appendix a - geochemistry report - ntepa€¦ · geochemistry report: eastern leases project page...

157
Geochemistry Report A

Upload: others

Post on 19-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report A

Page 2: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report Eastern Leases Project

Prepared for: Hansen Bailey On behalf of: South32 Pty Ltd

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 3: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page i

Geochemistry Report EASTERN LEASES PROJECT

Prepared for: Hansen Bailey

DOCUMENT CONTROL Report Title Geochemistry Report Eastern Leases Project

Project Name Eastern Leases Project

Job Number 121312 Client Hansen Bailey

© RGS Environmental Pty Ltd, 2015. ................. 123 Wynne St, Sunnybank Hills, QLD 4109 www.rgsenv.com

Limitations and disclaimer: This report documents the work undertaken by RGS Environmental Pty Ltd (RGS).This report should be read in full. While the findings presented in this report are based on information that RGS considers reliable unless stated otherwise, the accuracy and completeness of source information cannot be guaranteed, although RGS has taken reasonable steps to verify the accuracy of such source data. RGS has made no independent verification of this information beyond the agreed scope of works and RGS assumes no responsibility for any inaccuracies or omissions outside of RGS’s direct control. Furthermore, the information compiled in this report addresses the specific needs of the client, so may not address the needs of third parties using this report for their own purposes. Thus, RGS and their employees accept no liability for any losses or damage for any action taken or not taken on the basis of any part of the contents of this report. Those acting on information provided in this report do so entirely at their own risk.

This report does not purport to give legal advice. Legal advice can only be given by qualified legal practitioners.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................ 2

2.0 PROJECT SITE SETTING ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location and Topography ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Geology .................................................................................................................................. 3

3.0 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Investigation Strategy ............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Field Investigation and Sampling Program ............................................................................ 4 3.3 Geochemical Test Program ................................................................................................... 5

3.3.1 Static Geochemical Tests ................................................................................................ 5 3.3.2 Kinetic Geochemical Tests .............................................................................................. 6

4.0 OVERBURDEN GEOCHEMISTRY ............................................................................................ 8 4.1 Acid Base Account Results .................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids ................................................................................. 11 4.3 Dispersion and Erosion ........................................................................................................ 12

4.3.1 Sodicity .......................................................................................................................... 12 4.3.2 Ultrafine Clays ............................................................................................................... 12

4.4 Water Quality Static Leach Tests ......................................................................................... 12 4.5 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests ....................................................................................... 13

5.4.1 Bulk Overburden Leachate ............................................................................................ 13 5.4.1 Localised PAF Overburden ........................................................................................... 14

4.6 Management Measures ....................................................................................................... 15 5.0 ORE GEOCHEMISTRY............................................................................................................ 16

5.1 Acid Base Account Results .................................................................................................. 16 5.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids ................................................................................. 18 5.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests ......................................................................................... 18 5.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests ....................................................................................... 19 5.5 Management Measures ....................................................................................................... 20

6.0 MIDDLINGS GEOCHEMISTRY ............................................................................................... 21 6.1 Acid Base Account Results .................................................................................................. 21 6.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids ................................................................................. 21 6.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests ......................................................................................... 21 6.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests ....................................................................................... 21 6.5 Management Measures ....................................................................................................... 22

7.0 REVIEW OF TAILINGS GEOCHEMISTRY.............................................................................. 23 8.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 24

8.1 Overburden .......................................................................................................................... 24 8.2 Ore ....................................................................................................................................... 24 8.3 Tailings and Middlings .......................................................................................................... 25

9.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 26

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 4: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page i

Geochemistry Report EASTERN LEASES PROJECT

Prepared for: Hansen Bailey

DOCUMENT CONTROL Report Title Geochemistry Report Eastern Leases Project

Project Name Eastern Leases Project

Job Number 121312 Client Hansen Bailey

© RGS Environmental Pty Ltd, 2015. ................. 123 Wynne St, Sunnybank Hills, QLD 4109 www.rgsenv.com

Limitations and disclaimer: This report documents the work undertaken by RGS Environmental Pty Ltd (RGS).This report should be read in full. While the findings presented in this report are based on information that RGS considers reliable unless stated otherwise, the accuracy and completeness of source information cannot be guaranteed, although RGS has taken reasonable steps to verify the accuracy of such source data. RGS has made no independent verification of this information beyond the agreed scope of works and RGS assumes no responsibility for any inaccuracies or omissions outside of RGS’s direct control. Furthermore, the information compiled in this report addresses the specific needs of the client, so may not address the needs of third parties using this report for their own purposes. Thus, RGS and their employees accept no liability for any losses or damage for any action taken or not taken on the basis of any part of the contents of this report. Those acting on information provided in this report do so entirely at their own risk.

This report does not purport to give legal advice. Legal advice can only be given by qualified legal practitioners.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................ 2

2.0 PROJECT SITE SETTING ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location and Topography ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Geology .................................................................................................................................. 3

3.0 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Investigation Strategy ............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Field Investigation and Sampling Program ............................................................................ 4 3.3 Geochemical Test Program ................................................................................................... 5

3.3.1 Static Geochemical Tests ................................................................................................ 5 3.3.2 Kinetic Geochemical Tests .............................................................................................. 6

4.0 OVERBURDEN GEOCHEMISTRY ............................................................................................ 8 4.1 Acid Base Account Results .................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids ................................................................................. 11 4.3 Dispersion and Erosion ........................................................................................................ 12

4.3.1 Sodicity .......................................................................................................................... 12 4.3.2 Ultrafine Clays ............................................................................................................... 12

4.4 Water Quality Static Leach Tests ......................................................................................... 12 4.5 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests ....................................................................................... 13

5.4.1 Bulk Overburden Leachate ............................................................................................ 13 5.4.1 Localised PAF Overburden ........................................................................................... 14

4.6 Management Measures ....................................................................................................... 15 5.0 ORE GEOCHEMISTRY............................................................................................................ 16

5.1 Acid Base Account Results .................................................................................................. 16 5.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids ................................................................................. 18 5.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests ......................................................................................... 18 5.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests ....................................................................................... 19 5.5 Management Measures ....................................................................................................... 20

6.0 MIDDLINGS GEOCHEMISTRY ............................................................................................... 21 6.1 Acid Base Account Results .................................................................................................. 21 6.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids ................................................................................. 21 6.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests ......................................................................................... 21 6.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests ....................................................................................... 21 6.5 Management Measures ....................................................................................................... 22

7.0 REVIEW OF TAILINGS GEOCHEMISTRY.............................................................................. 23 8.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 24

8.1 Overburden .......................................................................................................................... 24 8.2 Ore ....................................................................................................................................... 24 8.3 Tailings and Middlings .......................................................................................................... 25

9.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 26

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 5: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page iii

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan

Figure 2: Local Setting

Figure 3: Indicative Stratigraphy

Figure 4: Geochemistry Sampling Bore Locations

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Sample materials used for geochemical testing

Table 2: Geochemical classification criteria for ore and overburden

Table 3: Sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation rates for KLC tests on overburden

Table 4: Sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation rates for KLC tests on ore

Table 5: Sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation rates for KLC tests on middlings

LIST OF GRAPHS Graph 1: pH values for overburden

Graph 2: EC values for overburden

Graph 3: Sulfur values for overburden

Graph 4: NAPP values for overburden

Graph 5: ANC v MPA for overburden

Graph 6: pH values for ore

Graph 7: EC values for ore

Graph 8: Sulfur values for ore

Graph 9: NAPP values for ore

Graph 10: ANC v MPA for ore

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Geochemical Assessment Methodology for Mine Waste Materials

Attachment B: ALS Laboratory Data (Certificates of Analysis)

Attachment C: Static Geochemical Results

Attachment D: Kinetic Geochemical Results

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page iv

GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS

Acidity A measure of hydrogen ion (H+) concentration; generally expressed as pH.

ABA Acid Base Account, an evaluation of the balance between acid generation and acid neutralisation processes. Generally determines the MPA and the inherent ANC, as defined below, and is commonly used in assessing the potential for AMD associated with mining.

AHD Australian Height Datum used for altitude measurement in Australia.

AMD Acid and metalliferous drainage caused by exposure of sulfide minerals in mine waste materials to oxygen and water. Typically characterised by low pH and elevated concentrations of salts, sulfate and metals.

ANC Acid neutralising capacity of a sample as kg H2SO4 per tonne of sample. Commonly referred to as the buffering capacity.

ANC:MPA Ratio Ratio of the acid neutralising capacity and maximum potential acidity of a sample. Used to assess the risk of a sample generating acid conditions.

Dispersive Dispersive soil and rock materials are structurally unstable and disperse into basic particles such as sand, silt and clay in water. When a dispersive soil is wet, the basic structure has a tendency to collapse, whereas when it is dry it is prone to surface sealing and crusting.

EC Electrical Conductivity, expressed as µS/cm, is a measure of electrical conductance.

eCEC Effective cation exchange capacity provides a measure of the amount of exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) in a sample.

ESP Exchangeable sodium percentage provides a measure of the sodicity of a materials and propensity to erode.

Interburden The material found in between ore layers, and considered to be of low economic value (ie. a type of waste material).

KLC test Kinetic leach column tests are procedures used to measure the geochemical/ weathering behaviour of a sample of mine material over time, and are arecognised laboratory method of replicating natural processes affecting in-situ mine material.

LoR Limit of Reporting. Laboratory detection limit for the reporting of results for a particular geochemical test.

Middlings A form of process residue generated as a result of processing the ore at the concentrator.

MPA Maximum Potential Acidity calculated by multiplying the total sulfur content of a sample by 30.625 (stoichiometric factor) and expressed as kg H2SO4 per tonne.

NAF-Barren Non-acid forming and barren of sulfur (i.e. less than or equal to 0.1% sulfur). Geochemical classification criterion for a sample that will not generate acid conditions.

NAG test Net acid generation test. Hydrogen peroxide solution is used to oxidise sulfides in a sample, then any acid generated through oxidation may be consumed by neutralising components in the sample. Any remaining acidity is expressed as kg H2SO4 per tonne.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 6: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page iii

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan

Figure 2: Local Setting

Figure 3: Indicative Stratigraphy

Figure 4: Geochemistry Sampling Bore Locations

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Sample materials used for geochemical testing

Table 2: Geochemical classification criteria for ore and overburden

Table 3: Sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation rates for KLC tests on overburden

Table 4: Sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation rates for KLC tests on ore

Table 5: Sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation rates for KLC tests on middlings

LIST OF GRAPHS Graph 1: pH values for overburden

Graph 2: EC values for overburden

Graph 3: Sulfur values for overburden

Graph 4: NAPP values for overburden

Graph 5: ANC v MPA for overburden

Graph 6: pH values for ore

Graph 7: EC values for ore

Graph 8: Sulfur values for ore

Graph 9: NAPP values for ore

Graph 10: ANC v MPA for ore

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Geochemical Assessment Methodology for Mine Waste Materials

Attachment B: ALS Laboratory Data (Certificates of Analysis)

Attachment C: Static Geochemical Results

Attachment D: Kinetic Geochemical Results

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page iv

GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS

Acidity A measure of hydrogen ion (H+) concentration; generally expressed as pH.

ABA Acid Base Account, an evaluation of the balance between acid generation and acid neutralisation processes. Generally determines the MPA and the inherent ANC, as defined below, and is commonly used in assessing the potential for AMD associated with mining.

AHD Australian Height Datum used for altitude measurement in Australia.

AMD Acid and metalliferous drainage caused by exposure of sulfide minerals in mine waste materials to oxygen and water. Typically characterised by low pH and elevated concentrations of salts, sulfate and metals.

ANC Acid neutralising capacity of a sample as kg H2SO4 per tonne of sample. Commonly referred to as the buffering capacity.

ANC:MPA Ratio Ratio of the acid neutralising capacity and maximum potential acidity of a sample. Used to assess the risk of a sample generating acid conditions.

Dispersive Dispersive soil and rock materials are structurally unstable and disperse into basic particles such as sand, silt and clay in water. When a dispersive soil is wet, the basic structure has a tendency to collapse, whereas when it is dry it is prone to surface sealing and crusting.

EC Electrical Conductivity, expressed as µS/cm, is a measure of electrical conductance.

eCEC Effective cation exchange capacity provides a measure of the amount of exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) in a sample.

ESP Exchangeable sodium percentage provides a measure of the sodicity of a materials and propensity to erode.

Interburden The material found in between ore layers, and considered to be of low economic value (ie. a type of waste material).

KLC test Kinetic leach column tests are procedures used to measure the geochemical/ weathering behaviour of a sample of mine material over time, and are arecognised laboratory method of replicating natural processes affecting in-situ mine material.

LoR Limit of Reporting. Laboratory detection limit for the reporting of results for a particular geochemical test.

Middlings A form of process residue generated as a result of processing the ore at the concentrator.

MPA Maximum Potential Acidity calculated by multiplying the total sulfur content of a sample by 30.625 (stoichiometric factor) and expressed as kg H2SO4 per tonne.

NAF-Barren Non-acid forming and barren of sulfur (i.e. less than or equal to 0.1% sulfur). Geochemical classification criterion for a sample that will not generate acid conditions.

NAG test Net acid generation test. Hydrogen peroxide solution is used to oxidise sulfides in a sample, then any acid generated through oxidation may be consumed by neutralising components in the sample. Any remaining acidity is expressed as kg H2SO4 per tonne.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 7: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page v

NAPP Net acid producing potential expressed as kg H2SO4 per tonne. NAPP is the balance between the capacity of a sample to generate acidity (MPA) minus its capacity to neutralise acidity (ANC).

NMD Neutral mine drainage typically caused by exposure of sulfide minerals in mine waste materials to oxygen and water and then neutralisation by gangue minerals. Typically characterised by neutral pH and elevated concentrations of salts, sulfate and metals.

Ore Material that has been mined with sufficient value to warrant processing.

Overburden The waste rock material found overlying the first ore horizon within the stratigraphic profile.

PAF Potentially acid forming. Geochemical classification criterion for a sample that has the potential to generate acid conditions.

PSD Particle size distribution of a sample material measured by hydrometer.

%S Percent sulfur. A measurement unit for the sulfur content of a sample material.

Scr Chromium reducible sulfur test measures the sulfide sulfur content of a sample material.

Slaking Disintegration of unconfined soil or rock after exposure to air and subsequent immersion in water.

Sodic Sodic soil and rock materials are characterized by a disproportionately high concentration of sodium (Na) in their cation exchange complex and are innately unstable, exhibiting poor physical and chemical properties, which impede water infiltration, water availability, and ultimately plant growth.

Static test Procedure for characterising the geochemical nature of a sample at one point in time. Static tests may include measurements of mineral and chemical composition of a sample and the Acid Base Account.

Tailing (sand) A form of process residue generated as a result of processing the ore at the concentrator. Represents the coarser size fraction of the tailings material produced.

Tailing (slime) A form of process residue generated as a result of processing the ore at the concentrator. Represents the finer size fraction of the tailings material produced.

Total Sulfur Total sulfur content of a sample generally measured using a ‘Leco’ analyser expressed as % S.

TSS Total suspended solids is a measurement of the suspended solids concentration in a water sample.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background RGS Environmental Pty Ltd (RGS) was commissioned by Hansen Bailey on behalf of BHP Billiton Manganese Australia Pty Ltd to complete a geochemical assessment of ore and mine waste materials as part of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Eastern Leases Project (the project). Thegeochemical assessment has been developed as a stand-alone document suitable for inclusion in theEIS document to support an approval application for the project.

The project proponent is the Groote Eylandt Mining Company Pty Ltd (GEMCO), which has two shareholders, namely South32 Pty Ltd (60%) and Anglo Operations (Australia) Pty Ltd (40%). BHP Billiton Manganese Australia Pty Ltd was previously a shareholder in GEMCO, however its interest is now represented by South32.

The project involves the development of a number of open cut mining areas to the east of the existing GEMCO manganese mine on Groote Eylandt in the Gulf of Carpentaria, approximately 650 km south-east of Darwin (Figure 1). The proposed additional mining areas are located on the Eastern Leases, which are two Exploration Licences in Retention (ELRs). ELR28161 is termed the Northern Eastern Lease (Northern EL) and ELR28162 is termed the Southern Eastern Lease (Southern EL).

The Eastern Leases are located 2 km east of the existing GEMCO mine at the closest point. The township of Angurugu is located approximately 6 km to the north-west of the Eastern Leases, and is the closest residential community (Figure 2). The Eastern Leases are located on Aboriginal land, scheduled under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act (Northern Territory) 1976. The land within the Eastern Leases comprises natural bushland, with the Emerald River and a small section of the Amagula River traversing the Northern EL and Southern EL respectively.

The project involves:

developing a number of open cut mining areas (termed “quarries”) within the Eastern Leases and mining manganese ore by the same mining methods that are in use at the existing GEMCO mine;

constructing mine related infrastructure in the Eastern Leases (dams, water fill points, crib hut, truck park up areas and laydown storage areas); and

transporting the ore by truck on a new haul road to be constructed between the existing GEMCO mine and the Eastern Leases.

Quarry development will involve the removal of overburden and interburden associated with the manganese ore. All overburden will be emplaced in mined quarry areas, or may be temporarily emplaced in out-of-pit emplacement areas until quarry areas are available for backfilling and rehabilitation. Interburden is found within the horizons of the manganese ore and, depending on thickness of this material, may be handled as either overburden or ore. As interburden is geologically comparable to overburden and geochemically distinct relative to manganese ore, interburden and overburden have been assessed collectively in this report. All overburden will be emplaced in mined quarry areas, or may be temporarily emplaced in out-of-pit emplacement areas until quarry areas are available for backfilling and rehabilitation.

Ore will be processed at the concentrator at the existing GEMCO mine and the concentrate would be transported to market via the existing port located at Milner Bay (Figure 2). No changes or upgrades to the existing GEMCO mine facilities are required as a result of the project. Ore mined from the Eastern Leases will supplement production from the existing GEMCO mine, but the project will not increase GEMCO’s annual production rate of approximately 5 Million tonnes per annum of product manganese.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 8: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page v

NAPP Net acid producing potential expressed as kg H2SO4 per tonne. NAPP is the balance between the capacity of a sample to generate acidity (MPA) minus its capacity to neutralise acidity (ANC).

NMD Neutral mine drainage typically caused by exposure of sulfide minerals in mine waste materials to oxygen and water and then neutralisation by gangue minerals. Typically characterised by neutral pH and elevated concentrations of salts, sulfate and metals.

Ore Material that has been mined with sufficient value to warrant processing.

Overburden The waste rock material found overlying the first ore horizon within the stratigraphic profile.

PAF Potentially acid forming. Geochemical classification criterion for a sample that has the potential to generate acid conditions.

PSD Particle size distribution of a sample material measured by hydrometer.

%S Percent sulfur. A measurement unit for the sulfur content of a sample material.

Scr Chromium reducible sulfur test measures the sulfide sulfur content of a sample material.

Slaking Disintegration of unconfined soil or rock after exposure to air and subsequent immersion in water.

Sodic Sodic soil and rock materials are characterized by a disproportionately high concentration of sodium (Na) in their cation exchange complex and are innately unstable, exhibiting poor physical and chemical properties, which impede water infiltration, water availability, and ultimately plant growth.

Static test Procedure for characterising the geochemical nature of a sample at one point in time. Static tests may include measurements of mineral and chemical composition of a sample and the Acid Base Account.

Tailing (sand) A form of process residue generated as a result of processing the ore at the concentrator. Represents the coarser size fraction of the tailings material produced.

Tailing (slime) A form of process residue generated as a result of processing the ore at the concentrator. Represents the finer size fraction of the tailings material produced.

Total Sulfur Total sulfur content of a sample generally measured using a ‘Leco’ analyser expressed as % S.

TSS Total suspended solids is a measurement of the suspended solids concentration in a water sample.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background RGS Environmental Pty Ltd (RGS) was commissioned by Hansen Bailey on behalf of BHP Billiton Manganese Australia Pty Ltd to complete a geochemical assessment of ore and mine waste materials as part of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Eastern Leases Project (the project). Thegeochemical assessment has been developed as a stand-alone document suitable for inclusion in theEIS document to support an approval application for the project.

The project proponent is the Groote Eylandt Mining Company Pty Ltd (GEMCO), which has two shareholders, namely South32 Pty Ltd (60%) and Anglo Operations (Australia) Pty Ltd (40%). BHP Billiton Manganese Australia Pty Ltd was previously a shareholder in GEMCO, however its interest is now represented by South32.

The project involves the development of a number of open cut mining areas to the east of the existing GEMCO manganese mine on Groote Eylandt in the Gulf of Carpentaria, approximately 650 km south-east of Darwin (Figure 1). The proposed additional mining areas are located on the Eastern Leases, which are two Exploration Licences in Retention (ELRs). ELR28161 is termed the Northern Eastern Lease (Northern EL) and ELR28162 is termed the Southern Eastern Lease (Southern EL).

The Eastern Leases are located 2 km east of the existing GEMCO mine at the closest point. The township of Angurugu is located approximately 6 km to the north-west of the Eastern Leases, and is the closest residential community (Figure 2). The Eastern Leases are located on Aboriginal land, scheduled under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act (Northern Territory) 1976. The land within the Eastern Leases comprises natural bushland, with the Emerald River and a small section of the Amagula River traversing the Northern EL and Southern EL respectively.

The project involves:

developing a number of open cut mining areas (termed “quarries”) within the Eastern Leases and mining manganese ore by the same mining methods that are in use at the existing GEMCO mine;

constructing mine related infrastructure in the Eastern Leases (dams, water fill points, crib hut, truck park up areas and laydown storage areas); and

transporting the ore by truck on a new haul road to be constructed between the existing GEMCO mine and the Eastern Leases.

Quarry development will involve the removal of overburden and interburden associated with the manganese ore. All overburden will be emplaced in mined quarry areas, or may be temporarily emplaced in out-of-pit emplacement areas until quarry areas are available for backfilling and rehabilitation. Interburden is found within the horizons of the manganese ore and, depending on thickness of this material, may be handled as either overburden or ore. As interburden is geologically comparable to overburden and geochemically distinct relative to manganese ore, interburden and overburden have been assessed collectively in this report. All overburden will be emplaced in mined quarry areas, or may be temporarily emplaced in out-of-pit emplacement areas until quarry areas are available for backfilling and rehabilitation.

Ore will be processed at the concentrator at the existing GEMCO mine and the concentrate would be transported to market via the existing port located at Milner Bay (Figure 2). No changes or upgrades to the existing GEMCO mine facilities are required as a result of the project. Ore mined from the Eastern Leases will supplement production from the existing GEMCO mine, but the project will not increase GEMCO’s annual production rate of approximately 5 Million tonnes per annum of product manganese.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 9: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 2

The processing of manganese ore from the Eastern Leases will generate tailings (sands and slimes) and middlings. GEMCO has established handling and storage methods for process residues and these methods have been operating since the commencement of operations.

The project site for the purposes of this report is the Northern and Southern ELs.

1.2 Scope of Work The primary purpose of this report is to complete a geochemical assessment of overburden (i.e. overburden and interburden) to be excavated during quarry development, and identify any environmental risks associated with this material. This material was characterised through field investigations and sample analysis. Where potential environmental risks were identified, conceptual management strategies have been developed by RGS to ensure that these risks are addressed.

As noted in Section 1.1, ore from the project will be stockpiled at the existing GEMCO mine and processed at the concentrator, also located at the existing GEMCO mine. The tailings and middlings generated by this process will be managed in accordance with GEMCO’s current management strategy for tailings and middlings. In general, the EIS does not include any assessment of operations within the existing GEMCO mine, given that these operations are subject to existing environmental approvals, and will not be altered by the project. However, in accordance with the EIS Terms of Reference (TOR) that the NT Environment Protection Authority (NT EPA) has prepared for the project (NT EPA, 2014), this report includes geochemical characterisation of manganese ore, tailings and middlings. This assessment was prepared following a review of available geochemical data from the existing GEMCO mine, supplemented by targeted sampling and analysis of middlings materials from the existing operations.

The scope of this assessment is summarised as follows:

Review available geochemical data, geological data and existing exploration and groundwater drilling databases (including plans, drill hole logs and drill core photographs) relevant to the project site;

Design a geochemical assessment program including sampling and testing requirements for representative materials from the project site;

Coordinate the material sampling program and geochemical analysis programs;

Geochemically characterise representative samples of overburden, ore and middlings materials;and

Prepare a Geochemistry Report (this report) identifying any environmental risks related to the geochemistry of project materials.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 3

2.0 PROJECT SITE SETTING

2.1 Location and Topography The land within and surrounding the project site comprises natural bushland. No farming or agriculture activities are undertaken within, or in the vicinity of the project site.

GEMCO has been undertaking manganese exploration activities across the Eastern Leases site since 2001. The geology of the Eastern Leases is discussed in Section 2.2.

The topography across the project site varies from level to undulating plains, to sandy colluvial footslopes with rugged uplands. Elevations range from approximately 10 m Australian Height Datum (AHD) to 120 m AHD.

Several drainage lines traverse the project site, including sections of the Emerald and Amagula Rivers, and their tributaries.

2.2 Geology Groote Eylandt was formed on a stable basement of Proterozoic quartzite that outcrops over the majority of the island.

The Proterozoic basement materials were eroded and redeposited under marine conditions during the early Cretaceous period.

A blanket of Cretaceous sediments was subsequently deposited over the basement and reworked basement materials in the west of the island. The distribution of Cretaceous sediments is generally confined to the western plains of the island. The upper Cretaceous sediments contain the manganese deposits.

The manganese ore is a sedimentary layer, consisting of manganese strata occurring between clay and sand beds. The ore body is essentially stratabound and strataform in character and it represents a continuous horizon up to 11 m thick. The ore body consists of pisolitic and oolitic manganese oxides.

Much of the Cretaceous sediment profile (including some of the manganese deposits) has been extensively modified by a long period of tropical weathering (or laterisation) during the Tertiary period. This has resulted in the development of thick laterite profiles up to 25m thick.

The laterite is strongly oxidised and leached and forms the iron and alumina rich layers above the manganese ore.

The typical stratigraphy of the project site is provided in Figure 3 and comprises (in reverse chronological order):

A thin veneer of Quaternary sediments;

A weathered profile of Tertiary laterite and lateritic clays;

Cretaceous marine clays including the manganese ore;

Cretaceous marine sandstone;

Cretaceous sandstone of reworked quartzite basement; and

the underlying Proterozoic quartzite basement.

The relative depth and thickness of each sedimentary unit varies across the Eastern Leases depending on the depth of the underlying Proterozoic basement.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 10: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 2

The processing of manganese ore from the Eastern Leases will generate tailings (sands and slimes) and middlings. GEMCO has established handling and storage methods for process residues and these methods have been operating since the commencement of operations.

The project site for the purposes of this report is the Northern and Southern ELs.

1.2 Scope of Work The primary purpose of this report is to complete a geochemical assessment of overburden (i.e. overburden and interburden) to be excavated during quarry development, and identify any environmental risks associated with this material. This material was characterised through field investigations and sample analysis. Where potential environmental risks were identified, conceptual management strategies have been developed by RGS to ensure that these risks are addressed.

As noted in Section 1.1, ore from the project will be stockpiled at the existing GEMCO mine and processed at the concentrator, also located at the existing GEMCO mine. The tailings and middlings generated by this process will be managed in accordance with GEMCO’s current management strategy for tailings and middlings. In general, the EIS does not include any assessment of operations within the existing GEMCO mine, given that these operations are subject to existing environmental approvals, and will not be altered by the project. However, in accordance with the EIS Terms of Reference (TOR) that the NT Environment Protection Authority (NT EPA) has prepared for the project (NT EPA, 2014), this report includes geochemical characterisation of manganese ore, tailings and middlings. This assessment was prepared following a review of available geochemical data from the existing GEMCO mine, supplemented by targeted sampling and analysis of middlings materials from the existing operations.

The scope of this assessment is summarised as follows:

Review available geochemical data, geological data and existing exploration and groundwater drilling databases (including plans, drill hole logs and drill core photographs) relevant to the project site;

Design a geochemical assessment program including sampling and testing requirements for representative materials from the project site;

Coordinate the material sampling program and geochemical analysis programs;

Geochemically characterise representative samples of overburden, ore and middlings materials;and

Prepare a Geochemistry Report (this report) identifying any environmental risks related to the geochemistry of project materials.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 3

2.0 PROJECT SITE SETTING

2.1 Location and Topography The land within and surrounding the project site comprises natural bushland. No farming or agriculture activities are undertaken within, or in the vicinity of the project site.

GEMCO has been undertaking manganese exploration activities across the Eastern Leases site since 2001. The geology of the Eastern Leases is discussed in Section 2.2.

The topography across the project site varies from level to undulating plains, to sandy colluvial footslopes with rugged uplands. Elevations range from approximately 10 m Australian Height Datum (AHD) to 120 m AHD.

Several drainage lines traverse the project site, including sections of the Emerald and Amagula Rivers, and their tributaries.

2.2 Geology Groote Eylandt was formed on a stable basement of Proterozoic quartzite that outcrops over the majority of the island.

The Proterozoic basement materials were eroded and redeposited under marine conditions during the early Cretaceous period.

A blanket of Cretaceous sediments was subsequently deposited over the basement and reworked basement materials in the west of the island. The distribution of Cretaceous sediments is generally confined to the western plains of the island. The upper Cretaceous sediments contain the manganese deposits.

The manganese ore is a sedimentary layer, consisting of manganese strata occurring between clay and sand beds. The ore body is essentially stratabound and strataform in character and it represents a continuous horizon up to 11 m thick. The ore body consists of pisolitic and oolitic manganese oxides.

Much of the Cretaceous sediment profile (including some of the manganese deposits) has been extensively modified by a long period of tropical weathering (or laterisation) during the Tertiary period. This has resulted in the development of thick laterite profiles up to 25m thick.

The laterite is strongly oxidised and leached and forms the iron and alumina rich layers above the manganese ore.

The typical stratigraphy of the project site is provided in Figure 3 and comprises (in reverse chronological order):

A thin veneer of Quaternary sediments;

A weathered profile of Tertiary laterite and lateritic clays;

Cretaceous marine clays including the manganese ore;

Cretaceous marine sandstone;

Cretaceous sandstone of reworked quartzite basement; and

the underlying Proterozoic quartzite basement.

The relative depth and thickness of each sedimentary unit varies across the Eastern Leases depending on the depth of the underlying Proterozoic basement.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 11: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 4

3.0 METHODOLOGY The geochemical assessment of the project materials was guided by the requirements of the NT EPA Environmental Assessment Guideline on Acid and Metalliferous Drainage (AMD) (NT EPA, 2013). The geochemical assessment strategy was developed taking into account the key information sources, legislative requirements and methodology described in the Guideline.

3.1 Investigation Strategy RGS developed a site-specific investigation strategy to characterise the geochemistry of materials to be mined and processed as part of the project (RGS, 2013). The strategy was developed taking into account Australian (TEAM NT, 2004; DME, 1995; and DITR, 2006a,b; 2007a,b; 2008) and international (INAP, 2009) technical guidelines for the geochemical assessment of mine waste materials (NT EPA, 2013).

The strategy took into account the availability of detailed site-specific exploration and geological data,to allow the targeted collection of representative samples of ore and overburden from the lithological profile at the project site. In addition, the investigation layout was designed to provide sample distribution across the proposed mining areas. This combined approach allowed RGS to accurately characterise materials likely to be generated by the project.

The investigation strategy also involved review of existing geochemical data on slime and sand tailings materials and collection of middlings samples from the existing GEMCO operation to allow comparison with the results of the site-specific investigations.

3.2 Field Investigation and Sampling Program Based upon the available site-specific exploration and geological data, field investigations undertaken at the project site included:

Rotary coring and full core logging of six geochemistry bores; and

Open hole drilling and logging of drill chips from 19 groundwater monitoring bores and 4 groundwater production bores (located at a total of 10 sites).

All drill holes were logged and sampled by a suitably qualified geologist or hydrogeologist to ensure the collection of representative samples.

Following review of the drilling logs, samples were selected for detailed geochemical analysis. Samples were preferentially selected from geochemistry bores due to the high quality of the cored material. Additional samples of drill chip materials were collected from representative monitoring bores.

A total of 112 ore and overburden samples were selected, comprising 54 drill core samples and 58 drill chip samples. Four supplementary middlings samples were collected from the existing middlings storage at GEMCO operation on 6 June 2014.

The distribution of samples collected is shown on Figure 4. Table 1 provides the number of samples of each type of material collected and used in the geochemical assessment.

Drill chip and middlings samples typically comprised 1 to 2 kg of material stored in plastic sample bags. Drill core samples typically comprised full core taken from targeted drill core depth intervals no greater than 0.5 m. All samples were stored in a cool dry location until dispatch to Australian Laboratory Services in Brisbane (ALS Brisbane) for geochemical testing.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 5

Table 1. Sample materials used for geochemical testing

Project Material Representative Sample Material Number of samples

Overburden EmplacementsOverburden 78

Interburden 8

Ore Stockpiles Manganese Ore Body 26

Middlings Process Residue Middlings Process Residue 4

Total 116 samples

3.3 Geochemical Test Program The GEMCO samples received by ALS Brisbane were prepared by crushing (where necessary) and pulverising to ≤ 75 µm particle size. This standard laboratory procedure provides a homogenous sample but also generates a large sample surface area in contact with the resultant assay solution, thereby providing greater potential for dissolution and reaction, and represents an assumed initial ‘worst case’ scenario for these materials.

A series of static and kinetic geochemical tests were completed on the GEMCO samples. The geochemical test program was designed to assess the degree of risk from the presence and potential oxidation of sulfides, acid generation and the presence/leaching of soluble metals/metalloids and salts. The assessment also included characterisation of standard soil parameters including salinity, dispersion, cation exchange capacity, exchangeable sodium percentage, and major metal concentrations.

A summary of the parameters involved in geochemical assessment of ore and mine waste materials is provided in Attachment A.

3.3.1 Static Geochemical Tests

Static geochemical tests provide a ‘snapshot’ of the geochemical characteristics of a sample material at a single point in time. These tests were staged to screen a large number of samples before selecting either individual and/or composite samples for more detailed static test work.

The Acid Base Account (ABA) was used as a screening procedure whereby the acid-neutralising and acid-generating characteristics of a material are assessed. All 116 samples were screened using ABA. The ABA screening included static geochemical testing for the following parameters:

pH (1:5 w:v, sample:deionised water);

Electrical conductivity (EC) (1:5 w:v, sample:deionised water);

Total sulfur [Leco method]; and

Acid neutralising capacity (ANC) [AMIRA, 2002 method].

The results of the ABA screening assessment are discussed in Section 4.1. Where initial ABA screening results indicated that total sulfur content was greater than average crustal abundance (0.1%) (INAP, 2009), samples were selected for further sulfur speciation testing. A total of four samples were tested for chromium reducible sulfur (Scr) [AS 4969.7-2008 method].

From the total sulfur (or Scr where available) and ANC results, the maximum potential acidity (MPA) and net acid producing potential (NAPP) values of the sample materials were calculated. Where

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 12: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 4

3.0 METHODOLOGY The geochemical assessment of the project materials was guided by the requirements of the NT EPA Environmental Assessment Guideline on Acid and Metalliferous Drainage (AMD) (NT EPA, 2013). The geochemical assessment strategy was developed taking into account the key information sources, legislative requirements and methodology described in the Guideline.

3.1 Investigation Strategy RGS developed a site-specific investigation strategy to characterise the geochemistry of materials to be mined and processed as part of the project (RGS, 2013). The strategy was developed taking into account Australian (TEAM NT, 2004; DME, 1995; and DITR, 2006a,b; 2007a,b; 2008) and international (INAP, 2009) technical guidelines for the geochemical assessment of mine waste materials (NT EPA, 2013).

The strategy took into account the availability of detailed site-specific exploration and geological data,to allow the targeted collection of representative samples of ore and overburden from the lithological profile at the project site. In addition, the investigation layout was designed to provide sample distribution across the proposed mining areas. This combined approach allowed RGS to accurately characterise materials likely to be generated by the project.

The investigation strategy also involved review of existing geochemical data on slime and sand tailings materials and collection of middlings samples from the existing GEMCO operation to allow comparison with the results of the site-specific investigations.

3.2 Field Investigation and Sampling Program Based upon the available site-specific exploration and geological data, field investigations undertaken at the project site included:

Rotary coring and full core logging of six geochemistry bores; and

Open hole drilling and logging of drill chips from 19 groundwater monitoring bores and 4 groundwater production bores (located at a total of 10 sites).

All drill holes were logged and sampled by a suitably qualified geologist or hydrogeologist to ensure the collection of representative samples.

Following review of the drilling logs, samples were selected for detailed geochemical analysis. Samples were preferentially selected from geochemistry bores due to the high quality of the cored material. Additional samples of drill chip materials were collected from representative monitoring bores.

A total of 112 ore and overburden samples were selected, comprising 54 drill core samples and 58 drill chip samples. Four supplementary middlings samples were collected from the existing middlings storage at GEMCO operation on 6 June 2014.

The distribution of samples collected is shown on Figure 4. Table 1 provides the number of samples of each type of material collected and used in the geochemical assessment.

Drill chip and middlings samples typically comprised 1 to 2 kg of material stored in plastic sample bags. Drill core samples typically comprised full core taken from targeted drill core depth intervals no greater than 0.5 m. All samples were stored in a cool dry location until dispatch to Australian Laboratory Services in Brisbane (ALS Brisbane) for geochemical testing.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 5

Table 1. Sample materials used for geochemical testing

Project Material Representative Sample Material Number of samples

Overburden EmplacementsOverburden 78

Interburden 8

Ore Stockpiles Manganese Ore Body 26

Middlings Process Residue Middlings Process Residue 4

Total 116 samples

3.3 Geochemical Test Program The GEMCO samples received by ALS Brisbane were prepared by crushing (where necessary) and pulverising to ≤ 75 µm particle size. This standard laboratory procedure provides a homogenous sample but also generates a large sample surface area in contact with the resultant assay solution, thereby providing greater potential for dissolution and reaction, and represents an assumed initial ‘worst case’ scenario for these materials.

A series of static and kinetic geochemical tests were completed on the GEMCO samples. The geochemical test program was designed to assess the degree of risk from the presence and potential oxidation of sulfides, acid generation and the presence/leaching of soluble metals/metalloids and salts. The assessment also included characterisation of standard soil parameters including salinity, dispersion, cation exchange capacity, exchangeable sodium percentage, and major metal concentrations.

A summary of the parameters involved in geochemical assessment of ore and mine waste materials is provided in Attachment A.

3.3.1 Static Geochemical Tests

Static geochemical tests provide a ‘snapshot’ of the geochemical characteristics of a sample material at a single point in time. These tests were staged to screen a large number of samples before selecting either individual and/or composite samples for more detailed static test work.

The Acid Base Account (ABA) was used as a screening procedure whereby the acid-neutralising and acid-generating characteristics of a material are assessed. All 116 samples were screened using ABA. The ABA screening included static geochemical testing for the following parameters:

pH (1:5 w:v, sample:deionised water);

Electrical conductivity (EC) (1:5 w:v, sample:deionised water);

Total sulfur [Leco method]; and

Acid neutralising capacity (ANC) [AMIRA, 2002 method].

The results of the ABA screening assessment are discussed in Section 4.1. Where initial ABA screening results indicated that total sulfur content was greater than average crustal abundance (0.1%) (INAP, 2009), samples were selected for further sulfur speciation testing. A total of four samples were tested for chromium reducible sulfur (Scr) [AS 4969.7-2008 method].

From the total sulfur (or Scr where available) and ANC results, the maximum potential acidity (MPA) and net acid producing potential (NAPP) values of the sample materials were calculated. Where

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 13: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 6

available, the MPA and NAPP values were calculated using Scr data instead of total sulfur data. Scr data (for fresh samples) generally provides a more accurate representation of the MPA that could theoretically be generated, as acid generation primarily occurs from oxidation of reactive sulfides(eg. pyrite), whereas total sulfur includes other forms of sulfur such as sulfate and organic sulfur,which produce negligible acidity.

After the results of the ABA screening tests were received and interpreted, 18 drill core samples and four middlings samples were selected, prepared and subjected to multi-element analysis. The samples were selected based on material type, location, lithology and geochemical characteristics. All selected samples underwent multi-element testing on both the solid and soluble fractions. The 22selected samples were tested for: Total alkalinity and acidity (automatic titrator measured as CaCO3);

Total metals/metalloids (Al, Ag, As, B, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Th, U, V and Zn) in solids [HCl and HNO3 acid digest followed by FIMS and/or ICP-AES/MS];

Total cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) [HCl and HNO3 acid digest followed by ICP-AES/MS];

Soluble metals/metalloids (Al, Ag, As, B, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Th, U, V and Zn) [ICP-AES/MS and FIMS (1:5 w:v water extracts)];

Major cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) [ICP-AES/MS (1:5 w:v water extracts)]; and

Major anions (Cl, F and SO4) [ICP-AES/MS and PC Titrator (1:5 w:v water extracts)].

A total of six samples were logged as containing a visual abundance of the clay minerals smectite and kaolinite. These samples included one sample from EL-N-GC02 (4.5-4.85m); three samples from EL-N-GC03 (8.6-9.0 m, 21.0-21.5 m and 22.65-22.8 m) and two samples from EL-S-GC04 (8.4-8.7 m and9.5 to 9.8 m). As these samples were located in overburden (two samples) and interburden (four samples), and were visually distinct, these six samples were subjected to additional detailed testing to confirm the likely behaviour of these clays if disturbed by mining, including:

Exchangable Cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K) [by ICP-AES/MS];

Effective Cation Exchange Capacity (eCEC) and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP);

Particle Size Distribution (PSD) [hydrometer - AS1289.3.6.3]; and

Emerson Aggregate test.

The ALS test results for the static geochemical test program are provided in Attachment B. Summary results tables are provided in Attachment C and discussed in Sections 4 to 6.

3.3.2 Kinetic Geochemical Tests

Following receipt and interpretation of the static geochemical test results, six Kinetic Leach Column (KLC) tests were set up at the RGS in-house laboratory using crushed or ‘as received’ samples. The KLC tests comprised the most representative composite samples of overburden (four samples), ore (one sample) and middlings (one sample). The KLC tests commenced in August 2014 and operated under a monthly watering and leaching cycle for six months until February 2015. The KLC tests followed standard mining industry guidelines for such tests (AMIRA, 2002).

Approximately 1-2 kg of each selected sample was used in the KLC tests with the weight varying according to sample bulk density. Heat lamps were used on a daily basis to simulate sunshine and ensure that the KLC test materials were unsaturated and subject to oxidising conditions between leaching events. This method essentially represents the worst case or maximum potential for sulfide oxidation and potential acid/salt generation.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 7

All leachate samples collected from the KLC tests were sent to ALS Brisbane for analysis of various parameters including:

pH and EC;

Acidity and alkalinity [Automatic titrator];

Dissolved metals/metalloids (Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, F, Fe, Hg, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Th, U, V and Zn) [ICP-AES and FIMS];

Dissolved major cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) [ICP-AES]; and

Dissolved major anions (Cl, SO4) [ICP-AES].

The ALS test results for the kinetic geochemical test program are provided in Attachment B. Summary results tables are provided in Attachment D and discussed in Sections 4 to 6.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 14: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 6

available, the MPA and NAPP values were calculated using Scr data instead of total sulfur data. Scr data (for fresh samples) generally provides a more accurate representation of the MPA that could theoretically be generated, as acid generation primarily occurs from oxidation of reactive sulfides(eg. pyrite), whereas total sulfur includes other forms of sulfur such as sulfate and organic sulfur,which produce negligible acidity.

After the results of the ABA screening tests were received and interpreted, 18 drill core samples and four middlings samples were selected, prepared and subjected to multi-element analysis. The samples were selected based on material type, location, lithology and geochemical characteristics. All selected samples underwent multi-element testing on both the solid and soluble fractions. The 22selected samples were tested for: Total alkalinity and acidity (automatic titrator measured as CaCO3);

Total metals/metalloids (Al, Ag, As, B, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Th, U, V and Zn) in solids [HCl and HNO3 acid digest followed by FIMS and/or ICP-AES/MS];

Total cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) [HCl and HNO3 acid digest followed by ICP-AES/MS];

Soluble metals/metalloids (Al, Ag, As, B, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Th, U, V and Zn) [ICP-AES/MS and FIMS (1:5 w:v water extracts)];

Major cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) [ICP-AES/MS (1:5 w:v water extracts)]; and

Major anions (Cl, F and SO4) [ICP-AES/MS and PC Titrator (1:5 w:v water extracts)].

