appendix 40cfr...aluminuni dtp btaiing, burbank industrial user page 15 of p5 appendix 3 aluminum...

® Murniiiurn Dj9 ii3razing. Burbank - Industrial User Page. 14 of 15

Appendix 2

Sewer Disohorge Standards and Limits Aluminum Dip Brazing @ 1WD-1003

-

pollutants of concern (mg/1)

Fed categorical stas 40CFR 433 PSES

(d-rnax)

local limits nat'l prohib. (instant)

monitoring frequency 1WD-1048

i

arsenic cadmium total chromium hex chromium copper - lead mercury

, nickel _ .-,. _-.-_::

silver zinc total cyanide amenable cyanide total toxic organics oil & grease-total oil & grease-free !:

phenol selenium ,_.-

volatile organic compounds biochem oxygen demand Chem oxygen demand total suspended solids total dissolved solids phosphates sulfates

_

chlorides dissolved sulfides flow (gpd) pH min and max (s.u. ) - ,

-_,-

explosivity t temperature (°F)

0.69 2.77

3.38 0.69

3,98 0.43 2.61 0.40 ® 0.29 ® 2.13 -

-

-

, -

-

_(mo-av)

0.26 1.71

2.07 0.43

2.38 0.24 L48 0.22 0 0.11 ®

-

; -

i -

-

-

-

-

3.0 15.0 -

10.0 ' 3.0 15.0 5.0 0.005 12.0 -

3.0 - '

25.0 - , - , ,..

10.0 ,-

2.0 i ,,,-- 5.0 ,r; ,-

300( -

none visible l .5 -1,

1.0

4.0 1000,- 1000. - , '

1000,2- !

50.0` 420. , .= .,-

275. .--

0.1 -' '

9500 dqriaxi 5.5-9.5 s.tr-;

0 0 104°F

3 6 / year 0 -

6 / year-C). ---i

G 6 / year 3

16Iyear 0

; 6 / year 0 6 / year 0 6 / year 3 0 6 / year 3

1 I year 0 6 / year S 3 .,.-

0

3 _

0. 3 ., =

0 .

6 / year S

6 / year ® 6 / year 0 3 continuous continuous 0 1

0 10 National-prohibitions - Closed-cup flash point <140°F and pH <5.0 su. 0 Narrative prohibition against the introduction of flammable or explosive substances 0 As part of periodic priority pollutant scans in order to identify changes in discharge quality

1, 0 Adjusted to account for dilution from non-cyanide bearing flows : 3 Quarterly sampling by Burbank plus semi-annually self-monitoring i D Certification following the approved toxics organics management plan in lieu Of self-monitoring

liex.1 - proposed increase black --uncharged green - proposed decrease

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User 4 of 15

0 Appendix 2

Sewer Discharge Standards and Limits Aluminum Dip Brazing @ IWD -1003

pollutants of concern (mg /I)

Fed categorical stds 40 CFR 433 PSES

(d -max) (mo -av)

local limits nat'1 prohib (instant)

monitoring frequency 1WD -1 048

arsenic - - 3.0 0 cadmium 0.69 0.26 15.0 6 / year 0 total chromium 2.77 1.71 10.0 6 / year 0 hex chromium - - 3.0 0 copper 3.38 2.07 15.0 6 / year lead 0.69 0.43 5.0 6 / year U mercury - - 0.005 0 nickel 3.98 2.38 12.0 6 / year O silver 0.43 0.24 3.0 6 / year 0 zinc 2.61 1.48 25.0 6 / year total cyanide 0.40 ® 0.220 10.0 O amenable cyanide 0.29 ® 0.11 ® 2.0 6 / year total toxic organics 2.13 - 5.0 1 i year oil & grease -total - 300. 6 / year 0 oil & grease -free - - none visible O phenol - - 1.5 0 selenium - - 1.0 0 volatile organic compounds - - 4.0 biochem oxygen demand - - 1000. O chem oxygen demand - - 1000. O total suspended solids - - 1000. e total dissolved solids - - - 6 / year phosphates - - 50.0 O sulfates - - 420. 6 / year 0 chlorides - - 275. 6 / year 0 dissolved sulfides - - 0.1 O flow (gpd) - 9500 d -max continuous pH min and max (s. u.) 5.5 -9.5 s.u. continuous explosivity - - O e O temperature ( °F) - - 104 °F 0 @ National -prohibitions - Closed -cup flash point <140 °F and pH <5.0 su. e Narrative prohibition against the introduction of flammable or explosive substances O As part of periodic priority pollutant scans in order to identify changes in discharge quality ® Adjusted to account for dilution from non -cyanide bearing flows O Quarterly sampling by Burbank plus semi -annually self -monitoring © Certification following the approved toxics organics management plan in lieu of self -monitoring red -- proposed increase black - unchanged green - proposed decrease

Aluminuni Dtp Btaiing, Burbank industrial User Page 15 of P5

Appendix 3

Aluminum Dip Brazing Sampling ResitIts @ TWD-1-003 January 2003 - November 2006-

'''pollutant Jan03-Nov0 - violation rates 0 0 sample (u.g/1) mean 99th% max mean 99th% max d-max mo-av local count aluminum - - - ,1) arsenic 1

cadmium 0.9 -

1.5 -

'I -.9

13.8 1.7 --

19 -

- .

0/23 .

-- ,

0/21 0/9 0/23

. 9 23

Chromium 92.4 408.0 657 - 0/22 0/20 10/22 22 copper T.t: 14.9 36.6 38.6 - 0/23 0/211 0/23 23 lead :: 0.3 1.1 1.3 0/23 ,... 0/211 0/23 23 mercury :-- ::-,

nickel -.

- 15.1 65.0

<0.2 93 ' 0/23 0/21

0/1

0/23 1

23 selenium ' 2.2 4.1 3.4 0/18 18 silver 6. 53.9 71 0/21 0/20 0/21 21 zinc 39.1 130.8 182 0/22 0/21 0/22 22 cyanide-total 3.1 13.8 22 . - 0/22 0/21 0/22 22 total toxic organics 23.9 59.6 49.7 - 0/10 10/6 6 IDS (mg/t) 486 - 803 , 858 - ; 0/21 21 TSS (mg/1) 5.5 18.4 ! 17 - _ 0/21 21 chloride (mg/1) 88 246 ! 253 z - ' 0/20 20 sulfates (mg/I) 66 104 108 0/21 21

grease (mg/1)

pFI min (s.u.) Tili max (sm.)

11.4

17.5 0 7.9

-

loit& 2.9

7.0 8.5

..- ,, 0/21

0/8^

21

0 Daily-maximums and monthly-averages compardbleio Federal categorical standards. However. dilution renders the sample results only provisionally useful for determining compliance. 3 Monthly-average standards based on the calendar month.

3 0.171mcdian

1

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User Page 15 of 15

Appendix 3

Aluminum Dip Brazing Sampling Results @ IWD -1003 January 2003 - November 2006

pollutant (µg /1)

Jan03 -Nov06 - violation rates OO © sample count mean 99th% max mean 99th% max d -max mo -av local

aluminum - - - - - - - - - 0 arsenic 0.9 1.9 1.7 - - - - - 0/9 9 cadmium 1.5 13.8 19 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 23 chromium 92.4 408.0 657 - - - 0/22 0 /20 0/22 22 copper 14.9 36.6 38.6 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 23 lead 0.3 1.1 1.3 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 ' 23 mercury - - <0.2 - - - - - 0/1 1

nickel 15.3 65.0 93 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 23 selenium 2.2 4.1 3.4 - - - - - 0/18 18 silver 6.5 53.9 71 - - - 0/21 0/20 0/21 21 zinc 39.1 130.8 182 - - - 0/22 0 /2I 0/22 22 cyanide -total 3.1 13.8 22 - - - 0/22 0/21 0/22 22 total toxic organics 23.9 59.6 49.7 - - - 0 /10 - 0/6 6 TDS (mg /1) 486 803 858 - - - - - 0/21 21 TSS (mg /1) 5.5 18.4 17 - - - - - 0/21 21 chloride (mg /1) 88 246 253 - - - - - 0/20 20 sulfates (mg/l) 66 104 l 08 - - - - - 0/21 21 oil & grease (mg /1) E4 7.9 12.9 - - - - - 0/21 21 pH min (s.u.) pH max (s.u.)

7.5 O - -

7.0 8.5

- -

- -

- - 0/8 8

O Daily -maximums and monthly- averages comparable to Federal categorical standards. However dilution renders the sample results only provisionally useful for determining compliance.

O Monthly- average standards based on the calendar month. O pH median

L4t pF auAS, CITY OF BURBANK DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS Page

INDUSTRIAL SOURCE REDUCTION and CONTROL PROGRAM ;740: N LAKE ST BURBANK CA 91502 - (818) 972 -111.5 TAX (8 18) 845- 0718

SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE

Cusstomer:.. p 4 . 1.;:+rr9 -.IS< lI. S Permit #: Key #: 1 c16.

Everrt:Date: i r q i 3 Event Type 4 4 L-1544 Pr e P\-. Ol,! i o .' Cr d 0-0Ucm f --N (s rJ v

¡D Q 9? s prS y fi.-00

s

S \-,fr ; .5 ̀ 4 t- t ` G r- 'f- Rr t - r> -v rv-, Q t t-t-s r' 1;7\ _

cY"`-#` (s t-J' C. o .v ry-6 S - Tc r4 S

Pt 't--j.N >3.4 ,k-s(t C U YJ 1-6ri

FC,4.°.. il.vrNV teTL11 E t Qti 0 Y7 5r` Pill- k.)'PIS1-6

.Pc (TED > r T -?-Ss z s T vc t"Se °ri t -I}t-criC OEM- Ea-- N -C (Lkr^Py'

Mi.,V>. r; () t;S 1A1--).1 C LJ ^^ ̀ A prS P.4:6-0 J C 4 f 111t-, (- -4 s 6 (27 4S. ! &os`

+cS~r -s'`-'S P+[ 5 A . ' N. w-s> cr S+srfi} . _ z

... ONI)C-L -4) N.QA. 5o;L ,e4t-s n ti t

. .

c_ D ur , sì !` s O ` -14 1-1 D u.á.r: At`-1.

f)-6uW\I .AS

1Lt, JS '6 .0 ty-.1(-,71 P 401760 A1- s.

6 ,-I S rt., e' (-.eS en- s C2). Rog

- rtl .utd*-C (a f 1.40 íi-VI, aIN PPT-tS . 6 flqP fiktrTMA

I eertif'y_thatFhav a =copy of this report;

(Frill t Name)

CITY OF BURBANK DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS Page of INDUSTRIAL SOURCE REDUCTION and CONTROL PROGRAM

740 N LAKE ST BURBANK CA 91502 (818) 972 -1 115 FAX (818) 845 -0718

SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE

Customer: At q f a5r _IL ^ S Permit #: Key #: 9t Event Date: Fj g( Event Type (2-flvTr+ e 1-1.:_sSvl, A- e t\--z cA-v<-Erjrj

N t u , 9 T p 4 t r i 51- on-P tr, (t-o u S P v r s ,t1 i N C vs-4 9 u

- ß41-,.ç P t1"? (n.r S S 1)1 s s y f2-0 SS Pt .a-ç-erc J.1 Pr- 17

(>0.(1-E,N <3N3 91'; -}-S f tiM U V ̂ S

-- S A (t-1/44-;4" (kG 94 Nil-S. w TrzaiL

s'7 S ortsir- p " i-i C a r,-.6j S ef' w 1.6>M1.. r S tLEw"41,c-1 G SA `T Mr4 G 14104 V- CL-t0t-©`r(r) "Tts.4t^` ÿa tr kI,IL $Ak.,-r

Coriï' - LTr4 R 1\,ci f C Ls q) Qc'2- t' (.1.1"" C

f C - E-11- r D t-Y{s 0.)-7 ` w ofS, 6 `"'S Pr QQ (-) TED 1L ll-Q SS j (ac-i67.\_ rt T . 641.)-1 (2'-"P4 S

M (1v\-A,, IL,--1-se ,1 n 6" t- cs7c -5- 04iiit- - a 't n.c -- T 6D QRti 1 i'k& N -L--T 0- #A-1-)-i C1.1 P-S 14 '6() ED C érv, - ritt, A- `P`' S 6 (2, Pr -t

rz-v-S-6 g,st1/41.1 s- S (5 )4 S rp Ot\.P `l- C.^j M0\..fv n S(rlt--T Í74ÍL-1-S N trit 1 L -a-- t t- ti C

(l. (1% tL),... eLir S tJ *) DAk'I

1,111-r 5.0 r'\ P H .so 911-Pt-vN5

-- 4-) era n..S c.),K kt, btNi-rs 5 ut.1 y MAt X ü oa1-67o (5110-4 s

S&Ra C4e-A1,4 h-1 c.,1 6yt- . L(1- S Ar") t-e

'0 v Cñ<,4)ti7.-6(t- C. sip% AL A-rfl Uk1r4C i'i íl.o U 4..A-S{,-s ü ̀ f, it-an4% E. flTlf `CU fj°4 I certify that I have a copy of this report.

(Print Name) (Signature)

Received By: k\ia Tjejoi . Y1-e ó / Inspector: ( \ 0 5 ,t u c,J v2 V.- 1..-

5-`51 .

CITY OF BURBANK DEPT ßF PUBLIC WORKS INDUSTRIAL SOURCE REDUCTION and CONTROL PROGRAM

40 N LAKE ST BURBANK CA 91502 (818) 972-11.15 FAX (818) 845-0718

INSPECTION REPORT co,

p i- 0 (j .11ate:& k j i 3 Time l ü r

Customer im--,-)Pe iv g 2.a-L-C, r-rv5 - 25:.23. V4 ,.00, h S

Páge 1 of :I:.

Address; Class:. ti\/

Phone 4; Purpose of Inspection: (4 u 6 : è5SisLirG : rrt .. _.'.l,

Cçintact_Pctsctn. _DR! () 'C )5-0 g cS461..,p, *Cxtz. . Title:

1NSPECT7QN. CHtúCKLI ST:;.

Process Discharge Stream Non -- discharging Process Pretreatment Equipment Flow Monitoring/Sample Stations Hazardous Chemical /Waste;Storage

Spill Containment 13oiler(s) /Cooling Tower(s).

Water Treatment Systems MP IMP /n/ DS 5": -,(L.

Waste Hauling Records General ,Housekeeping

Other (specify) ritira1 Sources (SC IO - 42).

Storm Water 13MPs.

Storni Drains Elicit Discharge/Connection Outdoor Equipment BM Rs

Outdoor Parking /Storage.BMPs

wading Docks4BMPs

Spill /Leak Prevention.& Response Vehicle Repair(Fucltg BMPs

Solid Waste Storagc/t-iândling I3MPs

INSPECTED V1OLA7'CONS YES NO N/A YES NO N/T?

Cff ff

) - Cf _ Ef Er

12( C2 '

Er Er 0 [2"-

O

Stormwater Pretreatment Unit d Other (specify)

InspectioffSummarv:

{a-6--c-ei rlAAJ t-v.1 (.3

N1'.4 ("ESA- S

(""fc-6 14.V-4 % v ,tx.)e 1137 N ,u t°R-`i ti -r-s

N tit- .1 .cer.tfy that : iive-a:çopy o this znspecton rep

(Print Name)

Received By: A-c) e_./al

REFEREN.CE/.COILII iv;(ENTS

73 Sz-v b csirrr Mu,}N (rit.t-44e4

-v,40.is ,4.4.,:N` -re r rv. E..p.4 ?LA tK -r- t.) STv'S`C.64-f,41.-

,./10,J0

ot'j fr11k)1 115

(Signature)

5-`rt

CITY OF BURBANK DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS INDUSTRIAL SOURCE REDUCTION and CONTROL PROGRAM

740 N LAKE ST BURBANK CA 91502 (818) 972-1115 FAX (818) 845-0718

Customer: NL'»' S.t.44 41^

Page 1 of I.

INSPECTION REPORT co.

P4-0 O P (5 it-Pri--e, oiNS 1- 4- .1e.S Date: S k )1 S Time: t

Class: \ Purpose of Inspection: o '11".-14t Ì-t%,.1t kCik'r'D

Y--Pt-r"C )5-0 ft_..Pt Title:

Address: 2513 Phone if;

Contact Person:

INSPECTION CHECKLIST: INSPECTED YES NO N/A

Process Discharge Stream flr 0 LI Non - discharging Process D a 0 Pretreatment Equipment Ef Flow Monitoring/Sample Station(s) [2- D 0 Hazardous Chemical/Waste Storage Er 0 0 Spill Containment Er 0 0 Boiler(s)/Cooling Tower(s) 0 LI Rr Water Treatment Systems C2r D 0

MP/ÇDSDS, ta D 0 Waste Hauling Records D LI O General Housekeeping 0 0 0 Other (specify) 0 0 0 Critical Sources (SC IO - 42) Storm' Water BMPs a' HD o LI Storm Drains 12r 0 0 0 Illicit Discharge/Connection 12 [1 El Outdoor Equipment BMPs

Outdoor Parking/Storage BMPs Er Loading Docks BMPs o

Spill/Leak Prevention & Response Cr 1:1 0 LI Vehicle Repair/Fueling BMPs D 0 Er ED

Solid Waste Storage/Handling BMPs 0 O 0 Stormwater Pretreatment Unit Ef 0 D D Other (specify) 0 0 Er- 0

VIOLATIONS YES NO NID

121--

E Er ErDD

o Efo Ero tzro

O 12r- 0 O 2" 0 El 21"- 0 d o

Er o DEr D

Insoection Summary:

tv,ANts.4-(-t-S1' S

if7r..-,CIT'Ne45,...r4 (,) vt)

,Vr41 P4A-174 c>1-. T's ccq P.LED

tcA; '4;Tan fal4 Vpc7tIolittplAj.L I

(Print Name)

REFERENCE/COMMENTS

StJO S CArt",rr ROL f t-A-0

+.40.1%14. 4N/5 'r (444,1A t

(.1

Oi

SCPr'Ve,rrril- 110,),0 wFt-ST6 O.V-S c-f÷A-4Z-G-tE

orIij3

(Signature)

Received By:

Inspector:

(2) ejal 11 3-Ca

OCAA -c3; Q-

of BURBq4,A CITY OF BURBANK DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS P4ge 'INDUSTRIAL SOURCE REDUCTION and CONTROL PROGRAM

N LAKE ST BURBANK CA 91502 (818) 972-1115 - FAX (818) 845-0718

SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE Customer: .._ . 4) 6 1/4,1 Si- (t-sy-E5 Permit 4: _w. KeY:.

giJ7?"1-i*3 ..- . -Event Type

y G> .Cs (.v a: 9 t- f - ̀n Cs 1 7 iv,,rn S r S ß tt- s 41:7S- S. tv),ets{ W 1';Q

(5.1 ("..4--(`-5-1-.9&-\)('N

l cf? v-tA s it c ' :.0 QlL _i!P D`L 3 ,'r 01 ctn.Er7

'? n -` Co-P r- ei-4\- 13-4 ti G.

u>1- ck.C) N PüctL +t L . PS vu- o

C .5 sL- s i c ;t - a-4,i o4 '16L Ssi{s 4S-PtN s è.,J t).4 -.-ï

S-Ck.f S A-ü-ike4C ..": " "..S 5,4E; S $ R `4.4..1 nc1-6

ÿ1ä:A'11,1 5c-AAr,,,$)S (Lfa:,S 5i Led j.111 A.y..4--1fD

etxq.\ -;Ça. Si c :-6u.o s1-7.L,. 0/4 \.vnN.JY" _`141-1'S Q4E^, Pr`?

ra -c á ow r + . o- 0,,,,J,,4 to $ 1 Gr c e t á c S .s

<C-Ff (A CA- S } Ç Cr h't...tJPr`

D it-trvV L,,P4T CJt^-1 C.Ut'

dertify; that, ̀ I,have:á'çbpy ofthis report:

(Print Name) (Signature

146,6, Recei yed,l3y,

\.1 a,e 13 &/,

CITY OF BURBANK DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS Page INDUSTRIAL SOURCE REDUCTION and CONTROL PROGRAM

740 N LAKE ST BURBANK CA 91502 (818) 972 -1115 FAX (818) 845 -0718

SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE Customer: ¡a-') 6 N 9 v Event Date: )7" )13 Event Type .2-uv'\- 2

Permit #: Key #:

ß 5 bN E CS (l.Uv N 9 . n.g-.f JL- if ' trl ScL,4r i-wm t ÿ'?

q'`-+

Ii P.-xir--% O (-voce

P L to.-1

(L?Sft-r EÌE:yt--1 y S^("011 v.lkpv-Tt,Lf C Pt 1,---,,-P5tA-PrT1

N` ., S w c\-0 trkr41`.

