anti-tumor effects of the glycolipids fraction from spinach which inhibited dna polymerase activity

Upload: khnumdumandfullofcum

Post on 18-Oct-2015

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • NUTRITION AND CANCER, 57(2), 216223Copyright C 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Anti-Tumor Effects of the Glycolipids Fraction from Spinachwhich Inhibited DNA Polymerase Activity

    Naoki Maeda, Yasuo Kokai, Seiji Ohtani, Hiroeki Sahara, Takahiko Hada, Chisato Ishimaru,Isoko Kuriyama, Yuko Yonezawa, Hiroshi Iijima, Hiromi Yoshida, Noriyuki Sato,

    and Yoshiyuki Mizushina

    Abstract: We succeeded in purifying the fraction of mono-galactosyl diacylglycerol (MGDG), digalactosyl diacylglyc-erol (DGDG), and sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol (SQDG)containing the major glycolipids from a green vegetable,spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). This glycolipids fraction in-hibited the activities of replicative DNA polymerases (pols)such as , , and , and mitochondrial pol with IC50 valuesof 44.046.2 g/ml, but had no influence on the activity ofrepair-related pol . The fraction also inhibited the prolif-eration of human cervix carcinoma (HeLa) cells with LD50values of 57.2 g/ml. In an in vivo anti-tumor assay onnude mice bearing solid tumors of HeLa cells, the fractionwas shown to be a promising suppressor of solid tumors.Histopathological examination revealed that tumor necrosiswith hemorrhage was significantly enhanced with the glycol-ipids fraction in vivo. The spinach glycolipids fraction mightbe a potent anti-tumor compound, and this fraction may bea healthy food substance with anti-tumor activity.

    Introduction

    In spite of the many advances in cancer treatment,chemotherapy for solid tumors is still greatly limited by alack of selective anti-cancer drugs and by the recurrence ofdrug-resistant tumors; finding a source of novel chemother-apeutics continues to be a focus of effort. Diets rich in veg-etables are known to reduce cancer risk, implicating edibleplants as potential sources of anti-cancer agents.

    Multiple organisms are known to contain at least 14 typesof DNA polymerase (pol) (1), which catalyze both DNAreplication and repair (1,2). Pol inhibitors could therefore beemployed as anti-cancer chemotherapy agents, because theyinhibit cell proliferation. Based on this idea, we have found

    N. Maeda, C. Ishimaru, I. Kuriyama, Y. Yonezawa, H. Iijima, H. Yoshida, and Y. Mizushina are affiliated with the Laboratory of Food & NutritionalSciences, Department of Nutritional Science, Kobe-Gakuin University, Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 651-2180, Japan. Y. Kokai and S. Ohtani are affiliated with theBiomedical Research Center Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan.H. Sahara is affiliated with the Marine Biomedical Institute, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Oshidomari, Rishirifujij, Hokkaido 097-0101,Japan. T. Hada is affiliated with the Hada Giken Co. Ltd., Yamaguchi-shi, Yamaguchi 753-0047, Japan. H. Yoshida and Y. Mizushina are affiliated with theCooperative Research Center of Life Sciences, Kobe-Gakuin University, Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 651-2180, Japan. N. Sato is affiliated with the Department ofPathology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan.

    many new pol inhibitors over the past 10 yr, e.g., long-chainfatty acids (36), conjugated fatty acids (79), bile acidssuch as lithocholic acid (1012), steroidal glycosides (13,14),steviol derivatives (15), sulfo-glycolipids (1630), catechins(3133), curcumin (3437), vitamin A-related compounds(38), vitamin B6 compounds (39), vitamin D2 and D3 (40),and vitamin E homologs (41), from natural compounds, inparticular food materials.

    Of these, sulfo-glycolipids in the class sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol (SQDG) from a fern (16) and an alga (17,18)are particularly potent inhibitors of eukaryotic pol. We suc-ceeded in chemically synthesizing SQDG (1922), whichwas the strongest inhibitor of replicative pols such as , ,and in the tested compounds (25). Therefore, this glycolipidshows promise as an agent for cancer chemotherapy.

    SQDG is a major glycolipid of the chloroplast membranein plants (42). We have widely screened for the glycolipidsfraction containing SQDG from common vegetables thatshow such inhibitory activity, and found that spinach (Spina-cia oleracea L.) had the largest amount of SQDG and was thestrongest pol inhibitor in the tested vegetables (43). In thisreport, we report that the glycolipids fraction from spinachcan inhibit mammalian pol activities, mammalian culturedcell growth and in vivo solid tumor proliferation, and discusswhether the glycolipids fraction could help to prevent cancer,and be a functional food with anti-cancer activity.

