a.no. 81/20. 24.02.2020 present : sh. bhagat singh, ld
TRANSCRIPT
A.No. 81/20. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Bhagat Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for SDMC.
Ld. counsel for respondent seeks time to file reply.
To come up for arguments on 19.03.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 77/20. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Shailender Dahiya, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. S.A. Hussain, Ld. counsel for North DMC.
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of respondent.
Time is sought to file status report and record.
AE(B) to be present on the next date.
To come up for arguments on the application for stay on
13.03.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 67/20. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Vikram Pawar, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. S.A. Hussain, Ld. proxy counsel for North DMC with Sh.
Sanjay Gupta, ALO and Sh. Sriniwas, JE(B).
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of respondent.
Status report filed stating that the appeal is not maintainable
since it has been filed against the sealing order dated
26.12.2019 whereas infact there is no sealing order dated
26.12.2019. It is also stated that the present appeal has
been filed against the vacation notice dated 27.01.2020.
An application moved on behalf of appellant u/s. 151 CPC
for placing on record the ownership documents. Appellant
is directed to place on record legible copies of the
documents.
Ld. counsel for appellant alsom seeks time to amend the
appeal.
To come up now for arguments on 30.03.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 83/2020. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Vimal Dhingra, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. S.A. Hussain, Ld.counsel for North DMC.
Ld. counsel for appellant seeks time to file documents of
title.
More time is sought to file status report.
Show cause notice be issued to JE(B) for next date.
Be listed for arguments on 30.03.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 266/15. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Rajeshwar Kumar Gupta, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Ms. Swati Gupta, Ld. counsel for DDA.
None for respondent no.2
Ld. counsel for DDA seeks time to take instructions in terms
of the orders passed by Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition
(C) No. 1766/2018 & CM Appl. 51290/2019 titled GP Capt
Bhagat Singh Daulta and Ors. Vs. DDA & Ors. and file
report on the next date.
Be listed for further proceedings on 09.07.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 365/19. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Dwapan Gupta, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for North DMC with Sh.
Rajiv Garg, ALO and Sh. S.K. Goel, AE(B).
1. Ld. counsel for respondent states that the application
for regularization moved by the appellant stands rejected
since there is no policy of the regularization of the flats in
Nimri Colony till date. Copy of rejection letter has been
filed.
2. Arguments heard on the application for interim stay.
Ld. counsel for appellant has pressed the application for
interim stay on the ground that otherwise the appeal will
become infructuous.
3. It is stated that the appellant has become the owner
of property bearing House No. 231, Ground Floor, Nimri
Colony, Ashok Vihar, New Delhi-110052 by virtue of will
dated 01.12.1997. It is stated that the property was
originally allotted to Smt. Shanti Devi Narula vide lease
deed dated 05.08.1992 and Smt. Shanti Devi Narula
bequeathed the same in favour of appellant. It is further
stated that the appellant was served with a demolition order
dated 05.10.2018, pursuant to which appellant gave a
representation to the respondent. It is also stated that there
is no illegal construction existing in the premises and excess
construction has been regularized as per various
notifications of respondent. It is also stated that some
portion of the appellant’s property was demolished on
28.10.2018. The appellant thereafter applied for
regularization. It is further stated that the flat in question was
built up by respondent in the year 1960 and in the layout
plan, the area of each flat was 62.26 sq.mts. It was decided
vide Corporation resolution No.386 of 25.09.2000 to
regularize additional area and make the total land area as
135 sq.mtr.
4. The respondent had filed status report stating that
unauthorized construction in the shape of covering of open
space at front and rear side of ground floor has been
booked in respect of the property in question. Thereafter
demolition order was passed on 05.10.2018. It was also
stated that demolition action was partly taken on 28.12.2018
and the remaining demolition action remains to be taken. It
was further stated that the appellant filed show that the
construction was raised after obtaining permission from the
complete authority or that the construction is protected by
any law.
5. Respondent has also filed letter dated 21.02.2020
stating that there is no policy of the regularization of the flats
in Nimri Colony till date.
