annual report fiscal year 2020michael l. parson, governor • jennifer tidball, acting director...

Annual Report

Fiscal Year 2020

Empower Missouriansto live safe, healthy, &

productive lives

OUR MISSION

MICHAEL L. PARSON, GOVERNOR • JENNIFER TIDBALL, ACTING DIRECTOR

JOANIE ROGERS, INTERIM DIRECTOR CHILDREN’S DIVISION

P.O. BOX 88 • JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65103-0088 WWW.DSS.MO.GOV • 573-522-8024 • 573-526-3971 FAX

AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES

TDD / TTY: 800-735-2966

RELAY MISSOURI: 711

Missouri Department of Social Services is an Equal Opportunity Employer/Program.

Dear Reader:

The Children's Division is pleased to present the Children's Division Annual Report for FY 2020. Material in this report covers the activities from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020.

Information about children's services provided in the areas of Child Abuse/Neglect, Family-Centered Services, Out-Of-Home Placement, and Intensive In-Home Services are included in this report. We hope the data presented will be useful to all who are interested in the programs and services provided by the Children's Division and our partners for children and families of Missouri.

Any questions about the report should be directed to the Children's Division within the Department of Social Services.

Note: Jefferson County moved from the Northeast region to the Southeast region in September 2019.

Missouri Children’s Division Regions

Northwest

Northeast

Kansas City

Southwest Southeast

St. Louis

Table of Contents

Child Abuse and Neglect ................................................................................ 1 Table 1. Reported Incidents and Children, FY 2020 Compared to FY 2019 ......................... 2 Table 2. Status of Children Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 by Conclusion ................................................................................. 4 Table 3. Status of Incidents Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 by Conclusion ................................................................................. 6 Table 4. Time Between Receipt of a Report and Initial Child Contact for Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 ........................................................... 8 Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 ...................................................................................................... 10 Table 6. CA/N Hotlines and Referrals during FY 2020 ........................................................ 12 Figure 1. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed during FY 2020 by Conclusion ..... 14 Figure 2. Investigations with Substantiated Conclusions during FY 2020 ........................... 14 Figure 3. Time Between Report and Initial Child Contact during FY 2020 .......................... 15 Figure 4a. Number of Days to Complete Investigations during FY 2020 ............................... 15 Figure 4b. Number of Days to Complete Assessments during FY 2020 ................................ 15 Table 7. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children FY 2016 – 2020 ....................................... 16 Figure 5. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children FY 2016 – 2020 ....................................... 16 Table 8. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Family Assessment Findings FY 2016 – 2020 ..................................................................................................... 17 Figure 6. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Family Assessment Findings FY 2016 – 2020 ...................................................................................................... 17 Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ........................................................ 18

Family-Centered Services ............................................................................ 19 Table 9. Cases Active during FY 2020 by Reason for Opening ........................................... 20 Table 10. Persons in FCS during FY 2020 by Role ................................................................. 22 Table 11. Cases Opened during FY 2020 by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24 Table 12. Cases Closed during FY 2020 by Reason for Closing ............................................. 26 Table 13. Cases Active during FY 2020 with Court Involvement by Number of Months Open ...................................................................................................................... 28 Table 14. Cases Active during FY 2020 with No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open ...................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 7. Family-Centered Services Cases Opened during FY 2020 by Reason for Opening ................................................................................................................. 32 Figure 8. Family-Centered Services Cases Closed during FY 2020 by Reason for Closing ................................................................................................................... 32 Table 15. Family-Centered Services Cases Active, Opened and Closed FY 2016 – 2020 ..... 33 Figure 9. Family-Centered Services Cases Active, Opened and Closed FY 2016 – 2020 ..... 33 Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures ....................................................... 34

Out-of-Home Placement ............................................................................. 35 Table 16. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Last Known Placement Category ................................................................... 36 Table 17. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County ...... 38 Table 18. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Last Known Placement Category ................................................................... 40 Table 19. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Last Known Placement Type .......................................................................... 42 Table 20. Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Length of Stay ................................................................................................ 50 Table 21. Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Placement Category at Time of Exit ............................................................... 52 Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System during FY 2020

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing ........................................ 54 Table 23. Children in Alternative Care during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Adoptive Status .............................................................................................. 56 Table 24. Children in Alternative Care during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Legal Status .................................................................................................... 58 Table 25. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Goal ................................................................................................................ 60 Table 26. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Length of Stay ................................................................................................ 62 Table 27. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Number of Placements during the Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell .......... 64 Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Case Manager County FY 2016 – 2020 ............................ 66 Table 29. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Age ................................................................................................................. 68 Table 30. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Race ................................................................................................................ 70 Table 31. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Hispanic Origin ............................................................................................... 72 Table 32. Children in CD Custody during FY 2020 by Case Manager County

and Gender ........................................................................................................... 74 Table 33. CD Custody (Re)Entries by Month FY 2019 – 2020 ............................................... 76 Figure 10. CD Custody (Re)Entries by Month FY 2019 – 2020 ............................................... 76 Table 34. CD Custody Exits by Month FY 2019 – 2020 ......................................................... 76 Figure 11. CD Custody Exits by Month FY 2019 – 2020 ......................................................... 76 Figure 12. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2020 by Placement Type ............... 77 Figure 13. Children Closed from Alternative Care during FY 2020 by Close Reason ............. 77 Table 35. Children in CD Custody FY 2016 – 2020 ................................................................ 78 Figure 14. Children in CD Custody FY 2016 – 2020 ................................................................ 78 Table 36. Adoptions Finalized FY 2016 – FY 2020 ................................................................ 79 Figure 15. Adoptions Finalized FY 2016 – FY 2020 ................................................................ 79 Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ........................................................ 80

Intensive In-Home Services .......................................................................... 83 Table 37. Families Referred to IIS during FY 2020 by Referral County ................................. 84 Table 38. Families and Children Accepted into IIS during FY 2020 by Household County ... 86 Table 39. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS during FY 2020 .................................................. 88 Table 40. Families Referred to IIS FY 2016 – 2020 ............................................................... 90 Figure 16. Families Referred to IIS during FY 2020 ................................................................ 90 Table 41. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS FY 2016 – 2020 ................................................. 91 Figure 17. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS during FY 2020 .................................................. 91 Table 42. Families and Children Accepted into IIS FY 2016 – 2020 ...................................... 92 Figure 18. Families and Children Accepted into IIS FY 2016 – 2020 ...................................... 92 Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables and Figures .................................................... 93

Child Abuse and Neglect

Missouri Children's Division FY 2020 Report Page 1


Table 1. Reported Incidents and Children, FY 2020 Compared to FY 2019

PERCENT PERCENTCOUNTY CHANGE CHANGE

NORTHWEST ANDREW 90 129 -30.2% 124 168 -26.2% ATCHISON 41 37 10.8% 53 58 -8.6% BUCHANAN 1,231 1,428 -13.8% 1,799 2,022 -11.0% CALDWELL 60 68 -11.8% 93 96 -3.1% CARROLL 82 120 -31.7% 116 161 -28.0% CASS 824 890 -7.4% 1,106 1,160 -4.7% CHARITON 49 75 -34.7% 70 100 -30.0% CLAY 1,725 1,974 -12.6% 2,276 2,547 -10.6% CLINTON 155 204 -24.0% 215 280 -23.2% COOPER 133 145 -8.3% 210 186 12.9% DAVIESS 75 87 -13.8% 113 137 -17.5% DE KALB 56 88 -36.4% 80 108 -25.9% GENTRY 49 56 -12.5% 67 76 -11.8%

GRUNDY 118 155 -23.9% 191 246 -22.4%HARRISON 92 110 -16.4% 148 165 -10.3%

HOLT 25 62 -59.7% 35 85 -58.8% JOHNSON 377 446 -15.5% 561 623 -10.0% LAFAYETTE 297 282 5.3% 427 399 7.0% LINN 113 154 -26.6% 172 237 -27.4% LIVINGSTON 146 160 -8.8% 200 241 -17.0% MERCER 23 25 -8.0% 32 36 -11.1% NODAWAY 142 154 -7.8% 228 222 2.7% PETTIS 406 462 -12.1% 587 654 -10.2% PLATTE 639 688 -7.1% 848 886 -4.3% PUTNAM 48 86 -44.2% 69 121 -43.0% RAY 246 267 -7.9% 350 390 -10.3% SALINE 312 303 3.0% 445 426 4.5% SULLIVAN 57 57 0.0% 92 92 0.0% WORTH 9 14 -35.7% 10 16 -37.5% *REGION TOTAL* 7,620 8,726 -12.7% 10,717 11,938 -10.2%

NORTHEAST ADAIR 217 233 -6.9% 313 351 -10.8% AUDRAIN 277 306 -9.5% 395 454 -13.0% BOONE 1,348 1,482 -9.0% 1,847 2,019 -8.5% CALLAWAY 557 581 -4.1% 825 809 2.0% CLARK 73 81 -9.9% 125 122 2.5% COLE 588 636 -7.5% 774 840 -7.9% FRANKLIN 955 1,159 -17.6% 1,294 1,591 -18.7% GASCONADE 169 207 -18.4% 225 296 -24.0% HOWARD 109 110 -0.9% 157 147 6.8% KNOX 32 29 10.3% 52 52 0.0% LEWIS 91 94 -3.2% 125 122 2.5% LINCOLN 703 681 3.2% 1,016 924 10.0% MACON 134 171 -21.6% 217 260 -16.5% MARION 347 418 -17.0% 506 602 -15.9% MONROE 84 81 3.7% 109 127 -14.2% MONTGOMERY 135 157 -14.0% 199 245 -18.8% OSAGE 60 77 -22.1% 76 105 -27.6% PIKE 196 208 -5.8% 269 307 -12.4% RALLS 60 88 -31.8% 89 140 -36.4% RANDOLPH 361 397 -9.1% 558 555 0.5% SCHUYLER 32 50 -36.0% 57 76 -25.0% SCOTLAND 39 47 -17.0% 65 80 -18.8% SHELBY 51 65 -21.5% 83 111 -25.2% ST. CHARLES 1,980 2,266 -12.6% 2,598 2,945 -11.8% WARREN 367 476 -22.9% 489 623 -21.5% *REGION TOTAL* 8,965 10,100 -11.2% 12,463 13,903 -10.4%

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 145 136 6.6% 235 206 14.1% BUTLER 544 628 -13.4% 787 893 -11.9% CAPE GIRARDEAU 577 633 -8.8% 796 887 -10.3% CARTER 79 82 -3.7% 115 140 -17.9% CRAWFORD 302 355 -14.9% 443 499 -11.2% DENT 188 178 5.6% 275 257 7.0% DUNKLIN 368 409 -10.0% 596 625 -4.6%

FY 2019CHILDREN

FY 2020INCIDENTS

FY 2019INCIDENTS

FY 2020CHILDREN

Page 2 Missouri Children's Division FY 2020 Report


Table 1. (continued) Reported Incidents and Children, FY 2020 Compared to FY 2019

PERCENT PERCENTCOUNTY CHANGE CHANGE

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 602 687 -12.4% 882 1,008 -12.5%IRON 113 145 -22.1% 162 200 -19.0%JEFFERSON 1,568 1,984 -21.0% 2,190 2,737 -20.0%MADISON 128 164 -22.0% 172 225 -23.6%MARIES 57 88 -35.2% 81 129 -37.2%MISSISSIPPI 187 181 3.3% 298 262 13.7%NEW MADRID 202 256 -21.1% 284 348 -18.4%OREGON 139 155 -10.3% 228 256 -10.9%PEMISCOT 228 288 -20.8% 340 438 -22.4%PERRY 149 181 -17.7% 229 282 -18.8%PHELPS 447 456 -2.0% 626 628 -0.3%PULASKI 425 532 -20.1% 614 753 -18.5%REYNOLDS 87 96 -9.4% 122 131 -6.9%RIPLEY 183 201 -9.0% 279 294 -5.1%SCOTT 423 531 -20.3% 613 760 -19.3%SHANNON 94 77 22.1% 133 110 20.9%ST. FRANCOIS 800 825 -3.0% 1,110 1,187 -6.5%STE. GENEVIEVE 159 157 1.3% 217 230 -5.7%STODDARD 308 356 -13.5% 462 513 -9.9%TEXAS 267 257 3.9% 389 375 3.7%WASHINGTON 298 341 -12.6% 413 485 -14.8%WAYNE 128 153 -16.3% 202 221 -8.6%*REGION TOTAL* 9,195 10,532 -12.7% 13,293 15,079 -11.8%

