ap42 chapter 1 reference - us epa...moisture lbs/hr lbs/mmbtu lbs/hr lbs/mmbtu 'f % 1 63300 157...
TRANSCRIPT
AP-42 Section Number: 1.8
Reference Number: 29
Title: Source Test Report for Particulate Emissions Twin Impingement Wet Scrubber Boiler Number 4: Talisman Sugar Corporation
December 1991
I I
- -
SOURCE TEST REPORT
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
TWIN IMPINGEMENT WET SCRUBBER
for
BOILER NUMBER 4
TALISMAN SUGAR CORPORATION SOUTH BAY, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 9. 1991
Prepared for:
KLEEMAN ENGINEERING 4300 NW 44TH STREET
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33319
Prepared by:
AIR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING, INC. 2106 N.W. 67TH PLACE. SUITE 4 . .. GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA-32606
(9041 335-1889
287-91 -09
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
1 .o INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1
2 . 0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ............................. 2
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION ............................. 4
4 . O SAMPLING POINT LOCATION ....................................... 5
5 . 0 FIELD AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ............................... 7 5 . 1 PARTICULATE MATTER SAMPLING 6 ANALYSIS--EPA METHOD S . . . . ...... 7
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A--COMPLETE EMISSION DATA A N D SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX 8--FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX C--LABORATORY A N A L Y S I S
APPENDIX D--PRODUCTION RATE CERTIFICATION
APPENDIX E--QUALITY ASSURANCE A N D CHAIN OF CUSTODY
APPENDIX F--PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
i
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE - PAGE
1 EMISSION SUMMARY ..................................... 3
LIST OF FIGURES
FIG- - PAGE
I SAMPLING POINT LOCATION--BOILERS 3 AND 4 ............. 6
2 EPA METHOD 5 SAMPLING TRAIN .......................... 8
ii
n G a r 7 I n r
AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
2106 N. W. 67th Place - Suite 4 Gainesville, Florida - 32606 (904) 335-1889 FAX (904) 335-1891
REPORT CERTIFICATION
To the best of my knowledge, all applicable field and analytical
wocedures comply with Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
equirements and all test data and plant operating data are true and correct.
iii
I 1.0 INTRODUCTION
On December 9, 1991, Air Consulting and Engineering, Inc. (ACE), conducted
particulate emission testing on the Wet Scrubber Outlet of Boiler 4 a t
Talisman Sugar Corporation located in South Bay, Florida.
Testing was performed to demonstrate compliance with the current Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) operating permit.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 5 was utilized for
the emission testing.
Mr. Kleeman of Kleeman Engineering, Inc. coordinated testing and provided
production data.
1 I
I
I 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
,
Boiler Number 4 demonstrated compliance with the permit conditions.
Table 1 is a summary of the emission results and flue gas parameters.
Particulate emissions averaged 59.53 pounds per hour (Ibs/Hr) and 0.262 pounds
per million BTU (Ibs/MMBTU) which is within the allowable emissions of 68.22
Ibs/Hr and 0.300 Ibs/MMBTU.
Complete emission summaries, field data sheets and laboratory data are
presented in Appendices A, B, and C, respectively.
Production rate summaries are provided in Appendix D. This data was obtained
from control room recordings of steam flow, temperature, and pressure as well
as feed water temperature and pressure. Residue integrator and oil meter
readings were recorded at the beginning and end of each particulate run.
I
L
I Table 1 Emission Summary Boiler Number 4 Talisman Sugar Corporation South Bay, Florida December 9. 1991
Run Flow Rate Stack Stack Particulate Emissions Allowable Emissions Number SCFMD Temp. Moisture lbs/Hr lbs/MMBTU lbs/Hr lbs/MMBTU
'F %
1 63300 157 29.4 60.88 0.265 68.94 0.300
2 59677 159 31.6 57.38 0.253 68.01 0.300
3 61312 160 31.6 60.33 0.267 67.71 0.300
AVERAGE 61430 159 30.9 59.53 0.262 68-22 0.300
3
I 3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
The Number 4 Boiler at Talisman Sugar Corporation is a traveling grate stoker
design used primarily for bagasse fuel firing. Supplemental oil firing may
also be utilized but was not used during the emission test series.
The Boiler averaged 114,950 pounds per hour (IbslHr) steam production over the
test run period.
