annual report - national government...8 annual report 2014/15 council on higher education sahepsc...

Annual Report 2014/15

ii

ANNUAL REPORT 2014/15

COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION

Annual Report2014/15

2



CONTENTS: PART A 5General Information 6List of Acronyms 7Chairperson’s Message 9CEO’s Overview – The year in perspective 12Statement of Responsibility and Confirmation of Accuracy 15Strategic Overview 16Legislative Mandates 17Strategic Imperatives 18Strategic Goals and Objectives 19Organisational Structure 21

PART B 23Performance by Programme 24Advice to the Minister 24Monitoring of the State of Higher Education 25Higher Education Performance Indicators 25Review of the State of Higher Education 1994 – 2014 25Research Projects 25Private Higher Education Management Information System 26Publications 27Conferences 27HEQSF Alignment and Linked Alignment Project 27Standards Development 28HEQCIS 29Institutional Audits 29Quality Enhancement 30Programme Accreditation 31National Reviews 34Quality Promotion and Capacity Development 35Human Resources 37Administration and Finance 41Overview of the CHE’s Performance 43

3



PART C: GOVERNANCE 53 Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 54Executive Authority 54The Accounting Authority 54Governance Structure 55Committees and Sub-committees 60Remuneration of Council Members 64Risk Management 64Materiality Framework 64Internal Audit 65Auditors 65Compliance with Laws and Regulations 65Audit Report Matters in the Previous Year 65Fraud and Corruption 65Subsequent Events 65Minimising Conflict of Interest 65Code of Conduct 66Health, Safety and Environmental Issues 66Social Responsibility 66Audit Committee Report 66Council Members 67

PART D: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 73Overview 74Human Resources Oversight Statistics 74

PART E: ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 79

A

4



Part A:General

Information

6



GENERAL INFORMATIONRegistered Name: Council on Higher EducationPhysical Address: 1 Quintin Brand Street Persequor Technopark Pretoria 0020Postal Address: P O Box 94 Persequor Park 0020 South AfricaTelephone Number +27 012 349 3840Fax Number +27 012 349 3942Email [email protected] www.che.ac.zaExternal Auditors: Auditor-General South AfricaBank: Standard Bank, Brooklyn Branch, Fehrsen Street, Brooklyn, Tshwane

7



LIST OF ACRONYMSASB Accounting Standards BoardAPP Annual Performance PlanARC Audit and Risk CommitteeBSW Bachelor of Social WorkCEO Chief Executive OfficerCFO Chief Financial OfficerCESM Classification of Educational Subject MatterCHE Council on Higher EducationDHET Department of Higher Education and TrainingENE Estimates of National ExpenditureEXCO Executive CommitteeGAAP Generally Accepted Accounting PracticeGRAP Generally Recognised Accounting PracticeHELTASA Higher Education Learning and Teaching Association of South AfricaHEMIS Higher Education Management Information SystemHEQC Higher Education Quality CommitteeHEQCIS Higher Education Quality Committee Information SystemHEQSF Higher Education Qualifications Sub-FrameworkHR Human ResourcesHRRC Human Resources and Remuneration CommitteeIAC Independent Actuaries and ConsultantsIAS International Accounting StandardsIASB International Accounting Standards BoardIFRS International Financial Reporting StandardsLLB Bachelor of LawsMBA Master of Business AdministrationMEC Monitoring and Evaluation CommitteeMTEF Medium Term Expenditure FrameworkNIHSS National Institute for the Humanities and Social SciencesNBT National Benchmark TestNLRD National Learners’ Records DatabaseNQF National Qualifications Framework Act 67 of 2008NRF National Research FoundationPAA Public Audit Act of South Africa, Act 25 of 2004PFMA Public Finance Management Act 1 of South Africa, Act 1 of 1999PPPFA Preferential Procurement Policy Framework ActQCTO Quality Council for Trades and OccupationsQEP Quality Enhancement Project

A

8



SAHEPSC South African Higher Education Platform in Sport Coaching SAQA South African Qualifications AuthoritySARS South African Revenue ServicesSASCOC South African Sports Confederation and Olympic CommitteeSRC Students’ Representative CouncilUIF Unemployment Insurance FundUMALUSI Council for Quality Assurance in General and Further Education and TrainingVAT Value Added Tax

9



CHAIRPERSON’S MESSAGEThe Council on Higher Education remains a key player, in partnership with other stakeholders, in shaping the higher education system in South Africa. I have been honoured to steer the work of the Council in the 2014/15 financial year, and to oversee the induction of new members of Council appointed in December 2014 by the Minister. It is gratifying to have been working with Council members with vast experience and expertise in higher education and other sectors. In order to fulfil our fiduciary duties and ensure that there is good governance at the CHE, Council underwent an independent external evaluation of its performance, the results of which were pleasing to see. It was evident from the results that the CHE takes its role very seriously. Regular attendance of meetings, robust engagements in meetings, the quality of advice to the Minister and interactions in the higher education sector in various forms characterised the work of the CHE in the 2014/15 financial year. I am pleased to report that in this period, the administrative, financial and governance systems of the organisation continued on a sound footing already laid in previous years which enabled the work of the CHE to grow and develop as it implemented a range of new and exciting projects as outlined in this Annual Report. Although the projects are exciting and relevant to the development of the higher education system, there were a few challenges that affected the progress in some of the research projects. The time it takes to complete some of the projects is a challenge faced by Council. The CHE depends to a large extent on the expertise and willingness of peers in the sector to contribute to the work of the entity. There are instances where there are inordinate delays in completing the projects, and consequently an overlap into the next financial year.

The improvement of quality in teaching and learning has been at the centre of many of the CHE’s projects. The first phase of the Quality Enhancement Project which was implemented in this financial year focused the attention of public universities, and to a lesser extent, private higher education institutions on improving four key aspects that underpin good teaching and learning and hence student success. The CHE is concerned about low throughput rates and is cognisant of a range of interventions put in place by institutions of higher learning together with the Department of Higher Education and Training through the Teaching and Development Grants to address this challenge. The CHE played a crucial role in these interventions through HELTASA, particularly in recognizing excellence in teaching at universities in this country.

One of the legislative requirements for the CHE is to conduct institutional audits through its permanent Committee, the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). In the 2014/15 financial year there was also extensive engagement with those institutions still busy implementing the recommendations of their institutional quality audits. The Improvement Plans are closely monitored, and some of the universities that encountered governance and management challenges were assisted to focus on their Improvement Plans in 2014/15. The challenge faced by Council was the closure of the first cycle of audits at some universities for various reasons.

A

10



A robust accreditation system of the CHE has enabled the processing of 427 new applications, the accreditation of 324 programmes and 36 site visits across the country. In addition to this, a total of 53 programmes were re-accredited. As a result of the rigour involved in accrediting academic programmes, the CHE encountered legal challenges from higher education providers who had their accreditation withdrawn in the financial year 2014/15. As the custodian of quality assurance mechanisms, the CHE continues to preserve the integrity of the system by ensuring that our qualifications are beyond reproach. The legal challenges that purport variations and/or deviations from the well-considered criteria to assess the quality of provisioning at some private higher education institutions put a strain on the human and financial resources of the CHE. Council is, however, resolute that quality of teaching and learning shall not be compromised by legal threats and actions.

In the year under review there were structural re-arrangements within the Council on Higher Education. The National Reviews Directorate was merged with the Standards Development Directorate to enhance interactions and synergies in setting standards and reviewing certain professional programmes. The Capacity Development and Quality Promotion Unit was housed within the office of the Chief Executive Officer to pull together projects across the organisation and maximise our output. The accreditation system, the national reviews, the quality promotion activities and the alignment of qualifications with the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF) all contributed to the HEQC’s sharper focus on bringing about improvements in the quality of teaching and learning and in the offerings of our higher education system.

The strategic direction signalled in the 2014 workshop of Council to strengthen the CHE’s relationship with other stakeholders, notably the Department of Higher Education and Training, other Quality Councils, institutions of higher learning and the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training was aimed at enhancing the visibility and impact of the CHE as it executes its quality assurance functions, and provides advice to address the key challenges in the higher education system. This is still work in progress that overlaps into the 2015/16 financial year, but certainly one of the medium to long term goals of the CHE to increase its visibility and impact nationally and internationally. This strategic direction has been reiterated by the new Council. The level of engagement of the CHE with higher education institutions has, however, increased through its quality enhancement and promotion activities and through ongoing consultation processes regarding the CHE’s proposal for undergraduate curriculum reform. The latter informed the CHE’s comprehensive and proactive advice to the Minister to introduce an extended and flexible curriculum structure in undergraduate qualifications to address the major challenge of poor throughput and graduation rates in higher education. Advice on a number of policy-related matters was also provided in this period.

As indicated above, one of the medium to long term goals is to increase the visibility and impact of the Council on Higher Education and playing a crucial role in the implementation of the plan to be crafted for the post school education and training sector. Adequate funding for the CHE to deliver on its mandate, within the shortest possible time, form part of the medium to long term goals of the entity. Roll-over funds from projects are not sustainable.The Council’s relationships and work with the South African Qualifications Authority, the

11



Council for Quality Assurance in General and Further Education, and the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations have continued to be strengthened, and the priorities related to the NQF identified by the Minister for 2014/15 were advanced significantly, particularly through the near-completion of the HEQSF-alignment project. International linkages were also pursued through ongoing collaboration with other quality agencies in the Southern African region, with the Scottish Quality Assurance Agency, with a number of international projects and through participation in conferences and a number of international speakers at the CHE’s events.

The CHE improved the rate at which it retained its staff through various human resources strategic interventions, and I am pleased to report that there is a stable work force dedicated to deliver on the mandate of Council. Attracting and retaining staff with superior intellectual capabilities remains a challenge that we hope can be mitigated by providing competitive remuneration and benefits in the medium to long term.

The outcome of the audit by the Auditor-General of South Africa attests to compliance with legal requirements of the Public Finance Management Act. I would like to express my appreciation to the Audit and Risk Committee together with the management and staff for working hard and ensuring that the CHE had a clean audit in 2014/2015.

In conclusion, I would like to thank all our partners who supported the work of the CHE in various ways in 2014/15. Higher education is confronted by many challenges, some of which if not addressed in a collaborative manner could reverse all the gains we have realised since the dawn of democracy. Diminishing resources and an expanded mandate of the post- school education and training system begs of all role players to “do more with less.” As I thank the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training for the oversight role and support in resourcing the CHE in 2014/15, I commit the CHE to fulfil its mandate and utilise the scarce resources which we hope will improve in the next financial year. Thanks to the Minister,the Deputy Minister, Director-General and all the staff of the Department of Higher Education and Training for their support during the 2014/15 financial year.

Professor N. Themba MosiaChairperson

A

12



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S OVERVIEW

The Year in PerspectiveThe past year has seen the CHE focusing on the implementation of the plans and projects that characterise its activities as both an advisory body on higher education matters, and as a Quality Council. The execution of its quality assurance and quality promotion functions have taken centre stage, while the CHE’s contribution to the policy discourse on higher education has been strengthened through its research and information dissemination activities.

One of the most pressing challenges of higher education, the enduring problem of poor throughput rates, has been on the CHE’s radar for some time. That less than half of the students taking diploma and degree programmes currently graduate, even allowing for extra years to do so, is an unsustainable situation, costly both in human and subsidy terms.Such a challenge requires an imaginative and bold response at a system level to turn it around. A CHE Task Team put forward a proposal based on extensive research for reform in the undergraduate curriculum structure in 2013, and, after extensive consultation, further research and refinement of the proposal, the CHE submitted advice on this matter to the Minister in December 2014.

A comprehensive review of the higher education system, undertaken by a number of working groups, continued to be worked on and refined for publication in the next financial year; it has the potential to lead to further advice to the Minister. In the year under review, advice and comment was also provided on a number of policy matters at the Minister’s request. The CHE continued to provide audited data on the higher education system through a third and expanded edition of the successful publication VitalStats, and carried out work on a number of other research projects which are designed to reach fruition and publication in the next financial year.

The Quality Enhancement Project (QEP), which was launched in 2014, gained traction in both the public and private higher education institutions as it entered into the first major phase of implementation. The aim of the QEP is to contribute to enhancing learning and teaching in order to improve student success, which is understood as increasing the number of graduates with attributes that are personally, professionally and socially valuable. The work of the Directorate has been enhanced by the active involvement of Deputy Vice-Chancellors (DVCs) Academic of the universities both within their institutions in their preparation of submissions on their current activities in four areas that underpin teaching and learning, and nationally, in assisting with the design and oversight of a number of collaborative learning opportunities. Their support is essential to making the QEP a success.

The 2014/15 year also saw the major project of aligning all 10 000 or so existing qualifications in higher education with the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF) reach a point of near-completion. Apart from the ongoing process of accrediting new programmes as they are developed to replace those that do not align with the HEQSF,

13



A

which will form part of the routine accreditation process at the CHE going forward, all existing programmes have been evaluated and aligned with the HEQSF. This process has facilitated an intensive rationalising and reorganising of offerings in higher education to promote quality, coherence and articulation within the sector.

A milestone was reached in this year with the development of the first five draft qualification standards to be piloted for curriculum development, accreditation and national reviews. The functions of developing standards and the carrying out of national reviews were amalgamated in order to ensure that national reviews are carried out in relation to standards developed and agreed to within academic groupings. The National Review of Social Work was completed, and ongoing monitoring of the implementation of accreditation conditions will be part of the work of the CHE for some time. A national review of the LLB qualification was launched as the next major project in this regard.

In terms of the overall financial performance of the CHE, the 2014/15 year continued some of the healthy developments noted in 2013/14 and less under-expenditure than in previous years; at 17% it is, however, still short of the target of 5%.

There was ongoing focus on governance and accounting policy reviews and enhance-ments in order to ensure compliance with the applicable guidelines from National Treasury, Accounting Standards and best practices.

Further, there was enhancement of current procedures and processes to address internal control deficiencies, identified by both the internal and external auditors, in finance and supply chain which included the development of both month and year-end close processes. By the introduction of Goods Receipt Vouchers transactions are now recognised in the correct period as they are expensed immediately when the goods or services are delivered or rendered.

The CHE ended the 2014/15 financial year with an audited surplus of R14 228 860 after adjusting for non-cash items relating to depreciation and bad debts written off amounting to R2 257 810. A request for roll-over of funds was submitted to National Treasury for approval.

A consolidated strategic audit action plan was developed and implemented and this resulted in 13 audit findings from the internal auditors and 22 audit findings from external auditors being addressed. Efforts were made to continue enhancing internal controls and procedures to ensure an excellent audit outcome – which indeed was the case, as the CHE achieved a clean audit for 2014/15.

As is evidenced in the financial data, with an average of 90% of posts filled throughout the year all existing Directorates were appropriately staffed and carrying out all their functions, while an intensified focus on quality promotion and policy development was facilitated through the appointment of a new Director in this area. The implementation of a new flexible remuneration framework for senior staff, approved by the Minister of Higher Education and Training and the Minister of Finance, assisted in achieving stability in staffing at that level and ensured continuity and progression in the work of the CHE.

14



We are grateful to the members of the outgoing Council for exercising keen oversight of the work of the CHE and for providing input on its strategic direction. The HEQC has continued to demonstrate its commitment to improving quality through its careful consideration of quality matters and sensible decision-making. Our thanks go to four members whose terms of office came to an end in this period for their dedication and wise input: Professor Narend Baijnath, Dr. Felicity Coughlan, Mr. Thami Ledwaba and Ms. Kuselwa Marala. A special word of gratitude is extended to Professor Yunus Ballim, whose term similarly came to an end, for chairing the Committee in a manner that was both thoughtful and decisive.

After five successful years at the helm of the CHE, Mr Ahmed Essop decided not to pursue a second term in the Chief Executive Officer’s post. He has left a legacy of good governance, sound principles applied in policy-making, and an organisation that has both consolidated and extended its important role in higher education. Our appreciation is extended to him for his strong leadership, his wise counsel, his extensive support to the Directors of the CHE as they carried out their programmes and projects, for his insights and for his somewhat acerbic sense of humour.

Finally, the CHE’s Directors and staff are commended for their hard work and commitment to ensuring that the CHE’s advice and quality assurance functions are professionally carried out in the furtherance of the long-term health of South Africa’s higher education system.

Denyse Webbstock (Dr)Acting Chief Executive Officer

15



STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND CONFIRMATION OF ACCURACYTo the best of our knowledge and belief, we confirm the following:

All information and amounts disclosed in the annual report are consistent with the annual financial statements audited by the Auditor-General.

The annual report is complete, accurate and is free from any omissions.

The annual report has been prepared in accordance with the annual report guidelines as issued by National Treasury.

The Annual Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice (GRAP) including any interpretations, guidelines and directives issued by the Accounting Standards Board applicable to the Council.

The accounting authority is responsible for the preparation of the annual financial statements and for the judgements made in this information.

The accounting authority is responsible for establishing, and implementing a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of the performance information, the human resources information and the annual financial statements.

The external auditors are engaged to express an independent opinion on the annual financial statements.

In our opinion, the annual report fairly reflects the operations, the performance information, the human resources information and the financial affairs of the entity for the financial year ended 31 March 2015.

Prof N. Themba Mosia Dr Denyse WebbstockChairperson ActingChiefExecutiveOfficer31 July 2015 31 July 2015

A

16



STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

Vision The CHE as an independent statutory body strives to be an organisation nationally and internationally recognised for the quality of its intellectual contribution to and its impact on the development of the South African higher education system through its core functions of advising the Minister of Higher Education and Training, monitoring trends in the higher education system and assuring and promoting the quality of higher education.

Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a transformed, equitable, high quality higher education system capable of responding to the intellectual, ethical and human resource challenges of a democratic society based on social justice principles which operates in a global context.

Values In pursuit of its vision and mission the CHE is committed to and guided by the following values:

• Independence • Transformation • Integrity • Public Accountability

17



LEGISLATIVE MANDATEThe CHE is a statutory body established under the Higher Education Act (Act 101 of 1997), as amended, and is the Quality Council for Higher Education in terms of the National Qualifications Framework Act (Act 67 of 2008). As a statutory body, the CHE is a Schedule 3A National Public Entity in terms of the Public Finance Management Act (Act 29 of 1999) and the applicable Treasury Regulations.

Higher Education ActIn terms of the Higher Education Act, the mandate of the CHE includes the following:

• To provide advice to the Minister of Higher Education and Training on all higher education matters on request and proactively.

• To promote quality and quality assurance in higher education through its permanent committee, the HEQC, including auditing the quality assurance mechanisms of, and accrediting programmes offered by, higher education institutions.

• To monitor the state of higher education and publishing information regarding developments in higher education on a regular basis, including arranging and co-ordinating conferences on higher education issues.

National Qualifications Framework ActIn terms of the National Qualifications Framework Act, as the Quality Council for Higher Education the CHE’s mandate includes the following:

• To develop and manage the qualifications sub-framework for higher education, namely, the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF), including ensuring the relevance and currency of qualifications.

• To advise the Minister of Higher Education on matters relating to the HEQSF.• To develop and implement policy and criteria for the development, registration and

publication of qualifications, as well as for assessment, recognition of prior learning and credit accumulation and transfer in the context of the policy and criteria developed by the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA).

• To contribute to the development of level descriptors and to ensure their relevance.• To maintain a database of learner achievements in higher education and to submit the

data to the National Learners’ Records Database, which SAQA maintains.• To conduct and publish research, which facilitates the development and implementation

of the sub-framework.• To inform the public of the sub-framework.

A

18



STRATEGIC IMPERATIVESThe CHE, in interpreting and giving effect to its mandate, has adopted five strategic imperatives, which inform the development of its strategic goals and objectives:

• To contribute to informing and influencing the public debate on the policy framework for the transformation of the higher education system.

• To contribute to developing the role of the quality assurance system as a steering tool in conjunction with planning and funding to enhance the quality of higher education and to enable the achievement of national policy goals and objectives.

• To contribute to ensuring the currency and relevance of the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework to meet the human resource and knowledge needs of South Africa, including the development and maintenance of standards to enhance the quality of higher education.

• To contribute to building the intellectual capability of the CHE. • To contribute to the development of an enabling and effective organisational climate.

19



STRATEGIC GOALS AND OBJECTIVESThe strategic imperatives have been translated into four strategic goals and eleven linked strategic objectives, which inform the CHE’s strategic plan for 2012-2017 and the framework for the CHE’s Annual Performance Plan (APP). These are outlined below:

Goal One

To contribute to informing and influencing the public debate on the policy framework for the transformation of the higher education system and to become a recognised centre for information and policy analysis on higher education. Objective One To provide advice to the Minister of Higher Education and Training on all higher education matters on request and on the CHE’s own initiative. Objective Two To monitor the state of higher education, including publishing information and convening conferences, seminars and workshops on developments in higher education.