SOUTHWEST BARRY 393 432 -9.0% 565 599 -5.7%BARTON 123 161 -23.6% 156 212 -26.4%BATES 168 153 9.8% 250 215 16.3%BENTON 145 192 -24.5% 214 271 -21.0%CAMDEN 420 469 -10.4% 576 688 -16.3%CEDAR 159 199 -20.1% 230 276 -16.7%CHRISTIAN 772 949 -18.7% 1,045 1,247 -16.2%DADE 78 67 16.4% 113 92 22.8%DALLAS 218 206 5.8% 309 296 4.4%DOUGLAS 106 147 -27.9% 174 220 -20.9%GREENE 4,077 4,644 -12.2% 5,482 6,334 -13.5%HENRY 273 282 -3.2% 380 387 -1.8%HICKORY 70 114 -38.6% 95 164 -42.1%JASPER 1,557 1,778 -12.4% 2,165 2,445 -11.5%LACLEDE 555 600 -7.5% 812 885 -8.2%LAWRENCE 531 584 -9.1% 708 829 -14.6%MCDONALD 228 247 -7.7% 345 376 -8.2%MILLER 278 360 -22.8% 399 554 -28.0%MONITEAU 120 149 -19.5% 191 200 -4.5%MORGAN 200 264 -24.2% 294 411 -28.5%NEWTON 540 555 -2.7% 753 746 0.9%OZARK 70 115 -39.1% 129 172 -25.0%POLK 448 534 -16.1% 619 749 -17.4%ST. CLAIR 95 91 4.4% 128 141 -9.2%STONE 279 397 -29.7% 388 542 -28.4%TANEY 686 752 -8.8% 955 1,025 -6.8%VERNON 257 296 -13.2% 374 423 -11.6%WEBSTER 426 477 -10.7% 622 679 -8.4%WRIGHT 262 305 -14.1% 363 471 -22.9%*REGION TOTAL* 13,534 15,519 -12.8% 18,834 21,649 -13.0%

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 6,722 7,791 -13.7% 9,586 10,653 -10.0%*REGION TOTAL* 6,722 7,791 -13.7% 9,586 10,653 -10.0%

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 2,879 3,644 -21.0% 4,125 5,108 -19.2%ST. LOUIS COUNTY 5,157 6,549 -21.3% 6,897 8,695 -20.7%*REGION TOTAL* 8,036 10,193 -21.2% 11,022 13,803 -20.1%

OTHER OUT HOME INV 1,630 1,924 100.0% 2,218 2,528 100.0%OUT OF STATE 151 134 12.7% 195 184 6.0%STAT UNIT 0 1 -100.0% 0 1 -100.0%*REGION TOTAL* 1,781 2,059 -13.5% 2,413 2,713 -11.1%

STATE TOTAL 55,853 64,920 -14.0% 78,328 89,738 -12.7%

INCIDENTS INCIDENTS CHILDREN CHILDRENFY 2020 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2019



Table 2. Status of Children Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 by Conclusion

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 5 0 40 78 1 124 1.20 29.78 ATCHISON 4 1 5 41 2 53 3.38 44.84 BUCHANAN 125 14 520 1,101 39 1,799 5.96 85.82 CALDWELL 9 5 25 53 1 93 3.74 38.69 CARROLL 9 3 30 73 1 116 4.11 52.92 CASS 41 23 277 753 12 1,106 1.55 41.92 CHARITON 2 6 9 53 0 70 1.13 39.57 CLAY 91 120 413 1,616 36 2,276 1.59 39.74 CLINTON 9 8 57 135 6 215 1.77 42.21 COOPER 10 5 47 146 2 210 2.51 52.78 DAVIESS 8 2 34 65 4 113 3.55 50.18

DE KALB 4 3 22 49 2 80 1.73 34.63 GENTRY 5 3 7 48 4 67 3.02 40.51 GRUNDY 30 15 41 104 1 191 12.16 77.42 HARRISON 18 16 22 87 5 148 8.10 66.64 HOLT 3 0 10 22 0 35 3.09 36.05 JOHNSON 14 11 156 374 6 561 1.16 46.58 LAFAYETTE 23 7 110 282 5 427 2.81 52.16 LINN 9 21 23 117 2 172 2.85 54.50 LIVINGSTON 9 14 46 125 6 200 2.70 60.08 MERCER 2 2 3 25 0 32 2.08 33.23 NODAWAY 18 7 39 162 2 228 4.22 53.48 PETTIS 44 5 166 362 10 587 4.08 54.43 PLATTE 51 19 191 551 36 848 2.32 38.55 PUTNAM 6 5 7 49 2 69 5.17 59.48 RAY 10 3 76 255 6 350 1.70 59.66 SALINE 35 13 103 285 9 445 6.49 82.47 SULLIVAN 6 6 12 66 2 92 3.69 56.62 WORTH 2 0 2 6 0 10 4.50 22.52

*REGION TOTAL* 602 337 2,493 7,083 202 10,717 2.78 49.50

NORTHEAST ADAIR 30 46 26 209 2 313 6.03 62.95 AUDRAIN 26 16 79 272 2 395 4.08 62.02 BOONE 138 27 434 1,142 106 1,847 4.03 53.93 CALLAWAY 86 27 178 517 17 825 8.60 82.48 CLARK 14 29 4 77 1 125 8.15 72.80 COLE 32 29 200 507 6 774 1.78 43.15 FRANKLIN 72 42 243 900 37 1,294 2.87 51.55 GASCONADE 6 7 45 163 4 225 1.78 66.88 HOWARD 17 14 25 97 4 157 7.81 72.08 KNOX 3 6 6 33 4 52 2.91 50.39 LEWIS 9 7 9 90 10 125 3.76 52.19 LINCOLN 70 22 210 698 16 1,016 4.75 68.99 MACON 47 11 24 132 3 217 12.44 57.42 MARION 66 46 60 308 26 506 9.58 73.46 MONROE 10 9 17 71 2 109 4.85 52.89 MONTGOMERY 16 7 37 135 4 199 5.61 69.75 OSAGE 3 1 20 48 4 76 0.87 22.14 PIKE 35 9 59 162 4 269 8.52 65.50 RALLS 12 7 9 60 1 89 5.05 37.43 RANDOLPH 38 28 105 376 11 558 6.46 94.91 SCHUYLER 7 11 1 38 0 57 6.14 50.00 SCOTLAND 4 12 4 43 2 65 2.94 47.72 SHELBY 13 6 15 49 0 83 8.14 51.97 ST. CHARLES 268 27 510 1,727 66 2,598 2.89 27.98 WARREN 34 20 84 342 9 489 4.18 60.18

*REGION TOTAL* 1,056 466 2,404 8,196 341 12,463 4.05 47.84

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 37 2 46 148 2 235 12.68 80.56 BUTLER 74 46 222 426 19 787 7.42 78.93 CAPE GIRARDEAU 106 19 136 513 22 796 6.39 47.95 CARTER 21 4 31 53 6 115 13.86 75.91 CRAWFORD 33 15 85 295 15 443 5.50 73.82

DENT 20 12 54 177 12 275 5.48 75.30DUNKLIN 22 18 125 411 20 596 2.72 73.73

ASSESSMENT OTHERTOTAL

CHILDRENSUBSTAN-

TIATEDUNSUB.

PSI UNSUB.

SUBSTAN-TIATED

CHILDRENPER 1,000

TOTALCHILDRENPER 1,000



Table 2. (continued) Status of Children Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 by Conclusion

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 94 27 192 543 26 882 9.34 87.64 IRON 11 4 37 110 0 162 4.58 67.42 JEFFERSON 139 84 241 1,670 56 2,190 2.53 39.83

MADISON 17 6 40 105 4 172 5.80 58.68 MARIES 10 0 17 54 0 81 4.64 37.60 MISSISSIPPI 10 5 49 212 22 298 3.14 93.48 NEW MADRID 21 7 63 188 5 284 4.65 62.92 OREGON 34 5 36 147 6 228 14.01 93.98 PEMISCOT 38 10 65 220 7 340 7.55 67.54 PERRY 38 1 31 154 5 229 7.98 48.09 PHELPS 30 33 99 419 45 626 3.06 63.93 PULASKI 74 54 104 357 25 614 5.90 48.98 REYNOLDS 5 5 29 81 2 122 3.26 79.63 RIPLEY 10 6 61 192 10 279 3.02 84.37 SCOTT 52 4 81 472 4 613 5.28 62.23 SHANNON 11 4 24 93 1 133 5.58 67.48 ST. FRANCOIS 86 35 244 705 40 1,110 5.97 77.04 STE. GENEVIEVE 22 11 37 139 8 217 5.21 51.41 STODDARD 34 18 60 332 18 462 4.98 67.63 TEXAS 47 22 75 239 6 389 8.22 68.00 WASHINGTON 24 16 78 283 12 413 3.96 68.12 WAYNE 22 11 24 138 7 202 7.84 71.99

*REGION TOTAL* 1,142 484 2,386 8,876 405 13,293 5.19 60.36

SOUTHWEST BARRY 8 23 159 360 15 565 0.93 65.39 BARTON 11 2 28 109 6 156 3.42 48.54 BATES 12 25 60 149 4 250 2.82 58.77 BENTON 20 8 28 147 11 214 5.82 62.26 CAMDEN 70 9 108 360 29 576 8.34 68.65 CEDAR 20 3 53 146 8 230 6.05 69.53 CHRISTIAN 56 24 257 693 15 1,045 2.64 49.33 DADE 12 4 35 61 1 113 6.72 63.31 DALLAS 18 11 82 187 11 309 4.32 74.12 DOUGLAS 9 12 24 128 1 174 2.94 56.84 GREENE 250 105 1,168 3,832 127 5,482 4.28 93.91 HENRY 10 10 65 289 6 380 2.02 76.67 HICKORY 9 9 11 66 0 95 5.41 57.06 JASPER 76 53 555 1,402 79 2,165 2.51 71.50 LACLEDE 42 19 216 524 11 812 4.72 91.16 LAWRENCE 14 19 206 454 15 708 1.38 69.58 MCDONALD 9 27 100 202 7 345 1.39 53.28 MILLER 41 30 59 259 10 399 6.67 64.94 MONITEAU 18 4 36 128 5 191 4.58 48.65 MORGAN 32 16 56 177 13 294 7.06 64.84 NEWTON 20 55 147 513 18 753 1.35 51.01 OZARK 2 4 40 81 2 129 1.03 66.19 POLK 25 13 140 429 12 619 3.26 80.75 ST. CLAIR 2 3 27 96 0 128 1.02 65.31 STONE 8 5 86 279 10 388 1.33 64.32 TANEY 64 34 177 650 30 955 5.60 83.57 VERNON 25 0 90 246 13 374 4.75 71.06 WEBSTER 49 14 118 429 12 622 4.88 61.96 WRIGHT 23 16 80 240 4 363 4.72 74.51

*REGION TOTAL* 955 557 4,211 12,636 475 18,834 3.66 72.20

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 360 171 2,314 6,178 563 9,586 2.17 57.87*REGION TOTAL* 360 171 2,314 6,178 563 9,586 2.17 57.87

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 195 131 939 2,465 395 4,125 2.89 61.08ST. LOUIS COUNTY 294 105 1,996 3,952 550 6,897 1.26 29.45*REGION TOTAL* 489 236 2,935 6,417 945 11,022 1.62 36.53

OTHER OUT HOME INV 132 2 1,412 578 94 2,218 0.00 0.00OUT OF STATE 0 0 0 0 195 195 0.00 0.00*REGION TOTAL* 132 2 1,412 578 289 2,413 0.00 0.00

STATE TOTAL 4,736 2,253 18,155 49,964 3,220 78,328 3.32 54.95

TIATED PSI UNSUB. ASSESSMENT OTHER CHILDREN PER 1,000 PER 1,000CHILDREN

SUBSTAN-TIATED TOTAL

SUBSTAN- UNSUB. TOTAL CHILDREN



Table 3. Status of Incidents Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 by Conclusion

COUNTY TOTALNORTHWEST ANDREW 4 4.4% 0 0.0% 30 33.3% 56 62.2% 0 0.0% 90 ATCHISON 3 7.3% 1 2.4% 5 12.2% 30 73.2% 2 4.9% 41 BUCHANAN 87 7.1% 13 1.1% 352 28.6% 760 61.7% 19 1.5% 1,231 CALDWELL 8 13.3% 3 5.0% 17 28.3% 31 51.7% 1 1.7% 60 CARROLL 7 8.5% 3 3.7% 17 20.7% 54 65.9% 1 1.2% 82 CASS 30 3.6% 13 1.6% 224 27.2% 547 66.4% 10 1.2% 824 CHARITON 2 4.1% 3 6.1% 8 16.3% 36 73.5% 0 0.0% 49 CLAY 80 4.6% 93 5.4% 331 19.2% 1,194 69.2% 27 1.6% 1,725 CLINTON 9 5.8% 6 3.9% 43 27.7% 95 61.3% 2 1.3% 155 COOPER 9 6.8% 3 2.3% 33 24.8% 87 65.4% 1 0.8% 133 DAVIESS 6 8.0% 2 2.7% 22 29.3% 43 57.3% 2 2.7% 75 DE KALB 3 5.4% 3 5.4% 19 33.9% 30 53.6% 1 1.8% 56 GENTRY 3 6.1% 3 6.1% 7 14.3% 33 67.3% 3 6.1% 49

