appendix a scoping documentarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...subject: re:...

228
Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace Gorove/Slade Associates May 1, 2012 A1 APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENT

Upload: others

Post on 11-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   A‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX A ‐ 

SCOPING DOCUMENT 

Page 2: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting.

PRE-SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM Information on the Project

Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions The applicant is responsible for entering the relevant information and submitting the form to VDOT and the locality no less than three (3) business days prior to the meeting. If a form is not received by this deadline, the scope of work meeting may be postponed. Contact Information Consultant Name: Tele: E-mail:

Chris M. Tacinelli, Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. 703-787-9595 chris.tacinelli @goroveslade.com

Developer/Owner Name: Tele: E-mail:

Mitch Bonanno, Vornado/Charles E. Smith L.P. (703) 769-5020 [email protected]

Project Information

Project Name: PenPlace Site (Parcel 1D of Site Plan 105, the Pentagon City PDSP) Locality/County: Arlington County,

VA Project Location: (Attach regional and site specific location map) PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED FIGURE 1

The PenPlace site is bounded by Army-Navy Drive to the north, S. Fern Street to the west, and S. Eads Street to the east. Regional access to Pentagon City is provided via I-395 and VA-110 from the north, Route 1 (Jefferson Davis Highway) and I-395 to the south, VA-27 to the west, and I-295 to the east.

Submission Type Comp Plan Rezoning Site Plan Subd Plat

Project Description: (Including details on the land use, acreage, phasing, access location, etc. Attach additional sheet if necessary) PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED TABLE 1

The proposal seeks an amendment to the existing Phased Development Site Plan (PDSP) for the parcel. The current PDSP is approved for 930 residential units and 882 hotel units (of which 300 are built and operating). The proposal would substitute the currently approved but unbuilt uses with a mixed use development consisting of 80 kSF of retail and approximately 2.4 M SF of office space with 300-room hotel. See Table 1. **

Proposed Use: (Check all that apply; attach additional pages as necessary)

Residential Commercial Mixed Use Other

Office Use(s): 2.4 M SF ** ITE Code: 710 Residential Use(s):

Retail Use(s): Specialty Retail : 80 kSF ** ITE Code: 814 Hotel 300 Rooms ITE Code: 310

Total Peak Hour Trip Projection: Less than 100 100-499 500-999 1,000 or more

** The development program has been updated since the original scoping meeting and has superseded this information. The report provides the updated breakdown of trips and trip distribution.

Page 3: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

PenPlace Development March 24, 2010 Page 2 of 10

It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting.

Traffic Impact Analysis Assumptions

Study Period Existing Year: 2010 Build-out Year: 2015 Design Year: 2020

Study Area Boundaries (Attach map) PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED FIGURE 1

North: Army Navy Drive South: 15th Street S

East: Jefferson Davis Highway West: S. Hayes Street

External Factors That Could Affect Project (Planned road improvements, other nearby developments)

1. Completion of 12th Street between S. Fern Street and S. Eads Street with a five-lane cross-section at ultimate build-out.

Consistency With Comprehensive Plan (Land use, transportation Plan)

According to Arlington County’s General Land Use Plan (GLUP), this site is currently listed as a mix of high-medium residential land use and medium office-apartment-hotel uses.

Available Traffic Data (Historical, forecasts)

VDOT AADT Data, Existing Traffic Counts (2010), Synchro files/signal timings obtained from Arlington County, previous traffic studies conducted in the area

Trip Distribution (%) (Attach sketch) PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED FIGURE 2

Road Name: Army Navy Drive (E) 30% Road Name: S. Fern St (S) 15%

Road Name: S. Eads St (S) 20% Road Name: Army Navy Drive (W) 20%

Road Name: 15th St S (N) 15%

Annual Vehicle Trip Growth Rate: PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED TABLE 2

1.0%

Peak Period for Study (check all that apply)

AM PM Sat (Adjacent street commuter)

Peak Hour of Generator Varies depending on land use

Study Intersections and/or Road Segments (Attach additional sheets as necessary) PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED FIGURE 1

1. Army Navy Drive & S. Hayes Street 7. 12th Street & S Clark Street

2. Army Navy Drive & S. Fern Street 8. 15th Street & Jefferson Davis Hwy Northbound Ramps

3. Army Navy Drive & S. Eads Street 9. 15th Street & Jefferson Davis Hwy Southbound Ramps

4. 12th Street & S. Fern Street 10. 15th Street & S. Eads Street

5. 12th Street & S. Eads Street 11. 15th Street & S. Fern Street

6. 12th Street & Army Navy Drive 12. 12th Street & S. Hayes Street

Trip Adjustment Factors PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED TABLE 3

Internal allowance: Yes No Pass-by allowance: Yes No Reduction: 25%

Transit/TDM Reduction: Yes No 56/65/65% (office/hotel/retail)

Software Methodology Synchro HCS (v.2000/+) aaSIDRA CORSIM Other

Traffic Signal Proposed 1. Army Navy Drive & S. Hayes Street

Page 4: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Robert Gibson is the Local Government (ArlingtonCounty) Representative. VDOT approval isshown at the end of Appendix A.

Page 5: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

PenPlace Development March 24, 2010 Page 4 of 10

It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting.

Table 1: Currently Approved vs Proposed

Current PDSP Land Use Size (Units) Size (Approx. SF)

Residential 930 Units 930 kSF

Hotel 582 Units 407 kSF

Total 1512 Units 1337 kSF Proposed Plan** Land Use Size (Units) Size (Approx. SF)

Office 2400 kSF 2400 kSF

Retail 80 kSF 80 kSF

Hotel 300 Units 210 kSF

Total 2690 kSF

Table 2: Inherent Growth Rate

Roadway Segment

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Comparison

From To AADT AADT AADT AADT AADT 2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2004-2007

2004-2008

S. Fern St 23rd St Army Navy Drive

5,100 5,100 5,000 5,000 5,400 0% -2% 0% 8% -1% 1%

S. Hayes St 18th St I-395 12,000 12,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 0% -8% 9% 8% 0% 2%

Jefferson Davis Hwy

Reagan Nat'l Airport

I-395 52,000 51,000 50,000 49,000 48,000 -2% -2% -2% -2% -2% -2%

Army-Navy Drive

I-395 S Hayes St

12th Street 7,500 7,600 7,400 9,200 9,900 1% -3% 24%* 8% 7% 7%

S. Joyce St Army-Navy Drive

S. Hayes St 11,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 11,000 0% -9% 0% 10% -3% 0%

12th Street Crystal Drive

S. Eads St 4,500 4,600 4,400 4,200 4,500 2% -4% -5% 7% -2% 0%

15th Street S. Hayes St Jefferson Davis Hwy

17,000 17,000 16,000 16,000 18,000 0% -6% 0% 13% -2% 1%

Average -0.4% 1.4%

(Based on VDOT’s Historical AADT Data) *This data point is an anomaly and was not used to calculate the overall growth rate.

Table 3: Non-Auto Reduction Breakdown*

Mode of Non-Auto Reduction Office Hotel/Retail

Transit 45% 50%

Walking/Biking 5% 5% Other (Carpool, Flexible Schedule, Telecommute) 6% 10% TOTAL 56% 65%

*Based on the Arlington County Commercial Building Research Topline Report, July 2009; the 2005 Development-Related Ridership Survey by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) and various other studies conducted nationally and throughout the Washington DC area.

The walking distance from the entrance of the Pentagon City Metro access on the southeast corner of 12th Street and Hayes Street to the southwest corner of the project site (the northeast corner of 12th Street and S. Fern St) is approximately 850 feet as shown in Figure 1.

** The development program has been updated since the original scoping meeting and has superseded this information. The report provides the updated breakdown of trips and trip distribution.

Page 6: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

1

Felice B. Brychta

From: Trivedi, Rahul, P.E. [[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:49 AMTo: Felice B. Brychta; Raj, Arun A.; Robert GibsonCc: Turner, Jim R.; Faghri, Arsalan; VanPoole, Thomas B., P.E.; Bridget Obikoya; Novotny,

Michael; Bonanno, Mitch; Daniel B. VanPelt; Christopher M. TacinelliSubject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document

All our comments are addressed.

Thank you for providing the opportunity to review and comment.

Rahul

Rahul Trivedi P.E.VDOT, Northern Virginia DistrictTransportation Planning SectionChantilly, VA - 20151Phone-703-383-2223

From: Felice B. Brychta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:24 AM To: Raj, Arun A.; Robert Gibson Cc: Trivedi, Rahul, P.E.; Turner, Jim R.; Faghri, Arsalan; VanPoole, Thomas B., P.E.; Bridget Obikoya; Novotny, Michael; Bonanno, Mitch; Daniel B. VanPelt; Christopher M. Tacinelli Subject: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document�All,

We received a few additional comments from VDOT regarding the Transit/TDM reduction that was assumed for the office use, and to provide information on planned projects in the study area for the year 2026. These comments have been addressed in the attached document.

If this looks acceptable to you, please send us back a signed copy so that we may include it in the appendix of our report.

Thanks, Felice

Felice�B.�BrychtaProject�Manager�Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. �dc:�202�296�8625��|���va:�703�787�9595��

Page 7: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   B‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX B ‐ 

RAW (UNBALANCED) TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY SHEETS 

Page 8: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 0 57 32 3 11 0 8 5 12 30 0 3 0 0 0 26:15 AM to 6:30 AM 0 49 37 5 4 0 5 3 15 60 0 0 0 0 0 86:30 AM to 6:45 AM 0 68 36 3 7 1 6 13 7 70 0 1 0 0 0 96:45 AM to 7:00 AM 0 83 57 5 10 0 15 17 18 62 0 3 0 0 0 167:00 AM to 7:15 AM 0 64 53 4 7 0 14 7 18 69 0 6 0 0 0 117:15 AM to 7:30 AM 0 92 51 6 15 0 10 17 27 62 0 6 0 0 0 237:30 AM to 7:45 AM 0 95 65 15 15 0 14 15 29 79 0 5 0 0 0 227:45 AM to 8:00 AM 0 90 50 12 12 0 16 21 16 58 0 5 0 0 0 298:00 AM to 8:15 AM 0 76 40 11 15 0 18 13 30 87 0 8 0 0 0 248:15 AM to 8:30 AM 0 92 53 15 19 0 8 10 29 70 0 4 0 0 0 258:30 AM to 8:45 AM 1 85 35 17 8 0 18 12 22 62 0 6 0 0 0 188:45 AM to 9:00 AM 0 105 29 9 9 0 20 8 23 76 0 3 0 0 0 13

PM PEAK .

Direction:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 0 60 12 22 21 0 18 4 14 95 0 22 0 0 0 34:15 PM to 4:30 PM 0 65 14 18 24 0 16 6 6 86 0 21 0 0 0 64:30 PM to 4:45 PM 0 75 11 20 25 0 19 8 10 94 0 22 0 0 0 74:45 PM to 5:00 PM 0 82 11 15 31 0 19 14 21 107 0 19 0 0 0 135:00 PM to 5:15 PM 0 63 15 12 27 0 26 8 14 100 0 21 0 0 0 65:15 PM to 5:30 PM 0 63 13 15 28 0 24 8 18 100 0 17 0 0 0 55:30 PM to 5:45 PM 0 92 24 6 38 0 23 9 15 84 0 19 0 0 0 35:45 PM to 6:00 PM 0 75 14 7 29 1 19 7 13 84 0 13 0 0 0 66:00 PM to 6:15 PM 0 85 17 4 25 0 21 10 11 89 0 16 0 0 0 46:15 PM to 6:30 PM 0 103 12 6 21 0 24 4 11 77 0 12 0 0 0 26:30 PM to 6:45 PM 0 81 12 5 11 0 21 7 10 61 0 20 0 0 0 56:45 PM to 7:00 PM 0 61 11 2 16 0 14 4 8 67 0 9 0 0 0 4

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 0 353 208 53 61 0 56 59 104 294 0 22 0 0 0 100

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 0 300 63 48 124 0 92 39 68 391 0 131 0 0 0 27

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 0 353 208 53 61 0 56 59 104 294 0 22 0 0 0 100

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 0 293 66 40 122 1 92 32 60 368 0 70 0 0 0 20

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

AM PEAK HOUR 0.00 0.93 0.80 0.88 0.80 0.00 0.78 0.89 0.87 0.84 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/0!Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.00 0.80 0.69 0.77 0.80 0.25 0.88 0.88 0.83 0.92 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/0!= 0.91 = 0.91

Southbound Westbound

AM Period Intersection Volume:

12th St.

2811Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR

S. Eads St.

PM PEAK HOUR

PM Period Intersection Volume: 2807

0

385

368

0

12th St.

12th St.Southbound Westbound Northbound

60

S. Eads St.Eastbound

12th St.Northbound

S. Eads St.

12th St.

Date of Counts: Wednesday, January 06, 2010

312

0

Intersection: South Eads Street at 12th Street

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VAGorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

117

353

208

S. E

ads

St.

0

61

56

355

68

1

428

0 12th St.

S. E

ads

St.

131

0

0

0

391

92

12th St. 215

0 12th St.

S. E

ads

St.

126

0

0

00

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

359

490

122

0 293

66

S. E

ads

St.

0

63

515

1

398

S. E

ads

St.

0

0

0 12th St.

0

92S. E

ads

St.

0

216

124

392

459

363

300

0

0 12th St.

12th St.

294

0

398

409

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

0

0

AM Weather Conditions: PM Weather Conditions:Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Clear

104

61

0

56

117

312

561

104

0

409

0

Clear

S. Eads St. 12th St. S. Eads St.

12th St.

0

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

Northbound Eastbound

0

S. E

ads

St.

294

208

S. E

ads

St.

355

561

S. Eads St. 12th St. S. Eads St.

353

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

12th St.

Southbound Westbound

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR

Eastbound

12th St. S. Eads St.

N

Page 9: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 55 66 10 4 18 37 2 1 1 14 15 4 26 36 13 06:15 AM to 6:30 AM 53 67 9 4 12 47 11 0 0 21 15 2 35 45 20 26:30 AM to 6:45 AM 60 63 8 6 13 64 1 7 10 28 15 9 23 43 25 16:45 AM to 7:00 AM 56 86 10 3 7 50 3 8 4 30 26 11 41 68 34 87:00 AM to 7:15 AM 31 79 7 2 22 73 8 4 1 43 19 4 28 68 34 67:15 AM to 7:30 AM 44 78 9 4 15 91 5 3 0 35 39 11 36 57 41 117:30 AM to 7:45 AM 43 95 7 8 11 94 17 14 13 51 38 17 36 55 42 117:45 AM to 8:00 AM 60 107 13 4 11 102 5 3 7 23 37 7 30 56 41 78:00 AM to 8:15 AM 40 99 7 9 3 32 16 13 0 26 32 11 15 72 49 58:15 AM to 8:30 AM 45 79 12 8 13 53 7 9 4 26 40 14 42 87 55 48:30 AM to 8:45 AM 24 64 7 2 13 40 4 2 3 23 21 7 20 62 44 48:45 AM to 9:00 AM 51 82 10 1 20 60 12 6 1 33 41 12 71 93 51 6

PM PEAK .

Direction:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 9 22 1 3 37 147 4 1 2 72 76 19 29 24 91 64:15 PM to 4:30 PM 15 34 1 4 60 173 16 7 2 57 61 8 30 32 96 84:30 PM to 4:45 PM 28 27 1 0 32 221 3 5 0 103 75 11 33 19 130 164:45 PM to 5:00 PM 32 24 0 17 46 244 5 2 5 95 60 10 33 15 96 175:00 PM to 5:15 PM 36 12 0 6 106 249 7 17 4 101 100 10 31 27 67 15:15 PM to 5:30 PM 34 22 0 3 66 290 4 0 0 80 84 2 21 28 76 95:30 PM to 5:45 PM 49 45 4 4 65 226 9 9 0 62 91 8 25 30 102 85:45 PM to 6:00 PM 25 29 0 0 52 211 8 3 2 50 62 3 38 32 95 36:00 PM to 6:15 PM 60 21 0 2 54 200 7 5 2 64 124 4 27 19 122 46:15 PM to 6:30 PM 55 32 0 3 58 174 9 0 0 38 77 0 24 14 115 36:30 PM to 6:45 PM 34 42 4 0 27 170 8 0 0 33 86 0 26 32 83 16:45 PM to 7:00 PM 20 25 0 4 7 133 14 3 1 46 79 2 21 13 107 2

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:00 AM to 8:00 AM 178 359 36 18 59 360 35 24 21 152 133 39 130 236 158 35

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 151 103 4 30 283 1009 25 28 9 338 335 151 110 100 341 35

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 188 380 39 29 38 281 45 39 24 126 147 49 123 270 187 27

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 144 108 4 13 289 976 28 29 6 293 337 23 115 117 340 21

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.78 0.89 0.75 0.84 0.73 0.69 0.66 0.75 0.46 0.62 0.92 0.73 0.73 0.78 0.85 0.79Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.73 0.60 0.25 0.65 0.68 0.84 0.78 0.89 0.38 0.73 0.84 0.78 0.76 0.91 0.83 0.87= 0.92 = 0.93

258

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR7482AM Period Intersection Volume: 4957 PM Period Intersection Volume:

S. Eads St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound

S. Eads St. Army Navy Dr.

Army Navy Dr.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Eastbound

360

Army Navy Dr.

59

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

AM Weather Conditions:

130

S. E

ads

St.

Army Navy Dr.

152

306

36

S. E

ads

St.

369

524

Army Navy Dr.S. Eads St. Army Navy Dr. S. Eads St.

178

359

35

454

293

607

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

573

671

Army Navy Dr.

236

151

Army Navy Dr.

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

962

Army Navy Dr.

21

551 Army Navy Dr.

1009

1317

283

133

335

338 9

25

113

147

38

188

380

39

S. E

ads

St.

281

45

351

976

28

126 24

123

548

297

S. E

ads

St.

187

270

1457 Army Navy Dr.

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

256

922

289

144

108

4

S. E

ads

St.

1293

572 Army Navy Dr.

S. E

ads

St.

127

340

616 Army Navy Dr. 364

580 Army Navy Dr. 333

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VAGorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

4

S. E

ads

St.

1495

103

Intersection: Army Navy Drive at South Eads Street

524

158

Northbound

S. Eads St.

6

115

251

636

Date of Counts: Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Clear PM Weather Conditions: Clear

341

100 293

S. E

ads

St.

110

238

682

117 337

Eastbound

S. Eads St. Army Navy Dr. S. Eads St.

EastboundSouthbound Westbound

Army Navy Dr.S. Eads St.

PM PEAK HOUR

N

Page 10: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 6 10 2 3 6 24 11 7 0 0 0 6 45 11 10 86:15 AM to 6:30 AM 7 17 3 3 12 22 12 14 0 0 0 9 76 8 20 256:30 AM to 6:45 AM 9 21 2 10 15 22 20 10 0 0 0 6 83 11 13 466:45 AM to 7:00 AM 14 21 3 11 20 46 16 13 0 0 0 5 93 17 29 297:00 AM to 7:15 AM 8 27 1 8 23 42 40 24 0 0 0 12 91 15 26 257:15 AM to 7:30 AM 14 30 3 13 22 34 35 32 0 0 0 13 97 15 29 487:30 AM to 7:45 AM 10 27 4 12 32 32 34 24 0 0 0 10 112 13 27 517:45 AM to 8:00 AM 10 25 1 14 36 46 49 32 0 0 0 18 119 22 41 448:00 AM to 8:15 AM 9 21 4 14 15 50 38 12 0 0 0 6 116 17 37 388:15 AM to 8:30 AM 11 29 4 6 36 44 45 16 0 0 0 8 111 19 46 238:30 AM to 8:45 AM 7 19 1 12 24 37 46 20 0 0 0 7 85 12 53 148:45 AM to 9:00 AM 8 20 2 6 30 34 63 10 0 1 0 12 96 12 57 20

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 22 18 3 3 47 128 17 19 0 0 0 6 26 5 12 304:15 PM to 4:30 PM 27 20 1 6 43 144 22 14 0 0 0 6 33 5 6 434:30 PM to 4:45 PM 29 18 0 5 74 136 31 11 0 0 0 4 39 6 19 394:45 PM to 5:00 PM 33 19 0 17 59 139 20 8 0 0 0 5 24 5 9 305:00 PM to 5:15 PM 37 16 1 15 56 155 38 15 0 0 0 2 35 6 20 475:15 PM to 5:30 PM 27 17 0 5 83 140 30 30 0 0 0 7 41 4 11 325:30 PM to 5:45 PM 38 28 0 7 49 151 36 25 0 0 0 3 36 7 8 345:45 PM to 6:00 PM 17 22 1 2 41 128 14 10 0 0 0 1 30 4 13 246:00 PM to 6:15 PM 23 19 0 3 15 114 17 16 0 0 0 3 28 3 7 156:15 PM to 6:30 PM 25 12 1 6 18 113 17 6 0 0 0 3 28 3 8 236:30 PM to 6:45 PM 13 9 2 2 18 85 13 9 0 0 0 0 33 8 7 96:45 PM to 7:00 PM 25 11 1 2 19 78 17 5 0 0 0 1 25 6 5 8

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 40 102 13 46 119 172 166 84 0 0 0 42 458 71 151 156

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 135 80 1 44 247 585 124 78 0 0 0 118 136 22 48 143

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 40 102 13 46 119 172 166 84 0 0 0 42 458 71 151 156

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 119 83 2 29 229 574 118 80 0 0 0 13 142 21 52 137

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.91 0.88 0.81 0.88 0.83 0.86 0.85 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/0! 0.96 0.81 0.82 0.93Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.78 0.74 0.50 0.77 0.69 0.93 0.78 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/0! 0.87 0.75 0.65 0.88= 0.93 = 0.92

Eastbound

Clark St. 12th St. One-Way

Eastbound

12th St.

Clark St. 12th St.

Date of Counts:Clear

3405AM Period Intersection Volume: 3208

84

0

0 0

142

343

Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

Intersection: 12th Street at Clark Street

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VA

212 12th St. 457

680

119

Cla

rk S

t. 172

166

12th St.

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

921

206 12th St.

One

-Way

23

48

22

0 0 0

215 12th St.

One

-Way

23

52

21

0

136

124Cla

rk S

t. 585

956

340

0

720 12th St.

247

216

135

80

Cla

rk S

t. 574

One

-Way151

83 2

693

119

118

12th St.

726

71

1

458

0 0

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

204

281

229

Southbound Westbound

12th St.Northbound

12th St. One-WayClark St.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

166

0

457

84

155

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

Clear

Clark St. 12th St. One-Way

12th St.

40 102

0

680

151

AM Weather Conditions: PM Weather Conditions:

102

1340

Cla

rk S

t.

0

458

71

12th St.

00

One

-Way

12th St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Southbound

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

270

155

726

0

Westbound

270

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

295

119

172

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR

One-Way

13

Northbound Eastbound

212

12th St.

PM PEAK HOUR

PM Period Intersection Volume:

N

Page 11: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 0 106 12 16 8 0 3 0 2 31 0 20 0 0 0 76:15 AM to 6:30 AM 4 117 10 12 13 0 2 1 6 42 5 17 4 3 4 106:30 AM to 6:45 AM 14 115 14 13 8 0 1 3 8 59 2 8 4 0 4 26:45 AM to 7:00 AM 9 142 18 24 19 0 2 6 2 63 6 18 2 0 11 57:00 AM to 7:15 AM 21 179 12 16 7 0 2 8 8 66 5 30 9 0 10 117:15 AM to 7:30 AM 9 195 17 13 4 0 1 11 8 76 5 33 8 0 14 117:30 AM to 7:45 AM 8 263 28 8 15 0 2 11 17 123 5 19 6 0 8 07:45 AM to 8:00 AM 8 147 66 9 8 1 4 12 6 99 4 23 4 0 7 108:00 AM to 8:15 AM 14 208 30 10 18 0 1 22 5 109 6 31 7 1 9 158:15 AM to 8:30 AM 13 234 25 4 13 0 0 18 6 104 7 18 13 0 5 178:30 AM to 8:45 AM 10 257 29 22 13 1 3 25 16 99 8 36 7 0 7 88:45 AM to 9:00 AM 11 252 26 10 8 0 3 17 8 92 7 25 6 0 10 4

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 15 146 36 1 25 0 9 23 10 154 21 18 14 5 18 344:15 PM to 4:30 PM 20 159 34 3 23 1 5 21 8 165 14 18 18 1 16 524:30 PM to 4:45 PM 30 172 29 4 20 0 8 29 20 159 9 19 14 0 12 374:45 PM to 5:00 PM 18 174 31 8 21 1 4 27 19 189 14 20 23 1 7 435:00 PM to 5:15 PM 20 183 25 9 25 3 5 32 17 187 17 15 33 2 13 375:15 PM to 5:30 PM 26 204 32 3 21 1 3 20 15 180 23 37 23 0 18 395:30 PM to 5:45 PM 29 183 29 6 29 2 8 23 17 157 19 43 25 1 13 275:45 PM to 6:00 PM 30 214 36 5 23 1 5 9 17 170 20 35 27 3 17 556:00 PM to 6:15 PM 32 163 21 2 20 2 8 11 17 151 17 14 27 2 17 416:15 PM to 6:30 PM 21 189 31 4 20 3 5 12 21 156 12 28 22 2 21 676:30 PM to 6:45 PM 22 166 28 6 11 3 10 17 30 170 20 28 18 2 17 456:45 PM to 7:00 PM 24 156 22 5 16 1 6 11 16 166 14 22 15 1 15 40

PEAK HOURS 0

Direction:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR8:00 AM to 9:00 AM 48 951 110 46 52 1 7 82 35 404 28 110 33 1 31 44

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 105 784 122 23 98 7 21 84 66 694 79 130 108 6 61 158

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 43 852 149 31 54 1 7 63 34 435 22 91 30 1 29 42

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 105 784 122 23 98 7 21 84 66 694 79 130 108 6 61 158

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.77 0.81 0.56 0.87 0.75 0.25 0.44 0.82 0.50 0.88 0.79 0.85 0.58 0.25 0.81 0.83Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.88 0.92 0.85 0.90 0.84 0.58 0.66 0.81 0.97 0.93 0.86 0.95 0.82 0.50 0.85 0.91= 0.87 = 0.96

1011

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR5972AM Period Intersection Volume: 4061 PM Period Intersection Volume:

Hayes St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

Hayes St. 12th St.

12th St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Eastbound

1

12th St.

52

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

AM Weather Conditions:

33

Hay

es S

t.

12th St.

404

467

110

Hay

es S

t.

487

991

12th St.Hayes St. 12th St. Hayes St.

48 951

7

60

146

1044

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

1109

77

12th St.

1

105

12th St.

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

853

12th St.

35

175 12th St.

7

126

98

2879 694 66

21

194

22

54

43 852

149

Hay

es S

t. 1

7

518

7

21

435 34

30

889

491

Hay

es S

t.29

1

191 12th St.

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

1011 853

98

105

784

122

Hay

es S

t.

126

175 12th St.

Hay

es S

t.

194

61

66 12th St. 62

60 12th St. 184

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VAGorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

122

Hay

es S

t.

191

784

Intersection: Hayes Street at 12th Street

65

31

Northbound

Hayes St.

66

108

913

839

Date of Counts: Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Clear PM Weather Conditions: Clear

61

6 694

Hay

es S

t.

108

913

839

6

79

Eastbound

Hayes St. 12th St. Hayes St.

EastboundSouthbound Westbound

12th St.Hayes St.

PM PEAK HOUR

N

Page 12: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 14 8 5 0 5 94 27 1 3 3 3 1 26 66 6 06:15 AM to 6:30 AM 24 21 16 0 4 82 35 1 3 8 5 3 26 105 7 06:30 AM to 6:45 AM 29 20 16 0 14 92 33 1 3 9 4 5 32 105 9 06:45 AM to 7:00 AM 43 33 23 0 13 90 25 11 6 6 9 8 37 135 10 17:00 AM to 7:15 AM 33 25 21 0 11 89 24 6 11 10 8 17 53 157 12 07:15 AM to 7:30 AM 35 23 32 0 8 141 33 3 13 3 11 15 39 157 13 07:30 AM to 7:45 AM 37 32 20 0 8 135 23 1 12 10 16 8 40 161 9 07:45 AM to 8:00 AM 41 29 31 0 7 141 28 0 7 3 15 6 55 161 14 08:00 AM to 8:15 AM 32 39 17 0 4 132 28 3 8 8 17 4 38 161 8 08:15 AM to 8:30 AM 29 32 12 0 5 123 29 0 8 4 8 4 63 198 7 08:30 AM to 8:45 AM 23 29 10 0 10 92 21 1 5 7 11 4 40 190 11 08:45 AM to 9:00 AM 20 19 13 0 7 92 29 0 11 11 10 0 44 185 8 0

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 13 12 3 0 57 166 8 0 32 22 29 5 20 130 23 04:15 PM to 4:30 PM 26 14 7 0 74 163 18 3 31 20 25 6 25 158 20 04:30 PM to 4:45 PM 14 10 10 0 61 174 10 2 31 41 33 6 21 153 30 04:45 PM to 5:00 PM 33 12 6 0 61 216 16 0 46 26 27 7 20 142 32 05:00 PM to 5:15 PM 21 11 7 0 53 204 23 0 33 36 28 4 20 146 40 05:15 PM to 5:30 PM 35 11 9 0 73 228 10 1 32 27 38 6 30 160 34 05:30 PM to 5:45 PM 46 25 12 0 74 246 21 0 26 25 29 1 22 160 38 05:45 PM to 6:00 PM 68 25 5 1 56 185 12 0 26 27 29 0 23 160 30 06:00 PM to 6:15 PM 40 10 5 0 11 233 6 0 27 17 34 3 18 159 21 06:15 PM to 6:30 PM 43 8 7 0 59 276 9 1 29 14 26 1 27 127 25 06:30 PM to 6:45 PM 25 13 6 0 38 203 21 1 31 14 22 3 13 132 22 06:45 PM to 7:00 PM 13 10 2 0 32 164 13 1 16 21 28 2 15 126 25 0

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 139 132 80 0 24 531 108 4 35 25 56 22 196 681 38 0

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 170 72 33 1 256 863 66 1 117 115 124 11 95 626 142 0

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 139 132 80 0 24 531 108 4 35 25 56 22 196 681 38 0

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 170 72 33 1 256 863 66 1 117 115 124 11 95 626 142 0

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.85 0.85 0.65 0.87 0.75 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.73 0.63 0.82 0.76 0.78 0.86 0.68 0.85Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.63 0.72 0.69 0.70 0.86 0.88 0.72 0.87 0.89 0.80 0.82 0.92 0.79 0.98 0.89 0.96= 0.96 = 0.93

Eastbound

Fern St. Army Navy Dr. Fern St.

Eastbound

Army Navy Dr.

Fern St. Army Navy Dr.

Date of Counts:Clear

7236AM Period Intersection Volume: 5297

796

356

115

117

95

233

Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

Intersection: Fern Street at Army Navy Drive

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VA

726 Army Navy Dr. 663

915

24

Fern

St. 531

108

Army Navy Dr.

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

1185

863 Army Navy Dr.

Fern

St.

776

142

626 124

115

117

863 Army Navy Dr.

Fern

St.

776

142

626 124

95

66Fern

St. 863

1185

233

356

1157 Army Navy Dr.

256

275

170

72

Fern

St. 863

Fern

St.38

72 33

1157

170

66

Army Navy Dr.

436

681

33

196

25 35

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

275

513

256

Southbound Westbound

Army Navy Dr.Northbound

Army Navy Dr. Fern St.Fern St.

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

108

116

663

796

351

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

Clear

Fern St. Army Navy Dr. Fern St.

Army Navy Dr.

139

132

35

915

38

AM Weather Conditions: PM Weather Conditions:

132

80139

Fern

St.

56

196

681

Army Navy Dr.

2556Fern

St.

Army Navy Dr.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Southbound

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

87351

436

116

Westbound

87

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

513

24

531

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR

Fern St.

80

Northbound Eastbound

726

Army Navy Dr.

PM PEAK HOUR

PM Period Intersection Volume:

N

Page 13: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 35 101 66 23 56 5 0 14 25 2 6 29 6 116:15 AM to 6:30 AM 39 99 96 28 63 4 0 7 34 10 4 27 3 86:30 AM to 6:45 AM 46 104 101 35 56 6 0 14 54 5 16 33 3 66:45 AM to 7:00 AM 69 160 111 34 78 5 0 15 56 13 7 62 9 137:00 AM to 7:15 AM 63 177 146 28 63 3 0 16 50 9 11 61 7 167:15 AM to 7:30 AM 65 215 126 36 87 0 0 16 74 19 17 71 12 187:30 AM to 7:45 AM 69 231 116 55 62 17 0 21 87 18 23 79 9 167:45 AM to 8:00 AM 75 226 151 84 72 12 0 16 86 12 22 63 5 158:00 AM to 8:15 AM 66 186 111 50 62 9 0 13 91 25 26 95 13 178:15 AM to 8:30 AM 80 173 170 49 52 8 0 15 77 12 17 87 15 128:30 AM to 8:45 AM 67 235 137 39 51 7 0 14 93 14 27 80 10 138:45 AM to 9:00 AM 55 215 158 25 50 8 0 16 87 11 28 74 14 9

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 52 164 50 101 78 1 0 57 169 32 26 91 62 204:15 PM to 4:30 PM 51 192 49 102 70 6 0 39 160 33 37 105 77 114:30 PM to 4:45 PM 35 177 47 109 80 5 0 63 176 37 38 87 51 74:45 PM to 5:00 PM 48 167 48 92 125 18 1 55 184 39 30 108 71 05:00 PM to 5:15 PM 71 166 48 83 110 17 0 66 215 48 61 86 63 05:15 PM to 5:30 PM 37 195 50 95 150 10 2 49 146 52 41 122 92 05:30 PM to 5:45 PM 54 198 45 94 142 23 0 70 188 57 61 99 82 05:45 PM to 6:00 PM 71 226 55 72 167 8 1 53 163 44 34 99 78 06:00 PM to 6:15 PM 60 145 53 74 134 8 0 47 167 47 51 119 80 06:15 PM to 6:30 PM 64 181 49 65 175 16 0 34 168 52 54 100 82 06:30 PM to 6:45 PM 64 159 35 76 121 15 1 33 176 26 38 99 89 06:45 PM to 7:00 PM 61 169 48 47 86 14 0 22 145 42 33 87 77 0

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 290 816 548 0 238 248 46 0 65 341 67 0 88 324 42 60

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 233 785 198 0 344 569 58 3 238 712 201 0 197 406 315 0

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 290 816 548 0 238 248 46 0 65 341 67 0 88 324 42 60

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 233 785 198 0 344 569 58 3 238 712 201 0 197 406 315 0

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.91 0.88 0.81 0.91 0.71 0.86 0.68 0.79 0.77 0.94 0.67 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.70 0.85Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.82 0.87 0.90 0.86 0.91 0.85 0.63 0.94 0.85 0.83 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.83 0.86 0.90= 0.94 = 0.96

1216

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR11737AM Period Intersection Volume: 7874 PM Period Intersection Volume:

Hayes St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

Route 395/27 Ramps Army Navy Dr.

Army Navy Dr.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Eastbound

248

Army Navy Dr.

238

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

AM Weather Conditions:

88

Hay

es S

t.

Army Navy Dr.

341

473

548

Rou

te 3

95/2

7 R

amps

621

950

Army Navy Dr.Route 395/27 Ramps Army Navy Dr. Hayes St.

290

816

46

532

937

1654

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

1654

605

Army Navy Dr.

324

233

Army Navy Dr.

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

1371

Army Navy Dr.

65

918 Army Navy Dr.

569

971

344

6720

1

712

238

58

842

67

238

290

816

548

Rou

te 3

95/2

7 R

amps

248

46

621

569

58

341 65

88

950

473

Hay

es S

t.42

324

1003 Army Navy Dr.

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

1216

1371

344

233

785

198

Rou

te 3

95/2

7 R

amps

971

918 Army Navy Dr.

Hay

es S

t.

842

315

605 Army Navy Dr. 532

454 Army Navy Dr. 937

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VAGorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

198

Rou

te 3

95/2

7 R

amps

1003

785

Intersection: Army Navy Drive at Hayes Street and Routes 395/27

454

42

Northbound

Hayes St.

238

197

1040

1151

Date of Counts: Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Clear PM Weather Conditions: Clear

315

406 712

Hay

es S

t.

197

1040

1151

406 201

Eastbound

Route 395/27 Ramps Army Navy Dr. Hayes St.

EastboundSouthbound Westbound

Army Navy Dr.Route 395/27 Ramps

PM PEAK HOUR

N

Page 14: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM

6:15 AM to 6:30 AM

6:30 AM to 6:45 AM

6:45 AM to 7:00 AM

7:00 AM to 7:15 AM

7:15 AM to 7:30 AM

7:30 AM to 7:45 AM 12 66 32 4 40 111 15 6 23 50 17 17 16 133 9 27:45 AM to 8:00 AM 3 60 32 0 27 135 9 1 23 39 14 5 8 124 5 48:00 AM to 8:15 AM 14 53 35 0 46 141 26 15 31 53 20 2 15 128 17 28:15 AM to 8:30 AM 12 78 30 2 36 115 15 3 29 51 13 1 21 117 7 08:30 AM to 8:45 AM 12 66 29 2 41 116 12 7 30 58 13 0 9 140 15 58:45 AM to 9:00 AM 15 80 40 4 33 107 19 22 43 56 10 0 8 138 9 2

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 16 50 20 0 35 167 26 7 29 67 25 0 13 105 4 44:15 PM to 4:30 PM 10 58 20 1 34 144 30 5 39 66 31 3 8 116 8 44:30 PM to 4:45 PM 18 57 24 0 37 186 36 1 39 62 32 7 24 141 13 24:45 PM to 5:00 PM 22 68 23 0 49 165 48 5 34 80 23 7 11 130 14 15:00 PM to 5:15 PM 25 68 13 14 54 172 46 7 37 68 25 17 11 146 11 25:15 PM to 5:30 PM 14 57 27 5 46 214 54 9 36 54 22 21 11 117 18 25:30 PM to 5:45 PM 25 73 32 4 45 225 68 1 44 64 17 3 11 140 6 05:45 PM to 6:00 PM 15 54 23 2 43 245 37 14 29 84 21 6 4 111 6 16:00 PM to 6:15 PM 21 62 25 0 38 194 35 10 34 54 17 12 8 129 6 26:15 PM to 6:30 PM 21 76 18 1 51 187 67 5 34 42 15 8 8 110 13 06:30 PM to 6:45 PM 12 63 21 0 23 185 42 3 40 39 22 3 8 106 11 16:45 PM to 7:00 PM 10 53 18 0 35 174 50 13 23 49 14 10 12 104 10 1

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR8:00 AM to 9:00 AM 53 277 134 8 156 479 72 47 133 218 56 3 53 523 48 9

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 79 252 95 25 188 856 205 31 146 270 85 47 37 514 41 5

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 41 257 129 6 149 502 65 25 106 193 64 25 60 502 38 8

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 79 252 95 25 188 856 205 31 146 270 85 47 37 514 41 5

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.73 0.82 0.92 0.89 0.81 0.89 0.63 0.84 0.85 0.91 0.80 0.87 0.71 0.94 0.56 0.94Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.79 0.86 0.74 0.82 0.87 0.87 0.75 0.92 0.83 0.80 0.85 0.93 0.84 0.88 0.57 0.88= 0.91 = 0.92

Eastbound

Eads St. 15th St. Eads St.

Eastbound

15th St.

Eads St. 15th St.

Date of Counts:Clear

7614AM Period Intersection Volume: 3205

737

501

270

146

37

494

Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

Intersection: Eads Street at 15th Street

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VA

607 15th St. 716

600

149

Ead

s S

t. 502

65

15th St.

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

1249

592 15th St.

Ead

s S

t.

755

41

514

85 270

146

592 15th St.

Ead

s S

t.

755

41

514

85

37

205Ead

s S

t. 856

1249

494

501

1020 15th St.

188

426

79 252

Ead

s S

t. 856

Ead

s S

t.38

252

95

1020

79

205

15th St.

402

523

95

53

193

106

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

426

499

188

Southbound Westbound

15th St.Northbound

15th St. Eads St.Eads St.

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

72

407

707

790

427

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

Clear

Eads St. 15th St. Eads St.

15th St.

53 277

133

624

48

AM Weather Conditions: PM Weather Conditions:

257

129

41

Ead

s S

t.

64

60

502

15th St.

21856

Ead

s S

t.

15th St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Southbound

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

422

464

382

363

Westbound

380

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

499

156

479

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR

Eads St.

134

Northbound Eastbound

588

15th St.