Goal Two

To contribute to the development of qualification standards to ensure the relevance, comparability and currency of qualifications. Objective Three To develop and manage the HEQSF, including the articulation of qualifications between the three sub-frameworks, namely, the HEQSF, the General and Further Education and Training Qualifications Sub-Framework and the Trades and OccupationsQualificationsSub-Framework. Objective Four To develop and implement policy, criteria and standards for higher education qualificationstoinformandguidethedevelopment,registrationandpublicationof qualifications. Objective Five To maintain a database of learner achievements in higher education and to submit the data to the National Learners’ Records Database (NLRD), which is maintained by SAQA.

A

20



Goal Three

To promote quality and quality assurance in higher education, including enhancing the quality of higher education. Objective Six To audit the quality assurance mechanisms of higher education institutions. Objective Seven To accredit new programmes submitted by public and private higher education institutions and to re-accredit existing programmes offered by private higher education institutions. Objective Eight Toundertakenationalreviewsofexistingprogrammesinspecificsubjectfieldsand qualificationlevelsofferedbypublicandprivatehighereducationinstitutions. Objective Nine To promote quality and to develop capacity and understanding of the role of quality assurance in improving quality in higher education at both the systemic and institutional levels.

Goal Four

To ensure the efficient and effective provision of corporate services – administrative, financial, technical and professional, to support the discharge of the core mandate of the CHE. Objective Ten To ensure the development of human resources management environment that enables staff to develop their full potential. Objective Eleven Toensurethatfinancial,administrationandsupplychainmanagementiscompliant with the requirements of the PFMA, relevant Treasury regulations and laws.

Objective Twelve To ensure effective governance and compliance of ICT with statutory requirements.

21



ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE

Council Structure

Management Structure

A

Council

Human Resources and Remuneration

Committee

Audit and Risk Committee

Executive Committee

Higher Education

Quality Committee

Monitoring and

Evaluation Committee

Council

Chief Executive Officer

Denyse Webbstock (Acting)

Corporate Services

Vuyo Matsam

Chief Financial Officer

ThulaganyoMothusi

Monitoring and

EvaluationGenevieve

Simpson (Acting)

Programme AccreditationKethamonie

Naidoo

Institutional AuditsDiane

Grayson

National Standards

and Reviews

Olivia Mokgatle

Quality Assurance

and Promotion

Co-ordinationAmani Saidi

22



Part B:Performance

Information

24



PERFORMANCE INFORMATION BY PROGRAMME

Strategic Goal OneTo contribute to informing and influencing the public debate on the policy framework for the transformation of the higher education system and to become a recognised centre for information and policy analysis on higher education.

Objective One

To provide advice to the Minister of Higher Education and Training on all higher education matters on request and on the CHE’s own initiative.

Advice to the Minister

The CHE has a dual advisory function; providing advice at the request of the Minister of Higher Education and Training and providing advice on its own initiative in response to critical issues and challenges identified by the Council that impact on the higher education system.

In the year under review, the Council provided the Minister with advice and comment at his request on the following:

• Draft Policy on the Policy and Procedures for Measurement of Research Outputs of Public Higher Education Institutions.

• Draft Articulation Policy.

In addition, the Council provided the Minister with advice on its own initiative on the Reform of the Undergraduate Curriculum. This advice was based on the report of the Task Team established by the Council to investigate the desirability and feasibility of restructuring the duration of the current three- and four-year undergraduate diplomas and degrees, as a mechanism for both enhancing academic success and for enabling students to engage with the changing role of knowledge in contributing to social and economic development in the 21st century. In finalising its advice, the Council took into account the responses received as part of the consultation process on the Task Team report from higher education institutions and other stakeholders.

Objective Two

To monitor the state of higher education, including publishing information and convening conferences, seminars and workshops on developments in higher education.

25



B

Monitoring of the State of Higher Education

The CHE is responsible for monitoring and interpreting trends and progress towards achieving national policy goals and objectives in higher education.

Higher Education Performance Indicators

VitalStats 2012, the third in the annual series of VitalStats booklets to provide audited data on key aspects of the public higher education system, was published in December 2014. It provides student and staff data in public higher education for the period 2007 to 2012, including cohort data for the 2007 student intake, and, for the first time, cohort data on postgraduate qualifications. It has also been expanded to include data on higher education funding and research.

Review of the State of Higher Education 1994-2014

A review of the state of higher education to mark the first two decades of democracy was launched in 2013. Eight working groups were formed to identify and engage with the key challenges in the main focus areas to be covered by the review, namely:

• Context• Regulation;• Management and governance;• Teaching and Learning;• Research;• Community engagement;• Academic staffing; and • Funding.

The various chapters of the review are being finalised and, after engagement with Council, will be published.

Research Projects

Restructuring the Undergraduate Curriculum

This project has been completed and advice has been provided to the Minister as reported above.

Student Governance in Public Higher Education Institutions

This project, which was initiated in the light of the ongoing unrest and disputes relating to different aspects of student governance in public higher education institutions, is making steady progress. It focuses on the participation of student political organisations in Student Representative Council (SRC) elections, as well as the role, function and structure of SRCs in higher education institutions. The empirical research, including interviews with SRC members and Deans of Students at 8 institutions across the country was undertaken in 2013 and is

26



currently being analysed. The findings have fed into the 20-year review of higher education discussed above.

Governance and Management in Public Higher Education

The research on governance and management challenges in higher education, which focuses on the size, composition and role of Councils, including comparative international experience on codes of conduct for Councils, has been completed. A draft discussion document, which proposes a new institutional governance model in relation to the size, composition, role and modus operandi of Councils of public higher education institutions, is being finalised.

ReflectionsonAcademicLeadershipinSouthAfrica

The role of academic leadership has become increasingly important in the context of the changing nature of higher education world-wide in terms of the pressures for access, the impact of new technologies and funding constraints. In South Africa there is the added complexity of the transformation imperative and the inequities of the past. It is against this background that a project on reflections on academic leadership was initiated with the aim of publishing a book on the reflections of a selected group of retired senior leaders in higher education sharing their insights, knowledge and experience for the benefit of current and future leaders in higher education. Nine contributions have been received and the book is being prepared for publication in mid-2015.

Placement Mechanisms

A background paper on placement mechanisms and practices, such as the National Benchmark Test, in public higher education institutions has been prepared to inform further research. Placement mechanisms are particularly important in the context of the CHE Task Team’s Report, A proposal for undergraduate curriculum reform in South Africa: the case foraflexiblecurriculumstructure,which suggests extending degree and diploma study by 120 credits as the norm, with flexible options depending on students’ levels of preparedness. The CHE will review whether further research is required based on the Minister’s response to its advice on the Task Team’s proposals.

Private Higher Education Management Information System

The development of the framework for a private higher education management information system that would facilitate the monitoring of trends in private higher education and enable comparative analysis with the public higher education system was completed at the end of 2013. The framework was developed jointly with DHET, SAQA and representatives of private providers. The development of the system software for the framework has been completed and is in the testing phase. It is anticipated that it will go online in the course of 2015.

27



B

Publications

The following publications were produced in the year under review:

Distance Higher Education Programmes in a Digital Era: Good Practice Guide was published in August. This is the outcome of a project initiated in 2012 to assist programme evaluators and designers in interpreting and applying the HEQC accreditation criteria to distance education programmes.

VitalStats: Public Higher Education 2012 was published in December 2014. It provides public higher education student and staff data for the period 2007 to 2012, including cohort data for the 2007 student intake, and for the first time, cohort data on postgraduate qualifications. It has been expanded to include data on higher education funding and research.

Conferences

An Information and Communications Technology (ICT) colloquium, Moving the Teaching and Learning System in South African Higher Education into the Digitally-Mediated Era took place in October 2014. It was attended by approximately 100 delegates from public universities, private institutions and regulatory bodies. The purpose of the Colloquium was to engage with the latest trends and developments in ICT in higher education.

Strategic Goal TwoTo contribute to the development of qualification standards to ensure the relevance, comparability and currency of qualifications.

Objective Three

To develop and manage the HEQSF, including the articulation of qualifications between the three sub-frameworks, namely, the HEQSF, the General and Further Education and Training Qualifications Sub-Framework and the Trades and OccupationsQualificationsSub-Framework.

HigherEducationQualificationsSub-Framework(HEQSF)AlignmentProject

The purpose of the alignment project is to align existing programmes and qualifications offered by public and private institutions of higher education with the requirements of the revised HEQSF. The alignment of Category A programmes, that is, programmes that required minimal change, was completed in the 2013/14 financial year.

The Accreditation Directorate received 1268 applications for Category B HEQSF-alignment during the 2014/15 financial year. Category B programmes are those programmes that require less than 50% changes to the curricula in order for them to be aligned with the requirements of the HEQSF. Of these submissions, all have been evaluated and reviewed and

28



all recommendations were tabled at the HEQC meeting of 11 March 2015. The outcomes of this meeting have been communicated to the institutions and relevant stakeholders.

In addition, a total of 3 781 Category C programmes were tabled at the HEQC meeting of 11 March 2015 for noting. Category C programmes are those that require more than a 50% change to the curricula in order to align with the requirements of the HEQSF and therefore will be taught-out. The outcomes of this meeting have been communicated to the institutions and relevant stakeholders.

Further to the release of the outcomes of approved Category A programmes in July 2014, the Accreditation Directorate received applications for title changes to 261 approved programmes from 15 institutions. The recommendations of these applications were tabled at the HEQC Meeting of 11 March 2015, and the outcomes of this meeting have been communicated to the institutions and relevant stakeholders.

As previously reported, the alignment process has been beneficial, as it has enabled higher education institutions to rationalise their offerings, including removing outdated and discontinued programmes from their records.

Objective Four

To develop and implement policy, criteria and standards for higher education qualificationstoinformandguidethedevelopment,registrationandpublicationof qualifications.

Standards Development

The development of pilot qualification standards has been completed and draft standards statements are ready for public comment for the following qualifications:

• Bachelor of Social Work.• Master of Business Administration (MBA).• Bachelor of Laws (LLB).• Bachelor of Engineering.• Bachelor of Science in Engineering.• Diploma in Engineering.

The Framework for Qualification Standards in Higher Education will be reviewed in the light of experience gained during the pilot phase. This will be done during the first quarter of 2015/16. The scope of standards development will be expanded to include other fields of study and qualification types. Tentative approaches have been made with the Pharmacy Council with regard to developing qualification standards for the Higher and Advanced Certificates in Pharmacy, and with the South African Council of Quantity Surveying Practitioners (SACQSP) to develop standards in the field of quantity surveying.

29



B

Objective Five

To maintain a database of learner achievements in higher education and to submit the data to the National Learners’ Records Database (NLRD), which is maintained by SAQA.

HEQCIS

There was continued progress in collecting data on student enrolment and achievement data in private higher education through the Higher Education Quality Committee Information System (HEQCIS), which has been developed in conjunction with SAQA. The number of unique, currently registered private providers that have submitted at least one data load increased from 114 of 116 (98%) in the previous financial year to 113 of 114 (99%) in this financial year. Within the December 2014 cycle, 88% of all unique private higher education institutions each successfully submitted at least one full data load.

Strategic Goal ThreeTo promote quality and quality assurance in higher education, including enhancing the quality of higher education.

Objective Six

To audit the quality assurance mechanisms of higher education institutions.

Institutional Audits

Although the first cycle of institutional audits was completed in mid-2011, there is ongoing monitoring of those institutions that are still in the process of implementing the recommendations flowing from their institutional audit reports. The monitoring of the institutional audits is the responsibility of the Institutional Audits Committee, which is a sub-committee of the HEQC. In the year under review, the Institutional Audits Committee comprised the following members:

• Prof Usuf Chikte, Chairperson, Executive Head, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University

• Prof Rocky Ralebipi-Simela, CEO and National Librarian, National Library of South Africa• Prof Nan Yeld, Director University Teaching and Learning Development, Department of

Higher Education and Training• Prof Bennie Anderson, Chief Executive Officer, Da Vinci Institute• Prof Xikombiso Mbhenyane, Professor and Head of Human Nutrition Division, Stellenbosch

University• Ms Judy Favish, Director, Institutional Planning, University of Cape Town• Prof Renuka Vithal, Deputy Vice-Chancellor Teaching and Learning, University of

KwaZulu- Natal• Prof Tinyiko Maluleke, Professor of African Spirituality and Culture, University of Pretoria

30



Audits Closed

• University of South Africa• University of Venda

Progress Reports (still under consideration)

• Mangosuthu University of Technology• North-West University• University of Zululand • Walter Sisulu University

Quality Enhancement

In the year under review, the main focus was on the implementation of the Quality Enhancement Project (QEP), which was launched in February 2014 and which focuses on enhancing learning and teaching, specifically, student success, which is conceptualised as increasing the number of graduates with attributes that are personally, professionally and socially valuable.

In September 2014, all public universities (barring the two universities that opened in 2014) produced institutional submissions in which they provided baseline information about how they were engaging with the four focus areas for Phase 1 of the QEP, namely, enhancing academics as teaching, enhancing student support and development, enhancing the learning environment and enhancing course and programme enrolment management. A content analysis of the 23 institutional submissions was finalised and published in May 2015.

As part of the QEP, the Deputy Vice-Chancellors for Teaching and Learning, or DVCs Academic from all universities have been asked to be co-leaders of the project. At a meeting of DVCs on 5 November 2014 they agreed to constitute the QEP DVC Forum, to be coordinated and facilitated by the CHE. The main purpose of the forum is to provide reflection and guidance on the QEP process and to action issues that arise from the QEP that need to be addressed at a national level. For some issues the DVCs may initiate actions, while other issues may be referred to other stakeholders, such as HESA or the DHET.

Two QEP institutional workshops were held in March 2015, each one attended by participants from approximately half the public universities to, “discuss good practices related to each focus area, suggest how good practices could be more widely adopted, adapted and improved, share challenges, generate ideas for addressing common challenges, propose concrete steps that can be taken to bring about improvements, identify opportunities for collaboration and begin to identify elements of what could become codes of good practice.”

The facilitators’ reports and the recommendations arising from the workshops will form the basis for a publication in the new financial year as a further step in the QEP process. A voluntary participation process in the QEP was initiated for the private providers. In June 2014,

31



B

58 private providers submitted baseline information, and a further 11 did so in November 2014. Thus more than half the private providers completed a submission. A workshop for participating institutions was held on 28 October 2014, the focus of which was QEP Focus Area 1: Enhancing academics as teachers. The workshop was attended by 67 participants from 38 institutions. Two further workshops will be held for participating private providers in August 2015 on Focus Area 2: Enhancing student support and development and Focus Area 3: Enhancing the learning environment respectively.

Objective Seven

To accredit new programmes submitted by public and private higher education institutions and to re-accredit existing programmes offered by private higher education institutions.

Programme Accreditation

The programme accreditation function is facilitated by the Accreditation Committee, which is a sub-committee of the HEQC and in 2014/15 comprised of the following members:

• Dr Felicity Coughlan, Chairperson, Director and Head, The Independent Institute of Education

• Dr Rolf Becker, Executive Director, South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions• Ms Gloria Castrillón, Director, Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs, Milpark Business

School• Mr Colin Daniels, Associate Dean, Faculty of Informatics and Design, Cape Peninsula

University of Technology• Prof Sabiha Essack, Dean, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal• Prof Marvin Kambuwa, Principal, Regent Business School• Prof Wendy Kilfoil, Director, Department for Education Innovation, University of Pretoria• Prof Lesley le Grange, Vice-Dean, Research, University of Stellenbosch• Prof Gugu Moche, Executive Dean, College of Science, Engineering and Technology,

University of South Africa• Prof Relebohile Moletsane, Professor and JL Dube Chair in Rural Education, University of

KwaZulu-Natal• Mr Vincent Morta, Director, Quality Assurance and Management Information Systems,

Institutional Planning Office, University of the Western Cape• Ms Nicolene Murdoch, Executive Director, Teaching, Learning and Quality Assurance,

Monash South Africa• Prof Martin Oosthuizen, Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Teaching and Learning, North-West

University• Dr Shaheeda Essack, Deputy Director, Private Higher Education, DHET• Dr Whitfield Green, Acting Chief Director, Teaching and Learning Development, DHET• Ms Jean Skene, Director, Higher Education, Management Information Systems, DHET

32



Accreditation of New Programmes

Submissions for the accreditation of programmes are received and evaluated on an on-going basis throughout the year and therefore applications submitted in one financial year may only receive an HEQC outcome in the following financial year.

There were 427 applications submitted for accreditation of new programmes in 2014/15. These applications are disaggregated per NQF level in Table 1 and per CESM category in Table 2 below.

In the same period, 2014/15, the HEQC approved a total of 324 outcomes which included applications for the accreditation of new programmes, representations and deferrals related to both accreditation and re-accreditation. It should be noted that this includes some programmes submitted in the previous financial year and processed in the current financial year. This is reflected in Table 3 below. Of the 324 outcomes, 231 programmes were accredited (with or without conditions, or deferred) and 93 programmes were not accredited. Poorly designed curricula and unsatisfactory teaching and learning approaches were among the most common reasons for programmes not being accredited. The majority of applications submitted were for programmes at National Qualifications Framework (NQF) levels 7 and 8, as indicated below in Table 1.

Table 1: New applications for programme accreditation per NQF level

Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8 Level 9 Level 10 TOTAL

Number of Applications

46 60 122 122 69 8 427

Similarly, as in the previous year, the majority of the applications for programme accreditation were in business, commerce and management sciences, health care and health sciences, education, visual and performing arts, and computer sciences , as shown in Table 2 below.

33



B

Table 2: New applications for programme accreditation per CESM category

CESM Category Number of applications

Agriculture, Agricultural Operations and Related Sciences 5

Architecture and the Built Environment 5

Visual and Performing Arts 17

Business, Economics and Management Studies 97

Communication, Journalism and Related Studies 2

Computer and Information Sciences 19

Education 104

Engineering 14

Health Professions and Related Clinical Sciences 82

Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences 2

Languages, Linguistics and Literature 0

Law 7

Life Sciences 8

Physical Sciences 8

Mathematics and Statistics 0

Military Sciences 0

Philosophy, Religion and Theology 23

Psychology 4

Public Management and Services 17

Social Sciences 13

Total 427

Table 3: HEQC Decisions and outcomes for accreditation

Item TOTAL

Total number of applications for new / relocated site of delivery

324

Programmes accredited / accredited with conditions / deferred

231

Programmes not accredited 93

Total number of applications for new / relocated site of delivery

36

Total number of sites of delivery visited 36

34



Re-accreditation of Private Higher Education Institutions

On an annual basis the programmes of private higher education institutions, which are due for re-registration with the Department of Higher Education and Training, need to be re-accredited. In 2014/15, as indicated in Table 4 below, 51 programmes for re-accreditation were tabled at an HEQC meeting. There were 12 programmes that were not aligned to the HEQSF and the accreditation of these programmes was extended to allow them to be taught out. There were 29 programmes that were re-accredited and 10 that were not re-accredited.

Table 4: HEQC Decisions and outcomes for re-accreditation

Item TOTAL

Total number of programmes for re-accreditation 53

Programmes re-accredited 29

Programmes not re-accredited 10

Programmes with accreditation status extended 12

Programmes deferred pending additional information 2

Objective Eight

Toundertakenationalreviewsofexistingprogrammesinspecificsubjectfieldsand qualificationlevelsofferedbypublicandprivatehighereducationinstitutions.

National Reviews

National reviews focus on the re-accreditation of existing programmes with a view to improving programme quality. The national reviews function is facilitated by the National Reviews Committee, which is a sub-committee of the HEQC and comprises the following members:

• Prof Theo Andrew, Chairperson, Executive Dean: Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Durban University of Technology

• Prof Jean Baxen, Dean: Education, University of the Witwatersrand• Prof Dhiro Gihwala, Dean, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of

Technology• Prof Ken Harley, Emeritus Professor, University of KwaZulu-Natal (resigned In October 2014)• Ms Kuselwa Marala, Academic Administration, Registrar’s Office, Cape Peninsula

University of Technology• Dr Matete Madiba, Director: Student Affairs, University of Pretoria• Dr Paul Steyn, Academic Head, Akademia Konkordia• Prof Völker Wedekind, Deputy Dean, Continuing Education, University of KwaZulu-Natal

35



B

In the year under review the main focus was on finalising the National Reviews Committee’s (NRC) findings and recommendations regarding the national review of the Bachelor of Social Work (BSW). The recommendations were approved by the HEQC in November 2014 following representations submitted by institutions.

Of the BSW programmes from 16 institutions that were reviewed; 3 were Accredited; 8 Accredited with Conditions; and 5 were put on Notice of Withdrawal of Accreditation.

Institutions accredited with conditions and those on notice of withdrawal of accreditation are required to put measures in place to address the conditions set out in their respective reports as follows:

• Short-term conditions should be addressed within 90 days, but no longer than 6 months of receipt of the report.

• Long-term conditions require an Improvement Plan (IP) with clear targets, milestones and timeframes to facilitate the implementation of the IP. The deadline for the submission of IPs was 31 March 2015.

Institutions on notice of withdrawal of accreditation were required to submit an Improvement Plan (IP) by 31 March 2015 taking into consideration all the recommendations and conditions stipulated in the report, for evaluation by the HEQC. The final stage in the national review process is the publication of a national report addressing the findings, strengths, shortcomings and concerns from the review. A draft report on the “The State of the Provision of the Bachelor of Social Work in South Africa” was prepared and is in the process of finalisation.

