“opening the pathways to engineering” that looks like america · g all other 5.1% 4.5% 90.4% g...
TRANSCRIPT
C4
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc.
NACME, Inc.440 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 302White Plains, NY 10601-1813
tel 914/539-4010fax 914/539-4032
www.NACME. o rg /05
NACME, a charitable, not-for-profit corporation, welcomes your tax-deductible contribution.Visit www.NACME.org/contribute to support our work today.
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc.
A graduating class of engineers and an engineering workforce
that looks like America
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 0 5
“Opening the Pathways to Engineering”
1
This past year has been a truly significant one for NACME. Not only have we been able to fulfill the promise
made at our 30th Anniversary Gala to increase the number of scholarships awarded by over 40 percent, we
have added 12 new universities to the list of academic partners who work with us to increase the representation
of underrepresented minority students in engineering. Our 2005 Annual Report presents a picture of an organization
committed to a vision of the future: “an engineering workforce that looks like America.”
Our goal is simple. We strive to increase the number of students whose educations we help support so that more
of those who have been historically underserved and underrepresented will study engineering and become active
participants in our nation’s technological workforce. But we know that cannot be done unless there is a dramatic
increase in the number of young people, especially minorities, who graduate from high school motivated and
prepared to do so. When that is accomplished, we will have met our goal and the nation will produce “an engi-
neering graduating class that looks like America.”
To that end, NACME has invested a considerable portion of the past year developing a pre-engineering studies
strategy. We believe that we can play an important leadership role in conveying to middle and high school students
the excitement and opportunities present in an engineering career. We need to help them—and their parents—
become knowledgeable about the field of engineering and the academic requirements to enter its study.
Importantly, we need to make them fully aware that there are organizations like NACME, and supporters like
our donors, who are prepared to help them succeed.
We are thankful for the continued strong encouragement and financial assistance we have received from those
individuals, corporations, and foundations that, through their support, have expressed their commitment to the
vision expressed above. We trust that you will see depicted in the pages of this annual report the image of an
organization focused on its mission, dedicated to the purposes it extols, and true to its beliefs. We look forward
to the future with enthusiasm.
Thank you for being such an important part of NACME.
A JOINT MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN & THE PRESIDENT
John Brooks Slaughter, Ph.D.President & CEONACME, Inc.
Michael L. King , Ph.D.Chairman, NACME, Inc.Senior Vice President,Science and TechnologyMerck & Co., Inc.
CONTENTS
1 Chairman/President Letter2 Pre-engineering Studies4 Scholarships6 Research and Policy8 Financial Statements
10 Donors12 Partner Institutions13 Board, Officers, Staff,
Research Council
A PROFILE OF NACME
O U R M I S S I O N
To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of
successful African American, American Indian and Latino women and men in engineering
and technology, math- and science-based careers.
O U R V I S I O N
An engineering workforce that looks like America.
O U R G O A L
Working with our partners to produce an engineering graduating class that looks like America.
O U R P U R P O S E
Our goal is diversity with equity; our metric is parity in the workforce; and our methodology is the
formation of partnerships with those corporations, educational institutions, foundations, nonprofit
agencies and governmental bodies that share a commitment to these aims.
O U R B E L I E F S
We believe in the concept of the “learning organization,” a community in which each member
is encouraged and assisted to grow and develop. We believe that we must work not only to
continuously improve our skills and capabilities for performing our individual responsibilities
increasingly well, but also to strive to be cooperative and effective team members who are
committed collectively to the fulfillment of NACME’s mission and purposes.
1
This past year has been a truly significant one for NACME. Not only have we been able to fulfill the promise
made at our 30th Anniversary Gala to increase the number of scholarships awarded by over 40 percent, we
have added 12 new universities to the list of academic partners who work with us to increase the representation
of underrepresented minority students in engineering. Our 2005 Annual Report presents a picture of an organization
committed to a vision of the future: “an engineering workforce that looks like America.”
Our goal is simple. We strive to increase the number of students whose educations we help support so that more
of those who have been historically underserved and underrepresented will study engineering and become active
participants in our nation’s technological workforce. But we know that cannot be done unless there is a dramatic
increase in the number of young people, especially minorities, who graduate from high school motivated and
prepared to do so. When that is accomplished, we will have met our goal and the nation will produce “an engi-
neering graduating class that looks like America.”
To that end, NACME has invested a considerable portion of the past year developing a pre-engineering studies
strategy. We believe that we can play an important leadership role in conveying to middle and high school students
the excitement and opportunities present in an engineering career. We need to help them—and their parents—
become knowledgeable about the field of engineering and the academic requirements to enter its study.
Importantly, we need to make them fully aware that there are organizations like NACME, and supporters like
our donors, who are prepared to help them succeed.
We are thankful for the continued strong encouragement and financial assistance we have received from those
individuals, corporations, and foundations that, through their support, have expressed their commitment to the
vision expressed above. We trust that you will see depicted in the pages of this annual report the image of an
organization focused on its mission, dedicated to the purposes it extols, and true to its beliefs. We look forward
to the future with enthusiasm.
Thank you for being such an important part of NACME.
A JOINT MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN & THE PRESIDENT
John Brooks Slaughter, Ph.D.President & CEONACME, Inc.
Michael L. King , Ph.D.Chairman, NACME, Inc.Senior Vice President,Science and TechnologyMerck & Co., Inc.
CONTENTS
1 Chairman/President Letter2 Pre-engineering Studies4 Scholarships6 Research and Policy8 Financial Statements
10 Donors12 Partner Institutions13 Board, Officers, Staff,
Research Council
A PROFILE OF NACME
O U R M I S S I O N
To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of
successful African American, American Indian and Latino women and men in engineering
and technology, math- and science-based careers.
O U R V I S I O N
An engineering workforce that looks like America.
O U R G O A L
Working with our partners to produce an engineering graduating class that looks like America.
O U R P U R P O S E
Our goal is diversity with equity; our metric is parity in the workforce; and our methodology is the
formation of partnerships with those corporations, educational institutions, foundations, nonprofit
agencies and governmental bodies that share a commitment to these aims.
O U R B E L I E F S
We believe in the concept of the “learning organization,” a community in which each member
is encouraged and assisted to grow and develop. We believe that we must work not only to
continuously improve our skills and capabilities for performing our individual responsibilities
increasingly well, but also to strive to be cooperative and effective team members who are
committed collectively to the fulfillment of NACME’s mission and purposes.
32
n the fall of 2004, NACME, with the support and
involvement of our board, initiated a strategic planning
process to examine ways in which we could enhance
our efforts to increase the participation of minority
students in engineering. The resulting strategy called
for a new emphasis on secondary school education,
specifically one directed toward support of the Science,
Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) curricula.
We also recognize the lack of programs to support and
encourage students at two-year institutions to pursue
engineering studies in four-year institutions.
We were struck by the realization that only four percent of
minority high school graduates have completed the
mathematics and sciences courses that are prerequi-
sites for engineering study (see charts on page 3).
Furthermore, few of them have been made aware of
the excitement and opportunities that the field of engi-
neering presents.
Therefore, we have embarked upon a pre-engineering
studies effort designed to introduce secondary school
students to engineering and technology, and encourage
them to take the courses that will prepare them to be
able to study engineering upon their graduation from high
school. In this way, NACME can support those strategic
initiatives designed to increase the number of college-
ready minority aspirants for engineering study who will
be available to benefit from our core activity, scholarships.
In our quest to find the best fit for our organization in the
realm of secondary school STEM education, we engaged
in a number of activities. In October 2004, we convened
a roundtable meeting of representatives from prominent
academic institutions, foundations, corporations and
regional school districts. We reached out to high schools
having engineering as a positive, powerful theme through-
out the curriculum and met with officials of major city
school systems and non-profit organizations.
