Upload File

appeal no 189judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/appeal no 189judgement.pdf3. according to the...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
26

Upload: others

Post on 29-Dec-2019

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 2: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 3: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 4: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 5: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 6: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 7: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 8: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 9: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 10: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 11: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 12: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 13: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 14: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 15: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 16: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 17: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 18: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 19: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 20: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 21: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 22: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 23: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 24: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 25: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but
Page 26: Appeal No 189Judgementaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No 189Judgement.pdf3. According to the Appellant, it had proposed a loss reduction target of 2% in the financial year 2007-08 but

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate …aptel.gov.in/judgements/Judgment in Appeal nos. 153 of...Appeal No.153 of 2011 and Appeal No.154 of 2011 Appellate Tribunal for Electricity

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction ...aptel.gov.in/judgements/Judgements Review Petition No. 10 of 2012... · Review Petition No. 10 of 2012 in Appeal No.89

Appeal decision Appeal No. 2017-18019 Appellant …...1 / 23 Appeal decision Appeal No. 2017-18019 Appellant KATO, Hirotaka Attorney Eto Law & Patent Office Corp Patent Attorney SONODA,

Appeal decision Appeal No. 2020-3523 Appellant SONY

Appeal No: A 106/2019 THALITA SUSANNA CLOETE APPELLANT … · THALITA SUSANNA CLOETE APPELLANT 1 FRANCOAIS STEPHANUS SCHUTTE APPELLANT 2 FRANCOAIS BENJAMIN SCHUTTE APPELLANT 3 and

Appeal decision Appeal No. 2018-12216 Patent …...1 / 21 Appeal decision Appeal No. 2018-12216 Tokyo, Japan Appellant Shiseido Company, Limited Patent Attorney UCHIDA, Naoto The case

Appeal No. 179 of 2012 - aptel.gov.inaptel.gov.in/judgements/Judgement Appeal No. 179 of... · Appeal No. 179 of 2012 ... 25.7.2012 wherein the State Commission determined ... of

Appeal No. 193 of 2011aptel.gov.in/judgements/Judgment in Appeal No.193 of 2011_03102012_ssi.pdf · Appeal No. 193 of 2011 Page 1 of 44 Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity - aptel.gov.inaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No. 51 and 79 of 2013.pdf · Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) Appeal No

Appellate Tribunal for Electricityaptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal no. 207 of 2012_23.04.2014...Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) Appeal no. 207 of 2012 Dated:

Appeal decision Appeal No. 2019-3718 Appellant DENSO

Appeal - Appellant Brief Attorney Solomon, 10-22-12

KERCHNER v OBAMA (APPEAL) - Appellant Reply Brief - Transport Room

Appeal no. 59 of 2013 and Appeal no. 116 of 2013aptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal no. 59 of 2013 and Appeal no. 116 of... · Appeal no. 59 of 2013 and Appeal no. 116 of 2013 Page 1 of

Judgment in Appeal No. 28 of 2012aptel.gov.in/judgements/Judgment in Appeal No. 28 of 2012_11102012... · Judgment in Appeal No. 28 of 2012 ... Grahak Bhavan, ... knowledge regarding

sstsindh.gov.pksstsindh.gov.pk/admin/upload/judgements/Appeal No. 417 of 2017.pdf29.11.2016 and appellate order dated 07.04.2017 passed on the departmental appeal which was rejected

Judgment in Appeal No.27 of 2013aptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No. 42 of 2013_11.04.2014.pdf · card (USB modem). The services provided by the Appellant are in the nature of public

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction)aptel.gov.in/judgements/Judgements Appeal nos. 150, 166...Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Datta, Judicial Member Appeal No. 150

Appeal No. 185 of 2011 - Appellate Tribunal For Electricityaptel.gov.in/judgements/Judgment in Appeal No.185 of 2011... · 2012-10-05 · Appeal No. 185 of 2011 . Page . 7. of . 56

DERRICK POWELL, ) No. 310, 2016 Appellant ) ON APPEAL FROM

Noonan v Bowen APPEAL - Reply Brief of Appellant Barnett 131202

Appellate Tribunal for Electricityaptel.gov.in/old_website/judgements/Judg2015/APPEAL No...APPEAL No. 304 of 2013 Page 1of 36 Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction)

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT HIGHGATE HOTELS, INC’S BRIEF ON APPEAL ... · PDF fileDEFENDANT-APPELLANT HIGHGATE HOTELS, INC’S BRIEF ON APPEAL ... Campbell-Ewald Co v 525 Lexington Ave Assoc,

Appeal: Background · Docket Number: 20/9420 Appellant: Todd Stewart, 9150 NE 94th Avenue, Bondurant, IA 50035 (Property Owner) Appeal: The appellant requests a front yard setback

HOLLISTER v SOETORO (APPEAL) - PETITION filed [1241041] by Appellant - Petition - Transport Room

IN THE SEYCHELLES COURT OF APPEAL Gerald Bibi Appellant

RHODES v MacDONALD, et al. (APPEAL) - E-Brief Tendered: Appellant - PCRQHR4P

NOTICE OF DECISION - Toronto · each connected appeal filed by the same appellant. To obtain a copy of Appellant Form (A1) and other information about the appeal process please visit

Appeal No. 137 of 2006 - aptel.gov.inaptel.gov.in/judgements/order in Appeal No. 137 of 2006.pdf · Ltd. switchyard for linking 2 Nos. power evacuation ... Page 3 of 46 . Appeal No

Plaintiff-Appellant, District, No. 4-16-0527 Fou1th Appeal

Before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate ...aptel.gov.in/judgements/Appeal No. 236 of 2013 and Appeal no. 291... · Appeal No. 236 & 291 of 2013 . Page 4 of 46. Power

Appeal decision Appeal No. 2018-12724 ITERG Patent ......1 / 20 Appeal decision Appeal No. 2018-12724 Appellant Institut des Corps Gras Etudes et Recherches Techniques - ITERG Patent

BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY Appellate ...aptel.gov.in/judgements/order in appeal No. 107 of 2006.pdf · 1.4.2000. The first appellant was further unbundled and segregated

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA BRENDAN … · IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) BETWEEN: BRENDAN PATERSON APPELLANT (Appellant)

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) Appeal no ...aptel.gov.in/judgements/Judg2015/Appeal no. 195 of 2013.pdf · JUDGMENT This Appeal has been filed by Mr