    Materials and Methods

    Materials

    Dried spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) was obtained fromShinyu Co. Ltd. (Hiroshima, Japan). Diaion HP-20 was

  • obtained from Mitsubishi Chemical, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Nu-cleotides and chemically-synthesized DNA template-primerssuch as [3H]-2-deoxythymidine 5-triphosphate (dTTP, 43Ci/mmol) and poly(dA), oligo(dT)1218 were purchased fromAmersham Biosciences, Inc. (Buckinghamshire, UK). Theantibody for MIB-1 and its staining kit (chemMateENVI-SION kit) were obtained from Dako, Japan (Tokyo, Japan).All other reagents were of analytical grade and were pur-chased from Nacalai Tesque, Inc. (Kyoto, Japan).

    DNA Polymerases

    Pol was purified from calf thymus by immuno-affinitycolumn chromatography as described previously (44). Pol was purified from a recombinant plasmid expressing ratpol (45). The human pol catalytic gene was cloned intopFastBac. Histidine-tagged enzyme was expressed using theBAC-TO-BAC HT Baculovirus Expression System accord-ing to the suppliers manual (Life technologies, MD) and pu-rified using ProBoundresin (Invitrogen Japan, Tokyo, Japan)(46). Human pols and were purified by the nuclear frac-tionation of human peripheral blood cancer cells (Molt-4)using the second subunit of pols - and -conjugated affinitycolumn chromatography, respectively (47).

    DNA Polymerase Assay

    The reaction mixtures for pol and pol were describedpreviously (3,4). Those for pol , and pols and were asdescribed by Umeda et al. (46) and Ogawa et al. (48), respec-tively. For the pols, poly(dA)/oligo(dT)1218 (A/T = 2/1)and [3H]-2-deoxythymidine 5-triphosphate ([3H]-dTTP)were used as the DNA template-primer and nucleotide sub-strate, respectively. The glycolipids fraction was dissolved indimethyl sulfoxide at various concentrations and sonicatedfor 30 S. Four microliters of each sonicated sample wasmixed with 16 l of each enzyme (final 0.05 units) in 50 mMTris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50% glyc-erol and 0.1 mM EDTA, and kept at 0C for 10 min. Theseinhibitor-enzyme mixtures (8 l) were added to 16 l ofeach enzyme standard reaction mixtures, and incubation wascarried out at 37C for 60 min. One unit of each pol ac-tivity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzedthe incorporation of 1 nmol of deoxyribonucleoside triphos-phates into synthetic DNA template-primers at 37C for60 min (3,4).

    Cell Culture and Measurement of Cell Proliferation

    A human cervix carcinoma cell line, HeLa was obtainedfrom the Health Science Research Bank (Osaka, Japan). Thecells were cultured in Eagles minimum essential medium(MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, peni-cillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 g/ml) at 37Cin a humid atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. For the cellproliferation assay, HeLa cells were plated at 3 105 cellsinto each well of 96-well microplates with various concen-

    trations of the glycolipids fraction from spinach. The com-pound was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) ata concentration of 10 mM as a stock solution. The stock so-lutions were diluted to the appropriate final concentrationswith growth medium just before use. Cell viability was deter-mined by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay (49).

    In Vivo Assessment of Anti-tumor Assay

    Male BALB/c nu/nu mice, 6 wk of age (2022 g), werepurchased from Japan SLC, Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan). Mice re-ceiving standard laboratory chow and water ad libitum wereacclimatized for 1 wk before the cancer cells implantation.For in vivo experiments, HeLa cells (1 106 cells/mouse)were subcutaneously inoculated nude mice. At 12 days afterimplantation, the tumor sizes in all mice were measured at2-day intervals. Mice bearing solid tumors that had grown to2535 mm3 in volume (tumor volume = length (width)2 0.5) at 12 days after implantation were used for the assess-ment of anti-tumor effect. They were divided randomly into2 groups (n = 5/group). One of the 2 groups was a controlgroup injected with 0.1 ml of PBS alone, and another groupwas injected with the glycolipids fraction from spinach dis-solved in PBS at a dose of 50 mg/kg to the mice. The aboveadministrations all took place between days 12 to 39 subse-quent to implantation. All mice were injected subcutaneously10 times at 2-day intervals with the compound and PBS alone(control). Tumor growth was measured at 2-day intervals for27 days after implantation, and the statistics were analyzedusing Students t-test. At the end of in vivo anti-tumor as-say, some mice treated with the glycolipids fraction and PBSwere separately examined to observe the pathohistologicalfeatures of the tumors and major organs such as lung, heart,spleen, stomach, liver, pancreas, kidney, intestine, and brain.

    Pathological Analysis

    Tissues or tumors were fixed with 10% formaldehyde inPBS (pH 7.2) and processed for paraffin embedding. Threemicrometers thick sections were stained for hematoxylin-eosin or appropriate antigens by immunohistochemistry. ForMIB-1 staining, the antibody for MIB-1 was reacted withdeparaffinized sections which were antigen-retrieved citratewith a kit. Anti-MIB-1 antibody was diluted 1:100 with PBSand incubated for 30 min, washed, and incubated with anappropriate second antibody.

