anti money laundering optimisation by alexon bell, compliance director
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved.
ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING
OPTIMISATION
ALEXON BELL, COMPLIANCE DIRECTOR - SAS
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 2
AML
COMPLIANCEAGENDA
• Global Drivers, Challenges and Background
• How Global Institutions are Addressing the New Wave of Regulations
• Using advanced analytics to minimise investigation cycles and save
investigator time;
• Realising benefits through co-existence with existing AML solutions (without
the need to rip and replace);
• How technology can be leveraged to uncover new trends and meet new
regulations;
• Incremental steps towards a more sophisticated holistic monitoring capability.
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved.
GLOBAL DRIVERS, CHALLENGES AND
BACKGROUND
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 4
GLOBAL DRIVERS &
CHALLENGES
Compliance Trends
40 New FATF Recommendations
New Focus Areas: Trade-based AML
Correspondent BankingRisk Based Approach
Domestic PEP
American and EU Regulators
Increase Checks
Ultimate Beneficial Ownership
(UBO)
FATCA /OECD Compliance
AML Optimisation
& Governance
Financial Crime Intelligence Units
THE FOCUS ON COMPLIANCE CONTINUES
40 New FATF Recommendations
American and EU Regulators
Increase Checks
Ultimate Beneficial Ownership
(UBO)
FATCA /OECD Compliance
Financial Crime Intelligence Units
New Focus Areas: Trade-based AML
Correspondent Banking Risk Based Approach
Domestic PEP
AML Optimisation & Governance
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 6
MANAGING MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS
High volumes of alerts and false positives
• Inefficient processes and weak detection rates
• Too much noise – “needle in the haystack”
• Must investigate everything due to regulatory pressure
Existing controls are rigid and black box
• Cannot plug in new data and they run slowly
• What is the risk just below the threshold?
• Money launderers and fraudsters continually adapt
No quick and easy way to explore disparate data sources and discover new MOs
• No comprehensive ah-hoc analysis or discovery of new modus operandi
• No visibility of emerging trends in non alert data
𝑥 + 𝑎 𝑛 =
𝑘=0
𝑛𝑛
𝑘𝑥𝑘𝑎𝑛−𝑘
X
CHALLENGES
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved.
HOW GLOBAL BANKS ARE ADDRESSING THE
NEW WAVE OF REGULATIONS
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 8
MEETING THE
GLOBAL CHALLENGEKEY PROGRAMME THEMES AND DRIVERS
Holistic approach
Global case management
Data & data sharing cross
siloes & borders
Leverage existing
investments / co-existence
Analytics, optimisation and tuning
FCIU
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 9
ENTERPRISE CASE
MANAGEMENT
THREATS, COUNTER MEASURES, STRENGTHS AND
WEAKNESSES
H
Holistic
• Single Financial Crime Repository
• Global Search
• Intelligence
Information Sharing
• Best Practice
• Consistency
• DPA Compliance
Analysis
• Emerging Threats
• Process Weaknesses
• Automation
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 10
ITS ALL ABOUT
THE DATAYOUR BEST FRIEND AND WORST ENEMY
Question your data
• Who
• What
• Why
How do you question?
• Analytics
• Visualisation
• Business Knowledge
What will you find?
• Information
• Intelligence
• Insight
What does it tell you?
• Existing Typologies
• Emerging Trends
• Gaps
What will it give you?
• Known Knowns
• Known Unknowns
• Unknown Unknowns
How will you use it?
• Proactive
• Get more data
• Visualisation
• When
• Where
• How?
