appendix e exp2 e_exp2.pdf · lc; unweighted means (% discarded in erp.stw) current effect: f(1,...

2.1 Number of Discarded Trials (Ratio)2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA Coding Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (% discarded in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorTASKTASK*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorTASK*LCTASK*LC*groupErrorTASK*FREQTASK*FREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorTASK*LC*FREQTASK*LC*FREQ*groupError

2.053591 1 2.053591 25.88146 0.0000180.106206 1 0.106206 1.33852 0.2564252.380381 30 0.0793460.000020 1 0.000020 0.00115 0.9732000.019153 1 0.019153 1.10282 0.3020340.521006 30 0.0173670.179867 1 0.179867 5.41695 0.0268780.047852 1 0.047852 1.44112 0.2393520.996134 30 0.0332040.466538 1 0.466538 14.30693 0.0006920.000977 1 0.000977 0.02995 0.8637720.978276 30 0.0326090.019153 1 0.019153 1.37456 0.2502560.000977 1 0.000977 0.07009 0.7930210.418009 30 0.0139340.000020 1 0.000020 0.00198 0.9648010.000977 1 0.000977 0.09703 0.7575780.301937 30 0.0100650.060288 1 0.060288 2.27615 0.1418380.106206 1 0.106206 4.00978 0.0543480.794603 30 0.0264870.004484 1 0.004484 0.18432 0.6707580.012456 1 0.012456 0.51199 0.4798120.729871 30 0.024329

Appendix E STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR EXPERIMENT 2 Hakuei Fujiyama

1

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (% discarded in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BnAdj. df

TASKTASK*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorTASK*LCTASK*LC*groupErrorTASK*FREQTASK*FREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorTASK*LC*FREQTASK*LC*FREQ*groupError

1 0.00115 0.973200#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.973200 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 1.10282 0.302034#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.302034 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

301 5.41695 0.026878#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.026878 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 1.44112 0.239352#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.239352 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

301 14.30693 0.000692#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000692 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 0.02995 0.863772#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.863772 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

301 1.37456 0.250256#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.250256 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 0.07009 0.793021#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.793021 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

301 0.00198 0.964801#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.964801 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 0.09703 0.757578#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.757578 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

301 2.27615 0.141838#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.141838 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 4.00978 0.054348#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.054348 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

301 0.18432 0.670758#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.670758 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 0.51199 0.479812#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.479812 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

30

LC; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.4170, p=.02688

Effective hypothesis decomposit ionVertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals

1 2

LC

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

DV_

1Appendix E STATISTICAL RESULTS FOR EXPERIMENT 2 Hakuei Fujiyama

2

FREQ; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=14.307, p=.00069


1 2

FREQ

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

DV_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (% discarded in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .03261, df = 30.000

Cell No.FREQ {1}

.04688{2}

.1322512

1 0.0008182 0.000818

group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.3385, p=.25642Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.109933 0.024898 0.059085 0.160781 162 0.069196 0.024898 0.018349 0.120044 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00115, p=.97320Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.089844 0.019003 0.051034 0.128654 322 0.089286 0.019861 0.048725 0.129847 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1028, p=.30203Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.101563 0.026875 0.046677 0.156448 161 2 0.118304 0.028087 0.060942 0.175665 162 1 0.078125 0.026875 0.023240 0.133010 162 2 0.060268 0.028087 0.002906 0.117630 16


3

LC; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.4170, p=.02688Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.116071 0.020209 0.074800 0.157343 322 0.063058 0.021700 0.018740 0.107376 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.4411, p=.23935Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.122768 0.028580 0.064401 0.181135 161 2 0.097098 0.030689 0.034423 0.159773 162 1 0.109375 0.028580 0.051008 0.167742 162 2 0.029018 0.030689 -0.033657 0.091693 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=14.307, p=.00069Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.046875 0.013387 0.019536 0.074214 322 0.132254 0.026371 0.078397 0.186112 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.02995, p=.86377Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.069196 0.018932 0.030533 0.107860 161 2 0.150670 0.037295 0.074504 0.226836 162 1 0.024554 0.018932 -0.014110 0.063217 162 2 0.113839 0.037295 0.037673 0.190005 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.3746, p=.25026Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.125000 0.025516 0.072890 0.177110 321 2 0.054688 0.021632 0.010509 0.098866 322 1 0.107143 0.021487 0.063260 0.151026 322 2 0.071429 0.025826 0.018685 0.124172 32


4

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.07009, p=.79302Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group TASK LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.125000 0.036084 0.051306 0.198694 161 1 2 0.078125 0.030592 0.015648 0.140602 161 2 1 0.120536 0.030388 0.058476 0.182596 161 2 2 0.116071 0.036524 0.041480 0.190663 162 1 1 0.125000 0.036084 0.051306 0.198694 162 1 2 0.031250 0.030592 -0.031227 0.093727 162 2 1 0.093750 0.030388 0.031690 0.155810 162 2 2 0.026786 0.036524 -0.047805 0.101377 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00198, p=.96480Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.046875 0.017585 0.010961 0.082789 321 2 0.132813 0.030123 0.071293 0.194332 322 1 0.046875 0.014569 0.017121 0.076629 322 2 0.131696 0.027368 0.075803 0.187590 32

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09703, p=.75758Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group TASK FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.062500 0.024869 0.011710 0.113290 161 1 2 0.140625 0.042600 0.053624 0.227626 161 2 1 0.075893 0.020604 0.033815 0.117971 161 2 2 0.160714 0.038705 0.081669 0.239760 162 1 1 0.031250 0.024869 -0.019540 0.082040 162 1 2 0.125000 0.042600 0.037999 0.212001 162 2 1 0.017857 0.020604 -0.024221 0.059935 162 2 2 0.102679 0.038705 0.023633 0.181724 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.2761, p=.14184Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.058036 0.015736 0.025898 0.090173 321 2 0.174107 0.033751 0.105178 0.243037 322 1 0.035714 0.016132 0.002768 0.068661 322 2 0.090402 0.032170 0.024701 0.156103 32


5

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.0098, p=.05435Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.087054 0.022254 0.041604 0.132503 161 1 2 0.158482 0.047732 0.061001 0.255963 161 2 1 0.051339 0.022814 0.004746 0.097933 161 2 2 0.142857 0.045496 0.049942 0.235772 162 1 1 0.029018 0.022254 -0.016432 0.074467 162 1 2 0.189732 0.047732 0.092251 0.287213 162 2 1 0.020089 0.022814 -0.026504 0.066683 162 2 2 0.037946 0.045496 -0.054969 0.130862 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18432, p=.67076Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.062500 0.029646 0.001954 0.123046 321 1 2 0.187500 0.043824 0.097999 0.277001 321 2 1 0.031250 0.022097 -0.013878 0.076378 321 2 2 0.078125 0.032022 0.012728 0.143522 322 1 1 0.053571 0.019764 0.013207 0.093935 322 1 2 0.160714 0.030410 0.098610 0.222819 322 2 1 0.040179 0.022082 -0.004919 0.085276 322 2 2 0.102679 0.036066 0.029022 0.176335 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (% discarded in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.51199, p=.47981Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group TASK LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.093750 0.041926 0.008125 0.179375 161 1 1 2 0.156250 0.061977 0.029676 0.282824 161 1 2 1 0.031250 0.031250 -0.032571 0.095071 161 1 2 2 0.125000 0.045286 0.032515 0.217485 161 2 1 1 0.080357 0.027951 0.023274 0.137440 161 2 1 2 0.160714 0.043006 0.072885 0.248544 161 2 2 1 0.071429 0.031229 0.007651 0.135206 161 2 2 2 0.160714 0.051005 0.056548 0.264880 162 1 1 1 0.031250 0.041926 -0.054375 0.116875 162 1 1 2 0.218750 0.061977 0.092176 0.345324 162 1 2 1 0.031250 0.031250 -0.032571 0.095071 162 1 2 2 0.031250 0.045286 -0.061235 0.123735 162 2 1 1 0.026786 0.027951 -0.030298 0.083869 162 2 1 2 0.160714 0.043006 0.072885 0.248544 162 2 2 1 0.008929 0.031229 -0.054849 0.072706 162 2 2 2 0.044643 0.051005 -0.059523 0.148809 16

2.2 Movement Frequency2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limbLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible


6

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (frequency in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorLIMBLIMB*groupErrorTASKTASK*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorLIMB*TASKLIMB*TASK*groupErrorLIMB*LCLIMB*LC*groupErrorTASK*LCTASK*LC*groupErrorLIMB*FREQLIMB*FREQ*groupErrorTASK*FREQTASK*FREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorLIMB*TASK*LCLIMB*TASK*LC*groupErrorLIMB*TASK*FREQLIMB*TASK*FREQ*groupErrorLIMB*LC*FREQLIMB*LC*FREQ*groupErrorTASK*LC*FREQTASK*LC*FREQ*groupErrorLIMB*TASK*LC*FREQLIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*groupError

771.9384 1 771.9384 2164.329 0.0000008.2763 1 8.2763 23.205 0.000039

10.6999 30 0.35670.0008 1 0.0008 0.842 0.3661220.0080 1 0.0080 8.444 0.0068190.0283 30 0.00090.0652 1 0.0652 2.176 0.1505700.1378 1 0.1378 4.599 0.0402120.8989 30 0.03000.1887 1 0.1887 6.217 0.0183940.1518 1 0.1518 5.002 0.0328970.9106 30 0.03047.8547 1 7.8547 36.223 0.0000011.6942 1 1.6942 7.813 0.0089596.5053 30 0.21680.0000 1 0.0000 0.007 0.9327820.0029 1 0.0029 3.308 0.0789380.0267 30 0.00090.0004 1 0.0004 1.255 0.2715310.0001 1 0.0001 0.234 0.6319210.0099 30 0.00030.0000 1 0.0000 0.003 0.9566810.0149 1 0.0149 3.223 0.0826920.1385 30 0.00460.0000 1 0.0000 0.050 0.8252630.0045 1 0.0045 8.649 0.0062490.0157 30 0.00050.0039 1 0.0039 0.507 0.4819950.0773 1 0.0773 10.009 0.0035560.2317 30 0.00770.0021 1 0.0021 0.190 0.6661510.0238 1 0.0238 2.113 0.1564260.3374 30 0.01120.0010 1 0.0010 3.288 0.0798000.0000 1 0.0000 0.093 0.7621660.0092 30 0.00030.0003 1 0.0003 0.402 0.5309300.0019 1 0.0019 2.678 0.1121750.0215 30 0.00070.0000 1 0.0000 0.038 0.8467180.0000 1 0.0000 0.141 0.7102890.0070 30 0.00020.0071 1 0.0071 0.845 0.3652720.0060 1 0.0060 0.717 0.4038920.2516 30 0.00840.0007 1 0.0007 3.208 0.0833710.0007 1 0.0007 3.492 0.0714750.0062 30 0.0002


7

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

LowAd

LIMBLIMB*groupErrorTASKTASK*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorLIMB*TASKLIMB*TASK*groupErrorLIMB*LCLIMB*LC*groupErrorTASK*LCTASK*LC*groupErrorLIMB*FREQLIMB*FREQ*groupErrorTASK*FREQTASK*FREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorLIMB*TASK*LCLIMB*TASK*LC*groupErrorLIMB*TASK*FREQLIMB*TASK*FREQ*groupErrorLIMB*LC*FREQLIMB*LC*FREQ*groupErrorTASK*LC*FREQTASK*LC*FREQ*groupErrorLIMB*TASK*LC*FREQLIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*groupError

1 0.84208 0.366122#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.366122 1.000000 1.000000 301 8.44424 0.006819#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.006819 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 2.17630 0.150570#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.150570 1.000000 1.000000 301 4.59897 0.040212#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.040212 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 6.21719 0.018394#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.018394 1.000000 1.000000 301 5.00242 0.032897#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.032897 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 36.22252 0.000001#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 301 7.81279 0.008959#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.008959 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.00723 0.932782#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.932782 1.000000 1.000000 301 3.30804 0.078938#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.078938 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 1.25477 0.271531#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.271531 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.23423 0.631921#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.631921 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.00300 0.956681#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.956681 1.000000 1.000000 301 3.22299 0.082692#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.082692 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.04960 0.825263#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.825263 1.000000 1.000000 301 8.64922 0.006249#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.006249 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.50688 0.481995#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.481995 1.000000 1.000000 301 10.00896 0.003556#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.003556 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.18986 0.666151#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.666151 1.000000 1.000000 301 2.11309 0.156426#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.156426 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 3.28810 0.079800#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.079800 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.09327 0.762166#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.762166 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.40187 0.530930#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.530930 1.000000 1.000000 301 2.67829 0.112175#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.112175 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.03802 0.846718#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.846718 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.14063 0.710289#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.710289 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.84511 0.365272#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.365272 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.71682 0.403892#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.403892 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 3.20807 0.083371#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.083371 1.000000 1.000000 301 3.49157 0.071475#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.071475 1.000000 1.000000 30

30


8

LIMB*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=8.4442, p=.00682

Effective hypothesis decomposit ionVertical bars denote 0.95 confidence in tervals

group 1 group2

1 2

LIMB

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

DV_

1

TASK*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=4.5990, p=.04021


group 1 group2

1 2

TASK

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

DV_


9



1 2

LC

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

DV_

1

LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.0024, p=.03290


group 1 group2

1 2

LC

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

DV_


10



1 2

FREQ

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

DV_

1

FREQ*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=7.8128, p=.00896


group 1 group2

1 2

FREQ

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

DV_


11

LIMB*FREQ*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=8.6492, p=.00625


group 1 group2

LIMB: 1

FREQ: 1 20.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.9

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

FREQ: 1 2

TASK*FREQ*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=10.009, p=.00356


group 1 group2

TASK: 1

FREQ: 1 20.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92.0

DV_

1

TASK: 2

FREQ: 1 2

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (frequency in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02235, df = 30.158

Cell No.group LIMB {1}

1.1059{2}

1.0956{3}

1.3523{4}

1.35771234

1 1 0.051869 0.012712 0.0003841 2 0.051869 0.000329 0.0075102 1 0.012712 0.000329 0.5056672 2 0.000384 0.007510 0.505667


12


Cell No.group TASK {1}

1.1059{2}

1.0956{3}

1.3273{4}

1.38271234

1 1 0.964445 0.028438 0.0002331 2 0.964445 0.001044 0.0032082 1 0.028438 0.001044 0.0709242 2 0.000233 0.003208 0.070924


Cell No.group LC {1}

1.0988{2}

1.1027{3}

1.3186{4}

1.39141234

1 1 0.997891 0.029927 0.0001861 2 0.997891 0.002201 0.0030302 1 0.029927 0.002201 0.0114012 2 0.000186 0.003030 0.011401


Cell No.group FREQ {1}

1.0344{2}

1.1671{3}

1.1736{4}

1.53641234

1 1 0.125748 0.264288 0.0001581 2 0.125748 0.999700 0.0002922 1 0.264288 0.999700 0.0001622 2 0.000158 0.000292 0.000162


Cell No.group LIMB FREQ {1}

1.0364{2}

1.1755{3}

1.0324{4}

1.1587{5}

1.1737{6}

1.5310{7}

1.1736{8}

1.541812345678

1 1 1 0.000141 0.972993 0.000141 0.891634 0.000145 0.601787 0.0001431 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.005517 1.000000 0.038520 1.000000 0.0008151 2 1 0.972993 0.000141 0.000141 0.567086 0.000144 0.877182 0.0001431 2 2 0.000141 0.005517 0.000141 0.999999 0.000681 0.999999 0.0205502 1 1 0.891634 1.000000 0.567086 0.999999 0.000141 1.000000 0.0001412 1 2 0.000145 0.038520 0.000144 0.000681 0.000141 0.000141 0.1634242 2 1 0.601787 1.000000 0.877182 0.999999 1.000000 0.000141 0.0001412 2 2 0.000143 0.000815 0.000143 0.020550 0.000141 0.163424 0.000141


Cell No.group TASK FREQ {1}

1.0300{2}

1.1817{3}

1.0388{4}

1.1524{5}

1.1610{6}

1.4937{7}

1.1863{8}

1.579112345678

1 1 1 0.000141 0.999087 0.000141 0.912792 0.000152 0.454172 0.0001391 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.570924 0.999993 0.096667 1.000000 0.0003551 2 1 0.999087 0.000141 0.000142 0.735532 0.000159 0.851628 0.0001391 2 2 0.000141 0.570924 0.000142 1.000000 0.001984 0.999805 0.0072922 1 1 0.912792 0.999993 0.735532 1.000000 0.000141 0.730853 0.0001412 1 2 0.000152 0.096667 0.000159 0.001984 0.000141 0.000141 0.0002592 2 1 0.454172 1.000000 0.851628 0.999805 0.730853 0.000141 0.0001412 2 2 0.000139 0.000355 0.000139 0.007292 0.000141 0.000259 0.000141


13

group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.205, p=.00004Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.100741 0.037326 1.024512 1.176971 162 1.355021 0.037326 1.278792 1.431251 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.84208, p=.36612Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.229126 0.026157 1.175706 1.282545 322 1.226636 0.026697 1.172114 1.281159 32

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.4442, p=.00682Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.105927 0.036991 1.030381 1.181474 161 2 1.095555 0.037755 1.018449 1.172661 162 1 1.352324 0.036991 1.276778 1.427871 162 2 1.357718 0.037755 1.280612 1.434824 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.1763, p=.15057Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.216596 0.026567 1.162338 1.270853 322 1.239167 0.028363 1.181242 1.297092 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.5990, p=.04021Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.105861 0.037572 1.029130 1.182593 161 2 1.095621 0.040111 1.013703 1.177539 162 1 1.327330 0.037572 1.250598 1.404061 162 2 1.382713 0.040111 1.300795 1.464631 16

LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.2172, p=.01839Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.208683 0.026902 1.153741 1.263625 322 1.247079 0.028072 1.189748 1.304411 32


14

LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0024, p=.03290Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.098764 0.038045 1.021064 1.176463 161 2 1.102719 0.039700 1.021640 1.183797 162 1 1.318602 0.038045 1.240903 1.396301 162 2 1.391440 0.039700 1.310361 1.472519 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=36.223, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 1.104022 0.030921 1.040873 1.167171 322 1.351741 0.035835 1.278555 1.424926 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=7.8128, p=.00896Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.034405 0.043729 0.945099 1.123711 161 2 1.167077 0.050679 1.063578 1.270577 162 1 1.173639 0.043729 1.084333 1.262945 162 2 1.536404 0.050679 1.432904 1.639904 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00723, p=.93278Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.217728 0.026634 1.163335 1.272121 321 2 1.240523 0.028244 1.182842 1.298205 322 1 1.215463 0.026732 1.160868 1.270058 322 2 1.237810 0.028516 1.179573 1.296047 32

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.3080, p=.07894Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.113331 0.037666 1.036408 1.190255 161 1 2 1.098523 0.039943 1.016949 1.180098 161 2 1 1.098391 0.037805 1.021183 1.175600 161 2 2 1.092719 0.040327 1.010359 1.175078 162 1 1 1.322125 0.037666 1.245202 1.399048 162 1 2 1.382524 0.039943 1.300949 1.464098 162 2 1 1.332534 0.037805 1.255326 1.409743 162 2 2 1.382901 0.040327 1.300542 1.465261 16


15

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.2548, p=.27153Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.209027 0.026731 1.154435 1.263619 321 2 1.249224 0.027658 1.192740 1.305709 322 1 1.208339 0.027146 1.152900 1.263777 322 2 1.244934 0.028585 1.186555 1.303313 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.23423, p=.63192Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.102660 0.037803 1.025456 1.179865 161 1 2 1.109194 0.039114 1.029312 1.189076 161 2 1 1.094867 0.038390 1.016465 1.173269 161 2 2 1.096243 0.040426 1.013683 1.178803 162 1 1 1.315394 0.037803 1.238189 1.392599 162 1 2 1.389255 0.039114 1.309373 1.469136 162 2 1 1.321810 0.038390 1.243408 1.400212 162 2 2 1.393626 0.040426 1.311065 1.476186 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00300, p=.95668Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.197233 0.028953 1.138103 1.256362 321 2 1.235958 0.027171 1.180467 1.291449 322 1 1.220133 0.027368 1.164240 1.276026 322 2 1.258200 0.031116 1.194654 1.321747 32

