appeals court to hear guy neighbors case

Upload: jones-walker

Post on 10-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Appeals court to hear Guy Neighbors case

    1/6

    GuyNeighborsCCA Prisoner 1152003Leavenworth etentionCenter100Hwy Terr.Leavenworth,,ansas 6048

    UNITED STATESCOURT OF APPEALSFOR THE 1OTH IRCUIT COT]RTTJhITIEDSTATES,

    Plaintiff / AppelleeV .

    IN RE: GUY NEIGHBORSDefendant Petitioner

    10'hCir. CaseNo:

    WITIT OF HABD{S CORPUS. INJI]hICTIVE RELIEF. AND STAY OFEXECUTTON pF THE ORDER GIVEN ON 0712812010.Y THEHONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIAtPursuanto 28 USC $ 2255,FRCPRule 651

    COMES NOW on the 9ft dayof August2010,Guy Neighbors,actingas apro se itigant,with a Writ of HabeasCorpus, njunctiveRelief, and StayofExecutionof the orderdeliveredon0712812010y theHonorableCarlosMurguiawith the following:

    1). On the 28thday of July 2010, he HonorableCarlosMurguia gave heOrder hat GuyNeighborsvoluntaryallow himself o be heavilymedicated aseduponDr. RobertG. Lucking's evaluation.

    USDCCaseNo: 07 20073-CM07-2AL24-CM08-20105-CM

  • 8/8/2019 Appeals court to hear Guy Neighbors case

    2/6

    2). Dr. Luckinghad estified n July 27,2010' n referenceo CarrieNeighbors, GuyNeighborswife and co-defendant),hathe hadviolatedFederal

    Law in tampering ith theU.S.Postal ervice ealed ndPostmarkednails o basehis unethical valuation ponCarrieNeighbors.

    3). This testimonywasgiven n frontof the HonorableCarlosMurguia, heday before he courtallowedDr. Lucking'sevaluationeport o be usedagainstheco-defendantGuy Neighbors. n which shouldhavehad no probativevalue,due oDr. LuckingsJuly27'hTestimony. SeeAttach 1 July27 Transcripts f Dr.Lucking

    4). During Dr. Lucking'sJuly 27'hTestimony,CarrieNeighbors hasalreadybeen oundcompetent timesby this court)specifically uestioned)r. Luckingon his rationale or his evaluation n her, n whichhewasnot ordered o evaluateCarrieNeiehbors, or did he nform hershewasbeineevaluated.n whichheviolated isethics, swell as,privilegedmaritalcommunications,n whichhecouldnot definehis rationale, hereby howingapattern f practice finconsistencies,ackof rationale r followingsupreme ourt ules, iolations fFederal aw, and o improperly ecure sellorder,, s n thiscase.Wherebyhis sa patternof practice.See efArizonacase:CR-}5-0099-02-PHX-MHM rderdated09/28/09by the HonorableJudgeMo,y H. Murguia, and I.lSv Gonzalez-

  • 8/8/2019 Appeals court to hear Guy Neighbors case

    3/6

    Aguilar, 446 f. Supp.2d 1099D Ariz. 2006,and LISCourt of Appealfor the B't'Cir., Caseno: 08-3700LI.S. HessamGhane.l

    4) . My counsel as ailed o represent e with zeal,my competency asneverquestioned y any prior attorneys, herylPilatehasprejudicedmy defensewhensheproffered o thecourtagainst othme andmy wife, in which heappointed ounsel as -ailedo giveme hebasic epresentationn violationof mySixth Amendment ight. [See ef Attach 2-letter o Cheryl Pilate rom GryNeighborsl

    5). After the Testimony f Dr. Luckingon 07127DAl0, dmitting o aFederalCrimeunderoath, Tamperingwith sealed ndstampedmail outgoingmailwithout awarrant), heUSDC for the Districtof Kansas houldnothaveallowedany urther estimony,evaluations, r reportsby Dr. Lucking, due o now anyfurther reatment, r evaluation y Dr. Lucking s bias,prejudice, r at the veryleast ainted.WherebY, rt njunction, ndstayof execution houldbe ssuedoprevent ny further njuryto theDefend nt Petitioner who wasalreadyoundcompetentn a priorevaluation y a differentPsychiatrist)

