antares: towards acoustic detection of highest energy neutrinos
DESCRIPTION
ANTARES: Towards Acoustic Detection of Highest Energy Neutrinos. Kay Graf for the ANTARES Collaboration Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics VLV n T 09, Athens, Oct. 13 th – 15 th 2009. Outline. Motivation The AMADEUS System Positioning Source Reconstruction. Motivation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ANTARES: Towards Acoustic Detection of Highest Energy Neutrinos
Kay Graf for the ANTARES Collaboration
Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics
VLVT 09, Athens, Oct. 13th – 15th 2009
Outline
• Motivation• The AMADEUS System• Positioning• Source Reconstruction
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 2
Motivation
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 3
Ultra-high Energy Neutrino Astrophysics
at energies above 1014-15eV:
• universe becomes opaque to
photons at Mpc range
• CR protons, nuclei are galactic up to
~1018eV, suffer GZK cut-off above
that
• neutrinos unabsorbed at all energies
→ sources exist to at least
3x1020eV
• UHE neutrinos are the only viable
messenger beyond the local
universe
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 4
vi
able
thr
ough
out
thes
e re
gion
s
P. Gorham
Highest Energy Neutrinos
• astrophysics:
origin of UHECR
GZK neutrinos
• cosmology:
top-down scenarios
topological defects
• particle physics:
neutrino cross section
5Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
log10(E[eV])1614 2418
TD
20 22
T. Karg, arXiv:astro-ph/0608312
10-4
10-8
10-6
10-10
Flu
x ×
E2 [e
V m
-2 s
-1 s
r-1]
water/iceCherenkovtelescopes
complementary techniques
for GZK : >100km2 ∙ 2∙ year detector needed
(U)HE Detection Methods
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 6
neutrino cascadecascade
hydrophone arrayAcoustic Detection
water, ice, salt
att > 1km (water)
sonic wavesonic wave
radio radio CherenkovCherenkov
cascadecascade
antenna arrayRadio Cherenkov
ice, salt, rock
att ~ 1km (ice)
opticalopticalCherenkovCherenkov
PMT arrayOptical Cherenkov
water, ice
att < 100m
• balloon• satellite• telescope
+ hybrid detectors
Acoustic Signal Properties
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 7
Ecasc= 1 EeV @ 1km
bipolar signal (~10kHz) with disk-like geometry
Acorne Coll. astro-ph/0704.1025
peak pressure
(mPa/EeV)
T. Karg, astro-ph/0608312v1
log10 (radial distance (m))di
stan
ce a
long
sho
wer
axi
s (m
) shower maximum
log10 (radial distance (m))
Simulations of an Acoustic Detector
• strong dependence: Veff(Pthres)
• Pthres mainly given by ambient noise
• a threshold of 5mPa seems reachable in the deep-sea
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 8
T. Karg, arXiv:astro-ph/0608312
200 acoustic antennas/km3
Pthres
The AMADEUS System
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 9
The AMADEUS Project
Feasibility Study
• detector environment (hybrid)
• detector calibration functionality
• sensor design and positioning
• background studies
• signal processing techniques
integration of acoustic setup into the ANTARES neutrino telescope
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 10
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope
• optical Cherenkov Telescope
• 875 PMT• at 2500m water depth• Vinst~ 200 x 200 x 400 m3
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 11
ANTARESsite
F
The AMADEUS System
• taking data since 5-Dec-2007
• completely installed since 30-May-2008
• acoustics on L12: data from 6-Sep to 24-Dec 2008
“pingers“ (acoustic RxTx) on each anchor
12Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
AMADEUS Facts
• characteristics- 36 sensors at 6 storeys
(1 – 350m distance, 34 active)- 16bit @ 250kSps sampling- ~ -125dB re 1V/Pa sensitivity- ~85-90% uptime
• data acquisition- all data to shore- raw: 20 MByte/s (1.5 TByte/d) - filtered: 0.3 MByte/s (4 GByte/d), up to now: 4
TByte - excellent stability of all DAQ parts
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 13
Data Samples: Amplitude Histograms
noise at different sensors• gaussian profile• linear correlation between
sensors (factor ~ 99%)
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 14
noise and transient• additional tails• ~60dB S/N (SINAD), no
significant crosstalk
Sam
ple
s (p
er
AD
C c
ount)
Sam
ple
s (p
er
AD
C c
ount)
Positioning
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 15
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 16
Positioning: Method for Reconstruction
use emissions from the ANTARES acoustic positioning system (not directly connected with AMADEUS)
→ positioning of individual sensors:• use absolute time from > 3 pingers:
| rreception – remission | = cs ¢ (treception – temission – toffset )
• treception by threshold crossing of signal envelope
• temission from positioning system
→ position/orientation by fitting storey geometry
Positioning: Example
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 17
• 5 days of data• completely independent derivation of heading
Acoustic Modules (AMs)
Piezo sensors + preamplifiers
design allows for integration of acoustic sensors into pressure housing of photo sensors
no need for additional mechanical structures
18Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
Pinger Signals for Reconstruction of Hydrophones and AMs
AMs
Hydros
19Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
signal quality of AMs slightly degraded w.r.t. hydrophones(coupling, ringing of sphere, ...)
Positioning with AMs
2
30mmσ
• calculate difference of individually reconstructed sensor position• some issues/systematics need to be investigated
20Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
0
1
23
45
• systematic effects due to orientation of sensors w.r.t. pingers need to be investigated
• for two sensors with distance at 250mm (in a sphere) better than 10° resolution reachable
21Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
Sensors 0 and 2
Heading on AM Storey
Positioning Option for KM3NeT
AMADEUS-like acoustic sensors have the potential to combine:
• positioning
• investigation of acoustic neutrino detection techniques
• marine science
Acoustic Modules (AMs) allow for an integration of acoustic sensors into Opto-Acoustical Modules (OAMs).
First Measurements in the Lab:
• no significant degradation of performance of acoustic sensors by ANTARES HV base
• noise expected mainly from DC-DC converter
22Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
Source Reconstruction
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 23
Source Direction Reconstruction: A Dolphin
• beam forming or time difference algorithms used• uncertainty <1°
(mainly due to binning in the algorithm)
24
Inte
nsity
(au
)
-180 0 180f (°)
0 0.5 1time (ms)
90
0
-90
(°
)
1
0
-1
Am
plit
ude
(a
u)
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009
most probable source direction
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 25
Angular Distribution of Marine Sound Sources• direction reconstruction for one storey• all types of transient signals included• origin points horizontal to north• one month of data
Tracking of a Source
• reconstruction with one storey• all triggered events within 500s displayed
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 26
Summary
• at UHE neutrinos are the only viable messenger beyond the local universe
• need a >100km2 ∙ 2∙ year detector
•acoustic detection promising candidate
• complementary to optical and radio techniques (hybrid detection)
•AMADEUS in ANTARES: feasibility study for a future acoustic detector
• dedicated array in a detector environment – hybrid detection possible
• successfully operated since 12/2007
• return of experience for future arrays (opto-acoustical?)
Kay Graf (ECAP) – VLVnT 09, Athens – October 2009 27
Funded by: