answers for infrastructure and cities.restricted © siemens ag 2014 all rights reserved. september...

Answers for infrastructure and cities.Restricted © Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.September 2002

2nd Generation Models for Modeling of Renewable Sources (Wind & PV) in PSS®EPresented by Jay Senthil and Yuriy Kazachkov, Siemens PTIRenewable Energy Modeling task Force (REMTF) Workshop, Salt Lake City, June 17, 2014

Siemens Power Technologies International

Restricted © Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.

Discussion Outline

• Representing wind turbines and Photo Voltaic (PV) in PSS®E Power Flow

• PSS®E Dynamic Simulation models of wind turbines and PV systems

• 2nd Generation Generic wind turbine and PV models in PSS®E

• Test results for 2nd Generation wind and PV models

• Parameterization of 2nd Generation Generic Model for Siemens 2.3 MW and 3 MW Wind machines

• Recent developments- Plant controller for multi-unit application

• Issues in Modeling of Wind and PV type devices

• Summary


Representation of Wind Turbine in PSS®E Power Flow

• Wind machine explicitly identified in power flow data

• Reactive power boundary conditions :

• Limits specified by QT and QB (i.e., same a non-wind machines)

• Limits determined from the machine’s active power output and a specified power factor

• Fixed reactive power setting determined from the machine’s active power output and a specified power factor (typical for induction machines)


Modeling in Power Flow- Real Power

• Direct MW dispatch as for conventional machines.

• User responsible for aggregation of original wind turbines to equivalent machines.


Modeling in Power Flow- Reactive Power

Type 1 and Type 2 WTGs:

• If (for example), Qgen consumed is ½ Pgen (i.e. PF 0.9 under-excited):

For example, for WTG rated at 100 MW; Qgen = Qmin = Qmax = 50

Mvar; may want to provide 50 Mvar shunt capacitors at the equivalent WTG terminals.


Modeling in Power Flow- Reactive Power

Type 3 and Type 4 WTGs:

• For fixed power factor (PFref) control,

set Qgen = Qmin = Qmax = Qref = Pgen tan[arccos (PFref)]

• For steady-state voltage control using WTGs with PF range 0.95, set Qmax = Pgen tan[arccos (0.95)] = Qmin

For example, for 100 MW WPP using WTGs with +/-0.95 PF range, set Qmax = 33 Mvar and Qmin = 33 Mvar.


Source: Dynamic Performance of Wind Power Generation Working Group – IEEE PES PSCE – Seattle, WA

21

2

N

nZjXRZ

I

iii

eqeqeq

I

iieq BB

1

Collector System Equivalencing Methodology

Example (N=18, I=21)

Computation of equivalent collector system parameters for N wind turbine generators and I branches:


References

[1] WECC Wind Generator Modeling Group, “WECC Wind Power Plant Power Flow Modeling Guide,” 2008.

[2] Muljadi, E.; Butterfield C.P.; Ellis, A.; Mechenbier, J.; Hocheimer, J.; Young, R.; Miller, N.; Delmerico, R.; Zavadil, R.; Smith, J. C. “Equivalencing the Collector System of a Large Wind Power Plant.” IEEE Power Engineering Society, General Meeting, June 12-16, 2006, Montreal, Quebec.

[3] Wind Modeling IEEE Tutorial. 2008, Pittsburgh, PN; 2009, Seattle, WA


Representation of Wind Turbine in PSS®E Dynamic Simulation

• User prepares dynamic raw data file (“dyr” file) by following example in modeling package documentation

• Two distinct groups of Wind Models:

• Vendor specific models: are provided as user-written models.

• To represent these machines in power flow, designate the machines as ‘Not a Wind Machine’ in the PSS®E power flow generator data record.

• Models can be downloaded from:

• http://w3.usa.siemens.com/smartgrid/us/en/transmission-grid/products/grid-analysis-tools/transmission-system-planning/Pages/transmission-system-planning.aspx?tabcardname=pss%c2%aee%20user%20support

• Generic Wind Models: these models are supplied as part of PSS®E library

http://w3.usa.siemens.com/smartgrid/us/en/transmission-grid/products/grid-analysis-tools/transmission-system-planning/Pages/transmission-system-planning.aspx?tabcardname=pss%C2%AEe%20user%20support





Generic Wind Models in PSS®E

• Siemens PTI has been closely involved in efforts of various WECC working groups to develop generic models all 4 types (Types 1 through 4) for wind turbines.

• • Idea is to create generic models that are parametrically adjustable to represent

specific wind turbines available in the market.

• All 4 types became standard PSS®E models in Version 32 and above.


PSS®E 1st Generation of Generic Wind Models

Above generic model are available as standard library model starting PSS®E 32

Generic model WT1 WT2 WT3 WT4

Generator WT1G WT2G WT3G WT4GEl. Controller WT2E WT3E WT4ETurbine/shaft WT12T WT12T WT3TPitch control WT3PPseudo Governor: aerodynamics WT12A WT12A


2nd Generation Generic Wind Turbine Models

• PSS®E 2nd Generation Wind Models consistent with WECC REMTF recommendations .