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 11
Ale
rts
LEVERAGE
INVESTMENTSCO-EXISTENCE AND ENHANCEMENT
Entity Consolidation
Calibration
Ultimate
Beneficial
Owner
Optimisation
Payment and
Correspondent
Banking
Automation
Visualisation, Simulation, MI Environment
Social
Network
Analysis
Global
Federated
Search and
Retrieval
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 12
AML
OPTIMISATIONSOLUTION OVERVIEW
• Co-existence with existing AML vendors in the current estate
• Capabilities aimed at• Entity Consolidation – “Single View” of Customers, internal and external (correspondent banking and KYCC)
• Calibration – tuning the rules inside your existing Transaction Monitoring System
• Optimisation – 2nd pass, were the existing system runs and “alerts” SAS runs before cases are raised and re-prioritise / hybernate
• Customer Screening
• Payments Screening
• Transaction Monitoring Post Alert – Advanced Triage
• Automation – No ETL process to get additional data needed by analysts to make decisions
• Social Network Analysis – Prioritisation and SAR linkages
• Global Federated Search and Retrieval – Find all your customers and retrieve all relevant data – DPA aware
• Correspondent Banking – Profiling and visualisation of data
• Visualisation and Reporting – Transaction flows, Interactive drill-down
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 13
ENTITY
CONSOLIDATIONENTITY CONSOLIDATION PROCESS – EXAMPLE RESULT
TRANSACTION RECORD
BENEFICIARY ADDRESS 1 BENEFICIARY ADDRESS 2 BENEFICIARY ADDRESS 3 BENEFICIARY ADDRESS 4
UNITED ADVANTADGE SIGNS INC 208 TOWER DRIVE OLDSMAR FLORIDA 34677 U S A
REFERENCE TABLE
REFERENCE BENEFICIARY NAME REFERENCE BENEFICIARY ADDRESS 2 REFERENCE BENEFICIARY ADDRESS 3
REFERENCE BENEFICIARY ADDRESS 4
UNITED ADVANTADGESIGNS FLAT RM S 10 F TACK BLDG 48 GILMA ST CENTRAL HONGKONG
INC UNITED ADVANTADGE SIGNS 208 TOWER DRIVE OLDSMAR Washington 37365
Unitetadvantadgesigns 22 Otakau Rd Milford 0620 New Zealand
UNITED ADVANTADGE SIGNS INC TOWER DR 208 OLDSMAR FLORIDA 34677 U S A
UNITETADVANTADGESIGNS GHANA PARA BRAZI
UNITED of ADVANTADGE SIGNS 103 RITZ RD ADENTA ACCRA 00233 GHANA
UNITED ADVANTADGE SIGNS INC FLAT RM S 10 F TACK BLDG 48 GILMA ST CENTRAL HONGKONGM
atc
hes
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 14
CORRESPONDENT
BANKINGKEY COMPONENTS – REPORTS AND INSIGHT
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 15
UBOs
UBO ULTIMATE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
Bank A
Alpha Exports Ltd
Bank B
Alpha Regional Ltd
Alpha Parent Ltd
Director
Director
Arms Manufacturer
Bank B
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 16
SEARCH GLOBAL FEDERATED SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL
Mexico UK MalaysiaGermanyOthers
Security and Permission Models
Connected
Parties
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 17
CALIBRATION TRANSACTION MONITORING - TUNING
• Tuning existing rules, profiles and thresholds in the incumbent system
• OCC 2011-12 “Aligned” Methodology
• 7 Work packages covering
• Segmentation Model (Peer Groups)
• Scenario Effectiveness (BLU)
• Scenario Threshold Distribution
• Below the Line Testing
• Above the Line Productive Alert Analysis
• Model Validation and Testing
• Look Back
• 8 to 16 week engagement depending on how many work packages selected
Payments
ScreeningCustomer
Systems
Txn
Monitroing
Alert
Investigation
Near Real Time
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 18
OPTIMISATION TRANSACTION MONITORING – ADVANCED TRIAGE
• Second Screening approach
• SAS Advanced Analytics and Decisioning Rules run
after overnight batch
• Disclosure prediction model
• False positive prediction model
• Alert re-prioritisation model
• Multi-peer group comparisons
• “Auto Close” alerts based on auditable business
rules and logic
Payments
ScreeningCustomer
Systems
Txn
Monitoring
Alert
Investigation
Near Real Time
Mange different strategies for “Re-Prioritisation”
• Specific Line of Business Strategies
• RBS Retail, Coutts, NatWest
• Peer Group Strategies
• High Account Type or Low Account Type or both
• Corporates, Government
• Mass Market Retail Current Account, SME Current
Account
• Specific Customer Type Strategies
• Non Resident Alien
• Solicitors
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 19
OPTIMISATION CUSTOMER SCREENING
• Second Screening approach
• SAS Advanced Matching and Decisioning Rules run
after overnight batch
• 240+ Screening Rules for Individuals
• 40+ Screening Rules for Organisations
• Elimination Rules
• Conflict Rules
• 40 + Prioritisation/Elimination/Automation Rules
• Transliteration and Native Script Matching
Customer
ScreeningScreening
Engine
Customer
Systems
Alert
Investigation
Over Night Batch
• Mange different strategies for matching and “Re-
Prioritisation”
• PEP
• SIP
• Sanctions
• Arabic/ Hispanic/Russian/ Slavic, etc. Strategies
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 20
OPTIMISATION PAYMENT SCREENING
• Second Screening approach
• SAS Advanced Matching and Decisioning Rules run after the payment is blocked
• Contextual Matching – field parsing and categorisation
• Matching Rules for Individuals, Organisations, Vessels, Sanctions, Town, Cities and Ports
• Imbedding Human Decision Process into matching logic and prioritisation rules
• Identifying data in fields that can release the payment
• Mange different strategies for matching and “Re-Prioritisation”
• Arabic/ Hispanic/Russian/ Slavic, etc. Strategies
• Strategies for Sanctioned Locations – Korea, Middle East, Cuba
• Vessel Strategies – Laura 1, Patricia
• High False Positive Strategies – New York, Santa Clara, Trinidad
Payments
ScreeningPayment
Systems
Screening
Engine
Alert
Investigation
Near Real Time
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 21
OPTIMISATION FOR PAYMENT SCREENING
Broker
Screening
SWIFTGateway
Payment
System 1
Payment
System 2
Payment
System n
Case
Management CM Database Second
Screening
MQ
MQ
Real Time
Off Line
• Integration with the Case Management
Database
• SAS Polls Database for new
alerts/records
• Pulls details to screen
• Writes outcome to the database
• Changes Workflow State
• Use the existing tool’s capabilities to
release the payment
• Possibly new workflow for SAS released
payments.
