appendix-7 photos of piles and props under general cargo
TRANSCRIPT
Appendix-7
Photos of Piles and Props under General Cargo Terminal
A7-1
Slab nearby Pile 1B Pile 1B
Wall and Slab nearby Pile 1C Pile 1D
Pile 1E Slab bet. Pile 1E & 2E
A7-2
Pile 2B-1 Pile 2B-2
Pile 2C Pile 2E
Pile 3B Pile 3C-1
A7-3
Pile 3C-2 Pile 3D-1
Pile 3D-2 Pile 3D-3
Pile 4B ~ Pile 4C Pile 4D ~ Pile 4E
A7-4
Pile 6B ~ Pile 6C Pile 6C
Pile 6D Pile 8C-1
Pile 8C-2 Pile 8C-3
A7-5
Pile 8D ~ Pile E Wall bet. Pile 8E ~ Pile 9E
Pile 9C Pile 9E
Pile 10B Pile 10C
A7-6
Pile 10E Pile 11C-1
Pile 11C-2 Pile 12C
Pile 12D-1 Pile 12D-2
A7-7
Pile 12D ~ Pile 12E-1 Pile 12D ~ Pile 12E-2
Pile 13C Pile 14B ~ Pile 14C
Pile 14C-1 Pile 14C-2
A7-8
Pile 14E Pile 15C
Pile 15D Pile 15E
Pile 16C Pile 16E-1
A7-9
Pile 16E-2 Pile 17C
Pile 17D ~ Pile 17E Pile 18B ~ Pile 18C
Pile 18C-1 Pile 18C-2
A7-10
Pile 18E Pile 19C
Pile 19E Pile 20B ~ Pile 20C
Pile 20C Pile 20E
A7-11
Pile 21C Pile 21D
Pile 21E Pile 22C-1
Pile 22C-2 Pile 22D
A7-12
Pile 23B Pile 23C
Pile 23E Pile 24C
Pile 24C ~ Pile 24D
Pile 25C ~ Pile 25D Pile 24E
A7-13
Wall nearby Pile 25C Pile 25D
Pile 25D ~ Pile 25D
A7-14
Pile 104a Pile 105a
Pile 107a Pile 109a
A7-15
Appendix-8
Results of scoping Item Project
stage Rating Reason
1 Involuntary Resettlement P, C, O D There will be no resettlement. P D No impacts expected.
B+ Generation of construction related employment.C B- Possible reduction in fish catch due to
disturbances from marine construction works.
2 Local Economy such as Employment and Livelihood, etc
O B+ Generation of operation related employment. P D No impacts expected. 3 Land Use and Utilization of
Local Resources C, O B- Some fishermen use the adjacent coastal area for fishing (e.g. beach seine) and boat parking.
4 Social Institutions such as Social Infrastructure and Local Decision - making Institutions
P, C, O D
No impacts expected.
5 Existing Social Infrastructures and Services P, C, O D No impacts expected.
6 The Poor, Indigenous and Ethnic people P, C, O D No impacts expected.
P D No impacts expected.
B+ Possible benefits in regards to local employment, economy and so on. C
B- Possible hindrance to fishing activities due to marine construction works.
B+ Possible benefits in regards to local employment, economy and so on.
7 Misdistribution of Benefit and Damage
O B- Possible hindrance to fishing activities due to
increase in shipping traffic. 8 Cultural heritage P, C, O D There are no cultural heritages in the project
site. 9 Local Conflicts of Interest P, C, O D No impacts expected.
10 Water Usage or Water Rights and Communal Rights P, C, O D No impacts expected.
P D No impacts expected.
C B- Human wastes of construction workers could degrade local sanitary conditions.
11 Sanitation
O D No impacts expected. P D No impacts expected.
C B- Construction workers could spread communicable diseases (e.g. AIDS) into the local community.
Soci
al E
nviro
nmen
t:
12 Hazards (risk) Infectious Diseases such as HIV/AIDS
O D No impacts expected. 13 Topography and
Geographical Features P, C, O D No impacts expected.
14 Soil Erosion P, C, O D No impacts expected. P D No impacts expected. 15 Groundwater
C, O A- Groundwater could become contaminated if the contaminated dredged spoil is disposed inappropriately.
16 Hydrological Situation P, C, O D No impacts expected. P D No impacts expected. N
atur
al E
nviro
nmen
t
17 Coastal zone
C, O D The bypass access road will slightly alter the shape of the coastline. However, impact should be negligible due to the limited alteration.
A8 - 1
Item Project stage Rating Reason
P D No impacts expected.
C A-
Marine construction works could have a range of impacts on marine fauna/flora as it may cause: - Loss of benthic habitat - Degradation of water quality ( i.e. increase
in turbidity) - Dispersion of contaminated sediments
18 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
O A-
Uncontrolled discharge of ballast water could introduce invasive species into the bay, which consequently could have devastating impacts on the bay’s ecosystem.
19 Meteorology P, C, O D No impacts expected. P D No impacts expected. 20 Landscape
C, O D
The bypass access road will slightly alter the landscape. However, impact should be negligible as the area is located in an industrial area with limited landscape value.
P D No impacts expected. 21 Global Warming
C, O D
CO2 emission from the port will likely increase during the construction and operation stages, but their contribution to global warming should be insignificant.
P D No impacts expected.
C B- Deterioration of air quality due to fugitive dust and exhaust emissions from construction activities and construction vehicles.
22 Air Pollution
O B- Deterioration of air quality due to exhaust emissions from cargo trucks.
P D No impacts expected.
C A-
Deterioration of water quality due to marine construction works such as dredging. Impact could be significant as sediments in the dredging site are contaminated.
23 Water Pollution
O A- Possible contamination of seawater and groundwater if the contaminated dredge spoil is disposed inappropriately.