A total of six samples were logged as containing a visual abundance of the clay minerals smectite and kaolinite. These samples included one sample from EL-N-GC02 (4.5-4.85m); three samples from EL-N-GC03 (8.6-9.0 m, 21.0-21.5 m and 22.65-22.8 m) and two samples from EL-S-GC04 (8.4-8.7 m and9.5 to 9.8 m). As these samples were located in overburden (two samples) and interburden (four samples), and were visually distinct, these six samples were subjected to additional detailed testing to confirm the likely behaviour of these clays if disturbed by mining, including:

Exchangable Cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K) [by ICP-AES/MS];

Effective Cation Exchange Capacity (eCEC) and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP);

Particle Size Distribution (PSD) [hydrometer - AS1289.3.6.3]; and

Emerson Aggregate test.

The ALS test results for the static geochemical test program are provided in Attachment B. Summary results tables are provided in Attachment C and discussed in Sections 4 to 6.

3.3.2 Kinetic Geochemical Tests

Following receipt and interpretation of the static geochemical test results, six Kinetic Leach Column (KLC) tests were set up at the RGS in-house laboratory using crushed or ‘as received’ samples. The KLC tests comprised the most representative composite samples of overburden (four samples), ore (one sample) and middlings (one sample). The KLC tests commenced in August 2014 and operated under a monthly watering and leaching cycle for six months until February 2015. The KLC tests followed standard mining industry guidelines for such tests (AMIRA, 2002).

Approximately 1-2 kg of each selected sample was used in the KLC tests with the weight varying according to sample bulk density. Heat lamps were used on a daily basis to simulate sunshine and ensure that the KLC test materials were unsaturated and subject to oxidising conditions between leaching events. This method essentially represents the worst case or maximum potential for sulfide oxidation and potential acid/salt generation.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 7

All leachate samples collected from the KLC tests were sent to ALS Brisbane for analysis of various parameters including:

pH and EC;

Acidity and alkalinity [Automatic titrator];

Dissolved metals/metalloids (Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, F, Fe, Hg, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, Se, Th, U, V and Zn) [ICP-AES and FIMS];

Dissolved major cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) [ICP-AES]; and

Dissolved major anions (Cl, SO4) [ICP-AES].

The ALS test results for the kinetic geochemical test program are provided in Attachment B. Summary results tables are provided in Attachment D and discussed in Sections 4 to 6.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 15: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 8

23456789

101112

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Cur

rent

pH

(1:5

)

Sample Number

Graph 1: pH values for overburden Overburden Interburden

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Cur

rent

EC

(µS/

cm)

Sample Number

Graph 2: EC values for overburden Overburden Interburden

4.0 OVERBURDEN GEOCHEMISTRY

4.1 Acid Base Account Results The ABA results for the 86 overburden samples are provided in Table C-1 (Attachment C). For the purposes of this discussion, the term overburden has been used to refer to both overburden and interburden samples. An explanation of the methodology used in this section, including a description of the ABA screening method, is provided at Section 3.3 and a glossary of terms and acronyms used is listed on Page IV. The ABA data trends discussed in this section are presented in Graphs 1 to 5.

pH: The natural pH of the deionised water used in the pH tests is typically in the pH range 5.0 to 6.5. The pH(1:5) of the 86 overburden samples ranges from pH 3.4 to 8.9 and has a neutral median pH value of 6.0 (Graph 1). The majority of the samples (92 %) have pH values within the range pH 5.0 to 7.0. Four overburden samples have a pH value greater than pH 7.0 indicating the presence of some alkalinity. Three overburden samples have pH values less than pH 5.0 indicating the presence of some acidity. The three samples with reduced pH values represent clay (drill chip) overburden material sampled from drill hole EL-S-MB06 (18m, 21m and 24m depth) located at the north-west of the Southern Eastern Lease. There is no other correlation between sample pH and sample location, depth, type or lithology.

Electrical Conductivity (EC): The current EC(1:5) of the 86 overburden samples ranges from 6 to 2,740 µS/cm and is typically low, (median 36 µS/cm). Two overburden samples have an EC value greater than 1,000 µS/cm (Graph 2) and represent clay (drill chip) overburden material sampled from drill hole EL-S-MB06 at 18m and 21m depth. There is no other correlation between sample EC and sample location, depth, type or lithology.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 9

Total Sulfur: The total sulfur content of the 86 overburden samples range from 0.005 percent sulfur (%S) to 0.87 %S and is typically low (median 0.02 %S) compared to average crustal abundance (0.1 %) for this element (INAP, 2009). Materials with a total sulfur content less than or equal to 0.1 %S are essentially barren of sulfur, generally represent background concentrations, and have negligible capacity to generate acidity1. Three of the 86 overburden samples tested (3.5 %) had total sulfur values greater than 0.1 %S. These samples represent overburden from bores EL-S-MBO5 (36 m) and EL-S-MB06 (18 m and 21 m).

Sulfide Sulfur: Scr analysis was undertaken on the three overburden samples with total sulfur values greater than 0.1 %S to confirm their sulfide sulfur content. One of the three samples (EL-S-MB-06 (18 m)) had a sulfide sulfur value significantly less than the total sulfur value,indicating that much of the sulfur is likely to be present as other forms of sulfur such as organic sulfur and sulfate which, in comparison to a reactive sulfur form such as pyrite, has negligible capacity to generate acidity if exposed to oxidising conditions. The remaining two samples have sulfide sulfur values similar to total sulfur values indicating that most of the sulfur is likely to be present as reactive sulfur (eg. pyrite).

Graph 3 shows the sulfur content of the overburden materials2 and illustrates that these materials typically have very low sulfide sulfur content, with 83 of the 86 samples (96.5 %) having sulfide sulfur content less than 0.1 %S.

Maximum Potential Acidity (MPA): The MPA for the overburden samples ranges from 0.2 to 19.2 kg H2SO4/t, and is typically very low with a median value of 0.6 kg H2SO4/t.

Acid Neutralising Capacity (ANC): The ANC value for the overburden samples ranges from 0.25 to 8.4 kg H2SO4/t and has a median value of 1.4 kg H2SO4/t (more than double the median MPA).

Net Acid Producing Potential (NAPP): The NAPP is the balance between the capacity of a sample to generate acidity (MPA) minus its capacity to neutralise acidity (ANC). The calculated NAPP value for the samples ranges from -7.8 to +18.6 kg H2SO4/t and has a negative median value of -0.8 kg H2SO4/t. The NAPP data for the overburden samples are presented in Graph 4and illustrate that the vast majority of overburden samples have NAPP values that are negative or close to zero.

Given the typically low sulfide sulfur content of these materials, the risk of generating any significant acidity and/or neutral mine drainage (NMD) from bulk overburden materials is

1 The average crustal abundance of sulfur is approximately 0.1 % (INAP, 2009). 2 The total sulfur content of the samples was used in the graph when no sulfide sulfur data was available.

0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.80

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Sulfi

de S

ulfu

r (%

)

Sample Number

Graph 3: Sulfur values for overburden Overburden Interburden

Samples with sulfur values below 0.1% are classified as

NAF (Barren)

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 16: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 8

23456789

101112

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Cur

rent

pH

(1:5

)

Sample Number

Graph 1: pH values for overburden Overburden Interburden

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Cur

rent

EC

(µS/

cm)

Sample Number

Graph 2: EC values for overburden Overburden Interburden

4.0 OVERBURDEN GEOCHEMISTRY

4.1 Acid Base Account Results The ABA results for the 86 overburden samples are provided in Table C-1 (Attachment C). For the purposes of this discussion, the term overburden has been used to refer to both overburden and interburden samples. An explanation of the methodology used in this section, including a description of the ABA screening method, is provided at Section 3.3 and a glossary of terms and acronyms used is listed on Page IV. The ABA data trends discussed in this section are presented in Graphs 1 to 5.

pH: The natural pH of the deionised water used in the pH tests is typically in the pH range 5.0 to 6.5. The pH(1:5) of the 86 overburden samples ranges from pH 3.4 to 8.9 and has a neutral median pH value of 6.0 (Graph 1). The majority of the samples (92 %) have pH values within the range pH 5.0 to 7.0. Four overburden samples have a pH value greater than pH 7.0 indicating the presence of some alkalinity. Three overburden samples have pH values less than pH 5.0 indicating the presence of some acidity. The three samples with reduced pH values represent clay (drill chip) overburden material sampled from drill hole EL-S-MB06 (18m, 21m and 24m depth) located at the north-west of the Southern Eastern Lease. There is no other correlation between sample pH and sample location, depth, type or lithology.

Electrical Conductivity (EC): The current EC(1:5) of the 86 overburden samples ranges from 6 to 2,740 µS/cm and is typically low, (median 36 µS/cm). Two overburden samples have an EC value greater than 1,000 µS/cm (Graph 2) and represent clay (drill chip) overburden material sampled from drill hole EL-S-MB06 at 18m and 21m depth. There is no other correlation between sample EC and sample location, depth, type or lithology.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 9

Total Sulfur: The total sulfur content of the 86 overburden samples range from 0.005 percent sulfur (%S) to 0.87 %S and is typically low (median 0.02 %S) compared to average crustal abundance (0.1 %) for this element (INAP, 2009). Materials with a total sulfur content less than or equal to 0.1 %S are essentially barren of sulfur, generally represent background concentrations, and have negligible capacity to generate acidity1. Three of the 86 overburden samples tested (3.5 %) had total sulfur values greater than 0.1 %S. These samples represent overburden from bores EL-S-MBO5 (36 m) and EL-S-MB06 (18 m and 21 m).

Sulfide Sulfur: Scr analysis was undertaken on the three overburden samples with total sulfur values greater than 0.1 %S to confirm their sulfide sulfur content. One of the three samples (EL-S-MB-06 (18 m)) had a sulfide sulfur value significantly less than the total sulfur value,indicating that much of the sulfur is likely to be present as other forms of sulfur such as organic sulfur and sulfate which, in comparison to a reactive sulfur form such as pyrite, has negligible capacity to generate acidity if exposed to oxidising conditions. The remaining two samples have sulfide sulfur values similar to total sulfur values indicating that most of the sulfur is likely to be present as reactive sulfur (eg. pyrite).

Graph 3 shows the sulfur content of the overburden materials2 and illustrates that these materials typically have very low sulfide sulfur content, with 83 of the 86 samples (96.5 %) having sulfide sulfur content less than 0.1 %S.

Maximum Potential Acidity (MPA): The MPA for the overburden samples ranges from 0.2 to 19.2 kg H2SO4/t, and is typically very low with a median value of 0.6 kg H2SO4/t.

Acid Neutralising Capacity (ANC): The ANC value for the overburden samples ranges from 0.25 to 8.4 kg H2SO4/t and has a median value of 1.4 kg H2SO4/t (more than double the median MPA).

Net Acid Producing Potential (NAPP): The NAPP is the balance between the capacity of a sample to generate acidity (MPA) minus its capacity to neutralise acidity (ANC). The calculated NAPP value for the samples ranges from -7.8 to +18.6 kg H2SO4/t and has a negative median value of -0.8 kg H2SO4/t. The NAPP data for the overburden samples are presented in Graph 4and illustrate that the vast majority of overburden samples have NAPP values that are negative or close to zero.

Given the typically low sulfide sulfur content of these materials, the risk of generating any significant acidity and/or neutral mine drainage (NMD) from bulk overburden materials is

1 The average crustal abundance of sulfur is approximately 0.1 % (INAP, 2009). 2 The total sulfur content of the samples was used in the graph when no sulfide sulfur data was available.

0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.80

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Sulfi

de S

ulfu

r (%

)

Sample Number

Graph 3: Sulfur values for overburden Overburden Interburden

Samples with sulfur values below 0.1% are classified as

NAF (Barren)

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 17: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 10

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86

kg H

2SO

4/ t

onne

Sample Number

Graph 4: NAPP values for overburden

ELSMB-05D (36m)

ELSMB-06D (18m)ELSMB-06D (21m)0

10

20

30

0 5 10 15 20

Aci

d N

eutra

lisin

g C

apac

ity (k

g H

2SO

4/t)

Maximum Potential Acidity (kg H2SO4/t)

Graph 5: ANC v MPA for overburden

Overburden

InterburdenNegligible Risk

Possible Risk

IncreasedRisk

LowRisk

Scr <0.1%

negligible. Only three overburden samples have a significantly positive NAPP value (ie. greater than 3 kg H2SO4/t) (INAP, 2009). The three samples were all sourced from two drill holes (EL-S-MB05 and EL-S-MB06) located at the north-west end of the Southern Eastern Lease and correspond to the 3 samples which had sulfide sulfur values >0.1%.

ANC:MPA ratio: The ANC:MPA ratio of the overburden samples ranges from 0.03 to 26.1 and is typically elevated (median 2.5). In simplistic terms, this means that the ANC is greater than double the small amount of MPA that could theoretically be generated from the overburden samples.

Graph 5 shows a plot of ANC versus MPA for the overburden samples. ANC:MPA ratio lines have been plotted on the graph to illustrate the factor of safety associated with the samples, in terms of potential for generation of AMD. Generally those samples with an ANC:MPA ratio of greater than 2 and a sulfide sulfur content of <0.1% are considered to represent material with a low to negligible risk of acid generation and a high factor of safety in terms of potential for AMD (DITR, 2007; INAP, 2009).The majority of the samples fall within the negligible and low risk domains in the graph and therefore have a high factor of safety and very low risk of acid generation.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 11

Three of the overburden samples fall in the ‘increased risk’ domain and represent clay overburden materials sampled from two drill holes (EL-S-MB05-D and EL-S-MB06-D) located at the north-west end of the Southern Eastern Lease. These samples correspond to those samples that reported sulfide sulfur >0.1% and elevated NAPP.

The ABA test data presented in Table C-1 (Attachment C) and discussed in this section has been used to classify the acid forming nature of the overburden materials. These classification criteria generally reflect Australian (DITR, 2007) and international (INAP, 2009) guideline criteria for classification of mine waste materials. Table 2 provides a summary of the criteria used by RGS to classify the acid forming nature of the samples and a breakdown of the number of samples in each classification category by material type.

The data presented in Table 2 illustrate that 83 of the 86 overburden samples (96.5%) are classified as Non-Acid Forming-Barren (NAF-Barren) and only 3.5 % are classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF). The three samples classified as PAF were all sourced from below 18 m depth at two drill holes (EL-S-MB05 and EL-S-MB06) located at the north-west end of the Southern Eastern Lease.

Table 2: Geochemical classification criteria for overburden

Geochemical Classification

Sulfide Sulfur1

(%)NAPP

(kg H2SO4/t)ANC:MPA

RatioOverburden

(n = 86)

Non-Acid Forming (Barren)2 ≤ 0.1 - - 83

Uncertain3 > 0.1 < 3 < 2 0

Potentially Acid Forming > 0.1 > 3 < 2 3

Notes: 1. If total sulfur or sulfide sulfur is less than or equal to 0.1 %, the NAPP and ANC:MPA ratio are not required for material classification as the sample is essentially barren of oxidisable sulfur. 2. A sample classified as NAF can be further described as ‘barren’ if the total sulfur and/or sulfide sulfur content is less than or equal to 0.1 per cent, as the sample essentially has negligible acid generating capacity. 3. Samples that fall outside the stated NAF-Barren/PAF classification categories based on the criteria provided are classified as Uncertain.

4.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids Multi-element scans were carried out on 16 selected samples of overburden to identify any elements (metals/metalloids) present in these materials at concentrations that may be of environmental concern with respect to materials handling, storage, and water quality. The results were compared to potentially relevant guideline criteria to determine any concerns related to mine operation and final rehabilitation. To provide relevant context, RGS has compared the total metal/metalloid concentration in samples to National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC) Health-based Investigation Levels (HIL(C)) for soils in public open spaces (NEPC, 2013).

The 16 samples of overburden materials used in the multi-element test work are described in Table C-2 (Attachment C). The results from multi-element testing (total metals/metalloids) of the samples are presented in Table C-3 (Attachment C). The results indicate that the overburden materials typically have low total metal and metalloid concentrations in solids, many below the laboratory limit of reporting (LoR) and all below the applied NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline for soils. The only exception is the elevated concentration of manganese, which exceeds the NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline in 11 of 16 samples. This is expected given that these samples were taken from in and around a manganese deposit.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 18: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 10

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86

kg H

2SO

4/ t

onne

Sample Number

Graph 4: NAPP values for overburden

ELSMB-05D (36m)

ELSMB-06D (18m)ELSMB-06D (21m)0

10

20

30

0 5 10 15 20

Aci

d N

eutra

lisin

g C

apac

ity (k

g H

2SO

4/t)

Maximum Potential Acidity (kg H2SO4/t)

Graph 5: ANC v MPA for overburden

Overburden

InterburdenNegligible Risk

Possible Risk

IncreasedRisk

LowRisk

Scr <0.1%

negligible. Only three overburden samples have a significantly positive NAPP value (ie. greater than 3 kg H2SO4/t) (INAP, 2009). The three samples were all sourced from two drill holes (EL-S-MB05 and EL-S-MB06) located at the north-west end of the Southern Eastern Lease and correspond to the 3 samples which had sulfide sulfur values >0.1%.

ANC:MPA ratio: The ANC:MPA ratio of the overburden samples ranges from 0.03 to 26.1 and is typically elevated (median 2.5). In simplistic terms, this means that the ANC is greater than double the small amount of MPA that could theoretically be generated from the overburden samples.

Graph 5 shows a plot of ANC versus MPA for the overburden samples. ANC:MPA ratio lines have been plotted on the graph to illustrate the factor of safety associated with the samples, in terms of potential for generation of AMD. Generally those samples with an ANC:MPA ratio of greater than 2 and a sulfide sulfur content of <0.1% are considered to represent material with a low to negligible risk of acid generation and a high factor of safety in terms of potential for AMD (DITR, 2007; INAP, 2009).The majority of the samples fall within the negligible and low risk domains in the graph and therefore have a high factor of safety and very low risk of acid generation.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 11

Three of the overburden samples fall in the ‘increased risk’ domain and represent clay overburden materials sampled from two drill holes (EL-S-MB05-D and EL-S-MB06-D) located at the north-west end of the Southern Eastern Lease. These samples correspond to those samples that reported sulfide sulfur >0.1% and elevated NAPP.

The ABA test data presented in Table C-1 (Attachment C) and discussed in this section has been used to classify the acid forming nature of the overburden materials. These classification criteria generally reflect Australian (DITR, 2007) and international (INAP, 2009) guideline criteria for classification of mine waste materials. Table 2 provides a summary of the criteria used by RGS to classify the acid forming nature of the samples and a breakdown of the number of samples in each classification category by material type.

The data presented in Table 2 illustrate that 83 of the 86 overburden samples (96.5%) are classified as Non-Acid Forming-Barren (NAF-Barren) and only 3.5 % are classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF). The three samples classified as PAF were all sourced from below 18 m depth at two drill holes (EL-S-MB05 and EL-S-MB06) located at the north-west end of the Southern Eastern Lease.

Table 2: Geochemical classification criteria for overburden

Geochemical Classification

Sulfide Sulfur1

(%)NAPP

(kg H2SO4/t)ANC:MPA

RatioOverburden

(n = 86)

Non-Acid Forming (Barren)2 ≤ 0.1 - - 83

Uncertain3 > 0.1 < 3 < 2 0

Potentially Acid Forming > 0.1 > 3 < 2 3

Notes: 1. If total sulfur or sulfide sulfur is less than or equal to 0.1 %, the NAPP and ANC:MPA ratio are not required for material classification as the sample is essentially barren of oxidisable sulfur. 2. A sample classified as NAF can be further described as ‘barren’ if the total sulfur and/or sulfide sulfur content is less than or equal to 0.1 per cent, as the sample essentially has negligible acid generating capacity. 3. Samples that fall outside the stated NAF-Barren/PAF classification categories based on the criteria provided are classified as Uncertain.

4.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids Multi-element scans were carried out on 16 selected samples of overburden to identify any elements (metals/metalloids) present in these materials at concentrations that may be of environmental concern with respect to materials handling, storage, and water quality. The results were compared to potentially relevant guideline criteria to determine any concerns related to mine operation and final rehabilitation. To provide relevant context, RGS has compared the total metal/metalloid concentration in samples to National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC) Health-based Investigation Levels (HIL(C)) for soils in public open spaces (NEPC, 2013).

The 16 samples of overburden materials used in the multi-element test work are described in Table C-2 (Attachment C). The results from multi-element testing (total metals/metalloids) of the samples are presented in Table C-3 (Attachment C). The results indicate that the overburden materials typically have low total metal and metalloid concentrations in solids, many below the laboratory limit of reporting (LoR) and all below the applied NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline for soils. The only exception is the elevated concentration of manganese, which exceeds the NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline in 11 of 16 samples. This is expected given that these samples were taken from in and around a manganese deposit.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 19: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 12

4.3 Dispersion and Erosion 4.3.1 Sodicity

The exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) results for 16 overburden samples described in Section 4.2 are presented in Table C-3 (Attachment C).

The ESP results for the composite overburden samples range from <0.1 to 3.5 % and have a median value of 1.8 %. Generally samples with ESP values less than 6 are considered non-sodic and unlikely to be susceptible to dispersion and erosion (Isbell, 2002; and Northcote and Skene, 1972).

Overall, the results of the eCEC and ESP tests indicate that the overburden materials are likely to be non-sodic, and are consequently unlikely to be susceptible to dispersion and erosion.

4.3.2 Ultrafine Clays

As described in Section 3.3.1, smectite and kaolinite clay minerals occur within some of the overburden and interburden materials at the Eastern Leases and are generally ultrafine-grained (normally considered to be less than 2 µm in size in standard particle size classification systems).

The results of Particle Size Distribution (PSD) and Emerson Aggregate (EA) tests on these materials are summarised in Table C-4 (Attachment C).

The PSD results indicate that the composition of the six overburden samples selected for testing is between 9 % and 45 % clay minerals, with the remainder comprising silt, sand and gravel.

The EA test results indicate that the six overburden samples are characterised as either slaking but non-dispersive (Class 4) or non-slaking and non-dispersive (Class 8).

Overall, the PSD and EA results suggest that materials represented by the six overburden samples generally contain a smaller proportion of clay minerals compared to their combined silt, sand and gravel fraction and are classified as non-dispersive.

4.4 Water Quality Static Leach Tests RGS has compared the multi-element results in water extracts from the 16 overburden samples described in Section 4.2 with ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guideline values. These guidelines are provided for context only and are not intended to be interpreted as “maximum permissible levels” for site water storage or discharge. Site-specific water quality criteria are described in detail in the EIS Surface Water Section.

It should also be recognised that direct comparison of geochemical data with guideline values can bemisleading. For the purpose of this study, guideline values are only provided for broad context and should not be interpreted as arbitrary ‘maximum’ values or ‘trigger’ values. Using sample pulps (ground to passing 75 µm) provides a very high surface area to solution ratio, which encourages mineral reaction and dissolution of the solid phase. As such, the results of screening tests on water extract solutions are assumed to represent an assumed ‘worst case’ scenario for initial surface runoff and seepage from overburden materials.

The results from multi-element testing of water extracts (1:5 solid:water) from the 16 overburden samples are presented in Table C-5 (Attachment C).

The pH of the water extracts ranges from pH 4.9 to 6.2 (median 5.7) and is typically within the pH range of the deionised water used in the water extract tests (ie. pH 5.0 to 6.5). This indicates that these materials are unlikely to contribute any acidity to initial surface runoff and seepage.

This is further supported by the typically low acidity of the water extracts, which ranges from 3 to 14 mg/L (median 5 mg/L). The alkalinity of the water extracts spans the same range (3 to 14 mg/L) (median 6 mg/L), and is typically equivalent to the measured acidity.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 13

The EC in the water extracts is typically very low, ranging from 8 to 36 µS/cm (median 17 µS/cm).This confirms that these materials exhibit low salinity and low concentrations of dissolved solids when in contact with water. The concentrations of the major cations and anions in the water extracts are typically very low and below the LoR.

The concentration of all trace metals/metalloids tested in the water extracts is below the laboratory LoR in all samples. The only exception is manganese, which is above the LoR in most samples. However, the maximum and median values of 0.254 mg/L and 0.007 mg/L are well below the guideline value of 1.90 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

The results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in initial surface runoff and seepage from permanent overburden emplacements are unlikely to impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources at relevant storage facilities.

4.5 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests As described in Section 3.3.2 and Attachment A, KLC tests were undertaken for four composite samples of overburden from the project site (i.e. KLC 1 to KLC 4). The composite KLC samples comprised three samples (KLC2, KLC3 and KLC4) that are representative of the NAF materials that comprise the vast majority of the overburden that will be generated by the project. A composite KLC sample (KLC1) was also selected to further investigate the characteristics of the small proportion of the potential overburden material that was identified as PAF from static testing.

The KLC test results are presented in Attachment D and interpreted in this section. The compositions of the four composite samples used in the KLC tests are provided in Table C-9 (Attachment C). The static ABA test results for the individual samples used to make up the four composite KLC samples are detailed in Table C-10 (Attachment C).

The KLC leachate concentrations are presented alongside ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guideline values. These guidelines are provided for context only and are not intended to be interpreted as “maximum permissible levels” for site water storage or discharge. It should be noted that the ratio of sample to water in most of the KLC tests is typically 2:1 (w/v) (i.e. concentrated), whereas the ratio of sample to water generally used in tests where results can (arbitrarily) be compared against guideline concentrations to provide relevant context is an order of magnitude more dilute at 1:5 (w/v). Whilst arbitrary comparisons against guideline concentrations can be useful in some situations and help to provide relevant context, such comparisons cannot be directly extrapolated to the field situation at the project.

5.4.1 Bulk Overburden Leachate

The KLC leachate pH trends show that the leachate pH from the three NAF overburden samples is fairly consistent over the six month test period and remains within the pH range 5.3 to 7.3. Dynamic contact with overburden typically adds very little acidity or alkalinity to the deionised water used in the KLC tests (the typical pH of the deionised water used in the tests is in the pH range 5 to 6.5).

The EC value of KLC leachate from the overburden samples is typically low and ranges from 12 to 99 µS/cm. The EC generally shows a steady or decreasing trend over the test period. After the initial leaching event, the EC of KLC leachate remains below 50 µS/cm, even under ideal oxidising (wetting and drying) conditions.

The concentration of sulfate in leachate from the KLC tests has been used to calculate the residual sulfur content of the overburden materials. The results show that at least 97.8 % of the total sulfur content remains in the NAF samples. For these samples, the sulfate concentration in KLC leachate is generally two orders of magnitude lower than the applied guideline value (ANZECC & ARMCANZ, 2000).

The concentrations of dissolved calcium and magnesium in leachate from the KLC tests have been used to calculate the residual ANC remaining in the overburden materials. The results indicate that for

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 20: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 12

4.3 Dispersion and Erosion 4.3.1 Sodicity

The exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) results for 16 overburden samples described in Section 4.2 are presented in Table C-3 (Attachment C).

The ESP results for the composite overburden samples range from <0.1 to 3.5 % and have a median value of 1.8 %. Generally samples with ESP values less than 6 are considered non-sodic and unlikely to be susceptible to dispersion and erosion (Isbell, 2002; and Northcote and Skene, 1972).

Overall, the results of the eCEC and ESP tests indicate that the overburden materials are likely to be non-sodic, and are consequently unlikely to be susceptible to dispersion and erosion.

4.3.2 Ultrafine Clays

As described in Section 3.3.1, smectite and kaolinite clay minerals occur within some of the overburden and interburden materials at the Eastern Leases and are generally ultrafine-grained (normally considered to be less than 2 µm in size in standard particle size classification systems).

The results of Particle Size Distribution (PSD) and Emerson Aggregate (EA) tests on these materials are summarised in Table C-4 (Attachment C).

The PSD results indicate that the composition of the six overburden samples selected for testing is between 9 % and 45 % clay minerals, with the remainder comprising silt, sand and gravel.

The EA test results indicate that the six overburden samples are characterised as either slaking but non-dispersive (Class 4) or non-slaking and non-dispersive (Class 8).

Overall, the PSD and EA results suggest that materials represented by the six overburden samples generally contain a smaller proportion of clay minerals compared to their combined silt, sand and gravel fraction and are classified as non-dispersive.

4.4 Water Quality Static Leach Tests RGS has compared the multi-element results in water extracts from the 16 overburden samples described in Section 4.2 with ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guideline values. These guidelines are provided for context only and are not intended to be interpreted as “maximum permissible levels” for site water storage or discharge. Site-specific water quality criteria are described in detail in the EIS Surface Water Section.

It should also be recognised that direct comparison of geochemical data with guideline values can bemisleading. For the purpose of this study, guideline values are only provided for broad context and should not be interpreted as arbitrary ‘maximum’ values or ‘trigger’ values. Using sample pulps (ground to passing 75 µm) provides a very high surface area to solution ratio, which encourages mineral reaction and dissolution of the solid phase. As such, the results of screening tests on water extract solutions are assumed to represent an assumed ‘worst case’ scenario for initial surface runoff and seepage from overburden materials.

The results from multi-element testing of water extracts (1:5 solid:water) from the 16 overburden samples are presented in Table C-5 (Attachment C).

The pH of the water extracts ranges from pH 4.9 to 6.2 (median 5.7) and is typically within the pH range of the deionised water used in the water extract tests (ie. pH 5.0 to 6.5). This indicates that these materials are unlikely to contribute any acidity to initial surface runoff and seepage.

This is further supported by the typically low acidity of the water extracts, which ranges from 3 to 14 mg/L (median 5 mg/L). The alkalinity of the water extracts spans the same range (3 to 14 mg/L) (median 6 mg/L), and is typically equivalent to the measured acidity.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 13

The EC in the water extracts is typically very low, ranging from 8 to 36 µS/cm (median 17 µS/cm).This confirms that these materials exhibit low salinity and low concentrations of dissolved solids when in contact with water. The concentrations of the major cations and anions in the water extracts are typically very low and below the LoR.

The concentration of all trace metals/metalloids tested in the water extracts is below the laboratory LoR in all samples. The only exception is manganese, which is above the LoR in most samples. However, the maximum and median values of 0.254 mg/L and 0.007 mg/L are well below the guideline value of 1.90 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

The results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in initial surface runoff and seepage from permanent overburden emplacements are unlikely to impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources at relevant storage facilities.

4.5 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests As described in Section 3.3.2 and Attachment A, KLC tests were undertaken for four composite samples of overburden from the project site (i.e. KLC 1 to KLC 4). The composite KLC samples comprised three samples (KLC2, KLC3 and KLC4) that are representative of the NAF materials that comprise the vast majority of the overburden that will be generated by the project. A composite KLC sample (KLC1) was also selected to further investigate the characteristics of the small proportion of the potential overburden material that was identified as PAF from static testing.

The KLC test results are presented in Attachment D and interpreted in this section. The compositions of the four composite samples used in the KLC tests are provided in Table C-9 (Attachment C). The static ABA test results for the individual samples used to make up the four composite KLC samples are detailed in Table C-10 (Attachment C).

The KLC leachate concentrations are presented alongside ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guideline values. These guidelines are provided for context only and are not intended to be interpreted as “maximum permissible levels” for site water storage or discharge. It should be noted that the ratio of sample to water in most of the KLC tests is typically 2:1 (w/v) (i.e. concentrated), whereas the ratio of sample to water generally used in tests where results can (arbitrarily) be compared against guideline concentrations to provide relevant context is an order of magnitude more dilute at 1:5 (w/v). Whilst arbitrary comparisons against guideline concentrations can be useful in some situations and help to provide relevant context, such comparisons cannot be directly extrapolated to the field situation at the project.

5.4.1 Bulk Overburden Leachate

The KLC leachate pH trends show that the leachate pH from the three NAF overburden samples is fairly consistent over the six month test period and remains within the pH range 5.3 to 7.3. Dynamic contact with overburden typically adds very little acidity or alkalinity to the deionised water used in the KLC tests (the typical pH of the deionised water used in the tests is in the pH range 5 to 6.5).

The EC value of KLC leachate from the overburden samples is typically low and ranges from 12 to 99 µS/cm. The EC generally shows a steady or decreasing trend over the test period. After the initial leaching event, the EC of KLC leachate remains below 50 µS/cm, even under ideal oxidising (wetting and drying) conditions.

The concentration of sulfate in leachate from the KLC tests has been used to calculate the residual sulfur content of the overburden materials. The results show that at least 97.8 % of the total sulfur content remains in the NAF samples. For these samples, the sulfate concentration in KLC leachate is generally two orders of magnitude lower than the applied guideline value (ANZECC & ARMCANZ, 2000).

The concentrations of dissolved calcium and magnesium in leachate from the KLC tests have been used to calculate the residual ANC remaining in the overburden materials. The results indicate that for

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 21: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 14

the NAF samples, at least 99.2 % of the measured ANC remains in the samples at the end of the test period.

The sulfate generation rate results obtained for the four KLC tests on overburden have been used to determine the rate of sulfide oxidation in these materials. Most sulfate salts generated from sulfide reaction involving materials with a relatively low sulfide sulfur concentration are highly soluble, and therefore will be collected in column leachate. The dissolved sulfate (and calcium) concentrations in the KLC leachate are typically less than the solubility limit of gypsum (CaSO4), which indicates that sulfate generation is not controlled by gypsum dissolution in the KLC test materials. Therefore, the sulfate concentrations and oxidation rate calculations provide reasonable estimates of these parameters and the results align well with existing static and dynamic geochemical data derived from a wide range of mine waste materials (AMIRA, 1995). The sulfate generation rate and associated sulfide oxidation rate for the four KLC tests are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Sulfate Generation and Sulfide Oxidation Rates for KLC Tests on Overburden

KLC Sample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg O2/m3/s)

KLC 1 PAF Overburden 302.3 1.2 x 10-7

KLC 2 NAF Overburden 0.3 1.3 x 10-10

KLC 3 NAF Overburden 0.1 4.1 x 10-11

KLC 4 NAF Overburden 0.2 7.3 x 10-11

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in leachate from the NAF samples is relatively consistent and tends towards a long term equilibrium value. The sulfate generation rate from the NAF overburden KLC samples ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg/week indicating that the rate of sulfide oxidation is low in these materials (equivalent to an oxidation rate ranging from 4.1 x 10-11 to 1.3 x 10-10 kg O2/m3/s). Mine materials with an oxidation rate in this range have an increased factor of safety, and are likely to generate leachate that is pH neutral and/or has low levels of acidity (AMIRA, 1995; Bennett et al., 2000). Hence, all of the NAF overburden samples fall into this category and the KLC results reflect the NAF material characteristics predicted from static geochemical test results presented in Section 4.1.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in leachate from the four KLC tests on NAF overburden materials is typically very low, below the laboratory LoR, and within applied water quality guidelines. The only exception is manganese, which is above the LoR in the leachate samples with maximum and median values of 0.157 mg/L and 0.014 mg/L, respectively. These values are below the default water quality guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

Overall, these results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in ongoing surface runoff and seepage from the bulk overburden materials at emplacement areas are unlikely to significantly impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources.

5.4.1 Localised PAF Overburden

As expected, the KLC leachate from the single PAF overburden sample (KLC1) has an acidic pH value, which remains within the range pH 4.9 to 2.3 and shows a decreasing trend from week 13 of the test period. This sample initially generates low EC leachate (109 µS/cm), but shows an increasing trend over the test period towards a final EC of approximately 7,000 µS/cm.

Approximately 60 % of the total sulfur content remains in the PAF sample at the end of the six month test period and the sulfate concentration in this leachate is also elevated towards the end of the test

KLC Sample No.

Oxidation Rate(kg/O2/m3/s)Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 15

period, as the ANC is consumed. However, the high residual ANC (99%) of the bulk overburden materials is likely to offset the depleted ANC exhibited by localised PAF material.

Nonetheless, the rates of sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation (Table 4) are greater than the bulk overburden and indicate that the localised PAF overburden material has a reduced factor of safety (AMIRA, 1995; Bennett et al., 2000). Management measures for handling and placing the small amount of PAF materials at overburden emplacement areas are provided at Section 4.6.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in this leachate shows a slight increase in metal concentrations (for aluminium, cobalt, copper, nickel and selenium) over the test period. While this indicates that localised PAF overburden materials have some potential to leach trace metals/metalloids into contact water with prolonged exposure to ideal oxidising (wetting and drying) conditions, management measures are proposed for handling and placing the small amount of PAF materials to ensure that these conditions are mitigated (Section 4.6).

4.6 Management Measures The interburden materials were found to be geochemically stable and no specific management measures are required to manage dispersion or erosion.

The bulk overburden materials were also geochemically stable, with no special management measures are required for the handling or storage of the majority of these materials.

However, there will be specific management measures for the handling and placing of overburden from the small area in the Southern Eastern Lease, which has been identified as containing PAF material. Management measures for this area include:

Undertaking geochemical sampling ahead of mining in areas located within 500 m of EL-S-MB06 and EL-S-MB05 in order to identify any PAF material;

Selectively handling and burying any PAF material within the centre of overburden emplacement areas away from final outer surfaces. PAF material will be placed directly within in-pit overburden emplacements, and will not be stored within temporary overburden emplacements.

In addition, samples will be collected at random from overburden emplacements and analysed on-site using net acid generation (NAG) tests as a rapid screening tool.

Surface water and seepage from overburden emplacement areas will be monitored to ensure that key water quality parameters remain within appropriate criteria. The proponent will:

Monitor surface run-off and seepage from the proposed overburden emplacement areas for pH, EC, total suspended solids (TSS) and the range of dissolved trace metals/metalloids and major ions including manganese on a quarterly basis; and

Undertake groundwater monitoring in accordance with the program described in the EIS Groundwater Report.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 22: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 14

the NAF samples, at least 99.2 % of the measured ANC remains in the samples at the end of the test period.

The sulfate generation rate results obtained for the four KLC tests on overburden have been used to determine the rate of sulfide oxidation in these materials. Most sulfate salts generated from sulfide reaction involving materials with a relatively low sulfide sulfur concentration are highly soluble, and therefore will be collected in column leachate. The dissolved sulfate (and calcium) concentrations in the KLC leachate are typically less than the solubility limit of gypsum (CaSO4), which indicates that sulfate generation is not controlled by gypsum dissolution in the KLC test materials. Therefore, the sulfate concentrations and oxidation rate calculations provide reasonable estimates of these parameters and the results align well with existing static and dynamic geochemical data derived from a wide range of mine waste materials (AMIRA, 1995). The sulfate generation rate and associated sulfide oxidation rate for the four KLC tests are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Sulfate Generation and Sulfide Oxidation Rates for KLC Tests on Overburden

KLC Sample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg O2/m3/s)

KLC 1 PAF Overburden 302.3 1.2 x 10-7

KLC 2 NAF Overburden 0.3 1.3 x 10-10

KLC 3 NAF Overburden 0.1 4.1 x 10-11

KLC 4 NAF Overburden 0.2 7.3 x 10-11

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in leachate from the NAF samples is relatively consistent and tends towards a long term equilibrium value. The sulfate generation rate from the NAF overburden KLC samples ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg/week indicating that the rate of sulfide oxidation is low in these materials (equivalent to an oxidation rate ranging from 4.1 x 10-11 to 1.3 x 10-10 kg O2/m3/s). Mine materials with an oxidation rate in this range have an increased factor of safety, and are likely to generate leachate that is pH neutral and/or has low levels of acidity (AMIRA, 1995; Bennett et al., 2000). Hence, all of the NAF overburden samples fall into this category and the KLC results reflect the NAF material characteristics predicted from static geochemical test results presented in Section 4.1.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in leachate from the four KLC tests on NAF overburden materials is typically very low, below the laboratory LoR, and within applied water quality guidelines. The only exception is manganese, which is above the LoR in the leachate samples with maximum and median values of 0.157 mg/L and 0.014 mg/L, respectively. These values are below the default water quality guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

Overall, these results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in ongoing surface runoff and seepage from the bulk overburden materials at emplacement areas are unlikely to significantly impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources.

5.4.1 Localised PAF Overburden

As expected, the KLC leachate from the single PAF overburden sample (KLC1) has an acidic pH value, which remains within the range pH 4.9 to 2.3 and shows a decreasing trend from week 13 of the test period. This sample initially generates low EC leachate (109 µS/cm), but shows an increasing trend over the test period towards a final EC of approximately 7,000 µS/cm.

Approximately 60 % of the total sulfur content remains in the PAF sample at the end of the six month test period and the sulfate concentration in this leachate is also elevated towards the end of the test

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 15

period, as the ANC is consumed. However, the high residual ANC (99%) of the bulk overburden materials is likely to offset the depleted ANC exhibited by localised PAF material.

Nonetheless, the rates of sulfate generation and sulfide oxidation (Table 4) are greater than the bulk overburden and indicate that the localised PAF overburden material has a reduced factor of safety (AMIRA, 1995; Bennett et al., 2000). Management measures for handling and placing the small amount of PAF materials at overburden emplacement areas are provided at Section 4.6.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in this leachate shows a slight increase in metal concentrations (for aluminium, cobalt, copper, nickel and selenium) over the test period. While this indicates that localised PAF overburden materials have some potential to leach trace metals/metalloids into contact water with prolonged exposure to ideal oxidising (wetting and drying) conditions, management measures are proposed for handling and placing the small amount of PAF materials to ensure that these conditions are mitigated (Section 4.6).

4.6 Management Measures The interburden materials were found to be geochemically stable and no specific management measures are required to manage dispersion or erosion.

The bulk overburden materials were also geochemically stable, with no special management measures are required for the handling or storage of the majority of these materials.

However, there will be specific management measures for the handling and placing of overburden from the small area in the Southern Eastern Lease, which has been identified as containing PAF material. Management measures for this area include:

Undertaking geochemical sampling ahead of mining in areas located within 500 m of EL-S-MB06 and EL-S-MB05 in order to identify any PAF material;

Selectively handling and burying any PAF material within the centre of overburden emplacement areas away from final outer surfaces. PAF material will be placed directly within in-pit overburden emplacements, and will not be stored within temporary overburden emplacements.

In addition, samples will be collected at random from overburden emplacements and analysed on-site using net acid generation (NAG) tests as a rapid screening tool.

Surface water and seepage from overburden emplacement areas will be monitored to ensure that key water quality parameters remain within appropriate criteria. The proponent will:

Monitor surface run-off and seepage from the proposed overburden emplacement areas for pH, EC, total suspended solids (TSS) and the range of dissolved trace metals/metalloids and major ions including manganese on a quarterly basis; and

Undertake groundwater monitoring in accordance with the program described in the EIS Groundwater Report.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 23: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 16

5.0 ORE GEOCHEMISTRY

5.1 Acid Base Account Results The ABA results for the 26 ore samples are provided in Table C-1 (Attachment C). The ABA data trends for ore are discussed in this section and presented in Graphs 6 to 10.

pH: The natural pH of the deionised water used in the pH tests is typically in the pH range 5.0 to 6.5. The pH(1:5) of the 26 ore samples ranges from pH 5.2 to 7.2 and has a neutral median pH value of 6.1 (Graph 6).

EC: The current EC(1:5) of the 26 ore samples ranges from 8 to 209 µS/cm and is typically low, (median 26 µS/cm) (Graph 7).

Total Sulfur: The total sulfur content of the 26 ore samples ranges from 0.005 %S to 0.31 %S and is typically low (median 0.02 %S) compared to background levels (0.1 %) for this element (INAP, 2009).

Sulfide Sulfur: Scr analysis was undertaken on the single ore sample (EL-S-MB05 (39 m))with a total sulfur value greater than 0.1 %S to confirm its sulfide sulfur content. The ore sample had a sulfide sulfur value of <0.1%. This is significantly less than the total sulfur value,indicating that much of the sulfur is likely to be present as other forms of sulfur such as organic sulfur and sulfate which, in comparison to a reactive sulfur form such as pyrite, has negligible capacity to generate acidity if exposed to oxidising conditions.

