch wheatgrass 1.0Bottlebrush squirreltail 1.5Western wheatgrass 1.2Thickspike wheatgrass 0.8Thurber’s needlegrass 0.8Idaho fescue 0.5Sandberg bluegrass 0.3Lewis blue flax 0.3Hawksbeard 0.3Sulphur flower
buckwheat 0.3Deseret parsley
October 2009 5-7
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Table 5.2-1 Sagebrush Steppe Seed Mix
Species PLS lbs/Acre Bulk lbs/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 0.3Pussytoes 0.3Milkvetch
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
The seed mixes presented in Tables 5.2-2 to 5.2-5 were provided by the KFRA and Reclamation for seeding in specified vegetation types on their lands:
Table 5.2-2 Low Sagebrush Vegetation Type
Species PLS lbs/Acre Bulk lbs/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 2.0Sandberg bluegrass 2.0Idaho fescue 2.0Bluebunch wheatgrass 1.0Onespike danthornia 0.25 Lupine 0.25 Oregon yampah 0.25 Bolander’s yampah 0.25 Low beardtongue 0.25 Nineleaf biscuitroot 0.25 Barestem biscuitroot 0.1Low sagebrush 0.25 Sulphur-flower
buckwheat 0.5Antelope bitterbrush
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
Table 5.2-3 Basin Big Sagebrush Vegetation Type
October 2009 5-8
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Species PLS lbs/Acre Bulk lbs/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 2.0Idaho fescue 3.0Bluebunch wheatgrass 2.0Sandberg bluegrass 1.0Basin wildrye 1.0Thurber’s needlegrass 1.0Ross’ sedge 1.0Squirreltail 1.0Prairie junegrass 0.25 Agoseris 0.25 Phacelia 0.25 Common yarroe 0.25 Oregon yampah 0.25 Bolander’s yampah 0.25 Spreading phlox 0.25 Nineleaf biscuitroot 0.25 Barestem biscuitroot 0.5Antelope bitterbrush 0.1Basin big sagebrush 0.25 Sulphur-flower
buckwheat 1.0Klamath plum 0.1Saskatoon serviceberry 0.5Desert gooseberry
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
Table 5.2-4 Juniper Vegetation type
October 2009 5-9
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Species PLS lbs/Acre Bulk lbs/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 2.0Idaho fescue 3.0Bluebuch wheatgrass 2.0Sandberg bluegrass 1.0Onespike danthornia 1.0Thurber’s needlegrass 1.0Squirreltail 1.0Prairie junegrass 0.25 Agoseris 0.25 Lupine 0.25 Common yarrow 0.25 Low beardtongue 0.25 Nineleaf biscuitroot 0.25 Barestem biscuitroot 0.25 Spreading phlox 0.1Low sagebrush 0.25 Sulphur-flower
buckwheat 0.5Antelope bitterbrush
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
Table 5.2-5 Pine Vegetation type
Species PLS lbs/Acre Bulk lbs/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 2.0Idaho fescue 3.0Bluebuch wheatgrass 2.0Sandberg bluegrass 2.0Thurber’s needlegrass 1.0Ross’ sedge
October 2009 5-10
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Table 5.2-5 Pine Vegetation type
Species PLS lbs/Acre Bulk lbs/Acre PLS/sq. ft. 1.0Western needlegrass 1.0Squirreltail 1.0Prairie junegrass 0.25 Agoseris 0.25 Lupine 0.25 Common yarrow 0.25 Low beardtongue 0.25 Nineleaf biscuitroot 0.25 Barestem biscuitroot 0.25 Spreading phlox 0.1Low sagebrush 0.25 Sulphur-flower
buckwheat 0.5Antelope bitterbrush
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
The FWNF has requested that both transplanting and seeding occur on their lands. One-hundred and fifty ponderosa pine seedlings will be transplanted on the portion of the ROW that can be revegetated with trees. Tables 5.2-6 and 5.2-7 present the required seed mixes (under discussion with the agencies).
