apital industry structure and business models for c ... · •growth strategies for industrial ......
TRANSCRIPT
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
0 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
Industry Structure and Business Models for
Industrial Biotechnology
Research Methodology and Results for Discussion
© 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
OECD Workshop on the Outlook on
Industrial Biotechnology Vienna, January 14, 2010
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
1 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Copyright and Disclaimer
Copyright
• All rights for the use of all or parts of the information in this document, including reprinting
the whole document or parts thereof, the storage in databanks and translations remain with
FESTEL CAPITAL
• Individual charts can be reproduced stating FESTEL CAPITAL as source; please contact
FESTEL CAPITAL, should you wish to reproduce larger parts of this document
Disclaimer
• FESTEL CAPITAL has prepared this document to the best of FESTEL CAPITAL„s know-
ledge and belief based on all available information
• FESTEL CAPITAL takes no warranty for the accuracy and completeness of this information
• Before deducting individual conclusions, it is necessary to obtain additional data and
conduct further analyses
• Therefore, all liability for costs or damage resulting from information and conclusions in this
document is excluded
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
2 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Contents
Research Methodology 2
Conclusion and Outlook 4
Goals and Objectives 1
Research Results 3
Industry Trends 3.1
Market Structure 3.2
Market Players 3.3
Business Models 3.4
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
3 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
The paper gives an overview of current industrial biotechnology industry structure and business models with special focus on innovation
General aspects
• Drivers and barriers for industrial biotechnology
• Size and growth of industrial biotech markets
• Characteristics and importance of market players
• Established and emerging business models for companies
• Growth strategies for industrial biotech companies
• Major trends and outlook for the most important sectors
• Recommendations including issue list for next steps
Special aspects
• Constraints of industry capacity for performing R&D or absorbing new technologies
• Dependence of large firms dependent on innovations from smaller companies
Goals and Objectives - Aspects
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
4 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Contents
Research Methodology 2
Conclusion and Outlook 4
Goals and Objectives 1
Research Results 3
Industry Trends 3.1
Market Structure 3.2
Market Players 3.3
Business Models 3.4
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
5 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
FESTEL CAPITAL database Data sources
Additional desk research in October and November 2009 was performed using
typical key words to find relevant information
• Interviews with industrial
companies, research institutions
and investors
• Desk research (company
information, external market
studies, press clippings)
• Open discussions with key
market players
• Excel calculation model with data
between 2003 and 2009
- Sales per segment/sub-
segment
- Capital requirements for R&D
and infrastructure
A structured research approach using the existing FESTEL CAPITAL database was used to prepare the paper for further discussion
Research Methodology - Approach
Innovations in industrial biotechnology as focus topic of the
Working Group Start-ups within the Chair of Technology and
Innovation Management (Prof. Dr. Roman Boutellier)
Pap
er(s
)
Five market studies with with focus
on special industrial biotech areas
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
6 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Starting point was the existing FESTEL CAPITAL database with relevant data which has been built up between 2003 and 2009
• About 50 interviews with managers and experts from industrial biotech companies as well
as additional interviews with experts from research institutions and the investment area
- Various rounds during the past 6 years
- Semi-structured nature to the interviews
• Periodical desk research using public sources (e.g. business databases) and company
disclosures (e.g. websites and press releases)
• Open discussions with persons from the industry to clarify open questions, which could not
be answered using other sources
More than 150 industrial biotechnology companies were analysed through desk research,
interviews or open discussions with FESTEL CAPITAL
Additional desk research in October and November 2009 was performed using typical key
words to find relevant information
Research Methodology - Data Sources
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
7 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Four main regions are analysed to present and discuss the key insights and indicators in the paper
• Europe: EU-27 countries, whereby all of the larger countries are OECD members, and
Switzerland which is also an OECD member
• North America: NAFTA members Canada, Mexico and United States of America which are