GRUNDY 18 15.3% 11 9.3% 19 16.1% 70 59.3% 0 0.0% 118HARRISON 11 12.0% 7 7.6% 12 13.0% 59 64.1% 3 3.3% 92

HOLT 2 8.0% 0 0.0% 7 28.0% 16 64.0% 0 0.0% 25 JOHNSON 10 2.7% 6 1.6% 107 28.4% 251 66.6% 3 0.8% 377 LAFAYETTE 19 6.4% 5 1.7% 78 26.3% 192 64.6% 3 1.0% 297 LINN 8 7.1% 11 9.7% 17 15.0% 76 67.3% 1 0.9% 113 LIVINGSTON 9 6.2% 10 6.8% 37 25.3% 86 58.9% 4 2.7% 146 MERCER 2 8.7% 2 8.7% 3 13.0% 16 69.6% 0 0.0% 23 NODAWAY 12 8.5% 6 4.2% 24 16.9% 99 69.7% 1 0.7% 142 PETTIS 29 7.1% 5 1.2% 124 30.5% 242 59.6% 6 1.5% 406 PLATTE 32 5.0% 11 1.7% 147 23.0% 422 66.0% 27 4.2% 639 PUTNAM 6 12.5% 5 10.4% 4 8.3% 32 66.7% 1 2.1% 48 RAY 9 3.7% 3 1.2% 59 24.0% 170 69.1% 5 2.0% 246 SALINE 23 7.4% 9 2.9% 83 26.6% 191 61.2% 6 1.9% 312 SULLIVAN 4 7.0% 6 10.5% 10 17.5% 37 64.9% 0 0.0% 57 WORTH 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 9 *REGION TOTAL* 447 5.9% 243 3.2% 1,841 24.2% 4,960 65.1% 129 1.7% 7,620

NORTHEAST ADAIR 23 10.6% 26 12.0% 19 8.8% 148 68.2% 1 0.5% 217 AUDRAIN 18 6.5% 9 3.2% 55 19.9% 194 70.0% 1 0.4% 277 BOONE 103 7.6% 20 1.5% 315 23.4% 834 61.9% 76 5.6% 1,348 CALLAWAY 56 10.1% 14 2.5% 132 23.7% 347 62.3% 8 1.4% 557 CLARK 11 15.1% 19 26.0% 3 4.1% 39 53.4% 1 1.4% 73 COLE 30 5.1% 20 3.4% 164 27.9% 371 63.1% 3 0.5% 588 FRANKLIN 60 6.3% 35 3.7% 204 21.4% 633 66.3% 23 2.4% 955 GASCONADE 6 3.6% 7 4.1% 35 20.7% 118 69.8% 3 1.8% 169 HOWARD 11 10.1% 7 6.4% 18 16.5% 72 66.1% 1 0.9% 109 KNOX 2 6.3% 5 15.6% 3 9.4% 20 62.5% 2 6.3% 32 LEWIS 4 4.4% 6 6.6% 9 9.9% 65 71.4% 7 7.7% 91 LINCOLN 54 7.7% 14 2.0% 158 22.5% 467 66.4% 10 1.4% 703 MACON 23 17.2% 6 4.5% 18 13.4% 86 64.2% 1 0.7% 134 MARION 38 11.0% 36 10.4% 44 12.7% 212 61.1% 17 4.9% 347 MONROE 5 6.0% 7 8.3% 15 17.9% 56 66.7% 1 1.2% 84 MONTGOMERY 13 9.6% 3 2.2% 25 18.5% 92 68.1% 2 1.5% 135 OSAGE 3 5.0% 1 1.7% 17 28.3% 36 60.0% 3 5.0% 60 PIKE 25 12.8% 5 2.6% 45 23.0% 118 60.2% 3 1.5% 196 RALLS 10 16.7% 5 8.3% 8 13.3% 36 60.0% 1 1.7% 60 RANDOLPH 22 6.1% 20 5.5% 76 21.1% 237 65.7% 6 1.7% 361 SCHUYLER 3 9.4% 9 28.1% 1 3.1% 19 59.4% 0 0.0% 32 SCOTLAND 3 7.7% 9 23.1% 2 5.1% 24 61.5% 1 2.6% 39 SHELBY 7 13.7% 4 7.8% 12 23.5% 28 54.9% 0 0.0% 51 ST. CHARLES 191 9.6% 18 0.9% 411 20.8% 1,309 66.1% 51 2.6% 1,980 WARREN 27 7.4% 17 4.6% 69 18.8% 247 67.3% 7 1.9% 367 *REGION TOTAL* 748 8.3% 322 3.6% 1,858 20.7% 5,808 64.8% 229 2.6% 8,965

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 20 13.8% 1 0.7% 26 17.9% 96 66.2% 2 1.4% 145 BUTLER 52 9.6% 27 5.0% 164 30.1% 289 53.1% 12 2.2% 544 CAPE GIRARDEAU 74 12.8% 11 1.9% 109 18.9% 370 64.1% 13 2.3% 577 CARTER 12 15.2% 2 2.5% 24 30.4% 38 48.1% 3 3.8% 79 CRAWFORD 24 7.9% 12 4.0% 60 19.9% 194 64.2% 12 4.0% 302 DENT 17 9.0% 5 2.7% 40 21.3% 119 63.3% 7 3.7% 188

DUNKLIN 14 3.8% 9 2.4% 92 25.0% 240 65.2% 13 3.5% 368

UNSUB. PSISUBSTANTIATED UNSUB. ASSESSMENT OTHER



Table 3. (continued) Status of Incidents Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020 by Conclusion

COUNTY TOTALSOUTHEAST HOWELL 63 10.5% 20 3.3% 140 23.3% 361 60.0% 18 3.0% 602 IRON 8 7.1% 3 2.7% 30 26.5% 72 63.7% 0 0.0% 113 JEFFERSON 105 6.7% 53 3.4% 188 12.0% 1,180 75.3% 42 2.7% 1,568

MADISON 12 9.4% 3 2.3% 30 23.4% 80 62.5% 3 2.3% 128 MARIES 7 12.3% 0 0.0% 16 28.1% 34 59.6% 0 0.0% 57 MISSISSIPPI 7 3.7% 3 1.6% 32 17.1% 132 70.6% 13 7.0% 187 NEW MADRID 16 7.9% 6 3.0% 42 20.8% 134 66.3% 4 2.0% 202 OREGON 20 14.4% 4 2.9% 26 18.7% 86 61.9% 3 2.2% 139 PEMISCOT 22 9.6% 7 3.1% 50 21.9% 143 62.7% 6 2.6% 228 PERRY 20 13.4% 1 0.7% 22 14.8% 102 68.5% 4 2.7% 149

PHELPS 25 5.6% 25 5.6% 80 17.9% 290 64.9% 27 6.0% 447PULASKI 56 13.2% 35 8.2% 76 17.9% 236 55.5% 22 5.2% 425REYNOLDS 3 3.4% 4 4.6% 24 27.6% 54 62.1% 2 2.3% 87RIPLEY 9 4.9% 5 2.7% 41 22.4% 122 66.7% 6 3.3% 183

SCOTT 39 9.2% 3 0.7% 62 14.7% 315 74.5% 4 0.9% 423 SHANNON 10 10.6% 3 3.2% 19 20.2% 61 64.9% 1 1.1% 94 ST. FRANCOIS 68 8.5% 26 3.3% 184 23.0% 490 61.3% 32 4.0% 800 STE. GENEVIEVE 15 9.4% 7 4.4% 31 19.5% 102 64.2% 4 2.5% 159 STODDARD 23 7.5% 14 4.5% 40 13.0% 216 70.1% 15 4.9% 308 TEXAS 32 12.0% 17 6.4% 61 22.8% 153 57.3% 4 1.5% 267 WASHINGTON 17 5.7% 10 3.4% 66 22.1% 194 65.1% 11 3.7% 298 WAYNE 10 7.8% 6 4.7% 17 13.3% 91 71.1% 4 3.1% 128 *REGION TOTAL* 800 8.7% 322 3.5% 1,792 19.5% 5,994 65.2% 287 3.1% 9,195

SOUTHWEST BARRY 7 1.8% 15 3.8% 113 28.8% 249 63.4% 9 2.3% 393 BARTON 9 7.3% 2 1.6% 26 21.1% 82 66.7% 4 3.3% 123 BATES 7 4.2% 16 9.5% 40 23.8% 102 60.7% 3 1.8% 168 BENTON 10 6.9% 7 4.8% 18 12.4% 102 70.3% 8 5.5% 145 CAMDEN 46 11.0% 6 1.4% 91 21.7% 259 61.7% 18 4.3% 420 CEDAR 16 10.1% 1 0.6% 42 26.4% 96 60.4% 4 2.5% 159 CHRISTIAN 36 4.7% 16 2.1% 208 26.9% 505 65.4% 7 0.9% 772 DADE 7 9.0% 1 1.3% 26 33.3% 44 56.4% 0 0.0% 78 DALLAS 11 5.0% 4 1.8% 71 32.6% 128 58.7% 4 1.8% 218 DOUGLAS 6 5.7% 6 5.7% 19 17.9% 74 69.8% 1 0.9% 106 GREENE 197 4.8% 85 2.1% 912 22.4% 2,789 68.4% 94 2.3% 4,077 HENRY 9 3.3% 9 3.3% 53 19.4% 199 72.9% 3 1.1% 273 HICKORY 6 8.6% 5 7.1% 10 14.3% 49 70.0% 0 0.0% 70 JASPER 53 3.4% 37 2.4% 419 26.9% 999 64.2% 49 3.1% 1,557 LACLEDE 30 5.4% 13 2.3% 153 27.6% 351 63.2% 8 1.4% 555 LAWRENCE 12 2.3% 15 2.8% 155 29.2% 338 63.7% 11 2.1% 531 MCDONALD 7 3.1% 14 6.1% 71 31.1% 131 57.5% 5 2.2% 228 MILLER 34 12.2% 19 6.8% 44 15.8% 176 63.3% 5 1.8% 278 MONITEAU 11 9.2% 4 3.3% 26 21.7% 75 62.5% 4 3.3% 120 MORGAN 20 10.0% 14 7.0% 37 18.5% 121 60.5% 8 4.0% 200 NEWTON 19 3.5% 34 6.3% 116 21.5% 360 66.7% 11 2.0% 540 OZARK 2 2.9% 1 1.4% 21 30.0% 45 64.3% 1 1.4% 70 POLK 19 4.2% 11 2.5% 108 24.1% 302 67.4% 8 1.8% 448 ST. CLAIR 2 2.1% 2 2.1% 20 21.1% 71 74.7% 0 0.0% 95 STONE 7 2.5% 4 1.4% 62 22.2% 199 71.3% 7 2.5% 279 TANEY 44 6.4% 25 3.6% 145 21.1% 453 66.0% 19 2.8% 686 VERNON 19 7.4% 0 0.0% 70 27.2% 160 62.3% 8 3.1% 257 WEBSTER 32 7.5% 10 2.3% 89 20.9% 284 66.7% 11 2.6% 426 WRIGHT 18 6.9% 11 4.2% 65 24.8% 165 63.0% 3 1.1% 262 *REGION TOTAL* 696 5.1% 387 2.9% 3,230 23.9% 8,908 65.8% 313 2.3% 13,534

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 279 4.2% 114 1.7% 1,724 25.6% 4,211 62.6% 394 5.9% 6,722 *REGION TOTAL* 279 4.2% 114 1.7% 1,724 25.6% 4,211 62.6% 394 5.9% 6,722

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 161 5.6% 90 3.1% 662 23.0% 1,701 59.1% 265 9.2% 2,879 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 233 4.5% 83 1.6% 1,536 29.8% 2,928 56.8% 377 7.3% 5,157 *REGION TOTAL* 394 4.9% 173 2.2% 2,198 27.4% 4,629 57.6% 642 8.0% 8,036

OTHER OUT HOME INV 102 6.3% 2 0.1% 1,087 66.7% 380 23.3% 59 3.6% 1,630OUT OF STATE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 151 100.0% 151

*REGION TOTAL* 102 5.7% 2 0.1% 1,087 61.0% 380 21.3% 210 11.8% 1,781

STATE TOTAL 3,466 6.2% 1,563 2.8% 13,730 24.6% 34,890 62.5% 2,204 3.9% 55,853

SUBSTANTIATED UNSUB. PSI UNSUB. ASSESSMENT OTHER



Table 4. Time Between Receipt of Report and Initial Child Contact for Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 71 81.6% 14 16.1% 2 2.3% 87 ATCHISON 32 84.2% 5 13.2% 1 2.6% 38 BUCHANAN 959 80.9% 207 17.5% 19 1.6% 1,185 CALDWELL 52 91.2% 5 8.8% 0 0.0% 57 CARROLL 71 91.0% 6 7.7% 1 1.3% 78 CASS 687 85.4% 109 13.6% 8 1.0% 804 CHARITON 46 93.9% 3 6.1% 0 0.0% 49 CLAY 1,466 90.8% 124 7.7% 25 1.5% 1,615 CLINTON 130 86.7% 19 12.7% 1 0.7% 150 COOPER 122 92.4% 9 6.8% 1 0.8% 132 DAVIESS 62 86.1% 7 9.7% 3 4.2% 72 DE KALB 49 90.7% 5 9.3% 0 0.0% 54 GENTRY 34 73.9% 11 23.9% 1 2.2% 46