Table 5.2-6 Mixed Conifer Forest Species PLS lbs/Acre Seed in Production
?, maybe outplant Symphoricarpos albus(snowberry) Cercocarpus ledifolius (curl-leaf mt mahogany)
?, maybe outplant
Mahonia aquifolium (Oregon grape)
?, maybe outplant
?, maybe outplant Amelanchier alnifolia (serviceberry)
October 2009 5-11
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Table 5.2-6 Mixed Conifer Forest Elymus elymoides (squirreltail) 1.5 125 lbs 11/2009
1.0Achnatherum occidentale(western needlegrass)
2.5 4.8 lbs, not enough to grow yet
Bromus carinatus var. marginatus (California brome) Linum lewisii (blue flax) 0.3Achillea millefolium (yarrow) 0.3Arnica cordifolia (heartleaf arnica) 0.3Potentilla glandulosa (sticky cinquefoil)
0.3
Carex hoodii (Hood’s sedge) ?, maybe outplant Wyethia mollis (wooly wyethia) 0.3Vicia americana (American vetch) 0.3Lupinus argenteus (silvery lupine) 0.3
Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
Table 5.2-7 Low Sagebrush Seed Mix
Species PLS LBS/Acre Seed in Production Artemesia arbuscula (low sage) 0.05 Eriogonum umbellatum (sulphur buckwheat)
0.3
Elymus elymoides (squirreltail) 1.5 185 lbs due11/09 (250 lbs available in 2010)
Festuca idahoensis (Idaho fescue)
0.8 seed being tested prior to grow out
Poa secunda (Sandberg bluegrass)
0.5
1.0 250 lbs due11/10 (some may be available in 2009)
Pseudoroegnaria spicata(bluebunch wheatgrass) Linum lewisii (blue flax) 0.3Lomatium triternatum (nine-leaved biscuitroot)
0.3
Lomatium macrocarpum (bigseed biscuitroot)
0.3
Lomatium canbyi (Canby's biscuitroot)
0.3
Astragalus purshii (woollypod milkvetch)
0.3
October 2009 5-12
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Table 5.2-7 Low Sagebrush Seed Mix
Species PLS LBS/Acre Seed in Production Astragalus lentiginosus (freckledmilkvetch)
0.3
Crepis acuminata (tapertip hawksbeard)
0.3
0.3Phoenicaulis cheiranthoides(wallflower phoenicaulis) Key: lbs = pounds PLS = pure live seed sq. ft. = square foot
Riparian and Wetland Restoration Riparian and wetland areas disturbed by pipeline construction will be restored following the procedures described in Section 5 of this Plan. In addition, impermeable plugs will be placed around the pipeline to prevent it from acting as a French drain and preventing water movement. Vegetative propagules obtained from surrounding native plants will be collected to revegetate disturbed sites. Many wetland plants commonly reproduce using vegetative means such as rhizomes, tuber, stolons, stem-layering, or root sprouting. The topsoil removed from the ROW will contain vegetative propagules that should grow after the topsoil is replaced during restoration. Also, plant materials will be collected from riparian/wetland plants and then planted in disturbed areas. The collection of plant materials will be spread over a large area to minimize impacts to any single area. Shrub Transplants Shrubs such as low sagebrush, Wyoming sagebrush, bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry will be grown in containers and transplanted during late fall or early into sagebrush habitat that receives at least 10 inches of average annual precipitation and soils are at least six inches deep and are agreed upon by Ruby and BLM. Cages will be placed around the transplants to limit livestock and wildlife grazing. The shrubs will be planted into small basins, approximately 24 inches diameter and four inches deep, to concentrate precipitation and surface runoff near the plant roots. Transplants will be watered monthly during the first growing season, as practical.
Local seed ecotypes for these species may not be commercially available, and production is unpredictable. Local ecotypic seed would be collected within the same ecological site or similar ecological site as in the ROW and grown in containers at nurseries. Shrubs will be planted to replicate patterns of the surrounding area, to the greatest degree possible.
October 2009 5-13
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Seeding Methods The NRCS guidelines for seeding native plants in arid and semi-arid rangelands will be followed (Dreesen not dated). These guidelines call for at least 20-40 pure live seeds per square foot for drilled seed. The number of pure live seed per square foot would be doubled for broadcast seedings.
The main purpose of seeding methods is to place the seed in direct contact with the soil, cover the seed with soil, and firm the soil around the seed in to eliminate air pockets (Sheley et al. 2008). Drill and broadcasting seeding techniques will be used. Most species can be successfully drill-seeded into the soil. Seeding depth in the soil depends on seed size. Grass and forb seed will be planted at a soil depth greater than 0.5 and 0.25 inch, respectively. Sagebrush seed is best planted on the soil surface because it usually germinates better from broadcast seeding.
Direct seeding will be the primary method for seeding within the ROW. Direct seeding uses specialized equipment such as a rangeland seeder. The advantages of direct seeding are efficiency at placing seed at the proper soil depth and economy of bulk seed. Its disadvantages are terrain limitations such as slopes greater than 15 percent and rocky soils.
Broadcast seeding distributes the seed on top of the soil surface using a hand-held spreader or all-terrain vehicle-mounted cyclone-type seed spreader, seed blower, hydroseeding, and/or aerial application. Broadcast seed is not as efficient as direct seeding because in this method seeds are not buried in the soil, and it requires approximately twice the bulk seed. In areas where broadcast seeding occurs, a harrow will be used to cover the seed, where possible.
Hydroseeding/hydromulching uses water with a slurry of seed, mulch, and tackifier, if required by land management agencies, which are sprayed over the restored topsoil surface. Hydroseeding alone sprays only the seed on the soil surface. This method often does not allow good soil-to-seed contact, leaves seed exposed to desiccating wind and temperatures, and increases seed loss by rodent and avian foraging. Both methods are limited by equipment access. Slopes that cannot be straw punched or hydroseeded/hydromulched will be broadcast seeded and hand-raked.
Fertilizer, Soil Amendments, and Weed Control Ruby does not anticipate the need for application of fertilizers as part of its post-construction restoration activities because elevated levels of soil nitrogen may encourage weedy plant colonization (Sheley et al. 2008). Mycorrhizal fungi will be used to inoculate seed to aid shrub establishment; soil microorganisms should remain viable during stockpiling. Mycorrhizal inoculums will be applied in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.