23456789

101112

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

Cur

rent

pH

(1:5

)

Sample Number

Graph 6: pH values for ore Ore

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

Cur

rent

EC

(µS/

cm)

Sample Number

Graph 7: EC values for ore Ore

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 17

Graph 8 shows the sulfide sulfur content of the ore samples and illustrates that these materials typically have very low sulfide sulfur content, and all samples have a sulfide sulfur content less than or equal to 0.1 %S.

Maximum Potential Acidity (MPA): The MPA for the ore samples ranges from 0.2 to 2.9 kg H2SO4/t, and is typically very low with a median value of 0.6 kg H2SO4/t.

Acid Neutralising Capacity (ANC): The ANC value for the ore samples ranges from 0.25 to 7.6 kg H2SO4/t and has a median value of 2 kg H2SO4/t (i.e. more than three times the median MPA).

Net Acid Producing Potential (NAPP): The calculated NAPP value for the ore samples ranges from -6.7 to +0.4 kg H2SO4/t and has a negative median value of -1.4 kg H2SO4/t. The NAPP data for the ore samples are presented in Graph 9 and illustrate that all ore samples have NAPP values that are negative or close to zero.

Given the uniformly low sulfide sulfur content of these samples, the risk of generating any significant acidity and/or neutral mine drainage (NMD) from bulk ore materials is negligible.

ANC:MPA ratio: The ANC:MPA ratio of the ore samples ranges from 0.4 to 31.3 and is typically elevated (median 3.2). In simplistic terms, this means that the ANC is more than three times the small amount of MPA that could theoretically be generated from the ore samples.

0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.80

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

Sul

fide

Sul

fur (

%)

Sample Number

Graph 8: Sulfur values for ore Ore

Samples with sulfur values below 0.1% are classified as

NAF (Barren)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

kg H

2SO

4/ t

onne

Sample Number

Graph 9: NAPP values for ore

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 24: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 16

5.0 ORE GEOCHEMISTRY

5.1 Acid Base Account Results The ABA results for the 26 ore samples are provided in Table C-1 (Attachment C). The ABA data trends for ore are discussed in this section and presented in Graphs 6 to 10.

pH: The natural pH of the deionised water used in the pH tests is typically in the pH range 5.0 to 6.5. The pH(1:5) of the 26 ore samples ranges from pH 5.2 to 7.2 and has a neutral median pH value of 6.1 (Graph 6).

EC: The current EC(1:5) of the 26 ore samples ranges from 8 to 209 µS/cm and is typically low, (median 26 µS/cm) (Graph 7).

Total Sulfur: The total sulfur content of the 26 ore samples ranges from 0.005 %S to 0.31 %S and is typically low (median 0.02 %S) compared to background levels (0.1 %) for this element (INAP, 2009).

Sulfide Sulfur: Scr analysis was undertaken on the single ore sample (EL-S-MB05 (39 m))with a total sulfur value greater than 0.1 %S to confirm its sulfide sulfur content. The ore sample had a sulfide sulfur value of <0.1%. This is significantly less than the total sulfur value,indicating that much of the sulfur is likely to be present as other forms of sulfur such as organic sulfur and sulfate which, in comparison to a reactive sulfur form such as pyrite, has negligible capacity to generate acidity if exposed to oxidising conditions.

23456789

101112

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

Cur

rent

pH

(1:5

)

Sample Number

Graph 6: pH values for ore Ore

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

Cur

rent

EC

(µS/

cm)

Sample Number

Graph 7: EC values for ore Ore

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 17

Graph 8 shows the sulfide sulfur content of the ore samples and illustrates that these materials typically have very low sulfide sulfur content, and all samples have a sulfide sulfur content less than or equal to 0.1 %S.

Maximum Potential Acidity (MPA): The MPA for the ore samples ranges from 0.2 to 2.9 kg H2SO4/t, and is typically very low with a median value of 0.6 kg H2SO4/t.

Acid Neutralising Capacity (ANC): The ANC value for the ore samples ranges from 0.25 to 7.6 kg H2SO4/t and has a median value of 2 kg H2SO4/t (i.e. more than three times the median MPA).

Net Acid Producing Potential (NAPP): The calculated NAPP value for the ore samples ranges from -6.7 to +0.4 kg H2SO4/t and has a negative median value of -1.4 kg H2SO4/t. The NAPP data for the ore samples are presented in Graph 9 and illustrate that all ore samples have NAPP values that are negative or close to zero.

Given the uniformly low sulfide sulfur content of these samples, the risk of generating any significant acidity and/or neutral mine drainage (NMD) from bulk ore materials is negligible.

ANC:MPA ratio: The ANC:MPA ratio of the ore samples ranges from 0.4 to 31.3 and is typically elevated (median 3.2). In simplistic terms, this means that the ANC is more than three times the small amount of MPA that could theoretically be generated from the ore samples.

0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.80

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

Sul

fide

Sul

fur (

%)

Sample Number

Graph 8: Sulfur values for ore Ore

Samples with sulfur values below 0.1% are classified as

NAF (Barren)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 107 109 111

kg H

2SO

4/ t

onne

Sample Number

Graph 9: NAPP values for ore

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 25: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 19

The pH of the water extracts from the two ore samples is pH 5.0 and 5.8 and is therefore within the pH range of the deionised water used in the water extract tests (ie. pH 5.0 to 6.5). This indicates that these materials are unlikely to contribute any acidity to initial surface runoff and seepage.

This is further supported by the typically low acidity of the water extracts from the two samples (ie. 6 and 8 mg/L. The alkalinity of the water extracts from the two samples has a similar low value (3 and 7 mg/L), which is essentially equivalent to the measured acidity.

The EC in the water extracts from the two ore samples is very low (11 and 15 µS/cm). This confirms that these materials exhibit low salinity and low concentrations of dissolved solids when in contact with water. The concentrations of the major cations and anions in the two water extracts are typically very low and below the LoR.

The concentration of all trace metals/metalloids tested in the water extracts is below the laboratory LoR in all samples. The only exception is manganese, which is above the LoR in most samples. However, the maximum value of 0.014 mg/L is well below the guideline value of 1.90 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

The results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in initial surface runoff and seepage from stockpiled run-of-mine ore materials are unlikely to impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources at relevant storage facilities.

5.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests As described in Section 3.2.2 and Attachment A, a KLC test was undertaken on a representative composite sample of ore from the project site. The composition of the composite sample used in the KLC test is listed in Table C-9 (Attachment C). The static ABA test results for the individual samples used to make up the composite KLC ore sample are detailed in Table C-10 (Attachment C). The KLC results are presented in Attachment D and interpreted in this section.

The KLC leachate pH trends for the ore sample in Attachment D show that the leachate pH from the sample (KLC5) is fairly consistent over the six month test period and trends from a pH of 6.7 towards a pH of 4.9. Dynamic contact with NAF ore typically adds very little acidity or alkalinity to the deionised water used in the KLC tests.

The EC value of KCL leachate from the ore sample is low and ranges from 17 to 31 µS/cm. The EC generally shows a slight decreasing trend over the test period.

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in leachate shows that at least 99 % of the total sulfur content remains in the ore at the end of the test period. The sulfate concentration in ore leachate is three orders of magnitude lower than the applied guideline value. At least 99 % of the measured ANC remains in the sample material at the end of the test period.

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in ore leachate is very low, relatively consistent, and tends towards a long term equilibrium value. The sulfate generation rate and associated sulfide oxidation rate for the KLC test on ore are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Sulfate Generation and Sulfide Oxidation Rates for KLC Tests on Ore

RGS-KLC Sample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg O2/m3/s)

KLC 5 NAF Ore 0.03 1.3 x 10-11

The sulfate generation rate from the KLC test on the ore sample is 0.03 mg/kg/week indicating that the rate of sulfide oxidation is low (equivalent to an oxidation rate of 1.3 x 10-11 kg O2/m3/s), with an increased factor of safety (AMIRA, 1995, Bennett et al., 2000). These materials are likely to generate

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 18

Graph 10 shows a plot of ANC versus MPA for the ore samples. ANC:MPA ratio lines have been plotted on the graph to illustrate the factor of safety associated with the samples, in terms of potential for generation of AMD. All of the samples fall within the negligible and low risk domains in the graph or have a negligible MPA content; and therefore have a high factor of safety and very low risk of acid generation.

The geochemical classification criteria previously presented in Table 2 highlights that all of the ore samples are classified as NAF-Barren.

5.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids Multi-element scans were carried out on two selected samples of ore to identify any elements (metals/metalloids) present in these materials at concentrations that may be of environmental concern with respect to materials handling, storage, and water quality. The ore samples used in the multi-element test work are described in Table C-2 (Attachment C). The results from multi-element testing (total metals/metalloids) of the samples are presented in Table C-3 (Attachment C).

The results indicate that the ore materials typically have low total metal and metalloid concentrations in solids, many below the LoR and all below the applied NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline for soils. The only exception is the elevated concentration of manganese, which exceeds the NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline in both samples. This is expected given that these samples were taken from within a manganese deposit.

5.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests The results from multi-element testing of water extracts (1:5 solid:water) from the two samples of ore materials described in Section 5.2 are presented in Table C-5 (Attachment C).

0

10

20

30

0 5 10 15 20

Aci

d N

eutra

lisin

g C

apac

ity (k

g H

2SO

4/t)

Maximum Potential Acidity (kg H2SO4/t)

Graph 10: ANC v MPA for ore

OreNegligible

Risk

Possible Risk

IncreasedRisk

LowRisk

Scr <0.1%

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 26: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 19

The pH of the water extracts from the two ore samples is pH 5.0 and 5.8 and is therefore within the pH range of the deionised water used in the water extract tests (ie. pH 5.0 to 6.5). This indicates that these materials are unlikely to contribute any acidity to initial surface runoff and seepage.

This is further supported by the typically low acidity of the water extracts from the two samples (ie. 6 and 8 mg/L. The alkalinity of the water extracts from the two samples has a similar low value (3 and 7 mg/L), which is essentially equivalent to the measured acidity.

The EC in the water extracts from the two ore samples is very low (11 and 15 µS/cm). This confirms that these materials exhibit low salinity and low concentrations of dissolved solids when in contact with water. The concentrations of the major cations and anions in the two water extracts are typically very low and below the LoR.

The concentration of all trace metals/metalloids tested in the water extracts is below the laboratory LoR in all samples. The only exception is manganese, which is above the LoR in most samples. However, the maximum value of 0.014 mg/L is well below the guideline value of 1.90 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

The results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in initial surface runoff and seepage from stockpiled run-of-mine ore materials are unlikely to impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources at relevant storage facilities.

5.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests As described in Section 3.2.2 and Attachment A, a KLC test was undertaken on a representative composite sample of ore from the project site. The composition of the composite sample used in the KLC test is listed in Table C-9 (Attachment C). The static ABA test results for the individual samples used to make up the composite KLC ore sample are detailed in Table C-10 (Attachment C). The KLC results are presented in Attachment D and interpreted in this section.

The KLC leachate pH trends for the ore sample in Attachment D show that the leachate pH from the sample (KLC5) is fairly consistent over the six month test period and trends from a pH of 6.7 towards a pH of 4.9. Dynamic contact with NAF ore typically adds very little acidity or alkalinity to the deionised water used in the KLC tests.

The EC value of KCL leachate from the ore sample is low and ranges from 17 to 31 µS/cm. The EC generally shows a slight decreasing trend over the test period.

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in leachate shows that at least 99 % of the total sulfur content remains in the ore at the end of the test period. The sulfate concentration in ore leachate is three orders of magnitude lower than the applied guideline value. At least 99 % of the measured ANC remains in the sample material at the end of the test period.

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in ore leachate is very low, relatively consistent, and tends towards a long term equilibrium value. The sulfate generation rate and associated sulfide oxidation rate for the KLC test on ore are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Sulfate Generation and Sulfide Oxidation Rates for KLC Tests on Ore

RGS-KLC Sample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg O2/m3/s)

KLC 5 NAF Ore 0.03 1.3 x 10-11

The sulfate generation rate from the KLC test on the ore sample is 0.03 mg/kg/week indicating that the rate of sulfide oxidation is low (equivalent to an oxidation rate of 1.3 x 10-11 kg O2/m3/s), with an increased factor of safety (AMIRA, 1995, Bennett et al., 2000). These materials are likely to generate

RGS-KLCSample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg/O2/m3/s)

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 18

Graph 10 shows a plot of ANC versus MPA for the ore samples. ANC:MPA ratio lines have been plotted on the graph to illustrate the factor of safety associated with the samples, in terms of potential for generation of AMD. All of the samples fall within the negligible and low risk domains in the graph or have a negligible MPA content; and therefore have a high factor of safety and very low risk of acid generation.

The geochemical classification criteria previously presented in Table 2 highlights that all of the ore samples are classified as NAF-Barren.

5.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids Multi-element scans were carried out on two selected samples of ore to identify any elements (metals/metalloids) present in these materials at concentrations that may be of environmental concern with respect to materials handling, storage, and water quality. The ore samples used in the multi-element test work are described in Table C-2 (Attachment C). The results from multi-element testing (total metals/metalloids) of the samples are presented in Table C-3 (Attachment C).

The results indicate that the ore materials typically have low total metal and metalloid concentrations in solids, many below the LoR and all below the applied NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline for soils. The only exception is the elevated concentration of manganese, which exceeds the NEPC (HIL(C)) guideline in both samples. This is expected given that these samples were taken from within a manganese deposit.

5.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests The results from multi-element testing of water extracts (1:5 solid:water) from the two samples of ore materials described in Section 5.2 are presented in Table C-5 (Attachment C).

0

10

20

30

0 5 10 15 20

Aci

d N

eutra

lisin

g C

apac

ity (k

g H

2SO

4/t)

Maximum Potential Acidity (kg H2SO4/t)

Graph 10: ANC v MPA for ore

OreNegligible

Risk

Possible Risk

IncreasedRisk

LowRisk

Scr <0.1%

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 27: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 20

leachate that is pH neutral and/or has a low level of acidity. Hence, the kinetic ore leachate results reflect the characteristics predicted from static geochemical test results presented in Section 5.1.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in leachate from the KLC test on the ore sample is typically very low, below the laboratory LoR, and within applied water quality guidelines. The only exception is naturally occurring manganese, which is above the LoR in the leachate samples,but with maximum and median values of 0.297 mg/L and 0.227 mg/L remains well below the guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

Overall, these results indicate that ongoing surface runoff and seepage from ore materials are unlikely to significantly impact upon the quality of surface water and groundwater. In addition, these materials are only stockpiled for a relatively short period of time and have limited interaction with contact water.

5.5 Management MeasuresThe geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or stockpiling of the ore.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 21

6.0 MIDDLINGS GEOCHEMISTRY

6.1 Acid Base Account Results As described in Section 3, ABA and multi-element tests were completed on four representative samples of process residue (middlings) material from the project site.

The ABA results are presented in Table C-6 (Attachment C) and show that the middlings have pH values within the pH range typical of the deionised water used in the tests (ie. pH 5.0 to 6.5). This indicates that the middlings are unlikely to contribute any acidity to initial surface runoff and seepage.

The salinity of water extracts from the middlings materials is very low (EC varies from 18 to23 µS/cm). This confirms that these materials exhibit low salinity and low concentrations of dissolved solids when in contact with water.

The sample materials have a very low total sulfur concentration, well below background levels for this element (ie. below 0.1%S) (INAP, 2009), resulting in a low MPA value of 0.15 kg H2SO4/t. The ANC for the samples is also relatively low, but remains at least an order of magnitude greater than the MPA, resulting in a negative NAPP and a high ANC:MPA ratio (median of 19.25). On the basis of these results, the middlings samples are classified as NAF-Barren and have a high factor of safety with respect to potential for acid generation.

6.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids The multi-element results (metals/metalloids in solids) for the middlings are presented in Table C-7(Attachment C). The results indicate that the middlings have low total metal/metalloid concentrations in solids within the applied HIL(C) guideline criteria (NEPC, 2013), except for manganese. The elevated manganese concentration in the middlings is expected given that these samples are derived from processing manganese ore.

6.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests The results from multi-element testing of water extracts (1:5 solid:water) from the middlings materials are presented in Table C-8 (Attachment C). The concentration of all trace metals/metalloids tested in the water extracts is below the laboratory LoR, with the exception of manganese. However, the maximum concentration of 0.04 mg/L remains well below the guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater aquatic ecosystems.

The water extract results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in any surface runoff from middlings materials are unlikely to impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources at the project site.

6.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests As described in Section 3.2.2 and Attachment A, a KLC test was undertaken on a representative composite sample of middlings from the project site. The composition of the composite sample used in the KLC test is listed in Table C-9 (Attachment C). The static ABA test results for the individual samples used to make up the composite KLC middlings sample are detailed in Table C-10(Attachment C). The KLC results are presented in Attachment D and interpreted in this section.

The KLC leachate trends for the middlings sample in Attachment D show that pH is fairly consistent over the test period and ranges from pH 6.9 to 5.2. Dynamic contact with middlings typically adds very little acidity or alkalinity to the deionised water used in the KLC tests (the typical pH of the deionised water used in the tests is in the pH range 5 to 6.5).

The EC value of KLC leachate from the middlings sample is low and ranges from 13 to 41 µS/cm, with a slight decreasing trend over the test period.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 28: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 20

leachate that is pH neutral and/or has a low level of acidity. Hence, the kinetic ore leachate results reflect the characteristics predicted from static geochemical test results presented in Section 5.1.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in leachate from the KLC test on the ore sample is typically very low, below the laboratory LoR, and within applied water quality guidelines. The only exception is naturally occurring manganese, which is above the LoR in the leachate samples,but with maximum and median values of 0.297 mg/L and 0.227 mg/L remains well below the guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

Overall, these results indicate that ongoing surface runoff and seepage from ore materials are unlikely to significantly impact upon the quality of surface water and groundwater. In addition, these materials are only stockpiled for a relatively short period of time and have limited interaction with contact water.

5.5 Management MeasuresThe geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or stockpiling of the ore.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 21

6.0 MIDDLINGS GEOCHEMISTRY

6.1 Acid Base Account Results As described in Section 3, ABA and multi-element tests were completed on four representative samples of process residue (middlings) material from the project site.

The ABA results are presented in Table C-6 (Attachment C) and show that the middlings have pH values within the pH range typical of the deionised water used in the tests (ie. pH 5.0 to 6.5). This indicates that the middlings are unlikely to contribute any acidity to initial surface runoff and seepage.

The salinity of water extracts from the middlings materials is very low (EC varies from 18 to23 µS/cm). This confirms that these materials exhibit low salinity and low concentrations of dissolved solids when in contact with water.

The sample materials have a very low total sulfur concentration, well below background levels for this element (ie. below 0.1%S) (INAP, 2009), resulting in a low MPA value of 0.15 kg H2SO4/t. The ANC for the samples is also relatively low, but remains at least an order of magnitude greater than the MPA, resulting in a negative NAPP and a high ANC:MPA ratio (median of 19.25). On the basis of these results, the middlings samples are classified as NAF-Barren and have a high factor of safety with respect to potential for acid generation.

6.2 Multi-Element Concentration in Solids The multi-element results (metals/metalloids in solids) for the middlings are presented in Table C-7(Attachment C). The results indicate that the middlings have low total metal/metalloid concentrations in solids within the applied HIL(C) guideline criteria (NEPC, 2013), except for manganese. The elevated manganese concentration in the middlings is expected given that these samples are derived from processing manganese ore.

6.3 Water Quality Static Leach Tests The results from multi-element testing of water extracts (1:5 solid:water) from the middlings materials are presented in Table C-8 (Attachment C). The concentration of all trace metals/metalloids tested in the water extracts is below the laboratory LoR, with the exception of manganese. However, the maximum concentration of 0.04 mg/L remains well below the guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater aquatic ecosystems.

The water extract results indicate that dissolved metal/metalloid concentrations in any surface runoff from middlings materials are unlikely to impact upon the quality of surface and groundwater resources at the project site.

6.4 Water Quality Kinetic Leach Tests As described in Section 3.2.2 and Attachment A, a KLC test was undertaken on a representative composite sample of middlings from the project site. The composition of the composite sample used in the KLC test is listed in Table C-9 (Attachment C). The static ABA test results for the individual samples used to make up the composite KLC middlings sample are detailed in Table C-10(Attachment C). The KLC results are presented in Attachment D and interpreted in this section.

The KLC leachate trends for the middlings sample in Attachment D show that pH is fairly consistent over the test period and ranges from pH 6.9 to 5.2. Dynamic contact with middlings typically adds very little acidity or alkalinity to the deionised water used in the KLC tests (the typical pH of the deionised water used in the tests is in the pH range 5 to 6.5).

The EC value of KLC leachate from the middlings sample is low and ranges from 13 to 41 µS/cm, with a slight decreasing trend over the test period.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 29: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 22

The residual sulfur content of this material shows that at least 99% of the total sulfur content remains in the sample at the end of the six month test period. The sulfate concentration in KLC middlings leachate is three orders of magnitude lower than the applied guideline value. The concentrations of dissolved calcium and magnesium in leachate indicate that at least 99% of the measured ANC remains in the sample material at the end of the test period.

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in middlings leachate is relatively consistent and tends towards a long term equilibrium value. The sulfate generation rate and associated sulfide oxidation rate for the KLC test on middlings are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Sulfate Generation and Sulfide Oxidation Rates for KLC Tests on Middlings

RGS-KLC Sample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg O2/m3/s)

KLC 6 NAF Middlings 0.03 1.1 x 10-11

The sulfate generation rate from the KLC test on the middlings sample is 0.03 mg/kg/week indicating that the rate of sulfide oxidation is low (equivalent to an oxidation rate of 1.1 x 10-11 kg O2/m3/s), with an increased factor of safety (AMIRA, 1995, Bennett et al., 2000). These materials are likely to generate leachate that is pH neutral and/or has a low level of acidity. Hence, the KLC results reflect the characteristics predicted from static geochemical test results presented in Section 6.1.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in leachate from the KLC test on the middlings sample is typically very low, below the laboratory LoR, and within applied water quality guidelines. The only exception is naturally occurring manganese, which is above the LoR in the leachate samples,but with maximum and median values of 0.077 mg/L and 0.067 mg/L remains well below the guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

Overall, these results indicate that ongoing surface runoff and seepage from middlings materials are unlikely to significantly impact upon the quality of surface water and groundwater.

6.5 Management Measures The geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or storage of the middlings.

RGS-KLCSample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg/O2/m3/s)

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 23

7.0 REVIEW OF TAILINGS GEOCHEMISTRY While the EIS does not include any assessment of operations within the existing GEMCO mine, a review of geochemical data available for tailings generated and stored at the existing operations has been included for completeness.

GEMCO has established handling and storage methods for process residues and these methods have been operating since the commencement of operations.

As previously discussed in Section 2.2, the ore lithology is relatively uniform across the west of the island. It is therefore likely that the tailings samples selected and tested at the existing GEMCO mine will provide a good representation of the geochemical properties of the range of tailings materials likely to be generated from the processing of ore from the Eastern Leases.

The proponent maintains a database of geochemical data on the geochemistry of the slime and sand tailings (GEMCO, 2014). These data have been reviewed by RGS and the main findings are summarised as follows:

The slime and sand tailings are classified as NAF on the basis of having negligible sulfur content and excess buffering capacity.

The slime and sand tailings typically have relatively low total metal/metalloid concentrations in solids which are within applied Health Based (HIL(C)) guideline criteria for recreational open spaces (NEPC, 2013), except for manganese. The elevated manganese concentration in these materials is expected given that the samples are derived from processing manganese ore.

Leachate from slime and sand materials is typically towards the lower end of the pH neutral range and also has a low salinity.

The concentration of most trace metals/metalloids in leachate from slime and sand tailings is low, typically below the laboratory limit of reporting, and less than the applied ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) trigger values for 95 % species protection.

This information confirms that from a geochemical perspective, the slime and sand tailings are relatively benign and very similar to the middlings materials. The geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or storage of the tailings material.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 30: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 22

The residual sulfur content of this material shows that at least 99% of the total sulfur content remains in the sample at the end of the six month test period. The sulfate concentration in KLC middlings leachate is three orders of magnitude lower than the applied guideline value. The concentrations of dissolved calcium and magnesium in leachate indicate that at least 99% of the measured ANC remains in the sample material at the end of the test period.

The concentration of dissolved sulfate in middlings leachate is relatively consistent and tends towards a long term equilibrium value. The sulfate generation rate and associated sulfide oxidation rate for the KLC test on middlings are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Sulfate Generation and Sulfide Oxidation Rates for KLC Tests on Middlings

RGS-KLC Sample No. Sample Description Sulfate Generation Rate

(mg/kg/week)Oxidation Rate

(kg O2/m3/s)

KLC 6 NAF Middlings 0.03 1.1 x 10-11

The sulfate generation rate from the KLC test on the middlings sample is 0.03 mg/kg/week indicating that the rate of sulfide oxidation is low (equivalent to an oxidation rate of 1.1 x 10-11 kg O2/m3/s), with an increased factor of safety (AMIRA, 1995, Bennett et al., 2000). These materials are likely to generate leachate that is pH neutral and/or has a low level of acidity. Hence, the KLC results reflect the characteristics predicted from static geochemical test results presented in Section 6.1.

The concentration of dissolved trace metals/metalloids in leachate from the KLC test on the middlings sample is typically very low, below the laboratory LoR, and within applied water quality guidelines. The only exception is naturally occurring manganese, which is above the LoR in the leachate samples,but with maximum and median values of 0.077 mg/L and 0.067 mg/L remains well below the guideline value of 1.9 mg/L for protection of freshwater ecosystems.

Overall, these results indicate that ongoing surface runoff and seepage from middlings materials are unlikely to significantly impact upon the quality of surface water and groundwater.

6.5 Management Measures The geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or storage of the middlings.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 23

7.0 REVIEW OF TAILINGS GEOCHEMISTRY While the EIS does not include any assessment of operations within the existing GEMCO mine, a review of geochemical data available for tailings generated and stored at the existing operations has been included for completeness.

GEMCO has established handling and storage methods for process residues and these methods have been operating since the commencement of operations.

As previously discussed in Section 2.2, the ore lithology is relatively uniform across the west of the island. It is therefore likely that the tailings samples selected and tested at the existing GEMCO mine will provide a good representation of the geochemical properties of the range of tailings materials likely to be generated from the processing of ore from the Eastern Leases.

The proponent maintains a database of geochemical data on the geochemistry of the slime and sand tailings (GEMCO, 2014). These data have been reviewed by RGS and the main findings are summarised as follows:

The slime and sand tailings are classified as NAF on the basis of having negligible sulfur content and excess buffering capacity.

The slime and sand tailings typically have relatively low total metal/metalloid concentrations in solids which are within applied Health Based (HIL(C)) guideline criteria for recreational open spaces (NEPC, 2013), except for manganese. The elevated manganese concentration in these materials is expected given that the samples are derived from processing manganese ore.

Leachate from slime and sand materials is typically towards the lower end of the pH neutral range and also has a low salinity.

The concentration of most trace metals/metalloids in leachate from slime and sand tailings is low, typically below the laboratory limit of reporting, and less than the applied ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) trigger values for 95 % species protection.

This information confirms that from a geochemical perspective, the slime and sand tailings are relatively benign and very similar to the middlings materials. The geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or storage of the tailings material.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 31: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 24

8.0 CONCLUSIONS RGS has completed a geochemical assessment of overburden, ore and process residue materials likely to be generated by the project. The main findings of the geochemical assessment are presented in the following sections.

8.1 Overburden The overwhelming majority of overburden show excess acid buffering capacity, and a high

factor of safety with respect to potential acid generation.

The bulk excavated overburden material generated by the project will have a significant excess buffering capacity at least double the MPA and is therefore considered to be NAF.

Smectite and kaolinite clay minerals that may be sporadically present within the excavated overburden material are non-dispersive and should not provide a significant materials handling issue.

The concentrations of metals and metalloids in excavated overburden material are within relevant health-based criteria. Only manganese was found to be elevated, reflecting the natural geological setting of the project. During the project life, these materials will be handled and stored within operational mining areas and there will be negligible potential for human health impacts through contact with these materials. Mined areas will be progressively rehabilitated,further reducing potential manganese exposure pathways.

Surface runoff and seepage from excavated overburden material is likely to exhibit low acidity with excess buffering capacity. Salinity will be low due to a general absence of dissolved solids.

Static and kinetic leach tests indicate that trace metals/metalloids and major ions will be sparingly soluble in runoff and seepage from excavated overburden material. Dissolved concentrations will remain within applied water quality guideline criteria and will not present any significant environmental risks for on-site or downstream water quality. Dilution effects from rainfall and natural attenuation are also likely to occur in the field and further reduce the concentrations of soluble metals and metalloids in runoff and seepage.

Based on the benign nature of the overburden material, no special management measures are required for the handling or storage of the majority of the overburden. There will, however, be specific management measures for the handling and placing of overburden from the small area which has been identified as containing PAF material, and these measures are described in the report (as discussed in Section 4.6).

Surface water and seepage from overburden emplacement areas will be monitored to ensure that key water quality parameters remain within appropriate criteria. Groundwater monitoring will also be undertaken.

8.2 Ore The run of mine ore generated by the project has an excess buffering capacity, which is

significantly greater than the MPA, and is therefore considered to be NAF. Storage of run of mine ore generated by the project is therefore unlikely to generate acid.

The concentrations of metals and metalloids in run of mine ore are within relevant health-based criteria. Only manganese was found to be elevated, reflecting the natural geological setting of the project. During the project life, run of mine ore will be handled and stored within operational mining areas and there will be negligible potential for human health impacts through contact with these materials. No run of mine ore materials will remain on site following mine closure and rehabilitation.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 25

Surface runoff and seepage from run of mine ore is likely to exhibit low acidity with excess buffering capacity. Salinity will be low due to a general absence of dissolved solids.

Static and kinetic leach tests indicate that trace metals/metalloids and major ions are sparingly soluble in runoff and seepage from run of mine ore. Dissolved concentrations will remain within applied water quality guideline criteria and will not present any significant environmental risks for on-site or downstream water quality. Dilution effects from rainfall and natural attenuation are also likely to occur in the field and further reduce the concentrations of soluble metals and metalloids in runoff and seepage.

The geochemistry of the Eastern Leases ore does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or temporary storage of the run of mine ore materials.

8.3 Tailings and Middlings The tailings and middlings generated by the project have an excess buffering capacity, which is

significantly greater than the MPA, and are therefore considered to be NAF. Storage and reuse of tailings and middlings generated by the project is unlikely to generate acid.

The concentrations of metals and metalloids in tailings and middlings are within relevant health-based criteria. Only manganese was found to be elevated, reflecting the natural geological setting of the project. During the project life, these materials will be handled and stored within operational mining areas and there will be negligible potential for human health impacts through contact with these materials. As part of mine closure and rehabilitation activities, materials will be removed or capped, further reducing potential manganese exposure pathways.

Surface runoff and seepage from tailings and middlings are likely to exhibit low acidity with excess buffering capacity. Salinity will be low due to a general absence of dissolved solids.

Static and kinetic leach tests indicate that trace metals/metalloids and major ions are sparingly soluble in runoff and seepage from tailings and middlings. Dissolved concentrations will remain within applied water quality guideline criteria and will not present any significant environmental risks for on-site or downstream water quality. Dilution effects from rainfall and natural attenuation are also likely to occur in the field and further reduce the concentrations of soluble metals and metalloids in runoff and seepage.

The geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or storage of the tailings or middlings.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 32: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 24

8.0 CONCLUSIONS RGS has completed a geochemical assessment of overburden, ore and process residue materials likely to be generated by the project. The main findings of the geochemical assessment are presented in the following sections.

8.1 Overburden The overwhelming majority of overburden show excess acid buffering capacity, and a high

factor of safety with respect to potential acid generation.

The bulk excavated overburden material generated by the project will have a significant excess buffering capacity at least double the MPA and is therefore considered to be NAF.

Smectite and kaolinite clay minerals that may be sporadically present within the excavated overburden material are non-dispersive and should not provide a significant materials handling issue.

The concentrations of metals and metalloids in excavated overburden material are within relevant health-based criteria. Only manganese was found to be elevated, reflecting the natural geological setting of the project. During the project life, these materials will be handled and stored within operational mining areas and there will be negligible potential for human health impacts through contact with these materials. Mined areas will be progressively rehabilitated,further reducing potential manganese exposure pathways.

Surface runoff and seepage from excavated overburden material is likely to exhibit low acidity with excess buffering capacity. Salinity will be low due to a general absence of dissolved solids.

Static and kinetic leach tests indicate that trace metals/metalloids and major ions will be sparingly soluble in runoff and seepage from excavated overburden material. Dissolved concentrations will remain within applied water quality guideline criteria and will not present any significant environmental risks for on-site or downstream water quality. Dilution effects from rainfall and natural attenuation are also likely to occur in the field and further reduce the concentrations of soluble metals and metalloids in runoff and seepage.

Based on the benign nature of the overburden material, no special management measures are required for the handling or storage of the majority of the overburden. There will, however, be specific management measures for the handling and placing of overburden from the small area which has been identified as containing PAF material, and these measures are described in the report (as discussed in Section 4.6).

Surface water and seepage from overburden emplacement areas will be monitored to ensure that key water quality parameters remain within appropriate criteria. Groundwater monitoring will also be undertaken.

8.2 Ore The run of mine ore generated by the project has an excess buffering capacity, which is

significantly greater than the MPA, and is therefore considered to be NAF. Storage of run of mine ore generated by the project is therefore unlikely to generate acid.

The concentrations of metals and metalloids in run of mine ore are within relevant health-based criteria. Only manganese was found to be elevated, reflecting the natural geological setting of the project. During the project life, run of mine ore will be handled and stored within operational mining areas and there will be negligible potential for human health impacts through contact with these materials. No run of mine ore materials will remain on site following mine closure and rehabilitation.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 25

Surface runoff and seepage from run of mine ore is likely to exhibit low acidity with excess buffering capacity. Salinity will be low due to a general absence of dissolved solids.

Static and kinetic leach tests indicate that trace metals/metalloids and major ions are sparingly soluble in runoff and seepage from run of mine ore. Dissolved concentrations will remain within applied water quality guideline criteria and will not present any significant environmental risks for on-site or downstream water quality. Dilution effects from rainfall and natural attenuation are also likely to occur in the field and further reduce the concentrations of soluble metals and metalloids in runoff and seepage.

The geochemistry of the Eastern Leases ore does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or temporary storage of the run of mine ore materials.

8.3 Tailings and Middlings The tailings and middlings generated by the project have an excess buffering capacity, which is

significantly greater than the MPA, and are therefore considered to be NAF. Storage and reuse of tailings and middlings generated by the project is unlikely to generate acid.

The concentrations of metals and metalloids in tailings and middlings are within relevant health-based criteria. Only manganese was found to be elevated, reflecting the natural geological setting of the project. During the project life, these materials will be handled and stored within operational mining areas and there will be negligible potential for human health impacts through contact with these materials. As part of mine closure and rehabilitation activities, materials will be removed or capped, further reducing potential manganese exposure pathways.

Surface runoff and seepage from tailings and middlings are likely to exhibit low acidity with excess buffering capacity. Salinity will be low due to a general absence of dissolved solids.

Static and kinetic leach tests indicate that trace metals/metalloids and major ions are sparingly soluble in runoff and seepage from tailings and middlings. Dissolved concentrations will remain within applied water quality guideline criteria and will not present any significant environmental risks for on-site or downstream water quality. Dilution effects from rainfall and natural attenuation are also likely to occur in the field and further reduce the concentrations of soluble metals and metalloids in runoff and seepage.

The geochemistry of the material does not indicate the need for any special management measures for the handling or storage of the tailings or middlings.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 33: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 26

9.0 REFERENCES AMIRA (1995). Mine Waste Management: Project P387 Prediction and Identification of Acid Forming Mine Waste. Australian Minerals Industry Research Association, Report prepared by EGi Pty Ltd, August 1995. AMIRA (2002). ARD Test Handbook: Project 387A Prediction and Kinetic Control of Acid MineDrainage, Australian Minerals Industry Research Association, Ian Wark Research Institute and Environmental Geochemistry International Pty Ltd, May 2002. ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000).AS 4969.7-2008. Analysis of acid sulfate soil – Dried samples – Methods of test. Method 7: Determination of chromium reducible sulfur (Scr). Standards Australia, June 2008. Bennett J.W, Comarmond J.M. and Jeffrey J.J. (2000). Comparison of Oxidation Rates of Sulfidic Mine Wastes in the Laboratory and Field. Paper prepared by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation and Environmental Geochemistry International Pty Ltd, Australian Centre for Mining Environmental Research. February.

DITR (2006a). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Mine Rehabilitation. October, Canberra ACT. DITR (2006b). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Mine Closure and Completion. October, Canberra ACT. DITR (2007a). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Managing Acid and Metalliferous Drainage. February, Canberra ACT.DITR (2007b). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Tailings Management. February, Canberra ACT. DITR (2008). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Water Management. May, Canberra ACT. DME (1995). Draft Technical Guidelines for the Environmental Management of Exploration and Mining in Queensland, Technical Guideline – Assessment and Management of Acid Drainage and Saline/Sodic Wastes. Queensland Department of Minerals and Energy (DME).INAP (2009). Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (GARD Guide). Document prepared by Golder Associates on behalf of the International Network on Acid Prevention (INAP). June 2009 (http://www.inap.com.au/).Isbell, RF. (2002). The Australian Soil Classification (revised edition). CSIRO Publishing. Victoria. GEMCO Pty Ltd (2014). Internal Database. Existing information on the geochemistry of slime and sand tailings. NEPC (2013). [Amendment of Schedule B1to B7 of 1999 version]. National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC). National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM). Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, Health-Based Investigation Level - HIL(C): generic land use including recreational open spaces.NT EPA (2013). Environmental Assessment Guidelines. Acid and Metalliferous Drainage. Version 1.2. April NT EPA (2014). Terms of Reference for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. GEMCO Eastern Leases Project. Northcote, KH., Skene, JKM. (1972). Australian Soils with Saline and Sodic properties. CSIRO Australia, Soil Publication No. 27, Canberra.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 27

RGS (2013), GEMCO Eastern Leases Project: Mine Waste Geochemistry Assessment – Sampling Protocol, provided to Hansen Bailey, 22 November, RGS Project Number 121312. Team NT (2004). Northern Territory Minerals Council (Inc.) and the Mines and Petroleum Management Division of the Northern Territory Government, 2004, TEAM NT: Technologies for Environmental Advancement of Mining in the Northern Territory: Toolkit, D.R. Jones and M. Fawcett, principal authors. Posted on the Northern Territory Minerals Council web page at: http://ntminerals.org.au/VisionEdit/files/TEAMNT.pdf

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 34: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 26

9.0 REFERENCES AMIRA (1995). Mine Waste Management: Project P387 Prediction and Identification of Acid Forming Mine Waste. Australian Minerals Industry Research Association, Report prepared by EGi Pty Ltd, August 1995. AMIRA (2002). ARD Test Handbook: Project 387A Prediction and Kinetic Control of Acid MineDrainage, Australian Minerals Industry Research Association, Ian Wark Research Institute and Environmental Geochemistry International Pty Ltd, May 2002. ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000).AS 4969.7-2008. Analysis of acid sulfate soil – Dried samples – Methods of test. Method 7: Determination of chromium reducible sulfur (Scr). Standards Australia, June 2008. Bennett J.W, Comarmond J.M. and Jeffrey J.J. (2000). Comparison of Oxidation Rates of Sulfidic Mine Wastes in the Laboratory and Field. Paper prepared by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation and Environmental Geochemistry International Pty Ltd, Australian Centre for Mining Environmental Research. February.

DITR (2006a). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Mine Rehabilitation. October, Canberra ACT. DITR (2006b). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Mine Closure and Completion. October, Canberra ACT. DITR (2007a). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Managing Acid and Metalliferous Drainage. February, Canberra ACT.DITR (2007b). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Tailings Management. February, Canberra ACT. DITR (2008). Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Water Management. May, Canberra ACT. DME (1995). Draft Technical Guidelines for the Environmental Management of Exploration and Mining in Queensland, Technical Guideline – Assessment and Management of Acid Drainage and Saline/Sodic Wastes. Queensland Department of Minerals and Energy (DME).INAP (2009). Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (GARD Guide). Document prepared by Golder Associates on behalf of the International Network on Acid Prevention (INAP). June 2009 (http://www.inap.com.au/).Isbell, RF. (2002). The Australian Soil Classification (revised edition). CSIRO Publishing. Victoria. GEMCO Pty Ltd (2014). Internal Database. Existing information on the geochemistry of slime and sand tailings. NEPC (2013). [Amendment of Schedule B1to B7 of 1999 version]. National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC). National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM). Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, Health-Based Investigation Level - HIL(C): generic land use including recreational open spaces.NT EPA (2013). Environmental Assessment Guidelines. Acid and Metalliferous Drainage. Version 1.2. April NT EPA (2014). Terms of Reference for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. GEMCO Eastern Leases Project. Northcote, KH., Skene, JKM. (1972). Australian Soils with Saline and Sodic properties. CSIRO Australia, Soil Publication No. 27, Canberra.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 27

RGS (2013), GEMCO Eastern Leases Project: Mine Waste Geochemistry Assessment – Sampling Protocol, provided to Hansen Bailey, 22 November, RGS Project Number 121312. Team NT (2004). Northern Territory Minerals Council (Inc.) and the Mines and Petroleum Management Division of the Northern Territory Government, 2004, TEAM NT: Technologies for Environmental Advancement of Mining in the Northern Territory: Toolkit, D.R. Jones and M. Fawcett, principal authors. Posted on the Northern Territory Minerals Council web page at: http://ntminerals.org.au/VisionEdit/files/TEAMNT.pdf

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 35: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 28

FIGURES

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 36: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

LOCATION PLAN

Figure:GEOCHEMISTRY REPORT

GEMCO EASTERN LEASES PROJECT

1

10/03/2015121312 001 A4 - Rev.B

Source: HB supplied 1354 GEMCO Location Plan for subbies (2) dwg

RGS Environmental Pty LtdPO Box 3091, Sunnybank South QLD 4109 Australia

Tel/Fax +61 7 3344 1222Mobile 0431 620 623

Email [email protected]

File:Date:

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page 28

FIGURES

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 37: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

LOCAL SETTING

Figure: 2

Source: HB supplied HB 1354 S00 - F02 Local Setting-revA dwg

121312 002 A4 - Rev.B

GEOCHEMISTRY REPORT

GEMCO EASTERN LEASES PROJECT

10/03/2015

RGS Environmental Pty LtdPO Box 3091, Sunnybank South QLD 4109 Australia

Tel/Fax +61 7 3344 1222Mobile 0431 620 623

Email [email protected]

File:Date:

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 38: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

INDICATIVESTRATIGRAPHY

Figure: 3

Source: HB supplied 1354 GEMCO Indicative Stratigraphy dwg

121312 003 A4

GEOCHEMISTRY REPORT

GEMCO EASTERN LEASES PROJECT

10/03/2015File:

Date:

RGS Environmental Pty LtdPO Box 3091, Sunnybank South QLD 4109 Australia

Tel/Fax +61 7 3344 1222Mobile 0431 620 623

Email [email protected]

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 39: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

GEOCHEMISTRY SAMPLINGBORE LOCATIONS

Figure: 4

121312 004 A4 - Rev.B

GEOCHEMISTRY REPORT

GEMCO EASTERN LEASES PROJECT

Source: HB supplied HB 1354 Gemco - S09 - Geochem and Groundwater Bores revA (1) (2) dwg

10/03/2015

RGS Environmental Pty LtdPO Box 3091, Sunnybank South QLD 4109 Australia

Tel/Fax +61 7 3344 1222Mobile 0431 620 623

Email [email protected]

File:Date:

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A1

ATTACHMENT A

Geochemical Assessment Methodology for Mine Waste Materials

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 40: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A1

ATTACHMENT A

Geochemical Assessment Methodology for Mine Waste Materials

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 41: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A2

ATTACHMENT A

GEOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT OF MINE WASTE MATERIALS

ACID GENERATION AND PREDICTIONAcid generation is caused by the exposure of sulfide minerals, most commonly pyrite (FeS2), to atmospheric oxygen and water. Sulfur assay results are used to calculate the maximum amount of acid that could be generated by a material based on either direct measurement of the pyritic S content, or assuming that all sulfur not present as sulfate occurs as pyrite. Pyrite reacts under oxidising conditions to generate acid according to the following overall reaction:

FeS2 + 15/4 O2 + 7/2 H2O ---> Fe(OH)3 + 2 H2SO4

According to this reaction, the maximum potential acidity (MPA) of a sample containing 1%S as pyrite would be 30.6 kg H2SO4/t. The chemical components of the acid generation process consist of the above sulfide oxidation reaction and acid neutralization, which is mainly provided by inherent carbonates and to a lesser extent silicate materials. The amount and rate of acid generation is determined by the interaction and overall balance of the acid generation and neutralisation components.