    Results

    Preparation of the Glycolipids Fraction from Spinach

    As briefly described in the Introduction, we screenedfor and found many pol inhibitors from natural resourcesincluding food materials. Some natural glycolipids such asSQDG were found to be the strongest inhibitors of eukaryoticpols tested over the past 10 yr (1630). We found that spinach

    Vol. 57, No. 2 217

  • Figure 1. The method of purifying the glycolipids fraction from driedspinach (Spinacia oleracea L.).

    (Spinacia oleracea L.) had the most SQDG in the testedvegetables (43).

    Initially, an effective purification method of the glycol-ipids fraction from spinach was established, as shown inFig. 1. The water soluble substances were extracted fromdried spinach (20 g) with 1,000 ml of warm water (60C).The tissue cake containing fat-soluble compounds was addedto 1,000 ml of warm ethanol (60C), and the substances con-taining glycolipids were extracted. The ethanol extract wasdiluted with water to a 70% ethanol solution. The solutionwas subjected to Diaion HP-20 column chromatography (200ml), a hydrophobic type of chromatography, and washed with1,000 ml of 70% ethanol, and then eluted using 95% ethanol(1,000 ml). The 95% ethanol solution was the glycolipidsfraction (23 mg).

    In the glycolipids fraction from spinach, 3 major com-pounds were analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC),and no other compounds were detected (data not shown).Each of these compounds was completely purified by silicagel column chromatography, and their chemical structureswere determined by 1H-, 13C-, and DEPT (DistortionlessEnhancement by Polarization Transfer) NMR spectroscopicanalyses. These compounds were glycolipids such as mono-galactosyl diacylglycerol (MGDG), digalactosyl diacylglyc-erol (DGDG), and SQDG. The weight percents of MGDG,DGDG, and SQDG in the glycolipids fraction were 72.0%,2.8%, and 25.2%, respectively, and no other glycolipids weredetected. From fatty acid analysis by gas chromatography,the major fatty acids in MGDG were stearic acid (18:0) andoleic acid (18:1), DGDG mostly consisted of palmitic acid

    (16:0) and oleic acid (18:1), and SQDG mostly consisted ofpalmitic acid (16:0) and linolenic acid (18:3) (43).

    Effects of the Glycolipids Fraction of Spinachon the Activities of Mammalian DNA Polymerasesand Other Enzymes

    The glycolipids fraction from spinach containing majornatural glycolipids such as MGDG, DGDG, and SQDG wasinvestigated for its inhibitory effect on mammalian pols

    Figure 2. Dose-response curves of the glycolipids fraction from spinach(0100 g/ml) in mammalian DNA polymerases. The enzymes used (0.05units each) were calf thymus pol (circle), rat pol (square), human pol (triangle), human pol (diamond), and human pol (reverse-traingle). Theabsence of the compound was taken as 100%. Data are shown as the means SEM of 3 independent experiments.

    Figure 3. Human cancer cell growth inhibition by the glycolipids fractionfrom spinach. Dose-response curve of proliferation inhibition of a humancervix carcinoma cell line, HeLa by the compound. The assay was carriedout under the conditions described in Materials and Methods with thecompounds at the indicated concentrations. Survival rate was determinedby the MTT assay (49). The absence of the compound was taken as 100%.Data are shown as the means SEM of 5 independent experiments.

    218 Nutrition and Cancer 2007

  • to . Pols , , and are representative replicative pols,pol is a repair-related pol, and pol is a mitochon-drial pol (1,2). As shown in Fig. 2, the inhibitory effecton nuclear replicative pols , , and was the strongest inthe tested pols, and the IC50 values were 44.1, 46.2, and44.0 g/ml, respectively. The glycolipids fraction moder-ately inhibited the activity of pol , with 50% inhibition ata dose of 79.8 g/ml. The compound did not influence theactivity of pol at less than 100 g/ml. Since DGDG andMGDG had moderate or no influence on pol activity (data

    not shown), SQDG in the fraction might be an inhibitor ofpols.

    The glycolipids fraction had no influence at all on theactivities of a higher plant, cauliflower, pols I (-like) and II(-like), or prokaryotic pols such as the Klenow fragment ofE. coli pol I, Taq pol, and T4 pol. The compound also didnot inhibit the activities of other DNA-metabolic enzymessuch as T7 RNA polymerase, T4 polynucleotide kinase, andbovine deoxyribonuclease I. These results suggested that theglycolipids fraction from spinach could selectively inhibit

    Figure 4. In vivo study of the anti-tumor effects of the glycolipids fraction from spinach. (a) The inhibitory effect on tumor volume of nude mice. Nude micebearing HeLa solid tumors were injected with PBS as a control group (open square) and the glycolipids fraction (closed circle) at a dose of 50 mg/kg. Data areshown as the means SEM of 5 independent animals. (b) A photograph of nude mice injected with PBS only (right) and 50 mg/kg of the glycolipids fraction(left) bearing HeLa solid tumors at 39 days after.