PM PEAK HOUR

PM Period Intersection Volume:

N

Page 15: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 9 0 47 3 25 8 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 22 0 76:15 AM to 6:30 AM 4 0 51 2 19 8 0 9 0 1 1 1 2 49 3 146:30 AM to 6:45 AM 5 0 61 10 24 6 0 8 2 2 2 0 1 49 4 216:45 AM to 7:00 AM 6 0 77 7 42 12 1 10 1 3 2 1 1 64 3 157:00 AM to 7:15 AM 9 0 68 7 44 12 0 6 3 4 4 0 1 68 13 117:15 AM to 7:30 AM 5 1 72 8 38 8 0 15 0 4 2 1 0 70 4 237:30 AM to 7:45 AM 15 0 66 12 31 7 0 18 5 4 2 2 1 83 11 187:45 AM to 8:00 AM 12 0 86 7 42 20 0 20 5 3 3 0 1 99 2 218:00 AM to 8:15 AM 11 0 102 8 47 7 0 15 1 4 1 0 3 78 6 258:15 AM to 8:30 AM 8 0 100 5 42 12 0 18 2 5 4 0 0 79 7 138:30 AM to 8:45 AM 9 0 91 4 30 7 0 13 4 2 1 0 0 66 2 158:45 AM to 9:00 AM 14 0 95 6 33 12 0 18 3 1 3 1 1 70 3 9

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 8 1 34 10 123 23 1 13 0 2 1 1 5 15 1 214:15 PM to 4:30 PM 4 2 33 8 127 42 0 12 1 1 0 3 2 13 2 274:30 PM to 4:45 PM 11 1 57 8 128 38 0 11 0 2 1 3 3 18 5 344:45 PM to 5:00 PM 6 1 38 8 139 39 1 11 1 1 1 1 3 15 3 185:00 PM to 5:15 PM 7 3 44 9 144 37 0 22 1 1 0 2 5 18 3 275:15 PM to 5:30 PM 9 1 41 5 127 36 1 21 2 1 0 1 5 20 4 195:30 PM to 5:45 PM 8 3 32 7 140 42 1 18 1 0 2 3 6 23 3 255:45 PM to 6:00 PM 6 2 34 14 115 24 1 14 3 4 1 3 3 15 5 206:00 PM to 6:15 PM 11 1 26 7 98 37 0 12 2 2 3 0 5 13 1 136:15 PM to 6:30 PM 6 0 31 2 99 34 2 8 0 1 2 0 3 11 1 106:30 PM to 6:45 PM 10 1 32 0 78 22 0 10 1 0 2 2 4 18 4 86:45 PM to 7:00 PM 5 2 24 3 73 25 2 8 0 1 0 0 4 14 0 8

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 46 0 354 32 162 46 0 71 13 16 10 2 5 339 26 77

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR4:30 PM to 5:30 PM 33 6 180 30 538 150 2 65 4 5 2 7 16 71 15 98

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 46 0 354 32 162 46 0 71 13 16 10 2 5 339 26 77

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 30 9 151 35 526 139 3 75 7 6 3 9 19 76 15 91

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.77 0.00 0.87 0.88 0.86 0.58 0.00 0.84 0.65 0.80 0.63 0.89 0.42 0.86 0.59 0.91Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.83 0.75 0.86 0.88 0.91 0.83 0.75 0.91 0.58 0.38 0.38 0.50 0.79 0.83 0.75 0.86= 0.93 = 0.94

219

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR2648AM Period Intersection Volume: 2513 PM Period Intersection Volume:

Hotel Access

Southbound Westbound Northbound

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

Army Navy Dr. 12th St.

12th St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Eastbound

46

12th St.

162

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

AM Weather Conditions:

5

Hot

el A

cces

s

12th St.

16

39

354

Arm

y N

avy

Dr.

204

5

12th St.Army Navy Dr. 12th St. Hotel Access

46 0

0

208

706

400

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

400

102

12th St.

339

33

12th St.

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

558

12th St.

13

102 12th St.

150

690

538

102 5 4

2

255

10

162

46 0 354

Arm

y N

avy

Dr.

46

0

204

139

3

16 13

5

5 39H

otel

Acc

ess

26

339

172 12th St.

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

190

547

526

30 9 151

Arm

y N

avy

Dr.

668

110 12th St.

Hot

el A

cces

s

234

15

102 12th St. 208

370 12th St. 706

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VAGorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

180

Arm

y N

avy

Dr.

185

6

Intersection: Army Navy Drive at 12th Street

370

26

Northbound

Hotel Access

7

19

31 16

Date of Counts: Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Clear PM Weather Conditions: Clear

15

71

6

Hot

el A

cces

s

16

24 11

76

3

Eastbound

Army Navy Dr. 12th St. Hotel Access

EastboundSouthbound Westbound

12th St.Army Navy Dr.

PM PEAK HOUR

N

Page 16: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 1 5 9 2 37 42 4 2 13 5 1 1 2 37 2 26:15 AM to 6:30 AM 1 7 12 2 45 49 5 1 10 3 0 1 4 33 3 46:30 AM to 6:45 AM 0 6 16 1 46 43 9 1 15 8 4 3 4 46 3 36:45 AM to 7:00 AM 2 7 10 0 47 78 14 2 17 11 3 2 6 48 4 27:00 AM to 7:15 AM 2 5 21 9 39 59 11 11 13 22 3 4 11 77 5 137:15 AM to 7:30 AM 1 11 15 2 61 66 8 2 19 17 4 1 6 71 5 57:30 AM to 7:45 AM 1 17 28 2 58 73 8 14 28 14 6 10 5 95 2 167:45 AM to 8:00 AM 1 19 24 3 52 84 19 6 20 13 4 8 5 107 4 158:00 AM to 8:15 AM 1 9 22 2 61 98 10 2 18 22 6 7 3 94 4 68:15 AM to 8:30 AM 2 6 16 5 46 96 7 7 24 21 3 21 1 126 6 108:30 AM to 8:45 AM 2 11 14 0 31 62 11 8 31 12 6 7 8 106 2 38:45 AM to 9:00 AM 3 11 18 1 38 66 8 1 21 28 3 8 5 130 1 1

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 10 22 66 4 55 109 10 10 14 21 5 8 9 83 10 124:15 PM to 4:30 PM 11 42 46 7 39 124 16 13 16 15 4 12 9 87 10 94:30 PM to 4:45 PM 13 23 55 4 46 132 10 16 10 15 8 12 9 88 12 94:45 PM to 5:00 PM 11 39 54 6 46 138 13 19 13 32 6 19 8 102 18 105:00 PM to 5:15 PM 10 43 69 5 41 199 25 16 12 20 12 6 13 92 13 135:15 PM to 5:30 PM 9 38 61 5 46 142 33 22 9 19 11 10 10 86 11 125:30 PM to 5:45 PM 11 41 49 7 54 159 27 8 11 22 6 11 12 82 10 145:45 PM to 6:00 PM 12 45 56 4 40 146 20 18 14 20 4 7 14 84 15 176:00 PM to 6:15 PM 7 33 47 7 40 135 22 17 9 25 10 19 10 83 21 216:15 PM to 6:30 PM 10 18 43 14 35 155 23 8 10 21 2 6 8 99 12 166:30 PM to 6:45 PM 5 28 33 11 37 157 18 3 15 9 9 8 21 96 19 46:45 PM to 7:00 PM 14 17 34 4 39 163 16 14 9 12 5 11 11 88 22 12

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 5 51 90 12 217 351 44 29 90 70 19 46 14 422 16 47

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 41 161 233 23 187 638 98 65 45 93 35 122 43 362 52 49

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 5 51 90 12 217 351 44 29 90 70 19 46 14 422 16 47

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 42 167 235 21 181 646 105 64 46 81 33 34 49 344 49 56

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.63 0.67 0.80 0.79 0.89 0.90 0.58 0.91 0.80 0.80 0.79 0.93 0.70 0.84 0.67 0.85Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.88 0.93 0.85 0.91 0.84 0.81 0.80 0.88 0.82 0.92 0.69 0.91 0.88 0.93 0.82 0.94= 0.98 = 0.90

Eastbound

Fern St. 15th St. Fern St.

Eastbound

15th St.

Fern St. 15th St.

Date of Counts:Clear

5467AM Period Intersection Volume: 3346

602

160

81 46

49

321

Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

Intersection: 15th Street at Fern Street

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VA

375 15th St. 612

452

217

Fern

St. 351

44

15th St.

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

932

457 15th St.

Fern

St.

640

52

362

35 93 45

442 15th St.

Fern

St.

625

49

344

33

43

98Fern

St. 638

923

302

173

714 15th St.

187

435

41 161

Fern

St. 646

Fern

St.16

167

235

721

42

105

15th St.

109

422

233

14

70 90

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

444

311

181

Southbound Westbound

15th St.Northbound

15th St. Fern St.Fern St.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

44

179

612

602

146

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

Clear

Fern St. 15th St. Fern St.

15th St.

5 51

90

452

16

AM Weather Conditions: PM Weather Conditions:

51 905

Fern

St.

19

14

422

15th St.

7019Fern

St.

15th St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Southbound

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

303

146

109

179

Westbound

303

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

332

217

351

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR

Fern St.

90

Northbound Eastbound

375

15th St.

PM PEAK HOUR

PM Period Intersection Volume:

N

Page 17: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 87 0 85 0 29 33 3 2 14 0 37 2 13 14 73 86:15 AM to 6:30 AM 90 0 89 0 32 35 2 3 19 1 44 1 14 21 91 126:30 AM to 6:45 AM 94 0 81 0 37 44 4 7 27 0 51 1 22 16 95 186:45 AM to 7:00 AM 96 0 104 1 28 54 2 1 21 0 48 3 19 131 111 227:00 AM to 7:15 AM 91 0 109 1 43 47 17 5 35 0 53 4 18 157 83 177:15 AM to 7:30 AM 108 0 117 3 34 62 4 8 23 0 45 2 26 158 118 157:30 AM to 7:45 AM 121 1 114 1 41 59 1 3 32 0 52 3 38 165 100 87:45 AM to 8:00 AM 130 0 132 1 48 52 4 3 25 2 37 1 35 186 140 118:00 AM to 8:15 AM 78 0 102 1 48 83 5 3 29 0 45 4 27 196 156 158:15 AM to 8:30 AM 77 2 91 2 53 27 0 2 32 0 37 1 40 153 178 38:30 AM to 8:45 AM 104 0 152 1 50 36 1 3 27 0 23 1 42 209 193 28:45 AM to 9:00 AM 91 0 133 0 48 43 3 3 21 0 32 1 38 17 188 5

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 125 0 49 0 129 82 8 21 5 1 59 3 40 48 106 84:15 PM to 4:30 PM 115 1 46 0 136 83 5 10 8 0 53 0 48 52 98 74:30 PM to 4:45 PM 115 0 39 1 134 109 10 11 10 0 58 0 23 60 137 64:45 PM to 5:00 PM 165 0 32 2 130 75 4 5 7 0 72 1 37 51 125 65:00 PM to 5:15 PM 218 0 57 9 156 103 5 16 7 0 78 2 44 55 195 65:15 PM to 5:30 PM 221 0 56 1 145 126 14 10 12 2 74 0 40 64 179 95:30 PM to 5:45 PM 254 0 77 1 156 103 7 14 8 0 103 1 53 59 184 105:45 PM to 6:00 PM 204 0 50 2 140 102 13 8 11 0 73 0 46 55 168 56:00 PM to 6:15 PM 197 0 46 1 116 111 6 10 9 0 55 2 40 48 152 76:15 PM to 6:30 PM 163 0 30 1 89 91 4 9 9 0 75 0 36 50 128 76:30 PM to 6:45 PM 216 0 60 0 75 74 8 13 6 0 65 3 26 40 121 06:45 PM to 7:00 PM 212 6 36 0 78 97 6 5 10 0 72 0 46 41 109 3

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:45 AM to 8:45 AM 389 2 477 5 199 198 10 11 113 2 142 7 144 744 667 31

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 897 0 240 13 597 434 39 48 38 2 328 3 183 233 726 30

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 406 3 439 5 190 221 10 11 118 2 171 9 140 700 574 37

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 897 0 240 13 597 434 39 48 38 2 328 3 183 233 726 30

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.78 0.38 0.83 0.81 0.90 0.67 0.50 0.77 0.92 0.25 0.82 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.81 0.93Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.88 0.00 0.78 0.86 0.96 0.86 0.70 0.94 0.79 0.25 0.80 0.83 0.86 0.91 0.93 0.96= 0.94 = 0.93

1137

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR9266AM Period Intersection Volume: 7684 PM Period Intersection Volume:

Rte. 1

Southbound Westbound Northbound

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

Rte. 1 15th St.

15th St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Eastbound

198

15th St.

199

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

AM Weather Conditions:

144

Rte

. 1

15th St.

2

257

477

Rte

. 1

868

156

15th St.Rte. 1 15th St. Rte. 1

389

2

10

407

1334

848

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

868

729

15th St.

744

897

15th St.

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

1325

15th St.

113

1142 15th St.

434

1070

597

142

328 2 38

39

511

171

190

406

3 439

Rte

. 1 221

10

766

434

39

2

118

140

153

291

Rte

. 1 574

700

1659 15th St.

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

1137

1325

597

897

0 240

Rte

. 1

1070

1142 15th St.

Rte

. 1

511

726

798 15th St. 421

1414 15th St. 1257

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VAGorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

240

Rte

. 1

1659

0

Intersection: Route 1 at 15th Street

1555

667

Northbound

Rte. 1

38

183

222

368

Date of Counts: Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Clear PM Weather Conditions: Clear

726

233

2Rte

. 1

183

222

368

233 328

Eastbound

Rte. 1 15th St. Rte. 1

EastboundSouthbound Westbound

15th St.Rte. 1

PM PEAK HOUR

N

Page 18: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Project # :Location

AM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 5 12 2 2 3 24 5 0 26:15 AM to 6:30 AM 12 21 0 2 2 24 6 3 26:30 AM to 6:45 AM 13 16 3 1 3 43 4 9 46:45 AM to 7:00 AM 12 21 0 11 9 51 8 11 127:00 AM to 7:15 AM 10 23 2 15 8 44 3 8 67:15 AM to 7:30 AM 11 18 3 15 11 55 4 9 77:30 AM to 7:45 AM 13 25 1 15 14 64 8 16 127:45 AM to 8:00 AM 10 29 2 13 17 52 8 6 68:00 AM to 8:15 AM 15 20 2 18 10 46 11 8 48:15 AM to 8:30 AM 12 31 1 12 2 49 4 11 68:30 AM to 8:45 AM 12 28 3 12 5 59 5 11 98:45 AM to 9:00 AM 12 39 0 17 3 54 5 10 4

PM PEAKDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 11 49 5 14 48 10 35 184:15 PM to 4:30 PM 9 68 6 22 39 13 25 94:30 PM to 4:45 PM 7 61 1 15 47 7 34 164:45 PM to 5:00 PM 10 68 12 10 47 18 25 105:00 PM to 5:15 PM 9 53 9 4 40 10 33 205:15 PM to 5:30 PM 7 72 5 4 47 7 20 85:30 PM to 5:45 PM 14 102 6 1 47 11 21 165:45 PM to 6:00 PM 6 78 7 4 49 10 38 86:00 PM to 6:15 PM 9 53 2 6 58 10 29 56:15 PM to 6:30 PM 15 48 2 1 43 6 32 36:30 PM to 6:45 PM 10 59 2 3 41 6 28 86:45 PM to 7:00 PM 6 55 0 0 38 14 29 4

PEAK HOURSDirection:Roadway:

Movement: Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds

AM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 50 105 6 58 0 0 0 43 0 211 31 0 41 0 28 0

PM INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 36 305 0 27 0 0 0 13 0 183 38 0 112 0 52 0

AM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 50 105 6 58 0 0 0 43 0 211 31 0 41 0 28 0

PM SYSTEM PEAK HOUR5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 36 305 0 27 0 0 0 13 0 183 38 0 112 0 52 0

PEAK HOUR FACOTRS

AM Peak Hour Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.83 0.85 0.75 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/0! 0.00 0.82 0.70 0.84 0.64 0.00 0.58 0.62Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach

0.64 0.75 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/0! 0.00 0.93 0.86 0.94 0.74 0.00 0.65 0.77= 0.85 = 0.86

Eastbound

Fern St. 12th St. Fern St.

Eastbound

12th St.

Fern St. 12th St.

Date of Counts:Clear

2019AM Period Intersection Volume: 1251

6

221

183 0

112

417

Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.Data Source:

Intersection: 12th Street at Fern Street

Project Name : N101407-052

Arlington, VA

81 12th St. 0

69

0

Fern

St. 0

0

12th St.

AM PEAK HOUR

Southbound Westbound Northbound

0

164 12th St.

Fern

St.

0

52

0

38 183 0

164 12th St.

Fern

St.

0

52

0

38

112

0Fern

St. 0

0

417

221

74 12th St.

0

341

36 305

Fern

St. 0

Fern

St.28

305

0

74

36

0

12th St.

146

0

0

41

211 0

PM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

341

235

0

Southbound Westbound

12th St.Northbound

12th St. Fern St.Fern St.

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

0

242

0

6

161

AM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

Clear

Fern St. 12th St. Fern St.

12th St.

50 105

0

69

28

AM Weather Conditions: PM Weather Conditions:

105

650

Fern

St.

31

41

0

12th St.

21131Fern

St.

12th St.

Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound

Southbound

AM SYSTEM PEAK VOLUMES

239

161

146

242

Westbound

239

PM INTERSECTION PEAK VOLUMES

235

0

0

Overall AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Overall PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR

Fern St.

6

Northbound Eastbound

81

12th St.

PM PEAK HOUR

PM Period Intersection Volume:

N

Page 19: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   C‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX C ‐ 

EXISTING CONDITION CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 

Page 20: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS All capacity analyses are based on the procedures specified by the Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2000. Levels of service (LOS) range from A to F. A brief description of each level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections is provided below: { Signalized Intersections: Level of service is based upon the traffic volume present in each lane on the roadway, the capacity of each lane at the intersection and the delay associated with each directional movement. The levels of service for signalized intersections are defined below:

v Level of Service A describes operations with very low average delay per vehicle, i.e., less than 10.0 seconds. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles ar-rive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop. Short signal cycle lengths may also con-tribute to low delay.

v Level of Service B describes operations with average delay in the range of 10.1 to 20.0 sec-onds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay.

v Level of Service C describes operations with delay in the range of 20.1 to 35.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Indi-vidual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is sig-nificant at this level although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. This is generally considered the lower end of the range of the acceptable level of service in rural areas.

v Level of Service D describes operations with delay in the range of 35.1 to 55.0 seconds per vehicle. At LOS D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and/or high traffic volumes as compared to the roadway capacity. Many vehicles are required to stop and the num-ber of vehicles that do not have to stop declines. Individual signal cycle failures, where all wait-ing vehicles do not clear the intersection during a single green time, are noticeable. This is gen-erally considered the lower end of the range of the acceptable level of service in urban areas.

v Level of Service E describes operations with delay in the range of 55.1 to 80.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high traffic volumes. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. LOS E has been set as the limit of acceptable conditions.

v Level of Service F describes operations with average delay in excess of 80.0 seconds per ve-hicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with over-saturation, i.e., when traffic arrives at a flow rate that exceeds the capacity of the intersec-tion. It may also occur at high volumes with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such delays.

Page 21: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

{ Unsignalized Intersections: At an unsignalized intersection, the major street through traffic and right turns are assumed to operate unimpeded and therefore receive no level of service rat-ing. The level of service for the minor street and the major street left turn traffic is dependent on the volume and capacity of the available lanes, and, the number and frequency of acceptable gaps in the major street traffic to make a conflicting turn. The level of service grade is provided for each conflicting movement at an unsignalized intersection and is based on the total average delay experienced by each vehicle. The delay includes the time it takes a vehicle to move from the back of a queue through the intersection.

The unsignalized intersection level of service analysis does not account for variations in driver behavior or the effects of nearby traffic signals. Therefore, the results from this analysis usually indicates worse levels of service than may be experienced in the field. The unsignalized intersection level of service descriptions are provided below:

v Level of Service A. Describes operations where there is very little to no conflicting traffic for a minor side street movement, i.e., an average total delay of less than 10.0 seconds per vehicle. v Level of Service B. Describes operations with average total delay in the range of 10.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. v Level of Service C. Describes operations with average total delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 second per vehicle. v Level of Service D. Describes operations with average total delay in the range of 25.1 to 35.0 seconds per vehicle. v Level of Service E. Describes operations with average total delay in the range of 35.1 to 50.0 seconds per vehicle. v Level of Service F. Describes operations with average total delay of 50 seconds per vehicle. LOS F exists when there are insufficient gaps of suitable size to allow a side street demand to cross safely through or enter a major street traffic stream. This level of service is generally evi-dent from extremely long total delays experienced by side street traffic and by queuing on the minor approaches. It is important to note that LOS F may not always result in long queues but may result in adjustments to normal driver behavior.

Page 22: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 49 485 54 690 73 371 71 602 938 319v/c Ratio 0.22 0.51 0.22 0.64 0.39 0.23 0.12 0.79 0.36 0.31Control Delay 26.2 34.3 21.7 27.3 52.1 18.7 1.8 21.5 18.3 5.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.2 34.3 21.7 27.3 52.1 18.7 1.8 21.5 18.3 5.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 94 25 97 51 31 1 214 143 16Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 107 51 138 100 48 5 #432 216 81Internal Link Dist (ft) 590 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 271 1382 245 1345 219 1633 591 820 2634 1019Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.35 0.22 0.51 0.33 0.23 0.12 0.73 0.36 0.31

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 42 324 88 46 248 338 67 341 65 548 854 290Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4831 1691 4645 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.44 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 369 4831 630 4645 1770 5085 1689 787 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91Adj. Flow (vph) 49 381 104 54 292 398 73 371 71 602 938 319RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 53 0 0 254 0 0 0 49 0 0 149Lane Group Flow (vph) 49 432 0 54 436 0 73 371 22 602 938 170Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 60Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 22.2 16.5 20.4 15.6 7.2 29.3 29.3 62.7 48.5 48.5Effective Green, g (s) 28.2 19.5 26.4 18.6 10.2 32.3 32.3 65.7 51.5 48.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.19 0.25 0.18 0.10 0.31 0.31 0.63 0.49 0.46Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 210 897 237 823 172 1564 520 751 2494 829v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.09 0.04 0.07 c0.22 0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.01 c0.28 0.09v/c Ratio 0.23 0.48 0.23 0.53 0.42 0.24 0.04 0.80 0.38 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 29.5 38.2 30.5 39.2 44.6 27.1 25.5 11.8 16.7 16.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.15 1.07 0.60 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 5.8 0.4 0.6Delay (s) 29.7 38.6 25.0 45.9 48.2 16.7 3.9 17.6 17.1 17.4Level of Service C D C D D B A B B BApproach Delay (s) 37.8 44.3 19.4 17.3Approach LOS D D B B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 23: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 45 801 231 706 66 70 92 254v/c Ratio 0.08 0.32 0.19 0.35 0.33 0.11 0.34 0.32Control Delay 5.8 5.8 2.1 15.0 35.6 13.9 35.5 19.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 5.8 5.8 2.1 15.0 35.6 13.9 35.5 19.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 20 0 82 41 8 57 48Queue Length 95th (ft) m21 144 m33 m128 62 21 81 64Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 578 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 557 2533 1237 2034 333 1003 444 1246Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.32 0.19 0.35 0.20 0.07 0.21 0.20

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 38 681 196 108 531 24 56 25 35 80 132 89Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3539 1636 5013 1770 2849 1735 3437Flt Permitted 0.32 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.52 1.00 0.71 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 585 3539 1636 3667 973 2849 1295 3437Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87Adj. Flow (vph) 45 801 231 115 565 26 66 29 41 92 152 102RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 66 0 3 0 0 32 0 0 81 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 801 165 0 703 0 66 38 0 92 173 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 22 22Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 72.6 72.6 72.6 55.6 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9Effective Green, g (s) 75.6 75.1 75.1 58.1 21.9 21.9 21.9 21.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.55 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 560 2531 1170 2029 203 594 270 717v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.23 0.01 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.10 c0.19 0.07 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.08 0.32 0.14 0.35 0.33 0.06 0.34 0.24Uniform Delay, d1 4.5 5.5 4.7 13.0 35.3 33.3 35.4 34.6Progression Factor 0.77 0.77 1.41 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.8 0.2Delay (s) 3.8 4.5 6.9 13.0 36.2 33.4 36.2 34.8Level of Service A A A B D C D CApproach Delay (s) 5.0 13.0 34.7 35.2Approach LOS A B C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.35Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 24: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 683 429 173 176 493 221v/c Ratio 0.51 0.35 0.98 0.25 0.71 0.35Control Delay 11.2 28.0 96.7 21.4 33.9 16.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 11.2 28.0 96.7 21.4 33.9 16.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 138 78 113 73 275 65Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 101 #234 116 366 114Internal Link Dist (ft) 578 433 592 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1340 1217 177 710 693 640Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.35 0.98 0.25 0.71 0.35

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 187 270 123 45 281 38 147 126 24 39 380 188Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3313 4916 1752 1801 1848 1520Flt Permitted 0.67 0.80 0.25 1.00 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2246 3945 453 1801 1774 1520Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 220 318 145 53 331 45 173 148 28 46 447 221RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 14 0 0 7 0 0 0 46Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 660 0 0 415 0 173 169 0 0 493 175Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 39 27 27 39 29 49 49 29Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 29.5 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 32.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1316 1202 177 703 693 594v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.09v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.11 c0.38 0.28 0.11v/c Ratio 0.50 0.35 0.98 0.24 0.71 0.29Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 28.4 31.5 21.5 27.0 22.0Progression Factor 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.8 60.6 0.2 3.7 0.4Delay (s) 14.3 29.1 92.1 21.8 30.7 22.4Level of Service B C F C C CApproach Delay (s) 14.3 29.1 56.6 28.1Approach LOS B C E C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.0% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 25: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 238 492 191 198 137 176v/c Ratio 0.36 0.54 0.40 0.21 0.18 0.15Control Delay 12.1 3.4 13.5 9.8 2.4 13.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.1 3.4 13.5 9.8 2.4 13.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 0 51 47 0 23Queue Length 95th (ft) 111 41 95 78 21 43Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 286 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 658 919 482 956 742 1154Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.54 0.40 0.21 0.18 0.15

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 151 71 458 166 172 119 0 0 0 13 102 40Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1667 1268 1412 1739 1237 3211Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1196 1268 877 1739 1237 3211Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 162 76 492 191 198 137 0 0 0 15 116 45RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 221 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 29 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 238 271 191 198 75 0 0 0 0 147 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84 46 42 42 46Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 658 697 482 956 680 1124v/s Ratio Prot 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.21 c0.22 0.06 0.05v/c Ratio 0.36 0.39 0.40 0.21 0.11 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.1 10.3 10.4 9.1 8.6 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 1.6 2.4 0.5 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 11.7 11.9 12.8 9.6 9.0 17.9Level of Service B B B A A BApproach Delay (s) 11.8 10.6 0.0 17.9Approach LOS B B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.29Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 26: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Drive 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 26 339 5 0 46 162 10 16 13 354 0 46Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88Hourly flow rate (vph) 29 373 5 0 54 191 11 18 15 402 0 52Pedestrians 32 2 77 71Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 0 6 7Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 316 455 621 825 268 489 733 225vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 316 455 621 825 268 489 733 225tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 100 96 93 98 0 100 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1149 1037 279 260 686 351 294 701

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 215 192 27 218 44 402 52Volume Left 29 0 0 0 11 402 0Volume Right 0 5 0 191 15 0 52cSH 1149 1700 1037 1700 335 351 701Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.13 0.13 1.15 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 11 398 6Control Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.3 128.4 10.5Lane LOS A C F BApproach Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 17.3 114.9Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 46.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 63 69 346 122 236 401v/c Ratio 0.15 0.18 0.28 0.10 0.37 0.34Control Delay 19.1 5.3 7.8 2.3 10.5 8.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 19.1 5.3 7.8 2.3 10.5 8.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 0 34 0 25 42Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 22 131 19 124 167Internal Link Dist (ft) 596 187 592Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 705 615 1230 1266 630 1185Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.11 0.28 0.10 0.37 0.34

Intersection Summary

Page 27: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 56 61 294 104 208 353Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 13 12 10 16 9 9Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1829 1484 1739 1740 1575 1676Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1829 1484 1739 1740 891 1676Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 63 69 346 122 236 401RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 55 0 39 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 14 346 83 236 401Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 59 22 22Turn Type Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 12.1 12.1 44.9 44.9 44.9 44.9Effective Green, g (s) 14.6 14.6 47.4 47.4 47.4 47.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 381 310 1178 1178 603 1135v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.20 0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.05 c0.27v/c Ratio 0.17 0.05 0.29 0.07 0.39 0.35Uniform Delay, d1 22.7 22.1 4.6 3.8 5.0 4.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.1 1.9 0.9Delay (s) 22.8 22.2 5.2 3.9 6.9 5.7Level of Service C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 22.5 4.9 6.1Approach LOS C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 7.4 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 81 284 170v/c Ratio 0.20 0.21 0.13Control Delay 10.9 5.9 4.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.9 5.9 4.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 23 8Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 91 48Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 1055 464Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 684 1381 1322Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.21 0.13

Intersection Summary

Page 28: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 28 41 31 211 105 50Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 14 14 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1903 1958 1779Flt Permitted 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1903 1880 1779Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.91 0.91Adj. Flow (vph) 33 48 36 248 115 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 39 0 0 0 16 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 42 0 0 284 154 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 58 58Turn Type PermProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 47.0 47.0Effective Green, g (s) 12.5 49.5 49.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.71 0.71Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 340 1329 1258v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.09v/s Ratio Perm c0.15v/c Ratio 0.12 0.21 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 24.1 3.5 3.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.4 0.2Delay (s) 24.2 3.9 3.5Level of Service C A AApproach Delay (s) 24.2 3.9 3.5Approach LOS C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 6.8 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.20Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 72 10 66 26 512 40 171 986v/c Ratio 0.20 0.04 0.22 0.06 0.17 0.05 0.24 0.30Control Delay 17.6 26.8 9.4 9.4 14.5 7.8 4.1 4.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 17.6 26.8 9.4 9.4 14.5 7.8 4.1 4.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 5 0 7 80 0 18 39Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 16 27 18 105 18 27 45Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 513 417 423 536 2949 856 731 3289Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.02 0.16 0.05 0.17 0.05 0.23 0.30

Intersection Summary

Page 29: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 29 1 30 7 1 54 22 435 34 149 815 43Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1802 1603 1357 1823 4916 1400 1894 4862Flt Permitted 0.87 0.82 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1601 1369 1357 521 4916 1400 835 4862Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87Adj. Flow (vph) 35 1 36 9 1 66 26 512 40 171 937 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 29 0 0 0 55 0 0 17 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 0 0 10 11 26 512 23 171 982 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 63 42 42 63 31 91 91 31Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 17.8 17.8 17.8 62.4 59.1 59.1 71.0 63.4Effective Green, g (s) 20.8 20.8 17.8 68.4 61.6 61.6 76.7 65.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.65 0.59 0.59 0.73 0.63Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 317 271 230 418 2884 821 717 3051v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.10 c0.02 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.15v/c Ratio 0.14 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.18 0.03 0.24 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 34.7 34.0 36.5 6.5 10.0 9.1 4.3 9.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.16 1.58 0.52 0.35Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 34.8 34.0 36.5 8.1 11.8 14.5 2.3 3.5Level of Service C C D A B B A AApproach Delay (s) 34.8 36.2 11.8 3.3Approach LOS C D B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.5 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.27Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 24 522 76 634 112 112 196v/c Ratio 0.06 0.26 0.17 0.34 0.22 0.25 0.26Control Delay 8.0 9.3 6.6 3.1 28.8 7.1 28.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.0 9.3 6.6 3.1 28.8 7.1 28.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 60 13 25 56 0 51Queue Length 95th (ft) m11 76 16 35 89 30 58Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 409 2019 454 1885 500 450 747Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.26 0.17 0.34 0.22 0.25 0.26

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 30: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 16 422 14 44 351 217 19 70 90 90 51 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1657 3258 1600 2896 1778 1336 3220Flt Permitted 0.38 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 661 3258 734 2896 1638 1336 2441Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.67 0.84 0.70 0.58 0.90 0.89 0.79 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.67 0.63Adj. Flow (vph) 24 502 20 76 390 244 24 88 112 112 76 8RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 93 0 0 0 81 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 519 0 76 541 0 0 112 31 0 193 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 47 29 12 46 46 12Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 32.0 29.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.30Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 409 2017 454 1793 499 369 744v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.10 0.07 0.02 c0.08v/c Ratio 0.06 0.26 0.17 0.30 0.22 0.08 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 7.9 9.1 8.5 9.4 27.2 28.2 27.6Progression Factor 0.95 1.00 0.66 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.8Delay (s) 7.7 9.3 6.3 4.9 28.3 28.6 28.4Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 9.3 5.1 28.4 28.4Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.29Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 40 598 77 775 296 122 480v/c Ratio 0.18 0.25 0.22 0.47 0.27 0.17 0.43Control Delay 12.3 9.8 17.7 19.2 19.6 3.9 21.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.3 9.8 17.7 20.1 19.6 3.9 21.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 43 29 176 64 0 110Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 70 56 207 92 30 152Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 222 2359 349 1648 1113 712 1129Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 567 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.25 0.22 0.72 0.27 0.17 0.43

Intersection Summary

Page 31: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 38 502 60 65 502 149 64 193 106 129 257 41Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1582 4827 1764 3391 3360 1469 3432Flt Permitted 0.28 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.73Satd. Flow (perm) 458 4827 718 3391 2540 1469 2558Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.89 0.89Adj. Flow (vph) 40 534 64 77 598 177 74 222 122 145 289 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 8 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 40 584 0 77 775 0 0 296 53 0 472 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 8 8 25 6 25 25 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 43.5 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 222 2345 349 1647 1113 644 1121v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.23v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.04 c0.18v/c Ratio 0.18 0.25 0.22 0.47 0.27 0.08 0.42Uniform Delay, d1 15.2 15.8 15.6 18.0 18.8 17.2 20.3Progression Factor 0.66 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.2 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 1.2Delay (s) 11.7 10.3 17.0 19.0 19.3 17.5 21.5Level of Service B B B B B B CApproach Delay (s) 10.3 18.8 18.8 21.5Approach LOS B B B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1049 13 287 363 349 331v/c Ratio 0.43 0.02 0.10 0.72 0.72 0.47Control Delay 21.6 3.4 0.7 36.6 33.2 5.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 21.6 3.4 0.7 36.6 33.2 5.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 92 0 1 166 145 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 162 m2 1 #286 261 43Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 485Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2413 735 2922 540 518 730Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 36 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.02 0.10 0.67 0.67 0.45

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 32: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 835 140 10 221 0 0 0 0 439 0 406Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6925 1752 4867 1698 1533 1589Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6925 1752 4867 1698 1533 1589Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.93 0.93 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81Adj. Flow (vph) 0 898 151 13 287 0 0 0 0 542 0 501RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 238Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1024 0 13 287 0 0 0 0 363 316 93Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 37 5 5Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 26.7 19.5 51.2 22.6 22.6 22.6Effective Green, g (s) 27.7 20.5 52.2 23.6 23.6 23.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.24 0.62 0.28 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2289 429 3032 478 432 447v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.01 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.21 0.06v/c Ratio 0.45 0.03 0.09 0.76 0.73 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 22.0 24.1 6.3 27.5 27.2 23.0Progression Factor 1.00 0.17 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.1 5.4 0.1Delay (s) 22.1 4.2 0.6 33.6 32.7 23.1Level of Service C A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 22.1 0.8 0.0 29.9Approach LOS C A A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.8% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 617 753 78 247 197 136v/c Ratio 0.37 0.22 0.08 0.57 0.60 0.33Control Delay 6.6 1.1 31.7 10.5 39.3 7.9Queue Delay 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.5 1.2 31.7 10.5 39.3 7.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 90 4 10 0 92 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 17 19 35 163 41Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 286Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1722 3604 1481 540 576 628Starvation Cap Reductn 783 1756 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.41 0.05 0.46 0.34 0.22

Intersection Summary

Page 33: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 574 700 0 0 60 190 171 0 118 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 14 11 11 11Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1465 1814 1688Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1465 1814 1688Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.88 0.50 0.77 0.77 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Adj. Flow (vph) 617 753 0 0 78 247 197 0 136 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 211 0 0 113 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 617 753 0 0 78 36 197 0 23 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 11 9 9Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 44.3 60.5 11.2 11.2 13.3 13.3Effective Green, g (s) 45.3 61.5 12.2 12.2 14.3 14.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.73 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1776 3572 893 213 310 288v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.15 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.11 0.01v/c Ratio 0.35 0.21 0.09 0.17 0.64 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 10.9 3.5 31.0 31.4 32.3 29.2Progression Factor 0.48 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.1 0.0Delay (s) 5.3 0.8 31.0 31.5 35.4 29.3Level of Service A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 2.8 31.4 32.9 0.0Approach LOS A C C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 34: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 350 670 68 1133 218 774 259 218 863 256v/c Ratio 0.91 0.34 0.20 0.81 0.82 0.61 0.42 0.66 0.70 0.47Control Delay 55.5 19.3 11.9 26.8 80.9 23.7 2.7 31.3 40.4 12.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 55.5 19.3 11.9 26.8 80.9 23.7 2.7 31.3 40.4 12.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 180 93 11 242 154 79 0 95 198 31Queue Length 95th (ft) #347 130 m20 210 #274 102 0 155 246 104Internal Link Dist (ft) 610 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 391 1949 399 1424 270 1277 618 349 1227 540Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.34 0.17 0.80 0.81 0.61 0.42 0.62 0.70 0.47

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 315 406 197 58 594 369 201 712 238 198 785 233Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4836 1711 4765 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 214 4836 694 4765 1770 5085 1689 365 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91Adj. Flow (vph) 350 451 219 68 699 434 218 774 259 218 863 256RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 78 0 0 106 0 0 0 197 0 0 161Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 592 0 68 1027 0 218 774 62 218 863 95Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 50.3 37.6 32.4 26.7 12.7 22.0 22.0 32.7 21.0 21.0Effective Green, g (s) 53.3 40.6 38.4 29.7 15.7 25.0 25.0 38.7 24.0 21.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.39 0.37 0.28 0.15 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.23 0.20Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 388 1870 338 1348 265 1211 402 323 1162 359v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.12 0.02 0.22 c0.12 0.15 0.09 c0.17v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0.06 0.04 0.15 0.05v/c Ratio 0.90 0.32 0.20 0.76 0.82 0.64 0.15 0.67 0.74 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 28.7 22.5 22.0 34.4 43.3 35.9 31.6 24.7 37.6 35.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.72 1.31 0.60 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 23.0 0.1 0.1 2.2 17.3 2.6 0.8 4.3 4.3 1.8Delay (s) 51.7 22.6 16.3 26.8 74.2 24.3 5.0 29.1 41.9 37.3Level of Service D C B C E C A C D DApproach Delay (s) 32.6 26.2 29.0 38.9Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 31.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 35: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 160 639 120 1371 151 275 48 290v/c Ratio 0.47 0.26 0.10 0.64 0.68 0.34 0.21 0.31Control Delay 18.6 5.7 1.0 13.1 49.9 16.4 30.8 11.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 18.6 5.7 1.0 13.1 49.9 16.4 30.8 11.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 69 2 106 93 41 26 27Queue Length 95th (ft) 106 108 9 m165 127 54 38 33Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 578 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 338 2416 1155 2154 317 1090 326 1246Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.26 0.10 0.64 0.48 0.25 0.15 0.23

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 142 626 95 66 863 256 124 115 117 33 72 120Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3539 1636 4889 1769 2926 1757 3270Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.50 1.00 0.51 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 225 3539 1636 4063 926 2926 951 3270Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.98 0.79 0.72 0.88 0.86 0.82 0.80 0.89 0.69 0.72 0.63Adj. Flow (vph) 160 639 120 92 981 298 151 144 131 48 100 190RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 38 0 39 0 0 99 0 0 144 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 160 639 82 0 1332 0 151 176 0 48 146 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 11 11 1Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 69.2 69.2 69.2 52.2 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3Effective Green, g (s) 72.2 71.7 71.7 54.7 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.52 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 339 2417 1117 2117 223 705 229 788v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.18 0.06 0.04v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.05 c0.33 c0.16 0.05v/c Ratio 0.47 0.26 0.07 0.63 0.68 0.25 0.21 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 9.1 6.4 5.6 17.9 36.1 32.2 31.9 31.7Progression Factor 1.65 0.73 0.48 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 0.2 0.1 0.6 7.9 0.2 0.5 0.1Delay (s) 19.3 4.9 2.8 12.7 44.0 32.4 32.3 31.8Level of Service B A A B D C C CApproach Delay (s) 7.2 12.7 36.5 31.9Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 16.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 36: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 887 1228 396 352 132 169v/c Ratio 0.88dl 0.90 1.08 0.61 0.24 0.30Control Delay 12.9 43.0 104.4 34.2 26.2 5.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.9 43.0 104.4 34.2 26.2 5.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 271 ~298 195 63 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 173 #350 #444 271 104 38Internal Link Dist (ft) 578 433 592 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1555 1359 367 573 545 570Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.90 1.08 0.61 0.24 0.30