all OECD members
• Asia: With China and India as well as including the OECD member states Australia and
Japan
• Rest of the world: All other countries not covered by the other categories
A separate category with the BRIC countries is currently not possible as the FESTEL
CAPITAL database does not yet fully include this category
Research Methodology - Regions
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
8 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Contents
Research Methodology 2
Conclusion and Outlook 4
Goals and Objectives 1
Research Results 3
Industry Trends 3.1
Market Structure 3.2
Market Players 3.3
Business Models 3.4
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
9 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
The fast technological development within industrial biotechnology is a driver for industrial biotechnology
Fast technological development
• Technological development progressing at an enormous rate
- Development of basic technologies (e.g. directed evolution, genetical modification tools)
- Development of tailormade and high performance enzymes (especially in the number of
available enzymes)
- Improvement of efficiency through new developments in reactor and process design
• Implementation of new applications for existing and new enzymatic systems
• Increasing production of high-value products, such as nutraceuticals, cosmeceuticals and
performance chemicals
Industry Trends - Drivers
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
10 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
The need for sustainable development as well as the ongoing globalisation is a driver for industrial biotechnology
Need for sustainable development
• Consumers increasingly conscious about the impacts of their consumption and choosing
products with low negative impact on the environment (e.g. low-carbon economy)
• Need for a switch to clean and sustainable processes using renewable resources as a
sustainable raw material basis
• Contributes to the sustainable development of established industries as well global
economy
• Biomass-derived energy based on biotechnology expected to account for an increasing
share in energy consumption
Ongoing globalisation
• Global competition drives companies to biotech routes, especially in Europe and the US
• Processes to sustain competitiveness especially regarding Asian challenges
• Reduction of trade barriers towards global biotech markets (e.g. for biofuels)
Industry Trends - Drivers
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
11 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
High investment and production costs as well as critical raw material prices and limited availability are barriers facing industrial biotechnology
High investment and production costs
• Restrictions of biotechnological production processes from an economic viewpoint
- High investments in R&D and process development
- Massive new investments to build new production facilities
• Higher prices for products from biotechnology processes normally not achievable
Cyclical raw material prices and limited availability
• Almost 1:1 correlation of crude oil and biomass prices during the last years so no general
cost advantages of bio-based routes
• Hope that biomass shows less cyclicality compared to crude oil prices has not been
realised
• Rising food and feed demand is a critical driver and a significant limitation on the uptake of
industrial biotechnology (especially in debates around biofuels, land use has been a
controversial issue)
Industry Trends - Barriers
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
12 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Complex innovation processes as well as critical social acceptance and regulations are barriers facing industrial biotechnology
Complex innovation processes
• Industrial biotechnology know-how mainly used in the early stages of the value chain
• Specialised companies cover normally only a small share of the value-added along the
value chain
• Combination of “technology push” and “market pull” along the value chain necessary
Critical social acceptance and regulations
• Social acceptance of industrial biotechnology normally high but some regions still have
rather a low acceptance of genetically modified organisms - in the field of genetic
engineering considerably more bureaucracy and legislation
• Problem accepting green biotechnology, especially in Europe, has a direct impact on
industrial biotechnology
- Growth depends very much on the development of green biotechnology
- Green and industrial biotechnology often combine to an integrated value chain
Industry Trends - Barriers
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
13 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Contents
Research Methodology 2
Conclusion and Outlook 4
Goals and Objectives 1
Research Results 3
Industry Trends 3.1
Market Structure 3.2
Market Players 3.3
Business Models 3.4
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
14 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
25,3%
31,0%
22,5%
21,2%
Base chemicals Specialty chemicals
Consumer chemicals Active pharma ingredients
59,2%22,4%
14,5%
3,9%
Base chemicals Specialty chemicals
Consumer chemicals Active pharma ingredients
Market Structure - Sales per Segment