In addition, in this period, there was ongoing monitoring related to the previous review of teacher education programmes, which should be closed in the course of 2015. Preparations for the launch of the Bachelor of Laws (LLB) national review in April 2015 were finalised.

Objective Nine

To promote quality and to develop capacity and understanding of the role of quality assurance in improving quality in higher education at both the systemic and institutional levels.

Quality Promotion and Capacity Development

In the year under review, the appointment of a Director: Quality Assurance Promotion and Co-ordination, facilitated the development of quality promotion activities, which had been undertaken on an ad hoc basis in prior years because of a lack of capacity. In this regard, the Directorate has co-ordinated the development of two projects:

• The role of the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC) and (Statutory) Professional Councils in Programme Accreditation.

36



In response to concerns raised by public higher education institutions regarding the role of the (statutory) professional councils in programme accreditation, a background paper was developed and discussed at a joint workshop with the DHET, HESA and the statutory professional councils in June 2014. A small working group was subsequently established to develop draft guidelines on the roles of the HEQC and professional bodies and to develop a national framework that transcends the separate regulatory frameworks of the statutory professional councils. It met in September 2014 and March 2015.

The latter meeting developed principles that will anchor the required national framework whose purpose is to clarify the roles of the different parties. A draft framework is planned to be discussed by the working group at its meeting in September 2015.

• Continuing Education Courses

A project on short courses to develop a framework and guidelines for good practice to ensure that short-courses offered by higher education institutions meet minimum standards was initiated in late 2013. As a first step, a questionnaire-based survey of public and private institutions to collect baseline data about the nature, quantity, quality assurance and management of short courses was undertaken and a background report prepared. The latter will inform the next phase of the project, which is to develop a framework and guidelines for good practice for the quality assurance, governance and management of short courses across the higher education sector. It is anticipated that that the framework and guidelines will be finalised in the latter half of 2015.

• Further capacity development activities

There were two quality assurance forums convened, the purpose of which is to exchange information on quality assurance issues and developments; one for statutory professional bodies in June 2014, and a combined forum for public and private higher education institutions in February 2015. Furthermore, the CHE participated in the Awards Committee for the sixth CHE-HELTASA (Higher Education Learning and Teaching Association of Southern Africa) National Excellence in Teaching and Learning Awards, which were announced in November 2014 at the annual HELTASA conference.

Name Category of Award Institution

Lindsay Clowes National Excellence in Teaching University of the Western Cape

Ian Malcom-Rijsdijk National Excellence in Teaching University of Cape Town

Simon Mukwembi National Excellence in Teaching University of KwaZulu-Natal

June Pym Leadership in Excellent Teaching

University of Cape Town

Sunitha Srinivas Leadership in Excellent Teaching

Rhodes University

37



B

Name Category of Award Institution

Sibusiso Mdletshe Commendation University of Johannesburg

Ismail Nabbi Commendation Mangosuthu University of Technology

Robert Pattman Commendation University of Stellenbosch

Herman Viviers Commendation North-West University

Thea de Wet Commendation University of Johannesburg

• Regional network

In July the CEO attended a Southern African Sub-Regional Conference on Quality Assurance in Higher Education, which was hosted by the Zimbabwe Council for Higher Education. The purpose of the workshop was to work towards establishing a regional network, which was accepted in principle. The Conference appointed a Task Team to formalise the establishment of sub-regional quality assurance network for Southern Africa, which consists of the CEOs of higher education quality assurance bodies of Botswana, Lesotho and Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe. The Task Team met in December 2014 in Windhoek, Namibia and agreed to develop a draft Constitution, which was circulated to higher education quality agencies in the SADC region for comment in January 2015.

It is expected that the regional network body will be officially launched as the next Southern African Sub-Regional Conference on Quality in Higher Education which will be held in Botswana in October 2015. The CHE is actively participating in this regional initiative.

Strategic Goal Four To ensure the efficient and effective provision of corporate services – administrative, financial, technical and professional, to support the discharge of the core mandate of the CHE.

Objective Ten

To ensure the development of a human resources management environment that enables staff to develop their full potential.

Human Resources

The Human Resources function continued to make progress in operationalising and giving effect to one of the CHE’s key strategic imperatives, namely, to build the CHE’s intellectual capability and to ensure that the CHE has the human capacity and capability to execute its mandate and strategy. The human resources function is overseen by the Human Resources and Remuneration Committee, which is a sub-committee of Council.

38



The focus on ensuring that the CHE has appropriate human capacity and capability has been given effect through a range of interventions in the year under review that are outlined below.

Staff Turnover, Recruitment and Retention

The CHE’s approved structure provides for 51 positions and 46 of these are filled. The process of replacing the CEO has been delayed owing to the appointment of the new Council in December 2014. However, attempts are underway to finalise this process in the near future. In the interim, Dr Denyse Webbstock has been appointed as Acting CEO effective from 1 March 2015.

There has been an increase in staff turnover from 10.86% in 2013/14 to 21.73% in 2014/15 (this includes expiry of contracts and a dismissal) but the staff retention rate is 90%. Nevertheless, staff retention remains a challenge for the CHE. This is largely due to the small size of the organisation which limits the opportunities for career progression for mid-level staff. The new Attraction and Retention Framework was implemented during the year under review after a comprehensive and consultative process, and this should contribute to facilitating the recruitment and retention of senior staff in the organisation, which to date has been a major risk and challenge. This will promote stability at the senior levels so that the CHE can successfully carry out its functions.

CHE Competency Framework

The CHE introduced and adopted a new Competency Framework. This was important to ensure that the organisation achieves its objective of professionalising the CHE.

The Competency Framework will assist in ensuring consistency in performance throughout the organisation and help to drive and support all Human Resources initiatives. In developing the Competency Framework, emphasis was placed on the core and process competencies that employees would be expected to possess, rather than the functional/technical competencies essential to a specific directorate or a specific job.

The Competency Framework includes five core competencies that communicate what is expected of CHE employees. It also includes five process competencies that assist in driving the decisions around the core competencies, and provide focus on how these core competencies are to be successfully achieved.

This framework seeks to establish a shared understanding of the critical success factors of performance for employees. It will inform the recruitment and selection process, performance management and the identification of development needs of employees in the CHE.

The Competency Framework has emerged from an extensive process of interviews, desktop studies and analysis. Interviews were held with the CEO and Directors for the purpose of gathering information regarding the CHE’s strategy, competencies and possible pitfalls. The

39



B

review further included an analysis of existing Key Performance Areas and Key Performance Indicators of respective Directorates.

The adoption and implementation of the CHE Competency Framework has necessitated changes in some of the Human Resource policies and processes to align them with the Framework, e.g. the development of comprehensive Job Descriptions for all positions at the CHE and the review of naming conventions (Job Titles) to align them better with the functions of employees and general usage in the sector.

The Recruitment and Selection Policy has since been reviewed and all managers involved in the recruitment of employees were trained in competency-based interviewing processes. The Council’s Human Resources and Remuneration Committee played a significant oversight role in the development and implementation of this framework.

Staff Training and Development

In line with the CHE’s Staff Training and Development Policy, the provision of focused training programmes to address skills gaps within the organisation remains a priority. In the past year, 30 training programmes covering office management, finance administration and management, health and safety, information technology and qualitative research methods were attended by members of staff. However, it has not been possible to implement the full training plan as work pressures have had an impact on the availability of staff for training events.

In addition, personal career development through pursuing formal qualifications is encouraged, and seven staff members received bursaries.

Employee Wellness Programme

The Wellness Programme continues to yield positive results for the CHE. During the year under review the following has taken place:

• EAP Referrals

A number of employees were either self-referred or referred by the employer to the Employee Assistance Programme for counselling sessions with Counselling Psychologists, an Occupational Therapist, Wellness Expert and Ergonomist.

• Wellness Day

A Wellness Day took place on 30 January 2015 with the theme “Drive Towards Life”. The objective was to enhance and continue motivating employees regarding the importance of managing a holistic balance between work and life. Activities included an industrial theatre, motivational speakers, a laughter workshop, corporate massages, ergonomic advice and counselling, fun exercises and general coaching and counselling.

40



• Wellness Awareness

Weekly wellness snippets and information articles on different wellness aspects e.g. stress management, nutrition, productivity and ergonomic tips, fatigue management etc. are circulated amongst staff via the CHE intranet to reinforce wellness.

• Sick Leave Days and Costs

The annual average sick leave days per employee have declined from 8.5 since the implementation of the programme in July 2013 to 4.78 at the end of the financial year, and an associated reduction in the cost of sick leave days from R341 342.68 to R75 731.02. This is significantly lower than the national normative rates that range from 6.16 and 8.5 for organisations employing less than 50 and more than 50 employees, respectively. The challenge going forward is to measure changes in employee productivity related to the programme. Plans are underway to include this measurement in the new financial year.

Performance Management

The Performance Management process for the financial year was concluded on 31 March 2015 and bonus awards were paid out to deserving employees.

The Performance Moderation Committee meeting held on 20 March 2015 noted that the CHE had reached a point of stability, with all directorates staffed and carrying out their functions. The organisational and individual employee performance has significantly improved over the last few years. The organisation is embracing performance excellence as a core element of the CHE culture. All directorates performed well above average. In individual cases of underperformance, plans have been put in place to address these cases accordingly.

A total of forty-one (41) out of forty-six (46) employees participated in the process and a total of R860 395.95 was paid out to deserving employees on 30 March 2015.

Future Human Resources plans/goals

The CHE will continue to develop and revise policies focused on developing the critical leadership competencies required in this sector. Plans are underway to implement an organisation-wide cultural diversity intervention that will entail revisiting the CHE’s vision, mission and values to embed an organisational culture that embraces high performance, diversity, collaboration, teamwork and integrity.

Objective Eleven

Toensurethatfinancial,administrationandsupplychainmanagementiscompliant with the requirements of the PFMA, relevant Treasury regulations and laws.

41



Administration and Finance

In the financial year under review, there was ongoing focus on governance and accounting policy reviews and enhancements in order to ensure compliance with the applicable guidelines from National Treasury, Accounting Standards and best practices.

Further, there was ongoing enhancement of current procedures and processes to address internal control deficiencies, identified by both the internal and external auditors, in finance and supply chain which included the development of both month and year-end close processes. By the introduction of Goods Receipt Vouchers transactions are now recognised in the correct period as they are expensed immediately when the goods or services are delivered or rendered.

Summary of financial information

2014/15 2013/14

Sources of Revenue

Estimate Actual Amount

Collected

(Over)/Under

expenditure

Estimate Actual Amount

Collected

(Over)/ Under

expenditure

R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000DHET 42 689 42 689 - 41 888 41 888 -

Rollover Funds 12 971 12 971 - 13 854 13 854 -

Deferred Income Recognised(Standards Development)

2 177 1 239 (938) 2 179 1 297 (882)

Accreditation 1 900 3 549 1 649 1 641 3 861 2 220

Investment 250 1 263 1 013 525 812 287

TOTAL 59 987 61 711 1 724 60 087 61 712 1 625

B

42



2014/15 2013/14

Programme/ Directorate

Name

Estimates Actual (Over)/ Under

expenditure

Estimates Actual (Over)/ Under

expenditure

R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000Administration Goods and

Services15 605 1 366 2 039 12 303 10 288 (16%)

Personnel 12 022 12 248 -226 8 563 9 203 (7%)

Quality Promotion and Capacity Development

Goods and Services

3 357 3 620 (8%)

Personnel 2 388 436 82%

Monitoring and Evaluation

Goods and Services

4 536 3 197 1 339 5 173 3 218 38%

Personnel 3 665 2 962 703 2 441 3 636 (49%)


Goods and Services

4 673 5 455 -782 8 215 6 857 16%

Personnel 5 621 4 558 1 063 5 717 5 016 12%

National Reviews

Goods and Services

2 836 567 2 269 2 082 407 80%

Personnel 2 303 1 342 961 2 040 1 925 6%

Institutional Audits

Goods and Services

2 483 1 195 1 288 1 928 1 971 (22%)

Personnel 3 697 3 411 286 3 278 2 588 21%

Standards Development

Goods and Services

400 872 -472 1 450 667 54%

Personnel 2 146 367 1 780 1 698 930 45%

TOTAL 59 987 49 740 10 248 60 087 50 762 14%

Objective Twelve To ensure effective governance and compliance of ICT with statutory requirements.

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is playing an ever-increasing role as a strategic enabler of service delivery. The Department of Public Service and Administration, in collaboration with the Government Information Technology Officer Council (GITOC), developed a policy framework for the Corporate Governance of ICT. A three-year implementation guideline was also developed to support all departments/ public entities. Phases 1 and 2 were to be implemented by March 2014 and March 2015 respectively.

(i) All entities were also to include this in the Annual Performance Plan for 2015/16 with a description and indicator of how it will be monitored.(ii) The CHE included ‘Compliance with the Corporate Governance of ICT Framework of the D.P.S.A’ as its Strategic Objective 12.

43



B

OVE

RVIE

W O

F TH

E C

HE’s

PER

FORM

AN

CE

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Ad

visin

g th

e M

inist

er o

n an

y as

pect

of

hig

her

educ

atio

n in

line

with

th

e Hi

gher

Ed

ucat

ion

Act

(A

ct N

o 10

1 of

199

7), a

s am

end

ed

Ad

vise

the

Min

ister

at

his

requ

est o

r on

own

initi

ativ

e

Num

ber o

f re

spon

ses t

o re

ques

ts fo

r ad

vice

with

in

the

timef

ram

e re

ques

ted

100%

510

0%10

0%2

Targ

et a

chie

ved

.Th

e nu

mbe

r of r

espo

nses

can

not b

e pr

edet

erm

ined

as i

t is d

epen

den

t on

the

num

ber o

f req

uest

s rec

eive

d fr

om

the

Min

ister

. i)

Ad

vice

on

DHE

T’s P

olic

y an

d

Proc

edur

es fo

r Mea

sure

men

t of

Rese

arch

Out

puts

of P

ublic

Hig

her

Educ

atio

n In

stitu

tions

.ii)

C

omm

ent o

n th

e Re

port

of

the

Min

ister

ial C

omm

ittee

on

Arti

cula

tion.

Num

ber o

f pi

eces

of

advi

ce o

n ow

n in

itiat

ive

on is

sues

id

entifi

ed a

s re

leva

nt fl

owin

g fro

m th

e ac

tiviti

es

of th

e C

HE

12

2Ta

rget

ach

ieve

d.

Ad

vice

pro

vid

ed:

i) Re

form

of t

he u

nder

grad

uate

cu

rricu

lum

.ii)

A

dvi

ce o

n Un

accr

edite

d

Prog

ram

mes

offe

red

by

Publ

ic a

nd

Priv

ate

High

er E

duc

atio

n In

stitu

tions

.

44



Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Mon

itorin

g th

e st

ate

of h

ighe

r ed

ucat

ion

Rese

arch

Pro

ject

sPr

oduc

tion

of

perfo

rman

ce

ind

icat

ors r

epor

t (o

n-go

ing

proj

ect)

11

1Ta

rget

ach

ieve

d.

Perfo

rman

ce in

dic

ator

s to

asse

ss th

e st

ate

of th

e hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

syst

em.

Vita

lSta

ts 2

012

publ

icat

ion

and

web

site

dat

a up

dat

ed.

Proj

ects

in

prog

ress

2

44

Targ

et a

chie

ved

.Th

ese

proj

ects

are

long

-term

pro

ject

s w

hich

will

run

thro

ugho

ut th

e ye

ar a

nd

som

e w

ill st

rad

dle

fina

ncia

l yea

rs. T

he

cum

ulat

ive

tota

l will

rem

ain

cons

tant

at

4.

i) Un

der

grad

uate

Dip

lom

a an

d

Deg

ree

Stru

ctur

eii)

Re

view

of t

he S

tate

of H

ighe

r Ed

ucat

ion:

199

4-20

14iii)

Refl

ectio

ns o

n A

cad

emic

Le

ader

ship

iv)

Gov

erna

nce

Cha

lleng

es in

Pub

lic

High

er E

duc

atio

n

Diss

emin

atio

n of

re

sear

ch fi

ndin

gsN

umbe

r of

publ

icat

ions

22

2Ta

rget

ach

ieve

d.

Publ

icat

ion

of re

sear

ch re

ports

.i)

Dist

ance

Ed

ucat

ion

in a

Dig

ital A

geii)

V

italS

tats

201

2

45



B

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Dev

elop

men

t an

d

man

agem

ent

of th

e HE

QSF

*

Alig

nmen

t of

exis

ting

prog

ram

mes

with

th

e HE

QSF

Perc

enta

ge o

f pr

ogra

mm

es

with

an

HEQ

C

outc

ome,

as p

er

HEQ

C m

inut

es.

0%

Cat

egor

y B

80%

of

Subm

issio

ns

for C

ateg

ory

B

100%

Ta

rget

exc

eed

ed.

It sh

ould

be

note

d th

at th

e ta

rget

w

as se

t at 8

0% to

take

into

acc

ount

th

e tim

e-la

g be

twee

n th

e re

ceip

t of

appl

icat

ions

and

a fi

nal d

ecisi

on b

eing

m

ade

by th

e HE

QC

.

*The

Hig

her E

duc

atio

n Q

ualifi

catio

ns

Fram

ewor

k (H

EQF

was

pro

mul

gate

d in

O

ctob

er 2

007

(Gov

ernm

ent G

azet

te

No

3035

3 of

5 O

ctob

er 2

007)

. Giv

en

the

CHE

’s e

xpan

ded

man

dat

e as

the

Qua

lity

Cou

ncil f

or H

ighe

r Ed

ucat

ion

in te

rms o

f the

Nat

iona

l Qua

lifica

tions

Fr

amew

ork

Act

of 2

008

(Act

No

67 o

f 20

08),

the

CHE

initi

ated

a re

view

of t

he

HEQ

F in

Oct

ober

201

0. A

s det

erm

ined

by

the

Min

ister

of H

ighe

r Ed

ucat

ion

and

Tra

inin

g th

e na

me

of th

e HE

QF

was

am

end

ed to

the

High

er E

duc

atio

n Q

ualifi

catio

ns S

ub-F

ram

ewor

k (H

EQSF

) an

d th

e Fr

amew

ork

was

pub

lishe

d

as p

olic

y of

the

Cou

ncil o

n Hi

gher

Ed

ucat

ion

by S

AQ

A in

Gov

ernm

ent

Gaz

ette

No.

367

21, N

otic

e 54

9, 2

A

ugus

t 201

3).

This

gaze

tte w

as re

calle

d a

nd it

was

re

-gaz

ette

d b

y th

e C

HE o

n 17

Oct

ober

20

14, N

o. 3

8116

.

1 26

8 pr

ogra

mm

es w

ere

proc

esse

d.

816

App

rove

d40

0 D

efer

red

52 N

ot a

ligne

dIn

stitu

tions

may

subm

it re

pres

enta

tions

.

46



Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Dev

elop

men

t, re

gist

ratio

n an

d

publ

icat

ion

of

qual

ifica

tions

Dev

elop

men

t of

qua

lifica

tions

st

and

ard

s

Dev

elop

men

t of

tem

plat

es

for q

ualifi

catio

n ty

pes (

QT)

an

d fi

eld

/su

bjec

t spe

cific

st

and

ard

s (FS

)

n/a

20

It w

as n

ot p

ossib

le to

und

erta

ke

cons

ulta

tion

as th

e pi

lots

are

still

in

prog

ress

as r

epor

ted

bel

ow.

Dev

elop

men

t of

pilo

t sta

ndar

ds

04

(4Q

TV; 4

FS)

55

dra

ft pi

lot s

tand

ard

s hav

e be

en

appr

oved

by

the

HEQ

C fo

r sen

din

g ou

t to

high

er e

duc

atio

n in

stitu

tions

for

com

men

t.i)

Bach

elor

of S

ocia

l Wor

kii)

M

aste

r of B

usin

ess A

dm

inist

ratio

niii)

Bac

helo

r of L

aws

iv)

Bach

elor

of E

ngin

eerin

gv)

D

iplo

ma

in E

ngin

eerin

g

NLR

D

Dat

abas

eC

olle

ctin

g d

ata

from

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns

Num

ber o

f pr

ivat

e pr

ovid

ers

that

will

be

cont

ribut

ing

to th

e HE

QC

IS

dat

abas

e

98%

80%

99%

114

priv

ate

prov

ider

s up

load

ed

info

rmat

ion

Targ

et a

chie

ved

.

Aud

iting

in

stitu

tiona

l qu

ality

as

sura

nce

mec

hani

sms

Ana

lyse

and

ap

prov

e

inst

itutio

nal

impr

ovem

ent

plan

s and

pro

gres

s re

ports

bas

ed o

n re

com

men

dat

ions

m

ade

in a

udit

repo

rt

Mon

itorin

g of

pr

ogre

ss re

ports

100%

3 au

dits

wer

e cl

osed

and

6

cont

inue

to

be

mon

itore

d.