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 440 117 215 28 776 289 337 293 6 4 108 144Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3580 4784 1576 1670 1611 1339Flt Permitted 0.59 0.89 0.65 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2180 4260 1070 1670 1590 1339Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 506 134 247 31 872 325 396 345 7 5 127 169RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 38 0 0 62 0 0 1 0 0 0 111Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 849 0 0 1166 0 396 351 0 0 132 58Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 21 21 29 13 23 23 13Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 52.0 29.5 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 57.0 32.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.30 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1517 1298 367 573 545 459v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 c0.27 c0.37 0.08 0.04v/c Ratio 0.88dl 0.90 1.08 0.61 0.24 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 15.8 34.9 34.5 28.7 24.7 23.7Progression Factor 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 10.1 69.7 2.2 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 17.6 45.0 104.2 30.9 25.0 23.9Level of Service B D F C C CApproach Delay (s) 17.6 45.0 69.7 24.4Approach LOS B D E C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 41.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 37: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 83 161 136 660 263 231v/c Ratio 0.16 0.21 0.25 0.69 0.32 0.19Control Delay 9.9 2.3 10.8 17.8 2.4 8.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.9 2.3 10.8 17.8 2.4 8.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 0 33 222 0 16Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 24 62 324 28 38Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 281 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 529 770 554 956 823 1218Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.21 0.25 0.69 0.32 0.19

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 52 21 142 118 574 229 0 0 0 2 83 119Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1268 1362 1739 1281 3228Flt Permitted 0.53 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 961 1268 1008 1739 1281 3228Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88Adj. Flow (vph) 59 24 161 136 660 263 0 0 0 2 94 135RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 72 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 88 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 83 89 136 660 145 0 0 0 0 143 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 529 697 554 956 705 1130v/s Ratio Prot c0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.07 0.13 0.11 0.04v/c Ratio 0.16 0.13 0.25 0.69 0.21 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 8.9 8.7 9.4 13.1 9.1 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 1.1 4.1 0.7 0.2Delay (s) 9.5 9.1 10.4 17.1 9.8 17.9Level of Service A A B B A BApproach Delay (s) 9.2 14.4 0.0 17.9Approach LOS A B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.6% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 38: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 15 76 19 3 139 526 3 6 7 151 9 30Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 88 22 3 153 578 4 7 8 172 10 34Pedestrians 35 9 91 75Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 1 7 8Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 806 201 382 1038 155 623 760 475vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 806 201 382 1038 155 623 760 475tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 100 99 96 99 40 96 93cM capacity (veh/h) 751 1273 392 192 797 285 279 479

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 62 66 80 654 19 182 34Volume Left 17 0 3 0 4 172 0Volume Right 0 22 0 578 8 0 34cSH 751 1700 1273 1700 335 285 479Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.38 0.06 0.64 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 4 101 6Control Delay (s) 3.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 16.4 37.6 13.1Lane LOS A A C E BApproach Delay (s) 1.4 0.0 16.4 33.7Approach LOS C D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 7.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 105 139 404 66 78 345v/c Ratio 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.06 0.15 0.31Control Delay 20.5 4.9 8.7 2.9 8.5 8.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 20.5 4.9 8.7 2.9 8.5 8.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 41 0 47 0 8 39Queue Length 95th (ft) 58 30 171 17 38 133Internal Link Dist (ft) 596 187 592Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 705 672 1139 1116 522 1097Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.21 0.35 0.06 0.15 0.31

Intersection Summary

Page 39: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 92 122 368 60 66 293Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 13 12 10 16 9 9Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1829 1521 1739 1670 1542 1676Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1829 1521 1739 1670 796 1676Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 105 139 404 66 78 345RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 107 0 23 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 105 32 404 43 78 345Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 32 70 70Turn Type Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 13.7 13.7 43.3 43.3 43.3 43.3Effective Green, g (s) 16.2 16.2 45.8 45.8 45.8 45.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 423 352 1138 1093 521 1097v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.23 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.03 0.10v/c Ratio 0.25 0.09 0.36 0.04 0.15 0.31Uniform Delay, d1 21.9 21.1 5.4 4.3 4.6 5.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.6 0.8Delay (s) 22.0 21.2 6.3 4.4 5.2 6.0Level of Service C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 21.5 6.0 5.9Approach LOS C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.3 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.33Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 193 235 401v/c Ratio 0.40 0.19 0.31Control Delay 10.0 6.0 6.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.0 6.0 6.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 20 37Queue Length 95th (ft) 54 82 128Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 1055 464Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 733 1235 1304Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.19 0.31

Intersection Summary

Page 40: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 52 112 38 183 305 36Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 14 14 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.91 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1886 1970 1886Flt Permitted 0.98 0.90 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1886 1793 1886Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 61 132 40 195 359 42RTOR Reduction (vph) 106 0 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 0 0 235 397 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 27Turn Type PermProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1Actuated Green, G (s) 11.8 45.7 45.7Effective Green, g (s) 13.8 48.2 48.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.69 0.69Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 372 1235 1299v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 c0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.13v/c Ratio 0.23 0.19 0.31Uniform Delay, d1 23.7 3.9 4.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.6Delay (s) 23.8 4.2 4.9Level of Service C A AApproach Delay (s) 23.8 4.2 4.9Approach LOS C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.1 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.29Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: Driveway & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 193 33 115 83 731 69 136 988v/c Ratio 0.51 0.13 0.34 0.19 0.26 0.09 0.24 0.34Control Delay 23.6 29.6 8.5 11.8 18.0 9.7 7.3 6.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 23.6 29.6 8.5 11.8 18.0 9.7 7.3 6.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 58 16 0 27 139 0 19 59Queue Length 95th (ft) 123 38 36 m50 175 m28 m46 84Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 500 358 449 504 2812 768 602 2903Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.09 0.26 0.16 0.26 0.09 0.23 0.34

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 41: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: Driveway & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 61 6 108 21 7 98 79 694 66 122 784 105Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1631 1534 1323 1825 4916 1291 1905 4795Flt Permitted 0.88 0.74 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1459 1178 1323 489 4916 1291 661 4795Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90Adj. Flow (vph) 67 7 119 25 8 115 83 731 69 136 871 117RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 0 0 0 93 0 0 30 0 12 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 131 0 0 33 22 83 731 39 136 976 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 158 158 84 23 130 130 23Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 19.8 19.8 19.8 62.9 57.6 57.6 66.5 59.4Effective Green, g (s) 22.8 22.8 19.8 68.9 60.1 60.1 72.5 61.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.19 0.66 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.59Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 317 256 249 426 2814 739 576 2827v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.15 c0.02 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.03 0.02 0.11 0.03 0.14v/c Ratio 0.41 0.13 0.09 0.19 0.26 0.05 0.24 0.35Uniform Delay, d1 35.4 33.1 35.1 6.6 11.3 9.9 5.6 11.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.56 1.34 2.45 0.96 0.46Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 35.7 33.2 35.2 10.4 15.4 24.4 5.4 5.4Level of Service D C D B B C A AApproach Delay (s) 35.7 34.8 15.6 5.4Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 52 418 119 940 125 51 488v/c Ratio 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.54 0.25 0.11 0.58Control Delay 10.0 7.9 6.3 7.1 26.6 8.0 30.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.0 7.9 6.3 7.1 26.6 8.0 30.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 59 14 50 60 0 136Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 71 23 59 108 27 192Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 245 1871 473 1745 491 461 844Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.54 0.25 0.11 0.58

Intersection Summary

Page 42: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 49 344 49 105 646 181 33 81 46 235 167 42Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1659 3204 1578 2961 1770 1354 3221Flt Permitted 0.24 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 421 3204 814 2961 1430 1354 2438Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Adj. Flow (vph) 52 366 52 119 734 206 36 89 51 258 184 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 24 0 0 0 35 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 52 408 0 119 916 0 0 125 16 0 481 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 56 56 64 21 34 34 21Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 36.0 33.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 245 1861 473 1720 490 426 836v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.31v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.15 0.09 0.01 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.53 0.26 0.04 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 10.6 10.8 13.3 24.8 25.0 28.2Progression Factor 0.72 0.76 0.47 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.2 2.9Delay (s) 9.4 8.3 6.1 7.4 26.1 25.1 31.1Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.4 7.3 25.8 31.1Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 47 626 223 1134 381 157 501v/c Ratio 0.29 0.23 0.55 0.59 0.45 0.25 0.55Control Delay 11.0 5.4 21.2 16.7 27.7 4.8 27.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 11.0 5.4 21.2 19.9 27.7 4.8 27.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 34 90 248 101 0 131Queue Length 95th (ft) m26 49 170 311 146 42 171Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 160 2739 402 1921 842 621 915Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 662 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.23 0.55 0.90 0.45 0.25 0.55

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 43: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 41 514 37 205 856 188 85 270 146 95 252 79Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1586 4861 1766 3419 3355 1438 3378Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.72Satd. Flow (perm) 285 4861 716 3419 2326 1438 2475Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.85Adj. Flow (vph) 47 584 42 223 930 204 91 290 157 112 296 93RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 19 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 618 0 223 1134 0 0 381 57 0 482 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 31 5 5 31 25 47 47 25Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.5 35.5 35.5Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 160 2731 402 1921 842 520 896v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.31 0.16 0.04 c0.19v/c Ratio 0.29 0.23 0.55 0.59 0.45 0.11 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 12.1 11.5 14.6 15.1 25.6 22.3 26.6Progression Factor 0.49 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 0.2 5.4 1.3 1.8 0.4 2.3Delay (s) 10.3 5.5 20.1 16.4 27.3 22.7 28.9Level of Service B A C B C C CApproach Delay (s) 5.8 17.0 26.0 28.9Approach LOS A B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.0% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 836 41 462 251 539 532v/c Ratio 0.37 0.06 0.14 0.65 0.80 0.76Control Delay 25.0 5.3 0.1 41.6 17.2 14.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0Total Delay 25.0 5.3 0.4 41.6 17.5 14.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 101 1 0 148 50 44Queue Length 95th (ft) 128 m5 m0 222 209 144Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 470Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2234 784 3307 464 713 754Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2169 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 231 0 0 0 15 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.05 0.41 0.54 0.77 0.71

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 44: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 619 183 39 434 0 0 0 0 240 0 897Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6769 1752 4867 1698 1418 1566Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6769 1752 4867 1698 1418 1566Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.86Adj. Flow (vph) 0 645 191 41 462 0 0 0 0 279 0 1043RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 349 349Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 791 0 41 462 0 0 0 0 251 190 183Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 13 13Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 29.1 30.7 64.8 20.2 20.2 20.2Effective Green, g (s) 30.1 31.7 65.8 21.2 21.2 21.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.33 0.69 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2145 585 3371 379 316 349v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.02 c0.09v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.13 0.12v/c Ratio 0.37 0.07 0.14 0.66 0.60 0.52Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 21.6 5.0 33.6 33.1 32.5Progression Factor 1.00 0.25 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.2 0.7Delay (s) 25.1 5.4 0.0 37.0 35.3 33.1Level of Service C A A D D CApproach Delay (s) 25.1 0.5 0.0 34.8Approach LOS C A A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 25.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 652 243 154 635 386 45v/c Ratio 0.46 0.07 0.13 0.94 0.87 0.10Control Delay 9.1 1.0 33.0 31.9 55.8 9.6Queue Delay 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.9 1.0 33.0 31.9 55.8 9.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 144 2 23 75 235 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 191 m3 39 #325 #355 24Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 322Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1542 3467 1272 687 495 497Starvation Cap Reductn 544 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.07 0.12 0.92 0.78 0.09

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 45: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Existing 2010 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 626 233 0 0 145 597 328 0 38 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1341 1814 1702Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1341 1814 1702Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00Adj. Flow (vph) 652 243 0 0 154 635 386 0 45 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 419 0 0 34 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 652 243 0 0 154 216 386 0 11 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48 3 3Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 41.1 63.2 17.1 17.1 21.8 21.8Effective Green, g (s) 42.1 64.2 18.1 18.1 22.8 22.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.68 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1456 3289 1168 255 435 408v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 0.05 0.03v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 c0.21 0.01v/c Ratio 0.45 0.07 0.13 0.85 0.89 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 18.4 5.3 31.9 37.1 34.9 27.6Progression Factor 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 21.1 18.7 0.0Delay (s) 7.8 0.9 31.9 58.2 53.5 27.6Level of Service A A C E D CApproach Delay (s) 5.9 53.1 50.8 0.0Approach LOS A D D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 32.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 46: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   D‐2

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX D ‐ 

FUTURE CONDITION (2015) WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT 

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 

 

Page 47: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 48 471 52 658 76 430 74 541 1093 332v/c Ratio 0.22 0.51 0.22 0.62 0.40 0.24 0.12 0.75 0.41 0.33Control Delay 26.5 34.5 21.2 26.6 51.4 17.7 1.7 18.9 18.8 7.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.5 34.5 21.2 26.6 51.4 17.7 1.7 18.9 18.8 7.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 92 24 90 53 36 0 179 171 31Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 112 52 143 103 57 5 345 258 109Internal Link Dist (ft) 590 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 271 1381 244 1342 219 1760 633 807 2652 1010Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.34 0.21 0.49 0.35 0.24 0.12 0.67 0.41 0.33

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 341 92 48 261 344 70 396 68 498 1006 305Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4833 1691 4652 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 379 4833 641 4652 1770 5085 1689 734 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 371 100 52 284 374 76 430 74 541 1093 332RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 52 0 0 249 0 0 0 49 0 0 132Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 419 0 52 409 0 76 430 25 541 1093 200Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 60Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 21.6 16.0 20.0 15.2 7.2 31.9 31.9 63.2 49.0 49.0Effective Green, g (s) 27.6 19.0 26.0 18.2 10.2 34.9 34.9 66.2 52.0 49.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.18 0.25 0.17 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.63 0.50 0.47Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 209 875 237 806 172 1690 561 717 2518 837v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.09 0.04 0.08 c0.20 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.01 c0.28 0.11v/c Ratio 0.23 0.48 0.22 0.51 0.44 0.25 0.04 0.75 0.43 0.24Uniform Delay, d1 29.9 38.6 30.8 39.3 44.7 25.6 23.7 11.0 17.0 16.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.15 1.04 0.59 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.1 4.0 0.5 0.7Delay (s) 30.1 39.0 24.3 45.7 47.3 15.5 3.5 15.1 17.6 17.5Level of Service C D C D D B A B B BApproach Delay (s) 38.1 44.1 18.2 16.9Approach LOS D D B B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 25.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 48: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 43 688 229 727 78 90 68 261v/c Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.19 0.35 0.39 0.14 0.26 0.33Control Delay 6.1 5.8 2.3 14.9 37.9 15.9 33.1 20.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 6.1 5.8 2.3 14.9 37.9 15.9 33.1 20.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 19 0 86 49 13 41 50Queue Length 95th (ft) m22 136 43 m132 77 28 66 69Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 578 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 548 2533 1236 2060 328 1023 436 1247Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.19 0.35 0.24 0.09 0.16 0.21

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 40 633 211 116 534 19 72 41 41 63 146 94Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3539 1636 5017 1770 2897 1736 3443Flt Permitted 0.32 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.51 1.00 0.70 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 570 3539 1636 3713 956 2897 1271 3443Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 43 688 229 126 580 21 78 45 45 68 159 102RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 65 0 2 0 0 36 0 0 81 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 688 164 0 725 0 78 54 0 68 180 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 22 22Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 72.6 72.6 72.6 55.6 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9Effective Green, g (s) 75.6 75.1 75.1 58.1 21.9 21.9 21.9 21.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.55 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 552 2531 1170 2055 199 604 265 718v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.19 0.02 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.10 c0.20 c0.08 0.05v/c Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.14 0.35 0.39 0.09 0.26 0.25Uniform Delay, d1 4.6 5.3 4.7 13.0 35.8 33.5 34.7 34.7Progression Factor 0.80 0.81 1.54 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.3 0.1 0.5 0.2Delay (s) 3.9 4.5 7.5 12.9 37.1 33.6 35.3 34.9Level of Service A A A B D C D CApproach Delay (s) 5.2 12.9 35.2 35.0Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.35Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 49: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 554 415 135 182 484 217v/c Ratio 0.36 0.32 0.92 0.30 0.84 0.40Control Delay 9.8 27.0 89.8 22.8 44.5 17.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.8 27.0 89.8 22.8 44.5 17.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 118 74 83 78 285 64Queue Length 95th (ft) 54 104 #204 132 #457 128Internal Link Dist (ft) 578 433 592 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1520 1314 153 641 600 561Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.32 0.88 0.28 0.81 0.39

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 201 284 25 47 295 40 124 143 25 41 404 200Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3746 4916 1577 1625 1602 1317Flt Permitted 0.65 0.82 0.24 1.00 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2492 4053 394 1625 1537 1317Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 218 309 27 51 321 43 135 155 27 45 439 217RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 13 0 0 6 0 0 0 48Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 551 0 0 402 0 135 176 0 0 484 169Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 39 27 27 39 29 49 49 29Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.7 31.2 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3Effective Green, g (s) 53.7 33.7 39.3 39.3 39.3 39.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.32 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1513 1301 147 608 575 493v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.11v/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.10 c0.34 0.31 0.13v/c Ratio 0.36 0.31 0.92 0.29 0.84 0.34Uniform Delay, d1 15.4 26.9 31.3 23.0 30.0 23.6Progression Factor 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.6 50.6 0.4 11.2 0.6Delay (s) 11.7 27.5 81.9 23.4 41.2 24.2Level of Service B C F C D CApproach Delay (s) 11.7 27.5 48.3 35.9Approach LOS B C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.4 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.9% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 50: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 257 551 189 197 136 179v/c Ratio 0.39 0.60 0.40 0.21 0.18 0.15Control Delay 12.6 4.7 13.6 9.8 2.3 13.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.6 4.7 13.6 9.8 2.3 13.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 13 51 46 0 23Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 69 100 81 23 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 286 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 654 919 471 956 766 1191Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.60 0.40 0.21 0.18 0.15

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 161 75 507 174 181 125 0 0 0 14 107 44Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 1268 1419 1739 1281 3314Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1190 1268 856 1739 1281 3314Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 175 82 551 189 197 136 0 0 0 15 116 48RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 221 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 31 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 257 330 189 197 75 0 0 0 0 148 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84 46 42 42 46Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 655 697 471 956 705 1160v/s Ratio Prot 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 c0.26 0.22 0.06 0.04v/c Ratio 0.39 0.47 0.40 0.21 0.11 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.3 10.9 10.4 9.1 8.6 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 2.3 2.5 0.5 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 12.1 13.2 12.9 9.6 8.9 17.9Level of Service B B B A A BApproach Delay (s) 12.9 10.6 0.0 17.9Approach LOS B B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.7 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 51: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 27 384 5 0 50 170 11 17 14 372 0 48Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 29 417 5 0 54 185 12 18 15 404 0 52Pedestrians 32 2 77 71Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 0 6 7Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 310 500 667 866 290 512 776 223vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 310 500 667 866 290 512 776 223tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 95 92 98 0 100 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1155 998 258 246 663 336 278 704

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 238 214 27 212 46 404 52Volume Left 29 0 0 0 12 404 0Volume Right 0 5 0 185 15 0 52cSH 1155 1700 998 1700 316 336 704Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.12 0.14 1.20 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 12 433 6Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.3 150.7 10.5Lane LOS A C F BApproach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 18.3 134.7Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 52.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th St Connection & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 170 64 72 349 120 125 408v/c Ratio 0.46 0.23 0.19 0.32 0.10 0.22 0.38Control Delay 8.6 19.9 11.6 8.7 2.3 9.2 9.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.6 19.9 11.6 8.7 2.3 9.2 9.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 24 13 48 0 16 58Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 42 35 145 22 62 176Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 596 187 592Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 601 430 606 1089 1154 557 1067Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.15 0.12 0.32 0.10 0.22 0.38

Intersection Summary

Page 52: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th St Connection & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 131 15 59 32 34 12 309 110 115 371 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1739 1631 1664 1733 1740 1575 1671Flt Permitted 0.98 0.65 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.53 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1703 1121 1664 1707 1740 872 1671Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 142 16 64 35 37 13 336 120 125 403 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 29 0 0 0 43 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 164 0 64 43 0 0 349 77 125 408 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 100 100 59 53 22 22 53Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 14.8 14.8 42.2 42.2 42.2 42.2Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 17.3 14.8 44.7 44.7 44.7 44.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 360 277 352 1090 1111 557 1067v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.24v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.06 0.20 0.04 0.14v/c Ratio 0.45 0.23 0.12 0.32 0.07 0.22 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 24.1 21.0 22.3 5.7 4.8 5.3 6.0Progression Factor 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.9 1.0Delay (s) 5.6 21.2 22.4 6.5 4.9 6.3 7.1Level of Service A C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 5.6 21.8 6.1 6.9Approach LOS A C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.40Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 197 75 293 194v/c Ratio 0.51 0.23 0.24 0.16Control Delay 26.8 20.5 6.7 5.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.8 20.5 6.7 5.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 76 24 36 17Queue Length 95th (ft) 113 50 101 56Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 644 1055 464Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 610 521 1246 1182Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.14 0.24 0.16

Intersection Summary

Page 53: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 29 129 23 9 43 17 30 237 2 8 117 53Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2037 1693 1960 1786Flt Permitted 0.93 0.95 0.96 0.99Satd. Flow (perm) 1916 1620 1887 1764Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 32 140 25 10 47 18 33 258 2 9 127 58RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 16 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 188 0 0 61 0 0 293 0 0 178 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 43 58 58Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 13.8 13.8 43.7 43.7Effective Green, g (s) 13.8 13.8 46.2 46.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 378 319 1245 1164v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04 c0.16 0.10v/c Ratio 0.50 0.19 0.24 0.15Uniform Delay, d1 25.0 23.4 4.8 4.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.3Delay (s) 25.4 26.8 5.2 4.8Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 25.4 26.8 5.2 4.8Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 69 10 104 25 497 40 288 981v/c Ratio 0.20 0.04 0.29 0.06 0.18 0.05 0.41 0.31Control Delay 17.4 26.9 7.8 9.4 15.5 8.4 8.9 3.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 17.4 26.9 7.8 9.4 15.5 8.4 8.9 3.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 5 1 7 83 0 27 30Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 18 40 19 112 18 90 36Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 495 369 486 526 2794 813 717 3143Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.03 0.21 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.40 0.31

Intersection Summary

Page 54: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 30 1 32 9 1 95 23 457 37 265 857 45Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1584 1361 1823 4916 1400 1892 4862Flt Permitted 0.83 0.73 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1547 1213 1361 531 4916 1400 844 4862Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 33 1 35 10 1 103 25 497 40 288 932 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 82 0 0 0 17 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 41 0 10 22 0 25 497 23 288 977 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 63 42 42 63 31 91 91 31Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 60.4 57.2 57.2 71.0 62.5Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 21.8 21.8 66.4 59.7 59.7 75.7 65.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.72 0.62Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 321 252 283 412 2795 796 723 3010v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 0.10 c0.04 0.20v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.02 c0.24v/c Ratio 0.13 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.18 0.03 0.40 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 33.2 33.5 7.2 10.9 9.9 5.0 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.17 1.69 1.07 0.28Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 33.9 33.3 33.6 9.1 12.8 16.9 5.5 3.0Level of Service C C C A B B A AApproach Delay (s) 33.9 33.5 13.0 3.5Approach LOS C C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.9 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 21 499 50 650 105 103 174v/c Ratio 0.05 0.25 0.11 0.34 0.21 0.23 0.23Control Delay 7.9 9.1 6.3 3.5 28.5 7.2 27.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.9 9.1 6.3 3.5 28.5 7.2 27.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 58 9 29 52 0 44Queue Length 95th (ft) m10 80 19 41 96 40 73Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 403 2032 467 1886 504 444 755Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.25 0.11 0.34 0.21 0.23 0.23

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 55: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 19 444 15 46 369 229 20 76 95 93 59 8Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1667 3279 1597 2898 1778 1336 3210Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.75Satd. Flow (perm) 651 3279 754 2898 1653 1336 2466Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 21 483 16 50 401 249 22 83 103 101 64 9RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 92 0 0 0 75 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 497 0 50 558 0 0 105 28 0 171 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 47 29 12 46 46 12Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 32.0 29.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.30Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 403 2030 467 1794 504 369 752v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.07 0.06 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.05 0.24 0.11 0.31 0.21 0.08 0.23Uniform Delay, d1 7.9 9.0 8.2 9.4 27.1 28.1 27.3Progression Factor 0.95 0.99 0.69 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.7Delay (s) 7.7 9.1 6.1 5.3 28.0 28.5 28.0Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 9.1 5.4 28.3 28.0Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.28Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 45 640 74 746 310 121 505v/c Ratio 0.19 0.27 0.22 0.45 0.29 0.17 0.45Control Delay 12.8 9.7 17.9 18.9 20.0 3.9 21.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.8 9.7 17.9 19.8 20.0 3.9 21.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 43 28 167 68 0 118Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 75 59 217 102 32 165Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 233 2354 330 1643 1055 712 1122Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 570 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.27 0.22 0.70 0.29 0.17 0.45

Intersection Summary

Page 56: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 41 509 80 68 522 165 78 207 111 137 284 43Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1582 4803 1765 3383 3356 1469 3435Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.73Satd. Flow (perm) 480 4803 680 3383 2408 1469 2545Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 45 553 87 74 567 179 85 225 121 149 309 47RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 620 0 74 746 0 0 310 53 0 498 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 8 8 25 6 25 25 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 43.5 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 233 2333 330 1643 1055 644 1115v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.04 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.19 0.27 0.22 0.45 0.29 0.08 0.45Uniform Delay, d1 15.3 15.9 15.6 17.8 19.0 17.2 20.6Progression Factor 0.67 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.3 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.3 1.3Delay (s) 12.1 10.3 17.2 18.7 19.7 17.4 21.9Level of Service B B B B B B CApproach Delay (s) 10.4 18.6 19.1 21.9Approach LOS B B B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1095 12 253 336 323 307v/c Ratio 0.44 0.02 0.09 0.69 0.68 0.45Control Delay 21.4 1.7 0.2 35.0 31.1 5.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 21.4 1.7 0.2 35.0 31.1 5.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 97 0 0 153 131 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 169 m1 0 #312 #280 64Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2472 742 2969 545 523 718Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 33 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.02 0.09 0.62 0.62 0.43

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 57: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 881 126 11 233 0 0 0 0 461 0 428Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6964 1752 4867 1698 1532 1589Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6964 1752 4867 1698 1532 1589Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 958 137 12 253 0 0 0 0 501 0 465RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 223Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1074 0 12 253 0 0 0 0 336 290 84Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 37 5 5Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 19.4 51.4 21.7 21.7 21.7Effective Green, g (s) 28.0 20.4 52.4 22.7 22.7 22.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.25 0.63 0.27 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2346 430 3069 464 418 434v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.01 c0.05v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 0.19 0.05v/c Ratio 0.46 0.03 0.08 0.72 0.69 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 21.6 23.8 6.0 27.4 27.1 23.2Progression Factor 1.00 0.09 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.0 0.1Delay (s) 21.6 2.1 0.1 32.1 31.1 23.3Level of Service C A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 21.6 0.2 0.0 28.9Approach LOS C A A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.2 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.9% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 659 800 68 217 197 135v/c Ratio 0.39 0.23 0.07 0.53 0.60 0.33Control Delay 6.7 1.0 31.5 10.4 39.2 8.0Queue Delay 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.5 1.1 31.5 10.4 39.2 8.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 103 4 9 0 94 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 16 20 61 168 45Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 286Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1777 3659 1497 520 582 632Starvation Cap Reductn 755 1682 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 0.40 0.05 0.42 0.34 0.21

Intersection Summary

Page 58: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Gorove/Slade Associates

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 606 736 0 0 63 200 181 0 124 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1466 1814 1688Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1466 1814 1688Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 659 800 0 0 68 217 197 0 135 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 185 0 0 112 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 659 800 0 0 68 32 197 0 23 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 11 9 9Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 43.7 59.9 11.2 11.2 13.2 13.2Effective Green, g (s) 44.7 60.9 12.2 12.2 14.2 14.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.73 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1767 3567 900 215 310 288v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 c0.16 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.11 0.01v/c Ratio 0.37 0.22 0.08 0.15 0.64 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 11.1 3.5 30.6 30.9 32.0 29.0Progression Factor 0.49 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.1 0.0Delay (s) 5.5 0.7 30.6 31.0 35.2 29.0Level of Service A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 2.9 30.9 32.7 0.0Approach LOS A C C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.40Actuated Cycle Length (s) 83.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 59: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 360 689 66 1061 229 888 272 214 943 266v/c Ratio 0.92 0.36 0.20 0.78 0.85 0.69 0.43 0.69 0.77 0.50Control Delay 58.4 19.5 12.0 26.3 82.1 25.0 2.8 33.9 42.3 14.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 58.4 19.5 12.0 26.3 82.1 25.0 2.8 33.9 42.3 14.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 187 96 11 214 162 95 0 94 221 42Queue Length 95th (ft) #363 134 m21 243 #293 132 2 165 272 120Internal Link Dist (ft) 610 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 391 1940 392 1418 270 1293 632 334 1229 533Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.36 0.17 0.75 0.85 0.69 0.43 0.64 0.77 0.50

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 331 427 207 61 624 352 211 817 250 197 868 245Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4836 1711 4784 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 217 4836 681 4784 1770 5085 1689 300 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 360 464 225 66 678 383 229 888 272 214 943 266RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 79 0 0 97 0 0 0 206 0 0 154Lane Group Flow (vph) 360 610 0 66 964 0 229 888 66 214 943 112Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 50.1 37.4 31.9 26.2 12.9 22.3 22.3 32.6 21.0 21.0Effective Green, g (s) 53.1 40.4 37.9 29.2 15.9 25.3 25.3 38.6 24.0 21.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.38 0.36 0.28 0.15 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.23 0.20Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 393 1861 331 1330 268 1225 407 306 1162 359v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.13 0.02 0.20 c0.13 0.17 0.10 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0.06 0.04 0.16 0.06v/c Ratio 0.92 0.33 0.20 0.73 0.85 0.72 0.16 0.70 0.81 0.31Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 22.7 22.3 34.3 43.4 36.6 31.5 25.1 38.4 35.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.73 1.26 0.61 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 25.1 0.1 0.1 1.7 21.3 3.7 0.8 5.5 6.2 2.3Delay (s) 53.9 22.8 16.6 26.6 76.2 26.0 6.2 30.6 44.6 38.1Level of Service D C B C E C A C D DApproach Delay (s) 33.5 26.0 30.4 41.3Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.2 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 60: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 162 687 125 1295 155 288 30 241v/c Ratio 0.45 0.28 0.11 0.59 0.65 0.37 0.14 0.27Control Delay 16.3 5.6 0.9 10.7 47.9 16.9 29.9 13.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 16.3 5.6 0.9 10.7 47.9 16.9 29.9 13.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 71 1 85 95 43 16 29Queue Length 95th (ft) m106 117 m12 m100 145 68 36 53Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 578 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 357 2446 1169 2192 351 1094 314 1229Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.28 0.11 0.59 0.44 0.26 0.10 0.20

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 149 632 115 76 858 257 143 137 128 28 96 126Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3539 1636 4891 1768 2922 1757 3321Flt Permitted 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.55 1.00 0.49 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 256 3539 1636 4067 1024 2922 916 3321Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 162 687 125 83 933 279 155 149 139 30 104 137RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 39 0 38 0 0 107 0 0 105 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 162 687 86 0 1257 0 155 181 0 30 136 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 11 11 1Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 70.1 70.1 70.1 53.1 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.4Effective Green, g (s) 73.1 72.6 72.6 55.6 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.53 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 358 2447 1131 2154 238 679 213 772v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.19 0.06 0.04v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.05 c0.31 c0.15 0.03v/c Ratio 0.45 0.28 0.08 0.58 0.65 0.27 0.14 0.18Uniform Delay, d1 8.0 6.2 5.3 16.8 36.5 33.0 32.0 32.3Progression Factor 1.77 0.73 0.47 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.8 0.3 0.1 0.6 6.2 0.2 0.3 0.1Delay (s) 18.0 4.8 2.6 10.5 42.7 33.2 32.3 32.4Level of Service B A A B D C C CApproach Delay (s) 6.7 10.5 36.5 32.4Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 61: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 852 1249 318 354 142 172v/c Ratio 0.90dl 0.90 0.91 0.63 0.27 0.31Control Delay 12.7 41.8 64.6 35.2 26.8 5.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.7 41.8 64.6 35.2 26.8 5.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 141 278 200 196 68 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 132 #369 #368 296 118 45Internal Link Dist (ft) 578 433 592 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1576 1395 358 573 548 572Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.90 0.89 0.62 0.26 0.30

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 467 123 193 29 816 304 293 319 6 4 127 158Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3599 4784 1576 1670 1612 1339Flt Permitted 0.59 0.89 0.63 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2205 4266 1044 1670 1597 1339Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 508 134 210 32 887 330 318 347 7 4 138 172RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 30 0 0 61 0 0 1 0 0 0 114Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 822 0 0 1188 0 318 353 0 0 142 58Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 21 21 29 13 23 23 13Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 52.8 30.3 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2Effective Green, g (s) 57.8 32.8 35.2 35.2 35.2 35.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.31 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1546 1333 350 560 535 449v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 c0.28 c0.30 0.09 0.04v/c Ratio 0.90dl 0.89 0.91 0.63 0.27 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 15.0 34.4 33.4 29.4 25.5 24.2Progression Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 9.3 26.7 2.6 0.4 0.2Delay (s) 16.9 43.7 60.0 32.0 25.8 24.4Level of Service B D E C C CApproach Delay (s) 16.9 43.7 45.3 25.1Approach LOS B D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 34.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.5% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 62: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 87 229 135 657 262 237v/c Ratio 0.17 0.27 0.22 0.64 0.31 0.20Control Delay 10.0 2.2 10.3 16.1 2.3 8.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.0 2.2 10.3 16.1 2.3 8.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 0 32 212 0 16Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 29 62 323 31 41Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 281 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 514 842 627 1025 853 1193Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.27 0.22 0.64 0.31 0.20

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 22 211 124 604 241 0 0 0 2 87 129Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1343 1545 1863 1336 3149Flt Permitted 0.51 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 934 1343 1140 1863 1336 3149Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 63 24 229 135 657 262 0 0 0 2 95 140RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 103 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 91 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 87 126 135 657 144 0 0 0 0 146 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 137 137 80 29 13 13 29Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 514 739 627 1025 735 1102v/s Ratio Prot c0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.05v/c Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.22 0.64 0.20 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 8.9 8.9 9.2 12.5 9.1 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.5 0.8 3.1 0.6 0.2Delay (s) 9.6 9.4 10.0 15.6 9.7 18.0Level of Service A A A B A BApproach Delay (s) 9.5 13.4 0.0 18.0Approach LOS A B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 63: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 16 145 20 3 152 553 3 6 7 159 9 32Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 158 22 3 165 601 3 7 8 173 10 35Pedestrians 35 9 91 75Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 1 8 6Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 841 270 458 1142 190 681 852 493vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 841 270 458 1142 190 681 852 493tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 100 99 96 99 35 96 93cM capacity (veh/h) 741 1192 345 168 752 265 249 475

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 96 101 86 684 17 183 35Volume Left 17 0 3 0 3 173 0Volume Right 0 22 0 601 8 0 35cSH 741 1700 1192 1700 298 264 475Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.40 0.06 0.69 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 5 116 6Control Delay (s) 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 17.8 44.4 13.2Lane LOS A A C E BApproach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 17.8 39.4Approach LOS C E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 7.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 133 108 145 444 70 39 349v/c Ratio 0.36 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.07 0.07 0.29Control Delay 28.6 22.0 13.0 9.1 2.8 8.1 8.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 28.6 22.0 13.0 9.1 2.8 8.1 8.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 42 28 62 0 4 44Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 64 58 189 17 23 139Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 596 187 592Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 619 512 638 1167 974 536 1190Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.38 0.07 0.07 0.29

Intersection Summary

Page 64: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 97 15 99 66 67 21 387 64 36 308 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1728 1688 1855 1473 1718 1846Flt Permitted 0.96 0.73 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.46 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1748 1327 1688 1812 1473 830 1846Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 105 16 108 72 73 23 421 70 39 335 14RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 58 0 0 0 25 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 124 0 108 87 0 0 444 45 39 348 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 20 20 32 40 70 70 40Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 42.6 42.6 42.6 42.6Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 16.9 14.4 45.1 45.1 45.1 45.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 360 320 347 1167 949 535 1189v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.19v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.08 c0.24 0.03 0.05v/c Ratio 0.35 0.34 0.25 0.38 0.05 0.07 0.29Uniform Delay, d1 23.8 21.9 23.3 5.9 4.6 4.6 5.5Progression Factor 1.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.3 0.6Delay (s) 32.4 22.2 23.4 6.8 4.7 4.9 6.1Level of Service C C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 32.4 22.9 6.5 6.0Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 239 117 267 435v/c Ratio 0.60 0.33 0.23 0.36Control Delay 27.0 18.5 6.8 7.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.0 18.5 6.8 7.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 29 36 63Queue Length 95th (ft) 129 47 93 156Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 644 1055 464Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 591 536 1175 1207Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.22 0.23 0.36

Intersection Summary

Page 65: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 55 99 65 11 77 19 35 206 5 22 340 38Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.98 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1992 1735 1962 1885Flt Permitted 0.90 0.96 0.91 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1809 1671 1802 1846Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 60 108 71 12 84 21 38 224 5 24 370 41RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 214 0 0 104 0 0 266 0 0 431 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 13 27 27Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 43.1 43.1Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 14.4 45.6 45.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.65 0.65Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 372 344 1174 1203v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.06 0.15 c0.23v/c Ratio 0.57 0.30 0.23 0.36Uniform Delay, d1 25.0 23.5 5.0 5.5Progression Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.2 0.4 0.8Delay (s) 26.4 20.8 5.4 6.4Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 26.4 20.8 5.4 6.4Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 201 26 195 90 792 78 186 1016v/c Ratio 0.66 0.15 0.44 0.21 0.29 0.10 0.35 0.35Control Delay 31.3 30.4 8.2 12.3 19.9 9.8 14.9 6.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 31.3 30.4 8.2 12.3 19.9 9.8 14.9 6.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 67 13 4 29 156 0 45 58Queue Length 95th (ft) 143 35 57 m52 190 m29 m91 98Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 389 245 538 492 2759 759 570 2880Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.11 0.36 0.18 0.29 0.10 0.33 0.35

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 66: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 64 6 114 24 7 172 83 729 72 171 824 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1646 1472 1339 1825 4916 1291 1914 4796Flt Permitted 0.65 0.52 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1095 806 1339 476 4916 1291 604 4796Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 70 7 124 26 8 187 90 792 78 186 896 120RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 0 0 146 0 0 0 34 0 12 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 139 0 26 49 0 90 792 44 186 1004 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 158 158 84 23 130 130 23Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 20.2 20.2 20.2 61.8 56.4 56.4 66.8 58.9Effective Green, g (s) 23.2 23.2 23.2 67.8 58.9 58.9 72.8 61.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.65 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.58Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 242 178 296 415 2758 724 555 2805v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.02 0.16 c0.03 c0.21v/s Ratio Perm c0.13 0.03 0.12 0.03 0.20v/c Ratio 0.58 0.15 0.17 0.22 0.29 0.06 0.34 0.36Uniform Delay, d1 36.5 32.9 33.1 7.1 12.1 10.5 5.8 11.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.41 2.56 2.01 0.49Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 38.6 33.1 33.2 11.4 17.2 27.0 11.8 5.9Level of Service D C C B B C B AApproach Delay (s) 38.6 33.2 17.5 6.8Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.8% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 60 448 120 961 138 52 477v/c Ratio 0.25 0.24 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.11 0.56Control Delay 10.5 7.5 6.9 7.6 27.0 8.8 30.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.5 7.5 6.9 7.6 27.0 8.8 30.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 64 16 57 67 1 132Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 66 m26 70 117 29 186Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 236 1873 457 1739 494 459 845Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.24 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.11 0.56

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 67: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 55 362 51 110 679 205 35 92 48 211 181 47Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 3205 1582 2948 1771 1354 3227Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 408 3205 785 2948 1442 1354 2439Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 60 393 55 120 738 223 38 100 52 229 197 51RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 27 0 0 0 34 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 60 438 0 120 934 0 0 138 18 0 468 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 56 56 64 21 34 34 21Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 36.0 33.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 237 1862 456 1713 494 426 836v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.01 c0.19v/c Ratio 0.25 0.23 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.04 0.56Uniform Delay, d1 10.8 10.7 10.9 13.5 25.1 25.0 28.1Progression Factor 0.68 0.71 0.51 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.3 1.1 1.0 1.4 0.2 2.7Delay (s) 9.8 7.9 6.7 8.0 26.5 25.2 30.8Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.1 7.8 26.1 30.8Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 48 589 234 1201 449 166 504v/c Ratio 0.34 0.22 0.56 0.63 0.58 0.27 0.57Control Delay 13.7 5.3 21.0 17.4 30.7 4.8 28.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.7 5.3 21.0 22.3 30.7 4.8 28.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 32 95 271 126 0 133Queue Length 95th (ft) m35 51 176 339 181 43 188Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 142 2727 421 1918 775 626 881Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 639 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.22 0.56 0.94 0.58 0.27 0.57