24 Soil Contamination P, C, O D No impacts expected. P D No impacts expected.
C A- Dredging will generate large quantity of contaminated dredge spoil.
25 Waste
O D The type of wastes should not differ from present, which can be treated/disposed with existing practices.
P D No impacts expected.
C B- Noise from pile-driving works and construction trucks could have adverse impacts on the local residents.
26 Noise and Vibration
O B- Noise from cargo trucks could have adverse impacts on the local residents.
27 Ground Subsidence P, C, O D No impacts expected. 28 Offensive Odor P, C, O D No impacts expected.
Pollu
tion
29 Bottom Sediment P D No impacts expected.
A8 - 2
Item Project stage Rating Reason
C A-
Dredging work could contaminate the surrounding bottom sediments as it will resuspend and disperse the contaminated sediments at the dredging site.
O B- Contamination of bottom sediment through leaching of pollutants (e.g. TBT) from ship anti-fouling paint.
P D No impacts expected.
C B- Higher risk of maritime and road accidents due to marine construction works and traffic of construction trucks.
30 Accidents
O B- Higher risk of maritime and road accidents due to increase in shipping and cargo-truck traffic.
Legend of project stage P: Pre-construction Stage C: Construction Stage O: Operation Stage Rating criteria A-: Major negative impact A+: Major positive impact B-: Moderate negative impact B+: Moderate positive impact C-: Impact uncertain D: No impact expected. No need for further assessment
A8 - 3
Appendix 9
Draft TOR of sediment quality survey 1. Objective
The objective of the sediment quality survey is to understand the sediment quality status at the proposed dredging site. 2. Scope of work
The sediment quality survey includes field works (sediment sampling), laboratory analysis and reporting. Details are described below. 2.1 Sampling quantity
Sampling should be conducted at twelve (12) sites within the proposed dredging area (approx 50,000 m2). Samples should be taken from the surface and subsurface layers (-1 m) for all the sites. 2.2 Analytical parameter
The following parameters should at least be analyzed for both the surface and -1 m layers:
1) Specific gravity 2) Ignition loss 3) Moisture content 4) Particle size distribution 5) Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 6) Arsenic (As) 7) Cadmium (Cd) 8) Chromium (Cr) 9) Copper (Cu) 10) Lead (Pb) 11) Mercury (Hg) 12) Nickel (Ni) 13) Zinc (Zn) 14) Total DDT 15) Total PCBs 16) Tributyltin (TBT) Analysis should be conducted at a nationally or internationally certified laboratory.
2.3 Report The report should at least contain the following information:
Methodology (e.g. preservation/transportation method, analysis method, quantification limit, QA/QC)
Analysis results Discussion (e.g. comparison with appropriate sediment quality standard, uncertainties with
the results)
A9 - 1
Appendix-10
(1) Details of monitoring methods for changes of piles Details of survey lines and points on a pile
Deck Slab
Pile covered w/ steel pipe
Survey lines drawn on pile Survey points marked on pile
Grinded areas for drawing lines
A10-1
Locations of survey piles
A10-2
(2) Survey locations on the decks and the container yard Details of survey points on a deck
Deck Slab
Anchor wallAnchor wall
Tie wires
Legend
Locations of points for surveying elevations and coordinates on the deck Locations for surveying joints between the deck slab and the container yards Locations of points for surveying elevations of the ground near the anchor walls
A10-3
Appendix-11
Environmental Checklist
A11-1
Cat
egor
yEn
viro
nmen
tal
Item
Mai
n C
heck
Item
sYe
s: Y
No:
NC
onfir
mat
ion
of E
nviro
nmen
tal C
onsi
dera
tions
(Rea
sons
, Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res)
(1) E
IA a
ndEn
viro
nmen
tal
Perm
its
(a) H
ave
EIA
repo
rts b
een
alre
ady
prep
ared
in o
ffici
al p
roce
ss?
(b) H
ave
EIA
repo
rts b
een
appr
oved
by
auth
oriti
es o
f the
hos
t cou
ntry
'sgo
vern
men
t?(c
) Hav
e EI
A re
ports
bee
n un
cond
ition
ally
app
rove
d? If
con
ditio
ns a
reim
pose
d on
the
appr
oval
of E
IA re
ports
, are
the
cond
ition
s sa
tisfie
d?(d
) In
addi
tion
to th
e ab
ove
appr
oval
s, h
ave
othe
r req
uire
d en
viro
nmen
tal
perm
its b
een
obta
ined
from
the
appr
opria
te re
gula
tory
aut
horit
ies
of th
eho
st c
ount
ry's
gov
ernm
ent?
(a) N
(b) N
(c) N
(d) N
(a) T
he p
roje
ct p
ropo
nent
is c
urre
ntly
in th
e pr
oces
s of
sel
ectin
g th
e EI
Aco
nsul
tant
thro
ugh
a te
nder
ing
proc
ess.
The
y pl
an to
sub
mit
the
EIA
toth
e EI
A au
thor
ity a
t aro
und
Oct
ober
201
1.(b
) See
abo
ve.
(c) S
ee a
bove
.(d
) The
re a
re n
o en
viro
nmen
tal p
erm
its re
quire
d ot
her t
han
the
EIA.
(2) E
xpla
natio
n to
the
Loca
lSt
akeh
olde
rs
(a) H
ave
cont
ents
of t
he p
roje
ct a
nd th
e po
tent
ial i
mpa
cts
been
ade
quat
ely
expl
aine
d to
the
Loca
l sta
keho
lder
s ba
sed
on a
ppro
pria
te p
roce
dure
s,in
clud
ing
info
rmat
ion
disc
losu
re?
Is u
nder
stan
ding
obt
aine
d fro
m th
eLo
cal s
take
hold
ers?