    Vol. 57, No. 2 219

  • the activity of mammalian pols, especially replicative , ,and -types.

    Effects of the Glycolipids Fraction of Spinachon Human Cancer Cell Proliferation

    The glycolipids fraction, which inhibited mammalian polactivities, might be a suitable anti-cancer agent; therefore,we investigated its influence on a human cervix carcinomacell line, HeLa. Fig. 3 shows inhibition dose-response curvesof the compound on cancer cell growth. Inhibition by thespinach glycolipids fraction was dependent on the dose, andthe LD50 value was 57.2 g/ml. The inhibitory effect onhuman cancer cells was almost the same concentration as thaton replicative pols; therefore, the inhibition of pol activitymight directly affect cell proliferation in cancer cells. Theseresults suggested that SQDG in the glycolipids fraction wasable to penetrate cancer cells and reach the nucleus, inhibitingpol , , and activities.

    Effect of the Glycolipids Fraction from Spinachon In Vivo Antitumor Activity

    At 12 days after the implantation of HeLa cells, nudemice bearing a solid tumor were injected with the spinachglycolipids fraction (50 mg/kg) at 2-day intervals until39 days. As shown in Fig. 4A, the compound suppressed tu-mor growth from 21 days as compared to the control group,and tumor volume showed a smaller increase at the ratio of54.0% decrease at 39 days (Fig. 4B). Since SQDG containingthe glycolipids fraction inhibited the activities of replicativepols, SQDG might suppress tumor activity. None of the nudemice showed any significant loss of body weight through-out the experimental period. It was also noted that the mainvisceral organs, such as the liver, lung, kidney, spleen, heart,stomach, small intestine, large intestine, pancreas, and testisof all the groups showed no toxic or degenerative histologicalappearance (data not shown); therefore, the glycolipids frac-tion must be of interest as a candidate material for anti-cancertreatment.

    As shown in Fig. 5A and B, injected tumors formed asignificant mass in each animal. Although necrosis and hem-orrhage could be detected in the PBS treatment (Fig. 5C), theglycolipids fraction and PBS tend to induce more vigorousnecrosis and hemorrhage compared with PBS (Fig. 5D). InTable 1, histological findings regarding the mass area andtumor area as examined by image analysis software also re-vealed that tumors with the glycolipids fraction treatment hadsmaller areas. The mitotic index shown in Table 2 depicts theeffect of the glycolipids treatment on reducing mitosis in thetumors. This was further examined using the MIB-1 index.MIB-1 antigen provides a good indicator for cell division insitu, providing an objective indication for cell proliferationin specified tissue. Significant decrease of the MIB-1 indexwas observed in tumors treated with the glycolipids fraction

    but not in the control treatment. These results suggested thatthe in vivo inhibition of cell proliferation and induction ofnecrosis in the tumor tissue by the glycolipids fraction fromspinach might be caused by the inhibition of replicative polsby the compound.

    Discussion

    The lipid composition of thylakoid membranes is highlycoserved among higher plants such as spinach (Spinacia ol-

    Figure 5. Histopathological examination of tumors treated with the glycol-ipids fraction from spinach. Low magnification (40) appearance of tumorstreated with either PBS as a control (A) or the glycolipids fraction (B). Thebars show as 5 mm. At higher magnification (200), necrosis and hemor-rhage appeared to be evident. The necrotic zone with hemorrhage appearedto be evident. The necrotic zone with hemorrhage tended to be more vigor-ous in tumors treated with the glycolipids fraction (D) compared to that ofthe PBS control (C). The bars show as 200 m. (Continued)

    220 Nutrition and Cancer 2007

  • Figure 5. (Continued)

    eracea L.), algae, and cyanobacteria, composed mainly ofthe following three glycolipids, MGDG, DGDG, and SQDG(50). MGDG and DGDG are noncharged lipids, whereasSQDG possesses a negatively charged head group. Thy-lakoid membranes in plant chloroplasts and cyanobacterialcells are unique in possessing photosynthetic electron trans-port and photophosphorylation systems for the conversion oflight to chemical energy. A mutant of Chlamydomonas rein-hardtii, defective in SQDG (hf-2), showed photosystem II(PSII) activity 40% lower than that of wild-type, an increase

    Table 1. Histopathological findings of mass area and tumorarea

    Area (mm2)Mass area Tumor area

    Control 45.25 10.42 21.13 2.91Glycolipids fraction 27.72 2.98 15.45 2.13

    Mice were injected with either PBS (control) or the glycolipids fractionin PBS at a dose of 50 mg/kg. Mass area and tumor area were evaluatedwith image scanning software and showed as mm2. Data are shown as themean SEM of 5 independent experiments.