Oil meters, steam integrators, and other production monitoring devices were
rigorously calibrated prior to the production season.
I
I 4.0 SAMPLING POINT LOCATION
The sampling point location and outlet duct schematic are provided in
Figure 1.
5
63' -
0
T 129"
1- -[
248.
-63' - ..
0
UPSREAM DISTURBANCE
'RAVERSE POINT INCHESINSIM NUMBER m c K W A U
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
e 9
I O
I I 12
1.3
4.2
7.4
11.2
15.8
22.4
4Q6
413
51.8
55.6
56.8
6 1.7
NOTE: NOT TO SCALE
AIR CONSULTING and
ENGINEERING
FlSURE 1. 9AWPLIN6 POINT LOCATION BOILER NQ4 TALISMAN SWAR CORPORATION SOUTH BAY, FLORIDA I
I 6
5.0 FIELD AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
5.1 Particulate Matter Sampling and Analysis-EPA Method 5 (Glass Probe) I Particulate matter samples were collected by the particulate matter emission
measurement method specified by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency. A schematic diagram of the sampling train used is shown in Figure 2.
All particulate matter captured from the nozzle to, and including, the filter
was included in the calculation of the emission rate of particulate matter.
PREPARATION OF EQUIPMENT
1 . FILTERS - Gelman type "A" filters were placed in a dr ing
a standard desiccator containing indicating silica gel, allowed to cool for t w o hours, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg. The filters were then re-desiccated for a minimum of six hours and weighed to a constant weight (less than 0.5 mg change from previous weighing). The average of the two constant weights was used as the tare weight.
NOZZLE, FILTER HOLDER, AND SAMPLING PROBE - The nozzle, filter holder, and sampling probe were washed vigorously with soapy water and brushes, rinsed with distilled water and acetone, and dried prior to the test program. All openings on the sampling equipment were sealed while in transit to the test site.
IMPINGERS - The Greenburg-Smith impingers were cleaned with a warm soapy water solution and brushes, rinsed with distilled water and acetone, and dried. The impingers were sealed tightly during transit.
oven for two hours at 105 degrees C, removed and p Y aced in
2.
3.
TEST PROCEDURE
Prior to performing the actual particulate matter sample runs, certain stack
and stack gas parameters were measured. These preliminary measurements
“w c
t
a
I included the average gas temperature, the stack gas velocity head, the stack
gas moisture content, and the stack dimensions at the point where the tests
were being performed. The stack gas temperature was determined by using a
bi-metallic thermocouple and calibrated pyrometer. Velocity head measurements
were made with calibrated type "S" pitot tube and an inclined manometer.
Velocity head measurements of 0.05 inches H20 or less were measured utilizing
a micromanometer.
The sampling traverse points were selected so that a representative sample
could be extracted from the gas stream. The traverse points were located in
the center of equal areas, the number of which were dependent upon the
distance upstream and downstream from f low disturbances.
Each particulate matter test run consisted of sampling for a specific amount
of time at each traverse point. The type "S" pitot tube was connected to the
sampling probe so that an instantaneous velocity head measurement could be
made at each traverse point while making the test run. The stack gas
temperature was also measured a t each traverse point. Nomographs were used to
calculate the isokinetic sampling rate at each traverse point during each test
run.
The gases sampled passed through the following components: a stainless steel
, nozzle and glass probe; a glass fiber filter; t w o impingers each with 100 ml
9
I of distilled deionized water; one impinger dry; one impinger with 200 grams of
silica gel; a flexible sample line; an air-tight pump; a dry test meter; and a
calibrated orifice. The second impinger had a standard tip, while the first,
third, and fourth impingers had modified tips with a 0.5 inch I.D. opening..
Sample recovery was accomplished by the following procedures:
1. The pre-tared filter was removed from its holder and placed in Container 1 and sealed. (This is usually performed in the lab.)
2. All sample-exposed surfaces prior to the filter were washed with acetone and placed in Container 2, sealed and the liquid level marked.
3. The volume of water from the first three impin ers was measured
then discarded.
4. The used silica gel from the fourth impinger was transferred to the original tared container and sealed.
for the purpose of calculating the moisture in t ii e stack gas and
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
The three sample containers from each sample run were analyzed according to
the following procedures:
1. The filter was dried a t 105 degrees C for three hours, desiccated for a minimum of one hour, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg. A minimum of two such weighings six hours apart was made to determine constant weight.