(b) H
ave
the
com
men
t fro
m th
e st
akeh
olde
rs (s
uch
as lo
cal r
esid
ents
)be
en re
flect
ed to
the
proj
ect d
esig
n?
(a) Y
(b) Y
(a) D
urin
g th
e pr
epar
ator
y su
rvey
, thr
ee s
take
hold
er m
eetin
gs w
ere
cond
ucte
d to
obt
ain
thei
r opi
nion
s ab
out t
he p
ropo
sed
deve
lopm
ent p
lan.
A co
nsul
tatio
n m
eetin
g w
as a
lso
held
spe
cific
ally
with
the
loca
l fis
herm
en.
In g
ener
al, t
he s
take
hold
ers
wer
e fu
lly s
uppo
rtive
of t
he p
roje
ct. T
here
wer
e no
obj
ectio
ns fr
om th
e fis
herm
en a
s w
ell.
A pu
blic
con
sulta
tion
mee
ting
will
als
o be
hel
d as
par
t of t
he E
IA p
roce
ss.
(b) N
o op
inio
ns w
ere
rais
ed d
urin
g th
e ab
ove
men
tione
d st
akeh
olde
rm
eetin
gs th
at re
quire
d an
y ch
ange
s to
the
proj
ect d
esig
n.
(3) E
xam
inat
ion
of A
ltern
ativ
es
(a) H
ave
alte
rnat
ive
plan
s of
the
proj
ect b
een
exam
ined
with
soc
ial a
nden
viro
nmen
tal c
onsi
dera
tions
?(a
) Y(a
) Alte
rnat
ives
wer
e ex
amin
ed in
rega
rds
to th
e lo
catio
n of
the
new
cont
aine
r ter
min
al, b
y ta
king
into
acc
ount
asp
ects
suc
h as
env
ironm
enta
lim
pact
s, c
ost,
cons
truct
ion
cons
train
ts, p
ort o
pera
tion
and
so o
n.
2 Po
llutio
nC
ontro
l(1
) Air
Qua
lity
(a) D
o ai
r pol
luta
nts,
suc
h as
sul
fur o
xide
s (S
Ox)
, nitr
ogen
oxi
des
(NO
x),
and
soot
and
dus
t em
itted
from
shi
ps, v
ehic
les
and
proj
ect e
quip
men
tsco
mpl
y w
ith th
e co
untry
's e
mis
sion
sta
ndar
ds?
Are
any
miti
gatin
gm
easu
res
take
n?
(a) Y
(a) T
here
are
no
emis
sion
sta
ndar
ds fo
r shi
ps, v
ehic
les
and
proj
ect
equi
pmen
ts. H
owev
er, t
he p
ort w
ill n
eed
to s
treng
then
its
envi
ronm
enta
lm
anag
emen
t to
min
imiz
e ai
r pol
lutio
n fro
m p
ort a
ctiv
ities
, esp
ecia
llyre
gard
ing
bulk
car
go h
andl
ing,
exh
aust
em
issi
ons
from
truc
ks a
nd fu
gitiv
edu
st e
mis
sion
from
sto
ckya
rd. T
hese
sho
uld
be c
onsi
dere
d fu
rther
in th
eEI
A. S
ee 5
(1) f
or re
com
men
ded
coun
term
easu
res
durin
g th
e co
nstru
ctio
nph
ase.
1 Pe
rmits
and
Expl
anat
ion
Env
iron
men
tal C
heck
list（１）
A11-2
(2) W
ater
Qua
lity
(a) D
o ef
fluen
ts fr
om th
e pr
ojec
t fac
ilitie
s co
mpl
y w
ith th
e co
untry
'sef
fluen
t and
env
ironm
enta
l sta
ndar
ds?
(b) D
o ef
fluen
ts fr
om th
e sh
ips
and
othe
r pro
ject
equ
ipm
ents
com
ply
with
the
coun
try's
effl
uent
and
env
ironm
enta
l sta
ndar
ds?
(c) D
oes
the
proj
ect p
repa
re a
ny m
easu
res
to p
reve
nt le
akag
es o
f oils
and
toxi
cant
s?(d
) Doe
s th
e pr
ojec
t cau
se a
ny a
ltera
tions
in c
oast
al li
nes
and
disa
ppea
ranc
e/ap
pear
ance
of s
urfa
ce w
ater
to c
hang
e w
ater
tem
pera
ture
or q
ualit
y by
dec
reas
e of
wat
er e
xcha
nge
or c
hang
es in
flow
regi
mes
?(e
) Doe
s th
e pr
ojec
t pre
pare
any
mea
sure
s to
pre
vent
pol
lutin
g su
rface
,se
a or
und
ergr
ound
wat
er b
y th
e pe
netra
tion
from
recl
aim
ed la
nds?
(a) N
/A(b
) N/A
(c) Y
(d) Y
(e) Y
(a) I
n ge
nera
l the
re w
ill b
e no
maj
or e
fflue
nt s
ourc
es fr
om th
e po
rt.H
owev
er, e
fflue
nt fr
om th
e co
nfin
ed d
ispo
sal f
acili
ty w
ill b
e m
onito
red
ifth
ere
are
any.
App
ropr
iate
effl
uent
sta
ndar
ds s
houl
d be
app
lied
in s
uch
case
. See
2(3
) for
det
ails
on
the
conf
ined
dis
posa
l fac
ility
.(b
) All
ship
s sh
ould
be
requ
ired
to c
ompl
y w
ith re
gula
tions
and
sta
ndar
dsst
ipul
ated
in th
e M
ARPO
L co
nven
tion.
(c) T
here
will
be
no m
ajor
add
ition
al s
ourc
es o
f oil
and
toxi
cant
leak
ages
.Th
e pr
ojec
t will
als
o in
stal
l a n
ew o
il lo
adin
g/un
load
ing
arm
, whi
ch s
houl
dre
duce
the
risk
of o
il sp
illag
e fro
m th
e oi
l loa
ding
/unl
oadi
ng o
pera
tion.
(d) T
he c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
e ne
w a
cces
s ro
ad a
nd s
tock
yard
will
resu
lt in
som
e al
tera
tion
in th
e co
nfig
urat
ion
of th
e co
astli
ne a
nd d
isap
pear
ance
of
appr
ox. 6
.7 h
a of
sur
face
wat
er. H
owev
er, i
t sho
uld
not h
ave
any
sign
ifica
nt im
pact
on
wat
er q
ualit
y as
it s
houl
d no
t dec
reas
e w
ater
exch
ange
or f
low
regi
me
to a
ny s
igni
fican
t deg
ree.
(e) C
onta
min
ated
dre
dge
soil
is p
lann
ed to
be
disp
osed
insi
de a
con
fined
disp
osal
faci
lity,
whi
ch w
ill b
e co
nstru
cted
insi
de th
e ne
w s
tock
yard
. The
conf
ined
disp
osal
faci
lity
will
bede
sign
edto
prev
enta
nyco
ntam
inat
ion
ofs
(3) W
aste
s
(a) A
re w
aste
s ge
nera
ted
from
the
ship
s an
d ot
her p
roje
ct fa
cilit
ies
prop
erly
trea
ted
and
disp
osed
of i
n ac
cord
ance
with
the
coun
try's
regu
latio
ns?
(b) I
s of
fsho
re d
umpi
ng o
f dre
dged
soi
l pro
perly
dis
pose
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
coun
try's
regu
latio
ns?
(c) D
oes
the
proj
ect p
repa
re a
ny m
easu
res
to a
void
dum
ping
or d
isch
arge
toxi
cant
s?
(a) Y
(b) Y
(c) Y
(a) A
ll w
aste
s ge
nera
ted
from
por
t act
iviti
es s
houl
d be
trea
ted
and
disp
osed
in a
ccor
danc
e to
the
rele
vant
regu
latio
ns a
nd n
orm
s.(b
) All
dred
ged
soil
will
be
used
as
land
fill m
ater
ial f
or th
e ne
w s
tock
yard
.C
onta
min
ated
dre
dged
soi
l will
be
disp
osed
insi
de a
con
fined
dis
posa
lfa
cilit
y. T
here
fore
, the
re w
ill b
e no
offs
hore
dum
ping
.(c
) All
cont
amin
ated
dre
dged
soi
l will
be
disp
osed
insi
de a
con
fined
disp
osal
faci
lity.
Apa
rt fro
m d
redg
ed s
oil,
ther
e sh
ould
be
no d
umpi
ng o
rdi
scha
rge
of to
xica
nts.
(4) N
oise
and
Vibr
atio
n
(a) D
o no
ise
and
vibr
atio
ns fr
om th
e ve
hicl
e an
d tra
in tr
affic
com
ply
with
the
coun
try's
sta
ndar
ds?
(a) N
/A(a
) The
re a
re n
o no
ise
and
vibr
atio
n st
anda
rds
for v
ehic
le a
nd tr
ain
traffi
c.H
owev
er, t
he p
ort w
ill n
eed
to s
treng
then
its
envi
ronm
enta
l man
agem
ent
to m
inim
ize
nois
e em
issi
ons,
esp
ecia
lly fr
om c
argo
truc
ks. T
hese
sho
uld
be c
onsi
dere
d fu
rther
in th
e EI
A. S
ee 5
(1) f
or re
com
men
ded
coun
term
easu
res
durin
g th
e co
nstru
ctio
n ph
ase.
(5) S
ubsi
denc
e(a
) In
the
case
of e
xtra
ctio
n of
a la
rge
volu
me
of g
roun
dwat
er, i
s th
ere
apo
ssib
ility
that
the
extra
ctio
n of
gro
undw
ater
will
cau
se s
ubsi
denc
e?(a
) N(a
) The
re w
ill b
e no
ext
ract
ion
of g
roun
dwat
er.
(6) O
dor
(a) A
re th
ere
any
odor
sou
rces
? Ar
e ad
equa
te o
dor c
ontro
l mea
sure
sta
ken?
(a) N
(a) T
here
will
be
no m
ajor
odo
r sou
rces
.
(7) S
edim
ent
(a) A
re a
dequ
ate
mea
sure
s ta
ken
to p
reve
nt c
onta
min
atio
n of
sed
imen
tsby
dis
char
ges
or d
umpi
ng o
f haz
ardo
us m
ater
ials
from
the
ship
s an
dre
late
d fa
cilit
ies?
(a) N
/A(a
) Ant
i-fou
ling
pain
ts u
sed
by s
hips
may
con
tinue
to c
onta
min
ate
sedi
men
ts. T
he p
ort s
houl
d th
eref
ore
enco
urag
e sh
ips
to re
frain
the
use
ofha
rmfu
l ant
i-fou
ling
pain
t. R
atifi
catio
n of
the
AFS
Con
vent
ion
is a
lso
reco
mm
ende
d.
2 Po
llutio
nC
ontro
l
Env
iron
men
tal C
heck
list（２）
A11-3
(1) P
rote
cted
Area
s
(a) I
s th
e pr
ojec
t site
loca
ted
in p
rote
cted
are
as d
esig
nate
d by
the
coun
try's
law
s or
inte
rnat
iona
l tre
atie
s an
d co
nven
tions
? Is
ther
e a
poss
ibili
ty th
at th
e pr
ojec
t will
affe
ct th
e pr
otec
ted
area
s?