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 68: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 485 57 215 896 209 119 294 153 101 278 85Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1587 4830 1766 3413 3346 1438 3384Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.70Satd. Flow (perm) 253 4830 749 3413 2143 1438 2379Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 527 62 234 974 227 129 320 166 110 302 92RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 19 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 575 0 234 1201 0 0 449 60 0 485 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 31 5 5 31 25 47 47 25Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.5 35.5 35.5Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 2714 421 1918 776 520 861v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.31 c0.21 0.04 0.20v/c Ratio 0.34 0.21 0.56 0.63 0.58 0.12 0.56Uniform Delay, d1 12.4 11.4 14.7 15.5 27.0 22.3 26.9Progression Factor 0.52 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 6.1 0.2 5.2 1.6 3.1 0.5 2.7Delay (s) 12.6 5.5 19.9 17.1 30.2 22.8 29.5Level of Service B A B B C C CApproach Delay (s) 6.1 17.6 28.2 29.5Approach LOS A B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 19.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 858 45 499 247 531 525v/c Ratio 0.37 0.07 0.15 0.64 0.83 0.78Control Delay 25.4 6.1 0.1 41.8 20.4 16.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0Total Delay 25.5 6.1 0.4 41.8 20.7 16.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 107 2 0 146 65 58Queue Length 95th (ft) 134 m7 m0 232 #272 197Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 373Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2324 772 3338 455 685 725Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2114 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 256 0 0 0 15 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.06 0.41 0.54 0.79 0.72

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 69: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 654 135 41 459 0 0 0 0 252 0 947Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6879 1752 4867 1698 1418 1566Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6879 1752 4867 1698 1418 1566Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 711 147 45 499 0 0 0 0 274 0 1029RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 325 325Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 827 0 45 499 0 0 0 0 247 206 200Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 13 13Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 30.4 30.6 66.0 20.2 20.2 20.2Effective Green, g (s) 31.4 31.6 67.0 21.2 21.2 21.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.70 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2245 576 3390 374 312 345v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.03 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.15 0.13v/c Ratio 0.37 0.08 0.15 0.66 0.66 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 24.8 22.3 4.9 34.2 34.2 33.5Progression Factor 1.00 0.29 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.8 1.5Delay (s) 24.8 6.5 0.0 37.6 38.0 35.0Level of Service C A A D D CApproach Delay (s) 24.8 0.6 0.0 36.7Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 25.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36Actuated Cycle Length (s) 96.2 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.7% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 718 266 165 682 378 43v/c Ratio 0.51 0.08 0.13 1.02 0.87 0.10Control Delay 10.0 0.8 32.8 52.3 56.0 9.7Queue Delay 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 11.2 0.8 32.8 52.3 56.0 9.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 168 1 25 ~190 228 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 219 m3 41 #413 #382 27Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 322Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1515 3487 1248 669 486 487Starvation Cap Reductn 537 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.08 0.13 1.02 0.78 0.09

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 70: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 1 Future Background 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 661 245 0 0 152 627 348 0 40 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1339 1814 1702Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1339 1814 1702Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 718 266 0 0 165 682 378 0 43 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 400 0 0 33 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 718 266 0 0 165 282 378 0 10 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48 3 3Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 41.4 64.6 18.2 18.2 21.6 21.6Effective Green, g (s) 42.4 65.6 19.2 19.2 22.6 22.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.68 0.20 0.20 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1448 3319 1224 267 426 400v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 0.05 0.03v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 c0.21 0.01v/c Ratio 0.50 0.08 0.13 1.06 0.89 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 19.3 5.1 31.7 38.5 35.6 28.3Progression Factor 0.44 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 70.4 19.0 0.0Delay (s) 8.6 0.7 31.7 108.9 54.6 28.3Level of Service A A C F D CApproach Delay (s) 6.4 93.9 51.9 0.0Approach LOS A F D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 47.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 96.2 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.2% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 71: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   E‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX E ‐ 

FUTURE CONDITION (2015) WITH INTERIM PHASE DEVELOPMENT 

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 

 

Page 72: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 48 496 52 698 76 430 74 665 1093 332v/c Ratio 0.22 0.52 0.22 0.64 0.40 0.31 0.14 0.86 0.42 0.33Control Delay 26.2 35.2 19.5 24.6 51.5 21.6 2.2 27.5 19.0 7.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.2 35.2 19.5 24.6 51.5 21.6 2.2 27.5 19.0 7.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 99 22 91 53 39 1 249 173 32Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 120 47 138 103 59 5 #562 258 109Internal Link Dist (ft) 590 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 271 1381 242 1356 219 1379 512 786 2630 1003Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.36 0.21 0.51 0.35 0.31 0.14 0.85 0.42 0.33

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 364 92 48 265 377 70 396 68 612 1006 305Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4846 1693 4637 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 369 4846 610 4637 1770 5085 1689 673 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 396 100 52 288 410 76 430 74 665 1093 332RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 47 0 0 266 0 0 0 55 0 0 133Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 449 0 52 432 0 76 430 19 665 1093 199Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 60Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 22.1 16.5 20.5 15.7 7.2 24.0 24.0 62.7 48.5 48.5Effective Green, g (s) 28.1 19.5 26.5 18.7 10.2 27.0 27.0 65.7 51.5 48.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.19 0.25 0.18 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.63 0.49 0.46Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 209 900 234 826 172 1308 434 764 2494 829v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.09 0.04 0.08 c0.29 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.01 c0.26 0.11v/c Ratio 0.23 0.50 0.22 0.52 0.44 0.33 0.04 0.87 0.44 0.24Uniform Delay, d1 29.6 38.4 30.4 39.1 44.7 31.6 29.3 13.1 17.4 17.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.07 1.05 0.63 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.2 10.3 0.6 0.7Delay (s) 29.8 38.8 22.2 42.3 47.4 20.6 5.5 23.4 17.9 17.8Level of Service C D C D D C A C B BApproach Delay (s) 38.0 40.9 22.2 19.6Approach LOS D D C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 73: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 43 742 324 737 112 95 84 320v/c Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.26 0.38 0.57 0.13 0.29 0.44Control Delay 5.8 6.1 2.4 16.0 44.8 16.4 32.7 25.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 5.8 6.1 2.4 16.0 44.8 16.4 32.7 25.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 69 0 95 69 15 48 74Queue Length 95th (ft) m18 m133 m48 m132 111 31 79 97Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 250 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 527 2454 1234 1951 292 1031 434 1054Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.26 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.19 0.30

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 40 683 298 116 541 21 103 48 40 77 201 94Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3539 1636 5016 1770 2924 1736 2921Flt Permitted 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.46 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 555 3539 1636 3670 853 2924 1265 2921Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 43 742 324 126 588 23 112 52 43 84 218 102RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 99 0 2 0 0 33 0 0 62 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 742 225 0 735 0 112 62 0 84 258 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 22 22Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 70.3 70.3 70.3 53.3 21.2 21.2 21.2 21.2Effective Green, g (s) 73.3 72.8 72.8 55.8 24.2 24.2 24.2 24.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.53 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 530 2454 1134 1950 197 674 292 673v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.21 0.02 0.09v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.14 c0.20 c0.13 0.07v/c Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.20 0.38 0.57 0.09 0.29 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 5.3 6.2 5.7 14.4 35.8 31.8 33.3 34.1Progression Factor 0.73 0.76 1.73 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 3.7 0.1 0.5 0.4Delay (s) 4.1 5.0 10.2 14.3 39.5 31.8 33.8 34.5Level of Service A A B B D C C CApproach Delay (s) 6.5 14.3 36.0 34.3Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 74: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 558 488 135 188 534 242v/c Ratio 0.39 0.43 1.02 0.29 0.89 0.43Control Delay 10.1 29.7 119.8 22.5 48.4 18.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.1 29.7 119.8 22.5 48.4 18.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 115 92 ~93 81 329 78Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 126 #219 136 #533 148Internal Link Dist (ft) 248 433 166 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1443 1127 132 640 603 561Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.43 1.02 0.29 0.89 0.43

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 204 284 25 97 313 40 124 148 25 41 450 223Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3751 4902 1579 1626 1603 1317Flt Permitted 0.62 0.74 0.20 1.00 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2370 3660 340 1626 1543 1317Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 222 309 27 105 340 43 135 161 27 45 489 242RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 11 0 0 5 0 0 0 46Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 554 0 0 477 0 135 183 0 0 534 196Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 39 27 27 39 29 49 49 29Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 29.5 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 32.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1437 1115 133 635 603 514v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 c0.13 c0.40 0.35 0.15v/c Ratio 0.39 0.43 1.02 0.29 0.89 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 16.5 29.2 32.0 22.0 29.8 22.9Progression Factor 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.2 82.1 0.3 14.9 0.6Delay (s) 12.3 30.4 114.1 22.3 44.7 23.6Level of Service B C F C D CApproach Delay (s) 12.3 30.4 60.7 38.1Approach LOS B C E D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.0% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 75: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 257 551 189 207 136 179v/c Ratio 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.22 0.18 0.15Control Delay 12.6 4.7 13.6 9.9 2.3 13.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.6 4.7 13.6 9.9 2.3 13.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 13 51 49 0 23Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 69 100 85 23 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 286 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 650 919 471 956 766 1191Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.22 0.18 0.15

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 161 75 507 174 190 125 0 0 0 14 107 44Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1669 1268 1419 1739 1281 3314Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1182 1268 856 1739 1281 3314Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 175 82 551 189 207 136 0 0 0 15 116 48RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 221 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 31 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 257 330 189 207 75 0 0 0 0 148 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84 46 42 42 46Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 650 697 471 956 705 1160v/s Ratio Prot 0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 c0.26 0.22 0.06 0.04v/c Ratio 0.40 0.47 0.40 0.22 0.11 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.4 10.9 10.4 9.2 8.6 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 2.3 2.5 0.5 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 12.1 13.2 12.9 9.7 8.9 17.9Level of Service B B B A A BApproach Delay (s) 12.9 10.7 0.0 17.9Approach LOS B B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.7 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 76: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 27 384 5 0 59 170 11 17 14 372 0 48Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 29 417 5 0 64 185 12 18 15 404 0 52Pedestrians 32 2 77 71Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 0 6 7Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 320 500 672 876 290 521 786 227vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 320 500 672 876 290 521 786 227tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 95 92 98 0 100 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1145 998 256 243 663 330 274 699

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 238 214 32 217 46 404 52Volume Left 29 0 0 0 12 404 0Volume Right 0 5 0 185 15 0 52cSH 1145 1700 998 1700 313 330 699Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.15 1.23 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 13 445 6Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 159.1 10.6Lane LOS A C F BApproach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 18.4 142.2Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 54.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 181 64 82 448 120 125 426v/c Ratio 0.49 0.24 0.21 0.43 0.10 0.26 0.40Control Delay 12.3 19.9 11.8 10.0 2.3 10.0 9.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.3 19.9 11.8 10.0 2.3 10.0 9.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 24 15 68 0 17 63Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 43 39 201 22 66 186Internal Link Dist (ft) 277 596 187 153Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 596 418 610 1052 1151 479 1063Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.15 0.13 0.43 0.10 0.26 0.40

Intersection Summary

Page 77: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 131 25 59 37 39 30 382 110 115 387 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1636 1665 1727 1740 1578 1672Flt Permitted 0.98 0.63 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.45 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1676 1089 1665 1654 1740 753 1672Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 142 27 64 40 42 33 415 120 125 421 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 33 0 0 0 44 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 170 0 64 49 0 0 448 76 125 426 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 100 100 59 53 22 22 53Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 17.5 15.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 359 272 357 1051 1106 479 1063v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.25v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.06 c0.27 0.04 0.17v/c Ratio 0.47 0.24 0.14 0.43 0.07 0.26 0.40Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 20.9 22.3 6.4 4.9 5.6 6.2Progression Factor 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 1.1Delay (s) 9.7 21.1 22.3 7.6 5.0 6.9 7.4Level of Service A C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 9.7 21.8 7.1 7.3Approach LOS A C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 202 80 304 201v/c Ratio 0.53 0.24 0.24 0.17Control Delay 27.2 17.3 6.7 5.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.2 17.3 6.7 5.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 23 38 18Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 45 105 59Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 286 1055 200Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 602 521 1241 1170Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.15 0.24 0.17

Intersection Summary

Page 78: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 34 129 23 9 43 21 30 242 7 12 119 54Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2033 1675 1956 1787Flt Permitted 0.92 0.95 0.96 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1891 1607 1884 1751Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 37 140 25 10 47 23 33 263 8 13 129 59RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 0 16 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 193 0 0 62 0 0 303 0 0 185 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 43 58 58Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 13.9 13.9 43.6 43.6Effective Green, g (s) 13.9 13.9 46.1 46.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 375 319 1241 1153v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04 c0.16 0.11v/c Ratio 0.52 0.19 0.24 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 25.0 23.4 4.9 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.3Delay (s) 25.5 23.3 5.3 4.9Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 25.5 23.3 5.3 4.9Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.31Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 69 11 104 25 497 46 288 981v/c Ratio 0.20 0.04 0.29 0.06 0.18 0.06 0.41 0.31Control Delay 17.4 27.3 7.8 9.5 15.4 8.2 8.9 3.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 17.4 27.3 7.8 9.5 15.4 8.2 8.9 3.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 5 1 7 82 0 28 31Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 19 40 19 110 19 90 37Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 495 369 486 526 2794 816 717 3143Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.03 0.21 0.05 0.18 0.06 0.40 0.31

Intersection Summary

Page 79: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 30 1 32 10 1 95 23 457 42 265 857 45Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1584 1361 1823 4916 1400 1892 4862Flt Permitted 0.83 0.73 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1547 1213 1361 531 4916 1400 844 4862Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 33 1 35 11 1 103 25 497 46 288 932 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 82 0 0 0 20 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 41 0 11 22 0 25 497 26 288 977 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 63 42 42 63 31 91 91 31Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 60.4 57.2 57.2 71.0 62.5Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 21.8 21.8 66.4 59.7 59.7 75.7 65.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.72 0.62Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 321 252 283 412 2795 796 723 3010v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 0.10 c0.04 0.20v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.02 c0.24v/c Ratio 0.13 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.18 0.03 0.40 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 33.3 33.5 7.2 10.9 10.0 5.0 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.16 1.71 1.07 0.28Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 33.9 33.3 33.6 9.1 12.8 17.1 5.5 2.9Level of Service C C C A B B A AApproach Delay (s) 33.9 33.5 13.0 3.5Approach LOS C C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.9 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 26 499 50 650 110 103 177v/c Ratio 0.06 0.25 0.11 0.34 0.22 0.23 0.24Control Delay 8.0 9.1 6.2 3.4 28.6 7.2 27.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.0 9.1 6.2 3.4 28.6 7.2 27.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 58 9 28 55 0 44Queue Length 95th (ft) m12 80 m17 40 100 40 74Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110Base Capacity (vph) 403 2032 467 1886 505 444 753Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.25 0.11 0.34 0.22 0.23 0.24

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 80: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 444 15 46 369 229 20 81 95 93 61 9Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1667 3279 1597 2898 1779 1336 3211Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 651 3279 754 2898 1658 1336 2458Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 483 16 50 401 249 22 88 103 101 66 10RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 92 0 0 0 75 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 497 0 50 558 0 0 110 28 0 173 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 47 29 12 46 46 12Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 32.0 29.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.30Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 403 2030 467 1794 505 369 749v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.06 0.24 0.11 0.31 0.22 0.08 0.23Uniform Delay, d1 7.9 9.0 8.2 9.4 27.2 28.1 27.3Progression Factor 0.95 0.99 0.69 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.7Delay (s) 7.8 9.1 6.0 5.2 28.2 28.5 28.0Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 9.1 5.3 28.3 28.0Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.28Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 45 640 74 821 335 121 533v/c Ratio 0.22 0.27 0.22 0.51 0.32 0.17 0.49Control Delay 13.6 9.6 17.9 19.8 20.3 3.9 22.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.6 9.6 17.9 21.0 20.3 3.9 22.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 43 28 191 75 0 128Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 75 59 245 110 32 178Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 206 2354 330 1622 1051 712 1088Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 536 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.27 0.22 0.76 0.32 0.17 0.49

Intersection Summary

Page 81: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 41 509 80 68 522 234 78 230 111 159 288 43Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 4803 1765 3339 3359 1469 3432Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.71Satd. Flow (perm) 424 4803 680 3339 2399 1469 2466Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 45 553 87 74 567 254 85 250 121 173 313 47RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 620 0 74 821 0 0 335 53 0 526 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 8 8 25 6 25 25 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 43.5 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 206 2333 330 1622 1051 644 1080v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.04 c0.21v/c Ratio 0.22 0.27 0.22 0.51 0.32 0.08 0.49Uniform Delay, d1 15.5 15.9 15.6 18.4 19.3 17.2 21.1Progression Factor 0.67 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.3 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.3 1.6Delay (s) 12.8 10.2 17.2 19.5 20.1 17.4 22.6Level of Service B B B B C B CApproach Delay (s) 10.4 19.3 19.4 22.6Approach LOS B B B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1118 12 303 346 331 314v/c Ratio 0.46 0.02 0.10 0.73 0.71 0.47Control Delay 23.0 1.6 0.2 39.0 33.5 6.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 23.0 1.6 0.4 39.0 33.5 6.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 0 0 169 140 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 182 m0 0 #355 #320 67Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 377Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2413 764 3028 521 505 705Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2043 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 40 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.02 0.31 0.66 0.66 0.45

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 82: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 894 134 11 279 0 0 0 0 461 0 451Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6948 1752 4867 1698 1523 1589Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6948 1752 4867 1698 1523 1589Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 972 146 12 303 0 0 0 0 501 0 490RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 230Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1096 0 12 303 0 0 0 0 346 291 84Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 37 5 5Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 27.6 22.0 54.6 22.2 22.2 22.2Effective Green, g (s) 28.6 23.0 55.6 23.2 23.2 23.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.26 0.64 0.27 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2289 464 3118 454 407 425v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.01 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 0.19 0.05v/c Ratio 0.48 0.03 0.10 0.76 0.71 0.20Uniform Delay, d1 23.2 23.6 6.0 29.3 28.8 24.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.08 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 4.9 0.1Delay (s) 23.2 2.0 0.1 36.0 33.7 24.7Level of Service C A A D C CApproach Delay (s) 23.2 0.2 0.0 31.6Approach LOS C A A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 672 801 68 217 247 135v/c Ratio 0.41 0.24 0.07 0.53 0.67 0.30Control Delay 7.3 1.1 33.0 10.3 40.7 7.3Queue Delay 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.3 1.3 33.0 10.3 40.7 7.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 112 4 9 0 122 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 17 20 63 209 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 286Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1701 3533 1431 519 557 610Starvation Cap Reductn 721 1623 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.42 0.05 0.42 0.44 0.22

Intersection Summary

Page 83: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 618 737 0 0 63 200 227 0 124 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1515 1814 1687Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1515 1814 1687Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 672 801 0 0 68 217 247 0 135 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 109 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 672 801 0 0 68 31 247 0 26 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 11 9 9Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 44.5 61.0 11.5 11.5 15.8 15.8Effective Green, g (s) 45.5 62.0 12.5 12.5 16.8 16.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.71 0.14 0.14 0.19 0.19Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1722 3476 883 218 351 327v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 c0.16 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.14 0.02v/c Ratio 0.39 0.23 0.08 0.14 0.70 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 12.4 4.2 32.2 32.5 32.7 28.7Progression Factor 0.47 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.2 0.0Delay (s) 5.8 0.8 32.2 32.6 37.8 28.7Level of Service A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 3.1 32.5 34.6 0.0Approach LOS A C C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 200 509 64 41 619 16 8 0 4 17 0 30Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 217 553 70 45 673 17 9 0 4 18 0 33Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 330 328pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.97vC, conflicting volume 715 648 1404 1852 346 1521 1878 268vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 608 452 1120 1599 125 1246 1626 148tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 76 96 92 100 99 80 100 96cM capacity (veh/h) 922 1001 109 69 810 91 67 825

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 494 346 213 336 186 13 51Volume Left 217 0 45 0 0 9 18Volume Right 0 70 0 0 17 4 33cSH 922 1700 1001 1700 1700 153 210Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.20 0.04 0.20 0.11 0.09 0.24Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 0 3 0 0 7 23Control Delay (s) 6.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 30.8 27.5Lane LOS A A D DApproach Delay (s) 3.6 0.6 30.8 27.5Approach LOS D D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 84: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 4 17 174 5 69 546Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 18 189 5 75 593Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 544 349pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 674 227 220vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 674 227 220tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 98 94cM capacity (veh/h) 356 755 1321

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 23 195 273 396Volume Left 4 0 75 0Volume Right 18 5 0 0cSH 623 1700 1321 1700Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.11 0.06 0.23Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 5 0Control Delay (s) 11.0 0.0 2.5 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 11.0 0.0 1.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 17 291 6 73 182Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 18 316 7 79 198Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 280 613pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96vC, conflicting volume 711 355 348vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 681 311 304tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 97 93cM capacity (veh/h) 364 684 1188

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 22 323 277Volume Left 3 0 79Volume Right 18 7 0cSH 604 1700 1188Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.19 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 5Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 2.8Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 2.8Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 85: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th Street & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 5 143 12 11 49 23 31 0 30 6 0 4Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 155 13 12 53 25 34 0 33 7 0 4Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 366 357pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98vC, conflicting volume 103 193 302 325 197 330 319 101vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 103 160 271 295 164 300 289 101tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 99 95 100 96 99 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1460 1357 619 571 836 572 575 929

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 174 90 66 11Volume Left 5 12 34 7Volume Right 13 25 33 4cSH 1460 1357 710 676Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.02Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 8 1Control Delay (s) 0.3 1.1 10.6 10.4Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.3 1.1 10.6 10.4Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 2 10 37 395 497 46Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 11 40 429 540 50Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 233 437pX, platoon unblocked 0.73 0.73 0.73vC, conflicting volume 895 600 615vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 670 265 286tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 98 96cM capacity (veh/h) 264 521 910

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 13 183 286 590Volume Left 2 40 0 0Volume Right 11 0 0 50cSH 448 910 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.04 0.17 0.35Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 3 0 0Control Delay (s) 13.3 2.3 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 13.3 0.9 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 86: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 6 41 294 522 50Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 7 45 320 567 54Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 424 246pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.71 0.71vC, conflicting volume 878 630 647vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 622 270 294tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 99 95cM capacity (veh/h) 274 502 877

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 10 151 213 622Volume Left 3 45 0 0Volume Right 7 0 0 54cSH 393 877 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.05 0.13 0.37Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 4 0 0Control Delay (s) 14.4 3.1 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 14.4 1.3 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 87: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 360 696 66 1275 229 888 272 248 943 266v/c Ratio 0.93 0.35 0.19 1.00dr 0.85 0.73 0.45 0.77 0.80 0.51Control Delay 59.4 19.3 13.6 29.7 82.1 27.1 3.2 40.0 44.0 15.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 59.4 19.3 13.6 29.7 82.1 27.1 3.2 40.0 44.0 15.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 189 98 15 280 162 95 0 111 221 42Queue Length 95th (ft) #365 136 m21 m305 #292 132 2 #221 272 120Internal Link Dist (ft) 610 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 391 1984 398 1442 270 1210 609 333 1183 519Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.35 0.17 0.88 0.85 0.73 0.45 0.74 0.80 0.51

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 331 433 207 61 646 527 211 817 250 228 868 245Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4839 1711 4710 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 211 4839 676 4710 1770 5085 1689 312 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 360 471 225 66 702 573 229 888 272 248 943 266RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 76 0 0 138 0 0 0 211 0 0 155Lane Group Flow (vph) 360 620 0 66 1137 0 229 888 61 248 943 111Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 51.0 38.4 32.8 27.2 12.9 20.6 20.6 32.5 20.1 20.1Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 41.4 38.8 30.2 15.9 23.6 23.6 38.5 23.1 20.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.39 0.37 0.29 0.15 0.22 0.22 0.37 0.22 0.19Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 391 1908 335 1355 268 1143 380 320 1119 343v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.13 0.02 0.24 c0.13 0.17 0.11 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.30 0.06 0.04 0.17 0.06v/c Ratio 0.92 0.33 0.20 1.00dr 0.85 0.78 0.16 0.78 0.84 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 29.5 22.1 21.7 35.1 43.4 38.2 32.7 25.9 39.2 36.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.76 1.26 0.62 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 26.3 0.1 0.1 3.1 21.3 5.1 0.9 10.2 7.8 2.5Delay (s) 55.8 22.2 19.1 29.8 76.2 28.8 7.3 36.1 47.0 39.1Level of Service E C B C E C A D D DApproach Delay (s) 33.7 29.3 32.4 43.7Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.0 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 88: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 162 702 150 1342 333 325 35 258v/c Ratio 0.55 0.34 0.15 0.76 0.94 0.30 0.11 0.21Control Delay 25.4 9.3 1.5 16.2 70.1 15.0 24.9 11.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 25.4 9.3 1.5 16.2 70.1 15.0 24.9 11.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 96 5 123 213 45 16 28Queue Length 95th (ft) m112 126 m15 m145 #390 81 40 58Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 249 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 297 2076 1021 1770 360 1103 319 1236Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.34 0.15 0.76 0.93 0.29 0.11 0.21

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 149 646 138 76 892 266 306 172 127 32 111 126Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3539 1636 4892 1768 2954 1758 3343Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.56 1.00 0.50 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 186 3539 1636 4060 1050 2954 931 3343Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 162 702 150 83 970 289 333 187 138 35 121 137RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 62 0 47 0 0 91 0 0 91 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 162 702 88 0 1295 0 333 234 0 35 167 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 11 11 1Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.1 59.1 59.1 42.1 32.4 32.4 32.4 32.4Effective Green, g (s) 62.1 61.6 61.6 44.6 35.4 35.4 35.4 35.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 299 2076 960 1725 354 996 314 1127v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.20 0.08 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.05 c0.32 c0.32 0.04v/c Ratio 0.54 0.34 0.09 0.75 0.94 0.23 0.11 0.15Uniform Delay, d1 14.3 11.2 9.5 25.5 33.8 25.0 24.0 24.3Progression Factor 1.35 0.78 0.71 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 6.2 0.4 0.2 1.7 32.7 0.1 0.2 0.1Delay (s) 25.6 9.2 6.9 16.8 66.5 25.2 24.1 24.3Level of Service C A A B E C C CApproach Delay (s) 11.4 16.8 46.1 24.3Approach LOS B B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 21.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 89: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 871 1269 318 382 156 177v/c Ratio 0.93dl 0.95 0.93 0.67 0.29 0.31Control Delay 12.5 49.5 68.4 36.6 27.1 5.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.5 49.5 68.4 36.6 27.1 5.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 139 289 203 216 76 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 177 #393 #375 324 128 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 249 433 116 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1576 1332 347 573 548 575Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.95 0.92 0.67 0.28 0.31

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 485 123 193 43 821 304 293 345 6 4 140 163Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3601 4785 1577 1671 1612 1339Flt Permitted 0.60 0.86 0.61 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2229 4120 1013 1671 1598 1339Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 527 134 210 47 892 330 318 375 7 4 152 177RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 29 0 0 60 0 0 1 0 0 0 117Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 842 0 0 1209 0 318 381 0 0 156 60Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 21 21 29 13 23 23 13Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 1 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 52.4 29.9 32.6 32.6 32.6 32.6Effective Green, g (s) 57.4 32.4 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.31 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1545 1271 343 567 542 454v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.23v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 c0.29 c0.31 0.10 0.04v/c Ratio 0.93dl 0.95 0.93 0.67 0.29 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 15.4 35.5 33.4 29.7 25.4 24.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 16.0 30.6 3.4 0.4 0.2Delay (s) 16.7 51.5 64.1 33.1 25.8 24.2Level of Service B D E C C CApproach Delay (s) 16.7 51.5 47.2 25.0Approach LOS B D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 38.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 90: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 87 229 135 659 262 237v/c Ratio 0.17 0.28 0.24 0.69 0.32 0.20Control Delay 10.1 2.3 10.7 17.8 2.4 8.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.1 2.3 10.7 17.8 2.4 8.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 0 32 221 0 16Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 29 64 345 31 41Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 281 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 512 817 564 956 828 1193Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.28 0.24 0.69 0.32 0.20

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 22 211 124 606 241 0 0 0 2 87 129Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1298 1391 1739 1291 3149Flt Permitted 0.51 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 932 1298 1026 1739 1291 3149Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 63 24 229 135 659 262 0 0 0 2 95 140RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 103 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 91 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 87 126 135 659 144 0 0 0 0 146 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 137 137 80 29 13 13 29Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 513 714 564 956 710 1102v/s Ratio Prot c0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.11 0.05v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.24 0.69 0.20 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 8.9 9.0 9.3 13.0 9.1 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.5 1.0 4.1 0.6 0.2Delay (s) 9.6 9.5 10.3 17.1 9.8 18.0Level of Service A A B B A BApproach Delay (s) 9.5 14.4 0.0 18.0Approach LOS A B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 91: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 16 145 20 3 154 553 3 6 7 159 9 32Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 158 22 3 167 601 3 7 8 173 10 35Pedestrians 35 9 91 75Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 1 7 8Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 843 270 459 1144 190 683 855 494vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 843 270 459 1144 190 683 855 494tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 100 99 96 99 33 96 93cM capacity (veh/h) 727 1200 344 166 757 258 246 466

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 96 101 87 685 17 183 35Volume Left 17 0 3 0 3 173 0Volume Right 0 22 0 601 8 0 35cSH 727 1700 1200 1700 295 257 466Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.40 0.06 0.71 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 5 121 6Control Delay (s) 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 18.0 47.3 13.3Lane LOS A A C E BApproach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 18.0 41.9Approach LOS C E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th St & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 190 108 147 470 70 39 439v/c Ratio 0.51 0.39 0.36 0.44 0.06 0.08 0.41Control Delay 23.1 23.6 13.0 10.0 2.8 8.3 9.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 23.1 23.6 13.0 10.0 2.8 8.3 9.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 42 28 69 0 4 62Queue Length 95th (ft) 105 66 59 212 17 24 193Internal Link Dist (ft) 267 596 187 196Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 601 443 639 1077 1101 464 1073Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.24 0.23 0.44 0.06 0.08 0.41

Intersection Summary

Page 92: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th St & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 96 68 99 67 68 26 407 64 36 391 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 1791 1688 1731 1670 1549 1664Flt Permitted 0.97 0.61 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.44 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1625 1150 1688 1672 1670 719 1664Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 104 74 108 73 74 28 442 70 39 425 14RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 59 0 0 0 25 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 150 0 108 88 0 0 470 45 39 438 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 20 20 32 40 70 70 40Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 42.6 42.6 42.6 42.6Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 16.9 14.4 45.1 45.1 45.1 45.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 334 278 347 1077 1076 463 1072v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.09 c0.28 0.03 0.05v/c Ratio 0.45 0.39 0.25 0.44 0.04 0.08 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 24.3 22.2 23.3 6.2 4.6 4.7 6.0Progression Factor 1.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.3 0.1 0.4 1.2Delay (s) 28.7 22.6 23.4 7.4 4.6 5.0 7.2Level of Service C C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 28.7 23.1 7.1 7.0Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 240 141 270 478v/c Ratio 0.62 0.38 0.23 0.41Control Delay 27.9 18.0 6.9 8.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.9 18.0 6.9 8.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 34 37 75Queue Length 95th (ft) 132 67 94 179Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 297 1055 232Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 565 538 1163 1163Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.26 0.23 0.41

Intersection Summary

Page 93: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 56 99 65 11 77 41 35 207 6 44 353 42Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1933 1686 1956 1871Flt Permitted 0.88 0.96 0.91 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1729 1634 1786 1783Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 61 108 71 12 84 45 38 225 7 48 384 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 215 0 0 113 0 0 269 0 0 474 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 50 50 13 27 50 50 27Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 14.5 45.5 45.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.65 0.65Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 358 338 1161 1159v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.07 0.15 c0.27v/c Ratio 0.60 0.34 0.23 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 23.6 5.0 5.8Progression Factor 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.2 0.5 1.1Delay (s) 26.9 22.3 5.5 6.9Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 26.9 22.3 5.5 6.9Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 201 30 195 90 792 79 186 1016v/c Ratio 0.66 0.17 0.44 0.21 0.29 0.10 0.35 0.35Control Delay 31.3 31.0 8.2 12.3 19.9 9.8 14.8 6.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 31.3 31.0 8.2 12.3 19.9 9.8 14.8 6.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 67 15 4 29 156 0 45 58Queue Length 95th (ft) 143 39 57 m52 190 m29 m86 99Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 389 245 538 492 2759 759 570 2880Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.12 0.36 0.18 0.29 0.10 0.33 0.35

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 94: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 64 6 114 28 7 172 83 729 73 171 824 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1646 1472 1339 1825 4916 1291 1914 4796Flt Permitted 0.65 0.52 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1095 806 1339 476 4916 1291 604 4796Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 70 7 124 30 8 187 90 792 79 186 896 120RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 0 0 146 0 0 0 35 0 12 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 139 0 30 49 0 90 792 44 186 1004 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 158 158 84 23 130 130 23Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 20.2 20.2 20.2 61.8 56.4 56.4 66.8 58.9Effective Green, g (s) 23.2 23.2 23.2 67.8 58.9 58.9 72.8 61.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.65 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.58Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 242 178 296 415 2758 724 555 2805v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.02 0.16 c0.03 c0.21v/s Ratio Perm c0.13 0.04 0.12 0.03 0.20v/c Ratio 0.58 0.17 0.17 0.22 0.29 0.06 0.34 0.36Uniform Delay, d1 36.5 33.1 33.1 7.1 12.1 10.5 5.8 11.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.41 2.57 2.00 0.49Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 38.6 33.3 33.2 11.4 17.2 27.1 11.7 5.9Level of Service D C C B B C B AApproach Delay (s) 38.6 33.2 17.5 6.8Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.8% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 61 448 120 961 139 52 491v/c Ratio 0.26 0.24 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.11 0.58Control Delay 10.5 7.3 6.5 7.2 27.1 8.8 30.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.5 7.3 6.5 7.2 27.1 8.8 30.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 63 16 58 67 1 136Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 66 m25 71 119 29 192Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 236 1873 457 1739 493 459 848Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.24 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.11 0.58

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 95: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 56 362 51 110 679 205 35 93 48 211 190 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 3205 1582 2948 1771 1354 3228Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 408 3205 785 2948 1437 1354 2446Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 61 393 55 120 738 223 38 101 52 229 207 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 27 0 0 0 34 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 61 438 0 120 934 0 0 139 18 0 482 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 56 56 64 21 34 34 21Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 36.0 33.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 237 1862 456 1713 493 426 839v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.01 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.04 0.57Uniform Delay, d1 10.8 10.7 10.9 13.5 25.1 25.0 28.2Progression Factor 0.68 0.70 0.48 0.49 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.3 1.1 0.9 1.4 0.2 2.9Delay (s) 9.8 7.7 6.3 7.5 26.5 25.2 31.1Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.0 7.4 26.2 31.1Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 48 589 234 1221 455 166 652v/c Ratio 0.35 0.22 0.56 0.64 0.64 0.27 0.82Control Delay 14.3 5.2 21.0 17.6 33.0 4.8 39.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 14.3 5.2 21.0 23.5 33.0 4.8 39.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 32 95 278 132 0 201Queue Length 95th (ft) m35 51 176 348 190 43 #286Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 137 2727 421 1913 707 626 797Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 629 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.22 0.56 0.95 0.64 0.27 0.82

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 96: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 485 57 215 896 227 119 300 153 215 300 85Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1587 4830 1766 3404 3349 1438 3377Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.63Satd. Flow (perm) 244 4830 749 3404 1952 1438 2167Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 527 62 234 974 247 129 326 166 234 326 92RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 575 0 234 1221 0 0 455 60 0 639 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 31 5 5 31 25 47 47 25Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.5 35.5 35.5Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 137 2714 421 1913 706 520 784v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.31 0.23 0.04 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.35 0.21 0.56 0.64 0.64 0.12 0.82Uniform Delay, d1 12.5 11.4 14.7 15.7 27.9 22.3 30.3Progression Factor 0.53 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 0.2 5.2 1.6 4.5 0.5 9.1Delay (s) 13.2 5.5 19.9 17.4 32.4 22.8 39.5Level of Service B A B B C C DApproach Delay (s) 6.1 17.8 29.8 39.5Approach LOS A B C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 982 45 512 247 535 528v/c Ratio 0.43 0.07 0.15 0.64 0.84 0.79Control Delay 26.2 6.0 0.1 41.8 22.3 18.0Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0Total Delay 26.3 6.0 0.4 41.8 22.8 18.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 125 2 0 146 78 66Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 m7 m0 232 #291 211Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 325Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2290 769 3323 450 675 714Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2113 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 252 0 0 0 15 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.06 0.42 0.55 0.81 0.74

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 97: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 724 179 41 471 0 0 0 0 252 0 953Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6824 1752 4867 1698 1417 1566Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6824 1752 4867 1698 1417 1566Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 787 195 45 512 0 0 0 0 274 0 1036RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 317 317Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 945 0 45 512 0 0 0 0 247 218 211Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 13 13Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 30.4 31.2 66.6 20.5 20.5 20.5Effective Green, g (s) 31.4 32.2 67.6 21.5 21.5 21.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.33 0.70 0.22 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2207 581 3388 376 314 347v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.03 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.15 0.13v/c Ratio 0.43 0.08 0.15 0.66 0.69 0.61Uniform Delay, d1 25.8 22.3 5.0 34.4 34.8 34.0Progression Factor 1.00 0.28 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 5.3 2.1Delay (s) 25.8 6.3 0.0 37.6 40.1 36.1Level of Service C A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 25.8 0.6 0.0 38.0Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 790 271 165 682 391 43v/c Ratio 0.56 0.08 0.13 1.04 0.88 0.10Control Delay 10.8 0.8 33.0 59.7 58.0 9.7Queue Delay 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.4 0.8 33.0 59.7 58.0 9.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 193 1 25 ~208 238 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 250 m2 41 #431 #401 27Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 322Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1531 3454 1234 655 480 482Starvation Cap Reductn 531 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.79 0.08 0.13 1.04 0.81 0.09

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 98: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 727 249 0 0 152 627 360 0 40 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1337 1814 1702Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1337 1814 1702Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 790 271 0 0 165 682 391 0 43 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 389 0 0 33 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 790 271 0 0 165 293 391 0 10 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48 3 3Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 41.8 64.9 18.1 18.1 22.2 22.2Effective Green, g (s) 42.8 65.9 19.1 19.1 23.2 23.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.68 0.20 0.20 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1448 3303 1206 263 433 407v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 0.06 0.03v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 c0.22 0.01v/c Ratio 0.55 0.08 0.14 1.11 0.90 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 20.0 5.3 32.2 39.0 35.9 28.3Progression Factor 0.45 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0 0.0 89.9 21.3 0.0Delay (s) 9.2 0.7 32.2 128.9 57.2 28.3Level of Service A A C F E CApproach Delay (s) 7.0 110.1 54.3 0.0Approach LOS A F D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 53.0 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.9% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Driveway 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 788 17 11 1267 0 43 0 18 79 0 23Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 857 18 12 1377 0 47 0 20 86 0 25Pedestrians 10 10 50 50Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 329 329pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.80vC, conflicting volume 1427 925 1434 2367 498 1909 2376 519vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 667 693 281 1377 218 839 1388 0tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 98 90 100 97 54 100 97cM capacity (veh/h) 706 774 472 111 672 188 109 826

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 428 447 356 689 344 66 111Volume Left 0 0 12 0 0 47 86Volume Right 0 18 0 0 0 20 25cSH 706 1700 774 1700 1700 518 228Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.41 0.20 0.13 0.49Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 0 0 11 61Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 13.0 34.9Lane LOS A B DApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 13.0 34.9Approach LOS B D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 99: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 22 88 516 1 19 307Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 24 96 561 1 21 334Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 545 349pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 845 636 612vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 845 636 612tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 91 76 98cM capacity (veh/h) 279 397 926

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 120 562 132 222Volume Left 24 0 21 0Volume Right 96 1 0 0cSH 366 1700 926 1700Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.13Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 0 2 0Control Delay (s) 19.6 0.0 1.6 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 19.6 0.0 0.6Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 18 86 303 2 20 422Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 20 93 329 2 22 459Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 312 582pX, platoon unblocked 0.99 0.99 0.99vC, conflicting volume 908 405 382vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 899 389 365tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 93 85 98cM capacity (veh/h) 282 613 1131

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 113 332 480Volume Left 20 0 22Volume Right 93 2 0cSH 510 1700 1131Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.20 0.02Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 0 1Control Delay (s) 14.1 0.0 0.6Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 14.1 0.0 0.6Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 100: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th St & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 2 148 34 29 100 6 35 0 30 31 0 22Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 161 37 32 109 7 38 0 33 34 0 24Pedestrians 25 25 50 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 2 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 377 347pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 165 248 458 462 254 466 477 187vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 165 248 458 462 254 466 477 187tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 98 91 100 96 92 100 97cM capacity (veh/h) 1359 1268 434 447 740 422 439 807

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 200 147 71 58Volume Left 2 32 38 34Volume Right 37 7 33 24cSH 1359 1268 537 526Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.11Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 11 9Control Delay (s) 0.1 1.9 12.7 12.7Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.1 1.9 12.7 12.7Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 4.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 9 53 11 476 387 12Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 58 12 517 421 13Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 276 396pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 0.95 0.95vC, conflicting volume 785 502 484vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 751 455 435tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 97 88 99cM capacity (veh/h) 308 499 1029

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 67 184 345 434Volume Left 10 12 0 0Volume Right 58 0 0 13cSH 458 1029 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.01 0.20 0.26Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 14.2 0.7 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 14.2 0.2 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 101: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase I 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 18 30 11 627 361 15Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 20 33 12 682 392 16Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 476 196pX, platoon unblocked 0.94 0.94 0.94vC, conflicting volume 840 476 459vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 797 409 391tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 93 94 99cM capacity (veh/h) 283 526 1051

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 52 239 454 409Volume Left 20 12 0 0Volume Right 33 0 0 16cSH 398 1051 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.01 0.27 0.24Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 15.4 0.5 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 15.4 0.2 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 102: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   F‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX F ‐ 