Pre-emergent herbicides will be used, where appropriate and approved by agencies, to minimize germination of noxious and annual weeds such as cheatgrass, medusahead
October 2009 5-14
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
October 2009 5-15
wildrye, halogeton, and mustards. Herbicide selections, applications rates, and timing will be conducted in compliance with product use directions and approved by the BLM, USFS, Reclamation, or private landowner.
5.3 Restoration Treatment for Erodible Soils Erodible soils have been identified in the Project area (See Ruby’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement [DEIS] section 4.2.1). Erodible soils may require additional restorative inputs to minimize wind and water erosion. The objective will be to rapidly stabilize erodible soils by means of erosion control measures, including a vegetation cover. Erosion control measures will include one or more techniques, such as the planting of a sterile annual grass or slender wheatgrass, weed-free straw bales or wattles, silt fencing, water bars, soil tackifier, and/or wetting compounds to decrease erosion. The application of a sterile annual grass will be approved by the land management agency or landowner, as appropriate. Appropriate restoration action will begin immediately after pipeline trench closure.
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
6.0 Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance
The purpose of restoration monitoring is to evaluate long-term soil stability, vegetative composition and cover, and occurrence of noxious weeds within the ROW. Restoration monitoring would include both qualitative and quantitative measures. Issues such as erosion control and plant establishment failures will be identified and appropriately addressed. Ruby will insure that LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, and FWNF have the opportunity to participate in designing and carrying out restoration monitoring.
The primary objectives of monitoring and anticipated actions are listed below.
� Assess the effectiveness of erosion-control structures (e.g., water bars) to ensure soil stability with no accelerated erosion or wash-outs. Locations where additional remedial work may be required would be identified by MP. The monitoring of the ROW for significant and/or new erosion or third-party damage is an element of Ruby’s routine aerial surveillance that will be conducted throughout the life of the pipeline. It is anticipated that any active erosion will be apparent during the first two years following restoration or after the first runoff event.
� Monitor and assess, through quantitative analysis, the success of the reseeding efforts during the third growing season, with subsequent follow-up surveys in the fifth and seventh growing seasons and additional surveys if needed. Vegetation sampling plots will be used to measure plant density, cover, bare ground, vegetation litter, and rock in comparison with adjacent undisturbed areas (Brower and Zar 1977; Elzinga et al. 1998).
� Monitor the survival of special plantings for visual restoration, if applicable, and the extent to which the restored ROW blends in with the adjacent undisturbed areas.
� Monitor and assess targeted weeds in accordance with the Ruby’s Noxious and Invasive Weed Control Plan (see POD Appendix H). Newly established weed colonies will be reported to the appropriate LRA, KFRA, FWNF, Reclamation offices or landowner immediately. Identify places where other vegetation control may be needed. Note that with the exception of noxious weed control, vegetation maintenance, including mowing of non-agricultural lands or general tree removal, is not anticipated. Ruby will, however, selectively remove trees and large shrubs from the permanent 50-foot wide ROW to facilitate aerial surveillance and inspection. Grass, forb, and low growing shrub growth within the 50-foot-wide ROW will be facilitated.
October 2009 6-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
� Monitor and identify other disturbances that may hinder restoration success, such as excessive livestock grazing or unauthorized OHV travel. Determine ways to take corrective actions in consultation with BLM, USFS, Reclamation, and ODFW.
� Ruby will fund an ODFW restoration project oversight position. The purpose of this position will be to monitor post-construction Project restoration and plant establishment, unauthorized OHV activity, and excessive livestock grazing. The position would be funded for a predetermined number of years following construction of the Project, the cost and number of years of which would be agreed upon by Ruby and ODFW.
6.1 Revegetation Performance Criteria Upland restoration on non-agriculture land will generally be considered successful when vegetation within the reclaimed ROW supports non-noxious plants that are similar in forb, graminoid, and woody plant density and cover to those growing on adjacent undisturbed lands. However, determination of upland and other area restoration success rests with the Authorized Officer of the agency granting the ROW. Mutually acceptable relinquishment could occur as ROW acreage restoration and revegetation are deemed successful. Where initial restoration and plant establishment efforts fail to meet plant establishment standards, reseeding and/or transplanting shrubs or trees may be necessary on plots and portions of the ROW.
Because initial plant establishment efforts may not be successful, reseeding and/or re-transplanting may be necessary on plots and portions of the ROW that fail to meet objectives. Ruby will re-seed and/or re-transplant areas where initial plant establishment efforts fail. BLM, USFS, Reclamation, ODFW, and landowners will be consulted regarding any proposed changes in seeding mixes and application methods. If successful plant establishment is not achieved within 10 years, appropriate compensatory mitigation will be discussed with BLM, Reclamation, and USFS.
Ruby will fund and carry out a comprehensive monitoring program approved by BLM, Reclamation, and USFS. A quantitative vegetative monitoring program will document the restoration progress in the ROW. LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, and FWNF will participate in the selection of the monitoring and control plots. Monitoring plots will be established randomly within different vegetation types along the ROW and control plots on adjacent undisturbed lands. The monitoring and control plots will be similar in aspect, slope, and soils and approximately one acre in size. NRCS ecological sites will be used to help define plot locations. BLM, Reclamation, and USFS will approve plot locations on respective managed lands.