Community colleges also represent a significant source
of eligible students for baccalaureate engineering pro-
grams. NACME met with leaders of two- and four-year
institutions to understand the barriers minority students
face in continuing their education in pursuit of a degree
in engineering.
We are committed to developing and implementing a
comprehensive pre-engineering studies program
focused on increasing the number of minorities on the
pathways to engineering.
PRE-ENGINEERING STUDIES: A YEAR OF PLANNING
Only four percent of minority high school
graduates have completed the prerequisite math
and science courses for engineering study. To
produce a college engineering graduating class
that looks like America, we must dramatically
improve this number.
Comparison of URMs* and Non-URMs in the Engineering Pipeline
URMs Non-URMs
Public school students in 1998 33.2% 66.8%
Engineering freshmen in Fall 1999 15.6% 84.4%
*URMs= Underrepresented minorities Source: NCES and EWC
While underrepresented minority students number one third of the highschool population, only four percent are sufficiently educated to applyfor entry to engineering programs. Consequently, they are dramaticallyunderrepresented in our college engineering programs.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000690,000
4% of Graduates
59% of Eligible
28,300 16,800
MinorityHigh SchoolGraduates
EngineeringEligible
EngineeringAdmits
The Undertapped Minority Pool
Approximately 690,000 minority students graduated from high school in2002. Only 28,300 (4%) were considered “engineering eligible” based oncourses taken and grades. Of these, 16,800 (59%) enrolled as freshmenin engineering schools, out of 107,000 total admissions.
Source: CPST, data derived from NCES and EWC, 2002
g African American
g Latino
g All Other
5.1%
4.5%
90.4%
gg African American
gg Latino
gg All Other
5.1%4.5%
90.4%
Composition of the EngineeringWorkforce, 2004
Source: CPST, data derived from CPS, BLS
While the actual percentage of underrepresented minorities inthe U.S. population is 27% the number of underrepresentedminority engineers in the workforce is less than 10%.
I
32
n the fall of 2004, NACME, with the support and
involvement of our board, initiated a strategic planning
process to examine ways in which we could enhance
our efforts to increase the participation of minority
students in engineering. The resulting strategy called
for a new emphasis on secondary school education,
specifically one directed toward support of the Science,
Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) curricula.
We also recognize the lack of programs to support and
encourage students at two-year institutions to pursue
engineering studies in four-year institutions.
We were struck by the realization that only four percent of
minority high school graduates have completed the
mathematics and sciences courses that are prerequi-
sites for engineering study (see charts on page 3).
Furthermore, few of them have been made aware of
the excitement and opportunities that the field of engi-
neering presents.
Therefore, we have embarked upon a pre-engineering
studies effort designed to introduce secondary school
students to engineering and technology, and encourage
them to take the courses that will prepare them to be
able to study engineering upon their graduation from high
school. In this way, NACME can support those strategic
initiatives designed to increase the number of college-
ready minority aspirants for engineering study who will
be available to benefit from our core activity, scholarships.
In our quest to find the best fit for our organization in the
realm of secondary school STEM education, we engaged
in a number of activities. In October 2004, we convened
a roundtable meeting of representatives from prominent
academic institutions, foundations, corporations and
regional school districts. We reached out to high schools
having engineering as a positive, powerful theme through-
out the curriculum and met with officials of major city
school systems and non-profit organizations.
Community colleges also represent a significant source
of eligible students for baccalaureate engineering pro-
grams. NACME met with leaders of two- and four-year
institutions to understand the barriers minority students
face in continuing their education in pursuit of a degree
in engineering.
We are committed to developing and implementing a
comprehensive pre-engineering studies program
focused on increasing the number of minorities on the
pathways to engineering.
PRE-ENGINEERING STUDIES: A YEAR OF PLANNING
Only four percent of minority high school
graduates have completed the prerequisite math
and science courses for engineering study. To
produce a college engineering graduating class
that looks like America, we must dramatically
improve this number.
Comparison of URMs* and Non-URMs in the Engineering Pipeline
URMs Non-URMs
Public school students in 1998 33.2% 66.8%
Engineering freshmen in Fall 1999 15.6% 84.4%
*URMs= Underrepresented minorities Source: NCES and EWC
While underrepresented minority students number one third of the highschool population, only four percent are sufficiently educated to applyfor entry to engineering programs. Consequently, they are dramaticallyunderrepresented in our college engineering programs.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000690,000
4% of Graduates
59% of Eligible
28,300 16,800
MinorityHigh SchoolGraduates
EngineeringEligible
EngineeringAdmits
The Undertapped Minority Pool
Approximately 690,000 minority students graduated from high school in2002. Only 28,300 (4%) were considered “engineering eligible” based oncourses taken and grades. Of these, 16,800 (59%) enrolled as freshmenin engineering schools, out of 107,000 total admissions.
Source: CPST, data derived from NCES and EWC, 2002
g African American
g Latino
g All Other
5.1%
4.5%
90.4%
gg African American
gg Latino
gg All Other
5.1%4.5%
90.4%
Composition of the EngineeringWorkforce, 2004
Source: CPST, data derived from CPS, BLS
While the actual percentage of underrepresented minorities inthe U.S. population is 27% the number of underrepresentedminority engineers in the workforce is less than 10%.
I
54
ince it was founded, NACME has refined its
strategy for partnering with students, universities
and corporations. We know that the most effec-
tive strategies include more than just financial aid;
they require that students be given a comprehensive
range of support, including the opportunity to have
internships, practical research experiences, leadership
training and mentoring.
We know that of all the barriers to minority retention,
lack of financial resources is the most significant. The
cost of higher education grows annually in double digits;
federal aid is unable to keep pace; reductions have
occurred in state support and, as a result, student loans
have increased dramatically. Now, more than ever
before, NACME scholarships help make the difference.
In this fiscal year, NACME increased by 41% the number
of underrepresented minority engineering scholars
supported, to 746. We added 9 academic institutions
to our partnership family, now totaling 34 well-respected
colleges and universities spread across our great nation.
Our scholarship programs are focused on schools that
have demonstrated the ability and commitment to retain
all students, particularly minority students, to graduation.
These partnerships — which represent approximately
30% of all engineering degrees awarded in America —
and the sharing of best practices are centered on
improving the retention rate of minority students in
all schools of engineering throughout the country.
This academic year marks the completion of the first
phase of our growth strategy. Our long-term goal is to
double NACME scholars supported annually to 1,600
and grow the number of partner schools to 54 by 2009.
Comprehensive scholarship programs such as ours have
proven to deliver a measurable return on investment
in the form of student retention and improved academic
performance. NACME scholars achieved a graduation
rate of 80 percent — more than double the national
average of 39 percent for minorities, and substantially
above the national average of 62 percent for all stu-
dents. The average NACME Scholar GPA is an
impressive 3.2. (See chart on facing page for complete
NACME Scholar profile, including statistics on discipline,
ethnicity and sex).
Our partners are building supportive environments to
prepare engineering students for the workforce. In the
past 12 months, we convened two conferences attended
by over 100 representatives from 30 universities to
share experiences and best practices for pre-college
outreach, student recruitment and retention.
We developed and launched a new Internet-based
network to help increase our value to our students and
corporate partners. Our NACME Scholar Online Resume
Directory is an easy-to-use tool connecting corporate
recruiting managers and students for rapid response to
opportunities for internships, co-op assignments or full-
time positions. Corporate sponsors attended user
training sessions and were enthusiastic about the ease
of identifying students for work experience opportunities.