(a) N
(a) T
here
are
no
prot
ecte
d ar
eas
in th
e vi
cini
ty o
f the
pro
ject
site
.
(2) E
cosy
stem
(a) D
oes
the
proj
ect s
ite e
ncom
pass
prim
eval
fore
sts,
trop
ical
rain
fore
sts,
ecol
ogic
ally
val
uabl
e ha
bita
ts (e
.g.,
cora
l ree
fs, m
angr
oves
, or t
idal
flat
s)?
(b) D
oes
the
proj
ect s
ite e
ncom
pass
the
prot
ecte
d ha
bita
ts o
f end
ange
red
spec
ies
desi
gnat
ed b
y th
e co
untry
's la
ws
or in
tern
atio
nal t
reat
ies
and
conv
entio
ns?
(c) I
f sig
nific
ant e
colo
gica
l im
pact
s ar
e an
ticip
ated
, are
ade
quat
epr
otec
tion
mea
sure
s ta
ken
to re
duce
the
impa
cts
on th
e ec
osys
tem
?(d
) Is
ther
e a
poss
ibili
ty th
at th
e pr
ojec
t will
adv
erse
ly a
ffect
aqu
atic
orga
nism
s? A
re a
dequ
ate
mea
sure
s ta
ken
to re
duce
neg
ativ
e im
pact
s on
aqua
tic o
rgan
ism
s?(e
) Is
ther
e a
poss
ibili
ty th
at th
e pr
ojec
t will
adv
erse
ly a
ffect
veg
etat
ion
orw
ildlif
e of
coa
stal
zon
es?
If an
y ne
gativ
e im
pact
s ar
e an
ticip
ated
, are
adeq
uate
mea
sure
s ta
ken
to re
duce
the
impa
cts
on v
eget
atio
n an
dw
ildlif
e?
(a) Y
(b) N
(c) Y
(d) Y
(e) Y
(a) T
here
are
sm
all p
atch
es o
f man
grov
e, s
eagr
ass
and
tidal
flat
in o
rne
ar th
e pr
ojec
t site
.(b
) The
re a
re n
o pr
otec
ted
habi
tats
of e
ndan
gere
d sp
ecie
s in
the
vici
nity
of th
e pr
ojec
t site
.(c
) Dre
dgin
g an
d co
nstru
ctio
n of
the
cont
aine
r ter
min
al, a
cces
s ro
ad a
ndst
ocky
ard
will
resu
lt in
loss
of s
and-
silty
mar
ine
habi
tat.
Whi
le it
is n
otpo
ssib
le to
acc
urat
ely
pred
ict h
ow th
e ab
ove
loss
es w
ill a
ffect
the
loca
lec
osys
tem
, it i
s lik
ely
that
impa
cts
will
rem
ain
with
in n
eglig
ible
leve
ls d
ueto
the
follo
win
g re
ason
s:- I
n te
rms
of s
urfa
ce a
rea,
the
sand
-silt
y ha
bita
t tha
t will
be
lost
com
pris
eson
ly a
min
or fr
actio
n of
the
entir
e sa
nd-s
ilty
habi
tat a
rea
in N
acal
a Ba
y.- N
o en
dang
ered
spe
cies
hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
to in
habi
t the
con
stru
ctio
nsi
tes.
- The
reve
tmen
ts o
f the
new
mar
ine
stru
ctur
es s
houl
d fu
nctio
n as
a n
ewro
cky-
type
hab
itat f
or v
ario
us m
arin
e or
gani
sms.
Nev
erth
eles
s th
e si
gnifi
canc
e of
the
abov
e m
entio
ned
impa
cts
on th
eec
osys
tem
sho
uld
be a
sses
sed
in th
e E
IA.
Anot
her c
once
rn is
the
intro
duct
ion
of in
vasi
ve s
peci
es th
roug
h sh
ipba
llast
wat
er. T
he p
ort s
houl
d th
eref
ore
enco
urag
e sh
ips
to e
xcha
nge
ball a
(d) I
n ad
ditio
n to
the
loss
of m
arin
e ha
bita
t, dr
edgi
ng a
ctiv
ities
may
affe
ct a u
(e) S
ome
vege
tatio
n in
clud
ing
man
grov
e, w
ill n
eed
to b
e cl
eare
d to
con
str
(3) H
ydro
logy
(a) D
o th
e pr
ojec
t fac
ilitie
s af
fect
adv
erse
ly fl
ow re
gim
es, w
aves
, tid
es,
curr
ents
of r
iver
s an
d et
c if
the
proj
ect f
acili
ties
are
cons
truct
ed o
n/by
the
seas
?
(a) Y
(a) T
he n
ew a
cces
s ro
ad a
nd s
tock
yard
will
resu
lt in
som
e al
tera
tion
inth
e flo
w re
gim
e ne
ar th
e po
rt. H
owev
er, i
ts a
ltera
tion
shou
ld b
e ve
rylim
ited.
(4) T
opog
raph
yan
d G
eolo
gy
(a) D
oes
the
proj
ect r
equi
re a
ny la
rge
scal
e ch
ange
s of
topo
grap
hic/
geog
raph
ic fe
atur
es o
r cau
se d
isap
pear
ance
of t
he n
atur
alse
asho
re?
(a) Y
(a) A
ppro
xim
atel
y 50
0 m
of n
atur
al s
eash
ore
will
be
lost
due
to th
eco
nstru
ctio
n of
the
new
acc
ess
road
and
sto
ckya
rd.
3 N
atur
alEn
viro
nmen
t
Env
iron
men
tal C
heck
list（３）
A11-4
(1) R
eset
tlem
ent
(a) I
s in
volu
ntar
y re
settl
emen
t cau
sed
by p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion?