100%

m

onito

ring

of

all p

rogr

ess

repo

rts

rece

ived

100%

2 au

dits

wer

e cl

osed

and

4

inst

itutio

ns

cont

inue

to

be

mon

itore

d.

Targ

et a

chie

ved

.It

is an

ticip

ated

that

the

4 re

mai

ning

au

dits

repo

rts w

ill be

clo

sed

in th

e 20

15/1

6 fin

anci

al y

ear.

47



B

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Impl

emen

t in

stitu

tiona

l qua

lity

enha

ncem

ent

fram

ewor

k.

Inst

itutio

nal

Qua

lity

enha

ncem

ent

fram

ewor

k im

plem

ente

d.

n/a

100%

100%

Targ

et a

chie

ved

.

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Six

in th

e cu

rrent

st

rate

gic

plan

stat

es: T

o au

dit

the

qual

ity a

ssur

ance

mec

hani

sms o

f hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

inst

itutio

ns. W

ork

had

com

men

ced

in 2

011/

12 o

n th

e d

evel

opm

ent o

f a fr

amew

ork

for t

he

seco

nd c

ycle

of a

udits

whi

ch w

ould

ha

ve ru

n be

twee

n 20

13 a

nd 2

017.

In

201

2 a

dec

ision

was

take

n by

the

High

er E

duc

atio

n Q

ualit

y C

omm

ittee

(H

EQC

) and

Cou

ncil r

athe

r tha

n ru

n a

seco

nd c

ycle

aud

it on

the

sam

e lin

es a

s the

firs

t cyc

le a

udits

a Q

ualit

y En

hanc

emen

t Pro

ject

wou

ld b

e im

plem

ente

d. I

n th

e fir

st p

hase

of t

his

proj

ect T

each

ing

and

Lea

rnin

g w

ould

be

the

mai

n fo

cus.

100%

refe

rs to

pla

nned

act

iviti

es:

• Q

EP w

orks

hop

for s

tud

ents

hel

d.

• Q

EP u

pdat

e re

ports

rece

ived

from

23

pub

lic H

EIs.

• V

olun

tary

onl

ine

subm

issio

ns

rece

ived

from

58

priv

ate

HEIs.

• In

stitu

tiona

l sub

miss

ions

rece

ived

fro

m 2

3 pu

blic

hig

her e

duc

atio

n in

stitu

tions

(HEI

s)•

QEP

Inku

ndla

hel

d fo

r re

pres

enta

tives

from

pub

lic H

EIs

• Q

EP w

orks

hop

held

for

repr

esen

tativ

es fr

om p

artic

ipat

ing

priv

ate

HEIs

• D

VC

s for

um h

eld

for D

VC

s ac

adem

ic a

nd te

achi

ng a

nd

lear

ning

from

pub

lic H

EIs

• 2

QEP

wor

ksho

ps h

eld

in M

arch

20

15.

48



Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Inst

itutio

nal

prog

ram

me

accr

edita

tion

and

re-

accr

edita

tion

Acc

red

itatio

n of

ne

w p

rogr

amm

es

subm

itted

by

publ

ic a

nd p

rivat

e hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

inst

itutio

ns

Perc

enta

ge o

f ne

w p

rogr

amm

es

with

an

appr

oved

HEQ

C

outc

ome

tabl

ed

with

in 6

mon

ths

of su

bmiss

ion

for

publ

ic u

nive

rsiti

es

and

with

in 6

m

onth

s of r

elea

se

from

Fin

ance

af

ter p

aym

ent

has b

een

proc

esse

d, a

s per

HE

QC

min

utes

.

93%

398

dec

ision

s 75

% o

f ap

plic

atio

ns

rece

ived

76%

324

prog

ram

mes

Targ

et a

chie

ved

The

num

ber o

f app

licat

ions

rece

ived

va

ries a

nnua

lly.

The

perc

enta

ge is

cal

cula

ted

as t

he

num

ber o

f dec

ision

s tak

en b

y th

e HE

QC

(exc

lud

ing

def

erra

ls) in

rela

tion

to th

e nu

mbe

r of r

ecom

men

dat

ions

fro

m th

e A

ccre

dita

tion

Com

mitt

ee

tabl

ed a

t the

HEQ

C.

It sh

ould

be

note

d th

at fo

llow

ing

disc

ussio

ns a

fter t

he 2

012/

13 a

udit,

the

targ

et w

as c

hang

ed to

75%

to ta

ke

into

acc

ount

the

time-

lag

betw

een

the

rece

ipt o

f app

licat

ions

and

a fi

nal

dec

ision

mad

e by

the

HEQ

C.

Perc

enta

ge o

f ne

w /

ad

diti

onal

sit

es o

f del

iver

y pr

oces

sed

in

clud

ing

site

visit

s with

an

appr

oved

HEQ

C

outc

ome

tabl

ed

with

in 6

mon

ths

of su

bmiss

ion

for

publ

ic u

nive

rsiti

es

and

with

in 6

m

onth

s of r

elea

se

from

Fin

ance

af

ter p

aym

ent

has b

een

proc

esse

d, a

s per

HE

QC

min

utes

.

100%

75

site

s75

% o

f ap

plic

atio

ns

rece

ived

100

%36

site

visi

tsTa

rget

exc

eed

ed.

The

targ

et se

t was

75%

as i

t is n

ot

alw

ays p

ossib

le to

com

plet

e sit

e vi

sits

from

the

time

requ

este

d w

ithin

a

spec

ific

finan

cial

yea

r.Si

te v

isits

wer

e un

der

take

n fo

r ac

cred

itatio

n an

d re

-acc

red

itatio

n pu

rpos

es.

49



B

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Re-a

ccre

dita

tion

of p

rogr

amm

es

offe

red

by

priv

ate

high

er e

duc

atio

n in

stitu

tions

Perc

enta

ge o

f pr

ogra

mm

es w

ith

an a

ppro

ved

HE

QC

out

com

e ta

bled

with

in

18 m

onth

s afte

r pa

ymen

t has

be

en p

roce

ssed

.

100%

82 d

ecisi

ons

75%

49%

53

prog

ram

mes

The

targ

et w

as c

hang

ed to

75%

to ta

ke

into

acc

ount

the

time-

lag

betw

een

the

rece

ipt o

f app

licat

ions

and

a fi

nal

dec

ision

mad

e by

the

HEQ

C.

The

targ

et re

ache

d w

as lo

wer

as a

la

rge

num

ber o

f app

licat

ions

wer

e d

e-fe

rred

by

the

Acc

red

itatio

n C

omm

ittee

(A

C) p

end

ing

site

visit

s. W

here

an

inst

itutio

n ha

d n

ot b

een

visit

ed in

the

past

five

yea

rs, t

he A

C re

com

men

ded

d

efer

rals

to v

erify

the

qual

ity a

rrang

e-m

ents

repo

rted

on.

Thi

s has

incr

ease

d

the

scru

tiny

on th

e qu

ality

of h

ighe

r ed

ucat

ion

prog

ram

mes

.

The

perc

enta

ge is

cal

cula

ted

as

num

ber o

f dec

ision

s tak

en b

y th

e HE

QC

(exc

lud

ing

def

erra

ls) in

rela

tion

to th

e nu

mbe

r of r

ecom

men

dat

ions

fro

m th

e A

ccre

dita

tion

Com

mitt

ee

tabl

ed a

t the

HEQ

C.

Nat

iona

l Re

view

s, i.e

. re-

accr

edita

tion

of p

rogr

amm

es

in sp

ecifi

c fie

lds a

nd

qual

ifica

tion

leve

l

Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

enta

tion

of

natio

nal r

evie

ws:

Bach

elor

of S

ocia

l W

ork

(BSW

)

Fina

lisat

ion

of

Nat

iona

l Rep

ort

of B

ache

lor o

f So

cial

Wor

k pr

ogra

mm

e

n/a

10

Dra

ft re

port

has b

een

pres

ente

d to

the

HEQ

C.

The

repo

rt w

ill be

fina

lised

ear

ly in

20

15/1

6.

Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

enta

tion

of

natio

nal r

evie

ws:

Bach

elor

of L

aws

(LLB

)

Esta

blish

crit

eria

fo

r rev

iew

.n/

a1

0C

urre

ntly

und

er d

iscus

sion

with

the

Dea

ns o

f Law

.

50



Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prog

ram

me

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rA

nnua

l C

umul

ativ

e

Out

put

2013

/201

4

Ann

ual

Targ

et a

s pe

r St

rate

gic

Plan

20

14 -

2015

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Qua

lity

prom

otio

n an

d c

apac

ity

build

ing

Trai

ning

of

eval

uato

rs fo

r pr

ogra

mm

e ac

cred

itatio

n an

d

re-a

ccre

dita

tion

Num

ber

of tr

aini

ng

wor

ksho

ps fo

r ev

alua

tors

, d

iscip

line

grou

ps/

repo

rt w

ritin

g

82

7Ta

rget

exc

eed

ed d

ue to

an

incr

ease

in

acc

red

itatio

n ap

plic

atio

ns a

nd

need

to tr

ain

and

retra

in e

valu

ator

s an

d re

com

men

dat

ion

writ

ers.

It al

so in

clud

ed e

nd-u

ser t

rain

ing

for

Inst

itutio

nal A

dm

inist

rato

rs fo

r the

HE

QSF

-Cat

egor

y B

and

the

2014

re-

accr

edita

tion

proc

esse

s.

Qua

lity

assu

ranc

e fo

rum

s for

pub

lic

and

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns a

nd

prof

essio

nal b

odie

s

Num

ber o

f fo

rum

s4

32

Inst

ead

of h

old

ing

sepa

rate

QA

For

a ea

ch fo

r pub

lic a

nd p

rivat

e in

stitu

tions

re

spec

tivel

y, o

ne w

as h

eld

com

bini

ng

both

pub

lic a

nd p

rivat

e in

stitu

tions

. Th

e co

mbi

ned

QA

For

um a

lso ra

n fo

r 2 d

ays,

17 a

nd 1

8 M

arch

201

5 w

hich

is d

oubl

e th

e no

rmal

tim

e fo

r a

sepa

rate

For

um. T

he c

ombi

ned

QA

Fo

rum

ther

efor

e ac

hiev

ed th

e sa

me

(if n

ot m

ore)

out

com

es a

s wou

ld h

ave

been

exp

ecte

d fr

om tw

o se

para

te Q

A

Fora

, one

eac

h fo

r pub

lic a

nd p

rivat

e in

stitu

tions

resp

ectiv

ely.

A se

para

te fo

rum

was

hel

d fo

r pr

ofes

siona

l bod

ies.

Hum

an

Reso

urce

s M

anag

emen

t

Skills

Dev

elop

men

t Pl

anD

evel

opm

ent

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e Sk

ills P

lan

50%

30 tr

aini

ng

inte

rven

tions

100%

Impl

emen

ta-

tion

of th

e pl

an

68%

53 T

rain

ing

even

ts

Due

to th

e nu

mbe

r of t

rain

ing

inte

rven

tions

per

em

ploy

ee, t

he

accu

mul

ated

tota

l num

ber o

f em

ploy

ees t

rain

ed is

107

(thi

s is m

ade

up o

f 35,

23,

19,

30

empl

oyee

s tra

ined

in

Q1,

Q2,

Q3

and

Q4,

resp

ectiv

ely)

. To

tal n

umbe

r of e

mpl

oyee

s at t

he

CHE

is a

ppro

ximat

ely

46 a

nd 5

1 w

ere

train

ed (i

nclu

din

g te

rmin

atio

ns).

It w

as n

ot b

een

poss

ible

to im

plem

ent

the

full t

rain

ing

plan

due

to th

e un

avai

labi

lity

of st

aff d

ue to

wor

k pr

essu

res.

51



trate

gic

Obj

ectiv

ePr

ogra

mm

ePe

rform

ance

In

dica

tor

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

O

utpu

t 20

13/2

014

Ann

ual T

arge

t as

per

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

2014

- 20

15

Ann

ual

Cum

ulat

ive

Out

put

2014

- 20

15

Com

men

ts

Recr

uitm

ent

and

rete

ntio

n st

rate

gy

Fillin

g of

all

vaca

nt p

ositi

ons,

incl

udin

g re

duc

ed

turn

arou

nd ti

me

– m

axim

um th

ree

mon

ths

87%

95%

of

vaca

ncie

s fille

d90

%

Dur

ing

the

year

und

er re

view

, the

re

wer

e ch

ange

s to

the

CHE

org

anisa

tiona

l st

ruct

ure.

The

se w

ere

due

to a

mer

ger

of tw

o d

irect

orat

es (n

amel

y St

and

ard

D

evel

opm

ent a

nd N

atio

nal R

evie

ws)

. The

to

tal s

taff

com

plem

ent (

appr

oved

pos

ts)

subs

eque

ntly

cha

nged

from

53

to 5

1 by

end

of

Mar

ch 2

015.

*The

Cou

ncil a

gree

d th

at 1

pos

t sho

uld

no

t be

fille

d u

ntil d

icta

ted

by

oper

atio

nal

requ

irem

ents

(Ins

titut

iona

l Aud

its

Dire

ctor

ate)

.*It

shou

ld b

e no

ted

that

at t

he e

nd o

f Mar

ch

2015

46

post

s wer

e fil

led

.*T

his r

epre

sent

s 90%

of t

he p

osts

fille

d a

t the

en

d o

f the

fina

ncia

l yea

r bas

ed o

n 51

pos

t st

ruct

ure.

Ach

ieve

or

gani

satio

nal

grow

th a

nd

sust

aina

bilit

y

Func

tioni

ng

perfo

rman

ce

man

agem

ent

syst

em

100%

100%

of

perfo

rman

ce

agre

emen

ts

signe

d

100%

Targ

et a

chie

ved

.

Empl

oym

ent

Equi

tyIm

plem

enta

tion

of e

mpl

oym

ent

equi

ty (E

E) st

rate

gy

and

pla

n

21.5

%25

%

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

EE p

lan

22%

Dur

ing

the

year

und

er re

view

ther

e w

ere

10

empl

oym

ent e

quity

can

did

ates

app

oint

ed

(22%

). Th

ere

has b

een

an im

prov

emen

t in

the

num

ber o

f mal

es a

ppoi

nted

dur

ing

the

year

. The

recr

uitm

ent o

f peo

ple

with

d

isabi

litie

s rem

ains

a c

halle

nge.

Con

tract

s M

anag

emen

tSu

pplie

r pe

rform

ance

as

sess

men

t

100%

60%

133%

Targ

et e

xcee

ded

.

A la

rger

num

ber o

f sup

plie

r per

form

ance

as

sess

men

ts w

ere

com

plet

ed th

an in

itial

ly

plan

ned

.

B

52



Part C:Governance

54



PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAININGThe Annual Performance Plan and MTEF Budget for 2014/15 – 2016/2017 was presented to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training in the National Assembly on 2 July 2014.

The Annual Report for the 2013/14 financial year was presented to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education in the National Assembly on 16 October 2014.

In both cases, the presentations were well-received and there were no major issues of concern raised regarding the discharge of the CHE’s mandate by the portfolio committee.

Executive AuthorityThere was no meeting between the Minister of Higher Education and Training and the Council in the year under review.

The Accounting AuthorityMandates and Objectives of the Council on Higher Education

The CHE is established as a juristic person in terms of section 4 of the Higher Education Act (Act 101 of 1997), as amended, and as the Quality Council for Higher Education in terms of section 25 and 27 of the National Qualifications Act (Act 67 of 2008). In summary, the main areas of work of the CHE are:

• To provide advice to the Minister of Higher Education and Training on all higher education matters, at the Minister’s request and at its own initiative;

• To develop and implement a system of quality assurance for all higher education institutions, including private providers of higher education, which includes programme accreditation, institutional audits, national reviews, and capacity development and quality promotion;

• To develop and manage the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF) and the development of higher education qualifications;

• To monitor the state of the higher education system in relation to national policy goals and international trends;

• To contribute to the development of higher education through facilitating intellectual engagement on key issues in partnership with relevant stakeholders.

Roles and Responsibilities

The CHE is a public entity listed under Schedule 3A of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) (Act 1 of 1999), as amended. In this regard, the Council fulfils the role of the

55



C

Accounting Authority in terms of section 49 of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) (Act 1 of 1999), as amended.

As the Accounting Authority, the Council adheres to principles of good governance, financial and performance management and acts in a fiduciary capacity. Its responsibilities include:

• Effective, efficient and transparent systems of financial and risk management and internal control, internal audit and procurement;

• Effective and appropriate steps to collect revenue due, prevent irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure, losses from criminal conduct and expenditure as a result of non-compliance with operational policies;

• Management, including safeguarding, of the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenditure of the CHE;

• Compliance with applicable legislation and regulations; and • An effective and appropriate disciplinary system for failure to comply with the PFMA and

the internal control system.

Governance Structure

The Council comprises a Chairperson appointed for five (5) years and thirteen (13) ordinary Council members appointed by the Minister of Higher Education and Training for a period of four (4) years following a public nomination process. Eight (8) non-voting members are appointed by the Minister from nominations respectively by the Director-General of the Department of Higher Education and Training, the Provincial Heads of Education, the Director-General of the Department of Science and Technology, the Director-General of the Department of Labour, the National Research Foundation and the Chief Executive Officers of the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA), the General and Further Education and Training Quality Assurance Council (Umalusi) and the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO), in their official capacities. Three members can be co-opted by the Council.

The term of office of the Council ended on 14 December 2014, except for the Chairperson whose term of office ends on 14 July 2018. The Minister appointed a new Council with effect from 15 December 2014 for a four-year term. The members of the previous and the new Council are outlined below.

56



COUNCIL1 April 2014 - 14 December 2014

Name Designation Appointed in own right Appointed Number of

meetings attended

Fees(in

rands)

Prof Themba Mosia

Chairperson Vice Principal, Student Affairs and Residence Affairs and Accommodation, University of Pretoria

July 2013 3 of 3 27 648

Prof Yunus Ballim

Member University of the Witwatersrand

Re-appointed December

2010

1 of 3 NR

Dr Yvonne Dladla

Member Consultant Re-appointed May 2013

0 of 3 0

Prof Magda Fourie-Malherbe

Member University of Stellenbosch, Centre for Higher and Adult Education, Department of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Education

Re-appointed December

2010

3 of 3 21 504

Ms Malebo Ledwaba

Member Lecturer, Waterberg Further Education and Training College

December 2010

3 of 3 21 504

Dr Nyambeni Luruli

Member Principal Scientist, Sasol Polymers, PTC

December 2010

2 of 3 14 336

Dr Bandile Masuku

Member Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Gauteng Department of Health

Re-appointed May 2013

3 of 3 21 504

Dr Letticia Moja

Member Rob Ferreira Hospital, Mpumalanga Department of Health


3 of 3 21 504

Prof Shireen Motala

Member Director: Postgraduate Centre for Education and Innovation, University of Johannesburg

December 2010

2 of 3 14 336

Ms Dora Ndaba

Member Consultant December 2010

3 of 3 21 504

Mr Edmund Nxumalo

Member Consultant December 2010

3 of 3 21 504

Dr Zilungile Sosibo

Member Head of Department, Further Education and Training, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

December 2010

3 of 3 21 504

57



C

COUNCIL1 April 2014 - 14 December 2014

Name Designation Appointed in own right Appointed Number of

meetings attended

Fees(in

rands)

Prof Beverley Thaver

Member Faculty of Education, University of the Western Cape

December 2010

3 of 3 21 504

Dr Molapo Qhobela

Co-opted Member

Vice-Principal Institutional Development, University of South Africa.

October 2012

2 of 3 0

Prof Sophie Mogotlane

Co-opted Member

Consultant October 2012

2 of 3 14 336

Non-voting members Representing organisation

Ms Joyce Mashabela

QCTO Chief Executive Officer, Quality Council for Trades and Occupations

n/a 3 of 3 NR

Mr Joe Samuels

SAQA Chief Executive Officer, South African Qualifications Authority

n/a 3 of 3 NR

Dr Diane Parker

DHET Acting Deputy Director General, Department of Higher Education and Training

n/a 1 of 3 NR

Dr Thomas Auf der Heyde

DST Deputy Director General: Human Capital and Knowledge Systems, Department of Science and Technology

n/a 2 of 3 NR

Dr Mafu Rakometsi

Umalusi Chief Executive Officer, the Council for Quality Assurance in General and Further Education and Training (Umalusi)

n/a 3 of 3 NR

Dr Albert van JaarsveldRepresented by Andrew Kaniki

NRF President and Chief Executive Officer National Research Foundation

n/a 1 of 3 NR

58



COUNCIL15 December 2014 - 31 March 2015

Name Designation Appointed in own right

Appointed Number of meetings attended

Fees(in

rands)Prof Themba Mosia

Chairperson Vice Principal, Student Affairs and Residence Affairs and Accommodation, University of Pretoria

July 2013 0 of 1 0

Mr Luzuko Buku Member Secretary GeneralSASCO

15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168

Prof Christiaan de Beer

Member University of Pretoria 15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168

Prof André Keet Member Director Institute for Reconciliation and Social Justice, University of the Free State

15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168

Mr Casper Kruger

Member Chief Executive OfficerFalse Bay TVET College

15 December

2014

1 of 1 NR

Dr Pamela Maseko

Member LecturerRhodes University

15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168

Dr Bandile Masuku

Member Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Gauteng Department of Health


1 of 1 7 168

Prof Shireen Motala

Member Director: Postgraduate Centre for Education and Innovation, University of Johannesburg.