CfifL-.-A.-ot-YEC)

r^trrt E. r1- CsP . ei-C-k '1)4 cg-160 G-Prk,S

L'al..,4-454) eP3 q u'v cE.C7 1-1c1L (1-17t-gr -ï jt tvNGS .{ p.-A Q u 4s^ ß ED 6.,.A P ü Ar arT6 A- 1 '1(,,t ?N.-5 S-9 6vA . .(k. iri 00 S N-1 f4r4Z- Um- CLr4S s A-1- stt N4WIL.O O - )1 (A n Sti(s S ` N` S 4-Cr+`- +ed R 1? Ft TG,tI

-- F 11,e41-1 S-Or k.rf 46 - [45:L,^j arrrvQ a N1ipi svrt ìü 61 Pc P.6 11 Pt173ri.

q7A-11-1 tL.e,1-SS \--,;1-'S 't7£ C-04-t1A`"x-4-4f0 - S) QX'E.J\-S,CA S C TOtacO SPìß-tTCI,y

- UN LA CL i1v'E,U (r, - grvz,/-5 ow r 61) 0, >J i-i t.0 $ 1 Co Et E `. j ít-o c.6 5 S U N t-NI

-- Dv) vor ET AL_ N^tL.0 ti.N(s 5 t,A-S i-`Ç.c4Cr- , Í).Loce <f N J (-(Arra C,- ,N 47 (}tet. "0 itt&v Curi-t}c..r I certify that I have a copy of this report.

(Print Name) (Signature)

Received B : By: / `.1 z°-/G a ̀ vtS? ( ...4c.

Inspector: 3- S C_,1 1\. r-' "5-(9,,, A-L.

EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT 5

8/14/13 Business Search- Business Entities - Business Programs

Business Entity Detail.

Data is updated to the California Business Search on Wednesday and Saturday mornings. Results reflect work processed through Tuesday, August 13, 2013. Please refer to Processing Times for the received dates of filings currently being processed. The data

f r' ...S á:r,. ,.r'.A;.1.?a'=`a.z'`-;is`? Éntity,:Náme:

Enti tÿ' N iimber8 ''

;Status;;_ ryc 9

Jurisdiction

Entity Address

provided is not a complete or certified record of an entity.

ADB INDUSTRIES

;C0668237

10x/31/1972

,°!" ACTIVE

CAL1FORN I.:

1400 CORPORATE

: ,Entity Citÿ;.Staté,,Zip.: .. . ,.,

Agent ?for. ServicéP fró s çés. CORPORATE _ . . . .

CENTER WAY

ELL= INGTON rL 334:

Agèritu`Addréss. '

=Agent Citÿ;,`SStát . ... .v;.

CREATIONS

'131 A STOÑEY Ç,IRCLÉ

':4 SANTA ROSA CA 95401

CALIFORNIA INC.

* Indicates the information is not contained in the California Secretary of State's database.

If the status of the corporation is "Surrender," the agent for service of process is automatically revoked. Please refer to California Corporations Code section 2114 for information relating to service upon corporations that have surrendered. For information on checking or reserving a name, refer to Name Availability. For information on ordering certificates, copies of documents and /or status reports or to request a more extensive search, refer to Information Requests. For help with searching an entity name, refer to Search Tips. For descriptions of the various fields and status types, refer to Field Descriptions and Status Definitions.

Privacy Statement I Free Document Readers

Copyright © 2013 California Secretary of State

4 14

8/14/13 Business Search- Business Entities - Business Programs

Business Entity Detail

Data is updated to the California Business Search on Wednesday and Saturday mornings. Results reflect work processed through Tuesday, August 13, 2013. Please refer to Processing Times for the received dates of filings currently being processed. The data provided is not a complete or certified record of an entity.

Entity Name:

Entity Number :.

Date Filed :.

Status:

Jurisdiction:

Entity Address:

Entity City, State, Zip:

Agent for Service of- Process:

Agent Address:

Agent City, State, Zip:

ADB INDUSTRIES`

C0668237

10/31/1972

ACTIVE

CALIFORNIA

1400 CORPORATE CENTER WAY

WELLINGTON FL 33414':

CORPORATE CREATIONS CALIFORNIA INC.

131 -A STONEY CIRCLE, 5'00

SANTA ROSA CA 95401

* Indicates the information is not contained in the California Secretary of State's database.

If the status of the corporation is "Surrender," the agent for service of process is automatically revoked. Please refer to California Corporations Code section 2114 for information relating to service upon corporations that have surrendered. For information on checking or reserving a name, refer to Name Availability. For information on ordering certificates, copies of documents and /or status reports or to request a more extensive search, refer to Information Requests. For help with searching an entity name, refer to Search Tips. For descriptions of the various fields and status types, refer to Field Descriptions and Status Definitions.

Privacy Statement I Free Document Readers

Copyright © 2013 California Secretary of State

.1/4

EXHIBIT 6

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE COMPANY A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

DAVID R. KANE certifies that:

L He is the president and the secretary, respectively, of ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE

COMPANY, a California corporation.

2. Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation be amended to read in its entirety

as follows:

ARTICLE I

That the name of this corporation is, and shall be: ADB INDUSTRIES

3. The Board of Directors has approved the foregoing amendment.

4. The foregoing amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the

required vote of shareholders in accordance with Section 902, California Corporations Code. The

total number of outstanding shares of the corporation is 100. The number of shares voting in favor

of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required. The percentage vote required was more

than 50 %.

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the matters .

set forth in this certificate are true and correct of our own knowledge.

DATE: ,. David rKane, President

David R. Kane, Secretary

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE COMPANY A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

DAVID R. KANE certifies that:

1. He is the president and the secretary, respectively, of ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE

COMPANY, a California corporation.

2. Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation be amended to read in its entirety

as follows:

ARTICLE I

That the name of this corporation is, and shall be ADB INDUSTRIES

3. The Board of Directors has approved the foregoing amendment.

4. The foregoing amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the

required vote of shareholders in accordance with Section 902, California Corporations Code. The

total number of outstanding shares of the corporation is 100. The number of shares voting in favor

of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required. The percentage vote required was more

than 50%.

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct of our own knowledge.

DATE: rÿ j/ / D 4 David . Kane, President

David R. Kane, Secretar

EXHIBIT 7

- OC-i. 20t. 2010 4:251N W0.0831 P, 2/7

THIRD AMENDMENT TO

LEASE FOR 2523 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BURBANK, CALIFORNIA

This Third Amendment to the Lease for 2523 Ontario Street, Burbank, California ( "Third Amendment ") is made as of October 1, 2010, by and between SHARYN EMMICK. SCHRICK, Trustee of The Sharyn Emmick Schrick Separate Property Trust; DENISE MCLAUGHLAN, Trustee of The Denise McLaughlan Living Trust; and SANDRA EMMICK BOWMAN, Trustee of The Sandra Emmick Bowman Living Trust (collectively "Landlord "), and ADB INDUSTRIES INC., a California corporation ( "Tenant''), This Third Amendment amends and modifies the terms and conditions of that certain lease (the "Original Lease") dated May 7, 1998, the pint Amendment to Lease For 2523 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California dated March 25, 2005 ( "First Amendment ") and the Second Amendment to Lease for 2523 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California dated November 1, 2009 ( "Second Amendment "). The Original Lease, as previously amended and as hereby amended, is referred to herein as the "Lease ",

RECITALS A. Sharyn Emmick Schriek, Denise McLaughlan and Sandra Emmick Bowman, as Landlord, and Tenant previously entered into the Lease, which set forth the terms and conditions relating to Tenant's occupancy of certain premises consisting of approximately 3, 600 square feet at 2523 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California;

E, Sharyn Emmick Schrick, Denise McLaughlan and Sandra Emmick Bowman, heretofore have assigned their interests as owners and landlord of the premises to the Landlord, C. Prior to execution of the Lease, the Premises was occupied continually by Tenant pursuant to the terms of prior leases between Landlord's predecessor in interest and Tenant (the earliest of such prior leases shall be referred to as the "Initial Lease ").

D. Tenant has previously exercised three options to extend this Lease, including one of the options granted in the Second Amendment.

E. Tenant has given notice to Landlord desiring to extend the Lease for an additional 3 year term commencing October I, 2010, with one option term to extend for one additional 3 year term.

E. Landlord and Tenant desire to memorialize (i) the terms for the extension of the Lease, and (íi) to set forth certain other matters of agreement between Landlord and Tenant

AGREEMENT

FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:

Jç;',çifflct.4\4O419\O2 3\I Odocumente\thúd ntnd adb leauC (2523) 10011D-do

Received Time Oct ,20. 5 :29PM

LÌ? 20'. 2010 4 : 25P NO, 0831 P. 2/7

THIRD AMENDMENT TO

LEASE FOR 2523 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BUR13ANK, CALIFORNIA

This Third Amendment to the Lease for 2523 Ontario Street, Burbank, California ( "Third Amendment ") is made as of October 1, 2010, by and between SHARYN EMMICK SCHRICK, Trustee of The Sharyn Emmick Schrick Separate Property Trust; DENISE MCLAUGHLAN, Trustee of' The Denise McLaughlan Living Trust; and SANDRA EMMICK BOWMAN, Trustee of The Sandra Emmick Bowman Living Trust (collectively "Landlord "), and ADB INDUSTRIES INC., a California corporation ( "Tenant"), This Third Amendment amends and modifies the terms and conditions of that certain lease (the "Original Lease ") dated May 7, 1998, the First Amendment to Lease For 2523 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California dated March 25, 2005 ( "First Amendment ") and the Second Amendment to Lease for 2523 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California dated November 1, 2009 ( "Second Amendment "). The Original Lease, as previously amended and as hereby amended, is referred to herein as the "Lease ",

RECITALS A. Sharyn Emmick Schrick, Denise McLaughlan and Sandra Emmick Bowman, as Landlord, and Tenant previously entered into the Lease, which set forth the terms and conditions relating to Tenant's occupancy of certain premises consisting of approximately 3,600 square feet at 2523 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California;

B, Sharyn Emmick Schrick, Denise McLaughlan and Sandra Emmick Bowman, heretofore have assigned their interests as owners and landlord of the premises to the Landlord,

C. Prior to execution of the Lease, the Premises was occupied continually by Tenant pursuant to the terms of prior leases between Landlord's predecessor in interest and Tenant (the earliest of such prior leases shall be referred to as the "Initial Lease ").

D. Tenant has previously exercised three options to extend this Lease, including one of the options granted in the Second Amendment.

E. Tenant has given notice to Landlord desiring to extend the Lease for an additional 3 year term commencing October 1, 2010, with one option term to extend for one additional 3 year term.

E. Landlord and Tenant desire to memorialize (i) the terms for the extension of the Lease, and (ii) to set forth certain other matters of agreement between Landlord and Tenant.

AGREEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby

acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:

k:\afficcA140479\OZ] \I Odocuments \third arrtd adb tease (2523) 10011D -dos

Received Time Oct.20. 5:29PM

OCT.20.2010 4125M t NO.0831 P. 3/1

(1) Meaning ofTerms. Except as otherwise stated in this Third Amendment, (a) All capitalized terms in this Third Amendment will have the respective defined meanings stated in the Lease, and

(b) The terms and provisions of this Third Amendment will be considered to be effective as of October 1, 2010.

(2) Revised Lease Expiration Date; Extended Tern]. The Lease term was originally scheduled to expire on July 3.1, 2010. The expiration date was extended, by Tenant's exercise of its first 9 -month option to extend to April 30, 2011. M of the date of this Third Amendment, the Lease term is extended from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2013 ( "Revised Lease Expiration Date "). And, unless terminated earlier under the terms of the Lease, extended by further written agreement, or extended by further exercise of a certain option to extend, the Lease will expire on the Revised Lease Expiration Date. The period of time beginning on October 1, 2010 and continuing to the Revised Lease Expiration Date is the "Extended Term."

(3) Minimum Monthly Rent. Throughout the Extended Terni, Tenant will pay the following (with 3% per annum annual increase):

Months Monthly Rent

October 1, 2010 - September 30, 2010.,..,..,....$2,628.00

October I, 2011 -- September 30, 2012.....,,.. -. 2,707.00 October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013 2,788,00

(4) Option. Landlord grants to Tenant one (1) option to extend the Terns upon the same terms, covenants and conditions of the Lease, for a term of 3 years (the "Extended Option Tenn"), which Tenant may exorcise provided Tenant is not then in default under the terms of the Lease. If Tenant elects to exercise its option, Tenant shall notify Landlord in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the Extended Option Term, The rent during the Extended Option Tenn shall be:

Months geXithly Rent October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014.,,., $2,872.00 October 1, 2014- September 30, 2015,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..,,,,,. 2,958.00 October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016,,,,,,,-_.x,._ 3,047.00

(5) Tenant's Acceptance of Premises "AS IS." Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that Tenant has been occupying the Premises under the Lease since before May 7, 1998. Tenant continues to accept the Premises in their current "AS IS" state.

(6) Notice and Payment. The provisions regarding notices as set forth in Article 23 of the Lease shall apply. For purposes of making the payments as required by the Lease, Tenant shall make all checks payable to "SDS Management Corporation" and deliver payment as follows!

_2_

Received Time Oct.20. 5:29PPï

OCT. 20. 2010 4 ; 25PM . t

NO. 0831 P. 3/7

(1) IMeanin ofTerms. Except as otherwise stated in this Third Amendment, (a) All capitalized terms in this Third Amendment will have the respective defined meanings stated in the Lease, and

(b) The terms and provisions of this Third Amendment will be considered to be effective as of October 1, 2010.

(2) Revised Lease Expiration Date; Extended Tenn. The Lease term was originally scheduled to expire on July 3.1, 2010. The expiration date was extended, by Tenant's exercise of its first 9 -month option to extend to April 30, 2011. As of the date. of this Third Amendment, the Lease term is extended from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2013 ( "Revised Lease Expiration Date "). And, unless terminated earlier under the terms of the Lease, extended by further written agreement, or extended by further exercise of a certain option to extend, the Lease will expire on the Revised Lease Expiration Date. The period of time beginning on October 1, 2010 and continuing to the Revised Lease Expiration Date is the "Extended Tern." (3) Minimum Monthly Rent. Throughout the Extended Term, Tenant will pay the following (with 3% per annum annual increase):

Months Monthly Rent October 1, 2010 - September 30, 2010 $2,628.00 October 1, 2011 -- September 30, 2012 2,107.00 October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013 2,788.00

(4) Option. Landlord grants to Tenant one (1) option to extend the Term upon the same terms, covenants and conditions of the Lease, for a ternn of 3 years (the "Extended Option Term "), which Tenant may exercise provided Tenant is not then in default under the terms of the Lease. If Tenant elects to exercise its option, Tenant shall notify Landlord in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the Extended Option Term, The rent during the Extended Option Tenn shall be:

Months Monthly Rent October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014 $2,872.00 October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015 2,958.00 October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016 3,047.00

(5) Tenant's Acceptance of Premises "AS IS." Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that Tenant has been occupying the Premises under the Lease since before May 7, 1998, Tenant continues to accept the Premises in their current "AS IS" state.

(6) Notice and Payment. The provisions regarding notices as set forth in Article 23 of the Lease shall apply. For purposes of making the payments as required by the Lease, Tenant shall make all checks payable to "SDS Management Corporation" and deliver payment as follows:

-2-

Received Time Oct.20: 5:29PP1

OCT. 20. 2010 4; 25 PM

Oct 8. 2014 2 48PM

SDS Management Corporation P.0. Box 458 Sun Valley, California 91353 4458

(7) General.

NO. 0831 P. 4/7

No.9968 P a 3l3

(a) Effect 9LAmendment. Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that the Lease, as hereby amended, remains in full for and effect in accordance with its terms, (b) EttitAgreement. The Lease, as modified bereìn, constitutes the entire understanding between Landlord and Tenant, and can be changed only by a writing executed by Landlord and Tenant,

(e) CQUit p ts. If this Third Amendment is executed in counterparts, each i3 hereby declared to be an original; all, however, shall constitute but one and the same agreement_

(d) rt4X ts,,pnti hutncrsbip Ali , If Tenant is a corporation, limited liability company or partnership, or is comprised of either or both of them, each individual executing this Third Anttendmcnt for the corporation, limited liability company or partnership represents that be or she is duly authorized to executes and deliver this Third Amendment on behalf of the corporation, limited liability company or partnership and that this Third Amendment is binding upon the corporation, limited liability company or partnership in accordance with its terms,

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have exe utcd this Third Amendment as of the date first written above.

"LANDLORD"

sHARYN EMNIIGK SCHRICK SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST .

Dy: Sharyn Bmmick Sohrick, Trance

THE DENISE McLAUGHLAN LIVING TRUST

"'I tiNANT*'

AI7B INDUSTRIES NCI a California corporation

By:

SANDRA EMMICK BOWMAN LIVING TRUST

By: -S Emmick bowman, Trust=

-3-

Received Time Oct.20. 5:29PM

David Helms, Chief Financial Officer

OCT. 20. 2010 4:25PM

Oct. 8. 2010 2:48PM

SDS Management Corporation P.O, Box 458 Sun Valley, California 91353 -0458

(7) StçsterAl.

NO.0831 P. 4/7

No.9968 P. 3/3

(a) Effect ßf1#mendment. Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that the Leas; as hereby amended, remains in full for and effect in accordance with its terms. (b) Bptire LEreattaent. The Lease, as modified herein, corsdtutes the entire understanding between Landlord and Tenant, and can be Changed only by a writing executed by Landlord and Tenant.

(e) Counterparts- If this Third Amendment ie executed in counterparts, each is hereby declared to be an original; all, bowrver, shall constitute but one and the are agrcemonr_

(d) ranoramniTiginmVip___AuthgAv. If Tenant is a corporation, limited liability company or partnership, or is comprised of either or both of theca, each individual executing this Thud Amendment for the corporation, limited liability company or partnership represents that be or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Third Amendment on behalf of the corporation, limited liability company or partnership and that this Third Amendment is binding upon the corporation, limited liability company or partnership in accordance with its terms,

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Third Amendment as of the date first written above.

"LANDLORD"

SHARYN EMIvIICK SCHRICK SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST

By: Sharyn Eui nick Schrick, Trustee

THE DENISE McLAUGHLAN LIVING TRUST

By i,44:.1 /l. enise McLaughlan, T

"'1 isNANT"

AD13 INDUSTRIES INC., a California corporation;

B y I

SANDRA EMMICK BOWMAN LIVING TRUST

By: 7 Sandra Emrnick Bowman, Trustee

Received Time Oct,20, 5:29PM

-3-

David Helms, Chie£Financial Officer

EXHIBIT 8 EXHIBIT 8

Cw1.1!014N1/1 Water Boards

L.os. Angeles Regional Water Quality Control :Board.