    Table 2. Histopathological Findings of Mitosis

    Control 17.80 1.92Glycolipids fraction 9.65 0.31

    Mice were injected with PBS (control) and the glycolipids fraction in PBS at adose of 50 mg/kg. Mitotic index was calculated at a high magnification field(400). One hundred independent fields were examined for the presenceof mitosis, and the data are shown as the mean SEM of 5 independentexperiments.

    in sensitivity of PSII activity to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), and a lower growth rate (5154). Inaccordance with these observations, the incubation of iso-lated thylakoid membranes of hf-2 with SQDG in vitro re-versed the lowered PSII activity; therefore, these results con-cluded that SQDG has the specific function of maintainingPSII properties.

    We found previously that spinach contains the mostSQDG in the glycolipids fraction of more than 10 vegetablestested (43); therefore, the spinach glycolipids fraction couldbe developed as an anti-cancer functional food. However, thewater and ethanol extracts from spinach (i.e., water-solubleand fat-soluble fractions, respectively, in Fig. 1) did not in-hibit the activities of pols, human cancer cell growth andtumor activity, although the ethanol extract contained SQDG(data not shown); therefore, it was suggested that some com-pounds avoiding the SQDG bio-activity might be containedin the spinach ethanol extract. It is important to purify the gly-colipids fraction containing SQDG. In this report, we foundthat the glycolipids fraction could be an inhibitor of mam-malian pols and human cancer cell proliferation, and hasanti-tumor activity in vivo. The molecular weight of SQDGcontaining the spinach glycolipids fraction is 800900, thisfraction contains 25.5% of SQDG, and the anti-tumor activ-ity in mice was found at 50 mg/kg; therefore, when an adulthuman (60 kg) eat 3 g of the fraction, SQDG are taken 15 Min the body, and this concentration of SQDG could inhibit theactivity of pols. The glycolipids fraction from spinach couldhelp to prevent cancer disease, and become a functional foodwith anti-cancer activity.

    Acknowledgments and Notes

    We are grateful to Dr. Masaharu Takemura of Tokyo University ofScience (Tokyo, Japan), Dr. Akio Matsukage of Japan Womens Univer-sity (Tokyo, Japan) and Dr. Kengo Sakaguchi of Tokyo University ofScience (Chiba, Japan) for preparing calf pol , rat pol , and humanpols and , respectively, and for valuable discussions concerning in-hibitors. This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-aid for Kobe-Gakuin University Joint Research (A) (H. Y. and Y. M.) and Coop-erative Research Center of Life Sciences Project for Private Universi-ties: matching fund subsidy from MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture,Sports, Science and Technology), 2006-2010 (H. Y. and Y. M.). Y. M.acknowledges Grants-in-aid from the Mochida Memorial Foundation forMedical and Pharmaceutical Research (Japan), and the Nakashima Founda-tion (Japan). Address correspondence to Y. Mizushina, Laboratory of Food& Nutritional Sciences, Department of Nutritional Science, Kobe-Gakuin

    Vol. 57, No. 2 221

  • University, Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 651-2180, Japan. Phone: +81-78-974-1551 (ext. 3232). FAX: +81-78-974-5689. E-mail: [email protected]

    Submitted 21 June 2006; accepted in final form 17 October 2006.

    References

    1. Hubscher U, Mag, G, and Spadari S: Eukaryotic DNA polymerases.Annu Rev Biochem 71, 133163, 2002 .

    2. Kornberg A and Baker TA: DNA replication, second edition, W. H.Freeman, New York, Chapter 6, 197225, 1992.

    3. Mizushina Y, Tanaka N, Yagi H, Kurosawa T, Onoue M, Seto H, HorieT, Aoyagi N, Yamaoka M, Matsukage A, Yoshida S, and Sakaguchi K:Fatty acids selectively inhibit eukaryotic DNA polymerase activities invitro. Biochim Biophys Acta 1308, 256262, 1996.

    4. Mizushina Y, Yoshida S, Matsukage A, and Sakaguchi K: The in-hibitory action of fatty acids on DNA polymerase . Biochim BiophysActa 1336, 509521, 1997.

    5. Mizushina Y, Ohkubo T, Date T, Yamaguchi T, Saneyoshi M, SugawaraF, and Sakaguchi K: Mode analysis of a fatty acid molecule binding tothe N-terminal 8-kDa domain of DNA polymerase . J Biol Chem 274,2559925607, 1999.

    6. Mizushina Y, Sagisaka M, Sakai H, Abe M, and Sakaguchi K: Modeanalysis of binding of fatty acids to mammalian DNA polymerases.Biochim Biophys Acta 1486, 211218, 2000.

    7. Mizushina Y, Tsuzuki T, Eitsuka T, Miyazawa T, Kobayashi K, IkawaH, Kuriyama I, Yonezawa Y, Takemura M, Yoshida H, and SakaguchiK: Inhibitory action of conjugated C18-fatty acids on DNA polymerasesand DNA topoisomerases. Lipids 39, 977983, 2004.