6. Heard. keeping in view the submissions made on
behalf of respondent that as per information received by
respondent for Land & Estate Department that allotted area
of the plot in question is only 62.26 sq.mts as per lease
deed and that letter dated 07.04.2008 was addressed to
Commissioner Planning, DDA by Town Planning
Department with regard to status of Nimri Colony in
reference to Writ Petition titled “Flat Owners Welfare
Association (Nimri Colony) Vs. MCD” wherein it was stated
that the Standing Committee Resolution No. 821 dated
05.03.2008 has resolved as under :
“Having considered the position as brought out
by the Commissioner in his letter No.
F.33/Chief Town Planner/2014/C&C dated
05.03.2008 and the documents annexed
thereto, wherein the status of Nimri Colony is
established of Pre-62 colony with double
storeyed flats, resolved that regularization of
additional construction be done as per
provision of Master Plan 2021, treating double
storeyed flats of residential plots and DDA be
requested to include Nimri Colony in the list of
Pre-62 built up residential rehabilitation
colony.”
7. In the above facts and circumstances as application
for regularization of the appellant has been rejected as
there is no policy of regularization of flats in Nimri Colony till
date and unauthorized construction in the shape of covering
open space in the front and rear side of flat in question has
been raised and no Sanctioned Building Plan of
unauthorized construction has been filed. The construction
is not protected under the NCT of Delhi Laws (Special
Provisions) Act, the application for interim stay stands
dismissed.
8. Be listed for final arguments on 19.05.2020.
9. A copy of order be given dasti to Ld. counsel for
appellant, as prayed for.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 94/20 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant with Ld. counsels Ms. Priyanka Kapur and Ms.
Geetika Kapur.
Fresh appeal filed u/s 343 (2) of DMC Act against the order
of demolition dated 13.08.2019 alongwith application for
stay and condonation of delay. Be checked and registered.
Notice of the appeal and application be issued to the
respondent through concerned Chief Law Officer. AE(B) is
directed to appear alongwith entire record of the
proceedings, status report and reply of the appeal on date
fixed. Record be deposited in the Tribunal.
Be listed for arguments on the application for condonation of
delay and stay on 05.03.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 888/17 24.02.2020 Statement of Sh. Kapil Jain S/o Sh. Prem Chand Jain, Director DFS Agri
Foods Pvt. Ltd. registered office 440 Katra Medgran , Khari Baoli, Delhi-6
On SA
I am the Director of the appellant company and I have instructions to
withdraw appeal, I may be permitted to withdraw the appeal
unconditionally. (Copy of my Adhar Card of the Director Exh. A-1.)
RO & AC
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 78/20. 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant in person.
Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for North DMC.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the respondent.
More time is sought to file status report and record.
To come up for arguments on the interim application on
31.03.2020.
AE(B) to be present on the date fixed.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 116/14, 121/14, 1202/13, 1106/13, 277/14, 278/14, 1104/13, 1105/13 and 1109/13. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Gaurav Jain, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for SDMC.
Ld. counsel for respondent states that appellant be directed
to supply the copy of regularization application, the same be
supplied within three days.
To come up for filing of status report of the regularization
application on 22.05.2020.
AE(B) to be present on the date fixed.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 1203/13. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Gaurav Jain, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. Sanjay Gupta, ALO for North DMC with Sh. Vikas
Kumar, JE(B).
More time is sought to file status report of the regularization
application.
To come up for further proceedings on 22.05.2020.
AE(B) to be present on the date fixed.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 25/14. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Gaurav Jain, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for EDMC with Sh. Ankit
Pandey, JE(B).
Status report filed stating that the application for
regularization has been examined and the appellant has
bee called upon to submit all necessary documents as per
Settlement Deed vide letter No. D-44 dated 19.02.2020.
Ld. counsel for appellant seeks four weeks time to comply
with the same.
Be listed for filing of status report of the regularization
application on 22.05.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 696/19. 24.02.2020 Present : Ms. Sunaina Niga, Ld. Proxy counsel for appellant.