GRUNDY 113 96.6% 4 3.4% 0 0.0% 117HARRISON 79 92.9% 6 7.1% 0 0.0% 85

HOLT 19 76.0% 5 20.0% 1 4.0% 25 JOHNSON 327 89.3% 34 9.3% 5 1.4% 366 LAFAYETTE 271 94.8% 13 4.5% 2 0.7% 286 LINN 104 94.5% 6 5.5% 0 0.0% 110 LIVINGSTON 133 93.7% 9 6.3% 0 0.0% 142 MERCER 23 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 NODAWAY 123 89.8% 12 8.8% 2 1.5% 137 PETTIS 365 91.9% 28 7.1% 4 1.0% 397 PLATTE 502 84.9% 78 13.2% 11 1.9% 591 PUTNAM 44 95.7% 2 4.3% 0 0.0% 46 RAY 221 92.1% 18 7.5% 1 0.4% 240 SALINE 292 98.0% 6 2.0% 0 0.0% 298 SULLIVAN 53 93.0% 4 7.0% 0 0.0% 57 WORTH 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9 *REGION TOTAL* 6,458 88.5% 750 10.3% 88 1.2% 7,296

NORTHEAST ADAIR 191 93.2% 12 5.9% 2 1.0% 205 AUDRAIN 236 88.4% 30 11.2% 1 0.4% 267 BOONE 845 68.4% 352 28.5% 38 3.1% 1,235 CALLAWAY 500 93.6% 31 5.8% 3 0.6% 534 CLARK 67 93.1% 4 5.6% 1 1.4% 72 COLE 544 95.1% 27 4.7% 1 0.2% 572 FRANKLIN 764 83.9% 130 14.3% 17 1.9% 911 GASCONADE 94 59.9% 56 35.7% 7 4.5% 157 HOWARD 96 90.6% 9 8.5% 1 0.9% 106 KNOX 26 89.7% 3 10.3% 0 0.0% 29 LEWIS 78 97.5% 2 2.5% 0 0.0% 80 LINCOLN 610 90.0% 57 8.4% 11 1.6% 678 MACON 128 98.5% 1 0.8% 1 0.8% 130 MARION 280 86.4% 42 13.0% 2 0.6% 324 MONROE 75 92.6% 6 7.4% 0 0.0% 81 MONTGOMERY 112 86.2% 18 13.8% 0 0.0% 130 OSAGE 44 78.6% 12 21.4% 0 0.0% 56 PIKE 169 89.9% 18 9.6% 1 0.5% 188 RALLS 49 87.5% 7 12.5% 0 0.0% 56 RANDOLPH 300 86.7% 33 9.5% 13 3.8% 346 SCHUYLER 28 87.5% 3 9.4% 1 3.1% 32 SCOTLAND 34 89.5% 2 5.3% 2 5.3% 38 SHELBY 49 98.0% 1 2.0% 0 0.0% 50 ST. CHARLES 1,607 86.4% 232 12.5% 21 1.1% 1,860 WARREN 304 88.6% 38 11.1% 1 0.3% 343 *REGION TOTAL* 7,230 85.3% 1,126 13.3% 124 1.5% 8,480

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 137 96.5% 4 2.8% 1 0.7% 142 BUTLER 485 91.9% 41 7.8% 2 0.4% 528 CAPE GIRARDEAU 510 93.4% 35 6.4% 1 0.2% 546 CARTER 69 90.8% 6 7.9% 1 1.3% 76 CRAWFORD 222 78.7% 57 20.2% 3 1.1% 282 DENT 129 72.5% 45 25.3% 4 2.2% 178 DUNKLIN 295 83.6% 52 14.7% 6 1.7% 353

0 - 24 HOURS TOTALOVER 24 HOURS NO CONTACT



Table 4. (continued) Time Between Receipt of Report and Initial Child Contact for Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 508 88.7% 54 9.4% 11 1.9% 573 IRON 96 85.7% 15 13.4% 1 0.9% 112 JEFFERSON 1,138 76.6% 316 21.3% 32 2.2% 1,486

MADISON 108 87.1% 11 8.9% 5 4.0% 124 MARIES 34 59.6% 19 33.3% 4 7.0% 57 MISSISSIPPI 162 88.0% 9 4.9% 13 7.1% 184 NEW MADRID 182 96.3% 6 3.2% 1 0.5% 189 OREGON 121 89.6% 13 9.6% 1 0.7% 135 PEMISCOT 204 93.6% 14 6.4% 0 0.0% 218 PERRY 135 93.1% 9 6.2% 1 0.7% 145 PHELPS 284 67.1% 132 31.2% 7 1.7% 423 PULASKI 309 75.6% 86 21.0% 14 3.4% 409 REYNOLDS 75 89.3% 8 9.5% 1 1.2% 84 RIPLEY 154 89.5% 16 9.3% 2 1.2% 172 SCOTT 376 92.4% 29 7.1% 2 0.5% 407 SHANNON 82 88.2% 11 11.8% 0 0.0% 93 ST. FRANCOIS 672 89.5% 54 7.2% 25 3.3% 751 STE. GENEVIEVE 135 91.2% 12 8.1% 1 0.7% 148

STODDARD 277 94.9% 12 4.1% 3 1.0% 292 TEXAS 211 80.5% 45 17.2% 6 2.3% 262 WASHINGTON 226 83.4% 38 14.0% 7 2.6% 271 WAYNE 100 83.3% 18 15.0% 2 1.7% 120 *REGION TOTAL* 7,436 84.9% 1,167 13.3% 157 1.8% 8,760

SOUTHWEST BARRY 343 92.5% 27 7.3% 1 0.3% 371 BARTON 106 93.0% 8 7.0% 0 0.0% 114 BATES 137 89.5% 13 8.5% 3 2.0% 153 BENTON 106 79.7% 20 15.0% 7 5.3% 133 CAMDEN 318 78.7% 72 17.8% 14 3.5% 404 CEDAR 151 98.1% 3 1.9% 0 0.0% 154 CHRISTIAN 680 90.7% 62 8.3% 8 1.1% 750 DADE 73 96.1% 3 3.9% 0 0.0% 76 DALLAS 192 92.3% 10 4.8% 6 2.9% 208 DOUGLAS 96 92.3% 8 7.7% 0 0.0% 104 GREENE 3,243 84.2% 560 14.5% 48 1.2% 3,851 HENRY 248 94.7% 12 4.6% 2 0.8% 262 HICKORY 61 87.1% 7 10.0% 2 2.9% 70 JASPER 1,400 94.3% 77 5.2% 7 0.5% 1,484 LACLEDE 415 78.4% 110 20.8% 4 0.8% 529 LAWRENCE 471 92.0% 36 7.0% 5 1.0% 512 MCDONALD 207 94.1% 13 5.9% 0 0.0% 220 MILLER 224 85.2% 37 14.1% 2 0.8% 263 MONITEAU 96 82.8% 18 15.5% 2 1.7% 116 MORGAN 143 74.9% 41 21.5% 7 3.7% 191 NEWTON 491 94.8% 26 5.0% 1 0.2% 518 OZARK 61 89.7% 7 10.3% 0 0.0% 68 POLK 326 76.5% 91 21.4% 9 2.1% 426 ST. CLAIR 85 93.4% 6 6.6% 0 0.0% 91 STONE 249 94.0% 14 5.3% 2 0.8% 265 TANEY 571 87.7% 67 10.3% 13 2.0% 651 VERNON 224 91.8% 20 8.2% 0 0.0% 244 WEBSTER 379 91.1% 34 8.2% 3 0.7% 416 WRIGHT 237 91.9% 21 8.1% 0 0.0% 258 *REGION TOTAL* 11,333 87.8% 1,423 11.0% 146 1.1% 12,902

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 4,600 74.8% 1,197 19.5% 352 5.7% 6,149 *REGION TOTAL* 4,600 74.8% 1,197 19.5% 352 5.7% 6,149

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 1,280 55.1% 957 41.2% 86 3.7% 2,323 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 2,859 63.3% 1,458 32.3% 198 4.4% 4,515 *REGION TOTAL* 4,139 60.5% 2,415 35.3% 284 4.2% 6,838

OTHER OUT HOME INV 1,507 93.3% 97 6.0% 12 0.7% 1,616OUT OF STATE 1 0.7% 2 1.3% 147 98.0% 150

*REGION TOTAL* 1,508 85.4% 99 5.6% 159 9.0% 1,766

STATE TOTAL 42,704 81.8% 8,177 15.7% 1,310 2.5% 52,191

TOTAL0 - 24 HOURS OVER 24 HOURS NO CONTACT



Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020

COUNTY TOTALNORTHWEST ANDREW 25 27.8% 9 10.0% 48 53.3% 8 8.9% 0 0.0% 90 ATCHISON 7 17.1% 2 4.9% 29 70.7% 3 7.3% 0 0.0% 41 BUCHANAN 329 26.7% 129 10.5% 661 53.7% 105 8.5% 6 0.5% 1,230 CALDWELL 14 23.3% 15 25.0% 22 36.7% 7 11.7% 2 3.3% 60 CARROLL 20 24.4% 8 9.8% 41 50.0% 13 15.9% 0 0.0% 82 CASS 162 19.7% 110 13.3% 361 43.8% 118 14.3% 73 8.9% 824 CHARITON 11 22.4% 2 4.1% 27 55.1% 8 16.3% 1 2.0% 49 CLAY 469 27.2% 49 2.8% 1,154 66.9% 45 2.6% 7 0.4% 1,724 CLINTON 45 29.0% 14 9.0% 83 53.5% 13 8.4% 0 0.0% 155 COOPER 27 20.3% 18 13.5% 63 47.4% 21 15.8% 4 3.0% 133 DAVIESS 17 23.6% 12 16.7% 32 44.4% 11 15.3% 0 0.0% 72 DE KALB 21 37.5% 4 7.1% 26 46.4% 5 8.9% 0 0.0% 56 GENTRY 8 16.3% 5 10.2% 36 73.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 49

GRUNDY 44 37.3% 4 3.4% 58 49.2% 12 10.2% 0 0.0% 118HARRISON 26 28.3% 6 6.5% 49 53.3% 8 8.7% 3 3.3% 92

HOLT 7 28.0% 2 8.0% 13 52.0% 3 12.0% 0 0.0% 25 JOHNSON 108 28.6% 17 4.5% 236 62.6% 13 3.4% 3 0.8% 377 LAFAYETTE 78 26.4% 25 8.4% 180 60.8% 12 4.1% 1 0.3% 296 LINN 20 17.7% 16 14.2% 63 55.8% 11 9.7% 3 2.7% 113 LIVINGSTON 42 28.8% 16 11.0% 74 50.7% 13 8.9% 1 0.7% 146 MERCER 4 17.4% 3 13.0% 14 60.9% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 23 NODAWAY 31 21.8% 11 7.7% 90 63.4% 9 6.3% 1 0.7% 142 PETTIS 69 17.0% 92 22.7% 154 37.9% 68 16.7% 23 5.7% 406 PLATTE 146 22.8% 55 8.6% 361 56.5% 74 11.6% 3 0.5% 639 PUTNAM 12 25.0% 3 6.3% 29 60.4% 4 8.3% 0 0.0% 48 RAY 52 21.2% 21 8.6% 138 56.3% 34 13.9% 0 0.0% 245 SALINE 68 22.0% 47 15.2% 134 43.4% 57 18.4% 3 1.0% 309 SULLIVAN 13 22.8% 7 12.3% 29 50.9% 6 10.5% 2 3.5% 57 WORTH 3 33.3% 1 11.1% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 *REGION TOTAL* 1,878 24.7% 703 9.2% 4,210 55.3% 683 9.0% 136 1.8% 7,610