Sales of products made by biotechnological processes in 2007 was around 48 billion Euro = 3,5% of total chemical sales
Chemical sales per segment 2007
100% = 1,383 billion Euro
Biotech sales1) per segment 2007
100% = 48 billion Euro
1,5% of base
chemicals
4,8% of
specialty
chemicals 5,4% of
consumer
chemicals
18,7% of
active pharma
ingredients
1) Sales of chemical products made by biotechnological processes and not chemical processes
Source: CEFIC Facts & Figures January 2009, FESTEL CAPITAL database
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
15 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
Ano
rgan
ics
Fertilis
ers
& g
ases
Org
anic c
hem
ical
s
Pol
ymer
s & fibre
s
Agr
ochem
ical
s
Adh
esives
& s
ealants
Pai
nts
& c
oatin
gs
Food a
dditive
s
Oth
er spec
ialty
che
micals
Det
ergen
ts
Cos
met
ics
Act
ive
phar
ma in
gred
ient
s
Europe (EU-27) North America (NAFTA) Asia (incl. China and Japan) Rest of the World
The most important sub-segments in 2007 were active pharma ingredients and cosmetics
Biotech sales per sub-segment 2007
100% = 48 billion Euro
Market Structure - sales per Sub-segent
Source: FESTEL CAPITAL database
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
16 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
30,0%
24,3%
35,9%
9,8%
Europe (EU-27) North America (NAFTA)
Asia (incl. China and Japan) Rest of the World
There is no significant difference in the regional split of chemical sales and biotech sales
29,5%
22,2%
37,9%
10,4%
Europe (EU-27) North America (NAFTA)
Asia (incl. China and Japan) Rest of the World
Biotech sales1) per region 2007
100% = 48 billion Euro
Chemical sales per region 2007
100% = 1,383 billion Euro
1) Sales of chemical products made by biotechnological processes and not chemical processes
Source: CEFIC Facts & Figures January 2009, FESTEL CAPITAL database
Market Structure - Sales per Region
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
17 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Contents
Research Methodology 2
Conclusion and Outlook 4
Goals and Objectives 1
Research Results 3
Industry Trends 3.1
Market Structure 3.2
Market Players 3.3
Business Models 3.4
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
18 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Dedicated
start-ups
Importance of industrial
biotech-nology
High
Low
Small Large Company
Size
Company types and examples
Dedicated
SMEs
Diversified
MNEs
Dedicated
MNEs
Diversified
SMEs
Dedicated multi-
nationals
Diversified
SMEs
Dedicated
start-ups
Dedicated
SMEs
CSM/Purac
Lesaffre
Novozymes
Döhler
Siegfried
Südzucker
Autodisplay Biotech
Evocatal
Fluxome Sciences
AB Enzymes
Brain
Codexis
Iogen
Stern Enzym
Examples Company type
Diversified
multinationals
BASF
Danisco
DSM
There are different company types active in the industrial biotechnology area
Market Players - Company Types
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
19 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Dedicated
start-ups
Commercial develop-
ment
Very important
Less important
Less important
Very important
Technological development
Dedicated
SMEs
Diversified
MNEs
Dedicated
MNEs
Diversified
SMEs
Especially dedicated companies are important for the further development of industrial biotechnology
Market Players - Further Development
Further development of industrial biotechnology
• Dedicated and diversified MNEs
are by far the most important
groups in terms of biotech sales
and R&D budgets
• Dedicated and diversified SMEs
are driving especially the
commercial development
• The commercial development is
also driven by dedicated MNEs
• Dedicated start ups are
contributing significantly to the
further technological
development
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
20 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Dedicated and diversified MNEs are by far the most important groups in terms of biotech sales and R&D budgets
Dedicated MNEs
• Companies mainly active in the area of natural products (e.g. CSM/Purac, Lesaffre) and
also sub-type of high-tech oriented companies (e.g. Novozymes)
• Industrial biotechnology is one cornerstone in their technology portfolio
• They are increasingly moving towards more sophisticated products and processes
• They will significantly drive the technological and commercial development of industrial
biotechnology
Diversified MNEs
• Mainly established companies from the chemical industry (e.g. BASF, DSM), agro industry
(e.g. ADM, Cargill) or food industry (e.g. Danisco)
• Broad and integrated technology portfolio which is complemented by industrial biotech
processes
• Competition between industrial biotechnology and traditional technologies compared to
other company types which slows down development
Market Players - MNEs
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
21 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Dedicated and diversified SMEs are driving especially the commercial development of industrial biotechnology
Dedicated SMEs
• Focused on building up own production facilities and selling their products (e.g. Brain and
Codexis)
• Core for the further technological and commercial development of an independent
industrial biotechnology sector
Diversified SMEs
• Mainly located in established industrial sectors like the chemical or food industry (e.g.