    8. Yonezawa Y, Tsuzuki T, Eitsuka T, Miyazawa T, Hada T, Uryu K,Murakami-Nakai C, Ikawa H, Kuriyama I, Takemura M, Oshige M,Yoshida H, Sakaguchi K, and Mizushina Y: Inhibitory effect of conju-gated eicosapentaenoic acid on human DNA topoisomerases I and II.Arch Biochem Biophys 435, 197206, 2005.

    9. Yonezawa Y, Hada T, Uryu K, Tsuzuki T, Eitsuka T, Miyazawa T,Murakami-Nakai C, Yoshida H, and Mizushina Y: Inhibitory effect ofconjugated eicosapentaenoic acid on mammalian DNA polymerase andtopoisomerase activities and human cancer cell proliferation. BiochemPharmacol 70, 453460, 2005.

    10. Mizushina Y, Ohkubo T, Sugawara F, and Sakaguchi K: Structure oflithocholic acid binding to the N-terminal 8-kDa domain of DNA poly-merase . Biochemistry 39, 1260612013, 2000.

    11. Watanabe M, Hanashima S, Mizushina Y, Yoshida H, Oshige M, Sak-aguchi K, and Sugawara F: Biotinylated lithocholic acids for affinitychromatography of mammalian DNA polymerases and . BioorgMed Chem Lett 12, 287290, 2002.

    12. Mizushina Y, Kasai N, Miura K, Hanashima S, Takemura M, YoshidaH, Sugawara F, and Sakaguchi K: Structural relationship of lithocholicacid derivatives binding to the N-terminal 8-kDa domain of DNA poly-merase . Biochemistry 43, 1066910677, 2004.

    13. Mizushina Y, Nakanishi R, Kuriyama I, Kamiya K, Satake T, ShimazakiN, Koiwai O, Uchiyama Y, Yonezawa Y, Takemura M, Sakaguchi K,and Yoshida H: -Sitosterol-3-O--D-glucopyranoside: a eukaryoticDNA polymerase lambda inhibitor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 99,100107, 2006.

    14. Mizushina Y, Akihisa T, Hayakawa Y, Takeuchi T, Kuriyama I,Yonezawa Y, Takemura M, Kato I, Sugawara F, and Yoshida H: Struc-tural analysis of mogrol and its glycosides as inhibitors of animal DNApolymerase and human cancer cell growth. Lett in Drug Design andDiscovery in press, 2006.

    15. Mizushina Y, Akihisa T, Ukiya M, Hamasaki Y, Murakami-Nakai C,Kuriyama I, Takeuchi T, Sugawara F, and Yoshida H: Structural analysisof isosteviol and related compounds as DNA polymerase and DNAtopoisomerase inhibitors. Life Sci 77, 21272140, 2005.

    16. Mizushina Y, Watanabe I, Ohta K, Takemura M, Sahara H, Takahashi N,Gasa S, Sugawara F, Matsukage A, Yoshida S, and Sakaguchi K: Studieson inhibitors of mammalian DNA polymerase and : sulfolipids froma pteridophyte, Athyrum niponicum. Biochem Pharmacol 55, 537541,1998.

    17. Ohta K, Mizushina Y, Hirata N, Takemura M, Sugawara F, Matsuk-age A, Yoshida S, and Sakaguchi K: Sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol,KM043, a new potent inhibitor of eukaryotic DNA polymerases andHIV-reverse transcriptase type 1 from a marine red alga, Gigartinatenella. Chem Pharm Bull 46, 684686, 1998.

    18. Ohta K, Mizushina Y, Hirata N, Takemura M, Sugawara F,Matsukage A, Yoshida S, and Sakaguchi K: Action of new mammalianDNA polymerase inhibitor, sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol. Biol PharmBull 22, 111116, 1999.

    19. Hanashima S, Mizushina Y, Ohta K, Yamazaki T, Sugawara F, andSakaguchi K: Structure-activity relationship of a novel group of mam-malian DNA polymerase inhibitors, synthetic sulfoquinovosylacylglyc-erols. Jpn J Cancer Res 91, 10731083, 2000.

    20. Hanashima S, Mizushina Y, Yamazaki T, Ohta K, Takahashi S, KoshinoH, Sahara H, Sakaguchi K, and Sugawara F: Structural determinationof sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol by chiral syntheses. Tetrahedron Lett41, 44034407, 2000.

    21. Ohta K, Hanashima S, Mizushina Y, Yamazaki T, Saneyoshi M, Sug-awara F, and Sakaguchi K: Studies on a novel DNA polymerase in-hibitor group, synthetic sulfoquinovosylacylglycerols: inhibitory actionon cell proliferation. Mutat Res 467, 139152, 2000.