December 2010

1 of 1 7 168

Ms Nombulelo Nxesi

Member Chief Executive OfficerEducation, Training and Development Practices (ETDP) SETA

15 December

2014

1 of 1 NR

Dr Kimberley Porteus

Member Executive Director,Nelson Mandela Institution for Education and Rural Development

15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168

Prof Selby Ripinga

Member Independent Consultant

15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168

59



C

COUNCIL15 December 2014 - 31 March 2015

Name Designation Appointed in own right

Appointed Number of meetings attended

Fees(in

rands)Prof Ratnamala Singh

Member Independent Consultant

15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168


Member Faculty of Education, University of the Western Cape

December 2010

1 of 1 7 168

Prof Mvuyo Tom Member Vice-ChancellorUniversity of Fort Hare

15 December

2014

1 of 1 7 168

Dr Molapo Qhobela

Co-opted Member

Vice-Principal Institutional Development, University of South Africa

October 2012

1 of 1 NR

Prof Sophie Mogotlane

Co-opted Member

Independent Consultant

October 2012

1 of 1 7 168

Non-voting members Representing organisationMs Joyce Mashabela

QCTO Chief Executive Officer, Quality Council for Trades and Occupations

n/a 1 of 1 NR

Mr Joe Samuels SAQA Chief Executive Officer, South African Qualifications Authority

n/a 1 of 1 NR

Dr Diane Parker DHET Deputy Director General, Department of Higher Education and Training

n/a 1 of 1 NR

Representative DST Deputy Director General: Human Capital and Knowledge Systems, Department of Science and Technology

n/a 0 of 1 NR

Dr Mafu Rakometsi

Umalusi Chief Executive Officer, the Council for Quality Assurance in General and Further Education and Training (Umalusi)

n/a 1 of 1 NR

Representative NRF President and Chief Executive Officer National Research Foundation

n/a 0 of 1 NR

60



The details of Council members, including their qualifications, areas of expertise and directorships/membership of other organisations are listed in the table on page 38.

Committees and Sub-Committees

Permanent Committee

The Council has one (1) permanent committee, the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC) established in terms of section 7 (3) of the Higher Education Act. The HEQC has executive responsibility in terms of section 5 (1) (c) of the Higher Education Act and the NQF Act for quality promotion and quality assurance in higher education, specifically to:

• promote quality in higher education• audit the quality assurance mechanisms of higher education institutions• accredit programmes of higher education.

The term of office of the HEQC ends on 31 March 2105. The Council in the interest of continuity has re-appointed 8 members who are eligible to serve a second term from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2018.

HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY COMMITTEE (HEQC)Name Designation Appointed in

own rightAppointed Resigned Number

of meetings attended

Fees(in

rands)

Prof Yunus Ballim

Chairperson University of the Witwatersrand

April 2012 December 2014

3 of 5 0

Prof Theo Andrew

Member Executive Dean: Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Durban University of Technology

April 2012(Reappointed

for second term)

6 of 7 43 008

Prof Narend Baijnath

Member Pro Vice-Chancellor, University of South Africa

April 2012 March 2015

Completed two terms

3 of 7 23 552

Prof Usuf Chikte

Member Executive Head: Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch.


for second term)

7 of 7 50 176

Dr Felicity Coughlan

Member Director and Head: The Independent Institute of Education


Completed two terms

5 of 7 35 840

61



C




Fees(in

rands)

Dr Andrew Kaniki

Member Executive Director: Knowledge Management and Strategy, National Research Foundation


for second term)

2 of 7 NR

Mr Thamsanqa Ledwaba

Co-opted member



Completed two terms

7 of 7 50 176

Ms Kuselwa Marala

Member Director: Academic Administration, Cape Peninsula University of Technology.


Completed two terms

5 of 7 35 840

Prof John Mubangizi

Member Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Head of the College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal


for second term)

7 of 7 50 176

Ms Nicolene Murdoch

Member Executive Director Teaching, Learning and Quality Assurance, Monash University, South Africa.


for second term)

7 of 7 50 176

Prof Nthabiseng Ogude

Member Vice-Chancellor, Tshwane University of Technology


for second term)

2 of 7 14 336

Prof Martin Oosthuizen

Member Deputy Vice Chancellor: Teaching and Learning, North-West University


for second term)

6 of 7 43 008

62






Fees(in

rands)

Prof Rocky Ralebipi-Simela

Member Regional Director: University of South Africa, Limpopo Region


for second term)

4 of 7 NR

Dr Diane Parker

Ex-officio Member

Deputy Director General: Universities, DHET

6 of 7 NR

Sub-committees

The Council has four (4) sub-committees, namely:

• Executive Committee (EXCO) established in terms of section 13 of the Higher Education Act;

• Audit and Risk Committee (ARC);• Human Resources and Remuneration Committee (HRRC);• Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (MEC).

The members of sub-committees are appointed for the specific knowledge and skills relating to the work the sub-committees.

The Council and its sub-committees, including its permanent committee responsible for quality assurance, the HEQC, have functioned effectively in terms of the CHE’s statutory mandate and adherence to principles of good governance.

63



C

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Members Designation Appointed Resigned Number of

meetings attended

Fees (in rands)

Prof Themba Mosia

Chairperson July 2013 - 2 of 2 18 432

Prof Yunus Ballim Council Member

Re-appointed June 2011

- 1 of 2 NR

Dr Bandile Masuku

Council Member


- 2 of 2 14 336

Dr Letticia Moja Council Member

Re-appointed June 2011Acting-Chair until July 2013

- 0 of 2 0

Dr Diane Parker Council Member


- 1 of 2 NR

AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEEMembers Designation Appointed in



Fees(in

rands)

Dr Doeke Tromp

Chairperson Independent Consultant

Re-appointed June 2011Chairperson from September 2013

- 5 of 5 35 840

Mr Malson Chilenge

Expert Member


April 2013 - 5 of 5 21 760

Mr Joe Samuels

Council Representative

Chief Executive Officer, SAQA

March 2012 - 3 of 5 NR

Prof Quintus Vorster

Expert Member

Director Finance, University of Pretoria

May 2014 - 4 of 4 17 408

Ms Vuyo Memani-Sedile

Expert Member

Executive Director: Finance, UNISA

May 2014 - 3 of 4 13 056

64



HUMAN RESOURCES AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEEMembers Designation Appointed in

own rightAppointed Resigned Number of

meetings attended

Fees(in

rands)Dr Yvonne Dladla

Chairperson June 2011 - 2 of 2 14 336

Ms Jennie Browning

Expert Member


June 2011 - 2 of 2 8 704

Ms Tina Georgoulakis

Expert Member


August 2012 - 2 of 2 8 704

Ms Dora Ndaba

Council Member

June 2011 - 2 of 2 8 704

Mr Edmund Nxumalo

Council Member

August 2013 - 1 of 2 4 352

MONITORING ANAND EVALUATION COMMITTEE

Members Designation Appointed in own right

Appointed Resigned No of meetings attended

Fees(in rands)

Dr Nyambeni Luruli

Council Member

June 2011 - 1 of 2 0

Prof Shireen Motala

Council Member

June 2011 - 1 of 2 0

Mr Edmund Nxumalo

Council Member

June 2011 - 2 of 2 0


Council Member

June 2011 - 2 of 2 0

Remuneration of Council Members

Members of Council and its permanent and sub-committees who are not CHE employees or government officials qualify for daily allowances for services rendered to the CHE in accordance with the Treasury Regulations and Directives.

Risk Management

The CHE has reviewed its risk profile during the course of the year to consider the extent to which potential events may have an impact on the achievement of the organisation’s objectives. Emerging events were assessed from two perspectives – likelihood and impact – and a number of risks, predominantly on a strategic level, were identified and weighed.

Materiality Framework

As required by the Treasury Regulations, the Council has developed a materiality and significance framework appropriate to its size and circumstances.

65



C

Internal Audit

The internal audit function is contracted out as the Council does not consider it appropriate to establish an in-house internal audit function due to the nature and size of the CHE. However, the ARC is responsible for monitoring the internal audit function and for evaluating the effectiveness of the internal controls in place, including recommending improvements to Council where appropriate.

Auditors

As required by the PFMA, the external auditor of the CHE is the Auditor-General of South Africa.

Compliance with laws and regulations

The ARC is responsible for monitoring compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding financial matters and management and other related matters.

Audit Report Matters in the Previous Year

A consolidated strategic audit action plan was developed and implemented and this resulted in 13 audit findings from the internal auditors and 22 audit findings from external auditors being addressed.

Supply Chain Management

There were no unsolicited bids.

Fraud and Corruption

The CHE has policies in place on fraud prevention, detection and reporting.

No cases of fraud occurred during the year under review. However, the Council was made aware of fraud, which occurred in the 2007/08 financial year as a result of information provided by SARS in November 2012. This was reported to the South African Police Services and a criminal case was opened on 14 March 2014.

An investigation is currently being conducted.

Subsequent events

The Council is aware of one subsequent event arising after the end of the financial year which is disclosed in note 25 of the Financial Statements.

Minimising Conflict of Interest

Council and sub-committee members are required to declare any conflict of interest for the record at the beginning of each Council or sub-committee meeting.

66



Code of Conduct

There is a code of conduct in place for staff but not Council and sub-committees members. The Council recognises that this is a shortcoming and is committed to developing a Code of Conduct for members going forward.

Health, Safety and Environmental Issues

The CHE regards the health and safety of its employees and people affected by the organisation’s operations to be of vital importance. The CHE’s primary objective is therefore to achieve and maintain the highest practicable level of health and safety control.

In line with this and in fulfilment of the requirements stipulated in the Occupational and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993), the CHE has established a Health and Safety Committee that monitors the health and safety of employees in the work environment and identifies potential health and safety threats that require addressing.

The CHE is also cognisant of the need to ensure that the work environment is environmentally sustainable. In this regard, efforts have been made to ensure that lights and other appliances are switched off appropriately at the end of the working day and paper is recycled. The Council is, however, aware that the actions taken to date are limited and require further development.

Social Responsibility

The CHE has been involved in two corporate social responsibility initiatives during the year under review.

These are:• Cell C’s Take a Girl Child to Work initiative held on 29 May 2014. The CHE hosted 14 girls

as part of the programme that aims to inspire girls and expose them to the world of work.• Nelson Mandela Day initiative held on 18 July 2014. The CHE staff spent the day at an

orphanage, Dimponyana Tsa Lapeng in Olievenhoutbosch, Centurion painting the home. The CHE has undertaken to adopt the home and will continue to provide support where possible, on an ongoing basis.

Audit and Risk Committee Report

See page 82, in Part E, for the full report.

67



Cou

ncil M

embe

rs (A

ppoi

nted

by

the

Min

ister

of H

ighe

r Edu

catio

n an

d Tr

aini

ng)

Nam

eDe

signa

tion

Oth

er C

HE

com

mitt

ees

Qua

lifica

tion

Are

a of

Exp

ertis

eDi

rect

orsh

ips

/ C

ounc

il M

embe

rshi

psPr

of T

hem

ba

Mos

iaC

hairp

erso

nEX

CO

PhD

• M

edic

al e

duc

atio

n•

Gov

erna

nce

• Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

• M

anag

emen

t•

Lead

ersh

ip

• N

SFA

S

Prof

Yun

us

Ballim

M

embe

rEX

CO

HEQ

C -

C

hairp

erso

n

PhD

• C

ivil e

ngin

eerin

g ed

ucat

ion

• Hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

lead

ersh

ip a

nd

man

agem

ent

• N

one

Mr B

uku

Luzu

koM

embe

rM

aste

r of

Soc

ial

Scie

nces

• Hi

gher

Ed

ucat

ion

• M

edia

Man

agem

ent a

nd S

tud

ies

• Pu

blic

Rel

atio

ns•

Urba

n St

udie

s

• N

one

Prof

Chr

istia

an

de

Beer

Mem

ber

LL.D

• Hi

gher

Ed

ucat

ion

• N

one

Dr Y

vonn

e D

lad

laM

embe

rHR

RC -

C

hairp

erso

nPh

D S

ocio

logy

an

d S

ocia

l W

ork

• O

rgan

isatio

nal d

evel

opm

ent

• So

cial

pol

icy

adm

inist

ratio

n•

Hum

an re

sour

ce m

anag

emen

t•

Rese

arch

• Pr

oduc

tivity

man

agem

ent

• St

rate

gy d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

Impl

emen

tatio

n

• Th

ebe

Tour

ism G

roup

(Pty

) Lt

d•

Theb

e Fo

und

atio

n•

Kelly

Gro

up (P

ty) L

td•

YD C

onsu

lting

(Pty

) Ltd

.•

YAM

E Un

ique

Cra

fts (P

ty)

Ltd

Prof

Mag

da

Four

ie-

Mal

herb

e

Mem

ber

PhD

• Hi

gher

Ed

ucat

ion

man

agem

ent a

nd

lead

ersh

ip.

• Te

achi

ng a

nd le

arni

ng, s

tud

ent s

ucce

ss

• Um

alus

i

C

68



Nam

eDe

signa

tion

Oth

er C

HE

com

mitt

ees

Qua

lifica

tion

Are

a of

Exp

ertis

eDi

rect

orsh

ips

/ C

ounc

il M

embe

rshi

psPr

of A

ndré

Kee

tM

embe

rPh

D –

Ed

ucat

ion

Man

agem

ent,

Law

and

Po

licy.

• Hi

gher

Ed

ucat

ion

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

• So

cial

Jus

tice,

Soc

ial C

ohes

ion

and

Re

conc

iliatio

n.•

Hum

an R

ight

s and

Hum

an R

ight

s Ed

ucat

ion.

• C

hair

of B

oard

, Cen

tre

for E

duc

atio

n Ri

ghts

and

Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n, U

nive

rsity

of

Joh

anne

sbur

g•

Cou

ncil M

embe

r, IN

SETA

• C

omm

ittee

Mem

ber,

Cen

tre fo

r Ed

ucat

ion

Law

an

d P

olic

y, U

nive

rsity

of

Pret

oria

• EE

CA

Con

sulti

ng,

Shar

ehol

der

• C

ounc

il Mem

ber,

Stel

lenb

osch

Uni

vers

ity

Mr C

aspe

r Kr

uger

Mem

ber

BEd

Ed

ucat

ion

Man

agem

ent

• Te

chni

cal,

voca

tiona

l ed

ucat

ion

and

tra

inin

g•

Trus

tee,

Acc

ess T

rust

.•

Boar

d M

embe

r, SA

So

ciet

y of

Co-

oper

ativ

e Ed

ucat

ion

(SA

SCE)

re

pres

entin

g th

e na

tiona

l So

uth

Afri

can

Col

lege

Pr

inci

pals

Org

anisa

tion.

Ms M

aleb

o Le

dw

aba

Mem

ber

BTec

h M

anag

emen

t •

Man

agem

ent

• Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

• N

one

Dr N

yam

beni

Lu

ruli

Mem

ber

MEC

PhD

(Pol

ymer

Sc

ienc

e)•

Ana

lytic

al c

hem

istry

• Po

lym

er sc

ienc

e•

Poly

mer

con

vers

ion

• St

uden

t tra

inin

g

• N

one

Dr P

amel

a M

asek

oM

embe

rPh

D•

Soci

olin

guist

ics a

nd so

ciol

ogy

of

lang

uage

• La

ngua

ge P

olic

y an

d P

lann

ing

in

Educ

atio

n (F

ocus

on

Afri

can

cont

ext)

• N

one

Dr B

and

ile

Mas

uku

Mem

ber

EXC

OFe

llow

of t

he

Col

lege

of

Obs

tetri

cs a

nd

Gyn

aeco

logy

(F

CO

G)

• C

omm

unic

atio

ns•

Polic

y d

evel

opm

ent

• C

omm

unity

wor

k•

Med

ical

skills

• Le

ader

ship

• Ts

hwan

e Un

iver

sity

of

Tech

nolo

gy

69



C

Nam

eDe

signa

tion

Oth

er C

HE

com

mitt

ees

Qua

lifica

tion

Are

a of

Exp

ertis

eDi

rect

orsh

ips

/ C

ounc

il M

embe

rshi

psD

r Let

ticia

Moj

aM

embe

rEX

CO

MM

ed

• He

alth

pro

fess

ions

ed

ucat

ion

and

tra

inin

g•

Man

agem

ent o

f hea

lth p

rofe

ssio

n’s

train

ing

• M

edic

al e

duc

atio

n

• N

one

Prof

Shi

reen

M

otal

aM

embe

rM

ECPh

D

• Hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

polic

y•

Non

e

Ms D

ora

Nd

aba

Mem

ber

HRRC

BTec

h Tr

ansp

ort a

nd

Logi

stic

s

• Bu

sines

s and

eco

nom

y•

Ind

ustri

al re

latio

ns•

Rese

arch

and

mar

ketin

g

• W

ater

Res

earc

h C

omm

issio

n•

Nat

iona

l Reg

ulat

or fo

r C

ompu

lsory

Spe

cific

atio

ns•

Agr

icul

tura

l Res

earc

h C

ounc

il

Ms N

ombu

lelo

N

xesi

Mem

ber

Mas

ters

in

Busin

ess

Lead

ersh

ip

• St

rate

gy a

nd le

ader

ship

• G

over

nanc

e•

Polic

y an

alys

is

• N

one

Mr E

dm

und

N

xum

alo

Mem

ber

MEC

HRRC

Mas

ters

Pub

lic

Ad

min

istra

tion

• Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

• Sk

ills d

evel

opm

ent t

rain

ing

• Hu

man

reso

urce

man

agem

ent

• Hu

man

reso

urce

dev

elop

men

t

• Te

chno

logy

D

emon

stra

tion

Cen

tre•

Tshw

ane

Sout

h C

olle

ge

Dr K

imbe

rley

Porte

usM

embe

rD

octo

r of

Philo

soph

y,

Educ

atio

n

• Pe

dag

ogic

al in

nova

tion

in h

ighe

r ed

ucat

ion

• Te

ache

r pro

fess

iona

l dev

elop

men

t•

Rela

tions

hip

betw

een

high

er e

duc

atio

n an

d ru

ral c

omm

unity

dev

elop

men

t

• N

one

Prof

Sim

eon

Ripi

nga

Mem

ber

D.E

d•

Lead

ersh

ip a

nd G

over

nanc

e•

Teac

hing

and

Stu

den

t Lea

rnin

g•

Aca

dem

ic T

rain

ing

and

Dev

elop

men

t

• M

anag

ing

Dire

ctor

Th

inkS

ucce

ss P

ty L

td

70



Nam

eDe

signa

tion

Oth

er C

HE

com

mitt

ees

Qua

lifica

tion

Are

a of

Exp

ertis

eDi

rect

orsh

ips

/ C

ounc

il M

embe

rshi

psPr

of R

atna

mal

a Si

ngh

Mem

ber

D.P

hil

Philo

soph

y•

Inte

rnat

iona

l and

Com

para

tive

High

er

Educ

atio

n Po

licy

• Q

ualit

y A

ssur

ance

• Hi

gher

Ed

ucat

ion

and

Soc

iety

• Sc

ienc

e Po

licy

• N

one

Dr Z

ilung

ile

Sosib

o M

embe

rPh

D (A

dul

t Ed

ucat

ion)

• Te

ache

r ed

ucat

ion

(T&

L)•

Cur

ricul

um d

evel

opm

ent

• Re

sear

ch

• Um

alus

i

Prof

Bev

erle

y Th

aver

Mem

ber

MEC

PhD

(E

duc

atio

n)•

High

er e

duc

atio

n•

Non

e

Dr M

vuyo

Tom

Mem

ber

M.F

am M

ed•

Stra

tegi

c Le

ader

ship

and

Gov

erna

nce

• Pu

blic

Pol

icy

Dev

elop

men

t and

M

anag

emen

t

• D

irect

or –

Nel

son

Man

del

a In

stitu

te•

Dire

ctor

– F

ore

Hare

Tr

adin

g So

lutio

ns•

Mas

ibum

bane

D

evel

opm

ent

Org

anisa

tion

• Tr

uste

e –

Fort

Hare

Fo

und

atio

n•

Trus

tee

– Se

nzw

a Fa

mily

Tr

ust

Prof

Sop

hie

Mog

otla

ne

Co-

opte

d

mem

ber

PhD

• C

omm

unity

hea

lth•

Rese

arch

• N

one

Dr M

olap

o Q

hobe

laC

o-op

ted

m

embe

rPh

D•

High

er e

duc

atio

n•

Gov

erna

nce

• Pl

anni

ng

• Tr

uste

e –

Cra

dle

of H

uman

Ki

nd•

Dire

ctor

– S

outh

Afri

can

Act

uarie

s Dev

elop

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e•

Trus

tee

– UN

ISA

Fo

und

atio

n

Dr E

dm

und

Zin

guC

o-op

ted

m

embe

rHE

QC

PhD

(Phy

sics)

•

Phys

ics

• Ed

ucat

ion

• N

one

71



C

Nam

eDe

signa

tion

Oth

er C

HE

com

mitt

ees

Qua

lifica

tion

Are

a of

Exp

ertis

eDi

rect

orsh

ips

/ C

ounc

il M

embe

rshi

psN

on-V

otin

g

Dr T

hom

as A

uf

der

Hey

de

(DST

)D

epar

tmen

t of

Scie

nce

and

Te

chno

logy

PhD

(C

hem

istry

)•

High

er e

duc

atio

n an

d sc

ienc

e an

d

tech

nolo

gy m

anag

emen

t and

pol

icy

• A

frica

Inst

itute

of S

outh

A

frica

Mr A

hmed

Ess

op

CHE

- C

EOM

aste

rs in

In

tern

atio

nal

Dev

elop

men

t Ed

ucat

ion

• Hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

• Um

alus

i•

SAQ

A•

QC

TO•

Old

Mut

ual E

duc

atio

n Tr

ust

Ms J

oyce

M

asha

bela

(Q

CTO

)

Qua

lity

Cou

ncil f

or

Trad

es a

nd

Occ

upat

ions

MA

• Ed

ucat

ion

and

ad

min

istra

tion

• Um

alus

i•

SAQ

A•

QC

TO

Dr D

iane

Par

ker

(DHE

T)D

epar

tmen

t of

Hig

her

Educ

atio

n an

d

Trai

ning

EXC

OHE

QC

PhD

• Te

ache

r ed

ucat

ion

• Hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

• M

athe

mat

ics e

duc

atio

n

• Pe

ta S

ourc

e cc

(50%

pa

rtner

ship

)

Dr M

afu

Rako

met

si (U

mal

usi)

Umal

usi

PhD

• G

ener

al a

nd fu

rther

ed

ucat

ion

and

tra

inin

g –

curri

culu

m a

nd e

xam

inat

ions

• Um

alus

i Cou

ncil

• SA

QA

•

QC

TO•

Held

erbe

rg C

olle

ge

Cou

ncil

Mr J

oe S

amue

ls (S

AQ

A)

Sout

h A

frica

n Q

ualifi

catio

ns

Aut

horit

y

ARC

MPh

il•

Ad

ult e

duc

atio

n•

Con

tinui

ng e

duc

atio

n po

licy

• Q

ualifi

catio

ns

• Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

• SA

QA

• Q

CTO

• Um

alus

i

Dr A

lber

t van

Ja

arsv

eld

(N

RF)

Nat

iona

l Re

sear

ch

Foun

dat

ion

PhD

• Zo

olog

y•

Ang

elfis

h In

vest

men

ts

334

(Dor

man

t)

72



Part D:Human Resource

Management

74



OVERVIEWFor an overview of the human resources section please see page 37 Part B.