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2230, p=.08269Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.109111 0.040946 1.025489 1.192733 161 1 2 1.102612 0.038426 1.024136 1.181088 161 2 1 1.088417 0.038704 1.009372 1.167462 161 2 2 1.102825 0.044004 1.012957 1.192694 162 1 1 1.285355 0.040946 1.201733 1.368977 162 1 2 1.369305 0.038426 1.290829 1.447781 162 2 1 1.351850 0.038704 1.272805 1.430895 162 2 2 1.413576 0.044004 1.323707 1.503444 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.04960, p=.82526Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.105042 0.030936 1.041862 1.168221 321 2 1.353210 0.035493 1.280725 1.425696 322 1 1.103002 0.030926 1.039842 1.166162 322 2 1.350271 0.036315 1.276106 1.424436 32


16

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.6492, p=.00625Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.036397 0.043750 0.947047 1.125747 161 1 2 1.175457 0.050194 1.072947 1.277968 161 2 1 1.032413 0.043736 0.943092 1.121734 161 2 2 1.158697 0.051357 1.053812 1.263583 162 1 1 1.173686 0.043750 1.084336 1.263036 162 1 2 1.530963 0.050194 1.428453 1.633473 162 2 1 1.173591 0.043736 1.084270 1.262912 162 2 2 1.541845 0.051357 1.436959 1.646730 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.50688, p=.48199Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.095501 0.032449 1.029232 1.161771 321 2 1.337690 0.034467 1.267299 1.408080 322 1 1.112542 0.030530 1.050193 1.174892 322 2 1.365791 0.040025 1.284049 1.447534 32

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.009, p=.00356Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.030003 0.045890 0.936284 1.123722 161 1 2 1.181720 0.048743 1.082172 1.281267 161 2 1 1.038807 0.043175 0.950631 1.126982 161 2 2 1.152435 0.056604 1.036834 1.268037 162 1 1 1.160999 0.045890 1.067280 1.254718 162 1 2 1.493660 0.048743 1.394113 1.593208 162 2 1 1.186278 0.043175 1.098102 1.274454 162 2 2 1.579147 0.056604 1.463546 1.694749 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18986, p=.66615Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 1.086866 0.029874 1.025855 1.147877 321 2 1.330500 0.034596 1.259845 1.401155 322 1 1.121178 0.033978 1.051786 1.190569 322 2 1.372981 0.039518 1.292274 1.453688 32


17

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.1131, p=.15643Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.027656 0.042248 0.941374 1.113939 161 1 2 1.169871 0.048926 1.069950 1.269792 161 2 1 1.041153 0.048052 0.943019 1.139288 161 2 2 1.164284 0.055887 1.050146 1.278421 162 1 1 1.146075 0.042248 1.059793 1.232358 162 1 2 1.491129 0.048926 1.391208 1.591050 162 2 1 1.201202 0.048052 1.103067 1.299337 162 2 2 1.581678 0.055887 1.467541 1.695816 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2881, p=.07980Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB TASK LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.196059 0.029035 1.136762 1.255355 321 1 2 1.239398 0.027020 1.184216 1.294579 321 2 1 1.221996 0.027282 1.166279 1.277712 321 2 2 1.259051 0.030960 1.195822 1.322281 322 1 1 1.198407 0.029086 1.139006 1.257808 322 1 2 1.232519 0.027698 1.175951 1.289086 322 2 1 1.218270 0.027523 1.162061 1.274480 322 2 2 1.257350 0.031296 1.193434 1.321265 32

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09327, p=.76217Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB TASK LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 1.114122 0.041061 1.030264 1.197980 161 1 1 2 1.112541 0.038212 1.034502 1.190579 161 1 2 1 1.091199 0.038582 1.012404 1.169994 161 1 2 2 1.105848 0.043785 1.016427 1.195268 161 2 1 1 1.104100 0.041134 1.020094 1.188106 161 2 1 2 1.092683 0.039171 1.012684 1.172681 161 2 2 1 1.085634 0.038923 1.006142 1.165127 161 2 2 2 1.099803 0.044259 1.009413 1.190193 162 1 1 1 1.277995 0.041061 1.194138 1.361853 162 1 1 2 1.366255 0.038212 1.288216 1.444293 162 1 2 1 1.352793 0.038582 1.273997 1.431588 162 1 2 2 1.412255 0.043785 1.322835 1.501675 162 2 1 1 1.292714 0.041134 1.208708 1.376720 162 2 1 2 1.372355 0.039171 1.292356 1.452353 162 2 2 1 1.350907 0.038923 1.271414 1.430399 162 2 2 2 1.414896 0.044259 1.324506 1.505286 16


18

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.40187, p=.53093Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.097159 0.032465 1.030857 1.163462 321 1 2 1.338297 0.034652 1.267529 1.409065 321 2 1 1.112924 0.030489 1.050657 1.175191 321 2 2 1.368123 0.040080 1.286269 1.449978 322 1 1 1.093843 0.032465 1.027541 1.160145 322 1 2 1.337083 0.034845 1.265920 1.408246 322 2 1 1.112161 0.030604 1.049659 1.174663 322 2 2 1.363459 0.040030 1.281706 1.445212 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.6783, p=.11217Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB TASK FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 1.033092 0.045912 0.939326 1.126858 161 1 1 2 1.193570 0.049005 1.093489 1.293652 161 1 2 1 1.039702 0.043118 0.951643 1.127761 161 1 2 2 1.157345 0.056682 1.041585 1.273104 161 2 1 1 1.026914 0.045912 0.933149 1.120679 161 2 1 2 1.169869 0.049278 1.069229 1.270508 161 2 2 1 1.037912 0.043281 0.949520 1.126303 161 2 2 2 1.147526 0.056612 1.031910 1.263142 162 1 1 1 1.161227 0.045912 1.067461 1.254992 162 1 1 2 1.483023 0.049005 1.382942 1.583105 162 1 2 1 1.186146 0.043118 1.098087 1.274204 162 1 2 2 1.578902 0.056682 1.463142 1.694662 162 2 1 1 1.160772 0.045912 1.067007 1.254537 162 2 1 2 1.504297 0.049278 1.403658 1.604936 162 2 2 1 1.186410 0.043281 1.098019 1.274802 162 2 2 2 1.579393 0.056612 1.463776 1.695009 16

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.03802, p=.84672Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.086854 0.030026 1.025532 1.148176 321 1 2 1.331200 0.034412 1.260922 1.401479 321 2 1 1.123229 0.033863 1.054072 1.192386 321 2 2 1.375220 0.038824 1.295931 1.454508 322 1 1 1.086878 0.029762 1.026096 1.147659 322 1 2 1.329800 0.034952 1.258417 1.401182 322 2 1 1.119126 0.034128 1.049427 1.188825 322 2 2 1.370742 0.040384 1.288267 1.453218 32


19

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.14063, p=.71029Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 1.027975 0.042464 0.941253 1.114698 161 1 1 2 1.177346 0.048666 1.077957 1.276734 161 1 2 1 1.044819 0.047889 0.947016 1.142621 161 1 2 2 1.173569 0.054905 1.061439 1.285700 161 2 1 1 1.027338 0.042089 0.941379 1.113296 161 2 1 2 1.162397 0.049430 1.061447 1.263347 161 2 2 1 1.037488 0.048265 0.938918 1.136058 161 2 2 2 1.154998 0.057112 1.038360 1.271636 162 1 1 1 1.145733 0.042464 1.059010 1.232455 162 1 1 2 1.485055 0.048666 1.385667 1.584444 162 1 2 1 1.201640 0.047889 1.103837 1.299442 162 1 2 2 1.576870 0.054905 1.464739 1.689000 162 2 1 1 1.146418 0.042089 1.060460 1.232376 162 2 1 2 1.497203 0.049430 1.396253 1.598153 162 2 2 1 1.200764 0.048265 1.102194 1.299334 162 2 2 2 1.586487 0.057112 1.469849 1.703124 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.84511, p=.36527Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 1.074460 0.031749 1.009621 1.139299 321 1 2 1.320005 0.035424 1.247661 1.392350 321 2 1 1.116542 0.036707 1.041576 1.191508 321 2 2 1.355374 0.038110 1.277544 1.433204 322 1 1 1.099272 0.030004 1.037995 1.160548 322 1 2 1.340995 0.037781 1.263836 1.418153 322 2 1 1.125813 0.032426 1.059590 1.192036 322 2 2 1.390588 0.044289 1.300138 1.481038 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.71682, p=.40389Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 1.021334 0.044899 0.929638 1.113031 161 1 1 2 1.196887 0.050096 1.094577 1.299198 161 1 2 1 1.038672 0.051912 0.932654 1.144690 161 1 2 2 1.166552 0.053895 1.056483 1.276620 161 2 1 1 1.033978 0.042432 0.947320 1.120637 161 2 1 2 1.142855 0.053430 1.033737 1.251973 161 2 2 1 1.043635 0.045857 0.949982 1.137288 161 2 2 2 1.162016 0.062634 1.034100 1.289932 162 1 1 1 1.127586 0.044899 1.035889 1.219282 162 1 1 2 1.443123 0.050096 1.340813 1.545434 162 1 2 1 1.194412 0.051912 1.088394 1.300431 162 1 2 2 1.544197 0.053895 1.434128 1.654265 162 2 1 1 1.164565 0.042432 1.077906 1.251223 162 2 1 2 1.539134 0.053430 1.430016 1.648253 162 2 2 1 1.207991 0.045857 1.114338 1.301644 162 2 2 2 1.619160 0.062634 1.491244 1.747076 16


20

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.2081, p=.08337Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 1.074822 0.031743 1.009994 1.139650 321 1 1 2 1.317295 0.035857 1.244065 1.390526 321 1 2 1 1.119497 0.036758 1.044427 1.194567 321 1 2 2 1.359298 0.037853 1.281993 1.436604 321 2 1 1 1.098886 0.030096 1.037422 1.160350 321 2 1 2 1.345106 0.037990 1.267520 1.422691 321 2 2 1 1.126961 0.032237 1.061125 1.192798 321 2 2 2 1.391141 0.044139 1.300997 1.481285 322 1 1 1 1.074098 0.031773 1.009210 1.138987 322 1 1 2 1.322716 0.035620 1.249969 1.395462 322 1 2 1 1.113588 0.036743 1.038549 1.188626 322 1 2 2 1.351450 0.039097 1.271604 1.431296 322 2 1 1 1.099657 0.030020 1.038348 1.160966 322 2 1 2 1.336884 0.037675 1.259941 1.413827 322 2 2 1 1.124665 0.032635 1.058014 1.191315 322 2 2 2 1.390035 0.044492 1.299170 1.480899 32


21

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (frequency in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.4916, p=.07148Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LIMB TASK LC FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132

1 1 1 1 1 1.021531 0.044891 0.929851 1.113212 161 1 1 1 2 1.206712 0.050710 1.103149 1.310276 161 1 1 2 1 1.044653 0.051984 0.938488 1.150819 161 1 1 2 2 1.180428 0.053532 1.071102 1.289754 161 1 2 1 1 1.034419 0.042562 0.947496 1.121343 161 1 2 1 2 1.147979 0.053726 1.038256 1.257702 161 1 2 2 1 1.044984 0.045590 0.951878 1.138091 161 1 2 2 2 1.166711 0.062422 1.039228 1.294194 161 2 1 1 1 1.021138 0.044933 0.929372 1.112903 161 2 1 1 2 1.187063 0.050375 1.084183 1.289942 161 2 1 2 1 1.032691 0.051962 0.926570 1.138811 161 2 1 2 2 1.152675 0.055291 1.039755 1.265595 161 2 2 1 1 1.033538 0.042455 0.946833 1.120242 161 2 2 1 2 1.137731 0.053281 1.028917 1.246545 161 2 2 2 1 1.042285 0.046153 0.948027 1.136543 161 2 2 2 2 1.157321 0.062921 1.028819 1.285823 162 1 1 1 1 1.128112 0.044891 1.036432 1.219793 162 1 1 1 2 1.427878 0.050710 1.324315 1.531442 162 1 1 2 1 1.194341 0.051984 1.088175 1.300506 162 1 1 2 2 1.538169 0.053532 1.428843 1.647495 162 1 2 1 1 1.163353 0.042562 1.076429 1.250277 162 1 2 1 2 1.542232 0.053726 1.432509 1.651955 162 1 2 2 1 1.208938 0.045590 1.115832 1.302045 162 1 2 2 2 1.615571 0.062422 1.488088 1.743054 162 2 1 1 1 1.127059 0.044933 1.035294 1.218825 162 2 1 1 2 1.458369 0.050375 1.355490 1.561248 162 2 1 2 1 1.194484 0.051962 1.088364 1.300605 162 2 1 2 2 1.550225 0.055291 1.437305 1.663145 162 2 2 1 1 1.165777 0.042455 1.079072 1.252481 162 2 2 1 2 1.536036 0.053281 1.427223 1.644850 162 2 2 2 1 1.207044 0.046153 1.112786 1.301302 162 2 2 2 2 1.622749 0.062921 1.494247 1.751250 16

2.3 Coefficient of Variation for Movement Frequency2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limbLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible


22

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


1.786376 1 1.786376 472.4344 0.0000000.006094 1 0.006094 1.6116 0.2140240.113436 30 0.0037810.076636 1 0.076636 49.9127 0.0000000.001795 1 0.001795 1.1691 0.2882110.046062 30 0.0015350.000122 1 0.000122 0.1177 0.7339720.002328 1 0.002328 2.2530 0.1438060.030992 30 0.0010330.007660 1 0.007660 10.8953 0.0024940.000470 1 0.000470 0.6680 0.4201820.021090 30 0.0007030.026723 1 0.026723 23.5160 0.0000360.001197 1 0.001197 1.0535 0.3129090.034091 30 0.0011360.000228 1 0.000228 0.3955 0.5341870.003109 1 0.003109 5.3946 0.0271690.017287 30 0.0005760.000390 1 0.000390 0.5680 0.4569330.003561 1 0.003561 5.1811 0.0301380.020617 30 0.0006870.000239 1 0.000239 0.3698 0.5476710.000296 1 0.000296 0.4576 0.5039400.019417 30 0.0006470.001292 1 0.001292 2.8302 0.1028880.000803 1 0.000803 1.7593 0.1947240.013691 30 0.0004560.004999 1 0.004999 5.0919 0.0314820.000861 1 0.000861 0.8771 0.3564790.029456 30 0.0009820.000633 1 0.000633 0.8553 0.3624340.000215 1 0.000215 0.2901 0.5941620.022207 30 0.0007400.000023 1 0.000023 0.0931 0.7624400.000014 1 0.000014 0.0570 0.8128470.007472 30 0.0002490.000352 1 0.000352 0.9702 0.3325140.000221 1 0.000221 0.6087 0.4414020.010879 30 0.0003630.000246 1 0.000246 0.7416 0.3959790.000140 1 0.000140 0.4230 0.5204030.009937 30 0.0003310.000043 1 0.000043 0.1305 0.7204760.000348 1 0.000348 1.0532 0.3129830.009903 30 0.0003300.000105 1 0.000105 0.1876 0.6680340.000056 1 0.000056 0.1000 0.7540490.016755 30 0.000559


23

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

LowrAdj


1 49.91268 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 301 1.16905 0.288211 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.288211 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.11767 0.733972 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.733972 1.000000 1.000000 301 2.25303 0.143806 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.143806 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 10.89525 0.002494 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.002494 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.66803 0.420182 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.420182 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 23.51601 0.000036 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000036 1.000000 1.000000 301 1.05349 0.312909 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.312909 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.39549 0.534187 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.534187 1.000000 1.000000 301 5.39460 0.027169 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.027169 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.56799 0.456933 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.456933 1.000000 1.000000 301 5.18106 0.030138 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.030138 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.36984 0.547671 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.547671 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.45758 0.503940 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.503940 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 2.83020 0.102888 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.102888 1.000000 1.000000 301 1.75928 0.194724 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.194724 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 5.09190 0.031482 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.031482 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.87709 0.356479 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.356479 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.85531 0.362434 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.362434 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.29005 0.594162 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.594162 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.09305 0.762440 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.762440 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.05705 0.812847 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.812847 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.97017 0.332514 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.332514 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.60867 0.441402 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.441402 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.74160 0.395979 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.395979 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.42298 0.520403 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.520403 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.13047 0.720476 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.720476 1.000000 1.000000 301 1.05317 0.312983 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.312983 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.18758 0.668034 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.668034 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.09998 0.754049 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.754049 1.000000 1.000000 30

30


24

LIMB; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=49.913, p=.00000


1 2

LIMB

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

DV_

1



1 2

LC

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

DV_


25



1 2

FREQ

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

DV_

1

LIMB*TASK*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.3946, p=.02717

Effective hypothesis decompositionVertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals

group 1 group2

LIMB: 1

TASK: 1 20.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.100.110.12

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

TASK: 1 2


26

LIMB*LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.1811, p=.03014


group 1 group2

LIMB: 1

LC: 1 20.000.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.100.11

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2

TASK*FREQ; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.0919, p=.03148


TASK 1 TASK2

1 2

FREQ

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

DV_


27

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .00054, df = 38.936

Cell No.group LIMB TASK {1}

.06120{2}

.07076{3}

.04674{4}

.04377{5}

.08104{6}

.07221{7}

.04923{8}

.0475912345678

1 1 1 0.352064 0.035025 0.006143 0.609142 0.880270 0.827807 0.7177901 1 2 0.352064 0.000215 0.000150 0.912455 1.000000 0.183825 0.1225391 2 1 0.035025 0.000215 0.996389 0.003968 0.065787 0.999998 1.0000001 2 2 0.006143 0.000150 0.996389 0.001458 0.027210 0.997578 0.9999622 1 1 0.609142 0.912455 0.003968 0.001458 0.448764 0.000141 0.0001412 1 2 0.880270 1.000000 0.065787 0.027210 0.448764 0.000295 0.0001892 2 1 0.827807 0.183825 0.999998 0.997578 0.000141 0.000295 0.9999262 2 2 0.717790 0.122539 1.000000 0.999962 0.000141 0.000189 0.999926

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .00056, df = 40.556

Cell No.group LIMB LC {1}

.07065{2}

.06131{3}

.04640{4}

.04411{5}

.07794{6}

.07531{7}

.05675{8}

.0400812345678

1 1 1 0.487886 0.000408 0.000201 0.997261 0.999234 0.709164 0.0151441 1 2 0.487886 0.054569 0.016815 0.500404 0.896185 0.999331 0.2080201 2 1 0.000408 0.054569 0.999623 0.011089 0.025713 0.977855 0.9944331 2 2 0.000201 0.016815 0.999623 0.005152 0.012387 0.796429 0.9999452 1 1 0.997261 0.500404 0.011089 0.005152 0.999077 0.001868 0.0001412 1 2 0.999234 0.896185 0.025713 0.012387 0.999077 0.008000 0.0001412 2 1 0.709164 0.999331 0.977855 0.796429 0.001868 0.008000 0.0222032 2 2 0.015144 0.208020 0.994433 0.999945 0.000141 0.000141 0.022203

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .00098, df = 30.000

Cell No.TASK FREQ {1}

.04921{2}

.06990{3}

.05448{4}

.062681234

1 1 0.000207 0.541488 0.0089881 2 0.000207 0.002527 0.2732872 1 0.541488 0.002527 0.1784792 2 0.008988 0.273287 0.178479

group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.6116, p=.21402Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.055618 0.003843 0.047769 0.063467 162 0.062518 0.003843 0.054669 0.070367 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=49.913, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.071302 0.003531 0.064092 0.078513 322 0.046834 0.002881 0.040949 0.052718 32