Döhler and Siegfried)
• Introducing step by step biotechnology processes and products into their markets
• Especially drive the commercial development of industrial biotechnology
Market Players - SMEs
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
22 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Dedicated start ups are contributing significantly to the further technological development of industrial biotechnology
Dedicated start ups
• Start-up companies focused on industrial biotechnology which are mainly driven by R&D
(e.g. Evocatal, Fluxome Sciences)
• Development and commercialisation of special technologies and their applications
• Also targeted red biotechnology, but with increase in maturity of companies (e.g. Direvo
Industrial Biotechnology, Eucodis Bioscience) the businesses are separated
• Expected to contribute significantly to the further technological development of industrial
biotechnology
Market Players - Start ups
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
23 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Contents
Research Methodology 2
Conclusion and Outlook 4
Goals and Objectives 1
Research Results 3
Industry Trends 3.1
Market Structure 3.2
Market Players 3.3
Business Models 3.4
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
24 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Established business models within industrial biotechnology focus on production and service
Producers
• Realised mainly by diversified SMEs as well as dedicated and diversified MNEs
• Develop own technologies or buy/license them and focus on production including the
whole supply chain from raw materials to distribution
• Most service oriented dedicated SMEs are currently in the phase of going into this
business model as it offers more growth options
• High capital requirements to build-up own production facilities are a disadvantage
Service providers
• Mostly dedicated start-ups and some dedicated SMEs offering their particular know-how
predominantly as services to support other companies
• Normally realise primarily organic growth and are profitable, but have sub-critical
structures with regard to size and financial strength (unable to realise growth opportunities
due to a lack of financial resources)
• IP normally belongs to the customer and growth or value creation potential through
development and commercialisation of own IP is very limited
Business Models - Established
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
25 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
IP oriented business models are emerging besides the established business models
Emerging business models
• Emerging business models include the IP creator and the integrated process developer
• Focus on the development of own IP and licensing business
• Development of own portfolios of technologies and products which are sold or out-licensed
Business Models - Emerging
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
26 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
R&D co-opera-
tions
Joint ventures Internal
R&D
M&A
Tech-nologies
New
Estab-lished
Estab-lished
New Markets
M&A
Joint
ventures
Internal
R&D
R&D co-
operations
Acquisition of or merger with
another company to create a
single new entity
Formation of a new company
where parent companies
have ownership and
contribute complementary
assets, technologies, people
or other capabilities
Own R&D with primarily
internal resources
R&D together with external
partners (other companies,
universities and R&D
institutes)
Description Strategy
Growth strategies for industrial biotech companies
Companies have four different potential growth strategies to move from a service-oriented to an IP-oriented business model
Business Models - Growth Strategies
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
27 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Contents
Research Methodology 2
Conclusion and Outlook 4
Goals and Objectives 1
Research Results 3
Industry Trends 3.1
Market Structure 3.2
Market Players 3.3
Business Models 3.4
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
28 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Sector Outlook Major trends
Base Chemicals
and intermediates
• Stronger use of renewable raw materials due to cost reasons