Human Resources Oversight StatisticsPersonnel cost by programme

Directorate Total Expenditure

for the entity

Personnel Expenditure

Personnel expenditure

as a % of total

expenditure

Number of employees

Average personnel cost per

employee

(R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000)Administration* 24 811 12 093 49% 20 605


7 129 3 944 55% 7 563


10 028 4 239 42% 10 424

National Standards and Reviews

3 144 1 482 47% 3 494

Institutional Audits 4 606 3 241 70% 6 540

TOTAL 49 718 24 999 50% 46 543*AdministrationreferstoCorporateServices,theChiefExecutiveOfficer’sofficeandQualityPromotionandCapacityDevelopment

Personnel cost by salary band

Level Personnel Expenditure

% of personnel expenditure to total personnel

cost

Number of employees

Average personnel cost per employee

(R’000)Top Management 1 348 5% 0 0

Senior Management 5 270 21% 7 753

Professional qualified 7 464 30% 14 533

Skilled 10 641 43% 23 463

Unskilled 276 1% 2 138

TOTAL 24 999 100% 46 543

75



D

Performance Rewards

Level Performance rewards

Personnel Expenditure

% of performance rewards to total personnel cost

Top Management 0 1 348 0%

Senior Management 356 5 270 7%

Professional qualified 238 7 464 3.18%

Skilled 255 10 641 2.39%

Unskilled 12 276 4.34%

TOTAL 861 24 999 3.44%

Training Costs

Directorate Personnel Expenditure

Training Expenditure

Training Expenditure

as a % of personnel cost

Number of employees

trained

Average training cost per

employee(R’000) (R’000)

Administration* 12 093 366 3% 23 16

Monitoring and Evaluation 3 944 140 4% 7 20

Programme Accreditation 4 239 172 4% 11 16

National Standards and Reviews 1 482 29 2% 5 6

Institutional Audits 3 241 66 2% 5 13

TOTAL 24 999 773 3% 51 15*AdministrationreferstoCorporateServices,theChiefExecutiveOfficer’sofficeandQualityPromotionandCapacityDevelopment# excludes accommodation and travelling

76



Employment and vacancies

Directorate 2013/2014 Number of Employees

2014/2015 Approved

posts

2014/2015 Number of Employees

2014/2015 Vacancies

% of vacancies

Administration* 18 22 20 2 9%


7 7 7 0 0


10 11 10 1 9%

**National Standards and Reviews

5 4 3 1 25%

Institutional Audits 6 7 6 1 14%

TOTAL 46 51 46 5 9.8%*AdministrationreferstoCorporateServices,theChiefExecutiveOfficer’sofficeandQualityPromotionandCapacityDevelopment** Due to the merging of two directorates, one position was removed the organisational structure

Employment and vacancies (continued)

Level 2013/2014 Number of Employees

2014/2015 Approved

Posts

2014/2015Number of Employees

2014/2015 Vacancies

% of Vacancies

Top Management 1 1 0 1 100%

Senior Management 7 7 7 0 0%

Professional qualified 12 14 14 0 0%

Skilled 24 27 23 4 14.8%

Semi-skilled 0 0 0 0 0%

Unskilled 2 2 2 0 0%

TOTAL 46 51 46 5 9.8%

77



D

Employment Changes

Level Employment at beginning

of period

Appointments Terminations Employment at end of the

periodTop Management 1 0 1 0

Senior Management 7 2 2 7

Professional qualified 12 4 2 14

Skilled 24 5 5 23

Semi-skilled 0 0 0 0

Unskilled 2 0 0 2

TOTAL 46 11 10 46Note: The lines above do not add up horizontally There have been internal transfers/promotions of staff members and two directorates merged

Reasons for Staff Leaving

Reason Number % of total number of staff leaving

Death 0 0%

Resignation 7 15.21%

Dismissal 1 2.17%

Retirement 0 0%

Ill Health 0 0%

Expiry of contract 1 2.17%

*Other 1 2.17%

TOTAL 10 21.73%* Due to the merging of two directorates, one position was removed from the organisational structure

Labour Relations: Misconduct and disciplinary action

Nature of disciplinary Action NumberVerbal Warning 1

Written Warning 0

Final Written Warning 0

Dismissal 1

78



Equity Target and Employment Equity Status

Levels MaleAfrican Coloured Indian White

Current Target Current Target Current Target Current TargetTop Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Senior Management 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Professional qualified 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

Skilled 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Semi-skilled 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Unskilled 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total 12 0 1 1 0 0 1 1Levels Female

African Coloured Indian WhiteCurrent Target Current Target Current Target Current Target

Top Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Senior Management 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0

Professional qualified 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 0

Skilled 13 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

Semi-skilled 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Unskilled 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Total 22 0 1 1 1 0 8 0

Equity Target and Employment Equity Status (continued)

Levels Disabled StaffCurrent Target

Top Management 0 0

Senior Management 0 0

Professional qualified 0 1

Skilled 0 0

Semi-skilled 0 0

Unskilled 0 0

TOTAL 0 1

Part E:Annual Financial

StatementsIndex PageStatement of Responsibility 80Audit and Risk Committee Report 82Accounting Authority Report 87Statement of Financial Position 90Statement of Financial Performance 93Statement of Changes in Net Assets 92Cash Flow Statement 93Statement of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amounts 94-95Accounting Policies 96-108Notes to the Annual Financial Statements 109-125

80



STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITYThe Council is required to maintain adequate accounting records and is responsible for the content and integrity of the annual financial statements and related financial information included in this report. It is the responsibility of the Council to ensure that the annual financial statements fairly present the state of affairs of the Council on Higher Education (CHE) as at the end of the financial year and the results of its operations and cashflows for the period then ended. The external auditors were engaged to express an independent opinion on the annual financial statements and were given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data.

The annual financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice (GRAP) including any interpretations, guidelines and directives issued by the Accounting Standards Board.

The annual financial statements are based upon appropriate accounting policies consistently applied and supported by reasonable and prudent judgements and estimates.

The Council acknowledges that it is ultimately responsible for the system of internal financial control established by the CHE and places considerable importance on maintaining a strong control environment. To enable the members to meet these responsibilities, the Council sets standards for internal control aimed at reducing the risk of error or deficit in a cost effective manner. The standards include the proper delegation of responsibilities within a clearly defined framework, effective accounting procedures and adequate segregation of duties to ensure an acceptable level of risk. These controls are monitored throughout the CHE and all employees are required to maintain the highest ethical standards in ensuring the CHE’s business is conducted in a manner that in all reasonable circumstances is above reproach. The focus of risk management in the CHE is on identifying, assessing, managing and monitoring all known forms of risk across the CHE. While operating risk cannot be fully eliminated,the CHE endeavours to minimise it by ensuring that appropriate infrastructure, controls, systems and ethical behaviour are applied and managed within predetermined procedures and constraints.

The Council is of the opinion, based on the information and explanations given by management in response to the internal and external audit reports, that the system of internal control provides reasonable assurance that the financial records may be relied on for the preparation of the financial statements. Where deficiencies were noted, the controls are being strengthened. However, any system of internal financial control can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or deficit.

The CHE is financially dependent on a transfer payment from the Department of Higher Education and Training for the continued funding of its operations. The annual financial statements are prepared on the basis that the CHE is a going concern and that the

81



E

Department of Higher Education and Training will transfer the payment as listed in the Estimates of National Expenditure (ENE) to the CHE.

The Council is primarily responsible for the financial affairs of the CHE.

The external auditors are responsible for independently reviewing and reporting on the CHE’s annual financial statements. The annual financial statements have been examined by the CHE’s external auditors and their report is presented on page 84.

The annual financial statements set out on page 87 to 125 which have been prepared on the basis that it is a going concern, were approved by the Council on 29 July 2015 and were signed on its behalf by:

Prof N. Themba Mosia Dr Denyse WebbstockChairperson ActingChiefExecutiveOfficer

82



AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORTAudit and Risk Committee members and attendance

The Audit and Risk Committee consists of the members listed here under and should meet four times per annum in accordance with its approved terms of reference. During the current year five meetings were held.

Name of member Number of meetings attendedDr D Tromp (Chairperson) 5 of 5Mr M Chilenge 5 of 5Mr J Samuels 3 of 5Prof Q Vorster* 4 of 4Ms V Memani-Sedile* 3 of 4

* Appointed May 2014

Audit and Risk Committee responsibility

The Audit and Risk Committee reports that it has complied with its responsibilities arising from section 55(1)(a) of the PFMA and Treasury Regulations section 27.1.

The Audit and Risk Committee also reports that it has adopted appropriate formal terms of reference through its audit and risk committee charter, has regulated its affairs in compliance with this charter and has discharged all its responsibilities as contained therein.

The effectiveness of internal control

In line with the PFMA requirements, Internal Audit provides the Audit and Risk Committee and management with assurance that the internal controls are appropriate and effective. This is achieved by means of the risk management process, as well as the identification of corrective actions and suggested enhancements to the controls and processes. From the various reports of the Internal Auditors, the audit report on the annual financial statements, and the management report of the Auditor-General of South Africa (AG SA), it was noted that some matters were reported that indicate some minor deficiencies in the system of internal control and deviations there from. Accordingly, we can report that the system of internal control over financial reporting for the period under review was satisfactory. Assurance was obtained that the identified problems are receiving the necessary attention.

Evaluation of annual financial statements

The Audit and Risk Committee has:

• reviewed and discussed the audited annual financial statements to be included in the annual report, with the AG SA and the Council;

• reviewed the AG SA’s management report and management’s response thereto;

83



E

• reviewed changes in accounting policies and practices;• reviewed the entity’s compliance with legal and regulatory provisions;• reviewed significant adjustments resulting from the audit.

The Audit and Risk Committee concurs with and accepts the AG SA’s report on the annual financial statements, and is of the opinion that the audited annual financial statements should be accepted and read together with the report of the AG SA.

Internal audit

The Audit and Risk Committee is satisfied that the internal audit function is operating effectively and that it has addressed the risks pertinent to the CHE and its controls.

Auditor-General of South Africa

The Audit and Risk Committee has met with the AG SA to ensure that there are no unresolved issues.

Recommendation

At its meeting held on 27July 2015, the Audit and Risk Committee recommended the adoption of the financial statements to the Council.

Dr D TrompChairperson of the Audit and Risk Committee

84



REPORT OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL TO THE PARLIAMENT ON THE COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION

Report on the Financial Statements

Introduction

1. I have audited the financial statements of the Council on Higher Education (CHE) set out on pages 90 to 125, which comprise the statement of financial position as at 31 March 2015, the statement of financial performance, statement of changes in net assets, cash flow statement and the statement of comparison of budget information with actual amounts for the year then ended, as well as the notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Accounting authority’s responsibility for the financial statements

2. The board of directors, which constitutes the accounting authority, is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with South African Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practices (SA Standards of GRAP)and the requirements of the Public Finance Management Act of South Africa, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999) (PFMA), and for such internal control as the accounting authority determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor-general’s responsibility

3. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit. I conducted my audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that I comply with ethical requirements, and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

5. I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for my audit opinion.

85



Opinion

6. In my opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CHE as at 31 March 2015 and its financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with SA Standards of GRAP, and the requirements of the PFMA.

Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

7. In accordance with the Public Audit Actof South Africa, 2004 (Act No. 25 of 2004)and the general notice issued in terms thereof. I have a responsibility to report findings on the reported performance information against predetermined objectives for selected programmes presented in the annual performance report, non-compliance with legislation as well as internal control. The objective of my tests was to identify reportable findings as described under each subheading but not to gather evidence to express assurance on these matters. Accordingly, I do not express an opinion or conclusion on these matters.

Predetermined objectives

8. I performed procedures to obtain evidence about the usefulness and reliability of the reported performance information for the following selected programmes presented in the annual performance report of the public entity for the year ended 31 March 2015:• Programme 1: Advise the Minister at his request or on own initiative on page 43• Programme 2: Research Projects on page 44• Programme 3: Dissemination of research findings on page 44• Programme 10: Accreditation of new programmes submitted by public and private

higher education institutions on page 48• Programme11: Re-accreditation of programmes offered by private higher education

institutions on pages 49• Programme 15: Training for programme accreditation and re-accreditation on

page 50• Programme 16: Quality assurance forums for public and private institutions and

professional bodies on page 50

9. I evaluated the reported performance information against the overall criteria of usefulness and reliability.

10. I evaluated the usefulness of the reported performance information to determine whether it was presented in accordance with the National Treasury’s annual reporting principles and whether the reported performance was consistent with the planned programmes. I further performed tests to determine whether indicators and targets were well defined, verifiable, specific, measurable, time bound and relevant, as required by the National Treasury’s Framework for managing programme performance information (FMPPI).

E

86



11. I assessed the reliability of the reported performance information to determine whether it was valid, accurate and complete.

12. I did not identify any material findings on the usefulness and reliability of reported performance information for the following programmes:• Programme 1: Advise the Minister at his request or on own initiative• Programme 2: Research Projects• Programme 3: Dissemination of research findings• Programme 10: Accreditation of new programmes submitted by public and private

higher education institutions• Programme 11:Re-accreditation of programmes offered by private higher education

institutions• Programme 15:Training for programme accreditation and re-accreditation• Programme 16: Quality assurance forums for public and private institutions and

professional bodies

Compliance with legislation

13. I performed procedures to obtain evidence that the entity has complied with applicable laws and regulations regarding financial matters, financial management and other related matters.

14. I did not identify any instances of material non-compliance with specific matters in key legislation, as set out in the general notice issued in terms of the PAA.

Internal control

15. I considered internal control relevant to my audit of the financial statements, annual performance report and compliance with legislation. I did not identify any significant deficiencies in internal control.

Pretoria29 July 2015

87



ACCOUNTING AUTHORITY REPORTThe Council submits its report for the year ended March 31,2015.

1. Mandate and Objectives of the Council on Higher Education

The Council on Higher Education (CHE) is a public entity listed under Schedule 3A of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) (Act 1 of 1999), as amended. It adheres to principles of good governance, financial and performance management and is held accountable for these to the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa.

The CHE was established as a juristic person in terms of section 4 of the Higher Education Act (Act 101 of 1997), as amended and as the Quality Council for Higher Education in terms of the National Qualifications Framework Act (Act 67 of 2008). In summary, the main areas of work of the CHE are:

• To provide advice to the Minister of Higher Education and Training on all higher education matters, at the Minister’s request and proactively.

• To develop and implement a system of quality assurance for all higher education institutions, including private providers of higher education, which includes programme accreditation, institutional audits, national reviews, and capacity development and quality promotion.

• To develop and manage the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF)and the development of higher education qualifications.

• To monitor the state of the higher education system in relation to national policy goals and international trends.

• To contribute to the development of higher education through facilitating intellectual engagement on key issues in partnership with relevant stakeholders.

2. Role and responsibilities

The Council fulfils the role of the Accounting Authority in terms of section 51 of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) (Act 1 of 1999), as amended.

As the Accounting Authority, the Council acts in a fiduciary capacity and its responsibilities include:

• overseeing effective, efficient and transparent systems of financial and risk management and internal control, internal audit and procurement;

• taking effective and appropriate steps to collect revenue due, to prevent irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure, and prevent losses from criminal conduct and expenditure as a result of non compliance with operational policies;

• managing and safeguarding the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenditure of the CHE;• ensuring compliance with applicable legislation; and• ensuring that there is an effective and appropriate disciplinary system for failure to

comply with the PFMA and the internal control system.

E

88



3. Going concern

The CHE is financially dependent on a transfer payment from the Department of Higher Education and Training. On the basis that the transfer payment has been listed in the Estimates of National Expenditure, the Council believes that the CHE will continue to be a going concern in the year ahead. For this reason, the Council has prepared the annual financial statements on the basis that it is a going concern.

4. Governance of the Council on Higher Education

Council

The Council comprises a Chairperson appointed for five (5) years and thirteen (13) ordinary Council members each appointed for a period of four (4)years. Eight (8) non-voting members are appointed to the Council, nominated respectively by the Director-General of the Department of Higher Education and Training, the Provincial Heads of Education, the Director-General of the Department of Science and Technology, the Director-General of the Department of Labour, the National Research Foundation and the Chief Executive Officers of the: South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA), the General and Further Education and Training Quality Assurance Council (Umalusi) and the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO) in their official capacities. Three members can be co-opted by the Council.

All members who served on the Council during the year under review were appointed in terms of the Higher Education Act (Act101 of 1997) as amended.

Committees and Sub-committees

Permanent Committee

The Council has one (1) permanent committee, the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). The HEQC has executive responsibility for quality promotion and quality assurance in higher education. The functions of the HEQC in terms of the Higher Education Act are to:

• promote quality in higher education;• audit the quality assurance mechanisms of higher education institutions; and• accreditation of programmes of higher education.

Sub-committees

On 31 March 2015 four (4) Council sub-committees were in place and were fully functional, namely:

1. Executive Committee (EXCO);2. Audit and Risk Committee (ARC);

89



E

3. Human Resources and Remuneration Committee (HRRC); and4. Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (MEC).

The members of sub-committees are appointed for the specific knowledge and skills they bring to their respective Sub- Committees.

During the year, the Council and its sub-committees, including its permanent committee responsible for quality assurance, the HEQC, have functioned effectively in terms of the CHE’s statutory mandate and have adhered to principles of good governance.

5. Subsequent events

The Council is aware of one subsequent event arising after the end of the financial year which is disclosed in note 25 of the Financial Statements.

6. Controlling entity

The CHE has reviewed its risk profile during the course of the year to consider the extent to which potential events may have an impact on the achievement of the organisation’s objectives. Emerging events were assessed from two perspectives – likelihood and impact– and a number of risks, predominantly on a strategic level, were identified and weighed.

7. Economic entity

As required by the Treasury Regulations, the Council has developed and agreed on a materiality and significance framework appropriate to its size and circumstances.

8. Internal audit

The internal audit function is under the direction of the Audit and Risk Committee and ultimately the Council, to evaluate the effectiveness of the CHE’s systems of internal controls, and to recommend improvements where appropriate. The internal audit function is currently outsourced.

9. Auditors

As required by the PFMA,the current external auditor of the CHE is the Auditor General of South Africa.