Our scholarship programs are designed to produce
graduates who increasingly “look like America.” We are
proud of the achievements of the NACME Scholars of
the past, and look forward to the contributions of a new
generation of underrepresented minority engineers.
The importance of the NACME scholarship programs
cannot be overstated in the face of the dramatic changes
in the global economy and our nation’s need to maintain
its technological leadership in the 21st century.
265
171
115195
SCHOLARSHIPS: OUR CORE MISSION
NORTHEAST
SOUTHEAST
MIDWEST
WEST
g African American g Latino
g American Indian g Other
49%
3%
44%
4%
NACME Scholars by Region, 2004-2005
NACME Scholars by Ethnicity — 2005In the past 31 years, NACME has provided more
than $75 million for scholarship programs,
and has supported more than 20,000 African
Americans, American Indians and Latinos in
the pursuit of careers in engineering.
NACME Scholars by Discipline 2005 vs. 2004
Major 2005 2004 ChangeElectrical Engineering 147 98 50%
Mechanical Engineering 146 97 51%
Computer Engineering 73 58 26%
Civil/Environmental Engineering 69 39 77%
Chemical Engineering 65 54 20%
Computer Science 51 44 16%
Biomedical/Bio Engineering 40 26 54%
IE/OR 30 23 30%
Engineering Science 30 13 131%
Information Systems/Technology 11 15 -27%
Other 84 61 38%
Totals 746 528 41% 36% of NACME Scholars are female
NACME is proud to provide management support for the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Minority Ph.D. Program
and the American Indian Graduate Program directed by Dr. Ted Greenwood. The Sloan Foundation is a leader in
the effort to increase the number of minority students pursuing doctoral degrees in engineering, mathematics
and the natural sciences. Now entering its 10th year, this innovative program currently supports more than 400
students, and can point to over 100 scholars who have earned their Ph.D.
S
54
ince it was founded, NACME has refined its
strategy for partnering with students, universities
and corporations. We know that the most effec-
tive strategies include more than just financial aid;
they require that students be given a comprehensive
range of support, including the opportunity to have
internships, practical research experiences, leadership
training and mentoring.
We know that of all the barriers to minority retention,
lack of financial resources is the most significant. The
cost of higher education grows annually in double digits;
federal aid is unable to keep pace; reductions have
occurred in state support and, as a result, student loans
have increased dramatically. Now, more than ever
before, NACME scholarships help make the difference.
In this fiscal year, NACME increased by 41% the number
of underrepresented minority engineering scholars
supported, to 746. We added 9 academic institutions
to our partnership family, now totaling 34 well-respected
colleges and universities spread across our great nation.
Our scholarship programs are focused on schools that
have demonstrated the ability and commitment to retain
all students, particularly minority students, to graduation.
These partnerships — which represent approximately
30% of all engineering degrees awarded in America —
and the sharing of best practices are centered on
improving the retention rate of minority students in
all schools of engineering throughout the country.
This academic year marks the completion of the first
phase of our growth strategy. Our long-term goal is to
double NACME scholars supported annually to 1,600
and grow the number of partner schools to 54 by 2009.
Comprehensive scholarship programs such as ours have
proven to deliver a measurable return on investment
in the form of student retention and improved academic
performance. NACME scholars achieved a graduation
rate of 80 percent — more than double the national
average of 39 percent for minorities, and substantially
above the national average of 62 percent for all stu-
dents. The average NACME Scholar GPA is an
impressive 3.2. (See chart on facing page for complete
NACME Scholar profile, including statistics on discipline,
ethnicity and sex).
Our partners are building supportive environments to
prepare engineering students for the workforce. In the
past 12 months, we convened two conferences attended
by over 100 representatives from 30 universities to
share experiences and best practices for pre-college
outreach, student recruitment and retention.
We developed and launched a new Internet-based
network to help increase our value to our students and
corporate partners. Our NACME Scholar Online Resume
Directory is an easy-to-use tool connecting corporate
recruiting managers and students for rapid response to
opportunities for internships, co-op assignments or full-
time positions. Corporate sponsors attended user
training sessions and were enthusiastic about the ease
of identifying students for work experience opportunities.
Our scholarship programs are designed to produce
graduates who increasingly “look like America.” We are
proud of the achievements of the NACME Scholars of
the past, and look forward to the contributions of a new
generation of underrepresented minority engineers.
The importance of the NACME scholarship programs
cannot be overstated in the face of the dramatic changes
in the global economy and our nation’s need to maintain
its technological leadership in the 21st century.
265
171
115195
SCHOLARSHIPS: OUR CORE MISSION
NORTHEAST
SOUTHEAST
MIDWEST
WEST
g African American g Latino
g American Indian g Other
49%
3%
44%
4%
NACME Scholars by Region, 2004-2005
NACME Scholars by Ethnicity — 2005In the past 31 years, NACME has provided more
than $75 million for scholarship programs,
and has supported more than 20,000 African
Americans, American Indians and Latinos in
the pursuit of careers in engineering.
NACME Scholars by Discipline 2005 vs. 2004
Major 2005 2004 ChangeElectrical Engineering 147 98 50%
Mechanical Engineering 146 97 51%
Computer Engineering 73 58 26%
Civil/Environmental Engineering 69 39 77%
Chemical Engineering 65 54 20%
Computer Science 51 44 16%
Biomedical/Bio Engineering 40 26 54%
IE/OR 30 23 30%
Engineering Science 30 13 131%
Information Systems/Technology 11 15 -27%
Other 84 61 38%
Totals 746 528 41% 36% of NACME Scholars are female
NACME is proud to provide management support for the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Minority Ph.D. Program
and the American Indian Graduate Program directed by Dr. Ted Greenwood. The Sloan Foundation is a leader in
the effort to increase the number of minority students pursuing doctoral degrees in engineering, mathematics
and the natural sciences. Now entering its 10th year, this innovative program currently supports more than 400
students, and can point to over 100 scholars who have earned their Ph.D.
S
73/74 78/79 83/84 88/89 93/94 99/00 04/05
0
20
40
60
80
%100
ACADEMIC YEAR
PE
RC
EN
T O
F A
LL
FR
ES
HM
EN
4.4 %16.3 % 15.3 %
URM National PopulationRepresentation: (2003)
27%
Non-URMs
URMs
76
• After the Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger
cases, NACME joined with the American Association
for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) to produce
the report, “Standing Our Ground: A Guidebook for
STEM Educators in the Post-Michigan Era.” NACME
bases its academic institutional support on this
document, which provided guidance to university
administrators for complying with the U.S. Supreme
Court’s decisions on those important affirmative
action cases.
• NACME will develop and implement programs in the
pre-engineering arena to increase the number of
minority students graduating from high school who
are eligible to enroll in a four-year engineering pro-
gram. The Council will evaluate the outcomes and
provide recommendations for improvement.
The NACME Research and Policy Program will continue
to be a major factor in shaping strategy and driving
change in the effort to increase minority representation
in engineering.
eveloped as the foundation for the organiza-
tion’s strategic directions and programs,
NACME research and policy studies remain
the principal source of information and analysis on
trends in minority engineering enrollment, retention,
graduation and other key indicators. The results of our
work have been used by industry, government and
academic institutions to understand and set policy to
address the underlying issues of underrepresented
minorities in engineering.
Over the years, NACME has provided briefings and
testimony to the President's Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology, the President’s Office of
Science and Technology Policy, Congress, and the
National Science Foundation, to name a few. NACME
has also filed briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court in
support of legal issues central to our mission.
The mission of the NACME Research and Policy Program
is to identify and articulate national issues, and drive
program development, scholarship strategies, commu-
nications and public policy initiatives. NACME’s research
supports many companies and other organizations
around the nation striving to understand the underlying
issues of underrepresented minorities in engineering,
and looking for measurable results from the programs
they fund.