May 23, 2013

Mr. Joe Belanger General Manager Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries 2537 North Ontario Street Burbank, California 91504

5Fi1Atk, O. lip1.411!lfi

r+crivrc---Jr.,

Ftf)LRiDJL.. at E1FF' ,^.{

? VI 1N41.t:7, t tn-..7N;

CERTIFIED MAIL

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

7011 2970 0000 0645 4585

SUBJECT: REQUIREMENT FOR TECHNICAL REPORTS: PURSUANT : TO CALIFORNIA ATER CODE SECTION 13267 ORDER NO. R4- 2013 -0085 .

SITE ALUMINUM DIP BRAZING INDUSTRIES, 2537 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BURBANK, CALIFORNIA (FILE NO 104.0086)

Dear Mr. Belanger:

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) is the public agency with primary responsibility for the protection of ground and surface water quality for á.N

beneficial uses within major portions of the Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, including the referenced site,,

The Regional Board is investigating potential sources for groundwater pollution within the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) San Fernando Valley Superfund Site (Superfund Site). It is known that groundwater within the Superfund Site, including the vicinity of the Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries (Aluminum Dip Brazing) facility, is impacted with volatile organic (VOCs) and heavy metals; particularly chromium.

Regional Board staff has received information regarding the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility located at 2537 North Ontario Street, in the City of Burbank, California (the Site) Regional Board records indicate that Aluminum Dip Brazing has occupied the Site since approximately 1972. Aluminum Dip Brazing's operations at the Site include machining, welding, sheet metal work, salt bath clip brazing and chromium conversion coating line for aluminum.

Based on our review of available documents, we have determined that additional information is required regarding the operations conducted and the chemicals used and stored by Aluminum Dip Brazing, at the Site Enclosed is a California Water Code (CWC) section 13267 Order No R4- 2013 -0085 (Order), requiring you to complete the enclosed Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire which provides information regarding the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility including detailed information regarding site operations and chemical use at the Site, in order to evaluate the potential for soil and groundwater contamination..

MAqtA KASMF7,äNIAN, COA SAMUEL UNCRr'EREÇUYIVE OFFICEfl`

320 West Ath St, Suite NO'. LOS.Aggetós,-CA 90013 t wvèw wgtërboarös.çYa§oV(iosángt;kés

1.i ACC tE, RAPER

111:00 CA LI lORNI

Water. Boards

Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board

May 23, 2013

Mr. Joe Belanger General Manager Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries 2537 North Ontario Street Burbank, California 91504

ED/ALIAD G. BROW!. .J):- IIOVCRIKKI \ MAnaew FtocRloer

ilia., \- itil:IGI(ty r. fNVIR[NlMr:tllMt. ,.t.Ir'.:. :)t

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

7011 2970 0000 0645 4585

SUBJECT: REQUIREMENT FOR TECHNICAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA WATER CODE SECTION 13267 ORDER NO. R4 -2013 -0085

SITE: ALUMINUM DIP BRAZING INDUSTRIES, 2537 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BURBANK, CALIFORNIA (FILE NO. 104.0086)

Dear Mr. Belanger:

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) is the public agency with primary responsibility for the protection of ground and surface water quality for all beneficial uses within major portions of the Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, including the referenced site.

The Regional Board is investigating potential sources for groundwater pollution within the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) San Fernando Valley Superfund Site (Superfund Site). It is known that groundwater within the Superfund Site, including the vicinity of the Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries (Aluminum Dip Brazing) facility, is impacted with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals, particularly chromium.

Regional Board staff has received information regarding the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility located at 2537 North Ontario Street, in the City of Burbank, California (the Site). Regional Board records indicate that Aluminum Dip Brazing has occupied the Site since approximately 1972. Aluminum Dip Brazing's operations at the Site include machining, welding, sheet metal work, salt bath dip brazing and chromium conversion coating line for aluminum.

Based on our review of available documents, we have determined that additional information is required regarding the operations conducted and the chemicals used and stored by Aluminum Dip Brazing, at the Site. Enclosed is a California Water Code (CWC) section 13267 Order No. R4- 2013 -0085 (Order), requiring you to complete the enclosed Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire which provides information regarding the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility including detailed information regarding site operations and chemical use at the Site, in order to evaluate the potential for soil and groundwater contamination.

MAFIA ME /IRANIAN, CHAIR I SAMUEL UNGER, EXECUTIVE OFFICER

320 West 4th St., Sude 200, Los Angeles, GA 90013 I www .waterboards.ca.gov /losangetes

` RCCYCI(J PAPCR

Mr. Joe Belanger Z May 23,2013 Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries

Should you have any questions- related to this project, please contact Ms. Luz'Rabelo via telephone at (213) 576 -6783 or via email at iuz:rabelo @waterboards.ca.gov.

Sincerely,

Samuel Unger, P.E.

Executive Officer

enclosure: California Water Code Section 1326/Order No. R4-2013,-0985 Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire

cc: Ms. Lisa Hanusiak, tJSEPA Region IX

Mr. Leo Chan, City of Glendale Mr. Bill Mace, City of Burbank Water Supply Department Mr. Vahe Dabbaghian, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Mr. Milad 7aghavi, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Mr. Richard Slade, ULARA Watermaster

Mr. Joe Belanger Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries

- 2 - May 23, 2013

Should you have any questions related to this project, please contact Ms. Luz Rabelo via telephone at (213) 576 -6783 or via email at luz.rabelo @waterboards.ca,gov.

Sincerely,

Samuel Unger, P.E.

Executive Officer

Enclosure: California Water Code Section 13267 Order No. R4- 2013 -0085 Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire

cc: Ms. Lisa Hanusiak, USEPA Region IX

Mr. Leo Chan, City of Glendale Mr. Bill Mace, City of Burbank Water Supply Department Mr. Vahe Dabbaghian, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Mr. Milad Taghavi, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Mr. Richard Slade, ULARA Watermaster

GALIPOIH,A

Water Boards.

e,,.il/417 G. BROW. ji

\. M1aT1 L v ROOr fos. .. (4+fk t.Cti nt

Los Angeles Regional Water .Quality Control Board

ORDER TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL REPORTS CALIFORNIA WATER. CODE SECTION 13267 ORDER NO. R4 -2013 -0085

DIRECTED TO ALUMINUM DiP BRAZING INDUSTRIES':

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZING INDUSTRIES 2537 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BURBANK, CALIFORNIA

(FILE NO, 104.0086)

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region ( Regional Board) ;makes the following findings and issues this Order pursuant to California Water Code (CWC) section 13267.

1. The groundwater within the San Fernando Valley Groundwater Basin has been impacted by heavy metals, specifically chromium. As a result of the groundwater impacts, the Regional Board is investigating potential sources of the contamination. The current investigation, led by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Regional Board, is focused on identifying individuals and companies responsible for the chromium pollution in the region and holding them responsible for the investigation and remediation of the affected: site: The above Site is located in the investigative area

Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries (Aluminum Dip Brazing) operates a: facility located at 2537 North Ontario Street, in the City of Burbank, California (the Site). Aluminum Dip Brazing has occupied the Site since approximately 1972. Regional Board files indicate that on September 5,;. 2006, Mr. Greg V. Arthur, USEPA Clean Water Act (CWA) Compliance Officer, conducted a CWA Inspection in order to evaluate the compliance status oft lie .Aluminum` Dip Brazing facility. The inspection report stated that Aluminum Dip Brazing's operations at the site included machining, welding, sheet metal work, salt bath dip brazing and chromium conversion coating line for aluminum. Based on our review of available documents, additional information is required in order to evaluate the potential discharge and /or release to the subsurface soils, as a' result of Aluminum Dip Brazing's operations, at the Site

3. CWC section 13267(b)(1) states, in part: In conducting an investigation` the Regional Board may require that any person who has discharged, discharges, or is suspected of having discharged or,, discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste within its region shall furnish, under penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring program reports which the Regional Board requires. The burden, including costs, of these reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the report and the benefits to be obtained from the reports. In requiring those reports, the Regional Board shall provide the person with a written explanation with regard to the need for the reports, and shall identify the evidence that supports requiring that person to provide the reports.

4* Regional Board staff suspects that there is or has been a potential for discharge of waste at or from the Site. The supporting evidence is that the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility is located

iSÏi.?1'IA 'Mt f147ANIAN, CHAIR ( .SAMVEt-AÌNGeRi. RXEGUTfVE -OFFICER

320V`JeSt- 8th -.St:, Suite 200, Los Angeles, :CA 9Q03 I yfwvtwatérboárds.ca:govllosangeles:.

YüLFJ l'PVr.n-

CALION NIA

Water Boards

Ce1nURl1 C. fìNQ,:n ,Jil.. OAV(nNOq

M1àtt++c.w RCIORIOVC7 Nél:Nf.IA/it f(Ai 1.NL'INisN'.ttt1l AI. I.kc ft


ORDER TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL REPORTS

CALIFORNIA WATER CODE SECTION 13267 ORDER NO. R4- 2013 -0085

DIRECTED TO ALUMINUM DIP BRAZING INDUSTRIES

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZING INDUSTRIES 2537 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BURBANK, CALIFORNIA

(FILE NO. 104.0086)

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) makes the following findings and issues this Order pursuant to California Water Code (CWC) section 13267.

1. The groundwater within the San Fernando Valley Groundwater Basin has been impacted by heavy metals, specifically chromium. As a result of the groundwater impacts, the Regional Board is investigating potential sources of the contamination. The current investigation, led by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Regional Board, is focused on identifying individuals and companies responsible for the chromium pollution in the region and holding them responsible for the investigation and remediation of the affected site. The above Site is located in the investigative area.

2. Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries (Aluminum Dip Brazing) operates a facility located at 2537 North Ontario Street, in the City of Burbank, California (the Site). Aluminum Dip Brazing has occupied the Site since approximately 1972. Regional Board files indicate that on September 5, 2006, Mr. Greg V. Arthur, USEPA Clean Water Act (CWA) Compliance Officer, conducted a CWA Inspection in order to evaluate the compliance status of the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility. The inspection report stated that Aluminum Dip Brazing's operations at the site included machining, welding, sheet metal work, salt bath dip brazing and chromium conversion coating line for aluminum. Based on our review of available documents, additional information is required in order to evaluate the potential discharge and /or release to the subsurface soils, as a result of Aluminum Dip Brazing's operations, at the Site.

3. CWC section 13267(b)(1) states, in part: In conducting an investigation the Regional Board may require that any person who has discharged, discharges, or is suspected of having discharged or, discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste within its region shall furnish, under penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring program reports which the Regional Board requires. The burden, including costs, of these reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the report and the benefits to be obtained from the reports. In requiring those reports, the Regional Board shall provide the person with a written explanation with regard to the need for the reports, and shall identify the evidence that supports requiring that person to provide the reports.

4. Regional Board staff suspects that there is or has been a potential for discharge of waste at or from the Site. The supporting evidence is that the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility is located

MAPIA MßfI ANIAN, CHAIR I SAMUEL UNGER. EXECUTIVE OFFICER

320 West 4th St., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 00013 www .waterboards.ca.gov /losangeles

;lf D I'AVl.rl

Mr. Joe Belanger 2. May23, 2013 Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries

within the USEPA San Fernando Valley Superfund Site (Superfund Site). It is known that groundwater within the Superfund Site, including the vicinity of the Aluminum. Dip Brazing facility, is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals, particularly chromium. The Aluminum Dip Brazing facility is among the suspected sources of waste discharge in the Superfund Site because of the operations conducted and the suspected chemicals used at the Site.

5. This Order identifies Aluminum Dip Brazing as the entity responsible for the potential unauthorized discharge of waste identified in paragraphs two (2) and four (4) because Aluminum Dip Brazing operated the activity that resulted in the potential discharge of waste.

6. This Order requires Aluminum Dip Brazing to prepare and submit the enclosed Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire as well as technical reports on the operations history and chemical use history by Aluminum Dip Brazing at the Site. You are required to submit a complete report or reports, as required by this Order, to the Regional Board. The Regional Board may request additional information under this Order,

The Regional Board needs this information in order to completely evaluate the Aluminum Dip facility and to determine the subsurface soil conditions at the Site as part of the efforts

to identify sources of chromium contamination in the San Fernando Valley.

8. The burdens, including costs, of these: reports bear a reasonable relationship to the heed for the reports and the benefits to be obtained from the reports. The information is necessary to assure adequate cleanup of the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility, which as described above potentially poses significant threats to public health and the environment..

9. The issuance of this Order is an enforcement action by a regulatory agency and is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15321(a)(2), Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. This Order requires submittal of technical and /or monitoring reports and work plans. The proposed activities under the work plan are not yet known. It is unlikely that implementation of the work associated with this Order could result in anything more than minor physical changes to the environment. If the implementation may result in significant impacts on the environment, the appropriate lead agency will address the CEQA requirements prior to implementing any work plan.

10. Any person aggrieved by this action of the Regional Board may petition: the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) to review the action in accordance with Water Code section 13320 and California Code of Regulations, title 23, sections 2050 and following, The State Board must receive the petition by 5:00 p.m., 30 days after the date of this Order, except that if the thirtieth day following the date of this Order falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or state holiday, the petition must be received by the State Board by 5 :00 p.m on the next business day. Copies of the law and regulations applicable to filing petitions may be found on the Internet at the following link

Mr. Joe Belanger - 2 - May 23, 2013 Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries

within the USEPA San Fernando Valley Superfund Site (Superfund Site). It is known that groundwater within the Superfund Site, including the vicinity of the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility, is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals, particularly chromium. The Aluminum Dip Brazing facility is among the suspected sources of waste discharge in the Superfund Site because of the operations conducted and the suspected chemicals used at the Site.

5. This Order identifies Aluminum Dip Brazing as the entity responsible for the potential unauthorized discharge of waste identified in paragraphs two (2) and four (4) because Aluminum Dip Brazing operated the activity that resulted in the potential discharge of waste.

6. This Order requires Aluminum Dip Brazing to prepare and submit the enclosed Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire as well as technical reports on the operations history and chemical use history by Aluminum Dip Brazing at the Site. You are required to submit a complete report or reports, as required by this Order, to the Regional Board. The Regional Board may request additional information under this Order.

7. The Regional Board needs this information in order to completely evaluate the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility and to determine the subsurface soil conditions at the Site as part of the efforts to identify sources of chromium contamination in the San Fernando Valley.

8. The burdens, including costs, of these reports bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the reports and the benefits to be obtained from the reports. The information is necessary to assure adequate cleanup of the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility, which as described above potentially poses significant threats to public health and the environment.

9. The issuance of this Order is an enforcement action by a regulatory agency and is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15321(a)(2), Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. This Order requires submittal of technical and /or monitoring reports and work plans. The proposed activities under the work plan are not yet known. It is unlikely that implementation of the work associated with this Order could result in anything more than minor physical changes to the environment. If the implementation may result in significant impacts on the environment, the appropriate lead agency will address the CEQA requirements prior to implementing any work plan.

10. Any person aggrieved by this action of the Regional Board may petition the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) to review the action in accordance with Water Code section 13320 and California Code of Regulations, title 23, sections 2050 and following. The State Board must receive the petition by 5:00 p.m., 30 days after the date of this Order, except that if the thirtieth day following the date of this Order falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or state holiday, the petition must be received by the State Board by 5:00 p.m. on the next business day. Copies of the law and regulations applicable to filing petitions may be found on the Internet at the following link:


- 3:- May 23, 2013

http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/Public notices /petitions /water qualitv

or will be provided upon request.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Aluminum Dip Brazin pursuant to section 13267(b) of the CWC, is required to submit the following:

By July 1, 2013, complete and return the attached Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire (CUQ) which provides information on past and /or present chemicals stored and used at the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility located at 2537` North Ontario. Street in the. City. of Burbank, California. Please return the CUQ properly signed, even if no chemicals are stored or used at your facility

in. addition, you must also submit any and all documentation "regarding the historical chemical use and storage and detailed information on historical operations conducted at the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility, including copies of hazardous waste manifests, chemical inventory lists, fire department inspection records and other relevant documents.

The aboie °items shall be submitted to

Ms. Luz Rabelo Water Resources' Control Engineer Remediation Section Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board 320 West 4ch

Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90013 Phone. (213) 576 -6783 Email: [email protected]:

Pursuant to section 13267(a) of the. CWC, any person who fails to submit reports in accordance -with the Order is guilty of a misdemeanor. Pursuant to section 13268(b)(1) of the CVWC, failure to submit the required information described above by the specified due date(s) may result in the imposition of administrative civil liability by the Regional Board in an amount up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per dayy for each day the information is not received after the above due date. These civil liabilities may be assessed by the Regional Board for failure to comply, beginning with the date that the violations first occurred, and without further warning.

The Regional. Board, under the authority given by CWC section 13267, subdivision (b)(1), requires you to, include a perjury statement in all reports submitted under the 13267 Order. The perjury statement shall be signed by a senior authorized Aluminum Dip Brazing representative (not by a >consultant). The perjury statement shall be in the following format:

"I, [NAME], certify under penalty of law that this document and all - attachments were prepared by me, or under my direction or supervision, in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for . gathering the information, the


- 3 - May 23, 2013

http: / /www.waterboards.ca.gov /public notices /petitions /water quality

or will be provided upon request.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Aluminum Dip Brazing, pursuant to section 13267(b) of the CWC, is required to submit the following:

By July 1, 2013, complete and return the attached Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire (CUQ) which provides information on past and /or present chemicals stored and used at the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility located at 2537 North Ontario Street in the City of Burbank, California. Please return the CUQ properly signed, even if no chemicals are stored or used at your facility.

In addition, you must also submit any and all documentation regarding the historical chemical use and storage and detailed information on historical operations conducted at the Aluminum Dip Brazing facility, including copies of hazardous waste manifests, chemical inventory lists, fire department inspection records and other relevant documents.

The above items shall be submitted to:

Ms. Luz Rabelo

Water Resources Control Engineer Remediation Section Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board 320 West 4th

Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90013 Phone: (213) 576 -6783 Email: luz.rabelo @waterboards.ca.Rov

Pursuant to section 13267(a) of the CWC, any person who fails to submit reports in accordance with the Order is guilty of a misdemeanor. Pursuant to section 13268(b)(1) of the CWC, failure to submit the required information described above by the specified due date(s) may result in the imposition of administrative civil liability by the Regional Board in an amount up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for each day the information is not received after the above due date. These civil liabilities may be assessed by the Regional Board for failure to comply, beginning with the date that the violations first occurred, and without further warning.

The Regional Board, under the authority given by CWC section 13267, subdivision (b)(1), requires you to include a perjury statement in all reports submitted under the 13267 Order. The perjury statement shall be signed by a senior authorized Aluminum Dip Brazing representative (not by a consultant). The perjury statement shall be in the following format:

"I, [NAME], certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared by me, or under my direction or supervision, in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the


May.23; 2013-

information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."

The State Board adopted. regulations (Chapter 30, Division 3 of Title 23 & Division 3 of Title 27, California Code of Regulation). requiring the electronic submittals of information (E51) for all site cleanup: programs, starting January 1, 2005. Currently, all of the information on electronic submittals and :GeoTracker contacts can be found on the Internet at the following link:

http:j/winrw.uraterboards:ca.govfuSt/electronic submittal

To comply with the above referenced regulation, you are tegUired to upload all technical repots, documents, and well data to GeoTracker by the due dates specified in the Regional Board letters and, orders issued to you or: for the Site However, the Regional Board may request that you submit hard copies of selected documents and data in addition to electronic submittal of information to GeoTracker.

SO ORDERED.

6/2- Samuel Unger, P. . Date

.,

Executive Officer

/.3

Mr. Joe Belanger - 4 - May 23, 2013 Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries

information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."

The State Board adopted regulations (Chapter 30, Division 3 of Title 23 & Division 3 of Title 27, California Code of Regulation) requiring the electronic submittals of information (ESI) for all site cleanup programs, starting January 1, 2005. Currently, all of the information on electronic submittals and GeoTracker contacts can be found on the Internet at the following link:

http:¡/www.waterboards.ca.Qov/ust/electronic submittal

To comply with the above referenced regulation, you are required to upload all technical repots, documents, and well data to GeoTracker by the due dates specified in the Regional Board letters and orders issued to you or for the Site. However, the Regional Board may request that you submit hard copies of selected documents and data in addition to electronic submittal of information to GeoTracker.