90



Statement of Financial Position as at March 31,2015 Figures in Rand Note(s) 2015 2014

AssetsCurrent AssetsCash and cash equivalents 3 19,102,406 19,730,204Receivables from exchange transactions 2 143,745 386,447Prepayments 4 290,122 136,501

19,536,273 20,253,152

Non-Current AssetsProperty, plant and equipment 5 32,108,926 32,751,660Intangible assets 6 3,490,468 3,291,036

35,599,394 36,042,696

Total Assets 55,135,667 56,295,848

Liabilities

Current LiabilitiesPayables from exchange transactions 7 6,074,259 5,069,491Provisions 9 762,351 687,931

6,836,610 5,757,422

Non-Current LiabilitiesUnspent conditional grants and receipts 10 3,992,329 5,231,439

Total Liabilities 10,828,939 10,988,861

Net Assets 44,306,728 45,306,987

ReservesRevaluation reserve 4,914,475 4,914,475Accumulated surplus 39,392,253 40,392,512

Total Net Assets 44,306,728 45,306,987

91



E

Statement of Financial Performancefor the year ended 31 March 2015 Figures in Rand Note(s) 2015 2014

RevenueExchange Revenue 3,548,825 3,861,005Interest received- investment 11 1,263,195 812,263Non exchange revenue 12 43,928,110 43,184,847

Total revenue 48,740,130 47,858,115

ExpenditurePersonnel 13 (24,998,707) (23,476,432)Depreciation and amortisation (2,250,810) (1,858,963)Interest paid 20 (990) (154,532)Debt impairment (7,000) (126,553)Repairs and maintenance (1,036,292) (2,193,240)Loss on disposal of assets - (35,825)General expenses 14 (21,446,590) (22,916,603)

Total expenditure (49,740,389) (50,762,148)

Deficit for the year (1,000,259) (2,904,033)

92



Statement of Changes in Net Assetsfor the year ended 31 March 2015

Figures in Rand Revaluation reserve

Accumulated surplus

Total net assets

Balance at April 01, 2013 - 43,296,538 43,296,538Changes in net assetsRevaluation of Land and Building 4,914,475 - 4,914,475Net income (losses) recognised directly in net assets

4,914,475 - 4,914,475

Restated Deficit for the year - (2,904,032) (2,904,032)Total recognised income and expenses for the year

4,914,475 (2,904,032) 2,010,443

Total changes 4,914,475 (2,904,032) 2,010,443

Balance at April 01, 2014 4,914,475 40,392,512 45,306,987Changes in net assetsDeficit for the year - (1,000,259) (1,000,259)

Total changes - (1,000,259) (1,000,259)

Balance at March 31, 2015 4,914,475 39,392,253 44,306,728

93



E

Cash Flow Statementfor the year ended 31 March 2015

Figures in Rand Note(s) 2015 2014

Cash flows from operating activities

ReceiptsGrants 43,928,110 43,246,953Interest income 1,263,195 812,263Other receipts 3,548,825 3,861,005

48,740,130 47,920,221

PaymentsEmployee costs (24,998,708) (23,476,432)Suppliers (22,561,712) (23,311,034)Finance costs - (173,102)

(47,560,420) (46,960,568)

Net cash flows from operating activities 15 1,179,710 959,653

Cash flows from investing activities

Purchase of property, plant and equipment 5 (1,163,007) (2,201,150)Proceeds from insurance claims on property, plant and equipment

- 24,359

Purchase of other intangible assets 6 (644,501) (1,077,188)

Net cash flows from investing activities (1,807,508) (3,253,979)

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(627,798) (2,294,326)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

19,730,204 22,024,530

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

3 19,102,406 19,730,204

94



Statement of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amountsfor the year ended 31 March 2015

Budget on Cash Basis

Figures in Rand Approved budget

Adjustments Final Budget

Actual amounts on

comparable basis

Difference between

final budget

and actual

Reference

Statement of Financial Performance

RevenueRevenue from exchange transactionsExchange revenue 1,900,000 370,000 2,270,000 3,548,825 1,278,825

Interest received- investment

250,000 - 250,000 1,263,195 1,013,195

Total revenue from exchange transactions

2,150,000 370,000 2,520,000 4,812,020 2,292,020

Revenue from non-exchange transactionsNon exchange revenue 44,866,000 (370,000) 44,496,000 43,928,110 (567,890)

Transfer revenueRoll-over funds - 12,971,309 12,971,309 12,971,309 -Total revenue from non- exchange transactions

44,866,000 12,601,309 57,467,309 56,899,419 (567,890)

Total revenue 47,016,000 12,971,309 59,987,309 61,711,439 1,724,130

ExpenditurePersonnel (27,313,000) - (27,313,000) (24,998,707) 2,314,293Depreciation and amortisation

(2,250,039) - (2,250,039) (2,250,810) (771)

Finance costs - - - (990) (990)Debt impairment - - - (7,000) (7,000)Repairs and maintenance

(1,036,292) - (1,036,292) (1,036,292) -

General expenses (16,416,669) (12,971,309) (29,387,978) (21,446,590) 7,941,388Total expenditure (47,016,000) (12,971,309) (59,987,309) (49,740,389) 10,246,920Reconciliation for non cash items2015 Surplus 11,971,050-Depreciation and amortisation

2,250,810

-Bad debts written off 7,000Funds available for Roll over

14,228,860

95



E

Statement of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amounts (continued)for the year ended 31 March 2015

Budget differences

Revenue from exchange transactions was higher than budget due to more applications for accreditation being received from private institutions.

Revenue from non-exchange transactions is lower than budget due to the standards development pilot phase only being completed at the end of the current year. The late completion of the pilot phase meant the Directorate was not operating at full capacity. This Directorate has now been merged with National reviews in order to effectively carry out the CHE mandate.

Employee costs are under budget due to vacancies that are in the organogram being unfilled during the financial year.

General expenses were under budget due to delayed projects in directorates. These projects have been carried forward into the new financial year and completion is expected in the new financial year.

96



Accounting Policies1. Presentation of Annual Financial Statements

The annual financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice (GRAP), including any interpretations, guidelines and directives issued by the Accounting Standards Board.

These annual financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting and are in accordance with historical cost convention as the basis of measurement, unless specified otherwise. They are presented in South African Rand.

A summary of the significant accounting policies, which have been consistently applied in the preparation of these annual financial statements, are disclosed below.

1.1 Significant judgements and sources of estimation uncertainty

In preparing the annual financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts represented in the annual financial statements and related disclosures. Use of available information and the application of judgement is inherent in the formation of estimates. Actual results in the future could differ from these estimates which may be material to the annual financial statements. Significant judgements include:

Trade receivables

The CHE assesses its loans and receivables for impairment at the end of each reporting period. In determining whether an impairment loss should be recorded in surplus or deficit, the CHE makes judgements as to whether there is observable data indicating a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a financial asset.

The impairment for loans and receivables is calculated on a portfolio basis, based on historical loss ratios, adjusted for national and industry-specific economic conditions and other indicators present at the reporting date that correlate with defaults on the portfolio.

Provisions

Provisions were raised and management determined an estimate based on the information available. Additional disclosure of these estimates of provisions are included in note 9-Provisions.

Effective interest rate

The CHE used the prime interest rate to discount future cash flows.

97



E

1.1 Significant judgements and sources of estimation uncertainty (continued)

Allowancefordoubtfuldebts

On debtors an impairment loss is recognised in surplus and deficit when there is objective evidence that it is impaired. The impairment is measured as the difference between the debtors carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate, computed at initial recognition.

1.2 Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are tangible non-current assets (including infrastructure assets) that are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, rental to others, or for administrative purposes, and are expected to be used for more than one financial reporting period.

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an asset when:

• it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the CHE; and

• the cost of the item can be measured reliably.

Property, plant and equipment are initially measured at cost.

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is the purchase price and other costs attributable to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Trade discounts and rebates are deducted in arriving at the cost.

Where an asset is acquired through a non-exchange transaction, its cost is its fair value as at date of acquisition.

Where an item of property, plant and equipment is acquired in exchange for a non- monetary asset or monetary assets, or a combination of monetary and non-monetary assets, the asset acquired is initially measured at fair value (the cost). If the acquired item’s fair value was not determinable, its deemed cost is the carrying amount of the asset(s) given up.

When significant components of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.

Costs include costs incurred initially to acquire or construct an item of property, plant and equipment and costs incurred subsequently to add to, replace part of, or service it. If a replacement cost is recognised in the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment, the carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognised.

98



1.2 Property, plant and equipment (continued)

The initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located is also included in the cost of property, plant and equipment, where the entity is obligated to incur such expenditure, and where the obligation arises as a result of acquiring the asset or using it for purposes other than the production of inventories.

Recognition of costs in the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment ceases when the item is in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.

Major spare parts and standby equipment which are expected to be used for more than one period are included in property, plant and equipment. In addition, spare parts and standby equipment which can only be used in connection with an item of property, plant and equipment are accounted for as property, plant and equipment.

Major inspection costs which are a condition of continuing use of an item of property, plant and equipment and which meet the recognition criteria above are included as a replacement in the cost of the item of property, plant and equipment. Any remaining inspection costs from the previous inspection are derecognised.

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses except for Land and Building which are carried at revalued amount being the fair value at the date of revaluation less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and subsequent accumulated impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment are depreciated on the straight line basis over their expected useful lives to their estimated residual value.

Any increase in an asset’s carrying amount, as a result of a revaluation, is credited directly to a revaluation surplus. The increase is recognised in surplus or deficit to the extent that it reverses a revaluation decrease of the same asset previously recognised in surplus or deficit.

Any decrease in an asset’s carrying amount, as a result of a revaluation, is recognised in surplus or deficit in the current period. The decrease is debited in revaluation surplus to the extent of any credit balance existing in the revaluation surplus in respect of that asset.

An impairment loss is only recognised when the recoverable amount of an asset is less than its carrying amount and is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount.

Subsequent to the recognition of an impairment loss on an asset, the related depreciation or amortisation charge should be adjusted for future periods.

99



E

1.2 Property, plant and equipment (continued)

An impairment loss is recognised immediately in the surplus or deficit, except where an asset is carried at a revalued amount in accordance with another GRAP standard on property, plant and equipment. Such an impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease to the extent of the revaluation surplus available.

The useful lives of items of property, plant and equipment have been assessed as follows:

Item Average useful lifeLand Indefinite Buildings 30 years Furniture and fixtures 1-21 years Office equipment 1-15 years IT equipment 1-13 years

The residual value, and the useful life and depreciation method of each asset are reviewed at the end of each reporting date. If the expectations differ from previous estimates, the change is accounted for as a change in accounting estimate.

Reviewing the useful life of an asset on an annual basis does not require the CHE to amend the previous estimate unless expectations differ from the previous estimate.

Each part of an item of property, plant and equipment with a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost of the item is depreciated separately.

The depreciation charge for each period is recognised in surplus or deficit unless it is included in the carrying amount of another asset.

Items of property, plant and equipment are derecognised when the asset is disposed of or when there are no further economic benefits or service potential expected from the use of the asset.

The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment is included in surplusor deficit when the item is derecognised. The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment is determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the item.

RevaluationofLandandBuilding

Land and Buildings held for administrative purposes are carried at their revalued amounts, being the fair value at the date of revaluation less any subsequent accumulated depreci-ation and subsequent impairment losses.

100



1.2 Property,plant and equipment (continued)

Revaluations are done by an independent valuer every 3 years so that the carrying amounts do not differ materially from those that would be determined using fair values at the reporting date. The fair value of Land and Buildings measured using the valuation model is based on market values.

Change in estimate

After the revaluation of Land and Buildings, the useful lives of all category of assets related to the building are re-assessed.

1.3 Intangible assets

An asset is identifiable if it either:

• is separable, i.e. is capable of being separated or divided from an entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or together with a related contract, identifiable assets or liability, regardless of whether the entity intends to do so; or

• arises from binding arrangements (including rights from contracts), regardless of whether those rights are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations.

A binding arrangement describes an arrangement that confers similar rights and obligations on the parties to it as if it were in the form of a contract.

An intangible asset is recognised when:

• it is probable that the expected future economic benefits or service potential that are attributable to the asset will flow to the entity; and

• the cost or fair value of the asset can be measured reliably.

The entity assesses the probability of expected future economic benefits or service potential using reasonable and supportable assumptions that represent management’s best estimate of the set of economic conditions that will exist over the useful life of the asset.

Where an intangible asset is acquired through an exchange transaction, its initial cost at the date of acquisition is measured at its fair value as at that date.

Expenditure on research (or on the research phase of an internal project) is recognised as an expense when it is incurred.

101



E

1.3 Intangible assets (continued)

An intangible asset arising from development (or from the development phase of an internal project) is recognised when:

• it is technically feasible to complete the asset so that it will be available for use or sale.• there is an intention to complete and use or sell it.• there is an ability to use or sell it.• it will generate probable future economic benefits or service potential.• there are available technical, financial and other resources to complete the development

and to use or sell the asset.• the expenditure attributable to the asset during its development can be measured

reliably.

Subsequent to initial recognition intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any impairment losses.

An intangible asset is regarded as having an indefinite useful life when, based on all relevant factors, there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows or service potential. Amortisation is not provided for these intangible assets, but they are tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. For all other intangible assets amortisation is provided ona straight line basis over their useful life.

The amortisation period and the amortisation method for intangible assets are reviewed at each reporting date.

Reassessing the useful life of an intangible asset with a finite useful life after it was classified as indefinite is an indicator that the asset may be impaired. As a result the asset is tested for impairment and the remaining carrying amount is amortised over its useful life.

Internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items similar in substance are not recognised as intangible assets.

Amortisation is provided to write down the intangible assets, on a straight line basis, to their residual values as follows:

Item Usefullife Computer software 1-8 years Internally generated intangible assets 10-20 years

Intangible assets are derecognised:

• on disposal; or• when no future economic benefits or service potential are expected from its use or

disposal.

102



1.4 Financial instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the CHE’s Statement of Financial Position when the CHE becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Financial instruments are initially measured at fair value, including transactional costs.Subsequent to initial recognition these instruments are measured as set out below:

Financial Assets

The CHE’s principal financial assets are accounts receivable and cash and cash equivalents.

• Accounts receivables are subsequently measured at their amortised costs using the effective interest rate method and reduced by appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts which represents fair value.

• Cash and cash equivalents are measured at fair value.

Financial assets or a portion thereof are derecognised when the contractual rights to the benefits specifies in the contract expire and the CHE surrenders those rights or otherwise loses control of the contractual rights that comprise the financial asset. On derecognition, the difference between the carrying amount of the financial assets and the sum of the proceeds receivable and any prior adjustment to reflect the fair value of the asset that had been reported in net assets is included in surplus or deficit for the period.

Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables are stated at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.

1.5 Leases

A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership. A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership.

Financeleases-lessee

Finance leases are recognised as assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position at amounts equal to the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation.

The discount rate used in calculating the present value of the minimum lease payments is the interest rate implicit in the lease. Minimum lease payments are apportioned between the finance charge and reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance charge is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of on the remaining balanceof the liability.

103



E

1.5 Leases (continued)

Any contingent rents are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

Operatingleases-lessee

Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The difference between the amounts recognised as an expense and the contractual payments are recognised as an operating lease asset or liability.

1.6 Employee benefits

Short-termemployeebenefits

The cost of all short-term employee benefits is recognised during the period in which the employee renders the related service to the CHE.

The provisions for employee entitlements to wages, salaries and annual leave represent the amount that the CHE has a present obligation to pay as a result of employees’ services provided to the statement of financial position date. The provisions have been calculated at undiscounted amounts on current wages and salary rates.

The expected cost of compensated absence is recognised as an expense as the employees render services that increase their entitlement or, in the case of non-accumulating absences, when the absence occurs.

The expected cost of bonus payments is recognised as an expense when there is a legal or constructive obligation to make such payment as a result of past performance.

Definedcontributionplans

Payments to defined contribution retirement benefit plans are charged as an expense as they fall due.

Payments made to industry-managed (or state plans) retirement schemes are dealt with as defined contribution plans where the entities obligation under the schemes is equivalent to those arising in a defined contribution retirement plan.

1.7 Provisions and contingencies

Provisions are recognised when the CHE has a present obligation as a result of a past event, for which it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits or service potential will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the obligation. All the provisions of the CHE are short-term in nature and thus ignore the effect of discounting.

104



1.7 Provisions and contingencies (continued)

Where the effect of time value of money is material, the amount of a provision is the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation.

Where some or all of the expenditure required to settle a provision is expected to be reimbursed by another party, the reimbursement is recognised when, and only when, it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received if the CHE settles the obligation. The reimbursement is treated as a separate asset. The amount recognised for the reimbursement does not exceed the amount of the provision.

Provisions are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. Provisions are reversed if it is no longer probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits or service potential will be required, to settle the obligation.

Where discounting is used, the carrying amount of a provision increases in each period to reflect the passage of time. This increase is recognised as an interest expense.

A provision is used only for expenditures for which the provision was originally recognised. Provisions are not recognised for future operating deficits.

1.8 Revenue from exchange transactions

Revenue from exchange transactions refers to revenue that accrued to the CHE directly in return for services rendered, the value of which approximate the consideration received or receivable.

The CHE receives exchange revenue from the Private institutions as indicated below:

• Private institutions’ applications for accreditation: Institutions pay a non-refundable fee which is recognised as revenue based on the stage of completion;

• Site Visits: Site visit fees, including the associated costs incurred, are invoiced to the institutions and recognised in revenue on accrual basis; and

• Other revenue such as conditions, representations, reaccreditation and referrals for private institutions are recognised as revenue on accrual basis.

Interest received

Interest received from favourable bank deposits is recognised as revenue from exchange transactions through the statement of financial performance in the period it is received.

1.9 Revenue from non-exchange transactions

The transfer from DHET is recognised when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the CHE and when the amount can be measured reliably. A transfer is recognised as revenue to the extent that there is no further obligation arising from the receipt of transfer payment.

105



E

1.9 Revenue from non-exchange transactions (continued)

Conditions on transferred assets are stipulations that specify that the future economic benefits or service potential embodied in the asset is required to be consumed by the recipient as specified or future economic benefits or service potential must be returned to the transfer or.

Unspent conditional grant

Unspent conditional grants are disclosed as liabilities and only realised as revenue through the statement of financial performance when the conditions related to the grant are met.

1.10 Translation of foreign currencies

Foreigncurrencytransactions

A foreign currency transaction is recorded, on initial recognition, in Rands, by applying to the foreign currency amount the spot exchange rate between the functional currency and the foreign currency at the date of the transaction.

At each reporting date:

• foreign currency monetary items are translated using the closing rate;• non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency

are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction; and• non-monetary items that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated

using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined.

Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items or on translating monetary items at rates different from those at which they were translated on initial recognition during the period or in previous annual financial statements are recognised in surplus or deficit in the period in which they arise.

When a gain or loss on a non-monetary item is recognised directly in net assets, any exchange component of that gain or loss is recognised directly in net assets. When a gain or loss on a non-monetary item is recognised in surplus or deficit, any exchange component of that gain or loss is recognised in surplus or deficit.

Cash flows arising from transactions in a foreign currency are recorded in Rands by applying to the foreign currency amount the exchange rate between the Rand and the foreign currency at the date of the cashflow.

1.11 Fruitless and wasteful expenditure

Fruitless and wasteful expenditure means expenditure which was made in vain and would have been avoided had reasonable care been exercised.

106



1.11 Fruitless and wasteful expenditure (continued)

All expenditure relating to fruitless and wasteful expenditure is recognised as an expense in the statement of financial performance in the year that the expenditure was incurred. The expenditure is classified in accordance with the nature of the expense, and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted for as revenue in the statement of financial performance.

1.12 Irregular expenditure

Irregular expenditure as defined in section 1 of the PFMA is expenditure other than unauthorised expenditure, incurred in contravention of or that is not in accordance with a requirement of any applicable legislation, including-

(a) The PFMA; or(b) the State Tender Board Act, 1968 (Act No. 86 of 1968),or any regulations made in terms of the Act; or(c) any provincial legislation providing for procurement procedures in that provincial government.

All expenditure relating to irregular expenditure is recognised as an expense in the statement of financial performance in the year that the expenditure was incurred. The expenditure is classified in accordance with the nature of expenses and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted for as revenue in the statement of financial performance.

National Treasury practice note no.4 of 2008/2009 which was issued in terms of sections 76 (1) to 76 (4) of the PFMA requires the following (effective from 1 April 2008):

Where irregular expenditure was incurred in the previous financial year and is only condoned in the following financial year, the register and the disclosure note to the financial statements must be updated with the amount condoned.

1.13 Budget information

The CHE is typically subject to budgetary limits in the form of appropriations or budget authorisations (or equivalent), which is given effect through authorising legislation, appropriation or similar.

General purpose financial reporting by the CHE shall provide information on whether resources were obtained and used in accordance with the legally adopted budget.

The financial statements and budget are not presented on the same basis as the financial statements are prepared on accrual basis and the budget on a cash basis of accounting. A reconciliation between the surplus/(deficit) for the period as per statement of financial performance and the budgeted surplus/(deficit) is included in the statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts.