    22. Hanashima S, Mizushina Y, Yamazaki T, Ohta K, Takahashi S, SaharaH, Sakaguchi K, and Sugawara F: Synthesis of sulfoquinovosylacyl-glycerols, inhibitors of eukaryotic DNA polymerase and . BioorgMed Chem 9, 367376, 2001.

    23. Murakami C, Yamazaki T, Hanashima S, Takahashi S, Ohta K, YoshidaH, Sugawara F, Sakaguchi K, and Mizushina Y: Structure-activity re-lationship of synthetic sulfoquinovosylacylglycerols as a mammalianDNA polymerases inhibitor and apoptosis inducer. Arch Biochem Bio-phys 403, 229236, 2002.

    24. Sahara H, Hanashima S, Yamazaki T, Takahashi S, Sugawara F, OhtaniS, Ishikawa M, Mizushina Y, Ohta K, Shimozawa K, Gasa S, Jim-bow K, Sakaguchi K, Sato N, and Takahashi N: Anti-tumor effect ofchemically synthesized sulfolipids based on sea urchins natural sul-fonoquinovosylmonoacylglycerols. Jpn J Cancer Res 93, 8592, 2002.

    25. Mizushina Y, Xu X, Asahara H, Takeuchi R, Oshige M, ShimazakiN, Takemura M, Yamaguchi T, Kuroda K, Linn S, Yoshida H, KoiwaiO, Saneyoshi M, Sugawara F, and Sakaguchi K: A sulphoquinovosyldiacylglycerol is a DNA polymerase inhibitor. Biochem J 370, 299305, 2003.

    26. Murakami C, Yamazaki T, Hanashima S, Takahashi S, TakemuraM, Yoshida S, Ohta K, Yoshida H, Sugawara F, Sakaguchi K, andMizushina Y: A novel DNA polymerase inhibitor and a potent apopto-sis inducer: 2-mono-O-acyl-3-O-(-D-sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride withstearic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta 1645, 7280, 2003.

    27. Mizushina Y, Maeda N, Kawasaki M, Ichikawa H, Murakami C, Take-mura M, Xu X, Sugawara F, Fukumori Y, Yoshida H, and Sakaguchi K:Inhibitory action of emulsified sulfoquinovosyl acylglycerol on mam-malian DNA polymerases. Lipids 38, 10651074, 2003.

    28. Murakami C, Miuzno T, Hanaoka F, Yoshida H, Sakaguchi K,and Mizushina Y: Mechanism of cell cycle arrest by sulfoquinovo-syl monoacylglycerol with a C18-saturated fatty acid (C18-SQMG).Biochem Pharmacol 67, 13731380, 2004.

    29. Kasai N, Mizushina Y, Murata H, Yamazaki T, Ohkubo T, SakaguchiK, and Sugawara F: Sulfoquinovosylmonoacylglycerol inhibitory modeanalysis of rat DNA polymerase . FEBS J 272, 43494361, 2005.

    30. Mizushina Y, Kasai N, Iijima H, Sugawara F, Yoshida H, and Sak-aguchi K: Sulfoquinovosyl-acyl-glycerol (SQAG), a eukaryotic DNApolymerase inhibitor and anticancer agent. Curr Med Chem Anti-cancerAgents 5, 613625, 2005.

    31. Saito A, Mizushina Y, Ikawa H, Yoshida H, Doi Y, Tanaka A, andNakajima N: Systematic synthesis of galloyl-substituted procyanidinB1 and B2, and their ability of DPPH radical scavenging activity and

    222 Nutrition and Cancer 2007

  • inhibitory activity of DNA polymerases. Bioorg Med Chem 13, 27592771, 2005.

    32. Mizushina Y, Saito A, Tanaka A, Nakajima N, Kuriyama I, TakemuraM, Takeuchi T, Sugawara F, and Yoshida H: Structural analysis of cat-echin derivatives as mammalian DNA polymerase inhibitors. BiochemBiophys Res Commun 333, 101109, 2005.

    33. Sakuda H, Saito A, Mizushina Y, Yoshida H, Tanaka A, and NakajimaN: Synthesis of galloyl-substituted procyanidin B4 series, and theirDPPH radical scavenging activity and DNA polymerase inhibitory ac-tivity. Heterocycles 67, 175188, 2006.

    34. Mizushina Y, Kamisuki S, Kasai N, Ishidoh T, Shimazaki N, TakemuraM, Asahara H, Linn S, Yoshida S, Koiwai O, Sugawara F, YoshidaH, and Sakaguchi K: Petasiphenol: a DNA polymerase inhibitor.Biochemistry 41, 1446314471, 2002.

    35. Mizushina Y, Hirota M, Murakami C, Ishidoh T, Kamisuki S, ShimazakiN, Takemura M, Perpelescu M, Suzuki M, Yoshida H, Sugawara F, Koi-wai O, and Sakaguchi K: Some anti-chronic inflammatory compoundsare DNA polymerase -specific inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol 66,19351944, 2003.