October 2009 6-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
The control plots will have similar dimensions as the ROW monitoring plots and be established in undisturbed vegetation adjacent to the ROW. Global positioning system (GPS) coordinates will be located at all plots within and outside the ROW. A quadrant sampling (2 x 2 meters in size) method will be used to assess species cover in the monitoring and control plots (Brower and Zar 1977; Elzinga et al. 1998). Approximately 25 quadrants will be randomly placed in the monitoring plots and 25 in the control plots to measure species density and cover. A one-tailed independent-sample t-test will compare total grass, forb, and woody plant density and cover between the monitoring and control plots. Mortality rates of transplanted shrubs and trees will be reported. Negligible disturbance to soil and vegetation will occur during monitoring and plant sampling.
Vegetation monitoring will occur for a minimum of five years. The first, third, and fourth years will monitor the presence of noxious weeds, settling, and erosion. The second and fifth years will focus on plant success and documenting any additional seeding requirements. Vegetative plots will be monitored for five years. Additional monitoring will occur as necessary and agreed upon by Ruby and the land managing agency or landowner.
As stated above, Ruby will quantitatively document restoration success within the ROW. Parameters will include a species list and estimates of species density and percentage of plant cover, vegetation litter, rock, and bare ground. Observations of soil disturbance, occurrence of noxious and invasive weeds, plant growth stages, animal use, and grazing impacts will be documented. Qualitative analysis methods will be incorporated at established monitoring locations to provide visual documentation of all quantitative data.
6.2 Remedial Action and Maintenance Ruby will address identified erosion problems as soon as practical based on evaluation of conditions outside the permanent ROW and conditions prior to ROW construction. The same technique could be re-applied or a new approach taken based on site-specific conditions. Erosion control structures, such as certified weed-free straw bale or sediment fences, will be removed when sites are deemed stable and restoration is determined to be successful.
Reseeding or replanting efforts, if necessary, will occur in agreement with the landowner or land management agency in areas where monitoring identifies plant establishment failure, particularly where accompanied by observed increases in water or wind erosion. Discussions will occur with land management agencies and landowners to determine actions required to limit livestock grazing or OHV use, where needed.
October 2009 6-3
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
October 2009 6-4
Noxious and invasive weed control is also included in maintenance and would be performed in accordance with the weed control plan (see POD, Appendix H).
6.3 Reporting Ruby will document its observations of restoration success following the field inspections and provide summary reports to the BLM, USFS, Reclamation, ODFW, and FERC. Areas that need remedial action will also be identified by MP and GPS coordinates and will include a description of additional erosion controls or revegetation work anticipated. Reports including a summary of corrective actions proposed will be submitted within three months of identifying these conditions. Areas where control applications for noxious and invasive weeds are needed will also be reported.
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
7.0 Off-highway Vehicle Control
The LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, FWNF, ODFW, and private landowners have expressed concerns that the reclaimed ROW will be used for unauthorized OHV travel, which could thwart restoration efforts and promote erosion. To minimize OHV access on the ROW, Ruby will install OHV barriers at appropriate locations in coordination with LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, FWNF, and landowners. Ruby will submit to LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, and FWNF for review and approval site-specific designs for OHV barriers. All designs will meet agency standards and may include dirt/rock berms, log barriers, vegetative screens, signs, fencing, and locked gates. The proposed OHV barriers will be constructed in a manner that is designed to prevent unauthorized motor vehicle/OHV use to and along the ROW. Federal agencies understand that unauthorized OHV trespass can be difficult to control in remote, heavy OHV use areas. Efforts to control unauthorized OHV use will be monitored throughout the life of the Project and additional measures implemented as necessary to control OHV use.
To discourage OHV use of the ROW, Ruby will use the following deterrents, in consultation with LRA, KFRA, Reclamation, FWNF, and ODFW:
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition; � Establish “keep off” signs with an explanation at entry ways onto the ROW; � Install rock barriers, earthen berms, or other barricades at existing authorized OHV
routes that cross the ROW; and Work closely with the BLM, Reclamation, and private landowners, grazing lessees, local law enforcement personnel, and adjacent landowners to monitor and eliminate unauthorized access to the ROW.
Ruby will coordinate with LRA, KFRA, FWNF, Reclamation, USFWS, ODFW, landowners, and appropriate law enforcement personnel to determine the adequacy and appropriateness of proposed countermeasures. Ruby will maintain, repair, or replace countermeasures during life of the Project.
October 2009 7-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
8.0 Livestock Control
The ROW will cross through livestock grazing allotments on BLM land. Succulent grass and forb growth will attract these grazing animals. Excessive grazing may cause plant establishment efforts to fail. The following management practices for livestock grazing will be implemented:
� Leave the ROW surface in a roughened condition; � Include low palatable plant species in the seeding mix such as sagebrush and
western yarrow; and � Negotiate with allotment permittees to limit livestock grazing in the ROW by using one
or more of the following options: herding or placing salt licks and/or protein blocks one mile from the ROW, fencing crucial habitat areas, deferring grazing for two to three years, closing pasture, implementing seasonal deferment, and/or reducing stocking preference. Ruby may compensate permittees if reduced stocking preference or pasture closure occurs.