28

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1691, p=.28821Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.065980 0.004993 0.055783 0.076177 161 2 0.045256 0.004075 0.036934 0.053578 162 1 0.076625 0.004993 0.066427 0.086822 162 2 0.048411 0.004075 0.040089 0.056733 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.11767, p=.73397Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.059555 0.003164 0.053094 0.066016 322 0.058581 0.002966 0.052523 0.064638 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.2530, p=.14381Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.053973 0.004474 0.044836 0.063110 161 2 0.057263 0.004195 0.048696 0.065830 162 1 0.065137 0.004474 0.056000 0.074274 162 2 0.059898 0.004195 0.051332 0.068465 16

LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.895, p=.00249Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.062936 0.002702 0.057417 0.068454 322 0.055200 0.003196 0.048673 0.061728 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.66803, p=.42018Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.058528 0.003821 0.050724 0.066332 161 2 0.052708 0.004520 0.043477 0.061939 162 1 0.067343 0.003821 0.059539 0.075147 162 2 0.057692 0.004520 0.048461 0.066924 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.516, p=.00004Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.051843 0.002196 0.047358 0.056329 322 0.066292 0.003793 0.058546 0.074038 32


29

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0535, p=.31291Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.049923 0.003106 0.043579 0.056266 161 2 0.061313 0.005364 0.050359 0.072268 162 1 0.053764 0.003106 0.047421 0.060107 162 2 0.071271 0.005364 0.060317 0.082226 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.39549, p=.53419Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.071122 0.004292 0.062356 0.079888 321 2 0.071482 0.003755 0.063813 0.079152 322 1 0.047988 0.003387 0.041070 0.054906 322 2 0.045679 0.003179 0.039187 0.052172 32

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.3946, p=.02717Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.061204 0.006070 0.048807 0.073601 161 1 2 0.070756 0.005311 0.059909 0.081603 161 2 1 0.046742 0.004791 0.036959 0.056526 161 2 2 0.043770 0.004496 0.034588 0.052951 162 1 1 0.081041 0.006070 0.068644 0.093438 162 1 2 0.072208 0.005311 0.061362 0.083055 162 2 1 0.049234 0.004791 0.039450 0.059017 162 2 2 0.047589 0.004496 0.038407 0.056770 16

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.56799, p=.45693Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.074297 0.003992 0.066144 0.082450 321 2 0.068308 0.003662 0.060828 0.075787 322 1 0.051575 0.002757 0.045945 0.057204 322 2 0.042093 0.003930 0.034066 0.050119 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.1811, p=.03014Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.070654 0.005646 0.059123 0.082185 161 1 2 0.061306 0.005179 0.050728 0.071883 161 2 1 0.046402 0.003898 0.038440 0.054364 161 2 2 0.044110 0.005558 0.032758 0.055461 162 1 1 0.077940 0.005646 0.066409 0.089470 162 1 2 0.075309 0.005179 0.064732 0.085887 162 2 1 0.056747 0.003898 0.048785 0.064709 162 2 2 0.040075 0.005558 0.028724 0.051427 16


30

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.36984, p=.54767Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.062739 0.003258 0.056085 0.069394 321 2 0.056371 0.004226 0.047740 0.065003 322 1 0.063132 0.003491 0.056003 0.070261 322 2 0.054029 0.002738 0.048438 0.059621 32

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.45758, p=.50394Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.056960 0.004608 0.047549 0.066371 161 1 2 0.050986 0.005977 0.038779 0.063193 161 2 1 0.060096 0.004937 0.050014 0.070178 161 2 2 0.054430 0.003872 0.046522 0.062337 162 1 1 0.068518 0.004608 0.059108 0.077929 162 1 2 0.061756 0.005977 0.049549 0.073963 162 2 1 0.066168 0.004937 0.056086 0.076250 162 2 2 0.053629 0.003872 0.045721 0.061536 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.8302, p=.10289Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.062489 0.002670 0.057036 0.067943 321 2 0.080115 0.005123 0.069652 0.090578 322 1 0.041197 0.002800 0.035479 0.046916 322 2 0.052470 0.003572 0.045175 0.059765 32

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.7593, p=.19472Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.059949 0.003776 0.052236 0.067661 161 1 2 0.072011 0.007246 0.057214 0.086809 161 2 1 0.039897 0.003960 0.031809 0.047984 161 2 2 0.050615 0.005052 0.040299 0.060932 162 1 1 0.065030 0.003776 0.057318 0.072743 162 1 2 0.088219 0.007246 0.073421 0.103016 162 2 1 0.042498 0.003960 0.034411 0.050585 162 2 2 0.054324 0.005052 0.044007 0.064641 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0919, p=.03148Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.049206 0.002174 0.044766 0.053646 321 2 0.069904 0.005186 0.059313 0.080496 322 1 0.054481 0.003080 0.048191 0.060771 322 2 0.062680 0.003613 0.055301 0.070059 32


31

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.87709, p=.35648Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.046450 0.003074 0.040171 0.052729 161 1 2 0.061496 0.007334 0.046518 0.076474 161 2 1 0.053395 0.004356 0.044500 0.062291 161 2 2 0.061130 0.005110 0.050695 0.071566 162 1 1 0.051962 0.003074 0.045683 0.058241 162 1 2 0.078313 0.007334 0.063335 0.093291 162 2 1 0.055567 0.004356 0.046671 0.064462 162 2 2 0.064230 0.005110 0.053795 0.074666 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.85531, p=.36243Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.054599 0.002370 0.049759 0.059440 321 2 0.071272 0.004128 0.062843 0.079702 322 1 0.049088 0.002912 0.043141 0.055034 322 2 0.061313 0.004308 0.052514 0.070111 32

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.29005, p=.59416Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.051073 0.003352 0.044228 0.057918 161 1 2 0.065983 0.005837 0.054062 0.077904 161 2 1 0.048772 0.004118 0.040362 0.057182 161 2 2 0.056644 0.006093 0.044200 0.069087 162 1 1 0.058125 0.003352 0.051280 0.064971 162 1 2 0.076561 0.005837 0.064640 0.088483 162 2 1 0.049403 0.004118 0.040993 0.057813 162 2 2 0.065981 0.006093 0.053538 0.078425 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09305, p=.76244Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.073220 0.005423 0.062144 0.084297 321 1 2 0.069024 0.004619 0.059591 0.078457 321 2 1 0.075373 0.004230 0.066734 0.084013 321 2 2 0.067591 0.003536 0.060369 0.074813 322 1 1 0.052258 0.003008 0.046115 0.058401 322 1 2 0.043718 0.005270 0.032956 0.054480 322 2 1 0.050891 0.004134 0.042449 0.059333 322 2 2 0.040467 0.002982 0.034378 0.046557 32


32

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.05705, p=.81285Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.065908 0.007670 0.050245 0.081572 161 1 1 2 0.056499 0.006532 0.043159 0.069839 161 1 2 1 0.075399 0.005983 0.063181 0.087618 161 1 2 2 0.066113 0.005001 0.055900 0.076325 161 2 1 1 0.048011 0.004254 0.039324 0.056699 161 2 1 2 0.045473 0.007453 0.030253 0.060693 161 2 2 1 0.044793 0.005846 0.032853 0.056732 161 2 2 2 0.042746 0.004217 0.034135 0.051358 162 1 1 1 0.080532 0.007670 0.064869 0.096196 162 1 1 2 0.081549 0.006532 0.068209 0.094889 162 1 2 1 0.075347 0.005983 0.063129 0.087566 162 1 2 2 0.069069 0.005001 0.058857 0.079282 162 2 1 1 0.056504 0.004254 0.047817 0.065192 162 2 1 2 0.041963 0.007453 0.026743 0.057183 162 2 2 1 0.056989 0.005846 0.045050 0.068929 162 2 2 2 0.038188 0.004217 0.029576 0.046800 16

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.97017, p=.33251Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.058356 0.002928 0.052376 0.064335 321 1 2 0.083889 0.007344 0.068890 0.098888 321 2 1 0.066623 0.003168 0.060154 0.073092 321 2 2 0.076341 0.004904 0.066326 0.086356 322 1 1 0.040056 0.002632 0.034681 0.045430 322 1 2 0.055920 0.004853 0.046009 0.065831 322 2 1 0.042339 0.003971 0.034229 0.050449 322 2 2 0.049019 0.003358 0.042162 0.055876 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.60867, p=.44140Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.053172 0.004141 0.044716 0.061629 161 1 1 2 0.069236 0.010386 0.048024 0.090447 161 1 2 1 0.066725 0.004480 0.057576 0.075874 161 1 2 2 0.074787 0.006935 0.060624 0.088950 161 2 1 1 0.039727 0.003722 0.032127 0.047328 161 2 1 2 0.053757 0.006863 0.039741 0.067774 161 2 2 1 0.040066 0.005616 0.028597 0.051535 161 2 2 2 0.047473 0.004748 0.037776 0.057171 162 1 1 1 0.063539 0.004141 0.055083 0.071996 162 1 1 2 0.098542 0.010386 0.077330 0.119754 162 1 2 1 0.066521 0.004480 0.057373 0.075670 162 1 2 2 0.077895 0.006935 0.063732 0.092058 162 2 1 1 0.040384 0.003722 0.032784 0.047985 162 2 1 2 0.058083 0.006863 0.044067 0.072099 162 2 2 1 0.044612 0.005616 0.033143 0.056081 162 2 2 2 0.050565 0.004748 0.040868 0.060263 16


33

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.74160, p=.39598Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.065065 0.003161 0.058608 0.071521 321 1 2 0.083529 0.006302 0.070659 0.096399 321 2 1 0.059914 0.003003 0.053781 0.066047 321 2 2 0.076701 0.005155 0.066174 0.087228 322 1 1 0.044134 0.003182 0.037635 0.050632 322 1 2 0.059015 0.003563 0.051738 0.066292 322 2 1 0.038261 0.003821 0.030458 0.046065 322 2 2 0.045924 0.004869 0.035981 0.055868 32

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.42298, p=.52040Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.063032 0.004471 0.053902 0.072163 161 1 1 2 0.078275 0.008912 0.060074 0.096477 161 1 2 1 0.056865 0.004247 0.048191 0.065538 161 1 2 2 0.065747 0.007290 0.050860 0.080635 161 2 1 1 0.039114 0.004500 0.029923 0.048304 161 2 1 2 0.053691 0.005039 0.043399 0.063982 161 2 2 1 0.040680 0.005404 0.029644 0.051715 161 2 2 2 0.047540 0.006886 0.033478 0.061602 162 1 1 1 0.067097 0.004471 0.057966 0.076228 162 1 1 2 0.088783 0.008912 0.070582 0.106984 162 1 2 1 0.062964 0.004247 0.054291 0.071637 162 1 2 2 0.087655 0.007290 0.072767 0.102542 162 2 1 1 0.049154 0.004500 0.039963 0.058344 162 2 1 2 0.064340 0.005039 0.054049 0.074631 162 2 2 1 0.035843 0.005404 0.024807 0.046878 162 2 2 2 0.044308 0.006886 0.030246 0.058370 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.13047, p=.72048Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.050988 0.002538 0.045805 0.056171 321 1 2 0.074491 0.005898 0.062446 0.086535 321 2 1 0.047424 0.003760 0.039745 0.055103 321 2 2 0.065318 0.006194 0.052668 0.077969 322 1 1 0.058211 0.003896 0.050254 0.066167 322 1 2 0.068054 0.004178 0.059520 0.076587 322 2 1 0.050751 0.002829 0.044975 0.056528 322 2 2 0.057307 0.003431 0.050299 0.064314 32


34

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0532, p=.31298Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.046563 0.003589 0.039233 0.053893 161 1 1 2 0.067357 0.008340 0.050323 0.084390 161 1 2 1 0.046337 0.005318 0.035477 0.057196 161 1 2 2 0.055636 0.008760 0.037745 0.073527 161 2 1 1 0.055583 0.005509 0.044331 0.066835 161 2 1 2 0.064609 0.005909 0.052541 0.076677 161 2 2 1 0.051208 0.004000 0.043038 0.059377 161 2 2 2 0.057651 0.004852 0.047741 0.067561 162 1 1 1 0.055413 0.003589 0.048083 0.062742 162 1 1 2 0.081624 0.008340 0.064591 0.098658 162 1 2 1 0.048511 0.005318 0.037651 0.059371 162 1 2 2 0.075001 0.008760 0.057110 0.092891 162 2 1 1 0.060838 0.005509 0.049586 0.072090 162 2 1 2 0.071499 0.005909 0.059430 0.083567 162 2 2 1 0.050295 0.004000 0.042126 0.058465 162 2 2 2 0.056962 0.004852 0.047052 0.066872 16

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18758, p=.66803Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.060197 0.003783 0.052471 0.067923 321 1 1 2 0.086244 0.009908 0.066009 0.106479 321 1 2 1 0.056515 0.003942 0.048465 0.064565 321 1 2 2 0.081534 0.007369 0.066483 0.096584 321 2 1 1 0.069933 0.003823 0.062125 0.077740 321 2 1 2 0.080814 0.005573 0.069433 0.092195 321 2 2 1 0.063314 0.003084 0.057014 0.069613 321 2 2 2 0.071868 0.004745 0.062178 0.081559 322 1 1 1 0.041779 0.002897 0.035862 0.047695 322 1 1 2 0.062737 0.005193 0.052132 0.073342 322 1 2 1 0.038333 0.004845 0.028439 0.048227 322 1 2 2 0.049103 0.006982 0.034843 0.063363 322 2 1 1 0.046489 0.005789 0.034666 0.058311 322 2 1 2 0.055294 0.004079 0.046963 0.063624 322 2 2 1 0.038189 0.003422 0.031200 0.045179 322 2 2 2 0.042745 0.003385 0.035832 0.049659 32


35

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (COV of Freq in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09998, p=.75405Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132

1 1 1 1 1 0.055295 0.005350 0.044368 0.066222 161 1 1 1 2 0.076522 0.014012 0.047905 0.105139 161 1 1 2 1 0.051049 0.005574 0.039665 0.062434 161 1 1 2 2 0.061949 0.010422 0.040664 0.083234 161 1 2 1 1 0.070770 0.005406 0.059729 0.081811 161 1 2 1 2 0.080029 0.007881 0.063934 0.096124 161 1 2 2 1 0.062680 0.004362 0.053771 0.071588 161 1 2 2 2 0.069546 0.006710 0.055841 0.083250 161 2 1 1 1 0.037831 0.004097 0.029464 0.046198 161 2 1 1 2 0.058192 0.007344 0.043194 0.073189 161 2 1 2 1 0.041624 0.006851 0.027631 0.055616 161 2 1 2 2 0.049323 0.009875 0.029156 0.069490 161 2 2 1 1 0.040396 0.008187 0.023677 0.057115 161 2 2 1 2 0.049190 0.005769 0.037408 0.060971 161 2 2 2 1 0.039736 0.004840 0.029851 0.049620 161 2 2 2 2 0.045757 0.004787 0.035980 0.055534 162 1 1 1 1 0.065099 0.005350 0.054172 0.076026 162 1 1 1 2 0.095966 0.014012 0.067349 0.124583 162 1 1 2 1 0.061980 0.005574 0.050595 0.073364 162 1 1 2 2 0.101118 0.010422 0.079834 0.122403 162 1 2 1 1 0.069095 0.005406 0.058054 0.080136 162 1 2 1 2 0.081599 0.007881 0.065504 0.097694 162 1 2 2 1 0.063948 0.004362 0.055039 0.072856 162 1 2 2 2 0.074191 0.006710 0.060486 0.087896 162 2 1 1 1 0.045726 0.004097 0.037359 0.054093 162 2 1 1 2 0.067283 0.007344 0.052285 0.082280 162 2 1 2 1 0.035042 0.006851 0.021050 0.049035 162 2 1 2 2 0.048883 0.009875 0.028717 0.069050 162 2 2 1 1 0.052581 0.008187 0.035862 0.069300 162 2 2 1 2 0.061398 0.005769 0.049617 0.073179 162 2 2 2 1 0.036643 0.004840 0.026758 0.046527 162 2 2 2 2 0.039733 0.004787 0.029956 0.049510 16

2.4 Movement Amplitude2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limbLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible


36

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (amplitude in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


1398517 1 1398517 1027.382 0.00000022931 1 22931 16.846 0.00028640837 30 1361

101995 1 101995 105.855 0.0000001036 1 1036 1.075 0.308161

28906 30 9641259 1 1259 17.613 0.000222256 1 256 3.585 0.067985

2144 30 711892 1 1892 13.333 0.0009851334 1 1334 9.401 0.0045604257 30 142108 1 108 1.294 0.26437256 1 56 0.673 0.418358

2495 30 8355 1 55 2.892 0.099374

200 1 200 10.424 0.003008574 30 19721 1 721 3.638 0.066084793 1 793 4.001 0.054595

5944 30 1982 1 2 0.078 0.781714

46 1 46 1.883 0.180198733 30 24336 1 336 6.537 0.015866154 1 154 2.999 0.093567

1541 30 5156 1 56 1.752 0.19568354 1 54 1.699 0.202368

955 30 323 1 3 0.180 0.6747213 1 3 0.197 0.660535

522 30 170 1 0 0.022 0.882821

75 1 75 5.010 0.032778451 30 1563 1 63 4.079 0.05243439 1 39 2.569 0.119470

460 30 157 1 7 0.614 0.4394701 1 1 0.099 0.754880

327 30 1110 1 10 0.767 0.3881322 1 2 0.144 0.706990

391 30 134 1 4 0.330 0.569810

13 1 13 1.150 0.292046336 30 11


37

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (amplitude in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

LowAd


1 105.8548 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 31 1.0747 0.308161 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.308161 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 17.6129 0.000222 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000222 1.000000 1.000000 31 3.5850 0.067985 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.067985 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 13.3329 0.000985 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000985 1.000000 1.000000 31 9.4015 0.004560 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.004560 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 1.2937 0.264372 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.264372 1.000000 1.000000 31 0.6734 0.418358 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.418358 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 2.8919 0.099374 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.099374 1.000000 1.000000 31 10.4243 0.003008 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.003008 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 3.6382 0.066084 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.066084 1.000000 1.000000 31 4.0011 0.054595 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.054595 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 0.0782 0.781714 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.781714 1.000000 1.000000 31 1.8827 0.180198 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.180198 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 6.5370 0.015866 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.015866 1.000000 1.000000 31 2.9994 0.093567 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.093567 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 1.7515 0.195683 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.195683 1.000000 1.000000 31 1.6987 0.202368 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.202368 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 0.1796 0.674721 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.674721 1.000000 1.000000 31 0.1968 0.660535 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.660535 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 0.0221 0.882821 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.882821 1.000000 1.000000 31 5.0098 0.032778 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.032778 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 4.0789 0.052434 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.052434 1.000000 1.000000 31 2.5688 0.119470 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.119470 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 0.6139 0.439470 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.439470 1.000000 1.000000 31 0.0993 0.754880 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.754880 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 0.7669 0.388132 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.388132 1.000000 1.000000 31 0.1440 0.706990 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.706990 1.000000 1.000000 3

301 0.3302 0.569810 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.569810 1.000000 1.000000 31 1.1503 0.292046 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.292046 1.000000 1.000000 3