Sh. Sanjay Kaushik, Ld. counsel for SDMC with Sh. Sanjay
Gupta, ALO.
An application moved on behalf of SDMC stating that the
property in question does not fall within its jurisdiction.
At request of proxy counsel for appellant, adjourned for
taking steps to amend the appeal on 17.04.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 325/19. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Abhinav Dang, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. Proxy counsel for SDMC.
An application moved on behalf of appellant u/s. 151 CPC,
copy supplied.
At request of proxy counsel for respondent, be listed for
consideration of application on date fixed i.e. 28.04.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 210/19. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Rupesh Mundhra, son of appellant in person.
Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. counsel for SDMC.
Sh. K.N. Singh, Ld. counsel for applicants.
An application moved on behalf of applicant under Rule 17
of DMC Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1986 read
with section 151 of CPC, copy supplied.
Ld. counsel for appellant and MCD seeks time to file reply.
Be listed for arguments on the application on 05.03.2020.
AE(B) to be present on the date fixed.
Date of hearing of 07.04.2020 stands cancelled.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 498/14. 24.02.2020 Present : Ms. Neha Praveen, Ld. Proxy counsel for appellant.
Sh. Shashikant Sharma, Ld. counsel for SDMC.
Ld. counsel for appellant states that the Writ Petition (C) No.
6857/14 titled Jatin Khanna Vs. SDMC & Anr. is pending in
the Hon’ble High Court and is listed in the regular matters.
In view of the stay proceedings by the Hon’ble High Court,
be listed for further proceedings on 15.07.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 486/19. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Mohan Kumar, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. Varun Sharma, Ld. counsel for SDMC with Sh. Hukum
Singh, AE(B).
Status report filed stating that the permission granted vide
No. EE(B)NGZ/18/D-13 dated 19.03.2018 for erection of cell
tower/antenna/pole at Property No.8, Abadi known as Old
Lal Dora, Village Surakhpur, Najafgarh, New Delhi has been
revoked by the competent authority vide revocation letter
No. EE(B)/NGZ/20/D-1/1379 dated 03.02.2020.
To come up now for final arguments on 27.04.2020 at
request of Ld. Counsel for the appellant .
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 449/19. 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant with Ld. Proxy counsel, Sh. Ravinder Kumar.
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for SDMC.
Proxy counsel for appellant seeks adjournment as ld.
counsel for appellant is not available due to death of her
relative.
Show cause notice be issued to AE(B) since he is absent
despite being directed to be present today.
To come up now for filing of report and arguments on
03.04.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 40/20. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Ajeeet Kumar, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for North DMC with Sh.
S.K. Uppal, LI.
Status report filed stating that the owner / occupier of
property in question was running the factory / industrial
activities in the name & style of M/s. Rajeev Anand against
the provision of MPD-2021 which amounts to misuse of
premises and the property was sealed on 21.12.2019. It is
further stated that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Writ
Petition (C) No.4677/1985 dated 26.11.2018 had passed an
order that “None of these 21960 Industrial Units should be
allowed to re-open without their permission”. It is further
stated that as per affidavit filed by the Commissioner /
SDMC before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the property in
question is part of 21960 Industrial Units as per 49th
progress report of the Monitoring Committee. It is further
stated that the property in question is not in the list of 21960
in step-I but this property was sealed under step-III
procedure and this Tribunal has no jurisdiction.
Ld. counsel for appellant seeks adjournment to peruse the
report.
Be listed for arguments on the maintainability of the appeal
on 31.03.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 61/20. 24.02.2020 Present : Sh. Satish Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for appellant.
Sh. Mohit Sharma, Ld. Proxy counsel for EDMC.
To come up for filing of status report and record and
arguments on 26.03.2020.
AE(B) to be present on the date fixed.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 27/2019 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Gautam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the appellant .
Shri Absar Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
An application moved for condonation of delay in filing the
affidavit in terms of order dated 11.01.2019.
Heard, as there is no justifiable ground disclosed, the delay
stands condoned subject to payment of Rs. 10,000/- as cost
by appellant to be deposited in the Registry.