• Cost advantages of biotech processes due to the stricter regulatory
environment
Specialty
Chemicals
• Strong growth in industrial enzymes for more and more applications
• Increasing advantages of enzymatic processes especially in the food,
cosmetic, textile and leather industries due to customer requirements
Polymers
• Stronger use of renewable raw materials due to cost reasons
• Access to polymers with new properties (e.g. biodegradability)
• Increasing regulatory pressure to realise sustainable solutions (e.g. for
packaging applications)
Fine Chemicals
• Growing importance of chiral active pharmaceutical ingredients
• Cost reductions through simplified synthesis paths (especially if
molecules are complex)
• Only through biotechnological processes accessible products
Biofuels
• Increasing advantage due to rising oil prices and climate change
• Significant progress in production technologies with increasing cost
competitiveness without subsidies
The largest market potential lies in the production of fine chemicals for the pharma and agro industry, biopolymers and biofuels
Conclusion and Outlook - Markets
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
29 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
There are three groups of industrial companies which can be targeted by policy makers with different approaches
• Dedicated start-ups and SMEs: Provide incentives to foster growth based on R&D based
innovations
• Diversified SMEs: Provide incentives to enable the usage of biotech technologies in
established production processes
• Dedicated and diversified MNEs: Provide incentives to support market introduction and
penetration of biotech products
Conclusion and Outlook - Players
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
30 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Production/sales figures
Clear and consistent structure necessary
Structure of FC database (modified CEFIC structure) as starting point
• Production and sales figures for 2007,
2012 and 2017
- Per segment/sub-segment
- Per region/country
• Rough data are available from FC
Availability of relevant data
Company types
• Structure of the industrial biotech
companies
- Size
- Growth
- Business model
• Currently no consistent data available
Suitable key indicators could be production/sales figures differentiated for the different company types as key indicators
Conclusion and Outlook - Relevant Data
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
31 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
The issue list regarding the need for further research and the definition of next steps can help to improve the paper
Conclusion and Outlook - Issue List
Need for further research
• Better understanding of the development of production technologies in the different
sectors, segments and sub-segments
• Better understanding of the specific impact of raw material supply and prices
Definition of next steps
• Agree on data structure (production and sales figures, description of industrial biotech
companies) to enable an OECD wide comparison
• Agree on data collection and processing process
• Agree on suitable key indicators to get relevant information for policy makers
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
33 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
More than 150 industrial biotechnology companies were analysed through desk research, interviews or open discussions with FESTEL CAPITAL (1/2)
Research Methodology - Interviews
Abbreviations: Dr = Desk research, Si = Standardised interview, Od = Open discussion
Company Dr Si Od Company Dr Si Od Company Dr Si Od
AB Enzymes x x Ciba SC x x x Lonza x x x
Abitep x Clariant x x LS9 x
AC Biotec x x c-LEcta x x Lybradyn x
Aglycon Mycoton x CMC Biopharmaceuticals x Lyven x
AlgMax x x Codexis x x m2p-labs x
Alligator Bioscience x Cognis x x x Maxygen x
Alvito Biotechnologie x CSM Biochemicals x Meiji x
Amino x Direvo Industrial Biotech x x Merck x x x
Amyris Biotechnologies x Diversa x Metabolix x
AnalytiCon Discovery x Döhler x Molekulare Biotechnologie x
AnBio x Dow Chemical x xMunich Innovative
Biomaterials x
Angel Biotechnology x Dr. Petry Genmedics x MykoMax x
Animox x x Dr. Rieks x Nadicom x
Anoxymer x DSM x x x Nexia Biotechnologies x
Arrayon Biotechnology x DSM Biotech x x Nexyte x
Artechno x DuPont x x Nordzucker x x x