• Same set of models to represent different types manufacturers by changing parameters.

• PSS®E Model names for 2nd generation models: • REGCAU1: Generator converter model for Types 3, 4 & large scale PV• REECAU1: Electrical control model for Types 3 & 4• REECBU1: Electrical control model for large scale PV• REPCAU1: Plant control model for Types 3 & 4• WTDTAU1: Drive Train model for Types 3 & 4• WTPTAU1: Pitch control model for Type 3• WTARAU1: Aerodynamic model for Type 3• WTTQAU1: Torque control model for Type 3

• PSS ®E 33.4 and above for 2nd generation wind, PSS®E 33.5 and above for large scale PV models


Testing of 2nd Generation Models

• Details of Test Simulation:• Time step (Δt = ¼ cycle)• Run flat (no disturbance) for 1 s• Apply 3-phase fault at bus 41902, run to 1.1 s• Remove fault, trip branch between 41901 & 41906, run to 10 s

41901INFINITE

41902PV HIGH

1.052.6

41906MID LINE

1.051.3

5.6 -5.6

-49.0

5.6 -5.6

1-98.1

11.5R49.3

-5.6

-49.1

5.6

-49.0

49.2

49.1

1.050.0

41903PV LOW

0.988.4

41904PV LOW2

1.009.8

-98.5

11.2

1 98.5

-1.2

-98.5

1.2

100.0

0.3

1.06

41905PV TERM

1.0012.7

-100.0

-0.3

1 1 100.0

5.4

15.4R

100.0


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsWT4 – plot of vt


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsWT4 – plot of pg


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsWT4 – plot of qg


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsWT3 – plot of vt


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsWT3 – plot of pg


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsWT3 – plot of qg


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsPV – plot of vt


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsPV – plot of pg


Test results for 2nd Generation modelsPV – plot of qg


Parameterization of 2nd Generation Generic Model for the 2.3 MW & 3 MW Siemens WT

• The 2nd generation Renewable Energy Generic Model includes several features that can be successfully used in the course of parameterization of this model for some vendor’s implementation.

• Couple of examples:

• Low Voltage Power Limit of the generator/converter REGCA module can be used to simulate ramping up active power after fault clearing

• The drive train WTDTA module can be used for mimicking the action of the controller responsible for damping of the machine rotor torsional oscillations

• Vdl1/Vdl2 look-up tables of the electrical control REECA module can be used for simulating the P-Q capability of the unit under fault conditions.


2.3 MW Siemens WTTerminal Voltage (Close-in fault)


2.3 MW Siemens WTPower (Close-in fault)


2.3 MW Siemens WTReactive current (Close-in fault)


Recent DevelopmentsUpgrade of the 2nd Generation RE plant controller

• Generic Renewable Plant Control Model REPCAU1 is designed to interact with the local control of the single equivalent (aggregated) unit with control of active and reactive power (Pref and Qref)

• Active power path is used for frequency control. The reactive power path may be used to control either the POI voltage or reactive power interchange between the plant and the grid or a power factor at the POI.

• Siemens PTI has upgraded the REPCAU1 model to a new REPCMU1 model with the capability to supervise multiple WTGs.

• The new REPCMU1 user written model has the same dynamics of the active and reactive power paths as a standard REPCAU1 model and a provision to supervise local controls of up to 150 WTGs.


Testing with 4 WTGs supervised by REPCMU1 plant controller

POI Voltage (red), Command from the Plant Controller (blue) as a Response to Step Change in Plant Controller Voltage Reference (black).


Issues in Modeling of Wind & PV type devicesIssue 1: Fictitious Frequency Spikes

• Frequency Spike during and after the fault to prevent fictitious frequency spikes.

• Problem is very acute in weak systems.

• Causes False Frequency Relay Trips.

• Temporary Solution:

• Disabling Frequency Relay during fault.

• Long-term Solution:

• Better frequency calculation – Siemens PTI is investigating this.


Issues in Modeling of Wind & PV type devices Issue 2: Network Non Convergence

• Problem: Network does not converge at the onset of the fault and after fault clearing

• Possible Cause: During the fault,• unlike synchronous machines, no inertia to fix Ө, and hence

possibly no voltage angle reference, • WTG control model tries to control P,Q; it needs voltage angle

reference to compute the complex current for the given Ө.• PSS®E uses current injection, in the example, voltage is

determined by current: YV = I


Summary

• 2nd Generation wind models are available in PSS®E starting Version 33.4.

• 2nd Generation PV models are available in PSS®E starting Version 33.5.

• Models can be parametrically adjusted to represent any specific wind turbines available in the market.


Questions?

Siemens PTI

400 State StreetSchenectady, NY 12305

(518) 395-5013

(518) 395-5132

E-mail:[email protected]

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

answers for infrastructure and cities.restricted © siemens ag 2014 all rights reserved. september...

Documents

modeling of wind

large wind power plant

pss e power flow wind

reactive power setting

restricted siemens ag

nd generation wind

machines active power

mw q gen