SO ORDERED.

5/2.3/0 amuel Unger, P. Date Executive Officer

C L C !Aft A

Water Boards

Los. Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board

CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE QUESTIONNAIRE HEAVY METALS INVESTIGATION

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZING 2537 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BURBANK, CALIFORNIA

Edigigli- G. Ssici..,4- Ji 6CyLittitAi

ly1A11:4-i0S, iaiLLAqs' On,

ter0A,,,C,(:W At. AAC-11,,,,SN

I. Facility-information

L Compan# name:

Z. Company address: Unit No.

3. Contact Name., Email:

4; City: Zip code: Phone:- ( )

5. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC):

6. Brief description of business:

7. EPA Generator I.D. Number: Years at this location:

8. Answer the following Auestrons relative tò present operations:

A. Do you perform plating, metal finishing, and anodizing? If yes, please explain:

Yes No

B. Do you have plating or anodizing tanks? Yes No

Do you use or have you ever used Alumicote type products? Yes No

D. Do you have a clarifier, sump, tank or other holding tanks for wastewater? Yes No

E. Do you have an industrial waste permit for sewer discharge? Yes No If yes, provide permit no.

F. Do you store chemicals at this location? Yes No

MARIA MEHE,ANIAN,.CHAIri I SAMUEL WICIER, EIXECLMIVE ÒFFICE4

32O West dth St., Suite 200. Les Angeles, CA 9003 { sei,ew,wilteitiUttrUs.ta,gerviletiegeles,

kV. 0?-14

CALIVOIINIA

Water Boards


CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE QUESTIONNAIRE HEAVY METALS INVESTIGATION

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZING 2537 NORTH ONTARIO STREET, BURBANK, CALIFORNIA

EOi.itIM1O G. Geo" Jlt. {tWLlttiiNi

MnrrN6W Rninüuue:.

tri+Aii. irai nïllk,W+fii,¡ mat TC1-Ji

I. Facility information

1. Company name:

2. Company address: Unit No.

3. Contact Name: Email:

4. City: Zip code: Phone: ( )

5. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC):

6. Brief description of business:

7. EPA Generator I.D. Number: Years at this location:

8. Answer the following questions relative to present operations:

A. Do you perform plating, metal finishing, and anodizing? Yes No If yes, please explain:

B. Do you have plating or anodizing tanks? Yes No

C. Do you use or have you ever used Alumicote type products? Yes No

D. Do you have a clarifier, sump, tank or other holding tanks for wastewater? Yes No

E. Do you have an industrial waste permit for sewer discharge? Yes No If yes, provide permit no.

F. Do you store chemicals at this location? Yes No

MANIA MEHFANIAN, CHAIR I SAMUEL UNGER, EXECUTIVE OFFICER

320 West 4th St., Suite 200. Los Angeles, CA 90013 I www .waterboards,ca.gov /losangeles

Ca rir(;Yi.t LJ I+AYi II

Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire Heavy Metals Investigation

-2- File No. 104.0086

G. Have any soil, wastewater and/or groundwater investigations been

conducted on the property?

If so, provided date(s), and State or local agency?

Yes. No

9, Do you know if plating operations existed at this location? If yes, please explain:

Yes- No

10. Answer the following questions relative to past operations, if applicable:

A. Address of previous metal finishing operations-:_

B. Years in business at previous looation(s), if applicable:

C. Did you once have plating or anodizing tanks?

-D. Did you perform any metal finishing work?

Yes No

Yes No

E., Did youbave,a clarifier, sump, tank or other'holdihg tanks,for waste water? Yes NO

F. Did you have an industrial waste permit for sewer discharge? Yes.. No

G. Did you have a drum storage area? Yes No.

H., Have any soil, waste water and/or groundwater investigations: been conducted on the property? Ye No

if so, provide date(s) and name of regulatory agency:-

11. Name(s) of former tenants(s),,dates of operation and type of business (provide a separate sheet if necessary).

Company Name Type of Business Dates of Operation at the Site


- 2 - File No. 104.0086

G. Have any soil, wastewater and /or groundwater investigations been

conducted on the property? Yes No

If so, provided date(s), and State or local agency?

9. Do you know if plating operations existed at this location? Yes If yes, please explain:

10. Answer the following questions relative to past operations, if applicable:

A.

B.

Address of previous metal finishing operations:

Years in business at previous location(s), if applicable:

C. Did you once have plating or anodizing tanks? Yes No

D. Did you perform any metal finishing work? Yes No

E. Did you have a clarifier, sump, tank or other holding tanks for waste water? Yes No

F. Did you have an industrial waste permit for sewer discharge? Yes . No

G. Did you have a drum storage area? Yes No

H. Have any soil, waste water and /or groundwater investigations been conducted on the property? Yes No

If so, provide date(s) and name of regulatory agency:

11. Name(s) of former tenants(s), dates of operation and type of business (provide a separate sheet if necessary).

Company Name Type of Business Dates of Operation at the Site


File No, 10.0086

12. List all processes in which metallic compounds (Chromium, Cadmium, Mercury; Nickel, Zinc, etc.) are used.

îL Property owner information:

1. Name of current property owner:

2. Mailing address of property owner:

3'. City; _ Zip -code: Phone: ( )

4. Prior property owner(s) and the dates of their ownership (for past 40 yrs., if known)

Property Owner Dates of Ownership

From

M. Waste Management

1., List source(s) of industrial waste(s) from the site? (Identify sources by process, composition of

wastes generated and approximate quantity disposed of monthly)..

11./. Sewer_ Information

1. Industrial Septic tank Municipal: Cesspool Other

2. Was a different disposal system used in the past? Yes No

If yes, specify typev V. Chemical Storage and Use

Complete the following sections for each chemical(s) used or stored at the facility, both past and present use; excluding common housekeeping chemicals : Add separate sheets to complete your listing,. if necessary.


- 3 - File No. 104.0086

12. List all processes in which metallic compounds (Chromium, Cadmium, Mercury, Nickel, Zinc, etc.) are used.

II. Property owner information

1. Name of current property owner:

2. Mailing address of property owner:

3. City: Zip code: Phone: ( )

4. Prior property owner(s) and the dates of their ownership (for past 40 yrs., if known)

Property Owner Dates of Ownership

From To

III. Waste Management

1. List source(s) of industrial waste(s) from the site? (Identify sources by process, composition of

wastes generated and approximate quantity disposed of monthly).

IV. Sewer Information

1. Industrial Septic tank Municipal Cesspool Other

2. Was a different disposal system used in the past? Yes No

If yes, specify type

V. Chemical Storage and Use

Complete the following sections for each chemical(s) used or stored at the facility, both past and present use; excluding common housekeeping chemicals. Add separate sheets to complete your listing, if necessary.

Chemical Heavy

Chemical

Storage and Use Questionnaire - 4 - Metals Investigation

Name:

File No 104.0086

Common/Trade name: Quantity stored:

2. Storage method: Underground tank Drums

Aboveground tank Other (specify):

3:.. Waste disposal: Sewered Onsite recycling

led Offsite recycling

4. Is waststreatment preformed prior to disposal? Yes No

If yes, specify treatment method:

5. image storectprior todispOsal? Yes No

6. Are manifest records for designated waste streams available for review'? Yes No

Chemical Name:

COmmontrrade name.; Quantity stdred:

2. Storage method.- Underground tank

Aboveground tank Other (specify

3. Waste disposal: Sewered 'Onsite recycling.

4, Hauled Offsite recycling

4. Is waste treatment preformed prior to disposal? Yes No


5. Is waste stored prior to disposal? Yes No

6. Are manifest records for designated waste streams available for review? Yes No


- 4 - File No. 104.0086

Chemical Name:

1. Common /Trade name: Quantity stored:



3. Waste disposal: Sewered Onsite recycling

Hauled Offsite recycling

4. Is waste treatment preformed prior to disposal? Yes


5. Is waste stored prior to disposal?

6. Are manifest records for designated waste streams available for review?

Yes No

Yes No

Chemical Name:

1. Common /Trade name: Quantity stored:



3. Waste disposal: Sewered Onsite recycling




5. Is waste stored prior to disposal? Yes


Chemical Storage and Use Questionnaire S File No 104.0086

Heavy Metals Investigation

Chemical Name:

1. Common /Trade name: .. Quantity stored


Aboveground tank Other (specify)

3 Waste disposal: Sewered Onsite recycling


4., Is waste treatment preformed priorto disposal? -Yes '. No


Is waste stored prior to disposal?

Are manifest records for designated waste streams available for review?

Yes

Yes NO

Chemical Name:

Common/Trade nare. Quantity stored:

Storage method:

Waste disposal:

Underground tank-- Drains

Aboveground tank Other (specify ):

Sewered

Hauled',

4. is waste treatment preformed prior to disposal?


5. Is waste stored prior to disposal?

Onsite red.ÿcling

Offsite recycling-

Yes.

6: Are manifest records for designated waste streams available;' for review? Yes


Chemical Name:

- 5 - File No. 104.0086

1.

2.

3.

Common/Trade name: Quantity stored:

Storage method: Underground tank Drums


Waste disposal: Sewered Onsite recycling






1.

2.

3.

Common /Trade name: Quantity stored:

Storage method: Underground tank Drums


Waste disposal: Sewered Onsite recycling







- 6 r- File Nò. 104.0086

THIS. QUESTIONNAIRE SHALL BE SIGNED AND ACKNOWLEDGE BELOW AS FOLLOWS :,

By a principal, an executive of the company, or other authorized representative of the company. This questionnaire has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my know_ ledge, as true and correct.

Signature: Date:

Printed name Title :.

Phone number : :(

Please Return this Form to: LOS ANGELES REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD 320 WEST 4H STREET, SUITE ZOO

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90013


- 6 - File No. 104.0086

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE SHALL BE SIGNED AND ACKNOWLEDGE BELOW AS FOLLOWS:

By a principal, an executive of the company, or other authorized representative of the company. This questionnaire has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge, as true and correct.

Signature: Date:

Printed name: Title:

Phone number: ( )

Please Return this Form to: LOS ANGELES REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD 320 WEST 4Th STREET, SUITE 200 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90013

EXHIBIT 9

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE CO. 2537 N, ,ONTARIO ST. BURBANK/ CA 91504 WILLIAM R. VAZZANA

(818) 845 -6=964

REPORT DATE: 11/16/88 SUBJECT: REPORT REVIEW FILE NO. AB104.0086

Review of the report prepared by EMCON indicates low levels of aromatic VOC's, toluene: 6 ppb, and xylenes: 30 -40 ppb, in the two near surface soil samples. These concentrations are unlikely to pose a threat to deep gw. High and variable concentrations of Al (339 -1320 ppm) and Li (34.9 -168 ppm) in samples suggest discharge of wastes, although neither compound is currently addressed by regulatory objectives /limits. Soil sample concentrations for halides range as Cl -: 55 -305 ppm, and F -: 92.1 -190 ppm. The EPA Drinking Water MCL's are Cl -: 250 ppm, and F- :4.0 ppm. Average gw vanes reported by the Watermaster for the area are C1 -: 20 -38 ppm, and, -, 0.2 -9.6 ppm. No data on soil background concentrations were available. Cl- is highly mobile in soil due to negligible sorption. F -, however, has a high precipitation potential in the presence of metals, especially in relatively dry soils. This information, combined with the comparatively great depths to gw, suggests that the apparent waste discharge to soils poses little threat to groundwater quality.

RECOMMENDATIONS: Assign NFA priority 3; to be reassessed in the future if deemed necessary.

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE CO. 2537 N. ONTARIO ST. BURBANK, CA 91504 WILLIAM R. VAZZANA

(818) 845 -6964

REPORT DATE: 11/16/88 SUBJECT: REPORT REVIEW FILE NO. AB104.0086

J. M. H0,$ T/A'K

Review of the report prepared by EMCON indicates low levels of aromatic VOC's, toluene: 6 ppb, and xylenes: 30 -40 ppb, in the two near surface soil samples. These concentrations are unlikely to pose a threat to deep gw. High and variable concentrations of Al (339 -1320 ppm) and Li (34.9 -168 ppm) in samples suggest discharge of wastes, although neither compound is currently addressed by regulatory objectives /limits. Soil sample concentrations for halides range as Cl -: 55 -305 ppm, and F -: 92.1 -190 ppm. The EPA Drinking Water MCL's are Cl -: 250 ppm, and F- :4.0 ppm. Average gw values reported by the Watermaster for the area are Cl -: 20 -38 ppm, and, F -, 0.2 -9.6 ppm. No data on soil background concentrations were available. Cl- is highly mobile in soil due to negligible sorption. F -, however, has a high precipitation potential in the presence of metals, especially in relatively dry soils. This information, combined with the comparatively great depths to gw, suggests that the apparent waste discharge to soils poses little threat to groundwater quality.

RECOMMENDATIONS: Assign NFA priority 3; to be reassessed in the future if deemed necessary.

vtq-)

EXHIBIT 10 EXHIBIT 10

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

CLEAN WATER ACT COMPLIANCE OFFICE

NPI)ESCOMPI.iANCE EVALUATION-INSPECTION REPORT

Industrial User:

Treatment Works:

Date. of Inspection:

Aluminium Dip Brazing Industries 2537 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California 91504 -2592 40 CFR 433 - Existing Source Metal Finishing

City of Burbank Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES Permit CA0055531)

September 5, 2006

Inspection Participants:

US EPA:

RWQCB -Los Angeles:

City of Burbank:

Aluminum Dip Brazing:

Greg V. Arthur, Region 9, CWA Compliance Office, (415) 972 -3504

None

Kristy Laird, United Water, Source Inspector, (818) 972 -1115 ex23 Jeff Carter, United Water, Source Manager, (818) 972 -1115 ex17

Joe Belanger, General Manager, (818) 841 -5927

Report Prepared By: Greg V. Arthur, Environmental Engineer March 11, 2007

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

CLEAN WATER ACT COMPLIANCE OFFICE

NPUI:S COì\IPI,Ir\NCI? EVALUATION INSPECTION REPORT

Industrial User:

Treatment Works:

Date, of Inspection:

Aluminum Dip Brazing Industries 2537 North Ontario Street, Burbank, California 91504 -2592 40 CFR 433 - Existing Source Metal Finishing

City of Burbank Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES Permit CA0055531)

September 5, 2006

Inspection Participants:

US EPA:

RWQCB -Los Angeles:

City of Burbank:

Aluminum Dip Brazing:

Greg V. Arthur, Region 9, CWA Compliance Office, (415) 972 -3504

None

Kristy Laird, United Water, Source Inspector, (818) 972 -1115 ex23 Jeff Carter, United Water, Source Manager, (818) 972 -1115 ex 17

Joe Belanger, General Manager, (818) 841 -5927

Report Prepared By: Greg V. Arthur, Environmental Engineer March 11, 2007

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User C Page 2 of 15

1.0 Scope and Purpose

On September 5, 2007, EPA, and the City of Burbank conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of Aluminum Dip Brazing in Burbank, California. The purpose was to ensure compliance with the Federal regulations covering the discharge of non -domestic wastewaters into the sewers. In particular, it was to ensure:

Classification in the proper Federal categories; Application of the correct standards at the correct sampling points; Consistent compliance with the standards; and Fulfillment of Federal self -monitoring requirements.

Aluminum Dip Brazing is a significant industrial user ( "SIU ") within the Burbank`sewer service area whose compliance was assessed as part of an on -going EPA evaluation of industrial users in EPA Region 9 by sector. The inspection participants are listed on the title page. Arthur conducted the inspection on September 5. .

1.1 Process Description

Aluminum Dip Brazing is a metals fabrication shop that has. the added- capability to perform a form of aluminum welding in a molten salt bath known as dip brazing. the basis materials include aluminum, steel, stainless steel, and other steel alloys such as inconel. According to the General Manager, 70% of the dip brazed assemblies are fabricate'son -site and thereby owned for sale by Aluminum Dip. Brazing, with the remaining 30% of the work consisting of job -shop brazing of fabrications and parts it does not:own.

The operations involve machining, welding, CNC drilling, grinding, machining, and sheet metal work in the Machining Bldg 2537. The opérations in the Dip Braze Bldg 2523 com- prise spot welding, pre -heating, salt bath dip brazing, air quench, spray water quench, desalt washing, and a chromium conversion coating line for aluminum. The conversional coating line consists of alkaline cleaning, alkaline degreasing, caustic etching, hydrofluoric /nitric- acid deoxidation, nitric -acid desmut, and them film conversion coating. Pertinent support operations include chemical storage, mop water evaporation, and DI -water production.

Aluminum Dip Brazing began operations in 1972 with no significant changes in operational configuration since then. Alúminum;Dip Brazing discharges non -domestic wastewaters to the Burbank domestic sewers through a single: sewer connection designated in this report by permit number as IWD -1003. Domestic sewage discharges through separate connections downstream of the industrial wastewater connection:

1.2 Facility SIC Code

Aluminum Dip Brazing is assigned the SIC codes for aircraft parts (SIC 3728) and for electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring of metals (SIC 3471).

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User ® Page 2 of 15

1.0 Scope and Purpose

On September 5, 2007, EPA, and the City of Burbank conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of Aluminum Dip Brazing in Burbank, California. The purpose was to ensure compliance with the Federal regulations covering the discharge of non- domestic wastewaters into the sewers. In particular, it was to ensure:

Classification in the proper Federal categories; Application of the correct standards at the correct sampling points;

. Consistent compliance with the standards; and Fulfillment of Federal self -monitoring requirements.

Aluminum Dip Brazing is a significant industrial user ( "SRI ") within the Burbank sewer service area whose compliance was assessed as part of an on -going EPA evaluation of industrial users in EPA Region 9 by sector. The inspection participants are listed on the title page. Arthur conducted the inspection on September 5.

1.1 Process Description

Aluminum Dip Brazing is a metals fabrication shop that has the added capability to perform a form of aluminum welding in a molten salt bath known as dip brazing. The basis materials include aluminum, steel, stainless steel, and other steel alloys such as inconel. According to the General Manager, 70% of the dip brazed assemblies are fabricated on -site and_ thereby owned for sale by Aluminum Dip. Brazing, with the remaining 30% of the work consisting of job -shop brazing of fabrications and parts it does not own.

The operations involve machining, welding, CNC drilling, grinding, machining, and sheet metal work in the Machining Bldg 2537. The operations in the Dip Braze Bldg 2523 com- prise spot welding, pre -heating, salt bath dip brazing, air quench, spray water quench, desalt washing, and a chromium conversion coating line for aluminum. The conversional coating line consists of alkaline cleaning, alkaline degreasing, caustic etching, hydrofluoric /nitric- acid deoxidation, nitric -acid desmut, and chem film conversion coating. Pertinent support operations include chemical storage, mop water evaporation, and DI -water production.

Aluminum Dip Brazing began operations in 1972 with no significant changes in operational configuration since then. Aluminum.Dip Brazing discharges non -domestic wastewaters to the Burbank domestic sewers through a single sewer connection designated in this report by permit number as IWD -1003. Domestic sewage discharges through separate connections downstream of the industrial wastewater connection.

1.2 Facility SIC Code

Aluminum Dip Brazing is assigned the SIC codes for aircraft parts (SIC 3728) and for electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring of metals (SIC 3471).

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User Page 3of15

1.3 Facility Wastewater Sources

The dip brazing and Chem film lines generate spents, rinses, and residuals. _The support operations also generate washdowns and other wastewaters. The tanks are referenced in this report are by the shop designations. See Appendix 1.

Spent Solutions - The imparted contamination from the processing of parts and the progress - sive drop in solution strength results in the generation of spent solutions. Every quarter, Aluminum Dip Brazing hauls off -site for disposal the spents from the Chem film line. Every- thing else is regenerated through additions. The list of spents follows below.