Net Acid Producing Potential

The net acid producing potential (NAPP) is used as an indicator of materials that may be of concern with respect to acid generation. The NAPP calculation represents the balance between the maximum potential acidity (MPA) of a sample, which is derived from the sulfide sulfur content, and the acid neutralising capacity (ANC) of the material, which is determined experimentally. By convention, the NAPP result is expressed in units of kg H2SO4/t sample. If the capacity of the solids to neutralise acid (ANC) exceeds their capacity to generate acid (MPA), then the NAPP of the material is negative. Conversely, if the MPA exceeds the ANC, the NAPP of the material is positive. A NAPP assessment involves a series of analytical tests that include:

Determination of pH and EC

pH and EC measured on 1:5 w/w water extract. This gives an indication of the inherent acidity and salinity of the waste material when initially exposed in an emplacement area.

Total sulfur content and Maximum Potential Acidity (MPA)

Total sulfur content is determined by the Leco high temperature combustion method. The total sulfur content is then used to calculate the MPA, which is based on the assumption that the entire sulfur content is present as reactive pyrite. Direct determination of the pyritic sulfur content can provide a more accurate estimate of the MPA.

Acid neutralising capacity (ANC)

The ANC is determines by addition of acid to a known weight of sample, then titration with NaOH to determine the amount of residual acid. The ANC measures the capacity of a sample to react with and neutralise acid. The ANC can be further evaluated by slow acid titration to a set end-point in the Acid Buffering Characteristic Curve (ABCC) test through calculation of the amount of acid consumed and evaluation of the resultant titration curve.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A3

Net acid producing potential (NAPP)

Calculated from the MPA and ANC results. The NAPP represents the balance between a sample’s inherent capacities to generate and neutralise acid. If the MPA is greater than the ANC then the NAPP is positive. If the MPA is less than the ANC then the NAPP is negative.

Net Acid Generation (NAG)

The net acid generation (NAG) test involves the addition of hydrogen peroxide to a sample of mine rock or process residue to oxidise reactive sulfide, then measurement of pH and titration of any net acidity produced by the acid generation and neutralisation reactions occurring in the sample. A significant NAG result (i.e. final NAGpH < 4.5) indicates that the sample is potentially acid forming (PAF) and the test provides a direct measure of the net amount of acid remaining in the sample after all acid generating and acid neutralising reactions have taken place. A NAGpH > 4.5 indicates that the sample is non-acid forming (NAF). The NAG test provides a direct assessment of the potential for a material to produce acid after a period of exposure and weathering and is used to refine the results of the theoretical NAPP predictions. The NAG test can be used as a stand-alone test, but is recommended that this only be considered after site specific calibration work is carried out.

ASSESSMENT OF ELEMENT ENRICHMENT AND SOLUBILITY In mineralised areas it is common to find a suite of enriched elements that have resulted from natural geological processes. Multi-element scans are carried out to identify any elements that are present in a material (or readily leachable from a material) at concentrations that may be of environmental concern with respect to surface water quality, revegetation and public health. The samples are generally analysed for the following elements:

Major elements Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na and S.

Minor elements As, B, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, F, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se and Zn.

The concentration of these elements in samples can be directly compared with relevant state or national environmental and health based concentration guideline criteria to determine the level of significance. Water extracts are used to determine the immediate element solubilities under the existing sample pH conditions of the sample. The following tests are normally carried out:

Multi-element composition of solids.

Multi-element composition of solid samples determined using a combination of ICP-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), ICP-optical emission spectroscopy (OES), and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).

Multi-element composition of water extracts (1:5 sample:deionised water).

Multi-element composition of water extracts from solid samples determined using a combination of ICP-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), ICP-optical emission spectroscopy (OES), and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).

Under some conditions (e.g. low pH) the solubility and mobility of common environmentally important elements can increase significantly. If element mobility under initial pH conditions is deemed likely and/or subsequent low pH conditions may occur, kinetic leach column test work may be completed on representative samples.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 42: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A2

ATTACHMENT A

GEOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT OF MINE WASTE MATERIALS

ACID GENERATION AND PREDICTIONAcid generation is caused by the exposure of sulfide minerals, most commonly pyrite (FeS2), to atmospheric oxygen and water. Sulfur assay results are used to calculate the maximum amount of acid that could be generated by a material based on either direct measurement of the pyritic S content, or assuming that all sulfur not present as sulfate occurs as pyrite. Pyrite reacts under oxidising conditions to generate acid according to the following overall reaction:

FeS2 + 15/4 O2 + 7/2 H2O ---> Fe(OH)3 + 2 H2SO4

According to this reaction, the maximum potential acidity (MPA) of a sample containing 1%S as pyrite would be 30.6 kg H2SO4/t. The chemical components of the acid generation process consist of the above sulfide oxidation reaction and acid neutralization, which is mainly provided by inherent carbonates and to a lesser extent silicate materials. The amount and rate of acid generation is determined by the interaction and overall balance of the acid generation and neutralisation components.

Net Acid Producing Potential

The net acid producing potential (NAPP) is used as an indicator of materials that may be of concern with respect to acid generation. The NAPP calculation represents the balance between the maximum potential acidity (MPA) of a sample, which is derived from the sulfide sulfur content, and the acid neutralising capacity (ANC) of the material, which is determined experimentally. By convention, the NAPP result is expressed in units of kg H2SO4/t sample. If the capacity of the solids to neutralise acid (ANC) exceeds their capacity to generate acid (MPA), then the NAPP of the material is negative. Conversely, if the MPA exceeds the ANC, the NAPP of the material is positive. A NAPP assessment involves a series of analytical tests that include:

Determination of pH and EC

pH and EC measured on 1:5 w/w water extract. This gives an indication of the inherent acidity and salinity of the waste material when initially exposed in an emplacement area.

Total sulfur content and Maximum Potential Acidity (MPA)

Total sulfur content is determined by the Leco high temperature combustion method. The total sulfur content is then used to calculate the MPA, which is based on the assumption that the entire sulfur content is present as reactive pyrite. Direct determination of the pyritic sulfur content can provide a more accurate estimate of the MPA.

Acid neutralising capacity (ANC)

The ANC is determines by addition of acid to a known weight of sample, then titration with NaOH to determine the amount of residual acid. The ANC measures the capacity of a sample to react with and neutralise acid. The ANC can be further evaluated by slow acid titration to a set end-point in the Acid Buffering Characteristic Curve (ABCC) test through calculation of the amount of acid consumed and evaluation of the resultant titration curve.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A3

Net acid producing potential (NAPP)

Calculated from the MPA and ANC results. The NAPP represents the balance between a sample’s inherent capacities to generate and neutralise acid. If the MPA is greater than the ANC then the NAPP is positive. If the MPA is less than the ANC then the NAPP is negative.

Net Acid Generation (NAG)

The net acid generation (NAG) test involves the addition of hydrogen peroxide to a sample of mine rock or process residue to oxidise reactive sulfide, then measurement of pH and titration of any net acidity produced by the acid generation and neutralisation reactions occurring in the sample. A significant NAG result (i.e. final NAGpH < 4.5) indicates that the sample is potentially acid forming (PAF) and the test provides a direct measure of the net amount of acid remaining in the sample after all acid generating and acid neutralising reactions have taken place. A NAGpH > 4.5 indicates that the sample is non-acid forming (NAF). The NAG test provides a direct assessment of the potential for a material to produce acid after a period of exposure and weathering and is used to refine the results of the theoretical NAPP predictions. The NAG test can be used as a stand-alone test, but is recommended that this only be considered after site specific calibration work is carried out.

ASSESSMENT OF ELEMENT ENRICHMENT AND SOLUBILITY In mineralised areas it is common to find a suite of enriched elements that have resulted from natural geological processes. Multi-element scans are carried out to identify any elements that are present in a material (or readily leachable from a material) at concentrations that may be of environmental concern with respect to surface water quality, revegetation and public health. The samples are generally analysed for the following elements:

Major elements Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na and S.

Minor elements As, B, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, F, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se and Zn.

The concentration of these elements in samples can be directly compared with relevant state or national environmental and health based concentration guideline criteria to determine the level of significance. Water extracts are used to determine the immediate element solubilities under the existing sample pH conditions of the sample. The following tests are normally carried out:

Multi-element composition of solids.

Multi-element composition of solid samples determined using a combination of ICP-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), ICP-optical emission spectroscopy (OES), and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).

Multi-element composition of water extracts (1:5 sample:deionised water).

Multi-element composition of water extracts from solid samples determined using a combination of ICP-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), ICP-optical emission spectroscopy (OES), and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).

Under some conditions (e.g. low pH) the solubility and mobility of common environmentally important elements can increase significantly. If element mobility under initial pH conditions is deemed likely and/or subsequent low pH conditions may occur, kinetic leach column test work may be completed on representative samples.

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 43: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A4

KINETIC LEACH COLUMN TESTS Kinetic leach column (KLC) tests can be used to provide information on the reaction kinetics of mine waste materials. The major objectives of kinetics tests are to:

Provide time-dependent data on the kinetics and rate of acid generation and acid neutralising reactions under laboratory controlled (or onsite conditions);

Investigate metal release and drainage/seepage quality; and Assess treatment options such as addition of alkaline materials.

The KLC tests simulate the weathering process that leads to acid and base generation and reaction under laboratory controlled or site conditions. The kinetic tests allow an assessment of the acid forming characteristics and indicate the rate of acid generation, over what period it will occur, and what management controls may be required.

In KLC tests, water is added to a sample and the mixture allowed to leach products and by-products ofacid producing and consuming reactions. Samples of leachate are then collected and analysed. Intermittent water application is applied to simulate rainfall and heat lamps are used to simulate sunshine. These tests provide real-time information and may have to continue for months or years. Monitoring includes trends in pH, sulfate, acidity or alkalinity, and metals, for example. The pH of the collected leachate simulates the acid drainage process, acidity or alkalinity levels indicate the rate of acid production and acid neutralisation, and sulfate production can be related to the rate of sulfide oxidation. Metal concentration data provides an assessment of metal solubility and leaching behaviour.

Figure A1 shows the kinetic leach column set up used by RGS adapted from AMIRA, 2002. The columns are placed under heat lamps to allow the sample to dry between water additions to ensure adequate oxygen ingress into the sample material.

Approximately 2 kg of sample is accurately weighed and used in the leach columns depending on the physical nature of the material and particle size. Some materials can be used on an as-received basis (i.e. no crushing as with process residues and tailings materials), whereas others are crushed to nominal 5-10 mm particle size (as with overburden).

The sample in the column is initially leached with deionised water at a rate of about 400 ml/kg of sample and the initial leachate from the columns collected and analysed. Subsequent column leaching is carried out at a rate of about 400 ml/kg per month or quarterly, and again collected and analysed. The leaching rate can be varied to better simulate expected site conditions or satisfy test program data requirements.

The column must be exposed to drying conditions in between watering events. The residual water content and air void content in the column can be determined by comparing the wet and dry column weights. A heat lamp is generally used above the sample during daylight hours to maintain the leach column surface temperature at about 30oC.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A5

Figure A1

Kinetic Leach Column Setup

AMIRA (2002). ARD Test Handbook: Project 387A Prediction and Kinetic Control of Acid Mine Drainage. Australian Minerals Industry Research Association, Ian Wark Research Institute and Environmental Geochemistry International Pty Ltd, May 2002.

Heat Lamp

Leach Column

Leachate Collection Container

170 mm

100 mm

70 mm

110 mm

1000 ml

Benchtop

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 44: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A4

KINETIC LEACH COLUMN TESTS Kinetic leach column (KLC) tests can be used to provide information on the reaction kinetics of mine waste materials. The major objectives of kinetics tests are to:

Provide time-dependent data on the kinetics and rate of acid generation and acid neutralising reactions under laboratory controlled (or onsite conditions);

Investigate metal release and drainage/seepage quality; and Assess treatment options such as addition of alkaline materials.

The KLC tests simulate the weathering process that leads to acid and base generation and reaction under laboratory controlled or site conditions. The kinetic tests allow an assessment of the acid forming characteristics and indicate the rate of acid generation, over what period it will occur, and what management controls may be required.

In KLC tests, water is added to a sample and the mixture allowed to leach products and by-products ofacid producing and consuming reactions. Samples of leachate are then collected and analysed. Intermittent water application is applied to simulate rainfall and heat lamps are used to simulate sunshine. These tests provide real-time information and may have to continue for months or years. Monitoring includes trends in pH, sulfate, acidity or alkalinity, and metals, for example. The pH of the collected leachate simulates the acid drainage process, acidity or alkalinity levels indicate the rate of acid production and acid neutralisation, and sulfate production can be related to the rate of sulfide oxidation. Metal concentration data provides an assessment of metal solubility and leaching behaviour.

Figure A1 shows the kinetic leach column set up used by RGS adapted from AMIRA, 2002. The columns are placed under heat lamps to allow the sample to dry between water additions to ensure adequate oxygen ingress into the sample material.

Approximately 2 kg of sample is accurately weighed and used in the leach columns depending on the physical nature of the material and particle size. Some materials can be used on an as-received basis (i.e. no crushing as with process residues and tailings materials), whereas others are crushed to nominal 5-10 mm particle size (as with overburden).

The sample in the column is initially leached with deionised water at a rate of about 400 ml/kg of sample and the initial leachate from the columns collected and analysed. Subsequent column leaching is carried out at a rate of about 400 ml/kg per month or quarterly, and again collected and analysed. The leaching rate can be varied to better simulate expected site conditions or satisfy test program data requirements.

The column must be exposed to drying conditions in between watering events. The residual water content and air void content in the column can be determined by comparing the wet and dry column weights. A heat lamp is generally used above the sample during daylight hours to maintain the leach column surface temperature at about 30oC.

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page A5

Figure A1

Kinetic Leach Column Setup

AMIRA (2002). ARD Test Handbook: Project 387A Prediction and Kinetic Control of Acid Mine Drainage. Australian Minerals Industry Research Association, Ian Wark Research Institute and Environmental Geochemistry International Pty Ltd, May 2002.

Heat Lamp

Leach Column

Leachate Collection Container

170 mm

100 mm

70 mm

110 mm

1000 ml

Benchtop

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 45: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page B1

ATTACHMENT B

ALS Laboratory Data

(Certificates of Analysis)

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 46: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Fa

lse

2 2

.00

Tru

eE

nvir

onm

ental

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:E

B1416507

Pa

ge

:1

of 1

4

:A

me

nd

me

nt

1:

:L

ab

ora

tory

Clie

nt

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

eR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

7 3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

7 3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ctG

em

co P

roje

ct (

12

13

12

)Q

C L

eve

l:

NE

PM

20

13

S

che

du

le B

(3)

an

d A

LS

QC

S3

re

qu

ire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te S

am

ple

s R

ece

ive

d:

08

-JU

L-2

01

4

Sa

mp

ler

:H

. M

cCa

rth

yIs

sue

Da

te:

23

-FE

B-2

01

5

Site

:--

--

58

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s re

ceiv

ed

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:B

N/4

13

/12

58

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is

rep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is

refe

ren

ce.

Re

sults

a

pp

ly

to

the

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

All

pa

ge

s o

f th

is

rep

ort

h

ave

b

ee

n

ch

ecke

d

an

d

ap

pro

ve

d

for

rele

ase

.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tio

n:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ited

fo

r co

mp

lian

ce w

ith

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sB

risb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Sa

tish

kum

ar

Trive

di

Brisb

an

e A

cid

Su

lph

ate

So

ils2

IC

Aci

d S

ulfa

te S

oils

Su

pe

rvis

or

Envi

ronm

enta

l Div

isio

n B

risb

ane

AB

N 8

4 0

09

93

6 0

29 P

art

of

the

AL

S G

rou

p

A

n A

LS

Lim

ited

Co

mp

an

y

Ad

dre

ss 2

Byt

h S

tre

et

Sta

ffo

rd Q

LD

Au

stra

lia 4

05

3 | P

HO

NE

+

61-7

-3243 7

222 | F

acsim

ile

+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page B1

ATTACHMENT B

ALS Laboratory Data

(Certificates of Analysis)

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 47: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

ve

lop

ed

pro

ced

ure

s a

re e

mp

loye

d in

th

e a

bse

nce

of

do

cum

en

ted

sta

nd

ard

s o

r b

y c

lien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as

be

en

pe

rfo

rme

d,

resu

lts a

re r

ep

ort

ed

on

a d

ry w

eig

ht

ba

sis.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult d

iffe

rs f

rom

sta

nd

ard

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y t

he

clie

nt,

sa

mp

ling

da

tes

are

sh

ow

n w

itho

ut

a t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t.

In t

he

se in

sta

nce

s, t

he

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt

ha

s b

ee

n a

ssu

me

d b

y th

e la

bo

rato

ry f

or

pro

cess

ing

pu

rpo

ses.

Wh

ere

a r

esu

lt is

re

qu

ire

d t

o m

ee

t co

mp

lian

ce

lim

its t

he

ass

oci

ate

d u

nce

rta

inty

mu

st b

e c

on

sid

ere

d.

Re

fer

to t

he

AL

S C

on

tact

fo

r d

eta

ils.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l an

aly

te d

ete

ctio

ns

at

or

ab

ove

th

e le

vel o

f re

po

rtin

g

Ke

y : A

SS

: E

A0

13

(A

NC

) F

izz

Ra

tin

g:

0-

No

ne

; 1

- S

lig

ht;

2-

Mo

de

rate

; 3

- S

tro

ng

; 4

- V

ery

Str

on

g;

5-

Lim

e.

l

Th

is r

ep

ort

ha

s b

ee

n a

me

nd

ed

as

a r

es

ult

of

a r

eq

ue

st

to c

ha

ng

e s

am

ple

id

en

tifi

ca

tio

n n

um

be

rs (

IDs

) re

ce

ive

d b

y A

LS

fro

m R

GS

EN

V.

All

an

aly

sis

re

su

lts

are

as

pe

r th

e p

rev

iou

s r

ep

ort

.l

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 48: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 24m

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 21m

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 18m

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 15m

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 12m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

01

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

00

1-D

EC

-20

13

15

:00

01

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

00

1-D

EC

-20

13

15

:00

01

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

07

EB

14

16

50

7-0

06

EB

14

16

50

7-0

05

EB

14

16

50

7-0

04

EB

14

16

50

7-0

03

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.9

6.6

6.9

6.7

6.7

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.9

0.6

0.6

1.2

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-3

.9-3

.5-7

.8-7

.1-3

.6kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C9

01

30

85

10

21

10

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

4.5

4.4

8.4

7.7

4.8

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.5

0.4

0.8

0.8

0.5

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

30

.02

0.0

20

.04

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 49: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-M

B02

GW

02 3m

EL

-N-M

B03

GW

03 11.5

m

EL

-N-M

B03

GW

03 9m

EL

-N-M

B03

GW

03 6m

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 27m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

10

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

00

3-D

EC

-20

13

15

:00

03

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

00

3-D

EC

-20

13

15

:00

01

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

12

EB

14

16

50

7-0

11

EB

14

16

50

7-0

10

EB

14

16

50

7-0

09

EB

14

16

50

7-0

08

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.4

6.8

5.7

6.0

6.6

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

<0

.50

.61

.5kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-0

.9-2

.7<

0.5

-1.4

-2.5

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C3

55

03

83

65

04

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

1.5

3.3

<0

.52

.04

.0kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.2

0.3

<0

.10

.20

.4%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

2<

0.0

10

.02

0.0

5%

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 50: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

5 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-M

B04

GW

04 11m

EL

-N-M

B04

GW

04 9m

EL

-N-M

B04

GW

04 6m

EL

-N-M

B04

GW

04 3m

EL

-N-M

B02

GW

02 5m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

13

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

01

3-D

EC

-20

13

15

:00

13

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

01

3-D

EC

-20

13

15

:00

10

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

17

EB

14

16

50

7-0

16

EB

14

16

50

7-0

15

EB

14

16

50

7-0

14

EB

14

16

50

7-0

13

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

8.9

6.9

8.2

7.5

7.2

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-3

.7<

0.5

0.6

0.6

-1.0

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C3

52

40

65

36

32

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

4.3

0.5

<0

.5<

0.5

1.6

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.4

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.10

.2%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 51: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

6 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 21m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 18m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 15m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 12m

EL

-N-M

B04

GW

04 12m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

13

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

25

EB

14

16

50

7-0

24

EB

14

16

50

7-0

23

EB

14

16

50

7-0

22

EB

14

16

50

7-0

18

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.8

6.6

5.8

3.4

4.4

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

25

.12

6.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-3

.2-0

.6-3

.12

5.1

26

.0kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

44

27

63

27

40

11

20

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

3.8

1.2

3.7

<0

.50

.6kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.4

0.1

0.4

<0

.1<

0.1

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.8

20

.87

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 52: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

7 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 3m

EL

-S-M

B07

GW

07 6m

EL

-S-M

B07

GW

07 3m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 27m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 24m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

01

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

01

3-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

12

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

30

EB

14

16

50

7-0

29

EB

14

16

50

7-0

28

EB

14

16

50

7-0

27

EB

14

16

50

7-0

26

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.5

4.8

6.6

5.2

6.7

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.9

2.8

1.2

0.6

0.9

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-6

.72

.2-1

.5-1

.5<

0.5

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C9

93

16

16

23

51

24

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

7.6

0.5

2.7

2.1

1.3

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.8

<0

.10

.30

.20

.1%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.03

0.0

90

.04

0.0

20

.03

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 53: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

8 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 18m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 15m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 12m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 9m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 6m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

01

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

01

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

35

EB

14

16

50

7-0

34

EB

14

16

50

7-0

33

EB

14

16

50

7-0

32

EB

14

16

50

7-0

31

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.6

6.1

5.7

5.7

5.9

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.9

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l0

.6-0

.7<

0.5

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C9

35

45

87

05

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

<0

.51

.60

.6<

0.5

<0

.5kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

<0

.10

.2<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

30

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 54: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

9 o

f 1

4:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 33m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 30m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 27m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 24m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 21m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

01

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

01

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

40

EB

14

16

50

7-0

39

EB

14

16

50

7-0

38

EB

14

16

50

7-0

37

EB

14

16

50

7-0

36

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.3

6.1

6.4

6.5

6.6

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-1

.6<

0.5

-0.8

-2.5

-2.8

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C4

74

66

38

57

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

2.2

1.1

1.4

3.1

3.4

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.3

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 55: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

10

of

14

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B09

GW

09 9m

EL

-S-M

B09

GW

09 6m

EL

-S-M

B09

GW

09 3m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 39m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 36m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

22

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

2-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

22

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

01

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

45

EB

14

16

50

7-0

44

EB

14

16

50

7-0

43

EB

14

16

50

7-0

42

EB

14

16

50

7-0

41

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.9

7.5

6.4

6.3

5.4

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

9.5

17

.70

.90

.90

.6kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l3

.51

2.6

-2.7

<0

.5-1

.7kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C2

09

55

41

31

41

67

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

6.0

5.1

3.6

1.2

2.3

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.1

0.2

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.31

0.5

80

.03

0.0

30

.02

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 56: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

11

of

14

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B08

GW

08 9m

EL

-S-M

B08

GW

08 6m

EL

-S-M

B08

GW

08 3m

EL

-S-M

B09

GW

09 14.5

-15m

EL

-S-M

B09

GW

09 12m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

25

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

25

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

2-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

22

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

50

EB

14

16

50

7-0

49

EB

14

16

50

7-0

48

EB

14

16

50

7-0

47

EB

14

16

50

7-0

46

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.2

6.0

5.9

6.0

5.7

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.9

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-1

.0-0

.8<

0.5

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C7

93

73

72

93

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

1.6

1.4

1.2

<0

.5<

0.5

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.2

0.1

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.03

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 57: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

12

of

14

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B10

GW

10 6m

EL

-S-M

B10

GW

10 3m

EL

-S-M

B08

GW

08 16.6

m

EL

-S-M

B08

GW

08 15m

EL

-S-M

B08

GW

08 12m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

27

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

7-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

25

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

25

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

55

EB

14

16

50

7-0

54

EB

14

16

50

7-0

53

EB

14

16

50

7-0

52

EB

14

16

50

7-0

51

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.1

5.8

6.1

6.2

6.0

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

<0

.50

.60

.6kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l0

.60

.6-1

.8<

0.5

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C2

43

44

23

84

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

<0

.5<

0.5

1.8

0.8

<0

.5kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

<0

.1<

0.1

0.2

<0

.1<

0.1

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

2<

0.0

10

.02

0.0

2%

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 58: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

13

of

14

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 6-9

m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 4m

EL

-S-M

B10

GW

10 15m

EL

-S-M

B10

GW

10 12m

EL

-S-M

B10

GW

10 9m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

30

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

27

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

7-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

27

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

50

7-0

60

EB

14

16

50

7-0

59

EB

14

16

50

7-0

58

EB

14

16

50

7-0

57

EB

14

16

50

7-0

56

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.2

6.2

6.5

6.5

6.7

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l<

0.5

0.6

0.6

-1.2

-1.7

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C4

13

63

03

91

92

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

0.7

<0

.5<

0.5

1.8

2.3

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.10

.20

.2%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 59: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

14

of

14

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

50

7 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Ge

mco

Pro

ject

(1

21

31

2)

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 6m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 9m

EL

-N-M

B01

GW

01 3-6

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

----

----

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

1-D

EC

-20

13

15

:00

01

-DE

C-2

01

3 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

EB

14

16

50

7-0

63

EB

14

16

50

7-0

62

EB

14

16

50

7-0

61

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.0

6.8

5.8

----

----

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

1.2

0.6

<0

.5--

----

--kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l<

0.5

0.6

-2.7

----

----

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

18

39

38

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

1.4

<0

.52

.7--

----

--kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.1

<0

.10

.3--

----

--%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

0--

----

--F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.04

0.0

2<

0.0

1--

----

--%

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 60: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Fa

lse

4 4

.00

Tru

eE

nvir

onm

ental

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:E

B1416586

Pa

ge

:1

of 1

3

:A

me

nd

me

nt

1:

:L

ab

ora

tory

Clie

nt

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

eR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

7 3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

7 3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te S

am

ple

s R

ece

ive

d:

08

-JU

L-2

01

4

Sa

mp

ler

:C

ora

lee

Will

iam

sIs

sue

Da

te:

23

-FE

B-2

01

5

Site

:G

EM

CO

Min

e

54

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s re

ceiv

ed

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:B

N/4

13

/12

54

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is

rep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is

refe

ren

ce.

Re

sults

a

pp

ly

to

the

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

All

pa

ge

s o

f th

is

rep

ort

h

ave

b

ee

n

ch

ecke

d

an

d

ap

pro

ve

d

for

rele

ase

.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tio

n:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ited

fo

r co

mp

lian

ce w

ith

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w M

ath

eso

nB

risb

an

e A

cid

Su

lph

ate

So

ilsS

en

ior

Ch

em

ist

Kim

McC

ab

eB

risb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Sa

tish

kum

ar

Trive

di

Brisb

an

e A

cid

Su

lph

ate

So

ils2

IC

Aci

d S

ulfa

te S

oils

Su

pe

rvis

or

Envi

ronm

enta

l Div

isio

n B

risb

ane

AB

N 8

4 0

09

93

6 0

29 P

art

of

the

AL

S G

rou

p

A

n A

LS

Lim

ited

Co

mp

an

y

Ad

dre

ss 2

Byt

h S

tre

et

Sta

ffo

rd Q

LD

Au

stra

lia 4

05

3 | P

HO

NE

+

61-7

-3243 7

222 | F

acsim

ile

+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 61: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

ve

lop

ed

pro

ced

ure

s a

re e

mp

loye

d in

th

e a

bse

nce

of

do

cum

en

ted

sta

nd

ard

s o

r b

y c

lien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as

be

en

pe

rfo

rme

d,

resu

lts a

re r

ep

ort

ed

on

a d

ry w

eig

ht

ba

sis.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult d

iffe

rs f

rom

sta

nd

ard

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y t

he

clie

nt,

sa

mp

ling

da

tes

are

sh

ow

n w

itho

ut

a t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t.

In t

he

se in

sta

nce

s, t

he

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt

ha

s b

ee

n a

ssu

me

d b

y th

e la

bo

rato

ry f

or

pro

cess

ing

pu

rpo

ses.

Wh

ere

a r

esu

lt is

re

qu

ire

d t

o m

ee

t co

mp

lian

ce

lim

its t

he

ass

oci

ate

d u

nce

rta

inty

mu

st b

e c

on

sid

ere

d.

Re

fer

to t

he

AL

S C

on

tact

fo

r d

eta

ils.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l an

aly

te d

ete

ctio

ns

at

or

ab

ove

th

e le

vel o

f re

po

rtin

g

Ke

y : A

SS

: E

A0

13

(A

NC

) F

izz

Ra

tin

g:

0-

No

ne

; 1

- S

lig

ht;

2-

Mo

de

rate

; 3

- S

tro

ng

; 4

- V

ery

Str

on

g;

5-

Lim

e.

l

Th

is r

ep

ort

ha

s b

ee

n a

me

nd

ed

as

a r

es

ult

of

a r

eq

ue

st

to c

ha

ng

e s

am

ple

id

en

tifi

ca

tio

n n

um

be

rs (

IDs

) re

ce

ive

d b

y A

LS

fro

m R

GS

EN

V.

All

an

aly

sis

re

su

lts

are

as

pe

r th

e p

rev

iou

s r

ep

ort

.l

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 62: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

5 4.7

-5.0

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

4 2.9

-3.2

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

3 2.0

-2.4

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

2 0.7

5-1

.1m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

1 0.2

5-0

.75m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

05

EB

14

16

58

6-0

04

EB

14

16

58

6-0

03

EB

14

16

58

6-0

02

EB

14

16

58

6-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.0

6.3

6.1

6.0

6.3

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-1

.9-3

.4-1

.2-1

.7-1

.4kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

63

61

31

81

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

2.5

4.0

1.8

2.3

2.0

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.2

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 63: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

1 0.5

-1.0

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

9 7.8

7-8

.34m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

8 7.3

-7.6

5m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

7 6.7

5-7

.0m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

6 6.3

5-6

.65m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

10

EB

14

16

58

6-0

09

EB

14

16

58

6-0

08

EB

14

16

58

6-0

07

EB

14

16

58

6-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.1

5.9

5.9

6.1

5.9

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

<0

.5<

0.5

<0

.50

.6kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-2

.5-1

.4<

0.5

-1.5

-2.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C2

21

51

41

22

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

3.1

1.4

<0

.51

.53

.2kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.3

0.1

<0

.10

.20

.3%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

0.0

2%

0.0

1--

--

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 64: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

5 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

6 6.5

-7.0

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

5 5.0

-5.4

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

4 4.0

-4.4

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

3 3.0

-3.4

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

2 2.0

-2.4

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

15

EB

14

16

58

6-0

14

EB

14

16

58

6-0

13

EB

14

16

58

6-0

12

EB

14

16

58

6-0

11

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.1

6.0

5.8

6.0

6.0

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

<0

.5kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-2

.4-1

.2-0

.8-2

.2-4

.8kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

51

31

61

81

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

3.0

1.8

1.4

2.8

4.8

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.3

0.5

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.0

2<

0.0

1%

0.0

1--

--

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 65: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

6 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

3 3.0

-3.5

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

2 0.6

-1.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

1 0.0

-0.4

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

8 8.3

5-8

.75m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

7 8.0

-8.3

5m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

20

EB

14

16

58

6-0

19

EB

14

16

58

6-0

18

EB

14

16

58

6-0

17

EB

14

16

58

6-0

16

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.0

6.2

5.9

6.1

5.5

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

<0

.50

.60

.60

.6kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-4

.6-4

.0-2

.0-1

.4<

0.5

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C2

23

73

11

91

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

5.2

4.0

2.6

2.0

1.1

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

<0

.01

0.0

20

.02

0.0

2%

0.0

1--

--

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 66: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

7 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

8 9.5

-9.8

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

7 9.1

5-9

.45m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

6 8.4

-8.7

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

5 6.5

-7.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

4 5.6

-6.0

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

25

EB

14

16

58

6-0

24

EB

14

16

58

6-0

23

EB

14

16

58

6-0

22

EB

14

16

58

6-0

21

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.9

5.8

6.3

6.2

6.5

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

<0

.50

.6<

0.5

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-0

.6<

0.5

-0.8

-2.9

-2.0

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

11

01

31

71

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

1.2

0.6

0.8

3.5

2.0

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

0.4

0.2

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

2<

0.0

10

.02

<0

.01

%0

.01

----

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 67: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

8 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

5 5.6

-5.9

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

4 5.0

-5.4

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

3 3.0

6-3

.40m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

2 2.0

-2.4

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

1 0.6

-1.0

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

30

EB

14

16

58

6-0

29

EB

14

16

58

6-0

28

EB

14

16

58

6-0

27

EB

14

16

58

6-0

26

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.9

5.9

6.5

5.3

6.3

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l<

0.5

<0

.50

.6-0

.90

.6kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

21

51

42

21

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

0.9

0.9

<0

.51

.5<

0.5

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.10

.2<

0.1

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 68: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

9 o

f 1

3:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

10 13.1

-13.5

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

9 12.4

-13.0

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

8 11.0

-11.4

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

7 8.6

-9.0

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

6 7.0

-7.4

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

35

EB

14

16

58

6-0

34

EB

14

16

58

6-0

33

EB

14

16

58

6-0

32

EB

14

16

58

6-0

31

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.0

5.4

5.2

5.6

5.6

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

<0

.50

.60

.6kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l0

.6-1

.9-0

.9-0

.8-1

.2kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

22

41

71

51

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

<0

.52

.50

.91

.41

.8kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

<0

.10

.2<

0.1

0.1

0.2

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

2<

0.0

10

.02

0.0

2%

0.0

1--

--

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 69: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

10

of

13

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

14 21-2

1.5

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13a 20.4

-21m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13 20-2

0.3

7m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

12 17.6

-18.0

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

11 14.0

-14.4

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

40

EB

14

16

58

6-0

39

EB

14

16

58

6-0

38

EB

14

16

58

6-0

37

EB

14

16

58

6-0

36

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.6

6.2

5.0

5.6

5.2

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

<0

.50

.60

.6<

0.5

<0

.5kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-2

.0<

0.5

<0

.5-2

.0-1

.4kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C2

12

43

18

21

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

2.0

0.8

1.0

2.0

1.4

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.2

<0

.10

.10

.20

.1%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)<

0.0

10

.02

0.0

2<

0.0

1<

0.0

1%

0.0

1--

--

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 70: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

11

of

13

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

3 3.7

-3.9

m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

2 3.3

-3.7

m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

1 2.4

-3.0

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

16

22.6

5-2

2.8

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

15 21.9

-22.4

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

45

EB

14

16

58

6-0

44

EB

14

16

58

6-0

43

EB

14

16

58

6-0

42

EB

14

16

58

6-0

41

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.0

6.0

6.2

5.7

6.0

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

<0

.5<

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-1

.0-3

.4<

0.5

-1.8

-1.8

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C8

81

41

11

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

1.0

3.4

0.6

2.4

2.4

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

<0

.10

.3<

0.1

0.2

0.2

% C

aC

O3

0.1

----

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)<

0.0

1<

0.0

10

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 71: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

12

of

13

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

1 0-0

.27m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

7 5.9

-6.3

m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

6 5.1

5-5

.65m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

5 4.5

-4.8

5m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

4 3.9

-4.2

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

16

58

6-0

50

EB

14

16

58

6-0

49

EB

14

16

58

6-0

48

EB

14

16

58

6-0

47

EB

14

16

58

6-0

46

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.0

5.9

5.9

5.8

6.2

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

kg H

2S

O4

/t0

.5--

--

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l<

0.5

-1.3

<0

.5-0

.8-3

.5kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

11

01

21

03

S/c

m1

----

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

0.6

1.9

1.1

1.4

4.1

kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

<0

.10

.20

.10

.10

.4%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

0F

izz

Un

it0

----

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.02

0.0

20

.02

%0

.01

----

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

2.0

0kg

0.0

1--

--

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 72: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

13

of

13

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

16

58

6 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

5 3.5

-3.9

m

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

4 3.1

1-3

.5m

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

3 2.5

-3.0

m

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

2 0.5

-1.0

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

SO

IL (

Ma

trix

: S

OIL

)

----

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

[13

-JU

N-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

EB

14

16

58

6-0

54

EB

14

16

58

6-0

53

EB

14

16

58

6-0

52

EB

14

16

58

6-0

51

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

6.3

6.0

6.2

6.4

----

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

009:

Nett

Acid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tial

Ac

id P

rod

uc

tio

n P

ote

nti

al

(AP

P)

0.6

0.6

<0

.50

.6--

--kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

Ne

t A

cid

Pro

du

cti

on

Po

ten

tia

l-2

.0-1

.3<

0.5

-2.3

----

kg

H2

SO

4/t

0.5

----

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C8

13

68

----

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

013:

Acid

Neu

tralisin

g C

ap

acit

y

AN

C a

s H

2S

O4

2.6

1.9

<0

.52

.9--

--kg

H2

SO

4

eq

uiv

./t

0.5

----

AN

C a

s C

aC

O3

0.3

0.2

<0

.10

.3--

--%

Ca

CO

30

.1--

--

Fiz

z R

ati

ng

00

00

----

Fiz

z U

nit

0--

--

ED

042T

: T

ota

l S

ulf

ur

by L

EC

O

Su

lfu

r -

To

tal

as

S (

LE

CO

)0

.02

0.0

20

.01

0.0

2--

--%

0.0

1--

--

Sam

ple

Pre

para

tio

n M

eth

od

Am

ou

nt

2.0

02

.00

2.0

02

.00

----

kg0

.01

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 73: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Fa

lse

5 5

.00

Tru

eE

nvir

onm

ental

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:E

B1417699

Pa

ge

:1

of 1

8

:A

me

nd

me

nt

1:

:L

ab

ora

tory

Clie

nt

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

eR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

7 3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

7 3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2Q

C L

eve

l:

NE

PM

20

13

S

che

du

le B

(3)

an

d A

LS

QC

S3

re

qu

ire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te S

am

ple

s R

ece

ive

d:

22

-JU

L-2

01

4

Sa

mp

ler

:G

EM

CO

Issu

e D

ate

:2

3-F

EB

-20

15

Site

:--

--

22

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s re

ceiv

ed

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:B

NB

Q/2

18

/14

22

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is

rep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is

refe

ren

ce.

Re

sults

a

pp

ly

to

the

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

All

pa

ge

s o

f th

is

rep

ort

h

ave

b

ee

n

ch

ecke

d

an

d

ap

pro

ve

d

for

rele

ase

.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tio

n:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ited

fo

r co

mp

lian

ce w

ith

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

Gre

g V

og

el

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

sL

ab

ora

tory

Ma

na

ge

r

Ha

mis

h M

urr

ay

Ne

wca

stle

- I

no

rga

nic

sS

up

erv

iso

r -

So

ils

Sa

tish

kum

ar

Trive

di

Brisb

an

e A

cid

Su

lph

ate

So

ils2

IC

Aci

d S

ulfa

te S

oils

Su

pe

rvis

or

Envi

ronm

enta

l Div

isio

n B

risb

ane

AB

N 8

4 0

09

93

6 0

29 P

art

of

the

AL

S G

rou

p

A

n A

LS

Lim

ited

Co

mp

an

y

Ad

dre

ss 2

Byt

h S

tre

et

Sta

ffo

rd Q

LD

Au

stra

lia 4

05

3 | P

HO

NE

+

61-7

-3243 7

222 | F

acsim

ile

+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 74: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

ve

lop

ed

pro

ced

ure

s a

re e

mp

loye

d in

th

e a

bse

nce

of

do

cum

en

ted

sta

nd

ard

s o

r b

y c

lien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as

be

en

pe

rfo

rme

d,

resu

lts a

re r

ep

ort

ed

on

a d

ry w

eig

ht

ba

sis.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult d

iffe

rs f

rom

sta

nd

ard

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y t

he

clie

nt,

sa

mp

ling

da

tes

are

sh

ow

n w

itho

ut

a t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t.

In t

he

se in

sta

nce

s, t

he

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt

ha

s b

ee

n a

ssu

me

d b

y th

e la

bo

rato

ry f

or

pro

cess

ing

pu

rpo

ses.

Wh

ere

a r

esu

lt is

re

qu

ire

d t

o m

ee

t co

mp

lian

ce

lim

its t

he

ass

oci

ate

d u

nce

rta

inty

mu

st b

e c

on

sid

ere

d.

Re

fer

to t

he

AL

S C

on

tact

fo

r d

eta

ils.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l an

aly

te d

ete

ctio

ns

at

or

ab

ove

th

e le

vel o

f re

po

rtin

g

Ke

y : E

A0

58

Em

ers

on

: V

. =

Ve

ry,

D.

= D

ark

, L

. =

Lig

ht,

VD

. =

Ve

ry D

ark

l

EA

15

0H

: S

oil

Pa

rtic

le D

en

sit

y r

eq

uir

ed

fo

r H

yd

rom

ete

r a

na

lys

is a

cc

ord

ing

to

AS

12

89

.3.5

.1 2

00

6 w

as

no

t re

qu

es

ted

by

th

e c

lie

nt.

Ty

pic

al

se

dim

en

t S

PD

va

lue

s u

se

d f

or

ca

lcu

lati

on

s a

nd

co

ns

eq

ue

ntl

y N

AT

A e

nd

ors

em

en

t d

oe

s n

ot

ap

ply

to

hy

dro

me

ter

res

ult

s.

l

ED

00

7 a

nd

ED

00

8:

Wh

en

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le A

l is

re

po

rte

d f

rom

th

es

e m

eth

od

s,

it s

ho

uld

be

no

ted

th

at

Ra

ym

en

t &

Ly

on

s (

20

11

) s

ug

ge

sts

Ex

ch

an

ge

Ac

idit

y b

y 1

M K

Cl

(Me

tho

d 1

5G

1)

is a

mo

re

su

ita

ble

me

tho

d f

or

the

de

term

ina

tio

n o

f e

xc

ha

ng

e a

cid

ity

(H

+ +

Al3

+).

l

Th

is r

ep

ort

ha

s b

ee

n a

me

nd

ed

as

a r

es

ult

of

a r

eq

ue

st

to c

ha

ng

e s

am

ple

id

en

tifi

ca

tio

n n

um

be

rs (

IDs

) re

ce

ive

d b

y A

LS

fro

m R

GS

EN

V.