    36. Mizushina Y, Ishidoh T, Takeuchi T, Shimazaki N, Koiwai O, Ku-ramochi K, Kobayashi S, Sugawara F, Sakaguchi K, and Yoshida H:Monoacetylcurcumin: a new inhibitor of eukaryotic DNA polymerase and a new ligand for inhibitor-affinity chromatography. BiochemBiophys Res Commun 337, 12881295, 2005.

    37. Takeuchi T, Ishidoh T, Iijima H, Kuriyama I, Shimazaki N, Koiwai O,Kuramochi K, Kobayashi S, Sugawara F, Sakaguchi K, Yoshida H, andMizushina Y: Structural relationship of curcumin derivatives bindingto the BRCT domain of human DNA polymerase . Genes Cells 11,223235, 2006.

    38. Murakami C, Takemura M, Sugiyama Y, Kamisuki S, Asahara H,Kawasaki M, Ishidoh T, Linn S, Yoshida S, Sugawara F, Yoshida H,Sakaguchi K, and Mizushina Y: Vitamin A-related compounds, all-transretinal and retinoic acids, selectively inhibit activities of mammalianreplicative DNA polymerases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1574, 8592,2002.

    39. Mizushina Y, Xu X, Matsubara K, Murakami C, Kuriyama I, OshigeM, Takemura M, Kato N, Yoshida H, and Sakaguchi K: Pyridoxal 5-phosphate is a selective inhibitor in vivo of DNA polymerase and .Biochem Biophys Res Commun 312, 10251032, 2003.

    40. Mizushina Y, Xu X, Murakami C, Okano T, Takemura M, Yoshida H,and Sakaguchi K: Selective inhibition of mammalian DNA polymerase by vitamin D2 and D3. J Pharmacol Sci 92, 283290, 2003.

    41. Mizushina Y, Nakagawa K, Shibata A, Awata Y, Kuriyama I, ShimazakiN, Koiwai O, Uchiyama Y, Sakaguchi K, Miyazawa T, and Yoshida H:

    Inhibitory effect of tocotrienol on eukaryotic DNA polymerase lambdaand angiogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 339, 949955,2006.

    42. Ishizuka I and Yamakiwa T: New Comprehensive Biochemistry, H.Wiegandt (ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 10, 101, 1985.

    43. Murakami C, Kumagai T, Hada T, Kanekazu U, Nakazawa S, KamisukiS, Maeda N, Xu X, Yoshida H, Sugawara F, Sakaguchi K, andMizushina Y: Effects of glycolipids from spinach on mammalian DNApolymerases. Biochem Pharmacol 65, 259267, 2003.

    44. Tamai K, Kojima K, Hanaichi T, Masaki S, Suzuki M, Umekawa H,and Yoshida S: Structural study of immunoaffinity-purified DNA poly-merase -DNA primase complex from calf thymus. Biochim BiophysActa 950, 263273, 1998.

    45. Date T, Yamaguchi M, Hirose F, Nishimoto Y, Tanihara K, and Mat-sukage A: Expression of active rat DNA polymerase in Esherichiacoli. Biochemistry 27, 29832990, 1988.

    46. Umeda S, Muta T, Ohsato T, Takamatsu C, Hamasaki N, and KangD: The D-loop structure of human mtDNA is destabilized directlyby 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion (MPP+), a parkinsonism-causingtoxin. Eur J Biochem 267, 200206, 2000.

    47. Oshige M, Takeuchi R, Ruike R, Kuroda K, and Sakaguchi K: Sub-unit protein-affinity isolation of Drosophila DNA polymerase catalyticsubunit. Protein Expr Purif 35, 248256, 2004.

    48. Ogawa A, Murate T, Suzuki M, Nimura Y, and Yoshida S: Lithocholicacid, a putative tumor promoter, inhibits mammalian DNA polymerase. Jpn J Cancer Res 99, 11541159, 1998.

    49. Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival:application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods65, 5563, 1983.

    50. Benning C: Biosynthesis and function of the sulfolipid sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49, 5375, 1998.

    51. Minoda A, Sato N, Nozaki H, Okada K, Takahashi H, Sonoike K, andTsuzuki M: Role of sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol for the maintenanceof photosystem II in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eur J Biochem 269,23532358, 2002.

    52. Sato N, Aoki M, Maru Y, Sonoike K, Minoda A, and Tsuzuki M: In-volvement of sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol in the structural integrityand heat-tolerance of photosystem II. Planta 217, 245251, 2003.

    53. Sato N, Tsuzuki M, Matsuda Y, Ehara T, Osafune T, and Kawaguchi A:Isolation and characterization of mutants affected in lipid metabolismof Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eur J Biochem 230, 987993, 1995.

    54. Sato N, Sonoike K, Tsuzuki M, and Kawaguchi A: Impaired pho-tosystem II in a mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii defective insulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol. Eur J Biochem 234, 1623, 1995.

    Vol. 57, No. 2 223