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 22
INSIGHT INTO
INVESTIGATIONSCURRENT VIEW OF ALERT GENERATION
Source
Data
Stage
Data
Transaction
Monitoring
Alert
Review
(L1)
Case
Review
(L2)
SAR
Filing
(L3)
L1 Decision>100 data points
Prioritise Alert50-60 data points
Alert Creation<30 data points
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 23
ALERT AND
INVESTIGATION
ENHANCEMENTS
NEW VIEW OF ALERT GENERATION
Source
Data
Stage
Data
Transaction
Monitoring
Alert Creation
Event
Enrichment
Event
Analytics
Event Creation• <30 data points
• TM alerts “downgraded”
Get Additional
Data Points• 100 + data points
• Using no ETL
Technology
• Able to use data to
predict outcome
• Continuous
Improvement
Enhanced Investigation• Investigation time reduced from 40 mins to <10
• Investigator throughput up from 1.5 alerts per
hour to 5 to 12 alerts per hour
• Investigators presented with additional facts
• More robust, consistent, thorough Investigation
• Human eyes on data and still make the
decisions
Prioritise• 50% reduction
in Work Items –
100% SAR
Capture Rate
• 75% reduction
in Work Items –
97% SAR
Capture Rate
Alert
Review
(L1)
Case
Review
(L2)
SAR
Filing
(L3)
Event Creation
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 25
CASE STUDY 1:
MAJOR UK BANK
Screening for Individuals
• 17,000 matches from Original System
• 4,000 matches after SAS processing
• All true positives correctly identified 0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Incumbent SAS
Individuals
76%
Reduction
99%
Reduction
Screening for Organisations
• 4,000 matches from Original System
• 40 matches after SAS processing
• All true positives correctly identified 0
2000
4000
6000
Incumbent SAS
Organisations
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 26
BUSINESS ISSUE
• Improve the quality of SARs
• Improve the relevancy of work items to analysts
• Reduce false positives and reduce staffing costs
SAS APPROACH
• SAS’ hybrid approach to analyze past investigations during the prior 6 months
• Business rules applied to normalise the data between relevant & irrelevant work items
• A number of models were deployed with varying business objectives ranging from
workload reduction to SAR retention
RESULTS
• Estimated savings of $1 million in first year based upon 25 investigators
• Adopted a methodology that will scale as the institution acquires other banks
• Reduced work items by 46% with 100% SAR capture
• Reduced work items by 75% with 97% SAR capture
• Ability to auto-triage work items in objective and repeatable manner
CASE STUDY 2:
TOP 20 US BANK
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 27
Bank 3 – International Dutch Retail Bank
• Incumbent AML Solution producing 16,000 alerts per month
• “Auto Close” 13,000 per month deemed very risky
• Alerts after SAS Optimisation – 2,500
• 84% reduction in false positives with 100% SAR capture
• Greatly reduced risk profile
Bank 4 – International Spanish Bank
• Incumbent AML Solution producing 13,000
alerts for 1 scenario over 12 months
• After SAS Optimisation 30% FP Reduction
with100% SAR capture
• Potential Savings $3m per year
• For 1 Scenario
CASE STUDY 3 & 4:
TOP 20 EUROPEAN
BANKS
Copyright © 2015, SAS Insti tute Inc. Al l r ights reserved. 28
MEETING THE
GLOBAL CHALLENGEKEY PROGRAMME THEMES AND DRIVERS
Holistic approach
Global case management
Data & data sharing cross
siloes & borders
Leverage existing
investments / co-existence
Analytics, optimisation and tuning
FCIU