any questions from last class?. chapter 5 investment decisions: look ahead and reason back copyright...

18
Any Questions from Last Class?

Upload: isabella-hart

Post on 26-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Any Questions from Last Class?

Page 2: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Chapter 5Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back

COPYRIGHT © 2008Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.

Page 3: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Chapter 5 – Take Aways

Break-even quantity is equal to fixed cost divided by the contribution margin. If you expect to sell more than the break-even quantity, then incur the fixed costs to enter the industry.

Avoidable costs can be recovered by shutting down. If the benefits of shutting down (you recover your avoidable costs) are larger than the costs (you forgo revenue), then shut down. The break-even price is average avoidable cost.

If you incur sunk costs, you are vulnerable to postinvestment hold-up. Unless the parties are convinced they won’t be held up, they will be reluctant to make sunk-cost investments.

Relationship-specific investments are largely sunk. Once relationship-specific investments are made, parties are locked into a bargaining relationship with each other. If transactions are frequent and transaction costs are high, then organizational forms like vertical integration or long-term contracts reduce transactions costs and encourage relationship-specific investments.

Page 4: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Chapter 5 – Take Aways

Investments imply willingness to trade dollars in the present for dollars in the future. Wealth-creating transactions occur when individuals with low discount rates lend to those with high discount rates.

Companies, like individuals, have different discount rates. Invest only in projects with a positive NPV because they earn a return higher than the company’s cost of capital.

The NPV rule states that if the present value of the net cash flows of a project is larger than zero, the project is profitable.

Projects with positive NPV create economic profit.

Page 5: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Review of Chapter 4

Do not confuse marginal and average costs MR and MC are relevant benefits and costs

of an extent decision If MR>MC, do more of it Incentive compensation increases MR or

decreases MC. Fixed fees have no effect on effort

Link compensation to measures that reflect effort

Page 6: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Introductory Anecdote In 2000, Mobil Oil was the leading supplier of industrial lubricants in

the US, bundling engineering services with their high-quality lubricants

One of their largest customers was a regional producer of electric power (CBA)

In early 2000, Mobil invested in a three-month engineering audit of CBA Included employee training and equipment inspections For each piece of CBA equipment, Mobil provided repair,

service, and lubricant recommendations. CBA made the recommended repairs but shopped the

recommendation list to Mobil’s competitors, who offered lower prices

When Mobil failed to match the lower prices, they lost the contract and their three-month “investment”

In this section, we study investment decisions like the one by Mobil that involve costs that cannot be recovered

Page 7: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Background: Break-Even Quantities Break-even quantity is the amount you need

to sell to just cover your costs At this sales level, profit is zero The break-even quantity is Q=FC/(P-MC),

where FC are fixed costs, P is price, and MC is marginal cost

P-MC is the “contribution margin” – what’s left after marginal cost to “contribute” to covering fixed costs

Page 8: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Discrete (All-Or-Nothing) Decisions Should I enter this industry? Should I exit this industry? Should I purchase a new plant? Should I sell to a competitor? Total costs=F + MC*Q

Fixed cost to enter, constant mc per unit. Definition: Fixed costs (F) are costs that do not vary with the

level of production. Proposition: For short-run decisions, consider only marginal

costs Proposition: in the long run, you should consider all costs,

marginal and fixed.

Page 9: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Entry Decision Two investment options

Capital intensive production has higher fixed cost but lower marginal cost

More flexible production has lower fixed cost but higher marginal cost

Find the quantity level at which the costs of the two options are the same. Say, Cost1=100+10q and Cost2=50+20q Costs are same at q=5 If you expect to sell more than five, choose high fixed

cost and lower marginal cost. If less than five, choose the other

Page 10: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Shut Down Decisions: Break-Even Price If you shut down

Get back avoidable cost But lose revenue Opportunity cost of operation is the benefit of

shutting down RULE: shut down if

revenue is less than avoidable cost; or price is less than average avoidable cost

Break-even price is the average avoidable cost Profit =Rev-Cost=(P-AC)*Q

Page 11: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Avoidable Costs

Discussion: F=$100/year; MC=$5/unit; Q=100/year What is break-even price?

Discussion: what if F is sunk, not fixed? Discussion: post-investment hold-up

F ixed C os ts(avo id ab le in lon g ru n )

V ariab le C os ts(avo id ab le in sh ort ru n )

A vo id ab leC os ts

U n avo id ab leor "su n k " C os ts

C os ts

Page 12: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Sunk Costs and Postinvestment Hold-Up Printer and Magazine

2 year contract 2 million copies $2 million for printer MC=$1/copy

Break-even price is $2 Post-investment hold-up One Lesson of Business: how to consummate this

transaction? Discussion: after bidding the contract you get a PO

for half the quantity you quoted? Should you accept it?

Page 13: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Vertical Integration as Solution to Hold-Up Bauxite mine and alumina refinery

Refineries are tailored to specific qualities of ore Transaction options

Spot-market transactions Long-term contract Vertical integration

Vertical integration refers to the common ownership of two firms in separate stages of the vertical supply chain that connects raw materials to finished goods

Contractual view of marriage What is hold-up problem?

Page 14: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Determining Investment Profitability Money today is worth more than money tomorrow Compounding

Xt+1=(1+r) Xt

Xt+s=(1+r)s Xt

Discounting Xt+1/(1+r)= Xt

Xt+s/(1+r)s= Xt

Discussion: trade between individual with different discount rates

What does this say about behavior?

Page 15: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Present Value and Investment Decisions Companies also have discount rates,

determined by cost of capital Time is a critical element in investment

decisions – cash flows to be received in the future need to be discounted to present value using the cost of capital

The NPV Rule: if the present value of the net cash flows is larger than zero, the project if profitable

Page 16: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

The NPV Rule in Action

Two Projects

Project 2 is the better project, right? Not when you consider present value

Note: assuming cost of capital of 14%

Page 17: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

NPV and Economic Profit

Projects with positive NPV create economic profit.

Only positive NPV projects earn a return higher than the company’s cost of capital.

Projects with negative NPV may create accounting profits, but not economic profit.

In making investment decisions, choose only projects with a positive NPV.

Page 18: Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 5 Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson

Alternate Introductory Anecdote 1983: John Deere in midst of building Henry-

Ford-style production line for large 4WD tractors Wheat prices fell dramatically reducing demand for

large tractors Abandoned factory and purchased Versatile;

assembled tractors in a garage using off-the-shelf components Discrete investment decision

This is an example of a discrete or “all-or-nothing” decision