107



E

1.14 Related parties

The CHE operates in an economic sector currently dominated by entities directly or indirectly owned by the South African Government. As a consequence of the constitutional independence of the three spheres of government in South Africa, only entities within the national sphere of government are considered to be related parties.

Management are those persons responsible for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the CHE, including those charged with the governance of the CHE in accordance with legislation, in instances where they are required to perform such functions.

Close members of the family of a person are considered to be those family members who may be expected to influence, or be influenced by management in their dealings with the CHE.

Only transactions with related parties not at arm’s length or not in the ordinary course of business are disclosed.

1.15 Standards of GRAP not yet effective

The following standards have been approved but are not effective at 31 March 2015:

• GRAP 105 on Transfers of Functions between Entities under Common Control; • GRAP 106 on Transfers of Functions Between Entities not under Common Control; and• GRAP 20 on Related Party Disclosures.

1.16 Events after reporting date

Events after the reporting date are those events, both favourable and unfavourable, that occur betweenthe reporting and the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue. Two types of events can be identified:

• those that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date (adjusting events after the reporting date) and;

• those that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting date (non-adjusting events after the reporting date).

Adjustingeventsafterthereportingdate

The CHE shall adjust the amounts recognised in its financial statements to reflect adjusting events after the reporting date.

Non-adjustingeventsafterthereportingdate

The CHE shall not adjust the amounts recognised in its financial statements to reflect non-adjusting events after the reporting date.

108



1.16 Events after reporting date (continued)

The CHE shall disclose the following for each material category of non-adjusting event after the reporting date:

a) The nature of the event; andb) An estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made.

109



E

Notes to the Annual Financial Statementsfor the year ended 31 March 2014

Figures in Rand 2015 2014 2. Receivables from exchange transactions

Trade debtors 111,455 411,142Less: Provision for doubtful debts - (96,553)Deposits 7,045 22,580Over payment to supplier 9,000 45,225Staff loans 16,245 4,053

143,745 386,447

Trade and other receivables pledged as security

Trade and other receivables were not pledged as security for any financial liability.

Credit quality of trade and other receivables

The credit quality of trade and other receivables that are neither past nor due nor impaired can be assessed by reference to external credit ratings (if available) or to historical information about counterparty default rates:

Fairvalueofreceivablesfromexchangetransactions

The fair value of short term receivables approximates the carrying amount of the balance due to their short term maturity.

Trade and other receivables past due but not impaired

Trade and other receivables which are less than 3 months past due are not considered to be impaired. At March 31,2015, R0.00 (2014: R123,841) were past due but not impaired.

The ageing of amounts past due but not impaired is as follows:

1 month past due - 18,0002 months past due - 13,0003 months past due - 97,208

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the fair value of each class of receivable stated above. The CHE does not hold any collateral as security.

Trade receivables have not been discounted as the amount is not considered material.

110




Figures in Rand 2015 2014

3. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash on hand 2,609 1,932Standard Bank: Current Account 1,825,936 1,427,266Investec Investment Account 17,026,565 8,415,193South African Reserve Bank Account 19,006 17,922Standard Bank: Private Accreditation Funds 228,290 9,867,891

19,102,406 19,730,204

Credit quality of cash at bank and short term deposits, excluding cash on hand

The credit quality of cash at bank and short term deposits, excluding cash on hand that are neither past due nor impaired can be assessed by reference to external credit ratings (if available) or historical information about counter party default rates.

The CHE holds a short term investment account at Investec Bank where surplus cash is held during the year earning an average interest of 6% pa. This investment is accessible on a day’s notice.

4. Prepayments

Prepaid insurance and Licence feesOpening balance 136,501 160,213Amounts realised to expenses during the year (136,501) (160,213)Additions for the period 290,122 136,501

290,122 136,501

111



E


Figures in Rand

5. Property, plant and equipment

2015 2014Cost/

ValuationAccumulated depreciation

and accumulated

impairment

Carrying value

Cost/ Valuation

Accumulated depreciation

and accumulated

impairment

Carrying value

Land 6,360,120 - 6,360,120 6,360,120 - 6,360,120Buildings 27,865,363 (5,081,952) 22,783,411 27,665,650 (4,125,769) 23,539,881Furniture and fixtures

1,977,409 (1,223,262) 754,147 1,820,324 (1,072,053) 748,271

Office equipment

2,347,109 (840,783) 1,506,326 1,743,624 (526,025) 1,217,599

IT equipment 2,919,261 (2,214,339) 704,922 2,716,540 (1,830,751) 885,789

Total 41,469,263 (9,360,337) 32,108,926 40,306,259 (7,554,599) 32,751,660

Reconciliationofproperty,plantandequipment-2015

Opening balance Additions Depreciation TotalLand 6,360,120 - - 6,360,120Buildings 23,539,881 199,714 (956,183) 22,783,411Furniture and fixtures 748,271 157,086 (151,210) 754,147Office equipment 1,217,599 603,485 (314,759) 1,506,326IT equipment 885,789 202,722 (383,587) 704,922

32,751,660 1,163,007 (1,805,739) 32,108,926 Reconciliationofproperty,plantandequipment-2014

Opening balance

Additions Disposals Revaluations Depreciation Total

Land 5,314,747 - - 1,045,373 - 6,360,120Buildings 19,756,271 754,668 - 3,869,103 (840,161) 23,539,881Furniture and fixtures 701,191 251,434 (49,420) - (154,934) 748,271Office equipment 582,458 816,490 (3,336) - (178,013) 1,217,599IT equipment 858,506 378,558 (7,428) - (343,847) 885,789

27,213,173 2,201,150 (60,184) 4,914,476 (1,516,955) 32,751,660

During the year, assets with a cost price of R2,170,782 (2014: R1,395,394) had fully depreci-ated, but were still in use.

112




Figures in Rand

5. Property,plant and equipment (continued)

Details of properties

The 7580 square metre property is located at 1 Quintin Brand, Persequor Technopark, Pretoria. The title deed number is T4934/2009. The property was revalued at 31st March 2014 by Onyx Valuation Services under Mr Barry Richardson, a professional valuer, registration number 4500/7.

Revalued amount as at 31 March 2014 29,900,000- Acquisitions after revaluation 199,714- Depreciation (956,183)

Carrying Amount 29,143,531

Change in estimate

After the revaluation of Land and Buildings at the end of the last reporting date, the useful lives of all category of assets related to the building that were previously recorded with useful lives of 10 years were revised such that they are aligned to the main building which has a useful life of 30 years.

It is the CHE policy to revalue Land and Buildings every three years.

As at 31 March 2014, the remaining estimated useful life of the building was 23 years and 8 months.

6. Intangible assets

2015 2014Cost/

ValuationAccumulated

amortisation and

accumulated impairment

Carrying value

Cost/ Valuation

Accumulatedamortisation

and accumulated

impairment

Carrying value

Internally generated

4,158,202 (1,073,786) 3,084,416 3,783,320 (786,509) 2,996,811

Computer software, other

1,096,052 (690,000) 406,052 826,431 (532,206) 294,225

Total 5,254,254 (1,763,786) 3,490,468 4,609,751 (1,318,715) 3,291,036

113



E


Figures in Rand

6. Intangible assets (continued)

Reconciliationofintangibleassets-2015

Opening balance

Additions Amortisation Total

Internally generated 2,996,811 374,881 (287,277) 3,084,416Computer software, other 294,225 269,620 (157,794) 406,052

3,291,036 644,501 (445,071) 3,490,468 Reconciliationofintangibleassets-2014

Opening balance

Additions Amortisation Total

Internally generated 2,386,874 843,441 (233,504) 2,996,811Computer software, other 168,982 233,747 (108,504) 294,225

2,555,856 1,077,188 (342,008) 3,291,036

Pledged as security

No intangible assets are pledged as security.

Internally generated Intangibles

Internally generated intangible assets (Software) relates to development costs of the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC) and the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF) online systems. These two systems are owned by the CHE and were developed to enhance the CHE’s process of receiving and processing applications for accreditation from institutions and meet the definition of internally generated intangible assets according to GRAP 31 on Intangibles.

These systems are continuously developed with additional functionality and these development costs are capitalised as soon as they meet the Intangibles criteria.

114





7. Payables from exchange transactions

Trade payables 1,922,794 4,403,203Accreditation fees received in advanced 2,748,255 637,250Accrued bonus 21,534 29,038Accruals 1,381,676 -

6,074,259 5,069,491

CHE pays all its trade and other payables within 30 days of receipt of invoice in accordance with the terms of the PFMA and Treasury Regulations.

The fair value of payables approximate the carrying amount due to their short term nature.

8. Operating lease liability

Current liabilities 125,940 186,730Over payment to supplier - (45,225)

125,940 141,505

9. Provisions

Reconciliationofprovisions-2015

Opening balance

Additions Utilised during the year

Total

Leave pay provision 687,931 277,074 (202,654) 762,351

Reconciliationofprovisions-2014

Opening balance

Additions Utilised during the year

Total

Leave pay provision 492,400 195,531 - 687,931SARS interests and penalties (Note 20)

316,531 - (316,531) -

808,931 195,531 (316,531) 687,931

115



E



9. Provisions (continued)

Leavepayprovision The leave pay provision relates to vesting leave pay to which employees may become entitled upon leaving the employment of the CHE. The provision is utilised when employees are paid for their accumulated leave. There are no expected reimbursements of this provision.

10. Unspent conditional grants and receipts

In 2010, the National Treasury granted approval to the DHET to transfer an additional R9 million to the CHE for the implementation of the Standards Development directorate which is part of the expanded mandate of the CHE resulting from the promulgation of the NQF Act.

Unspent conditional grants and receipts comprises of:

Unspent conditional grants and receiptsDeferred Income 3,992,329 5,231,439

Movement during the yearBalance at the beginning of the year 5,231,439 6,528,286Income recognition during the year (1,239,110) (1,296,847)

3,992,329 5,231,439

11. Investment revenue

Interest revenueInterest earned 1,263,195 812,263

12. Non exchange revenue

Operating grants

Grants received from DHET 42,689,000 41,888,000Deferred Income - Standards development 1,239,110 1,296,847

43,928,110 43,184,847

116





13. Employee costs

Basic 20,209,687 20,072,077Bonus 860,396 786,719Medical aid- company contributions 807,624 746,753UIF 156,750 58,722Arbitration awards 188,648 -Leave paid 202,654 78,313NEHAWU 8,635 7,920Other short term costs 13,190 9,990Defined contribution plans 2,037,208 1,392,256Provident Fund: Administration fees 513,915 323,682

24,998,707 23,476,432

Included in employee costs are two CCMA arbitration awards relating to the resignation and dismissal of two employees respectively. The CHE won both cases.

The first employee resigned and opened a case of constructive dismissal. The applicant was seeking R500,000 but the CCMA awarded the employee R30,000.

The second employee was dismissed on the grounds of breach of employment contract and breach of performance management policy. The case was heard at the CCMA and finalised on the 31st March 2015. A settlement equivalent to five months’ remuneration (R158,648) of the employee was awarded.

117



E



14. General expenses

Assessment rates & municipal charges 182,540 172,046Auditors’ remuneration 1,545,062 1,349,525Bank charges 38,650 38,385Cleaning 385,604 390,786Consulting and professional fees 8,329,592 7,739,273Consumables 129,192 124,790Outsourced services 83,780 61,471Sundry expenses - 495Garden services 38,402 39,522Insurance 246,619 247,691Conferences and seminars 47,619 9,599Bursaries 38,980 46,040IT expenses 1,092,924 2,450,611Lease rentals on operating lease 280,921 277,941Promotions 164,321 116,786Levies 35,109 23,919Magazines, books and periodicals 6,287 23,122Recruitment costs 900,579 414,153Office supplies - 495Postage and courier 94,098 91,560Printing and stationery 495,673 719,397External meetings - workshops 41,115 348,115Security services 190,065 235,959Employee welfare 353,860 553,382Subscriptions and membership fees 170,674 56,687Telephone and fax 266,335 233,738Training 772,728 362,291Travel - local 2,365,555 3,674,036Travel - overseas 68,997 100,701Electricity 528,465 413,978Honoraria 434,502 449,900Venue & catering 673,037 978,918Small assets below R5000 expensed - 933Remuneration of Council and Committee members 890,624 941,659Legal fees 554,681 228,699

21,446,590 22,916,603

118





14. General expenses (continued)

Priorperiodreclassification

A reclassification between Employee costs and General expenses in the comparative year has been made. Employee welfare expenses amounting to R258,418 were incorrectly disclosed under employee costs last year and have now been reclassified and disclosed under General expenses.

15. Cash generated from operations

(Deficit) surplus (1,000,259) (2,904,033)Adjustments for:Depreciation and amortisation 2,250,810 1,858,963Loss on disposal of assets - 35,825Debt impairment 7,000 126,553Movements in provisions 74,420 (121,000)Changes in working capital:Receivables from exchange transactions 235,699 172,960Prepayments (153,621) 23,712Payables from exchange transactions 1,004,771 3,063,520Unspent conditional grants and receipts (1,239,110) (1,296,847)

1,179,710 959,653

16. Auditors’ remuneration

External Auditors 1,068,586 744,267Internal Auditors 476,476 605,258

1,545,062 1,349,525

17. Commitments

Operating leases - as LesseeMinimum lease payments due- Within one year 125,940 141,505- In second to fifth year inclusive 251,880 -

377,820 141,505

119



E



17. Commitments (continued)

Operating lease payments represent rentals by the Council for photocopying machines. These leases are negotiated for periods ranging from 12 months to 120 months. The operating lease liability at the end of the period is R377,820 (2014: R141,505)

The Council has capital commitments (PPE) of R491,850 (2014: R120,610) for the forthcoming year.

Other commitments of R3,678,048 (2014: R5,734,233) relates to contracts and orders made by the Council for goods or services that have yet to be received.

18. Related parties`RelationshipsExecutive Authority DHET

Public Entities under the DHET SAQAMembers of Key Management Refer to note 19

Related party balances:

Unspent conditional owed to related partiesDHET (3,992,329) (5,231,439)

Related party transactions:

Consulting fees paid to related partiesSAQA 1,577,315 1,285,708

Grant received from related partiesDHET (42,689,000) (41,888,000)

120




Figures in Rand

19. Members of Key Management and Council Emoluments

Executive Management

2015Emoluments Bonuses&

performance related

payments

RetentionAllowance

ActingAllowance

Total

Chief Executive Officer * 1,240,921 - - - 1,240,921Chief Financial Officer** 984,558 66,950 - - 1,051,508Acting Chief Financial Officer***

186,293 - - - 186,293

Director: Corporate Services 964,902 72,368 90,058 - 1,127,328Director: Institutional Audits 964,902 72,368 67,543 - 1,104,813Director: Accreditation**** 241,226 12,785 68,226 - 322,237Director: National Reviews and Standards*****

507,152 59,119 - - 566,271

Director: Quality Assurance Promotion and Coordination******

471,963 - - - 471,963

Director: Monitoring and Evaluation*******

964,902 72,368 90,058 10,629 1,137,957

6,526,819 355,958 315,885 10,629 7,209,291

* Resigned February 2015** Appointed June 2014*** April 2014 to May 2014**** On secondment between April 2014 to December 2014. Joined CHE on a permanent basis from January 2015***** Appointed Sept 2014 (internally)****** Appointed October 2014******* Acting CEO from March 2015

121



E


Figures in Rand

19. Members of Key Management and Council Emoluments (continued)

2014Emoluments Bonuses &

performance related

payments

Total

Chief Executive Officer 1,280,730 - 1,280,730Chief Financial Officer 1,117,758 64,830 1,182,588Director: Corporate Services 908,571 70,869 979,440Director: Institutional Audits 908,571 70,869 979,440Director: National Reviews 191,326 - 191,326Director: Standards Development 83,837 - 83,837Director: Monitoring and Evaluation 908,571 70,869 979,440

5,399,364 277,437 5,676,801

Council Members Remuneration

2015

Emoluments TotalFor services as Council and Committee members 890,624 890,624

2014

Emoluments TotalFor services as Council and Committee members 941,659 941,659

20. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure

2015 2014

Opening balance 471,063 316,531Current year 990 154,532Condoned (990) -

471,063 471,063

122




Figures in Rand

20. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure (continued)

Fruitless and wasteful expenditure for the current year relates to interest charged on Telkom invoices for late payment. The Financial Misconduct Committee conducted a disciplinary hearing and the CEO approved its recommendation that no negligence was found on the part of employees responsible for payments.

FraudCase

Prior year charges relate to SARS penalties and interest on late payment incurred on Employee tax from 2007. This outstanding SARS liability was only discovered and settled in the previous financial year.

The CHE discovered a fraudulent incident that occurred in February 2007 involving a cheque written out to SARS meant for Employee tax (PAYE). The cheque for R270,874.26 was drawn in favour of SARS but was deposited into an unknown account.

A fraud case was opened with SAPS and investigations are currently being conducted.

21. Financial instruments disclosure

Categories of financial instruments

2015

Financial assets

At cost TotalTrade and other receivables from exchange transactions 134,745 134,745Cash and cash equivalents 19,102,406 19,102,406

19,237,151 19,237,151Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables from exchange transactionsProvisions

At cost6,074,266

762,351

Total6,074,266

762,351

6,836,617 6,836,617

123



E


Figures in Rand

21. Financial instruments disclosure (continued)

2014

Financial assets

Trade and other receivables from exchange transactionsAt cost386,447

Total386,447

Cash and cash equivalents 19,730,204 19,730,204

20,116,651 20,116,651

Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables from exchange transactionsAt cost

5,069,487Total

5,069,487Provisions 687,931 687,931

5,757,418 5,757,418

22. Taxation

The CHE is exempt from normal income tax as more than 80% of its income is defrayed from funds voted by Parliament. The CHE is exempted from the payment of Value Added Tax (VAT) on the transfer received. As a result, any VAT paid by the CHE is also not refundable by SARS.

23. Risk management

Financial risk management

Liquidityrisk

The CHE is only exposed to liquidity risk with regards to the payment of its trade payables.These trade payables are all due within the short-term. The CHE manages its liquidity risk by holding sufficient cash in its bank account, supplemented by cash available in a money market account.

124




Figures in Rand

23. Risk management (continued)

The table below analyses the CHE’s financial liabilities and net-settled derivative financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the date of the statement of financial position to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. Balances due within 12 months equal their carrying balances as the impact of discounting is not significant.

At March 31, 2015 Less than 1 year

Between1 and 2 years

Between 2 and 5 years

Over 5 years

Payables from exchange transactions 6,074,266 - - -

At March 31, 2014 Less than 1 year

Between1 and 2 years

Between 2 and 5 years

Over 5 years

Payables from exchange transactions 5,069,487 - - -

Interest rate risk

As the CHE has no significant interest-bearing assets, the CHE’s income and operating cash flows are substantially independent of changes in market interest rates.

Credit risk

Credit risk consists mainly of cash deposits with banks and the Corporation for Public Deposits, staff loans and other receivables. The CHE only deposits cash with institutions with high quality credit standing and limits exposure to only one counter-party.

The receivables are exposed to a high credit risk and their exposure to credit risk at year end were as follows:`Financial instrument 2015 2014Bank 2,056,831 11,297,089Trade debtors 111,455 411,142Short term deposits 17,045,571 8,433,115

Trade Debtors age analysis as at 31st March 2015.

Over 90 Days 60 Days 30 Days Current Total- - - 111,455 111,455

125



E


Figures in Rand

24. Contingent Liability

On the 9th of April 2014, the CHE was cited as a respondent in a case brought against North-West University by an applicant to the University who was not granted exemption from courses obtained in a prior degree by the University. Aside from the CHE, the respondents include the Minister of Higher Education and Training, SAQA and Higher Education South Africa.

The applicant was seeking compensation for damages to the value of R10.9 million plus 15.5% interest from the date of the filing of papers from the respondents. The CHE, together with other respondents, were opposing the application.

On the 26th of May 2015, the Judge ordered the case to be dismissed and each party to bear its own legal costs.

The contingent liability is therefore CHE’s contribution to the legal costs, the amount of which is yet to be determined.

25. Events after the reporting date

On the 3rd July 2015, the CHE was cited as a fourth respondent by SANTS Private Higher Education Institution(Pty) Ltd. Aside from the CHE, the respondents include the Chairperson of the HEQC; Registrar: Private Higher Education Institutions; SAQA; the Minister of Higher Education and Training and the MEC of the Department of Education: KwaZulu-Natal.

The applicant wants an order reviewing and setting aside the decision of the HEQC taken on the 10th June 2015 withdrawing the accreditation of the applicant for its BEd (Foundation Phase) and BEd (Intermediate Phase) programmes.

The CHE will be opposing the application. The costs of the legal fees are not yet known.

126



Notes..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

127



Notes..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

128



Notes..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................

Published byThe South African Council on Higher Education

Telephone: +27 (12) 349 3840

1 Quintin Brand Street,Persequor Technopark

PretoriaSouth Africa

P O Box 94

Persequor Park0020

South Africa

www.che.ac.za

ISBN: 978-1-919856-98-8

Design, Layout and Printing by Tirommoho Communications

annual report - national government...8 annual report 2014/15 council on higher education sahepsc...

Documents