    6).ThePetitioner Defendant adverballyexplainedo thecouftonA7DBl2010hearinghathiscounsel adadvised im incorrectty n hisvoluntaryorder o submit o mediation. hePetitioner Defbndantwasorderedhathe had10 days o complyor hewouldbe n conternpt f cour1. he Petitioner Defendant

  • 8/8/2019 Appeals court to hear Guy Neighbors case

    4/6

    advisedhecourthewouldnot submit o voluntarymedication.hePetitionerDefbndant asnot actedoutor shownany ype of aggression,asno historyofmentaldiseaser defect, asno criminalhistorynorhasheshownanyoutrageousor delusional ctivity o require nymedication, herebyhe PetitionerDefbndants requestinghat he l0tr'Circuitcourlof Appeals eview hedocumentationrovidedand make he followingorders:

    a).That hePetitioner Defendantsounsel asshownbiasandwasineffective nd ailed o provide hebasic epresentationursuanto the611'Arnendmento theU.S.Constitution.

    b). That heTestimony f Dr. LuckingonA7D712010hould avestoppedany urther eports,evaluations, r recommendations,ue o his admittance fviolationof law underoath,and hat any urther nvolvement f Dr. Lucking stainted, ias,and or prejudice, t hispointand ime. See ef USDCDoc 174]

    c). Therehasneverbeenanydocumented roofof the recordbeyondareasonablexplanation f why anyheavy nedications needed. o rationaleoestablishGuy Neighborsncompetence,or is thereanyserious rime o ustif,z heorderof heavy nedication.

    7).Whereby, n njunction ndstayof execution,ntila reviewby the l0'hCircuitCourlof Appealso prevent miscarriagefjustice,aswell as,a manifestof injustice, ue o thecircumstancesn which, hePlaintiff,hadnot showna

  • 8/8/2019 Appeals court to hear Guy Neighbors case

    5/6

    scintillaof evidenceustif,ringheneed or theheavy nedicationor thePetitioner/ Def-endantr a logical ationale s o his ncompetence.

    8).That hePetitioner Defendant asoriginally ncarcerateday 24,2009becausef a bondviolation o agagorder elatedo "blast"email o Governmentagenciesedressingisgrievances,n which hecourtstated Mr. Neighborsposeda threatof futuredefamationo Goveffrment fflcials."Mr. Neighbors asalready erved asthis maximum ime allotted or the crimecharged.

    THEREFOREGuy Neighbors, ctingasa pro se itigant,with a Writ ofHabeasCorpus,njunctiveRelief,and Stayof Execution f the orderdelivered n071281201by the HonorableCarlosMurguia,andPRAYS he court eview heattachmentsa make he determination:

    That he Petitioner Defendantsounselwas neffective nd ailed oprovide he basic epresentationursuanto the 6thAmendmento theU.S.Constitution. hat heTestimony f Dr. Luckingon 0712712010hould avestopped ny urther eports, valuations, r recornmendations,ue o hisadmittance f violationof law underoath,and hat any urlher nvolvement f Dr.Lucking s tainted, ias,and or prejudice, t hispointand irne. See ef USDCDoc 17 l That herehasneverbeenany documented roofof the recordbeyondareasonablexplanation r rationale f why anyheavymedications needed, or sthereanyserious rime o ustifo the orderof heavy nedication.

  • 8/8/2019 Appeals court to hear Guy Neighbors case

    6/6

    That an njunction s proper o stopany urtherconstitutionalightsviolations egarding rders or immediatemedication f thePetitioner Def'endantand mproper indingof incornpetencey Dr. Lucking.

    Thata Stayof Executions propermmediately ntil the 10"'CircuitCourtcanreview he Documents, nd statementsrovided.

    That upon horough eview a HabeasCorpuss neededrnmediatelyoremove hePetitioner Defendant rom careandcustodyof Dr. RobertG. LuckingFMC Butner,North Carolina.

    That he Petitioner Defendant asserved is maximum ime allotted or thecrimecharged, oses o danger o society r himself, s not a flight risk andshouldbefreeon bondpending rial.

    Whereby, or the abovestated easonshe Petitioner Defendants proper nhis Writ of HabeasCorpus,njunctiveRelief,andStayof Execution f theorderdelivered n 0712812010v the Honorable arlosMurguia.