30


38

group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=16.846, p=.00029


1 2

group

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

DV_

1



1 2

LIMB

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

DV_


39

TASK; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=17.613, p=.00022


1 2

TASK

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

DV_

1



1 2

LC

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

DV_


40

LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=9.4015, p=.00456


group 1 group2

1 2

LC

20253035404550556065707580

DV_

1

LIMB*TASK*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=10.424, p=.00301


group 1 group2

TASK: 1

LIMB: 1 210

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DV_

1

TASK: 2

LIMB: 1 2


41

LIMB*FREQ; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=6.5370, p=.01587


LIMB 1 LIMB2

1 2

FREQ

2025303540455055606570758085

DV_

1

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.0098, p=.03278


group 1 group2

TASK: 1

LC: 1 210

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

DV_

1

TASK: 2

LC: 1 2

Factors: LevelsLIMB: 1


42

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.0098, p=.03278


group 1 group2

TASK: 1

LC: 1 210

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

DV_

1

TASK: 2

LC: 1 2


Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (amplitude in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 93.946, df = 36.187

Cell No.group LC {1}

59.264{2}

58.648{3}

49.108{4}

42.0351234

1 1 0.975743 0.145823 0.0002281 2 0.975743 0.040535 0.0059692 1 0.145823 0.040535 0.0003962 2 0.000228 0.005969 0.000396


Cell No.group LIMB TASK {1}

47.420{2}

45.108{3}

72.213{4}

71.083{5}

31.357{6}

28.712{7}

64.336{8}

57.87912345678

1 1 1 0.089782 0.000141 0.000141 0.249639 0.007315 0.019454 0.3507171 1 2 0.089782 0.000141 0.000141 0.094515 0.228280 0.005464 0.1458091 2 1 0.000141 0.000141 0.821021 0.000140 0.000140 0.923344 0.0719831 2 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.821021 0.000140 0.000140 0.825502 0.4834202 1 1 0.249639 0.094515 0.000140 0.000140 0.034062 0.000141 0.0001412 1 2 0.007315 0.228280 0.000140 0.000140 0.034062 0.000141 0.0001412 2 1 0.019454 0.005464 0.923344 0.825502 0.000141 0.000141 0.0001412 2 2 0.350717 0.145809 0.071983 0.483420 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (amplitude in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 51.356, df = 30.000

Cell No.LIMB FREQ {1}

36.881{2}

39.418{3}

66.729{4}

66.0261234

1 1 0.038909 0.000160 0.0001601 2 0.038909 0.000160 0.0001602 1 0.000160 0.000160 0.8609982 2 0.000160 0.000160 0.860998


43


Cell No.group LIMB TASK LC {1}

47.956{2}

46.884{3}

45.303{4}

44.912{5}

71.816{6}

72.610{7}

71.981{8}

70.185{9}

32.465{10

30.212345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.998645 0.355023 0.175385 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.936774 0.3741 1 1 2 0.998645 0.949360 0.789469 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.691658 0.8961 1 2 1 0.355023 0.949360 1.000000 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.829364 0.6291 1 2 2 0.175385 0.789469 1.000000 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.857710 0.6671 2 1 1 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.999960 1.000000 0.936057 0.000252 0.0001 2 1 2 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.999960 0.999998 0.495447 0.000221 0.0001 2 2 1 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 1.000000 0.999998 0.877055 0.000244 0.0001 2 2 2 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.000147 0.936057 0.495447 0.877055 0.000370 0.0002 1 1 1 0.936774 0.691658 0.829364 0.857710 0.000252 0.000221 0.000244 0.000370 0.6352 1 1 2 0.374428 0.896521 0.629450 0.667952 0.000188 0.000177 0.000185 0.000228 0.6357552 1 2 1 0.337846 0.431877 0.936859 0.625186 0.000181 0.000172 0.000179 0.000214 0.356635 1.0002 1 2 2 0.187056 0.252711 0.375607 0.867133 0.000163 0.000152 0.000162 0.000174 0.002043 0.3622 2 1 1 0.079380 0.054901 0.031117 0.026936 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.000147 0.0002 2 1 2 0.977121 0.946845 0.864550 0.836900 0.715602 0.951213 0.699980 0.851570 0.000147 0.0002 2 2 1 0.617823 0.511078 0.364359 0.331820 0.991476 0.981070 0.999727 0.999012 0.000147 0.0002 2 2 2 0.999993 0.999910 0.998503 0.997392 0.258824 0.207938 0.247578 0.854994 0.000147 0.000

group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=16.846, p=.00029Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 58.95587 2.305940 54.24652 63.66523 162 45.57121 2.305940 40.86186 50.28057 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=105.85, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 38.14937 1.901431 34.26613 42.03261 322 66.37771 2.337893 61.60310 71.15233 32

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0747, p=.30816Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 46.26388 2.689030 40.77214 51.75561 161 2 71.64787 3.306281 64.89554 78.40019 162 1 30.03487 2.689030 24.54314 35.52660 162 2 61.10756 3.306281 54.35523 67.85988 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=17.613, p=.00022Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 53.83157 1.680021 50.40051 57.26263 322 50.69552 1.665557 47.29400 54.09704 32


44

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.5850, p=.06799Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 59.81647 2.375909 54.96422 64.66873 161 2 58.09527 2.355454 53.28479 62.90575 162 1 47.84667 2.375909 42.99441 52.69892 162 2 43.29576 2.355454 38.48528 48.10624 16

LC; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=13.333, p=.00099Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 54.18579 1.697852 50.71831 57.65326 322 50.34130 1.728852 46.81051 53.87209 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=9.4015, p=.00456Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 59.26396 2.401125 54.36021 64.16771 161 2 58.64778 2.444965 53.65450 63.64107 162 1 49.10761 2.401125 44.20386 54.01136 162 2 42.03482 2.444965 37.04153 47.02810 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.2937, p=.26437Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 51.80512 1.666312 48.40206 55.20819 322 52.72196 1.692822 49.26476 56.17917 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.67335, p=.41836Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 58.82818 2.356521 54.01552 63.64084 161 2 59.08357 2.394012 54.19434 63.97279 162 1 44.78207 2.356521 39.96941 49.59472 162 2 46.36036 2.394012 41.47114 51.24959 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.8919, p=.09937Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 39.38860 1.926805 35.45354 43.32366 321 2 36.91015 1.925865 32.97701 40.84329 322 1 68.27454 2.407515 63.35774 73.19134 322 2 64.48089 2.377528 59.62533 69.33645 32


45

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.424, p=.00301Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 47.41994 2.724914 41.85492 52.98496 161 1 2 45.10781 2.723584 39.54551 50.67011 161 2 1 72.21301 3.404740 65.25960 79.16641 161 2 2 71.08273 3.362332 64.21593 77.94953 162 1 1 31.35726 2.724914 25.79224 36.92228 162 1 2 28.71248 2.723584 23.15018 34.27478 162 2 1 64.33607 3.404740 57.38266 71.28948 162 2 2 57.87905 3.362332 51.01225 64.74584 16

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.6382, p=.06608Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 38.88505 1.938686 34.92573 42.84438 321 2 37.41369 1.897563 33.53835 41.28904 322 1 69.48652 2.591306 64.19437 74.77868 322 2 63.26890 2.597069 57.96498 68.57283 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.0011, p=.05459Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 46.62974 2.741717 41.03041 52.22907 161 1 2 45.89801 2.683560 40.41745 51.37857 161 2 1 71.89818 3.664660 64.41395 79.38242 161 2 2 71.39755 3.672810 63.89667 78.89843 162 1 1 31.14036 2.741717 25.54103 36.73969 162 1 2 28.92938 2.683560 23.44882 34.40994 162 2 1 67.07486 3.664660 59.59063 74.55910 162 2 2 55.14026 3.672810 47.63938 62.64113 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.07817, p=.78171Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 55.81489 1.811862 52.11458 59.51521 321 2 51.84825 1.740727 48.29321 55.40328 322 1 52.55668 1.682805 49.11993 55.99343 322 2 48.83435 1.829687 45.09764 52.57107 32


46

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.8827, p=.18020Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 59.88588 2.562360 54.65284 65.11892 161 1 2 59.74707 2.461759 54.71949 64.77465 161 2 1 58.64205 2.379846 53.78175 63.50234 161 2 2 57.54849 2.587568 52.26398 62.83301 162 1 1 51.74391 2.562360 46.51087 56.97695 162 1 2 43.94942 2.461759 38.92184 48.97701 162 2 1 46.47131 2.379846 41.61102 51.33161 162 2 2 40.12021 2.587568 34.83569 45.40473 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.5370, p=.01587Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 36.88120 1.798102 33.20899 40.55342 321 2 39.41754 2.044334 35.24246 43.59263 322 1 66.72904 2.461449 61.70209 71.75599 322 2 66.02639 2.396281 61.13253 70.92024 32

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.9994, p=.09357Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 45.87494 2.542900 40.68164 51.06823 161 1 2 46.65281 2.891124 40.74835 52.55728 161 2 1 71.78142 3.481015 64.67224 78.89060 161 2 2 71.51432 3.388853 64.59336 78.43528 162 1 1 27.88747 2.542900 22.69417 33.08076 162 1 2 32.18227 2.891124 26.27781 38.08674 162 2 1 61.67667 3.481015 54.56749 68.78585 162 2 2 60.53845 3.388853 53.61749 67.45941 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.7515, p=.19568Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 53.04323 1.718773 49.53303 56.55344 321 2 54.61991 1.807696 50.92810 58.31171 322 1 50.56701 1.724891 47.04431 54.08971 322 2 50.82402 1.701249 47.34961 54.29844 32


47

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.6987, p=.20237Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 59.68377 2.430712 54.71959 64.64795 161 1 2 59.94918 2.556468 54.72817 65.17018 161 2 1 57.97259 2.439365 52.99074 62.95443 161 2 2 58.21795 2.405929 53.30439 63.13152 162 1 1 46.40270 2.430712 41.43852 51.36687 162 1 2 49.29064 2.556468 44.06963 54.51164 162 2 1 43.16144 2.439365 38.17959 48.14328 162 2 2 43.43009 2.405929 38.51653 48.34365 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.17962, p=.67472Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 53.64922 1.679796 50.21862 57.07983 321 2 54.72235 1.810120 51.02559 58.41911 322 1 49.96102 1.818856 46.24642 53.67562 322 2 50.72158 1.767065 47.11275 54.33041 32

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.19676, p=.66054Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 59.13991 2.375590 54.28831 63.99151 161 1 2 59.38801 2.559896 54.16001 64.61602 161 2 1 58.51645 2.572250 53.26321 63.76968 161 2 2 58.77912 2.499007 53.67546 63.88277 162 1 1 48.15854 2.375590 43.30694 53.01014 162 1 2 50.05668 2.559896 44.82868 55.28469 162 2 1 41.40559 2.572250 36.15236 46.65883 162 2 2 42.66404 2.499007 37.56039 47.76770 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.02210, p=.88282Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 40.21084 2.017304 36.09095 44.33072 321 1 2 38.56636 1.928260 34.62833 42.50439 321 2 1 37.55926 1.911939 33.65456 41.46396 321 2 2 36.26103 1.963001 32.25204 40.27001 322 1 1 71.41895 2.840789 65.61728 77.22061 322 1 2 65.13013 2.508844 60.00639 70.25387 322 2 1 67.55410 2.484660 62.47974 72.62845 322 2 2 61.40768 2.799280 55.69079 67.12457 32


48

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.0098, p=.03278Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 47.95624 2.852899 42.12984 53.78264 161 1 1 2 46.88364 2.726971 41.31442 52.45286 161 1 2 1 45.30324 2.703890 39.78116 50.82533 161 1 2 2 44.91238 2.776103 39.24282 50.58194 161 2 1 1 71.81552 4.017482 63.61073 80.02031 161 2 1 2 72.61050 3.548042 65.36443 79.85656 161 2 2 1 71.98085 3.513840 64.80463 79.15707 161 2 2 2 70.18461 3.958780 62.09970 78.26952 162 1 1 1 32.46544 2.852899 26.63904 38.29184 162 1 1 2 30.24908 2.726971 24.67986 35.81830 162 1 2 1 29.81528 2.703890 24.29320 35.33736 162 1 2 2 27.60968 2.776103 21.94012 33.27923 162 2 1 1 71.02238 4.017482 62.81759 79.22717 162 2 1 2 57.64976 3.548042 50.40369 64.89583 162 2 2 1 63.12734 3.513840 55.95112 70.30356 162 2 2 2 52.63075 3.958780 44.54584 60.71566 16

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.0789, p=.05243Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 38.14007 1.821784 34.41949 41.86065 321 1 2 40.63713 2.104055 36.34008 44.93418 321 2 1 35.62233 1.848009 31.84820 39.39647 321 2 2 38.19796 2.042068 34.02750 42.36842 322 1 1 67.94640 2.483045 62.87534 73.01745 322 1 2 68.60268 2.619816 63.25230 73.95306 322 2 1 65.51169 2.577540 60.24765 70.77573 322 2 2 63.45009 2.361268 58.62773 68.27244 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.5688, p=.11947Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 47.09815 2.576392 41.83645 52.35984 161 1 1 2 47.74173 2.975583 41.66478 53.81868 161 1 2 1 44.65173 2.613479 39.31429 49.98917 161 1 2 2 45.56389 2.887920 39.66597 51.46181 161 2 1 1 72.26940 3.511556 65.09784 79.44095 161 2 1 2 72.15662 3.704980 64.59004 79.72320 161 2 2 1 71.29344 3.645192 63.84897 78.73792 161 2 2 2 70.87202 3.339338 64.05218 77.69185 162 1 1 1 29.18200 2.576392 23.92030 34.44369 162 1 1 2 33.53252 2.975583 27.45557 39.60947 162 1 2 1 26.59293 2.613479 21.25550 31.93037 162 1 2 2 30.83202 2.887920 24.93410 36.72994 162 2 1 1 63.62340 3.511556 56.45184 70.79495 162 2 1 2 65.04875 3.704980 57.48217 72.61532 162 2 2 1 59.72994 3.645192 52.28546 67.17441 162 2 2 2 56.02816 3.339338 49.20832 62.84799 16


49

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.61389, p=.43947Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 37.42447 1.822496 33.70244 41.14650 321 1 2 40.34563 2.124542 36.00674 44.68453 321 2 1 36.33794 1.826180 32.60838 40.06749 321 2 2 38.48945 2.013712 34.37690 42.60200 322 1 1 69.87398 2.601675 64.56065 75.18731 322 1 2 69.09906 2.725692 63.53246 74.66567 322 2 1 63.58410 2.835641 57.79295 69.37525 322 2 2 62.95371 2.591865 57.66041 68.24700 32

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.09928, p=.75488Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 46.17613 2.577398 40.91238 51.43988 161 1 1 2 47.08336 3.004556 40.94723 53.21948 161 1 2 1 45.57375 2.582608 40.29936 50.84814 161 1 2 2 46.22227 2.847819 40.40625 52.03829 161 2 1 1 72.10369 3.679324 64.58951 79.61787 161 2 1 2 71.69267 3.854710 63.82030 79.56504 161 2 2 1 71.45914 4.010202 63.26922 79.64907 161 2 2 2 71.33596 3.665450 63.85011 78.82181 162 1 1 1 28.67281 2.577398 23.40906 33.93656 162 1 1 2 33.60791 3.004556 27.47179 39.74403 162 1 2 1 27.10212 2.582608 21.82773 32.37651 162 1 2 2 30.75663 2.847819 24.94061 36.57266 162 2 1 1 67.64427 3.679324 60.13009 75.15845 162 2 1 2 66.50545 3.854710 58.63309 74.37782 162 2 2 1 55.70906 4.010202 47.51914 63.89899 162 2 2 2 54.57145 3.665450 47.08560 62.05730 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.76691, p=.38813Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 54.80876 1.780703 51.17208 58.44545 321 1 2 56.82102 2.033440 52.66819 60.97386 321 2 1 51.27770 1.887435 47.42305 55.13236 321 2 2 52.41879 1.804762 48.73297 56.10460 322 1 1 52.48969 1.728048 48.96054 56.01883 322 1 2 52.62367 1.745870 49.05813 56.18922 322 2 1 48.64434 1.883820 44.79706 52.49161 322 2 2 49.02437 1.883836 45.17706 52.87168 32


50

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.14402, p=.70699Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 59.67768 2.518295 54.53464 64.82073 161 1 1 2 60.09408 2.875718 54.22108 65.96707 161 1 2 1 59.68986 2.669237 54.23855 65.14117 161 1 2 2 59.80428 2.552319 54.59175 65.01681 161 2 1 1 58.60214 2.443828 53.61118 63.59310 161 2 1 2 58.68195 2.469033 53.63952 63.72439 161 2 2 1 57.34304 2.664123 51.90217 62.78390 161 2 2 2 57.75395 2.664146 52.31304 63.19487 162 1 1 1 49.93985 2.518295 44.79680 55.08289 162 1 1 2 53.54797 2.875718 47.67497 59.42097 162 1 2 1 42.86555 2.669237 37.41424 48.31686 162 1 2 2 45.03330 2.552319 39.82077 50.24583 162 2 1 1 46.37723 2.443828 41.38627 51.36820 162 2 1 2 46.56539 2.469033 41.52295 51.60783 162 2 2 1 39.94564 2.664123 34.50477 45.38650 162 2 2 2 40.29479 2.664146 34.85388 45.73570 16

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.33023, p=.56981Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 38.54520 1.887371 34.69067 42.39972 321 1 1 2 41.87648 2.282083 37.21584 46.53712 321 1 2 1 37.73495 1.879033 33.89745 41.57244 321 1 2 2 39.39778 2.080319 35.14920 43.64636 321 2 1 1 36.30374 1.837911 32.55022 40.05725 321 2 1 2 38.81479 2.031681 34.66554 42.96403 321 2 2 1 34.94093 1.882738 31.09586 38.78599 321 2 2 2 37.58113 2.091920 33.30886 41.85340 322 1 1 1 71.07233 2.752795 65.45037 76.69429 322 1 1 2 71.76557 3.205093 65.21990 78.31124 322 1 2 1 64.82046 2.858209 58.98322 70.65770 322 1 2 2 65.43980 2.516561 60.30029 70.57930 322 2 1 1 68.67563 2.652699 63.25810 74.09317 322 2 1 2 66.43256 2.548964 61.22688 71.63824 322 2 2 1 62.34775 2.967394 56.28752 68.40797 322 2 2 2 60.46761 2.812939 54.72283 66.21240 32


51

LIMB*TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1503, p=.29205Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132

1 1 1 1 1 47.24686 2.669146 41.79574 52.69798 161 1 1 1 2 48.66562 3.227353 42.07448 55.25675 161 1 1 2 1 46.94943 2.657355 41.52239 52.37647 161 1 1 2 2 46.81785 2.942016 40.80945 52.82625 161 1 2 1 1 45.10540 2.599199 39.79712 50.41367 161 1 2 1 2 45.50109 2.873230 39.63317 51.36901 161 1 2 2 1 44.19807 2.662594 38.76032 49.63581 161 1 2 2 2 45.62669 2.958422 39.58479 51.66860 161 2 1 1 1 72.10851 3.893040 64.15786 80.05915 161 2 1 1 2 71.52253 4.532685 62.26555 80.77951 161 2 1 2 1 72.43028 4.042118 64.17518 80.68539 161 2 1 2 2 72.79071 3.558955 65.52235 80.05907 161 2 2 1 1 72.09888 3.751483 64.43733 79.76043 161 2 2 1 2 71.86282 3.604779 64.50087 79.22476 161 2 2 2 1 70.48801 4.196529 61.91755 79.05846 161 2 2 2 2 69.88122 3.978096 61.75686 78.00557 162 1 1 1 1 29.84354 2.669146 24.39241 35.29466 162 1 1 1 2 35.08734 3.227353 28.49621 41.67847 162 1 1 2 1 28.52046 2.657355 23.09342 33.94750 162 1 1 2 2 31.97771 2.942016 25.96931 37.98610 162 1 2 1 1 27.50208 2.599199 22.19381 32.81035 162 1 2 1 2 32.12848 2.873230 26.26056 37.99640 162 1 2 2 1 25.68379 2.662594 20.24605 31.12153 162 1 2 2 2 29.53556 2.958422 23.49366 35.57747 162 2 1 1 1 70.03615 3.893040 62.08550 77.98680 162 2 1 1 2 72.00861 4.532685 62.75163 81.26558 162 2 1 2 1 57.21064 4.042118 48.95553 65.46574 162 2 1 2 2 58.08889 3.558955 50.82053 65.35724 162 2 2 1 1 65.25239 3.751483 57.59083 72.91394 162 2 2 1 2 61.00230 3.604779 53.64036 68.36424 162 2 2 2 1 54.20748 4.196529 45.63703 62.77794 162 2 2 2 2 51.05401 3.978096 42.92966 59.17837 16