Ifin
volu
ntar
y re
settl
emen
t is
caus
ed, a
re e
fforts
mad
e to
min
imiz
e th
eim
pact
s ca
used
by
the
rese
ttlem
ent?
(b) I
s ad
equa
te e
xpla
natio
n on
com
pens
atio
n an
d re
settl
emen
t ass
ista
nce
give
n to
affe
cted
peo
ple
prio
r to
rese
ttlem
ent?
(c) I
s th
e re
settl
emen
t pla
n, in
clud
ing
com
pens
atio
n w
ith fu
ll re
plac
emen
tco
sts,
rest
orat
ion
of li
velih
oods
and
livi
ng s
tand
ards
dev
elop
ed b
ased
on
soci
oeco
nom
ic s
tudi
es o
n re
settl
emen
t?(d
) Are
the
com
pens
atio
ns g
oing
to b
e pa
id p
rior t
o th
e re
settl
emen
t?(e
) Are
the
com
pens
atio
n po
licie
s pr
epar
ed in
doc
umen
t?(f)
Doe
s th
e re
settl
emen
t pla
n pa
y pa
rticu
lar a
ttent
ion
to v
ulne
rabl
e gr
oups
or p
eopl
e, in
clud
ing
wom
en, c
hild
ren,
the
elde
rly, p
eopl
e be
low
the
pove
rtylin
e, e
thni
c m
inor
ities
, and
indi
geno
us p
eopl
es?
(g) A
re a
gree
men
ts w
ith th
e af
fect
ed p
eopl
e ob
tain
ed p
rior t
ore
settl
emen
t?(h
) Is
the
orga
niza
tiona
l fra
mew
ork
esta
blis
hed
to p
rope
rly im
plem
ent
rese
ttlem
ent?
Are
the
capa
city
and
bud
get s
ecur
ed to
impl
emen
t the
pla
n?(i)
Are
any
pla
ns d
evel
oped
to m
onito
r the
impa
cts
of re
settl
emen
t?(j)
Isth
egr
ieva
nce
redr
ess
mec
hani
smes
tabl
ishe
d?
(a) N
(b) N
(c) N
(d) N
(e) N
(f) N
(g) N
(h) N
(i) N
(j) N
(a) T
here
will
be
no in
volu
ntar
y re
settl
emen
t.(b
) Not
app
licab
le.
(c) N
ot a
pplic
able
.(d
) Not
app
licab
le.
(e) N
ot a
pplic
able
.(f)
Not
app
licab
le.
(g) N
ot a
pplic
able
.(h
) Not
app
licab
le.
(i) N
ot a
pplic
able
.(j)
Not
app
licab
le.
(2) L
ivin
g an
dLi
velih
ood
(a) I
s th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
the
proj
ect w
ill a
dver
sely
affe
ct th
e liv
ing
cond
ition
s of
inha
bita
nts?
Are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
redu
ceth
e im
pact
s, if
nec
essa
ry?
(b) I
s th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
cha
nges
in w
ater
use
s (in
clud
ing
fishe
ries
and
recr
eatio
nal u
ses)
in th
e su
rrou
ndin
g ar
eas
due
to p
roje
ct w
illad
vers
ely
affe
ct th
e liv
elih
oods
of i
nhab
itant
s?(c
) Is
ther
e a
poss
ibili
ty th
at p
ort a
nd h
arbo
r fac
ilitie
s w
ill a
dver
sely
affe
ctth
e ex
istin
g w
ater
traf
fic a
nd ro
ad tr
affic
in th
e su
rrou
ndin
g ar
eas?
(d) I
s th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
dis
ease
s, in
clud
ing
infe
ctio
us d
isea
ses,
suc
has
HIV
will
be
brou
ght d
ue to
imm
igra
tion
of w
orke
rs a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
epr
ojec
t? A
re c
onsi
dera
tions
giv
en to
pub
lic h
ealth
, if n
eces
sary
?
(a) Y
(b) Y
(c) N
(d) Y
(a) T
he c
onst
ruct
ion
vehi
cles
that
trav
el th
roug
h th
e ac
cess
road
may
caus
e nu
isan
ce (e
.g. a
ir po
llutio
n, n
oise
) to
the
loca
l res
iden
ts. S
ee 5
(1)
for r
ecom
men
ded
coun
term
easu
res.
(b) T
he fi
shin
g ac
tiviti
es o
f the
loca
l fis
herm
en c
ould
be
affe
cted
thro
ugh
for e
xam
ple:
- los
s of
fish
ing
grou
nd d
ue to
con
stru
ctio
n of
acc
ess
road
and
sto
ckya
rd- p
rese
nce
of c
onst
ruct
ion
vess
els
- inc
reas
e in
mar
itim
e tra
ffic
How
ever
, no
obje
ctio
ns o
r com
plai
nts
have
bee
n ra
ised
by
the
loca
lfis
herm
en d
urin
g th
e fis
herm
en c
onsu
ltatio
n m
eetin
g an
d st
akeh
olde
rm
eetin
gs. N
ever
thel
ess,
the
proj
ect p
ropo
nent
sho
uld
cons
ult r
egul
arly
with
the
loca
l fis
herm
en th
roug
hout
the
cons
truct
ion
and
oper
atio
nph
ases
, to
disc
uss
if th
e po
rt co
nstru
ctio
n or
act
iviti
es a
re c
ausi
ng a
nypr
oble
ms.
(c) T
he n
ew a
cces
s ro
ad w
ill a
lter t
he e
xist
ing
road
traf
fic m
ovem
ent.