FUTURE CONDITION (2015) WITH INTERIM PHASE DEVELOPMENT 

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS: 

MITIGATED CONDITIONS 

 

Page 103: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 48 496 52 698 76 430 74 665 1093 332v/c Ratio 0.22 0.52 0.22 0.64 0.40 0.31 0.14 0.86 0.42 0.33Control Delay 26.2 35.2 18.1 19.2 51.5 21.6 2.2 27.5 19.0 7.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.2 35.2 18.1 19.2 51.5 21.6 2.2 27.5 19.0 7.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 99 26 94 53 39 1 249 173 32Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 120 36 142 102 59 5 #562 258 109Internal Link Dist (ft) 590 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 271 1381 242 1356 219 1379 512 786 2630 1003Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.36 0.21 0.51 0.35 0.31 0.14 0.85 0.42 0.33

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 364 92 48 265 377 70 396 68 612 1006 305Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4846 1693 4637 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 369 4846 610 4637 1770 5085 1689 673 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 396 100 52 288 410 76 430 74 665 1093 332RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 47 0 0 266 0 0 0 55 0 0 133Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 449 0 52 432 0 76 430 19 665 1093 199Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 60Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 22.1 16.5 20.5 15.7 7.2 24.0 24.0 62.7 48.5 48.5Effective Green, g (s) 28.1 19.5 26.5 18.7 10.2 27.0 27.0 65.7 51.5 48.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.19 0.25 0.18 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.63 0.49 0.46Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 209 900 234 826 172 1308 434 764 2494 829v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.09 0.04 0.08 c0.29 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.01 c0.26 0.11v/c Ratio 0.23 0.50 0.22 0.52 0.44 0.33 0.04 0.87 0.44 0.24Uniform Delay, d1 29.6 38.4 30.4 39.1 44.7 31.6 29.3 13.1 17.4 17.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.80 1.05 0.63 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.2 10.3 0.6 0.7Delay (s) 29.8 38.8 20.5 32.0 47.4 20.6 5.5 23.4 17.9 17.8Level of Service C D C C D C A C B BApproach Delay (s) 38.0 31.2 22.2 19.6Approach LOS D C C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 24.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 104: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 43 742 324 737 112 95 84 320v/c Ratio 0.10 0.35 0.29 0.42 0.35 0.10 0.31 0.40Control Delay 12.4 14.2 5.7 20.3 26.0 12.4 34.6 26.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.4 14.2 5.7 20.3 26.0 12.4 34.6 26.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 115 30 92 59 14 52 78Queue Length 95th (ft) m22 m224 m48 154 78 25 79 94Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 250 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 426 2148 1120 1772 317 1333 434 1247Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.35 0.29 0.42 0.35 0.07 0.19 0.26

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 40 683 298 116 541 21 103 48 40 77 201 94Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.95Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3539 1636 5016 1770 2924 1736 3482Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.39 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 536 3539 1636 3663 730 2924 1265 3482Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 43 742 324 126 588 23 112 52 43 84 218 102RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 127 0 3 0 0 29 0 0 64 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 742 197 0 734 0 112 66 0 84 256 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 22 22Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 7 4 8Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 61.2 61.2 61.2 48.2 30.3 30.3 19.3 19.3Effective Green, g (s) 64.2 63.7 63.7 50.7 33.3 33.3 22.3 22.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.48 0.32 0.32 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 428 2147 993 1769 311 927 269 740v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.21 c0.03 0.02 0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.12 c0.20 c0.09 0.07v/c Ratio 0.10 0.35 0.20 0.42 0.36 0.07 0.31 0.35Uniform Delay, d1 8.6 10.3 9.2 17.6 26.4 25.0 34.9 35.2Progression Factor 1.01 1.14 2.93 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.3Delay (s) 9.1 12.0 27.4 18.1 27.2 25.1 35.5 35.4Level of Service A B C B C C D DApproach Delay (s) 16.4 18.1 26.2 35.5Approach LOS B B C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 105: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 558 488 135 188 534 242v/c Ratio 0.47 0.43 0.57 0.24 0.94 0.45Control Delay 10.9 29.6 25.5 16.3 57.8 20.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.9 29.6 25.5 16.3 57.8 20.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 92 49 68 341 82Queue Length 95th (ft) 69 126 86 114 #554 154Internal Link Dist (ft) 248 433 166 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1178 1132 235 780 573 538Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.43 0.57 0.24 0.93 0.45

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 204 284 25 97 313 40 124 148 25 41 450 223Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3754 4902 1591 1626 1603 1324Flt Permitted 0.59 0.74 0.17 1.00 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2275 3661 279 1626 1542 1324Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 222 309 27 105 340 43 135 161 27 45 489 242RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0 47Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 555 0 0 477 0 135 182 0 0 534 195Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 39 27 27 39 29 49 49 29Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 1 5 2 3 8 4Permitted Phases 5 2 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 44.6 29.6 46.9 46.9 35.9 35.9Effective Green, g (s) 47.1 32.1 49.9 49.9 38.9 38.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.31 0.48 0.48 0.37 0.37Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1175 1119 233 773 571 491v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 c0.04 0.11v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.13 0.23 c0.35 0.15v/c Ratio 0.47 0.43 0.58 0.24 0.94 0.40Uniform Delay, d1 20.3 29.1 20.0 16.3 31.8 24.4Progression Factor 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.2 3.5 0.2 23.0 0.7Delay (s) 11.7 30.3 23.4 16.5 54.8 25.1Level of Service B C C B D CApproach Delay (s) 11.7 30.3 19.4 45.5Approach LOS B C B D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 106: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 257 551 189 207 136 179v/c Ratio 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.22 0.18 0.15Control Delay 12.6 4.7 13.6 9.9 2.3 13.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.6 4.7 13.6 9.9 2.3 13.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 13 51 49 0 23Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 69 100 85 23 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 286 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 650 919 471 956 766 1191Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.22 0.18 0.15

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 161 75 507 174 190 125 0 0 0 14 107 44Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1669 1268 1419 1739 1281 3314Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1182 1268 856 1739 1281 3314Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 175 82 551 189 207 136 0 0 0 15 116 48RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 221 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 31 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 257 330 189 207 75 0 0 0 0 148 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84 46 42 42 46Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 650 697 471 956 705 1160v/s Ratio Prot 0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 c0.26 0.22 0.06 0.04v/c Ratio 0.40 0.47 0.40 0.22 0.11 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.4 10.9 10.4 9.2 8.6 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 2.3 2.5 0.5 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 12.1 13.2 12.9 9.7 8.9 17.9Level of Service B B B A A BApproach Delay (s) 12.9 10.7 0.0 17.9Approach LOS B B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.7 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 107: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 27 384 5 0 59 170 11 17 14 372 0 48Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 29 417 5 0 64 185 12 18 15 404 0 52Pedestrians 32 2 77 71Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 0 6 7Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 320 500 704 876 290 429 694 167vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 320 500 704 876 290 429 694 167tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 95 92 98 0 100 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1145 998 244 243 663 384 310 764

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 238 214 64 185 46 404 52Volume Left 29 0 0 0 12 404 0Volume Right 0 5 0 185 15 0 52cSH 1145 1700 998 1700 309 384 764Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.11 0.15 1.05 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 13 341 5Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 93.8 10.1Lane LOS A C F BApproach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 18.7 84.3Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 32.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 181 64 82 448 120 125 426v/c Ratio 0.49 0.24 0.21 0.43 0.10 0.26 0.40Control Delay 12.3 19.9 11.8 10.0 2.3 10.0 9.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.3 19.9 11.8 10.0 2.3 10.0 9.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 24 15 68 0 17 63Queue Length 95th (ft) 36 43 39 201 22 66 186Internal Link Dist (ft) 277 596 187 153Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 596 418 610 1052 1151 479 1063Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.15 0.13 0.43 0.10 0.26 0.40

Intersection Summary

Page 108: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 131 25 59 37 39 30 382 110 115 387 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1636 1665 1727 1740 1578 1672Flt Permitted 0.98 0.63 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.45 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1676 1089 1665 1654 1740 753 1672Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 142 27 64 40 42 33 415 120 125 421 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 33 0 0 0 44 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 170 0 64 49 0 0 448 76 125 426 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 100 100 59 53 22 22 53Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 17.5 15.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 359 272 357 1051 1106 479 1063v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.25v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.06 c0.27 0.04 0.17v/c Ratio 0.47 0.24 0.14 0.43 0.07 0.26 0.40Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 20.9 22.3 6.4 4.9 5.6 6.2Progression Factor 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 1.1Delay (s) 9.6 21.1 22.3 7.6 5.0 6.9 7.4Level of Service A C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 9.6 21.8 7.1 7.3Approach LOS A C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.9 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 202 80 304 201v/c Ratio 0.53 0.24 0.24 0.17Control Delay 27.2 17.5 6.7 5.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.2 17.5 6.7 5.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 23 38 18Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 45 105 59Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 286 1055 200Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 602 521 1241 1170Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.15 0.24 0.17

Intersection Summary

Page 109: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 34 129 23 9 43 21 30 242 7 12 119 54Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2033 1675 1956 1787Flt Permitted 0.92 0.95 0.96 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1891 1607 1884 1751Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 37 140 25 10 47 23 33 263 8 13 129 59RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 0 16 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 193 0 0 62 0 0 303 0 0 185 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 43 58 58Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 13.9 13.9 43.6 43.6Effective Green, g (s) 13.9 13.9 46.1 46.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 375 319 1241 1153v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04 c0.16 0.11v/c Ratio 0.52 0.19 0.24 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 25.0 23.4 4.9 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.3Delay (s) 25.5 23.6 5.3 4.9Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 25.5 23.6 5.3 4.9Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.31Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 69 11 104 25 497 46 288 981v/c Ratio 0.20 0.04 0.29 0.06 0.18 0.06 0.41 0.31Control Delay 17.5 27.3 7.8 9.5 15.4 8.2 8.9 3.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 17.5 27.3 7.8 9.5 15.4 8.2 8.9 3.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 5 1 7 82 0 28 31Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 19 40 19 110 19 90 37Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 482 369 486 526 2794 816 717 3143Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.03 0.21 0.05 0.18 0.06 0.40 0.31

Intersection Summary

Page 110: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 30 1 32 10 1 95 23 457 42 265 857 45Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1757 1584 1361 1823 4916 1400 1892 4862Flt Permitted 0.83 0.73 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1501 1213 1361 531 4916 1400 844 4862Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 33 1 35 11 1 103 25 497 46 288 932 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 82 0 0 0 20 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 41 0 11 22 0 25 497 26 288 977 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 63 42 42 63 31 91 91 31Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 60.4 57.2 57.2 71.0 62.5Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 21.8 21.8 66.4 59.7 59.7 75.7 65.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.72 0.62Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 312 252 283 412 2795 796 723 3010v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 0.10 c0.04 0.20v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.02 c0.24v/c Ratio 0.13 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.18 0.03 0.40 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 33.3 33.5 7.2 10.9 10.0 5.0 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.16 1.71 1.07 0.28Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 34.0 33.3 33.6 9.1 12.8 17.1 5.5 3.0Level of Service C C C A B B A AApproach Delay (s) 34.0 33.5 13.0 3.5Approach LOS C C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.9 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 26 499 50 650 110 103 177v/c Ratio 0.06 0.25 0.11 0.34 0.22 0.23 0.24Control Delay 8.0 9.1 6.2 3.4 28.6 7.2 27.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.0 9.1 6.2 3.4 28.6 7.2 27.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 58 9 28 55 0 44Queue Length 95th (ft) m12 80 m17 40 100 40 74Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110Base Capacity (vph) 403 2032 467 1886 505 444 753Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.25 0.11 0.34 0.22 0.23 0.24

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 111: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 444 15 46 369 229 20 81 95 93 61 9Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1667 3279 1597 2898 1779 1336 3211Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 651 3279 754 2898 1658 1336 2458Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 483 16 50 401 249 22 88 103 101 66 10RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 92 0 0 0 75 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 497 0 50 558 0 0 110 28 0 173 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 47 29 12 46 46 12Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 32.0 29.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.30Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 403 2030 467 1794 505 369 749v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.06 0.24 0.11 0.31 0.22 0.08 0.23Uniform Delay, d1 7.9 9.0 8.2 9.4 27.2 28.1 27.3Progression Factor 0.95 0.99 0.69 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.7Delay (s) 7.8 9.1 6.0 5.2 28.2 28.5 28.0Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 9.1 5.3 28.3 28.0Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.28Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 45 640 74 821 335 121 533v/c Ratio 0.20 0.27 0.22 0.51 0.32 0.17 0.49Control Delay 13.0 9.6 17.9 19.8 20.3 3.9 22.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.0 9.6 17.9 21.0 20.3 3.9 22.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 43 28 191 75 0 128Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 75 59 245 110 32 178Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 221 2354 330 1622 1051 712 1088Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 536 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.27 0.22 0.76 0.32 0.17 0.49

Intersection Summary

Page 112: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 41 509 80 68 522 234 78 230 111 159 288 43Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1700 4803 1765 3339 3359 1469 3432Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.71Satd. Flow (perm) 456 4803 680 3339 2399 1469 2466Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 45 553 87 74 567 254 85 250 121 173 313 47RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 620 0 74 821 0 0 335 53 0 526 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 8 8 25 6 25 25 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 43.5 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 2333 330 1622 1051 644 1080v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.11 0.14 0.04 c0.21v/c Ratio 0.20 0.27 0.22 0.51 0.32 0.08 0.49Uniform Delay, d1 15.4 15.9 15.6 18.4 19.3 17.2 21.1Progression Factor 0.67 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 0.3 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.3 1.6Delay (s) 12.4 10.2 17.2 19.5 20.1 17.4 22.6Level of Service B B B B C B CApproach Delay (s) 10.4 19.3 19.4 22.6Approach LOS B B B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1118 12 303 346 331 314v/c Ratio 0.46 0.02 0.10 0.73 0.71 0.47Control Delay 23.0 1.6 0.2 39.0 33.5 6.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 23.0 1.6 0.4 39.0 33.5 6.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 0 0 169 140 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 182 m0 0 #355 #320 67Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 377Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2413 764 3028 521 505 705Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2043 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 40 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.02 0.31 0.66 0.66 0.45

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 113: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 894 134 11 279 0 0 0 0 461 0 451Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6948 1752 4867 1698 1523 1589Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6948 1752 4867 1698 1523 1589Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 972 146 12 303 0 0 0 0 501 0 490RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 230Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1096 0 12 303 0 0 0 0 346 291 84Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 37 5 5Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 27.6 22.0 54.6 22.2 22.2 22.2Effective Green, g (s) 28.6 23.0 55.6 23.2 23.2 23.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.26 0.64 0.27 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2289 464 3118 454 407 425v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.01 c0.06v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 0.19 0.05v/c Ratio 0.48 0.03 0.10 0.76 0.71 0.20Uniform Delay, d1 23.2 23.6 6.0 29.3 28.8 24.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.08 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 4.9 0.1Delay (s) 23.2 2.0 0.1 36.0 33.7 24.7Level of Service C A A D C CApproach Delay (s) 23.2 0.2 0.0 31.6Approach LOS C A A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 672 801 68 217 247 135v/c Ratio 0.41 0.24 0.07 0.54 0.67 0.30Control Delay 7.3 1.1 33.0 10.6 40.7 7.3Queue Delay 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.3 1.3 33.0 10.6 40.7 7.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 112 4 9 0 122 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 17 20 63 209 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 286Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1701 3533 1431 507 557 610Starvation Cap Reductn 721 1623 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.42 0.05 0.43 0.44 0.22

Intersection Summary

Page 114: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 618 737 0 0 63 200 227 0 124 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1464 1814 1687Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1464 1814 1687Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 672 801 0 0 68 217 247 0 135 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 109 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 672 801 0 0 68 31 247 0 26 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 11 9 9Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 44.5 61.0 11.5 11.5 15.8 15.8Effective Green, g (s) 45.5 62.0 12.5 12.5 16.8 16.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.71 0.14 0.14 0.19 0.19Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1722 3476 883 211 351 327v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 c0.16 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.14 0.02v/c Ratio 0.39 0.23 0.08 0.15 0.70 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 12.4 4.2 32.2 32.5 32.7 28.7Progression Factor 0.47 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.2 0.0Delay (s) 5.8 0.8 32.2 32.6 37.8 28.7Level of Service A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 3.1 32.5 34.6 0.0Approach LOS A C C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.1% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 200 509 64 41 619 16 8 0 4 17 0 30Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 217 553 70 45 673 17 9 0 4 18 0 33Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 330 328pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.97vC, conflicting volume 715 648 1404 1852 346 1521 1878 268vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 609 385 1072 1563 50 1201 1591 149tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 76 96 92 100 100 81 100 96cM capacity (veh/h) 922 1032 115 71 883 96 68 825

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 494 346 213 336 186 13 51Volume Left 217 0 45 0 0 9 18Volume Right 0 70 0 0 17 4 33cSH 922 1700 1032 1700 1700 162 220Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.20 0.04 0.20 0.11 0.08 0.23Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 0 3 0 0 6 22Control Delay (s) 6.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 29.2 26.3Lane LOS A A D DApproach Delay (s) 3.6 0.6 29.2 26.3Approach LOS D D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 115: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 4 17 174 5 69 546Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 18 189 5 75 593Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 544 349pX, platoon unblocked 0.98vC, conflicting volume 674 227 220vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 631 227 220tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 98 94cM capacity (veh/h) 373 755 1321

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 23 195 273 396Volume Left 4 0 75 0Volume Right 18 5 0 0cSH 632 1700 1321 1700Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.11 0.06 0.23Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 5 0Control Delay (s) 10.9 0.0 2.5 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 10.9 0.0 1.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 17 291 6 73 182Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 18 316 7 79 198Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 280 613pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96vC, conflicting volume 711 355 348vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 681 311 304tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 97 93cM capacity (veh/h) 364 684 1188

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 22 323 277Volume Left 3 0 79Volume Right 18 7 0cSH 604 1700 1188Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.19 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 5Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 2.8Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 2.8Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 116: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th Street & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 5 143 12 11 49 23 31 0 30 6 0 4Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 155 13 12 53 25 34 0 33 7 0 4Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 366 357pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96vC, conflicting volume 103 193 302 325 197 330 319 101vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 103 142 255 279 146 284 273 101tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 99 95 100 96 99 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1460 1360 626 575 844 579 580 929

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 174 90 66 11Volume Left 5 12 34 7Volume Right 13 25 33 4cSH 1460 1360 717 682Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.02Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 8 1Control Delay (s) 0.3 1.1 10.5 10.4Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.3 1.1 10.5 10.4Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 2 10 37 395 497 46Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 11 40 429 540 50Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 233 437pX, platoon unblocked 0.72 0.72 0.72vC, conflicting volume 895 600 615vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 659 248 269tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 98 96cM capacity (veh/h) 265 527 911

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 13 183 286 590Volume Left 2 40 0 0Volume Right 11 0 0 50cSH 452 911 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.04 0.17 0.35Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 3 0 0Control Delay (s) 13.2 2.3 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 13.2 0.9 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 117: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase I Total Future 2015 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Mit Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 6 41 294 522 50Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 7 45 320 567 54Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 424 246pX, platoon unblocked 0.70 0.70 0.70vC, conflicting volume 878 630 647vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 609 252 277tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 99 99 95cM capacity (veh/h) 275 508 878

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 10 151 213 622Volume Left 3 45 0 0Volume Right 7 0 0 54cSH 396 878 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.05 0.13 0.37Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 4 0 0Control Delay (s) 14.3 3.1 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 14.3 1.3 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 118: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 360 696 66 1275 229 888 272 248 943 266v/c Ratio 0.90 0.35 0.19 1.00dr 0.85 0.75 0.45 0.77 0.82 0.52Control Delay 54.3 18.8 13.1 31.7 82.1 28.6 3.6 40.3 45.6 16.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 54.3 18.8 13.1 31.7 82.1 28.6 3.6 40.3 45.6 16.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 186 97 12 278 162 96 0 113 223 44Queue Length 95th (ft) #353 134 m20 #340 #292 141 2 #222 #276 124Internal Link Dist (ft) 610 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 407 2012 414 1442 270 1183 601 334 1155 508Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.88 0.35 0.16 0.88 0.85 0.75 0.45 0.74 0.82 0.52

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 331 433 207 61 646 527 211 817 250 228 868 245Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4839 1711 4710 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 211 4839 676 4710 1770 5085 1689 320 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 360 471 225 66 702 573 229 888 272 248 943 266RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 75 0 0 138 0 0 0 212 0 0 154Lane Group Flow (vph) 360 621 0 66 1137 0 229 888 60 248 943 112Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 51.6 39.0 32.8 27.2 12.9 20.0 20.0 31.9 19.5 19.5Effective Green, g (s) 54.6 42.0 38.8 30.2 15.9 23.0 23.0 37.9 22.5 19.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.37 0.29 0.15 0.22 0.22 0.36 0.21 0.19Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 401 1936 335 1355 268 1114 370 320 1090 333v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.13 0.02 0.24 c0.13 0.17 0.11 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0.06 0.04 0.17 0.06v/c Ratio 0.90 0.32 0.20 1.00dr 0.85 0.80 0.16 0.78 0.87 0.34Uniform Delay, d1 29.0 21.7 21.7 35.1 43.4 38.8 33.2 26.3 39.8 37.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.81 1.26 0.64 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 21.5 0.1 0.1 3.3 21.3 5.9 0.9 10.2 9.2 2.7Delay (s) 50.5 21.8 18.6 32.0 76.2 30.5 9.6 36.6 49.0 39.9Level of Service D C B C E C A D D DApproach Delay (s) 31.6 31.3 33.9 45.2Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 119: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 162 702 150 1342 333 325 35 258v/c Ratio 0.71 0.37 0.16 0.78 0.64 0.27 0.30 0.51Control Delay 39.7 12.8 2.9 20.5 29.1 12.2 48.2 23.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 39.7 12.8 2.9 20.5 29.1 12.2 48.2 23.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 110 5 116 159 41 22 40Queue Length 95th (ft) m#141 181 m25 227 227 68 53 77Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 249 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 228 1908 951 1730 541 1344 147 594Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.37 0.16 0.78 0.62 0.24 0.24 0.43

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 149 646 138 76 892 266 306 172 127 32 111 126Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3539 1636 4892 1769 2954 1757 3340Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.33 1.00 0.56 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 180 3539 1636 4058 622 2954 1027 3340Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 162 702 150 83 970 289 333 187 138 35 121 137RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 69 0 44 0 0 85 0 0 121 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 162 702 81 0 1298 0 333 240 0 35 137 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 11 11 1Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 7 4 8Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 54.1 54.1 54.1 41.1 37.4 37.4 9.1 9.1Effective Green, g (s) 57.1 56.6 56.6 43.6 40.4 40.4 12.1 12.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.42 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 229 1908 882 1685 516 1137 118 385v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.20 c0.16 0.08 0.04v/s Ratio Perm 0.32 0.05 c0.32 c0.09 0.03v/c Ratio 0.71 0.37 0.09 0.77 0.65 0.21 0.30 0.36Uniform Delay, d1 16.8 13.9 11.7 26.4 24.8 21.6 42.6 42.9Progression Factor 1.39 0.83 1.08 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 15.3 0.5 0.2 2.5 2.8 0.1 1.4 0.6Delay (s) 38.7 12.0 12.9 20.5 27.5 21.7 44.0 43.4Level of Service D B B C C C D DApproach Delay (s) 16.4 20.5 24.7 43.5Approach LOS B C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 120: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 871 1269 318 382 156 177v/c Ratio 1.48dl 0.75 0.84 0.63 0.38 0.37Control Delay 16.8 30.7 46.2 31.0 32.3 6.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 16.8 30.7 46.2 31.0 32.3 6.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 126 280 143 182 77 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 163 #372 220 272 131 47Internal Link Dist (ft) 249 433 116 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1298 1690 380 772 570 592Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.75 0.84 0.49 0.27 0.30

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 485 123 193 43 821 304 293 345 6 4 140 163Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3600 4785 1585 1671 1612 1339Flt Permitted 0.56 0.86 0.52 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2092 4133 868 1671 1596 1339Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 527 134 210 47 892 330 318 375 7 4 152 177RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 52 0 0 1 0 0 0 131Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 847 0 0 1217 0 318 381 0 0 156 46Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 21 21 29 13 23 23 13Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 7 4 8Permitted Phases 1 2 2 4 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 49.6 39.1 35.4 35.4 24.4 24.4Effective Green, g (s) 54.6 41.6 38.4 38.4 27.4 27.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.37 0.37 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1275 1637 372 611 416 349v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 c0.07 0.23v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 c0.29 c0.25 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 1.48dl 0.74 0.85 0.62 0.38 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 18.5 27.1 30.6 27.4 31.8 29.7Progression Factor 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 3.1 17.2 2.3 0.8 0.2Delay (s) 19.3 30.2 47.7 29.6 32.6 29.9Level of Service B C D C C CApproach Delay (s) 19.3 30.2 37.8 31.2Approach LOS B C D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 121: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 87 229 135 659 262 237v/c Ratio 0.17 0.28 0.24 0.69 0.32 0.20Control Delay 10.1 2.3 10.7 17.8 2.4 8.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.1 2.3 10.7 17.8 2.4 8.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 0 32 221 0 16Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 29 64 345 31 41Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 281 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 512 817 564 956 828 1193Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.28 0.24 0.69 0.32 0.20

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 22 211 124 606 241 0 0 0 2 87 129Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1298 1391 1739 1291 3149Flt Permitted 0.51 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 932 1298 1026 1739 1291 3149Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 63 24 229 135 659 262 0 0 0 2 95 140RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 103 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 91 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 87 126 135 659 144 0 0 0 0 146 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 137 137 80 29 13 13 29Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 513 714 564 956 710 1102v/s Ratio Prot c0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.11 0.05v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.24 0.69 0.20 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 8.9 9.0 9.3 13.0 9.1 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.5 1.0 4.1 0.6 0.2Delay (s) 9.6 9.5 10.3 17.1 9.8 18.0Level of Service A A B B A BApproach Delay (s) 9.5 14.4 0.0 18.0Approach LOS A B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 122: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 16 145 20 3 154 553 3 6 7 159 9 32Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 158 22 3 167 601 3 7 8 173 10 35Pedestrians 35 9 91 75Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 1 7 8Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 843 270 543 1144 190 382 554 277vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 843 270 543 1144 190 382 554 277tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 98 100 99 96 99 59 97 95cM capacity (veh/h) 727 1200 309 166 757 423 367 644

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 96 101 171 601 17 183 35Volume Left 17 0 3 0 3 173 0Volume Right 0 22 0 601 8 0 35cSH 727 1700 1200 1700 290 419 644Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.35 0.06 0.44 0.05Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 5 54 4Control Delay (s) 2.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 18.2 20.1 10.9Lane LOS A A C C BApproach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 18.2 18.6Approach LOS C C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 190 108 147 470 70 39 439v/c Ratio 0.51 0.39 0.36 0.44 0.06 0.08 0.41Control Delay 23.1 23.6 13.0 10.0 2.8 8.3 9.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 23.1 23.6 13.0 10.0 2.8 8.3 9.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 42 28 69 0 4 62Queue Length 95th (ft) 105 66 59 212 17 24 193Internal Link Dist (ft) 267 596 187 196Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 601 443 639 1077 1101 464 1073Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.24 0.23 0.44 0.06 0.08 0.41

Intersection Summary

Page 123: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 96 68 99 67 68 26 407 64 36 391 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 1791 1688 1731 1670 1549 1664Flt Permitted 0.97 0.61 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.44 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1625 1150 1688 1672 1670 719 1664Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 104 74 108 73 74 28 442 70 39 425 14RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 59 0 0 0 25 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 150 0 108 88 0 0 470 45 39 438 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 20 20 32 40 70 70 40Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 42.6 42.6 42.6 42.6Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 16.9 14.4 45.1 45.1 45.1 45.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 334 278 347 1077 1076 463 1072v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.09 c0.28 0.03 0.05v/c Ratio 0.45 0.39 0.25 0.44 0.04 0.08 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 24.3 22.2 23.3 6.2 4.6 4.7 6.0Progression Factor 1.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.3 0.1 0.4 1.2Delay (s) 28.7 22.6 23.4 7.4 4.6 5.0 7.2Level of Service C C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 28.7 23.1 7.1 7.0Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 240 141 270 478v/c Ratio 0.62 0.38 0.23 0.41Control Delay 27.9 18.0 6.9 8.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.9 18.0 6.9 8.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 34 37 75Queue Length 95th (ft) 132 67 94 179Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 297 1055 232Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 565 538 1163 1163Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.26 0.23 0.41

Intersection Summary

Page 124: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 56 99 65 11 77 41 35 207 6 44 353 42Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1933 1686 1956 1871Flt Permitted 0.88 0.96 0.91 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1729 1634 1786 1783Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 61 108 71 12 84 45 38 225 7 48 384 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 215 0 0 113 0 0 269 0 0 474 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 50 50 13 27 50 50 27Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 14.5 45.5 45.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.65 0.65Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 358 338 1161 1159v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.07 0.15 c0.27v/c Ratio 0.60 0.34 0.23 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 23.6 5.0 5.8Progression Factor 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.2 0.5 1.1Delay (s) 26.9 22.3 5.5 6.9Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 26.9 22.3 5.5 6.9Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 201 30 195 90 792 79 186 1016v/c Ratio 0.66 0.17 0.44 0.21 0.29 0.10 0.35 0.35Control Delay 31.3 31.0 8.2 12.3 19.9 9.8 15.1 6.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 31.3 31.0 8.2 12.3 19.9 9.8 15.1 6.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 67 15 4 29 156 0 45 55Queue Length 95th (ft) 143 39 57 m52 190 m29 m84 90Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 389 245 538 492 2759 759 570 2880Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.12 0.36 0.18 0.29 0.10 0.33 0.35

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 125: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 64 6 114 28 7 172 83 729 73 171 824 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1646 1472 1339 1825 4916 1291 1914 4796Flt Permitted 0.65 0.52 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1095 806 1339 476 4916 1291 604 4796Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 70 7 124 30 8 187 90 792 79 186 896 120RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 0 0 146 0 0 0 35 0 12 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 139 0 30 49 0 90 792 44 186 1004 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 158 158 84 23 130 130 23Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 20.2 20.2 20.2 61.8 56.4 56.4 66.8 58.9Effective Green, g (s) 23.2 23.2 23.2 67.8 58.9 58.9 72.8 61.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.65 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.58Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 242 178 296 415 2758 724 555 2805v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.02 0.16 c0.03 c0.21v/s Ratio Perm c0.13 0.04 0.12 0.03 0.20v/c Ratio 0.58 0.17 0.17 0.22 0.29 0.06 0.34 0.36Uniform Delay, d1 36.5 33.1 33.1 7.1 12.1 10.5 5.8 11.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.41 2.57 2.04 0.47Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 38.6 33.3 33.2 11.4 17.2 27.1 12.0 5.6Level of Service D C C B B C B AApproach Delay (s) 38.6 33.2 17.5 6.6Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.4 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.8% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 61 448 120 961 139 52 491v/c Ratio 0.26 0.24 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.11 0.58Control Delay 10.5 7.5 6.5 7.2 27.1 7.9 30.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.5 7.5 6.5 7.2 27.1 7.9 30.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 64 16 58 67 0 136Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 66 m25 71 119 27 192Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110Base Capacity (vph) 236 1873 457 1739 493 461 848Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.24 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.11 0.58

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 126: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 56 362 51 110 679 205 35 93 48 211 190 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 3205 1582 2948 1771 1354 3228Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 408 3205 785 2948 1437 1354 2446Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 61 393 55 120 738 223 38 101 52 229 207 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 27 0 0 0 36 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 61 438 0 120 934 0 0 139 16 0 482 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 56 56 64 21 34 34 21Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 36.0 33.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 237 1862 456 1713 493 426 839v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.01 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.55 0.28 0.04 0.57Uniform Delay, d1 10.8 10.7 10.9 13.5 25.1 25.0 28.2Progression Factor 0.68 0.71 0.48 0.49 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.3 1.1 0.9 1.4 0.2 2.9Delay (s) 9.8 7.8 6.3 7.5 26.5 25.2 31.1Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.1 7.4 26.2 31.1Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 48 589 234 1221 455 166 652v/c Ratio 0.35 0.22 0.56 0.64 0.64 0.27 0.82Control Delay 14.3 5.2 21.0 17.6 33.0 4.8 39.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 14.3 5.2 21.0 23.5 33.0 4.8 39.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 31 95 278 132 0 201Queue Length 95th (ft) m35 51 176 348 190 43 #286Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 137 2727 421 1913 707 626 797Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 629 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.22 0.56 0.95 0.64 0.27 0.82

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 127: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 44 485 57 215 896 227 119 300 153 215 300 85Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1587 4830 1766 3404 3349 1438 3377Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.63Satd. Flow (perm) 244 4830 749 3404 1952 1438 2167Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 48 527 62 234 974 247 129 326 166 234 326 92RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 575 0 234 1221 0 0 455 60 0 639 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 31 5 5 31 25 47 47 25Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.5 35.5 35.5Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 137 2714 421 1913 706 520 784v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.31 0.23 0.04 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.35 0.21 0.56 0.64 0.64 0.12 0.82Uniform Delay, d1 12.5 11.4 14.7 15.7 27.9 22.3 30.3Progression Factor 0.52 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 0.2 5.2 1.6 4.5 0.5 9.1Delay (s) 13.2 5.5 19.9 17.4 32.4 22.8 39.5Level of Service B A B B C C DApproach Delay (s) 6.1 17.8 29.8 39.5Approach LOS A B C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 982 45 512 247 535 528v/c Ratio 0.45 0.06 0.15 0.69 0.84 0.79Control Delay 26.2 5.5 0.1 46.1 21.5 17.5Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.0Total Delay 26.3 5.5 0.5 46.1 22.3 17.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 122 2 0 150 61 53Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 m7 0 #250 #281 #215Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 325Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2199 833 3386 402 665 700Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2231 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 378 0 0 0 23 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.05 0.44 0.61 0.83 0.75

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 128: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 724 179 41 471 0 0 0 0 252 0 953Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6831 1752 4867 1698 1419 1567Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6831 1752 4867 1698 1419 1567Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 787 195 45 512 0 0 0 0 274 0 1036RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 343Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 944 0 45 512 0 0 0 0 247 192 185Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 13 13Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 27.7 31.9 64.6 18.0 18.0 18.0Effective Green, g (s) 28.7 32.9 65.6 19.0 19.0 19.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.36 0.71 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2117 622 3448 348 291 322v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.03 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.14 0.12v/c Ratio 0.45 0.07 0.15 0.71 0.66 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 25.6 19.8 4.4 34.2 33.8 33.2Progression Factor 1.00 0.29 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 5.3 4.3 1.6Delay (s) 25.6 5.8 0.0 39.6 38.2 34.7Level of Service C A A D D CApproach Delay (s) 25.6 0.5 0.0 37.0Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39Actuated Cycle Length (s) 92.6 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 790 271 165 682 391 43v/c Ratio 0.63 0.09 0.12 0.94 0.81 0.09Control Delay 14.4 1.3 29.7 29.9 46.4 8.7Queue Delay 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 18.9 1.3 29.7 29.9 46.4 8.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 201 2 23 76 225 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 276 m6 39 #343 #336 25Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 322Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1334 3268 1591 758 594 586Starvation Cap Reductn 458 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.08 0.10 0.90 0.66 0.07

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 129: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 727 249 0 0 152 627 360 0 40 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1345 1814 1702Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1345 1814 1702Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 790 271 0 0 165 682 391 0 43 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 437 0 0 32 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 790 271 0 0 165 245 391 0 11 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48 3 3Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 59.5 19.0 19.0 23.1 23.1Effective Green, g (s) 36.5 60.5 20.0 20.0 24.1 24.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.65 0.22 0.22 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1295 3180 1324 290 472 443v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 0.06 0.03v/s Ratio Perm c0.18 c0.22 0.01v/c Ratio 0.61 0.09 0.12 0.85 0.83 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 5.9 29.2 34.8 32.3 25.5Progression Factor 0.50 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.0 0.0 19.0 10.9 0.0Delay (s) 11.6 1.1 29.3 53.9 43.2 25.5Level of Service B A C D D CApproach Delay (s) 8.9 49.1 41.5 0.0Approach LOS A D D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 92.6 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.9% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Driveway 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 788 17 11 1267 0 43 0 18 79 0 23Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 857 18 12 1377 0 47 0 20 86 0 25Pedestrians 10 10 50 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 329 329pX, platoon unblocked 0.83 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.83vC, conflicting volume 1427 925 1434 2367 498 1909 2376 519vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 812 662 389 1438 180 923 1448 0tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 98 89 100 97 50 100 97cM capacity (veh/h) 649 787 418 107 704 173 105 862

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 428 447 356 689 344 66 111Volume Left 0 0 12 0 0 47 86Volume Right 0 18 0 0 0 20 25cSH 649 1700 787 1700 1700 475 211Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.41 0.20 0.14 0.53Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 0 0 12 68Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 13.8 39.6Lane LOS A B EApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 13.8 39.6Approach LOS B E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 130: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 22 88 516 1 19 307Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 24 96 561 1 21 334Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 545 349pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 845 636 612vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 845 636 612tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 91 76 98cM capacity (veh/h) 279 397 926

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 120 562 132 222Volume Left 24 0 21 0Volume Right 96 1 0 0cSH 366 1700 926 1700Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.13Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 0 2 0Control Delay (s) 19.6 0.0 1.6 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 19.6 0.0 0.6Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 18 86 303 2 20 422Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 20 93 329 2 22 459Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 312 582pX, platoon unblocked 0.99 0.99 0.99vC, conflicting volume 908 405 382vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 876 389 365tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 93 85 98cM capacity (veh/h) 293 613 1131

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 113 332 480Volume Left 20 0 22Volume Right 93 2 0cSH 515 1700 1131Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.20 0.02Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 0 1Control Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 0.6Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 0.6Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 131: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th St. S. & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 2 148 34 29 100 6 35 0 30 31 0 22Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 161 37 32 109 7 38 0 33 34 0 24Pedestrians 25 25 50 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 2 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 377 347pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 165 248 458 462 254 466 477 187vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 165 248 458 462 254 466 477 187tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 98 91 100 96 92 100 97cM capacity (veh/h) 1359 1268 434 447 740 422 439 807

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 200 147 71 58Volume Left 2 32 38 34Volume Right 37 7 33 24cSH 1359 1268 537 526Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.11Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 11 9Control Delay (s) 0.1 1.9 12.7 12.7Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.1 1.9 12.7 12.7Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 4.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 9 53 11 476 387 12Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 58 12 517 421 13Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 276 396pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 0.95 0.95vC, conflicting volume 785 502 484vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 743 444 425tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 97 89 99cM capacity (veh/h) 308 502 1028

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 67 184 345 434Volume Left 10 12 0 0Volume Right 58 0 0 13cSH 460 1028 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.01 0.20 0.26Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 14.2 0.7 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 14.2 0.2 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 132: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future 2015-Phase I Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Mit Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 18 30 11 627 361 15Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 20 33 12 682 392 16Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 476 196pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 0.93 0.93vC, conflicting volume 840 476 459vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 791 399 381tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 93 94 99cM capacity (veh/h) 283 529 1051

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 52 239 454 409Volume Left 20 12 0 0Volume Right 33 0 0 16cSH 399 1051 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.01 0.27 0.24Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 15.4 0.5 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 15.4 0.2 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 133: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   G‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX G ‐ 

FUTURE CONDITION (2020) WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT 

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 

 

Page 134: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 50 494 55 691 80 451 78 574 1143 348v/c Ratio 0.23 0.52 0.23 0.64 0.42 0.28 0.13 0.79 0.44 0.35Control Delay 26.3 34.4 21.1 27.1 52.1 19.3 1.8 21.7 19.5 7.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.3 34.4 21.1 27.1 52.1 19.3 1.8 21.7 19.5 7.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 96 25 98 56 41 1 200 185 39Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 117 54 154 106 61 6 #393 272 121Internal Link Dist (ft) 590 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 271 1382 243 1340 219 1620 591 791 2620 1000Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.36 0.23 0.52 0.37 0.28 0.13 0.73 0.44 0.35

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 358 97 51 274 362 74 415 72 528 1052 320Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4833 1692 4651 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.38 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 367 4833 618 4651 1770 5085 1689 690 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 50 389 105 55 298 393 80 451 78 574 1143 348RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 53 0 0 247 0 0 0 54 0 0 134Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 441 0 55 444 0 80 451 24 574 1143 214Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 60Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 22.3 16.6 20.5 15.7 7.3 29.0 29.0 62.6 48.3 48.3Effective Green, g (s) 28.3 19.6 26.5 18.7 10.3 32.0 32.0 65.6 51.3 48.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.19 0.25 0.18 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.62 0.49 0.46Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 210 902 236 828 174 1550 515 719 2484 825v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.10 0.05 0.09 c0.23 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.01 c0.27 0.12v/c Ratio 0.24 0.49 0.23 0.54 0.46 0.29 0.05 0.80 0.46 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 29.5 38.2 30.4 39.2 44.7 27.8 25.7 11.9 17.7 17.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.12 1.05 0.61 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.2 5.8 0.6 0.8Delay (s) 29.7 38.6 24.1 44.5 47.6 17.4 4.0 17.7 18.3 18.1Level of Service C D C D D B A B B BApproach Delay (s) 37.8 43.0 19.6 18.1Approach LOS D D B B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 25.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.1% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 135: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 46 728 241 767 82 94 73 273v/c Ratio 0.09 0.29 0.19 0.38 0.42 0.15 0.27 0.34Control Delay 6.0 5.9 2.3 15.1 38.9 15.8 33.4 20.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 6.0 5.9 2.3 15.1 38.9 15.8 33.4 20.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 21 0 90 51 14 44 52Queue Length 95th (ft) m22 143 m43 m137 81 29 70 72Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 578 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 530 2525 1237 2027 319 1024 434 1250Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.29 0.19 0.38 0.26 0.09 0.17 0.22