, :ojg. . ..

FSt Z ,,I.J 3§iJ .-,.i,. ..

A @ AA : :.N{{,.'4-k. 11,:°ht èl-.-9 .

r- Y¡¡ è ,9 Ji F : 6 E Q o ZJ A 0 aly . ,.glii.':3 ,v

- alkaline cleaning '

- HF/HNO3-acid deox :

- alkaline degreasing - caustic etch - HF/1-INO3-acid deox - HNO3-acid desmut

- chem film

fìk 5` f' e j o è ' . ii A .A6.iSK.È3. }... li '7

Molten Salt Bath Dip"='

.

none . T1 T2 T3 T4 T6 T9 T11

nla U.S. Filter No Release

Rinses and Washwaters - Aluminum Dip Brazing generally employs first -stage static and second -stage continuously overflowing rinses dedicated :to specific' solution tanks. The continuously overflowing rinses discharge through a liií iced settlmgainit. Single -pass cooling water for spot welding and non -contact molten salt batkelectrode are directed to other on -site uses prior to discharge. Mop waters.,ánd air compressor condensate are handled on -site through evaporation. The list of rinses follows below:

r ïi°x i 5; .'41,t D n Aí`d o b;ë A` 'd rt*i Y

' ii R 3 'Jr a

T7 - 2° for T6 deox T12 - 2° for T11 ehem film Tl 3 - 1° desalt washing

S

;:1 T5 T8 T14

: í.

1";;,.'17' fS x 1

I ,r ì , f- `F i f"}YY - 1° for T47- 9desmut%ètch - 1° for T6 deox

- 1° for Ti 1 chem film

F rck:41:grg

gr . kf t ,FtJ$ti- P Yt P1 1 -'t M13 =.t

IjJ LL33'

f

Salt spray quench to T13 Spot weld cooling to T12 Electrode cool to T7/12/13 Mop water Compressor condensate

to on-site evaporation Discharged to lWD-1006 U.S. Filter On-site Reuse/Disposal

Residuals - .Residuals such as evaporation slurry, spent machining coolant, and spent adsorbent for floor clean -up are hauled off -site as hazardous to U.S. Filter. Machine shop and sheet metal chips and scrap are hauled for off -site reclaim.

Reuse - Single -pass non -contact cooling water for the molten salt bath electrode is reused as the make -up water for the continuous overflowing rinses.


1.3 Facility Wastewater Sources

The dip brazing and Chem film lines generate spents, rinses, and residuals. The support operations also generate washdowns and other wastewaters. The tanks are referenced in this report are by the shop designations. See Appendix 1.

Spent Solutions - The imparted contamination from the processing of parts and the progress - sive drop in solution strength results in the generation of spent solutions. Every quarter, Aluminum Dip Brazing hauls off -site for disposal the spents from the them film line. Every- thing else is regenerated through additions. The list of spents follows below.

p N

Cl;

` r 1$ :lìY,t4.k 1

, rQ Cf

Ili!' .m, 2,Ml'aJ4.í Yi(6k ÿ'

t:m, , .r ̀ c

tid<

rs

5 S. ¡

k`tbw Molten Salt

x 1 &S BçC

c CA e:Ki é } iia

Bath Dip none . T1 - alkaline cleaning T2 - 1-11q/11NO3-acid deox :

T3 - alkaline degreasing T4 - caustic etch T6 - HF/HNO3-acid deox T9 - HNO3-acid desmut T11 - chem film

n/a U.S. Filter No Release

Rinses and Washwaters - Aluminum Dip Brazing generally employs first -stage static and second -stage continuously overflowing rinses dedicated to specific solution tanks. The continuously overflowing rinses discharge through a limited settling. unit. Single -pass cooling water for spot welding and non -contact molten salt bath electrode are directed to other on -site uses prior to discharge. Mop waters and air compressor condensate are handled on -site through evaporation. The list of rinses follows below.

# t f:A c c ^T .. .. 4 , ; irTS= li .V: I:sàlf 'J °:t itLYdRi í:='aJßa

; pYp r r , 9

Îh;.Éreif : .

t;4}it:fi> tti

5 f. L. i, . fe... J' ìr

&cItk) .it%k?-. S!,_ rv } i r.i il'z ': , >o lta r f , , .t-

334irfs,iáaikcf`,6,>,L Salt spray quench to T13 Spot weld cooling to T12 Electrode cool to T7/12/13 Mop water Compressor condensate

to on-site evaporation

t r ;FSS p

,j 1ìA

T7 - 2° for T6 deox T12 - 2° for Ti 1 chem film T13 -1 ° desalt washing

T5 = 1° for T4/9 desmut/etch T8 - 1° for T6 deox T14 - 1° for T11 chem film

Discharged to IWD-1006 U.S. Filter On-site Reuse/Disposal

Residuals - .Residuals such as evaporation slurry, spent machining coolant, and spent adsorbent for floor clean -up are hauled off -site as hazardous to U.S. Filter. Machine shop and sheet metal chips and scrap are hauled for off -site reclaim.

Reuse - Single -pass non -contact cooling water for the molten salt bath electrode is reused as the make -up water for the continuous overflowing rinses.


1.4 Facility Process Wastewater Composition

The process wastewaters listed in section 1.3 above would be expected to contain salts, aluminum, copper, chromium, lead, nickel, zinc, total cyanide, and acidity, as well as oil & grease, surfactants, iron, suspended solids, and other pollutants in the surface grime cleaned off of parts.

1.5 Facility Process Wastewater Treatment

Aluminum Dip Brazing provides only solids settling of the overflowing rinses that discharge to the sewers. There is no treatment for the removal of metals or complexed cyanide, or a final pH adjustment. Air compressor condensate and mop waters are filtered through a filter press prior to on -site evaporation. Otherwise, there are no other wastewater treatment steps provided on -site. See Appendix 1. .

Operational Controls - Since no treatment is provided for the removal or cyanide or the adjustment of pH, there are no operational controls.

Sewer Discharge - The final discharge connection to the sewer is designated as the permitted compliance sampling point, IWD -1003.

1.6 POTW Legal Authorities

The City of Burbank - Burbank operates its own wastewater treatment plant, which discharges to the Los Angeles River. Burbank also operates an approved pretreatment program as required by the State of California in the Los Angeles'kWQCB`s Waste Discharge Requirements, No. R4 -2006 -0085, reissued to Burbank in 2006 and serving as NPDES Permit No. CA0055531. Burbank has established'a sewer use ordinance that applies to all industrial users within its city limits. Under this authority, Burbank issued industrial user permit No.1003 covering the sewer discharge from Alùminum Dip Brazing.

1.7 Photo Documentation

No photographs were taken during this inspection. .

1.8 Sampling Record

All compliance samples are collected by Burbank from the final settling tank within the facility at IWD -1003. See Appendix 3 for a summary of the 2003 -2006 sampling.


1.4 Facility Process Wastewater Composition

The process wastewaters listed in section 1.3 above would be expected to contain salts, aluminum, copper, chromium, lead, nickel, zinc, total cyanide, and acidity, as well as oil & grease, surfactants, iron, suspended solids, and other pollutants in the surface grime cleaned off of parts.

1.5 Facility Process Wastewater Treatment

Aluminum Dip Brazing provides only solids settling of the overflowing rinses that discharge to the sewers. There is no treatment for the removal of metals or complexed cyanide, or a final pH adjustment. Air compressor condensate and mop waters are filtered through a filter press prior to on -site evaporation. Otherwise, there are no other wastewater treatment steps provided on -site. See Appendix 1.

Operational Controls - Since no treatment is provided for the removal or cyanide or the adjustment of pH, there are no operational controls.

Sewer Discharge - The final discharge connection to the sewer is designated as the permitted compliance sampling point, IWD -1003.

1.6 POTW Legal Authorities

The City of Burbank - Burbank operates its own wastewater treatment plant, which discharges to the Los Angeles River. Burbank also operates an approved pretreatment program as required by the State of California in the Los Angeles 1 WQCB's Waste Discharge Requirements, No. R4 -2006 -0085, reissued to Burbank in 2006 and serving as NPDES Permit No. CA0055531. Burbank has established 'a sewer use ordinance that applies to all industrial users within its city limits. Under this authority, Burbank issued industrial user permit No.1003 covering the sewer discharge from Aluminum Dip Brazing:

1.7 Photo Documentation

No photographs were taken during this inspection..

1.8 Sampling Record

All compliance samples are collected by Burbank from the final settling tank within the facility at IWD -1003. See Appendix 3 for a summary of the 2003 -2006 sampling.


2.0 Sewer Discharge Standards and Limits

Federal categorical pretreatment standards (where they exist), national prohibitions, and the local limits (where they exist) must be applied to the sewered discharges from industrial users. (40 CFR 403.3 and 403.6).

Sun,. utnma,ry

The Federal standards in 40 CFR 433 for existing source metal finishers apply to all process wastewater discharges from Aluminum Dip Brazing through IWD -1003. The Burbank permit incorrectly applied the abbreviated and less stringent Federal standards in 40 CFR 413 for job -shop metal finishers discharging under 10,000 gallons per day. The Burbank permit correctly applies local limits. The application of Federal standards, national prohibitions, and local limits was determined through visual inspection. See Appendix 2.

Requirements .

The Federal standards in 40 CFR 433 for existing source Metal finishers`ìiust be applied to the discharges from Aluminum Dip Brazing.

Recommendations

Aluminum Dip Brazing should submit a report detailing the construction involved in the installation of secondary containment in the mid- 1980s, and the iistallation,of any new lines since then.

2.1 Classification by Federal Point Source Category

Aluminum Dip Brazing qualifies as an existing source metal finisher subject to the Federal metal finishing standards in 40 CFR 433. Burbank incorrectly classified Aluminum.Dip Brazing as an existing source job -shop metal finisher subject to the Federal electroplating standards in 40 CFR 413 for dischargers .of less than 10,000 gpd. Thé metal finishing standards are more stringent and cover an expanded'set. of pollutants. Federal standards are self -implementing which means they apply to regulated waste streams whether or not they are implemented in a local permit. The Federal rules in 40 CFR 403.6 define domestic sewage and non -contact wastewaters ,to be dilution waters.

New or Existing Sources - Aluminum Dip Brazing continues to be subject solely to the Federal standards for existing sources. Under the definitions in 40 CFR 403.3(k), a process constructed at an existing source job -shop metal finisher after August 31, 1982 is a new source (1) if it entirely replaces a process which caused a discharge from an existing source or (2) if it is substantially independent of the existing sources on -site. This means new source standards apply to the original installation of the metal finishing lines, rebuilt or moved lines, or existing lines converted to do new operations. This also means that the new source standards generally do not apply to the piecemeal replacement of tanks for maintenance in otherwise intact metal finishing lines, nor do they apply to treatment upgrades

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User C) Page 5 of 15

2.0 Sewer Discharge Standards and Limits

Federal categorical pretreatment standards (where they exist), national prohibitions, and the local limits (where they exist) must be applied to the sewered discharges from industrial users. (40 CFR 403.5 and 403.6).

Sum. ummary .

The Federal standards in 40 CFR 433 for existing source metal finishers apply to all process wastewater discharges from Aluminum Dip Brazing through IUD -1003. The Burbank permit incorrectly applied the abbreviated and less stringent Federal standards in 40 CFR 413 for job -shop metal finishers discharging.under 10,000 gallons per day. The Burbank permit correctly applies local limits. The application of Federal standards, national prohibitions, and local limits was determined through visual inspection. See Appendix 2.

Requirements .

The Federal standards in 40 CFR 433 for existing source metal finishers must be applied to the discharges from Aluminum Dip Brazing.

Recommendations

Aluminum Dip Brazing should submit a report detailing the construction involved in the installation of secondary containment in the mid- 1980s, and the iistallation,of any new lines since then.

.

2.1 Classification by Federal Point Source Category

Aluminum Dip Brazing qualifies as an existing source metal finisher subject to the Federal metal finishing standards in 40 CFR 433. Burbank incorrectly classified Aluminum Dip Brazing as an existing source job -shop metal finisher subject to the Federal electroplating standards in 40 CFR 413 for dischargers of less than 10,000 gpd. Thé metal finishing standards are more stringent and cover an expanded set of pollutants. Federal standards are self-implementing which means they apply to regulated waste streams whether or not they are implemented in a local permit. The Federal rules in 40 CFR 403.6 define domestic sewage and non- contact wastewaters to be dilution waters.

New or Existing Sources - Aluminum Dip Brazing continues to be subject solely to the Federal standards for existing sources. Under the definitions in 40 CFR 403.3(k), a process constructed at an existing source job -shop metal finisher after August 31, 1982 is a new source (1) if it entirely replaces a process which caused a discharge from an existing source or (2) if it is substantially independent of the existing sources on -site. This means new source standards apply to the original installation of the metal finishing lines, rebuilt or moved lines, or existing lines converted to do new operations. This also means that the new source standards generally do not apply to the piecemeal replacement of tanks for maintenance in otherwise intact metal finishing lines, nor do they apply to treatment upgrades


without altering production. The preamble to the final 1988 Federal rule states that new source standards apply when "an existing source undertakes major construction that legitimately provides it with the opportunity to install the best and most efficient production process and wastewater treatment technologies" (Fed Register, Vol.53, No.200, October 17, 1988, p.40601).

According to the General- Manager, there have been no configuration changes at Aluminum Dip Brazing since start-up in the 1970's. As a result, nothing qualifies for regulation under new source standards. The construction of new lines, or the physical relocation and re- installation of entire lines, even if part of the installation of secondary containment, would` qualify as construction that "legitimately provides it with the opportunity to install the best and.most efficient production process and wastewater treatment technologies ".

2.2 Local Limits and National Prohibitions

Local limits and the national prohibitions are meant to express the.limitations On non - domestic discharges necessary to protect the sewers, treatmentplants and their receiving waters from adverse impacts. In particular, they prohibit discharges that Can cause the pass - through of pollutants into the receiving waters or into reuse; the operational`interference of the sewage treatment works, the contamination of the sewage sludge, sewer worker health and safety risks, fire or explosive risks, and corrosive damage to the sewers. The national prohibitións.apply nationwide to all non -domestic sewer discharges. The Burbank local limits apply to non -domestic discharges within the Burbank city limits:

2.3 Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards Existing Source Metal Finishing - 40 CFR 433.15

a ';, f' ; ;'o, l° =`; {:; 3 .-`. , ; Cd Cr Cu ,Pb Ni Ag g Zn CNt CNa TTO daily-maximum (mg/1) 0.69 2.77 3.38 0.69 3;98°°. . 0.43 2.61 1.20 0.86 2.13 month-average (mg/1) 0.26 1.71 2.07 0.43 238 0.24 . 1.48 0.65 0.32 -

Applicability - Under 40 CFR 433.10(a), the metal finishing standards apply to Aluminum Dip. Brazing because the facility's operations involve chemical coating, and etching. The metal finishing standards "... apply to plants that perform ..." the core operations of electroplating, electroless plating, etching, anodizing, chemical coating, or printed circuit board manufacturing and they extend to other on -site operations, such as cleaning, machining, grinding, heat treating, welding, brazing, and soldering, associated with metal finishing and specifically listed in 40 CFR 433.10(a). If any of the core operations are performed, the metal finishing standards apply to discharges from any of the core or associated operations. Under 40 CFR 433.10(c), the metal finishing standards do not apply to existing source job -shops covered by 40 CFR 413. However, the definitions in 40 CFR 433.11(c) define "job- shop" to mean "a facility (that) owns not more than 50% (annual area basis) of the materials undergoing metal finishing. As a result, Aluminum Dip Brazing does not qualify as a job -shop. Instead, the metal finishinE standards apply to all of the process wastewater discharges to IWD -1003.


without altering production. The preamble to the final 1988 Federal rule states that new source standards apply when "an existing source undertakes major construction that legitimately provides it with the opportunity to install the best and most efficient production process and wastewater treatment technologies" (Fed Register, Vol.53, No.200, October 1 7, 1988, p.40601).

According to the General -Manager, there have been no configuration changes at Aluminum Dip Brazing since start-up in the 1970's. As a result, nothing qualifies for regulation under new source standards. The construction of new lines, or the physical relocation and re- installation of entire lines, even if part of the installation of secondary containment, would qualify as construction that "legitimately provides it with the opportunity to install the best and -most efficient production process and wastewater treatment technologies ".

2.2 Local Limits and National Prohibitions

Local limits and the national prohibitions are meant to express the limitations On non- domestic discharges necessary to protect .the sewers, treatment plants and their receiving waters from adverse impacts. In particular, they prohibit discharges that can cause the pass - through of pollutants into the receiving waters or into reuse; the operationalinterference of the sewage treatment works, the contamination of the sewage sludge, sewer worker health and safety risks, fire or explosive risks, and corrosive damage to the sewers. The national prohibitions:apply nationwide to all non -domestic sewer discharges. The Burbank local limits apply to non -domestic discharges within the Burbank city limits.

2.3 Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards Existing Source Metal Finishing - 40 CFR 433.15

s ., ut,, S r ; e ;1

° a ` . .c: ? ,"rh k,: Cd Cr Cii Pb Ni Ag g Zn CNt CNa TTO

daily-maximum (mg/1) 0.69 2.77 3.38 0.69 3;98. 0.43 2.61 1.20 0.86 2.13 month-average (mg/1) 0.26 1.71 2.07 0.43 2.38 0.24 . 1.48 0.65 0.32 -

Applicability - Under 40 CFR 433.10(a), the metal finishing standards apply to Aluminum Dip. Brazing because the facility's operations involve chemical coating, and etching. The metal finishing standards "... apply to plants that perform ..." the core operations of electroplating, electroless plating, etching, anodizing, chemical coating, or printed circuit board manufacturing and they extend to other on -site operations, such. as cleaning, machining, grinding, heat treating, welding, brazing, and soldering, associated with metal finishing and specifically listed in 40 CFR 433.10(a). If any of the core operations are performed, the metal finishing standards apply to discharges from any of the core or associated operations. Under 40 CFR 433.10(c), the metal finishing standards do not apply to existing source job -shops covered by 40 CFR 413. However, the definitions in 40 CFR 433.11(c) define "job- shop" to mean "a facility (that) owns not more than 50% (annual area basis) of the materials undergoing metal finishing. As a result, Aluminum Dip Brazing does not qualify as a job -shop. Instead, the metal finishinE standards apply to all of the process wastewater discharges to 1WD -1003.


Basis of the Standards - The metal finishing standards were based on a model pretreatment unit that comprises metals precipitation, settling, sludge removal, source control of toxic organics, and if necessary, cyanide destruction and chromium reduction. The best- available- technology standards were statistically set where metal finishers with model treatment operated at a long -term average and variability that achieved a compliance rate of 99% (1 in 100 chance of violation).

.

Adjustments - The Federal standards at IWD -1003 do not need to be adjusted to account for dual Federal categories or for dilution, even though there is dilution from the continuous feed of single -pass cooling water through the rinses. This is addressed by the narrative prohibi=t tion against dilution as a substitute for treatment and not through adjustment of the standards. Under 40 CFR 43112(c), the cyanide standards as applied to metal finishing wastewater discharges must be adjusted to account for dilution from non -cyanide bearing wastëstreams (Federally-regulated and unregulated). For Aluminum Dip Brazing, cyanide -bearing wastewaters are generated only by chem film. EPA estimates dilution at IWD -1003 to be -2:1 based on the number of cyanide- bearing and non -cyanide -bearing overflow rinses. As a result, at IWD -1003, the metal finishing standards adjust downward to 0.40 mg/1 daily - maximum and 0.22 mg11 monthly- average for total cyanide, and to. 0.29 mg/lóaily- maximum and 0.11 monthly- average for amenable cyanide.

Compliance Deadline - Under 40 CFR 433.15(f), existing :source metal finishers were required to comply by the final compliance deadline of Febrúary 15, 1986'.