9.0 References
Bainbridge, D.A. 2007. A Guide for Desert and Dryland Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International. Tucson, Arizona.
Belnap, J., 2000. Structure and Function of Biological Soil Crusts. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenhof, compilers. Proceedings: Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Belnap, J., R. Rosentreter, S. Leonard, J.H. Kaltenecker, and J. Williams, D. Eldridge, 2001. Biological Soil Crusts: Ecology and Management. Technical Reference 1730-2. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Denver, Colorado.
Brower, J.E. and J.H. Zar, 1977. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Dubuque, Iowa: William. C. Brown Company Publishers.
Dames and Moore, Inc. 1990. Kern River Pipeline Reclamation Plan, Dixie National Forest Portion, Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
October 2009 9-1
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
Dreesen, D.R. Not Dated. Basic Guidelines for Seeding Native Grasses In Arid and Semi-Arid Ecoregions. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center, Los Lunas, New Mexico.
Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2002. Reclamation Plan, Utah Portion 2003 Expansion Project. Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2007. Right-of-Way Reclamation Monitoring Report Year 2007. Prepared for Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
EDAW, 2002. Falcon to Gonder 345 kV Transmission Project Construction, Operation and Maintenance Plan: Appendix C3, Reclamation and Habitat Restoration Plan. Prepared by EDAW, Inc., San Francisco, California.
Elzinga, C.L., D. W. Salzer, and J.W. Willoughby, 1998. Measuring & Monitoring Plant Populations. BLM Technical Reference 1730-1. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Business Center, Denver, Colorado.
Institute for Land Rehabilitation, 1978. Rehabilitation of Western Wildlife Habitat: A Review. FWS/OBS-78/86. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Monsen, S.B., 2000. Establishment of Big Sagebrush (Artemisia Tridentata) in Semiarid Environments. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenhof, compilers. 2000. Proceedings: Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Monsen, Stephen B., 2005. Restoration Manual for Colorado Sagebrush and Associated Shrubland Communities. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, Colorado.
Monsen, S.B., R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw. 2004. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-136, Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Plummer, A.P., 1977. Revegetation of disturbed Intermountain area sites. In Thames, J.L., ed. Reclamation of disturbed land in the southwest. Tucson, Arizona: University Arizona Press; Pgs 302-339.
Shaw, N. L. and S. B. Monsen, 2000. Controlling Annual Grasses with OUST® Herbicide. In: Entwistle, P.G., A.M. DeBolt, J.H. Kaltenecker, and K. Steenhof, compilers. 2000. Proceedings: Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems Symposium. Bureau of Land Management Publication No. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150, Boise, Idaho.
Sheley, R., J. Mangold, K. Goodwin, and J. Marks, 2008. Revegetation Guidelines for the Great Basin: Considering Invasive Weeds. ARS-168. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C.
October 2009 9-2
RUBY PIPELINE PROJECT DRAFT RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION PLAN
OREGON
October 2009 9-3
Siegel, S. and S. Donaldson, 2003. Measures to Prevent the Spread of Noxious and Invasive Weeds During Construction Activities. Fact Sheet FS-03-59, Cooperative Extension, University of Nevada, Reno.
University of Minnesota Extension, 1998. Earth-Berm Water Bars. FS-06972. University of Minnesota.
Wallace, A., E.M. Romney, and R.B. Hunter. 1980. The Challenge of a Desert: Revegetation of Disturbed Desert Lands. In Soil-Plant-Animal Relationships Bearing on Revegetation and Land Reclamation in Nevada Deserts. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs (4): 214–225.
Watson, Dave. October 9, 2009. Lands and Realty Specialist. Personal Communication. Bureau of Land Management. Salt Lake Field Office. Telephone conversation with Jerry Barker, Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC, Boulder, Colorado.
A. Ecological Site Occurrence and
Descriptive Information Along the ROW in Oregon
A-1
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
586
.7
R02
3XY
218O
R
16-2
0"
Shr
ubby
lo
am
Gra
ss:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-2
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
, Le
ymus
ci
nere
us,
Psue
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na,
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a,A
mel
anch
ier
alni
folia
, C
erco
carp
us
ledi
foliu
s
2-15
%
4,80
0-5,
100
ft.
1) H
ill
Forb
s:A
stra
galu
s,
Lupi
nus,
Ac
hille
a m
illefo
lium
, Ag
oser
is
2) P
late
au
MP
587
.7
R02
3XY
218O
R
16-2
0"
Shr
ubby
lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Ach
nath
erum
th
urbe
rianu
m,
Leym
us
cine
reus
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na,
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a,A
mel
anch
ier
alni
folia
, C
erco
carp
us
ledi
foliu
s
2-15
%
4,80
0-5,
100
ft.
1) H
ill
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
s:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-3
Ast
raga
lus,
Lu
pinu
s,
Achi
llea
mille
foliu
m,
Agos
eris
2) P
late
au
MP
588.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
Forb
: Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
589.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-4
Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
590.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
Forb
: Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
591.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-5
Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
592.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
Forb
: Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
593.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-6
Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
594.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
A
chna
ther
um
thur
beria
num
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
Forb
: Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
595
.7
R02
3XY
216O
R
12-1
6"
Cla
ypan
G
rass
: Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
eudo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
2-30
%
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
Terra
ce
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
: Phl
ox s
p.,
Lom
atiu
m s
p.,
Agos
eris
MP
596.