Artes Biotechnology x x x E.gene Biotech x Novacta x x
ASA Spezialenzmye x x EKB Technologies x Novamont x x
ATG Biosynthetics x x Enzis x x Novozymes x x
Autodisplay Biotech x x EnzyScreen x N-Zyme Biotec x
BASF x x ESBATech x OrganoBalance x
Bayer x x x Essum x Pacovis x x
BayGenetics x x Eucodis x x Panolin x x
BBT Biotech x EuroFerm x Petroplast Vinora x x
Beiersdorf x x Evocatal x x Pfeifer & Langen x x
Beldem x Evonik Degussa x x x Phenion x
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
34 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Company Dr Si Od Company Dr Si Od Company Dr Si Od
Biocatalysts x FermenSys x Plantic x x
Bioconsens x Galactic x x PomBioTech x
Biolac x Ganomycin x Procter & Gamble x x
Biomay x Gevo x x Prokaria x x
Biomer x x Green Biologics x Protéus x
Biométhodes x Greenovation Biotech x x Rheinchemie x x x
Biomeva x Gyre x Roche Diagnostics x x
Bionova x HöFer Bioreact x Roquette x x
Bioreact x HPC Biotec x Schill & Seilacher x x
Bioressources Worlwide x Hycail x xScientific Research and
Developmentx x
Biospring x x x IEP x x Senomyx x
Biosynergy x IFB Halle x Sourcon-Padena x
Biotec x x Industrial Biotechnology x Stern Enzym x x
BIOTex x Ingenza x Subitec x x
Biovet x Innovia Films x x Süd-Chemie x x x
Biovian x Inosim x Südzucker x x x
Bioworx x Insilico x x Total x x
Biozym x Invigate x Trenzyme x
Bitop x Iogen x x Treofan x x
BlueBioTech x Jülich Chiral Solutions xW42 Industrial
Biotechnologyx
Brain x x x Jülich Enzyme Products x x Wacker Chemie x x
BTR Laboratories x Jülich Fine Chemicals x x Wentus x x
Butalco x x Kerry Bio Science x Weyl Chem x
Celanese x x x Lehmann & Voss x x X2 Biotechnologies x
Cerestar x x Lesaffre x x X-Zyme x x
ChiPro x Libragen x Zymeworks x
More than 150 industrial biotechnology companies were analysed through desk research, interviews or open discussions with FESTEL CAPITAL (2/2)
Research Methodology - Interviews
Abbreviations: Dr = Desk research, Si = Standardised interview, Od = Open discussion
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
35 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
FESTEL CAPITAL
market studies FESTEL CAPITAL database
Market data updated regularly
based on ongoing discussions with
key market players
• Desk research (company
information, external market
studies, press clippings)
• Interviews with industrial
companies, research institutions
and investors
• Excel calculation model based on
available information with specific
adjustments
• Biotech production
technologies (November
2003)
• Financing strategies
(April 2005)
• Renewable raw
materials (July 2005)
• Biofuel production
technologies (October
2006)
• Financing and
investment trends
(February 2009)
Already existing data of FESTEL CAPITAL and additional desk research were used for data gathering
Research Methodology - Market Studies
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
36 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
The combination of “technology push” and “market pull” along the value chain is necessary
Yeast genetics
and synthetic
biology =
"Technology
Push"
Rising oil
prices and de-
creasing security
of supply =
"Market
Pull"
1 The biofuel producer identifies new fermentation technologies and develops the fermentation
technology together with a biotechnology company
2 The biofuel producer develops together with a engineering / plant construction company the plants a
technical scale processes
3 The engineering / plant construction company develops together with specialised downstream
processing company a biofuel purification process
4 The downstream processing company develops with the biotechnology company the combined
fermentation / purification process
Step 2
Cellulose
Hydrolysis
Step 1
Feedstock
Supply
Step 4
Biofuel
Purification
Step 5
Engineering/
Construction
Step 3
Biofuel
Fermentation
Step 6
Biofuel
Production
1 2 3 4 5 6
5 The biotechnology company develops with the hydrolysate supplier the hydrolysis process
6 The hydrolysate supplier organises the feedstock supply
Industry Trends - Barriers
Innovation Innovation
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
37 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
24,9%
28,0%24,0%
23,0%
Base chemicals Specialty chemicals
Consumer chemicals Active pharma ingredients
55,3%
23,7%
