appeal against decision

9
Anti Corruption Group 3: Elinda Fariz Nanda Hidayah Melyan Satish Verenathan Appeal and Disenting Point

Upload: nanda-melyan

Post on 07-Aug-2015

29 views

Category:

Law


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

Anti Corruption

Group 3:Elinda FarizNanda Hidayah MelyanSatish Verenathan

Appeal and Disenting Point

Page 2: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

Appeal against the decision means the process formally legal . Appeal procedures , including whether a defendant has the right of appeal , vary in each country . If the appellate court decision felt less satisfactory , then the party who is dissatisfied can appeal to a higher court . Memory plaintiff made an appeal must be filed by the clerk of the district court where the case was first filed with the appropriate period of time , or in other words, should not be more than 14 working days , since the decision was issued by the District Court .

Banding artinya proses menentang keputusan hukum secara resmi. Prosedur banding, termasuk apakah seorang terdakwa memiliki hak banding, berbeda-beda di setiap negara. Banding Jika putusan pengadilan negeri dirasakan kurang memuaskan, maka pihak yang merasa kurang puas tersebut dapat mengajukan banding ke pengadilan tinggi. Memori banding yang dibuat pengugat harus diajukan melalui panitera pengadilan negeri tempat pertama kali perkara diajukan dengan jangka waktu yang tepat, atau dengan kata lain tidak boleh lebih dari 14 hari kerja, sejak putusan dikeluarkan oleh PN.

WHAT IS APPEAL?

Page 3: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

In Indonesia, the appeal filed in the High Court which is located in the provincial capital. if the appeal case filed back into crude . Appeal made by the interested parties (parties Negri defeated by the decision of the Court).Appeal if the decision to complete the PN ( court Negri ) was wrong or not quite right and upheld the ruling PN if the PN right decision

Di Indonesia banding diajukan di Pengadilan Tinggi yang terletak di ibukota provinsi. jika banding dimohonkan perkara menjadi mentah kembali. Banding dilakukan oleh pihak yang berkepentingan (pihak yang dikalahkan oleh putusan Pengadilan Negri). Banding untuk melengkapi bila putusan PN (pengadilan Negri) itu salah atau kurang tepat dan menguatkan putusan PN jika putusan PN benar.

Page 4: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

The grace period is 14 days since the appeal verdict PN . In the United States , the legal system recognizes two types of appeals : appeal court de novo or on the record . The court de novo , all the evidence can be presented again , as if it had never been filed . In the appeal on the record , which is used usually is precedent .

Tenggang waktu banding adalah 14 hari semenjak pengumuman putusan PN. Di Amerika Serikat, sistem hukum mengenal dua jenis banding: pengadilan de novo atau appeal on the record. Pengadilan de novo, semua bukti dapat dikemukakan kembali, seakan-akan belum pernah diajukan. Dalam appeal on the record, yang digunakan biasanya adalah preseden.

Page 5: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

The order of appeal under article 21 of Law No. 4/2004 jo. Article 9 of Law No. 20/1947 repeal provisions of Articles 188-194 HIR , namely :

1 . No statement wants to appeal2 . Clerks make an appeal deed3 . recorded in the register holding case4 . statement of appeal must be received by no later than 14 days compa statement

after the appeal is made .5 . comparison can be made appealed memory , memory compa may submit a counter

appeal .

Urutan banding menurut pasal 21 UU No 4/2004 jo. pasal 9 UU No 20/1947 mencabut ketentuan pasal 188-194 HIR, yaitu:

1. ada pernyataan ingin banding 2. panitera membuat akta banding3. dicatat dalam register induk perkara4. pernyataan banding harus sudah diterima oleh terbanding paling lama 14 hari

sesudah pernyataan banding tersebut dibuat.5. pembanding dapat membuat memori banding, terbanding dapat mengajukan kontra

memori banding.

Page 6: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

Dissenting opinion

Page 7: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

A dissenting opinion (or dissent) is an opinion in a legal case written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion of the court which gives rise to its judgment. When not necessarily referring to a legal decision, this can also be referred to as a minority report.

Sebuah dissenting opinion ( perbedaan pendapat atau ) adalah pendapat dalam kasus hukum yang ditulis oleh satu atau lebih hakim mengungkapkan ketidaksetujuan dengan pendapat mayoritas pengadilan yang menimbulkan keputusannya . Bila tidak selalu mengacu pada keputusan hukum , ini juga bisa disebut sebagai laporan minoritas .

WHAT IS DISSENTING POINT?

Page 8: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

The dissent may disagree with the majority for any number of reasons: a different interpretation of the case law, use of different principles, or a different interpretation of the facts. They are written at the same time as the majority opinion and are often used to dispute the reasoning behind the majority opinion.

Perbedaan pendapat ini mungkin tidak setuju dengan mayoritas untuk sejumlah alasan : interpretasi yang berbeda dari kasus hukum , penggunaan prinsip-prinsip yang berbeda , atau interpretasi yang berbeda dari fakta-fakta . Mereka ditulis pada saat yang sama dengan pendapat mayoritas dan sering digunakan untuk membantah alasan di

balik pendapat mayoritas .

Page 9: APPEAL AGAINST DECISION

THANK YOU!