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 42 670 222 121 563 21 75 43 43 67 153 98Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.94Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3539 1636 5017 1770 2897 1736 3442Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.50 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 541 3539 1636 3670 930 2897 1266 3442Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 46 728 241 132 612 23 82 47 47 73 166 107RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 69 0 2 0 0 37 0 0 84 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 728 172 0 765 0 82 57 0 73 189 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 22 22Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 72.4 72.4 72.4 55.4 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1Effective Green, g (s) 75.4 74.9 74.9 57.9 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.71 0.71 0.55 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 533 2524 1167 2024 196 610 266 724v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.21 0.02 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.11 c0.21 c0.09 0.06v/c Ratio 0.09 0.29 0.15 0.38 0.42 0.09 0.27 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 4.7 5.4 4.8 13.3 35.9 33.4 34.7 34.6Progression Factor 0.79 0.79 1.52 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.4 0.1 0.6 0.2Delay (s) 4.0 4.6 7.6 13.1 37.3 33.4 35.3 34.8Level of Service A A A B D C D CApproach Delay (s) 5.2 13.1 35.3 34.9Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 136: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 588 438 143 192 509 228v/c Ratio 0.40 0.35 0.96 0.30 0.85 0.41Control Delay 10.6 28.1 98.6 22.5 44.5 17.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.6 28.1 98.6 22.5 44.5 17.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 125 79 92 83 307 70Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 110 #221 139 #496 136Internal Link Dist (ft) 578 433 592 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1465 1234 149 640 599 561Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.35 0.96 0.30 0.85 0.41

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 211 298 32 50 311 42 132 150 27 43 425 210Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3741 4915 1578 1624 1602 1317Flt Permitted 0.64 0.81 0.23 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2449 4008 381 1624 1535 1317Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 229 324 35 54 338 46 143 163 29 47 462 228RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 14 0 0 6 0 0 0 46Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 583 0 0 424 0 143 186 0 0 509 182Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 39 27 27 39 29 49 49 29Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 29.5 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 32.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1459 1221 149 634 599 514v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.11v/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.11 c0.38 0.33 0.14v/c Ratio 0.40 0.35 0.96 0.29 0.85 0.35Uniform Delay, d1 16.7 28.4 31.2 22.0 29.2 22.6Progression Factor 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.8 61.2 0.4 11.3 0.6Delay (s) 12.9 29.2 92.4 22.4 40.5 23.2Level of Service B C F C D CApproach Delay (s) 12.9 29.2 52.3 35.1Approach LOS B C D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.4 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.4% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 137: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 269 578 199 207 142 188v/c Ratio 0.42 0.63 0.43 0.22 0.18 0.16Control Delay 13.0 5.7 14.3 9.9 2.3 13.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.0 5.7 14.3 9.9 2.3 13.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 22 54 49 0 24Queue Length 95th (ft) 129 96 108 85 24 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 286 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 647 913 463 956 768 1193Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.63 0.43 0.22 0.18 0.16

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 169 78 532 183 190 131 0 0 0 14 113 46Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 1268 1423 1739 1281 3317Flt Permitted 0.68 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1176 1268 842 1739 1281 3317Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 184 85 578 199 207 142 0 0 0 15 123 50RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 216 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 33 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 269 362 199 207 78 0 0 0 0 156 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84 46 42 42 46Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 647 697 463 956 705 1161v/s Ratio Prot 0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.29 0.24 0.06 0.05v/c Ratio 0.42 0.52 0.43 0.22 0.11 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 11.3 10.6 9.2 8.6 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 2.8 2.9 0.5 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 12.5 14.1 13.5 9.7 8.9 18.0Level of Service B B B A A BApproach Delay (s) 13.6 10.9 0.0 18.0Approach LOS B B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 138: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 29 403 6 0 53 179 11 18 14 391 0 51Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 438 7 0 58 195 12 20 15 425 0 55Pedestrians 32 2 77 71Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 0 6 7Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 323 522 698 905 301 535 810 229vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 323 522 698 905 301 535 810 229tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 95 92 98 0 100 92cM capacity (veh/h) 1142 980 244 233 653 320 265 697

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 251 226 29 223 47 425 55Volume Left 32 0 0 0 12 425 0Volume Right 0 7 0 195 15 0 55cSH 1142 1700 980 1700 299 320 697Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.16 1.33 0.08Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 14 519 6Control Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.3 200.1 10.6Lane LOS A C F BApproach Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 19.3 178.3Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 69.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 170 67 75 366 126 137 429v/c Ratio 0.46 0.24 0.20 0.34 0.11 0.25 0.40Control Delay 8.7 20.1 11.4 8.9 2.2 9.5 9.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.7 20.1 11.4 8.9 2.2 9.5 9.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 25 13 50 0 18 62Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 44 36 153 22 69 188Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 596 187 592Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 601 430 606 1089 1156 543 1067Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.16 0.12 0.34 0.11 0.25 0.40

Intersection Summary

Page 139: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 131 15 62 32 37 12 325 116 126 390 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1739 1631 1657 1733 1740 1576 1672Flt Permitted 0.98 0.65 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.51 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1702 1121 1657 1707 1740 851 1672Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 142 16 67 35 40 13 353 126 137 424 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 32 0 0 0 46 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 164 0 67 43 0 0 366 80 137 429 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 100 100 59 53 22 22 53Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 14.8 14.8 42.2 42.2 42.2 42.2Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 17.3 14.8 44.7 44.7 44.7 44.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 360 277 350 1090 1111 543 1068v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.06 0.21 0.05 0.16v/c Ratio 0.45 0.24 0.12 0.34 0.07 0.25 0.40Uniform Delay, d1 24.1 21.1 22.4 5.8 4.8 5.5 6.1Progression Factor 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.1 1.1 1.1Delay (s) 5.7 21.3 22.4 6.7 4.9 6.6 7.3Level of Service A C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 5.7 21.9 6.2 7.1Approach LOS A C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 8.1 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 201 75 306 203v/c Ratio 0.52 0.22 0.25 0.17Control Delay 26.9 20.3 6.8 5.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.9 20.3 6.8 5.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 23 39 18Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 50 106 59Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 644 1055 464Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 608 522 1245 1181Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.14 0.25 0.17

Intersection Summary

Page 140: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 31 129 25 9 43 17 31 248 2 8 123 55Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2033 1693 1960 1788Flt Permitted 0.93 0.95 0.96 0.99Satd. Flow (perm) 1906 1621 1886 1766Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 34 140 27 10 47 18 34 270 2 9 134 60RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 16 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 191 0 0 61 0 0 306 0 0 187 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 43 58 58Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 13.8 13.8 43.7 43.7Effective Green, g (s) 13.8 13.8 46.2 46.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 376 320 1245 1166v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04 c0.16 0.11v/c Ratio 0.51 0.19 0.25 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 23.4 4.8 4.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.3Delay (s) 25.5 26.6 5.3 4.8Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 25.5 26.6 5.3 4.8Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.4 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.31Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 72 11 108 26 523 42 297 1031v/c Ratio 0.21 0.04 0.29 0.06 0.19 0.05 0.43 0.33Control Delay 17.7 27.3 7.8 9.4 15.4 8.1 10.0 3.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 17.7 27.3 7.8 9.4 15.4 8.1 10.0 3.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 5 1 7 87 0 32 32Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 19 40 19 116 21 96 39Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 493 367 489 507 2791 813 703 3137Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.03 0.22 0.05 0.19 0.05 0.42 0.33

Intersection Summary

Page 141: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 32 1 33 10 1 98 24 481 39 273 901 48Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1812 1585 1361 1824 4916 1400 1896 4861Flt Permitted 0.83 0.72 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1537 1204 1361 498 4916 1400 819 4861Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 35 1 36 11 1 107 26 523 42 297 979 52RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 29 0 0 85 0 0 0 18 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 0 11 23 0 26 523 24 297 1027 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 63 42 42 63 31 91 91 31Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 60.4 57.1 57.1 71.0 62.4Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 21.8 21.8 66.4 59.6 59.6 75.7 64.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.72 0.62Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 319 250 283 394 2790 795 709 3005v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 0.11 c0.05 0.21v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.01 0.04 0.02 c0.26v/c Ratio 0.14 0.04 0.08 0.07 0.19 0.03 0.42 0.34Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 33.3 33.5 7.2 11.0 10.0 5.1 9.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.16 1.64 1.20 0.28Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 34.0 33.3 33.6 9.0 12.9 16.4 6.2 3.0Level of Service C C C A B B A AApproach Delay (s) 34.0 33.6 13.0 3.7Approach LOS C C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.35Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 22 523 53 684 109 108 181v/c Ratio 0.06 0.26 0.12 0.36 0.22 0.24 0.24Control Delay 7.9 9.1 6.3 3.6 28.6 7.2 27.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.9 9.1 6.3 3.6 28.6 7.2 27.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 61 9 32 54 0 46Queue Length 95th (ft) m10 83 m19 44 99 41 75Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 386 2032 454 1886 502 447 748Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.26 0.12 0.36 0.22 0.24 0.24

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 142: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 20 466 15 49 388 241 21 79 99 97 61 9Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1670 3280 1600 2898 1778 1336 3209Flt Permitted 0.36 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 625 3280 733 2898 1647 1336 2440Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 22 507 16 53 422 262 23 86 108 105 66 10RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 92 0 0 0 78 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 521 0 53 592 0 0 109 30 0 177 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 47 29 12 46 46 12Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 32.0 29.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.30Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 387 2030 454 1794 502 369 744v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.06 0.26 0.12 0.33 0.22 0.08 0.24Uniform Delay, d1 7.9 9.1 8.2 9.6 27.2 28.1 27.4Progression Factor 0.94 0.98 0.68 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.8Delay (s) 7.6 9.1 6.1 5.4 28.2 28.6 28.1Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 9.0 5.4 28.4 28.1Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 47 673 78 785 325 127 530v/c Ratio 0.21 0.29 0.25 0.48 0.32 0.18 0.48Control Delay 13.4 9.8 18.5 19.3 20.3 3.8 22.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.4 9.8 18.5 20.3 20.3 3.8 22.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 46 30 179 73 0 126Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 82 63 231 107 33 175Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 219 2353 316 1643 1031 715 1110Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 561 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.29 0.25 0.73 0.32 0.18 0.48

Intersection Summary

Page 143: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 43 536 83 72 549 173 82 217 117 144 298 45Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1582 4805 1765 3384 3356 1469 3436Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.72Satd. Flow (perm) 451 4805 650 3384 2354 1469 2519Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 47 583 90 78 597 188 89 236 127 157 324 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 653 0 78 785 0 0 325 56 0 523 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 8 8 25 6 25 25 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 43.5 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 219 2334 316 1644 1031 644 1104v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.23v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.04 c0.21v/c Ratio 0.21 0.28 0.25 0.48 0.32 0.09 0.47Uniform Delay, d1 15.5 16.1 15.8 18.1 19.2 17.2 20.9Progression Factor 0.68 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 0.3 1.9 1.0 0.8 0.3 1.5Delay (s) 12.7 10.3 17.6 19.1 20.0 17.5 22.4Level of Service B B B B C B CApproach Delay (s) 10.5 18.9 19.3 22.4Approach LOS B B B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1153 12 266 353 340 323v/c Ratio 0.47 0.02 0.09 0.72 0.72 0.47Control Delay 22.2 1.8 0.2 37.3 33.6 5.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 22.2 1.8 0.2 37.3 33.6 5.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 0 0 167 145 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 m1 0 #352 #330 67Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2459 734 2958 532 512 719Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 40 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.02 0.09 0.66 0.66 0.45

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 144: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 926 134 11 245 0 0 0 0 485 0 450Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6958 1752 4867 1698 1532 1589Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6958 1752 4867 1698 1532 1589Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1007 146 12 266 0 0 0 0 527 0 489RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 234Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1132 0 12 266 0 0 0 0 353 307 89Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 37 5 5Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 27.5 20.1 52.6 22.4 22.4 22.4Effective Green, g (s) 28.5 21.1 53.6 23.4 23.4 23.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.25 0.63 0.28 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2333 435 3069 467 422 437v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.01 c0.05v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.20 0.06v/c Ratio 0.49 0.03 0.09 0.76 0.73 0.20Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 24.2 6.1 28.2 27.9 23.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.09 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.1 5.2 0.1Delay (s) 22.5 2.2 0.1 34.3 33.1 23.7Level of Service C A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 22.5 0.2 0.0 30.5Approach LOS C A A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 692 841 72 228 207 141v/c Ratio 0.41 0.24 0.08 0.55 0.62 0.33Control Delay 7.0 1.0 32.0 10.4 39.7 7.8Queue Delay 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.0 1.2 32.0 10.4 39.7 7.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 111 4 9 0 100 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 17 21 63 177 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 286Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1737 3602 1460 521 568 624Starvation Cap Reductn 736 1638 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.43 0.05 0.44 0.36 0.23

Intersection Summary

Page 145: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase 2 Future Background 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 637 774 0 0 66 210 190 0 130 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 14 11 11 11Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1465 1814 1687Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1465 1814 1687Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 692 841 0 0 72 228 207 0 141 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 116 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 692 841 0 0 72 33 207 0 25 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 11 9 9Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 44.7 61.1 11.4 11.4 13.9 13.9Effective Green, g (s) 45.7 62.1 12.4 12.4 14.9 14.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.73 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1766 3556 895 214 318 296v/s Ratio Prot c0.21 c0.17 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.11 0.01v/c Ratio 0.39 0.24 0.08 0.16 0.65 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 11.5 3.7 31.4 31.7 32.6 29.3Progression Factor 0.49 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.6 0.0Delay (s) 5.6 0.8 31.4 31.8 36.2 29.4Level of Service A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 3.0 31.7 33.5 0.0Approach LOS A C C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 11.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.0% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 146: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 378 725 70 1117 241 930 286 226 989 279v/c Ratio 0.97 0.37 0.21 0.81 0.89 0.74 0.45 0.72 0.82 0.53Control Delay 67.3 19.8 11.9 26.1 87.5 27.3 3.2 35.7 45.1 16.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 67.3 19.8 11.9 26.1 87.5 27.3 3.2 35.7 45.1 16.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 203 104 12 225 170 101 0 99 234 50Queue Length 95th (ft) #393 143 m20 232 #311 144 2 #177 #288 132Internal Link Dist (ft) 610 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 391 1960 388 1419 270 1254 632 334 1200 524Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 0.37 0.18 0.79 0.89 0.74 0.45 0.68 0.82 0.53

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 348 449 218 64 656 372 222 856 263 208 910 257Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4836 1711 4783 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 214 4836 656 4783 1770 5085 1689 309 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 378 488 237 70 713 404 241 930 286 226 989 279RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 78 0 0 97 0 0 0 220 0 0 155Lane Group Flow (vph) 378 647 0 70 1020 0 241 930 66 226 989 124Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 50.7 37.9 32.5 26.7 13.0 21.4 21.4 32.2 20.3 20.3Effective Green, g (s) 53.7 40.9 38.5 29.7 16.0 24.4 24.4 38.2 23.3 20.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.39 0.37 0.28 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.36 0.22 0.19Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 395 1884 329 1353 270 1182 392 311 1128 347v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.13 0.02 0.21 c0.14 0.18 0.10 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.06 0.04 0.16 0.07v/c Ratio 0.96 0.34 0.21 0.75 0.89 0.79 0.17 0.73 0.88 0.36Uniform Delay, d1 29.9 22.6 22.0 34.3 43.7 37.9 32.2 25.8 39.5 36.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.69 1.25 0.63 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 33.7 0.1 0.1 2.0 27.7 5.2 0.9 7.0 9.7 2.9Delay (s) 63.6 22.7 16.1 25.9 82.5 29.0 8.1 32.8 49.1 39.6Level of Service E C B C F C A C D DApproach Delay (s) 36.7 25.3 33.8 44.9Approach LOS D C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 147: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 171 724 130 1366 163 301 32 254v/c Ratio 0.51 0.30 0.11 0.64 0.67 0.37 0.15 0.28Control Delay 19.9 6.0 1.0 11.6 48.0 16.3 29.2 12.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 19.9 6.0 1.0 11.6 48.0 16.3 29.2 12.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 84 2 93 100 44 17 30Queue Length 95th (ft) m117 125 m12 m127 151 70 37 54Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 578 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 337 2408 1155 2131 344 1097 309 1233Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.30 0.11 0.64 0.47 0.27 0.10 0.21

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 157 666 120 80 905 271 150 143 134 29 100 133Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3539 1636 4891 1768 2921 1758 3319Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.54 1.00 0.49 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 225 3539 1636 4031 1004 2921 901 3319Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 171 724 130 87 984 295 163 155 146 32 109 145RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 42 0 39 0 0 110 0 0 110 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 724 88 0 1327 0 163 191 0 32 144 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 11 11 1Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 68.9 68.9 68.9 51.9 22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6Effective Green, g (s) 71.9 71.4 71.4 54.4 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.52 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 2407 1112 2088 245 712 220 809v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.20 0.07 0.04v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.05 c0.33 c0.16 0.04v/c Ratio 0.51 0.30 0.08 0.64 0.67 0.27 0.15 0.18Uniform Delay, d1 9.5 6.8 5.7 18.2 35.8 32.1 31.1 31.4Progression Factor 1.62 0.73 0.47 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.8 0.3 0.1 0.7 6.7 0.2 0.3 0.1Delay (s) 20.2 5.2 2.8 11.3 42.5 32.3 31.4 31.5Level of Service C A A B D C C CApproach Delay (s) 7.4 11.3 35.9 31.5Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 148: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 897 1313 338 372 147 180v/c Ratio 0.94dl 0.97 0.95 0.65 0.27 0.31Control Delay 13.3 52.5 72.5 35.4 26.6 5.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.3 52.5 72.5 35.4 26.6 5.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 150 300 220 209 71 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 145 #406 #402 313 122 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 578 433 592 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1573 1353 355 573 548 577Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.97 0.95 0.65 0.27 0.31

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 491 129 205 31 857 319 311 335 7 4 132 166Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3598 4784 1577 1670 1612 1339Flt Permitted 0.61 0.89 0.62 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2245 4240 1036 1670 1597 1339Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 534 140 223 34 932 347 338 364 8 4 143 180RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 31 0 0 62 0 0 1 0 0 0 118Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 866 0 0 1251 0 338 371 0 0 147 62Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 21 21 29 13 23 23 13Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 52.0 29.5 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 57.0 32.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.30 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1541 1292 355 573 548 459v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 c0.30 c0.33 0.09 0.05v/c Ratio 0.94dl 0.97 0.95 0.65 0.27 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 15.8 36.0 33.7 29.1 25.0 23.8Progression Factor 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 18.5 35.4 2.8 0.4 0.2Delay (s) 17.8 54.5 69.1 32.0 25.3 23.9Level of Service B D E C C CApproach Delay (s) 17.8 54.5 49.6 24.6Approach LOS B D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 40.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 149: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 90 238 141 690 275 249v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.72 0.33 0.21Control Delay 10.3 2.3 10.9 18.9 2.4 8.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.3 2.3 10.9 18.9 2.4 8.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 0 34 238 0 18Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 30 67 373 32 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 281 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 485 821 563 956 834 1193Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.72 0.33 0.21

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 60 23 219 130 635 253 0 0 0 2 92 135Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1756 1298 1392 1739 1291 3149Flt Permitted 0.48 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 880 1298 1023 1739 1291 3149Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 65 25 238 141 690 275 0 0 0 2 100 147RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 107 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 90 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 90 131 141 690 151 0 0 0 0 159 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 137 137 80 29 13 13 29Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 484 714 563 956 710 1102v/s Ratio Prot c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.10 0.14 0.12 0.05v/c Ratio 0.19 0.18 0.25 0.72 0.21 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 9.0 9.0 9.4 13.4 9.2 17.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.6 1.1 4.7 0.7 0.3Delay (s) 9.9 9.6 10.5 18.1 9.9 18.1Level of Service A A B B A BApproach Delay (s) 9.7 15.1 0.0 18.1Approach LOS A B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 150: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 17 149 21 3 160 581 3 7 8 167 10 33Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 162 23 3 174 632 3 8 9 182 11 36Pedestrians 35 9 91 75Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 1 7 8Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 880 276 471 1188 192 711 884 513vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 880 276 471 1188 192 711 884 513tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 99 95 99 25 95 92cM capacity (veh/h) 704 1195 333 156 754 243 236 453

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 99 104 90 718 20 192 36Volume Left 18 0 3 0 3 182 0Volume Right 0 23 0 632 9 0 36cSH 704 1700 1195 1700 279 243 453Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.42 0.07 0.79 0.08Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 6 148 6Control Delay (s) 2.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 18.9 59.5 13.6Lane LOS A A C F BApproach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 18.9 52.3Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 133 113 152 465 73 43 366v/c Ratio 0.37 0.34 0.37 0.43 0.07 0.09 0.34Control Delay 28.7 22.0 12.7 9.8 2.8 8.4 8.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 28.7 22.0 12.7 9.8 2.8 8.4 8.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 44 28 68 0 5 49Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 66 59 207 18 25 154Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 596 187 592Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 598 529 640 1089 1100 466 1070Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.21 0.24 0.43 0.07 0.09 0.34

Intersection Summary

Page 151: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: S. 12th St. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 97 15 104 66 74 21 407 67 40 324 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1750 1786 1680 1732 1670 1548 1662Flt Permitted 0.96 0.73 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.44 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1689 1372 1680 1692 1670 724 1662Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 105 16 113 72 80 23 442 73 43 352 14RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 63 0 0 0 26 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 124 0 113 89 0 0 465 47 43 365 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 20 20 32 40 70 70 40Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 14.5 42.5 42.5 42.5 42.5Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 17.0 14.5 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 350 333 348 1088 1074 465 1068v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.08 c0.27 0.03 0.06v/c Ratio 0.36 0.34 0.25 0.43 0.04 0.09 0.34Uniform Delay, d1 23.7 21.9 23.2 6.2 4.6 4.7 5.7Progression Factor 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.2 0.1 0.4 0.9Delay (s) 32.3 22.1 23.4 7.4 4.7 5.1 6.6Level of Service C C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 32.3 22.8 7.0 6.4Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.40Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 247 117 280 454v/c Ratio 0.62 0.33 0.24 0.38Control Delay 27.2 18.4 6.9 7.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.2 18.4 6.9 7.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 86 29 39 68Queue Length 95th (ft) 133 48 97 164Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 644 1055 464Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 590 536 1167 1204Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.22 0.24 0.38

Intersection Summary

Page 152: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 57 99 71 11 77 19 37 216 5 22 356 40Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.98 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1988 1735 1963 1885Flt Permitted 0.90 0.96 0.91 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1805 1669 1794 1847Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 62 108 77 12 84 21 40 235 5 24 387 43RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 220 0 0 104 0 0 279 0 0 450 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 13 27 27Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 14.5 45.5 45.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.65 0.65Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 374 346 1166 1201v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.06 0.16 c0.24v/c Ratio 0.59 0.30 0.24 0.37Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 23.5 5.1 5.7Progression Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.2 0.5 0.9Delay (s) 26.6 20.7 5.6 6.6Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 26.6 20.7 5.6 6.6Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 210 27 201 95 834 83 193 1067v/c Ratio 0.70 0.15 0.45 0.23 0.30 0.11 0.37 0.37Control Delay 34.2 30.6 8.2 12.3 20.0 9.4 16.5 7.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 34.2 30.6 8.2 12.3 20.0 9.4 16.5 7.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 13 4 30 166 0 54 61Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 36 58 m55 200 m30 m93 104Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 380 241 542 472 2741 757 552 2864Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.11 0.37 0.20 0.30 0.11 0.35 0.37

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 153: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 67 7 119 25 8 177 87 767 76 178 866 116Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1648 1476 1341 1826 4916 1291 1918 4796Flt Permitted 0.64 0.51 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1068 795 1341 444 4916 1291 572 4796Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 73 8 129 27 9 192 95 834 83 193 941 126RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 61 0 0 149 0 0 0 37 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 149 0 27 52 0 95 834 46 193 1054 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 158 158 84 23 130 130 23Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 20.4 20.4 20.4 61.6 56.1 56.1 66.6 58.6Effective Green, g (s) 23.4 23.4 23.4 67.6 58.6 58.6 72.6 61.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.58Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 238 177 299 398 2744 721 537 2791v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.02 0.17 c0.04 c0.22v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 0.03 0.13 0.04 0.21v/c Ratio 0.62 0.15 0.17 0.24 0.30 0.06 0.36 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 32.8 33.0 7.2 12.3 10.6 6.0 11.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.57 1.39 2.51 2.20 0.52Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 40.5 33.0 33.1 11.5 17.4 26.9 13.3 6.4Level of Service D C C B B C B AApproach Delay (s) 40.5 33.1 17.6 7.4Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 63 472 126 1010 144 55 503v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.58 0.29 0.12 0.60Control Delay 11.4 7.4 7.0 7.7 27.3 9.3 31.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 11.4 7.4 7.0 7.7 27.3 9.3 31.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 67 17 61 70 2 142Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 70 m26 73 123 30 198Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 221 1871 444 1739 491 460 838Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.58 0.29 0.12 0.60

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 154: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 380 54 116 714 215 36 97 51 224 190 49Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 3203 1585 2949 1772 1354 3228Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.73Satd. Flow (perm) 380 3203 763 2949 1432 1354 2421Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 63 413 59 126 776 234 39 105 55 243 207 53RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 27 0 0 0 34 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 461 0 126 983 0 0 144 21 0 494 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 56 56 64 21 34 34 21Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 36.0 33.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 1861 443 1713 491 426 830v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.02 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.57 0.29 0.05 0.60Uniform Delay, d1 11.0 10.8 11.0 13.8 25.2 25.1 28.5Progression Factor 0.69 0.70 0.50 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 0.3 1.2 1.1 1.5 0.2 3.1Delay (s) 10.6 7.8 6.7 8.1 26.7 25.3 31.6Level of Service B A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.1 7.9 26.3 31.6Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 50 622 247 1262 470 175 527v/c Ratio 0.39 0.23 0.61 0.66 0.62 0.28 0.61Control Delay 16.8 5.3 23.4 18.1 31.7 4.7 29.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 16.8 5.3 23.4 26.2 31.7 4.7 29.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 34 105 292 134 0 143Queue Length 95th (ft) m38 54 198 366 191 44 201Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 127 2730 405 1918 764 632 861Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 620 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.23 0.61 0.97 0.62 0.28 0.61

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 155: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 513 59 227 942 219 124 308 161 106 291 88Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1587 4832 1766 3413 3346 1438 3385Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.68Satd. Flow (perm) 225 4832 719 3413 2110 1438 2329Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 50 558 64 247 1024 238 135 335 175 115 316 96RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 608 0 247 1262 0 0 470 63 0 509 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 31 5 5 31 25 47 47 25Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.5 35.5 35.5Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 126 2715 404 1918 764 520 843v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.37v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.34 c0.22 0.04 0.22v/c Ratio 0.40 0.22 0.61 0.66 0.62 0.12 0.60Uniform Delay, d1 13.0 11.5 15.3 16.0 27.5 22.4 27.4Progression Factor 0.53 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 8.6 0.2 6.7 1.8 3.7 0.5 3.2Delay (s) 15.6 5.6 22.1 17.8 31.2 22.8 30.6Level of Service B A C B C C CApproach Delay (s) 6.3 18.5 28.9 30.6Approach LOS A B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.2% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 905 47 525 259 559 552v/c Ratio 0.40 0.07 0.16 0.66 0.89 0.83Control Delay 26.2 6.4 0.1 42.6 28.2 22.2Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0Total Delay 26.3 6.4 0.4 42.6 28.9 22.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 2 0 153 112 94Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 m7 m0 244 #342 #291Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 373Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2275 766 3301 446 664 702Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2095 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 258 0 0 0 15 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.06 0.44 0.58 0.86 0.79

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 156: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 687 145 43 483 0 0 0 0 265 0 995Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6870 1752 4867 1698 1418 1565Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6870 1752 4867 1698 1418 1565Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 747 158 47 525 0 0 0 0 288 0 1082RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 307 307Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 873 0 47 525 0 0 0 0 259 252 245Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 13 13Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 30.3 31.5 66.8 21.1 21.1 21.1Effective Green, g (s) 31.3 32.5 67.8 22.1 22.1 22.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.33 0.69 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2196 582 3371 383 320 353v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.03 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.18 0.16v/c Ratio 0.40 0.08 0.16 0.68 0.79 0.70Uniform Delay, d1 26.0 22.4 5.2 34.6 35.7 34.8Progression Factor 1.00 0.30 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 11.3 4.7Delay (s) 26.0 6.8 0.1 38.3 47.0 39.5Level of Service C A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 26.0 0.6 0.0 42.3Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.9 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 121.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 755 279 174 717 397 46v/c Ratio 0.54 0.09 0.14 1.09 0.89 0.10Control Delay 10.5 0.9 33.3 75.4 59.2 9.4Queue Delay 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 12.0 0.9 33.3 75.4 59.2 9.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 178 1 27 ~248 244 0Queue Length 95th (ft) m235 m4 43 #474 #411 28Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 322Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1516 3420 1222 659 476 480Starvation Cap Reductn 537 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.77 0.08 0.14 1.09 0.83 0.10

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 157: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Future Background Phase 2 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 695 257 0 0 160 660 365 0 42 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 11 14 11 11 11Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1336 1814 1702Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1336 1814 1702Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 755 279 0 0 174 717 397 0 46 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 395 0 0 35 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 755 279 0 0 174 322 397 0 11 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48 3 3Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 42.3 65.4 18.1 18.1 22.5 22.5Effective Green, g (s) 43.3 66.4 19.1 19.1 23.5 23.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.68 0.20 0.20 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1453 3301 1196 261 435 409v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 0.06 0.03v/s Ratio Perm c0.24 c0.22 0.01v/c Ratio 0.52 0.08 0.15 1.23 0.91 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 19.8 5.4 32.6 39.4 36.2 28.5Progression Factor 0.45 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 133.5 22.9 0.0Delay (s) 9.0 0.8 32.7 172.9 59.1 28.5Level of Service A A C F E CApproach Delay (s) 6.8 145.5 55.9 0.0Approach LOS A F E A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 68.2 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.9 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 123.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 158: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   H‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX H ‐ 

FUTURE CONDITION (2020) WITH FULL BUILD‐OUT 

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 

Page 159: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 50 537 55 752 80 451 78 784 1143 348v/c Ratio 0.23 0.54 0.23 0.66 0.42 0.36 0.16 1.02 0.44 0.35Control Delay 25.8 35.5 18.6 24.1 52.5 23.2 2.5 59.3 20.0 8.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 25.8 35.5 18.6 24.1 52.5 23.2 2.5 59.3 20.0 8.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 109 22 100 56 43 1 ~444 188 39Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 131 m46 147 106 63 5 #757 272 121Internal Link Dist (ft) 590 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 271 1380 240 1363 219 1267 479 765 2578 988Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.39 0.23 0.55 0.37 0.36 0.16 1.02 0.44 0.35

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 397 97 51 280 412 74 415 72 721 1052 320Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4853 1695 4631 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 351 4853 568 4631 1770 5085 1689 623 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 50 432 105 55 304 448 80 451 78 784 1143 348RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 43 0 0 273 0 0 0 60 0 0 136Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 494 0 55 479 0 80 451 18 784 1143 212Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 60Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 23.2 17.5 21.4 16.6 7.3 21.7 21.7 61.7 47.4 47.4Effective Green, g (s) 29.2 20.5 27.4 19.6 10.3 24.7 24.7 64.7 50.4 47.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.20 0.26 0.19 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.62 0.48 0.45Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 210 947 232 864 174 1196 397 757 2441 810v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.10 0.02 c0.10 0.05 0.09 c0.36 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.04 0.01 c0.28 0.12v/c Ratio 0.24 0.52 0.24 0.55 0.46 0.38 0.05 1.04 0.47 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 29.0 37.9 29.8 38.7 44.7 33.7 31.0 19.1 18.3 17.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.02 1.06 0.65 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.2 42.3 0.6 0.8Delay (s) 29.2 38.4 20.9 40.1 48.0 22.6 6.5 61.4 19.0 18.7Level of Service C D C D D C A E B BApproach Delay (s) 37.6 38.8 23.9 33.5Approach LOS D D C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 160: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 46 821 401 781 134 105 98 374v/c Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.33 0.42 0.69 0.14 0.31 0.41Control Delay 5.8 6.4 2.5 17.0 52.7 15.7 32.1 27.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 5.8 6.4 2.5 17.0 52.7 15.7 32.1 27.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 111 42 111 83 15 54 92Queue Length 95th (ft) m17 m126 m45 m134 135 33 88 117Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 250 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 496 2387 1233 1849 265 1035 430 1241Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.33 0.42 0.51 0.10 0.23 0.30

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 42 755 369 121 573 24 123 53 43 90 246 98Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3539 1636 5015 1770 2927 1736 3500Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.41 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 517 3539 1636 3599 773 2927 1253 3500Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 46 821 401 132 623 26 134 58 47 98 267 107RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 130 0 3 0 0 35 0 0 47 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 821 271 0 778 0 134 70 0 98 327 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 22 22Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 68.3 68.3 68.3 51.3 23.2 23.2 23.2 23.2Effective Green, g (s) 71.3 70.8 70.8 53.8 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.51 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 499 2386 1103 1844 193 730 313 873v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.23 0.02 0.09v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.17 c0.22 c0.17 0.08v/c Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.25 0.42 0.69 0.10 0.31 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 6.0 7.3 6.7 15.9 35.8 30.3 32.1 32.6Progression Factor 0.69 0.72 1.85 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 10.3 0.1 0.6 0.3Delay (s) 4.4 5.4 12.7 15.5 46.1 30.3 32.7 32.9Level of Service A A B B D C C CApproach Delay (s) 7.7 15.5 39.2 32.8Approach LOS A B D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 16.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 161: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 594 565 143 201 593 271v/c Ratio 0.42 0.52 1.51 0.31 0.98 0.48Control Delay 9.5 31.4 302.4 22.9 65.8 20.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.5 31.4 302.4 22.9 65.8 20.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 53 111 ~134 88 388 94Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 149 #259 146 #623 172Internal Link Dist (ft) 248 433 166 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1409 1093 95 640 603 561Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.52 1.51 0.31 0.98 0.48

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 216 298 32 135 342 42 132 158 27 43 502 249Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3749 4895 1581 1626 1604 1317Flt Permitted 0.59 0.72 0.15 1.00 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2264 3554 242 1626 1545 1317Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 235 324 35 147 372 46 143 172 29 47 546 271RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 10 0 0 5 0 0 0 47Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 589 0 0 555 0 143 196 0 0 593 224Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 39 27 27 39 29 49 49 29Turn Type D.P+P Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 29.5 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 32.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1404 1083 94 635 603 514v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.16 c0.59 0.38 0.17v/c Ratio 0.42 0.51 1.52 0.31 0.98 0.44Uniform Delay, d1 16.9 30.1 32.0 22.2 31.7 23.5Progression Factor 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 1.7 281.2 0.4 32.3 0.8Delay (s) 11.6 31.8 313.2 22.5 64.0 24.3Level of Service B C F C E CApproach Delay (s) 11.6 31.8 143.4 51.5Approach LOS B C F D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 50.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.5% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 162: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 269 578 199 223 142 188v/c Ratio 0.42 0.63 0.43 0.23 0.18 0.16Control Delay 13.1 5.7 14.3 10.1 2.3 13.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.1 5.7 14.3 10.1 2.3 13.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 22 54 53 0 24Queue Length 95th (ft) 130 96 108 91 24 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 286 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 640 913 463 956 768 1193Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.63 0.43 0.23 0.18 0.16

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 169 78 532 183 205 131 0 0 0 14 113 46Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1672 1268 1423 1739 1281 3317Flt Permitted 0.67 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1164 1268 842 1739 1281 3317Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 184 85 578 199 223 142 0 0 0 15 123 50RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 216 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 33 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 269 362 199 223 78 0 0 0 0 156 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84 46 42 42 46Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 640 697 463 956 705 1161v/s Ratio Prot 0.13v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.29 0.24 0.06 0.05v/c Ratio 0.42 0.52 0.43 0.23 0.11 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 11.3 10.6 9.3 8.6 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 2.8 2.9 0.6 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 12.6 14.1 13.5 9.9 8.9 18.0Level of Service B B B A A BApproach Delay (s) 13.6 10.9 0.0 18.0Approach LOS B B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 163: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 29 403 6 0 68 179 11 18 14 391 0 51Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 438 7 0 74 195 12 20 15 425 0 55Pedestrians 32 2 77 71Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 0 6 7Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 339 522 706 921 301 551 827 237vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 339 522 706 921 301 551 827 237tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 95 91 98 0 100 92cM capacity (veh/h) 1126 980 240 228 653 311 259 689

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 251 226 37 232 47 425 55Volume Left 32 0 0 0 12 425 0Volume Right 0 7 0 195 15 0 55cSH 1126 1700 980 1700 294 311 689Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.14 0.16 1.37 0.08Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 14 540 7Control Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.5 216.8 10.7Lane LOS A C F BApproach Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 19.5 193.1Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 73.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 187 67 92 535 126 137 455v/c Ratio 0.50 0.24 0.23 0.52 0.11 0.33 0.43Control Delay 14.4 19.9 11.5 11.5 2.3 11.5 10.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 14.4 19.9 11.5 11.5 2.3 11.5 10.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 25 16 89 0 19 70Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 44 41 261 22 79 203Internal Link Dist (ft) 277 596 187 153Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 600 431 612 1031 1151 417 1062Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.16 0.15 0.52 0.11 0.33 0.43

Intersection Summary

Page 164: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 131 30 62 40 45 43 449 116 126 414 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1697 1639 1657 1726 1740 1581 1672Flt Permitted 0.98 0.62 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.39 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1663 1071 1657 1622 1740 656 1672Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 142 33 67 43 49 47 488 126 137 450 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 39 0 0 0 46 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 174 0 67 54 0 0 535 80 137 455 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 100 100 59 53 22 22 53Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 17.5 15.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 268 355 1031 1106 417 1063v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.27v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.06 c0.33 0.05 0.21v/c Ratio 0.49 0.25 0.15 0.52 0.07 0.33 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 24.1 21.0 22.3 6.9 4.9 5.9 6.4Progression Factor 0.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.9 0.1 2.1 1.3Delay (s) 12.3 21.2 22.4 8.8 5.0 8.0 7.6Level of Service B C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 12.3 21.9 8.1 7.7Approach LOS B C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.8 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 209 82 323 214v/c Ratio 0.55 0.24 0.26 0.18Control Delay 27.7 16.4 6.9 5.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.7 16.4 6.9 5.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 23 42 20Queue Length 95th (ft) 121 m42 111 64Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 286 1055 200Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 595 521 1237 1164Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.16 0.26 0.18

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 165: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 39 129 25 9 43 23 31 256 10 14 127 56Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2027 1669 1955 1790Flt Permitted 0.91 0.95 0.96 0.97Satd. Flow (perm) 1868 1603 1882 1747Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 42 140 27 10 47 25 34 278 11 15 138 61RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 20 0 0 1 0 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 200 0 0 62 0 0 322 0 0 199 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 43 58 58Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 14.0 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 14.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 374 321 1237 1148v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.04 c0.17 0.11v/c Ratio 0.54 0.19 0.26 0.17Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 23.3 5.0 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.3Delay (s) 25.8 22.5 5.5 5.0Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 25.8 22.5 5.5 5.0Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.32Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 72 12 108 26 523 51 297 1031v/c Ratio 0.21 0.05 0.29 0.06 0.19 0.06 0.43 0.33Control Delay 17.7 27.4 7.8 9.4 15.4 7.9 10.1 3.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 17.7 27.4 7.8 9.4 15.4 7.9 10.1 3.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 6 1 7 86 0 32 32Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 20 40 19 115 23 96 39Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 493 367 489 507 2791 817 703 3137Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.03 0.22 0.05 0.19 0.06 0.42 0.33

Intersection Summary

Page 166: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 32 1 33 11 1 98 24 481 47 273 901 48Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1812 1585 1361 1824 4916 1400 1896 4861Flt Permitted 0.83 0.72 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1537 1204 1361 498 4916 1400 819 4861Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 35 1 36 12 1 107 26 523 51 297 979 52RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 29 0 0 85 0 0 0 22 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 0 12 23 0 26 523 29 297 1027 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 63 42 42 63 31 91 91 31Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 60.4 57.1 57.1 71.0 62.4Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 21.8 21.8 66.4 59.6 59.6 75.7 64.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.72 0.62Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 319 250 283 394 2790 795 709 3005v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 0.11 c0.05 0.21v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.01 0.04 0.02 c0.26v/c Ratio 0.14 0.05 0.08 0.07 0.19 0.04 0.42 0.34Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 33.3 33.5 7.2 11.0 10.0 5.1 9.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.15 1.69 1.20 0.27Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 34.0 33.3 33.6 8.9 12.8 17.1 6.2 2.9Level of Service C C C A B B A AApproach Delay (s) 34.0 33.6 13.0 3.7Approach LOS C C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.35Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 30 523 53 684 118 108 186v/c Ratio 0.08 0.26 0.12 0.36 0.23 0.24 0.25Control Delay 8.1 9.1 6.2 3.5 28.9 7.2 27.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.1 9.1 6.2 3.5 28.9 7.2 27.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 61 9 31 59 0 47Queue Length 95th (ft) m14 83 m16 42 106 41 77Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 386 2032 454 1886 505 447 743Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.26 0.12 0.36 0.23 0.24 0.25