2.5 Standard Deviation of Movement Amplitude2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskLimb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limbLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible


52

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


7753.650 1 7753.650 1035.964 0.0000000.011 1 0.011 0.001 0.969971

224.534 30 7.484235.864 1 235.864 49.117 0.000000

4.737 1 4.737 0.986 0.328555144.062 30 4.80215.184 1 15.184 10.716 0.0026770.001 1 0.001 0.001 0.977543

42.507 30 1.4175.899 1 5.899 2.842 0.1021943.759 1 3.759 1.811 0.188455

62.268 30 2.07641.614 1 41.614 22.778 0.0000443.944 1 3.944 2.159 0.152155

54.807 30 1.8271.927 1 1.927 6.370 0.0171380.702 1 0.702 2.320 0.1382239.078 30 0.3032.075 1 2.075 1.485 0.2325110.397 1 0.397 0.284 0.597807

41.922 30 1.3973.410 1 3.410 3.516 0.0705350.133 1 0.133 0.137 0.713621

29.095 30 0.9704.250 1 4.250 5.906 0.0212840.199 1 0.199 0.276 0.603189

21.590 30 0.7201.675 1 1.675 1.435 0.2403921.650 1 1.650 1.413 0.243838

35.018 30 1.1672.725 1 2.725 2.022 0.1653540.414 1 0.414 0.308 0.583328

40.431 30 1.3481.542 1 1.542 4.310 0.0465500.085 1 0.085 0.239 0.628813

10.734 30 0.3580.719 1 0.719 1.314 0.2607040.203 1 0.203 0.372 0.546575

16.415 30 0.5472.775 1 2.775 5.167 0.0303493.335 1 3.335 6.211 0.018447

16.110 30 0.5370.114 1 0.114 0.174 0.6794810.580 1 0.580 0.888 0.353674

19.599 30 0.6531.271 1 1.271 2.849 0.1018080.219 1 0.219 0.491 0.488815

13.383 30 0.446


53

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p - -df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

LoA


1 49.11710 0.000000#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.0000001 0.98645 0.328555#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.328555 1.000000 1.000000

301 10.71645 0.002677#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.002677 1.000000 1.0000001 0.00081 0.977543#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.977543 1.000000 1.000000

301 2.84219 0.102194#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.102194 1.000000 1.0000001 1.81114 0.188455#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.188455 1.000000 1.000000

301 22.77810 0.000044#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000044 1.000000 1.0000001 2.15890 0.152155#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.152155 1.000000 1.000000

301 6.36959 0.017138#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.017138 1.000000 1.0000001 2.31963 0.138223#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.138223 1.000000 1.000000

301 1.48486 0.232511#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.232511 1.000000 1.0000001 0.28433 0.597807#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.597807 1.000000 1.000000

301 3.51621 0.070535#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.070535 1.000000 1.0000001 0.13726 0.713621#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.713621 1.000000 1.000000

301 5.90594 0.021284#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.021284 1.000000 1.0000001 0.27601 0.603189#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.603189 1.000000 1.000000

301 1.43461 0.240392#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.240392 1.000000 1.0000001 1.41328 0.243838#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.243838 1.000000 1.000000

301 2.02195 0.165354#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.165354 1.000000 1.0000001 0.30750 0.583328#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.583328 1.000000 1.000000

301 4.31023 0.046550#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.046550 1.000000 1.0000001 0.23854 0.628813#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.628813 1.000000 1.000000

301 1.31417 0.260704#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.260704 1.000000 1.0000001 0.37188 0.546575#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.546575 1.000000 1.000000

301 5.16677 0.030349#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.030349 1.000000 1.0000001 6.21105 0.018447#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.018447 1.000000 1.000000

301 0.17408 0.679481#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.679481 1.000000 1.0000001 0.88752 0.353674#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.353674 1.000000 1.000000

301 2.84890 0.101808#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.101808 1.000000 1.0000001 0.49115 0.488815#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.488815 1.000000 1.000000

30


54



1 2

LIMB

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

DV_

1



1 2

TASK

2.83.03.23.43.63.84.04.24.44.64.85.05.2

DV_


55



1 2

FREQ

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

DV_

1

LIMB*TASK; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=6.3696, p=.01714


TASK 1 TASK2

1 2

LIMB

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

DV_


56

LIMB*FREQ; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.9059, p=.02128


LIMB 1 LIMB2

1 2

FREQ

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

DV_

1

LIMB*TASK*LC; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=4.3102, p=.04655


LC 1 LC2

LIMB: 1

TASK: 1 22.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

TASK: 1 2


57

LIMB*LC*FREQ; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=5.1668, p=.03035


LC 1 LC2

LIMB: 1

FREQ: 1 22.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

DV_

1

LIMB: 2

FREQ: 1 2

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=6.2110, p=.01845


group 1 group2

LC: 1

FREQ: 1 21.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.5

DV_

1

LC: 2

FREQ: 1 2



58

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=6.2110, p=.01845


group 1 group2

LC: 1

FREQ: 1 21.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.5

DV_

1

LC: 2

FREQ: 1 2


Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = .30259, df = 30.000

Cell No.LIMB TASK {1}

3.3236{2}

3.1019{3}

4.8038{4}

4.33671234

1 1 0.015338 0.000160 0.0001601 2 0.015338 0.000160 0.0001602 1 0.000160 0.000160 0.0001602 2 0.000160 0.000160 0.000160


Cell No.LIMB FREQ {1}

3.0188{2}

3.4068{3}

4.1940{4}

4.94641234

1 1 0.005170 0.000160 0.0001601 2 0.005170 0.000160 0.0001602 1 0.000160 0.000160 0.0001602 2 0.000160 0.000160 0.000160


Cell No.LIMB TASK LC {1}

3.3406{2}

3.3067{3}

3.1723{4}

3.0315{5}

4.8383{6}

4.7693{7}

4.6442{8}

4.029212345678

1 1 1 0.999979 0.751681 0.103349 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.0001461 1 2 0.999979 0.902586 0.194512 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.0001431 2 1 0.751681 0.902586 0.879415 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.0001411 2 2 0.103349 0.194512 0.879415 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.0001412 1 1 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.997698 0.602080 0.0001412 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.997698 0.930569 0.0001422 2 1 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.602080 0.930569 0.0001872 2 2 0.000146 0.000143 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000142 0.000187


59


Cell No.LIMB LC FREQ {1}

3.0631{2}

3.4498{3}

2.9745{4}

3.3637{5}

4.2185{6}

5.2640{7}

4.1696{8}

4.628912345678

1 1 1 0.090744 0.996868 0.316056 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.0001411 1 2 0.090744 0.018632 0.997420 0.000173 0.000141 0.000242 0.0001411 2 1 0.996868 0.018632 0.086874 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.0001411 2 2 0.316056 0.997420 0.086874 0.000145 0.000141 0.000154 0.0001412 1 1 0.000141 0.000173 0.000141 0.000145 0.000141 0.999938 0.0607842 1 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.0008232 2 1 0.000141 0.000242 0.000141 0.000154 0.999938 0.000141 0.0252172 2 2 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.000141 0.060784 0.000823 0.025217

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 2.0054, df = 34.283

Cell No.group LIMB LC FREQ {1}

3.1127{2}

3.4677{3}

3.2442{4}

3.3928{5}

4.2208{6}

4.8331{7}

4.1807{8}

4.6433{9}

3.0136{10

3.4312345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 0.838689 0.999993 0.969431 0.000247 0.000147 0.000341 0.000147 1.000000 0.9991 1 1 2 0.838689 0.996175 1.000000 0.020057 0.000148 0.034087 0.000184 0.999874 1.0001 1 2 1 0.999993 0.996175 0.999965 0.000927 0.000147 0.001576 0.000147 1.000000 1.0001 1 2 2 0.969431 1.000000 0.999965 0.007169 0.000147 0.012495 0.000155 0.999987 1.0001 2 1 1 0.000247 0.020057 0.000927 0.007169 0.116797 1.000000 0.622342 0.552421 0.9621 2 1 2 0.000147 0.000148 0.000147 0.000147 0.116797 0.072930 0.999346 0.057029 0.3161 2 2 1 0.000341 0.034087 0.001576 0.012495 1.000000 0.072930 0.480586 0.605641 0.9751 2 2 2 0.000147 0.000184 0.000147 0.000155 0.622342 0.999346 0.480586 0.133127 0.5462 1 1 1 1.000000 0.999874 1.000000 0.999987 0.552421 0.057029 0.605641 0.133127 0.6372 1 1 2 0.999999 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.962422 0.316067 0.975603 0.546717 0.6376062 1 2 1 0.999966 0.971411 0.999975 0.988513 0.209779 0.012097 0.243492 0.032014 0.934981 0.0282 1 2 2 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.910735 0.224178 0.935739 0.421823 0.914569 1.0002 2 1 1 0.688769 0.975722 0.839111 0.947551 1.000000 0.996053 1.000000 0.999940 0.000173 0.0132 2 1 2 0.001066 0.007143 0.002129 0.004766 0.245078 0.994700 0.211204 0.752637 0.000147 0.0002 2 2 1 0.759487 0.988095 0.889910 0.970570 1.000000 0.990474 1.000000 0.999725 0.000204 0.0282 2 2 2 0.221461 0.632644 0.349709 0.533415 0.999979 1.000000 0.999928 1.000000 0.000147 0.000

group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00144, p=.96997Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 3.886920 0.170986 3.537720 4.236120 162 3.896099 0.170986 3.546899 4.245299 16

LIMB; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=49.117, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LIMB DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 3.212781 0.147538 2.911468 3.514094 322 4.570238 0.161947 4.239498 4.900978 32


60

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.98645, p=.32856Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.304379 0.208650 2.878258 3.730500 161 2 4.469461 0.229028 4.001724 4.937199 162 1 3.121183 0.208650 2.695063 3.547304 162 2 4.671015 0.229028 4.203278 5.138752 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=10.716, p=.00268Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 4.063720 0.154246 3.748707 4.378733 322 3.719300 0.104781 3.505309 3.933290 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00081, p=.97754Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 4.060623 0.218137 3.615128 4.506119 161 2 3.713217 0.148182 3.410588 4.015846 162 1 4.066816 0.218137 3.621320 4.512312 162 2 3.725382 0.148182 3.422753 4.028011 16

LC; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.8422, p=.10219Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 3.998850 0.120484 3.752790 4.244911 322 3.784169 0.151089 3.475605 4.092733 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.8111, p=.18845Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.908574 0.170390 3.560592 4.256556 161 2 3.865266 0.213672 3.428891 4.301642 162 1 4.089127 0.170390 3.741145 4.437109 162 2 3.703071 0.213672 3.266696 4.139447 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=22.778, p=.00004Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 3.606419 0.109457 3.382878 3.829960 322 4.176600 0.156179 3.857641 4.495560 32


61

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.1589, p=.15216Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.689598 0.154796 3.373463 4.005734 161 2 4.084242 0.220870 3.633165 4.535318 162 1 3.523240 0.154796 3.207104 3.839375 162 2 4.268959 0.220870 3.817882 4.720035 16

LIMB*TASK; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.3696, p=.01714Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.323636 0.174802 2.966643 3.680630 321 2 3.101926 0.134225 2.827802 3.376050 322 1 4.803803 0.197658 4.400131 5.207475 322 2 4.336673 0.147585 4.035265 4.638081 32

LIMB*TASK*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.3196, p=.13822Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.379702 0.247208 2.874836 3.884567 161 1 2 3.229056 0.189823 2.841387 3.616726 161 2 1 4.741545 0.279531 4.170667 5.312424 161 2 2 4.197377 0.208716 3.771122 4.623633 162 1 1 3.267571 0.247208 2.762706 3.772437 162 1 2 2.974796 0.189823 2.587126 3.362465 162 2 1 4.866061 0.279531 4.295182 5.436940 162 2 2 4.475969 0.208716 4.049713 4.902224 16

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.4849, p=.23251Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.256462 0.139492 2.971582 3.541342 321 2 3.169101 0.169883 2.822152 3.516049 322 1 4.741239 0.200449 4.331867 5.150611 322 2 4.399237 0.186074 4.019224 4.779250 32

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.28433, p=.59781Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.290230 0.197271 2.887349 3.693111 161 1 2 3.318528 0.240251 2.827869 3.809187 161 2 1 4.526918 0.283478 3.947979 5.105858 161 2 2 4.412004 0.263148 3.874585 4.949424 162 1 1 3.222694 0.197271 2.819813 3.625575 162 1 2 3.019673 0.240251 2.529014 3.510332 162 2 1 4.955560 0.283478 4.376620 5.534499 162 2 2 4.386470 0.263148 3.849051 4.923890 16


62

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.5162, p=.07054Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 4.089449 0.143168 3.797061 4.381837 321 2 4.037990 0.212200 3.604621 4.471360 322 1 3.908252 0.119817 3.663553 4.152950 322 2 3.530347 0.115985 3.293474 3.767221 32

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.13726, p=.71362Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 4.016791 0.202470 3.603292 4.430290 161 1 2 4.104456 0.300096 3.491579 4.717333 161 2 1 3.800357 0.169447 3.454301 4.146414 161 2 2 3.626076 0.164028 3.291086 3.961066 162 1 1 4.162108 0.202470 3.748609 4.575607 162 1 2 3.971524 0.300096 3.358647 4.584401 162 2 1 4.016146 0.169447 3.670090 4.362202 162 2 2 3.434619 0.164028 3.099629 3.769609 16

LIMB*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.9059, p=.02128Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.018803 0.147093 2.718399 3.319208 321 2 3.406759 0.161965 3.075983 3.737535 322 1 4.194035 0.133971 3.920429 4.467640 322 2 4.946442 0.223756 4.489471 5.403412 32

LIMB*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.27601, p=.60319Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.178473 0.208022 2.753637 3.603310 161 1 2 3.430285 0.229053 2.962497 3.898072 161 2 1 4.200724 0.189464 3.813787 4.587660 161 2 2 4.738199 0.316439 4.091945 5.384453 162 1 1 2.859134 0.208022 2.434297 3.283970 162 1 2 3.383233 0.229053 2.915446 3.851021 162 2 1 4.187345 0.189464 3.800409 4.574282 162 2 2 5.154684 0.316439 4.508430 5.800938 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.4346, p=.24039Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.721439 0.150537 3.414001 4.028878 321 2 4.406000 0.204234 3.988900 4.823100 322 1 3.491399 0.090913 3.305729 3.677068 322 2 3.947201 0.142464 3.656251 4.238151 32


63

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.4133, p=.24384Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.862875 0.212892 3.428091 4.297659 161 1 2 4.258372 0.288830 3.668503 4.848241 161 2 1 3.516322 0.128570 3.253746 3.778898 161 2 2 3.910112 0.201474 3.498646 4.321577 162 1 1 3.580004 0.212892 3.145220 4.014788 162 1 2 4.553628 0.288830 3.963759 5.143497 162 2 1 3.466475 0.128570 3.203899 3.729051 162 2 2 3.984289 0.201474 3.572824 4.395755 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.0220, p=.16535Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 3.640806 0.112762 3.410514 3.871098 321 2 4.356895 0.179577 3.990151 4.723639 322 1 3.572032 0.151347 3.262940 3.881124 322 2 3.996306 0.177823 3.633144 4.359468 32

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.30750, p=.58333Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.666749 0.159470 3.341067 3.992430 161 1 2 4.150399 0.253960 3.631745 4.669054 161 2 1 3.712448 0.214037 3.275326 4.149570 161 2 2 4.018084 0.251479 3.504496 4.531673 162 1 1 3.614863 0.159470 3.289182 3.940545 162 1 2 4.563391 0.253960 4.044736 5.082045 162 2 1 3.431616 0.214037 2.994494 3.868738 162 2 2 3.974527 0.251479 3.460938 4.488116 16

LIMB*TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=4.3102, p=.04655Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.340588 0.167579 2.998346 3.682831 321 1 2 3.306684 0.213167 2.871339 3.742030 321 2 1 3.172335 0.129975 2.906891 3.437780 321 2 2 3.031517 0.148408 2.728427 3.334606 322 1 1 4.838310 0.228565 4.371518 5.305103 322 1 2 4.769296 0.260788 4.236696 5.301896 322 2 1 4.644168 0.199906 4.235906 5.052430 322 2 2 4.029178 0.145596 3.731832 4.326524 32


64

LIMB*TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.23854, p=.62881Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 3.367859 0.236993 2.883856 3.851863 161 1 1 2 3.391544 0.301464 2.775873 4.007215 161 1 2 1 3.212600 0.183812 2.837205 3.587995 161 1 2 2 3.245513 0.209881 2.816879 3.674146 161 2 1 1 4.665722 0.323240 4.005577 5.325866 161 2 1 2 4.817369 0.368810 4.064159 5.570579 161 2 2 1 4.388115 0.282710 3.810745 4.965485 161 2 2 2 4.006640 0.205903 3.586129 4.427151 162 1 1 1 3.313317 0.236993 2.829313 3.797321 162 1 1 2 3.221825 0.301464 2.606154 3.837496 162 1 2 1 3.132071 0.183812 2.756676 3.507466 162 1 2 2 2.817521 0.209881 2.388887 3.246154 162 2 1 1 5.010898 0.323240 4.350754 5.671043 162 2 1 2 4.721223 0.368810 3.968013 5.474433 162 2 2 1 4.900221 0.282710 4.322851 5.477591 162 2 2 2 4.051717 0.205903 3.631206 4.472227 16

LIMB*TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.3142, p=.26070Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.109945 0.186722 2.728607 3.491282 321 1 2 3.537328 0.188731 3.151888 3.922768 321 2 1 2.927662 0.119869 2.682857 3.172468 321 2 2 3.276190 0.159804 2.949826 3.602553 322 1 1 4.332934 0.174981 3.975576 4.690293 322 1 2 5.274672 0.292914 4.676463 5.872881 322 2 1 4.055135 0.137477 3.774369 4.335900 322 2 2 4.618211 0.199288 4.211211 5.025212 32

LIMB*TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.37188, p=.54658Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 3.270909 0.264065 2.731616 3.810203 161 1 1 2 3.488494 0.266906 2.943399 4.033588 161 1 2 1 3.086037 0.169521 2.739830 3.432244 161 1 2 2 3.372076 0.225997 2.910528 3.833624 161 2 1 1 4.454841 0.247460 3.949459 4.960222 161 2 1 2 5.028250 0.414242 4.182254 5.874246 161 2 2 1 3.946607 0.194422 3.549545 4.343669 161 2 2 2 4.448148 0.281836 3.872562 5.023734 162 1 1 1 2.948980 0.264065 2.409686 3.488273 162 1 1 2 3.586163 0.266906 3.041068 4.131257 162 1 2 1 2.769288 0.169521 2.423080 3.115495 162 1 2 2 3.180304 0.225997 2.718756 3.641852 162 2 1 1 4.211028 0.247460 3.705646 4.716410 162 2 1 2 5.521094 0.414242 4.675098 6.367089 162 2 2 1 4.163663 0.194422 3.766601 4.560725 162 2 2 2 4.788275 0.281836 4.212689 5.363861 16


65

LIMB*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.1668, p=.03035Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 3.063145 0.136412 2.784555 3.341736 321 1 2 3.449778 0.173171 3.096116 3.803441 321 2 1 2.974462 0.179241 2.608403 3.340520 321 2 2 3.363740 0.179411 2.997333 3.730146 322 1 1 4.218467 0.182942 3.844850 4.592083 322 1 2 5.264011 0.288018 4.675800 5.852223 322 2 1 4.169603 0.176915 3.808295 4.530910 322 2 2 4.628872 0.234200 4.150571 5.107173 32