All

an

aly

sis

re

su

lts

are

as

pe

r th

e p

rev

iou

s r

ep

ort

.l

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 75: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

6 6.5

-7.0

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

5 5.0

-5.4

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

2 2.0

-2.4

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

5 4.7

-5.0

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

2 0.7

5-1

.1m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

05

EB

14

17

69

9-0

04

EB

14

17

69

9-0

03

EB

14

17

69

9-0

02

EB

14

17

69

9-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.9

6.0

5.7

5.6

5.8

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

91

91

31

71

S/c

m1

----

ED

008:

Exch

an

geab

le C

ati

on

s

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le C

alc

ium

0.4

1.1

0.6

0.2

----

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le M

ag

ne

siu

m1

.41

.31

.30

.6--

--m

eq

/10

0g

0.1

----

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le P

ota

ss

ium

0.2

0.1

0.1

<0

.1--

--m

eq

/10

0g

0.1

----

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

----

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ca

tio

n E

xc

ha

ng

e C

ap

ac

ity

2.1

2.6

2.0

0.9

----

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

Pe

rce

nt

1.9

1.0

1.2

3.5

----

%0

.1--

--

ED

037:

Alk

alin

ity

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

26

43

34

26

34

mg

/kg

1--

--

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

26

43

34

26

34

mg

/kg

17

1-5

2-3

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/k

g1

38

12

-32

-6

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

Ac

idit

y2

41

62

43

23

9m

g/k

g1

----

ED

040S

: S

olu

ble

Su

lfate

by IC

PA

ES

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

2-

<1

0<

10

<1

01

0<

10

mg

/kg

10

14

80

8-7

9-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e D

iscre

te a

naly

ser

Ch

lori

de

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

01

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093S

: S

olu

ble

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

Ca

lciu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

07

43

9-9

5-4

So

diu

m1

01

0<

10

10

10

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-23

-5

Po

tas

siu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-09

-7

ED

093T

: T

ota

l M

ajo

r C

ati

on

s

So

diu

m1

30

<5

0<

50

20

00

15

00

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-23

-5

Po

tas

siu

m1

49

03

20

16

50

48

40

87

00

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-09

-7

Ca

lciu

m1

40

30

01

80

86

08

20

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

32

03

70

36

05

00

24

20

mg

/kg

50

74

39

-95

-4

EG

005S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PA

ES

Bo

ron

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

2-8

Iro

n<

1<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/k

g1

74

39

-89

-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 76: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

6 6.5

-7.0

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

5 5.0

-5.4

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

2 2.0

-2.4

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

5 4.7

-5.0

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

2 0.7

5-1

.1m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

05

EB

14

17

69

9-0

04

EB

14

17

69

9-0

03

EB

14

17

69

9-0

02

EB

14

17

69

9-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EG

005T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-A

ES

Alu

min

ium

18

70

01

66

00

20

90

09

88

01

58

00

mg

/kg

50

74

29

-90

-5

An

tim

on

y<

5<

5<

5<

5<

5m

g/k

g5

74

40

-36

-0

Ars

en

ic3

1<

58

66

mg

/kg

57

44

0-3

8-2

Bo

ron

<5

0<

50

<5

0<

50

<5

0m

g/k

g5

07

44

0-4

2-8

Ca

dm

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

3-9

Ch

rom

ium

95

12

18

01

56

mg

/kg

27

44

0-4

7-3

Co

ba

lt2

77

91

19

75

48

mg

/kg

27

44

0-4

8-4

Co

pp

er

32

51

33

13

05

0m

g/k

g5

74

40

-50

-8

Iro

n1

38

00

01

02

00

01

00

00

01

35

00

03

68

00

mg

/kg

50

74

39

-89

-6

Le

ad

13

58

45

21

05

56

mg

/kg

57

43

9-9

2-1

Ma

ng

an

es

e3

08

00

29

10

05

81

00

34

40

00

20

80

00

mg

/kg

57

43

9-9

6-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

2<

22

<2

<2

mg

/kg

27

43

9-9

8-7

Nic

ke

l1

61

01

80

13

91

26

mg

/kg

27

44

0-0

2-0

Se

len

ium

<5

<5

<5

19

7m

g/k

g5

77

82

-49

-2

Sil

ve

r<

2<

2<

23

2m

g/k

g2

74

40

-22

-4

Va

na

diu

m3

46

26

12

69

20

81

23

mg

/kg

57

44

0-6

2-2

Zin

c2

0<

52

31

90

17

0m

g/k

g5

74

40

-66

-6

EG

020S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PM

S

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-38

-2

Se

len

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1m

g/k

g0

.17

78

2-4

9-2

Sil

ve

r<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-22

-4

Ba

riu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-39

-3

Be

ryll

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

1-7

Ca

dm

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

3-9

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-48

-4

Ch

rom

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

0.0

2m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-47

-3

Th

ori

um

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-2

9-1

Co

pp

er

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-5

0-8

Ma

ng

an

es

e0

.03

0.0

20

.01

<0

.01

0.0

5m

g/k

g0

.01

74

39

-96

-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

39

-98

-7

Nic

ke

l<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-02

-0

Le

ad

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

43

9-9

2-1

An

tim

on

y<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-36

-0

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 77: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

5 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

6 6.5

-7.0

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

5 5.0

-5.4

m

EL

-S-G

C05

GC

05-S

2 2.0

-2.4

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

5 4.7

-5.0

m

EL

-S-G

C06

GC

06-S

2 0.7

5-1

.1m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

05

EB

14

17

69

9-0

04

EB

14

17

69

9-0

03

EB

14

17

69

9-0

02

EB

14

17

69

9-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EG

020S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PM

S -

Co

nti

nu

ed

Ura

niu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-61

-1

Zin

c<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5m

g/k

g0

.05

74

40

-66

-6

Va

na

diu

m<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

mg

/kg

0.1

74

40

-62

-2

Alu

min

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1m

g/k

g0

.17

42

9-9

0-5

EG

020T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

Th

ori

um

7.5

9.3

5.7

4.3

5.3

mg

/kg

0.1

74

40

-29

-1

Ura

niu

m1

.52

.72

.61

.20

.7m

g/k

g0

.17

44

0-6

1-1

EG

035S

: S

olu

ble

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

Me

rcu

ry<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5m

g/k

g0

.00

05

74

39

-97

-6

EK

040S

: F

luo

rid

e S

olu

ble

Flu

ori

de

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

11

69

84

-48

-8

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 78: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

6 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

7 8.6

-9.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

8 9.5

-9.8

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

6 8.4

-8.7

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

4 5.6

-6.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

2 0.6

-1.0

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

10

EB

14

17

69

9-0

09

EB

14

17

69

9-0

08

EB

14

17

69

9-0

07

EB

14

17

69

9-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

150:

Part

icle

Siz

ing

+7

m--

----

--1

92

72

0%

1--

--

+1

50

µm

----

----

71

81

9%

1--

--

+3

00

µm

----

----

71

61

9%

1--

--

+4

25

µm

----

----

71

61

8%

1--

--

+6

00

µm

----

----

61

51

8%

1--

--

+1

18

m--

----

--5

12

16

%1

----

+2

.36

mm

----

----

38

10

%1

----

+4

.75

mm

----

----

<1

22

%1

----

+9

.5m

m--

----

--<

1<

1<

1%

1--

--

+1

9.0

mm

----

----

<1

<1

<1

%1

----

+3

7.5

mm

----

----

<1

<1

<1

%1

----

+7

5.0

mm

----

----

<1

<1

<1

%1

----

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.6

5.8

6.0

6.2

5.6

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

12

08

17

12

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

058:

Em

ers

on

Ag

gre

gate

Test

Co

lor

(Mu

ns

ell

)--

----

--R

ed

dis

h B

row

nL

. Y

ell

ow

ish

Bro

wn

Lig

ht

Bro

wn

--

----

Te

xtu

re--

----

--S

ilty

Cla

yS

ilty

Cla

yR

oc

k-

---

--

Em

ers

on

Cla

ss

Nu

mb

er

----

----

44

8-

-E

C/T

C

EA

150:

So

il C

lassif

icati

on

based

on

Part

icle

Siz

e

Cla

y (

<2

µm

)--

----

--4

54

32

7%

1--

--

Sil

t (2

-60

µm

)--

----

--3

22

95

1%

1--

--

Sa

nd

(0

.06

-2.0

0 m

m)

----

----

20

20

12

%1

----

Gra

ve

l (>

2m

m)

----

----

38

10

%1

----

Co

bb

les

(>

6c

m)

----

----

<1

<1

<1

%1

----

ED

008:

Exch

an

geab

le C

ati

on

s

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le C

alc

ium

<0

.10

.22

.31

.6<

0.1

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le M

ag

ne

siu

m0

.61

.21

1.9

8.5

0.2

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le P

ota

ss

ium

<0

.10

.10

.70

.6<

0.1

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

0.2

0.2

<0

.1m

eq

/10

0g

0.1

----

Ca

tio

n E

xc

ha

ng

e C

ap

ac

ity

0.7

1.6

15

.21

0.9

0.3

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

Pe

rce

nt

<0

.12

.21

.41

.63

.5%

0.1

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 79: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

7 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

7 8.6

-9.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

8 9.5

-9.8

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

6 8.4

-8.7

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

4 5.6

-6.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

2 0.6

-1.0

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

10

EB

14

17

69

9-0

09

EB

14

17

69

9-0

08

EB

14

17

69

9-0

07

EB

14

17

69

9-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

ED

037:

Alk

alin

ity

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

26

34

34

68

26

mg

/kg

1--

--

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

26

34

34

68

26

mg

/kg

17

1-5

2-3

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/k

g1

38

12

-32

-6

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

Ac

idit

y2

42

47

16

32

4m

g/k

g1

----

ED

040S

: S

olu

ble

Su

lfate

by IC

PA

ES

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

2-

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

01

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e D

iscre

te a

naly

ser

Ch

lori

de

10

<1

0<

10

<1

01

0m

g/k

g1

01

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093S

: S

olu

ble

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

Ca

lciu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

07

43

9-9

5-4

So

diu

m<

10

20

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

07

44

0-2

3-5

Po

tas

siu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-09

-7

ED

093T

: T

ota

l M

ajo

r C

ati

on

s

So

diu

m<

50

90

11

02

10

<5

0m

g/k

g5

07

44

0-2

3-5

Po

tas

siu

m6

10

61

01

86

03

20

02

00

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-09

-7

Ca

lciu

m<

50

10

05

50

50

0<

50

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

11

03

20

26

10

21

50

<5

0m

g/k

g5

07

43

9-9

5-4

EG

005S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PA

ES

Bo

ron

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

2-8

Iro

n<

1<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/k

g1

74

39

-89

-6

EG

005T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-A

ES

Alu

min

ium

49

50

22

80

08

50

01

01

00

48

20

mg

/kg

50

74

29

-90

-5

An

tim

on

y<

5<

5<

5<

5<

5m

g/k

g5

74

40

-36

-0

Ars

en

ic1

16

<5

7<

5m

g/k

g5

74

40

-38

-2

Bo

ron

<5

0<

50

<5

0<

50

<5

0m

g/k

g5

07

44

0-4

2-8

Ca

dm

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

3-9

Ch

rom

ium

61

16

31

35

26

mg

/kg

27

44

0-4

7-3

Co

ba

lt9

21

11

12

37

<2

mg

/kg

27

44

0-4

8-4

Co

pp

er

36

40

18

53

<5

mg

/kg

57

44

0-5

0-8

Iro

n2

03

00

12

60

00

56

50

05

64

00

23

30

0m

g/k

g5

07

43

9-8

9-6

Le

ad

<5

56

13

42

<5

mg

/kg

57

43

9-9

2-1

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 80: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

8 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

7 8.6

-9.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

8 9.5

-9.8

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

6 8.4

-8.7

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

4 5.6

-6.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

2 0.6

-1.0

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

10

EB

14

17

69

9-0

09

EB

14

17

69

9-0

08

EB

14

17

69

9-0

07

EB

14

17

69

9-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EG

005T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-A

ES

- C

on

tin

ue

d

Ma

ng

an

es

e2

17

00

36

10

01

10

00

51

20

04

00

mg

/kg

57

43

9-9

6-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m8

4<

2<

2<

2m

g/k

g2

74

39

-98

-7

Nic

ke

l5

58

13

20

<2

mg

/kg

27

44

0-0

2-0

Se

len

ium

<5

<5

<5

<5

<5

mg

/kg

57

78

2-4

9-2

Sil

ve

r<

2<

2<

2<

2<

2m

g/k

g2

74

40

-22

-4

Va

na

diu

m1

26

30

42

22

14

74

5m

g/k

g5

74

40

-62

-2

Zin

c3

41

24

05

9<

5m

g/k

g5

74

40

-66

-6

EG

020S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PM

S

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-38

-2

Se

len

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1m

g/k

g0

.17

78

2-4

9-2

Sil

ve

r<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-22

-4

Ba

riu

m0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-3

9-3

Be

ryll

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

1-7

Ca

dm

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

3-9

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-48

-4

Ch

rom

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

7-3

Th

ori

um

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-2

9-1

Co

pp

er

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-5

0-8

Ma

ng

an

es

e0

.04

0.0

4<

0.0

10

.02

0.0

4m

g/k

g0

.01

74

39

-96

-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

39

-98

-7

Nic

ke

l<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-02

-0

Le

ad

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

43

9-9

2-1

An

tim

on

y<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-36

-0

Ura

niu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-61

-1

Zin

c<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5m

g/k

g0

.05

74

40

-66

-6

Va

na

diu

m<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

mg

/kg

0.1

74

40

-62

-2

Alu

min

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1m

g/k

g0

.17

42

9-9

0-5

EG

020T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

Th

ori

um

1.2

7.4

6.1

4.5

1.3

mg

/kg

0.1

74

40

-29

-1

Ura

niu

m1

.03

.60

.20

.60

.1m

g/k

g0

.17

44

0-6

1-1

EG

035S

: S

olu

ble

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

Me

rcu

ry<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5m

g/k

g0

.00

05

74

39

-97

-6

EK

040S

: F

luo

rid

e S

olu

ble

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 81: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

9 o

f 1

8:

Pa

ge

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

7 8.6

-9.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

8 9.5

-9.8

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

6 8.4

-8.7

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

4 5.6

-6.0

m

EL

-S-G

C04

GC

04-S

2 0.6

-1.0

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

10

EB

14

17

69

9-0

09

EB

14

17

69

9-0

08

EB

14

17

69

9-0

07

EB

14

17

69

9-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EK

040S

: F

luo

rid

e S

olu

ble

- C

on

tin

ue

d

Flu

ori

de

<1

<1

<1

2<

1m

g/k

g1

16

98

4-4

8-8

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 82: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

10

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

16

22.6

5-2

2.8

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

14 21-2

1.5

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13a 20.4

-21m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13 20-2

0.3

7m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

10 13.1

-13.5

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

15

EB

14

17

69

9-0

14

EB

14

17

69

9-0

13

EB

14

17

69

9-0

12

EB

14

17

69

9-0

11

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

150:

Part

icle

Siz

ing

+7

m--

----

----

--3

26

1%

1--

--

+1

50

µm

----

----

----

21

58

%1

----

+3

00

µm

----

----

----

18

58

%1

----

+4

25

µm

----

----

----

15

57

%1

----

+6

00

µm

----

----

----

14

55

%1

----

+1

18

m--

----

----

--1

14

9%

1--

--

+2

.36

mm

----

----

----

83

6%

1--

--

+4

.75

mm

----

----

----

18

%1

----

+9

.5m

m--

----

----

--<

1<

1%

1--

--

+1

9.0

mm

----

----

----

<1

<1

%1

----

+3

7.5

mm

----

----

----

<1

<1

%1

----

+7

5.0

mm

----

----

----

<1

<1

%1

----

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

4.9

5.5

5.0

5.0

5.8

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C3

41

71

12

48

µS

/cm

1--

--

EA

058:

Em

ers

on

Ag

gre

gate

Test

Co

lor

(Mu

ns

ell

)--

----

----

--V

ery

Da

rk G

rey

Gre

y-

---

--

Te

xtu

re--

----

----

--S

ilty

Cla

yR

oc

k-

---

--

Em

ers

on

Cla

ss

Nu

mb

er

----

----

----

48

--

EC

/TC

EA

150:

So

il C

lassif

icati

on

based

on

Part

icle

Siz

e

Cla

y (

<2

µm

)--

----

----

--1

89

%1

----

Sil

t (2

-60

µm

)--

----

----

--4

83

0%

1--

--

Sa

nd

(0

.06

-2.0

0 m

m)

----

----

----

26

25

%1

----

Gra

ve

l (>

2m

m)

----

----

----

83

6%

1--

--

Co

bb

les

(>

6c

m)

----

----

----

<1

<1

%1

----

ED

008:

Exch

an

geab

le C

ati

on

s

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le C

alc

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

----

<0

.1<

0.1

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le M

ag

ne

siu

m<

0.1

<0

.1--

--<

0.1

0.1

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le P

ota

ss

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

----

<0

.1<

0.1

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

----

<0

.1<

0.1

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ca

tio

n E

xc

ha

ng

e C

ap

ac

ity

<0

.10

.2--

--0

.20

.2m

eq

/10

0g

0.1

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 83: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

11

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

16

22.6

5-2

2.8

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

14 21-2

1.5

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13a 20.4

-21m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13 20-2

0.3

7m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

10 13.1

-13.5

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

15

EB

14

17

69

9-0

14

EB

14

17

69

9-0

13

EB

14

17

69

9-0

12

EB

14

17

69

9-0

11

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

ED

008:

Exch

an

geab

le C

ati

on

s -

Co

nti

nu

ed

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

Pe

rce

nt

<0

.1<

0.1

----

<0

.1<

0.1

%0

.1--

--

ED

037:

Alk

alin

ity

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

17

34

17

17

26

mg

/kg

1--

--

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

17

34

17

17

26

mg

/kg

17

1-5

2-3

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/k

g1

38

12

-32

-6

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

Ac

idit

y3

22

43

22

43

2m

g/k

g1

----

ED

040S

: S

olu

ble

Su

lfate

by IC

PA

ES

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

2-

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

01

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e D

iscre

te a

naly

ser

Ch

lori

de

40

20

10

30

<1

0m

g/k

g1

01

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093S

: S

olu

ble

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

Ca

lciu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

07

43

9-9

5-4

So

diu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0<

10

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-23

-5

Po

tas

siu

m2

0<

10

<1

0<

10

<1

0m

g/k

g1

07

44

0-0

9-7

ED

093T

: T

ota

l M

ajo

r C

ati

on

s

So

diu

m<

50

<5

0<

50

<5

0<

50

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-23

-5

Po

tas

siu

m1

40

24

50

88

90

19

02

10

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-09

-7

Ca

lciu

m<

50

<5

09

00

<5

0<

50

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

<5

0<

50

30

06

0<

50

mg

/kg

50

74

39

-95

-4

EG

005S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PA

ES

Bo

ron

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

2-8

Iro

n<

1<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/k

g1

74

39

-89

-6

EG

005T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-A

ES

Alu

min

ium

44

30

37

30

69

30

29

80

23

20

mg

/kg

50

74

29

-90

-5

An

tim

on

y<

5<

5<

5<

5<

5m

g/k

g5

74

40

-36

-0

Ars

en

ic<

51

25

95

<5

mg

/kg

57

44

0-3

8-2

Bo

ron

<5

0<

50

<5

0<

50

<5

0m

g/k

g5

07

44

0-4

2-8

Ca

dm

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

3-9

Ch

rom

ium

26

74

11

11

mg

/kg

27

44

0-4

7-3

Co

ba

lt3

74

14

23

<2

mg

/kg

27

44

0-4

8-4

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 84: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

12

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

16

22.6

5-2

2.8

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

14 21-2

1.5

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13a 20.4

-21m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13 20-2

0.3

7m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

10 13.1

-13.5

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

15

EB

14

17

69

9-0

14

EB

14

17

69

9-0

13

EB

14

17

69

9-0

12

EB

14

17

69

9-0

11

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EG

005T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-A

ES

- C

on

tin

ue

d

Co

pp

er

33

28

17

21

3<

5m

g/k

g5

74

40

-50

-8

Iro

n1

17

00

01

23

00

18

40

03

54

00

60

10

mg

/kg

50

74

39

-89

-6

Le

ad

52

<5

23

31

36

mg

/kg

57

43

9-9

2-1

Ma

ng

an

es

e2

07

04

43

00

56

90

00

30

90

03

99

0m

g/k

g5

74

39

-96

-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

24

<2

<2

2m

g/k

g2

74

39

-98

-7

Nic

ke

l4

14

83

12

<2

mg

/kg

27

44

0-0

2-0

Se

len

ium

<5

<5

47

<5

<5

mg

/kg

57

78

2-4

9-2

Sil

ve

r<

2<

27

<2

<2

mg

/kg

27

44

0-2

2-4

Va

na

diu

m1

60

97

28

41

78

10

8m

g/k

g5

74

40

-62

-2

Zin

c2

94

51

80

11

<5

mg

/kg

57

44

0-6

6-6

EG

020S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PM

S

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-38

-2

Se

len

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1m

g/k

g0

.17

78

2-4

9-2

Sil

ve

r<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-22

-4

Ba

riu

m0

.03

<0

.01

<0

.01

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-39

-3

Be

ryll

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

1-7

Ca

dm

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

3-9

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-48

-4

Ch

rom

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

7-3

Th

ori

um

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-2

9-1

Co

pp

er

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-5

0-8

Ma

ng

an

es

e1

.27

0.0

70

.07

0.4

7<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

39

-96

-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

39

-98

-7

Nic

ke

l0

.02

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-0

2-0

Le

ad

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/kg

0.0

17

43

9-9

2-1

An

tim

on

y<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-36

-0

Ura

niu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-61

-1

Zin

c<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5m

g/k

g0

.05

74

40

-66

-6

Va

na

diu

m<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

mg

/kg

0.1

74

40

-62

-2

Alu

min

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1m

g/k

g0

.17

42

9-9

0-5

EG

020T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

Th

ori

um

4.2

1.8

2.1

5.1

1.6

mg

/kg

0.1

74

40

-29

-1

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 85: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

13

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

16

22.6

5-2

2.8

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

14 21-2

1.5

m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13a 20.4

-21m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13 20-2

0.3

7m

EL

-N-G

C03

GC

03-S

10 13.1

-13.5

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

15

EB

14

17

69

9-0

14

EB

14

17

69

9-0

13

EB

14

17

69

9-0

12

EB

14

17

69

9-0

11

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EG

020T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S -

Co

nti

nu

ed

Ura

niu

m2

.10

.41

.80

.60

.2m

g/k

g0

.17

44

0-6

1-1

EG

035S

: S

olu

ble

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

Me

rcu

ry<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5m

g/k

g0

.00

05

74

39

-97

-6

EK

040S

: F

luo

rid

e S

olu

ble

Flu

ori

de

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/kg

11

69

84

-48

-8

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 86: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

14

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 21m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 18m

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

1 0-0

.27m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

5 4.5

-4.8

5m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

2 3.3

-3.7

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

20

EB

14

17

69

9-0

19

EB

14

17

69

9-0

18

EB

14

17

69

9-0

17

EB

14

17

69

9-0

16

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

150:

Part

icle

Siz

ing

+7

m6

5--

----

----

----

--%

1--

--

+1

50

µm

52

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+3

00

µm

33

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+4

25

µm

26

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+6

00

µm

21

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+1

18

m1

8--

----

----

----

--%

1--

--

+2

.36

mm

11

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+4

.75

mm

<1

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+9

.5m

m<

1--

----

----

----

--%

1--

--

+1

9.0

mm

<1

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+3

7.5

mm

<1

----

----

----

----

%1

----

+7

5.0

mm

<1

----

----

----

----

%1

----

EA

002 :

pH

(S

oils)

pH

Va

lue

5.6

5.5

5.8

----

----

pH

Un

it0

.1--

--

EA

010:

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C1

21

33

6--

----

--µ

S/c

m1

----

EA

026 :

Ch

rom

ium

Red

ucib

le S

ulf

ur

Ch

rom

ium

Re

du

cib

le S

ulp

hu

r--

----

----

--0

.31

90

.62

8%

0.0

05

----

EA

058:

Em

ers

on

Ag

gre

gate

Test

Co

lor

(Mu

ns

ell

)B

row

n--

----

----

----

---

---

--

Te

xtu

reS

an

dy

Gra

ve

l--

----

----

----

---

---

--

Em

ers

on

Cla

ss

Nu

mb

er

8--

----

----

----

---

-E

C/T

C

EA

150:

So

il C

lassif

icati

on

based

on

Part

icle

Siz

e

Cla

y (

<2

µm

)2

6--

----

----

----

--%

1--

--

Sil

t (2

-60

µm

)8

----

----

----

----

%1

----

Sa

nd

(0

.06

-2.0

0 m

m)

55

----

----

----

----

%1

----

Gra

ve

l (>

2m

m)

11

----

----

----

----

%1

----

Co

bb

les

(>

6c

m)

<1

----

----

----

----

%1

----

ED

008:

Exch

an

geab

le C

ati

on

s

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le C

alc

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

1.0

----

----

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le M

ag

ne

siu

m0

.60

.30

.5--

----

--m

eq

/10

0g

0.1

----

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le P

ota

ss

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

0.1

----

----

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1--

----

--m

eq

/10

0g

0.1

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 87: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

15

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 21m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 18m

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

1 0-0

.27m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

5 4.5

-4.8

5m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

2 3.3

-3.7

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

20

EB

14

17

69

9-0

19

EB

14

17

69

9-0

18

EB

14

17

69

9-0

17

EB

14

17

69

9-0

16

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

ED

008:

Exch

an

geab

le C

ati

on

s -

Co

nti

nu

ed

Ca

tio

n E

xc

ha

ng

e C

ap

ac

ity

0.7

0.4

1.6

----

----

me

q/1

00

g0

.1--

--

Ex

ch

an

ge

ab

le S

od

ium

Pe

rce

nt

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1--

----

--%

0.1

----

ED

037:

Alk

alin

ity

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

26

34

43

----

----

mg

/kg

1--

--

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

26

34

43

----

----

mg

/kg

17

1-5

2-3

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1--

----

--m

g/k

g1

38

12

-32

-6

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

Ac

idit

y2

42

43

2--

----

--m

g/k

g1

----

ED

040S

: S

olu

ble

Su

lfate

by IC

PA

ES

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

2-

<1

0<

10

<1

0--

----

--m

g/k

g1

01

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e D

iscre

te a

naly

ser

Ch

lori

de

<1

0<

10

<1

0--

----

--m

g/k

g1

01

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093S

: S

olu

ble

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

Ca

lciu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

----

----

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

<1

0<

10

<1

0--

----

--m

g/k

g1

07

43

9-9

5-4

So

diu

m<

10

<1

0<

10

----

----

mg

/kg

10

74

40

-23

-5

Po

tas

siu

m<

10

<1

01

0--

----

--m

g/k

g1

07

44

0-0

9-7

ED

093T

: T

ota

l M

ajo

r C

ati

on

s

So

diu

m<

50

31

02

10

----

----

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-23

-5

Po

tas

siu

m1

60

11

20

04

93

0--

----

--m

g/k

g5

07

44

0-0

9-7

Ca

lciu

m<

50

22

05

00

----

----

mg

/kg

50

74

40

-70

-2

Ma

gn

es

ium

10

01

40

21

0--

----

--m

g/k

g5

07

43

9-9

5-4

EG

005S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PA

ES

Bo

ron

<1

<1

<1

----

----

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

2-8

Iro

n<

1<

1<

1--

----

--m

g/k

g1

74

39

-89

-6

EG

005T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-A

ES

Alu

min

ium

64

40

15

90

01

72

00

----

----

mg

/kg

50

74

29

-90

-5

An

tim

on

y<

5<

5<

5--

----

--m

g/k

g5

74

40

-36

-0

Ars

en

ic1

12

01

1--

----

--m

g/k

g5

74

40

-38

-2

Bo

ron

<5

0<

50

<5

0--

----

--m

g/k

g5

07

44

0-4

2-8

Ca

dm

ium

<1

<1

<1

----

----

mg

/kg

17

44

0-4

3-9

Ch

rom

ium

45

68

45

----

----

mg

/kg

27

44

0-4

7-3

Co

ba

lt<

21

01

10

7--

----

--m

g/k

g2

74

40

-48

-4

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 88: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

16

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 21m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 18m

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

1 0-0

.27m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

5 4.5

-4.8

5m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

2 3.3

-3.7

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

20

EB

14

17

69

9-0

19

EB

14

17

69

9-0

18

EB

14

17

69

9-0

17

EB

14

17

69

9-0

16

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EG

005T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-A

ES

- C

on

tin

ue

d

Co

pp

er

89

56

1--

----

--m

g/k

g5

74

40

-50

-8

Iro

n6

55

00

53

60

06

33

00

----

----

mg

/kg

50

74

39

-89

-6

Le

ad

20

11

75

1--

----

--m

g/k

g5

74

39

-92

-1

Ma

ng

an

es

e1

93

03

79

00

01

14

00

0--

----

--m

g/k

g5

74

39

-96

-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m3

<2

4--

----

--m

g/k

g2

74

39

-98

-7

Nic

ke

l<

22

23

0--

----

--m

g/k

g2

74

40

-02

-0

Se

len

ium

<5

22

<5

----

----

mg

/kg

57

78

2-4

9-2

Sil

ve

r<

24

<2

----

----

mg

/kg

27

44

0-2

2-4

Va

na

diu

m6

88

25

01

38

----

----

mg

/kg

57

44

0-6

2-2

Zin

c<

58

36

2--

----

--m

g/k

g5

74

40

-66

-6

EG

020S

: S

olu

ble

Meta

ls b

y IC

PM

S

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-38

-2

Se

len

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.17

78

2-4

9-2

Sil

ve

r<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-22

-4

Ba

riu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-39

-3

Be

ryll

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

----

----

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

1-7

Ca

dm

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

----

----

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-4

3-9

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-48

-4

Ch

rom

ium

<0

.01

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-47

-3

Th

ori

um

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

----

----

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-2

9-1

Co

pp

er

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

----

----

mg

/kg

0.0

17

44

0-5

0-8

Ma

ng

an

es

e0

.02

0.0

10

.16

----

----

mg

/kg

0.0

17

43

9-9

6-5

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

39

-98

-7

Nic

ke

l<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-02

-0

Le

ad

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

----

----

mg

/kg

0.0

17

43

9-9

2-1

An

tim

on

y<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-36

-0

Ura

niu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.01

74

40

-61

-1

Zin

c<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.05

74

40

-66

-6

Va

na

diu

m<

0.1

<0

.1<

0.1

----

----

mg

/kg

0.1

74

40

-62

-2

Alu

min

ium

<0

.1<

0.1

<0

.1--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.17

42

9-9

0-5

EG

020T

: T

ota

l M

eta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

Th

ori

um

11

.96

.85

.4--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.17

44

0-2

9-1

Ura

niu

m1

.32

.31

.2--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.17

44

0-6

1-1

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 89: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

17

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 21m

EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06 18m

EL

-N-G

C01

GC

01-S

1 0-0

.27m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

5 4.5

-4.8

5m

EL

-N-G

C02

GC

02-S

2 3.3

-3.7

m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

09

-JA

N-2

01

4 1

5:0

00

9-J

AN

-20

14

15

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

01

3-J

UN

-20

14

05

:00

13

-JU

N-2

01

4 0

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

17

69

9-0

20

EB

14

17

69

9-0

19

EB

14

17

69

9-0

18

EB

14

17

69

9-0

17

EB

14

17

69

9-0

16

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EG

035S

: S

olu

ble

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

Me

rcu

ry<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5<

0.0

00

5--

----

--m

g/k

g0

.00

05

74

39

-97

-6

EK

040S

: F

luo

rid

e S

olu

ble

Flu

ori

de

<1

<1

<1

----

----

mg

/kg

11

69

84

-48

-8

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 90: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

18

of

18

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

17

69

9 A

me

nd

me

nt

1

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

12

13

12

:P

roje

ct

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 39m

EL

-S-M

B05

GW

05 36m

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

PU

LP

(M

atr

ix:

SO

IL)

----

----

----

15

-MA

Y-2

01

4 1

5:0

01

5-M

AY

-20

14

15

:00

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

EB

14

17

69

9-0

22

EB

14

17

69

9-0

21

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

EA

026 :

Ch

rom

ium

Red

ucib

le S

ulf

ur

Ch

rom

ium

Re

du

cib

le S

ulp

hu

r0

.09

40

.55

9--

----

----

--%

0.0

05

----

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 91: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 3

.00

Tru

e

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 6

EB

1441384

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

e

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

12

3 W

YN

NE

ST

SU

NN

YB

AN

K H

ILL

S Q

LD

, A

US

TR

AL

IA 4

10

9

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te S

am

ple

s R

ece

ive

d:

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

8:4

5

Sa

mp

ler

:M

AN

DIE

MA

TH

ES

ON

Issu

e D

ate

:0

5-S

ep

-20

14

18

:32

Site

:--

--

6:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--6

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is r

ep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is r

efe

ren

ce

. R

esu

lts a

pp

ly t

o t

he

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tion

:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Gre

g V

og

el

La

bo

rato

ry M

an

ag

er

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Kim

McC

ab

eS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ite

d f

or

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 92: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

41

38

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds o

r b

y cl

ien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as b

ee

n p

erf

orm

ed

, re

sults

are

re

po

rte

d o

n a

dry

we

igh

t b

asis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by

the

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l a

na

lyte

de

tect

ion

s a

t o

r a

bo

ve t

he

leve

l of

rep

ort

ing

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y :

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 93: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

41

38

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

05

GE

MC

O #

04

GE

MC

O #

03

GE

MC

O #

02

GE

MC

O #

01

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

7-A

ug

-20

14

15

:00

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

7-A

ug

-20

14

15

:00

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

41

38

4-0

05

EB

14

41

38

4-0

04

EB

14

41

38

4-0

03

EB

14

41

38

4-0

02

EB

14

41

38

4-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

5.8

76

.81

5.9

15

.56

7.0

8p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

11

79

61

55

32

S/c

m1

----

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

4B

ica

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

32

63

34

mg

/L1

71

-52

-3

42

63

34

mg

/L1

----

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

43

83

65

mg

/L1

----

Ac

idit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

38

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

1C

hlo

rid

e7

31

27

mg

/L1

16

88

7-0

0-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

2C

alc

ium

4<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

4M

ag

ne

siu

m2

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

4S

od

ium

91

82

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m2

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

40

-09

-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

0.1

0A

lum

iniu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

42

9-9

0-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.05

Bo

ron

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

mg

/L0

.05

74

40

-42

-8

0.0

01

Ba

riu

m0

.00

7<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

9-3

<0

.00

1B

ery

lliu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-41

-7

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

<0

.00

01

<0

.00

01

<0

.00

01

<0

.00

01

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

0.0

54

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-48

-4

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

0.0

15

Co

pp

er

0.0

02

<0

.00

10

.00

2<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-5

0-8

2.4

9M

an

ga

ne

se

0.1

57

0.0

02

0.0

23

0.0

75

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

6-5

0.0

74

Nic

ke

l<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-02

-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 94: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

41

38

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

05

GE

MC

O #

04

GE

MC

O #

03

GE

MC

O #

02

GE

MC

O #

01

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

7-A

ug

-20

14

15

:00

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

7-A

ug

-20

14

15

:00

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

41

38

4-0

05

EB

14

41

38

4-0

04

EB

14

41

38

4-0

03

EB

14

41

38

4-0

02

EB

14

41

38

4-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S -

Co

nti

nu

ed

<0

.01

Va

na

diu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

44

0-6

2-2

0.0

90

Zin

c<

0.0

05

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

<0

.00

5m

g/L

0.0

05

74

40

-66

-6

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.00

1S

ilv

er

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-2

2-4

<0

.00

1T

ho

riu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-29

-1

<0

.00

1U

ran

ium

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-6

1-1

1.3

3Ir

on

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

mg

/L0

.05

74

39

-89

-6

EG

035F

: D

isso

lved

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

<0

.00

01

Me

rcu

ry<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1m

g/L

0.0

00

17

43

9-9

7-6

EG

050G

: H

exavale

nt

Ch

rom

ium

by D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

<0

.01

He

xa

va

len

t C

hro

miu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

11

85

40

-29

-9

EK

071G

: R

eacti

ve P

ho

sp

ho

rus a

s P

by d

iscre

te a

naly

ser

<0

.01

Re

ac

tiv

e P

ho

sp

ho

rus

as

P<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

11

42

65

-44

-2

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 95: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

5 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

41

38

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

06

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

14

41

38

4-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

6.0

0--

----

----

----

--p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

34

----

----

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

3B

ica

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

1-5

2-3

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--T

ota

l A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

5--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

<1

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

6C

hlo

rid

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

<1

Ca

lciu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

<1

Ma

gn

es

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

4S

od

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.01

Alu

min

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.05

Bo

ron

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.05

74

40

-42

-8

<0

.00

1B

ari

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

9-3

<0

.00

1B

ery

lliu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-41

-7

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

ob

alt

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

<0

.00

1C

op

pe

r--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

0.0

43

Ma

ng

an

es

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-96

-5

<0

.00

1N

ick

el

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 96: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

6 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

41

38

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

06

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

27

-Au

g-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

14

41

38

4-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S -

Co

nti

nu

ed

<0

.01

Va

na

diu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

17

44

0-6

2-2

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.00

1S

ilv

er

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-2

2-4

<0

.00

1T

ho

riu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-29

-1

<0

.00

1U

ran

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-6

1-1

<0

.05

Iro

n--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

EG

035F

: D

isso

lved

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

<0

.00

01

Me

rcu

ry--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

00

17

43

9-9

7-6

EG

050G

: H

exavale

nt

Ch

rom

ium

by D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

<0

.01

He

xa

va

len

t C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

11

85

40

-29

-9

EK

071G

: R

eacti

ve P

ho

sp

ho

rus a

s P

by d

iscre

te a

naly

ser

<0

.01

Re

ac

tiv

e P

ho

sp

ho

rus

as

P--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

11

42

65

-44

-2

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 97: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 2

.00

Tru

e

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 4

EB

1443211

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

e

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--D

ate

Sa

mp

les

Re

ceiv

ed

:2

5-S

ep

-20

14

19

:00

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:

26

-Se

p-2

01

4

Sa

mp

ler

:M

AN

DIE

MA

TH

ES

ON

Issu

e D

ate

:0

7-O

ct-2

01

4 1

3:5

6

Site

:--

--

6:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--6

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is r

ep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is r

efe

ren

ce

. R

esu

lts a

pp

ly t

o t

he

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tion

:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Kim

McC

ab

eS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ite

d f

or

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 98: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

43

21

1

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds o

r b

y cl

ien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as b

ee

n p

erf

orm

ed

, re

sults

are

re

po

rte

d o

n a

dry

we

igh

t b

asis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by

the

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l a

na

lyte

de

tect

ion

s a

t o

r a

bo

ve t

he

leve

l of

rep

ort

ing

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y :

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 99: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

43

21

1

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

05

GE

MC

O #

04

GE

MC

O #

03

GE

MC

O #

02

GE

MC

O #

01

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

25

-Se

p-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

5-S

ep

-20

14

15

:00

25

-Se

p-2

01

4 1

5:0

02

5-S

ep

-20

14

15

:00

25

-Se

p-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

43

21

1-0

05

EB

14

43

21

1-0

04

EB

14

43

21

1-0

03

EB

14

43

21

1-0

02

EB

14

43

21

1-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

6.1

06

.69

6.1

95

.85

5.3

4p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

69

92

91

62

82

S/c

m1

----

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

4B

ica

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

34

21

<1

mg

/L1

71

-52

-3

44

21

<1

mg

/L1

----

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

9<

1<

16

5m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

26

4S

ulf

ate

as

SO

4 -

Tu

rbid

ime

tric

31

1<

1m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

1C

hlo

rid

e2

37

6m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

67

Ca

lciu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

23

Ma

gn

es

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

5S

od

ium

22

41

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

1P

ota

ss

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

40

-09

-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

0.0

9A

lum

iniu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

42

9-9

0-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

0.0

00

3C

ad

miu

m<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1m

g/L

0.0

00

17

44

0-4

3-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

0.0

08

Co

pp

er

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

10

.00

2m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

0.0

87

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

03

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

0.1

38

Nic

ke

l<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

04

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

0.1

66

Zin

c<

0.0

05

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

0.0

11

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

4.1

2M

an

ga

ne

se

0.0

73

0.0

14

0.0

13

0.2

97

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

6-5

0.0

01

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-98

-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

0.4

0Ir

on

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

mg

/L0

.05

74

39

-89

-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 100: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

43

21

1

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

06

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

25

-Se

p-2

01

4 1

5:0

0C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

14

43

21

1-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

5.7

5--

----

----

----

--p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

18

----

----

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

<1

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

71

-52

-3

<1

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

----

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

2--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

<1

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

4C

hlo

rid

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

<1

Ca

lciu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

<1

Ma

gn

es

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

2S

od

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.01

Alu

min

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

<0

.00

1C

op

pe

r--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

<0

.00

1C

ob

alt

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

<0

.00

1N

ick

el

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

49

Ma

ng

an

es

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-96

-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

<0

.05

Iro

n--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 101: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 2

.00

Tru

e

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 4

EB

1445223

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

e

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

C/-

UR

S G

PO

BO

X 3

02

BR

ISB

AN

E Q

LD

, A

US

TR

AL

IA 4

00

1

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--D

ate

Sa

mp

les

Re

ceiv

ed

:2

8-O

ct-2

01

4 1

8:1

0

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:

29

-Oct

-20

14

Sa

mp

ler

:M

AN

DIE

MA

TH

ES

ON

Issu

e D

ate

:0

4-N

ov-

20

14

16

:36

Site

:--

--

6:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--6

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is r

ep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is r

efe

ren

ce

. R

esu

lts a

pp

ly t

o t

he

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tion

:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Kim

McC

ab

eS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ite

d f

or

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 102: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

45

22

3

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds o

r b

y cl

ien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as b

ee

n p

erf

orm

ed

, re

sults

are

re

po

rte

d o

n a

dry

we

igh

t b

asis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by

the

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l a

na

lyte

de

tect

ion

s a

t o

r a

bo

ve t

he

leve

l of

rep

ort

ing

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y :

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 103: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

45

22

3

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

5G

EM

CO

# 4

GE

MC

O #

3G

EM

CO

# 2

GE

MC

O #

1C

lient sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

[28

-Oct

-20

14

][2

8-O

ct-2

01

4]

[28

-Oct

-20

14

][2

8-O

ct-2

01

4]

[28

-Oct

-20

14

]C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

45

22

3-0

05

EB

14

45

22

3-0

04

EB

14

45

22

3-0

03

EB

14

45

22

3-0

02

EB

14

45

22

3-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

4.8

96

.27

5.8

55

.37

4.6

9p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

89

02

31

01

62

S/c

m1

----

Ele

ctr

ica

l C

on

du

cti

vit

y @

25

°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

2B

ica

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

32

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

1-5

2-3

22

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1--

--T

ota

l A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

38

33

65

mg

/L1

----

Ac

idit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

49

4S

ulf

ate

as

SO

4 -

Tu

rbid

ime

tric

42

2<

1m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

3C

hlo

rid

e2

24

5m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

61

Ca

lciu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

75

Ma

gn

es

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

20

So

diu

m2

23

2m

g/L

17

44

0-2

3-5

8P

ota

ss

ium

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

0.1

8A

lum

iniu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

42

9-9

0-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

0.0

01

3C

ad

miu

m<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1m

g/L

0.0

00

17

44

0-4

3-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

0.0

14

Co

pp

er

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

10

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

0.2

40

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

02

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

0.3

72

Nic

ke

l<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

03

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

0.4

95

Zin

c<

0.0

05

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

0.0

08

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

11

.7M

an

ga

ne

se

0.0

58

0.0

12

0.0

03

0.2

67

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

6-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

0.2

3Ir

on

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

mg

/L0

.05

74

39

-89

-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 104: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

45

22

3

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

6C

lient sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

[28

-Oct

-20

14

]C

lient sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

14

45

22

3-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

5.2

9--

----

----

----

--p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

14

----

----

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

<1

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

71

-52

-3

<1

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

----

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

2--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

<1

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

3C

hlo

rid

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

<1

Ca

lciu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

<1

Ma

gn

es

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

2S

od

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.01

Alu

min

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

<0

.00

1C

op

pe

r--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

<0

.00

1C

ob

alt

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

<0

.00

1N

ick

el

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

72

Ma

ng

an

es

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-96

-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

<0

.05

Iro

n--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 105: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 2

.00

Tru

e

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 4

EB

1447372

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

e

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--D

ate

Sa

mp

les

Re

ceiv

ed

:2

8-N

ov-

20

14

14

:00

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:

01

-De

c-2

01

4

Sa

mp

ler

:M

AN

DIE

MA

TH

ES

ON

Issu

e D

ate

:0

8-D

ec-

20

14

16

:10

Site

:--

--

6:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--6

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is r

ep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is r

efe

ren

ce

. R

esu

lts a

pp

ly t

o t

he

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tion

:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Kim

McC

ab

eS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ite

d f

or

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 106: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

47

37

2

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds o

r b

y cl

ien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as b

ee

n p

erf

orm

ed

, re

sults

are

re

po

rte

d o

n a

dry

we

igh

t b

asis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by

the

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l a

na

lyte

de

tect

ion

s a

t o

r a

bo

ve t

he

leve

l of

rep

ort

ing

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y :

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 107: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