NACME identified a need to have a broader and more
in-depth view of the trends that impact minorities seeking
careers in engineering and technology, and extend our
influence in policy-setting. NACME sought researchers
with experience and expertise in secondary school, under-
graduate and graduate education, and the engineering
workforce. These professionals now comprise the newly
formed NACME Research and Policy Advisory Council
(see list of members on page 13).
Currently three activities of the Council stand out:
• Launched in 1995, the NACME Vanguard Program is
a cooperative effort between NACME and selected
academic institutions to increase the number of minority
students graduating with engineering baccalaureate
degrees. The program was designed around intense
academic immersion and leadership training to cultur-
ally diverse cohorts of students. It provides full tuition,
which almost totally eliminates the need for student
loans or part-time jobs. The Council is evaluating the
results achieved by each university, with the goal of
identifying best practices.
NACME’s Research and Policy initiatives
are essential for shaping our programs and
activities to address the many issues affecting
the representation of African Americans,
American Indians and Latinos in the U.S.
engineering profession.
RESEARCH AND POLICY: A SOLID FOUNDATION
72/73 77/78 82/83 87/88 92/93 97/98 02/03
0
20
40
60
80
% 100
g Non-URMs
g URMs
ACADEMIC YEAR
PE
RC
EN
T O
F A
LL
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G G
RA
DU
AT
ES
2.9% 10.4% 9.9%
URM National PopulationRepresentation: (2003)
27%
Freshman Enrollment in Engineering: URMs* vs. NON-URMs
Engineering Bachelor’s Degrees:URMs* vs. NON-URMs
The progress made in increasing underrepresented minority enrollment in engineering is morethan offset by the lower retention rate of underrepresented minorities (39%), when compared tothat of all students (63%).
Scholarship programs such as NACME’s have significantly improved the numbers of underrepresentedminorities entering engineering. However, the United States still falls far short of the ultimate goal ofproportional minority representation, which in 2003 stood at 27%.
*URMs=Underrepresented minorities Source: Engineering Workforce Commission, U.S. Census Bureau figures*URMs=Underrepresented minorities Source: CPST, data derived from EWC, U.S. Census Bureau figures
D
73/74 78/79 83/84 88/89 93/94 99/00 04/05
0
20
40
60
80
%100
ACADEMIC YEAR
PE
RC
EN
T O
F A
LL
FR
ES
HM
EN
4.4 %16.3 % 15.3 %
URM National PopulationRepresentation: (2003)
27%
Non-URMs
URMs
76
• After the Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger
cases, NACME joined with the American Association
for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) to produce
the report, “Standing Our Ground: A Guidebook for
STEM Educators in the Post-Michigan Era.” NACME
bases its academic institutional support on this
document, which provided guidance to university
administrators for complying with the U.S. Supreme
Court’s decisions on those important affirmative
action cases.
• NACME will develop and implement programs in the
pre-engineering arena to increase the number of
minority students graduating from high school who
are eligible to enroll in a four-year engineering pro-
gram. The Council will evaluate the outcomes and
provide recommendations for improvement.
The NACME Research and Policy Program will continue
to be a major factor in shaping strategy and driving
change in the effort to increase minority representation
in engineering.
eveloped as the foundation for the organiza-
tion’s strategic directions and programs,
NACME research and policy studies remain
the principal source of information and analysis on
trends in minority engineering enrollment, retention,
graduation and other key indicators. The results of our
work have been used by industry, government and
academic institutions to understand and set policy to
address the underlying issues of underrepresented
minorities in engineering.
Over the years, NACME has provided briefings and
testimony to the President's Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology, the President’s Office of
Science and Technology Policy, Congress, and the
National Science Foundation, to name a few. NACME
has also filed briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court in
support of legal issues central to our mission.
The mission of the NACME Research and Policy Program
is to identify and articulate national issues, and drive
program development, scholarship strategies, commu-
nications and public policy initiatives. NACME’s research
supports many companies and other organizations
around the nation striving to understand the underlying
issues of underrepresented minorities in engineering,
and looking for measurable results from the programs
they fund.
NACME identified a need to have a broader and more
in-depth view of the trends that impact minorities seeking
careers in engineering and technology, and extend our
influence in policy-setting. NACME sought researchers
with experience and expertise in secondary school, under-
graduate and graduate education, and the engineering
workforce. These professionals now comprise the newly
formed NACME Research and Policy Advisory Council
(see list of members on page 13).
Currently three activities of the Council stand out:
• Launched in 1995, the NACME Vanguard Program is
a cooperative effort between NACME and selected
academic institutions to increase the number of minority
students graduating with engineering baccalaureate
degrees. The program was designed around intense
academic immersion and leadership training to cultur-
ally diverse cohorts of students. It provides full tuition,
which almost totally eliminates the need for student
loans or part-time jobs. The Council is evaluating the
results achieved by each university, with the goal of
identifying best practices.
NACME’s Research and Policy initiatives
are essential for shaping our programs and
activities to address the many issues affecting
the representation of African Americans,
American Indians and Latinos in the U.S.
engineering profession.
RESEARCH AND POLICY: A SOLID FOUNDATION
72/73 77/78 82/83 87/88 92/93 97/98 02/03
0
20
40
60
80
% 100
g Non-URMs
g URMs
ACADEMIC YEAR
PE
RC
EN
T O
F A
LL
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G G
RA
DU
AT
ES
2.9% 10.4% 9.9%
URM National PopulationRepresentation: (2003)
27%
Freshman Enrollment in Engineering: URMs* vs. NON-URMs
Engineering Bachelor’s Degrees:URMs* vs. NON-URMs
The progress made in increasing underrepresented minority enrollment in engineering is morethan offset by the lower retention rate of underrepresented minorities (39%), when compared tothat of all students (63%).
Scholarship programs such as NACME’s have significantly improved the numbers of underrepresentedminorities entering engineering. However, the United States still falls far short of the ultimate goal ofproportional minority representation, which in 2003 stood at 27%.
*URMs=Underrepresented minorities Source: Engineering Workforce Commission, U.S. Census Bureau figures*URMs=Underrepresented minorities Source: CPST, data derived from EWC, U.S. Census Bureau figures
D
98
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
2005 2004
PUBLIC SUPPORT AND REVENUE:
Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,984,507 $3,606,656
Contributions in-kind . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,778,891 $3,583,869
Government grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,985 564,719
Interest and dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372,209 371,655
30th Anniversary Dinner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 1,644,620
Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,448 50,599
Total Public Support and Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,227,040 $ 9,822,118
EXPENSES:
Program Services:
Scholarship programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,153,535 $5,200,952
Education programs and training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,655 100,817
Information dissemination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416,902 332,748
Research and policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308,373 456,476
Total Program Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,035,466 $6,090,993
Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910,865 679,627
Management and general . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 722,617 1,081,493
30th Anniversary Dinner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 684,327
Total Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,668,948 $8,536,439
Excess (deficiency) of operating public support and revenue over expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 558,092 $ 1,285,679
Other Income (Expenses):
Gain (Loss) on investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 868,122 $ 172,099
Total Other Income (Expenses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 868,122 $ 172,099
Change in Net Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,426,214 $ 1,457,778
Net Assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,349,141 $4,891,363
Net Assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,775,355 $ 6,349,141
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
2005 2004
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,605,310 $ 1,049,411
Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,097,332 12,049,912
Pledges receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,091,075 1,164,147
Interest and other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,747) 0
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,005 0
Long-term Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,035,728 1,002,574
Leasehold improvements, office furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266,215 356,574
Security deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,038 48,038
Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,312 24,126
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,169,268 $15,694,782
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS:
Liabilities:
Sloan Foundation—program fund advance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,681,411 $ 8,616,080
Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,816 43,942
Tenant deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,312 24,126
Deferrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501,257 526,945
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,117 134,548
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,393,913 $ 9,345,641
Net Assets:
Unrestricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,968,990 $ 2,628,906
Temporarily restricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,916,754 2,852,209
Permanently restricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889,611 868,026
Total Net Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,775,355 $ 6,349,141
Total Liabilities and Net Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,169,268 $15,694,782
For the year ended August 31, 2005 (with comparative data for 2004) NACME, Inc. (not-for-profit corporation) For the year ended August 31, 2005 (with comparative data for 2004) NACME, Inc. (not-for-profit corporation)
These financial statements are a condensed version of the audited statements of the National Action Council for Minorities inEngineering, Inc. for the year ending August 31, 2005. NACME will be pleased to provide complete copies along with all foot-notes and the unqualified report of our auditors, upon request.