2.4 Point(s) of Compliance

The permit designates the fmal settling tank inside the facility`as,the compliance point (designated in this report as IWD- 1003).

FederatStandards - Federal categorical pretreatment standards apply end-of- process -after- treatment to all Federally - regulated discharges to the sewers. The sample point 1WD -1003 is a suitable end -of- process- after -treatment sample point representative of the day -to -day discharge of Federally -regulated wastewaters. However, dilution issues support establishment of a separate sample point for Federal standards.

Local Limits - Local limits and the national prohibitions apply end -of -pipe to all non - domestic flows. The sample point designated as IWD -1003 is a suitable end -of -pipe sample point representative of the day-to-day non-domestic wastewater discharges.

2.6 Compliance Sampling

The national prohibitions are instantaneous- maximums and are comparable to samples of any length including single grab samples. Federal categorical pretreatment standards are daily - maximums comparable to 24 -hour composite samples. The 24 -hour composite samples can be replaced with single grabs or manually -composited grabs that are representative of the sampling day's discharge.


Basis of the Standards - The metal finishing standards were based on a model pretreatment unit that comprises metals precipitation, settling, sludge removal, source control of toxic organics, and if necessary, cyanide destruction and chromium reduction. The best- available- technology standards were statistically set where metal finishers with model treatment operated at a long -term average and variability that achieved a compliance rate of 99% (1 in 100 chance of violation).

Adjustments - The Federal standards at 1WD -1003 do not need to be adjusted to account for dual Federal categories or for dilution, even though there is dilution from the continuous feed of single -pass cooling water through the rinses. This is addressed by the narrative prohibition against dilution as a substitute for treatment and not through adjustment of the standards. Under 40 CFR 43112(c), the cyanide standards as applied to metal finishing wastewater discharges must be adjusted to account for dilution from non -cyanide bearing waste streams (Federally -regulated and unregulated). For Aluminum Dip Brazing, cyanide -bearing wastewaters are generated only by chem film. EPA estimates dilution at IWD -1003 to be -2:1 based on the number of cyanide- bearing and non -cyanide -bearing overflow rinses. As a result, at 1WD -1003, the metal finishing standards adjust downward to 0.40 mg/I daily - maximum and 0.22 mg/l monthly- average for total cyanide, and: to 0.29 mg/1 daily- maximum and 0.11 monthly- average for amenable cyanide. .

Compliance Deadline - Under 40 CFR 433.15(f), existing source metal finishers were required to comply by the final compliance deadline of February 15, 1986.

2.4 Point(s) of Compliance

The permit designates the final settling tank inside the facility as the compliance point (designated in this report as IWD- 1003).

FederatStandards - Federal categorical pretreatment standards apply end-of- process -after- treatment to all Federally- regulated discharges to the sewers. The sample point IWD -1003 is a suitable end -of- process- after -treatment sample point representative of the day -to -day discharge of Federally -regulated wastewaters. However, dilution issues support establishment of a separate sample point for Federal standards.

Local Limits - Local limits and the national prohibitions apply end -of -pipe to all non- domestic flows. The sample point designated as IWD -1003 is a suitable end -of -pipe sample point representative of the day-to-day non-domestic wastewater discharges.

2.6 Compliance Sampling

The national prohibitions are instantaneous- maximums and are comparable to samples of any length including single grab samples. Federal categorical pretreatment standards are daily - maximums comparable to 24 -hour composite samples. The 24 -hour composite samples can be replaced with single grabs or manually -composited grabs that are representative of the sampling day's discharge.


3.0 Compliance with Federal Standards

Industrial users must comply with the Federal categorical pretreatment standards that apply to their process wastewater discharges. 40 CFR 403.6(b).

Categorical industrial users must comply with the prohibition against dilution of the Federally- regulated waste streams as a substitute for treatment. 40 CFR 403.0d).

Industrial users must comply with the provision restricting the bypass of treatment necessary to comply with any pretreatment standard or requirement. 40 CFR 403.17(d).

Summary

Aluminum Dip Brazing does not employ wastewater treatment equivalent to the models used in originally setting the Federal standards. Nevertheless, there wereno violations of the Federal standards in the sample record because the wrong Federa standards were applied, and dilution causes the sampling results to be biased in favor of compliance. The Federal rules prohibit dilution as a substitute for treatment. The sampling results do'iidicate levels of chromium expected from a chem film line. On- demand rinsing and the diversion of excess single -pass cooling waters directly to the.sewer connection wöüld reduce the flow of process- related Federally -regulated wastewaters and proportionally increase pollutant concentrations. It is likely that best- available -technology treatment would be needed in order to comply with the Federal standards once the practice of dilution is ended. See Appendix 3.,

Requirements

Dilution from excess single -pass cooling water reused through' the running rinses is prohibited by the Federal rule against dilution as a substitute-for treatment.

Recommendations

The running rinses should be operated on- demand when there are parts undergoing processing or the rinses should be retreated to be conductivity -controlled.

The single -pass cooling water line should be outfitted with a diversion for excess cooling waters to the final compliance sampling point, around the running rinses, and past the limited treatment in place.

3.1 Sampling Results

The 2003 -2006 sample records consist of samples collected quarterly by Burbank and semi- annually by Aluminum Dip Brazing from the last of eight settling basins inside of the facility. All metals samples were 24 -hour composites. All cyanide samples were grabs. All sample results are provisionally usable for determining compliance with the Federal standards because they account for all rinses and spents discharged. However, they are only


3.0 Compliance with Federal Standards

Industrial users must comply with the Federal categorical pretreatment standards that apply to their process wastewater discharges. 40 CFR 403.6(b).

Categorical industrial users must comply with the prohibition against dilution of the Federally- regulated waste streams as a substitute for treatment. 40 CFR 403.6(d).

Industrial users must comply with the provision restricting the bypass of treatment necessary to comply with any pretreatment standard or requirement. 40 CFR 403.17(d).

Summary

Aluminum Dip Brazing does not employ wastewater treatment equivalent to the models used in originally setting the Federal standards. Nevertheless, there were no violations of the Federal standards in the sample record because the wrong Federal standards were applied, and dilution causes the sampling results to be biased in favor of compliance. The Federal rules prohibit dilution as a substitute for treatment. The sampling results do indicate levels of chromium expected from a chem film line. On- demand rinsing and the diversion of excess single -pass cooling waters directly to the,sewer connection would reduce the flow of process- related Federally -regulated wastewaters and proportionally increase pollutant concentrations. It is likely that best- available -technology treatment would be needed in order to comply with the Federal standards once the practice of dilution is ended. See Appendix 3.

Requirements

. Dilution from excess single -pass cooling water reused through the running rinses is prohibited by the Federal rule against dilution as a substitute for treatment.

Recommendations

The running rinses should be operated on- demand when there are parts undergoing processing or the rinses should be retrofitted to be conductivity -controlled.

The single pass cooling water line should be outfitted with a diversion for excess cooling waters to the final compliance sampling point, around the running rinses, and past the limited treatment in place.

3.1 Sampling Results

The 2003 -2006 sample records consist of samples collected quarterly by Burbank and semi- annually by Aluminum Dip Brazing from the last of eight settling basins inside of the facility. All metals samples were 24 -hour composites. All cyanide samples were grabs. All sample results are provisionally usable for determining compliance with the Federal standards because they account for all rinses and spents discharged. However, they are only


provisionally usable because they are diluted by rinses running continuously without parts undergoing processing. Aluminum Dip Brazing is exempted from total toxic organics sampling under an approved toxic organics management plan, as set forth in 40 CFR 433. See item 5.0 of this report.

3.2 Best-Available-Technology Treatment

The treatment in -place is not equivalent in design and performance to the best -available.- treatment ("BAT") technology models used in originally setting the Federal standards: Nevertheless, there were no violations of the Federal standards in the sample record. This can be explained in two ways. First, the less stringent and abbreviated Federal standards were incorrectly applied. Second, the results are biased in favor of compliance becäse the overflowing rinses run without parts undergoing processing. Excessive rinsing produces samples that are diluted by excess make -up water, a practice whichisoften prohibited by the Federal rule against dilution as a substitute for treatment.

The sampling results do indicate significant levels of chromium in the rinse waters as would be expected from a Chem film line. On -demand rinsing and the diversion of excess single - pass cooling waters directly to the sewer connection would.re duce the flow of process -related Federally -regulated wastewaters and proportionally increase: pollutant; concentrations. If excess cooling water constitutes more than 60% of the wastewater discharged to the sewers,

'the sample record for Aluminum Dip Brazing would have included at least one violation of the Federal standards for chromium.

The on -demand rinsing and diversion of excess cooling waters,to the sewer connection would allow establishment of a compliance sampling point speci ically for the Federal standards. This proposed sample point is designated in this report and depicted on the schematic of wastewater control in Appendix 1 as IWD -FED. See sections 3.3 and 5.0 and Appendix 1.

BAT treatment or its equivalent is nearly always necessary to consistently comply with Federal standards. BAT treatment would necessarily incorporate the following:.

chromium reduction, metals precipitation, and settling .

reaction end -point metering, the segregated batch treatment of high- strength spent solutions, diversion of non- compatible and low-strength wastewaters around treatment, and well controlled delivery methods.

3.3 Dilution as a Substitute for Treatment

The Federal standards in 40 CFR 403.6(d) prohibit "dilution as a substitute for treatment" in order to prevent compromising BAT model treatment with dilute waste streams. In particular, this prohibition applies when sample results for a diluted waste stream are below the Federal standards and the apparent compliance is used to justify discharge without treat-


provisionally usable because they are diluted by rinses running continuously without parts undergoing processing. Aluminum Dip Brazing is exempted from total toxic organics sampling under an approved toxic organics management plan, as set forth in 40 CFR 433. See item 5.0 of this report.

3.2 Best - Available- Technology Treatment

The treatment in -place is not equivalent in design and performance to the best-available- , treatment ("BAT") technology models used in originally setting the Federal standards:

Nevertheless, there were no violations of the Federal standards in the sample record. This can be explained in two ways. First, the less stringent and abbreviated Federal standards were incorrectly applied. Second, the results are biased in favor of compliance because the overflowing rinses run without parts undergoing processing. Excessive rinsing produces samples that are diluted by excess make -up water, a practice which is often prohibited by the Federal rule against . dilution as a substitute for treatment.

The sampling results do indicate significant levels of chromium in the rinse waters as would be expected from a Chem film line. 0n -demand rinsing and the diversion of excess single - pass cooling waters directly to the sewer connection would reduce the flow of process -related Federally -regulated wastewaters and proportionally increase pollutant concentrations. If excess cooling water constitutes more than 60% of the wastewater discharged to the sewers, the sample record for Aluminum Dip Brazing would have included at least one violation of the Federal standards for chromium.

The on- demand rinsing and diversion of excess cooling waters to the sewer connection would allow establishment of a compliance sampling point specifically for the Federal standards. This proposed sample point is designated in this report and depicted on the schematic of wastewater control in Appendix 1 as IWD -FED. See sections 3.3 and 5.0 and Appendix 1. .

BAT treatment or its equivalent is nearly always necessary to consistently comply with Federal standards. BAT treatment would necessarily incorporate the following:.

chromium reduction, metals precipitation, and settling. reaction end -point metering, the segregated batch treatment of high- strength spent solutions, diversion of non- compatible and low -strength wastewaters around treatment, and well controlled delivery methods.

3.3 Dilution as a Substitute for Treatment

The Federal standards in 40 CFR 403.6(d) prohibit "dilution as a substitute for treatment in order to prevent compromising BAT model treatment with dilute waste streams. In particular, this prohibition applies when sample results for a diluted waste stream are below the Federal standards and the apparent compliance is used to justify discharge without treat-


ment. There are two conditions that need to be established in order to make a determination of non -compliance with this prohibition. First, some or all of the Federally -regulated wastewaters must discharge without undergoing BAT model treatment or its equivalent. Second, there must be some form of excess water usage within a Federally -regulated process.

Aluminum Dip Brazing does not meet the first condition since all running rinses discharge without any treatment to remove any of the Federally -regulated pollutants. Aluminum Dip Brazing also does not meet the second condition since the reuse of non -contact single - pass cooling water as make -up for the overflowing rinsing determines the rinsing rates. This means the continuous overflow rinses do not operate on -demand only when there are parts undergoing processing.

3.4 Bypass Provision

The Federal standards in 40 Cr 'K 403.17 prohibit the bypassing of any on -site treatment necessary to comply with standards unless the bypass was unayòidable to prevent the loss of life, injury, or property damage, and there were no feasible alternatives. Thisprovision explicitly prohibits bypasses that are the result of a short-sighted lack of back -up equipment for normal downtimes or preventive maintenance. It also explicitly prohibits bypasses that could be prevented through wastewater retention or the procurement nf.äuxiliary equipment. It specifically allows bypasses that do not result in violatioñs of the stáridd ds as long as there is prior notice and approval from the sewerage agency or State.

There is no possibility of unauthorizèdbypassing at Aluminum Dip_ Brazing since there is no .treatment on -site to bypass.


ment. There are two conditions that need to be established in order to make a determination of non -compliance with this prohibition. First, some or all of the Federally -regulated wastewaters must discharge without undergoing BAT model treatment or its equivalent. Second, there must be some form of excess water usage within a Federally -regulated process.

Aluminum Dip Brazing does not meet the first condition since all running rinses discharge without any treatment to remove any of the Federally -regulated pollutants. Aluminum Dip Brazing also does not meet the second condition since the reuse of non-contact single -pass' cooling water as make -up for the overflowing rinsing determines the rinsing rates. This means the continuous overflow rinses do not operate on -demand only when there are parts undergoing processing.

3.4 Bypass Provision

The Federal standards in 40 Cr'K 403.17 prohibit the bypassing of any on -site treatment necessary to comply with standards Unless the bypass was unavoidable to prevent the loss of life, injury, or property damage, and there were no feasible alternatives. This provision explicitly prohibits bypasses that are the result of a short- sighted lack of back -up equipment for normal downtimes or preventive maintenance. It also explicitly prohibits bypasses that could be prevented through wastewater retention or the procurement of auxiliary equipment. It specifically allows bypasses that do not result in violations of the standards as long as there is prior notice and approval from the sewerage agency or State.

There is no possibility of unauthorizèd bypassing at Aluminum Dip gazing since there is no .treatment on -site to bypass.

Aluminum Dip Brazing,, Burbank - Industrial User _p_I Page 11 of 15 X11

4.0 Compliance with Local Limits and National Prohibitions

All non -domestic wastewater discharges to the sewers must comply with local limits and the national prohibitions. 40 CFR 403.5(a,b,d).

Industrial users must comply with the provision restricting the bypass of treatment necessary to comply with any pretreatment standard or requirement. 40 CFR 403,17(d).

Summary

The local limits apply end -of -pipe and not end -of- process- after -treatment. The local limits do not prohibit dilution. Therefore, the sample record is useable to determine compliance and that Aluminum Dip Brazing has and would be expected to continue to consistently comply with local limits at IWD -1003. Aluminum Dip Brazing would be expected to continue to generate wastewaters containing acids, caustics, hexavälei t chromium and complexed cyanide from chromium conversion coating, and copper, nickel, chromium, and zinc from the etching of aluminum and steel alloys. Aluminun`Dip Brazing,does not provide treatment beyond settling but does provide continuous pH monitdring. See' Appendix 3. Also see Sections 3.0 and 5.0 of this report.

Requirements

None.

Recommendations

None.

4.1 National Objectives

The general pretreatment regilations were promulgated in order to fulfill the national objectives to prevent the introduction of pollutants that:

(1) cause operational interference with sewage treatment or sludge disposal, (2) pass -through sewage treatment into the receiving waters or sludge, (3) are in any way incompatible with the sewerage works, or (4) do not improve the opportunities to recycle municipal wastewaters and sludge.

This inspection did not include an evaluation of whether achievement of the national objectives in 40 CFR 403.2 have been demonstrated by the Burbank wastewater treatment plant through consistent compliance with their sludge and discharge limits.

Aluminum Dip Brazing,, Burbank - Industrial User p 'l

Page I 1 of 15 X11

4.0 Compliance with Local Limits and National Prohibitions

All non -domestic wastewater discharges to the sewers must comply with local limits and the national prohibitions. 40 CFR 403.5(a,b,d).

Industrial users must comply with thé provision restricting the bypass of treatment necessary to comply with any pretreatment standard or requirement. 40 CFR 403.17(d).

Summary

The local limits apply end -of -pipe and not end -of- process -after- treatment. The local limits do not prohibit dilution. Therefore, the sample record is useable to determine compliance and that Aluminum Dip Brazing has and would be expected to continue to consistently comply with local limits at IWD -1003. Aluminum Dip Brazing would be expected to continue to generate wastewaters containing acids, caustics, hexavalent chromium and complexed cyanide from chromium conversion coating, and copper, nickel, chromium, and zinc from the etching of aluminum and steel alloys. Aluminum Dip Brazing does not provide treatment beyond settling but does provide continuous pH monitoring. See Appendix 3. Also see Sections 3.0 and 5.0 of this report.

Requirements

None.

Recommendations

None.

4.1 National Objectives

The general pretreatment regulations were promulgated in order to fulfill the national objectives to prevent the introduction of pollutants that:

(1). cause operational interference with sewage treatment or sludge disposal, (2) pass -through sewage treatment into the receiving waters or sludge, (3) are in any way incompatible with the sewerage works, or (4) do not improve the opportunities to recycle municipal wastewaters and sludge.

This inspection did not include an evaluation of whether achievement of the national objectives in 40 CFR 403.2 have been demonstrated by the Burbank wastewater treatment plant through consistent compliance with their sludge and discharge limits.


5.0 Compliance with Federal Monitoring Requirements

Significant industrial users must self- -monitor for all regulated parameters at least, twice per year unless the sewerage agency monitors in place of self- monitoring. 40 CFR 403.12(e) & 403.12(g).

Each sample must be representative of the sampling day's operations. Sampling must be representative of the conditions occurring during the reporting period. 40 CFR 403.12(g) and 403.12(h).

Summary

The sample record for Aluminum Dip Brazing involves semi -annual self -monitoring aid quarterly Burbank monitoring for toxics, salts, and conventional pollutants, All of the monitoring results are representative of the overall discharge of treated and untreated wastewater over the sampling day and over the six -month reporting period. The Federal prohibition against dilution as a substitute for treatment makes it necessary to_establish two sampling points, one end -of- process -after- treatment for Federal and the other end - of -pipe for local limits. The monitoring frequency and scope: are for the i ost`part appropriate for the discharge from Aluminum Dip Brazing: Aluminum Dip Brazing also appropriately conducts continuous self -monitoring for pH; flow, and salts. content (as measured by total dissolved solids). A recommended monitoring schedule that Only differs slightly from the permit requirements is included as part of Appendix 2.

Requirements

Upon the elimination of dilution as a substitute for treatment,: the wastewater discharges must be sampled at separate sampling points -for Federal standards and for local limits.

Recommendations

Self -monitoring results for continuous pH and flow should be summarized and reported each month. The pH each day should be summarized by the number of minutes below 2.0, between 2.5 and 5.5, between 5.5 and 9.5, between 9.5 and 12.0, and above 12.5.


5.0 Compliance with Federal Monitoring Requirements

Significant industrial users must self - :monitor for all regulated parameters at least, twice per year unless the sewerage agency monitors in place of self -monitoring. 40 CFR 403.12(e) & 403.12(g).

Each sample must be representative of the sampling day's operations. Sampling must be representative of the conditions occurring during the reporting period. 40 CFR 403.12(g) and 403.12(h).