47

37

2

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

05

GE

MC

O #

04

GE

MC

O #

03

GE

MC

O #

02

GE

MC

O #

01

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

[27

-No

v-2

01

4]

[27

-No

v-2

01

4]

[27

-No

v-2

01

4]

[27

-No

v-2

01

4]

[27

-No

v-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

47

37

2-0

05

EB

14

47

37

2-0

04

EB

14

47

37

2-0

03

EB

14

47

37

2-0

02

EB

14

47

37

2-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

4.7

06

.39

5.9

45

.55

4.9

2p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

11

80

26

13

20

23

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

<1

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

54

4<

1m

g/L

17

1-5

2-3

<1

54

4<

1m

g/L

1--

--T

ota

l A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

11

53

38

3m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

59

5S

ulf

ate

as

SO

4 -

Tu

rbid

ime

tric

32

3<

1m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

4C

hlo

rid

e2

23

5m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

27

Ca

lciu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

11

7M

ag

ne

siu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

43

9-9

5-4

34

So

diu

m2

23

1m

g/L

17

44

0-2

3-5

8P

ota

ss

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

40

-09

-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

0.1

9A

lum

iniu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

42

9-9

0-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

0.0

01

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-38

-2

0.0

02

8C

ad

miu

m<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1m

g/L

0.0

00

17

44

0-4

3-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

0.0

14

Co

pp

er

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-5

0-8

0.3

91

Co

ba

lt<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

0.6

66

Nic

ke

l<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

02

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

0.8

23

Zin

c<

0.0

05

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

0.0

06

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

19

.6M

an

ga

ne

se

0.0

46

0.0

12

0.0

02

0.2

41

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

6-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

<0

.05

Iro

n<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5<

0.0

5m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 108: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

47

37

2

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

06

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

[27

-No

v-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

14

47

37

2-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

5.2

8--

----

----

----

--p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

17

----

----

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

3B

ica

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

1-5

2-3

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--T

ota

l A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

<1

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

3C

hlo

rid

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

<1

Ca

lciu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

<1

Ma

gn

es

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

2S

od

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.01

Alu

min

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

<0

.00

1C

op

pe

r--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

<0

.00

1C

ob

alt

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

<0

.00

1N

ick

el

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

77

Ma

ng

an

es

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-96

-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

<0

.05

Iro

n--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 109: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 2

.00

Tru

e

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 4

EB

1449195

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

e

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--D

ate

Sa

mp

les

Re

ceiv

ed

:2

9-D

ec-

20

14

16

:55

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:

30

-De

c-2

01

4

Sa

mp

ler

:M

AN

DIE

MA

TH

ES

ON

Issu

e D

ate

:0

8-J

an

-20

15

15

:41

Site

:--

--

6:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--6

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is r

ep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is r

efe

ren

ce

. R

esu

lts a

pp

ly t

o t

he

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tion

:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Gre

g V

og

el

La

bo

rato

ry M

an

ag

er

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ite

d f

or

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 110: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

49

19

5

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds o

r b

y cl

ien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as b

ee

n p

erf

orm

ed

, re

sults

are

re

po

rte

d o

n a

dry

we

igh

t b

asis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by

the

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l a

na

lyte

de

tect

ion

s a

t o

r a

bo

ve t

he

leve

l of

rep

ort

ing

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y :

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 111: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

49

19

5

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

05

GE

MC

O #

04

GE

MC

O #

03

GE

MC

O #

02

GE

MC

O #

01

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

[29

-De

c-2

01

4]

[29

-De

c-2

01

4]

[29

-De

c-2

01

4]

[29

-De

c-2

01

4]

[29

-De

c-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

14

49

19

5-0

05

EB

14

49

19

5-0

04

EB

14

49

19

5-0

03

EB

14

49

19

5-0

02

EB

14

49

19

5-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

2.6

75

.79

5.5

15

.44

4.8

7p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

59

90

28

14

18

21

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

<1

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

1-5

2-3

<1

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1--

--T

ota

l A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

11

20

11

23

mg

/L1

----

Ac

idit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

40

40

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic9

34

<1

mg

/L1

14

80

8-7

9-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

6C

hlo

rid

e2

22

4m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

17

8C

alc

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

40

-70

-2

69

0M

ag

ne

siu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

43

9-9

5-4

16

9S

od

ium

22

31

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

9P

ota

ss

ium

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

51

.6A

lum

iniu

m0

.10

<0

.01

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

42

9-9

0-5

<0

.00

5A

nti

mo

ny

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

0.0

16

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-38

-2

0.0

24

5C

ad

miu

m<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1m

g/L

0.0

00

17

44

0-4

3-9

0.0

90

Ch

rom

ium

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

7-3

1.8

1C

op

pe

r<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

5.1

3C

ob

alt

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

8.2

4N

ick

el

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

10

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-02

-0

0.0

67

Le

ad

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

2-1

11

.4Z

inc

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

<0

.00

50

.00

5m

g/L

0.0

05

74

40

-66

-6

20

8M

an

ga

ne

se

0.0

54

0.0

14

0.0

07

0.2

27

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

6-5

0.0

08

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-98

-7

0.1

1S

ele

niu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

78

2-4

9-2

93

.4Ir

on

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

mg

/L0

.05

74

39

-89

-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 112: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

14

49

19

5

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

06

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

[29

-De

c-2

01

4]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

14

49

19

5-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

5.2

9--

----

----

----

--p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

15

----

----

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

<1

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

71

-52

-3

<1

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

----

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

2--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

<1

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

2C

hlo

rid

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

<1

Ca

lciu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

<1

Ma

gn

es

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

2S

od

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.01

Alu

min

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

<0

.00

1C

op

pe

r--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

<0

.00

1C

ob

alt

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

<0

.00

1N

ick

el

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

67

Ma

ng

an

es

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-96

-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

<0

.05

Iro

n--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 113: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 2

.00

Tru

e

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 4

EB

1511724

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

e

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--D

ate

Sa

mp

les

Re

ceiv

ed

:2

8-J

an

-20

15

18

:30

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:

30

-Ja

n-2

01

5

Sa

mp

ler

:M

AN

DIE

MA

TH

ES

ON

Issu

e D

ate

:0

6-F

eb

-20

15

15

:24

Site

:--

--

6:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--6

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is r

ep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is r

efe

ren

ce

. R

esu

lts a

pp

ly t

o t

he

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tion

:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Kim

McC

ab

eS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ite

d f

or

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 114: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

15

11

72

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds o

r b

y cl

ien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as b

ee

n p

erf

orm

ed

, re

sults

are

re

po

rte

d o

n a

dry

we

igh

t b

asis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by

the

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l a

na

lyte

de

tect

ion

s a

t o

r a

bo

ve t

he

leve

l of

rep

ort

ing

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y : E

G0

20

-F (

Dis

so

lve

d M

eta

ls b

y I

CP

-MS

): L

OR

ra

ise

d f

or

sa

mp

le d

ue

to

ma

trix

in

terf

ere

nc

e.

l

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 115: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

15

11

72

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

05

GE

MC

O #

04

GE

MC

O #

03

GE

MC

O #

02

GE

MC

O #

01

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

[28

-Ja

n-2

01

5]

[28

-Ja

n-2

01

5]

[28

-Ja

n-2

01

5]

[28

-Ja

n-2

01

5]

[28

-Ja

n-2

01

5]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

15

11

72

4-0

05

EB

15

11

72

4-0

04

EB

15

11

72

4-0

03

EB

15

11

72

4-0

02

EB

15

11

72

4-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

2.3

15

.30

5.4

25

.39

4.9

0p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

72

90

26

12

18

17

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

<1

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

33

32

mg

/L1

71

-52

-3

<1

33

32

mg

/L1

----

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

23

00

73

44

mg

/L1

----

Ac

idit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

57

80

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic7

<1

4<

1m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

6C

hlo

rid

e2

21

4m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

16

3C

alc

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

40

-70

-2

70

1M

ag

ne

siu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

43

9-9

5-4

15

4S

od

ium

22

31

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

78

.9A

lum

iniu

m0

.08

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

5A

nti

mo

ny

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

0.0

46

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-38

-2

0.0

27

3C

ad

miu

m<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1m

g/L

0.0

00

17

44

0-4

3-9

0.2

38

Ch

rom

ium

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

7-3

2.4

4C

op

pe

r<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

7.5

7C

ob

alt

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

9.5

0N

ick

el

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

5L

ea

d<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

14

.4Z

inc

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

25

0M

an

ga

ne

se

0.0

44

0.0

15

0.0

12

0.2

25

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

6-5

0.0

11

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-98

-7

0.0

6S

ele

niu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

78

2-4

9-2

29

2Ir

on

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

mg

/L0

.05

74

39

-89

-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 116: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

15

11

72

4

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

06

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

[28

-Ja

n-2

01

5]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

15

11

72

4-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

5.2

4--

----

----

----

--p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

13

----

----

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

3B

ica

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

1-5

2-3

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--T

ota

l A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

4--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

<1

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

2C

hlo

rid

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

<1

Ca

lciu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

<1

Ma

gn

es

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

1S

od

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.01

Alu

min

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

<0

.00

1C

op

pe

r--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

<0

.00

1C

ob

alt

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

<0

.00

1N

ick

el

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

62

Ma

ng

an

es

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-96

-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

<0

.05

Iro

n--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 117: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 3

.00

Tru

e

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 4

EB

1513613

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tR

GS

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

PT

Y L

TD

En

viro

nm

en

tal D

ivis

ion

Brisb

an

e

::

Co

nta

ctC

on

tact

MR

AL

AN

RO

BE

RT

SO

NC

ust

om

er

Se

rvic

es E

B

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

PO

Bo

x 3

09

1

SU

NN

YB

AN

K S

OU

TH

QL

D,

AU

ST

RA

LIA

41

09

2 B

yth

Str

ee

t S

taff

ord

QL

D A

ustr

alia

40

53

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

ala

n@

rgse

nv.

com

AL

SE

nvi

ro.B

risb

an

e@

als

glo

ba

l.co

m

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

22

2

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

+6

1 0

7 3

34

4 1

22

2+

61

-7-3

24

3 7

21

8

:P

roje

ct1

21

31

2 G

EM

CO

Pro

ject

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

01

3

Sch

ed

ule

B(3

) a

nd

AL

S Q

CS

3 r

eq

uire

me

nt

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r--

--D

ate

Sa

mp

les

Re

ceiv

ed

:2

5-F

eb

-20

15

18

:35

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:

26

-Fe

b-2

01

5

Sa

mp

ler

:M

AN

DIE

MA

TH

ES

ON

Issu

e D

ate

:0

9-M

ar-

20

15

13

:38

Site

:--

--

6:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--6

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

Th

is r

ep

ort

su

pe

rse

de

s a

ny

pre

vio

us

rep

ort

(s)

with

th

is r

efe

ren

ce

. R

esu

lts a

pp

ly t

o t

he

sa

mp

le(s

) a

s su

bm

itte

d.

Th

is C

ert

ifica

te o

f A

na

lysi

s co

nta

ins

the

fo

llow

ing

info

rma

tion

:

l

Ge

ne

ral C

om

me

nts

l

An

aly

tica

l Re

sults

Sig

na

torie

sT

his

d

ocu

me

nt

ha

s b

ee

n

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gn

ed

b

y th

e

au

tho

rize

d

sig

na

torie

s in

dic

ate

d

be

low

. E

lectr

on

ic

sig

nin

g

ha

s

be

en

ca

rrie

d o

ut

in c

om

plia

nce

with

pro

ced

ure

s sp

eci

fied

in 2

1 C

FR

Pa

rt 1

1.

Sig

nato

ries

Accre

ditation C

ate

gory

Posi

tion

An

dre

w E

pp

sS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Gre

g V

og

el

La

bo

rato

ry M

an

ag

er

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

Kim

McC

ab

eS

en

ior

Ino

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Brisb

an

e I

no

rga

nic

s

NA

TA

Accr

ed

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ite

d f

or

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 118: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

2 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

15

13

61

3

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds o

r b

y cl

ien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as b

ee

n p

erf

orm

ed

, re

sults

are

re

po

rte

d o

n a

dry

we

igh

t b

asis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

yed

) o

r m

atr

ix in

terf

ere

nce

.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by

the

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

oci

ety

.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l a

na

lyte

de

tect

ion

s a

t o

r a

bo

ve t

he

leve

l of

rep

ort

ing

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y :

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 119: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

3 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

15

13

61

3

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

GE

MC

O #

05

GE

MC

O #

04

GE

MC

O #

03

GE

MC

O #

02

GE

MC

O #

01

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

[25

-Fe

b-2

01

5]

[25

-Fe

b-2

01

5]

[25

-Fe

b-2

01

5]

[25

-Fe

b-2

01

5]

[25

-Fe

b-2

01

5]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

EB

15

13

61

3-0

05

EB

15

13

61

3-0

04

EB

15

13

61

3-0

03

EB

15

13

61

3-0

02

EB

15

13

61

3-0

01

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

2.2

75

.30

5.3

55

.30

4.9

2p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

70

80

35

17

20

18

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

<1

Bic

arb

on

ate

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

98

95

mg

/L1

71

-52

-3

<1

98

95

mg

/L1

----

To

tal

Alk

ali

nit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

21

90

24

45

mg

/L1

----

Ac

idit

y a

s C

aC

O3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

40

40

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic6

24

<1

mg

/L1

14

80

8-7

9-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

6C

hlo

rid

e2

21

3m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

14

2C

alc

ium

<1

<1

<1

<1

mg

/L1

74

40

-70

-2

58

2M

ag

ne

siu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

43

9-9

5-4

11

3S

od

ium

11

2<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-2

3-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m<

1<

1<

1<

1m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

57

.0A

lum

iniu

m0

.07

<0

.01

<0

.01

<0

.01

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

0.0

27

Ars

en

ic<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-38

-2

0.0

21

6C

ad

miu

m<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

1m

g/L

0.0

00

17

44

0-4

3-9

0.1

80

Ch

rom

ium

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

7-3

1.7

4C

op

pe

r<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

4.9

0C

ob

alt

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

7.2

8N

ick

el

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

10

.00

2m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-02

-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

10

.6Z

inc

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

<0

.00

5<

0.0

05

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

18

1M

an

ga

ne

se

0.0

44

0.0

12

0.0

07

0.2

00

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

6-5

0.0

06

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

<0

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-98

-7

0.1

2S

ele

niu

m<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1m

g/L

0.0

17

78

2-4

9-2

19

0Ir

on

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

<0

.05

mg

/L0

.05

74

39

-89

-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 120: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

4 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

EB

15

13

61

3

12

13

12

GE

MC

O P

roje

ct:

Pro

ject

RG

S E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L P

TY

LT

D

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

GE

MC

O #

06

Clie

nt sa

mple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

LE

AC

HA

TE

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

[25

-Fe

b-2

01

5]

Clie

nt sa

mplin

g d

ate

/ tim

e

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

EB

15

13

61

3-0

06

Unit

LO

RC

AS

Num

ber

Com

pound

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EA

005P

: p

H b

y P

C T

itra

tor

5.2

4--

----

----

----

--p

H U

nit

0.0

1--

--p

H V

alu

e

EA

010P

: C

on

du

cti

vit

y b

y P

C T

itra

tor

14

----

----

----

----

µS

/cm

1--

--E

lec

tric

al

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

@ 2

5°C

ED

037P

: A

lkalin

ity b

y P

C T

itra

tor

<1

Hy

dro

xid

e A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1D

MO

-21

0-0

01

<1

Ca

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

13

81

2-3

2-6

7B

ica

rbo

na

te A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

1-5

2-3

7--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--T

ota

l A

lka

lin

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

038A

: A

cid

ity

3--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

1--

--A

cid

ity

as

Ca

CO

3

ED

041G

: S

ulf

ate

(T

urb

idim

etr

ic)

as S

O4 2

- b

y D

A

<1

Su

lfa

te a

s S

O4

- T

urb

idim

etr

ic--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

48

08

-79

-8

ED

045G

: C

hlo

rid

e b

y D

iscre

te A

naly

ser

2C

hlo

rid

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

11

68

87

-00

-6

ED

093F

: D

isso

lved

Majo

r C

ati

on

s

<1

Ca

lciu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-7

0-2

<1

Ma

gn

es

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

39

-95

-4

1S

od

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L1

74

40

-23

-5

<1

Po

tas

siu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

17

44

0-0

9-7

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.01

Alu

min

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

74

29

-90

-5

<0

.00

1A

nti

mo

ny

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

6-0

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

<0

.00

1C

op

pe

r--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-50

-8

<0

.00

1C

ob

alt

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-4

8-4

<0

.00

1N

ick

el

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-0

2-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

69

Ma

ng

an

es

e--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-96

-5

<0

.00

1M

oly

bd

en

um

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

43

9-9

8-7

<0

.01

Se

len

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.01

77

82

-49

-2

<0

.05

Iro

n--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

57

43

9-8

9-6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 121: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page C1

ATTACHMENT C

Static Geochemical Results

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page C2

LIST OF TABLES

Table C-1: Acid Base Account (ABA) test results for overburden and ore samples

Table C-2: Overburden and ore samples selected for additional multi-element tests

Table C-3: Multi-element results for selected overburden and ore samples

Table C-4: Multi-element results for water extracts from selected overburden and ore samples

Table C-5: Particle Size Distribution and Emerson Aggregate test results for selected overburden samples

Table C-6: Acid-Base Account (ABA) test results for middlings samples

Table C-7: Multi-element results for middlings samples

Table C-8: Multi-element results for water extracts from middlings samples

Table C-9: Composite overburden, ore and middlings samples selected for KLC tests

Table C-10: Acid-Base results for samples selected for Kinetic Leach Column (KLC) tests

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 122: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page C1

ATTACHMENT C

Static Geochemical Results

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page C2

LIST OF TABLES

Table C-1: Acid Base Account (ABA) test results for overburden and ore samples

Table C-2: Overburden and ore samples selected for additional multi-element tests

Table C-3: Multi-element results for selected overburden and ore samples

Table C-4: Multi-element results for water extracts from selected overburden and ore samples

Table C-5: Particle Size Distribution and Emerson Aggregate test results for selected overburden samples

Table C-6: Acid-Base Account (ABA) test results for middlings samples

Table C-7: Multi-element results for middlings samples

Table C-8: Multi-element results for water extracts from middlings samples

Table C-9: Composite overburden, ore and middlings samples selected for KLC tests

Table C-10: Acid-Base results for samples selected for Kinetic Leach Column (KLC) tests

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 123: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

m

1E

B14

1658

6050

EL-

N-G

C01

GC

01-S

1ov

erbu

rden

0-0.

27B

row

n cl

ay w

ith p

lant

mat

eria

l and

min

or

Mn

fragm

ents

6.2

370.

020.

614.

1-3

.49

6.69

NA

F (B

arre

n)

2E

B14

1658

604 3

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

1ov

erbu

rden

2.4-

3.0

Bro

wn

iron-

stai

ned

sand

y so

il.

Con

solid

ated

loos

e sa

nd (0

.5-1

mm

) m

oder

atel

y w

ell s

orte

d.

6.2

140.

020.

610.

60.

010.

98N

AF

(Bar

ren)

3E

B14

1658

604 4

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

2ov

erbu

rden

3.3-

3.7

Red

and

yel

low

con

solid

ated

san

dy s

oil

with

lith

opho

rite

and

pyro

lusi

te p

isos

. 5.

711

0.02

0.61

2.4

-1.7

93.

92N

AF

(Bar

ren)

4E

B14

1658

6045

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

3ov

erbu

rden

3.7-

3.9

Bla

ck c

emen

ted

piso

s an

d ce

men

ted

fragm

ents

of m

anga

nese

. Som

e w

eath

erin

g to

iron

. Con

tinuo

us b

and.

6.

010

0.02

0.61

2.4

-1.7

93.

92N

AF

(Bar

ren)

5E

B14

1658

6046

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

4ov

erbu

rden

3.9-

4.2

Red

-ora

nge

and

yello

w la

terit

e. C

lay

dom

inat

ed. M

oder

atel

y w

eath

ered

. Fe-

piso

lites

(3m

m).

5.9

100.

020.

611.

9-1

.29

3.10

NA

F (B

arre

n)

6E

B14

1658

604 7

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

5ov

erbu

rden

4.5-

4.85

Bla

ck m

ass

mag

ite w

ith s

mal

l cla

y ba

nds

(<20

mm

). C

lay

band

s ar

e ge

oeth

ic a

nd

friab

le. W

eath

erin

g ev

iden

t on

som

e of

th

e fra

ctur

es. K

aolin

cla

y ba

nd 5

mm

thic

k.

6.0

110.

020.

610.

60.

010.

98N

AF

(Bar

ren)

7E

B14

1658

6026

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

1ov

erbu

rden

0.6-

1.0

Bro

wn

soil,

som

e ge

oeth

ic y

ello

w c

lay,

bi

oditr

itus,

woo

d an

d ro

ots.

Sm

all l

ater

ite,

clay

ston

e an

d qu

artz

ite fr

agm

ents

th

roug

hout

(0.5

-1m

m) l

arge

mod

erat

ely

roun

ded

fragm

ents

of l

ithop

horit

e at

the

base

70m

m o

f the

uni

t (<6

0mm

wid

e)

5.9

150.

020.

610.

9-0

.29

1.47

NA

F (B

arre

n)

8E

B14

1658

6027

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

2ov

erbu

rden

2.0-

2.4

Bla

ck m

oder

atel

y an

gula

r fra

gmen

ts o

f si

licio

us o

xidi

sed

litho

phor

ite. V

ery

soft

late

ritic

cla

y w

ith s

mal

l ang

ular

frag

men

ts

of c

lays

tone

thro

ugho

ut (2

-5m

m).

5.9

120.

020.

610.

9-0

.29

1.47

NA

F (B

arre

n)

9E

B14

1658

6028

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

3ov

erbu

rden

3.06

-3.4

0P

ale

yello

w a

nd y

ello

w c

lays

tone

. Fo

ram

inife

rra p

rese

nt (0

.2m

m) (

150m

m

core

loss

)6.

514

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

10E

B14

1658

6029

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

4ov

erbu

rden

5.0-

5.4

Bro

wn-

blac

k m

anga

nese

enr

iche

d qu

artz

ite.

5.3

220.

020.

611.

5-0

.89

2.45

NA

F (B

arre

n)

11E

B14

1658

603 0

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

5ov

erbu

rden

5.6-

5.9

Cre

am w

hite

qua

rtzite

6.3

170.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

pH1

AN

C:

MPA

R

atio

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

OVE

RB

UR

DEN

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

1G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 124: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

12E

B14

1658

603

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

6ov

erbu

rden

7.0-

7.4

Bro

wn-

blac

k m

anga

nese

enr

iche

d qu

artz

ite. l

ater

al R

ed a

nd y

ello

w q

uartz

ite

at to

p an

d ba

se o

f uni

t. 5.

424

0.02

0.61

2.5

-1.8

94.

08N

AF

(Bar

ren)

13E

B14

1658

6032

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

7ov

erbu

rden

8.6-

9.0

Whi

te k

aolin

ite c

lay.

Red

and

pin

k cl

ayst

one.

Red

Ver

tical

thin

vei

n th

roug

h un

it6.

012

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

14E

B14

1658

6033

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

8ov

erbu

rden

11.0

-11.

4Y

ello

w a

nd g

rey

clay

ston

e.5.

217

0.00

50.

150.

9-0

.75

5.88

NA

F (B

arre

n)

15E

B14

1658

6034

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

9ov

erbu

rden

12.4

-13.

0

Yel

low

, pur

ple

and

whi

te c

lays

tone

gr

adin

g do

wn

to q

uartz

ite. H

oriz

onta

l and

ve

rtica

l inf

illin

g w

ith w

hite

cla

y an

d sa

nd.

Som

e vu

gs (2

mm

)

5.6

150.

020.

611.

4-0

.79

2.29

NA

F (B

arre

n)

16E

B14

1658

6035

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

10ov

erbu

rden

13.1

-13.

5

Bro

wn

blac

k m

anga

nese

enr

iche

d co

nsol

idat

ed a

nd u

ncon

solid

ated

qu

artz

ite. L

ater

al w

hite

stre

aks

thro

ugho

ut.

5.6

160.

020.

611.

8-1

.19

2.94

NA

F (B

arre

n)

17E

B14

1658

6036

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

11ov

erbu

rden

14.0

-14.

4Y

ello

w, p

urpl

e an

d gr

ey c

lays

tone

. Sof

t to

very

sof

t. (C

ore

loss

450

mm

)6.

224

0.02

0.61

0.8

-0.1

91.

31N

AF

(Bar

ren)

18E

B14

1658

6037

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

12ov

erbu

rden

17.6

-18.

0B

lack

-yel

low

man

gane

se fr

agm

ents

, cla

y an

d co

nsol

idat

ed c

lays

tone

'cho

clat

e or

e'

(650

mm

cor

e lo

ss -

San

ds)

5.6

210.

005

0.15

2.0

-1.8

513

.06

NA

F (B

arre

n)

19E

B14

1658

6038

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13ov

erbu

rden

20-2

0.37

Pur

ple

and

oran

ge c

lays

tone

. Wel

l ro

unde

d m

anga

nese

frag

men

ts (2

0mm

). La

terit

e an

d lit

hoph

orite

con

cret

ions

(2-

7mm

)

5.0

310.

020.

611.

0-0

.39

1.63

NA

F (B

arre

n)

20E

B14

1658

6018

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

1ov

erbu

rden

0.0-

0.4

Bro

wn

sand

y so

il, u

ncon

solid

ate

cryp

tom

elan

e sp

heru

lites

, bio

detri

tus

5.9

310.

020.

612.

6-1

.99

4.24

NA

F (B

arre

n)

21E

B14

1658

6019

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

2ov

erbu

rden

0.6-

1.0

Mot

tled

red

and

brow

n m

anga

nife

rous

la

terit

e, li

thop

horit

e, c

ryto

pmel

ane

and

goet

hic

conc

retio

ns, s

ome

vugs

pre

sent

, so

me

biod

etrit

us in

top

500m

m

6.1

190.

020.

612.

0-1

.39

3.27

NA

F (B

arre

n)

22E

B14

1658

6020

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

3ov

erbu

rden

3.0-

3.5

Lam

inar

bro

wn

and

red

ferri

nous

late

rite,

si

licio

us m

anga

nese

laye

rs (3

0-60

mm

). S

ever

al v

ertic

al a

nd h

oriz

onta

l fra

ctur

es

infil

led

with

san

d.

5.5

140.

020.

611.

1-0

.49

1.80

NA

F (B

arre

n)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

2G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 125: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

23E

B14

1658

602

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

4ov

erbu

rden

5.6-

6.0

Lam

inar

whi

te, b

row

n an

d re

d fe

rrino

us

and

late

rite,

rew

orke

d w

ell r

ound

ed

quar

tzite

sto

nes

(20m

m),

silic

ious

m

anga

nes

laye

rs (4

0mm

thic

k).

5.8

100.

020.

610.

60.

010.

98N

AF

(Bar

ren)

24E

B14

1658

6010

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

1ov

erbu

rden

0.5-

1.0

Bro

wn

sand

y so

il, b

iode

tritu

s, s

uspe

nded

qu

artz

gra

nule

s5.

923

0.02

0.61

3.2

-2.5

95.

22N

AF

(Bar

ren)

25E

B14

1658

601

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

2ov

erbu

rden

2.0-

2.4

Mot

tled

red

and

bow

n la

terit

e w

ith s

ilici

ous

man

gane

se fr

agm

ents

and

late

ritic

pe

bble

s (5

-10m

m) s

uspe

nded

thro

ugho

ut.

Som

e la

rger

sub

roun

ded

elon

gate

d M

n fra

gmen

ts (5

0mm

) (~1

%).

Som

e bi

odet

ritus

(<0.

1%)

6.0

130.

020.

611.

8-1

.19

2.94

NA

F (B

arre

n)

26E

B14

1658

6012

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

3ov

erbu

rden

3.0-

3.4

Bro

wn

clay

with

pes

olite

s an

d su

brou

nded

si

licio

us fr

agm

ents

of m

anga

nese

th

roug

hout

(10-

70m

m).

Som

e bi

odet

ritus

<(

0.2%

)

6.1

150.

020.

613.

0-2

.39

4.90

NA

F (B

arre

n)

27E

B14

1658

6013

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

4ov

erbu

rden

4.0-

4.4

Bro

wn

and

oran

ge s

treak

ed s

ands

. Wel

l so

rted

loos

e an

d ce

men

ted.

Thi

n le

nses

of

sili

ciou

s m

anga

nese

(10m

m)

5.8

160.

020.

611.

4-0

.79

2.29

NA

F (B

arre

n)

28E

B14

1658

601 4

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

5ov

erbu

rden

5.0-

5.4

Gre

y B

lack

mas

s m

anga

nese

frag

men

ts

(5 -2

0mm

). B

row

n an

d or

ange

stre

aked

sa

nds.

Wel

l sor

ted

Loos

e an

d ce

men

ted.

Th

in b

ands

of s

ilici

ous

man

gane

se (2

0-30

mm

thic

k)(4

0mm

Cor

e lo

ss)

6.0

180.

020.

612.

8-2

.19

4.57

NA

F (B

arre

n)

29E

B14

1658

600

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

1ov

erbu

rden

0.25

-0.7

5B

row

n sa

ndy

soil,

bio

detri

tus,

late

ritic

pe

bble

s. M

inor

sili

ceou

s bl

ack

fragm

ents

th

roug

hout

(20m

m) <

2%6.

336

0.02

0.61

4.0

-3.3

96.

53N

AF

(Bar

ren)

30E

B14

1658

6002

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

2ov

erbu

rden

0.75

-1.1

Bro

wn

ferri

gnou

s lo

ose

clay

and

ce

men

ted

clay

ston

e, m

inor

sili

ciou

s bl

ack

man

gane

se fr

agm

ents

thro

ugho

ut. S

ome

vugs

20-

50m

m w

ide.

6.0

160.

020.

612.

5-1

.89

4.08

NA

F (B

arre

n)

31E

B14

1658

6003

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

3ov

erbu

rden

2.0-

2.4

Sol

id m

ass

mag

nite

larg

e fra

gmen

ts (2

0-60

mm

) in

a br

ecci

a te

xtur

e su

ppor

ted

by a

ce

men

ted

clay

and

late

rite

mat

rix.

6.1

130.

020.

611.

8-1

.19

2.94

NA

F (B

arre

n)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

3G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 126: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

32E

B14

1658

6004

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

4ov

erbu

rden

2.9-

3.2

Bro

wn

clay

with

sm

all f

ragm

ente

d m

anga

nese

piec

es (5

-10m

m)

6.0

180.

020.

612.

3-1

.69

3.76

NA

F (B

arre

n)

33E

B14

1658

6005

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

5ov

erbu

rden

4.7-

5.0

Sm

all m

angi

te fr

agm

ents

(5-1

0mm

) su

pprte

d in

a w

hite

and

ora

nge

clay

m

atrix

. Thi

n m

anga

nese

enr

iche

d ba

nds

(5-1

0mm

)(10

0mm

cor

e lo

ss)

6.3

190.

020.

612.

0-1

.39

3.27

NA

F (B

arre

n)

34E

B14

1658

600 6

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

6ov

erbu

rden

6.35

-6.6

5M

anga

nese

frag

men

ts a

nd o

olite

s (1

0-40

mm

) sup

porte

d in

a w

hite

and

pur

ple

clay

mat

rix.

5.9

150.

005

0.15

1.4

-1.2

59.

14N

AF

(Bar

ren)

35E

B14

1650

706

EL-

N-M

B01

GW

01ov

erbu

rden

3-6m

LATE

RIT

E: f

ine

sand

to m

ediu

m s

and,

iro

n ce

men

ted,

dar

k re

ddis

h br

own,

m

ediu

m s

tren g

th, m

inor

cla

y in

sam

ples

6.8

390.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

36E

B14

1650

706 0

EL-

N-M

B01

GW

01ov

erbu

rden

6-9m

CLA

Y: l

ow p

last

icity

, lig

ht g

rey,

stif

f6.

719

20.

020.

612.

3-1

.69

3.76

NA

F (B

arre

n)37

EB

1416

5070

03E

L-N

-MB

01G

W01

over

burd

en12

mC

LAY

: low

pla

stic

ity, l

ight

gre

y, s

tiff

6.6

130

0.03

0.92

4.4

-3.4

84.

79N

AF

(Bar

ren)

38E

B14

1650

7004

EL-

N-M

B01

GW

01ov

erbu

rden

15m

CLA

Y: l

ow p

last

icity

, lig

ht g

rey,

stif

f, di

ssem

inat

ed m

anga

nese

thro

ugho

ut6.

990

0.02

0.61

4.5

-3.8

97.

35N

AF

(Bar

ren)

39E

B14

1650

700 5

EL-

N-M

B01

GW

01ov

erbu

rden

18m

CLA

Y: l

ow p

last

icity

, lig

ht g

rey,

stif

f, di

ssem

inat

ed m

anga

nese

thro

ugho

ut6.

985

0.02

0.61

8.4

-7.7

913

.71

NA

F (B

arre

n)

40E

B14

1650

700 6

EL-

N-M

B01

GW

01ov

erbu

rden

21m

CLA

Y: l

ow p

last

icity

, lig

ht g

rey,

stif

f, di

ssem

inat

ed m

anga

nese

thro

ugho

ut6.

710

20.

020.

617.

7-7

.09

12.5

7N

AF

(Bar

ren)

41E

B14

1650

700 7

EL-

N-M

B01

GW

01ov

erbu

rden

24m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, dar

k gr

ey, f

irm6.

711

00.

041.

234.

8-3

.58

3.92

NA

F (B

arre

n)

42E

B14

1650

7012

EL-

N-M

B02

GW

02ov

erbu

rden

3m

LATE

RIT

E: m

ediu

m g

rave

l, su

b-an

gula

r to

sub

-roun

ded,

lith

ic c

last

s, ir

on

cem

ente

d, d

ark

redd

ish

brow

n, m

ediu

m

stre

ngth

, pro

babl

y a

late

rised

gra

vel

cong

lom

erat

e, s

igni

fican

t wat

er lo

ss

durin

g dr

illin

g

6.6

504

0.05

1.53

4-2

.47

2.61

NA

F (B

arre

n)

43E

B14

1650

7009

EL-

N-M

B03

GW

03ov

erbu

rden

6m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, mot

tled

red

/ gre

y,

firm

, man

gane

se m

iner

alis

atio

n th

roug

hout

6.4

350.

020.

611.

5-0

.89

2.45

NA

F (B

arre

n)

44E

B14

1650

701 0

EL-

N-M

B03

GW

03ov

erbu

rden

9m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, lig

ht b

row

n / g

rey,

fir

m5.

738

0.00

50.

150.

25-0

.10

1.63

NA

F (B

arre

n)

45E

B14

1650

7014

EL-

N-M

B04

GW

04ov

erbu

rden

3m

SA

ND

Y C

LAY

: silt

y m

atrix

, red

, sof

t, lit

hic

grav

el c

last

s at

bas

e8.

935

20.

020.

614.

3-3

.69

7.02

NA

F (B

arre

n)

46E

B14

1650

701 5

EL-

N-M

B04

GW

04ov

erbu

rden

6m

SA

ND

Y C

LAY

: silt

y m

atrix

, red

, sof

t, lit

hic

grav

el c

last

s at

bas

e8.

265

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

4G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 127: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

47E

B14

1650

7016

EL-

N-M

B04

GW

04ov

erbu

rden

9m

SA

ND

Y C

LAY

: fin

e sa

nd, q

uartz

cla

sts,

m

ottle

d ye

llow

/ re

d, s

oft

7.5

360.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

48E

B14

1650

703 0

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

3m

LATE

RIT

E: s

ub-ro

unde

d to

roun

ded,

lith

ic

clas

ts, m

ottle

d re

d / w

hite

, low

stre

ngth

, cl

asts

com

pris

ed o

f med

ium

gra

ined

sa

ndst

one

6.7

124

0.03

0.92

1.3

-0.3

81.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

49E

B14

1650

703

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

6m

LATE

RIT

E: s

ub-ro

unde

d to

roun

ded,

lith

ic

clas

ts, m

ottle

d re

d / w

hite

, low

stre

ngth

, cl

asts

com

pris

ed o

f med

ium

gra

ined

sa

ndst

one

6.1

540.

030.

921.

6-0

.68

1.74

NA

F (B

arre

n)

50E

B14

1650

7032

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

9m

CLA

Y: l

ow p

last

icity

, mot

tled

red

/ gre

y,

low

stre

ngth

, sof

t, po

ssib

ly w

eath

ered

cl

ayst

one

5.6

930.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

51E

B14

1650

703 3

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

12m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, ora

nge

/ gre

y, lo

w

stre

ngth

, sof

t5.

758

0.02

0.61

0.6

0.01

0.98

NA

F (B

arre

n)

52E

B14

1650

703 4

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

15m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, red

/ gr

ey, l

ow

stre

ngth

, sof

t5.

770

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

53E

B14

1650

703 5

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

18m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, yel

low

, low

stre

ngth

, so

ft5.

955

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

54E

B14

1650

703 6

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

21m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, gre

y, lo

w s

treng

th,

soft

6.1

460.

020.

611.

1-0

.49

1.80

NA

F (B

arre

n)

55E

B14

1650

703 7

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

24m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, gre

y, lo

w s

treng

th,

soft

6.3

470.

020.

612.

2-1

.59

3.59

NA

F (B

arre

n)

56E

B14

1650

703 8

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

27m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, gre

y, lo

w s

treng

th,

soft

6.4

630.

020.

611.

4-0

.79

2.29

NA

F (B

arre

n)

57E

B14

1650

703 9

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

30m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, gre

y, lo

w s

treng

th,

soft

6.5

850.

020.

613.

1-2

.49

5.06

NA

F (B

arre

n)

58E

B14

1650

704 0

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

33m

CLA

Y: m

ediu

m p

last

icity

, dar

k gr

eeni

sh

grey

, low

stre

ngth

, sof

t6.

673

0.02

0.61

3.4

-2.7

95.

55N

AF

(Bar

ren)

59E

B14

1650

704

EL-

S-M

B05

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

36m

CLA

Y: m

ediu

m p

last

icity

, dar

k gr

eeni

sh

grey

, low

stre

ngth

, sof

t7.

555

40.

580.

5617

.12

5.1

12.0

20.

30PA

F

60E

B14

1650

702 2

EL-

S-M

B06

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

12m

CLA

Y: m

ottle

d br

own

/ cre

am, f

irm5.

814

40.

020.

613.

8-3

.19

6.20

NA

F (B

arre

n)61

EB

1416

5070

23E

L-S

-MB

06G

W06

over

burd

en15

mC

LAY

: mot

tled

crea

m /

yello

w, f

irm5.

863

0.02

0.61

3.7

-3.0

96.

04N

AF

(Bar

ren)

62E

B14

1650

7024

EL-

S-M

B06

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

18m

CLA

Y: m

ottle

d cr

eam

/ ye

llow

, firm

3.4

2740

0.82

0.32

9.77

0.25

9.52

0.03

PAF

63E

B14

1650

702 5

EL-

S-M

B06

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

21m

CLA

Y: g

rey,

stif

f4.

411

200.

870.

6319

.23

0.6

18.6

30.

03PA

F64

EB

1416

5070

2 6E

L-S

-MB

06G

W06

over

burd

en24

mC

LAY

: red

, stif

f4.

831

60.

092.

760.

52.

260.

18N

AF

(Bar

ren)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

5G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 128: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

65E

B14

1650

7059

EL-

S-M

B06

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

4mLA

TER

ITE

: coa

rse

sand

, ang

ular

, lith

ic

clas

ts, p

oorly

gra

ded,

redd

ish

brow

n,

loos

e6.

539

0.02

0.61

1.8

-1.1

92.

94N

AF

(Bar

ren)

66E

B14

1650

7063

EL-

S-M

B06

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

6mLA

TER

ITE

: coa

rse

sand

, ang

ular

, lith

ic

clas

ts, p

oorly

gra

ded,

redd

ish

brow

n,

loos

e5.

838

0.00

50.

152.

7-2

.55

17.6

3N

AF

(Bar

ren)

67E

B14

1650

706 2

EL-

S-M

B06

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

9mC

LAY

: mot

tled

oran

ge /

crea

m, f

irm6.

011

80.

041.

231.

4-0

.18

1.14

NA

F (B

arre

n)

68E

B14

1650

7048

EL-

S-M

B08

GW

08ov

erbu

rden

3m

LATE

RIT

E: f

ine

sand

, qua

rtz c

last

s, s

ilty

mat

rix, r

eddi

sh lo

w s

treng

th5.

937

0.03

0.92

1.2

-0.2

81.

31N

AF

(Bar

ren)

69E

B14

1650

704 9

EL-

S-M

B08

GW

08ov

erbu

rden

6m

SIL

TY C

LAY

: hig

h pl

astic

ity, s

ilty

mat

rix,

mot

tled

oran

ge /

whi

te, l

ow s

treng

th, s

oft,

trace

coa

rse

sand

com

pone

nt6.

029

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

70E

B14

1650

7050

EL-

S-M

B08

GW

08ov

erbu

rden

9m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, mot

tled

redd

ish

whi

te, l

ow s

treng

th, s

oft

5.7

330.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

71E

B14

1650

705

EL-

S-M

B08

GW

08ov

erbu

rden

12m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, mot

tled

redd

ish

whi

te, l

ow s

tren g

th, s

oft

5.8

340.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

72E

B14

1650

704 3

EL-

S-M

B09

GW

09ov

erbu

rden

3m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, mot

tled

crea

m /

oran

ge, l

ow s

treng

th, s

oft

6.4

131

0.03

0.92

3.6

-2.6

83.

92N

AF

(Bar

ren)

73E

B14

1650

704 4

EL-

S-M

B09

GW

09ov

erbu

rden

6m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, ora

nge,

low

st

reng

th, s

oft,

red

stai

ning

on

plan

ar

surfa

ces

6.3

410.

030.

921.

2-0

.28

1.31

NA

F (B

arre

n)

74E

B14

1650

7045

EL-

S-M

B09

GW

09ov

erbu

rden

9m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, mot

tled

oran

ge /

grey

, low

stre

ngth

, sof

t5.

467

0.02

0.61

2.3

-1.6

93.

76N

AF

(Bar

ren)

75E

B14

1650

704 6

EL-

S-M

B09

GW

09ov

erbu

rden

12m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, mot

tled

oran

ge /

grey

, low

stre

ngth

, sof

t6.

037

0.02

0.61

1.4

-0.7

92.

29N

AF

(Bar

ren)

76E

B14

1650

705 4

EL-

S-M

B10

GW

10ov

erbu

rden

3m

SIL

TY C

LAY

: low

pla

stic

ity, c

oars

e sa

nd,

roun

ded,

qua

rtz c

last

s, re

d, lo

w s

treng

th,

soft

6.2

380.

020.

610.

8-0

.19

1.31

NA

F (B

arre

n)

77E

B14

1650

7055

EL-

S-M

B10

GW

10ov

erbu

rden

6m

LATE

RIT

E: f

ine

sand

, qua

rtz c

last

s, s

ilty

mat

rix, y

ello

w /

red,

med

ium

stre

ngth

, fin

e sa

ndst

one

late

rite

6.0

450.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

78E

B14

1650

705 6

EL-

S-M

B10

GW

10ov

erbu

rden

9m

SIL

TY C

LAY

: fin

e sa

nd, q

uartz

cla

sts,

m

ottle

d w

hite

/ ye

llow

, low

stre

ngth

, sof

t, pr

obab

ly w

eath

ered

san

dsto

ne6.

236

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

6G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 129: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

79E

B14

1658

6053

EL-

N-G

C01

GC

01-S

4in

terb

urde

n3.

11-3

.5W

hite

to li

ght b

row

n cl

ayst

one

- ver

y fin

e gr

aine

d.6.

26

0.01

0.31

0.25

0.06

0.82

NA

F (B

arre

n)

80E

B14

1658

604 0

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

14in

terb

urde

n21

-21.

5

Late

ral z

one

of M

anga

nife

rous

cla

y,

geoe

thiti

c cl

ay a

nd w

hite

kao

linite

. Som

e oo

litic

text

ures

pre

sent

. Pal

e pi

nk c

lay

and

brow

n an

d pu

rple

con

solid

ated

san

d

5.2

210.

