antonovsky’s sense of coherence dana riley epi 6181 november 6, 2006
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence
Dana Riley
EPI 6181
November 6, 2006
![Page 2: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Health, Stress & Coping
Description of development of sense of coherence (SOC)
Pathogenesis – focus of health care is reducing consequences of disease
Morbidity hypothesis: at least 1/3 & possibly majority of population is characterized by some morbidity at any point in time
Views health as a continuum
ease → dis-ease
![Page 3: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Salutogenesis
Saluto (health) + genesis (origins) How do we stay healthy? Why? “What are the stressors in the lives of poor
people that underlie the brute fact that with regard to everything related to health, illness & patienthood, the poor are screwed?”
![Page 4: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Tension management
2 people confronted by same stressor, one meets challenge & other doesn’t
Tension: strain incurred by exposure to stressor
Stress: reserved for the strain that remains when tension is not successfully overcome
Tension management: process of dealing with this tension
![Page 5: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Generalized Resistance Resources
GRR → {physical, biochemical, artifactual-material, cognitive, emotional, valuative-attitudinal, interpersonal-relational, macrosociocultural} → characteristic of an → {individual, group, subculture, society} → that is effective in → {avoiding, combating} → a wide variety of stressors
When a person regularly experiences the availability of GRRs, a strong SOC develops
![Page 6: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sense of coherence (SOC)
Global orientation that expresses the extent to which one has a pervasive, enduring & dynamic feeling of confidence that one’s internal & external environment are predictable
High probability that things will work out as reasonably as can be expected
Generalized, long-lasting way of seeing the world & one’s position in it
![Page 7: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sense of coherence (2)
Shaped & tested, reinforced & modified Constant tendency towards consistency &
generalization, stability & continuity Weak SOC: Anticipate things will go wrong,
difficulty expecting needs to be fulfilled, lack hope
Strong SOC: Life is complicated, but understood & in the end things will work out
![Page 8: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Development of SOC
Certain individuals & social groups likely to have stronger SOC than others
Social-structural & cultural-historical situations provide developmental & reinforcing experiences → strong SOC
Different from internal locus of control (Rotter) – “I am in control” vs. “Things are under control”
![Page 9: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Operationalizing SOC
Hypothesis: Strong SOC is salutogenic Operationalize:
– Don’t commit to one methodology– Requires exploration before it’s a systematic tool– SOC is not dichotomous
All problems have an answer, challenge/doubt intolerable, no flexibility to adapt to change, claim ultimate control/understanding, denial of sadness, incapacity to admit uncontrollable → Fake SOC
![Page 10: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Relation of SOC to health
High schizophrenia in lower social classes (Kohn)
Giving-up process antecedent to all disease categories (Engel et al)
Coping ability played an intermediary role between resources & health (Antonovsky)
Social-structural evidence; Animal studies SOC: Parsimonious way of integrating a
great variety of discrete variables
![Page 11: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
So, what has happened since 1979?
![Page 12: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Unraveling the Mystery of Health (1987)
Continues support of salutogenic approach over pathogenic (e.g., Dirks, Schraa & Robinson, 1982)
– Who are the Type A’s that do not get CHD?– Who are the smokers that do not get lung cancer?
Reject health/disease dichotomy Salutogenic approach compels us to
consider the formulation of a theory of coping.
![Page 13: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
3 components of SOC
Comprehensibility: Extent to which one perceives stimuli as ordered, consistent, etc.
Manageability: Extent to which one perceives resources available as adequate to meet demands.
Meaningfulness: Extent to which one feels life makes sense, some demands worth investing in, challenges welcome.
![Page 14: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SOC redefined
SOC is a global orientation that expresses the extent to which one has a pervasive, enduring though dynamic feeling of confidence that:
1. Stimuli derived from environment are structured, predictable, explicable
2. Resources are available to meet demands3. Demand are challenges, worthy of
investment & engagement
![Page 15: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Stressors
Stressor: characteristic that introduces entropy into the system; life experience characterized by inconsistency, under- or overload, & exclusion from decision making
Chronic: Enduring, permanent, generalized phenomenon; primary determinant of SOC
Major life events: Specifiable in time & space; Strength of SOC → outcome is noxious, neutral or salutary
Daily hassles: No automatic adaptive response, but no impact on SOC or health status
![Page 16: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Measuring the SOC concept
29-item questionnaire (11 C, 10 MA, 10 ME); 13 item short form
7-point Likert type scale Examples:
When you talk to people, do you have the feeling that they don’t understand you?
Has it happened that people whom you counted on disappointed you?
Many people-even those with a strong character-sometimes feel like sad sacks (losers) in certain situations. How often?
![Page 17: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Antonovsky, A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(6):725-733.
Internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91 in 8 published, 0.85 in 3 theses, 0.88 in 15 unpublished studies
Face validity: Adequately representative. Criterion validity: Consistently high correlations with
trait anxiety, hardiness & Sheridan’s Global Inventory of Stress
Interesting: 2 studies present low correlations with social support
Factor analysis: Principal components analysis produces one true factor
![Page 18: Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Dana Riley EPI 6181 November 6, 2006](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082411/5697c02c1a28abf838cd8f91/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Eriksson, A, Lindstrom, B. Antonovsky’s the sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. J Epi Comm Health. 2006;60:376-381.
Synthesis of findings on SOC & examination of capacity to explain health
Stronger SOC → better perceived health (at least initial ↑SOC)
Relation manifested regardless of age, sex, ethnicity, nationality & study design
Moderating, mediating & main effects on health SOC seems to be able to predict health SOC important for health development &
maintenance, but doesn’t alone explain overall health
SOC health promoting resource, strengthens resilience & develops +ve subjective state of health