7 R
023X
Y216
OR
12
-16"
C
layp
an
Gra
ss:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-7
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
eudo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
2-30
%
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
Terra
ce
Forb
: Phl
ox s
p.,
Lom
atiu
m s
p.,
Agos
eris
MP
597.
7 R
023X
Y216
OR
12
-16"
C
layp
an
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
Poa
se
cund
a
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
2-30
%
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
Terra
ce
Forb
: Phl
ox s
p.,
Lom
atiu
m s
p.,
Agos
eris
MP
598.
7 R
023X
Y216
OR
12
-16"
C
layp
an
Gra
ss: F
estu
ca
idah
oens
is,
Pseu
doro
egne
ria
spic
ata,
Poa
se
cund
a
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
C
hrys
otha
mnu
s vi
scid
iflor
us
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
2-30
%
5,50
0-6,
500
ft.
Terra
ce
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
: Phl
ox s
p.,
Lom
atiu
m s
p.,
Agos
eris
MP
599.
7 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-8
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
eudo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a,
Ach
nath
erum
th
urbe
rianu
m
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
Forb
: Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
600
.7
N/A
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
601
.7
R02
1XY
216O
R
14-1
8"
Sto
ny
clay
pan
Sur
face
sto
nes
limit
plan
t de
nsity
. If a
rea
is o
verg
raze
d Id
aho
fesc
ue
and
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s w
ill
decr
ease
and
Sa
ndbe
rg
blue
gras
s an
d lo
w s
age
will
in
crea
se.
1-40
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
Terra
ce
MP
609
.8
R02
1XY
216O
R
14-1
8"
Sto
ny
clay
pan
Sur
face
sto
nes
limit
plan
t de
nsity
. If a
rea
is o
verg
raze
d Id
aho
fesc
ue
and
blue
bunc
h w
heat
gras
s w
ill
decr
ease
and
Sa
ndbe
rg
blue
gras
s an
d lo
w s
age
will
in
crea
se.
1-40
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
Terra
ce O
ctob
er 2
009
A-9
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
610
.8
R02
1XY
306O
R
14-1
8"
Sto
ny
clay
pan
Sou
th
Gra
ss:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-10
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
A.
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
wyo
min
gens
is,
Erio
gonu
m
mic
roth
ecum
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata
30-7
0%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Mou
ntai
n sl
ope
Forb
s:E
riogo
num
ni
veum
, Pl
anta
go
pata
goni
ca,
Lom
atiu
m,
Phl
ox, T
rifol
ium
m
acro
ceph
alum
MP
611
.8
R02
1XY
214O
R
14-1
8"
Cla
ypan
G
rass
: Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
A
rtem
isia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
, E
riogo
num
m
icro
thec
um,
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-15
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
1) T
erra
ce
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
s
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-11
:Ba
lsam
orhi
za
hook
eri,
Lom
atiu
m,
Phl
ox, P
lant
ago
pata
goni
ca
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a 2)
Pla
teau
MP
612
.8
R02
4XY
002O
R
6-11
" S
odic
mea
dow
G
rass
: Dis
tichi
ls
spic
ata,
Spor
obol
us
airo
ides
, S
parti
na g
raci
lis
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us,
Shep
herd
ia
arge
ntea
0-3%
4,
000-
4,50
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:C
amas
sia
sp.
Mon
olep
is s
p.,
Rum
ex s
p.
2) V
alle
y
3) L
akeb
ed
MP
613
.8
MP
613
.8
R02
1XY
21O
R
14-1
8"
Loam
y G
rass
: Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
ssp.
va
seya
na,
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a,A
mel
anch
ier
alni
folia
,
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
Terra
ce
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
s:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-12
Ast
raga
lus,
Lo
mat
ium
, Lu
pinu
s, P
hlox
Pru
nus
subc
orda
ta
MP
R61
4.7
R02
1XY
102O
R
10-1
4"
Sod
ic fl
at
Gra
ss: L
eym
us
cine
reus
, D
istic
hilis
sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us,
0-1%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
B
asin
floo
r
Forb
s: A
chill
ea
mille
foliu
m,
Erig
eron
sp.
, Iva
ax
illar
is
MP
R61
5.8
R02
1XY4
06O
R
14-4
0"
min
/ma
x
Wet
mea
dow
W
et: *
Tufte
d ha
irgra
ss,
north
ern
man
nagr
ass,
ba
ltic
rush
big
sage
brus
h,
0-2%
4,
100-
7,00
0 ft.
Fl
oodp
lain
Mes
ic:o
rang
e ar
nica
, gr
een
rabb
itbru
sh
silv
erw
eed,
smal
l bed
stra
w
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Upl
and:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-13
pra
irie
june
gras
s,
oatg
rass
,K
entu
cky
blue
gras
s, m
at
muh
ly
MP
R61
6.8
R02
1XY1
04O
R
10-1
4"
Salin
e m
eado
w
Gra
ss:
Puc
cine
llia
nutta
llian
a,C
arex
sp.