15,8%
5,3%
Base chemicals Specialty chemicals
Consumer chemicals Active pharma ingredients
Market Structure - Biotech Sales 2012
Sales of products made by biotechnological processes in 2012 will be around 135 billion Euro = 7,7% of total chemical sales
Chemical sales per segment 2012
100% = 1,748 billion Euro
Biotech sales1) per segment 2012
100% = 135 billion Euro
3,5% of base
chemicals
9,1% of
specialty
chemicals
11,7% of
consumer
chemicals
33,7% of
active pharma
ingredients
1) Sales of chemical products made by biotechnological processes and not chemical processes
Source: CEFIC Facts & Figures January 2009, FESTEL CAPITAL database
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
38 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
Ano
rgan
ics
Fertilis
ers
& g
ases
Org
anic c
hem
ical
s
Pol
ymer
s & fibre
s
Agr
ochem
ical
s
Adh
esives
& s
ealants
Pai
nts
& c
oatin
gs
Food a
dditive
s
Oth
er spec
ialty
che
micals
Det
ergen
ts
Cos
met
ics
Act
ive
phar
ma in
gred
ient
s
Europe (EU-27) North America (NAFTA) Asia (incl. China and Japan) Rest of the World
The most important sub-segments in 2012 will be active pharma ingredients and cosmetics
Biotech sales per sub-segment 2012
100% = 135 billion Euro
Market Structure - Biotech Sales 2012
Source: FESTEL CAPITAL database
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
39 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
33,3%
21,4%
24,8%
20,5%
Base chemicals Specialty chemicals
Consumer chemicals Active pharma ingredients
51,3%
25,0%
17,1%
6,6%
Base chemicals Specialty chemicals
Consumer chemicals Active pharma ingredients
Sales of products made by biotechnological processes in 2017 will be around 340 billion Euro = 15,4% of total chemical sales
Chemical sales per segment 2017
100% = 2,212 billion Euro
Biotech sales1) per segment 2017
100% = 340 billion Euro
10,0% of base
chemicals
13,1% of
specialty
chemicals 22,3% of
consumer
chemicals
47,9% of
active pharma
ingredients
1) Sales of chemical products made by biotechnological processes and not chemical processes
Source: CEFIC Facts & Figures January 2009, FESTEL CAPITAL database
Market Structure - Biotech Sales 2017
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
40 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
30,0
Ano
rgan
ics
Fertilis
ers
& g
ases
Org
anic c
hem
ical
s
Pol
ymer
s & fibre
s
Agr
ochem
ical
s
Adh
esives
& s
ealants
Pai
nts
& c
oatin
gs
Food a
dditive
s
Oth
er spec
ialty
che
micals
Det
ergen
ts
Cos
met
ics
Act
ive
phar
ma in
gred
ient
s
Europe (EU-27) North America (NAFTA) Asia (incl. China and Japan) Rest of the World
The most important sub-segments in 2017 will be active pharma ingredients and polymers & fibres
Biotech sales per sub-segment 2017
100% = 340 billion Euro
Market Structure - Biotech Sales 2017
Source: FESTEL CAPITAL database
FESTELCreating a Better
Future
APITALC
41 © 2010 FESTEL CAPITAL www.festel.com
Strategy Advantages Disadvantages
• Enables the development of own IP
• Start-up decides on R&D projects
• Increased flexibility on project choice and research goals
• Cost and capital intensive
• High project risk
• Limited research capacities prevent a fast reaction
concerning new projects
• Lack of networks that provide new ideas with regard to
the research
• Increases number of possible technologies available for
R&D projects
• Additional resources and synergies
• Splitting the risk of the project
• Rarely receive considerable volume of IP developed in
the project (often the case with academic partners)
• Need for a strong project management
• Limited possibility of development of own IP
• Enables growth in a new business area
• Additional resources (e.g. assets, technologies)
• Synergies of complementary technologies and know-
how
• Loss of control in the company
• Loss of flexibility in the decision making process
• Enables use of synergies
• Enables expansion into new markets / international
markets
• Enables acquisition of IP and technologies
Internal R&D
R&D co-operation
Joint Venture
M&A
• The time involved for negotiations and contract
development is high
• An inflexible co-operation model, where the search for
the appropriate partner is critical
The different growth strategies have specific advantages and disadvantages from an entrepreneurial view
Business Models - Growth Strategies