2. The acetone from Container 2 was transferred to a tared beaker and evaporated to dryness a t ambient temperature and pressure, desiccated for 24 hours, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg. A minimum of two such weighings six hours apart were 'made to determine constant weight.
3. The used silica gel in its tared container was weighed to the nearest 0.1 gram.
10
The total sample weight included the weight of material collected on the
filter plus the weight of material collected in the nozzle, sampling probe,
and front half of the filter holder.
DATA
The field data sheets, calculation sheets, and nomenclature definitions are
included in the appendices of this report.
11
APPENDIX A COMPLETE EMISSION DATA
AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . ~ - . - ,.. - ........ - - - . ..... . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. c: .... ~ - = , ~ , - . . . - . . . . . . . .(.. . .._, i .............. - . . .
- :.,, - .... :7;.: : .......... - , . ,> - , - ' . -.,,, ,,. ,- ...... 4.- - , . , __ ,
.. - ................ - ..... . . . ._ , ! .I.. :.. : I. . . i- I p!,-', . . : i '-
.... - ...... - / :-, , -.-: : . ii . . . . . . . . . .
. _ i _-:
, ._ i :.;
; _ ; :
1 ,- , -- I _
. . . . . . . .
: r -, .. :- ?'.! i. 1, i - - . .. _ . . . , . , , ... I .. - ....
. . .2 2. > -. . . , - I ., . .....
- . , , ..... . - . . .+. . . . . . .... . . . _ i ./ ........ .... .:.:;!., . , ? / ,. .- I .-., ~
. . I .i
. .. ... .. ..... ....... .... , . - - , , .......... .: .. i 3 ...
... .. -',5!> _. . . . . .. ,. , - , ..
. ....... . _ . . , . .. ..... , _ . i i _ / - . . .
. _ _ i .z :
.. . ... . - -. ..... .... . -. . . , . . - .. . ,- ... _ _ .... .. - . _ _ ..... . . _. . ..... .... . - .i .- .. . . _ _ I _ , , ., . ._ - :- ... . -. . - _ , ._.I_
: .- .... ._ . , ....
.- : I ., .- -. .- -.:- ... ... .- .- .. ... - .- .. _ _ .. _. .. .. - . .- .. . . . . . , ..
... . . i - _~ . . . . - _. . i .: -.
. . . . . . . . - . - . . . . . - . . . -~ . . . ..i. .- ......... ........ - - . . . , . ,,- . . . . . . .
.. i. ._, : . - .... . . . I r I i
. ,_ . , : ,:. !_?
.... , ,:. .... . i ..... .... . . .- . .- -I. . . . . . ..... .... - ... ... E ; ' ( . I.. - ... - . ::: .- ..... . . . . . . . - .. , , ~ . . I
,._ : . - ~, .,- i . . - .- .-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. .., . - . . . . . . . . . . ,,,.. , . . . .,_ . i.._ ....... . . ~ ... ..... - .. - .... ............. I :..L,:'::- ... : : 1 =. .... :. z .. i: .: I,+ : .-.
. .
. .
. ,. .,,- - -_ -____ - - - - -
. - . .- , : -
. . . . ......... . .
. . I . ' . :c; .. -, . : , - i i
: , L - .
:", ;-7,i
... 7 :. .: . -.. . . . . . - i . .. ........ ...
l i . . . --. .......
. . ........ - , i
_. . . . : i t
..... . . , . . ..I. . _ - _ . -.
.$ .... ... .. .. Li ; -. ~ ..... ..
.. -, .. ..
. ~. . ._.: ...... ... : . , . , .i .: ... . ~ , . i i . . . ~ . . . . . . . . .-. . . . -, ........ . .
I/ , , .-- - .. . . . _. . ... . . . - .... i
. . L E ; _..
. ., . -.-,. .- .- . ....
. -.. 4 . i i
,. :. -: ..... . -.-_.
. - . . . j . .<.; I
- . , ! > ! j
- ..:, ~ . . i
... ... r:.. ..... ... ..... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ,.:; . . .- ... -.. . ..i . .. ..... - - I I ...... . . . , . ...... . . . .... . - .