You may obtain a copy of the latest annual report filed with the N.Y. State Board of Social Welfare by writing to the Secretary,State of New York, 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231, Attention: Charitable Registration Division.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
MANAG E M E NT ’S STATE M E NT O F F I NAN C IAL R ES P O N S I B I L I T Y
The management takes full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the NACME financial statements, presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our corporate governance polices and practices include the following:• A majority of our Board is comprised of independent directors.• Only independent directors are members of our Executive, Governance, Development and Finance Committees.• The Executive, Governance, Development and Finance Committees make appropriate use of charters that clearly detail each
Committee’s responsibilities.• The Finance Committee retains the independent auditors and regularly reviews the financial condition of the company.
The independent auditor has free access to the Finance Committee.We are committed to providing financial information that is transparent, timely, complete, relevant and accurate.
Dr. John Brooks SlaughterPresident and CEO
John C. EppolitoVice President of Administration and CFO
98
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
2005 2004
PUBLIC SUPPORT AND REVENUE:
Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,984,507 $3,606,656
Contributions in-kind . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,778,891 $3,583,869
Government grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,985 564,719
Interest and dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372,209 371,655
30th Anniversary Dinner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 1,644,620
Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,448 50,599
Total Public Support and Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,227,040 $ 9,822,118
EXPENSES:
Program Services:
Scholarship programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,153,535 $5,200,952
Education programs and training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,655 100,817
Information dissemination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416,902 332,748
Research and policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308,373 456,476
Total Program Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,035,466 $6,090,993
Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910,865 679,627
Management and general . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 722,617 1,081,493
30th Anniversary Dinner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 684,327
Total Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,668,948 $8,536,439
Excess (deficiency) of operating public support and revenue over expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 558,092 $ 1,285,679
Other Income (Expenses):
Gain (Loss) on investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 868,122 $ 172,099
Total Other Income (Expenses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 868,122 $ 172,099
Change in Net Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,426,214 $ 1,457,778
Net Assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,349,141 $4,891,363
Net Assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,775,355 $ 6,349,141
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
2005 2004
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,605,310 $ 1,049,411
Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,097,332 12,049,912
Pledges receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,091,075 1,164,147
Interest and other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,747) 0
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,005 0
Long-term Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,035,728 1,002,574
Leasehold improvements, office furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266,215 356,574
Security deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,038 48,038
Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,312 24,126
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,169,268 $15,694,782
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS:
Liabilities:
Sloan Foundation—program fund advance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,681,411 $ 8,616,080
Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,816 43,942
Tenant deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,312 24,126
Deferrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501,257 526,945
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,117 134,548
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,393,913 $ 9,345,641
Net Assets:
Unrestricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,968,990 $ 2,628,906
Temporarily restricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,916,754 2,852,209
Permanently restricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889,611 868,026
Total Net Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,775,355 $ 6,349,141
Total Liabilities and Net Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,169,268 $15,694,782
For the year ended August 31, 2005 (with comparative data for 2004) NACME, Inc. (not-for-profit corporation) For the year ended August 31, 2005 (with comparative data for 2004) NACME, Inc. (not-for-profit corporation)
These financial statements are a condensed version of the audited statements of the National Action Council for Minorities inEngineering, Inc. for the year ending August 31, 2005. NACME will be pleased to provide complete copies along with all foot-notes and the unqualified report of our auditors, upon request.
You may obtain a copy of the latest annual report filed with the N.Y. State Board of Social Welfare by writing to the Secretary,State of New York, 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231, Attention: Charitable Registration Division.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
M ANAG E M E NT ’S STATE M E NT O F F I NAN C IAL R ES P O N S I B I L I T Y
The management takes full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the NACME financial statements, presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our corporate governance polices and practices include the following:• A majority of our Board is comprised of independent directors.• Only independent directors are members of our Executive, Governance, Development and Finance Committees.• The Executive, Governance, Development and Finance Committees make appropriate use of charters that clearly detail each
Committee’s responsibilities.• The Finance Committee retains the independent auditors and regularly reviews the financial condition of the company.
The independent auditor has free access to the Finance Committee.We are committed to providing financial information that is transparent, timely, complete, relevant and accurate.
Dr. John Brooks SlaughterPresident and CEO
John C. EppolitoVice President of Administration and CFO
1110
I NST I TUT IONAL DONORS
$500,000 and overDrexel University
$200,000 to $499,999AT&T Foundation
ExxonMobil Corporation
General Electric Company
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Polytechnic University
Rochester Institute of Technology
$100,000 to $199,9993M
Amgen Foundation, Inc.
Booz Allen Hamilton
BP America
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The City College of the City University of New York
Clarkson University
The Dow Chemical Company
General Motors Corporation
Howard University
IBM Corporation
The LisaBeth Foundation
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Northrop Grumman Foundation
Raytheon Company
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
$50,000 to $99,999Agilent Technologies
Alcoa Foundation
The Barkley Fund
Bechtel Corporation
The Boeing Company
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Chevron Corporation
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
DaimlerChrysler Corporation Fund
Deloitte & Touche LLP
DuPont Company
Eastman Kodak Company
Ford Motor Company
Georgia Institute of Technology
Intel Corporation
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
Merck & Co., Inc.
North Carolina A&T State University
Pitney Bowes, Inc.
The Pitney Bowes Literacy and Education Fund, Inc.
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Shell Oil Company Foundation
Sony Electronics Inc.
The Starr Foundation
Toyota
University of Colorado at Boulder
Xerox Corporation
$25,000 to $49,999The Ahmanson Foundation
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Celestica Corporation
Cravath, Swaine & Moore
International Paper Company Fund
Michigan Technological University
Microsoft Corporation
PACCAR Foundation
Science Applications International Corporation
Siemens Corporation
Texas A&M University
University of Akron
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
University of Missouri-Rolla
$10,000 to $24,999ADC Telecommunications
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Bucknell University
Fluor Corporation
Genentech, Inc.
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
The Guidant Foundation
Kansas State University
KeySpan Energy
Los Alamos National Laboratory
OPTIMUS Corporation
PPG Industries Foundation
SBC Foundation
Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation
Symantec Corporation
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
University of Bridgeport
The University of Texas at San Antonio
University of Washington
The UPS Foundation
Virginia Polytechnic University
$5,000 to $9,999Amerada Hess Corporation
American Bureau of Shipping
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
Automatic Data Processing Foundation
Bayer Corporation
Caterpillar Foundation
DirectTV
Dominion Resources, Inc.
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Hertz Corporation
Public Service Electric & Gas Company
Sonalysts
Tennessee Technological University
The University of Texas at El Paso
$1,000 to $4,999Bose Corporation
Candela Corporation
Ceridian Corporation
Consumers Union
Degraw & Associates, P.A.