NORTHEAST ADAIR 50 23.0% 18 8.3% 125 57.6% 21 9.7% 3 1.4% 217 AUDRAIN 62 22.4% 21 7.6% 170 61.4% 23 8.3% 1 0.4% 277 BOONE 201 14.9% 265 19.7% 431 32.0% 306 22.7% 144 10.7% 1,347 CALLAWAY 127 22.8% 79 14.2% 274 49.3% 63 11.3% 13 2.3% 556 CLARK 25 34.2% 8 11.0% 37 50.7% 3 4.1% 0 0.0% 73 COLE 182 31.0% 32 5.4% 337 57.3% 35 6.0% 2 0.3% 588 FRANKLIN 204 21.4% 102 10.7% 466 48.9% 150 15.7% 31 3.3% 953 GASCONADE 38 22.5% 11 6.5% 101 59.8% 19 11.2% 0 0.0% 169 HOWARD 13 11.9% 24 22.0% 43 39.4% 20 18.3% 9 8.3% 109 KNOX 9 28.1% 2 6.3% 18 56.3% 3 9.4% 0 0.0% 32 LEWIS 16 17.6% 5 5.5% 57 62.6% 13 14.3% 0 0.0% 91 LINCOLN 120 17.1% 110 15.6% 305 43.4% 133 18.9% 35 5.0% 703 MACON 22 16.4% 25 18.7% 48 35.8% 38 28.4% 1 0.7% 134 MARION 95 27.4% 28 8.1% 191 55.0% 28 8.1% 5 1.4% 347 MONROE 18 21.4% 10 11.9% 46 54.8% 9 10.7% 1 1.2% 84 MONTGOMERY 32 23.7% 9 6.7% 84 62.2% 10 7.4% 0 0.0% 135 OSAGE 18 30.0% 3 5.0% 32 53.3% 7 11.7% 0 0.0% 60 PIKE 43 21.9% 32 16.3% 96 49.0% 21 10.7% 4 2.0% 196 RALLS 16 26.7% 7 11.7% 29 48.3% 6 10.0% 2 3.3% 60 RANDOLPH 56 15.6% 66 18.3% 142 39.4% 77 21.4% 19 5.3% 360 SCHUYLER 12 37.5% 1 3.1% 18 56.3% 1 3.1% 0 0.0% 32 SCOTLAND 13 33.3% 2 5.1% 23 59.0% 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 39 SHELBY 12 23.5% 11 21.6% 17 33.3% 11 21.6% 0 0.0% 51 ST. CHARLES 323 16.3% 319 16.1% 803 40.6% 366 18.5% 167 8.4% 1,978 WARREN 86 23.4% 30 8.2% 225 61.3% 25 6.8% 1 0.3% 367 *REGION TOTAL* 1,793 20.0% 1,220 13.6% 4,118 46.0% 1,389 15.5% 438 4.9% 8,958

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 15 10.4% 32 22.2% 46 31.9% 30 20.8% 21 14.6% 144 BUTLER 140 25.8% 107 19.7% 180 33.2% 99 18.3% 16 3.0% 542 CAPE GIRARDEAU 78 13.5% 120 20.8% 187 32.5% 116 20.1% 75 13.0% 576 CARTER 29 36.7% 10 12.7% 30 38.0% 9 11.4% 1 1.3% 79 CRAWFORD 24 7.9% 79 26.2% 73 24.2% 117 38.7% 9 3.0% 302 DENT 29 15.4% 37 19.7% 56 29.8% 56 29.8% 10 5.3% 188

DUNKLIN 36 9.8% 84 22.9% 106 28.9% 122 33.2% 19 5.2% 367

ASSESSMENTSINVESTIGATIONS0-45 DAYS OVER 90 DAYS0-45 DAYS OVER 45 DAYS 46-90 DAYS



Table 5. (continued) Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments during FY 2020

COUNTY TOTALSOUTHEAST HOWELL 167 27.8% 66 11.0% 283 47.1% 80 13.3% 5 0.8% 601 IRON 27 23.9% 14 12.4% 39 34.5% 32 28.3% 1 0.9% 113 JEFFERSON 111 7.1% 242 15.5% 546 34.9% 462 29.6% 202 12.9% 1,563

MADISON 34 26.6% 12 9.4% 69 53.9% 10 7.8% 3 2.3% 128 MARIES 7 12.3% 16 28.1% 13 22.8% 19 33.3% 2 3.5% 57 MISSISSIPPI 21 11.8% 25 14.0% 84 47.2% 41 23.0% 7 3.9% 178 NEW MADRID 35 17.4% 31 15.4% 87 43.3% 37 18.4% 11 5.5% 201 OREGON 35 25.4% 16 11.6% 71 51.4% 15 10.9% 1 0.7% 138 PEMISCOT 45 19.8% 38 16.7% 96 42.3% 36 15.9% 12 5.3% 227 PERRY 15 10.2% 28 19.0% 43 29.3% 42 28.6% 19 12.9% 147 PHELPS 45 10.3% 90 20.5% 111 25.3% 142 32.3% 51 11.6% 439 PULASKI 62 14.9% 113 27.2% 129 31.1% 94 22.7% 17 4.1% 415 REYNOLDS 17 19.5% 15 17.2% 34 39.1% 20 23.0% 1 1.1% 87 RIPLEY 28 15.3% 30 16.4% 63 34.4% 58 31.7% 4 2.2% 183 SCOTT 53 12.5% 53 12.5% 197 46.6% 95 22.5% 25 5.9% 423 SHANNON 25 26.6% 8 8.5% 46 48.9% 12 12.8% 3 3.2% 94 ST. FRANCOIS 210 26.3% 87 10.9% 396 49.6% 91 11.4% 15 1.9% 799

STE. GENEVIEVE 30 18.9% 25 15.7% 78 49.1% 22 13.8% 4 2.5% 159 STODDARD 57 18.6% 31 10.1% 167 54.4% 42 13.7% 10 3.3% 307 TEXAS 51 19.2% 60 22.6% 65 24.5% 60 22.6% 29 10.9% 265 WASHINGTON 76 25.5% 26 8.7% 131 44.0% 54 18.1% 11 3.7% 298 WAYNE 17 13.3% 17 13.3% 54 42.2% 37 28.9% 3 2.3% 128 *REGION TOTAL* 1,519 16.6% 1,512 16.5% 3,480 38.0% 2,050 22.4% 587 6.4% 9,148

SOUTHWEST BARRY 126 32.1% 12 3.1% 254 64.6% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 393 BARTON 36 29.3% 3 2.4% 83 67.5% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 123 BATES 58 34.5% 5 3.0% 103 61.3% 2 1.2% 0 0.0% 168 BENTON 30 20.7% 8 5.5% 93 64.1% 14 9.7% 0 0.0% 145 CAMDEN 73 17.9% 73 17.9% 176 43.2% 59 14.5% 26 6.4% 407 CEDAR 58 36.5% 2 1.3% 99 62.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 159 CHRISTIAN 223 28.9% 41 5.3% 491 63.7% 12 1.6% 4 0.5% 771 DADE 34 43.6% 0 0.0% 43 55.1% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 78 DALLAS 78 35.9% 8 3.7% 128 59.0% 3 1.4% 0 0.0% 217 DOUGLAS 29 27.4% 2 1.9% 67 63.2% 8 7.5% 0 0.0% 106 GREENE 773 19.0% 458 11.3% 2,047 50.4% 645 15.9% 138 3.4% 4,061 HENRY 67 24.6% 6 2.2% 193 71.0% 5 1.8% 1 0.4% 272 HICKORY 17 24.3% 4 5.7% 42 60.0% 6 8.6% 1 1.4% 70 JASPER 494 31.8% 36 2.3% 993 63.9% 28 1.8% 4 0.3% 1,555 LACLEDE 104 19.0% 91 16.6% 209 38.1% 88 16.1% 56 10.2% 548 LAWRENCE 173 32.7% 14 2.6% 337 63.7% 5 0.9% 0 0.0% 529 MCDONALD 88 38.6% 6 2.6% 131 57.5% 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 228 MILLER 42 15.2% 58 21.0% 94 34.1% 58 21.0% 24 8.7% 276 MONITEAU 15 12.9% 26 22.4% 48 41.4% 21 18.1% 6 5.2% 116 MORGAN 34 17.7% 37 19.3% 60 31.3% 40 20.8% 21 10.9% 192 NEWTON 165 30.6% 9 1.7% 358 66.3% 7 1.3% 1 0.2% 540 OZARK 24 34.3% 1 1.4% 39 55.7% 5 7.1% 1 1.4% 70 POLK 100 22.4% 40 8.9% 256 57.3% 37 8.3% 14 3.1% 447 ST. CLAIR 21 22.1% 3 3.2% 68 71.6% 3 3.2% 0 0.0% 95 STONE 74 26.5% 4 1.4% 200 71.7% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 279 TANEY 146 21.3% 73 10.7% 367 53.6% 90 13.1% 9 1.3% 685 VERNON 92 35.8% 1 0.4% 159 61.9% 5 1.9% 0 0.0% 257 WEBSTER 111 26.1% 25 5.9% 265 62.2% 22 5.2% 3 0.7% 426 WRIGHT 76 29.0% 20 7.6% 144 55.0% 21 8.0% 1 0.4% 262 *REGION TOTAL* 3,361 24.9% 1,066 7.9% 7,547 56.0% 1,191 8.8% 310 2.3% 13,475

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 1,381 20.6% 887 13.2% 3,168 47.2% 1,089 16.2% 180 2.7% 6,705 *REGION TOTAL* 1,381 20.6% 887 13.2% 3,168 47.2% 1,089 16.2% 180 2.7% 6,705

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 574 20.0% 426 14.8% 1,188 41.3% 593 20.6% 95 3.3% 2,876 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 762 14.8% 1,227 23.9% 1,208 23.5% 496 9.7% 1,444 28.1% 5,137 *REGION TOTAL* 1,336 16.7% 1,653 20.6% 2,396 29.9% 1,089 13.6% 1,539 19.2% 8,013

OTHER OUT HOME INV 1,161 71.4% 79 4.9% 382 23.5% 3 0.2% 0 0.0% 1,625*REGION TOTAL* 1,161 71.4% 79 4.9% 382 23.5% 3 0.2% 0 0.0% 1,625

STATE TOTAL 12,429 22.4% 7,120 12.8% 25,301 45.6% 7,494 13.5% 3,190 5.7% 55,534

0-45 DAYS OVER 45 DAYS 0-45 DAYS 46-90 DAYS OVER 90 DAYSINVESTIGATIONS ASSESSMENTS



Table 6. CA/N Hotline Reports and Referrals during FY 2020

COUNTY TOTALNORTHWEST ANDREW 30 52 8 12 12 13 0 127 ATCHISON 8 31 2 0 8 9 0 58 BUCHANAN 428 737 66 112 129 259 0 1,731 CALDWELL 27 31 2 7 4 17 0 88 CARROLL 27 51 4 6 10 29 0 127 CASS 272 516 36 64 89 185 0 1,162 CHARITON 12 37 0 2 1 14 0 66 CLAY 586 1,066 73 214 201 271 0 2,411 CLINTON 54 96 5 21 12 49 0 237 COOPER 47 80 6 14 6 30 0 183 DAVIESS 31 43 1 4 5 32 0 116 DE KALB 23 30 3 3 9 19 0 87

GENTRY 14 32 3 3 3 12 0 67GRUNDY 40 73 5 6 7 31 0 162

HARRISON 32 55 5 4 12 16 0 124 HOLT 9 13 3 2 2 3 0 32 JOHNSON 125 237 15 49 35 75 0 536 LAFAYETTE 99 182 16 39 36 55 0 427 LINN 34 74 5 10 8 37 0 168 LIVINGSTON 56 78 12 12 13 33 0 204 MERCER 8 14 1 0 1 5 0 29 NODAWAY 42 93 7 7 11 31 0 191 PETTIS 161 226 19 29 29 90 0 554 PLATTE 197 417 25 44 77 114 0 874 PUTNAM 14 33 1 2 6 16 0 72 RAY 71 167 8 23 18 41 0 328 SALINE 106 188 18 17 34 42 0 405 SULLIVAN 14 43 0 2 1 22 0 82 WORTH 3 6 0 2 1 2 0 14 *REGION TOTAL* 2,570 4,701 349 710 780 1,552 0 10,662

NORTHEAST ADAIR 73 135 9 8 14 49 0 288 AUDRAIN 81 183 13 21 20 66 0 384 BOONE 472 806 70 140 121 314 0 1,923 CALLAWAY 183 356 18 42 47 151 0 797 CLARK 28 45 0 5 10 29 0 117 COLE 202 358 28 67 39 153 0 847 FRANKLIN 334 574 47 169 60 196 0 1,380 GASCONADE 49 114 6 23 11 35 0 238 HOWARD 37 65 7 6 10 33 0 158 KNOX 11 21 0 3 1 1 0 37 LEWIS 29 56 6 5 9 21 0 126 LINCOLN 229 440 34 50 66 138 0 957 MACON 37 94 3 9 13 32 0 188 MARION 109 228 10 23 13 81 0 464 MONROE 28 51 5 9 7 18 0 118 MONTGOMERY 40 91 4 15 9 39 0 198 OSAGE 21 34 5 9 11 5 0 85 PIKE 80 106 10 12 12 35 0 255 RALLS 23 35 2 6 5 18 0 89 RANDOLPH 125 220 16 26 26 109 0 522 SCHUYLER 11 21 0 0 1 8 0 41 SCOTLAND 15 23 1 5 6 15 0 65 SHELBY 19 31 1 2 2 12 0 67 ST. CHARLES 674 1,203 103 154 205 364 0 2,703 WARREN 120 234 14 33 46 79 0 526 *REGION TOTAL* 3,030 5,524 412 842 764 2,001 0 12,573

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 48 92 5 12 12 24 0 193 BUTLER 242 282 20 43 56 119 0 762 CAPE GIRARDEAU 208 352 17 30 65 117 0 789 CARTER 39 40 0 7 2 16 0 104 CRAWFORD 100 192 10 41 23 91 0 457 DENT 63 112 13 18 14 51 0 271

DUNKLIN 128 223 17 25 34 87 0 514

PREVENTIVESERVICE

REFERRAL

NON-CA/NFATALITYREFERRALGATIONS

NEWBORNCRISIS

ASSESSMENT

NON-CARETAKERREFERRAL

INVESTI- FAMILYASSESSMENTS

JUVENILEASSESSMENTS

CA/N CA/NCA/N



Table 6. (continued) CA/N Hotline Reports and Referrals during FY 2020

COUNTY TOTALSOUTHEAST HOWELL 214 364 24 51 49 159 0 861 IRON 38 67 8 12 7 20 0 152 JEFFERSON 491 1,026 51 245 119 414 0 2,346 MADISON 45 73 10 29 15 33 0 205

MARIES 21 33 3 8 7 18 0 90 MISSISSIPPI 79 103 5 10 26 43 0 266 NEW MADRID 68 130 4 12 15 62 0 291 OREGON 43 83 13 10 13 35 0 197 PEMISCOT 83 137 8 20 14 70 0 332 PERRY 42 101 6 11 10 35 0 205 PHELPS 136 281 30 52 34 134 0 667 PULASKI 156 249 20 39 59 149 0 672 REYNOLDS 30 55 2 6 16 27 0 136 RIPLEY 70 109 4 12 13 44 0 252 SCOTT 140 260 23 36 28 83 0 570 SHANNON 33 55 6 7 6 28 0 135 ST. FRANCOIS 298 470 32 120 59 183 0 1,162 STE. GENEVIEVE 53 101 5 16 9 31 0 215 STODDARD 112 180 16 17 19 86 0 430 TEXAS 106 150 11 23 24 57 0 371 WASHINGTON 103 185 10 44 21 90 0 453 WAYNE 31 91 6 14 5 27 0 174 *REGION TOTAL* 3,220 5,596 379 970 774 2,333 0 13,272

SOUTHWEST BARRY 135 242 16 36 33 106 0 568 BARTON 38 81 4 12 12 29 0 176 BATES 61 104 3 14 13 45 0 240 BENTON 46 87 12 13 11 26 0 195 CAMDEN 147 253 20 24 50 155 0 649 CEDAR 57 95 7 18 9 36 0 222 CHRISTIAN 256 474 42 39 97 255 0 1,163 DADE 30 44 4 6 4 16 0 104 DALLAS 84 131 3 19 16 64 0 317 DOUGLAS 27 74 5 9 15 42 0 172 GREENE 1,278 2,612 187 391 447 1,158 0 6,073 HENRY 88 170 15 26 35 80 0 414 HICKORY 23 43 4 8 8 11 0 97 JASPER 510 965 83 107 130 422 0 2,217 LACLEDE 178 347 30 63 47 174 0 839 LAWRENCE 184 320 27 27 60 218 0 836 MCDONALD 94 128 6 18 16 57 0 319 MILLER 93 173 12 25 23 83 0 409 MONITEAU 40 76 4 6 14 26 0 166 MORGAN 66 131 3 10 14 62 0 286 NEWTON 173 339 28 49 43 93 0 725 OZARK 26 43 1 7 9 31 0 117 POLK 151 277 20 38 64 128 0 678 ST. CLAIR 34 57 4 5 12 19 0 131 STONE 77 185 17 35 29 101 0 444 TANEY 211 444 31 103 79 280 0 1,148 VERNON 85 162 10 25 24 53 0 359 WEBSTER 137 263 26 29 44 108 0 607 WRIGHT 93 156 13 15 26 88 0 391 *REGION TOTAL* 4,422 8,476 637 1,177 1,384 3,966 0 20,062

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 2,520 3,850 352 1,333 746 1,695 1 10,497 *REGION TOTAL* 2,520 3,850 352 1,333 746 1,695 1 10,497

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 1,028 1,727 124 670 212 586 0 4,347 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 2,006 2,916 235 850 479 1,012 0 7,498 *REGION TOTAL* 3,034 4,643 359 1,520 691 1,598 0 11,845

OTHER OUT HOME INV 1,608 22 0 0 10 67 0 1,707OUT OF STATE 88 59 4 0 0 0 0 151

STAT UNIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 818 818*REGION TOTAL* 1,696 81 4 0 10 67 818 2,676

STATE TOTAL 20,492 32,871 2,492 6,552 5,149 13,212 819 81,587

CA/NREPORTS ASSESSMENT REFERRAL REFERRAL

CA/NREPORTS

CA/NREPORTS REFERRAL

CRISIS CARETAKER SERVICE FATALITYNEWBORN NON- PREVENTIVE NON-CA/N



Figure 1. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed during FY 2020 by Conclusion

Figure 2. Investigations with Substantiated Conclusions during FY 2020

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis Statewide

Substantiated Unsub. PSI Unsub. Family Assess. Other

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00


Ch

ildre

n P

er T

ho

usa

nd



Figure 4a. Number of Days to Complete Investigations during FY 2020

Figure 3. Time Between Report and Initial Child Contact during FY 2020

Figure 4b. Number of Days to Complete Assessments during FY 2020

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Within 45 Days More than 45 Days

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Within 45 Days Within 46-90 Days More than 90 Days



Fiscal Year Incidents*

FY 2016 72,388 106,067

FY 2017 68,014 -6.0% 98,270 -7.4%

FY 2018 73,924 8.7% 106,090 8.0%

FY 2019 64,919 -12.2% 89,737 -15.4%

FY 2020 55,853 -14.0% 78,328 -12.7%

* Changes may be noted from previous annual reports due to record updates.

FY 2016 - 2020

Figure 5. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children

Table 7. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children

FY 2016 - 2020

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Percent Change

from Prior YearChildren*

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

Inci

de

nts

/Ch

ildre

n

Incidents Children



Fiscal Year Substantiated* Assessment

FY 2016 4,346 38,410

FY 2017 3,621 -16.7% 40,155 4.5%

FY 2018 4,346 20.0% 38,410 -4.3%

FY 2019 3,819 -12.1% 40,775 6.2%

FY 2020 3,466 -9.2% 34,890 -14.4%

* Changes may be noted from previous annual reports due to record updates.

Table 8. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Assessment Findings

FY 2016 - 2020

Figure 6. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Assessment Findings

FY 2016 - FY 2020

Percent Change Percent Change

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

Inci

de

nts

Substantiated Assessment



Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures

All data for this report was compiled during November 2020.

Tables and Figures are based upon incidents and children reported during the fiscal year unless

otherwise stated.

Conclusions in Tables 2 and 3, and Figure 1 are as follows:

Substantiated: Court adjudicated and preponderance of evidence, child abuse/neglect present

but perpetrator unidentified.

Unsub. PSI: Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated, a finding that insufficient

visible signs of abuse or neglect exist, but where the social worker determines

that indicators are present which, if unresolved, could potentially contribute to

child abuse and neglect.

Unsub: A finding that insufficient visible signs of abuse or neglect exist.

Assessment: Agency responded - refer to FCS or AC case opened, no concerns found,

concerns addressed, or services provided; family uncooperative child safe;

family declined child safe. Includes Family Assessments, Juvenile Assessments

and Differential Response Assessments.

Other: Unable to locate, inappropriate report, located out of state, home schooling,

already investigated, school investigation.

Table 1., Table 7. & Figure 5.

Reported incidents include investigations, family assessments and juvenile assessments.

Duplicate and combined reports are not included.

Table 2., Table 7., Figure 5.

Number of children and children per thousand are based on duplicated counts.

Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by the

U.S. Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

Table 4. & Figure 3.

Data does not include information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category

of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as unable to locate, inappropriate

report, located out of state, or already investigated.

Table 5. Pursuant to Section 210.145(15) Rs, Mo. all investigations must be concluded within forty-five (45)

days unless good cause for the failure to complete the investigation is specifically documented.

Data excludes reports not concluded by November 25, 2020.

Table 6. Duplicate and combined reports are not included.

Table 8. & Figure 6.

Substantiated reports include conclusions of Court Adjudicated, Preponderance of Evidence,

Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified.


Family-Centered Services



Table 9. Cases Active during FY 2020 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 0 0 0 4 4 0 8

ATCHISON 0 1 0 0 6 1 8BUCHANAN 26 10 1 20 70 3 130CALDWELL 1 2 0 1 11 0 15CARROLL 0 3 0 0 2 0 5CASS 5 19 14 0 17 4 59CHARITON 0 2 1 0 4 0 7CLAY 2 15 7 6 28 0 58CLINTON 1 16 2 0 7 1 27COOPER 0 5 2 1 7 0 15DAVIESS 0 4 0 2 6 0 12DE KALB 0 1 0 1 3 0 5GENTRY 0 0 0 1 15 0 16GRUNDY 1 12 0 0 16 0 29HARRISON 1 5 1 1 9 0 17HOLT 0 0 0 1 0 0 1JOHNSON 0 3 4 0 6 2 15LAFAYETTE 1 5 0 2 21 0 29LINN 1 9 4 0 3 2 19LIVINGSTON 0 6 0 1 12 0 19MERCER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0NODAWAY 0 0 0 2 14 1 17PETTIS 6 8 1 1 23 1 40PLATTE 1 4 1 6 14 0 26PUTNAM 1 6 1 0 12 0 20RAY 1 4 0 3 6 0 14SALINE 1 5 0 4 20 0 30SULLIVAN 0 2 3 1 6 0 12WORTH 1 0 1 0 2 0 4*REGION TOTAL* 50 147 43 58 344 15 657

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 3 0 0 27 0 30AUDRAIN 5 3 1 4 21 2 36BOONE 17 27 5 7 80 17 153CALLAWAY 10 3 2 2 41 11 69CLARK 1 7 0 0 13 1 22COLE 1 11 1 1 41 3 58FRANKLIN 8 21 0 15 55 0 99GASCONADE 2 6 0 2 14 0 24HOWARD 0 3 0 1 10 0 14KNOX 0 1 0 0 2 0 3LEWIS 0 5 0 0 7 1 13LINCOLN 1 9 5 3 54 0 72MACON 0 12 1 0 13 0 26MARION 3 5 4 2 19 0 33MONROE 0 10 0 0 3 0 13MONTGOMERY 2 6 0 1 13 0 22OSAGE 0 2 0 1 6 0 9PIKE 2 4 3 2 11 0 22RALLS 2 0 0 0 4 0 6RANDOLPH 3 11 3 6 25 0 48SCHUYLER 0 2 0 0 5 0 7SCOTLAND 0 3 1 1 5 0 10SHELBY 0 4 2 0 3 0 9ST. CHARLES 1 3 2 9 108 0 123WARREN 4 17 0 2 30 0 53*REGION TOTAL* 62 178 30 59 610 35 974

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 1 3 1 1 26 0 32BUTLER 4 54 2 10 36 0 106CAPE GIRARDEAU 7 11 4 7 120 10 159CARTER 4 1 0 2 8 0 15CRAWFORD 2 10 2 4 39 0 57DENT 2 5 0 1 15 0 23DUNKLIN 0 5 1 7 32 1 46

NEWBORNCOURTTOTAL CASES

ACTIVEAC CLOSED/FCS REOPENCA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENT

FAMILYASSESSMENT

SUBSTANTIATED PREVENTIVE ORDER CRISIS



Table 9. (continued) Cases Active during FY 2020 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 10 11 1 11 63 2 98

IRON 0 2 1 3 5 0 11JEFFERSON 0 16 5 10 126 3 160MADISON 0 2 0 1 22 0 25MARIES 0 1 0 1 3 0 5MISSISSIPPI 0 4 0 6 10 0 20NEW MADRID 0 6 0 7 38 0 51OREGON 3 4 1 1 6 1 16PEMISCOT 1 5 0 5 46 0 57PERRY 0 4 0 0 29 0 33PHELPS 0 12 7 5 49 0 73PULASKI 1 14 2 5 47 0 69REYNOLDS 0 1 0 0 12 0 13RIPLEY 2 3 1 1 8 1 16SCOTT 2 4 0 11 52 0 69SHANNON 0 5 0 2 9 1 17ST. FRANCOIS 1 28 0 2 94 0 125STE. GENEVIEVE 0 5 0 0 19 0 24STODDARD 2 6 0 1 46 4 59TEXAS 0 2 1 0 32 0 35WASHINGTON 1 6 0 0 34 1 42WAYNE 0 5 0 2 23 1 31*REGION TOTAL* 43 235 29 106 1,049 25 1,487

SOUTHWEST BARRY 0 7 0 0 22 0 29BARTON 0 5 2 3 8 0 18BATES 0 3 3 2 19 0 27BENTON 0 4 1 4 9 1 19CAMDEN 3 10 0 2 36 1 52CEDAR 2 7 1 0 9 1 20CHRISTIAN 0 17 2 6 34 1 60DADE 0 5 0 0 5 0 10DALLAS 1 4 0 0 9 0 14DOUGLAS 1 1 2 0 8 1 13GREENE 4 13 0 0 274 3 294HENRY 0 8 0 4 39 0 51HICKORY 1 3 0 1 5 0 10JASPER 0 62 5 9 225 4 305LACLEDE 6 9 3 5 31 0 54LAWRENCE 0 10 0 0 37 1 48MCDONALD 1 4 0 0 19 0 24MILLER 2 8 0 0 50 0 60MONITEAU 1 3 0 0 17 0 21MORGAN 1 3 0 0 23 0 27NEWTON 0 15 0 1 28 3 47OZARK 0 1 1 0 4 0 6POLK 1 3 2 0 10 0 16ST. CLAIR 0 0 0 0 12 0 12STONE 0 11 1 0 18 0 30TANEY 0 5 2 7 72 2 88VERNON 0 0 0 1 9 1 11WEBSTER 4 2 0 4 34 0 44WRIGHT 0 2 2 2 32 0 38*REGION TOTAL* 28 225 27 51 1,098 19 1,448

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 4 16 27 66 362 130 605*REGION TOTAL* 4 16 27 66 362 130 605

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 1 8 2 3 140 5 159ST. LOUIS COUNTY 19 16 50 8 59 22 174*REGION TOTAL* 20 24 52 11 199 27 333

STATE TOTAL 207 825 208 351 3,662 251 5,504

SUBSTANTIATED PREVENTIVE COURT FAMILYCRISISACTIVECA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FCS REOPEN

TOTAL CASESAC CLOSED/NEWBORN



Table 10. Persons in FCS during FY 2020 by Role

CHILD TOTAL PERSONS WITHCOUNTY ADULTS CHILDREN CARETAKERS PERSONS COURT ACTION

NORTHWEST ANDREW 13 12 0 25 0ATCHISON 14 15 0 29 6BUCHANAN 242 272 1 515 31CALDWELL 29 29 0 58 2CARROLL 9 9 0 18 0CASS 103 123 0 226 69CHARITON 15 16 1 32 6CLAY 127 125 0 252 20CLINTON 57 53 1 111 16COOPER 36 30 0 66 5DAVIESS 26 33 0 59 13DE KALB 12 14 0 26 8GENTRY 30 43 0 73 22GRUNDY 51 70 0 121 22HARRISON 24 45 0 69 13HOLT 1 1 0 2 0JOHNSON 26 30 0 56 11LAFAYETTE 60 62 0 122 4LINN 33 40 0 73 15LIVINGSTON 39 37 0 76 3MERCER 0 0 0 0 0NODAWAY 26 40 0 66 19PETTIS 76 87 0 163 30PLATTE 71 58 0 129 12PUTNAM 35 47 0 82 14RAY 24 29 0 53 7SALINE 63 55 0 118 9SULLIVAN 22 23 0 45 12WORTH 8 6 0 14 2*REGION TOTAL* 1,272 1,404 3 2,679 371

NORTHEAST ADAIR 55 78 0 133 30AUDRAIN 67 98 0 165 33BOONE 253 309 0 562 134CALLAWAY 133 156 0 289 74CLARK 39 52 0 91 20COLE 105 114 0 219 60FRANKLIN 205 218 1 424 57GASCONADE 45 61 0 106 11HOWARD 24 33 0 57 11KNOX 6 3 0 9 1LEWIS 21 30 0 51 10LINCOLN 112 156 0 268 38MACON 40 69 0 109 41MARION 53 87 1 141 14MONROE 25 26 0 51 8MONTGOMERY 39 41 0 80 10OSAGE 17 20 0 37 7PIKE 35 49 0 84 23RALLS 13 17 0 30 5RANDOLPH 84 105 0 189 31SCHUYLER 13 18 0 31 2SCOTLAND 23 28 0 51 7SHELBY 15 25 0 40 12ST. CHARLES 242 229 0 471 46WARREN 86 109 0 195 30*REGION TOTAL* 1,750 2,131 2 3,883 715

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 50 69 0 119 28BUTLER 180 217 0 397 55CAPE GIRARDEAU 266 351 0 617 104CARTER 32 27 0 59 2CRAWFORD 93 127 0 220 52DENT 53 72 0 125 30DUNKLIN 74 112 0 186 36



Table 10. (continued) Persons in FCS during FY 2020 by Role

CHILD TOTAL PERSONS WITHCOUNTY ADULTS CHILDREN CARETAKERS PERSONS COURT ACTION

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 186 205 0 391 53IRON 20 16 0 36 7JEFFERSON 381 324 1 706 132MADISON 42 58 0 100 18MARIES 8 5 0 13 3MISSISSIPPI 36 53 0 89 17NEW MADRID 78 94 0 172 26OREGON 31 53 0 84 17PEMISCOT 91 130 0 221 39PERRY 59 84 0 143 13PHELPS 138 155 0 293 50PULASKI 129 163 0 292 36REYNOLDS 32 18 0 50 13RIPLEY 27 39 0 66 10SCOTT 109 139 0 248 28SHANNON 31 30 0 61 4ST. FRANCOIS 216 272 2 490 67STE. GENEVIEVE 52 52 0 104 9STODDARD 97 120 0 217 42TEXAS 74 79 0 153 21WASHINGTON 74 96 1 171 26WAYNE 70 68 0 138 20*REGION TOTAL* 2,729 3,228 4 5,961 958

SOUTHWEST BARRY 52 61 0 113 13BARTON 31 31 0 62 1BATES 45 59 0 104 13BENTON 30 35 0 65 1CAMDEN 95 115 0 210 42CEDAR 36 43 0 79 27CHRISTIAN 110 127 1 238 44DADE 20 22 0 42 6DALLAS 20 33 0 53 15DOUGLAS 26 21 0 47 6GREENE 627 628 5 1,260 193HENRY 100 107 5 212 32HICKORY 15 17 1 33 9JASPER 543 654 1 1,198 225LACLEDE 106 119 0 225 24LAWRENCE 95 122 0 217 45MCDONALD 48 66 0 114 14MILLER 127 122 0 249 27MONITEAU 45 53 0 98 17MORGAN 57 63 0 120 32NEWTON 78 98 1 177 47OZARK 9 13 0 22 11POLK 28 34 0 62 5ST. CLAIR 28 21 0 49 13STONE 51 63 0 114 21TANEY 157 171 0 328 50VERNON 21 18 0 39 7WEBSTER 90 97 0 187 40WRIGHT 80 82 0 162 25*REGION TOTAL* 2,770 3,095 14 5,879 1,005

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 1,142 1,333 0 2,475 593*REGION TOTAL* 1,142 1,333 0 2,475 593

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 291 388 1 680 84ST. LOUIS COUNTY 282 382 0 664 134*REGION TOTAL* 573 770 1 1,344 218

STATE TOTAL 10,236 11,961 24 22,221 3,860



Table 11. Cases Opened during FY 2020 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 0 0 0 3 2 0 5

ATCHISON 0 0 0 0 6 0 6BUCHANAN 19 8 0 19 48 2 96CALDWELL 1 2 0 1 8 0 12CARROLL 0 3 0 0 2 0 5CASS 4 15 10 0 11 4 44CHARITON 0 2 0 0 4 0 6CLAY 2 13 5 5 24 0 49CLINTON 1 11 1 0 7 1 21COOPER 0 3 0 1 5 0 9DAVIESS 0 3 0 2 5 0 10DE KALB 0 1 0 0 3 0 4GENTRY 0 0 0 1 8 0 9GRUNDY 1 9 0 0 15 0 25HARRISON 1 5 1 1 9 0 17HOLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0JOHNSON 0 3 2 0 4 1 10LAFAYETTE 0 5 0 2 19 0 26LINN 1 6 1 0 3 0 11LIVINGSTON 0 6 0 1 8 0 15MERCER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0NODAWAY 0 0 0 1 11 1 13PETTIS 3 7 1 1 20 1 33PLATTE 1 3 1 4 11 0 20PUTNAM 1 3 1 0 5 0 10RAY 0 3 0 2 3 0 8SALINE 1 4 0 3 16 0 24SULLIVAN 0 2 2 0 4 0 8WORTH 1 0 1 0 2 0 4*REGION TOTAL* 37 117 26 47 263 10 500

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 2 0 0 18 0 20AUDRAIN 3 2 0 2 14 1 22BOONE 15 18 0 5 51 13 102CALLAWAY 5 1 2 1 27 6 42CLARK 1 4 0 0 12 0 17COLE 1 11 1 1 24 3 41FRANKLIN 3 16 0 10 38 0 67GASCONADE 0 4 0 2 6 0 12HOWARD 0 2 0 1 6 0 9KNOX 0 1 0 0 2 0 3LEWIS 0 4 0 0 5 1 10LINCOLN 1 6 1 1 40 0 49MACON 0 9 1 0 8 0 18MARION 1 1 3 1 10 0 16MONROE 0 8 0 0 2 0 10MONTGOMERY 1 4 0 1 11 0 17OSAGE 0 1 0 1 3 0 5PIKE 1 1 2 2 9 0 15RALLS 1 0 0 0 3 0 4RANDOLPH 3 10 3 4 16 0 36SCHUYLER 0 2 0 0 2 0 4SCOTLAND 0 2 1 1 5 0 9SHELBY 0 1 2 0 1 0 4ST. CHARLES 1 2 2 9 95 0 109WARREN 4 16 0 2 18 0 40*REGION TOTAL* 41 128 18 44 426 24 681

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 1 2 1 1 19 0 24BUTLER 3 44 1 5 25 0 78CAPE GIRARDEAU 4 9 1 6 74 7 101CARTER 1 0 0 2 7 0 10CRAWFORD 1 8 2 3 28 0 42DENT 1 3 0 0 14 0 18DUNKLIN 0 5 0 6 24 0 35

FCS REOPENCA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT

COURTSUBSTANTIATED TOTAL CASES

OPENED

NEWBORNPREVENTIVE ORDER CRISIS FAMILY AC CLOSED/



Table 11. (continued) Cases Opened during FY 2020 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 7 10 1 6 39 2 65

IRON 0 1 1 2 2 0 6JEFFERSON 0 11 0 6 73 1 91MADISON 0 2 0 1 20 0 23MARIES 0 1 0 0 1 0 2MISSISSIPPI 0 1 0 3 6 0 10NEW MADRID 0 1 0 2 25 0 28OREGON 3 4 1 0 4 1 13PEMISCOT 1 4 0 4 27 0 36PERRY 0 3 0 0 17 0 20PHELPS 0 8 5 3 36 0 52PULASKI 0 10 2 2 34 0 48REYNOLDS 0 1 0 0 8 0 9RIPLEY 0 3 0 1 6 1 11SCOTT 2 2 0 6 38 0 48SHANNON 0 5 0 2 4 1 12ST. FRANCOIS 0 20 0 1 72 0 93STE. GENEVIEVE 0 4 0 0 16 0 20STODDARD 2 2 0 0 42 4 50TEXAS 0 1 1 0 24 0 26WASHINGTON 0 4 0 0 27 0 31WAYNE 0 4 0 1 17 1 23*REGION TOTAL* 26 173 16 63 729 18 1,025

SOUTHWEST BARRY 0 6 0 0 15 0 21BARTON 0 2 1 2 7 0 12BATES 0 2 2 0 13 0 17BENTON 0 3 1 4 6 0 14CAMDEN 2 6 0 1 26 1 36CEDAR 2 6 1 0 5 1 15CHRISTIAN 0 15 2 5 27 1 50DADE 0 5 0 0 4 0 9DALLAS 0 0 0 0 3 0 3DOUGLAS 1 0 2 0 4 1 8GREENE 4 11 0 0 183 3 201HENRY 0 6 0 1 23 0 30HICKORY 1 1 0 1 3 0 6JASPER 0 38 4 7 140 2 191LACLEDE 3 7 2 3 22 0 37LAWRENCE 0 6 0 0 20 0 26MCDONALD 1 3 0 0 17 0 21MILLER 2 2 0 0 31 0 35MONITEAU 1 2 0 0 10 0 13MORGAN 0 2 0 0 13 0 15NEWTON 0 10 0 0 23 3 36OZARK 0 0 0 0 4 0 4POLK 1 2 2 0 6 0 11ST. CLAIR 0 0 0 0 5 0 5STONE 0 5 0 0 11 0 16TANEY 0 2 2 4 48 1 57VERNON 0 0 0 1 6 1 8WEBSTER 4 0 0 2 20 0 26WRIGHT 0 2 2 2 23 0 29*REGION TOTAL* 22 144 21 33 718 14 952

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 2 12 14 50 248 76 402*REGION TOTAL* 2 12 14 50 248 76 402

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 1 5 1 3 106 3 119ST. LOUIS COUNTY 10 13 28 3 34 14 102*REGION TOTAL* 11 18 29 6 140 17 221

STATE TOTAL STATE TOTAL 139 592 124 243 2,524 159 3,781

FCS REOPENCA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENTSUBSTANTIATED TOTAL CASES

ACTIVE

NEWBORNPREVENTIVE COURT CRISIS FAMILY AC CLOSED/



Table 12. Cases Closed during FY 2020 by Reason for Closing

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5

ATCHISON 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5BUCHANAN 57 65.5% 30 34.5% 87CALDWELL 6 50.0% 6 50.0% 12CARROLL 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4CASS 21 55.3% 17 44.7% 38CHARITON 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5CLAY 22 73.3% 8 26.7% 30CLINTON 12 54.5% 10 45.5% 22COOPER 6 46.2% 7 53.8% 13DAVIESS 6 54.5% 5 45.5% 11DE KALB 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5GENTRY 14 93.3% 1 6.7% 15GRUNDY 9 47.4% 10 52.6% 19HARRISON 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 9HOLT 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1JOHNSON 10 83.3% 2 16.7% 12LAFAYETTE 23 92.0% 2 8.0% 25LINN 8 50.0% 8 50.0% 16LIVINGSTON 7 50.0% 7 50.0% 14MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NODAWAY 10 71.4% 4 28.6% 14PETTIS 16 64.0% 9 36.0% 25PLATTE 10 50.0% 10 50.0% 20PUTNAM 7 43.8% 9 56.3% 16RAY 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 13SALINE 18 72.0% 7 28.0% 25SULLIVAN 3 37.5% 5 62.5% 8WORTH 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2*REGION TOTAL* 297 63.1% 174 36.9% 471

NORTHEAST ADAIR 12 50.0% 12 50.0% 24AUDRAIN 11 45.8% 13 54.2% 24BOONE 61 61.0% 39 39.0% 100CALLAWAY 29 72.5% 11 27.5% 40CLARK 9 69.2% 4 30.8% 13COLE 27 60.0% 18 40.0% 45FRANKLIN 33 50.0% 33 50.0% 66GASCONADE 12 57.1% 9 42.9% 21HOWARD 5 45.5% 6 54.5% 11KNOX 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3LEWIS 4 40.0% 6 60.0% 10LINCOLN 29 64.4% 16 35.6% 45MACON 11 50.0% 11 50.0% 22MARION 17 89.5% 2 10.5% 19MONROE 3 33.3% 6 66.7% 9MONTGOMERY 12 75.0% 4 25.0% 16OSAGE 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 8PIKE 9 64.3% 5 35.7% 14RALLS 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4RANDOLPH 16 45.7% 19 54.3% 35SCHUYLER 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 7SCOTLAND 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 6SHELBY 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 8ST. CHARLES 58 60.4% 38 39.6% 96WARREN 23 67.6% 11 32.4% 34*REGION TOTAL* 407 59.9% 273 40.1% 680

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 15 65.2% 8 34.8% 23BUTLER 28 49.1% 29 50.9% 57CAPE GIRARDEAU 66 64.1% 37 35.9% 103CARTER 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8CRAWFORD 29 60.4% 19 39.6% 48DENT 8 47.1% 9 52.9% 17DUNKLIN 20 60.6% 13 39.4% 33

GOAL ACHIEVEDTOTAL CASES

CLOSEDOTHER



Table 12. (continued) Cases Closed during FY 2020 by Reason for Closing

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 38 60.3% 25 39.7% 63

IRON 2 25.0% 6 75.0% 8JEFFERSON 59 48.0% 64 52.0% 123MADISON 11 57.9% 8 42.1% 19MARIES 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3MISSISSIPPI 10 66.7% 5 33.3% 15NEW MADRID 19 52.8% 17 47.2% 36OREGON 4 44.4% 5 55.6% 9PEMISCOT 23 54.8% 19 45.2% 42PERRY 15 62.5% 9 37.5% 24PHELPS 24 55.8% 19 44.2% 43PULASKI 27 58.7% 19 41.3% 46REYNOLDS 2 25.0% 6 75.0% 8RIPLEY 5 50.0% 5 50.0% 10SCOTT 17 47.2% 19 52.8% 36SHANNON 5 45.5% 6 54.5% 11ST. FRANCOIS 61 62.9% 36 37.1% 97STE. GENEVIEVE 15 83.3% 3 16.7% 18STODDARD 30 85.7% 5 14.3% 35TEXAS 17 65.4% 9 34.6% 26WASHINGTON 19 51.4% 18 48.6% 37WAYNE 15 75.0% 5 25.0% 20*REGION TOTAL* 592 58.2% 426 41.8% 1,018

SOUTHWEST BARRY 6 31.6% 13 68.4% 19BARTON 10 66.7% 5 33.3% 15BATES 8 42.1% 11 57.9% 19BENTON 3 25.0% 9 75.0% 12CAMDEN 18 45.0% 22 55.0% 40CEDAR 9 60.0% 6 40.0% 15CHRISTIAN 18 50.0% 18 50.0% 36DADE 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 7DALLAS 5 35.7% 9 64.3% 14DOUGLAS 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 8GREENE 87 40.5% 128 59.5% 215HENRY 18 51.4% 17 48.6% 35HICKORY 3 37.5% 5 62.5% 8JASPER 129 61.4% 81 38.6% 210LACLEDE 15 53.6% 13 46.4% 28LAWRENCE 24 58.5% 17 41.5% 41MCDONALD 10 83.3% 2 16.7% 12MILLER 22 56.4% 17 43.6% 39MONITEAU 10 62.5% 6 37.5% 16MORGAN 13 68.4% 6 31.6% 19NEWTON 24 68.6% 11 31.4% 35OZARK 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3POLK 5 50.0% 5 50.0% 10ST. CLAIR 4 33.3% 8 66.7% 12STONE 14 58.3% 10 41.7% 24TANEY 20 50.0% 20 50.0% 40VERNON 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 9WEBSTER 15 53.6% 13 46.4% 28WRIGHT 18 78.3% 5 21.7% 23*REGION TOTAL* 524 52.8% 468 47.2% 992

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 320 81.4% 73 18.6% 393*REGION TOTAL* 320 81.4% 73 18.6% 393

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 43 41.0% 62 59.0% 105ST. LOUIS COUNTY 81 69.8% 35 30.2% 116*REGION TOTAL* 124 56.1% 97 43.9% 221

STATE TOTAL 2,264 60.0% 1,511 40.0% 3,775

GOAL ACHIEVED OTHER CLOSEDTOTAL CASES



Table 13. Cases Active during FY 2020 with Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

ATCHISON 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4BUCHANAN 14 58.3% 8 33.3% 2 8.3% 0 0.0% 24CALDWELL 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1CARROLL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CASS 18 46.2% 10 25.6% 4 10.3% 7 17.9% 39CHARITON 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5CLAY 9 64.3% 4 28.6% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 14CLINTON 12 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12COOPER 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4DAVIESS 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6DE KALB 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3GENTRY 4 44.4% 2 22.2% 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 9GRUNDY 5 45.5% 4 36.4% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 11HARRISON 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0JOHNSON 4 50.0% 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 8LAFAYETTE 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4LINN 4 40.0% 5 50.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 10LIVINGSTON 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3MERCER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NODAWAY 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 7PETTIS 10 62.5% 4 25.0% 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 16PLATTE 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7PUTNAM 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8RAY 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2SALINE 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7SULLIVAN 2 25.0% 5 62.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8WORTH 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2*REGION TOTAL* 128 57.9% 61 27.6% 17 7.7% 15 6.8% 221

NORTHEAST ADAIR 13 92.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 14AUDRAIN 4 28.6% 4 28.6% 5 35.7% 1 7.1% 14BOONE 35 46.1% 15 19.7% 13 17.1% 13 17.1% 76CALLAWAY 12 32.4% 13 35.1% 5 13.5% 7 18.9% 37CLARK 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11COLE 20 57.1% 11 31.4% 4 11.4% 0 0.0% 35FRANKLIN 14 45.2% 10 32.3% 3 9.7% 4 12.9% 31GASCONADE 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4HOWARD 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 6KNOX 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2LEWIS 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4LINCOLN 8 36.4% 7 31.8% 2 9.1% 5 22.7% 22MACON 12 66.7% 4 22.2% 2 11.1% 0 0.0% 18MARION 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 2 22.2% 5 55.6% 9MONROE 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5MONTGOMERY 6 75.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 8OSAGE 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4PIKE 5 50.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 10RALLS 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3RANDOLPH 8 44.4% 3 16.7% 1 5.6% 6 33.3% 18SCHUYLER 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2SCOTLAND 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4SHELBY 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4ST. CHARLES 23 74.2% 5 16.1% 0 0.0% 3 9.7% 31WARREN 5 35.7% 8 57.1% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 14*REGION TOTAL* 189 49.0% 105 27.2% 41 10.6% 51 13.2% 386

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 8 57.1% 3 21.4% 0 0.0% 3 21.4% 14BUTLER 17 44.7% 16 42.1% 5 13.2% 0 0.0% 38CAPE GIRARDEAU 24 42.9% 18 32.1% 11 19.6% 3 5.4% 56CARTER 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1CRAWFORD 15 57.7% 9 34.6% 2 7.7% 0 0.0% 26DENT 7 63.6% 3 27.3% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 11DUNKLIN 14 77.8% 4 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18

0 - 3 MONTHS 4 - 7 MONTHS 8 - 11 MONTHS 12 + MONTHS TOTAL



Table 13. (continued) Cases Active during FY 2020 with Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 13 46.4% 9 32.1% 3 10.7% 3 10.7% 28

IRON 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7JEFFERSON 32 40.0% 16 20.0% 12 15.0% 20 25.0% 80MADISON 7 77.8% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9MARIES 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3MISSISSIPPI 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 7NEW MADRID 7 46.7% 5 33.3% 1 6.7% 2 13.3% 15OREGON 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6PEMISCOT 7 50.0% 6 42.9% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 14PERRY 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 6PHELPS 12 50.0% 7 29.2% 3 12.5% 2 8.3% 24PULASKI 10 45.5% 3 13.6% 5 22.7% 4 18.2% 22REYNOLDS 6 75.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 8RIPLEY 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6SCOTT 10 62.5% 3 18.8% 2 12.5% 1 6.3% 16SHANNON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2ST. FRANCOIS 26 66.7% 10 25.6% 1 2.6% 2 5.1% 39STE. GENEVIEVE 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 5STODDARD 16 64.0% 8 32.0% 1 4.0% 0 0.0% 25TEXAS 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 8WASHINGTON 12 80.0% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 15WAYNE 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 10*REGION TOTAL* 271 52.2% 140 27.0% 60 11.6% 48 9.2% 519

SOUTHWEST BARRY 6 66.7% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 9BARTON 5 62.5% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 8BATES 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 11BENTON 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1CAMDEN 10 52.6% 7 36.8% 2 10.5% 0 0.0% 19CEDAR 1 14.3% 3 42.9% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 7CHRISTIAN 13 59.1% 4 18.2% 1 4.5% 4 18.2% 22DADE 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3DALLAS 4 80.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5DOUGLAS 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6GREENE 49 46.7% 27 25.7% 19 18.1% 10 9.5% 105HENRY 11 42.3% 7 26.9% 2 7.7% 6 23.1% 26HICKORY 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4JASPER 54 42.2% 45 35.2% 13 10.2% 16 12.5% 128LACLEDE 10 43.5% 8 34.8% 4 17.4% 1 4.3% 23LAWRENCE 12 57.1% 5 23.8% 1 4.8% 3 14.3% 21MCDONALD 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4MILLER 7 36.8% 6 31.6% 4 21.1% 2 10.5% 19MONITEAU 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4MORGAN 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3NEWTON 10 55.6% 6 33.3% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 18OZARK 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 3POLK 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5ST. CLAIR 3 33.3% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 9STONE 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 11TANEY 11 39.3% 7 25.0% 5 17.9% 5 17.9% 28VERNON 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 5WEBSTER 7 43.8% 5 31.3% 4 25.0% 0 0.0% 16WRIGHT 7 50.0% 5 35.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 14*REGION TOTAL* 252 46.9% 160 29.8% 65 12.1% 60 11.2% 537

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 102 33.0% 87 28.2% 51 16.5% 69 22.3% 309*REGION TOTAL* 102 33.0% 87 28.2% 51 16.5% 69 22.3% 309

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 20 42.6% 14 29.8% 3 6.4% 10 21.3% 47ST. LOUIS COUNTY 32 37.6% 24 28.2% 7 8.2% 22 25.9% 85*REGION TOTAL* 52 39.4% 38 28.8% 10 7.6% 32 24.2% 132

STATE TOTAL 994 47.2% 591 28.1% 244 11.6% 275 13.1% 2,104

0 - 3 MONTHS 4 - 7 MONTHS 8 - 11 MONTHS 12 + MONTHS TOTAL



Table 14. Cases Active during FY 2020 with No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 3 3

annual report fiscal year 2020michael l. parson, governor • jennifer tidball, acting director...

Documents