LIMB*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD amplitude in ERP.stw)Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.2110, p=.01845Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 3.112723 0.192916 2.718737 3.506709 161 1 1 2 3.467736 0.244901 2.967582 3.967890 161 1 2 1 3.244223 0.253485 2.726538 3.761908 161 1 2 2 3.392833 0.253725 2.874657 3.911010 161 2 1 1 4.220774 0.258719 3.692401 4.749148 161 2 1 2 4.833062 0.407319 4.001206 5.664919 161 2 2 1 4.180673 0.250195 3.669707 4.691639 161 2 2 2 4.643336 0.331209 3.966916 5.319755 162 1 1 1 3.013567 0.192916 2.619581 3.407554 162 1 1 2 3.431821 0.244901 2.931666 3.931975 162 1 2 1 2.704700 0.253485 2.187015 3.222385 162 1 2 2 3.334646 0.253725 2.816469 3.852822 162 2 1 1 4.216159 0.258719 3.687785 4.744533 162 2 1 2 5.694960 0.407319 4.863104 6.526817 162 2 2 1 4.158532 0.250195 3.647566 4.669498 162 2 2 2 4.614408 0.331209 3.937989 5.290828 16

2.6 Absolute Error (AE) of Relative Phase2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= preferred, 2= fast-as-possible


66

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (AE of RP in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


131694.8 1 131694.8 215.8306 0.0000009.5 1 9.5 0.0155 0.901678

18305.3 30 610.22.8 1 2.8 0.0292 0.865362

82.0 1 82.0 0.8699 0.3584222828.7 30 94.3119.4 1 119.4 0.7840 0.382948468.9 1 468.9 3.0796 0.089487

4567.4 30 152.210554.2 1 10554.2 42.2925 0.000000

263.0 1 263.0 1.0539 0.3128137486.6 30 249.6

56.6 1 56.6 0.2880 0.595445168.2 1 168.2 0.8564 0.362125

5891.0 30 196.4178.3 1 178.3 1.1429 0.293560

8.3 1 8.3 0.0531 0.8192484681.2 30 156.0

54.2 1 54.2 0.5338 0.470692643.3 1 643.3 6.3408 0.017369

3043.5 30 101.513.3 1 13.3 0.2523 0.6191489.7 1 9.7 0.1843 0.670753

1585.9 30 52.9

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (AE of RP in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

TASKTASK*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorTASK*LCTASK*LC*group

1 0.02925 0.865362 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.865362 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.86993 0.358422 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.358422 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 0.78405 0.382948 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.382948 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 3.07965 0.089487 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.089487 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 42.29245 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 1.05392 0.312813 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.312813 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 0.28803 0.595445 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.595445 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.85643 0.362125 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.362125 1.000000 1.000000 30.000


67

FREQ; LS Means

Current ef f ect: F(1, 30)=42.292, p=.00000

Ef f ectiv e hy pothesis decomposition

Vertical bars denote 0.95 conf idence interv als

1 2

FREQ

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

DV_

1

LC*FREQ*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=6.3408, p=.01737

Effective hypothesis decompositionVertical bars denote 0.95 conf idence intervals

group 1 group 2

LC: 1

FREQ: 1 20

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

DV_

1

LC: 2

FREQ: 1 2

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (AE of RP in ERP)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 177.91, df = 39.708

Cell No.group LC FREQ {1}

17.921{2}

26.485{3}

17.011{4}

30.076{5}

15.045{6}

34.005{7}

15.063{8}

25.84212345678

1 1 1 0.035594 0.999954 0.000993 0.999747 0.029498 0.998646 0.6997661 1 2 0.035594 0.014797 0.838047 0.257472 0.920263 0.259201 1.0000001 2 1 0.999954 0.014797 0.000444 0.999887 0.017845 0.999982 0.5768121 2 2 0.000993 0.838047 0.000444 0.051349 0.990079 0.051821 0.9968362 1 1 0.999747 0.257472 0.999887 0.051349 0.000141 1.000000 0.0038732 1 2 0.029498 0.920263 0.017845 0.990079 0.000141 0.000141 0.0514932 2 1 0.998646 0.259201 0.999982 0.051821 1.000000 0.000141 0.0039442 2 2 0.699766 1.000000 0.576812 0.996836 0.003873 0.051493 0.003944

group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.01552, p=.90168Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 22.87346 2.183348 18.41447 27.33245 162 22.48876 2.183348 18.02977 26.94775 16


68

TASK; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.02925, p=.86536Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 22.78490 1.673796 19.36655 26.20325 322 22.57733 1.643791 19.22026 25.93440 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.86993, p=.35842Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_

+95.01234

1 1 23.54330 2.367105 18.70902 28.371 2 22.20363 2.324671 17.45602 26.952 1 22.02650 2.367105 17.19223 26.862 2 22.95102 2.324671 18.20341 27.69

LC; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.78405, p=.38295Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 23.36396 1.734534 19.82157 26.90635 322 21.99826 1.716921 18.49184 25.50469 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.0796, p=.08949Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%1234

1 1 22.20298 2.453002 17.19329 27.212681 2 23.54394 2.428094 18.58512 28.502772 1 24.52494 2.453002 19.51524 29.534642 2 20.45258 2.428094 15.49375 25.41141

FREQ; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=42.292, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 16.26025 1.641566 12.90773 19.61277 322 29.10198 2.005469 25.00626 33.19769 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.0539, p=.31281Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%1234

1 1 17.46620 2.321525 12.72501 22.207391 2 28.28073 2.836161 22.48851 34.072942 1 15.05430 2.321525 10.31311 19.795492 2 29.92322 2.836161 24.13101 35.71544


69

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.28803, p=.59544Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%1234

1 1 22.99771 1.836012 19.24808 26.747351 2 22.57208 2.524342 17.41669 27.727482 1 23.73021 1.882715 19.88519 27.575232 2 21.42444 1.779459 17.79030 25.05858

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.85643, p=.36213Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 21.59227 2.596513 16.28949 26.89506 161 1 2 25.49432 3.569959 18.20349 32.78515 161 2 1 22.81370 2.662561 17.37602 28.25137 161 2 2 21.59357 2.516535 16.45412 26.73302 162 1 1 24.40315 2.596513 19.10037 29.70594 162 1 2 19.64985 3.569959 12.35902 26.94068 162 2 1 24.64673 2.662561 19.20905 30.08440 162 2 2 21.25532 2.516535 16.11587 26.39477 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1429, p=.29356Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%1234

1 1 15.52938 1.876094 11.69788 19.360871 2 30.04042 2.535899 24.86142 35.219422 1 16.99112 1.649507 13.62238 20.359862 2 28.16353 2.161779 23.74859 32.57847

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.05314, p=.81925Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 17.12140 2.653197 11.70285 22.53995 161 1 2 29.96520 3.586303 22.64099 37.28940 161 2 1 17.81100 2.332754 13.04688 22.57512 161 2 2 26.59626 3.057217 20.35259 32.83993 162 1 1 13.93736 2.653197 8.51881 19.35591 162 1 2 30.11564 3.586303 22.79143 37.43985 162 2 1 16.17124 2.332754 11.40712 20.93536 162 2 2 29.73080 3.057217 23.48713 35.97447 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.53377, p=.47069Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 16.48317 1.967334 12.46534 20.50100 321 2 30.24475 2.397404 25.34860 35.14090 322 1 16.03733 1.611106 12.74701 19.32764 322 2 27.95920 2.276773 23.30941 32.60899 32


70

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=6.3408, p=.01737Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 17.92098 2.782230 12.23891 23.60305 161 1 2 26.48499 3.390441 19.56079 33.40920 161 2 1 17.01142 2.278448 12.35821 21.66463 161 2 2 30.07647 3.219844 23.50067 36.65226 162 1 1 15.04537 2.782230 9.36330 20.72744 162 1 2 34.00451 3.390441 27.08030 40.92872 162 2 1 15.06323 2.278448 10.41002 19.71644 162 2 2 25.84194 3.219844 19.26614 32.41773 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.25227, p=.61915Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 15.05403 2.274662 10.40855 19.69951 321 1 2 30.94140 2.802293 25.21835 36.66444 321 2 1 16.00473 1.993724 11.93300 20.07646 321 2 2 29.13944 3.868729 21.23844 37.04044 322 1 1 17.91232 2.128799 13.56473 22.25991 322 1 2 29.54810 2.456145 24.53199 34.56422 322 2 1 16.06992 1.584247 12.83446 19.30539 322 2 2 26.77896 2.315723 22.04963 31.50830 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (AE of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.18432, p=.67075Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 1 16.26249 3.216858 9.69279 22.83219 161 1 1 2 26.92206 3.963041 18.82845 35.01567 161 1 2 1 17.98031 2.819551 12.22202 23.73860 161 1 2 2 33.00833 5.471209 21.83463 44.18203 161 2 1 1 19.57947 3.010577 13.43105 25.72789 161 2 1 2 26.04792 3.473514 18.95406 33.14179 161 2 2 1 16.04254 2.240464 11.46690 20.61817 161 2 2 2 27.14460 3.274927 20.45631 33.83289 162 1 1 1 13.84557 3.216858 7.27587 20.41527 162 1 1 2 34.96074 3.963041 26.86713 43.05435 162 1 2 1 14.02915 2.819551 8.27086 19.78744 162 1 2 2 25.27055 5.471209 14.09685 36.44425 16

1.7 Standard Deviation (SD) of Relative Phase2 x 2 x 2 x 4 [GROUP x TASK x LC x FREQUENCY] ANOVA Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= 20%, 2= 60%, 3= 100% of CF, 4= preferred


71

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (SD of RP in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p


157119.3 1 157119.3 411.6022 0.000000142.9 1 142.9 0.3744 0.545249

11451.8 30 381.72.1 1 2.1 0.0111 0.9167099.0 1 9.0 0.0476 0.828772

5696.4 30 189.9910.8 1 910.8 11.0611 0.002337

0.1 1 0.1 0.0012 0.9723752470.2 30 82.33661.4 1 3661.4 23.1649 0.000039

6.9 1 6.9 0.0439 0.8354814741.7 30 158.1

61.1 1 61.1 1.2822 0.26646311.7 1 11.7 0.2445 0.624550

1430.6 30 47.7353.3 1 353.3 2.2726 0.142141100.1 1 100.1 0.6440 0.428589

4663.6 30 155.5164.1 1 164.1 3.4138 0.074534

1.0 1 1.0 0.0202 0.8879061442.3 30 48.1

9.6 1 9.6 0.4043 0.5297082.1 1 2.1 0.0878 0.769058

711.7 30 23.7

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (SD of RP in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p - -df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BnAdj. df2

TASKTASK*groupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorTASK*LCTASK*LC*groupErrorTASK*FREQTASK*FREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorTASK*LC*FREQTASK*LC*FREQ*groupError

1 0.01112 0.916709#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.916709 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.04760 0.828772#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.828772 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 11.06105 0.002337#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.002337 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.00122 0.972375#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.972375 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 23.16495 0.000039#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000039 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.04389 0.835481#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.835481 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 1.28218 0.266463#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.266463 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.24454 0.624550#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.624550 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 2.27257 0.142141#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.142141 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.64397 0.428589#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.428589 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 3.41383 0.074534#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.074534 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.02021 0.887906#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.887906 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

301 0.40428 0.529708#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.529708 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.08778 0.769058#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.769058 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

30


72



1 2

LC

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

DV_

1



1 2

FREQ

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

DV_

1

group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.37436, p=.54525Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 25.52106 1.726915 21.99422 29.04789 162 24.02679 1.726915 20.49996 27.55362 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.01112, p=.91671Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 24.86475 1.931269 20.92057 28.80893 322 24.68309 0.857829 22.93117 26.43501 32


73

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.04760, p=.82877Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 25.79978 2.731227 20.22187 31.37769 161 2 25.24233 1.213154 22.76474 27.71992 162 1 23.92972 2.731227 18.35181 29.50763 162 2 24.12386 1.213154 21.64627 26.60145 16

LC; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=11.061, p=.00234Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 26.66011 1.134371 24.34341 28.97680 322 22.88774 1.529288 19.76451 26.01096 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00122, p=.97238Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 27.42705 1.604243 24.15074 30.70335 161 2 23.61507 2.162739 19.19816 28.03197 162 1 25.89317 1.604243 22.61687 29.16947 162 2 22.16041 2.162739 17.74350 26.57731 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=23.165, p=.00004Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 20.99209 0.907719 19.13828 22.84590 322 28.55575 1.842036 24.79381 32.31769 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.04389, p=.83548Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 21.57462 1.283708 18.95294 24.19630 161 2 29.46749 2.605033 24.14731 34.78768 162 1 20.40957 1.283708 17.78789 23.03125 162 2 27.64401 2.605033 22.32382 32.96419 16

TASK*LC; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.2822, p=.26646Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 26.26223 1.663111 22.86570 29.65875 321 2 23.46727 2.538926 18.28210 28.65245 322 1 27.05799 0.993506 25.02898 29.08700 322 2 22.30820 0.873992 20.52327 24.09313 32


74

TASK*LC*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.24454, p=.62455Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 27.00364 2.351995 22.20022 31.80705 161 1 2 24.59593 3.590584 17.26298 31.92888 161 2 1 27.85046 1.405030 24.98100 30.71991 161 2 2 22.63420 1.236011 20.10993 25.15847 162 1 1 25.52082 2.351995 20.71741 30.32423 162 1 2 22.33862 3.590584 15.00567 29.67157 162 2 1 26.26552 1.405030 23.39607 29.13498 162 2 2 21.98219 1.236011 19.45792 24.50646 16

TASK*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.2726, p=.14214Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 19.90820 0.948861 17.97036 21.84603 321 2 29.82131 3.298627 23.08461 36.55800 322 1 22.07599 0.999902 20.03392 24.11806 322 2 27.29019 1.024123 25.19866 29.38173 32

TASK*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.64397, p=.42859Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 20.05329 1.341892 17.31278 22.79380 161 1 2 31.54628 4.664963 22.01915 41.07340 161 2 1 23.09595 1.414075 20.20802 25.98388 161 2 2 27.38871 1.448329 24.43083 30.34659 162 1 1 19.76311 1.341892 17.02260 22.50362 162 1 2 28.09633 4.664963 18.56921 37.62346 162 2 1 21.05603 1.414075 18.16810 23.94396 162 2 2 27.19168 1.448329 24.23380 30.14956 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.4138, p=.07453Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 22.07758 1.120584 19.78904 24.36612 321 2 31.24264 1.791812 27.58327 34.90200 322 1 19.90661 0.993868 17.87686 21.93636 322 2 25.86886 2.240044 21.29408 30.44365 32


75

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.02021, p=.88791Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 22.61830 1.584746 19.38182 25.85479 161 1 2 32.23579 2.534005 27.06066 37.41092 161 2 1 20.53093 1.405542 17.66043 23.40143 161 2 2 26.69920 3.167901 20.22948 33.16891 162 1 1 21.53686 1.584746 18.30038 24.77334 162 1 2 30.24948 2.534005 25.07435 35.42461 162 2 1 19.28228 1.405542 16.41178 22.15278 162 2 2 25.03853 3.167901 18.56882 31.50825 16

TASK*LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.40428, p=.52971Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 20.31141 1.177055 17.90754 22.71528 321 1 2 32.21304 3.035971 26.01276 38.41332 321 2 1 19.50498 1.343510 16.76117 22.24879 321 2 2 27.42957 4.037951 19.18297 35.67616 322 1 1 23.84375 1.247757 21.29549 26.39201 322 1 2 30.27223 1.371076 27.47212 33.07234 322 2 1 20.30823 0.925889 18.41731 22.19915 322 2 2 24.30816 0.979938 22.30686 26.30946 32

TASK*LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (SD of RP in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.08778, p=.76906Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678910111213141516

1 1 1 1 20.29147 1.664608 16.89189 23.69105 161 1 1 2 33.71580 4.293511 24.94728 42.48432 161 1 2 1 19.81510 1.900010 15.93477 23.69544 161 1 2 2 29.37675 5.710526 17.71430 41.03920 161 2 1 1 24.94514 1.764595 21.34136 28.54892 161 2 1 2 30.75577 1.938994 26.79582 34.71572 161 2 2 1 21.24676 1.309405 18.57260 23.92092 161 2 2 2 24.02164 1.385842 21.19138 26.85191 162 1 1 1 20.33136 1.664608 16.93177 23.73094 162 1 1 2 30.71028 4.293511 21.94177 39.47880 162 1 2 1 19.19486 1.900010 15.31452 23.07520 162 1 2 2 25.48238 5.710526 13.81993 37.14483 162 2 1 1 22.74236 1.764595 19.13857 26.34614 162 2 1 2 29.78868 1.938994 25.82873 33.74864 162 2 2 1 19.36970 1.309405 16.69554 22.04386 162 2 2 2 24.59468 1.385842 21.76441 27.42495 16

1.8 Visual Task: Reaction Time2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK]Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual task


76

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RT Mean in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorTASKTASK*groupError

11.02455 1 11.02455 2244.702 0.0000000.03791 1 0.03791 7.719 0.0093360.14734 30 0.004910.08638 1 0.08638 89.120 0.0000000.00437 1 0.00437 4.507 0.0421210.02908 30 0.00097



1 2

group

0.35

0.36

0.37

0.38

0.39

0.40

0.41

0.42

0.43

0.44

0.45

0.46

0.47

0.48

DV_

1



single Dual

TASK

0.34

0.36

0.38

0.40

0.42

0.44

0.46

0.48

0.50

DV_


77

TASK*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=4.5069, p=.04212


group 1 group 2

single Dual

TASK

0.32

0.34

0.36

0.38

0.40

0.42

0.44

0.46

0.48

0.50

0.52

0.54

DV_

1

group; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=7.7187, p=.00934Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.439379 0.012389 0.414077 0.464680 162 0.390703 0.012389 0.365401 0.416004 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=89.120, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

single 0.378302 0.008190 0.361576 0.395028 32Dual 0.451779 0.010803 0.429717 0.473841 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERPCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=4.5069, p=.04212Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV

+95.1234

1 single 0.394378 0.011582 0.370724 0.411 Dual 0.484379 0.015277 0.453179 0.512 single 0.362226 0.011582 0.338572 0.382 Dual 0.419179 0.015277 0.387979 0.45

1.9 Visual Task: Accuracy2 x 2 [GROUP x TASK]Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual task


78

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RT accuracy in ERPSigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorTASKTASK*groupError

44100.00 1 44100.00 6841.767 0.0000000.88 1 0.88 0.136 0.714525

193.37 30 6.4512.25 1 12.25 5.213 0.0296720.00 1 0.00 0.002 0.967748

70.50 30 2.35



single Dual

TASK

24.5

25.0

25.5

26.0

26.5

27.0

27.5

28.0

DV_

1

group; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.13636, p=.71453Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 26.36719 0.448808 25.45060 27.28377 162 26.13281 0.448808 25.21623 27.04940 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=5.2131, p=.02967Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

single 26.68750 0.359941 25.95240 27.42260 32Dual 25.81250 0.381188 25.03401 26.59099 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00166, p=.96775Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 single 26.81250 0.509033 25.77292 27.85208 161 Dual 25.92188 0.539081 24.82092 27.02283 162 single 26.56250 0.509033 25.52292 27.60208 162 Dual 25.70313 0.539081 24.60217 26.80408 16

1.10 Visual Task: Reaction Time-analysis for the effect of group, LC, and frequency2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x FREQUENCY]


79

Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= 20%, 2= 60%, 3= 100% of CF, 4= preferred

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RT Mean in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupError