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Harris Corporation
John Deere Corporation
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kenyon & Kenyon
Mine Safety Appliance Company
Mitretek Systems
Nordson Corporation
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
Temple University
Universal Instruments Corporation
University of California, San Diego
WGBH Educational Foundation
I N D I V I DUAL D ONORS
Founders' Circle ($10,000 and over)Arnold A. Allemang
William P. Dee
James M. Jamieson
Michael L. King
Estate of Mildred Willenbrock
Chairman's Circle ($5,000 to $9,999)Nicholas M. Donofrio
Alvin T. Keith
Harry Longwell
Richard M. Morrow
Lloyd G. Trotter
Benefactor ($2,500 to $4,999)Andrew G. Inglis
James Mahan
Charles E. Redman
J. Stephen Simon
John Brooks Slaughter
Edward S. Taft
William M. Zeitler
Patron ($1,000 to $2,499)Ronald R. Belschner
John E. Bethancourt
Robin Bienfait
Kevin Burke
G. Wayne Clough
John C. Eppolito
Charles L. Gregory
Mary J. Hellyar
Frank Ianna
Willie C. Martin
Michael P. Morley
Deborah L. Morrissett
Hector Motroni
Joseph A. Patt
Tom Price
Scott C. Roberts
David O. Swain
Andrew Valentine
Reginald Van Lee
Gene Washington
Michael J. Weir
Sponsor ($500 to $999)Daryl E. Chubin
Emily H. Deakins
Monica E. Emerson
Michael J. Fister
Courtney Lewis Enslow
John A. Lubbe
Richard J. Martino
Debra Muchow
Donald Newsom
Morris Tanenbaum
Aileen Walter
Phillip T. Woodrow
Wm. A. Wulf
Friend ($100 to $499)Julian M. Babad
Susan R. Bailey
Virginia Cast
Justin Cotton
Tom Cummings
Nadine T. Dennis
Aileen Fearon-Frisz
Kim Ferrarie
Felicia Fields
Phil and Celeste Johnson
Velma G. Lewis
Diana Natalicio
Richard F. Neblett
Charla Oja-Silvia
Shahim Orci
Alfred L. Randall
Ronald F. Roberts
Geraldine Simmons-Bradfield
Iola R. Smith
Arthur Van Clay
Linda Wilson
Laura Zeno
ALU M N I D ONORS
Patron ($1,000 and over)Mario R. Cristancho
Gary S. May
Sponsor ($500 to $999)Johnny M. Bledsoe
Shelton A. Howard
Anthony D. Jackson
William J. Shelmon
Friend ($100 to $499)Juan Cabrera
Matthew Carrillo
Jeffrey Chavez
Weston S. Clarke
Anthony E. Clayvon
Adam A. Corkins
Robert Donaldson
Timothy D. Drinkard
Douglas P. Freyre
Jose A. Gallardo
Rita A. Gonzales
Gustavo D. Gonzalez
Carol Harris
Pamela Leigh-Mack
Melanie Martin
Luis J. Mendez-Mediavil
Carmen D. Oliver
Kendrick P. Patterson
Reynard A. Richards
Clarise A. Shinn
Anthony A. Silva
Karen D. Taylor
Gena Townsend
Lamont Truttling
Gregory M. Wilkins
Eric Williams
Ronald Winder
DONORS
1110
I NST I T UT IO N AL D ONORS
$500,000 and overDrexel University
$200,000 to $499,999AT&T Foundation
ExxonMobil Corporation
General Electric Company
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Polytechnic University
Rochester Institute of Technology
$100,000 to $199,9993M
Amgen Foundation, Inc.
Booz Allen Hamilton
BP America
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The City College of the City University of New York
Clarkson University
The Dow Chemical Company
General Motors Corporation
Howard University
IBM Corporation
The LisaBeth Foundation
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Northrop Grumman Foundation
Raytheon Company
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
$50,000 to $99,999Agilent Technologies
Alcoa Foundation
The Barkley Fund
Bechtel Corporation
The Boeing Company
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Chevron Corporation
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
DaimlerChrysler Corporation Fund
Deloitte & Touche LLP
DuPont Company
Eastman Kodak Company
Ford Motor Company
Georgia Institute of Technology
Intel Corporation
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
Merck & Co., Inc.
North Carolina A&T State University
Pitney Bowes, Inc.
The Pitney Bowes Literacy and Education Fund, Inc.
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Shell Oil Company Foundation
Sony Electronics Inc.
The Starr Foundation
Toyota
University of Colorado at Boulder
Xerox Corporation
$25,000 to $49,999The Ahmanson Foundation
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Celestica Corporation
Cravath, Swaine & Moore
International Paper Company Fund
Michigan Technological University
Microsoft Corporation
PACCAR Foundation
Science Applications International Corporation
Siemens Corporation
Texas A&M University
University of Akron
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
University of Missouri-Rolla
$10,000 to $24,999ADC Telecommunications
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Bucknell University
Fluor Corporation
Genentech, Inc.
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
The Guidant Foundation
Kansas State University
KeySpan Energy
Los Alamos National Laboratory
OPTIMUS Corporation
PPG Industries Foundation
SBC Foundation
Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation
Symantec Corporation
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
University of Bridgeport
The University of Texas at San Antonio
University of Washington
The UPS Foundation
Virginia Polytechnic University
$5,000 to $9,999Amerada Hess Corporation
American Bureau of Shipping
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
Automatic Data Processing Foundation
Bayer Corporation
Caterpillar Foundation
DirectTV
Dominion Resources, Inc.
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Hertz Corporation
Public Service Electric & Gas Company
Sonalysts
Tennessee Technological University
The University of Texas at El Paso
$1,000 to $4,999Bose Corporation
Candela Corporation
Ceridian Corporation
Consumers Union
Degraw & Associates, P.A.