Application stands disposed off.
At request of Ld. Counsel for parties, be listed for filing of
brief synopsis and final arguments on 13.07.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 1071/17 24.02.2020 Present : None for appellant.
Shri Jatin Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
None has appeared on behalf of appellant despite several
calls since morning. Even on the previous date of hearing,
none had appeared for the appellant. The appeal stands
accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
Resultantly, the impugned order dated 17.11.2017 is
confirmed. Respondent is at liberty to take action in the
property in question in accordance with law. AE (B)
concerned is directed to submit the action taken report
before Dy. Commissioner concerned.
The file of the department, if any, be returned to the
respondent along with copy of this order.
File be consigned to record room.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 504/19 24.02.2020 Present : Shri S.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
An application moved for amendment of appeal, copy
supplied.
Appellant is directed to file documents of title.
To come up arguments on the application for interim stay
on 22.04.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 236/18 24.02.2020 Present : None for appellant.
Shri Sushil Kumar Jain, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
As none has appeared on behalf of the appellant, be listed
for further proceedings on 15.04.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 395/18 24.02.2020 Present : None for appellant.
Shri Mohit Sharma, , Ld. counsel for the respondent.
As none has appeared on behalf of the appellant, be listed
for further proceedings on 28.04.2020
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 60/SCM/13 24.02.2020 Present : Shri S.N. Aggarwal, Direction of Appellant.
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.’
Sh. Priyabrat Sahu, Ld. counsel for LAC.
Appellant seeks adjournment as his counsel is not available.
At request, last opportunity granted for final arguments.
Be listed on 24.04.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 388/18 24.02.2020 Present : Ms. Sukhwant Kaur, Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant.
Shri Madan Sagar, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant seeks adjournment as
main counsel is busy in Saket Court.
Ld. counsel for the respondent states that appeal is not
maintainable.
To come up for final arguments on 07.04.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 237/15 and 151/17 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Vinay Pathak, Ld.proxy Counsel for the appellant.
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. proxy Counsel for respondent.
At request of Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant, last
opportunity granted for final arguments.
Be listed on 21.05.2020..
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 41/18 24.02.2020 Present : Ms. Nikita Khanna, Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant .
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
At request of Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant. adjourned
for final arguments to 06.05.2020 as main counsel is
unwell.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 1016/15 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Vinay Pathak, Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant.
Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Shri Rajiv Garg, ALO.
Written submissions filed on behalf of appellant, copy
supplied.
Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant seeks adjournment as
main counsel is not available today. Last opportunity
granted.
Be listed for final arguments on 05.05.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 888/17 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant with counsel Shri Dinesh Aggarwal.
Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
An application moved for withdrawal of the appeal.
Statement of appellant recorded.
Statement of the appellant recorded.
In view of the statement of appellant, the appeal stands
dismissed as withdrawn. Resultantly the impugned order
dated 19.08.2016 is confirmed. Respondent is at liberty to
take action in the property in question in accordance with
law. AE(B) concerned to file action taken report before the
Dy. Commissioner concerned.
The file of the department, if any, be returned to the
respondent alongwith copy of this order.
File be consigned to record room.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 705/17 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Vimal Dhingra, Ld. Counsel for the appellant .
Shri Fransis Paul, Ld. counsel for intervener.
Shri Krishan Keshav, Nodal Officer.
Written submissions filed on behalf of the appellant and
applicant, copy supplied.
At request of Nodal Officer,MCD, adjourned for final
arguments to 02.07.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 717/18 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant with counsel Shri Vishal Soni.
Ms. Mitlesh Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
At request of Ld. Counsel for the appellant , adjourned for
filing of brief synopsis and final arguments to 02.07.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 872/18 24.02.2020 Present : Ms. N. Sehar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant .
Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
At request of Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant, last
opportunity granted for final arguments.
Put up on 24.04.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 552/19 and 553/19 24.02.2020 Present : None for appellant.
Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
As none has appeared on behalf of the appellant, be listed
for further proceedings on 11.03.2020
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 950/16 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant with Ld. proxy counsel Shri Rahul Kumar.