Summary

The sample record for Aluminum Dip Brazing involves semi -annual self -monitoring and quarterly Burbank monitoring for toxics, salts, and conventional pollutants. All of the monitoring results are representative of the overall discharge of treated and untreated wastewater over the sampling day and over the six -month reporting period. The Federal prohibition against dilution as a substitute for treatment makes it necessary to establish two sampling points, one end -of- process - after- treatment for Federarstandards, and the other end - of -pipe for local limits. The monitoring frequency and scope are for the most part appropriate for the discharge from Aluminum Dip Brazing. Aluminum Dip Brazing also appropriately conducts continuous self -monitoring for pH; flow, and salts content (as measured by total dissolved solids). A recommended monitoring schedule that only differs slightly from the permit requirements is included as part of Appendix 2.

Requirements

. Upon the elimination of dilution as a substitute for treatment, the wastewater discharges must be sampled at separate sampling points for Federal standards and for local limits.

Recommendations

Self- monitoring results for continuous pH and flow should be summarized and reported each month. The pH each day should be summarized by the number of minutes below 2.0, between 2.5 and 5.5, between 5.5 and 9.5, between 9.5 and 12.0, and above 12,5.


Appendix 1

Aluminum Dip Brazing Schematic of the Wastewater Collection and Treatment

spents / residuals by barrel ` rinses / wash waters by pipe

off -site reclaim U.S. Filter

single -pass cooling water molten salt bath salt bath s .ray . uench

T13 'el Ti alk cleaning T2 deoxidátion T3 alk degreasing

caustic etch static 1° drag -out rinse deoxidation

T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T11 T12 T14

static ' at ag -out nitric -acid .desmut cheìn film

A ,Y:`f'?itl 04,4:4l..^Kt,F4s`:.'} - ,... drag -out 1° spray nase mop waters air compress condensate spent machining coolant dry adsorbant of spills machining chips /scrap spent IX cartridges

filter cake pump

ta TDS continuous meter

r TDS -.293 mg/l

hazardous off -site disposal

U.S. Filter

IWD

settling tanks

flow / pH continuous petering pH - 8.0 s.u.

Propòsed Changes è_..._. 4'.: See Section 3.3

1003

Burbank sewers -6,500 gpd

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User Page 13 of 15'1

Appendix 1

Aluminum Dip Brazing Schematic of the Wastewater Collection and Treatment

spents 1 residuals by barrel rinses / wash waters by pipe

113 t.

Ti 4 T2

T3 T4 T5 : t- T6

single -pass cooling water molten salt bath - í

salt bath sra .uench 01

c01 alk cleaning deoxidation alk degreasing caustic etch static 1° drag -out rinse deoxidation

T8 : static _' .1 ag -out 4 T9 nitric -acid desmut 4- T11 Chem film

T12 T14 drag -out 1° spray rinse

mop waters air compress condensate spent machining coolant dry adsorbant of spills machining chips /scrap spent IX cartridges

filter cake pump

TDS continuous meter

TDS -.293 mg/1

off -site reclaim U.S. Filter

slurry dregs s 4- S yai>' ó eYá

.

hazardous off -site disposal

U.S. Filter

settling tanks

flow / pH continuous rnetering

pH - 8.0 s.u.

.- `trt` Proposed Changes < : ?7: -,_ è 6741", 1. '? See Section 3.3

IWD 1003

Burbank sewers -6,500 gpd


Appendix 2 .

Sewer Discharge Standards and Limits Aluminum Dip-Brazing @ IWD -1003

pollutants of concern. .i- 40 CFR 433 PSES

°;?4ë nat'l prohib

monitoring frequency

(d -max) (mo -av) (instant) IWD -1048 arsenic - - 3.0 .

cadmium ' 0.69 0.26 . 15.0. 6 / year s0

total chromium. 2.77 1.71 10.0 6 / year hex chromium - - 3.0 copper 3.38 2.07 15.0 6 /year lead 0.69 0.43 5.0 6 / year mercury - ' - 0.005 © "

nickel 3.98 2.38 12.0 6./ year silver .. 0.43 0.24 3.0 6 / year Os

zinc 2.61 1.48 - 25.0 6 / year 0 total cyanide 0.40 0 0.22 ® 10.0 ° "-®

amenable cyanide 0.29 ® 0.11 ® 2.0 6 / yew_ total toxic organics 2.13 - . 5.0 1 / year ©` oil & grease -total oil & grease -free

-

- .

-

- 300. none visible

6 / yeär, 4 "

phenol - . - 1.5 30...

selenium - - 1.0 .® '

volatile organic compounds - - 4.0 3 biochem oxygen demand - . - . 1000. chem.oxygen demand - - ,: *1000.. :.© total suspended solids - - 1000. ".®

total dissolved solids - ., - - 6 / year phosphates - - . . 50.0 sulfates - - 420. 6 / year chlorides - - 275. 6 / year CD

dissolved sulfides - - 0.1 flow (gpd) - - 9500 d -max continuous pH min and max (s.u.) - : 5.5 -9.5 s.u. continuous explosivity - - 0 OO

temperature ( °F) - - - 104 °F s0

m National -prohibitions - Closed -cup flash point <140 °F and pH <5.0 su. © Narrative prohibition against the introduction of flammable or explosive substances © As part of periodic priority pollutant scans in order to identify changes in discharge quality ® Adjusted to account for dilution from non -cyanide bearing flows © Quarterly sampling by Burbank plus semi -annually self-monitoring © Certification following the approved toxics'òrganics management plan in lieu of self -monitoring red - proposed increase black - unchanged green - proposed decrease


Appendix 2 . '

Sewer Discharge Standards and Limits Aluminum Dip-Brazing @ IWD -1003

pollutants Of concern 1i= t a

40 ÇFR 433 PSES (d -max) (mo -av)

ulgAar, éä# Sj:

nat'l prohib (instant)

monitoring frequency IWD -1048

arsenic . - - 3.0 . cadmium ' 0.69 0.26. 15.0 . 6 I year 4 total chrómium. 2.77 1.71 10.0 6 / year 4 hex chromium - - 3.0 copper 3.38 2.07 15.0 6 /year 4 lead 0.69 0.43 5.0 6 I year 4 mercury - ` - 0.005 nickel 198 2.38 12.0 6 1 year 4 silver . 0.43 0.24 3.0 6 I year zinc 2.61 1.48 25.0 61 year 4 total cyanide 0.40 ® 0.22 ® 10.0 amenable cyanide 0.29 ® 0.11 ® 2.0 ' 6 1 year total toxic organics 2.13 - . 5.0 1 I year © oil & grease -total - - 300. 6 1 year oil & grease -free - . - none visible 4 phenol - - 1.5 selenium - - 1.0 volatile organic compounds - - 4.0 biochem oxygen demand - . - . 1000. chem.oxygen demand - - 1000. total suspended solids - - 1000. D .

total dissolved solids - . - - 6 1 year phosphates - - 50.0 CD

sulfates - - 420. 6 / year 4 chlorides - - 275. 6 1 year CD

dissolved sulfides - - 0.1 flow (gpd) - - 9500 d -max continuous pH min and max (s.u.) - - 5.5 -9.5 s.u. continuous explosivity - - ® temperature ( °F) - - - 104 °F O ® National -prohibitions - Closed -cup flash point <140 °F and pH <5.0 su. 4 Narrative prohibition against the introduction of flammable or explosive substances © As part of periodic priority pollutant scans in order to identify changes in discharge quality ® Adjusted to account for dilution from non -cyanide bearing flows © Quarterly sampling by Burbank plus semi -annually self -monitoring © Certification following the approved toxics'organics management plan in lieu of self -monitoring red - proposed increase black - unchanged green - proposed decrease


Appendix 3 .

Aluminum Dip Brazing Sampling Results @ IWD -1003 January 2003 - November 2006

pollutant ''3l I . A t Ha Sr 11111111111111111111101MQ ' ; sample , (R ) .: M r É r mean 99t1í% max sk 4 ,0zß count aluminum - - - - - - - - - 0 arsenic 0.9 1.9 1.7 - - - - - 0/9 9 cadmium 1.5. 13.8 19 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 ,:- . 23 chromium 92.4 408.0 657 - - - 0/22 0/20 0/22 22 copper 14.9 36.6 38.6 ' - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 - 23 lead 0.3 1.1 1.3 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 23 mercury - - <0:2 - - - - - 6R,- i nickel 15.3 65.0. 93 - - - 0/23 0/21 6/23 23 selenium 2.2 4.1 3.4 - - - :- - 0/18 18 silver 6.5 53.9 71 - - - 0/21 0/20 0/21 21 zinc 39.1 130.8 182 - - - . 10/22 0/21 0/22 22 cyanide -total 3.1 13.8 22 . - - - 0/22 0/21 0/22 22 total toxic organics 23.9 59.6 49.7 - - - 0 /10 =- 0/6 6 TDS (mg/1) 486 803 858 - - - - - 0/21 21 TSS (mg/1) 5.5 18.4 17 - z - - - 0/21 21 chloride (mg/1) 88 246 253 - - _ - - - 0/20 20 sulfates (rng/1) 66 104 108 - - - - 0/21 21 oil & grease (mg/1) 1.4 7.9 12.9 - - - - - 0/21 21 pH min (s.u.) pH max (s.u.)

7.5 -

-

7.0 8.5

.. - ,.

-

-

- - 0/8 8

® Daily -maximums and monthly- averages comparable to ;Federal categorical standards. However dilution renders the sample results only provisionally useful for determining compliance.

© Monthly- average standards based on the calendar month. CD pH median

Aluminum Dip Brazing, Burbank - Industrial User 0 Page 15 of 15

Appendix 3 Aluminum Dip Brazing Sampling Results @ IWD -1003 :

January 2003 - November 2006

pollutànt ' ii 0 t. ß 4 1 , (o "gßÿ Á ' ß o b sample .(t :litirdESEMER mean 99t1í% max -0.0.0:V: I5' °k count aluminum - - - . - - - - - - 0 arsenic 0.9 1.9 1.7 - - . - - - 0/9 9 cadmium 1.5 13.8 19 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 23 chromium 92.4 408.0 657 - - - 0/22 0/20 0/22:22 copper 14.9 36.6 38.6 ' - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 23 lead 0.3 1.1 1.3 - - - 0/23 0/21 0/23 23 mercury - - <0.2 - - - - - 0/1 1

nickel 15.3 65.0 93 - - - Ö/23 0/21 0/23 23 selenium 2.2 4.1 3.4 - - - - - 0/18 18 silver 6.5 53.9 71 - - - 0/21 0/20 0/21 21 zinc 39.1 130.8 182 - - - 0/22 0/21 0/22 22 cyanide -total 3.1 13.8 22 . - - - 0/22 0/21 0/22 22 total toxic organics 23.9 59.6 49.7 - - - 0 /10 0/6 ' 6 TDS (mg/1) 486 803 858 - - - - - 0/21 21 TSS (mg/1) 5.5 18.4 17 - - - - 0/21 21 chloride (mg/1) ' 88 246 253 - - - - - 0/20 20 sulfates (mg/1) 66 104 108 - - - - - 0/21 21 oil & grease (mg/1) 1.4 7.9 12.9 - - - - - 0/21 21 pH min (s.u.) pH max (s.u.)

-

-

7.0 8.5 '

- - -

- . - -

0/8 8

cD Daily- maximums and monthly - averages comparable to Federal categorical standards. However dilution renders the sample results only provisionally useful for determining compliance.

® Monthly- average standards based on the calendar month. ® pH median

r

ATE OF CALIFORNIA

1L,IFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- ':).:0S ANGELES REGION

107 SOUTH BROADWAY, SUITE 4027 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 -4596 (2131 620-4460

January 29, 1988

Mr. Jack K. Tieche, President Al.uninun Dip Braze Company 2537 North Ontario Street

Burbank,'CA 91504

GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governgr

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION -- AB1803 FOLLOW -UP PROGRAM (FILE NO. AB104.0086)

On January 8, 1988, your facility was inspected by Mr. David Bacharowski of this Regional Board. The inspection focused on past and present methods used for handling chemicals and wastes at your facility. During the site visit, the inspector became aware of certain situations that may have resulted in soi.l and potential ground water contamination. Of primary concern is the waste barrel storage area located along the south central property line at your facility. There were visible signs of chemical spillage onto the asphaltic concrete in this area, and there were no control mechanisns in place to contain any spilled materials or preclude surface run -off wastes from leaving this area. The asphaltic concrete was scarred, contained nunerous cracks and appeared distressed from previous spills. Further, rione of these barrels cont.aineci ) abels to reflect the ' t.ype of 'waste

materials stored, or were dated to ensure timely disposal of these wastes within the 90 day limit specified in Title 22 of the California Admini- strative Code.

The major concern of this Agency's AB1803 follow -up inspection program is to determine possible sources of contamination in nearby drinking water wells. This program is comprehensive since even small discharges may have significant additive effects on the ground water quality in the area.

You are therefore directed to submit a workplan for conducting a subsurface investigation to det.eimi.ne whether contaminants have .infiltrated soils at the barrel storage area identified above.

Your workplan must address all of t.he, items on the enclosed requirements with the following changes.

1. A minimum of two (2) shallow test borings are required; one (1 )

imnédiatel y outside and adjacent to the east wall of the chemical storage building,. and one (1 ) adjacent to the block wall fencing in this area where waste barrels are stored.

2. All test borings must extend to a minimum depth of 10 feet below land surface.

ATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gov'rnpr

LIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- .,1S ANGELES REGION 107 SOUTH BROADWAY, SUITE 4027 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 -4596 (213) 620 -4460

January 29, 1988

Mr. Jack K. Tieche, President

Aluminum Dip Braze Company 2537 North Ontario Street Burbank, CA 91504

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION -- AB1803 FOLLOW -UP PROGRAM (FILE NO. AB104.0086)

On January 8, 1988, your facility was inspected by Mr. David Bacharowski of this Regional Board. The inspection focused on past and present methods used for handling chemicals and wastes at your facility. During the site visit, the inspector became aware of certain situations that may have resulted in soil and potential ground water contamination. Of primary concern is the waste barrel storage area located along the south central property line at your facility. There were visible signs of chemical spillage onto the asphaltic concrete in this area, and there were no control mechanisns in place to contain any spilled materials or preclude surface run -off wastes From leaving this area. The asphaltic concrete was scarred, contained nunerous cracks and appeared distressed from previous spills. Fort.her, , none of these barrels contained ' abets to reflect the type of waste materials stored, or were dated to ensure timely disposal of these wastes within the 90 day limit specified in Title 22 of the California Admini- strative Code.

The major concern of this Agency's AB1803 follow -up inspection program is to determine possible sources of contamination in nearby drinking water wells. This program is comprehensive since even small discharges may have significant additive effects on the ground water quality in the area.

You are therefore directed to submit a workplan For conducting a subsurface investigation to det.eimi.ne whether contaminants have .infiltrated soils at the barrel storage area identified above.

Your workplan must address all of the items on the enclosed requirements with the following changes.

1. A minimum of two (2) shallow test borings are required; one (1) immediately outside and adjacent to the east wall of the chemical storage building,.and one (1) adjacent to the block wall fencing in this area where waste barrels are stored.

2. AlI test borings must extend to a minimum depth of 10 feet below land surface.

_Mr. Jack K. Tieche, President Page 2

3. In addition to a Subsurface Investigation Workpian, your facility must submit a plan outlining additional steps to be taken to improve your chemical storage procedures in this area onsite. Adequate space must be provided to accommodate all barrels stored, and include containment structures to control any spills and to preclude surface water runoff from leaving this area.

Your workp]an containing all of the information identified above is due to this Regional Board by February 29, 1988. If you have any questions concerning this matter,- please contact Mr. David Bacharowski at. (213) 6210 -5988.

ROY R. SAKAIDA Senior Water Resource Control Engineer

DAB:kp

cc: Mr. Tom Klinger, County of Los Angeles, Department of Health Services Hazardous Waste Section

_.Mr. Jack K. Tieche, President Page 2

3. In addition to a Subsurface Investigation Workp].an, your facility must submit a plan outlining additional steps to be taken to improve your chemical storage procedures in this area onsite. Adequate space must be provided to accommodate all barrels stored, and include containment structures to control any spills and to preclude surface water runoff from leaving this area.

Your workplan containing all of the information identified above is due to this Regional Board by February 29, 1988. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. David Bacharowski at (213) 6210-5988.

ROY R. SAKAIDA Senior Wafer Resource Control Engineer

DAB:kp

cc: Mr. Tom Klinger, County of Los Angeles, Department of Health Services Hazardous Waste Section

,...

L- /) (9-1-37 0"-}-c-teziti....4.,

"Pa) //(4".

1 le , .

/803

WA-4114 6:61 thler :(24tti 11/x

(ÒC/

/ ,assi 1. ra.

.,,/:14:4 /. 7

47

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE, CO.

2531 NO, °WAR o BURBANK OA 91504

Via.OAM F V.,%7.2.ANA

'

.<!`

/Lei aff,e-tte,e.a4-Z. OtA40 6

;Dalai) . cte -

raer2) t.3.4

(213) 849-51383 01B1a45-8.51.84

r , .!:,'

- / . 1 , .- , .,

r' j t!--- , 41 1,..01-1.,-1-, ,..2t- 1 ....*--' 3 0,- -7:-. . / .....,L, ,-,11- ,-, -' ---a-1-, .---e.7 7- -,' _2....,(:,--C--- e!'f-i: . f:/t----t.--s-- -.t .-0, ,,)------ ...., f -,.;,1--0

li 67 /i' ' '''''

J 1 _..-fre, t- '1 (Lk i c":0_,L,/,.4..,ris---i. ,4,..,.,1/ i.

!.,17,,"1--(--4?----1- (7 :7.,, .1-4.1 il2,4.--f---t1 )

.) e-4,-. 0 ,x,L-,--)--,_.e....-----e a 4 f--''''''--1-.'-`.4.:- ,"' 1:..4,- i- . _ ---1 ;)--C 4,1A 11 1 '

, 4

e.. A- -,6' ''',/ . -.' '''''''' .. '' r) .(7) ri, r,..., 0 1 '' 1.).J 1 /:':'1 0-e ---4.- 4 ,i

f ......R.,..."---?"::;..-e...--1,--, - ,.--V6.,

i 1A .-- i,".-t,'",to,'' ..'.-'''''' ,

t rried-11 or- -''k'i - 0"1-2-- -I 7- 0, ,--,--' '-? 1 --/- 4

4/71/-?2 (3;

1--,-;»;,-,,,,..--,-.,,..1 rd---0,--(..-4--r," V ---e? -;1,.,

-,i-g,.-7_ 4,,,,21,-c,,, Sd,..-,,,,,...->,-7-1,.._,7-4,,,,

1,-.0 1 ..0. , , -7--e-di

-, ( p--t.--v-3---J-67 o , 11

g ,1

c_i_.,,,,,410 _.0.-t

4

C72 _j7f r / ' .; ". -

1 - - 0---- -1--1,--LQ-) -', <. ...

Jot- -

7te-L'OC-/ k-.407.9 L749 pei-VC/

ip-px4,777772 N.fr-ir-vx? "?:r. Y.- 4y .9 J

L-..W?'..72 004.

...t. -yp d...,c.,..y7

7 :"."0.7

cer-w7-7-y14.4,79- r .,../

r,r,e.b3 -,y ..;,--14,,,,--,--ri--

va69-gv2 (9 t

te6,s-Ova tE: -

i .1,,...;9.-.),..., rret,07.-,-. y7-7-r--(-1 0----ti

,. ., :x--.,K 4 ,

-7---..-;?---fr.-v- A.--02. .-2,- . , -3-4.-4. ' ..

sry, ,. -,--r c q

F_

1' ,---

\iNvzzo H tNv

t,09 t 6 ttO 'N,iNvAtiftt3

OitiviNO 'ON I.VgZ

'00 `32Vtig dIO oinNtwrnii

/

Imefrrir411,-11

Ql s/

of) It7r4'

9 t-v

Er:Z/7e

17%9 151)tf OrE,'

-9 ;)

» io 6 Eg,

ftt (9:eV

yirlP

1,142r;r2f

(;)-xe:1 t7 NO, -1/-6

&,44-tik

ÁkLtz eit_P,//

(rtt"ft 4CLe& 72.-15 d_fet,c2Let-0

--(1:1-e4W

c, &--6-( 2 , 4---44-jt-*!4:je

/G c,t-tifLe47

,441.

e.e s e

6-611-1.,A-4-4

y&s,TA._p

( 02,1-6Z-4...4J

L0-02))452- -&e

(

/ 5 p 00 12 It _

of

AAA

)

0

1.../4.---1,-4-'t7 --)--,,e,,-.2C:e1:1/...3L-0

,A.73...c.c)

-P

I.