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Harris Corporation
John Deere Corporation
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kenyon & Kenyon
Mine Safety Appliance Company
Mitretek Systems
Nordson Corporation
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
Temple University
Universal Instruments Corporation
University of California, San Diego
WGBH Educational Foundation
I N D I V I DUAL D ONORS
Founders' Circle ($10,000 and over)Arnold A. Allemang
William P. Dee
James M. Jamieson
Michael L. King
Estate of Mildred Willenbrock
Chairman's Circle ($5,000 to $9,999)Nicholas M. Donofrio
Alvin T. Keith
Harry Longwell
Richard M. Morrow
Lloyd G. Trotter
Benefactor ($2,500 to $4,999)Andrew G. Inglis
James Mahan
Charles E. Redman
J. Stephen Simon
John Brooks Slaughter
Edward S. Taft
William M. Zeitler
Patron ($1,000 to $2,499)Ronald R. Belschner
John E. Bethancourt
Robin Bienfait
Kevin Burke
G. Wayne Clough
John C. Eppolito
Charles L. Gregory
Mary J. Hellyar
Frank Ianna
Willie C. Martin
Michael P. Morley
Deborah L. Morrissett
Hector Motroni
Joseph A. Patt
Tom Price
Scott C. Roberts
David O. Swain
Andrew Valentine
Reginald Van Lee
Gene Washington
Michael J. Weir
Sponsor ($500 to $999)Daryl E. Chubin
Emily H. Deakins
Monica E. Emerson
Michael J. Fister
Courtney Lewis Enslow
John A. Lubbe
Richard J. Martino
Debra Muchow
Donald Newsom
Morris Tanenbaum
Aileen Walter
Phillip T. Woodrow
Wm. A. Wulf
Friend ($100 to $499)Julian M. Babad
Susan R. Bailey
Virginia Cast
Justin Cotton
Tom Cummings
Nadine T. Dennis
Aileen Fearon-Frisz
Kim Ferrarie
Felicia Fields
Phil and Celeste Johnson
Velma G. Lewis
Diana Natalicio
Richard F. Neblett
Charla Oja-Silvia
Shahim Orci
Alfred L. Randall
Ronald F. Roberts
Geraldine Simmons-Bradfield
Iola R. Smith
Arthur Van Clay
Linda Wilson
Laura Zeno
ALU M N I D ONORS
Patron ($1,000 and over)Mario R. Cristancho
Gary S. May
Sponsor ($500 to $999)Johnny M. Bledsoe
Shelton A. Howard
Anthony D. Jackson
William J. Shelmon
Friend ($100 to $499)Juan Cabrera
Matthew Carrillo
Jeffrey Chavez
Weston S. Clarke
Anthony E. Clayvon
Adam A. Corkins
Robert Donaldson
Timothy D. Drinkard
Douglas P. Freyre
Jose A. Gallardo
Rita A. Gonzales
Gustavo D. Gonzalez
Carol Harris
Pamela Leigh-Mack
Melanie Martin
Luis J. Mendez-Mediavil
Carmen D. Oliver
Kendrick P. Patterson
Reynard A. Richards
Clarise A. Shinn
Anthony A. Silva
Karen D. Taylor
Gena Townsend
Lamont Truttling
Gregory M. Wilkins
Eric Williams
Ronald Winder
DONORS
C312
Arizona State University, Tempe
Bucknell University
California State University, Los Angeles
California State University, Sacramento
The City College of the City University of New York
Clarkson University
Drexel University
Florida International University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Howard University
Kansas State University
Marquette University
Michigan Technological University
New Jersey Institute of Technology
North Carolina A&T State University
North Carolina State University
Polytechnic University
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Rochester Institute of Technology
Temple University
Tennessee Technological University
Texas A&M
University of Akron
University of Bridgeport
University of California, San Diego
University of Central Florida
University of Colorado, Boulder
University of Illinois, Chicago
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
University of Missouri, Rolla
University of Texas, El Paso
University of Texas, San Antonio
University of Washington
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
2004-2005 PARTNER INSTITUTIONS
MICHAEL L . KINGSenior Vice President, Science andTechnologyMerck & Co., Inc.Chairman, NACME, Inc.
JOHN BROOKS SLAUGHTERPresident and CEONACME, Inc.
ER IC A. ADOLPHECEOOPTIMUS Corporation
ARNOLD A. ALLEMANGSenior AdvisorThe Dow Chemical Company
CRAIG R. BARRETTChairman of the BoardIntel Corporation
JOHN E. BETHANCOURTExecutive Vice President, Technology & ServicesChevronTexaco Corporation
ROBIN B IENFAITVice President, GNTS-Network OperationsAT&T
KEVIN BURKEPresident and CEOConsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
DAVID C . CHANGChancellorPolytechnic University
G. WAYNE CLOUGHPresidentGeorgia Institute of Technology
WILLIAM P. DEE, P.E . , DEEPresident and CEOMalcolm Pirnie, Inc.
FELICIA F IELDSVice President, Human ResourcesFord Motor Company
PATR ICK S . F INNVice PresidentCisco Systems, Inc.
MICHAEL J . F ISTERPresident and CEOCadence Design Systems, Inc.
CHARLES L . GREGORYPresident, Sony Technology Center —PittsburghDeputy President, VTO-America
JAMES W. GR IFF ITHVice President, Materials Engineering and Administration & LegalToyota Technical Center, USA, Inc.
MARY JANE HELLYARPresident, Display and Components and Senior Vice PresidentEastman Kodak Company
ANDREW G. INGLISExecutive Vice President & Deputy Chief Executive, Exploration & ProductionBP p.l.c.
JAMES M. JAMIESONSenior Vice President, Chief Technology OfficerThe Boeing Company
DANIEL B. JULIETTEDirector of Engineering, Metal Fabricating DivisionGeneral Motors Corporation
WILLIAM E. MADISONSenior Vice President, Human Rescources and AdministrationEntergy Corporation
JAMES T. MAHANSenior Vice President3M Corporate Supply Chain Operations
WILLIE C . MARTINPresident—US Region, Vice President,Diversity, Worklife/U.S. Labor Relations/APP/EEODuPont Company
DEBORAH L . MORRISSETTVice President, Regulatory Affairs, Product DevelopmentDaimlerChrysler Corporation
HECTOR MOTRONISenior Vice President and Chief Staff OfficerXerox Corporation
DIANA NATALICIOPresidentThe University of Texas at El Paso
JOSEPH A. PATTIVice President, Human ResourcesBristol-Myers Squibb Company
CHARLES E . REDMANRegion President-Europe, Africa, Middle East and South West AsiaBechtel Limited
SCOTT C . ROBERTSVice President, Chemical ManufacturingShell Chemicals LP
MARK E . RUSSELLVice President, Engineering, Integrated Defense SystemsRaytheon Company
J . STEPHEN SIMONSenior Vice PresidentExxon Mobil Corporation
LLOYD G. TROTTERExecutive Vice President, OperationsGE Consumer & Industrial
REGINALD VAN LEESenior Vice PresidentBooz Allen Hamilton
JAMES C. VARDELL I I IPartnerCravath, Swaine & Moore
JOSEPH E . WALLSenior Vice President and Chief Technology OfficerPitney Bowes, Inc.
GREGORY G. WEAVERChairman and CEODeloitte & Touche LLP
WM. A. WULFPresidentNational Academy of Engineering
WILLIAM M. ZEITLERSenior Vice President and Group ExecutiveIBM Systems Group
JOHN BROOKS SLAUGHTERPresident & CEO
JOHN C. EPPOLITOVice President, Administration & CFO
JOHN A. LUBBEVice President, Resource Development
THOMAS PR ICESenior Vice President, Operations
AILEEN WALTERVice President, Scholar Management
JAMES C. VARDELL, I I ICorporate Secretary, NACMEPartner, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
NADINE T. DENNISDirector, Development
JENNIFER GARRICKExecutive Assistant to the President
MELONIA GUTHRIEAdministrative Assistant
ALEX JOHNSONMailroom Administrator
VELMA G. LEWISProgram Manager, Corporate Grants
GREGORY MARINOProgram Manager, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Programs
KEMI OLUWANIF ISEProgram Manager, Scholarship Programs
CAROLINA SANCHEZDirector, Information Technology
NICHOLAS V. TOMASSODirector, Special Events
TRACEY WILSONDevelopment Associate
KEVIN WOLOSHYNDirector, Communications
LAURA ZENOManager, Office Operations
EXECUTIVE ON LOAN
CRAWFORD B. BUNKLEY I I IExxon Mobil Corporation
OFFICERS STAFF
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OFFICERS AND STAFF
MS. ELEANOR BABCOExecutive Director Commission on Professionals in Science andTechnology (CPST)
DR. GARY S . MAYChair, Electrical & Computer EngineeringGeorgia Institute of Technology
DR. JOSE F. MORENOAssistant Professor, Latino/a Education & Policy StudiesCalifornia State University, Long Beach
DR. ROCCO RUSSOPrincipal InvestigatorPresidentRPR Consulting
DR. WATSON SCOTT SWAILPresidentEducational Policy Institute
DR. BEVLEE W. WATFORDProfessor, Associate Dean and Director ofMinority Engineering ProgramsVirginia Polytechnic Institute
RESEARCH AND POLICY ADVISORY COUNCIL
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
High School Graduates
Engineering Eligible
Engineering Admits
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
African American Latino Total American Indian
g NACME Partners
g All Other Schools of Engineering
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G D
EG
RE
ES
AW
AR
DE
D T
O U
RM
s
25%
75%
URM* Engineering Bachelor’s Degrees Awarded, 2004: NACME Partners vs. All Other Schools of Engineering
NACME Partner schools represent a significant portion of enrolled minority students inengineering programs. Working together and sharing best practices, we hope to improveretention-to-graduation substantially for all students pursuing degrees in engineering.