Shri Madan Sagar, Ld. counsel for the respondent
Shri Vinaty Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant.
Documents filed on behalf of applicant.
At request of Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant., last
opportunity granted for final arguments.
Ld. counsel for the respondent states that part demolition
action has been taken.
Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant seeks adjournment as
main counsel is busy in Hon’ble High Court.
Parties are directed to file brief synopsis.
To come up for final arguments on 27.05.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY)
AD&SJ-cum-P.O. Appellate Tribunal:MCD
24.02.2020
A.No. 783/18,715/18 and 719/18 24.02.2020 Present : Ms. Vivya Upadhaya, Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant.
Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Sh. Dharamvir Gupta, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
At request of Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant,last
opportunity granted for final arguments.
Be listed on 19.05.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 104/18 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant in person.
Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Shri Asok Kumar Popli, Ld. counsel for applicant.
Arguments have been addressed on behalf of applicant on
the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
At request of appellant, adjourned for arguments to
25.03.2020 as his counsel is busy in some other court case.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 93/17 24.02.2020 Present : Shri M. Hussain, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
None for respondent.
Shri R.K. Saxena, Ld. counsel for applicant.
\
Arguments heard on the application under Order 1 Rule 10
CPC.
Be listed for orders on 20.03.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No 92/19 and 93/19 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Prayas Aneja, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Mitlesh Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
Shri Pramod Kaushik, Ld. counsel for the respondent .
None for applicant.
Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks time to file documents
to show that the property in question is protected under
National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provision)
Act,
Be listed for final arguments on 23.03.2020.
Interim orders, if any, to continue till next date of hearing
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 367/15 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant in person.
Shri Mohit Sharma ,Ld. counsel for the respondent.
At joint request, adjourned for final arguments on
11.05.2020.
AE(B) concerned to be present on next date of hearing.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 667/18 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Nitin Ojha, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Dushra Waseem, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent.
An application moved on behalf of appellant under section
151 CPC .
Be listed for reply and arguments on the application on
28.02.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 435/19 24.02.2020 Present : Ms. Ravleen, Ld. proxy Counsel for the appellant .
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. proxy Counsel for respondent.
At request of Ld.proxy Counsel for the appellant, adjourned
for arguments on the interim application on 29.04.2020 as
main counsel is not available today.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 288/19 and 39/20 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Summit Gaba, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Shri Varun Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondent .
Shri Gaurav Bansal, AE (B).
Status report filed, copy supplied.
Documents filed on behalf of appellant, copy supplied.
Parties are directed to file their brief synopsis.
At joint requested, adjourned for final arguments to
17.04.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 390/11 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Rohit Goel, Ld. Counsel for the appellant .
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
An application moved on behalf of appellant under section
151 CPC for desealing of the property in question for a
period of four months to demolish the entire structure up to
the ground level.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent states that he does not wish
to file reply but states that one month time be granted.
Heard. The appellant is accordingly granted one month time
to demolish the entire structure of the property in question
up to the ground level. The property be desealed by
respondent on 02.03.2020 for one month and resealed
thereafter. The appellant is directed not to misuse the same
or raise any unauthorized construction during the said
period or create third party interest. AE (B) concerned will
inspect the property during the period it is de-sealed. The
property be resealed on 03.04.2020. Application stands
disposed off.
Be listed for filing status report on 20.04.2020.
Copy of the order be given Dasti to Ld. counsel for parties
as prayed for.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 191/19 24.02.2020 Present : Appellant in person.
Sh. V.K. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
One regular stenographer is on leave. No time left.
Be listed for orders on 16.03.2020.
POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020
A.No. 835/15 24.02.2020 Present : Shri Kamal Kumar Jain, Husband of appellant.
Sh. H.R. Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
One regular stenographer is on leave. No time left.
Be listed for orders on 25.02.2020.
(POONAM CHAUDHRY) AD&SJ-cum-P.O.
Appellate Tribunal:MCD 24.02.2020