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 167: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 28 466 15 49 388 241 21 87 99 97 64 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1670 3280 1600 2898 1780 1336 3213Flt Permitted 0.36 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.73Satd. Flow (perm) 625 3280 733 2898 1656 1336 2425Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 30 507 16 53 422 262 23 95 108 105 70 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 92 0 0 0 78 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 521 0 53 592 0 0 118 30 0 182 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 47 29 12 46 46 12Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 32.0 29.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.30Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 387 2030 454 1794 505 369 739v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.02 c0.07v/c Ratio 0.08 0.26 0.12 0.33 0.23 0.08 0.25Uniform Delay, d1 8.0 9.1 8.2 9.6 27.3 28.1 27.4Progression Factor 0.94 0.98 0.67 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.4 0.8Delay (s) 7.9 9.2 6.0 5.2 28.4 28.6 28.2Level of Service A A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 9.1 5.2 28.5 28.2Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 47 673 78 911 367 127 571v/c Ratio 0.27 0.29 0.25 0.57 0.36 0.18 0.54Control Delay 15.4 9.8 18.5 20.9 20.9 3.8 23.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 15.4 9.8 18.5 22.7 20.9 3.8 23.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 46 30 220 84 0 141Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 80 63 281 122 33 195Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 176 2353 316 1610 1027 715 1059Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 505 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.29 0.25 0.82 0.36 0.18 0.54

Intersection Summary

Page 168: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 43 536 83 72 549 289 82 256 117 177 304 45Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1585 4805 1765 3316 3361 1469 3432Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.69Satd. Flow (perm) 362 4805 650 3316 2345 1469 2401Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 47 583 90 78 597 314 89 278 127 192 330 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 653 0 78 911 0 0 367 56 0 564 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 8 8 25 6 25 25 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 43.5 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 176 2334 316 1611 1027 644 1052v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.27v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.12 0.16 0.04 c0.24v/c Ratio 0.27 0.28 0.25 0.57 0.36 0.09 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 16.0 16.1 15.8 19.1 19.7 17.2 21.7Progression Factor 0.68 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 0.3 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.3 2.0Delay (s) 14.4 10.3 17.6 20.6 20.6 17.5 23.6Level of Service B B B C C B CApproach Delay (s) 10.6 20.4 19.8 23.6Approach LOS B C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.4 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1188 12 350 369 355 335v/c Ratio 0.50 0.02 0.11 0.78 0.77 0.49Control Delay 24.2 1.6 0.2 43.8 37.5 6.1Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 24.3 1.6 0.5 43.8 37.6 6.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 119 0 0 195 163 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 195 m0 0 #394 #358 69Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 377Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2379 764 3043 498 488 702Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2077 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 156 0 0 0 1 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.53 0.02 0.36 0.74 0.73 0.48

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 169: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 946 147 11 322 0 0 0 0 485 0 489Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6935 1752 4867 1698 1519 1588Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6935 1752 4867 1698 1519 1588Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1028 160 12 350 0 0 0 0 527 0 532RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 246Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1164 0 12 350 0 0 0 0 369 311 89Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 37 5 5Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 28.4 23.9 57.3 22.9 22.9 22.9Effective Green, g (s) 29.4 24.9 58.3 23.9 23.9 23.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.28 0.65 0.26 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2260 484 3146 450 402 421v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.01 c0.07v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.20 0.06v/c Ratio 0.52 0.02 0.11 0.82 0.77 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 24.6 23.8 6.1 31.1 30.6 25.8Progression Factor 1.00 0.08 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.6 8.2 0.1Delay (s) 24.7 2.0 0.1 41.7 38.8 25.9Level of Service C A A D D CApproach Delay (s) 24.7 0.2 0.0 35.8Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 25.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.2 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 713 842 72 228 290 141v/c Ratio 0.44 0.25 0.08 0.55 0.74 0.30Control Delay 8.1 1.3 33.7 10.7 44.0 7.0Queue Delay 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.4 1.5 33.7 10.7 44.0 7.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 127 5 10 0 150 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 17 21 64 248 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 286Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1659 3433 1368 502 532 594Starvation Cap Reductn 691 1568 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.45 0.05 0.45 0.55 0.24

Intersection Summary

Page 170: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 656 775 0 0 66 210 267 0 130 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1463 1814 1686Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1463 1814 1686Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 713 842 0 0 72 228 290 0 141 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 112 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 713 842 0 0 72 33 290 0 29 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 11 9 9Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 45.5 62.5 12.0 12.0 17.7 17.7Effective Green, g (s) 46.5 63.5 13.0 13.0 18.7 18.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.70 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1693 3426 884 211 376 350v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 c0.17 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.16 0.02v/c Ratio 0.42 0.25 0.08 0.16 0.77 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 13.5 4.8 33.4 33.8 33.7 28.8Progression Factor 0.48 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 8.6 0.0Delay (s) 6.6 1.0 33.4 33.9 42.4 28.9Level of Service A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 3.6 33.8 38.0 0.0Approach LOS A C D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.2 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 200 540 108 69 653 16 13 0 6 17 0 30Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 217 587 117 75 710 17 14 0 7 18 0 33Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 330 328pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.97vC, conflicting volume 752 729 1535 2008 387 1638 2058 280vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 647 493 1229 1743 115 1341 1798 162tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 76 92 83 100 99 75 100 96cM capacity (veh/h) 891 948 86 53 807 73 49 808

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 511 411 252 355 195 21 51Volume Left 217 0 75 0 0 14 18Volume Right 0 117 0 0 17 7 33cSH 891 1700 948 1700 1700 119 174Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.21 0.11 0.17 0.29Queue Length 95th (ft) 24 0 6 0 0 15 29Control Delay (s) 6.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 41.4 34.0Lane LOS A A E DApproach Delay (s) 3.4 1.0 41.4 34.0Approach LOS E D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.2% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 171: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 6 26 192 8 116 620Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 28 209 9 126 674Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 544 349pX, platoon unblocked 0.96vC, conflicting volume 837 248 242vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 748 248 242tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 98 96 90cM capacity (veh/h) 294 732 1296

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 35 217 351 449Volume Left 7 0 126 0Volume Right 28 9 0 0cSH 572 1700 1296 1700Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.13 0.10 0.26Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 8 0Control Delay (s) 11.7 0.0 3.5 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 11.7 0.0 1.5Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 5 25 309 9 124 192Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 27 336 10 135 209Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 280 613pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96vC, conflicting volume 854 376 371vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 825 325 320tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 98 96 88cM capacity (veh/h) 282 667 1164

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 33 346 343Volume Left 5 0 135Volume Right 27 10 0cSH 543 1700 1164Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.20 0.12Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 10Control Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 4.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 4.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 172: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th Street & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 8 145 12 11 49 39 31 0 30 9 0 6Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 158 13 12 53 42 34 0 33 10 0 7Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 366 357pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98vC, conflicting volume 121 196 321 351 199 348 336 109vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 121 167 295 326 170 322 311 109tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 99 99 94 100 96 98 100 99cM capacity (veh/h) 1439 1354 596 550 832 554 560 919

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 179 108 66 16Volume Left 9 12 34 10Volume Right 13 42 33 7cSH 1439 1354 693 659Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.02Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 8 2Control Delay (s) 0.4 0.9 10.7 10.6Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.4 0.9 10.7 10.6Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 15 62 442 530 77Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 16 67 480 576 84Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 233 437pX, platoon unblocked 0.68 0.68 0.68vC, conflicting volume 1028 653 685vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 807 257 304tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 98 97 92cM capacity (veh/h) 194 493 838

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 20 228 320 660Volume Left 3 67 0 0Volume Right 16 0 0 84cSH 393 838 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.08 0.19 0.39Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 7 0 0Control Delay (s) 14.7 3.5 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 14.7 1.4 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 173: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase2 Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 5 9 69 312 584 85Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 10 75 339 635 92Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 424 246pX, platoon unblocked 0.65 0.65 0.65vC, conflicting volume 1036 716 752vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 789 299 355tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 97 98 90cM capacity (veh/h) 188 444 769

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 15 188 226 727Volume Left 5 75 0 0Volume Right 10 0 0 92cSH 299 769 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.10 0.13 0.43Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 8 0 0Control Delay (s) 17.7 4.7 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 17.7 2.1 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 174: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 378 736 70 1516 241 930 286 283 989 279v/c Ratio 0.96 0.37 0.21 1.25dr 0.89 0.80 0.47 0.85 0.85 0.54Control Delay 67.1 19.7 14.3 51.0 87.5 30.3 3.6 49.1 47.1 16.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 67.1 19.7 14.3 51.0 87.5 30.3 3.6 49.1 47.1 16.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 205 106 19 ~364 170 101 0 132 234 50Queue Length 95th (ft) #395 146 m22 m#350 #311 145 2 #277 #288 132Internal Link Dist (ft) 610 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 392 1995 391 1462 270 1167 608 334 1162 512Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.96 0.37 0.18 1.04 0.89 0.80 0.47 0.85 0.85 0.54

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 348 459 218 64 696 698 222 856 263 260 910 257Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4840 1711 4668 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 209 4840 649 4668 1770 5085 1689 319 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 378 499 237 70 757 759 241 930 286 283 989 279RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 75 0 0 169 0 0 0 224 0 0 156Lane Group Flow (vph) 378 661 0 70 1347 0 241 930 62 283 989 123Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 51.4 38.6 33.2 27.4 13.0 19.7 19.7 32.5 19.6 19.6Effective Green, g (s) 54.4 41.6 39.2 30.4 16.0 22.7 22.7 38.5 22.6 19.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.37 0.29 0.15 0.22 0.22 0.37 0.22 0.19Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 394 1918 331 1351 270 1099 365 328 1094 335v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.14 0.02 0.29 c0.14 0.18 0.13 c0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.06 0.04 0.19 0.07v/c Ratio 0.96 0.34 0.21 1.25dr 0.89 0.85 0.17 0.86 0.90 0.37Uniform Delay, d1 30.7 22.2 21.5 37.3 43.7 39.5 33.5 26.8 40.1 37.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.81 1.25 0.64 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 34.2 0.1 0.0 12.9 27.7 7.9 1.0 19.6 12.1 3.1Delay (s) 64.9 22.3 20.3 43.3 82.5 33.3 8.9 46.4 52.2 40.4Level of Service E C C D F C A D D DApproach Delay (s) 36.7 42.3 36.6 49.0Approach LOS D D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 41.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.8% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 175: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 171 749 173 1452 493 371 38 281v/c Ratio 0.61 0.36 0.17 0.84 1.42 0.33 0.13 0.23Control Delay 30.4 9.7 1.5 18.5 235.1 16.1 25.3 12.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 30.4 9.7 1.5 18.5 235.1 16.1 25.3 12.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 106 6 176 ~448 56 17 32Queue Length 95th (ft) m120 m136 m17 m164 #649 94 42 63Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 249 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 279 2056 1023 1734 347 1114 296 1245Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.36 0.17 0.84 1.42 0.33 0.13 0.23

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 157 689 159 80 969 287 454 208 133 35 125 133Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3539 1636 4893 1768 2972 1759 3352Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.54 1.00 0.47 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 149 3539 1636 4026 1013 2972 863 3352Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 171 749 173 87 1053 312 493 226 145 38 136 145RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 72 0 47 0 0 95 0 0 95 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 749 101 0 1405 0 493 276 0 38 186 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 11 11 1Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 58.5 58.5 58.5 41.5 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.5 61.0 61.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.58 0.58 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 281 2056 950 1687 347 1019 296 1149v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.21 0.09 0.06v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.06 c0.35 c0.49 0.04v/c Ratio 0.61 0.36 0.11 0.83 1.42 0.27 0.13 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 19.6 11.7 9.8 27.2 34.5 25.0 23.7 24.0Progression Factor 1.16 0.79 0.77 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 8.3 0.4 0.2 2.3 205.5 0.1 0.2 0.1Delay (s) 30.9 9.6 7.8 19.2 240.0 25.1 23.9 24.1Level of Service C A A B F C C CApproach Delay (s) 12.7 19.2 147.7 24.0Approach LOS B B F C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 47.5 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 176: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 933 1346 338 425 171 190v/c Ratio 1.01dl 1.06 1.01 0.74 0.31 0.33Control Delay 13.0 75.2 86.7 39.6 27.4 6.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.0 75.2 86.7 39.6 27.4 6.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 151 ~348 ~228 249 84 7Queue Length 95th (ft) 189 #444 #415 370 140 56Internal Link Dist (ft) 249 433 116 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1579 1275 336 573 548 573Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 1.06 1.01 0.74 0.31 0.33

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 524 129 205 54 865 319 311 384 7 4 154 175Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3602 4786 1577 1671 1612 1339Flt Permitted 0.61 0.83 0.59 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2275 3991 981 1671 1598 1339Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 570 140 223 59 940 347 338 417 8 4 167 190RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 60 0 0 1 0 0 0 114Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 905 0 0 1286 0 338 424 0 0 171 76Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 21 21 29 13 23 23 13Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 1 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 52.0 29.5 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 57.0 32.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.30 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1551 1216 336 573 548 459v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 c0.32 c0.34 0.11 0.06v/c Ratio 1.01dl 1.06 1.01 0.74 0.31 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 16.1 36.5 34.5 30.4 25.4 24.0Progression Factor 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 42.5 50.6 5.4 0.4 0.2Delay (s) 17.2 79.0 85.1 35.8 25.8 24.3Level of Service B E F D C CApproach Delay (s) 17.2 79.0 57.7 25.0Approach LOS B E E C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 51.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 177: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 90 238 141 695 275 249v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.73 0.33 0.21Control Delay 10.3 2.3 10.9 19.1 2.4 8.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.3 2.3 10.9 19.1 2.4 8.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 0 34 242 0 19Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 30 67 378 32 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 281 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 481 821 563 956 834 1191Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.73 0.33 0.21

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 60 23 219 130 639 253 0 0 0 2 92 135Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 12 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1757 1298 1392 1739 1291 3149Flt Permitted 0.48 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 874 1298 1023 1739 1291 3149Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 65 25 238 141 695 275 0 0 0 2 100 147RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 107 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 89 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 90 131 141 695 151 0 0 0 0 160 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 137 137 80 29 13 13 29Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 481 714 563 956 710 1102v/s Ratio Prot c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.10 0.14 0.12 0.05v/c Ratio 0.19 0.18 0.25 0.73 0.21 0.15Uniform Delay, d1 9.0 9.0 9.4 13.5 9.2 17.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.6 1.1 4.8 0.7 0.3Delay (s) 9.9 9.6 10.5 18.3 9.9 18.1Level of Service A A B B A BApproach Delay (s) 9.7 15.2 0.0 18.1Approach LOS A B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 178: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 17 149 21 3 164 581 3 7 8 167 10 33Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 162 23 3 178 632 3 8 9 182 11 36Pedestrians 35 9 91 75Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 1 7 8Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 885 276 473 1193 192 715 888 515vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 885 276 473 1193 192 715 888 515tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 99 95 99 25 95 92cM capacity (veh/h) 701 1195 332 155 754 242 234 452

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 99 104 92 721 20 192 36Volume Left 18 0 3 0 3 182 0Volume Right 0 23 0 632 9 0 36cSH 701 1700 1195 1700 277 241 452Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.42 0.07 0.80 0.08Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 6 149 6Control Delay (s) 2.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 19.0 60.7 13.7Lane LOS A A C F BApproach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 19.0 53.3Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 10.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th St Connection & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 238 113 157 510 73 45 535v/c Ratio 0.59 0.46 0.37 0.48 0.07 0.10 0.50Control Delay 21.1 26.1 12.5 10.8 2.8 8.6 11.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 21.1 26.1 12.5 10.8 2.8 8.6 11.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 44 28 82 0 5 87Queue Length 95th (ft) 111 71 60 239 18 27 255Internal Link Dist (ft) 267 596 187 196Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 612 383 642 1057 1094 431 1066Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.30 0.24 0.48 0.07 0.10 0.50

Intersection Summary

Page 179: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th St Connection & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 97 111 104 68 76 29 440 67 41 479 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1630 1795 1679 1731 1670 1552 1667Flt Permitted 0.98 0.53 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.41 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1597 993 1679 1654 1670 673 1667Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 105 121 113 74 83 32 478 73 45 521 14RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 65 0 0 65 0 0 0 26 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 173 0 113 92 0 0 510 47 45 534 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 20 20 32 40 70 70 40Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 14.8 14.8 42.2 42.2 42.2 42.2Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 17.3 14.8 44.7 44.7 44.7 44.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 245 355 1056 1066 430 1064v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.11 0.31 0.03 0.07v/c Ratio 0.51 0.46 0.26 0.48 0.04 0.10 0.50Uniform Delay, d1 24.4 22.4 23.0 6.6 4.7 4.9 6.7Progression Factor 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.5 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.5 1.7Delay (s) 26.3 22.9 23.2 8.2 4.8 5.4 8.4Level of Service C C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 26.3 23.0 7.8 8.2Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 249 161 285 532v/c Ratio 0.65 0.42 0.25 0.47Control Delay 28.9 17.2 7.1 9.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 28.9 17.2 7.1 9.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 87 36 41 90Queue Length 95th (ft) 138 68 100 211Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 297 1055 232Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 553 542 1144 1131Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.30 0.25 0.47

Intersection Summary

Page 180: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 99 71 11 77 60 37 218 7 62 380 48Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 1662 1956 1866Flt Permitted 0.86 0.97 0.90 0.93Satd. Flow (perm) 1685 1615 1768 1741Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 64 108 77 12 84 65 40 237 8 67 413 52RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 40 0 0 1 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 222 0 0 121 0 0 284 0 0 528 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 50 50 13 27 50 50 27Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.7 14.7 42.8 42.8Effective Green, g (s) 14.7 14.7 45.3 45.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.65 0.65Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 354 339 1144 1127v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.13 0.07 0.16 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.63 0.36 0.25 0.47Uniform Delay, d1 25.2 23.6 5.2 6.3Progression Factor 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 0.2 0.5 1.4Delay (s) 27.7 22.2 5.7 7.7Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 27.7 22.2 5.7 7.7Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: Driveway & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 210 36 201 95 834 85 193 1067v/c Ratio 0.70 0.20 0.45 0.23 0.30 0.11 0.37 0.37Control Delay 34.2 32.0 8.2 12.3 20.0 9.3 16.5 7.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 34.2 32.0 8.2 12.3 20.0 9.3 16.5 7.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 18 4 30 166 0 54 62Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 45 58 m55 200 m30 m89 104Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 380 241 542 472 2741 757 552 2864Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.15 0.37 0.20 0.30 0.11 0.35 0.37

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 181: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: Driveway & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 67 7 119 33 8 177 87 767 78 178 866 116Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1648 1476 1341 1826 4916 1291 1918 4796Flt Permitted 0.64 0.51 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1068 795 1341 444 4916 1291 572 4796Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 73 8 129 36 9 192 95 834 85 193 941 126RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 61 0 0 149 0 0 0 38 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 149 0 36 52 0 95 834 47 193 1054 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 158 158 84 23 130 130 23Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 20.4 20.4 20.4 61.6 56.1 56.1 66.6 58.6Effective Green, g (s) 23.4 23.4 23.4 67.6 58.6 58.6 72.6 61.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.58Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 238 177 299 398 2744 721 537 2791v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.02 0.17 c0.04 c0.22v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 0.05 0.13 0.04 0.21v/c Ratio 0.62 0.20 0.17 0.24 0.30 0.07 0.36 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 33.2 33.0 7.2 12.3 10.6 6.0 11.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.57 1.38 2.53 2.22 0.52Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 40.5 33.4 33.1 11.4 17.4 27.1 13.4 6.4Level of Service D C C B B C B AApproach Delay (s) 40.5 33.1 17.6 7.5Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 16.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 65 472 126 1010 147 55 529v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.58 0.30 0.12 0.63Control Delay 11.7 7.3 6.3 6.9 27.4 9.5 32.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 11.7 7.3 6.3 6.9 27.4 9.5 32.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 67 17 62 72 3 151Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 70 m24 m73 125 31 210Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 221 1871 444 1739 488 459 843Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.58 0.30 0.12 0.63

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 182: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 60 380 54 116 714 215 36 99 51 224 206 57Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 3203 1585 2949 1773 1354 3227Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 380 3203 763 2949 1425 1354 2429Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 65 413 59 126 776 234 39 108 55 243 224 62RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 27 0 0 0 34 0 10 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 461 0 126 983 0 0 147 21 0 519 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 56 56 64 21 34 34 21Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 36.0 33.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 1861 443 1713 489 426 833v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.02 c0.21v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.57 0.30 0.05 0.62Uniform Delay, d1 11.1 10.8 11.0 13.8 25.3 25.1 28.8Progression Factor 0.69 0.68 0.45 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 0.3 1.1 1.0 1.6 0.2 3.5Delay (s) 10.9 7.6 6.1 7.3 26.9 25.3 32.3Level of Service B A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.0 7.1 26.4 32.3Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 50 622 247 1296 481 175 803v/c Ratio 0.42 0.23 0.61 0.68 1.06dl 0.28 1.28dlControl Delay 18.7 5.3 23.4 18.6 37.3 4.7 81.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 18.7 5.3 23.4 29.8 37.3 4.7 81.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 34 105 306 146 0 ~308Queue Length 95th (ft) m39 54 198 382 212 44 #433Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 119 2730 405 1911 651 632 761Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 604 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.23 0.61 0.99 0.74 0.28 1.06

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

Page 183: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 513 59 227 942 250 124 318 161 318 332 88Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1588 4832 1766 3399 3352 1438 3375Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.60Satd. Flow (perm) 211 4832 719 3399 1799 1438 2074Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 50 558 64 247 1024 272 135 346 175 346 361 96RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 10 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 608 0 247 1296 0 0 481 63 0 793 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 31 5 5 31 25 47 47 25Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.5 35.5 35.5Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 119 2715 404 1910 651 520 751v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.34 0.27 0.04 c0.38v/c Ratio 0.42 0.22 0.61 0.68 1.06dl 0.12 1.28dlUniform Delay, d1 13.2 11.5 15.3 16.3 29.2 22.4 33.5Progression Factor 0.53 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 10.0 0.2 6.7 2.0 7.4 0.5 48.5Delay (s) 17.0 5.5 22.1 18.2 36.5 22.8 82.0Level of Service B A C B D C FApproach Delay (s) 6.4 18.9 32.9 82.0Approach LOS A B C F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 32.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.2% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1135 47 548 259 564 557v/c Ratio 0.51 0.07 0.16 0.65 0.91 0.85Control Delay 27.8 6.1 0.1 42.3 32.3 25.0Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.0Total Delay 27.9 6.1 0.4 42.3 33.3 25.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 149 2 0 153 132 113Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 m7 m0 244 #370 #317Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 325Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2222 782 3331 440 648 686Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2093 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 251 0 0 0 14 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.06 0.44 0.59 0.89 0.81

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 184: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 817 227 43 504 0 0 0 0 265 0 1005Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6783 1752 4867 1698 1417 1565Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6783 1752 4867 1698 1417 1565Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 888 247 47 548 0 0 0 0 288 0 1092RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 293 293Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1093 0 47 548 0 0 0 0 259 271 264Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 13 13Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 30.2 32.3 67.5 21.6 21.6 21.6Effective Green, g (s) 31.2 33.3 68.5 22.6 22.6 22.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.34 0.69 0.23 0.23 0.23Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2136 589 3364 387 323 357v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.03 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.19 0.17v/c Ratio 0.51 0.08 0.16 0.67 0.84 0.74Uniform Delay, d1 27.7 22.4 5.3 34.8 36.5 35.5Progression Factor 1.00 0.29 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 16.9 7.1Delay (s) 27.8 6.5 0.1 38.2 53.4 42.6Level of Service C A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 27.8 0.6 0.0 46.2Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47Actuated Cycle Length (s) 99.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 125.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 886 288 174 717 420 46v/c Ratio 0.63 0.09 0.14 1.12 0.93 0.10Control Delay 11.9 0.8 33.5 89.7 65.0 9.4Queue Delay 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 16.7 0.8 33.5 89.7 65.0 9.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 228 1 27 ~274 262 0Queue Length 95th (ft) m295 m4 43 #500 #445 28Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 322Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1497 3377 1207 638 470 475Starvation Cap Reductn 529 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.09 0.14 1.12 0.89 0.10

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 185: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 815 265 0 0 160 660 386 0 42 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1334 1814 1701Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1334 1814 1701Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 886 288 0 0 174 717 420 0 46 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 378 0 0 35 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 886 288 0 0 174 339 420 0 11 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48 3 3Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 42.8 65.9 18.1 18.1 23.2 23.2Effective Green, g (s) 43.8 66.9 19.1 19.1 24.2 24.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.68 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.24Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1452 3286 1182 257 443 415v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 0.06 0.03v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 c0.23 0.01v/c Ratio 0.61 0.09 0.15 1.32 0.95 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 21.1 5.6 33.2 40.0 36.8 28.5Progression Factor 0.46 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.0 0.0 168.6 29.3 0.0Delay (s) 10.2 0.8 33.3 208.6 66.2 28.5Level of Service B A C F E CApproach Delay (s) 7.9 174.4 62.5 0.0Approach LOS A F E A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 76.5 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 99.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 127.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Driveway 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 824 29 19 1255 0 82 0 35 79 0 23Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 896 32 21 1364 0 89 0 38 86 0 25Pedestrians 10 10 50 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 329 329pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.89 0.86 0.86 0.89 0.86 0.86 0.80vC, conflicting volume 1414 977 1492 2417 524 1951 2433 515vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 648 724 308 1388 214 844 1406 0tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 97 80 100 94 53 100 97cM capacity (veh/h) 719 747 455 109 671 183 106 829

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 448 479 362 682 341 127 111Volume Left 0 0 21 0 0 89 86Volume Right 0 32 0 0 0 38 25cSH 719 1700 747 1700 1700 503 222Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.28 0.03 0.40 0.20 0.25 0.50Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 0 0 25 63Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 14.6 36.5Lane LOS A B EApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 14.6 36.5Approach LOS B E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 186: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 41 165 630 2 32 332Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 45 179 685 2 35 361Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 545 349pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1011 761 737vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1011 761 737tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 79 45 96cM capacity (veh/h) 213 328 832

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 224 687 155 241Volume Left 45 0 35 0Volume Right 179 2 0 0cSH 297 1700 832 1700Volume to Capacity 0.76 0.40 0.04 0.14Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 0 3 0Control Delay (s) 46.7 0.0 2.5 0.0Lane LOS E AApproach Delay (s) 46.7 0.0 1.0Approach LOS E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 8.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 34 163 334 3 33 458Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 177 363 3 36 498Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 312 582pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98vC, conflicting volume 1009 440 416vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 999 417 393tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 85 70 97cM capacity (veh/h) 241 587 1097

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 214 366 534Volume Left 37 0 36Volume Right 177 3 0cSH 471 1700 1097Volume to Capacity 0.45 0.22 0.03Queue Length 95th (ft) 58 0 3Control Delay (s) 18.9 0.0 0.9Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 18.9 0.0 0.9Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 4.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 187: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th St Connection & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 163 34 29 100 10 35 0 30 57 0 41Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 177 37 32 109 11 38 0 33 62 0 45Pedestrians 25 25 50 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 2 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 377 347pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 170 264 499 485 271 487 498 189vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 170 264 499 485 271 487 498 189tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 97 90 100 95 85 100 94cM capacity (veh/h) 1354 1250 397 434 725 408 426 804

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 217 151 71 107Volume Left 3 32 38 62Volume Right 37 11 33 45cSH 1354 1250 501 514Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.03 0.14 0.21Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 12 19Control Delay (s) 0.1 1.8 13.4 13.8Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.1 1.8 13.4 13.8Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 5.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 16 99 17 510 434 21Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 108 18 554 472 23Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 276 396pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 0.95 0.95vC, conflicting volume 872 558 545vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 839 509 495tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 93 77 98cM capacity (veh/h) 267 458 974

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 125 203 370 495Volume Left 17 18 0 0Volume Right 108 0 0 23cSH 417 974 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.30 0.02 0.22 0.29Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 17.3 1.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 17.3 0.3 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 188: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 34 57 19 668 411 23Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 62 21 726 447 25Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 476 196pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 0.93 0.93vC, conflicting volume 939 534 522vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 897 463 450tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 85 87 98cM capacity (veh/h) 240 481 992

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 99 263 484 472Volume Left 37 21 0 0Volume Right 62 0 0 25cSH 350 992 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.02 0.28 0.28Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 2 0 0Control Delay (s) 19.3 0.9 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 19.3 0.3 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 189: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   I‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX I ‐ 

FUTURE CONDITION (2020) WITH FULL BUILD‐OUT 

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS: 

MITIGATED CONDITIONS 

 

Page 190: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 50 537 55 752 80 451 78 784 1143 348v/c Ratio 0.24 0.68 0.25 0.57 0.43 0.57 0.24 0.99 0.46 0.36Control Delay 25.2 39.5 24.5 27.5 56.9 33.5 3.9 53.7 21.1 7.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 25.2 39.5 24.5 27.5 56.9 33.5 3.9 53.7 21.1 7.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 164 29 126 57 42 0 455 202 37Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 212 m61 176 107 #191 3 #754 263 110Internal Link Dist (ft) 590 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 205 922 220 1491 202 790 329 801 2475 962Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.58 0.25 0.50 0.40 0.57 0.24 0.98 0.46 0.36

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 397 97 51 280 412 74 415 72 721 1052 320Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3378 1701 4631 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 352 3378 431 4631 1770 5085 1689 450 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 50 432 105 55 304 448 80 451 78 784 1143 348RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 270 0 0 0 67 0 0 147Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 515 0 55 482 0 80 451 11 784 1143 201Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 60 60Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 24.8 20.8 24.8 20.8 6.9 11.9 11.9 59.2 45.3 45.3Effective Green, g (s) 30.8 23.8 30.8 23.8 9.9 14.9 14.9 62.2 48.3 45.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.23 0.29 0.23 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.59 0.46 0.43Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 194 766 211 1050 167 722 240 787 2339 774v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.15 c0.02 0.10 0.05 0.09 c0.41 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.06 0.01 c0.18 0.11v/c Ratio 0.26 0.67 0.26 0.46 0.48 0.62 0.05 1.00 0.49 0.26Uniform Delay, d1 27.6 37.0 27.7 35.0 45.1 42.4 38.9 23.6 19.7 19.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.42 1.13 0.66 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 2.3 0.2 0.3 0.8 4.0 0.4 30.9 0.7 0.8Delay (s) 27.9 39.4 27.4 50.0 51.5 32.0 8.4 54.5 20.5 19.9Level of Service C D C D D C A D C BApproach Delay (s) 38.4 48.4 31.5 32.1Approach LOS D D C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 36.0 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 191: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 46 821 401 781 134 105 98 374v/c Ratio 0.11 0.39 0.35 0.50 0.44 0.11 0.35 0.45Control Delay 9.3 9.3 1.8 27.7 27.4 12.2 35.0 29.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.3 9.3 1.8 27.7 27.4 12.2 35.0 29.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 47 0 131 70 15 60 102Queue Length 95th (ft) m17 m176 m34 204 91 27 90 119Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 250 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 438 2107 1136 1557 306 1337 430 1241Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.39 0.35 0.50 0.44 0.08 0.23 0.30

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 42 755 369 121 573 24 123 53 43 90 246 98Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3539 1636 5015 1770 2927 1736 3500Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.35 1.00 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 480 3539 1636 3585 651 2927 1253 3500Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 46 821 401 132 623 26 134 58 47 98 267 107RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 162 0 3 0 0 32 0 0 48 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 821 239 0 778 0 134 73 0 98 326 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 22 22Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 7 4 8Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 60.0 60.0 60.0 43.0 31.5 31.5 20.5 20.5Effective Green, g (s) 63.0 62.5 62.5 45.5 34.5 34.5 23.5 23.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.43 0.33 0.33 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 440 2107 974 1554 299 962 280 783v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.23 c0.03 0.03 0.09v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.15 c0.22 c0.11 0.08v/c Ratio 0.10 0.39 0.25 0.50 0.45 0.08 0.35 0.42Uniform Delay, d1 9.3 11.2 10.1 21.5 26.1 24.3 34.3 34.9Progression Factor 0.74 0.69 0.81 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.8 0.4Delay (s) 7.2 8.1 8.5 25.3 27.1 24.3 35.1 35.2Level of Service A A A C C C D DApproach Delay (s) 8.2 25.3 25.9 35.2Approach LOS A C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 19.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 192: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 594 565 143 201 593 271v/c Ratio 0.56 0.51 0.56 0.24 0.94 0.46Control Delay 15.2 31.2 21.2 14.8 55.2 18.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 15.2 31.2 21.2 14.8 55.2 18.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 128 111 47 68 375 89Queue Length 95th (ft) 100 149 81 114 #602 164Internal Link Dist (ft) 248 433 166 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1058 1101 257 827 633 591Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.51 0.56 0.24 0.94 0.46

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 216 298 32 135 342 42 132 158 27 43 502 249Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 9 8 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.98 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3749 4895 1591 1626 1603 1327Flt Permitted 0.58 0.72 0.16 1.00 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2231 3554 274 1626 1545 1327Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 235 324 35 147 372 46 143 172 29 47 546 271RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 10 0 0 6 0 0 0 47Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 590 0 0 555 0 143 195 0 0 593 224Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 39 27 27 39 29 49 49 29Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 1 5 2 3 8 4Permitted Phases 5 2 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 41.7 29.7 49.8 49.8 39.8 39.8Effective Green, g (s) 44.2 32.2 52.8 52.8 42.8 42.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.31 0.50 0.50 0.41 0.41Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 4.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1091 1090 251 818 630 541v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 c0.05 0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 c0.16 0.24 c0.38 0.17v/c Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.57 0.24 0.94 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 22.8 29.9 18.7 14.7 29.9 22.2Progression Factor 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 1.7 3.6 0.2 22.6 0.7Delay (s) 15.9 31.6 22.3 14.9 52.5 22.9Level of Service B C C B D CApproach Delay (s) 15.9 31.6 18.0 43.2Approach LOS B C B D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.5% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 193: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 269 578 199 223 142 188v/c Ratio 0.42 0.62 0.43 0.23 0.19 0.16Control Delay 13.1 5.4 14.3 10.1 2.3 13.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.1 5.4 14.3 10.1 2.3 13.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 22 54 53 0 24Queue Length 95th (ft) 130 91 108 91 24 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 286 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 640 938 463 956 744 1193Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.62 0.43 0.23 0.19 0.16

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 169 78 532 183 205 131 0 0 0 14 113 46Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 12 9 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1672 1312 1423 1739 1237 3317Flt Permitted 0.67 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1164 1312 842 1739 1237 3317Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 184 85 578 199 223 142 0 0 0 15 123 50RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 216 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 33 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 269 362 199 223 78 0 0 0 0 156 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 156 156 84 46 42 42 46Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 640 722 463 956 680 1161v/s Ratio Prot 0.13v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.28 0.24 0.06 0.05v/c Ratio 0.42 0.50 0.43 0.23 0.11 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 11.2 10.6 9.3 8.6 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 2.5 2.9 0.6 0.3 0.2Delay (s) 12.6 13.7 13.5 9.9 9.0 18.0Level of Service B B B A A BApproach Delay (s) 13.3 10.9 0.0 18.0Approach LOS B B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 194: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 29 403 6 0 68 179 11 18 14 391 0 51Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 438 7 0 74 195 12 20 15 425 0 55Pedestrians 32 2 77 71Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 0 6 7Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 339 522 743 921 301 454 730 177vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 339 522 743 921 301 454 730 177tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 95 91 98 0 100 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1126 980 227 228 653 365 295 753

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 251 226 74 195 47 425 55Volume Left 32 0 0 0 12 425 0Volume Right 0 7 0 195 15 0 55cSH 1126 1700 980 1700 289 365 753Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.11 0.16 1.16 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 14 423 6Control Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.8 132.6 10.2Lane LOS A C F BApproach Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 19.8 118.4Approach LOS C F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 45.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 187 110 49 535 126 137 455v/c Ratio 0.50 0.41 0.12 0.52 0.11 0.33 0.43Control Delay 13.1 25.6 5.5 11.5 2.3 11.5 10.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 13.1 25.6 5.5 11.5 2.3 11.5 10.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 44 0 89 0 19 70Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 70 19 261 22 79 203Internal Link Dist (ft) 277 596 187 153Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 50Base Capacity (vph) 592 440 603 1030 1151 415 1061Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.25 0.08 0.52 0.11 0.33 0.43

Intersection Summary

Page 195: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th Street & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 131 30 62 40 45 43 449 116 126 414 5Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 13 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1697 1750 1484 1726 1740 1581 1672Flt Permitted 0.98 0.70 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.39 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1661 1261 1484 1622 1740 655 1672Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 142 33 67 43 49 47 488 126 137 450 5RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 37 0 0 46 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 174 0 0 110 12 0 535 80 137 455 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 100 100 59 53 22 22 53Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 15.1 15.1 15.1 41.9 41.9 41.9 41.9Effective Green, g (s) 15.1 15.1 17.6 44.4 44.4 44.4 44.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.25 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 358 272 373 1029 1104 415 1061v/s Ratio Prot 0.27v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.09 0.01 c0.33 0.05 0.21v/c Ratio 0.49 0.40 0.03 0.52 0.07 0.33 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 23.6 19.8 7.0 4.9 5.9 6.4Progression Factor 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.9 0.1 2.1 1.3Delay (s) 10.5 23.9 19.8 8.9 5.0 8.0 7.7Level of Service B C B A A A AApproach Delay (s) 10.5 22.7 8.1 7.8Approach LOS B C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.7 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 209 82 323 214v/c Ratio 0.55 0.24 0.26 0.18Control Delay 27.7 17.4 6.9 5.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.7 17.4 6.9 5.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 24 42 20Queue Length 95th (ft) 121 m44 111 64Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 286 1055 200Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 595 521 1237 1164Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.16 0.26 0.18

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 196: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 39 129 25 9 43 23 31 256 10 14 127 56Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.96Flt Protected 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2027 1669 1955 1790Flt Permitted 0.91 0.95 0.96 0.97Satd. Flow (perm) 1868 1603 1882 1747Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 42 140 27 10 47 25 34 278 11 15 138 61RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 20 0 0 1 0 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 200 0 0 62 0 0 322 0 0 199 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 43 58 58Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 14.0 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 14.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 374 321 1237 1148v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.04 c0.17 0.11v/c Ratio 0.54 0.19 0.26 0.17Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 23.3 5.0 4.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.3Delay (s) 25.8 24.0 5.5 5.0Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 25.8 24.0 5.5 5.0Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.32Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 72 12 108 26 523 51 297 1031v/c Ratio 0.21 0.05 0.29 0.06 0.19 0.06 0.43 0.33Control Delay 17.7 27.4 7.8 9.4 15.4 7.9 10.1 3.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 17.7 27.4 7.8 9.4 15.4 7.9 10.1 3.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 6 1 7 86 0 36 34Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 20 40 19 115 23 92 41Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 493 367 489 507 2791 817 703 3137Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.03 0.22 0.05 0.19 0.06 0.42 0.33

Intersection Summary

Page 197: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 32 1 33 11 1 98 24 481 47 273 901 48Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1812 1585 1361 1824 4916 1400 1896 4861Flt Permitted 0.83 0.72 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1537 1204 1361 498 4916 1400 819 4861Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 35 1 36 12 1 107 26 523 51 297 979 52RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 29 0 0 85 0 0 0 22 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 0 12 23 0 26 523 29 297 1027 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 63 42 42 63 31 91 91 31Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 60.4 57.1 57.1 71.0 62.4Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 21.8 21.8 66.4 59.6 59.6 75.7 64.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.72 0.62Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 319 250 283 394 2790 795 709 3005v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 0.11 c0.05 0.21v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.01 0.04 0.02 c0.26v/c Ratio 0.14 0.05 0.08 0.07 0.19 0.04 0.42 0.34Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 33.3 33.5 7.2 11.0 10.0 5.1 9.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.15 1.69 1.21 0.26Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 34.0 33.3 33.6 8.9 12.8 17.1 6.3 2.8Level of Service C C C A B B A AApproach Delay (s) 34.0 33.6 13.0 3.6Approach LOS C C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.0 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.35Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 30 523 53 684 226 186v/c Ratio 0.08 0.26 0.12 0.36 0.45 0.29Control Delay 8.1 9.1 6.2 3.5 26.5 28.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 8.1 9.1 6.2 3.5 26.5 28.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 61 9 31 96 48Queue Length 95th (ft) m14 83 m16 42 169 78Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110Base Capacity (vph) 386 2032 454 1886 507 649Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.26 0.12 0.36 0.45 0.29

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 198: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 28 466 15 49 388 241 21 87 99 97 64 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 11 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.97Satd. Flow (prot) 1670 3280 1600 2898 1624 3235Flt Permitted 0.36 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.96 0.64Satd. Flow (perm) 625 3280 733 2898 1561 2114Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 30 507 16 53 422 262 23 95 108 105 70 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 92 0 0 31 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 521 0 53 592 0 0 195 0 0 182 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 47 29 12 46 46 12Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 32.0 32.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.30Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 387 2030 454 1794 476 644v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.07 c0.12 0.09v/c Ratio 0.08 0.26 0.12 0.33 0.41 0.28Uniform Delay, d1 8.0 9.1 8.2 9.6 29.0 27.8Progression Factor 0.94 0.98 0.67 0.50 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 2.6 1.1Delay (s) 7.9 9.2 6.0 5.2 31.6 28.9Level of Service A A A A C CApproach Delay (s) 9.1 5.2 31.6 28.9Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 47 673 78 911 367 127 571v/c Ratio 0.27 0.29 0.25 0.57 0.36 0.18 0.54Control Delay 16.6 10.9 18.5 20.9 20.9 3.8 23.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 16.6 10.9 18.5 22.7 20.9 3.8 23.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 57 30 220 84 0 141Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 90 63 281 122 33 195Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 176 2353 316 1610 1027 715 1059Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 505 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.29 0.25 0.82 0.36 0.18 0.54