26.12535 1 26.12535 1749.024 0.0000000.13603 1 0.13603 9.107 0.0051540.44811 30 0.014940.01004 1 0.01004 18.609 0.0001600.00004 1 0.00004 0.071 0.7920210.01619 30 0.000540.00217 1 0.00217 3.024 0.0922960.00001 1 0.00001 0.014 0.9072330.02152 30 0.000720.00104 1 0.00104 2.637 0.1148920.00010 1 0.00010 0.245 0.6240140.01188 30 0.00040

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (RT Mean in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

LowrAdj

LCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*group

1 18.60915 0.000160#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000160 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.001 0.07078 0.792021#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.792021 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.79

301 3.02397 0.092296#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.092296 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.091 0.01381 0.907233#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.907233 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.90

301 2.63656 0.114892#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.114892 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.11 0.24530 0.624014#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.624014 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.62



1 2

group

0.36

0.38

0.40

0.42

0.44

0.46

0.48

0.50

0.52

0.54

DV_


80



1 2

LC

0.40

0.41

0.42

0.43

0.44

0.45

0.46

0.47

0.48

0.49

0.50

DV_

1

group; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=9.1069, p=.00515Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.484379 0.015277 0.453179 0.515579 162 0.419179 0.015277 0.387979 0.450379 16

LC; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=18.609, p=.00016Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.460637 0.010621 0.438947 0.482327 322 0.442921 0.011359 0.419723 0.466119 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.07078, p=.79202Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.493783 0.015020 0.463109 0.524458 161 2 0.474974 0.016064 0.442167 0.507782 162 1 0.427491 0.015020 0.396817 0.458166 162 2 0.410867 0.016064 0.378060 0.443675 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.0240, p=.09230Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 0.455896 0.011619 0.432168 0.479625 322 0.447662 0.010469 0.426280 0.469043 32


81

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.01381, p=.90723Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.488774 0.016431 0.455217 0.522331 161 2 0.479983 0.014806 0.449745 0.510221 162 1 0.423018 0.016431 0.389461 0.456575 162 2 0.415340 0.014806 0.385102 0.445578 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.6366, p=.11489Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 0.461899 0.011339 0.438742 0.485056 321 2 0.459376 0.011018 0.436873 0.481878 322 1 0.449894 0.012278 0.424819 0.474968 322 2 0.435948 0.010850 0.413789 0.458108 32

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (RT Mean in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.24530, p=.62401Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 0.496194 0.016036 0.463445 0.528943 161 1 2 0.491372 0.015582 0.459549 0.523196 161 2 1 0.481354 0.017363 0.445894 0.516814 161 2 2 0.468594 0.015345 0.437256 0.499933 162 1 1 0.427603 0.016036 0.394854 0.460352 162 1 2 0.427379 0.015582 0.395556 0.459202 162 2 1 0.418433 0.017363 0.382973 0.453893 162 2 2 0.403302 0.015345 0.371963 0.434640 16

1.11 Visual Task: Accuracy-analysis for the effect of group, LC, and frequency2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x FREQUENCY]]Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupLimb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateralFrequency: 1= 20%, 2= 60%, 3= 100% of CF, 4= preferred


82

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RT accuracy in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupError

85284.50 1 85284.50 4585.445 0.0000001.53 1 1.53 0.082 0.776137

557.97 30 18.6030.03 1 30.03 8.750 0.0059892.00 1 2.00 0.583 0.451217

102.97 30 3.4315.13 1 15.13 3.778 0.0613540.78 1 0.78 0.195 0.661824

120.09 30 4.002.53 1 2.53 1.652 0.2085300.50 1 0.50 0.326 0.572096

45.97 30 1.53

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (RT accuracy in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p - -df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

LowA

LCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*group

1 8.749621 0.005989#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.005989 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 01 0.582701 0.451217#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.451217 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0

301 3.778298 0.061354#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.061354 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 01 0.195160 0.661824#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.661824 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0

301 1.651937 0.208530#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.208530 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 01 0.326309 0.572096#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.572096 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0



1 2

LC

23.5

24.0

24.5

25.0

25.5

26.0

26.5

27.0

27.5

28.0

DV_


83

group; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.08233, p=.77614Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 25.92188 0.539081 24.82092 27.02283 162 25.70313 0.539081 24.60217 26.80408 16

LC; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=8.7496, p=.00599Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 25.32813 0.488724 24.33002 26.32623 322 26.29688 0.324634 25.63388 26.95987 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.58270, p=.45122Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 25.31250 0.691160 23.90096 26.72404 161 2 26.53125 0.459102 25.59364 27.46886 162 1 25.34375 0.691160 23.93221 26.75529 162 2 26.06250 0.459102 25.12489 27.00011 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=3.7783, p=.06135Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 25.46875 0.423819 24.60320 26.33430 322 26.15625 0.416576 25.30549 27.00701 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.19516, p=.66182Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 25.50000 0.599370 24.27592 26.72408 161 2 26.34375 0.589127 25.14059 27.54691 162 1 25.43750 0.599370 24.21342 26.66158 162 2 25.96875 0.589127 24.76559 27.17191 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.6519, p=.20853Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 24.84375 0.533695 23.75380 25.93370 321 2 25.81250 0.534609 24.72068 26.90432 322 1 26.09375 0.375260 25.32737 26.86013 322 2 26.50000 0.387298 25.70903 27.29097 32


84

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (RT accuracy in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.32631, p=.57210Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 24.68750 0.754759 23.14608 26.22892 161 1 2 25.93750 0.756052 24.39344 27.48156 161 2 1 26.31250 0.530698 25.22867 27.39633 161 2 2 26.75000 0.547723 25.63140 27.86860 162 1 1 25.00000 0.754759 23.45858 26.54142 162 1 2 25.68750 0.756052 24.14344 27.23156 162 2 1 25.87500 0.530698 24.79117 26.95883 162 2 2 26.25000 0.547723 25.13140 27.36860 16

1.12 P300 amplitude-analysis for the effect of group and task2 x 2 x 3 [GROUP x TASK x MIDLINE SITE]Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskMidline site: 1= frontal, 2= central, 3= parietal

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst inSigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorTASKTASK*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorTASK*MIDLINETASK*MIDLINE*groupError

29911.80 1 29911.80 384.9492 0.0000002.47 1 2.47 0.0318 0.859671

2331.10 30 77.70495.06 1 495.06 17.9191 0.00020017.57 1 17.57 0.6359 0.431470

828.83 30 27.63977.49 2 488.75 33.7984 0.000000242.64 2 121.32 8.3896 0.000613867.64 60 14.4627.39 2 13.70 5.0759 0.00919118.27 2 9.13 3.3856 0.040446

161.89 60 2.70

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p - -df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BndAdj. df2

TASKTASK*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorTASK*MIDLINETASK*MIDLINE*group

1 17.91910 0.000200#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000200 1.000000 1.000000 30.0001 0.63589 0.431470#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.431470 1.000000 1.000000 30.000

302 33.79843 0.000000#### 0.784861 1.569722 47.09166 0.000000 0.500000 1.000000 30.0002 8.38957 0.000613#### 0.784861 1.569722 47.09166 0.001735 0.500000 1.000000 30.000

602 5.07591 0.009191#### 0.991740 1.983480 59.50441 0.009380 0.500000 1.000000 30.0002 3.38556 0.040446#### 0.991740 1.983480 59.50441 0.040872 0.500000 1.000000 30.000


85



1 2

TASK

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

DV_

1

MIDLINE; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=33.798, p=.00000


1 2 3

MIDLINE

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

DV_

1

MIDLINE*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=8.3896, p=.00061


group 1 group 2

1 2 3

MIDLINE

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

DV_


86

TASK*MIDLINE; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=5.0759, p=.00919

Effective hypothesis decompositionVertica l bars denote 0.95 conf idence intervals

TASK 1 TASK 2

1 2 3

MIDLINE

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

DV_

1

TASK*MIDLINE*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=3.3856, p=.04045


group 1 group 2

TASK: 1

MIDLINE:1

23

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

DV_

1

TASK: 2

MIDLINE:1

23

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRApproximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 14.461, df = 60.000

Cell No.MIDLINE {1}

9.4016{2}

13.299{3}

14.744123

1 0.000118 0.0001172 0.000118 0.0887143 0.000117 0.088714

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 17.771, df = 52.829

Cell No.group MIDLINE {1}

10.830{2}

12.751{3}

13.524{4}

7.9732{5}

13.848{6}

15.964123456

1 1 0.343455 0.065793 0.784693 0.342526 0.0137381 2 0.343455 0.964011 0.026413 0.995926 0.2756391 3 0.065793 0.964011 0.006144 0.999935 0.8745822 1 0.784693 0.026413 0.006144 0.000133 0.0001332 2 0.342526 0.995926 0.999935 0.000133 0.2415962 3 0.013738 0.275639 0.874582 0.000133 0.241596


87

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 2.6982, df = 60.000

Cell No.TASK MIDLINE {1}

10.476{2}

15.221{3}

16.564{4}

8.3268{5}

11.377{6}

12.924123456

1 1 0.000133 0.000133 0.000159 0.256056 0.0001341 2 0.000133 0.021104 0.000133 0.000133 0.0001391 3 0.000133 0.021104 0.000133 0.000133 0.0001332 1 0.000159 0.000133 0.000133 0.000133 0.0001332 2 0.256056 0.000133 0.000133 0.000133 0.0049852 3 0.000134 0.000139 0.000133 0.000133 0.004985

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 27.700, df = 34.229

Cell No.group TASK MIDLINE {1}

12.599{2}

14.945{3}

15.285{4}

9.0609{5}

10.556{6}

11.763{7}

8.3538{8}

15.497{9}

17.844{10

7.592123456789101112

1 1 1 0.007894 0.001241 0.000126 0.036389 0.950524 0.962272 0.912521 0.216807 0.2731 1 2 0.007894 0.999984 0.000123 0.000123 0.000167 0.045456 1.000000 0.912457 0.0161 1 3 0.001241 0.999984 0.000123 0.000123 0.000127 0.029077 1.000000 0.999410 0.0101 2 1 0.000126 0.000123 0.000123 0.317328 0.001136 1.000000 0.055464 0.002078 0.9991 2 2 0.036389 0.000123 0.000123 0.317328 0.638953 0.986930 0.290181 0.017868 0.9001 2 3 0.950524 0.000167 0.000127 0.001136 0.638953 0.789695 0.686097 0.086000 0.5332 1 1 0.962272 0.045456 0.029077 1.000000 0.986930 0.789695 0.000123 0.000123 0.9742 1 2 0.912521 1.000000 1.000000 0.055464 0.290181 0.686097 0.000123 0.007879 0.0002 1 3 0.216807 0.912457 0.999410 0.002078 0.017868 0.086000 0.000123 0.007879 0.0002 2 1 0.273170 0.016335 0.010134 0.999998 0.900235 0.533555 0.974553 0.000123 0.0001232 2 2 1.000000 0.937276 0.874246 0.862201 0.999992 1.000000 0.000123 0.000142 0.000123 0.0002 2 3 0.999574 0.999998 0.999945 0.268942 0.753506 0.999764 0.000123 0.400949 0.000123 0.000

group; Unweighted Means (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-sCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=.03180, p=.85967Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 12.36817 0.899671 10.53080 14.20554 162 12.59505 0.899671 10.75768 14.43242 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-Current effect: F(1, 30)=17.919, p=.00020Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 14.08736 0.843502 12.36470 15.81002 322 10.87586 0.621047 9.60751 12.14421 32

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.63589, p=.43147Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 14.27641 1.192892 11.84020 16.71262 161 2 10.45993 0.878293 8.66621 12.25364 162 1 13.89831 1.192892 11.46210 16.33452 162 2 11.29179 0.878293 9.49807 13.08550 16


88

MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-Current effect: F(2, 60)=33.798, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123

1 9.40159 0.655083 8.06373 10.73944 322 13.29929 0.781204 11.70386 14.89472 323 14.74395 0.791578 13.12734 16.36057 32

MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=8.3896, p=.00061Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 10.82997 0.926427 8.93796 12.72199 161 2 12.75061 1.104789 10.49433 15.00689 161 3 13.52392 1.119460 11.23768 15.81017 162 1 7.97320 0.926427 6.08118 9.86522 162 2 13.84797 1.104789 11.59169 16.10425 162 3 15.96398 1.119460 13.67774 18.25022 16

TASK*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=5.0759, p=.00919Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 10.47641 0.928817 8.57951 12.37331 321 2 15.22133 1.032481 13.11273 17.32994 321 3 16.56434 0.941764 14.64100 18.48768 322 1 8.32676 0.616678 7.06734 9.58619 322 2 11.37725 0.735449 9.87526 12.87923 322 3 12.92356 0.791959 11.30617 14.54096 32

TASK*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3Amp_sing_dual_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=3.3856, p=.04045Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group TASK MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 12.59904 1.313546 9.91642 15.28166 161 1 2 14.94549 1.460149 11.96347 17.92752 161 1 3 15.28470 1.331855 12.56469 18.00471 161 2 1 9.06091 0.872115 7.27981 10.84200 161 2 2 10.55573 1.040081 8.43160 12.67986 161 2 3 11.76315 1.119999 9.47580 14.05049 162 1 1 8.35378 1.313546 5.67116 11.03640 162 1 2 15.49718 1.460149 12.51515 18.47920 162 1 3 17.84398 1.331855 15.12397 20.56400 162 2 1 7.59262 0.872115 5.81152 9.37372 162 2 2 12.19876 1.040081 10.07463 14.32289 162 2 3 14.08398 1.119999 11.79664 16.37132 16

1.13 P300 amplitude-analysis for the effect of group, LC, and frequency2 x 2 x 3 [GROUP x LC x FREQUENCY x MIDLINE SITE]Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskMidline site: 1= frontal, 2= central, 3= parietal


89

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorLC*MIDLINELC*MIDLINE*groupErrorFREQ*MIDLINEFREQ*MIDLINE*groupErrorLC*FREQ*MIDLINELC*FREQ*MIDLINE*groupError

45421.17 1 45421.17 306.6746 0.00000066.43 1 66.43 0.4485 0.508156

4443.26 30 148.1113.32 1 13.32 0.6853 0.4143010.13 1 0.13 0.0067 0.935150

582.89 30 19.433.76 1 3.76 0.0891 0.7673981.26 1 1.26 0.0300 0.863699

1265.45 30 42.181400.62 2 700.31 27.9658 0.000000261.30 2 130.65 5.2174 0.008146

1502.50 60 25.0410.42 1 10.42 0.6642 0.4214904.30 1 4.30 0.2741 0.604470

470.54 30 15.681.44 2 0.72 0.2088 0.8121680.05 2 0.03 0.0077 0.992311

206.55 60 3.445.30 2 2.65 0.5861 0.559649

44.54 2 22.27 4.9265 0.010447271.23 60 4.52

2.67 2 1.34 0.5406 0.5852374.80 2 2.40 0.9693 0.385217

148.42 60 2.47

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -i-df

-df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

LowAdj

LCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*group

1 0.68531 0.414301#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.414301 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.00673 0.935150#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.935150 1.000000 1.000000 30

301 0.08909 0.767398#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.767398 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.02998 0.863699#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.863699 1.000000 1.000000 30

302 27.96581 0.000000#### 0.773060 1.546120 46.38360 0.000000 0.500000 1.000000 302 5.21737 0.008146#### 0.773060 1.546120 46.38360 0.014614 0.500000 1.000000 30

601 0.66424 0.421490#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.421490 1.000000 1.000000 301 0.27406 0.604470#### 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.604470 1.000000 1.000000 30


90

MIDLINE; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=27.966, p=.00000


1 2 3

MIDLINE

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

DV_

1

MIDLINE*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=5.2174, p=.00815


group 1 group 2

1 2 3

MIDLINE

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

DV_

1

FREQ*MIDLINE*group; LS MeansCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=4.9265, p=.01045


group 1 group 2

MIDLINE: 1

FREQ: 1 22

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

DV

_1

MIDLINE: 2

FREQ: 1 2

MIDLINE: 3

FREQ: 1 2


91

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Within MS = 25.042, df = 60.000

Cell No.MIDLINE {1}

8.3268{2}

11.377{3}

12.924123

1 0.000138 0.0001172 0.000138 0.0425423 0.000117 0.042542

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 16.516, df = 50.814

Cell No.group MIDLINE {1}

9.0609{2}

10.556{3}

11.763{4}

7.5926{5}

12.199{6}

14.084123456

1 1 0.543844 0.037676 0.982617 0.263217 0.0121441 2 0.543844 0.747480 0.323203 0.971575 0.1571821 3 0.037676 0.747480 0.057829 0.999667 0.8859842 1 0.982617 0.323203 0.057829 0.000162 0.0001332 2 0.263217 0.971575 0.999667 0.000162 0.2857902 3 0.012144 0.157182 0.885984 0.000133 0.285790

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc TestsError: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 26.192, df = 33.712

Cell No.group FREQ MIDLINE {1}

9.2320{2}

10.386{3}

11.293{4}

8.8898{5}

10.725{6}

12.234{7}

7.1949{8}

11.898{9}

14.658{10}

7.990123456789101112

1 1 1 0.575685 0.012981 0.999957 0.202650 0.000145 0.999915 0.937845 0.153380 0.99981 1 2 0.575685 0.858844 0.200120 0.999961 0.040919 0.825443 0.999996 0.457377 0.96971 1 3 0.012981 0.858844 0.001759 0.995044 0.826967 0.518561 1.000000 0.992037 0.79341 2 1 0.999957 0.200120 0.001759 0.043507 0.000124 0.998139 0.872316 0.103188 1.00001 2 2 0.202650 0.999961 0.995044 0.043507 0.190925 0.720565 0.999942 0.578140 0.92701 2 3 0.000145 0.040919 0.826967 0.000124 0.190925 0.231437 1.000000 0.967174 0.4672 1 1 0.999915 0.825443 0.518561 0.998139 0.720565 0.231437 0.000123 0.000123 0.93582 1 2 0.937845 0.999996 1.000000 0.872316 0.999942 1.000000 0.000123 0.000264 0.0002 1 3 0.153380 0.457377 0.992037 0.103188 0.578140 0.967174 0.000123 0.000264 0.0002 2 1 0.999899 0.969767 0.793480 1.000000 0.927035 0.467127 0.935839 0.000123 0.0001232 2 2 0.803785 0.988161 0.999923 0.693485 0.999979 1.000000 0.000123 0.991952 0.007414 0.0002 2 3 0.455057 0.843627 0.982845 0.343796 0.918400 0.999999 0.000123 0.124570 0.584385 0.000

group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.44853, p=.50816Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 10.45993 0.878293 8.666214 12.25364 162 11.29179 0.878293 9.498074 13.08550 16

LC; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.68531, p=.41430Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 10.68965 0.583445 9.498092 11.88120 322 11.06207 0.729511 9.572211 12.55193 32


92

LC*group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00673, p=.93515Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 10.25526 0.825116 8.570147 11.94037 161 2 10.66460 1.031685 8.557617 12.77158 162 1 11.12403 0.825116 9.438921 12.80914 162 2 11.45954 1.031685 9.352564 13.56653 16

FREQ; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.08909, p=.76740Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 10.77693 0.812860 9.116853 12.43701 322 10.97478 0.574765 9.800956 12.14861 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.02998, p=.86370Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 10.30362 1.149557 7.955909 12.65133 161 2 10.61624 0.812841 8.956197 12.27628 162 1 11.25025 1.149557 8.902542 13.59796 162 2 11.33333 0.812841 9.673284 12.99337 16

MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=27.966, p=.00000Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123

1 8.32676 0.616678 7.06734 9.58619 322 11.37725 0.735449 9.87526 12.87923 323 12.92356 0.791959 11.30617 14.54096 32

MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=5.2174, p=.00815Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 9.06091 0.872115 7.27981 10.84200 161 2 10.55573 1.040081 8.43160 12.67986 161 3 11.76315 1.119999 9.47580 14.05049 162 1 7.59262 0.872115 5.81152 9.37372 162 2 12.19876 1.040081 10.07463 14.32289 162 3 14.08398 1.119999 11.79664 16.37132 16