........ . - . -- . . ...... .... .'-. , n ,". < ,
. _ _ .. . - . . i.i.
_ _ . +.y:.: .... . ,. - . 3 ; . ..,
. -.. . _ I .... .....
. - . -. . _ _ I - .
..... . . , - -. .. . . -:- ..... . . _ / . _ _ .... . - ,. . -.r I
. _ _ / - /
... ,-. . . . .. . _ - -. _ -
.. ... : .<. _ _ . ., .- .. .- ...
. . . . . . . . . I . i,_..,:; . . . . . . . ,-_
:!,> .. ~ ...... . . . . . - ._ . . . . . ::.. -.:, .,... . _- . . . . . . . . .........
r; , - '. _I ..... ..-.: . . . . .- _ _ :.::
........ . _ . . . . . . . .
-. ,. - . . .,
- . k.:.:..:
- . . , . ...
... 4 . ,, . - , ... - ... - .. ,
. . . . . . - , . . . .
- 1 ,
. . . . _ . . , . . ...
. -. . - - . .- ~
, ,.-- : ,- - : i , . _ . I L !>
. -.-. .....
. .- - - _ . , i . .~ .. - .
. - .-
... . . ... .. i
. . . . ,
. - ~ . . - .. - ,
: - . .,_I
...
. . . - . , . . ... .. . .
.... I _ I , .....
. . . . . . ..... . . .
. . . . I - ; : . . . . . . . . . .
.. r -
... ... :.i.; 1: ... ;:z-,: :,,: .... ~ .... ..... . . . - ... :
: / , . ,
........ .
, I ..
... .... :., :7.:?
..< , .':.::. I.
i.! , .2i..-
., . .i , - j .: , ......... . . . . . - . - . , : .
. _ _ . . . . : . ~ I , . . -. ... ....... . . . . . .
I ! . !
. . . . - . . , . ....
:+, , . . . . ....
_ _ . .A.-i: .... - -. , .......
. . . . . . . . . - - . . . . . . ...,.- ... . .. . . . . . . . . .
... -., , ....
... . . . -.. , I .- .
. . . , -., * . - .,
. .- ,
, -, .....
. . .
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA SHEETS
N
I
u)
oa. a
J a 3 I- o a
.._
...
J
W W z a a
L L 1
!
0 I
I Ili?
I- u)
0
a a
.*.
_._
0 m
N
. ..
I
...
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
I
>
m m 4 W W In
APPENDIX D
PRODUCTION RATE CERTIFICATION
P R O C E S S DATA INSTALLATION 133 i L E I Z FFY
.\ NORMAL RUN 1
SCRUBBER WATER FLOW ( G P M ) J 230 1100 / R O O l A O D
P R E S S U R E DROP ( I N C H E S ) IX t A . 0 I % . / 1 1 r 9
/-
R E P O R T E D BY f- fCfi I\/ IC K L E e M P Id
I
BOILER DATA S H E E T
_ L . . . . . . I I I _-..-
.............. __ ........ . . . . .. ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ___ I _ _ I ._ -.
I I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ii 7. K: :5*.=:7 , : ;::i:. . . i . - : ,, _ .
... .......... : - . =. ..'...'.?...i..- . - - - .......... ..... .__ . '-'.e;?*
. . . . . . . ~. . . . . .
. - - .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .... - - : ii
~
- . , ,. . , ,. .. t .c;<r:. - . . . . . . . - . . :- . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-. 2:t . . , . . . - .. -. . .
. . . . ,..
. . . . . . .- - _ _ . . _ . ... - - . . ... ..............
. . . . : ~ . , - . - I . .
. . . . . . .,, , I ..
..... _ _ . - ,-;--'ir.- . _ _ I
. . .- - .- . . . .
............... . . _ ; - ........ _ _ ..
. . . . . - . . - , . , , : - .... .. , ._L. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . _ : . . . ....... - . . . .
. . . ...... , , ,. . :*:i.-, . : :_
,. .i . . :.:/ ....... , ? / _
......... ii I_. ..... , .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._. . . . ,
......... ...
...... - -. . . . ..... ... _. - -.. . , .. . . . - .... . , , . _. i . i. ....
. . . . . . . .I. ,._ - .- . . _ . ~ .