How
ever
, thi
s sh
ould
in g
ener
al h
ave
a po
sitiv
e im
pact
as
it sh
ould
alle
viat
e tra
ffic
cong
estio
n.(d
) Im
plem
enta
tion
of re
gula
r hea
lth c
heck
s an
d ed
ucat
ion
prog
ram
s ar
ere
com
men
ded
to re
duce
the
risk
of s
prea
ding
of i
nfec
tious
dis
ease
s.Sh
ldb
fth
idd
ith
EIA
D/D
td
4 So
cial
Envi
ronm
ent
Env
iron
men
tal C
heck
list（４）
A11-5
(3) H
erita
ge
(a) I
s th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
the
proj
ect w
ill d
amag
e th
e lo
cal
arch
eolo
gica
l, hi
stor
ical
, cul
tura
l, an
d re
ligio
us h
erita
ge?
Are
adeq
uate
mea
sure
s co
nsid
ered
to p
rote
ct th
ese
site
s in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
coun
try's
law
s?
(a) N
(a) T
here
are
no
herit
ages
in o
r nea
r the
pro
ject
site
.
(4) L
ands
cape
(a) I
s th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
the
proj
ect w
ill a
dver
sely
affe
ct th
e lo
cal
land
scap
e? A
re n
eces
sary
mea
sure
s ta
ken?
(a) N
(a) I
mpa
cts
on th
e la
ndsc
ape
shou
ld b
e ne
glig
ible
as
the
proj
ect a
rea
lies
unde
r a d
esig
nate
d po
rt/in
dust
rial a
rea.
(5) E
thni
cM
inor
ities
and
Indi
geno
usPe
ople
s
(a) A
re c
onsi
dera
tions
giv
en to
redu
ce im
pact
s on
the
cultu
re a
nd li
fest
yle
of e
thni
c m
inor
ities
and
indi
geno
us p
eopl
es?
(b) A
re a
ll of
the
right
s of
eth
nic
min
oriti
es a
nd in
dige
nous
peo
ples
inre
latio
n to
land
and
reso
urce
s re
spec
ted?
(a) N
/A(b
) N/A
(a) T
here
are
no
ethn
ic m
inor
ities
and
indi
geno
us p
eopl
es n
ear t
he p
roje
ctsi
te.
(b) S
ee a
bove
.
(6)
Wor
king
Con
ditio
ns
(a) I
s th
e pr
ojec
t pro
pone
nt n
ot v
iola
ting
any
law
s an
d or
dina
nces
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e w
orki
ng c
ondi
tions
of t
he c
ount
ry w
hich
the
proj
ect
prop
onen
t sho
uld
obse
rve
in th
e pr
ojec
t?(b
) Are
tang
ible
saf
ety
cons
ider
atio
ns in
pla
ce fo
r ind
ivid
uals
invo
lved
inth
e pr
ojec
t, su
ch a
s th
e in
stal
latio
n of
saf
ety
equi
pmen
t whi
ch p
reve
nts
indu
stria
l acc
iden
ts, a
nd m
anag
emen
t of h
azar
dous
mat
eria
ls?
(c) A
re in
tang
ible
mea
sure
s be
ing
plan
ned
and
impl
emen
ted
for
indi
vidu
als
invo
lved
in th
e pr
ojec
t, su
ch a
s th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f a s
afet
yan
d he
alth
pro
gram
, and
saf
ety
train
ing
(incl
udin
g tra
ffic
safe
ty a
nd p
ublic
heal
th) f
or w
orke
rs e
tc.?
(d) A
re a
ppro
pria
te m
easu
res
take
n to
ens
ure
that
sec
urity
gua
rds
invo
lved
in th
e pr
ojec
t not
to v
iola
te s
afet
y of
oth
er in
divi
dual
s in
volv
ed, o
r
(a) N
/A(b
) N/A
(c) N
/A(d
) N/A
(a) N
ot c
onsi
dere
d in
the
prep
arat
ory
surv
ey. S
houl
d be
con
side
red
in th
eEI
A or
D/D
sta
ge.
(b) S
ee a
bove
.(c
) See
abo
ve.
(d) S
ee a
bove
.
4 So
cial
Envi
ronm
ent
loca
lres
iden
ts?
Env
iron
men
tal C
heck
list（５）
A11-6
(1) I
mpa
cts
durin
gC
onst
ruct
ion
(a) A
re a
dequ
ate
mea
sure
s co
nsid
ered
to re
duce
impa
cts
durin
gco
nstru
ctio
n (e
.g.,
nois
e, v
ibra
tions
, tur
bid
wat
er, d
ust,
exha
ust g
ases
, and
was
tes)
?(b
) If c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ities
adv
erse
ly a
ffect
the
natu
ral e
nviro
nmen
t(e
cosy
stem
), ar
e ad
equa
te m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
redu
ce im
pact
s?(c
) If c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ities
adv
erse
ly a
ffect
the
soci
al e
nviro
nmen
t, ar
ead
equa
te m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
redu
ce im
pact
s?
(a) Y
(b) Y
(c) Y
(a) V
ario
us m
easu
res
are
plan
ned
to p
reve
nt o
r min
imiz
e po
llutio
n fro
mco
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es. F
ollo
win
g ar
e so
me
of th
e pl
anne
dco
unte
rmea
sure
s:[A
ir po
llutio
n m
easu
res]
- Use
of w
ell m
aint
aine
d tru
cks
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
regu
lar v
ehic
lem
aint
enan
ce.
- Cov
erin
g of
truc
k lo
adin
g sp
ace
with
she
et c
over
to m
inim
ize
dust
spi
lls[N
oise
pol
lutio
n m
easu
res]
- Use
of l
ow n
oise
pile
-driv
er- U
se o
f wel
l mai
ntai
ned
truck
s an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of re
gula
r veh
icle
mai
nten
ance
- Stri
ct a
bida
nce
of s
peed
lim
it an
d av
oida
nce
of u
nnec
essa
ry re
vvin
g- A
void
ance
of n
ight
-tim
e tra
velli
ng o
f tru
cks
whe
neve
r pos
sibl
e[W
ater
pol
lutio
n m
easu
res]
- Ins
talla
tion
of s
ilt c
urta
ins
arou
nd th
e dr
edgi
ng s
ite.