93

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.66424, p=.42149Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 10.75544 0.737028 9.250224 12.26065 321 2 10.62386 0.609817 9.378444 11.86927 322 1 10.79843 0.991016 8.774506 12.82236 322 2 11.32571 0.671390 9.954551 12.69687 32

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.27406, p=.60447Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 10.36946 1.042315 8.240772 12.49816 161 1 2 10.14105 0.862411 8.379776 11.90233 161 2 1 10.23777 1.401509 7.375508 13.10003 161 2 2 11.09143 0.949489 9.152312 13.03054 162 1 1 11.14141 1.042315 9.012717 13.27010 162 1 2 11.10666 0.862411 9.345379 12.86793 162 2 1 11.35909 1.401509 8.496830 14.22135 162 2 2 11.56000 0.949489 9.620883 13.49911 16

LC*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.20877, p=.81217Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 8.05424 0.567176 6.89591 9.21257 321 2 11.22895 0.670554 9.85949 12.59840 321 3 12.78575 0.824307 11.10229 14.46921 322 1 8.59929 0.771616 7.02344 10.17514 322 2 11.52555 0.865087 9.75881 13.29229 322 3 13.06137 0.844593 11.33648 14.78626 32

LC*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.00772, p=.99231Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LC MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 8.75646 0.802107 7.11834 10.39458 161 1 2 10.38724 0.948307 8.45054 12.32394 161 1 3 11.62207 1.165746 9.24130 14.00285 161 2 1 9.36536 1.091230 7.13677 11.59395 161 2 2 10.72422 1.223417 8.22567 13.22277 161 2 3 11.90422 1.194436 9.46485 14.34358 162 1 1 7.35202 0.802107 5.71390 8.99014 162 1 2 12.07065 0.948307 10.13395 14.00735 162 1 3 13.94943 1.165746 11.56866 16.33020 162 2 1 7.83322 1.091230 5.60463 10.06181 162 2 2 12.32688 1.223417 9.82833 14.82543 162 2 3 14.21853 1.194436 11.77917 16.65789 16


94

FREQ*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.58610, p=.55965Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 8.21342 0.841698 6.49445 9.93240 321 2 11.14220 0.949384 9.20330 13.08110 321 3 12.97518 0.923636 11.08886 14.86149 322 1 8.44011 0.582933 7.24960 9.63061 322 2 11.61229 0.721859 10.13806 13.08653 322 3 12.87195 0.757185 11.32557 14.41833 32

FREQ*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=4.9265, p=.01045Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 9.23198 1.190340 6.80098 11.66298 161 1 2 10.38629 1.342631 7.64427 13.12830 161 1 3 11.29258 1.306219 8.62493 13.96024 161 2 1 8.88984 0.824392 7.20620 10.57347 161 2 2 10.72518 1.020863 8.64030 12.81006 161 2 3 12.23371 1.070822 10.04680 14.42062 162 1 1 7.19486 1.190340 4.76386 9.62586 162 1 2 11.89812 1.342631 9.15610 14.64014 162 1 3 14.65777 1.306219 11.99011 17.32542 162 2 1 7.99038 0.824392 6.30674 9.67401 162 2 2 12.49941 1.020863 10.41453 14.58429 162 2 3 13.51019 1.070822 11.32328 15.69710 16

LC*FREQ*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.54055, p=.58524Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 7.98887 0.756917 6.44304 9.53470 321 1 2 11.20202 0.856544 9.45272 12.95131 321 1 3 13.07543 0.948137 11.13907 15.01178 321 2 1 8.11961 0.632518 6.82784 9.41139 321 2 2 11.25588 0.719352 9.78676 12.72499 321 2 3 12.49608 0.815748 10.83010 14.16206 322 1 1 8.43798 1.036359 6.32145 10.55451 322 1 2 11.08239 1.159898 8.71356 13.45122 322 1 3 12.87493 1.013206 10.80568 14.94417 322 2 1 8.76060 0.762729 7.20290 10.31830 322 2 2 11.96871 0.832649 10.26821 13.66921 322 2 3 13.24782 0.867006 11.47716 15.01849 32


95

LC*FREQ*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3amplitude_r in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.96928, p=.38522Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LC FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 1 9.14558 1.070442 6.95945 11.33172 161 1 1 2 10.62460 1.211337 8.15073 13.09848 161 1 1 3 11.33821 1.340869 8.59979 14.07662 161 1 2 1 8.36734 0.894516 6.54049 10.19418 161 1 2 2 10.14988 1.017318 8.07224 12.22752 161 1 2 3 11.90594 1.153641 9.54989 14.26199 161 2 1 1 9.31838 1.465633 6.32516 12.31160 161 2 1 2 10.14797 1.640344 6.79794 13.49799 161 2 1 3 11.24696 1.432890 8.32061 14.17332 161 2 2 1 9.41233 1.078662 7.20941 11.61526 161 2 2 2 11.30047 1.177544 8.89561 13.70534 161 2 2 3 12.56147 1.226132 10.05738 15.06557 16

1.14 P300 latency-analysis for the effect of group and task2 x 2 x 3 [GROUP x TASK x MIDLINE SITE]Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskMidline site: 1= frontal, 2= central, 3= parietal

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (p3lat_sing_dua_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorTASKTASK*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorTASK*MIDLINETASK*MIDLINE*groupError

34857025 1 34857025 2824.494 0.00000089809 1 89809 7.277 0.011349

370229 30 1234166008 1 66008 18.042 0.0001939513 1 9513 2.600 0.117320

109759 30 36591260 2 630 0.794 0.4568572063 2 1031 1.300 0.280203

47619 60 7941802 2 901 1.782 0.177072302 2 151 0.299 0.742743

30330 60 506

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (p3lat_sing_dua_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p -si

-d

df

-d

df

-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

Lowr.BAdj. d

TASKTASK*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorTASK*MIDLINETASK*MIDLINE*group

1 18.04182 0.000193# ## # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.000193 1.000000 1.000000 30.001 2.60023 0.117320# ## # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.117320 1.000000 1.000000 30.00

302 0.79370 0.456857# ## # 0.749603 1.499205 44.97615 0.425343 0.500000 1.000000 30.002 1.29960 0.280203# ## # 0.749603 1.499205 44.97615 0.275841 0.500000 1.000000 30.00

602 1.78212 0.177072# ## # 0.806396 1.612793 48.38379 0.184578 0.500000 1.000000 30.002 0.29888 0.742743# ## # 0.806396 1.612793 48.38379 0.695628 0.500000 1.000000 30.00


96



1 2

group

370

380

390

400

410

420

430

440

450

460

470

480

DV_

1



1 2

TASK

360

380

400

420

440

460

480

500

DV_

1

group; Unweighted Means (lp3lat_sing_dua_GRP-M-subCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=7.2773, p=.01135Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 447.7109 11.33807 424.5555 470.8664 162 404.4557 11.33807 381.3003 427.6112 16

TASK; Unweighted Means (lp3lat_sing_dua_GRP-M-subCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=18.042, p=.00019Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 407.5417 9.377817 388.3896 426.6937 322 444.6250 8.872380 426.5052 462.7448 32


97

TASK*group; Unweighted Means (lp3lat_sing_dua_GRPCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=2.6002, p=.11732Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%1234

1 1 436.2083 13.26224 409.1232 463.29341 2 459.2135 12.54744 433.5883 484.83882 1 378.8750 13.26224 351.7899 405.96012 2 430.0365 12.54744 404.4112 455.6617

MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (lp3lat_sing_dua_GRP-MCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=.79370, p=.45686Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123

1 426.0156 8.570627 408.5121 443.5192 322 429.2539 8.805858 411.2699 447.2379 323 422.9805 8.162743 406.3099 439.6510 32

MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (lp3lat_sing_dua_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=1.2996, p=.28020Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 443.2578 12.12070 418.5040 468.0116 161 2 451.7734 12.45336 426.3403 477.2066 161 3 448.1016 11.54386 424.5259 471.6773 162 1 408.7734 12.12070 384.0197 433.5272 162 2 406.7344 12.45336 381.3012 432.1675 162 3 397.8594 11.54386 374.2837 421.4351 16

TASK*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (lp3lat_sing_dua_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=1.7821, p=.17707Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.TASK MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 411.1250 10.57677 389.5244 432.7256 321 2 410.9063 10.59295 389.2726 432.5399 321 3 400.5938 9.44271 381.3092 419.8783 322 1 440.9063 9.90669 420.6741 461.1384 322 2 447.6016 9.56646 428.0642 467.1389 322 3 445.3672 8.84767 427.2978 463.4365 32


98

TASK*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (lp3lat_sing_dua_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.29888, p=.74274Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group TASK MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 437.0625 14.95781 406.5146 467.6104 161 1 2 440.1875 14.98070 409.5928 470.7822 161 1 3 431.3750 13.35401 404.1025 458.6475 161 2 1 449.4531 14.01018 420.8405 478.0657 161 2 2 463.3594 13.52902 435.7294 490.9893 161 2 3 464.8281 12.51249 439.2742 490.3820 162 1 1 385.1875 14.95781 354.6396 415.7354 162 1 2 381.6250 14.98070 351.0303 412.2197 162 1 3 369.8125 13.35401 342.5400 397.0850 162 2 1 432.3594 14.01018 403.7468 460.9720 162 2 2 431.8438 13.52902 404.2138 459.4737 162 2 3 425.9063 12.51249 400.3523 451.4602 16

1.15 P300 latency-analysis for the effect of group, LC, and frequency2 x 2 x 3 [GROUP x LC x FREQUENCY x MIDLINE SITE]Caption Group: 1= older group, 2= younger groupTask: 1= single task, 2= dual taskMidline site: 1= frontal, 2= central, 3= parietal

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

EffectSS Degr. of

FreedomMS F p

InterceptgroupErrorLCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorLC*MIDLINELC*MIDLINE*groupErrorFREQ*MIDLINEFREQ*MIDLINE*groupErrorLC*FREQ*MIDLINELC*FREQ*MIDLINE*groupError

75913494 1 75913494 2511.351 0.00000081725 1 81725 2.704 0.110562

906844 30 3022898 1 98 0.063 0.803018

2817 1 2817 1.820 0.18739546426 30 154810107 1 10107 2.310 0.139054

198 1 198 0.045 0.832834131280 30 4376

2975 2 1487 0.731 0.4855757886 2 3943 1.938 0.152843

122049 60 20343313 1 3313 1.165 0.289073

14 1 14 0.005 0.94402585341 30 2845

414 2 207 0.164 0.849351932 2 466 0.368 0.693386

75876 60 1265205 2 102 0.082 0.921228

1521 2 761 0.611 0.54640774742 60 12461867 2 933 1.382 0.259003113 2 56 0.083 0.920041

40534 60 676


99

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. ofFreedom

F p G-siG-

ddf

G-d

df

G-dp

H-FEpsilon

H-FAdj. df1

H-FAdj. df2

H-FAdj. p

Lowr.BndEpsilon

Lowr.BndAdj. df1

LoA

LCLC*groupErrorFREQFREQ*groupErrorMIDLINEMIDLINE*groupErrorLC*FREQLC*FREQ*groupErrorLC*MIDLINELC*MIDLINE*groupErrorFREQ*MIDLINEFREQ*MIDLINE*groupErrorLC*FREQ*MIDLINELC*FREQ*MIDLINE*groupError

1 0.063334 0.803018 # # # # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.803018 1.000000 1.0000001 1.820114 0.187395 # # # # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.187395 1.000000 1.000000

301 2.309524 0.139054 # # # # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.139054 1.000000 1.0000001 0.045332 0.832834 # # # # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.832834 1.000000 1.000000

302 0.731191 0.485575 # # # # 0.728196 1.456393 43.69178 0.446184 0.500000 1.0000002 1.938396 0.152843 # # # # 0.728196 1.456393 43.69178 0.165845 0.500000 1.000000

601 1.164804 0.289073 # # # # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.289073 1.000000 1.0000001 0.005013 0.944025 # # # # 1.000000 1.000000 30.00000 0.944025 1.000000 1.000000

302 0.163728 0.849351 # # # # 0.932211 1.864423 55.93268 0.834898 0.500000 1.0000002 0.368413 0.693386 # # # # 0.932211 1.864423 55.93268 0.678743 0.500000 1.000000

602 0.082160 0.921228 # # # # 0.828936 1.657872 49.73616 0.889093 0.500000 1.0000002 0.610520 0.546407 # # # # 0.828936 1.657872 49.73616 0.517468 0.500000 1.000000

602 1.381794 0.259003 # # # # 1.000000 2.000000 60.00000 0.259003 0.500000 1.0000002 0.083452 0.920041 # # # # 1.000000 2.000000 60.00000 0.920041 0.500000 1.000000

60

group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=2.7036, p=.11056Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 459.2135 12.54744 433.5883 484.8388 162 430.0365 12.54744 404.4112 455.6617 16

LC; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.06333, p=.80302Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 444.1198 8.752152 426.2455 461.9941 322 445.1302 9.428578 425.8745 464.3859 32

LC*group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.8201, p=.18739Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 456.0000 12.37741 430.7220 481.2780 161 2 462.4271 13.33402 435.1954 489.6588 162 1 432.2396 12.37741 406.9615 457.5176 162 2 427.8333 13.33402 400.6016 455.0650 16


100

FREQ; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERPCurrent effect: F(1, 30)=2.3095, p=.13905Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12

1 439.4948 8.37223 422.3964 456.5932 322 449.7552 10.49455 428.3225 471.1879 32

FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.04533, p=.83283Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 453.3646 11.84013 429.1838 477.5454 161 2 465.0625 14.84154 434.7520 495.3730 162 1 425.6250 11.84013 401.4442 449.8058 162 2 434.4479 14.84154 404.1374 464.7584 16

MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ECurrent effect: F(2, 60)=.73119, p=.48557Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123

1 440.9063 9.906695 420.6741 461.1384 322 447.6016 9.566461 428.0642 467.1389 323 445.3672 8.847666 427.2978 463.4365 32

MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERPCurrent effect: F(2, 60)=1.9384, p=.15284Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 449.4531 14.01018 420.8405 478.0657 161 2 463.3594 13.52902 435.7294 490.9893 161 3 464.8281 12.51249 439.2742 490.3820 162 1 432.3594 14.01018 403.7468 460.9720 162 2 431.8438 13.52902 404.2138 459.4737 162 3 425.9063 12.51249 400.3523 451.4602 16

LC*FREQ; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=1.1648, p=.28907Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

1234

1 1 441.9271 8.78997 423.9756 459.8786 321 2 446.3125 11.22804 423.3818 469.2432 322 1 437.0625 9.45464 417.7535 456.3715 322 2 453.1979 10.65314 431.4413 474.9545 32


101

LC*FREQ*group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(1, 30)=.00501, p=.94402Effective hypothesis decomposition


MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

12345678

1 1 1 452.8958 12.43089 427.5086 478.2831 161 1 2 459.1042 15.87885 426.6752 491.5331 161 2 1 453.8333 13.37088 426.5263 481.1403 161 2 2 471.0208 15.06582 440.2523 501.7893 162 1 1 430.9583 12.43089 405.5711 456.3456 162 1 2 433.5208 15.87885 401.0919 465.9498 162 2 1 420.2917 13.37088 392.9847 447.5987 162 2 2 435.3750 15.06582 404.6065 466.1435 16

LC*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.16373, p=.84935Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 441.2969 10.45830 419.9382 462.6556 321 2 445.6406 9.67729 425.8770 465.4043 321 3 445.4219 9.17790 426.6781 464.1656 322 1 440.5156 10.24189 419.5989 461.4324 322 2 449.5625 10.40616 428.3103 470.8147 322 3 445.3125 9.95672 424.9782 465.6468 32

LC*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.36841, p=.69339Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LC MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 446.1250 14.79027 415.9192 476.3308 161 1 2 457.5000 13.68576 429.5500 485.4500 161 1 3 464.3750 12.97951 437.8673 490.8827 161 2 1 452.7813 14.48422 423.2005 482.3620 161 2 2 469.2188 14.71653 439.1636 499.2739 161 2 3 465.2813 14.08093 436.5242 494.0383 162 1 1 436.4688 14.79027 406.2630 466.6745 162 1 2 433.7813 13.68576 405.8312 461.7313 162 1 3 426.4688 12.97951 399.9611 452.9764 162 2 1 428.2500 14.48422 398.6693 457.8307 162 2 2 429.9063 14.71653 399.8511 459.9614 162 2 3 425.3438 14.08093 396.5867 454.1008 16

FREQ*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.08216, p=.92123Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456

1 1 436.7500 9.61486 417.1138 456.3862 321 2 441.6875 9.85096 421.5691 461.8059 321 3 440.0469 9.55902 420.5248 459.5690 322 1 445.0625 11.19644 422.1963 467.9287 322 2 453.5156 10.58038 431.9076 475.1236 322 3 450.6875 11.18117 427.8525 473.5225 32


102

FREQ*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.61052, p=.54641Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 444.5938 13.59747 416.8240 472.3635 161 1 2 459.1563 13.93137 430.7046 487.6079 161 1 3 456.3437 13.51849 428.7353 483.9522 161 2 1 454.3125 15.83416 421.9748 486.6502 161 2 2 467.5625 14.96292 437.0041 498.1209 161 2 3 473.3125 15.81257 441.0189 505.6061 162 1 1 428.9063 13.59747 401.1365 456.6760 162 1 2 424.2188 13.93137 395.7671 452.6704 162 1 3 423.7500 13.51849 396.1416 451.3584 162 2 1 435.8125 15.83416 403.4748 468.1502 162 2 2 439.4688 14.96292 408.9104 470.0271 162 2 3 428.0625 15.81257 395.7689 460.3561 16

LC*FREQ*MIDLINE; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=1.3818, p=.25900Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.LC FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 439.6250 10.39743 418.3906 460.8594 321 1 2 440.2188 11.05522 417.6410 462.7965 321 1 3 445.9375 11.97074 421.4900 470.3850 321 2 1 442.9688 12.00972 418.4416 467.4959 321 2 2 451.0625 11.38625 427.8087 474.3163 321 2 3 444.9063 11.97369 420.4527 469.3598 322 1 1 433.8750 10.64941 412.1260 455.6240 322 1 2 443.1563 11.01052 420.6698 465.6427 322 1 3 434.1562 10.76098 412.1794 456.1331 322 2 1 447.1563 11.90230 422.8485 471.4640 322 2 2 455.9688 11.13377 433.2306 478.7069 322 2 3 456.4688 11.74518 432.4819 480.4556 32

LC*FREQ*MIDLINE*group; Unweighted Means (P3lat_GRP-M-subst in ERP)Current effect: F(2, 60)=.08345, p=.92004Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.group LC FREQ MIDLINE DV_1

MeanDV_1

Std.Err.DV_1

-95.00%DV_1

+95.00%N

123456789101112

1 1 1 1 442.8125 14.70419 412.7825 472.8425 161 1 1 2 454.1250 15.63444 422.1952 486.0548 161 1 1 3 461.7500 16.92919 427.1760 496.3240 161 1 2 1 449.4375 16.98430 414.7509 484.1241 161 1 2 2 460.8750 16.10258 427.9891 493.7609 161 1 2 3 467.0000 16.93335 432.4175 501.5825 161 2 1 1 446.3750 15.06054 415.6173 477.1327 161 2 1 2 464.1875 15.57122 432.3868 495.9882 161 2 1 3 450.9375 15.21832 419.8575 482.0175 161 2 2 1 459.1875 16.83240 424.8112 493.5638 161 2 2 2 474.2500 15.74553 442.0933 506.4067 161 2 2 3 479.6250 16.61019 445.7025 513.5475 16


103

appendix e exp2 e_exp2.pdf · lc; unweighted means (% discarded in erp.stw) current effect: f(1,...

Documents