, D
istic
hlis
spic
ata,
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:E
ucep
halu
s sp
. 2)
Fllo
d pl
ain
MP
R61
7.8
R02
1XY1
04O
R
10-1
4"
Salin
e m
eado
w
Gra
ss:
Puc
cine
llia
nutta
llian
a,C
arex
sp.
, D
istic
hlis
spic
ata,
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
Forb
s:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-14
Euc
epha
lus
sp.
2) F
lood
pl
ain
MP
R61
8.8
R02
1XY1
04O
R
10-1
4"
Salin
e m
eado
w
Gra
ss:
Puc
cine
llia
nutta
llian
a,C
arex
sp.
, D
istic
hlis
spic
ata,
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:E
ucep
halu
s sp
. 2)
Flo
od
plai
n
MP
R61
9.8
R02
1XY1
04O
R
10-1
4"
Salin
e m
eado
w
Gra
ss:
Puc
cine
llia
nutta
llian
a,C
arex
sp.
, D
istic
hlis
spic
ata,
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:E
ucep
halu
s sp
. 2)
Flo
od
plai
n
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
R62
0.8
R02
1XY1
04O
R
10-1
4"
Salin
e m
eado
w
Gra
ss:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-15
Puc
cine
llia
nutta
llian
a,C
arex
sp.
, D
istic
hlis
spic
ata,
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:E
ucep
halu
s sp
. 2)
Flo
od
plai
n
MP
621
.4
R02
1XY
104O
R
10-1
4"
Sal
ine
mea
dow
G
rass
:P
ucci
nelli
a nu
ttalli
ana,
Car
ex s
p.,
Dis
tichl
issp
icat
a, E
lym
us
elym
oide
s
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:E
ucep
halu
s sp
. 2)
Flo
od
plai
n
MP
622
.4
Wat
er
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
623
.4
R02
1XY
104O
R
10-1
4"
Sal
ine
mea
dow
G
rass
:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-16
Puc
cine
llia
nutta
llian
a,C
arex
sp.
, D
istic
hlis
spic
ata,
Ely
mus
el
ymoi
des
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:E
ucep
halu
s sp
. 2)
Flo
od
plai
n
MP
624
.4
R02
1XY
104O
R
10-1
4"
Sal
ine
mea
dow
G
rass
:P
ucci
nelli
a nu
ttalli
ana,
Car
ex s
p.,
Dis
tichl
issp
icat
a, E
lym
us
elym
oide
s
Eric
amer
ia
naus
eosa
, E
ricam
eria
te
retif
olia
,S
arco
batu
s ve
rmic
ulat
us
0-2%
4,
000-
4,70
0 ft.
1)
Bas
in
floor
Forb
s:E
ucep
halu
s sp
. 2)
Flo
od
plai
n
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
625.
4 R
021X
Y212
OR
14
-18"
Sh
allo
w lo
am
Gra
ss:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-17
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
eudo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a,
Ach
nath
erum
th
urbe
rianu
m
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-30
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
1)M
ount
ain
slop
e
Forb
: Ast
raga
lus
sp.,
Lom
atiu
m
sp. (
dese
rt pa
rsle
y),
Lupi
nus
sp.
2) P
late
au
MP
626
.4
R02
1XY
214O
R
14-1
8"
Cla
ypan
G
rass
: Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
A
rtem
isia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
, E
riogo
num
m
icro
thec
um,
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-15
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
1) T
erra
ce
Forb
s:Ba
lsam
orhi
za
hook
eri,
Lom
atiu
m,
Phl
ox, P
lant
ago
pata
goni
ca
2) P
late
au
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
627
.4
R02
1XY
214O
R
14-1
8"
Cla
ypan
G
rass
:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-18
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
A
rtem
isia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
, E
riogo
num
m
icro
thec
um,
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-15
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
1) T
erra
ce
Forb
s:Ba
lsam
orhi
za
hook
eri,
Lom
atiu
m,
Phl
ox, P
lant
ago
pata
goni
ca
2) P
late
au
MP
628
.4
R02
1XY
308O
R
14-1
8"
Sou
th s
lope
s G
rass
:Ps
eudo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a,
Ach
nath
erum
th
urbe
rianu
m,
Poa
sec
unda
Arte
mis
iatri
dent
ata
var.
vase
yana
, Pu
rshi
a tri
dent
ata,
Am
elan
chie
ral
nifo
lia,
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
E
ricam
eria
na
useo
sa
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
15-7
0%
4,40
0-7,
500
ft.
N/A
Forb
s:Ba
lsam
orhi
za
sagi
ttata
, Cre
pis
acum
inat
a,
Lupi
nus
sp.