- Use
of d
redg
er w
ith fr
ame-
type
silt
cur
tain
.- U
se o
f enc
lose
d-ty
pe g
rab
buck
et.
- Im
plem
enta
tion
of w
ater
qua
lity
mon
itorin
g.(b
) See
3(2
)(c)
.(c
) Var
ious
pol
lutio
n m
easu
res
are
plan
ned
to p
reve
nt o
r min
imiz
e im
pact
(2) M
onito
ring
(a) D
oes
the
prop
onen
t dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t mon
itorin
g pr
ogra
m fo
rth
e en
viro
nmen
tal i
tem
s th
at a
re c
onsi
dere
d to
hav
e po
tent
ial i
mpa
cts?
(b) W
hat a
re th
e ite
ms,
met
hods
and
freq
uenc
ies
of th
e m
onito
ring
prog
ram
?(c
) Doe
s th
e pr
opon
ent e
stab
lish
an a
dequ
ate
mon
itorin
g fra
mew
ork
(org
aniz
atio
n, p
erso
nnel
, equ
ipm
ent,
and
adeq
uate
bud
get t
o su
stai
n th
em
onito
ring
fram
ewor
k)?
(d) A
re a
ny re
gula
tory
requ
irem
ents
per
tain
ing
to th
e m
onito
ring
repo
rtsy
stem
iden
tifie
d, s
uch
as th
e fo
rmat
and
freq
uenc
y of
repo
rts fr
om th
e a
utho
ritie
s?
(a) N
/A(b
) N/A
(c) N
/A(d
) N/A
(a) T
he p
repa
rato
ry s
urve
y re
com
men
ds m
onito
ring
of th
e fo
llow
ing
item
s:- F
ishe
rmen
(2/y
ear a
nd 1
/yea
r in
the
cons
truct
ion
and
oper
atio
n ph
ases
resp
ectiv
ely)
- Wat
er q
ualit
y du
ring
dred
ging
(dai
ly d
urin
g co
nstru
ctio
n ph
ase)
- Effl
uent
wat
er fr
om c
onfin
ed d
ispo
sal f
acili
ty (p
rior t
o di
scha
rge)
The
deta
iled
mon
itorin
g pr
ogra
m s
houl
d be
fina
lized
in th
e EI
A or
D/D
stag
e.(b
) Sho
uld
be fi
naliz
ed in
the
EIA
or D
/D s
tage
. g S
houl
d be
est
ablis
hed
in th
e EI
A or
D/D
sta
)c(y
prop
onen
t to
the
regu
lato
re.
5 O
ther
s
Env
iron
men
tal C
heck
list（６）
A11-7
6 N
ote
Not
e on
Usi
ngEn
viro
nmen
tal
Che
cklis
t
(a) W
here
nec
essa
ry, i
mpa
cts
on g
roun
dwat
er h
ydro
logy
(gro
undw
ater
leve
l dra
wdo
wn
and
salin
izat
ion)
that
may
be
caus
ed b
y al
tera
tion
ofto
pogr
aphy
, suc
h as
land
recl
amat
ion
and
cana
l exc
avat
ion
shou
ld b
eco
nsid
ered
, and
impa
cts,
suc
h as
land
sub
side
nce
that
may
be
caus
ed b
ygr
ound
wat
er u
ses
shou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
. If s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s ar
ean
ticip
ated
, ade
quat
e m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s sh
ould
be
take
n.(b
) If n
eces
sary
, the
impa
cts
to tr
ansb
ound
ary
or g
loba
l iss
ues
shou
ld b
eco
nfirm
ed, i
f nec
essa
ry (e
.g.,
the
proj
ect i
nclu
des
fact
ors
that
may
cau
sepr
oble
ms,
suc
h as
tran
sbou
ndar
y w
aste
trea
tmen
t, ac
id ra
in, d
estru
ctio
nof
the
ozon
ela
yer,
orgl
obal
war
min
g).
(a) N
/A(b
) N/A
(a) N
ot a
pplic
able
.(b
) Not
app
licab
le.
1) R
egar
ding
the
term
“Cou
ntry
's S
tand
ards
” men
tione
d in
the
abov
e ta
ble,
in th
e ev
ent t
hat e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tand
ards
in th
e co
untry
whe
re th
e pr
ojec
t is
loca
ted
dive
rge
sign
ifica
ntly
from
inte
rnat
iona
l sta
ndar
ds,
appr
opria
te e
nviro
nmen
tal c
onsi
dera
tions
are
requ
ired
to b
e m
ade.
In
cas
es w
here
loca
l env
ironm
enta
l reg
ulat
ions
are
yet
to b
e es
tabl
ishe
d in
som
e ar
eas,
con
side
ratio
ns s
houl
d be
mad
e ba
sed
on c
ompa
rison
s w
ith a
ppro
pria
te s
tand
ards
of o
ther
cou
ntrie
s (i
nclu
ding
Jap
an's
exp
erie
nce)
.2)
Env
ironm
enta
l che
cklis
t pro
vides
gen
eral
env
ironm
enta
l ite
ms
to b
e ch
ecke
d. I
t may
be
nece
ssar
y to
add
or d
elet
e an
item
taki
ng in
to a
ccou
nt th
e ch
arac
teris
tics
of th
e pr
ojec
t and
the
parti
cula
r circ
umst
ance
s of
the
coun
try a
nd lo
calit
y in
whi
ch it
is lo
cate
d.
Env
iron
men
tal C
heck
list（７）
A11-8