E:OI LER OFERAT I O N FARAIIETERE:
I N I T 1 A L INTEGRATOR
: T I M E I O I L FEEDWFITER
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .,_ .. : . . > . . . . . . . . (.- . . . . ..,!. .....
:. ,,, , .~~ . _i.. = = I - : i j j
. ... ..... ... .... ..,,_ ,.- ..-. .__ ... i.:.... ..
I
. . . . . . . . . . , . , .i . . - , . , , . . . -.:.. . . . . . . . . , -- . . . . . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . * , , , ~ . .... . . . . . . . . . . -_ . . . . . . . . . . . ., , . , . . - . _. , .- , - v .................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ._ . . . . . . . I ,. , : , A ~ . . , , , - I ....
. .
. ,.,
. . . . . . . . . ,~ :> i . ,--- .-, . . . . . --- .., ..... . . . . . . . . . . . -, /, . I . / :, : : ,? :: c,, ......... .i. .
.. i : . , . . . .
E:OI LER OPERATT01\1 PARAMETER:::
APPENDIX E
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
STANDAXD YETER CALIBRATION Meter Kumber 1040616
Air Consulting and Engineering. Inc. (ACE1 uses a dry qas meter for the calibration standard. This meter has been calibrated against a wet test meter in triplicate. This data was used to generate a standard meter calibration curve (see next page). Field meter calibrations are corrected to this curve using the following formula:
Ya x Ys = Y
Ya = actual ratio of field meter to standard mezer
Ys = ratio of standard meter to wet test neter az a given flow rate (from Calibration Curve)
Y = corrected ratio of field meter
The dry standard meter was calibrated on June 11. 1991. and is checked and/or recalibrated at least annually.
I
a c - d.
P 4 g In In W C e
C + W
u
5 C 4 m
c:. 1 0
W m 2 2 - -1
U W In
C Y I- W
Q-
I
In In -1 W a
U W c : v) 4 W 0 I- u)
c c c
Lci m oc u . . . m c c c
r m m m ~ m m m
. --. . c c c
w m m m m a. % m m m . . . c 3 c
m o m Z N - - ( I u u u U . . . v l ccc
-
e U
Y - E n 2 5
E 2
U
- - 5 J 3 > n a 3
- U w c z 0
0 z I- VI
W z 3 -I 0 5
VI 4 0
a a
a
-
-
P I LT c -
r-> c c m In G C c 7 - e - r c c c. c c. c. . .
W P * w m w
> m m m . . . 000
o o m r n o o m r o o m . . .
o... Cnooo
W r - U l m m m w r m m m . . . 000
g . . . W r l r l r l P
0 W
W m m 0
0 0 0
r )
W W m 0
W 01 4)
.-I
..
c
4 -
3- 6
3
0
2-
4 , d
- F
0 w I-
m
a a m a 2 0
D 4
I ! i
e'
& rk
\
0 W Q
E a a 0 m (3 z z W 0. 0 w
-
m a I- I- 0 I- - n
a W 0.
\rl I w W d >
-I
3 2 W m m
W
3 I- I- 0 I-
a m
- n !?
0 W D:
a
z a m a
a w
z I-
U
-I
0 m s
I I I
I . I
I I I I
1 E
t
Prcw temoaraiurss.
I I I
I I
1 I I I
~~
41R CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING, Inc. I S A M P L E RECOVERY A N D CHAIN O F CUSTODY
R U N NO.
3
S A M P L E RECOVERY
COMMENTS CONTAINER LIQUID LEVEL COLOR NO. MARKED
Drc. r +YJ - 3927
c s L ? i L L
WATER BLANK 5- CiW I R C L E )
FILTER BLANK
SILICA GEL RUN NO. CONTAINER FINAL WT I N I T WT. N E T WT. COLOR
NO. (P 1 (g ) ( g )
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
APPENDIX F
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
I I I I I I I I I.
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
AIR CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING, INC.
Stephen L. Neck, P.E. Project Manager
Early McFarland Field Participant
Gerard Gauthreaux Field Participant
Christy Neck Laboratory Analysis
Dagrnar Neck Report Preparation
Candace V. Taylor Document Production
KLEEMAN ENGINEERING
Frank Kleernan Coordinator
TALISMAN SUGAR CORPORATION
Angelo Archbold Test Coordinator
FDER Ken Tucker
Test Observer
Sherrel Culifer Test Observer