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
629
.4
R02
1XY
216O
R
14-1
8"
Sto
ny
clay
pan
If ar
ea is
ov
ergr
azed
Id
aho
fesc
ue
and
blue
buch
w
heat
gras
s w
ill
decr
ease
and
Sa
nber
g bl
uegr
ass
will
in
crea
se
1-40
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
Terra
ce
MP
630
.4
R02
1XY
214O
R
14-1
8"
Cla
ypan
G
rass
:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-19
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
A
rtem
isia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
, E
riogo
num
m
icro
thec
um,
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-15
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
1) T
erra
ce
Forb
s:Ba
lsam
orhi
za
hook
eri,
Lom
atiu
m,
Phl
ox, P
lant
ago
pata
goni
ca
2) P
late
au
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-1 L
ake
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Seed
M
ix
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
-ita
tion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Sl
ope
Elev
atio
nLa
ndfo
rmTr
ee
MP
631
.4
R02
1XY
214O
R
14-1
8"
Cla
ypan
G
rass
:
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-20
Fes
tuca
id
ahoe
nsis
, Ps
uedo
roeg
neri
a sp
icat
a, P
oa
secu
nda
Arte
mis
iaar
busc
ula,
A
rtem
isia
tride
ntat
a ss
p.
vase
yana
, E
riogo
num
m
icro
thec
um,
Purs
hia
tride
ntat
a
Juni
peru
s oc
cide
ntal
is
0-15
%
4,00
0-6,
500
ft.
1) T
erra
ce
Forb
s:Ba
lsam
orhi
za
hook
eri,
Lom
atiu
m,
Phl
ox, P
lant
ago
pata
goni
ca
2) P
late
au
MP
632.
4-M
PR
644.
4
Soi
ls d
ata
not
avai
labl
e
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-2 K
lam
ath
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itat
ion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Tr
ee
Slop
eEl
evat
ion
Land
form
Seed
M
ix
MP
R64
5.4-
MP
R66
0.4
Soi
ls d
ata
not
avai
labl
e
MP
R66
1.4
R02
1XY
200O
R
10-1
4”
Loam
y 10
-14
PZ
Blu
e bu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
Th
urbe
r’s
need
legr
ass,
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
bu
ckw
heat
, lu
pine
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
an
telo
pe
bitte
rbru
sh,
gree
n ra
bbitb
rush
2-20
%
4,10
0-4,
800
ft.
Lake
Terra
ces
Hills
Bas
ins
MP
R66
2.4-
MP
R66
4.4
Soi
ls d
ata
not
avai
labl
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-21
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-2 K
lam
ath
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itat
ion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Tr
ee
Slop
eEl
evat
ion
Land
form
Seed
M
ix
MP
R66
5.4
R02
XY
200O
R
10-1
4”
Loam
y 10
-14
PZ
Blu
e bu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
Th
urbe
r’s
need
legr
ass,
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
bu
ckw
heat
, lu
pine
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
an
telo
pe
bitte
rbru
sh,
gree
n ra
bbitb
rush
2-20
%
4,10
0-4,
800
ft.
Lake
Terra
ces
Hills
Bas
ins
MP
R66
6.4-
MP
R66
8.3
Soi
ls d
ata
not
avai
labl
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-22
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-2 K
lam
ath
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itat
ion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Tr
ee
Slop
eEl
evat
ion
Land
form
Seed
M
ix
1-40
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
MP
R66
9.3
R02
1XY
216O
R
14-1
8”
Sto
ney
clay
pan
Sur
face
ston
es li
mit
plan
t den
sity
. If
area
is
over
graz
ed
Idah
o fe
scue
an
d bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
will
decr
ease
an
d S
andb
erg
blue
gras
s an
d lo
w s
age
will
in
crea
se.
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-23
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Tabl
e A
-2 K
lam
ath
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itat
ion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Tr
ee
Slop
eEl
evat
ion
Land
form
Seed
M
ix
1-40
%
4,00
0-6,
000
ft.
MP
R66
9.3
R02
1XY
216O
R
14-1
8”
Sto
ney
clay
pan
Sur
face
ston
es li
mit
plan
t den
sity
. If
area
is
over
graz
ed
Idah
o fe
scue
an
d bl
uebu
nch
whe
atgr
ass
will
decr
ease
an
d S
andb
erg
blue
gras
s an
d lo
w s
age
will
in
crea
se.
MP
R67
1.3
Soi
ls d
ata
not
avai
labl
e
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-24
RU
BYP
IPEL
INE
PR
OJE
CT
D
RAF
T R
ESTO
RAT
ION
AN
D R
EVEG
ETAT
ION
PLA
N
OR
EGO
N
Oct
ober
200
9 A
-25
Tabl
e A
-2 K
lam
ath
Cou
nty
Ecol
ogic
al S
ites
Mile
post
N
RC
S ID
Pr
ecip
itat
ion
Ecol
ogic
al
Site
Nam
e D
omin
ant
Gra
min
oid,
Fo
rb
Dom
inan
t Sh
rub
Dom
inan
t Tr
ee
Slop
eEl
evat
ion
Land
form
Seed
M
ix
MP
R67
2.3
R02
XY
200O
R
10-1
4”
Loam
y 10
-14
PZ
Blu
e bu
nch
whe
atgr
ass,
Th
urbe
r’s
need
legr
ass,
Id
aho
fesc
ue,
tape
rtip
haw
ksbe
ard,
bu
ckw
heat
, lu
pine
Wyo
min
g bi
g sa
gebr
ush,
an
telo
pe
bitte
rbru
sh,
gree
n ra
bbitb
rush
2-20
%
4,10
0-4,
800
ft.
Lake
Terra
ces
Hills
Bas
ins