( o

LT)() ( o- r :1 - 7 ( CI 7 N

a d -.7 P ) 14-42-1-1

/ reifi

elutt4,f

(24,

(-4-Le-1-e /G

174,-117a-'69 441. Z/23

A, e-e

..."."-e-e-LA 6/ 0- fl .f

- c.6-pq

11.A. (I to /2-,2/A e "-A.,. 2 -

144_

1&'t)6e (°'t?1;

AAA

)

..e /°Y...1. - ,e7

I. ,

f

o fi

(-7? (6-1

!1/4

1, -- 0. ,

L.. -rtis.

Ww

wfm

.i -3

:7

- 5-fq ioi s-01.104:4

4s4.14 079)) *41'S -X

13QO

hQ1

Ys-T

T "-rs.

1

try 1.4.41ddl

-V

V

('N' vivw

-v)

?IV rV

ii )

t

C,

r

-41ev-t. 01,rp 17..1111 v

dr; ev .),;frva7r.,,

#14.

tT

'S

? .

/ /7)

e , r.-

r.\\

r 1e),T

O-ri

rq

(

\ 0

'

Q-7-. (

1--01.-2 i li

a

. Ls ,e :

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD LOS ANGELES REGION

CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE QUESTIONNAIRE 1.CJ

/(-)e/ , CC rr6-

I COMPANY NAME! -;rJC (0<ft .4)//) 66

II. FACILITY ADDRESS :

III. FACILITY INFORMATION

A. STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION CODE(SIC)1 (/1)

B. GENERATOR NUMBER (EPA/STATE ) 6 14 1..") 055) K.-)

C. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS: /t/th'j///',, .1,./xJ6

ArTi?//6

D. SEWER SYSTEM: INDUSTRIAL MUNICIPAL

SEPTIC TANK CESS POOL

OTHER(specify)

WAS A DIFFERENT SEWER SYSTEM USED IN THE PAST? YES V NO

IF YES SPECIFY TYPE

DATE CONVERTED

E. HISTORY: DATE OPERATIONS BEGAN:

PRIOR OWNERS : '(.'I/7 //w-ii 419.)(.. /c/6.-

IV. CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE AT THE SITE. Complete sections A-G(page 2) for all chemicals in current use or that have been used in the past, use additional sheets if necessary.

1 /.WD A. gArI-1 A nntAttlYt

JAM i 9 L87

/()</, ,r6, ,


I.Cj

CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE QUESTIONNAIRE

t.

I. COMPANY NAME: At (.7(i),t /,V/,JA/ ,/,)// eL

II. FACILITY ADDRESS : ,--)Z, , A_ ,-7;1`

III. FACILITY INFORMATION

A. STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION CODE(SIC): .V//tr

B. GENERATOR NUMBER(EPA/STATE): 6/4.00.5Y,f,4 A'

C. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS:

4/k, /1.7//M///,

D. SEWER SYSTEM: INDUSTRIAL MUNICIPAL

SEPTIC TANK CESS POOL

OTHER ( specify)

WAS A DIFFERENT SEWER SYSTEM USED IN THE PAST? YES v/ NO

IF YES SPECIFY TYPE

DATE CONVERTED -2)/t

E. HISTORY: DATE OPERATIONS BEGAN: ìqe',2

PRIOR OWNERS : e'v/1e,...7-6/-,(//1,A1

.

/`&f.i,/

/

IV. CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE AT THE SITE. Complete sections A-G(page 2) for all chemicals in current use or that have been used in the past, use additional sheets if necessary.

1

()swirl A. qAtN-1AnntAtt!vi

JAN .1 () 1-8 7

A. CHEMICAL NAME: C-3-A-(94 Aje- B. COMMON/TRADE NAME:G-4-S Oi

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) A

D. QUANTITY STORED: 67-

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED. HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO ////ig If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME: B. COMMON/TRADE NAME: /4Z7-ie

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) .5 A t.r7 417- It

1

D. QUANTITY STORED:

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO Ait/ If yes, method of treatment:


A. CHEMICAL NAME: B. COMMON/TRADE NAME:

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY STORED;


F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO If yes, method of treatment:


2

A. CHEMICAL NAME: GA--S ti Z.1 Af t`. B. COMMON/TRADE NAME :GA AJE--

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND INK BARRELS OTHER(specify) w (q A S 1

D. QUANTITY STORED: 6 - /0 6,41-

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SKEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL /0,/,4

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED 'PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO ,/t/ 7%Ìq If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO /A

A. CHEMICAL NAME: B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: 7Z-4

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) 5 t}v -r/ C =J AJ

D. QUANTITY STORED: (72? !-S

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL A)///11

F. ÏS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO If yes, method of treatment:


A. CHEMICAL NAME: B. COMMON /TRADE NAME:

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK_,,._ BARRELS OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY STORED:




2

A. CHEMICAL NAME : C /L. B. COMMON/TRADE NAME: PArjR O/

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) 56Appll IA. ,

D. QUANTITY STORED:'

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULEOX ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES. NO )4 If yes, method of treatment:


A. CHEMICAL NAME.: S TOD-D.1-1 R-.0 B. COMMON/TRADE NAME :1-1-6 I) alc; ti Ail.


D. QUANTITY STORED: /C)

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULEDX ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES )( NO If yes, method of treatment: ,501- /D I

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES_,X NO

r, A. CHEMICAL NAME: (74/4 ,Du-s7-B. COMMON/TRADE NAME: -54-17eF C>01?

C. METHOD METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK. ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS X OTHER (specif y)

"A 12 , D. QUANTITY STORED: 3 X 0 125 62 6 z

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED 7.... ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES ,X,/: NO If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES)( NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME: OIL B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: 1 J/9-rJ S0,.. OIL


D. QUANTITY STORED:.

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED X ONSITE DISPOSAL


G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES >C. NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME.:. STO AD R-D B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: cï r As>" /cam ad UEv,

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS .i( OTHER(spec.jfy)

D. QUANTITY STORED: î / DA E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED. ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES )( NO If yes, method of treatment : /.0. + E

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES X NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME: C/ 6x / /k'ILN Lü B . COMMON /TRADE NAME: -.SURF &.)R Ì N V ' A ? C f .fie d? 7f

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS X OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY STORED: -3 X l ó v í. es r /;, A 12 />>. C .¡_.. S

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED 7. ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES r NO If yes, method of treatment:

i

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES X._ NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME: AC6-7-6it. B. COMMON/TRADE NAME: /14- C6 7-0 A/ e

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) i (3.--AL..ceaus 61e,e 2-.5 , 4) E 8 7 -OK f Ant;

1 Al

`- --_ - - D. QUANTITY STORED: ) 6/zS 74A/1 Y 6 , 4 , L_

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL /V/A

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO 41/44 If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO 4//A

A. CHEMICAL NAME: kledt¡W 77-11014 ER B . COON/TRADE NAME: P4 .'i&î 1/Afiti


D. QUANTITY STORED:

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL AO F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO 11/ì4

If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO A1/4

A, CHEMICAL NAME: /1444-P7íA B. COMMON/TRADE NAME : A

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) CA,v

D. QUANTITY STORED: / //

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL iitY//4

Ai/A F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO A/44

A. CHEMICAL NAME: AC 6. T'?1,0 B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: { C6- C'

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS

)

OTHER(specify) ! (s -AL. c ear Cur,s,OE S7V A 4

lA) 1-1-C.'Lt s (. w

D. QUANTITY STORED: 3 C: A L 5 4 t' }~ Cry "-_

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL V //I

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO A'/4 If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO / 04

A. CHEMICAL NAME: 0Q61 P -iiikJIf& -e B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: P/1 / /U; TllA lit=

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) 56- 4-,1 /9r9 / -.

D. QUANTITY STORED: L

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL /!/ A

A/,'y_ If yes, method of treatment:

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO /14/4

A. CHEMICAL NAME: //441107-74/1 B. COMMON /TRADE NAME : 4'ß/J /'T1/ A

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK.___. BARRELS OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY STORED: / - /,

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL fr// S F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO /11.//1.

If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO ,/V/ fn.

A. CHEMICAL NAME: LJ S eAi B . COMMON /TRADE NAME : r14, `/r-' ./-160 L T""

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) PAIL_

D. QUANTITY STORED: 6L/4.4- J N{ ¡L. C A N5 Sc!/2J'F.47) ir _s)

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL 'WA

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO /VA If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL.: YES NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME: 0/4- B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: LOMP2(S3O Ott..

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK.. ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER(specify) Ph /4-

D. QUANTITY STORED: 5- G A

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED X ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NOX If yes, method of treatment:-

.

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES, NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME -la . a, ;' B. COMMON /TRADE NAME : dvcxs

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS. OTHER(specify) fio,./us

D. QUANTITY STORED: 6. #4 L ( /Ö ) E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL fit.

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES If yes, method of treatment:

.


A. CHEMICAL NAME : ) S /4A L r B . COMMON / TRADE NAME : A4`,(--)i-11-1t

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS OTHER (specify) Pf /1-

D. QUANTITY STORED: , G f 6`I41- JA) OIL c1 da,+u, /-!`SsoafF.p S;

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED. ONSITE DISPOSAL /A

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO Ai/A If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO iV/A

A. CHEMICAL NAME: 0/4_. B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: COMP2(-S3Oe 01L

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK _ BARRELS OTHER (specify) P 4 'i -

D. QUANTITY STORED: G ril L.-i

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED) ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO. If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES. ( NO

A. CHEMICAL NAME :14046 4/0A D 12,J7- B. COMMON /TRADE NAME : f /oi s ì,1pí o ? ,,,.-/

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS. OTHER (specify) ( n/.S

D. QUANTITY STORED: / Get. (7.40,1.2: ( 7 / ' )

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL fi t

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO 4, ¡/n If yes, method of treatment:


<

A. CHEMICAL NAME:SCtiv1i11eA4P-00(1) IX B. COMMON/TRADE NAME: sciek' r-fi;

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS .> OTHER(specify)

'

D. QUANTITY STORED: 1600-2000 L3S1

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULEDX ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: . YES)( NO If yes, method of treatment:


A. CHEMICAL NAME: -SÒ.01$sin /NrAihrriou.A.,.De B. .COMMON/TRADE NAME: Ceme au= C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK

BARRELS X OTHER(specify).

D. QUANTITY STORED: SOO LSS.

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED)4 HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO)4 If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NOX

A. CHEMICAL NAME:13'0/2,4X L5t1,4P B. COMMON/TRADE NAME:414/P/anC2,6-AM,e.

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS. A OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY STORED: 30e) --4e190 4/-7,3%5 -

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED>4 HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL.

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES) NO If yes, method of treatment:

G. IS THE WASTE STORED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES NO?

A. CHEMICAL NAME: SÖJ /Ii 7C.'.>q ¿ögt (m/X B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: `ryUÉ 1 Li) 1-.

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS .. OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY STORED: /400-2000 LAS ,

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED HAULEDA ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: . YES X NO If yes, method of treatment:


A. CHEMICAL NAME: Se.of ft 1hftAeirrlawa-36 B. COMMON /TRADE NAME: (F1í ?dme r) to r-

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS X OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY STORED: 300 1 -8 5 .

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWEREDX HAULED ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES N0 )4 If yes., method of treatment:..


A. CHEMICAL NAME : 80124 X .56,x4 P B. COMMON /TRADE NAME : /.444nt.i C16++,v6 e

C. METHOD OF STORAGE: UNDERGROUND TANK ABOVE GROUND TANK BARRELS 2( OTHER(specify)

D. QUANTITY. STORED: & .. moo 4735 .

E. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: SEWERED?4. HAULED. ONSITE DISPOSAL

F. IS THE WASTE TREATED PRIOR TO DISPOSAL: YES) NO If yes, method of treatment:


V. THIS QUESTIONNAIRE SHALL BE SIGNED BELOW AS FOLLOWS:

A. In the case of corporations, by a principal executive officer at the level of vice- president or his duly authorized representative if such representative is responsible for the overall operation of the facility, or

B. In the case of a partnership, by a general partner, or

C. In the case of a sole proprietorship, by the proprietor, or

D. In the case of a municipal, State, or other public facility, by either a principal executive officer, ranking elected official, or other duly authorized employee.

This questionnaire has been completed under penalty of perjury and, to the best of my knowledge,. is true and correct.

Signature. '« .: .

Printed Name, - _r't-r'f'.ie: k'

Title: rit.:L:S

Contact Name: o,d',R.

Date: '6't-1fc'

..; Phone: «ïU, ir) t- ..

¡ Title: l}A'n/4its.1/t ,r,', !L/rf Q,hone:,1"/?,- e'/` cYe.3

7

,. -r.znt`í.Y'.Rj 1.,:.lM1i:tï:.::.:

V. THIS QUESTIONNAIRE SHALL BE SIGNED BELOW AS FOLLOWS:

A. In the case of corporations, by a principal executive officer at the level of vice- president or his duly authorized representative if such representative is responsible for the overall operation of the facility, or

B. In the case of a partnership, by a general partner, or

C. In the case of a sole proprietorship, by the proprietor, or

D. In the case of a municipal, State, or other public facility, by either a principal executive officer, ranking elected official, or other duly authorized employee.

This questionnaire has been completed under penalty of perjury and, to the best of my knowledge,. is true and correct..

Signature:

Printed Name: r.('i)1 ;í- 'l; i.- ('r-/,.

Date: /=I;, Vf..'fC.i/ ,

,. Title: ;,,i,),t.E Phone: (r'v g.f.fl

Contact Name: 1 A: !_: /'i -'_

Title: l;'r'lFl1 t-Æt.> Hrl4 '06 Cïï/( . Phone : 4?t %,'!`1' -Z/86'

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RETE WILSON, Governor

CALIFORNIA REGIIONA. WATER QUALITY CO TROL BOARD LOS ANGELES REGION, 101 CENTRE PLA;ZA1bRIVE

MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754.2156 (213) 266-7500 FAX: (213) 266-7600

December 27, 1996

Mr. William R. Vazzana Aluminum Dip Braze, Co. 2537 N. Ontario St.

Burbank, CA 91504

SAN FERNANDO VALLEY CLEANUP PROGRAM - NO FURTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE CO., LOCATED AT 2537 N. ONTARIO ST., BURBANK, (FILE NO. 104.0086)

Regional Board staff have reevaluated your case. Based on the available information in our file and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, no further action related to this Board's Well Investigation Program is required.

It should be noted that this letter in no way releases you from any chemicals and /or waste handling requirements of this or any other agency.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (213) 266 -7538.

Sincerely,

Jonathon Bishop Senior Water Resource Control Engineer

cc: Mr. Mike Osinski, USEPA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD LOS ANGELES REGION 101 CENTRE PLAZA DRIVE

MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754-2156 (213) 266 -7500 FAX. (213) 266-7600

December 27, 1996

Mr. William R. Vazzana Aluminum Dip Braze, Co. 2537 N. Ontario St.

Burbank, CA 91504

SAN FERNANDO VALLEY CLEANUP PROGRAM - NO FURTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE CO., LOCATED AT 2537 N. ONTARIO ST., BURBANK, (FILE NO. 104.0086)

Regional Board staff have reevaluated your case. Based on the available information in our file and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, no further action related to this Board's Well Investigation Program is required.

It should be noted that this letter in no way releases you from any chemicals and /or waste handling requirements of this or any other agency.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (213) 266 -7538.

Sincerely,

Jonathon Bishop Senior Water Resource Control Engineer

cc: Mr. Mike Osinski, USEPA

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX . Hawthorne Street

Sari Francisco, CA 94105-3904

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD LOS ANGELES REGION.

101 -Centre Plaza Drive Mtniterey Park,ÇA 91754 ?q 6

October 31, 1997

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE CO. 2537 ONTARIO ST. BURBANK, CA 91504 File Number: 104.0086

RE: SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SUPERFUND AREAS U.S. EPA AND LARWQCB NOTIFICATION OF NO FURTHER ACTION

For property located at: 2537 ONTARIO ST. BURBANK, CA 91504-

Dear Owner /Operator;

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region ( "Regional Board ") staff has conducted an assessment of your facility to determine the extent of solvent usage and to assess past and current chemical handling, storage and disposal practices. Your company is among those in the San Fernando Valley which have received the Regional Board's "No Further Action" letters based on one or more of the following categories: 1) information provided in your pre -inspection questionnaire disclosed little or no solvent use; 2) the results of a staff inspection disclosed little or no solvent use; or 3) completed assessment work indicated insignificant or no solvent contamination in soil.

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that, based on the information provided to U.S. EPA by the Regional Board to date, you will not be asked by the U.S. EPA or the Regional Board to participate in regional groundwater cleanup projects currently planned for San Fernando Valley. Your company is no longer part of the U.S. EPA Superfund process, and the Regional Board and U.S. EPA plan no further action concerning your facility.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 -3901


101 Centre Plaza Drive Monterey Park, CA 91754 -2156

October 31, 1997

ALUMINUM DIP BRAZE CO. 2537 ONTARIO ST. BURBANK, CA 91504 File Number: 104.0086

RE: SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SUPERFUND AREAS U.S. EPA AND LARWQCB NOTIFICATION OF NO FURTHER ACTION

For property located at: 2537 ONTARIO ST. BURBANK, CA 91504-

Dear Owner /Operator,

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region ( "Regional Board ") staff has conducted an assessment of your facility to determine the extent of solvent usage and to assess past and current chemical handling, storage and disposai practices. Your company is among those in the San Fernando Valley which have received the Regional Board's "No Further Action" letters based on one or more of the following categories: 1) information provided in your pre -inspection questionnaire disclosed little or no solvent use; 2) the results of a staff inspection disclosed little or no solvent use; or 3) completed assessment work indicated insignificant or no solvent contamination in soil.

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that, based on the information provided to U.S. EPA by the Regional Board to date, you will not be asked by the U.S. EPA or the Regional Board to participate in regional groundwater cleanup projects currently planned for San Fernando Valley. Your company is no longer part of the U.S. EPA Superfund process, and the Regional Board and U.S. EPA plan no further action concerning your facility.

You may be contacted by thole potentially responsible partes ( "PRPs ") that # ave.been asked to participate in the groundwater cleanup efforts. UT the event you =are contacted by PRPs, please feel free to contact: the appropriate Regional Board or U. S. EPA staff for additional information or assistance. The telephone numbers bf Regional Board and U, S. EPA staff are provided ark: the enclosed contact list.

Säncerely;

k ith A. Takata Dennis A. Dickerson

irector Executive Officer Superfund Division California Regional Water Quality U. S. EPA, Region 9 Control Board, Los Angeles Region

Enclosure

You may be contacted by those potentially responsible parties ( "PRPs ") that have been asked to participate in the groundwater cleanup efforts. In the event you are contacted by PRPs, please feel free to contact the appropriate Regional Board or U. S. EPA staff for additional information or assistance. The telephone numbers of Regional Board and U. S. EPA staff are provided on the enclosed contact list.

Sincerely,

ith A. Takata Dennis A. Dickerson rector Executive Officer

Superfund Division California Regional Water Quality U. S. EPA, Region 9 Control Board, Los Angeles Region

Enclosure

appendix 40cfr...aluminuni dtp btaiing, burbank industrial user page 15 of p5 appendix 3 aluminum...

Documents