005

0.15

1.4

-1.2

59.

14N

AF

(Bar

ren)

81E

B14

1658

6042

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

16in

terb

urde

n22

.65-

22.8

Whi

te s

mec

tite

clay

- in

terb

urde

n6.

08

0.00

50.

151.

0-0

.85

6.53

NA

F (B

arre

n)

82E

B14

1658

6023

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

6in

terb

urde

n8.

4-8.

7W

hite

, pur

ple

and

red

smec

titic

cla

y.

Som

e M

n fra

gmen

ts6.

313

0.00

50.

150.

8-0

.65

5.22

NA

F (B

arre

n)

83E

B14

1658

602 4

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

7in

terb

urde

n9.

15-9

.45

Whi

te, p

urpl

e an

d re

d sm

ectit

ic c

lay.

S

ome

Mn

fragm

ents

6.2

170.

020.

613.

5-2

.89

5.71

NA

F (B

arre

n)

84E

B14

1658

602 5

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

8in

terb

urde

n9.

5-9.

8W

hite

, pur

ple

and

red

smec

titic

cla

y6.

518

0.00

50.

152.

0-1

.85

13.0

6N

AF

(Bar

ren)

85E

B14

1658

601 6

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

7in

terb

urde

n8.

0-8.

35V

ery

soft

crea

m w

hite

cla

ys. S

pars

ely

mot

tled

pink

bla

ck a

nd p

ale

yello

w6.

237

0.00

50.

154.

0-3

.85

26.1

2N

AF

(Bar

ren)

86E

B14

1658

600 8

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

8in

terb

urde

n7.

3-7.

65P

urpl

e cl

ay w

ith w

hite

cla

y bl

obs

(50m

m)

with

whi

te la

tera

l vei

ns (1

00m

m c

ore

loss

)5.

914

0.00

50.

150.

25-0

.10

1.63

NA

F (B

arre

n)

87E

B14

1658

605

EL-

N-G

C01

GC

01-S

2or

e (M

ID)

0.5-

1.0

Geo

thiti

c cl

ay a

nd M

as M

gt w

ith o

ol/p

iso

text

ures

. som

e se

ctio

ns th

e M

n te

xtur

es

(ool

ites)

are

com

plet

ely

geot

hitic

(in

terb

erde

n). L

arge

frag

men

ts <

80m

m o

f M

as M

gt th

roug

hout

.

6.0

130.

020.

611.

9-1

.29

3.10

NA

F (B

arre

n)

88E

B14

1658

605 2

EL-

N-G

C01

GC

01-S

3or

e (M

ID)

2.5-

3.0

Inte

rval

gra

des

into

mor

e de

nse

Mas

Mgt

w

ith m

inor

ool

/pis

text

ures

. Min

or to

m

oder

ate

visi

ble

clay

repl

acem

ent

6.3

80.

020.

612.

6-1

.99

4.24

NA

F (B

arre

n)

89E

B14

1658

6054

EL-

N-G

C01

GC

01-S

5or

e (B

OT)

3.5-

3.9

Sil

Mas

Mgt

and

alte

rnat

ing

geot

hite

and

S

il M

as M

gt. T

hin

geot

hitic

ban

ds a

t bo

ttom

hal

f of i

nter

val.

<2cm

vug

s at

hi

gher

den

sity

of g

eoth

ite b

efor

e sh

arp

cont

act

6.4

80.

020.

612.

9-2

.29

4.73

NA

F (B

arre

n)

90E

B14

1658

6048

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

6or

e (B

OT)

5.15

-5.6

5

Bla

ck m

ass

mag

ite w

ith s

mal

l cla

y ba

nds

(<20

mm

). C

lay

band

s ar

e ge

oeth

ic a

nd

friab

le. W

eath

erin

g ev

iden

t on

som

e of

th

e fra

ctur

es. K

aolin

cla

y ba

nd 5

mm

thic

k.

5.9

120.

020.

611.

1-0

.49

1.80

NA

F (B

arre

n)

INTE

RB

UR

DEN

OR

E

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

7G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 130: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

91E

B14

1658

6049

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

7or

e (B

OT)

5.9-

6.3

Bla

ck s

ilici

ous

mas

sive

man

gane

se w

ith

prom

inen

t red

cla

y ba

nd a

nd p

rom

inen

t or

ange

san

d ba

nd.

5.8

100.

020.

611.

4-0

.79

2.29

NA

F (B

arre

n)

92E

B14

1658

6039

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13a

ore

(MID

)20

.4-2

1

Bla

ck m

ass

man

gite

frag

men

ts. A

t the

top

and

botto

m o

f the

col

umn

is b

lack

cla

y-lik

e m

anga

nese

with

vei

ns o

f whi

te

thro

ugho

ut.

5.6

80.

005

0.15

2.0

-1.8

513

.06

NA

F (B

arre

n)

93E

B14

1658

604

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

15or

e (B

OT)

21.9

-22.

4B

lack

dis

cont

inuo

us m

assi

ve m

angi

te.

Rel

ict p

iso

stru

ctur

es6.

08

0.00

50.

153.

4-3

.25

22.2

0N

AF

(Bar

ren)

94E

B14

1658

602 2

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

5or

e (M

ID)

6.5-

7.0

Whi

te, b

row

n an

d re

d ge

oeth

ic

clay

.Dis

cont

inuo

us a

nd fr

actu

red

mas

s m

angi

te b

ands

thou

ghou

t (10

-50m

m)

5.9

110.

020.

611.

2-0

.59

1.96

NA

F (B

arre

n)

95E

B14

1658

601 5

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

6or

e6.

5-7.

0B

lack

ang

ular

and

sub

angu

lar f

ragm

ents

of

man

gane

se (5

-15m

m) s

uppo

rted

by

very

sof

t cre

am w

hite

cla

ys

6.0

150.

005

0.15

4.8

-4.6

531

.35

NA

F (B

arre

n)

96E

B14

1658

6017

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

8or

e8.

35-8

.75

Bla

ck a

ngul

ar a

nd s

uban

gula

r fra

gmen

ts

of m

anga

nese

(2-5

mm

). M

ass

man

gite

ba

nds

(10m

m-2

5mm

thic

k). S

uppo

rted

by

whi

te a

nd y

ello

w g

eoet

hitic

cla

ys (1

50m

m

core

loss

)

6.0

220.

020.

615.

2-4

.59

8.49

NA

F (B

arre

n)

97E

B14

1658

600 7

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

7or

e6.

75-7

.0S

ilico

ious

mas

sive

man

gite

, yel

low

, bro

wn

and

crea

m c

lay

6.1

220.

020.

613.

1-2

.49

5.06

NA

F (B

arre

n)

98E

B14

1658

6009

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

9or

e7.

87-8

.34

Bla

ck m

ass

man

gite

, fra

gmen

ted

larg

e pi

eces

>50

mm

, vei

ns o

f sili

ca ~

2mm

thic

k th

roug

hout

. Sha

rp c

onta

ct b

etw

een

inte

rbur

dern

ove

rlyin

g la

yer.

6.1

120.

005

0.15

1.5

-1.3

59.

80N

AF

(Bar

ren)

99E

B14

1650

7008

EL-

N-M

B01

GW

01or

e27

mC

LAY

: low

pla

stic

ity, o

rang

e, fi

rm,

occa

sion

al m

anga

nese

laye

rs th

roug

hout

6.8

500.

020.

613.

3-2

.69

5.39

NA

F (B

arre

n)

100

EB

1416

5070

1 3E

L-N

-MB

02G

W02

ore

5mC

LAY

: med

ium

pla

stic

ity, w

hite

, firm

, m

anga

nese

thro

ugho

ut a

s la

yers

with

in

clay

uni

t6.

940

0.02

0.61

0.5

0.11

0.82

NA

F (B

arre

n)

101

EB

1416

5070

1E

L-N

-MB

03G

W03

ore

11.5

mM

AN

GA

NE

SE

& C

LAY

: bla

ck, h

igh

stre

ngth

man

gane

se la

yers

alte

rnat

ing

with

hig

hpl

astic

ity, w

hite

, sof

t cla

y6.

036

0.02

0.61

2-1

.39

3.27

NA

F (B

arre

n)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

8G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 131: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC

2N

APP2

µS/c

mpH

1A

NC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AM

D ri

sk

Cla

ssifi

catio

n3%

kg H

2SO

4/t

Tabl

e C

-1: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for O

verb

urde

n an

d O

re S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

No.

ALS

La

bora

tory

N

o.

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)Li

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

n

102

EB

1416

5070

17E

L-N

-MB

04G

W04

ore

11m

MA

NG

AN

ES

E: b

lack

, ver

y hi

gh s

treng

th7.

232

0.02

0.61

1.6

-0.9

92.

61N

AF

(Bar

ren)

103

EB

1416

5070

18E

L-N

-MB

04G

W04

ore

12m

MA

NG

AN

ES

E: b

lack

, ver

y hi

gh s

treng

th6.

627

0.02

0.61

1.2

-0.5

91.

96N

AF

(Bar

ren)

104

EB

1416

5070

4 2E

L-S

-MB

05G

W05

ore

39m

MA

NG

AN

ES

E &

CLA

Y: b

lack

, hig

h st

reng

th m

anga

nese

with

sig

nific

ant c

lay

thro

ugho

ut6.

920

90.

310.

092.

886.

0-3

.12

2.08

NA

F (B

arre

n)

105

EB

1416

5070

2 7E

L-S

-MB

06G

W06

ore

27m

MA

NG

AN

ES

E: b

lack

, med

ium

stre

ngth

5.5

990.

030.

927.

6-6

.68

8.27

NA

F (B

arre

n)

106

EB

1416

5070

28E

L-S

-MB

07G

W07

ore

3m

MA

NG

AN

ES

E: b

lack

, hig

h st

reng

th,

gene

rally

mas

sive

man

gane

se, p

isol

ites

at b

ase

6.6

162

0.04

1.23

2.7

-1.4

82.

20N

AF

(Bar

ren)

107

EB

1416

5070

2 9E

L-S

-MB

07G

W07

ore

6m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, mot

tled

grey

ish

oran

ge, l

ow s

treng

th, s

oft,

diss

emin

ated

m

anga

nese

thro

ugho

ut5.

235

0.02

0.61

2.1

-1.4

93.

43N

AF

(Bar

ren)

108

EB

1416

5070

5 2E

L-S

-MB

08G

W08

ore

15m

MA

NG

AN

ES

E: b

lack

, hig

h st

reng

th, c

lay

disp

erse

d th

roug

hout

6.1

240.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

109

EB

1416

5070

5 3E

L-S

-MB

08G

W08

ore

16.6

mM

AN

GA

NE

SE

: bla

ck, h

igh

stre

ngth

, cla

y di

sper

sed

thro

ugho

ut6.

142

0.00

50.

151.

8-1

.65

11.7

6N

AF

(Bar

ren)

110

EB

1416

5070

4 7E

L-S

-MB

09G

W09

ore

14.5

-15m

CLA

Y: h

igh

plas

ticity

, red

, low

stre

ngth

, st

iff, m

anga

nese

dis

sem

inat

ed th

ough

out

6.2

790.

020.

611.

6-0

.99

2.61

NA

F (B

arre

n)

111

EB

1416

5070

5 7E

L-S

-MB

10G

W10

ore

12m

SA

ND

Y C

LAY

& M

AN

GA

NE

SE

: dar

k m

ediu

m s

treng

th, a

ltern

atin

g la

yers

of

clay

and

man

gane

se6.

241

0.02

0.61

0.7

-0.0

91.

14N

AF

(Bar

ren)

112

EB

1416

5070

5 8E

L-S

-MB

10G

W10

ore

15m

CLA

Y: l

ight

gre

y, lo

w s

treng

th, s

oft,

man

gane

se th

roug

hout

form

ing

alte

rnat

ing

laye

rs o

f cla

y an

d m

anga

nese

6.5

300.

020.

610.

250.

360.

41N

AF

(Bar

ren)

Not

es:

* M

ID =

hig

h-gr

ade

ore

cons

istin

g m

ostly

of c

emen

ted

and

loos

e pi

solit

es;

* B

OT

= lo

w-g

rade

ore

rich

in s

ilica

.1.

Cur

rent

pH

and

EC

pro

vide

d fo

r 1:5

sam

ple:

wat

er e

xtra

cts

2. S

cr =

Chr

omiu

m R

educ

ible

Sul

fur;

MP

A =

Max

imum

Pot

entia

l Aci

dity

; A

NC

= A

cid

Neu

tralis

ing

Cap

acity

; an

d N

AP

P =

Net

Aci

d P

rodu

cing

Pot

entia

l.3.

Sam

ple

clas

sific

atio

n de

tail

prov

ided

in re

port

text

.

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

9G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 132: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2AN

C2

NAP

P2

µS/c

m

1E

B14

1658

6050

EL-

N-G

C01

GC

01-S

1ov

erbu

rden

0-0.

27B

row

n cl

ay w

ith p

lant

mat

eria

l and

min

or

Mn

fragm

ents

6.2

370.

020.

614.

1-3

.49

6.69

NA

F (B

arre

n)

2E

B14

1658

6044

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

2ov

erbu

rden

3.3-

3.7

Red

and

yel

low

con

solid

ated

san

dy s

oil

with

lith

opho

rite

and

pyro

lusi

te p

isos

. 5.

711

0.02

0.61

2.4

-1.7

93.

92N

AF

(Bar

ren)

3E

B14

1658

6047

EL-

N-G

C02

GC

02-S

5ov

erbu

rden

4.5-

4.85

Bla

ck m

ass

mag

ite w

ith s

mal

l cla

y ba

nds

(<20

mm

). C

lay

band

s ar

e ge

oeth

ic a

nd

friab

le. W

eath

erin

g ev

iden

t on

som

e of

th

e fra

ctur

es. K

aolin

cla

y ba

nd 5

mm

thic

k.

6.0

110.

020.

610.

60.

010.

98N

AF

(Bar

ren)

4E

B14

1658

6032

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

7ov

erbu

rden

8.6-

9.0

Whi

te k

aolin

ite c

lay.

Red

and

pin

k cl

ayst

one.

Red

Ver

tical

thin

vei

n th

roug

h un

it6.

012

0.02

0.61

0.25

0.36

0.41

NA

F (B

arre

n)

5E

B14

1658

6035

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

10ov

erbu

rden

13.1

-13.

5

Bro

wn

blac

k m

anga

nese

enr

iche

d co

nsol

idat

ed a

nd u

ncon

solid

ated

qu

artz

ite. L

ater

al w

hite

stre

aks

thro

u gho

ut.

5.6

160.

020.

611.

8-1

.19

2.94

NA

F (B

arre

n)

6E

B14

1658

6038

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13ov

erbu

rden

20-2

0.37

Pur

ple

and

oran

ge c

lays

tone

. Wel

l ro

unde

d m

anga

nese

frag

men

ts (2

0mm

). La

terit

e an

d lit

hoph

orite

con

cret

ions

(2-

7mm

)

5.0

310.

020.

611.

0-0

.39

1.63

NA

F (B

arre

n)

7E

B14

1658

6019

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

2ov

erbu

rden

0.6-

1.0

Mot

tled

red

and

brow

n m

anga

nife

rous

la

terit

e, li

thop

horit

e, c

ryto

pmel

ane

and

goet

hic

conc

retio

ns, s

ome

vugs

pre

sent

, so

me

biod

etrit

us in

top

500m

m

6.1

190.

020.

612.

0-1

.39

3.27

NA

F (B

arre

n)

8E

B14

1658

6021

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

4ov

erbu

rden

5.6-

6.0

Lam

inar

whi

te, b

row

n an

d re

d fe

rrino

us

and

late

rite,

rew

orke

d w

ell r

ound

ed

quar

tzite

sto

nes

(20m

m),

silic

ious

m

anga

nes

laye

rs (4

0mm

thic

k).

5.8

100.

020.

610.

60.

010.

98N

AF

(Bar

ren)

9E

B14

1658

6011

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

2ov

erbu

rden

2.0-

2.4

Mot

tled

red

and

bow

n la

terit

e w

ith s

ilicio

us

man

gane

se fr

agm

ents

and

late

ritic

pe

bble

s (5

-10m

m) s

uspe

nded

thro

ugho

ut.

Som

e la

rger

sub

roun

ded

elon

gate

d M

n fra

gmen

ts (5

0mm

) (~1

%).

Som

e bi

odet

ritus

(<0.

1%)

6.0

130.

020.

611.

8-1

.19

2.94

NA

F (B

arre

n)

Lith

olog

ical

Des

crip

tion

pH1

Tabl

e C

-2:

Ove

rbur

den

and

Ore

Sam

ples

Sel

ecte

d fo

r Add

ition

al M

ulti-

Elem

ent T

ests

AN

C:

MPA

R

atio

AMD

risk

C

lass

ifica

tion3

%kg

H2S

O4/t

RG

SM

E N

o.O

VER

BU

RD

EN

ALS

Labo

rato

ry N

o.D

rill H

ole

Loca

tion/

ID

Clie

nt

Sam

ple

ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

10G

EMC

O E

aste

rn L

ease

s Pr

ojec

t

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 133: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2AN

C2

NAP

P2

µS/c

mLi

thol

ogic

al D

escr

iptio

npH

1

Tabl

e C

-2:

Ove

rbur

den

and

Ore

Sam

ples

Sel

ecte

d fo

r Add

ition

al M

ulti-

Elem

ent T

ests

AN

C:

MPA

R

atio

AMD

risk

C

lass

ifica

tion3

%kg

H2S

O4/t

RG

SM

E N

o.

ALS

Labo

rato

ry N

o.D

rill H

ole

Loca

tion/

ID

Clie

nt

Sam

ple

ID

Sam

ple

Type

*

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)

10E

B14

1658

6014

EL-

S-G

C05

GC

05-S

5ov

erbu

rden

5.0-

5.4

Gre

y B

lack

mas

s m

anga

nese

frag

men

ts

(5 -2

0mm

). B

row

n an

d or

ange

stre

aked

sa

nds.

Wel

l sor

ted

Loos

e an

d ce

men

ted.

Th

in b

ands

of s

ilicio

us m

anga

nese

(20-

30m

m th

ick)

(40m

m C

ore

loss

)

6.0

180.

020.

612.

8-2

.19

4.57

NA

F (B

arre

n)

11E

B14

1658

6002

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

2ov

erbu

rden

0.75

-1.1

Bro

wn

ferri

gnou

s lo

ose

clay

and

ce

men

ted

clay

ston

e, m

inor

silic

ious

bla

ck

man

gane

se fr

agm

ents

thro

ugho

ut. S

ome

vugs

20-

50m

m w

ide.

6.0

160.

020.

612.

5-1

.89

4.08

NA

F (B

arre

n)

12E

B14

1658

6005

EL-

S-G

C06

GC

06-S

5ov

erbu

rden

4.7-

5.0

Sm

all m

angi

te fr

agm

ents

(5-1

0mm

) su

pprte

d in

a w

hite

and

ora

nge

clay

m

atrix

. Thi

n m

anga

nese

enr

iche

d ba

nds

(5-1

0mm

)(10

0mm

cor

e lo

ss)

6.3

190.

020.

612.

0-1

.39

3.27

NA

F (B

arre

n)

13E

B14

1658

6040

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

14in

terb

urde

n21

-21.

5

Late

ral z

one

of M

anga

nife

rous

cla

y,

geoe

thiti

c cl

ay a

nd w

hite

kao

linite

. Som

e oo

litic

text

ures

pre

sent

. Pal

e pi

nk c

lay

and

brow

n an

d pu

rple

con

solid

ated

san

d

5.2

210.

005

0.15

1.4

-1.2

59.

14N

AF

(Bar

ren)

14E

B14

1658

6042

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

16in

terb

urde

n22

.65-

22.8

Whi

te s

mec

tite

clay

- in

terb

urde

n6.

08

0.00

50.

151.

0-0

.85

6.53

NA

F (B

arre

n)

15E

B14

1658

6023

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

6in

terb

urde

n8.

4-8.

7W

hite

, pur

ple

and

red

smec

titic

cla

y.

Som

e M

n fra

gmen

ts6.

313

0.00

50.

150.

8-0

.65

5.22

NA

F (B

arre

n)

16E

B14

1658

6025

EL-

S-G

C04

GC

04-S

8in

terb

urde

n9.

5-9.

8W

hite

, pur

ple

and

red

smec

titic

cla

y6.

518

0.00

50.

152.

0-1

.85

13.0

6N

AF

(Bar

ren)

17E

B14

1658

6039

EL-

N-G

C03

GC

03-S

13a

ore

(MID

)20

.4-2

1

Bla

ck m

ass

man

gite

frag

men

ts. A

t the

top

and

botto

m o

f the

col

umn

is b

lack

cla

y-lik

e m

anga

nese

with

vei

ns o

f whi

te

thro

u gho

ut.

5.6

80.

005

0.15

2.0

-1.8

513

.06

NA

F (B

arre

n)

18E

B14

1658

6015

EL-

N-G

C05

GC

05-S

6or

e6.

5-7.

0B

lack

ang

ular

and

sub

angu

lar f

ragm

ents

of

man

gane

se (5

-15m

m) s

uppo

rted

by

very

sof

t cre

am w

hite

cla

ys

6.0

150.

005

0.15

4.8

-4.6

531

.35

NA

F (B

arre

n)

Not

es:

* M

ID =

hi g

h-gr

ade

ore

cons

istin

g m

ostly

of c

emen

ted

and

loos

e pi

solit

es;

* BO

T =

low

-gra

de o

re ri

ch in

silic

a.1.

Cur

rent

pH

and

EC

pro

vide

d fo

r 1:5

sam

ple:

wat

er e

xtra

cts

2. S

cr =

Chr

omiu

m R

educ

ible

Sul

fur;

MPA

= M

axim

um P

oten

tial A

cidi

t y;

ANC

= A

cid

Neu

tralis

ing

Cap

acity

; an

d N

APP

= N

et A

cid

Prod

ucin

g Po

tent

ial.

3. S

ampl

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

deta

il pr

ovid

ed in

repo

rt te

xt.

INTE

RB

UR

DEN

OR

E

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

11G

EMC

O E

aste

rn L

ease

s Pr

ojec

t

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 134: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Tabl

e C

-3:

Mul

ti-El

emen

t Res

ults

for S

elec

ted

Ove

rbur

den

and

Ore

Sam

ples

1

23

45

67

89

EB

1417

6990

18E

B14

1769

9016

EB

1417

6990

17E

B14

1769

9010

EB

1417

6990

11E

B14

1769

9012

EB

1417

6990

06E

B14

1769

9007

EB

1417

6990

03

0.0-

0.27

m3.

3-3.

7m4.

50-4

.85m

8.6-

9.0m

13.1

-13.

5m20

-20.

37m

0.6-

1.0m

5.6-

6.0m

2.0-

2.4m

EL-N

-GC

01EL

-S-G

C05

Par

amet

ers

Det

ectio

nLi

mit

NE

PC

1H

ealth

-B

ased

Inve

stig

atio

nLe

vel H

IL-(

C)

GC

01-S

1G

C02

-S2

GC

02-S

5G

C03

-S7

GC

03-S

10G

C03

-S13

GC

04-S

2G

C04

-S4

GC

05-S

2

Maj

or E

lem

ents

Alu

min

ium

(Al)

50-

17,2

0015

,900

6,44

04,

820

3,73

04,

430

22,8

004,

950

20,9

00C

alci

um (C

a)50

-50

022

0<5

0<5

0<5

0<5

010

0<5

018

0Iro

n (F

e)50

-63

,300

53,6

0065

,500

23,3

0012

,300

117,

000

126,

000

20,3

0010

0,00

0M

agne

sium

(Mg)

50-

210

140

100

<50

<50

<50

320

110

360

Man

gane

se (M

n)5

19,0

0011

4,00

037

9,00

01,

930

400

44,3

002,

070

36,1

0021

,700

58,1

00P

otas

sium

(K)

50-

4,93

011

,200

160

200

2,45

014

061

061

01,

650

Sod

ium

(Na)

50-

210

310

<50

<50

<50

<50

90<5

0<5

0M

inor

Ele

men

tsA

ntim

ony

(Sb)

5-

<5<5

<5<5

<5<5

<5<5

<5A

rsen

ic (A

s)5

300

1120

11<5

12<5

611

8B

oron

(B)

5020

,000

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

Cad

miu

m (C

d)1

90<1

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

Chr

omiu

m (C

r) -

hexa

vale

nt2

300

**45

6845

267

2611

66

80C

obal

t (C

o)2

300

107

101

<2<2

743

111

9211

9C

oppe

r (C

u)5

17,0

0061

958

<528

3340

3633

Lead

(Pb)

560

051

117

20<5

<552

56<5

52M

olyb

denu

m (M

o)2

-4

<23

<24

<24

82

Nic

kel (

Ni)

21,

200

3022

<2<2

441

585

80S

elen

ium

(Se)

570

0<5

22<5

<5<5

<5<5

<5<5

Silv

er (A

g)2

-<2

4<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

Thor

ium

(Th)

0.1

-5.

46.

811

.91.

31.

84.

27.

41.

25.

7U

rani

um (U

)0.

1-

1.2

2.3

1.3

0.1

0.4

2.1

3.6

12.

6V

anad

ium

(V)

5-

138

250

688

4597

160

304

126

269

Zinc

(Zn)

530

,000

6283

<5<5

4529

1234

23Ex

chan

geab

le C

atio

nsE

xch.

Cal

cium

(Ca)

0.1

-1.

0<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.10.

2<0

.10.

6E

xch.

Mag

nesi

um (M

g)0.

1-

0.5

0.3

0.6

0.2

<0.1

<0.1

1.2

0.6

1.3

Exc

h. P

otas

sion

(K)

0.1

-0.

1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.10.

1<0

.10.

1E

xch.

Sod

ium

(Na)

0.1

-<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1<0

.1E

ffect

ive

Cat

ion

Exc

hang

e C

apac

ity (e

CE

C)

0.1

-1.

60.

40.

70.

30.

2<0

.11.

60.

72.

0E

xcha

ngea

ble

Sod

ium

Per

cent

age

(ES

P)

0.1%

-<0

.1<0

.1<0

.13.

5<0

.1<0

.12.

2<0

.11.

2C

alci

um/M

agne

sium

Rat

io0.

1-

2.00

0.33

0.17

0.5

1.00

1.00

0.17

0.17

0.46

Not

es

< i

ndic

ates

less

than

the

anal

ytic

al d

etec

tion

limit.

Sha

ded

cells

gre

ater

than

bac

kgro

und

rang

e or

app

lied

guid

elin

e lim

it.**

G

uide

line

leve

l for

hex

aval

ent c

hrom

ium

[Cr(

VI)]

= 3

00 m

g/kg

. G

uide

line

leve

l for

Cr(

III) =

24%

of t

otal

Cr.

All

units

mg/

kg

All

units

mg/

kg

All

units

in m

eq/1

00g

(exc

ept f

or E

SP

)

RG

S-M

E N

umbe

r →A

LS L

abor

ator

y ID

Sam

ple

Type

Dep

th In

terv

al R

ange

Dril

lhol

e Lo

catio

n/S

ampl

e ID

Ove

rbur

den

EL-N

-GC

02EL

-N-G

C03

EL-S

-GC

04

1. N

EP

C (2

013)

. N

atio

nal E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rote

ctio

n C

ounc

il (N

EP

C).

Nat

iona

l Env

ironm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

(Ass

essm

ent o

f Site

Con

tam

inat

ion)

M

easu

re (N

EP

M),

Am

endm

ent o

f Sch

edul

e B

1-B

7 of

199

9 ve

rsio

n.G

uide

line

on In

vest

igat

ion

Leve

ls fo

r Soi

l and

Gro

undw

ater

. H

ealth

-B

ased

Inve

stig

atio

n Le

vel -

HIL

(C);

gene

ric la

nd u

se in

clud

ing

recr

eatio

nal o

pen

spac

es.

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

12 G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 135: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Par

amet

ers

Det

ectio

nLi

mit

NE

PC

1H

ealth

-B

ased

Inve

stig

atio

nLe

vel H

IL-(

C)

Maj

or E

lem

ents

Alu

min

ium

(Al)

50-

Cal

cium

(Ca)

50-

Iron

(Fe)

50-

Mag

nesi

um (M

g)50

-M

anga

nese

(Mn)

519

,000

Pot

assi

um (K

)50

-S

odiu

m (N

a)50

-M

inor

Ele

men

tsA

ntim

ony

(Sb)

5-

Ars

enic

(As)

530

0B

oron

(B)

5020

,000

Cad

miu

m (C

d)1

90C

hrom

ium

(Cr)

- he

xava

lent

230

0 **

Cob

alt (

Co)

230

0C

oppe

r (C

u)5

17,0

00Le

ad (P

b)5

600

Mol

ybde

num

(Mo)

2-

Nic

kel (

Ni)

21,

200

Sel

eniu

m (S

e)5

700

Silv

er (A

g)2

-Th

oriu

m (T

h)0.

1-

Ura

nium

(U)

0.1

-V

anad

ium

(V)

5-

Zinc

(Zn)

530

,000

Exch

ange

able

Cat

ions

Exc

h. C

alci

um (C

a)0.

1-

Exc

h. M

agne

sium

(Mg)

0.1

-E

xch.

Pot

assi

on (K

)0.

1-

Exc

h. S

odiu

m (N

a)0.

1-

Effe

ctiv

e C

atio

n E

xcha

nge

Cap

acity

(eC

EC

)0.

1-

Exc

hang

eabl

e S

odiu

m P

erce

ntag

e (E

SP

)0.

1%-

Cal

cium

/Mag

nesi

um R

atio

0.1

-

RG

S-M

E N

umbe

r →A

LS L

abor

ator

y ID

Sam

ple

Type

Dep

th In

terv

al R

ange

Dril

lhol

e Lo

catio

n/S

ampl

e ID

Tabl

e C

-3:

Mul

ti-El

emen

t Res

ults

for S

elec

ted

Ove

rbur

den

and

Ore

Sam

ples

10

1112

1314

1516

1718

EB

1417

6990

04E

B14

1769

9001

EB

1417

6990

02E

B14

1769

9014

EB

1417

6990

15E

B14

1769

9008

EB

1417

6990

09E

B14

1769

9013

EB

1417

6990

05

5.0-

5.4m

0.75

-1.1

0m4.

7-5.

0m21

-21.

50m

22.6

5-22

.80m

8.4-

8.7m

9.5-

9.8m

20.4

-21.

0m6.

5-7.

0m

EL-S

-GC

05EL

-N-G

C03

EL-S

-GC

05

GC

05-S

5G

C06

-S2

GC

06-S

5G

C03

-S14

GC

03-S

16G

C04

-S6

GC

04-S

8G

C03

-S13

aG

C05

-S6

9,88

016

,600

18,7

002,

980

2,32

08,

500

10,1

006,

930

15,8

0086

030

014

0<5

0<5

055

050

090

082

013

5,00

010

2,00

013

8,00

035

,400

6,01

056

,500

56,4

0018

,400

36,8

0050

037

032

060

<50

2,61

02,

150

300

2,42

034

4,00

029

,100

30,8

0030

,900

3,99

011

,000

51,2

0056

9,00

020

8,00

04,

840

320

1,49

019

021

01,

860

3,20

08,

890

8,70

02,

000

<50

130

<50

<50

110

210

<50

1,50

0

<5<5

<5<5

<5<5

<5<5

<56

<531

5<5

<57

596

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<50

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

<115

121

9511

1131

354

675

7927

3<2

1237

142

4813

051

3213

<518

5317

250

105

8413

513

613

4223

356

<2<2

<2<2

2<2

<2<2

<213

910

116

12<2

1320

8312

619

<5<5

<5<5

<5<5

477

3<2

<2<2

<2<2

<27

24.

39.

37.

55.

11.

66.

14.

52.

15.

31.

22.

71.

50.

60.

20.

20.

61.

80.

720

826

134

617

810

822

214

728

412

319

0<5

2011

<540

5918

017

0

0.2

1.1

0.4

<0.1

<0.1

2.3

1.6

--

0.6

1.3

1.4

<0.1

0.1

11.9

8.5

--

<0.1

0.1

0.2

<0.1

<0.1

0.7

0.6

--

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

0.2

0.2

--

0.9

2.6

2.1

0.2

0.2

15.2

10.9

--

3.5

1.0

1.9

<0.1

<0.1

1.4

1.6

--

0.33

0.85

0.29

1.00

1.00

0.19

0.19

--

Not

es

< i

ndic

ates

less

than

the

anal

ytic

al d

etec

tion

limit.

Sha

ded

cells

gre

ater

than

bac

kgro

und

rang

e or

app

lied

guid

elin

e lim

it.**

G

uide

line

leve

l for

hex

aval

ent c

hrom

ium

[Cr(

VI)]

= 3

00 m

g/kg

. G

uide

line

leve

l for

Cr(

III) =

24%

of t

otal

Cr.

Ore

Ove

rbur

den

Inte

rbur

den

EL-S

-GC

06EL

-N-G

C03

EL-S

-GC

04

1. N

EP

C (2

013)

. N

atio

nal E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rote

ctio

n C

ounc

il (N

EP

C).

Nat

iona

l Env

ironm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

(Ass

essm

ent o

f Site

Con

tam

inat

ion)

M

easu

re (N

EP

M),

Am

endm

ent o

f Sch

edul

e B

1-B

7 of

199

9 ve

rsio

n.G

uide

line

on In

vest

igat

ion

Leve

ls fo

r Soi

l and

Gro

undw

ater

. H

ealth

-B

ased

Inve

stig

atio

n Le

vel -

HIL

(C);

gene

ric la

nd u

se in

clud

ing

recr

eatio

nal o

pen

spac

es.

All

units

mg/

kg

All

units

mg/

kg

All

units

in m

eq/1

00g

(exc

ept f

or E

SP

)

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

13 G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 136: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EB

1417

6990

17E

B14

1769

9010

EB

1417

6990

14E

B14

1769

9015

EB

1417

6990

08E

B14

1769

9009

EL-

N-G

C02

-S5

EL-

N-G

C03

-S7

EL-

N-G

C03

-S14

EL-

N-G

C03

-S16

EL-

S-G

C04

-S6

EL-

S-G

C04

-S8

4.5

0-4.

858.

6-9.

021

.0-2

1.5

22.6

5-22

.80

8.4-

8.7

9.5-

9.8

34

1314

1516

Kao

linite

Kao

linite

Kao

linite

Sm

ectit

eS

mec

tite

Sm

ectit

eEm

erso

n A

ggre

gate

Uni

tsLO

R

Col

or (M

unse

ll)-

Bro

wn

Ligh

t Bro

wn

Ver

y D

ark

Gre

yG

rey

Red

dish

Bro

wn

Ligh

t Yel

low

ish

Bro

wn

Text

ure

-S

andy

Gra

vel

Roc

kS

ilty

Cla

yR

ock

Silt

y C

lay

Silt

y C

lay

Em

erso

n C

lass

Num

ber

-8

84

84

4Pa

rtic

le S

izin

gU

nits

LOR

+75

µm%

165

2032

6119

27 +

150µ

m%

152

1921

587

18 +

300µ

m%

133

1918

587

16 +

425µ

m%

126

1815

577

16 +

600µ

m%

121

1814

556

15 +

1180

µm%

118

1611

495

12 +

2.36

mm

%1

1110

836

38

+4.

75m

m%

1<1

21

8<1

2 +

9.50

mm

%1

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

+19

.0m

m%

1<1

<1<1

<1<1

<1 +

37.5

mm

%1

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

+75

.0m

m%

1<1

<1<1

<1<1

<1So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

Uni

tsLO

RC

lay

(<2

µm)

%1

2627

189

4543

Silt

(2-6

0 µm

)%

18

5148

3032

29S

and

(0.0

6-2.

00 m

m)

%1

5512

2625

2020

Gra

vel (

>2m

m)

%1

1110

836

38

Cob

bles

(>6c

m)

%1

<1<1

<1<1

<1<1

Tabl

e C

-4: P

artic

le S

ize

Dis

trib

utio

n an

d Em

erso

n A

ggre

gate

Tes

t Res

ults

for S

elec

ted

Ove

rbur

den

Sam

ples

Inte

rbur

den

Ove

rbur

den

ALS

Lab

orat

ory

Num

ber →

Dril

l hol

e Lo

catio

n/Sa

mpl

e ID

→Sa

mpl

e Ty

pe →

Dep

th R

ange

(m) →

RG

S - M

E nu

mbe

r →D

omin

ant C

lay

Min

eral

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

14G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 137: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Tabl

e C

-5:

Mul

ti-El

emen

t Res

ults

for W

ater

Ext

ract

s fr

om S

elec

ted

Ove

rbur

den

and

Ore

Sam

ples

1

23

45

67

89

EB

1417

6990

18E

B14

1769

9016

EB

1417

6990

17E

B14

1769

9010

EB

1417

6990

11E

B14

1769

9012

EB

1417

6990

06E

B14

1769

9007

EB

1417

6990

03

0.0-

0.27

m3.

3-3.

7m4.

50-4

.85m

8.6-

9.0m

13.1

-13.

5m20

-20.

37m

0.6-

1.0m

5.6-

6.0m

2.0-

2.4m

EL-N

-GC

01EL

-S-G

C05

Aqu

atic

Eco

syst

ems

(fres

hwat

er)1

Live

stoc

k D

rinki

ng

Wat

er 2

pH0.

01 p

H u

nit

6 to

9

-5.

85.

55.

65.

65.

54.

95.

85.

65.

7E

lect

rical

Con

duct

ivity

1 µS

/cm

<1,0

00#

3,58

0^36

1312

1217

3420

1113

Aci

dity

(mgC

aCO

3/L)

0.2

mg/

L-

-6

55

55

65

55

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

gCaC

O3/L

)0.

2 m

g/L

--

97

55

73

75

7B

icar

bona

te A

lkal

inity

(mgC

aCO

3/L)

0.2

mg/

L-

-9

75

57

37

57

Car

bona

te A

lkal

inity

(mgC

aCO

3/L)

0.2

mg/

L-

-<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2M

ajor

Ions

Cal

cium

(Ca)

2 -

1,00

0<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

Mag

nesi

um (M

g)2

--

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2P

otas

sium

(K)

2-

-2

<2<2

<2<2

4<2

<2<2

Sod

ium

(Na)

2-

-<2

<2<2

<2<2

<24

<2<2

Chl

orid

e (C

l)2

--

<2<2

<22

48

<22

<2Fl

uorid

e (F

) 0.

2-

2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2S

ulfa

te (S

O4)

2 -

1,00

0<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

Trac

e M

etal

s/M

etal

loid

sA

lum

iniu

m (A

l)0.

020.

055

5<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

Ant

imon

y (S

b)0.

002

--

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02A

rsen

ic (A

s) -

pent

aval

ent

0.00

20.

013

**0.

5<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Bar

ium

(Ba)

0.00

2-

-<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

0.00

6<0

.002

0.00

2<0

.002

Ber

ylliu

m (B

e)0.

002

--

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02B

oron

(B)

0.2

0.37

5<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2C

adm

ium

(Cd)

0.00

20.

0002

0.01

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02C

hrom

ium

(Cr)

- to

tal o

r (V

I)*0.

002

0.00

10 (h

ex)*

1 (to

tal)

<0.0

020.

002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02C

obal

t (C

o)0.

002

-1

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02C

oppe

r (C

u)0.

002

0.00

141

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02Iro

n (F

e)0.

2-

-<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2Le

ad (P

b)0.

002

0.00

340.

1<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Man

gane

se (M

n)0.

002

1.90

-0.

032

0.00

20.

004

0.00

80.

014

0.25

40.

008

0.00

80.

002

Mer

cury

(Hg)

0.00

010.

0006

0.00

2<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1M

olyb

denu

m (M

o)0.

002

-0.

15<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Nic

kel (

Ni)

0.00

20.

011

1<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

0.00

4<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Sel

eniu

m (S

e)0.

020.

011

0.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2S

ilver

(Ag)

0.00

20.

0000

5 -

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02Th

oriu

m (T

h)0.

002

- -

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02U

rani

um (U

)0.

002

-0.

2<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Van

adiu

m (V

)0.

02-

- <0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

Zinc

(Zn)

0.01

0.00

820

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1N

otes

: < in

dica

tes

conc

entra

tion

less

than

the

LoR

. S

hade

d ce

lls in

dica

te v

alue

s w

hich

exc

eed

appl

ied

guid

elin

e va

lues

.1.

AN

ZEC

C &

AR

MC

AN

Z (2

000)

. Trig

ger v

alue

s fo

r aqu

atic

eco

syst

ems

(95%

spe

cies

pro

tect

ion

leve

l)2.

AN

ZEC

C &

AR

MC

AN

Z (2

000)

. Rec

omm

ende

d gu

idel

ine

limits

for L

ives

tock

Drin

king

Wat

er.

GC

02-S

5

Dep

th In

terv

al R

ange

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/S

ampl

e ID

Par

amet

ers

Det

ectio

nLi

mit

Wat

er Q

ualit

y G

uide

lines

Ove

rbur

den

RG

S-M

E N

umbe

r →

ALS

Lab

orat

ory

ID →

Sam

ple

Type

EL-N

-GC

03EL

-S-G

C04

1 +

2. b

oth

take

n fro

m th

e "A

ustra

lian

and

New

Zea

land

Gui

delin

es fo

r Fre

sh a

nd M

arin

e W

ater

Qua

lity"

, Nat

iona

l Wat

er

Qua

lity

Man

agem

ent S

trate

gy, 2

000,

com

pila

tion

by A

NZE

CC

and

AR

MC

AN

Z.

All

units

mg/

L

All

units

mg/

L

EL-N

-GC

02

# fo

r stil

l wat

er b

odie

s on

ly, m

ovin

g riv

ers

at lo

w fl

ow ra

tes

shou

ld n

ot e

xcee

d 22

00µS

/cm

. ^

calc

ulat

ed

base

d on

tota

l dis

solv

ed s

olid

s (T

DS

) con

vers

ion

rate

of 0

.67%

of E

C.

TDS

is a

n ap

prox

imat

e m

easu

re

of in

orga

nic

diss

olve

d sa

lts a

nd s

houl

d no

t exc

eed

2400

mg/

L fo

r liv

esto

ck d

rinki

ng w

ater

.

* C

r (V

I) =

hexa

vale

nt.

**

0.02

4 m

g/Lf

or tr

ival

ent A

rsen

ic (I

II).

GC

04-S

2G

C04

-S4

GC

05-S

2G

C01

-S1

GC

03-S

7G

C03

-S10

GC

03-S

13G

C02

-S2

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

15 G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 138: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Aqu

atic

Eco

syst

ems

(fres

hwat

er)1

Live

stoc

k D

rinki

ng

Wat

er 2

pH0.

01 p

H u

nit

6 to

9

-E

lect

rical

Con

duct

ivity

1 µS

/cm

<1,0

00#

3,58

0^

Aci

dity

(mgC

aCO

3/L)

0.2

mg/

L-

-To

tal A

lkal

inity

(mgC

aCO

3/L)

0.2

mg/

L-

-B

icar

bona

te A

lkal

inity

(mgC

aCO

3/L)

0.2

mg/

L-

-C

arbo

nate

Alk

alin

ity (m

gCaC

O3/L

)0.

2 m

g/L

--

Maj

or Io

nsC

alci

um (C

a)2

- 1,

000

Mag

nesi

um (M

g)2

--

Pot

assi

um (K

)2

--

Sod

ium

(Na)

2-

-C

hlor

ide

(Cl)

2-

-Fl

uorid

e (F

) 0.

2-

2S

ulfa

te (S

O4)

2 -

1,00

0Tr

ace

Met

als/

Met

allo

ids

Alu

min

ium

(Al)

0.02

0.05

55

Ant

imon

y (S

b)0.

002

--

Ars

enic

(As)

- pe

ntav

alen

t0.

002

0.01

3 **

0.5

Bar

ium

(Ba)

0.00

2-

-B

eryl

lium

(Be)

0.00

2-

-B

oron

(B)

0.2

0.37

5C

adm

ium

(Cd)

0.00

20.

0002

0.01

Chr

omiu

m (C

r) -

tota

l or (

VI)*

0.00

20.

0010

(hex

)*1

(tota

l)C

obal

t (C

o)0.

002

-1

Cop

per (

Cu)

0.00

20.