*URM=Underrepresented minority Source: CPST, data derived from EWC
The NACME Research and Policy Advisory Council is comprised of distinguished leaders in their field:
C312
Arizona State University, Tempe
Bucknell University
California State University, Los Angeles
California State University, Sacramento
The City College of the City University of New York
Clarkson University
Drexel University
Florida International University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Howard University
Kansas State University
Marquette University
Michigan Technological University
New Jersey Institute of Technology
North Carolina A&T State University
North Carolina State University
Polytechnic University
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Rochester Institute of Technology
Temple University
Tennessee Technological University
Texas A&M
University of Akron
University of Bridgeport
University of California, San Diego
University of Central Florida
University of Colorado, Boulder
University of Illinois, Chicago
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
University of Missouri, Rolla
University of Texas, El Paso
University of Texas, San Antonio
University of Washington
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
2004-2005 PARTNER INSTITUTIONS
MICHAEL L . KINGSenior Vice President, Science andTechnologyMerck & Co., Inc.Chairman, NACME, Inc.
JOHN BROOKS SLAUGHTERPresident and CEONACME, Inc.
ER IC A. ADOLPHECEOOPTIMUS Corporation
ARNOLD A. ALLEMANGSenior AdvisorThe Dow Chemical Company
CRAIG R. BARRETTChairman of the BoardIntel Corporation
JOHN E. BETHANCOURTExecutive Vice President, Technology & ServicesChevronTexaco Corporation
ROBIN B IENFAITVice President, GNTS-Network OperationsAT&T
KEVIN BURKEPresident and CEOConsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
DAVID C . CHANGChancellorPolytechnic University
G. WAYNE CLOUGHPresidentGeorgia Institute of Technology
WILLIAM P. DEE, P.E . , DEEPresident and CEOMalcolm Pirnie, Inc.
FELICIA F IELDSVice President, Human ResourcesFord Motor Company
PATR ICK S . F INNVice PresidentCisco Systems, Inc.
MICHAEL J . F ISTERPresident and CEOCadence Design Systems, Inc.
CHARLES L . GREGORYPresident, Sony Technology Center —PittsburghDeputy President, VTO-America
JAMES W. GR IFF ITHVice President, Materials Engineering and Administration & LegalToyota Technical Center, USA, Inc.
MARY JANE HELLYARPresident, Display and Components and Senior Vice PresidentEastman Kodak Company
ANDREW G. INGLISExecutive Vice President & Deputy Chief Executive, Exploration & ProductionBP p.l.c.
JAMES M. JAMIESONSenior Vice President, Chief Technology OfficerThe Boeing Company
DANIEL B. JULIETTEDirector of Engineering, Metal Fabricating DivisionGeneral Motors Corporation
WILLIAM E. MADISONSenior Vice President, Human Rescources and AdministrationEntergy Corporation
JAMES T. MAHANSenior Vice President3M Corporate Supply Chain Operations
WILLIE C . MARTINPresident—US Region, Vice President,Diversity, Worklife/U.S. Labor Relations/APP/EEODuPont Company
DEBORAH L . MORRISSETTVice President, Regulatory Affairs, Product DevelopmentDaimlerChrysler Corporation
HECTOR MOTRONISenior Vice President and Chief Staff OfficerXerox Corporation
DIANA NATALICIOPresidentThe University of Texas at El Paso
JOSEPH A. PATTIVice President, Human ResourcesBristol-Myers Squibb Company
CHARLES E . REDMANRegion President-Europe, Africa, Middle East and South West AsiaBechtel Limited
SCOTT C . ROBERTSVice President, Chemical ManufacturingShell Chemicals LP
MARK E . RUSSELLVice President, Engineering, Integrated Defense SystemsRaytheon Company
J . STEPHEN SIMONSenior Vice PresidentExxon Mobil Corporation
LLOYD G. TROTTERExecutive Vice President, OperationsGE Consumer & Industrial
REGINALD VAN LEESenior Vice PresidentBooz Allen Hamilton
JAMES C. VARDELL I I IPartnerCravath, Swaine & Moore
JOSEPH E . WALLSenior Vice President and Chief Technology OfficerPitney Bowes, Inc.
GREGORY G. WEAVERChairman and CEODeloitte & Touche LLP
WM. A. WULFPresidentNational Academy of Engineering
WILLIAM M. ZEITLERSenior Vice President and Group ExecutiveIBM Systems Group
JOHN BROOKS SLAUGHTERPresident & CEO
JOHN C. EPPOLITOVice President, Administration & CFO
JOHN A. LUBBEVice President, Resource Development
THOMAS PR ICESenior Vice President, Operations
AILEEN WALTERVice President, Scholar Management
JAMES C. VARDELL, I I ICorporate Secretary, NACMEPartner, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
NADINE T. DENNISDirector, Development
JENNIFER GARRICKExecutive Assistant to the President
MELONIA GUTHRIEAdministrative Assistant
ALEX JOHNSONMailroom Administrator
VELMA G. LEWISProgram Manager, Corporate Grants
GREGORY MARINOProgram Manager, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Programs
KEMI OLUWANIF ISEProgram Manager, Scholarship Programs
CAROLINA SANCHEZDirector, Information Technology
NICHOLAS V. TOMASSODirector, Special Events
TRACEY WILSONDevelopment Associate
KEVIN WOLOSHYNDirector, Communications
LAURA ZENOManager, Office Operations
EXECUTIVE ON LOAN
CRAWFORD B. BUNKLEY I I IExxon Mobil Corporation
OFFICERS STAFF
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OFFICERS AND STAFF
MS. ELEANOR BABCOExecutive Director Commission on Professionals in Science andTechnology (CPST)
DR. GARY S . MAYChair, Electrical & Computer EngineeringGeorgia Institute of Technology
DR. JOSE F. MORENOAssistant Professor, Latino/a Education & Policy StudiesCalifornia State University, Long Beach
DR. ROCCO RUSSOPrincipal InvestigatorPresidentRPR Consulting
DR. WATSON SCOTT SWAILPresidentEducational Policy Institute
DR. BEVLEE W. WATFORDProfessor, Associate Dean and Director ofMinority Engineering ProgramsVirginia Polytechnic Institute
RESEARCH AND POLICY ADVISORY COUNCIL
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
High School Graduates
Engineering Eligible
Engineering Admits
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
African American Latino Total American Indian
g NACME Partners
g All Other Schools of Engineering
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G D
EG
RE
ES
AW
AR
DE
D T
O U
RM
s
25%
75%
URM* Engineering Bachelor’s Degrees Awarded, 2004: NACME Partners vs. All Other Schools of Engineering
NACME Partner schools represent a significant portion of enrolled minority students inengineering programs. Working together and sharing best practices, we hope to improveretention-to-graduation substantially for all students pursuing degrees in engineering.
*URM=Underrepresented minority Source: CPST, data derived from EWC
The NACME Research and Policy Advisory Council is comprised of distinguished leaders in their field:
C4
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc.
NACME, Inc.440 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 302White Plains, NY 10601-1813
tel 914/539-4010fax 914/539-4032
www.NACME.o rg /05
NACME, a charitable, not-for-profit corporation, welcomes your tax-deductible contribution.Visit www.NACME.org/contribute to support our work today.
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc.
A graduating class of engineers and an engineering workforce
that looks like America
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 0 5
“Opening the Pathways to Engineering”