Intersection Summary

Page 199: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 43 536 83 72 549 289 82 256 117 177 304 45Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1585 4805 1765 3316 3361 1469 3432Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.69Satd. Flow (perm) 362 4805 650 3316 2345 1469 2401Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 47 583 90 78 597 314 89 278 127 192 330 49RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 653 0 78 911 0 0 367 56 0 564 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 8 8 25 6 25 25 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 43.5 43.5 43.5Effective Green, g (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 46.0 46.0 46.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 176 2334 316 1611 1027 644 1052v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.27v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.12 0.16 0.04 c0.24v/c Ratio 0.27 0.28 0.25 0.57 0.36 0.09 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 16.0 16.1 15.8 19.1 19.7 17.2 21.7Progression Factor 0.75 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 0.3 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.3 2.0Delay (s) 15.5 11.5 17.6 20.6 20.6 17.5 23.6Level of Service B B B C C B CApproach Delay (s) 11.8 20.4 19.8 23.6Approach LOS B C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.7 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1188 12 350 369 355 335v/c Ratio 0.50 0.02 0.11 0.78 0.77 0.49Control Delay 24.2 1.6 0.2 43.8 37.5 6.1Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 24.3 1.6 0.5 43.8 37.6 6.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 119 0 0 195 163 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 195 m0 0 #394 #358 69Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 377Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2379 764 3043 498 488 702Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2077 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 156 0 0 0 1 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.53 0.02 0.36 0.74 0.73 0.48

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 200: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 946 147 11 322 0 0 0 0 485 0 489Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6935 1752 4867 1698 1519 1588Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6935 1752 4867 1698 1519 1588Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1028 160 12 350 0 0 0 0 527 0 532RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 246Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1164 0 12 350 0 0 0 0 369 311 89Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 37 5 5Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 28.4 23.9 57.3 22.9 22.9 22.9Effective Green, g (s) 29.4 24.9 58.3 23.9 23.9 23.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.28 0.65 0.26 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2260 484 3146 450 402 421v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.01 c0.07v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.20 0.06v/c Ratio 0.52 0.02 0.11 0.82 0.77 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 24.6 23.8 6.1 31.1 30.6 25.8Progression Factor 1.00 0.08 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.6 8.2 0.1Delay (s) 24.7 2.0 0.1 41.7 38.8 25.9Level of Service C A A D D CApproach Delay (s) 24.7 0.2 0.0 35.8Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 25.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.2 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 713 842 72 228 290 141v/c Ratio 0.44 0.25 0.08 0.55 0.74 0.30Control Delay 8.1 1.3 33.7 10.7 44.0 7.0Queue Delay 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.4 1.5 33.7 10.7 44.0 7.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 127 5 10 0 150 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 17 21 64 248 46Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 286Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1659 3433 1368 502 532 594Starvation Cap Reductn 691 1568 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.45 0.05 0.45 0.55 0.24

Intersection Summary

Page 201: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 656 775 0 0 66 210 267 0 130 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1463 1814 1686Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1463 1814 1686Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 713 842 0 0 72 228 290 0 141 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 112 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 713 842 0 0 72 33 290 0 29 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 11 9 9Turn Type Prot Perm custom customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1Permitted Phases 1 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 45.5 62.5 12.0 12.0 17.7 17.7Effective Green, g (s) 46.5 63.5 13.0 13.0 18.7 18.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.70 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1693 3426 884 211 376 350v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 c0.17 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.16 0.02v/c Ratio 0.42 0.25 0.08 0.16 0.77 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 13.5 4.8 33.4 33.8 33.7 28.8Progression Factor 0.48 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 8.6 0.0Delay (s) 6.6 1.0 33.4 33.9 42.4 28.9Level of Service A A C C D CApproach Delay (s) 3.6 33.8 38.0 0.0Approach LOS A C D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.0 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.2 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 200 540 108 69 653 16 13 0 6 17 0 30Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 217 587 117 75 710 17 14 0 7 18 0 33Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 330 328pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.97vC, conflicting volume 752 729 1535 2008 387 1638 2058 280vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 648 424 1182 1711 36 1298 1766 164tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 76 92 84 100 99 76 100 96cM capacity (veh/h) 891 978 90 54 883 77 50 807

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 511 411 252 355 195 21 51Volume Left 217 0 75 0 0 14 18Volume Right 0 117 0 0 17 7 33cSH 891 1700 978 1700 1700 126 182Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.21 0.11 0.16 0.28Queue Length 95th (ft) 24 0 6 0 0 14 27Control Delay (s) 6.2 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 39.0 32.4Lane LOS A A E DApproach Delay (s) 3.4 1.0 39.0 32.4Approach LOS E D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.2% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 202: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 6 26 192 8 116 620Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 28 209 9 126 674Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 544 349pX, platoon unblocked 0.96vC, conflicting volume 837 248 242vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 740 248 242tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 98 96 90cM capacity (veh/h) 296 732 1296

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 35 217 351 449Volume Left 7 0 126 0Volume Right 28 9 0 0cSH 574 1700 1296 1700Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.13 0.10 0.26Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 8 0Control Delay (s) 11.7 0.0 3.5 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 11.7 0.0 1.5Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Site Driveway & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 5 25 309 9 124 192Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 27 336 10 135 209Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 280 613pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96vC, conflicting volume 854 376 371vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 825 325 320tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 98 96 88cM capacity (veh/h) 282 667 1164

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 33 346 343Volume Left 5 0 135Volume Right 27 10 0cSH 543 1700 1164Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.20 0.12Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 10Control Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 4.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 4.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 203: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th Street & Site Driveway 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 8 145 12 11 49 39 31 0 30 9 0 6Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 158 13 12 53 42 34 0 33 10 0 7Pedestrians 10 10 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 366 357pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96vC, conflicting volume 121 196 321 351 199 348 336 109vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 121 148 278 309 151 305 293 109tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 99 99 94 100 96 98 100 99cM capacity (veh/h) 1439 1357 604 554 840 561 565 919

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 179 108 66 16Volume Left 9 12 34 10Volume Right 13 42 33 7cSH 1439 1357 701 664Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.02Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 8 2Control Delay (s) 0.4 0.9 10.7 10.6Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.4 0.9 10.7 10.6Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 15 62 442 530 77Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 16 67 480 576 84Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 233 437pX, platoon unblocked 0.69 0.69 0.69vC, conflicting volume 1028 653 685vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 817 275 321tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 98 97 92cM capacity (veh/h) 194 487 838

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 20 228 320 660Volume Left 3 67 0 0Volume Right 16 0 0 84cSH 389 838 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.08 0.19 0.39Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 7 0 0Control Delay (s) 14.7 3.5 0.0 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 14.7 1.4 0.0Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 204: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Site Driveway & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Phase II Total Future 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: AM-Mit Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 5 9 69 312 584 85Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 10 75 339 635 92Pedestrians 25 10 10Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 1 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 424 246pX, platoon unblocked 0.66 0.66 0.66vC, conflicting volume 1036 716 752vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 799 317 372tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 97 98 90cM capacity (veh/h) 188 438 769

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 15 188 226 727Volume Left 5 75 0 0Volume Right 10 0 0 92cSH 297 769 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.10 0.13 0.43Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 8 0 0Control Delay (s) 17.8 4.7 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 17.8 2.1 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 205: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 1

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 378 736 70 1516 241 930 286 283 989 279v/c Ratio 0.94 0.37 0.21 1.27dr 0.89 0.77 0.46 0.89 0.85 0.54Control Delay 62.4 19.8 14.2 61.4 87.5 28.5 3.4 56.2 47.1 16.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 62.4 19.8 14.2 61.4 87.5 28.5 3.4 56.2 47.1 16.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 203 107 16 ~362 170 100 0 134 234 50Queue Length 95th (ft) #389 146 m22 #463 #311 143 2 #289 #288 132Internal Link Dist (ft) 610 475 816 742Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 175 205 205 120Base Capacity (vph) 400 1995 396 1440 270 1211 620 317 1162 512Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.94 0.37 0.18 1.05 0.89 0.77 0.46 0.89 0.85 0.54

Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Army Navy Dr. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 348 459 218 64 696 698 222 856 263 260 910 257Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 14 11 12 16Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 4840 1711 4668 1770 5085 1689 1711 5085 1794Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 212 4840 649 4668 1770 5085 1689 319 5085 1794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 378 499 237 70 757 759 241 930 286 283 989 279RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 75 0 0 170 0 0 0 222 0 0 156Lane Group Flow (vph) 378 661 0 70 1346 0 241 930 64 283 989 123Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 51.4 38.6 32.7 26.9 13.0 20.6 20.6 31.6 19.6 19.6Effective Green, g (s) 54.4 41.6 38.7 29.9 16.0 23.6 23.6 37.6 22.6 19.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.37 0.28 0.15 0.22 0.22 0.36 0.22 0.19Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 402 1918 328 1329 270 1143 380 313 1094 335v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.14 0.02 0.29 c0.14 0.18 0.13 0.19v/s Ratio Perm c0.30 0.06 0.04 c0.19 0.07v/c Ratio 0.94 0.34 0.21 1.27dr 0.89 0.81 0.17 0.90 0.90 0.37Uniform Delay, d1 30.2 22.2 21.8 37.5 43.7 38.6 32.8 27.3 40.1 37.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.86 1.25 0.64 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 29.8 0.1 0.1 21.4 27.7 6.3 0.9 27.3 12.1 3.1Delay (s) 60.1 22.3 20.0 53.5 82.4 30.8 8.6 54.6 52.2 40.4Level of Service E C B D F C A D D DApproach Delay (s) 35.1 52.0 35.0 50.5Approach LOS D D D D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 44.0 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.8% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 206: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 3

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 171 749 173 1452 493 371 38 281v/c Ratio 0.80 0.41 0.19 0.89 0.80 0.29 0.33 0.54Control Delay 48.9 15.1 3.8 26.5 33.6 12.7 49.4 24.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 48.9 15.1 3.8 26.5 33.6 12.7 49.4 24.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 121 7 143 248 50 24 44Queue Length 95th (ft) m#157 m209 m31 #417 #348 80 56 84Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 249 269 379Turn Bay Length (ft) 145 190 60Base Capacity (vph) 215 1840 934 1639 616 1356 140 603Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.41 0.19 0.89 0.80 0.27 0.27 0.47

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Army Navy Dr. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 157 689 159 80 969 287 454 208 133 35 125 133Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 12 13 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 13 13Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3539 1636 4893 1769 2972 1758 3349Flt Permitted 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.38 1.00 0.53 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 156 3539 1636 4024 706 2972 983 3349Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 171 749 173 87 1053 312 493 226 145 38 136 145RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 83 0 45 0 0 86 0 0 128 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 749 90 0 1407 0 493 285 0 38 153 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 11 11 1Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm pm+pt PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 7 4 8Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 52.1 52.1 52.1 39.1 39.4 39.4 9.4 9.4Effective Green, g (s) 55.1 54.6 54.6 41.6 42.4 42.4 12.4 12.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.12 0.12Clearance Time (s) 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 3.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 1840 851 1594 589 1200 116 396v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.21 c0.24 0.10 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.35 0.05 c0.35 0.10 0.04v/c Ratio 0.80 0.41 0.11 0.88 0.84 0.24 0.33 0.39Uniform Delay, d1 21.5 15.3 12.8 29.4 26.0 20.6 42.5 42.8Progression Factor 1.24 0.91 1.49 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 22.6 0.6 0.2 5.3 10.0 0.1 1.7 0.6Delay (s) 49.2 14.6 19.3 26.4 36.1 20.7 44.1 43.4Level of Service D B B C D C D DApproach Delay (s) 20.8 26.4 29.5 43.5Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 207: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 5

Lane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 933 1346 338 425 171 190v/c Ratio 1.76dl 0.83 0.87 0.67 0.40 0.40Control Delay 18.5 34.3 48.9 31.6 32.8 7.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 18.5 34.3 48.9 31.6 32.8 7.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 141 311 152 206 85 9Queue Length 95th (ft) 174 #423 #249 305 143 59Internal Link Dist (ft) 249 433 116 369Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 1267 1622 389 748 532 560Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.83 0.87 0.57 0.32 0.34

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Army Navy Dr. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 524 129 205 54 865 319 311 384 7 4 154 175Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 12 12 12 9 9 12 12 8 8Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3601 4786 1586 1671 1612 1339Flt Permitted 0.57 0.84 0.50 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2124 4007 835 1671 1596 1339Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 570 140 223 59 940 347 338 417 8 4 167 190RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 54 0 0 1 0 0 0 126Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 908 0 0 1292 0 338 424 0 0 171 64Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 21 21 29 13 23 23 13Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2 7 4 8Permitted Phases 1 2 2 4 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 48.1 38.6 36.9 36.9 24.9 24.9Effective Green, g (s) 53.1 41.1 39.9 39.9 27.9 27.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1243 1568 382 635 424 356v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 c0.08 0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.29 c0.32 c0.26 0.11 0.05v/c Ratio 1.76dl 0.82 0.88 0.67 0.40 0.18Uniform Delay, d1 20.3 28.7 30.0 27.1 31.7 29.7Progression Factor 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 5.1 20.9 2.9 0.9 0.3Delay (s) 20.5 33.8 50.9 30.0 32.6 30.1Level of Service C C D C C CApproach Delay (s) 20.5 33.8 39.2 31.3Approach LOS C C D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 31.1 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 208: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site Queues4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 7

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 90 238 141 695 275 249v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.73 0.33 0.21Control Delay 10.3 2.3 10.9 19.1 2.4 8.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 10.3 2.3 10.9 19.1 2.4 8.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 0 34 242 0 19Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 30 67 378 32 44Internal Link Dist (ft) 132 281 297Turn Bay Length (ft) 150Base Capacity (vph) 481 821 563 956 834 1191Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.73 0.33 0.21

Intersection Summary

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: S. 12th St. & S. Clark St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 60 23 219 130 639 253 0 0 0 2 92 135Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 12 12 11 9 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1757 1298 1392 1739 1291 3149Flt Permitted 0.48 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 874 1298 1023 1739 1291 3149Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 65 25 238 141 695 275 0 0 0 2 100 147RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 107 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 89 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 90 131 141 695 151 0 0 0 0 160 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 80 137 137 80 29 13 13 29Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 4 2Permitted Phases 4 4 4 4 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 25.5Effective Green, g (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Lane Grp Cap (vph) 481 714 563 956 710 1102v/s Ratio Prot c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.10 0.14 0.12 0.05v/c Ratio 0.19 0.18 0.25 0.73 0.21 0.15Uniform Delay, d1 9.0 9.0 9.4 13.5 9.2 17.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.6 1.1 4.8 0.7 0.3Delay (s) 9.9 9.6 10.5 18.3 9.9 18.1Level of Service A A B B A BApproach Delay (s) 9.7 15.2 0.0 18.1Approach LOS A B A B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 209: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: S. 12th St. & Army Navy Dr 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 17 149 21 3 164 581 3 7 8 167 10 33Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 162 23 3 178 632 3 8 9 182 11 36Pedestrians 35 9 91 75Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 3 1 7 8Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 676 212pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 885 276 562 1193 192 399 573 288vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 885 276 562 1193 192 399 573 288tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 97 100 99 95 99 55 97 94cM capacity (veh/h) 701 1195 298 155 755 407 357 636

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 99 104 182 632 20 192 36Volume Left 18 0 3 0 3 182 0Volume Right 0 23 0 632 9 0 36cSH 701 1700 1195 1700 273 404 636Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.37 0.07 0.48 0.06Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 6 62 4Control Delay (s) 2.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 19.2 21.8 11.0Lane LOS A A C C BApproach Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 19.2 20.1Approach LOS C C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 4.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site Queues6: 12th st & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 10

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 238 113 157 510 73 45 535v/c Ratio 0.59 0.46 0.37 0.48 0.07 0.10 0.50Control Delay 22.0 26.1 12.5 10.8 2.8 8.6 11.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 22.0 26.1 12.5 10.8 2.8 8.6 11.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 44 28 82 0 5 87Queue Length 95th (ft) 114 71 60 239 18 27 255Internal Link Dist (ft) 267 596 187 196Turn Bay Length (ft) 50Base Capacity (vph) 612 383 642 1057 1094 431 1066Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.30 0.24 0.48 0.07 0.10 0.50

Intersection Summary

Page 210: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: 12th st & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 97 111 104 68 76 29 440 67 41 479 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 13 12 12 10 10 16 9 9 9Total Lost time (s) 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 0.93 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1630 1795 1679 1731 1670 1552 1667Flt Permitted 0.98 0.53 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.41 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1597 993 1679 1654 1670 673 1667Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 105 121 113 74 83 32 478 73 45 521 14RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 65 0 0 65 0 0 0 26 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 173 0 113 92 0 0 510 47 45 534 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 32 20 20 32 40 70 70 40Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 14.8 14.8 42.2 42.2 42.2 42.2Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 17.3 14.8 44.7 44.7 44.7 44.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 245 355 1056 1066 430 1064v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.11 0.31 0.03 0.07v/c Ratio 0.51 0.46 0.26 0.48 0.04 0.10 0.50Uniform Delay, d1 24.4 22.4 23.0 6.6 4.7 4.9 6.7Progression Factor 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.5 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.5 1.7Delay (s) 27.8 22.9 23.2 8.2 4.8 5.4 8.4Level of Service C C C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 27.8 23.0 7.8 8.2Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 12

Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 249 161 285 532v/c Ratio 0.65 0.42 0.25 0.47Control Delay 28.9 17.5 7.1 9.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 28.9 17.5 7.1 9.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 87 36 41 90Queue Length 95th (ft) 138 76 100 211Internal Link Dist (ft) 676 297 1055 232Turn Bay Length (ft)Base Capacity (vph) 553 542 1144 1131Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.30 0.25 0.47

Intersection Summary

Page 211: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: 12th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 99 71 11 77 60 37 218 7 62 380 48Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 16 16 16 11 11 11 14 14 14 13 13 13Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 1662 1956 1866Flt Permitted 0.86 0.97 0.90 0.93Satd. Flow (perm) 1685 1615 1768 1741Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 64 108 77 12 84 65 40 237 8 67 413 52RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 40 0 0 1 0 0 4 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 222 0 0 121 0 0 284 0 0 528 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 50 50 13 27 50 50 27Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 14.7 14.7 42.8 42.8Effective Green, g (s) 14.7 14.7 45.3 45.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.65 0.65Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 354 339 1144 1127v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.13 0.07 0.16 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.63 0.36 0.25 0.47Uniform Delay, d1 25.2 23.6 5.2 6.3Progression Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 0.2 0.5 1.4Delay (s) 27.7 22.7 5.7 7.7Level of Service C C A AApproach Delay (s) 27.7 22.7 5.7 7.7Approach LOS C C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 13.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 14

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 210 36 201 95 834 85 193 1067v/c Ratio 0.72 0.20 0.45 0.23 0.30 0.11 0.37 0.37Control Delay 35.4 32.0 8.2 12.3 20.1 9.3 16.6 7.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 35.4 32.0 8.2 12.3 20.1 9.3 16.6 7.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 18 4 30 166 0 55 61Queue Length 95th (ft) 155 45 58 m55 200 m30 m90 104Internal Link Dist (ft) 52 676 847 816Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 190 55Base Capacity (vph) 372 242 542 472 2738 757 551 2861Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.15 0.37 0.20 0.30 0.11 0.35 0.37

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 212: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: 12th St. S. & S. Hayes St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 67 7 119 33 8 177 87 767 78 178 866 116Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 15 15 15 10 10 10 13 11 14 15 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1600 1476 1341 1826 4916 1291 1918 4796Flt Permitted 0.64 0.51 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1040 796 1341 444 4916 1291 572 4796Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 73 8 129 36 9 192 95 834 85 193 941 126RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 61 0 0 149 0 0 0 38 0 13 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 149 0 36 52 0 95 834 47 193 1054 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 158 158 84 23 130 130 23Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2Permitted Phases 4 4 6 6 2Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 20.5 61.5 56.0 56.0 66.5 58.5Effective Green, g (s) 23.5 23.5 23.5 67.5 58.5 58.5 72.5 61.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.58Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 233 178 300 397 2739 719 536 2786v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.02 0.17 c0.04 c0.22v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 0.05 0.13 0.04 0.21v/c Ratio 0.64 0.20 0.17 0.24 0.30 0.07 0.36 0.38Uniform Delay, d1 36.9 33.1 32.9 7.3 12.4 10.7 6.0 11.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.57 1.38 2.53 2.23 0.52Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 41.1 33.3 33.0 11.5 17.4 27.2 13.6 6.5Level of Service D C C B B C B AApproach Delay (s) 41.1 33.1 17.7 7.5Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 16.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.2% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 16

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 65 472 126 1010 147 55 529v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.58 0.30 0.12 0.63Control Delay 11.7 7.3 6.1 6.4 27.4 9.5 32.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 11.7 7.3 6.1 6.4 27.4 9.5 32.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 66 15 54 72 3 151Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 70 m21 m66 125 31 210Internal Link Dist (ft) 1060 662 767 1055Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 110 40Base Capacity (vph) 221 1871 444 1739 488 459 843Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.58 0.30 0.12 0.63

Intersection Summarym Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 213: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: 15th St. S. & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 60 380 54 116 714 215 36 99 51 224 206 57Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 10 10 10 9 9 11 11 9 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1666 3203 1585 2949 1773 1354 3227Flt Permitted 0.22 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 380 3203 763 2949 1425 1354 2429Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 65 413 59 126 776 234 39 108 55 243 224 62RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 27 0 0 0 34 0 10 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 461 0 126 983 0 0 147 21 0 519 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 64 56 56 64 21 34 34 21Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 36.0 33.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.31 0.34Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 1861 443 1713 489 426 833v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.02 c0.21v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.57 0.30 0.05 0.62Uniform Delay, d1 11.1 10.8 11.0 13.8 25.3 25.1 28.8Progression Factor 0.69 0.69 0.44 0.41 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 0.3 1.0 0.9 1.6 0.2 3.5Delay (s) 10.9 7.7 5.9 6.6 26.9 25.3 32.3Level of Service B A A A C C CApproach Delay (s) 8.1 6.6 26.4 32.3Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 18

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 50 622 247 1296 481 175 803v/c Ratio 0.55 0.25 0.68 0.74 0.64 0.25 1.08dlControl Delay 34.2 6.2 30.6 23.3 29.5 4.0 46.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 34.2 6.2 30.6 49.8 29.5 4.0 46.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 38 119 344 133 0 259Queue Length 95th (ft) m#72 58 227 430 192 40 #391Internal Link Dist (ft) 662 331 844 813Turn Bay Length (ft) 460 115Base Capacity (vph) 91 2500 364 1749 756 692 871Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 508 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.25 0.68 1.04 0.64 0.25 0.92

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

Page 214: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: 15th St. S. & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 46 513 59 227 942 250 124 318 161 318 332 88Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 9 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 1% -1%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1588 4832 1766 3399 3351 1438 3374Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.54 1.00 0.61Satd. Flow (perm) 177 4832 706 3399 1846 1438 2101Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 50 558 64 247 1024 272 135 346 175 346 361 96RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 10 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 608 0 247 1296 0 0 481 72 0 793 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 31 5 5 31 25 47 47 25Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 4 4Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 40.5 40.5 40.5Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.41 0.41 0.41Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 91 2485 363 1748 756 589 860v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.35 0.26 0.05 c0.38v/c Ratio 0.55 0.24 0.68 0.74 0.64 0.12 1.08dlUniform Delay, d1 17.3 14.2 19.1 20.0 24.8 19.3 29.4Progression Factor 0.53 0.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 20.7 0.2 9.9 2.9 4.1 0.4 16.8Delay (s) 29.8 6.5 28.9 22.9 28.8 19.7 46.2Level of Service C A C C C B DApproach Delay (s) 8.2 23.9 26.4 46.2Approach LOS A C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.2% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 20

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1135 47 548 259 564 557v/c Ratio 0.52 0.07 0.16 0.73 0.92 0.86Control Delay 27.6 5.7 0.1 49.0 33.1 25.7Queue Delay 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.7 0.0Total Delay 27.9 5.7 0.5 49.0 35.8 25.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 149 2 0 163 118 101Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 m7 0 #277 #361 #313Internal Link Dist (ft) 331 130 325Turn Bay Length (ft) 240Base Capacity (vph) 2182 839 3426 386 634 667Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2221 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 423 0 0 0 25 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.06 0.45 0.67 0.93 0.84

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 215: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 21

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 817 227 43 504 0 0 0 0 265 0 1005Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14Grade (%) 2% 2% 0% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.81 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 6789 1752 4867 1698 1418 1566Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 6789 1752 4867 1698 1418 1566Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 888 247 47 548 0 0 0 0 288 0 1092RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 320 320Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1092 0 47 548 0 0 0 0 259 244 237Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 30 13 13Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 6 4 5 1 4 6 3Permitted Phases 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 28.6 33.5 67.1 18.6 18.6 18.6Effective Green, g (s) 29.6 34.5 68.1 19.6 19.6 19.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.36 0.71 0.20 0.20 0.20Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2100 632 3463 348 290 321v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.03 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.17 0.15v/c Ratio 0.52 0.07 0.16 0.74 0.84 0.74Uniform Delay, d1 27.2 20.1 4.5 35.7 36.5 35.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.30 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 7.4 18.1 7.4Delay (s) 27.3 6.1 0.0 43.1 54.6 43.0Level of Service C A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 27.3 0.5 0.0 47.8Approach LOS C A A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 31.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.7 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 125.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site Queues12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 22

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 886 288 174 717 420 46v/c Ratio 0.77 0.09 0.12 0.95 0.85 0.09Control Delay 19.5 1.4 28.5 32.9 50.0 8.4Queue Delay 78.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 97.6 1.4 28.5 32.9 50.0 8.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 245 2 25 110 247 0Queue Length 95th (ft) m326 m6 39 #385 #396 26Internal Link Dist (ft) 130 322Turn Bay Length (ft) 210Base Capacity (vph) 1210 3205 1661 771 570 576Starvation Cap Reductn 450 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 1.17 0.09 0.10 0.93 0.74 0.08

Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Page 216: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: 15th St. S. & Jefferson Davis Off-Ramp 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 23

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 815 265 0 0 160 660 386 0 42 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 14 12 12 12Grade (%) 2% 2% -5% -2%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3285 4867 6132 1340 1814 1731Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3285 4867 6132 1340 1814 1731Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 886 288 0 0 174 717 420 0 46 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 426 0 0 34 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 886 288 0 0 174 291 420 0 12 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48 3 3Turn Type Prot Perm Prot customProtected Phases 2 3 1 3 6 1 4 4Permitted Phases 1Actuated Green, G (s) 34.0 61.1 22.1 22.1 24.6 24.6Effective Green, g (s) 35.0 62.1 23.1 23.1 25.6 25.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.65 0.24 0.24 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1201 3158 1480 323 485 463v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 0.06 0.03 c0.23 0.01v/s Ratio Perm c0.22v/c Ratio 0.74 0.09 0.12 0.90 0.87 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 6.3 28.3 35.2 33.4 25.9Progression Factor 0.54 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.0 0.0 25.6 14.5 0.0Delay (s) 15.9 1.2 28.4 60.8 47.9 25.9Level of Service B A C E D CApproach Delay (s) 12.3 54.5 45.7 0.0Approach LOS B D D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.3 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.7 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 127.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Army Navy Dr. & Driveway 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 24

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 0 824 29 19 1255 0 82 0 35 79 0 23Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 896 32 21 1364 0 89 0 38 86 0 25Pedestrians 10 10 50 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 329 329pX, platoon unblocked 0.84 0.87 0.90 0.90 0.87 0.90 0.90 0.84vC, conflicting volume 1414 977 1492 2417 524 1951 2433 515vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 804 681 409 1437 161 919 1455 0tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 97 78 100 95 49 100 97cM capacity (veh/h) 655 761 406 107 712 170 104 864

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 448 479 362 682 341 127 111Volume Left 0 0 21 0 0 89 86Volume Right 0 32 0 0 0 38 25cSH 655 1700 761 1700 1700 466 207Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.28 0.03 0.40 0.20 0.27 0.54Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 0 0 27 70Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 15.6 40.8Lane LOS A C EApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 15.6 40.8Approach LOS C E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 217: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Site Driveway-N & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 25

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 41 165 630 2 32 332Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 45 179 685 2 35 361Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 545 349pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1011 761 737vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1011 761 737tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 79 45 96cM capacity (veh/h) 213 328 832

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 224 687 155 241Volume Left 45 0 35 0Volume Right 179 2 0 0cSH 297 1700 832 1700Volume to Capacity 0.76 0.40 0.04 0.14Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 0 3 0Control Delay (s) 46.7 0.0 2.5 0.0Lane LOS E AApproach Delay (s) 46.7 0.0 1.0Approach LOS E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 8.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Site Drive-S & S. Fern St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 26

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 34 163 334 3 33 458Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 177 363 3 36 498Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 312 582pX, platoon unblocked 0.99 0.98 0.98vC, conflicting volume 1009 440 416vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 956 417 393tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 86 70 97cM capacity (veh/h) 258 587 1097

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 214 366 534Volume Left 37 0 36Volume Right 177 3 0cSH 482 1700 1097Volume to Capacity 0.44 0.22 0.03Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 0 3Control Delay (s) 18.3 0.0 0.9Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 18.3 0.0 0.9Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 4.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 218: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: 12th St & Site Drive 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 27

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 3 163 34 29 100 10 35 0 30 57 0 41Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 177 37 32 109 11 38 0 33 62 0 45Pedestrians 25 25 50 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 2 2 4 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 377 347pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 170 264 499 485 271 487 498 189vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 170 264 499 485 271 487 498 189tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 100 97 90 100 95 85 100 94cM capacity (veh/h) 1354 1250 397 434 725 408 426 804

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 217 151 71 107Volume Left 3 32 38 62Volume Right 37 11 33 45cSH 1354 1250 501 514Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.03 0.14 0.21Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 12 19Control Delay (s) 0.1 1.8 13.4 13.8Lane LOS A A B BApproach Delay (s) 0.1 1.8 13.4 13.8Approach LOS B B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 5.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Site Drive-S & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 28

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 16 99 17 510 434 21Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 108 18 554 472 23Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 276 396pX, platoon unblocked 0.94 0.94 0.94vC, conflicting volume 872 558 545vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 832 498 484tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 93 77 98cM capacity (veh/h) 267 461 972

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 125 203 370 495Volume Left 17 18 0 0Volume Right 108 0 0 23cSH 418 972 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.30 0.02 0.22 0.29Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 17.2 1.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 17.2 0.3 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 219: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

North 10 Site HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Site Driveway-N & S. Eads St. 5/3/2012

Total Future Phase II 2020 Synchro 7 - ReportTiming Plan: PM _mit Page 29

Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 34 57 19 668 411 23Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 62 21 726 447 25Pedestrians 50 25 25Lane Width (ft) 11.0 9.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 2 2Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 476 196pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92vC, conflicting volume 939 534 522vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 891 453 439tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 85 87 98cM capacity (veh/h) 240 484 991

Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1Volume Total 99 263 484 472Volume Left 37 21 0 0Volume Right 62 0 0 25cSH 350 991 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.02 0.28 0.28Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 2 0 0Control Delay (s) 19.3 0.9 0.0 0.0Lane LOS C AApproach Delay (s) 19.3 0.3 0.0Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 220: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   J‐1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX J ‐ 

SITE PLANS 

 

 

Page 221: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

12th Street

S. E

ad

s Stre

et

Army-Navy Drive

Elm

Stre

et

S. F

ern

Stre

et

N

0 50

feet

100

ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN

ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN

ExistingMarriott Residence Inn

Office 1Total 513,600 sf

18 floors

Office 2Total 506,400 sf

18-22 floors

DoD Office 2Total 312,000 sf

12 floors

DoD Office 1Total 477,000 sf

18-22 floors

Low-rise2 floors

Low-rise2 floors

Conf. HotelTotal 243,600 sf

12 floors

Conf. CenterTotal 39,000 sf

3 floors

Elm

Str

eet

Ped

est

rian

Pla

za

Landscape Gardens

Landscape Gardens

mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Rectangle
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
Total Office Area 1,809,000 sf DOD Office 1 477,000 sf DOD Office 2 312,000 sf Commercial Office 1 513,600 sf Commercial Office 2 506,400 sf
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
Hotel 300 units
mnovotny
Rectangle
mnovotny
Line
mnovotny
Rectangle
mnovotny
Rectangle
mnovotny
Rectangle
mnovotny
Rectangle
mnovotny
Polygon
mnovotny
Polygon
mnovotny
Rectangle
mnovotny
Polygon
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
Existing Marriott Residence Inn
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
Office 1
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
Office 2
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
DOD Office 1
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
DOD Office 2
mnovotny
Typewritten Text
Hotel
Page 222: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Traffic Impact Study – PenPlace  Gorove/Slade Associates

 

May 1, 2012   K‐2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX K ‐ 

SECURITY BOOTH ANALYSIS 

 

Page 223: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Waiting Lines M/M/s

Data ResultsArrival rate () 124 Average server utilization() 0.34444Service rate () 180 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.09273() 180 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.09273Number of servers(s) 2 Average number of customers in the system(L) 0.78162

Average waiting time in the queue(Wq) 0.00075

Average time in the system(W) 0.0063 hrsProbability (% of time) system is empty (P0) 0.4876

ProbabilitiesNumber Probability Cumulative Probability

0.487603 0 0.487603 0.4876030 823508 1 0 335904 0 8235080.823508 1 0.335904 0.8235080.939208 2 0.115700 0.9392080.979061 3 0.039852 0.9790610.992788 4 0.013727 0.9927880.997516 5 0.004728 0.9975160.999144 6 0.001629 0.9991440.999705 7 0.000561 0.9997050.999898 8 0.000193 0.9998980.999965 9 0.000067 0.9999650.999965 9 0.000067 0.9999650.999988 10 0.000023 0.9999880.999996 11 0.000008 0.9999960.999999 12 0.000003 0.9999991.000000 13 0.000001 1.0000001.000000 14 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 15 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 16 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 17 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 18 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 18 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 19 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 20 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 21 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 22 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 23 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 24 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 25 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 26 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 26 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 27 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 28 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 29 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 30 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 31 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 32 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 33 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 34 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 35 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 36 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 37 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 38 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 39 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 40 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 41 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 42 0.000000 1.000000

Page 224: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Waiting Lines M/M/s

Data ResultsArrival rate () 124 Average server utilization() 0.17222Service rate () 360 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.01053() 360 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.01053Number of servers(s) 2 Average number of customers in the system(L) 0.35497

Average waiting time in the queue(Wq) 8.5E-05

Average time in the system(W) 0.00286 hrsProbability (% of time) system is empty (P0) 0.70616

ProbabilitiesNumber Probability Cumulative Probability

0.706161 0 0.706161 0.7061610 949394 1 0 243233 0 9493940.949394 1 0.243233 0.9493940.991285 2 0.041890 0.9912850.998499 3 0.007214 0.9984990.999741 4 0.001242 0.9997410.999955 5 0.000214 0.9999550.999992 6 0.000037 0.9999920.999999 7 0.000006 0.9999991.000000 8 0.000001 1.0000001.000000 9 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 9 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 10 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 11 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 12 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 13 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 14 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 15 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 16 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 17 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 18 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 18 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 19 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 20 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 21 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 22 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 23 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 24 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 25 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 26 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 26 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 27 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 28 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 29 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 30 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 31 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 32 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 33 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 34 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 35 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 36 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 37 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 38 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 39 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 40 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 41 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 42 0.000000 1.000000

Page 225: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Waiting Lines M/M/s

Data ResultsArrival rate () 124 Average server utilization() 0.08611Service rate () 720 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.00129() 720 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.00129Number of servers(s) 2 Average number of customers in the system(L) 0.17351

Average waiting time in the queue(Wq) 1E-05

Average time in the system(W) 0.0014 hrsProbability (% of time) system is empty (P0) 0.84143

ProbabilitiesNumber Probability Cumulative Probability

0.841432 0 0.841432 0.8414320 986346 1 0 144913 0 9863460.986346 1 0.144913 0.9863460.998824 2 0.012479 0.9988240.999899 3 0.001075 0.9998990.999991 4 0.000093 0.9999910.999999 5 0.000008 0.9999991.000000 6 0.000001 1.0000001.000000 7 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 8 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 9 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 9 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 10 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 11 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 12 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 13 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 14 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 15 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 16 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 17 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 18 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 18 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 19 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 20 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 21 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 22 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 23 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 24 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 25 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 26 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 26 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 27 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 28 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 29 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 30 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 31 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 32 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 33 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 34 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 35 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 36 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 37 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 38 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 39 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 40 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 41 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 42 0.000000 1.000000

Page 226: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Waiting Lines M/M/s

Data ResultsArrival rate () 154 Average server utilization() 0.42778Service rate () 180 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.19163() 180 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.19163Number of servers(s) 2 Average number of customers in the system(L) 1.04718

Average waiting time in the queue(Wq) 0.00124

Average time in the system(W) 0.0068 hrsProbability (% of time) system is empty (P0) 0.40078

ProbabilitiesNumber Probability Cumulative Probability

0.400778 0 0.400778 0.4007780 743666 1 0 342888 0 7436660.743666 1 0.342888 0.7436660.890346 2 0.146680 0.8903460.953093 3 0.062746 0.9530930.979934 4 0.026842 0.9799340.991416 5 0.011482 0.9914160.996328 6 0.004912 0.9963280.998429 7 0.002101 0.9984290.999328 8 0.000899 0.9993280.999713 9 0.000385 0.9997130.999713 9 0.000385 0.9997130.999877 10 0.000164 0.9998770.999947 11 0.000070 0.9999470.999977 12 0.000030 0.9999770.999990 13 0.000013 0.9999900.999996 14 0.000006 0.9999960.999998 15 0.000002 0.9999980.999999 16 0.000001 0.9999991.000000 17 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 18 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 18 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 19 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 20 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 21 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 22 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 23 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 24 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 25 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 26 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 26 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 27 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 28 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 29 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 30 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 31 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 32 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 33 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 34 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 35 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 36 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 37 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 38 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 39 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 40 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 41 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 42 0.000000 1.000000

Page 227: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Waiting Lines M/M/s

Data ResultsArrival rate () 154 Average server utilization() 0.21389Service rate () 360 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.02051() 360 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.02051Number of servers(s) 2 Average number of customers in the system(L) 0.44829

Average waiting time in the queue(Wq) 0.00013

Average time in the system(W) 0.00291 hrsProbability (% of time) system is empty (P0) 0.6476

ProbabilitiesNumber Probability Cumulative Probability

0.647597 0 0.647597 0.6475970 924625 1 0 277028 0 9246250.924625 1 0.277028 0.9246250.983878 2 0.059253 0.9838780.996552 3 0.012674 0.9965520.999262 4 0.002711 0.9992620.999842 5 0.000580 0.9998420.999966 6 0.000124 0.9999660.999993 7 0.000027 0.9999930.999998 8 0.000006 0.9999981.000000 9 0.000001 1.0000001.000000 9 0.000001 1.0000001.000000 10 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 11 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 12 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 13 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 14 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 15 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 16 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 17 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 18 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 18 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 19 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 20 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 21 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 22 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 23 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 24 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 25 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 26 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 26 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 27 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 28 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 29 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 30 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 31 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 32 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 33 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 34 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 35 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 36 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 37 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 38 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 39 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 40 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 41 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 42 0.000000 1.000000

Page 228: APPENDIX A SCOPING DOCUMENTarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/...Subject: RE: PenPlace (N-10) Scoping document All our comments are addressed. Thank you for providing

Waiting Lines M/M/s

Data ResultsArrival rate () 154 Average server utilization() 0.10694Service rate () 720 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.00247() 720 Average number of customers in the queue(Lq) 0.00247Number of servers(s) 2 Average number of customers in the system(L) 0.21636

Average waiting time in the queue(Wq) 1.6E-05

Average time in the system(W) 0.0014 hrsProbability (% of time) system is empty (P0) 0.80678

ProbabilitiesNumber Probability Cumulative Probability

0.806775 0 0.806775 0.8067750 979336 1 0 172560 0 9793360.979336 1 0.172560 0.9793360.997790 2 0.018454 0.9977900.999764 3 0.001974 0.9997640.999975 4 0.000211 0.9999750.999997 5 0.000023 0.9999971.000000 6 0.000002 1.0000001.000000 7 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 8 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 9 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 9 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 10 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 11 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 12 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 13 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 14 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 15 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 16 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 17 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 18 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 18 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 19 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 20 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 21 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 22 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 23 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 24 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 25 0.000000 1.0000001 000000 26 0 000000 1 0000001.000000 26 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 27 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 28 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 29 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 30 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 31 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 32 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 33 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 34 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 35 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 36 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 37 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 38 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 39 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 40 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 41 0.000000 1.0000001.000000 42 0.000000 1.000000