0014

1Iro

n (F

e)0.

2-

-Le

ad (P

b)0.

002

0.00

340.

1M

anga

nese

(Mn)

0.00

21.

90-

Mer

cury

(Hg)

0.00

010.

0006

0.00

2M

olyb

denu

m (M

o)0.

002

-0.

15N

icke

l (N

i)0.

002

0.01

11

Sel

eniu

m (S

e)0.

020.

011

0.02

Silv

er (A

g)0.

002

0.00

005

- Th

oriu

m (T

h)0.

002

- -

Ura

nium

(U)

0.00

2-

0.2

Van

adiu

m (V

)0.

02-

- Zi

nc (Z

n)0.

010.

008

20

Dep

th In

terv

al R

ange

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/S

ampl

e ID

Par

amet

ers

Det

ectio

nLi

mit

Wat

er Q

ualit

y G

uide

lines

RG

S-M

E N

umbe

r →

ALS

Lab

orat

ory

ID →

Sam

ple

Type

# fo

r stil

l wat

er b

odie

s on

ly, m

ovin

g riv

ers

at lo

w fl

ow ra

tes

shou

ld n

ot e

xcee

d 22

00µS

/cm

. ^

calc

ulat

ed

base

d on

tota

l dis

solv

ed s

olid

s (T

DS

) con

vers

ion

rate

of 0

.67%

of E

C.

TDS

is a

n ap

prox

imat

e m

easu

re

of in

orga

nic

diss

olve

d sa

lts a

nd s

houl

d no

t exc

eed

2400

mg/

L fo

r liv

esto

ck d

rinki

ng w

ater

.

* C

r (V

I) =

hexa

vale

nt.

**

0.02

4 m

g/Lf

or tr

ival

ent A

rsen

ic (I

II).

Tabl

e C

-5:

Mul

ti-El

emen

t Res

ults

for W

ater

Ext

ract

s fr

om S

elec

ted

Ove

rbur

den

and

Ore

Sam

ples

1011

1213

1415

1617

18

EB

1417

6990

04E

B14

1769

9001

EB

1417

6990

02E

B14

1769

9014

EB

1417

6990

15E

B14

1769

9008

EB

1417

6990

09E

B14

1769

9013

EB

1417

6990

05

5.0-

5.4m

0.75

-1.1

0m4.

7-5.

0m21

-21.

50m

22.6

5-22

.80m

8.4-

8.7m

9.5-

9.8m

20.4

-21.

0m6.

5-7.

0m

EL-S

-GC

05EL

-N-G

C03

EL-S

-GC

05

5.6

6.0

5.9

5.0

5.8

6.0

6.2

5.0

5.8

1719

1924

88

1711

156

35

56

1413

68

59

53

57

143

75

95

35

714

37

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<22

22

<2<2

<2<2

<22

<2<2

<26

<2<2

<22

<2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.20.

4<0

.2<0

.22

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<2<2

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

0.00

2<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

0.00

4<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

020.

004

0.00

60.

094

<0.0

02<0

.002

0.00

40.

014

0.01

0<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1N

otes

: < in

dica

tes

conc

entra

tion

less

than

the

LoR

. S

hade

d ce

lls in

dica

te v

alue

s w

hich

exc

eed

appl

ied

guid

elin

e va

lues

.1.

AN

ZEC

C &

AR

MC

AN

Z (2

000)

. Trig

ger v

alue

s fo

r aqu

atic

eco

syst

ems

(95%

spe

cies

pro

tect

ion

leve

l)2.

AN

ZEC

C &

AR

MC

AN

Z (2

000)

. Rec

omm

ende

d gu

idel

ine

limits

for L

ives

tock

Drin

king

Wat

er.

Ore

Ove

rbur

den

Inte

rbur

den

All

units

mg/

L

All

units

mg/

L

1 +

2. b

oth

take

n fro

m th

e "A

ustra

lian

and

New

Zea

land

Gui

delin

es fo

r Fre

sh a

nd M

arin

e W

ater

Qua

lity"

, Nat

iona

l Wat

er

Qua

lity

Man

agem

ent S

trate

gy, 2

000,

com

pila

tion

by A

NZE

CC

and

AR

MC

AN

Z.

EL-S

-GC

06EL

-N-G

C03

EL-S

-GC

04

GC

04-S

6G

C04

-S8

GC

03-S

13a

GC

05-S

6G

C05

-S5

GC

06-S

2G

C06

-S5

GC

03-S

14G

C03

-S16

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

16 G

EM

CO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses

Pro

ject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 139: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

EC1

Tota

lSu

lfur

Scr2

MPA

2A

NC2

NA

PP2

µS/c

m

EB

1416

5860

50S

ampl

e 1

Mid

dlin

gs5.

519

0.00

5-

0.15

3.8

-3.6

24.8

NA

F (B

arre

n)E

B14

1658

6043

Sam

ple

2M

iddl

ings

5.5

230.

005

-0.

151.

8-1

.611

.8N

AF

(Bar

ren)

EB

1416

5860

44S

ampl

e 3

Mid

dlin

gs5.

520

0.00

5-

0.15

2.7

-2.5

17.6

NA

F (B

arre

n)E

B14

1658

6045

Sam

ple

4M

iddl

ings

5.3

180.

005

-0.

153.

2-3

.020

.9N

AF

(Bar

ren)

1. C

urre

nt p

H a

nd E

C p

rovi

ded

for 1

:5 s

ampl

e:w

ater

ext

ract

s 2.

Scr

= C

hrom

ium

Red

ucib

le S

ulfu

r; M

PA

= M

axim

um P

oten

tial A

cidi

ty;

AN

C =

Aci

d N

eutra

lisin

g C

apac

ity;

and

NA

PP

= N

et A

cid

Pro

duci

ng P

oten

tial.

3. S

ampl

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

deta

il pr

ovid

ed in

repo

rt te

xt.

MID

DLI

NG

S

AN

C:

MPA

Rat

ioA

MD

risk

C

lass

ifica

tion3

%kg

H2S

O4/t

Tabl

e C

-6: A

cid

Bas

e A

ccou

nt (A

BA

) Tes

t Res

ults

for M

iddl

ings

Sam

ples

ALS

Labo

rato

ryN

unbe

r

Clie

ntSa

mpl

e ID

Sam

ple

Type

pH1

Attachmen

t C ‐ page C17

GEM

CO Eastern Leases P

roject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 140: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Parameters

NEPC Health-Based

InvestigationLevel HIL(C)1

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4

Major ElementsAluminium (Al) - 8,770 9,100 8,860 10,500Calcium (Ca) - 180 190 190 100Iron (Fe) - 139,000 141,000 147,000 168,000Magnesium (Mg) - 580 560 420 120Manganese (Mn) 19,000 166,000 146,000 136,000 103,000Potassium (K) - 3,460 3,760 4,390 3,090Sodium (Na) - 760 700 670 390

Minor ElementsAntimony (Sb) - <5 <5 <5 <5Arsenic (As) 300 12 33 12 12Barium (Ba) - 9,970 6,090 5,600 3,520Beryllium (Be) 90 1 2 1 <1Boron (B) 20,000 <50 <50 <50 <50Cadmium (Cd) 90 1 1 2 1Chromium (Cr) 300 ** 101 141 121 133Cobalt (Co) 300 49 52 47 25Copper (Cu) 17,000 24 33 27 17Lead (Pb) 600 44 84 83 46Mercury (Hg) - inorganic 80 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1Molybdenum (Mo) - 11 9 7 6Nickel (Ni) 1,200 66 69 60 22Selenium (Se) 700 <5 <5 <5 <5Silver (Ag) - <2 <2 <2 <2Thorium (Th) - 5.8 6.8 6.7 6.4Uranium (U) - 1.6 2.1 1.6 1.8Vanadium (V) - 389 434 390 436Zinc (Zn) 30,000 87 102 74 34

Notes: ** guideline level for hexavalent Cr (VI) = 300 mg/kg, for trivalent Cr (III) = 24% of total Cr.1. NEPC (2013). National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC). National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM) , Amendment of Schedule B1-B7 of 1999 version. Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater. Health-Based Investigation Level - HIL(C); recreational open spaces . Shaded cells exceed guideline value.

Table C-7: Multi-element results for middlings samples

All units mg/kg

All units mg/kg

Attachment C ‐ page C18  GEMCO Eastern Leases Project

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 141: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Para

met

ers

Aqu

atic

Eco

syst

ems

(fres

hwat

er)1

Live

stoc

kD

rinki

ngW

ater

2Sa

mpl

e 1

Sam

ple

2Sa

mpl

e 3

Sam

ple

4

pH 6

to 9

-

5.5

5.5

5.5

5.3

EC

(µS

/cm

)1,

000

3,58

0^19

2320

18To

tal A

lkal

inity

(CaC

O3 m

g/L)

--

15.4

12.8

7.6

5.2

Bic

arbo

nate

Alk

alin

ity (C

aCO

3 mg/

L)-

-15

.412

.87.

65.

2C

arbo

nate

Alk

alin

ity (C

aCO

3 mg/

L)-

-<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2M

ajor

Ions

Cal

cium

(Ca)

-

1,00

0<2

<2<2

<2M

agne

sium

(Mg)

-

-<2

<2<2

<2P

otas

sium

(K)

--

<2<2

<2<2

Sod

ium

(Na)

-

-2

42

2C

hlor

ide

(Cl)

-

-4

44

2S

ulfa

te (S

O4)

- 1,

000

<2<2

<2<2

Trac

e M

etal

s/M

etal

loid

sA

lum

iniu

m (A

l)0.

055

5<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2A

ntim

ony

(Sb)

--

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Ars

enic

(As)

0.01

3 **

0.5

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Bar

ium

(Ba)

--

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Ber

ylliu

m (B

e)-

-<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02B

oron

(B)

0.37

5<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2<0

.2C

adm

ium

(Cd)

0.00

020.

01<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02C

hrom

ium

(Cr)

0.00

10 (h

ex)*

1 (to

tal)

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Cob

alt (

Co)

- 1

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Cop

per (

Cu)

0.00

141

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Iron

(Fe)

--

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

Lead

(Pb)

0.00

340.

1<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02M

anga

nese

(Mn)

***

1.9

-0.

014

0.01

40.

016

0.04

0M

ercu

ry (H

g)0.

0006

0.00

2<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1M

olyb

denu

m (M

o)-

0.15

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Nic

kel (

Ni)

0.01

11

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Sel

eniu

m (S

e)0.

011

0.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

Silv

er (A

g)0.

0000

5 -

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Thor

ium

(Th)

- -

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

Ura

nium

(U)

-0.

2<0

.002

<0.0

02<0

.002

<0.0

02V

anad

ium

(V)

- -

<0.0

2<0

.02

<0.0

2<0

.02

Zinc

(Zn)

0.00

820

<0.0

1<0

.01

<0.0

1<0

.01

Not

es:

1. A

NZE

CC

& A

RM

CA

NZ

(200

0). T

rigge

r val

ues

for a

quat

ic e

cosy

stem

s - f

resh

wat

er (9

5% s

peci

es p

rote

ctio

n le

vel)

2. A

NZE

CC

& A

RM

CA

NZ

(200

0). R

ecom

men

ded

guid

elin

e lim

its fo

r Liv

esto

ck D

rinki

ng W

ater

.

* C

r (V

I) =

hexa

vale

nt;

** 0

.024

mg/

Lfor

triv

alen

t Ars

enic

(III)

1 +

2. b

oth

take

n fro

m th

e "A

ustra

lian

and

New

Zea

land

Gui

delin

es fo

r Fre

sh a

nd M

arin

e W

ater

Qua

lity"

, Nat

iona

l Wat

er Q

ualit

y M

anag

emen

t Stra

tegy

, 200

0,

com

pila

tion

by A

NZE

CC

and

AR

MC

AN

Z.

^ c

alcu

late

d ba

sed

on to

tal d

isso

lved

sol

ids

(TD

S) c

onve

rsio

n ra

te o

f 0.6

7% o

f EC

. TD

S is

an

appr

oxim

ate

mea

sure

of i

norg

anic

dis

solv

ed

salts

and

sho

uld

not e

xcee

d 2,

400m

g/L

for l

ives

tock

drin

king

wat

er.

Tabl

e C

-8:

Mul

ti-el

emen

t res

ults

for w

ater

ext

ract

s fr

om m

iddl

ings

sam

ples

All

units

mg/

L

All

units

mg/

L

Attachmen

t C ‐ page C19

GEM

CO Eastern Leases P

roject

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 142: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

20GE

MCO

Eas

tern

Lea

ses P

roje

ct

EB14

1650

7-04

1EL

SMB-

05D

GW

05ov

erbu

rden

36m

0.98

2EB

1416

507-

024

ELSM

B-06

DG

W06

over

burd

en18

m0.

429

EB14

1650

7-02

5EL

SMB-

06D

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

21m

0.46

2EB

1416

586-

050

ELN

/GC

01G

C01

-S1

over

burd

en0-

0.27

1.02

5EB

1416

586-

053

ELN

/GC

01G

C01

-S4

inte

rbur

den

3.11

-3.5

0.98

8EB

1416

586-

020

ELS/

GC

04G

C04

-S3

over

burd

en3.

0-3.

51.

196

EB14

1658

6-02

1EL

S/G

C04

GC

04-S

4ov

erbu

rden

5.6-

6.0

1.02

7EB

1416

586-

005

ELS/

GC

06G

C06

-S5

over

burd

en4.

7-5.

01.

037

EB14

1658

6-00

6EL

S/G

C06

GC

06-S

6ov

erbu

rden

6.35

-6.6

51.

012

EB14

1658

6-03

9EL

N/G

C03

GC

03-S

13a

ore

(MID

)20

.4-2

11.

173

EB14

1658

6-04

1EL

N/G

C03

GC

03-S

15or

e (B

OT)

21.9

-22.

41.

508

EB14

1598

8-00

7Pr

oces

s Pl

ant

1m

iddl

ings

- 1.

240

EB14

1598

8-00

9Pr

oces

s Pl

ant

3m

iddl

ings

- 1.

058

EB14

1598

8-01

0Pr

oces

s Pl

ant

4m

iddl

ings

- 0.

747

Not

es:

* M

ID =

hig

h-gr

ade

ore

cons

istin

g m

ostly

of c

emen

ted

and

loos

e pi

solit

es *

BO

T =

low

-gra

de o

re ri

ch in

sili

ca

KLC

4

KLC

5

KLC

6

Sam

ple

Type

*D

epth

Inte

rval

(m

)W

eigh

t use

d in

co

lum

n (k

g)

KLC

1

KLC

2

KLC

3Tabl

e C

-9: C

ompo

site

Ove

rbur

den,

Ore

and

Mid

dlin

gs S

ampl

es S

elec

ted

for K

LC T

ests

KLC

num

ber

ALS

Labo

rato

ry

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

nt S

ampl

e ID

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 143: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Atta

chm

ent C

- pa

ge C

21G

EMC

O E

aste

rn L

ease

s Pr

ojec

t

EC1

Tota

l S

Scr2

MPA

2AN

C2

NAP

P2

µS/c

m

EB14

1650

7041

EL-S

-MB0

5G

W05

over

burd

en36

CLA

Y: m

ediu

m p

last

icity

, dar

k gr

eeni

sh

grey

, low

stre

ngth

, sof

t7.

555

40.

580.

5617

.12

5.1

12.0

20.

30PA

F

EB14

1650

7024

EL-S

-MB0

6G

W06

over

burd

en18

CLA

Y: m

ottle

d cr

eam

/ ye

llow

, firm

3.4

2,74

00.

820.

329.

770.

259.

520.

03PA

FEB

1416

5070

25EL

-S-M

B06

GW

06ov

erbu

rden

21C

LAY:

gre

y, s

tiff

4.4

1,12

00.

870.

6319

.23

0.6

18.6

30.

03PA

F

EB14

1658

6050

EL-N

-GC

01G

C01

-S1

over

burd

en0-

0.27

Brow

n cl

ay w

ith p

lant

mat

eria

l and

min

or

Mn

fragm

ents

6.2

370.

020.

614.

1-3

.49

6.69

NAF

(Bar

ren)

EB14

1658

6053

EL-N

-GC

01G

C01

-S4

inte

rbur

den

3.11

-3.5

Whi

te to

ligh

t bro

wn

clay

ston

e - v

ery

fine

grai

ned.

6.2

60.

010.

310.

250.

060.

82N

AF (B

arre

n)

EB14

1658

6020

EL-S

-GC

04G

C04

-S3

over

burd

en3.

0-3.

5

Lam

inar

bro

wn

and

red

ferr

inou

s la

terit

e,

silic

ious

man

gane

se la

yers

(30-

60m

m).

Seve

ral v

ertic

al a

nd h

oriz

onta

l fra

ctur

es

infil

led

with

san

d.

5.5

140.

020.

611.

1-0

.49

1.80

NAF

(Bar

ren)

EB14

1658

6021

EL-S

-GC

04G

C04

-S4

over

burd

en5.

6-6.

0

Lam

inar

whi

te, b

row

n an

d re

d fe

rrin

ous

and

late

rite,

rew

orke

d w

ell r

ound

ed

quar

tzite

sto

nes

(20m

m),

silic

ious

m

anga

nes

laye

rs (4

0mm

thic

k).

5.8

100.

020.

610.

60.

010.

98N

AF (B

arre

n)

EB14

1658

6005

EL-S

-GC

06G

C06

-S5

over

burd

en4.

7-5.

0

Smal

l man

gite

frag

men

ts (5

-10m

m)

supp

rted

in a

whi

te a

nd o

rang

e cl

ay

mat

rix. T

hin

man

gane

se e

nric

hed

band

s (5

-10m

m) (

100m

m c

ore

loss

)

6.3

190.

020.

612.

0-1

.39

3.27

NAF

(Bar

ren)

EB14

1658

6006

EL-S

-GC

06G

C06

-S6

over

burd

en6.

35-6

.65

Man

gane

se fr

agm

ents

and

ool

ites

(10-

40m

m) s

uppo

rted

in a

whi

te a

nd p

urpl

e cl

ay m

atrix

.5.

915

0.00

50.

151.

4-1

.25

9.14

NAF

(Bar

ren)

EB14

1658

6039

EL-N

-GC

03G

C03

-S13

aor

e (M

ID)

20.4

-21

Blac

k m

ass

man

gite

frag

men

ts. A

t the

to

p an

d bo

ttom

of t

he c

olum

n is

bla

ck

clay

-like

man

gane

se w

ith v

eins

of w

hite

th

roug

hout

.

5.6

80.

005

0.15

2.0

-1.8

513

.06

NAF

(Bar

ren)

EB14

1658

6041

EL-N

-GC

03G

C03

-S15

ore

(BO

T)21

.9-2

2.4

Blac

k di

scon

tinuo

us m

assi

ve m

angi

te.

Rel

ict p

iso

stru

ctur

es6.

08

0.00

50.

153.

4-3

.25

22.2

0N

AF (B

arre

n)

EB14

1598

8-00

7Pr

oces

s Pl

ant

Sam

ple

1M

iddl

ings

- M

iddl

ings

was

te s

tream

5.5

190.

005

0.15

3.8

-3.6

524

.82

NAF

(Bar

ren)

EB14

1598

8-00

9Pr

oces

s Pl

ant

Sam

ple

3M

iddl

ings

- M

iddl

ings

was

te s

tream

5.5

200.

005

0.15

2.7

-2.5

517

.63

NAF

(Bar

ren)

EB14

1598

8-01

0Pr

oces

s Pl

ant

Sam

ple

4M

iddl

ings

- M

iddl

ings

was

te s

tream

5.3

180.

005

0.15

3.2

-3.0

520

.90

NAF

(Bar

ren)

Not

es:

* M

ID =

hig

h-gr

ade

ore

cons

istin

g m

ostly

of c

emen

ted

and

loos

e pi

solit

es;

* BO

T =

low

-gra

de o

re ri

ch in

silic

a.1.

Cur

rent

pH

and

EC

pro

vide

d fo

r 1:5

sam

ple:

wat

er e

xtra

cts

2. S

cr =

Chr

omiu

m R

educ

ible

Sul

fur;

MPA

= M

axim

um P

oten

tial A

cidi

ty;

ANC

= A

cid

Neu

tralis

ing

Cap

acity

; an

d N

APP

= N

et A

cid

Prod

ucin

g Po

tent

ial.

3. S

ampl

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

deta

il pr

ovid

ed in

repo

rt te

xt.

pH1

6

Ove

rbur

den

+ In

terb

urde

n

321

Tabl

e C

-10:

Aci

d-B

ase

Res

ults

for S

ampl

es S

elec

ted

for K

inet

ic L

each

Col

umn

(KLC

) Tes

ts

Ore

Proc

ess

Res

idue

4 5

ANC

: M

PA

Rat

io

AMD

risk

C

lass

ifica

tion3

%kg

H2S

O4/t

RG

S K

LC

No.

ALS

Labo

rato

ry

Num

ber

Dril

l Hol

e Lo

catio

n/ID

Clie

nt

Sam

ple

IDSa

mpl

e Ty

pe *

Dep

th

Inte

rval

(m

)D

escr

iptio

nGeochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page D1

ATTACHMENT D

Kinetic Geochemical Test Results

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 144: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project

Page D1

ATTACHMENT D

Kinetic Geochemical Test Results

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 145: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC Test Data Attachment D

Weight (kg) 1.02 Total S (%) 0.757 ANC 1.98pH (1:5) 3.8 Scr (%) 0.502 NAPP 13.39

EC (µS/cm) 1,471 MPA 15.37 ANC:MPA 0.13

27-Aug-14 25-Sep-14 28-Oct-14 27-Nov-14 29-Dec-14 28-Jan-15 25-Feb-150 4 9 13 18 22 261 2 3 4 5 6 7

EB1441384 EB1443211 EB1445223 EB1447372 EB1449195 EB1511724 EB15136130.967 0.905 0.746 0.635 0.595 0.633 0.5370.97 1.87 2.62 3.25 3.85 4.48 5.020.7 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.74.19 4.87 4.49 4.70 2.80 2.30 2.30109 271 572 1,095 5,760 7,290 6,8704 4 38 115 1,120 2,300 219043 9 2 <1 <1 <1 <139 5 -36 -115 -1,120 -2,300 -2190

Dissolved elements (mg/L)

Guideline Limits #

Silver (Ag) - <0.001 - - - - - - Aluminium (Al) 5 0.10 0.09 0.18 0.19 51.6 78.9 57.0Arsenic (As) 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.016 0.046 0.027Boron (B) 5 <0.05 - - - - - - Barium (Ba) - 0.001 - - - - - - Beryllium (Be) - <0.001 - - - - - - Calcium (Ca) 1,000 2 67 61 27 178 163 142Cadmium (Cd) 0.01 <0.0001 0.0003 0.0013 0.0028 0.0245 0.0273 0.0216Chloride (Cl) - 1 1 3 4 6 6 6Cobalt (Co) 1 0.054 0.087 0.240 0.391 5.13 7.57 4.90Chromium (Cr) 1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.090 0.238 0.180Copper (Cu) 1 0.015 0.008 0.014 0.014 1.81 2.44 1.74Iron (Fe) - 1.33 0.40 0.23 <0.05 93.4 292 190Mercury (Hg) 0.002 <0.0001 - - - - - - Potassium (K) - <1 1 8 8 9 <1 <1Magnesium (Mg) - 4 23 75 117 690 701 582Manganese (Mn) - 2.49 4.12 11.7 19.6 208 250 181Molybdenum (Mo) 0.15 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.008 0.011 0.006Sodium (Na) - 4 5 20 34 169 154 113Nickel (Ni) 1 0.074 0.138 0.372 0.666 8.24 9.50 7.28Phosphorus (P) - <0.01 - - - - - - Lead (Pb) 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.067 <0.005 <0.001Sulfate (SO4) 1,000 38 264 494 595 4,040 5,780 4,040Antimony (Sb) - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.005 <0.005 <0.001Selenium (Se) 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.11 0.06 0.12Thorium (Th) - <0.001 - - - - - - Uranium (U) 0.2 <0.001 - - - - - - Vanadium (V) - <0.01 - - - - - - Zinc (Zn) 20 0.09 0.166 0.495 0.823 11.4 14.4 10.6

36 235 362 371 2360 3592 213036 271 632 1003 3364 6956 90861.9 59.5 44.7 16.8 104.0 101.3 74.91.9 61.4 106.1 122.9 226.9 328.2 403.13.8 20.4 54.9 72.9 403.1 435.7 306.93.8 24.2 79.2 152.1 555.2 990.9 1297.799.0 87.5 70.8 53.8 0 0 099.8 98.8 97.2 95.6 85.2 69.3 59.91.84 1.05 1.12 1.13 1.28 1.83 1.53

< indicates less than the analytical detection limit. * Acidity and alkalinity data calculated in mg CaCO3/L.** SO4, Ca and Mg release rates calculated in mg/kg/flush. Total S = Total Sulfur; Scr = Chromium Reducible Sulfur; and ANC = Acid Neutralising CapacityMPA = Maximum Potential Acidity, and NAPP = Net Acid Producing Potential

RGS-KLC1 : GEMCO ProjectKLC Test Results: PAF Overburden

WeekLeach Number

Volume Collected (L)ALS Laboratory Number

Date

Cum. Volume (L)Pore Volumes

Residual Sulfur (%)

pHEC (μS/cm)Acidity (mg/L)*Alkalinity (mg/L)*Net Alkalinity (mg/L)*

SO4/(Ca+Mg) molar ratio

Calculations**

Cumulative SO4 ReleaseCa Release RateCumulative Ca ReleaseMg Release RateCumulative Mg ReleaseResidual ANC (%)

SO4 Release Rate

# ANZECC & ARCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000). Livestock drinking water (low risk trigger levels).

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 146: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC Test Data Attachment D

Dissolved elements (mg/L)

Guideline Limits #

Silver (Ag) - Aluminium (Al) 5Arsenic (As) 0.5Boron (B) 5Barium (Ba) - Beryllium (Be) - Calcium (Ca) 1,000Cadmium (Cd) 0.01Chloride (Cl) - Cobalt (Co) 1Chromium (Cr) 1Copper (Cu) 1Iron (Fe) - Mercury (Hg) 0.002Potassium (K) - Magnesium (Mg) - Manganese (Mn) - Molybdenum (Mo) 0.15Sodium (Na) - Nickel (Ni) 1Phosphorus (P) - Lead (Pb) 0.1Sulfate (SO4) 1,000Antimony (Sb) - Selenium (Se) 0.02Thorium (Th) - Uranium (U) 0.2Vanadium (V) - Zinc (Zn) 20

WeekLeach Number

Volume Collected (L)ALS Laboratory Number

Date

Cum. Volume (L)Pore Volumes

Residual Sulfur (%)

pHEC (μS/cm)Acidity (mg/L)*Alkalinity (mg/L)*Net Alkalinity (mg/L)*

SO4/(Ca+Mg) molar ratio

Calculations**

Cumulative SO4 ReleaseCa Release RateCumulative Ca ReleaseMg Release RateCumulative Mg ReleaseResidual ANC (%)

SO4 Release Rate

Weight (kg) 2.01 Total S (%) 0.015 ANC 2.18pH (1:5) 6.2 Scr (%) - NAPP -1.72

EC (µS/cm) 22 MPA 0.46 ANC:MPA 4.73

27-Aug-14 25-Sep-14 28-Oct-14 27-Nov-14 29-Dec-14 28-Jan-15 25-Feb-150 4 9 13 18 22 261 2 3 4 5 6 7

EB1441384 EB1443211 EB1445223 EB1447372 EB1449195 EB1511724 EB15136130.683 0.648 0.635 0.656 0.598 0.572 0.5860.68 1.33 1.97 2.62 3.22 3.79 4.380.5 1.0 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.26.29 6.67 6.57 6.93 6.13 5.30 5.9899 33 28 26 43 26 2326 4 3 3 1 7 28 <1 2 5 1 3 9

-18 -4 -1 2 0 -4 7

<0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.10 0.08 0.07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 - - - - - - 0.007 - - - - - -

<0.001 - - - - - - 4 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.00017 2 2 2 2 2 2

<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0001 - - - - - - 2 <1 1 <1 1 <1 <12 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.157 0.073 0.058 0.046 0.054 0.044 0.044<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

9 2 2 2 2 2 1<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 - - - - - - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1 3 4 3 9 7 6<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 - - - - - - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.2 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.7 2.0 1.70.2 1.1 2.4 3.4 6.0 8.0 9.81.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.11.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.30.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.699.7 99.7 99.6 99.6 99.5 99.5 99.4100.0 99.7 99.5 99.2 98.7 98.2 97.80.03 0.95 1.26 0.95 2.84 2.21 1.89

< indicates less than the analytical detection limit. * Acidity and alkalinity data calculated in mg CaCO3/L.** SO4, Ca and Mg release rates calculated in mg/kg/flush. Total S = Total Sulfur; Scr = Chromium Reducible Sulfur; and ANC = Acid Neutralising CapacityMPA = Maximum Potential Acidity, and NAPP = Net Acid Producing Potential

RGS-KLC2 : GEMCO ProjectKLC Test Results: NAF Overburden + Interburden

# ANZECC & ARCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000). Livestock drinking water (low risk trigger levels).

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 147: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC Test Data Attachment D

Dissolved elements (mg/L)

Guideline Limits #

Silver (Ag) - Aluminium (Al) 5Arsenic (As) 0.5Boron (B) 5Barium (Ba) - Beryllium (Be) - Calcium (Ca) 1,000Cadmium (Cd) 0.01Chloride (Cl) - Cobalt (Co) 1Chromium (Cr) 1Copper (Cu) 1Iron (Fe) - Mercury (Hg) 0.002Potassium (K) - Magnesium (Mg) - Manganese (Mn) - Molybdenum (Mo) 0.15Sodium (Na) - Nickel (Ni) 1Phosphorus (P) - Lead (Pb) 0.1Sulfate (SO4) 1,000Antimony (Sb) - Selenium (Se) 0.02Thorium (Th) - Uranium (U) 0.2Vanadium (V) - Zinc (Zn) 20

WeekLeach Number

Volume Collected (L)ALS Laboratory Number

Date

Cum. Volume (L)Pore Volumes

Residual Sulfur (%)

pHEC (μS/cm)Acidity (mg/L)*Alkalinity (mg/L)*Net Alkalinity (mg/L)*

SO4/(Ca+Mg) molar ratio

Calculations**

Cumulative SO4 ReleaseCa Release RateCumulative Ca ReleaseMg Release RateCumulative Mg ReleaseResidual ANC (%)

SO4 Release Rate

Weight (kg) 2.22 Total S (%) 0.020 ANC 0.85pH (1:5) 5.6 Scr (%) - NAPP -0.24

EC (µS/cm) 12 MPA 0.61 ANC:MPA 1.39

27-Aug-14 25-Sep-14 28-Oct-14 27-Nov-14 29-Dec-14 28-Jan-15 25-Feb-150 4 9 13 18 22 261 2 3 4 5 6 7

EB1441384 EB1443211 EB1445223 EB1447372 EB1449195 EB1511724 EB15136130.704 0.632 0.639 0.667 0.625 0.579 0.5980.70 1.34 1.98 2.64 3.27 3.85 4.440.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.36.50 7.26 6.88 6.84 5.75 5.42 6.0926 25 19 17 17 12 233 2 3 3 1 3 43 <1 1 4 <1 3 80 -2 -2 1 -1 0 4

<0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - -

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

3 3 2 2 2 2 2<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0001 - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.002 0.014 0.012 0.012 0.014 0.015 0.012<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1 2 2 2 2 2 1<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 - - - - - - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1 1 2 2 3 0.5 2<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 - - - - - - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.1 0.50.2 0.4 1.0 1.6 2.5 2.6 3.10.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.00.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.099.9 99.8 99.7 99.5 99.4 99.3 99.2100.0 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.6 99.6 99.50.16 0.32 0.63 0.63 0.95 0.16 0.63

< indicates less than the analytical detection limit. * Acidity and alkalinity data calculated in mg CaCO3/L.** SO4, Ca and Mg release rates calculated in mg/kg/flush. Total S = Total Sulfur; Scr = Chromium Reducible Sulfur; and ANC = Acid Neutralising CapacityMPA = Maximum Potential Acidity, and NAPP = Net Acid Producing Potential

KLC Test Results: NAF Overburden RGS-KLC3 : GEMCO Project

# ANZECC & ARCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000). Livestock drinking water (low risk trigger levels).

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 148: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC Test Data Attachment D

Dissolved elements (mg/L)

Guideline Limits #

Silver (Ag) - Aluminium (Al) 5Arsenic (As) 0.5Boron (B) 5Barium (Ba) - Beryllium (Be) - Calcium (Ca) 1,000Cadmium (Cd) 0.01Chloride (Cl) - Cobalt (Co) 1Chromium (Cr) 1Copper (Cu) 1Iron (Fe) - Mercury (Hg) 0.002Potassium (K) - Magnesium (Mg) - Manganese (Mn) - Molybdenum (Mo) 0.15Sodium (Na) - Nickel (Ni) 1Phosphorus (P) - Lead (Pb) 0.1Sulfate (SO4) 1,000Antimony (Sb) - Selenium (Se) 0.02Thorium (Th) - Uranium (U) 0.2Vanadium (V) - Zinc (Zn) 20

WeekLeach Number

Volume Collected (L)ALS Laboratory Number

Date

Cum. Volume (L)Pore Volumes

Residual Sulfur (%)

pHEC (μS/cm)Acidity (mg/L)*Alkalinity (mg/L)*Net Alkalinity (mg/L)*

SO4/(Ca+Mg) molar ratio

Calculations**

Cumulative SO4 ReleaseCa Release RateCumulative Ca ReleaseMg Release RateCumulative Mg ReleaseResidual ANC (%)

SO4 Release Rate

Weight (kg) 2.05 Total S (%) 0.013 ANC 1.70pH (1:5) 6.1 Scr (%) - NAPP -1.32

EC (µS/cm) 17 MPA 0.38 ANC:MPA 4.44

27-Aug-14 25-Sep-14 28-Oct-14 27-Nov-14 29-Dec-14 28-Jan-15 25-Feb-150 4 9 13 18 22 261 2 3 4 5 6 7

EB1441384 EB1443211 EB1445223 EB1447372 EB1449195 EB1511724 EB15136130.730 0.622 0.627 0.733 0.585 0.649 0.4670.73 1.35 1.98 2.71 3.30 3.95 4.410.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.35.88 6.41 6.15 6.24 5.72 5.39 5.5461 41 21 20 21 18 293 1 6 8 2 4 46 6 <1 4 <1 3 93 5 -6 -4 -2 -1 5

<0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - -

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

12 7 4 3 2 1 1<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0001 - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.023 0.013 0.003 0.002 0.007 0.012 0.007<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

8 4 3 3 3 3 2<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 - - - - - - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1 1 2 3 4 4 4<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 - - - - - - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.3 0.90.2 0.5 1.1 2.2 3.3 4.6 5.50.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.10.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.10.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.10.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.199.9 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.7 99.6 99.6100.0 99.9 99.7 99.4 99.1 98.8 98.50.16 0.32 0.63 0.95 1.26 1.26 1.26

< indicates less than the analytical detection limit. * Acidity and alkalinity data calculated in mg CaCO3/L.** SO4, Ca and Mg release rates calculated in mg/kg/flush. Total S = Total Sulfur; Scr = Chromium Reducible Sulfur; and ANC = Acid Neutralising CapacityMPA = Maximum Potential Acidity, and NAPP = Net Acid Producing Potential

KLC Test Results: NAF Overburden RGS-KLC4 : GEMCO Project

# ANZECC & ARCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000). Livestock drinking water (low risk trigger levels).

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 149: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC Test Data Attachment D

Dissolved elements (mg/L)

Guideline Limits #

Silver (Ag) - Aluminium (Al) 5Arsenic (As) 0.5Boron (B) 5Barium (Ba) - Beryllium (Be) - Calcium (Ca) 1,000Cadmium (Cd) 0.01Chloride (Cl) - Cobalt (Co) 1Chromium (Cr) 1Copper (Cu) 1Iron (Fe) - Mercury (Hg) 0.002Potassium (K) - Magnesium (Mg) - Manganese (Mn) - Molybdenum (Mo) 0.15Sodium (Na) - Nickel (Ni) 1Phosphorus (P) - Lead (Pb) 0.1Sulfate (SO4) 1,000Antimony (Sb) - Selenium (Se) 0.02Thorium (Th) - Uranium (U) 0.2Vanadium (V) - Zinc (Zn) 20

WeekLeach Number

Volume Collected (L)ALS Laboratory Number

Date

Cum. Volume (L)Pore Volumes

Residual Sulfur (%)

pHEC (μS/cm)Acidity (mg/L)*Alkalinity (mg/L)*Net Alkalinity (mg/L)*

SO4/(Ca+Mg) molar ratio

Calculations**

Cumulative SO4 ReleaseCa Release RateCumulative Ca ReleaseMg Release RateCumulative Mg ReleaseResidual ANC (%)

SO4 Release Rate

Weight (kg) 2.68 Total S (%) 0.005 ANC 2.70pH (1:5) 5.8 Scr (%) - NAPP -2.55

EC (µS/cm) 8 MPA 0.15 ANC:MPA 17.63

27-Aug-14 25-Sep-14 28-Oct-14 27-Nov-14 29-Dec-14 28-Jan-15 25-Feb-150 4 9 13 18 22 261 2 3 4 5 6 7

EB1441384 EB1443211 EB1445223 EB1447372 EB1449195 EB1511724 EB15136130.791 0.653 0.741 0.840 0.774 0.677 0.6850.79 1.44 2.19 3.03 3.80 4.48 5.160.6 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.3 3.86.74 6.13 4.91 5.01 4.95 4.90 4.9330 31 29 23 23 17 224 <1 5 3 3 4 55 5 <1 <1 <1 2 51 5 -5 -3 -3 -2 0

<0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - -

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

7 6 5 5 4 4 3<0.001 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 0.002 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0001 - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.075 0.297 0.267 0.241 0.227 0.225 0.200<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

2 1 2 1 1 1 <1<0.001 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 <0.001 0.002<0.01 - - - - - - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 - - - - - - <0.005 0.011 0.008 0.006 0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0

100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.8 99.899.9 99.8 99.7 99.6 99.5 99.4 99.40.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16

< indicates less than the analytical detection limit. * Acidity and alkalinity data calculated in mg CaCO3/L.** SO4, Ca and Mg release rates calculated in mg/kg/flush. Total S = Total Sulfur; Scr = Chromium Reducible Sulfur; and ANC = Acid Neutralising CapacityMPA = Maximum Potential Acidity, and NAPP = Net Acid Producing Potential

RGS-KLC5 : GEMCO ProjectKLC Test Results: NAF Ore (high + low grade)

# ANZECC & ARCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000). Livestock drinking water (low risk trigger levels).

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 150: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC Test Data Attachment D

Dissolved elements (mg/L)

Guideline Limits #

Silver (Ag) - Aluminium (Al) 5Arsenic (As) 0.5Boron (B) 5Barium (Ba) - Beryllium (Be) - Calcium (Ca) 1,000Cadmium (Cd) 0.01Chloride (Cl) - Cobalt (Co) 1Chromium (Cr) 1Copper (Cu) 1Iron (Fe) - Mercury (Hg) 0.002Potassium (K) - Magnesium (Mg) - Manganese (Mn) - Molybdenum (Mo) 0.15Sodium (Na) - Nickel (Ni) 1Phosphorus (P) - Lead (Pb) 0.1Sulfate (SO4) 1,000Antimony (Sb) - Selenium (Se) 0.02Thorium (Th) - Uranium (U) 0.2Vanadium (V) - Zinc (Zn) 20

WeekLeach Number

Volume Collected (L)ALS Laboratory Number

Date

Cum. Volume (L)Pore Volumes

Residual Sulfur (%)

pHEC (μS/cm)Acidity (mg/L)*Alkalinity (mg/L)*Net Alkalinity (mg/L)*

SO4/(Ca+Mg) molar ratio

Calculations**

Cumulative SO4 ReleaseCa Release RateCumulative Ca ReleaseMg Release RateCumulative Mg ReleaseResidual ANC (%)

SO4 Release Rate

Weight (kg) 3.05 Total S (%) 0.005 ANC 3.23pH (1:5) 5.4 Scr (%) - NAPP -3.08

EC (µS/cm) 19 MPA 0.15 ANC:MPA 21.12

27-Aug-14 25-Sep-14 28-Oct-14 27-Nov-14 29-Dec-14 28-Jan-15 25-Feb-150 4 9 13 18 22 261 2 3 4 5 6 7

EB1441384 EB1443211 EB1445223 EB1447372 EB1449195 EB1511724 EB15136130.776 0.643 0.750 0.764 0.724 0.670 0.6920.78 1.42 2.17 2.93 3.66 4.33 5.020.6 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.76.85 6.74 5.97 5.86 5.67 5.24 5.8541 30 34 21 16 13 193 <1 2 3 2 4 35 2 <1 3 <1 3 72 2 -2 0 -2 -1 4

<0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - -

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

6 4 3 3 2 2 2<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

<0.0001 - - - - - - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.043 0.049 0.072 0.077 0.067 0.062 0.069<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

4 2 2 2 2 1 1<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 - - - - - - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01<0.001 - - - - - - <0.001 - - - - - - <0.01 - - - - - - <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

100.0 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.899.9 99.8 99.8 99.7 99.6 99.5 99.40.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16

< indicates less than the analytical detection limit. * Acidity and alkalinity data calculated in mg CaCO3/L.** SO4, Ca and Mg release rates calculated in mg/kg/flush. Total S = Total Sulfur; Scr = Chromium Reducible Sulfur; and ANC = Acid Neutralising CapacityMPA = Maximum Potential Acidity, and NAPP = Net Acid Producing Potential

KLC Test Results: NAF Process Residue (Middlings)RGS-KLC6 : GEMCO Project

# ANZECC & ARCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, ACT (2000). Livestock drinking water (low risk trigger levels).

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 151: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC test data trends Attachment D

-3,000

-2,500

-2,000

-1,500

-1,000

-500

0

500

1,000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Net

Alk

alin

ity (

CaC

O3

mg/

L)

Weeks

Net Alkalinity PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

pH

Weeks

pH PAF OverburdenKLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burden KLC2

NAF OverburdenKLC3

NAF OverburdenKLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0

25

50

75

100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Res

idua

l AN

C (%

)

Weeks

Residual ANC

PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 152: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC test data trends Attachment D

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

EC (µ

S/cm

)

Weeks

Electrical Conductivity PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Sulfa

te R

elea

se R

ate

(mg/

kg/fl

ush)

Weeks

SO4 Release Rate PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0

25

50

75

100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Res

idua

l S (%

)

Weeks

Residual Sulfur

PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6Residual sulfur is total sulfur at start minus sulfur (as sulfate) leached from sample

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 153: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC test data trends Attachment D

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Alum

iniu

m (m

g/L)

Weeks

Aluminium PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Arse

nic

(mg/

L)

Weeks

Arsenic PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Cad

miu

m (m

g/L)

Weeks

Cadmium PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 154: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC test data trends Attachment D

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Chr

omiu

m (m

g/L)

Weeks

Chromium PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Cop

per (

mg/

L)

Weeks

Copper PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0

3

6

9

12

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Cob

alt (

mg/

L)

Weeks

Cobalt PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 155: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC test data trends Attachment D

0

100

200

300

400

500

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Iron

(mg/

L)

Weeks

Iron PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Lead

(mg/

L)

Weeks

Lead PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0

100

200

300

400

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Man

gane

se (m

g/L)

Weeks

Manganese PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 156: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC test data trends Attachment D

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Sele

nium

(mg/

L)

Weeks

Selenium PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0

3

6

9

12

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Nic

kel (

mg/

L)

Weeks

Nickel PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Mol

ybde

num

(mg/

L)

Weeks

Molybdenum PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report

Page 157: Appendix A - Geochemistry Report - NTEPA€¦ · Geochemistry Report: Eastern Leases Project Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Local Setting Figure 3: Indicative

KLC test data trends Attachment D

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Zinc

(mg/

L)

Weeks

Zinc PAF Overburden KLC1

NAF Over/Inter-burdenKLC2

NAF Overburden KLC3

NAF Overburden KLC4

NAF Ore KLC5

NAF Middlings KLC6

Appendix A | Geochemistry Report